Selected quad for the lemma: daughter_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
daughter_n	die_v	son_n	succeed_v	10,853	5	9.7585	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
B20451	Justice vindicated from the false fucus [i.e. focus] put upon it, by [brace] Thomas White gent., Mr. Thomas Hobbs, and Hugo Grotius as also elements of power & subjection, wherein is demonstrated the cause of all humane, Christian, and legal society : and as a previous introduction to these, is shewed, the method by which men must necessarily attain arts & sciences / by Roger Coke.; Reports. Part 10. French	Coke, Roger, fl. 1696.	1660 (1660)	Wing C4979	450,561	399

saies ver 8 9. 10. If a man dye and have no Son then shall the inheritance pass to the daughter and if he have no daughter then shall the inheritance go to his brethren and if he have no brethren then ye shall give the inheritance unto his fathers brethren c. And that inheriting by the daughter when there is no Son in Britain consonant to the Law of God is as old as any record we can find when Voadicea led the Britans against the Romans it was alwaies a thing observed among them Neque enim sexum in imperiis discernunt Tacit. Lip in vita Agric. 457. Wherein Regality differs in descent from Estates by Civil Laws 9. Although Gynaecocraty be neither against the divine Law of God or Nature yet it is only to be understood that in regality the female shall inherit when she is the eldest sister and lineally descended from the Ancestor which has no Heir male of his body lawfully begotten For in Regality possessio fratris non facit sororem esse haeredem But if a King or Queen by inheritance have issue by several venters or extractions and by the latter a Son who does inherit who dyes without issue yet shall the Heir male descended from the Father although but of half blood to him inherit before his sister and the elder sister descended from the Father shall inherit before his sister although she be of whole blood to him from the reason aforesaid and therefore Queen Mary and Eliz. although but of half blood to Ed. the 6. did inherit before the Queen of Scots or the issue of the Queen Dowager of France by the Duke of Suffolk Charles Brandon although they were of whole blood to him and thus much does Sir Ed. Coke testifie Com. Lit. cap. 1. Sect. 8. p. 15. 10 Before we examine the authority and observance of the Salique Law First Charge let us see the heinous charge which Monsieur Bodin brings against Gynaecocatry Bodins charge and incommodities against Gynaecocatry cap. 5. lib. 6. pag. 738. de rep He says Gynaecocraty is inimicitious to the laws of Nature which gives prudence strength magnanimity of mind force to command to Men takes them away from Women Answ A fine general charge this If I can form an argument out of it this is it All Government wherein prudence strength magnanimity c. do not command is inimicitious to the Laws of Nature But in Gynaecocraty neither prudence c. do command Therefore Gynaecocraty is inimicitious to the Laws of Nature Now the Major proposition requiring strength prudence and magnanimity in command the Conclusion will be as strong against all Government as Gynaecocraty for he hath not defined what strength prudence c. is nor who shall be Judge what it is and so any man who will but deny that there is strength prudence c. in the Governor may by the Laws of Nature not obey nay it is against the Laws of Nature to obey But in what case are all Pupil Kings Sure the man intended to make good Pepins and Hugh Capets Titles from this Proposition against Childerick and Charls of Lorrain But that which is most monstrous and impious is that it is inimicitious to the Laws of Nature for any Child to obey and honor his Mother because she hath not prudence magnanimity and force of command The Law of God not only took from Women the Government of Common-wealths Second charge but also of Families whenas he deservedly subjected them to the command of their Husbands The argument out of this is Whom God hath subjected to the command of their Husbands cannot by the Law of God command in Families But God hath subjected Women to the command of their Husbands Therefore by the Law of God Women cannot command in Families Answ Yes such Women as never were married nor subject to their Husbands may granting the Major proposition But I deny the Major proposition for sure it is no where against the Law of God for a Widow to govern her Family As often as God testifies that he will take terrible vengeance against the enemies Third charge of his Name he threatens them to be subject to commands and laws of Women for this he cites Isa 8. although I cannot find any such thing there as if that were the utmost of evils and extremity of calamities Answ That this is false is evident by Gods miraculous delivery of the children of Israel by the leading and command of Deborah Besides how can God command Women to command and give Laws if it be against the Law of Nature Which is all one to say God does command against the Law of Nature that is his own Law The Roman Laws did seclude Women from all Civil offices and Publique Fourth charge employments Answ But though the Roman Laws did forbid it yet if the Laws of France did not allow it how came Blanch the wife of Lewis the Eighth Katherine de Medici wife of Henry the Second and Mary de Medici wife of Henry the Fourth and Anne the Mother of the present King to manage the Regencie of France as imperiously during the minority of their Sons as if they had been absolute Princes That in Gynarchy the Wife is not subject but superior to her Husband Fifth charge Answ So heavy bodies will against their nature ascend to supply a Vacuity Answ His sixth charge is an Invective against Vasti Joan of Naples called the Sixth charge Wolf Athaliah Cleopatra Zenobia Hirene As indeed telling of stories is usually the greatest part of his reasoning and that he will do so amply that Scaliger justly reprehends him with making not writing Histories Now if I should fall into the commendation of Ruth Hester Judith Deborah c. I am quit with him It is true indeed that 't is a great blessing to any Nation that God gives them a Masculine Heir endued with all those qualities he speaks of But when God doth give a Child which he pronounceth a woe to that Nation Eccles 10. 16. or a Female Subjects must be content and submit themselves to Gods pleasure For in going about to alter what God hath done they will make themselves in a much more woful condition Nor could that be a judgment of God upon a Nation to give Fools and Children or Women for Heirs if Subjects at pleasure might alter them and set up others in their stead 11. The Salique Law took its name either from the Country Salia The etymologie of the Salique Law or the River Sal or from contraction of Si aliqua so often mentioned in the Law 12. There are three things observable in the Salique Law the authority A short view of the authority and observance of the Salique Law of it the eternity of it and the reason of it For the authority of it it was made by the Lord knows whom for the eternity of it it shall end the Lord knows when

excommunicated or damned who differ in some things from the doctrine of the Pope who appeal from his decrees and hinder the execution of the ordinances of him or his Legates Although the Sesession of the Church King and Kingdom of England The reformation of King 1 d. was not Schismatical from the Papacy were an Act of Schism yet being done in the Reign of H. 8. one of the greatest favorers of the Papacy that ever was King of England and to his death as great an assertor of the Rites Ceremonies and Religion of it and in such a state independent from the Church of Rome was the Church and Kingdom at the time of Edwards Reformation whatsoever therefore his Reformation was yet could it not be Schismatical Whatever the Romanists pretend to unity and peace in their Church yet The rites and ceremonies of Edwards reformation were more uniform then before it is most manifest that in the Realm of England and Dominion of Wales in several places were used divers forms of Prayer commonly called the Service of the Church viz. that of Sarum of York of Bangor and Lincoln but also of late divers and sundry forms and fashions were used in the Cathedral and Parishes Church of England and Wales as well concerning the mattens or morning prayer and evening song as also concerning the holy Communion commonly called the Mass with divers and sundry rites and ceremonies concerning the same and in the administration of other Sacraments of See preamble to the Statute of 2 3. Ed. 6. Cap. 1. That the Scriptures Lords Prayer and Creed should be read in the English tongue is no new thing in England the Church whereas the service enjoyned in the Reign of Ed. 6 was uniform in all places of England and Wales as well in Parish Churches as Cathedrals In the Reign of King Ethelbald in the year of our Saviors incarnation 748. in a convocation held in the Prouince of Canterbury Cuthbert the Archbishop of his Clergy did Enact that the sacred Scriptures should be read in their monasteries the Lords Prayer and Creed taught in the English tongue Speed in the Reign of Ethelbald para 4. page 343. and how much it was against the Word of God and the custom of the ancient Church to use a tongue unknown to the people in common prayer and administration of Sacraments see the conference at Westminster an primo Eliz. which were never yet answered that I know of If any thing Heretical had been contained in the common Prayer administration Edwards reformation was not Heretical of Sacraments c. made in the Reign of Ed. 6. it would have been sufficiently shot at having so many adversaries at home and abroad but no such crime was ever that I ever heard of imputed to it if there be let the adversaries of it yet shew it affirmanti incumbit probatio If then not onely the Kings and supreme powers always under the old Covenant King Edwards Reformation was warrant-able materially and formally had this right of invoking the high Priest and other Priests and if God always punished the Kings of Judah and Israel for suffering the people to commit Idolatry and if God himself so often commends the zeal and reformation of Jehoshaphat Hezekiah Asa Josiah c. and if ever since Christianity the Bishops by that Divine Canon to Timothy have always had in 1 Tim. cap 2. their particular Churches right of composing publick Liturgies and in national Synods a right of composing publick and national Liturgies And the Liturgy of Edward being composed and received by the Bishops of the Church of England to that end convened and assembly by the King this Liturgy being neither schismattical nor containing any thing heretical is both for matter and form warrantable Object If the Sacriledge and extention of the civil Jurisdiction in giving the civil Magistrate licence to take cognizance of the publique Liturgy and administration of the Sacraments be objected The answer is easie Let the Courtiers and Parliament answer for it the Church was patient not agent in them The Church of Rome having robbed the poor laity of one half of the institution of the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and kept the people in such The King and Church had great reason to make Reformation in Religion stupid ignorance that in the publick worship and service of God they should neither use their reason nor understanding by imposing it upon them in an unknown tongue as if in the publick worship and service of God he were not to be served by intellectual and rational creatures and had filled the Mass with more prayers to the Virgin Mary and Saints which could no ways relieve them and so at best super fluous and vain there was great reason in the King and Church to a make a reformation of the Religion and publick Worship and Service of God Of Queen Maries Ecclesiastical Laws Although King Ed. were a Prince of transcendent Vertue and Learning far above his years yet doubtless his youth was not onely much abused in his Reign where a man might have seen all the woes pronounced by God upon that Nation where the King is a childe or where a company of men in Parliament arrogate to themselves the Politick capacity of a King abstracted from his person but also at his very death caused not without suspicion of poyson was he deluded upon specious pretences by his whole Councel but principally by the Duke of Northumberland to make way for the Lady Jane Gray in the time of his sickness married to his fourth son Guilford Dudley to declare the said Lady Jane the rightful heir and successor to the English Monarchy to the manifest wrong and injury not onely of Queen Mary and Elizabeth afterward Queens of England but also of Mary Queen of Scots heir to Margaret the eldest daughter of Henry the seventh whereas the Lady Janes Title was descended from Mary the younger daughter of H. 7. yet it so pleased God that this unjust Will should onely bring destruction both to the Lady Jane and her husband whereas the Ladies Mary and Elizabeth and the Posterity of Mary Queen of Scots did all succeed and enjoy the possession of the English Diadem of which they were debarred by this Will of King Edward That the Title of Head of the Church was continued by Queen Mary appears by the Parliament begun and holden at Westminster the fifth of October in the first year of her Reign in the first and second session of it where she is stiled our Gracious Soveraign Lady Mary by the Grace of God Queen of England France and Ireland Defender of the Faith and in Earth Supreme Head of the Church of England and Ireland but in the second Parliament of her Reign being holden at Westminster the second of April the first year of her Reign the Title of Supreme Head of the Church of England and Ireland is not mentioned Declares

institution and therefore incommunicable or alienable yet after it pleased God that Kings should be nursing fathers and Queens nursing mothers to his Church the exercise endowment priviledges and immunities of Christian power is of positive humane institution The obedience therefore or subjection due to them who have oversight over us in the Lord is not formally due to such Bishops and Priests who have once had the oversight over us but to such Bishops and Priests who are legally constituted to exercise the jurisdiction or function in such Dioceses or Parishes where they are so constituted which exercise is alienable or transferrible though not at the will of the Incumbent yet at the will of Supreme powers and legally at the will of the Donor CHAP. II. Of Inheritance and Succession 1. NO humane law can create a humane right Jura sanguinis nullo jure No Humane law can make a Royal heir civili dirimi possint Nor is this right of succession from Divine positive laws but observed as well where Gods revelation of himself is not received as where it is And if according to the resolution of all the most learned and reverend Judges in Calvin's Case subjection is from no humane law but from the law of nature Then of necessity must Regal right and inheritance be from the law of nature for no man supposeth subjection where he does not presuppose power The Will therefore of Henry the Eight where for want of issue of Edward Mary and Elizabeth he gives the English Monarchy to the issue of Frances and Elianor daughters of Mary his younger sister before the right heirs of Margaret his eldest sister wife of James the Fourth of Scotland was void and not to be allowed and so was that of Edward the Sixth who did disinherit his sisters Mary and Elizabeth and gave the Crown to Jane daughter of Frances the French Queen aforesaid by Charles Brandon Duke of Suffolk and so were the Acts of Parliament made by H. 4. 5. and 6. which entailed the Crown upon their Heirs so was the Acts of the last of Henry the 6. which entailed the Crown upon him and the heirs males of his body and so were the Acts of the first of Rich. 3. and H. 7. which entailed the Crown upon them and their heirs Neither is succession and inheritance of Crowns declared by any humane Law in the world that I know of but only the pretended French Salique Law which we shall examine afterwards 2. None but God can make an Heire to a Crown solus Deus haeredem None but God can make an Heire to a Crown facere potest non homo Co. Lit. Sect. 7. And this Heire which Sir E. Co. here speaks of is but heire in fee to Lands or Tenements according to common Law or Custom if then only God can make such an Heire then sure none but God can make an Heire which makes humane Laws and permits Customes 3. It is not only humane Laws which say a bastard is filius terrae None can inherit not born in Matrimony Gen. 22. 2. quasi nullius filius Et qui ex damnato coitu nascuntur inter liberos non computentur but God calls Isaac Abrahams only Son although at the same time Abraham had his Son Ismael by Hagar his Handmaid or Concubine And Abraham gave all he had to Isaac but to the Sonns of the Concubins which Abraham had he gave gifts Gen. 25. 5 6. So though Ismael were Isaacs elder brother yet in comparison of Isaac born in wedlock God himself did not account him Abrahams Son Nor can one instance be given that ever by Gods either command or permission any born out of marriage did inherit By the Law therefore of God aswell as humane Law none can inherit which are born out of matrimony 4. That which no humane Law prescribes and yet is observed by all The Issue male shall inherit before the Issue female in Royalty men generally in all ages is from the Law of Nature But no humane Law prescribes the male to inherit before the female in regality yet it is observed by all men generally therefore that the issue male shall inherit before the female in regality is from the Law of Nature 5. If primogeniture had not been a sacred thing and inheritance annexed Of the Issue male the first born is to be preferred to it by the Law of Nature then could not Esau have been pronounced a prophane person for selling his birthright Heb. 12. 16. although he did it to save his life Gen. 25. 34. but being due by the Law of Nature I say Esau by his sale could not transfer it to Jacob yet because Esau did despise it Gen. 25. 34. it was just with God to transfer it to Jacob neither can it be shewed any where in sacred writ but that alwaies primogeniture in royal descent was a good title where God did not interpose 6. Only the King can inherit and succeed because his Royal capacity is Why only the King is said to inherit and succeed and Subjects do either inherit or succeed but never both affixed and inseparable with his person In the Oath therefore of Ligeance Subjects swear to beare faith to the King his Heirs and Successors but no Subject can both inherit and succeed because there is no succession can be affixed to the person of any Subject by vertue of inheritance All Corporations therefore do not descend by inheritance but are acquired as they are nominated or elected in such manner as is granted by the King or supream power 7. There are but two waies by which hereditary or successive Monarchies How many waies hereditary Monarchies descend do descend the one is Lineal descent the other Lineal Agnatical Cognatical or Collateral or as we say the one descends to the heire general the other to the heire male This latter by vertue of a Salique law takes place only in France we will therefore see what may be said and objected against the former and how the latter hath been observed in France and of what Authority it is 8. That cannot be against the Law of God which he has owned and Gynococratia or inheritance of Women not unnatural nor against the Law of God given a blessed president of but that God has owned Gynaecocraty and that in a great and miraculous delivery of his own people is evident in Deborah And that Women may inherit when the daughters of Zelophehad made their plea for their inheritance Numb 27. They first pleaded negatively Our Father was not of the company of them that gathered themselves against the Lord in the company of Corah which is a plain argument that rebellious Subjects have no property against supream powers but forfeit their goods aswell as lives for God saies ver 7. the daughters of Zelophehad spake right why should the name of our father be done away from his family because he has no Son And God himself