Selected quad for the lemma: daughter_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
daughter_n father_n john_n marry_v 8,216 5 9.1096 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A34160 Hinc illæ lacrymæ, or, An epitome of the life and death of Sir Wlliam Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar ... with their great services and sufferings under the crown of England : together with a brief narrative of the case and tryal of certain persons for pyracy and felony on the 10th of February 1680 : upon a special commission of Oyer and Terminer, grounded upon the statute of the 28 of Henry the 8 / faithfully and modestly collected by Thomas Carew ... ; with some remarques thereupon. Carew, Thomas, 1595?-1639? 1681 (1681) Wing C563; ESTC R12035 39,994 28

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

dictus Dominus Rex nunc unquam seu aliqualiter fuit deceptus Rich. Wallapp R. Powell Edm. Saunders J. Somers Charles Molloy ON the first day of Easter-Term the said George Carew appeared in person at the Kings-Bench-Bar and moved the Court by Mr. Saunders his Councel that his Appearance might be Recorded which was done accordingly But no Information was brought in against the said Carew all that Term Then in Trinity-Term following the said Carew ordered his Clerk in the Petty-bagg to give Rules that the Attorney-General might Reply to the said Plea that Issue might be joyned in that Affair to make all things ripe for a final determination in Parliament either upon a Writ of Error or otherwise as occasion should offer But to this day no further Prosecution is made at the Kings Instance concerning the Scire Facias Wherefore several of the persons Interessed in pursuance of an Assignment indented and made the 14 th day of Iuly 1666. between the said George Carew of the one part and Iohn Graham Esq and Iohn Brown Gent. of the other part agreed to make a new Entry of five Ships and Pinnaces in due Form with the Register of the Admiralty Court de bene esse the week after Trinity Term and to set forth the same to Sea from time to time until the said Debt and Damages should be Recovered or a Composition made for the same according to the true intent and meaning of the said Letters Patents recited in the Plea to the Scire Facias aforesaid which they entred accordingly The Statutes of England in several Acts of Parliament are very positive in it that persons spoiled at Sea shall have the Law of Reprizals for their relief By the Laws of Moses Goods taken wrongfully away were to be restored fourfold which implyed the Damages sustained and the Costs in acquiring restitution By all Christian Precepts and Examples since Christianity came into the World it was practised in all Ages that Restitution was injoyned before any Absolution where the persons were of ability to do it To inforce the Argument in this Case something further it may be observed in the Patent recited in the Plea that the King foreseeing it was against all Natural Justice to mention any Pardon without a Restitution and Compensation to the Parties Injured the Hand points at the words ☞ That notwithstanding any Peace concerning General Reprizals yet this Remedy remains until satisfaction c. Which imploys that although he remits the Crimen Lasae Majestatis the particular Injury relates to particular Persons Nothing is more usual then Appeals of private persons after Soveraign Pardons whereby the Criminals have suffered for not making their Peace with the particular persons next of Blood But some will object that a Soveraign Prince may pro bono publico give away a particular Debt of his Subject although ascertained under the greatest circumstances But whether that assertion be consistent with the Law of England or that the particular should be satisfied out of the publick Purse or left to the proper Remedy granted I leave it to better Judgments upon Arguing the Plea It is remarkable that the said Daniel Gyles made a Contract with the Dutch-Skipper that he should give him the said Gyles 100. l. Sterling to Seize the said Captain Gwyther and his men who lay at Anchor near Cows-Castle with two of the Dutch Seamen on Board in the Prize-Ship and an English Pilot that the Captain had Hired in the Isle of Wight to bring the said Prize-Ship to London in order to her Condemnation And that the said Daniel Gyles in pursuance of his Contract Hired several Boats with Soldiers and came on board the said Prize-Ship called the Love of Rotterdam and there demanded ex officio as he pretended the Captains Commission and took it from him and the Money he had and Secured the said Captain and Seamen in Cows-Castle about the 9 th of December 1680. then took away the Prize-Ship wherein were seven pair of Pistols Swords and Pole-Axes of the Captains with all the English mens Bedding and Provisions that Boarded the said Ship which the said Gyles Seized and kept and alledged he might do it by virtue of the Kings Proclamation THat in Hillary-Term following the said Gyles appearing upon the Exchange in London several Actions were brought against him in the Kings-Bench for the said Ship Wine and other Goods whereupon he was Arrested and carried into the Powltry-Compter Who after several days Confinement being not able to give Bail moved the Court he might be Discharged upon Common Bail notwithstanding the Actious were for Trover and Conversion and Actions for Trespass on the Case at the Suits of the Proprietors the Captain and Seamen respectively to the Damages of 5000 l. and upwards Nevertheless the said Gyles was Discharged by Rule of Court upon Common Bail then the Ship and Goods were delivered in an Arbitrary way by Order of the Councel Table to the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty and to Sir Robert Holmes who dispossessed the English Interessed persons of their Ship and Goods contrary to the Laws of Property and the Established Laws of England to the great Dishonour of the Government and the Damages of the persons Interessed and Injured as aforesaid who are in prosecution of their Right in the ordinary course of Iustice against the said Daniel Gyles and Sir Robert Holmes for the Ship and her Lading as also for False Imprisonment of the Men and detainng their Arms and other Goods from them A short Narrative of the Life and Death of Sir William Courten SIR William Courten was born in the Parish of St. Mary-Hill in London his Father and Mother in the time of Persecution under the Duke de Alva in Flanders having fled from Menen in the year 1567. into England for Protection having Transported all their Goods and Moneys to the City of London dealt in Silks and Fine Linnen during their Lives and left three Children Named William Peter and Margaret unto whom they gave plentiful Estats Sir Willlam being the Eldest Son was Bred a Merchant and his Fathers Factor sometime at Harlem and other while at Corterick where he Married his first Wife the Daughter of Peter Cromeling with whom he had sixty thousand Pounds Sterling In the year 1606. the said Sir William Courten entred into a Trade in Partnership with a Ioynt Stock in Company with Peter Courten his Brother and John Mon●y his Brother in Law that Married his only Sister the Widow of Matthias Boudaen her first Husband Two parts or the Moiety of the said Stock in Company belonging to Sir William and to each of the other a fourth part This Trade was carried on Ioyntly in Silks and Linnens until the year 1631. wherein was returned Communibus Annis one hundred and fifty thousand Pounds Sterling But besides that Trade in Company to Holland France and Flanders Sir William carried on his own particular Trade to Guinea Portugal Spain and