garde at the age of 14. yeares THe principall reason that mooved our law founders so soone to set women out of ward is none other then hath béene already declared she is quickly able domui preesse viro subesse and her husband for her shall doe Knights service or some other for him and in his stead the cases are therefore 26 H. 8. fo 2 If the Kings tenant in chiefe having feoffees to his use marry his daughter vnder age to a man of full age and dye this daughter being heire is out of ward for her body though not for her land for that shal be in ward in this case an the Kings possession must bee voided by suite and livery But had she béene of full age of 14. yeares at her fathers death no such thing had néeded neither should she have bin in ward nor the King have any primer seisin For that was not as yet seene into by the Statutes of H. 7. which had given ward reliefe and herriots upon the death of him which died intestate and seised of onely a bare use againe if the King have a woman ward which he marrieth before she be 14 she shal be be to all intents out of ward at 14. and may immediatly sue her livery 28. H. 8. for as a ward masculine married by his Lord vnder 21. shal be sui luris at 21. so shall a ward feminine being maried before 14. bee out of ward at 14. altogether In the old Natura brevium in the writ de electione custodiae it is said that where the tenant marieth his daughter being under age to a man of ful age dieth the daughter shal be out of ward But if he mary his daughter being of full age to a man under age and die she shall be in ward This Mr. Brooke taketh to be no law even so doe I his reason is that no Lord can have the marriage of her that is already married or compell any heire to be twice married For if a tenant marry his son and die and then the sonnes wife dieth holden the Lord shall not have his body in ward to marry him Which is cleare specially if the sonne were infra annos nubiles at the time of his fathers death But certainely if the Lord couple his ward to a wife which dieth the ward is at full liberty for his body and shall not be married by his Lord. The reason why an heire female of full age married by her father to a man under age should not be out of ward must be because the supposition of law faileth her husband is not able arma portare officiis fungi militaribus vel pro iisdem faciendis cum alio pacisci But this notwithstanding me thinketh a woman married should bee out of ward for all her husbands nonage thought the woman bee but twelve yeares old a boy knight shall be out of ward for his body shall a woman innupta matura viro be in kéeping of any but her husband shall shee at 14. yeares age bee ward because she hath a husband but 19. yeare olds who should not have béene in ward had she had no husband at al non videtur The husbands ability to doe souldiers service is neither the onely nor the principall cause in mine opinion why a woman is by law out of ward at 14. yeares age But law going with the trace or tide of nature that hath made women as Bracton saith fit to carry cey and key cloge betimes suffereth them to mary very early And it should be a mischievous inconvenient unjust and unnatural law that should hold a woman from her husband or from her inheritance which is without offence of law maried fully able to bring forth children because her husband is not fully fit for all mannor of horsemanship Be not therefore good woman absterred from a young husband by old natura brevium SECT XII How a woman that hath beene in ward shall come by her land A Woman past 14. yeares of age at her ancestors death shall not be in ward And where she is in ward till 16. she may have action at 16. against her Lord for her inheritance according to the Statute By Littleton she may enter which standeth with reason for the Statute giving action to her affirmatiuely doth not disaffirme the entrie which she might have had by the auncient catholicke Common law if shee cannot or dare not enter she may have alone if she be alone or with her fellowes if she be a coheire a writ of mortdancester as well against her Lord as against any other abator Marlbridg ca. 16. But if shee be ward to the King against whom a mortdancestor writ of Aile Besaile or Cosinage then it melts into petition and she must sue for livery And where the King hath a woman in ward with some lands holden of other Lords in socage such a ward shall not so soone as shee is 14. yeare old have livery of that socage lands but she must arry unlesse she be married in the meane while till she be 16. because livery must be at once parcell not by percels Yet if 3. copartners be in ward to the King she which first commeth to age shall sue her livery and have partition vpon it SECT XIII Of Parceners FOr it must not be omitted there where a man dieth seised of any manner of inheritance having issue none but daughters to whom such inheritance descendeth when they have entered by Litt. they are parceners one heire to their common ancestor so are the heires of females parceners and they ought to come in by descent for if by purchase they are jointenants they are called partners saith he because they are compellable by a writ de partitione facienda to divide the inheritance amongst them Like or the same law is where a man dying seised having no issue his land goeth to his sisters or aunts that are partners if one of them dye before partition made her part shall descend to her issue and for want of issue to her coheires which shal be déemed and adjudged in by discent and not by survivour SECT XIII Difference betweene partners and jointenants FOr although partners have a conjoyned estate yet law maketh a great diversity betwixt them and jointenants Partners by the cōmon law are onely females or the heirs of females which also must be in by descents for if sisters makeajoint purchase they are jointnants and not partners Betwixt whom observe here the germaine apparent difference If two coparceners be of lands in fee simple wherof one before partition made chargeth her part with a rent dieth without issue her coparcener taking as heire and by discent shall hold the land charged But it is otherwise betwixt jointenants Also partners may devise and give away their part by testament so cannot jointenants SECT XV. Difference betweene partners and tenants in common ANd as in the cases precedent parteners are like tenants in
demand made of the rent by her husband hee shall haue Courtesie in the rent notwithstanding So it is if an Advouson in grosse descend to a woman married hauing Issue c. though she die afore auoydance the husband shall present and though the Bishop after the descent present by lapse yet the husband shall haue the second presentment for there cannot in these things possession be taken maintenant and at all times as they be in Lands And take with you here these Cases out of Dier 1. Ma. fo 95. Tenant per Cheualrie in cap. dieth his Daughter and Heyre being vnder age office is found and the King grants the wardship of body and Land to me which marrieth the ward and hath Issue by her and after shee accomplisheth the age of sixetéene yeares and the King is satisfied for the two yeares profit they tender a generall liuerie and before it be past the Wife dieth the Baron shall haue the Courtesie come semble saith the Booke And 6. Eliz. Dier 229. the like descent is to a Daughter and married hauing Issue by her husband and she dieth ten dayes after her Father no Liuery being sued that is found by office the Baron shal be Tenant by the Courtesie and shall sue liuery SECT XLIII No Courtesie of reuersion after estate for life THe seisin must be to the Wife in estate of Inheritance not mangled or cut off from the Frank Tenement and therefore by Parkins where a Woman an Heyre enters after her Fathers death and being seised in fée-simple makes a Lease of her Land to I. S. for terme of his life if she now marry haue Issue and die during the Lease the Husband shall neither be Tenant by the Courtesie of the Land when it reuerts nor of the rents in the meane while Also 8. assi p. 6. If a Daughter and Heyre enter endolâ— den and haue Issue by her and the condition being broken she dyeth if now the Feoffor enter the Feoffée shall not be Tenant per le Curâ—esie of the Seignorie But if a feme sole haue a rent or common in or out of certaine Lands and the Tenant leasseth the Land to a stranger during the life of I. S. and the woman intermarrieth with the Lessée hath Issue and I. S. dyeth now if the wife die the Baron shall haue Courtesie in the rent or Common And if the Tenant leased his ground for 20. yeares and a woman hauing in the ground a rent charge in fée intermarrieth with the Lessée c. dieth during the terme it is a question in Parkins whether the husband shall haue Courtesie in the rent after the terme determine see Parkins cap. By the Courtesie SECT XLVII No Courtesie of a bare vse IF a Woman sole seised c. make a feoffement to the vse of her selfe her heyres and then she marrieth hath Issue and dieth before any estate in the same lands be againe by entry or otherwise executed to her her husband shall not be Tenant by the Courtesie and this aswell after the Statute of 27. H. 8. as before if the Feoffement were since the Statute SECT XLVIII What Husband may be Tenant by the Courtesie and of what estate WHere the Wise is actually seised of Lands in â—éesimple see-taile generall or as Heyre of sée-taile speciall the second Baron may bee Tenant by the Courtesie as well as the first for so is the Maxime And Parkins Fitzherbert and Brooke haue all of them the Case 21. H. 3. viz. A woman Inheritour hath Issue by her Husband and he dieth she takes another Husband hath Issue by him and that Issue dieth the woman dieth her second Husband shall be Tenant by the Courtesie Bracton agréeth also who when hee hath shewed this Ciuilitie of England concludeth Quod dicitur de primo diâ—i poterit de secundo siue de primo viro haeredes apparentes extiterunt siue non plenae aetatis vel minoris But hee addeth Quod iniuriosum est secundum Sâ—ephanum de Segraue qui dicebat quod lex illâ— male â—uit intellecta male vsâ—tata Nam quod dicitur de lege Angliae intelligi debet de primo virâ— communibus haeredibus non de secundo maxime cum haeredes apparentes extiterint de primo My mind giues mee that hee said truth and that Law turning a little out of her Channell here before Iustice Segraues time could neuer since bee brought to her course SECT XLIX Of speciall Taile BEfore West 2. cap. 1. all the Estates which wée now call tailed that is curtailed or cut off were sée-simple Conditionall If Lands had béene giuen to a man and a woman in Franke Marriage or to them and to the Heyres of their two bodies which gifts make now a speciall Taile as soone as they had Issue the Condition was thought to be performed And as a woman suruiuing her first Husband in this case might alien the Land so might she by bearing a Childe to her second Husband c. this makes him Tenant by the Courtesie be inforced to proue that the Childe sent forth some voyce or cry arguing life and naturall humanity for if it bellowed bleated brayed grunted rored or howled there accrued no courtesie by getting such an vnciuill vrchin By him therefore there must be a naturall crie heard inter quatuor parietes for he saith though a Child be borne mutus surdus tamen clamorem emittere debet sive masculus sit siue foemina nam Dicunt E. vel A. quotquot nascuntur ab Eâ—a E. or A. all crye that from Eue come Though they be borne both deafe and dumbe Non sufficit igitur tantum baptizatus scpultura yâ—t 28. H. 8. Dyer fol. 25. sets downe Fitzherberts opinion that a man may be Tenant by the Courtesie though the Childe neuer crie car paraduenture lissue soit nee dumbe And so saith Parkins 9. 4. 7. viz. that if the issue bee borne aliue though it die before it be heard crie or before it be baptized for that is a matter also with Bracton if there were no lachesse contumacie or contempt in the Baron he may be Tenant by the Courtesie But by negligence or by contempt he shall preiudice himselfe ascuns diont SECT LI. A Childe borne beginneth the title of Courtesie NOw this hauing a Childe is such a matter as it séemeth that maine tenant thereupon the title of Courtesie beginneth for example if a bond woman purchase Land and marrie if the Lord enter before Issue be had no Childe borne afterwards shall make the husband tenant by the Courtesie But if the Baron haue Issue by his wife before the Lords entrie he shall be tenant by the Courtesie and the auourie from that time forward shall rest vpon him solement And the possession in Law if the wife die shall not light vpon the Heyre but vpon the Baron which shall be tenant to euery praecipe Câ—o est cleere lei Brooke out of the Doctor and Student vide Brooke
to make void the Obligation or Statute if there be cause with a seuere penalty of 300. li to bee forfeited by the Sheriffe if hee did not execute she same Writ duly according to the tenure thereof This Statute was too méeke and gentle something like him that made it H. 6. SECT XXVII 3. H. 7. c. 2. BVt 3. Hen 7. cap. 2. beginning with a better complaint against takers for lucre of maids widdowes or wiues hauing substance of lands or goods or being heires apparant which takers sometimes married them and sometime desâ—owred them to the breach of Gods Law and the Kings the disparagement of such women and vtter heauinesse and discomfort of their friends ordaineth that whosoeuer taketh against her will vnlawfully any maid widdow or wife shall together with the procurors abbetters and receiuers of any such women knowing her to bee so taken against her will bee felous and euery of them béene reputed and iudged as felons principall But this extendeth not to taking where a woman is claimed as a ward or bondwoman And Mr. Lambard noteth that anno 3. 4. Phil. Mar. this Statute was construed to make no felony vnlesse the woman married were either taken or deslowred SECT XXVIII 4. 5. Phi. Mar. cap. 8. THerefore to supply what hitherto was wanting against takers and also intisers rauishing by allurements and flatterers 4. 5. Phil. Mar. cap. 8. saith that for want of sufficient Law it remained still a famlâ—ar and common mischiefe in the Realme That maidens and women children of Noble men Gentlemen and others which were heires apparant or had lands in great substance left by their Ancestors or friends by flattery trifling gifts or faire promises of light persons and also by subtility of such as bought and sold them for reward were many times allured to contract matrimony with vnthrifty persons and thereupon oftentimes with sleight or force were taken from their parents friends or kinsâ—olke to the high displeasure of God the disparagement of the children and perpetuall condolence of their friends Therefore it is ordained that it shall not bee lawfull to conuey any maid or woman child vnmarried or vnder the age of sixteene yéeres out of the possession and against the will of her father or of such person to whom by his will or otherwise in his life time he shall haue appointed the kéeping education and gouernance of her except such taking as shall bee without fraud by the Master or Mistris or Gardian in Soâ—age or in Chiualry of or to such maid or woman child And if any person that is aboue the age of fourtéene yéeres shall conuey or cause to bee conueyed any such maid being within the age of sixtéene yéeres out of the possession and against the will of the father or mother or any other person which then shall haue by lawfull meanes the order keeping education or gouernance of her the offender duly attainted or conuicted other than such of whom shee shall hold by knights seruice shall suffer two yéeres imprisonment without baile or mainprise or par such fine as shall bee assesed by the Quéenes Councell in the Starchamber And if any shall take away and deflowre any such maid or woman child or shall against the will of her father or he not knowing if the father be in life or without the assent or knowledge of the mother hauing â—ustody â—nd gouernance of the child the father being dead by letters messages or otherwise contract matrimony with any such mard except it bee by the consent of the person or persons by interest of wardship intituled to haue the marriage he shall suffer being lawfully conâ—â—ted fiue yéeres imprisonment without baile or maineprise and pay such fine as shall bee assessed in the Starrechamber c. the one moity of all which fines shall bee to the Quâ—â—e and her successors and the other to the grieued And the Councell in Starrechamber by Bill of complaint or information and Instices of assise by inquisition or indictment in which processe shall be awarded as inditements of trespasse at tâ—e Common law haue authority to heare and determine the offen â—s Moreouer if any woman child or maidâ—n being aboue the age of twelue yéeres and vnder sixteene doe at any time consent to such person as shall make contract of matrimony contrary to the forme of this Statute the next of kin to whom the inheritance should come after her death shall from time of such assent haue and enâ—oy all such lands tenements and her editaments as shee had in possession reuersion or reâ—â—â—nder at the time of assent during the lâ—te of such peâ—son so contracting matrimâ—ny and after her â—â—cease so contracting c. then the said lands shalldescen reâ—eâ—â— remaine and â—ome to such person or persons other than tâ— him that shall so contract matrimony as they should haue done in case this Statute had neuer beenâ—mâ—deâ— But thâ—s At extenâ—eth not â—o diâ—â—â—sh any libeâ—ty custome or authorite in London or like corporations as touching Orphancs their lands goods or chattels Sée Ratcliffs Case in Sir Edward Cokes 3. Rep. fol. 38. vpon this Statute of 4. and 5. of Phil. and Mar. In an Eiectione firme vpon speciall pleading a speciall verdiâ—t was thus in effect that William Wilcokes married the daughter and heâ—re apparant of Iohn Edols and Alice his wife and hath issue by her Iohn Elizabeth and Martha William Wilcokes afterwards by his will in wrighting appoints the order custody education and gouernment of his said three children to their said grandfather and grandmother during the grandfather and grandmothers liues and then dyes the widdow of Wilcokeâ— marrieth Raphe Radcliffe Iohn Edois dyes and his widdow being Tenant in â—ee simple of the lands in question holden in soccage by her will deniseth them to her grandchild Iohn Wilcokes in taile the remainder to Elizabeth and Mortha and the heircs of their two bodies equally to bee diuided the remainder in fee to her said daughter and heire apparant the mother of these thrée deuisées and dieth Iohn Wilcoke dieth without issue his sister Elizabeth married one Andrewes and he his wife and her sister Marthâ— enter the lands and were seised accordingly and Marâ—ha abiding with Raph Râ—tclâ—ffe and his wife being aboue fourtéene and vnder sixtéene yéeres of age with Raph Râ—tâ—lâ—ffe his consent and of her owne accord departs eight miles off from them where six houres after shee was married to Edward Raâ—cliffâ— who enters and made the Plaintisâ—e his lease And the issue being whether Elizabeth Ratcliffe the wife of Raph Ratcliffe had the custody of Martha the wife of Edward Râ—tcliffe the lessor at the time of their contract and marriage all the Iudges and Coâ—rt of Kings Bench resolued that Elizâ—beth had the gouernance of her daughter Martha at the time of her contract and marriage within the intent and meaning of the Statute It was resolued in that case that those words father mother within the
this proportion by a Statute made 25. Ed. 3. and for this aide every Lord may either distraine or bring his writ de auxilio habendo at his election but tenant by grand serjeanty or petit shall not pay this aide Mich. 21. He. 4. fol. 32. no more shall coppy-holders as séemeth by the writ both in Fitzherbert and Bracton for it is Precipimus ut habere facias rationabile auxilium de Militibus et liberetenentibus Now if the Kings writ runne for it before the Statute how is it that Bracton saith it was due but de gratis That perhaps he meant but for the quantity ipse videriâ— if the father dye the daughter being unmarried shee shall recover so much as was gathered and not paied her at the hands of the executor or heire but this aide is onely for the marriage of the eldest daughter and not for no daughter where many make but one heire But sée Bracton fol. 36. b. Where he saith primae genitae filiae non dabitur auxilium tale quia istud auxilium pertinet ad Cap. dom sicut pertineret si non esset nisi unus haeres cum omnes sunt quasi unus hâ—eres SECT V. A Woman compellable to serve THe next age of a Woman is 9. yeares when shee is dowable but wee will stay a while with the virgins concerning whom if they be in the power and governance of parents masters or prochein amies or if they bee poore the Law differeth little or not much from the common forme apperteyning unto males unlesse it been in cases of rape which I reserve to the end of my discourse where the poore have least need of subsidie onely this I observe here By a Statute made 5. Eliz. ca. 4. Two Iustices of peace in the Countrie or the head officer and 2. Burgesses in Cities c. may appoint any woman of the age of twelue yeares and under 40. being unmaried and out of service to serve and bee retained by yeare weeke or day in such sort and for such wages as they shall thinke méet and if she refuse they may commit her to prison till she shall be bound to serve SECT VI. Of Heires BVt leaving this sort to the title of day laborers come we to women wards in the custody of their lords And take for the foundation here the Statute it selfe West 1. Cap. 22. This Statute expresly reciting the materiall point of the Statute of Merton willeth it in every of them to be observed Merton Cap. 6. and the Statute of Merton is this Whosoever lay person shall bee convicted bee hee parent or other to have detained abduced or married puerum aliquem he shall yéeld the value of the marriage and be imprisoned untill yee have both made amends to the partie damnified if the ward bee married and satisfaction to the King for the transgression hoc de haerede infra 14. c. but if any heire of 14. yeares age or upward till 21. shall marry himselfe without gréeing with his Lord to defraud him of the marriage where the Lord offered him a convenient marriage and without disparagement there it shall be lawfull to hold the inheritance untill and after the full age of 21. yeares by so long time as shall suffice to reape and receive the double value of the marriage secundum est inationem legalium hominum et secundum quod pâ—oeodem maritagio prius fuerit oblatum sine fraude malitia et secundum quod probare poterit in Curia Dm. Regis Let us speake of heires and see a litle in what cases a woman shall inherit It is knowne to all that because women lose the name of their ancestors and by marriage usually they are transferred in alienam familiam they participate seldome in heireship with males and therefore Bracton is bold to say Nunquam ad successionem vocatur femina quaÌ„diu haeres superfuerit ex masculis but to this rule he subjoyneth exception and examples the very same which are in Littleton To wit exception of right line right bloud and maner of giving SECT VII Of the right Line A Female may be preferred in succession before a male by the time wherein she commeth as a daughter or daughters daughter in the right line is preferred before a brother in the transversall line and that aswell in the common generall taile as in fee simple for example land is given to a man and to the heires of his body who dyeth having issue two sonnes of which the eldest dieth leaving issue a daughter this daughter shall inherit by the right of blood also a woman shall bee preferred propter jus sanguinis Example a man hath issue a sonne and a daughter by one venter and a sonne by another venter the first sonne purchaseth in fee and dieth without issue the sister shall inherit So it is where a man seised in fee hath issue ut supra and dieth his eldest sonne entereth and dieth without issue c. Bracton who hath both these cases disputeth here as if he were seeking a knot in a bulrush and he findeth a difference where the inheritance is Discendens and Perquisita But Littleton is plaine though the second sonne bee heire to the father in the last case and therfore should have had the land had the eldest sonne neuer entered yet the case being as it is possessio fratris de feodo simplici facit sororem de integro sanguine esse heredem whether the fee was descended or perquisit what skils it here it must needs be if the brother was heire of the blood of the first purchasor that the sister of the whole blood is so too yet there is a great difference betweene land purchased by him that died seised and land discended unto him for the first may goe to the heire on the fathers side for default of such to the heire of the mothers side but land discended must alwaies goe to heires of the blood of the first purchaser and the case may bee such that a female shall cary away inheritance from a male though there be no difference of right line or in the integrity of blood which Bracton calleth jus sanguinis duplicatum as where Iohn Stile purchaseth in fee dieth without issue an ant or ants or uncles daughter on the father side shal inherite before an uncle or uncles sonne on the mothers side where they be both collaterall and the integrity or neernes of blood is alike Put case that the purchasor died leaving issue only Iohn the younger and this Iohn married or unmarried dieth without issue now cannot the land goe to the heires on the part only of the mother of young Iohn and therefore ye must ascend a step higher to the marriage of the father and mother of the first purchasor if ye will finde who shall inherit where if there be neither brother nor sister to the purchasor a daughter to the eldest uncle on the fathers side may inherite before any of the
it selfe should be deliuered to a Lay-man altogether vnlettered which should distribute to euery coheyre her part at aduenture wherwith she should stand contented But this might be otherwise by their agréement amongst themselues to elect according to the prerogatiue of their age Bracton discendeth déeper into examination what things may be parted amongst coheyres exempting neither lands tenements homages villinages seruices seruitudes or anything belonging to lands and tenements from diuision vnlesse it be seriantia quae diuidi non debent ne cogatur-Rex seruitium accipere per particulas or a castle or the head of some Earldome or Barrony quod propter ius gladij diuidinon debet sit illud castrum vel aliud edificium hoc ideo saith he ne sic caput perplures particulas diuidatur plura iura comitatus Baroniarum deueniunt ad per nihilum quod deficiat regnum quod ex comitatibus Baronijs dicitur esse constitutum Therfore Caput comitatus vel Baroniae resteth indiuisible and shall go to the eldest copartner though where there are many chiefe and great Mansion-houses euery one may haue one perhaps and if there be but one euery one may haue part thereof where the frank-tenement is holden by seruice militarie for if a frée soke-man die whose heritage it is ab antiquo partibilis the eldest son by Bracton shall haue his house and the rest shall haue allowance Amongst other things Bracton standeth long vpon the bringing to a common heape which we call Hotchpot Lands giuen in marriage to a coheyre shewing that though lands giuen in marriage whether the Inheritance be discendens or perquisita and whether shee to whom the land is giuen be at the time of the gift a maid or a widow must needs fall into partition when part of the other lands is claimed hoc quamuis homagium interuenerit post tertium haeredem yet for all that she to whom there is giuen in marriage already more then an euen portion may well retaine it and is not compellable to any confusion vnlesse she demand a share in that which remaineth so that she to whom all is giuen may likewise retaine all And where a daughter was infeoffed pro homagio seruitio or where a stranger was infeoffed of part of the inheritance which afterwards married a daughter c. they might be made parcell of the other lands without any Hotch-pott of these things ye may read more in Bract. li. 2. c. 33 and 34 with a Writt of habere facias seisinam for he saith possessio non pertinet ad haeredes nisi naturaliter fuerit apprehensa animo et corpore proprio vel alieno sicut procreatorio prius ad ipsos non pertinebit vnde cum in curia Regis facta fuerit partitio statim habeanâ— breue de seisma sua habenda SECT XX. of Hotch pott according to Littleton FOr putting of lands in Hotch-pot there is no where so full and plaine learning as in M. Littl. third booke c. z. If saith he a man seised in fée-simple lands hauing issue two daughters of which the eldest is married giue parcell of those lands to his daughter and her husband in franke-marriage and die seised of other lands excéeding in value those which are giuen c. the husband and wife shall haue no part of this remnant vnlesse they will put the land giuen vnto them in Hotch-pot for example If the father had 30. acres and gaue 10. now after his decease if the donées refuse to make commixtion the other daughter may enter and occupie the whole 20. and hold it to her selfe But putting all in Hotch-pott to finde the intire value for it is but an estimation or valuation finding the acres to bee of like goodnesse the Donées in franke-marriage shall haue an nâ—reasement of 5. acres to hold all 15. in seueraltie so that alwayes the land giuen in frank marriage must remaine to the donées and their heyres for else saith Littleton should follow a thing vnreasonable and inconuenient which alwayes the Law detesteth there is the same Lawes betwixt the heyres of Donées in frank marriage and the other partners if the Donées themselues die before their ancestor or before partition This putting of Land in hotchpot is where the other lands descend from the Donor onely and not from any other auncestor for if they descend from the father or brother of the donour from the mother of the Donée that which is equallie so discended shall be without Commixtion equally diuided Also by Littleton if the land descended be of equall valew with the land giuen in franke Marriage Hotchpot should be then in vaine and to no purpose and sée Littl. Chapter of parceners more concerning such Hotchpot How partition may be auoyded PArtition made betwixt two Sisters tenants in fée simple they both being of full age is not defesable though there want oweltie and equall valew in their parts But if the land were in fée-taile the parties making the partition should bee bound and concluded onely for their time the issue of her which had the meaner value might enter after her mothers death into her Aunts part and occupie with her in common and she againe with her niece in the part alotted to her Sister If two Coparceners in fée both married together with their husbands make partition it shall stand in force during the coverture but after the death of a husband his wife hauing a meaner part may enter and defeat the partition not so if at the time of the alotment the parts were both of equall annuall valew If two Coparceners whereof the one is vnder 21. yeares age make partition so that a meaner valew is allotted to the puisne partner she may enter and defeat the partition either in her minoritie or when she is of full age but let her take héed when shée commeth once to full age that shée take not the whole profit of that which to her selfe was alotted for that is an agréement to the partition and maketh it indefeasable peraduenture a moietie of the profits she may take Thrée acres of land are giuen to one in taile which hath other thrée in fée and after his death his two daughters make partition so that one hath the land intailed and another the land in fée if shée which hath the fée-simple alien her part and die her issue may enter into the land tailed and hold occupation in Common with her Aunt whose folly was to make such a partition for since shee is without remedie against the alienée of her mother and without recompence for the lands intailed whereunto she is an heyre by descent from the first Donée it is reason she may enter specially considering that the state taile is not discontinued yet 20. Hen. 6. it is holden that she is put to her Formedon A man seised of two carues of land one by iust title another by disseisin of an infant dieth seised hauing issue two daughters they diuide
de peccatis for the heire could not be bastardized when the parents both or one of them were dead and therefore not citable to appeare c. And it is holden strongly by Thorpe 39. Edw. 3. and in the Parliament 24. H. 8. see Brooke titulo Bastardie 23. 37. 44. 47. And a diuorce cannot bee had but of a marriage consisting and not yet by death dissolued for there cannot wel be a reuersing of any diuorce when the parties diuorced be dead as Brooke vnderstandeth Connings by 12. H. 7. 22. for saith he it was adiudged in Coâ—bers case where the baron and feme had issue and afterward were diuorced the baron taking another wife by whom he had issue and died that when the first issue sued in spirituall Court to reuerse the diuorce and bastardize the second issue after his fathers death a prohibition lay But it was said that the title and discent were comprised in the libell or else the prohibition could not haue beene granted Thus saith Brooke titulo Deraignment But titulo Bastardy 47. hee setteth downe the same case that a man may be bastardized after the espousals wherein he was begotten and borne or by death determined Sée Sir Edw Cokes 7. report Kennes case that some diuorces dissolue the matrimony scilicet à vinculo matrimonei and bastardize the issue and â—arâ—â— the woman of her Dower and some à mensa Thoro which dissolueth not the marriage nor barre the wife of her Dower nor bastardize the issue And therefore if any action be brought and diuorce pleaded the cause of diuorce ought to bée shewed And there it is said that a diuorce may be repealed in the spirituall Court after the death of the parties but a suit after the death of the parties to diuorce them and to bastardize their issue may not be for that the triall of bastardy or not belongeth to the temporall Court originally if sentence doe not hinder And sée Sir Edw. Cokes Institut ca. Dower f. 33. ca. Estates upon condition fol. 181. the deriuation of the word diuorce à diuertendo or dinoâ—â—â—ndo quia vir diuertitur ab vxore and sée there the seuerall causes of diuorces and how for any of them respectiuely doe extend in power and effect and in Littletons tune many diuorces were of force which the Statute of 32. H. 8 cap. 8. take away and there sée that a man may marry the sister of his first wife since that Statute By Na. br â—â—l 44. in the writ of prohibition and Na. br 1â—9 and Dyer 28. H. â— 1â— agrée if the woman shall haue the goods not spent and that detinue lyes for them If goods be giuen in marriage with a woman shée shall recouer them in the spirituall Court after diuorce and there lyeth no prohibition â—6 Hen. 8. fol. 7. is that if the husband before diuorce had haue giuen or sold without collusion such goods as were the wiues before marriage she is without remedy for them being diuorced But if he aliened them by collusion and bring a writ of detinue for so much of them as the property may bée decerned of and for the residue money and such like shee shall sue in spirituall Court If a man which is bound to a woman by obligation marry her and they be diuorced she hath her action againe which was suspended ibid by Fitzh and Norwich But see the booke of 11. Hen. 7. 4. p Cur. contrary where the diuorce is causa praecontract ' and it is so cited Dyer 4. Mar. fol. 140. If the woman diuorced were an Inheritrix c. and the husband before diuorcement hath done waste felled her woods receiued her rents granted her wards presented to her Churches giuen away her goods none of these things past in possession executed can be reuersed or recalled But if the Inheritance it selfe were discontinued or charged or a release made of it or hir villaines manuâ—â—itted shée shall haue remedy for these things by common Law If baron and feme Iointpurchasers de disseised and the baron release c. the wife shall haue a moiety if they bee diuorced although before there were no moieties betwixt them for the diuorce conuert that into moieties which sée Brooke title Deraignement and diuorce 32. H. 8. In Sir Edward Cokes 5. Rep. in Olands case it was holden that if a Lease bée made to baron and feme during the Couerture and the baron soweth the land and after there is a diuorce causa praecontract the baron shall haâ—e the Corne and not the lessor for although the baron prefecuted the suit yet the sentence which dissolues the marriage is the iudgment-in Law and Iudicium redditur in â—â—ultum And as by diuorce that which was intire may bée conuerted or diuided into moeties so by it inheritance may bee made francktenement And if baron and feme donées in taile haue issue and be diuorced now they haue but francktenement and the issue shall not inherit for it is not like here as where lands are giuen to two men or â—o a man and his mother or to a man and his daughter and to the heires of their bodies where seuerall heires shall seuerally inherit for it was neuer lawfull for them to marry 7. Hen. 4. 16. Brooâ— 9. in titulo Taile sée also 13. Edw. 3. titulo Deraignment If land be giuen to baron and feme in taile which be diuorced causa praecontract c. they shall hold ioyntly for terme of their liues and the land goe to the Suruiuor But by the Reporter if the gift were in franckmarriage the party which did not cause the diuorce shall haue all and agreeing to that difference is Perk. Chap. feoffement Sect. 238. and also agréeing is Sir Edw. Cokes 9. Rep. in Beamonts case 12. Assisar p. 22. Dorees in franckmarriage were diuorced at the womans suit the baron continued possession till he died and afterward the womandied the possession was adiudged to haue remained alwayes to the woman because shee neuer made any debate for it so that the man neuer had it by disseisin and agréeing to that is Plowden Wymbysses case fol. 58. Dyet 3. M. fol. 126. 19. Assisar plac 2. The Doâ—â—e in franckmarriage wedded infra annus nubiâ—es sued diuorce by the barons motiue and the wiues agréement at their full age and the woman recouered all the land against her quondam husband by assise And Titulo Assise in Fitzh pla 413. 44â— is this case A man of certaine tenements infeoffed his feoffor his wife in tayle the remainder to the right heires of the baron they were diuorced at the suit of her husband which kept the woman out of the lands and she brought an Assise whereby she recouered a moyty of the tenemen's by iudgement presently And propter difficultatem it was adiâ—rned for the other mâ—ity to the Commonpleas where shee had â—udgement of that also because diuorce was at the husbands sâ—â—t As a woman may haue an Assise against her
mothers side yea and before a sonne of the second uncle on the part of the father and this by the worthinesse of blood I will not examine the crainkes of discent but turne to the case where possession of the brother excludeth a brother and taketh in a sister If a man hath issue a sonne and daughter by one venter and a sonne by another and give land to the eldest sonne in taile now if the father die and the reversion in fée discend to the eldest sonne who likewise dies without issue of his body the second sonne shall have this land For here was no possession but an expectance of fée simple in the eldest Per omnes Iusticiarios de Communi Banco 24 E. 3. fol. 13. For it is possessio fratris non reversio fratris c. Yet Thorpe Iustice of the Kings Bench thought the land should goe to the daughter Brooke con Brooke discent 13. Againe afine was levied to I. and A. his wife in taile the remainder in fée to A. they had issue a sonne and the husband died the wife tooke another husband by whom shee had issue another sonne and died the eldest sonne entered and died without issue the collaterall heire to him entered as into the remainder in fée and the youngest sonne of the halfe blood to execute the fée brought a Scire facias which was holden good for though the eldest might have charged forâ—ited or given the fée simple by atteinder yet it was not actually in him and therefore the demi sanke none impediment but the younger sonne might have it as heire to his mother 24. E. 3. fol. 30. Which cases prove that the possession of a brother to convey the fee to a collaterall heire if it be not apprehendeth actively the generall heire to the common ancestor may enter Therefore where there is a son or daughter by one venter and a puisne sonne by an other venter if the father die seised of an advouson or a rent and the eldest son died before he present or receive the rent the daughter shall not inherit and if the father die seised of an use in fee possessio fratris facit sororem esse haeredem by taking the profits of the ground 5. E. 4. 7. Where it is said that if the father by testameÌ„t bequeath the profits for tearme of yeares this letteth not the possession of the eldest brother otherwise it is if it had beene for tearme of life and the like difference is by this booke if a lease be made for yeares or for life of lands not in use c. SECT VIII Where the manner of gift altereth the discent BRactons first exception to his general rule that a Woman shall not inherit when there is an heire male is Nisi contrarium faciat modus donationis His example is A man giveth land to one in mariage with his daughter to them two and to the heires of their bodies they have issue a daughter and the husband dying the wife taking another husband hath by him a sonne and dieth the daughter shall inherit per modum donationis the case is plaine But Littleton hath a limitation where modus donationis doth cleane exclude Women from inheriting That is where lands are given to a man the heires male of his body now if he die having issue a sonne and a daughter by one wife and a second sonne by a second wife the daughter can never inherit nay if he die having issue a daughter onely which daughter hath a sonne neither daughter nor son shall inherit for whosoeuer shall inherit by force of an intaile made to heires males must per modum donationis be males coÌ„vey his disceÌ„t to it per heirs males which because the sonne cannot doe here the donor may reenter But Littleton saith also lest women should take the matter unkindly at his hand that where land is given to a man to the heires females of his body his issue female shal inherit per formaÌ„ doni not the issue male for the will of the giver must be observed He hath another case which I may not omit When lands are given a man to the heires males of his body which have issue 2. sonnes the eldest dyes having issue a daughter if hée lease the land for tearme of yeares the reversion descendeth to the sonne but if the lease bée for tearme of life of the lessée the reversion and the fée simple descendeth to the daughter the discontinuance is the cause here the daughter is in not in the per but contra modum donationis by violating the will of the giver SECT IX Where a woman comming to lands shall retaine them c. NOw I will shew you where a female having gotten inheritance per modum donationis or otherwise shall retaine it and where not Marke well this case Iohn died seised of fée leaving issue Robert the eldest sonne and Richard the puisne Robert entred tooke a wife and had issue Alice which Alice died hée tooke another and leaving her great with childe hée died the Lord seized the land and ward of Alice and granted the custody to one which indowed the wife of Robert she was delivered of a sonne William The Lord seized William his ward which lived ten yeares and died without issue Henry the sonne of Richard the second sonne of Iohn entereth Alice entereth upon Henry and hée brings an assise now because the possession of the Lord was seisin and possession of William to whom Alice was but of the halfe blood it was awarded that Henry should recover But by the opinion of the Court the land which the wife held in dowre should goe to Alice for therein William had Broke dispent pl. 19. no more but a reversion 8. Assisa pl. 6. Againe Henry seised of tenements deviseable in Winchester where the Custome is that hée which is seised by devise may not with warranty or without warranty make alienation to barre the reversion or remainder deviseth them to his wife Alice for tearme of life the remainder to Th. his sonne for life so that Th. should make no alienation quo minus tenementa devenirent propinquioribus haeredibus de sanguine puerorum post mortem predicti Thom. Henry died having issue Steven an elder sonne and Maud a daughter which had issue Eliz. Steven died without issue Alice the wife entered and died seised Tho. entereth and alieneth in fée with warranty Maâ—d dieth Elizabeth maketh claime by taking the haspe of the doore in her hand Tho. dieth without issue Eliz. entereth upon the alienee he puteth her out shée bringeth an assise It was holden that the heires of Henry had nothing in the fée simple by the limitation which went not to his children but to the next of blood to his children excluding ses infants demesne And by Wilby if B. make a lease to Alice for life the remainder to the néerest of blood if he die having issue 2. sonnes and the
eldest dye having issue a sonne though this issue be heire to B the other sonne after the death of Alice shall have the land as néerest of blood and by Greene and Seaton if there had béene severall issues of divers sonnes and daughters to the devisor when the remainder vested it should have gone to them all But here because the daughter of him had issue a daughter when the tenant for life died and there was not issue of any sonne at the instant to take from her or with her this Daughters Daughter shall have all and though there came an after borne sonne of any of the brethren she may detaine all c. for a remainder vested is not like to fée simple discended to a daughter where a sonne Posthumus may enter And if lands be letten for life the remainder to the right heires of I. if I. dye having issue a son which entereth after the death of the tenaÌ„t for life then dieth his son shal have nothing because he was not capax at the fal of the remainder likewise where there is a brother sister lands are let for life to an estranger the remainder to the right heires of the brother if he and the tenant for life die the sister may enter and retaine the possession and fée though the brothers wife bee afterward delivered of a sonne in like sort did the remainder rest in the child of Maâ—d in Eliz. viz. which recovered by award 30. Assi p. 47. But where there is father and sonne which sonne purchaseth and dieth without issue and an uncle entereth if two yeares after the father hath a sonne by the mother of the purchasor this sonne may enter and put out the uncle and the reason of Law is that hée that comes in by purchase must be capax at the time when the purchase vest in him but in case of discent it is not so requisite Perk. in his Chapter of devises saith that if a devise bée made to a colledge which is not a colledge at the time of the devise it is a void devise although afterward it be made a colledge upon the same reason is Dier 13 Eliz. 303. of a devise to an infant in ventre sa mere And where a man dieth seised and his daughter entereth c. a son borne afterward may enter but it is not so in case of purchase c. for if a woman consent to a ravishor her daughter and heire enter by the statute 6. R. 2. ca. 6. the son Posthumus shall not put her out no more shall he where a daughter and heire entereth for condition broken and where a daughter hath a villain by discent which purchaseth she entereth into the perquisits an after borne sonne her brother shall have that which discended viz. the villien but not the land these cases hath Brook Discents 58. out of the Doct. and Student 5. Ed. 4. fo 58. in the case of Elizabeth Venor agreeth concerning entry made by 6. Ri. 2. And so doth Hales and Mountague in the case of Wimbish and Talbois yet Mountague Chiefe Iustice taketh there a learned difference if a man devise land for life the remainder to the right heire male of the devisor the heires of his body c. now if the devisée for life die and a woman which is heire generall to the devisor entereth and hath afterward a sonne the sonne shall never out the mother in whom is vested the inheritance for want of other persons to take the falling remainder per le melior opinion 9. H. 6 yet he saith the cases of ravishment possession of a brother abatement of a bastard c are all to bee understood of fée simple for where the entry gaineth but estate taile one may beate the bush and another take the bird so if a man seised by discent from his mother make a feofment with condition c. and die without issue if a woman heire on the father side enter for condition broken an heire male or female on the mothers side may oust her Plow c. fo 56. a. b. 57. a. West 1. ca. 22. THen West goeth on with heire females that so soone as they come to the age of fourtéene yeares if the Lord for covetousnes will not marry them yet he shall not kéepe their land above two yeares after they have accomplished 14 within which two yeares if they be not married by their Lord they may take action against him for their inheritance to recover it without paying any thing for the custody or for marriage If so be that of their proper malice or through the mischievous counsell of others such women refuse convenable marriage offered by their Lord he may in this case retaine their land untill they be of 21. yeares and longer untill he shall receive the value of their marriage Littletons words upon this statute in his 2. booke cap. 4. BY Littleton if tennant by service of Chivalry die his here female being 14. yeares old or more the Lord shall have custody neither of the land nor body for at that age a woman may have a husband able to doe knights service but if such an heire be under 14. and unmaried at the time of her auncestors death the Lord shall have ward in her land untill she be of 16. yeares age West 1. cap. 22. which getteth the Lord 2. yeares to tender marriage without disparagement and if during these two yeares the Lord tender no such marriage shee may enter and oust the Lord. If such an heire female be married under the age of 14. in the life of her ancestor which ancestor dieth before she accomplisheth 14. yeares the Lord shall have no more but the wardship of her land till shee be 14. yeares old and then her husband with her may enter into her land and put the Lord out for this is out of the Statute because the Lord may not tender marriage to her that is already married for before the Statute of West such an heire female that was under the age of 14. at the death of her ancestor and had atteined afterward to the age of 14. yeares without any tender of marriage by her Lord made unto her might well enter into her land and put out the Lord as appeareth by the rehearsall and very words of the Statute which as it séemeth so saith Littleton was made altogether for the advantage of the Lord. A suspition of Littletons error NOw saving Mr. Littletons inspiration I am greatly afraid that ye shal not finde by the text of the Statute That an heire female being under 14. at the death of her ancestor might by the common law before this Statute enter and oust her Lord as soone as she had accomplished 14. yeare of age without tender of marriage The law perhaps was so but this Statute proves it not Againe I doubt Littleton was deceived in taking this Statute to be all for the advantage of Lords yet it is
likewise said by Davers 13. H. 7. 11. that this Statute was made for advantage of the Lords Glanvill ibro 7. cap. 12. HEare what Glanvill saith women shal be in ward vntill they be of ful age the Lord shal mary them being of ful age euery one of theÌ„ with their reasonable portion thoughthey be of ful age they shal remaine notwithstanding in their Lords custody vntil they bée married by his aduise for by the law of the land no woman heire can be married but by her Lords disposing and assent In so much that whosoever having a daughter or daughters heire or heires shall in his life time without grée of his Lord marry any of them he suffereth by the right and generall custome of the Realme perpetuall disinherison without ever recovering any thing but by the grace méere mercy of his Lord. If it be prooved that any woman holden in ward do forfit with her body she shal be deprived of her heritage her portion shall goe and accrue to her parceners And if they all offend the whole heritage shall fall as escheate to the Lord. But after such heires be once lawfully maried though they become widdow afterwards they shall no more be holden in ward nor then by their incontinency can they forfit any inheritance But yet they may not remarry without their Lords assent Thus far Glanvill Bracton his 2. Booke cap. 37. BRacton who as it may very well be gathered wrote one halfe hundred yeares after Glanvil and but very little before the making of West 1. In his 2. Booke and 37. Chap. finding it a question at what time an heire female should bee out of ward whether at 14. or 15. or at 21. acknowledgeth a greater capacity of deceipt and maturity of desire to be in women then in men And that therefore a woman might be out of ward at 14 and marry because at that age she is able disponere domui suae et habere cone et key et virum sustinere that is to order and dispose a to have the key clog at her girdle and to be a jolly stay vnto a man But this early emancipation of women heires he taketh to be onely of such as inherit laÌ„d of socage tenure for drawing toward the end of the Chapter he falleth in with Glanvil And saith of heires coparceners in Chivalry si ab initio omnes maiores extiterunt nihil ominus in custodia dominorum â—rint donec per consilium et dispositionem eorum maritentur quia sine ipsorum coÌ„silio et assensu mulier haereditateÌ„ habens maritari non potest non etiam in vita antecessorum quod si olim fecissent hereditatem amitterent sine spe recuperanâ—i nisi solum per gratiam Hodie tamen aliam paenam incurrent And presently hee sheweth the reason why they might not marry without their Lords assent viz. lest the Lord might be constrained to take homage of his capitall enemy or of a man altogether vnfit or vnworthy SECT X. How the law came to a certainty in the point of a womans being out of ward CHoose now whether ye will learne of Glanvil and Bracton what the law was in their time or of Mr. Littleton that wrote many score yeares after the making of Westm 1. In mine opinion neither did this law bring any advantage to Lords neither doth it shew that heires females oftenants in Chivalry might enter at 14. yeares neither is there any cléere proofe that the law was cléerely so taken The letter of the Statute doth not expresly give 2. yeares to tender mariage but rest raineth covetous Lords that they shall not hold the land above 2. yeres after the 14. which séemech plainly to import as it is reasonably taken both by Needh Billing 35. H. 6 that before the making of this law the age of male and female in this point tooke no difference I may be asked how it commeth then to passe that the law is so cléere in that which Littleton concludeth withall viêªt That the Lord shall not have two yeres to tender his woman ward marriage save onely where she is under 14. and unmaried at the death of her ancestor before the Statute it was either out of doubt that a daughter and heire should not be cleane out of ward at 14. or at the least it was doubted whether she should or no and the words of the Statute whatsoever Mr. Littleton saith maketh not the matter plaine enough But we have the helpe of Reverend Prisot in the Booke above mentioned 3. 5. Henrici 6. Westm 1. saith he was made in the time of Edward the first who purposing to put all the law into certainty and in writing begun to makes Bookes thereof by helpe of the most sage men of the law in this Realme Iudges and others And he made a Booke two yeares after the making of this Statute in which all the Statute is rehersed which booke goeth on and saith by expresse words that no woman shal be said to be vnder age thereby to be in ward after she is past the age of 14. Thus saith Prisot By him therefore and by other Iustices in the Eschequer chamber it was ruled cleere that where the Kings tenant in Chivalry died leaving his daughter and heire of the age of 15. yeare she should not be in ward And Billing saith for law that if betwéene the 14. and 16. yere when an heire female is in ward another ward falleth which holdeth in Chivalry of the first the Lord shall not have gard per cause de garde for the first ward is out of his power to all intents excepting onely tender of mariage And another Iustice saith if a tenant hold ofone lord bypriority of another by posteriority the daughter heir vnder 14. shal be in custody of the anteriour Lord till she be 16. but shée may enter vpon the land by posteriority as soone as shee commeth to 14. likewise if the Lord hath once maried this woman-ward after the age of 14. she may presently enter into her land for now the Lord hath had all that which to him belongeth the marriage And the course of the Chancery is to make livery before 14. cum exitibus but after 14. livery tantum vid. 4. Eliz. 213. Dyer Dyer 20. Eliz. 362. 1. Hen. 720. on livery for then such an heire is to have the profits by the law To come to an end of this matter I will not forget that even in Mr. Littletons daies very néere two hundred yeares after the making of West 1. by the last Statute that ever Hen. 6. made in the yeare of his reigne 39. ca. 2. it was established by Parliament that women being of the age of 14 yeares at the death of their ancestors without question or difficulty shall have delivery of their lands and tenements discended to them for so the Law of the land wils SECT XI A search for the true reason why a woman is hors du
so that one hath the carue gotten by disseisin the infant entereth vpon her possession c. she may enter into the other carue and hold in parcenarie with her Sister But if shee had aliened her part in fee before the entrie of the infant this had beene a full dismission of her selfe out of Copartnership which she could not haue recontinued by entrie as she might perhaps had she made onely a lease for yeares generally if after partition one part be euicted from her which hath it by loyall entrie she may enter into the other lands and occupie with the other Coparceners compelling them to a new diuision all this saith Littleton SECT XXI How Partition shall bee auoided when it is by Iudgement MUch of that which Littl. hath taught for the auoyding of partition as I collect must bee vnderstood of partition in pais and by agréement for when it is made by Iudgement in a Writ of rationabile parte nuper obijt or assise to hold in seueralty or by liuery in the Chancery or else by Writt de partitione in which cases there is commission or authority deriued from the Prince to extend and to make partes by the Oath of 12. men c. there is now no reason that a matter of this substance circumstance and solemnity should be all layd on the ground by a bare entrie yet that silly poore women altogether ignorant of the law might not feare that that Partition which is made by the Law that by law there were no meanes to reuerse it but that still it must stand impugnable whatsoeuer iniquitie or inequality it had Old Breton saith in the end of his 17. Chapter Si ascum â—ercener soit que se tient nient paie de cel partison si ferres nous vener le process le record deuant nostre iustices de banke c. illonques soient les errors redresse c. He concludeth somewhat like Bracton Et apres le Assignement des purparties fuit per sort ou per election foit le seisin per iudgement de nostre court But to the matter There is occurring in many of the yeare bookes remedies against partitions as if iudgement be giuen in a nuper obijt of purpartie and seisin granted to hold seuerally yet the partition may be anoyded by error in the first iudgement If partition bee made in Chancerie and a lesse value then is due alotted to a puisne Sister which remaineth still in ward she may haue remedy by scire facias when shee commeth to full age So whether partition be of it selfe altogether vniust or in part inequall through malice ignorance or negligence of the Sheriffe or extenders there is remedie alwayes so the parties be not hurtfull to themselues And although partners of estate in fée being all of full age making purpart by agréement bind conclude themselues and their heyres for euer yet when partition is compulsatorie and the parts are deliuered by the Sheriffe who with his extenders maketh diuision which may be without the presence of the heyres I sée no great reason here why acceptance should be a barre in the issue perpetuall or to the parceners for terme of life yet Littletons bien for garde is good counsell vide Dyer 33. H. 8. 52. SECT XXII Of the coherence betweene Partners after diuision BUt admit now that partition is so made that there remaineth neither cause nor intention to vndoe it yet the partners are in a kinde of confederacie and combination amongst themselues by the very Law and custome of this Realme Et louâ— droit est cy connex nul de eux ne doit respondre sans le autre pur le contribution Etsi ascun se face ceo ne serroit in preiudiâ—â— des auters partners Britton cap. 73. so that if any of them will sue for any inheritance that was their Common Ancestors the suit must be in all their names still and if any of them be sued for any such Land or inheritance she may pray ayde of the other coheires which may come with her to pleade a feoffment fine or release or deraigne warrantie and if in this sort she lose some or all her part she shall recouer that which her partners hold her equall portion But if a parcener put her selfe in defence and will not pray ayde of her fellowes which may strengthen and assist her she shall then recouer nothing against her coheyres though she lose all her purpart and liuelihood They continue therefore still in a sort one heyre tyed together like bundles of rods for their mutuall strength and by Bracton and Britton if one of them die without issue after partition her part shall goe to the rest per ius accrescendi But is crossed by Littleton aboue which telleth you that their title shall be in this case by discent though the dying be before partition therefore if partition be betwixt two Sisters of the halfe bloud and one of them dyeth without issue hauing an vncle of the whole blood to the Father that Vncle by Bractons partition shall haue her Inheritance c. SECT XXIII By what manner of acquisition the ouer-liuer taketh the part of a Co-heire when she dyeth FOr your better instruction in this point marke this Case a man hath issue thrée daughters by one venter and one daughter by another venter and dyeth soised c. they all enter and two of the daughters by the first venter die the third daughter by the same venter shall be heyre alone to their two parts and the fourth daughter of the halfe blood getteth therein nothing 10. Assi p. 27. yet 4. Assi p. 10. if a man die seised hauing issue two daughters by diuers venters both vnder age and a stranger abateth and one of these daughters in their infancie releaseth all her right and dyeth without issue the other may haue a mortdancestor and recouer the whole Inheritance as heire to her Father though she can by no meanes be heyre to her Sister But if she which released had beene of full age when shée released she had giuen away her moitie And if shée had entered at full age or vnder age nothing had accrewed to her Sister But not entring the mortdancestor to which they were both intituled goeth for all to the suruiuor And this I thinke to be a good case making nothing on Bractons side and not plaine any thing on Littletons SECT XXIIII Of Contribution THat which Britton toucheth aboue of Contribution I vnderstand to be in case where one partner prayeth ayde of another the sequell whereof I haue shortly told you There is another Contribution by Statute Marlebridge c. 9. which willeth Sâ— haereditas alâ—qua de qua vnica tantum secta debeatur ad plures parâ—icipes eiusdem haeredit devoluatur ille qui habet eineciam partem vnicam sacier sectam participes pro portione sua contribuant The writ for this Contribution when the young copartners will not performe the
ordinance hath cum de communi consilio prouiso c. reciting the Statute This Statute reacheth not to the King at whose Court all the copartners shall giue their seuerall attendance suite and seruice And if any of the lands partable be holden in Capite euery Coheyre shall and must haue a part of that in her alotment for the Kings profit The statute of Ireland which is a receipt of Hâ—n 3 14 of his reigne to Gerrard Fiâ—zmorrice Iustice sheweth that by those dayes the first borne partner did alwayes homage for her selfe and her fellowes to euery common Lord of the fée who tooke all his seruice per manâ—s primogeniâ—ae which primogenita had in recompence saith the Statute no homage ward-ship or subiection of Copartners nor any thing but the Capitall Messuage ratione eineciae Glanuil which writ before the Statute saith that homage and all other seruices were done to the chiefe Lord by the hand of the eldest parcener for all the rest without guerdon from them or their heyres in the first or second degrée But by him their heyres in the third degrée were bound to doe homage and pay reliefe to the heyres of the eldest daughter c. Because forsooth as Bracton maketh the reason issue being had and continued to the third and fourth degrée the heyre of the eldest might now take homage without feare of being excluded from inheriting that which was altogether vnlike to descend vnto them But by Bracton the youngest Sister should presently doe fealtie to the eldest and by Britton who wrote after Marlbridge the matter rested méerely in the Lords election for thus saith he Election le Seignior aprendre tiels seruices per vn mayne ou per les mains de toutes les parceners Car autrement per droit les gardes marriages des auters parceners pur les parols in le briefe de gard oâ— le plaintiffe dit que launcester l'infant soit son tenant lui fist seruice de chiualer eac 68. fo 175. Now séeing that Glanuile the Statute of Ireland Bract. Britton and al do agrée that euery Lord might take his seruices by the hands of the eldest partner the reason whereof was a desire which the Law had to conserue Seignories in their intierties that Lords should not take or diuide them into mynnomes and Crotchets what was it that caused the making of this ninth Chapter of Marlebridge It should séeme that Lords in those dayes played vpon the aduantage And though they were scrupulous in taking of homage by which they were shut from succession and yet willing enough to take intirely all other emoluments incident or annext to the tenure from one paire of hands yet suite of Court which is burdenous or inconuenient to none but to the tenants they would be and were content to dissipate and it should séeme also that in puisne Sisters and Coheyres though they were easily intreated that the eldest should do all suit and seruice yet they could be well content to giue them nothing for their paines and therefore a Statute was needfull for other things I will not accuse old writers of error they erred not perhaps if they take it as it was taken by Lawyers then though that taking staggered from Lawes conformitie This I say to me the statute of Ireland is sufficient to proue that the eldest Sister shall haue no gard marriage or subiection of the yongest and neither homage nor fealty by Littl. can be taken otherwise then a seruice incident to a tenure for which it is lawfull to distraine As therefore when a Mannor descendeth to two partners each one may haue parcell of the demesne and parcell of the seruices and so of one there may step vp two Mannors And if the diuision be that one shall haue the demesnes and another the seruices the suite is now in a very haut suspention and the Mannor for a time broken in pieces but it shal be a Mannor againe if she which had the seruices die without Issue per Thiru 12. H. 4. fo 34. 35 So I doubt not but when a tenement holden by seruice military descendeth vnto two coparceners and division is euenly made each of them may pay rents and do seruice for her part to the Lord who may take fealty and homage of either of them if he will And may be compellable to take homage of one of them at the least which for the warrantie shall be auailable to both SECT XXV What seruice belongeth only to the eldest parcener to doe THere is some thing besides suite of Court that shall lie only vpon the part which by an Alcumized tearme we call einitia Fitzherbert titulo partition 18. hath this note If the Earledome of Chester descend vnto two parceners it shall be diuided betwixt them As other lands vse to be and the eldest shall not haue the Seigniory or Earledome whole to her selfe quod nota adiudged percotam curiam 23. H. 3. But this notwithstanding if law should haue the course which she had in her state of innocencie I thinke the capitall Messuage of a Knights fee and the head of an Earldome or Baronie in partition ought euer to goe to the eldest And if because there is not else perhaps wherewith to make purparte to the youngest coheyre or not any other thing holden in Capite to be distributed for the Kings aduantage and so for necessity quae nullis vinculis legum contineâ—ur the head of a Barony be diuided yet the indiuisible seruice by which it is holden is scutage and grand-serjeantie I meane the very actuall seruice falleth by right vpon the eldest parcener Et vbi est commodum ibi debet esse onus and so vbi est onus debet esse commodum whether the case following proue mine assertion or no I will set it downe out of my Lord Dyer and then prepare me to speake of another partnership Humfrey Bohune sometime Earle of Hereford and Essex held the Mannors of Harefield Newman and Whitenhurst by seruice of Constableship of England which is grandserjantie and dyed seised hauing issue onely two daughters they entred tooke husbands and the husband of the youngest became King then partition was made in which the King and his wife did choose Whitenhurst and Harefield and Newman fell to the other partner By the opinion of all the Iustices of England the reseruation of the tenure at the first was good the two daughters before marriage erercise this office by sufficient deputie and after marriage the husband of the eldest might execute alone And per omnes iusticiarios as when there are two daughters and the Father dyeth seised of lands holden of one of them the whole seruice if it be entire as homage is reviued after partition so here vnitie of parcell of the tenansie in the King did not determine the office but it continued in the other parcener so that the King might exact the seruice or refuse it at his pleasure as euery Lord may
other causes for which the bond of desponsation may be taken away as devulgation of kindred vnknowne and opportunity of nuptialls sought by detestable meanes for which cause not only Spousals but Marriage it selfe when it is contracted may be dissolued SECT IX By what authoritie Spousals are to bee vndone TO all these causes of vndoing the first vowes of marriage there must be added the authority of the Bish which hath power to absolue yet the Canons doe without the authority of any Bishops make frée from the Obligation of onely promised marriage all those which abdicate themselues to Religion And Hostiensis contendeth that without authority of any Iudge Spousals are vndone ipso iure by a post-marriage made by words of the present time sed nemo sibi ipsi ius dicere debet no man may bee his owne Iudge And it is certaine that espousals ought neuer to be vndone but by publike authority vnlesse the cause for which wee will haue them vndone be so well knowne that it néedeth neither proofe nor sentence such as is fornication when it is notorious and publike to all the world SECT X. Of Matrimony contracted in the present time and who may contract THose which the Latines call puberes that is they which are come once to such state habit and disposition of body that they may be deemed able to procreate may contract Matrimony by words of the time present for in contract of Wedlocke pubertas is not strictly estéemed by number of yeares as it is in wardship but rather by the maturity ripenesse and disposition of body There is further required in them which contract Matrimonie a sound and whole minde to consent for hee that is mad without intermission of â—ury cannot marry But hee that is deafe and dumbe may contract Matrimony quia non verbis tantum sed nutu signis sensa mentis exprimuntur and as they which are impuberes cannot for infirmity of age make any firme knot of Wedlocke so likewise they which by coldnesse of nature or by inchantment are impotent be forbidden to contract The impediments Ecclesiasticall as vowes Compaternitie and spirituall kindred I will not meddle with But come to kindred of bloud which containeth a principall let and prohibition of Marriage SECT XI Impediment of Marriage by Kindred and Consanguinitie IN the worlds infancie men were inforced by necessity to marry with owne kindred propter hominum pauciâ—atem But that necessity is taken away and long since by the very voice of God they which are in certaine degrées of bloud are forbidden to marry Leuiticus 18. And because Marriage is an aboundant seminarie of charitie and loue it is wisely and profitably ordeyned that it should be dispersed into many families Therefore by Naturall Ciuill and Common Law Marriage is cleane forbidden betwixt all those which are as Parents or Children one towards another in infinitum and betwixt those persons which are of kindred in the transuerse line Marriage is forbidden till the fourth degrée bee past SECT XII The impediment of Marriage by Affinitie THere is further a certaine nigh alliance called affinity quasi fines duarum cognationum coniungens this riseth betwixt them which are married and the kindred of one of them as betwixt the husband and the kindred of his wife now affinity prohibiteth Marriage onely to the persons contracted c. for the Cosins or Consanguinity to my wife are of affinitie onely to me and not to my brothers or children by a former Wife and my bloud and consanguinity are kindred of affinitie onely to my Wife and not to her brothers or former children here is it that the Father and the Sonne may marry the Mother and the Daughter and two Brethren may marry two Sisters in another Family for the Consanguinity of which one is of bloud to the husband and another to the wife are betwixt themselues in no bond of affinity And obserue that in what degree a man or woman is to one of them that are married by Consanguinity they are accompted in the same degree to the other in affinity As the wiues brother who is in primo gradu to his Sister is in the same degree to her husband and their children in the second c. And so forth their Childrens Children which after the fourth degrée are againe by all lawes permitted to marrie contrahiâ—â—â— affinitas per illicitum coâ—â—um SECT XIII Diuersitie of Religion AMongst the hinderances of marriage note this also that by Constitution of holy Church marriage is forbidden betwixt persons of divers Religions as Iewes and Christians SECT XIV Of feare and constraint ALso Matrimonie holdeth not when it is extorted by force or by such a feare as may cadere in constantem virum quia matrimonia debent esse libera SECT XV. Of Marriage detestable made ALso Marriage holdeth not when it is sought or made with wickednes And if a man promise to a woman which he hath adulterously polluted that he will marry her when his wife dyeth c. Or if a man haue sought to abridge the dayes of his lawfull wife to marry another These villanies are such perpetuall cankers in marriage that they doe not onely hinder it to be made but also rend it in sunder when it is made There are other crimes quae distrahunt Matrimonia contracta as Incest cum cognata and rauishment yet if any man rauish a Maide or other vnmarried Woman the Canons doe admit him to marry with her if she consent But otherwise shee shall be rendered to her Father vpon whose suite and accusation the rauisher is put to Capitall punishment There are by the Ciuill and Common Lawes many other impediments of Marriage as susceptio propriae sobolis publica poenitentia caedes Sacerdotis interdictum Ecclesiasticum c. which I will not trouble Women withall SECT XVI Marriage forbidden by publique Constitution BY Ciuill ordinance also Marriage is sometime restrained and forbidden as betwixt him which adopteth and her which is adopted for séeing that they which are adopted are in the place and stead of Children there resteth a League as of kindred betwixt them and the bloud of him which adopteth by the Ciuill Law and Canons both But this Ciuill kindred lasteth no longer then the adopted are in potestate adoptantis Neither is it any obstacle to a Marriage saue onely betwixt the adopted and adoptant and those which are in his power And as adoption hindereth Marriage by the Ciuill Law so by the same lawe a man may not marry her whom hee tooke exposed as a cast-away or a foundling and brought her vp as a Daughter Marriage is also forbidden sometime ratione publicae honestatis as if a Man be diuorced from his wife and afterwards shée hath a Daughter by another man this is no Daughter in Law to the husband yet hée should doe impudently to marry her Those prohibitions of Marriage that were sometime betwixt a Tutor and Pupill betwixt a President and a Woman in
the woman they shal remaine ioyn-tenants of the Franke Tenement and the Inheritance is gone Tailâ— 9. But per Dyer fo 147. and 12. assi p. 22. and 19. assi p. 2. If Tenants in Franke Marriage be diuorced the Woman shall haue all the Land for the Land was giuen for the womans sake and for her aduancement and by Iohn Bracton her husband hath no more in it but Custodiam as he is the wiues tutor and Guardian By the same reason therefore that the wife shall haue the land if she be diuorced by the same I should thinke she should haue it if her Sponsus refuse to marry her But where I giue Land to one to marry my Daughter or if hee marry my Daughter there if hee marry another woman I may enter SECT XXXVI The word Franke Marriage maketh Inheritance IF a man giue lands with his Sister to I. S. in Franke Marriage habendum â—is haeredibus suis in perpetuum By Kniueâ— Mowbray and Finchden 45. Ed. 3. fo 19. this maketh neither Frank Marriage nor estate taile with an expectance of fée as in Case where Lands are giuen expresly in taile habendum eis haeredibus but the fee-simple passeth presently by the gift for Frank Marriage must be holden of the Donor which here hath nothing left in him but all is holden of the Lord Parainount and the words doe not make any other estate taile yet 13. Ed. 1. lands were giuen to one with the Cousin of the Donor in Franke Marriage habendum eis haeredibus and it was taken for good Frank Marriage This saith Brooke was in the yeare that estates taile were made in But for all that if yee look the case in Fitzherbert Formedone 63. whither Brooke sendeth you you shall perceiue that at the time of the gift it was Franke Marriage in fée-simple for by those dayes the Donee had potestatem alienandi post prolem suscitatâ—m But in a gift made after the Statute of quia emptoreâ— on such a fashion I take it the Law will be as before in the case 45. Ed. 3. According as it was also holden in the yeares of H. 8. that if a gift bee made in Franke Marriage the remainder to I. S. in fée this is no good Franke Marriage for warrantie and acquitall that are incident c. bee only in regard of the reuersion to the Donor and they cannot be had when the fée-simple is presently conueyed to a stranger SECT XXXVIII The Accompt of the Degrees LIttl accounts the Degrees from the Donor to the Donees the first Degrée from the Donées to their Issue the second from the Donées Issue to his Issue the third c. and the Issue in the fift Degrée shall doe seruice And this saith he because the Issue of the Donor and the Issue of the Donée after the fourth Degrée past may inter-marrie by holy Churches Law Bracton accompts thus donatarius facit primum gradum haeres suus facit secundum haeres haeredis facit tertium haeres secundi haeredis facit quartum qui tenebitur ad seruitium yea hee maketh it an expresse rule that onely the Donée and two heyres succéeding lineally shall enioy the immunitie of being acquitted And hee seemeth to vnderstand no other reason of the acquitall so long but onely an abstenancie from homage lest the taking of it should hinder a reuerting if it betided the Donée or the Issue to die without Issue Fitzherbert titulo droit 55. and 60. citeth 6 H. 3. and 15. H. 3. in warrant of Bractons Computation which I thinke he fetched not any further then out of the Author himselfe in whom fo 21. I find it And fo 22. hee answereth a doubt of his owne asking that is Whether all other seruice shall follow and continue if homage be done ante terâ—ium haeredem wherein he concludeth that the seruice euer followeth homage quamuis ad damnum soluentium And I conclude whether it be the third heyre or the fourth that shall doe seruice he may still vouch haue a Writ of me ne as if the fourth Degrée were not past and if he bring a Formedone the Writt shall be Dedit in liberum Maritagium SECT XXXIX A Woman giues Lands to one to marry her AS Franke Marriage maketh Inheritance without the words Heyres and is alwayes made to a woman and for her sake so there is another Donatio propâ—er nuptias that is conditionall without words of Condition made euer by a woman to a man That is where a woman giues Land to a man in fee-simple or for tearme of his life to the intent that hee marry her who if hee afterwards when hee is thereto within conuenient time required refuse c. there is now an ordinary Writt for remedy granted in this case to reduce the Land which Writt may be sued in the per cui or post after one or more alienations either by the woman sole or by her and her husband married against such a one as should haue married her after the refusall or after her death by her Heyre whether it bee Sonne or Daughter or Daughters with the child of another and there needs no scripture or writing to proue that the feoffement was for intent of Marriage nay if a woman infeoffe a stranger to the intent to infeoffe her and one which she intendeth to marrie if now the espousals take not effect she may haue Writt causa Matrimonij prelocuti against the stranger though the déed of feoffement were simple and sans Condition an 34. Ed. 3. li. assi and 40. Ed. 3. li. assi a woman enfeoffed one which had a wife and entred for non-performance of the Condition heritance of woman and in this part because it resembleth the Donations that are propter nuptias the Doctrine of it being something like that of Dower SECT XLI Marriage THis Courtesie is in the Inheritance of a Wife therefore a consequent of lawfull Marriage and exceptions of Concubinage or such like which are impediments of Dower must needs be good exceptions here SECT XLII Seisin THere must be in the wife a seisin and possession for if she were but heyre in appearance die before her Ancestor this auaileth her husband nothing Similie If the Father being seised of Lands dye and soone after his Daughter and Heyre dyeth before actuall seisin had by entrie either by the husband wife or other person for them so that no possession and a naked possession in law here is all one yea the law is taken that if a man dwell in Essex with his wife and lands descend to her in Yorkeshire if she die the next day after before entrie the husband shall not bee Tenant by the Courtesie for euen in this case is found a default in him that he did not constitute one to make entrie for him maintenant after the Auncestors death yet if rent descend to a woman Couert c. which dieth before day of payment or after the day and no
villenage 35. And if a woman Heyre haue issue by her husband commit felonie and be attainted it hath béen mostly holden that the husband shall be Tenant by the Courtesie notwithstanding and that after Issue had the Lord may auow for homage vpon the husband without the wife 21. Ed. 3. 49. By Parkins 91. 475. Likewise if the Wiues Inheritance be recouered against Baron and feme by false oath or erronious Processe and execution is had and sued of this recouerie if they haue Issue afterwards and then the wife dieth the Baron now reducing the Land by attaint or error shall hold per le Courtesie SECT LII What if the Childe die IF a man haue Issue by his wife that is here in possession the death of the Issue is no losse of Courtesie and by Parkins if a Daughter and Heyre apparant take a Husband haue Issue by him and the Issue dieth if now the Father die and the Baron and feme enter he may be Tenant by the Courtesie without hauing other Issue Brooke makes it questionable Also by Brooke if a man die his wife being priuement enseient a Daughter entreth as heyre taketh a Husband and hath Issue if a Sonne post-humus enter vpon the Baron and feme and the Issue of the Daughter dieth and the posthumus dieth without Issue the Baron cléerely shall not be Tenant by the Courtesie vnlesse hee re-enter in his wiues time and he doubteth though the Baron enter sans other Issue bility his wife may beare him may by possibilitie be heyre of that estate Si le possession le Baron ne soit loyalment anient As addeth Parkins the Wife shall be endowed SECT LVI The Husband must be seised DOwer is of the possession of a Husband the ground of it therefore is Marriage a Concubine then shall haue no Dower no more shall shee which is but onely contracted and it was holden by some 10. H. 3. that she which was married in a Parlor or Chamber should haue no Dower but it is now taken otherwise Also where Marriage is cleerely voyde and vnlawfull there groweth no title of Dower But if a woman first contracted to E. I. intermarry afterwards with T. K. this Marriage is voydable but not cléerely voyde and if it be not frustrated otherwise then by death of T. K. the Wife shall haue Dower of his Land Here yee may perceiue that which destroyeth an absolute true Marriage destroyeth Dower also for though by Bracton there may be by speciall Constitution a Dower appointed that shall stand good against the tempest of diuers assaults yet by ground of the Common Law Matrimonium est fulcimentum doâ—is And Bracton saith in his second booke and 39. Chapter Vbi nullum omnino Matrimonium ibi nulla dost igitur vbi Matrimonium ibi dos quod verum est si Matrimonium in facie ecclesiae contrahatur SECT LVII Matrimony may be and yet no Dower THough Matrimony doe alwayes precede Dower yet doth not Dower alwayes follow Matrimony for first where the husband had no Land the Wife can haue no Dower by the Common Law Bracton and Breton which giue a woman Dower in a certaine somme of money or in other Chattels speake rather as Ciuill Lawyers then méere English Also Dower is not granted vnlesse the Husband is aboue 7. yeers old and the wife aboue nine 13. Ed. 1. Fitzherbert Feme perdera Dower si son Baron morust deuant 9. ans d'age Dyer 14. Eliz. fo 313. Also if a man marry his bond-woman in grosse and die she shall not recouer Dower against the Heyre for shee is his bond-woman but against the Feoffée of her husband she shall recouer Dower vnlesse she be regardant to the Mannor whereof the Feoffement was made SECT LVIII What Seisin is requisite in a Husband WHere the Huband hath neither possession in fact nor possession in Law during the Couerture nor any thing saue onely a right or title the wife shall not haue Dower as also if the Baron suffer a Disseisin an abatement a Condition broken an alienation in Mortmaine or cesser of his rent or seruices by two yeares space c. and then he take a wife dieth before reduction of his Land or if iudgement be giuen for him in a plea of Lands and hee marryeth afterward and die before entry or suing of execution the wife shall not haue Dower of these Lands So is it if I. S. exchange Lands with T. K. and I. S. entreth but T. K. taketh a wife and dieth before entrie his wife shall not haue Dower in any of the Lands exchanged but where a husband is once actually seised the wife shall bee endowed notwithstanding any disseisin afterward done to him or feoffement made by him either absolute or conditionall And if before or after Marriage celebrated and not dissolued a possession in Law be cast vpon a Husband by descent escheate or fall of some remainder the wife shall be endowed though the Baron die before entrie as if the Kings Tenant die seised and his Heyre being married dieth before office or entrie the wife of the heyre is dowable so if rent desâ—end to a husband which dyeth before day of payment c. for there is not requisite in the husband such a seisâ—n as whereof an assise lyeth but if a precipe quod reddat might lie against him it sufficeth 4. He. 7. fo 1. Brooke 66. in Dower A husband may haue possession in law by descent of a villaine in gros or possession in law of a rent charge by excepting the déede of grant and hereof the wife shall be endowed although the Baron doe afterwards refuse receit and seisin of the rent But iudgement in a Writ of annuity for the Baron taketh away Dower of a rent charge from the wife and a woman may haue Dower of an estate that was suspended as if the Lord married with his Tenant now is the Seignorie suspended but if he die the wife shall haue Dower a third part of the rent per retâ—igneâ— for the Seigniorie though it slept yet there was still a possession in Law of it in the husband Here it must not be forgotten that it â—éemeth doubtfull whether an abatement of a stranger which is a possession in fact destroyeâ—h a Possession in Law it appeares by Park â—o 72. sect 371. 372 4. H. 7. 1. per meux that it doth not But 21. Ed. 4. â—o 60. which is accorded for good Law 4. H. 7. fo 1. where in a Writt of Dower the Tenant pleadeth ne vnques seisie in dower c. the demandament sheweth that Lands descended to her husband she being then his wife and that he dyed before entry made either by him or by other person issuit est donable per le lâ—y and shee was inforced by the Court to plead that none entred for if a stranger had entred she had not béene dowable And if she had pleaded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 que Dowâ—e la Poet this had wayned the speciall
these reasons grounded vpon the Law of nature and giuen by Iustice Stamford in his booke fo 194. saith he to this effect men will now eschew those Capitall crimes when they shall sée those persons who in nature and affection are néerest and dearest vnto them and most to bee beloued shall be punished with themselues so that if themselues will not refraine such crimes for themselues yet they should the rather refraine for the loue of their wife children vpon whom they bring so perpetuall losse and punishment and staine of so infamous a note as that their stocke blood and Lineage shall be corrupted and attainted their children disinherited and the wiues of their bosomes because the wiues of such impious and foolish Husbands by their defaults depriued of all their meanes and liuelihood And Breton fo 258. makes another reason why a wife of a man attainted c. shall lose her Dower est pur ceo que est a supposer que el scauoit del felony son mary and by him a woman lost no Dower in case the felony were committed before Couerture King Edward the sixt in the first yeare of his Reigne abrogating some Statutes concerning treasons or felonie for their austerity and making some new decrees concerning treason preserued Dower against all perpetrations of an euill husband But 5. 6. eiusdem regis ca. 11. by the last prouiso It was againe enacted that no Wife of any person attainted of treason should bee receiued to demand or haue Dower c. Yet for felonie 1. Ed. 6. is still in force And treasons by Act 5. Eliz. ca. 1. for assurance of her Maiesties royall power or by the Act eodem anno cap. 11. against clipping washing rounding or filing of Coynes or by the Act 18. Eliz. ca. 1. against diminishing or impayring the Quéenes Coyne or other coyne currant here doe none of them make any corruption of blood or forfeiture of Dower Note if after attainder the Baron purchase his pardon this is so farre forth a new birth vnto him that his Wife shall haue Dower of the Lands which come to him after pardon if his Issue by her may per possibilitie inherite Par. 75. And remember this Case 3. 4. Phi. Marie Dyer 140. b. Marie the wife of Sir Iohn Gate attainted of treason brought a Writt of Dower against Wiseman the attainder of Sir Iohn was certainly pleaded in barre she replyed that long time before the attainder and before the treason committed after the Espousals the said Sir Iohn Gate was seised in fee of the Land whererof she demands Dower and thereof enfeoffed A. B. whose estate the tenant hath vpon a demurrer without argument at barre or bench the Councell of the parties being heard in Iustice Brookes Chamber the demandant was barred of Dower by opinion of all the Iustices because the Statute is The Wife of a man attainted of any manner of treason whatsoeuer shall in no wise bee receiued to aske challenge demand or haue dower of any her Husbands Lands during the force of that attainder And by Stamford 195. this extendeth to petty treason But nota saith Dyer the Lands here sold and gone before treason committed were neuer subiect to forfeiture or escheate vt in causa Vauisor M. Littleton in the Chapter of Dower And therefore Antho Browne Serieant was angrie at the heart for this Iudgement See Littleton fo 11. per Vauisor If a man commit felonie aliene his land and then be attainted the Wife shall haue action of Dower against the Feoffée but not against the King or Lord if it be escheated SECT XVIII The Husbands power in his wiues inheritance and of discontinuance A Womans Inheritance is Lands of Inheritance which she hath by descent or purchase and her Marriage such as was giuen her in Franke Marriage by learned M. Littleton But take heere all fée-simple or fée-taile which she hath sole by her selfe or ioyntly with some other to be her Inheritance Then know that at Common Law a man seised in the right of his Wife of greene acre may make a feoffement of it to a stranger and this is such an interruption called a discontinuance of the wiues estate that not onely the Baron is bound whilest he liueth but the Wife also when he is dead is by common Law forbidden entry into her owne land and put to her action of cui in vita but if a man seised in the right of his wife be disseised and release to the disseisor though it bee with warrantie this is no Discontinuance If a man seised in fée in the right of his Wife haue Issue by her a sonne and die and then a second Husband makes a Lease of the Land for terme of his life and the Wife dyeth if now the Lessée surrender to the second Baron it is a question whether the sonne can enter during the life of lease for life But cleere saith Littleton when he is dead the son may enter for the discontinuance which was but forthe life was determined If Tenant in the right of his Wife make a Lease for his owne life the reuersion in fée is in the Baron If hee die in the life time of his Wife and of the Lessee and his heyre grant the reuersion with atturnament now though the grantee enter after the death of the Lessee yet the wife may re-enter for as an estate taile cannot be discontinued but by one which is seised by force of the intaile so the estate of a Wife is not discontinuable but by him which is seised in the wiues right SECT XIX Of a Remitter YOu must vnderstand somewhat also of a Remitter And because women learne faster by example then by precept I will not stay to define a Remitter Baron and Feme seised together in speciall taile haue Issue a daughter the wife dyeth the Baron catcheth another wife hath Issue by her another daughter discontinueth the taile disseiseth the discontinuee and dieth now is the Land descended to the two daughters the eldest daughter is remitted that is remaunded and setled in the ancient estate for a moitie and driuen to a Formedone against her Sister for the other moity for here the Sisters are by seuerall titles tenants in common not parceners If Tenant in taile infeoffe a Feme sole and die and then his sonne being vnder age intermarrieth with the Feme Feoffée this is a remitter to the Sonne and his wife which before had fée-simple hath now nothing at all in the land But if the sonne had beene of full age at the time of espousals hee had not regained the ancient estate but stood seised onely in droit sa feme If a Woman seised c. take a husband which alieneth in fee and then takes backe an estate to him and his wife for life this reprisall though it were by Indenture or by fine is meerely the act of the Husband and the woman sans folly is adiudged in her Remitter the reuersion of the
by Parliament But if the Ioynture were made before Marriage the woman must néeds hold her to her Ioynture sans election And this is by implication vpon the third prouiso as appeareth by the report of Anderson c Sée Commentaries Plowden 390. The Case 6. Eliz. Dyer 228. is That Richard Ashton Esquire in accomplishment of certaine Indentures dentures betwixt him and Sir William Barenport concerning Marriage to be had betwixt Richard Ashton the sonne and Elizabeth the daughter of Sir William which gaue seuen hundred Markes with her in marriage infeoffed certaine persons before Marriage of Land to the annuall rent of twenty pound to the vse of the said Elizabeth for terme of her life The Marriage being consummate first Richard the Father and then Richard the Sonne died then it was found by office that Richard the sonne died seised in Fée if these Lands whereof the Feoffement was made and of other Lands holden by Chiualry as of the Dutchie of Laâ—caster his heyre being vnder age the first question was whether shee might retaine the twenty pound Lands â—â—d haue Dower of the rest because she was not Richard Aâ—â—â—ons wife at the time of the Feoffement first made neither was it made of the barons lands or by the baron resolued by Councell of the Court that shée was barred of Dower And it was so likewise resolued in Vernons Case Sir Ed. Cokes 4. Report wherein is much learning touching Ioynture The second question in Eliz. Astons ca. was whether she were Dowable from the Quéene because the feoffement was not found by the Office The third question whether it might be aâ—â—râ—ed for the Quéene in stay of petition of Dower that the Feoffement was made pro iunctura no such matter being expressed neither in the déed of Feoffement or Indenture of Coâ—â—â—ants The fourth question whether the Widdow Elizabeth might be receiued to auerre and proue by Commissi 〈…〉 the Court of Wards that the Feoffement was not meant for a Ioynture Here is enough to make Women be wâ—â—e how they take Ioyntures before Marriage Take 〈…〉 ther to admonish you beware of fines after Marriâ—â—â— Ioynture was made to a Feme Couert by her Baron shée and her baron aliened the land by fine sur connusance de droit by the opinion of Iustices Wray Bell Manhood and Dyer she shall not demand Dower of the residue of her husbands Land after his death for she aliened her Ioynture before time of election was giuen her by the Statute quaere But if the fine had bene sur connusance de droit come ceo que le connuseead de done le Baron tantum this had béene a better forme for the wife and lesse dangerous 19. Eliz. Dyer 358. SECT XXXIX What is a sufficient refusall or agreement of or to a Iointure made after Couerture See Sir Edw. Cokes 3. Rep. in Butlers and Bakers Case THe refusing or agreement c. because they are peremptory must not bee clouded darke doubtfull or implicatiue but plaine and expresse a bare word or saying by a woman that she will refuse her Ioynture or accept it is not materiall as diuers Iustices doe hold it But if shee come vpon the Land whereof she is Dowable and there refusing her Ioynture pray the heyre to assigne her Dower this is such a refusall that the heyre by this shall be charged in damages from this time forth in a writt of Dower and this refusall must be to the heyre himselfe and not to a Stranger If a Widow waiue the possession of a house or tenement assigned in Ioynture by her husband and get her to another place this is no refusall But if she haue any medling with the land assigned in Ioynture or doe any other act amounting to assent or dissenting as for example If she bring a writt of Dower and declare vpon it this is peremptory although she bee vnder age Couert or not Couert of a second Husband for the Law saith that they which haue discretion to acquire and get things haue sufficient discretion to giue and preserue those things gotten Therefore if an Infant cdme to any thing by purchase hee shall not in that haue any aduantage or bee in better plight then a parson of full age As where estate is made to an Infant of two acres to haue and hold the one for life the other in fée c. a Feoffement made of one whilest he is yet vnder age is a sufficient election And if a rent charge bee granted to an Infant whereupon he bringeth a Writt of annuity he shall neuer auow for it as a vent when he commeth to full age So if an Infant recouer debt and sue execution by elegit c. he shall neuer haue a scire facias And an Infant is subiect to an action of waste or entry for condition broken as well as any other person These collections gathered as I thinke by some well learned and industrious Student out of M. Brograues reading though they want of the fulnesse and perfection which the owne pen of so great a Lawyer might haue giuen them yet are they pertinent and important And I not a little beholding to him from whose hands I obtaine them SECT XL. Of Actions brought by Baron and Feme or by one of them NOw because the common sayings are found by common experience true Qui capit vxorâ—m capit lites and qui habet terras habet guerras A Wife brings iarres and wealth brings warres quarrels suits and controuersies at Law sans câ—o that it hath any other intendment it will not be amisse a little to declare how and in what manner actions at law must be commenced and pursued by baâ—on and Feme or against them or by or against one of them according to prescription of Law and their seuerall and ioynt Interests c. SECT XLI Where the Baron shall sue onely in his owne name A Man shall sue for his Wiues Marriage money onely in his owne name but how or where that is a matter of some obscurity by Bracton lib. 5. ca. 10. 407. money that is promised causa Matrimonij is as a sequell of Marriage and so being annexed to a thing spirituall requires a spirituall suite yet he confesseth that it is otherwise for Land promised or couenanted c. Fitzherbert in his Writ of Debt citeth 31. Ed. 3. that if a man promise one twenty pound to marry his Daughter which marrieth her accordingly he may haue a Writ of debt vpon his promise but he forgets not the â—éere difference in the Booke of assizes for in the Writt of prohibition he tels vs if a man promise one twenty pounds if he marry his Daughter after marriage if the promiser will not pay the money the husband may not sue in Court Christian if hee doe a prohibition lyeth marry if I promise one twenty pounds with my Daughter in Marriage c. now vpon non-payment he may sue in Court Christian for this concerneth Matrimony The same
learning he insisteth vpon his Writt of Consultation adding that if he die which made the promise the other may sue in Court Christian against the Executor or Executors of Executors 22. ass pla 70. is thus vpon Contract had betwixt two men that if one of them will marry the others Daughter hee shall haue ten pound c. the ten pound after Marriage must be demanded in the Kings Court because the promise was not with his Daughter in Marriage but by Couenant that he should c. But if he had promised the money with his Daughter in Marriage it must haue béene demanded in Court Christian And if a man promise vpon his faith to pay ten pound the Ordinarie cannot compell him to pay it but he may enioyne corporall penance vnlesse the promiser will voluntarily redéeme it Thus teacheth Iustice Thorpe in declaration of the Statute of circumspecte agatis 45. Ed. 3. fo 24. The Demandant declares vpon a couenant betwixt him and the Defendant that if he married the Daughter of the defendant hee should haue an hundred pound c. It was moued that this demand of debt vpon a Couenant concerning Matrimony was not good but the matter concerned the Court Christian per articulos cleri Notwithstanding because the demand was vpon a déed and a written déed maketh a lay couenant the defendant was compelled to answer But 14. of Ed. 4. fo 6. in an action of debt the Plaintiffe declares that he had married the Defendants daughter vpon agréement of twenty pound to be paid c. and all the Iudges of the common pleas without tarrying the Defendants answer awarded que le plaint prist rieu person brief for the demand is say they of the same nature with the espousals viz. ius spirituale and determinable no where but in Court Christian and yet the Booke of assises was there remembred 15. Ed. 4. fo 32. the plaintiffe in a Writt of debt demanding fiue markes declares vpon a couenant quod notâ— for fiue pound where he had marryed c. and 33. pound fiue shillings foure pence was paid but the residue being 5. Marks the defendant denyed to pay yet I care not saith Catesoy though he be discharged for I know well enough that vpon such a matter the action lieth not at common Law quod fuiâ— concessum per curiam And the cause alledged was that there was not quid for quo 17. Ed. 4. fo 5. The master of the Rowles asketh the Iustices of the Common pleas if a man promise money to another to marry his daughter or seruant which marrieth her accordingly whether an action of debt will lye at the common Law or no No saith Townsend for it is but a nude promise of no more effect then if I promise you 20. pound to build you a new Chamber and ex nudo pacto non oritur actio But if I promise you sixe shillings euery wéeke for the bording of I. S. here is quid for quo for law intendeth here that I haue aduantage and profit by the seruice of I. S. But further in your case the thing that is to bee done is spirituall which cannot bee sold neither can the party be compelled to doe it Rogers and Siliard were contrary to him in opinion That a promise vpon Marriage is no â—â—dum pactum because the daughter cousin or friend is by intendment aduanced And if I promise a Schoole-master money to teach my childe he shall haue action of Debt Likewise if I promise a Surgeon money to heale a poore mans wound or a Labourer money to mend a high-way But in the end Choke Littleâ—on agréed with the Master of the Rowles that in the case by him propounded none action lyeth at common Law because Matrimony whereupon the promise is founded is a thing spirituall and by no manner of meanes vendable 19. Ed. 4. fo 10. in an action of debt brought vpon such a bargaine Collow saith it is true a man must demand a woman contracted to him in the spirituall Court but money is a temporall thing And when a Parson of a Church is to recouer tythes he must sue in Court Christian but if he sell his tythes when they be seuered hee shall sue for the money in the Kings Court but then and afterward in the same or like case 20. of Ed. 4. fo 3. Bryan asketh him then to what end serueth the Statute that things touching Matrimony and Testaments must be tryed in Courts Christian cui des vous quam vous purres achate les Sacraments Sir saith Neale dismes are a thing spirituall but if a Parson of a Church lease his Tythes hee must sue for the rent in a temporall Court and Collow stands to it that per emptionem venditionem res spirituales efficiuntur temporales he neuer spake a truer word in his life Out of these opinions consorting together like harpe and harrow may be gathered this sure learning That hee which will wed shall doe well and according to the Statute of circumspecte agatis to take as much as he can of his wiues marriage money before hand with faire Indentures or good obligation for the residue And by the aboue-said Bookes as also by M. Plowden in that case he may haue action of debt for euery déed sealed and deliuered carrieth sufficient consideration to wit the will of him that made it Concerning the old scruple though money be a visible signe of inuisible grace Sacramentall and Spirituall specially if it be in Angels yet I trust it is not more spirituall then the woman her selfe with whom it is promised And as there is no question made but a man may sue in Court Christian for his lawfull wife vnlawfully taken and witholden vpon which suite if a prohibition be granted a consultation may be had for procéedings quatenus pâ—r restitutione vxoris duntaxat prosequitur c. So by Fitzherbert in his Writt of Consultation an Action may be brought at Common Law de vxore abducta cum bonis viri or an action of trespasse for taking onely of the Wife But for a cleare proofe that in these promissions of money vpon Marriage neither the money is any Ghost nor the promise any nudum pactum Sée the case 10. Eliz. Dyer 272. An Action of the Case was brought vpon promise of twenty pound made to the Plaintiffe in consideration that at speciall Instance and request of the Defendant he had married his Cousin this was a good cause of action in the Queenes Court although the Marriage were celebrated and perfected before the assumption because the Nuptialls did ensue the Defendants request And as Lands may bee giuen in Franke marriage after the Espousals and yet the Espousals be cause and consideration of the gift so may money be promised after Espousals and yet the Espousals be cause of the promise But Reader be not confident of the Law in that Case of Dyer for I haue séene a report of a Case betwéene Sandill Plaintiffe and
the Statute of 21. H. 8. hath béene taken A sonne of Charles Duke of Suffolke by a second venter hauing certaine goods by his fathers Will dyed intestate and without wife or issue his mother who was daughter to the Lord Willough by tooke Administration which was afterward reuoked after great argument in the spirituall Court as well by common Lawyers as Ciuilians in the behalfes of the said mother Dutchesse of Suffolke and Lady Francis wife to the Marquis Dorset sister of the halfe â—loud to Henry the Intestate which sued to reuerse the Administration and obteined it her selfe though shee were but sister de demy sanke for the mother is not next of kin to her awâ—e sonne in thiâ—â—aâ—ter but must descend and not ascend either by one Law or the other and children be â—â— sanguine patris matris â—â—â— pater mater non sunt de saâ—gâ—ine puerorum Contrary it is of brethren and sisters 5. Edw. 6. 47 in Brooke titulo Administraton There is also this Case William Rawliâ—s Clericus died inteâ—â—ate administration was committed to Sir Humphrey Browne who had married Rawlins his sister William Shelton and Iohn Shelton sonnes to the Lady Browne by her first husband reuersed the administration and obteined â— for themselues But sée in Sir Edward Cokes 3. Rep. in Ratcliffs ca. fol. 40. it is said that the booke of 5. Edw. 6. haue beene often times resolued to bée no Law and that the goods of the sonne or daughter ought to be granted to the father or mother as the next of bloud and there is Littleton â—ited who saith that although the sonnes lands goe to the vncle yet the father is next of bloud SECT II. Areâ—sonâ—ble part of the goods IF there bée a will proued the widow must take such goods as were bequeathed her by deliuery from the Executors but whether here were a will or none in some places she shall haue a third part of all her late husbands goods For this there is an ordinary writ to the Sheriffe where she cannot haue a third part of that which remaines after funerals discharged and legacies payd and performed to summoâ— the Executors to appeare and make answer why she should not haue as the custome of the Court is that women ought to haue rationabilem partem de bonis caâ—alâ—â—s virâ—rum The like writ is for children whether they be sonnes or daughterâ— or both And this writ speaketh of a custome in the County that children which are not heires nor promoted in the fathers life time shall haue their reasonable part 3. Edw. 3. A Writ of debt was brought by a man Alice his wife against the Executors of his wiues father declaration was vpon custome of the Shire that children not aduanced should haue their reasonable part of their fathers goods the Executors said that Alice was married by her father in his life time iudgement si action c. It is no answer said one to say that she was married by her father except you say also by or with her fathers goods and to her conueniable aduancement and here the husband at time of the marriage or after had neuer any land The Executors said still shée was conueniently married by her fathers procurement c. And in the end the Baron and Feme offered to auerre not married by the father on which point the issue was ioyned Fiâ—zh Dett 156. 40. Edw. 3. In a rationabili parte bonorum brought by a daughter counting on the custome of the Towne that euery son and daughter should haue a reasonable part the defendant pleaded a reuersion discended to her which she might sell for her aduancement in marriage iudgement si action c. Mowbray said the Lords in Parliament would not agrée that this action is maintenable by any common custome or Law of the Realme Doctor and St. fol. 132. a. by the custome of some Country the children the dâ—bts and legacies payd shall haue a reasonable part of the goods of the dead 39. Edw. 3. fol. 9. 10. One brought a Writ of Detinue for certaine goods shewing the custome of Sussex That where the father dyed intestate his heire should haue a reasonable part of his Chattels and vpon this custome hee demanded goods come to the Defendants hands It was argued whether the custome were good or no. Morris such a custome hath béene allowed in Eyre 21. Hen. 6. fol. 1. 2. In fine â—asus a woman brought a Writ of detinew against her husbands Executors for a â—â—ity of his goods as for her reasonable part by custome and the Defendant was compelled to answer 7. Edw. 4. fol. 20. 21. Iâ— a raâ—ioâ—abili parte boâ—â—rum iudgement was asked of the declaration because the custome was that where the Baron dyed sans issue the wife should haue a moity of his goods after debts and â—uâ—erals discharged but if there were issue shee should haue but a third part and here the Plaintiffe had a demanded moity without alleaging that the baron died sans issue c. The Plea was amended by permittance of the Iustices for Daâ—by said the widow had as good title to the goods as to lands at the common Law But Cat. by spied another fault in the Count viz. Continuance of the custome not alleaged 18. Hen. 6. fo â— in a rationabili parte bonorum one Executor appearing confessed the action and the others made default whereupon the Plaintiffe recouered presently by equity of the Statute 9 Edw. 3. cap. 3. by which the Executor comming first must answer Like or the same learning is in the former Booke 7. Ed. 4. where Choke said that alwayes if ne vnques executor ne vnques administrat coÌ„e executor be a good plea vt hic the Executor first appearing must answer I see that many tunes in stead of this writ de rationabili parte bonorum a writ of debt sometimes and many times of detinue hath serued and you may finde further 52. and 56. titulo Detinue in Fitzâ— And the great variance is in this that the action is founded on a custome sometime of the Towne sometime of the County and sometime of the Realme for indéed many haue holden that it is generall like an action of the Case against an Hostler or an action deâ—igne custodiendo So teacheth Glanuil and so Fitzh who relieth vpon magna Charta cap. 18. which prescribiâ—g how the Kings debts shall bée leuied of his goods that is dead willeth the surplussage to remaine for the Executors ad testamentum defuncti pimplend saluis vxori pueris eius partibus rationabilibuâ— which being of a reasonable part may be restrained to places where custome yéeldeth it for ought that I perceiue Bracton in this passage is like a péece of Romane ancient coyne that time hath rusted and defaced If a man saith he make a Testament he ought to remember his Lord of whom hée holdeth his land with the best thing he hath and the Church with the next
the husbands Ancestors that they should doe nothing preiudiciall to the heires But in this case there came no Ioynture from the husband but contrariwise the wife had made a Ioynture to her husband and after his decease to bridle the woman to doe what shée listed with her owne inheritance were against all reason and as farre from any affinitie with 11. H. 7. as it should be when a woman seised in Fée simple giues lands to the father of him whom she intends to marrie to the intent that he regrant this land to his sonne and her after marriage with a remainder in taile c. to restraine her when after marriage regranting and death of the husband she should leuie a fine to other vses or suffer a recouerie which case though it be cleane out of the Statute yet it is within the words for the â—oynture was made by the Barons Ancestor though not originally c. And so note those two cases of Plowd one is taken to be within the intent though out of the letter and the other though within the letter yet out of the intent and yet both constructions most reasonable and iust And see Sir George Brownes case Sir Edw. Cokes â— Râ—p that a lease made by a woinaâ— tâ—nant in taâ—le of the gift of her husband c. make a lease for thrée liâ—sâ— that is not warranted by the Statute of 32. H. 8 and although the lease be without clause of Warrantie yet it is within the Statute of 11. H. 7. for those words in the act with warrantie refer to releases and confirmations which makes no discontinuance without warrantie for the inteâ—t of the Act is to proâ—ibit not onely euerie barre but â—ueriâ— manner of discontinuance which puts the heire to his reall action And in that case it was resolued that if the issue in taile had before the womans for feiture granted his remainder onely in that case hee by the exâ—resse letter of the Act shall enter vpon the discontinuance of the woman for his act doth not biâ—de his estate But when the issue in taile leuie a fine with praclamation in the life of the woman tenant in taile c. that shall binde the taile and therefore there the Conusée shall enter for hée which hath the immediate title interest or inheritance at the time of the for feiture shall enter by that Statute And it was said by Anderson Chiefe Iustice of the Common Pleas that where it was inâ—ented for to makâ— euaâ—â—â—ne out of the Statute that if such a woman tenant in taile accepts a fine sur conusans de droit come câ—o c. and by grant and renders the land for a thâ—usand yeares that is an alienâ—tion within the intention of the Act although the words of the Act are discontinuance aliâ—nation c. and of that opinion was Wâ—ay Chiefe Iustice and Dyer and all the Court of Commoâ— Pleas was of the same opinion 18. Eliz. And in Sir Edw. â—okes 3. Rep. Lincolne College case It was resolued that if the heire in taile conuey the lands to others and the woman tenant in taile release or maks conâ—â—râ—nation with waâ—rantie which is not but to perfect and corroborate the estate which the heire in taile hath made such a warrantie is not restrained by the said Act for that which the woman hath done is for the benefit of the heire and not for his preiudice and by his aâ—â—ent And she and the heirâ—â—â—ight haue iâ—yned a fine and so barre the estate taile not with standing the Statute of 11. H. 7. therefore such Acts by the woman shall not be void to grant the hâ—ire or any else any aduantage by the Statute of 11. H. 7. And note the opinion of Sir Edw. Coke in the said case of Lincolne College that the sonne borne after shall by this Statute out the daughter who entred for forfeiture and â—â—ewâ—â— other opinions concurring yâ—â— in Dyer 21. Eliz. 362. the heire in such a case is said to be in by purchass And note Reader that it hath â—â—â—ne adiudged that although the Déed of conueyance and assurance of the womans Ioynture or estate dâ—therpresse her marriage portion as well as her marriage to â—e the cause and consideration of such Ioynâ—urâ— or â—statâ— yet if the estate prâ—â—éds from the husband or his Ancestors she is within the said â—tatute of 11. H. 7. and sâ—e Villers and Beauâ—â—â—ritâ— case 4. Mar. 146. But â—â—â—uâ—râ— if the portion money appeare to be the full price of the land if that differ not the case Sée Sir Edw. Cokes Comment vpon Littleton 365. These â—ases put a man seised in Fee leuie a fine to the vse of himselfe for life and after to the vse of his wife and of the heires males of her body by him begotten and had issue male and after he and his wife leuied a fine and suffered a common recouerie the husband and the wife died and the issue male entred by the Statute of 11. H. 7. and the entrie was â—olden lawfull and yet this caâ—e is out of the letter of the Statute for she neither leuied the fine c. being sale or with any other saue her husband who made the Ioâ—â—ture Sed qui â—aeret iâ— littera â—aeret in cortice and therefore this case being within the 〈◊〉 of the Statute is within the remedy But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that this case was deâ—yed for Law by the Râ—â—â—rder oâ— London in his argument in the case hereunder 〈◊〉 betweene Copland and Pyat Another case in Sir 〈◊〉 Cokes Commentaries vpon Littleton which agrée with Eiston and Studs case in Plowd is A man seised of land â—ure vâ—oris and they two leuie a fine and the 〈◊〉 grant and render the land to the hâ—sband and wife in speciall taile the remainder to the right heires of the wiâ—â— they haue issue the husband dieth the wife taketh another husband and they two leuie a â—â—ne in Fée the issue entreth this is within the letter of the Statute and yet is out of the meaning because the state of the land 〈◊〉 from the wife so as it was the purchase of the husband in letter and not in meaning But where the woman in â—â—nant for life by the gift or conueyance of any other â—â—â— alienation with Warrantie shall binde the heire at this day The case of Copland and Pyaâ— adiudged Hillar 7. Car. in Banâ—â— Regis in effect was thus I. S. his sonne was to marrie to the daughter â—â— I. N. And the Deed 〈◊〉 that I. N. for thâ— consideration of foure hundred 〈◊〉 paid by I. S. and of a marriage c and for the 〈◊〉 of the bloâ—â— of I. N. coâ—enants to stand seised to the vse of the sonne â—â— I. S. and his daughter whom the 〈◊〉 of I. S. should marrie â—â—taile the remainder to another 〈◊〉 of I. N. thâ— remainder to the hâ—ires of I. N. 〈◊〉 dieth hauing issue and the wife alieneth by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was resolued that it was not within