that no man is to hang his saluation on these newe Ministers Which argueth first that hee supposeth the mission of the Pope and his shaâ—â—â— Masse-priestes to be a principall ground of religion and next 〈◊〉 â—he papists are to hang their saluation vpon them But this 〈…〉 nely a meere foolery and most grosse impietye but also an open way to all superstition and Heresie The same ground is also ouerthrowne by Kellisons owne positions Meere foolery it is to build our faith vpon a blind ignorant and wicked Pope Neither can wee esteeme it other then impietie to adde a foundation to that which is already laide which is Christ Iesus and to beleeue the Popes determinations as the word of God Furthermore this being graunted then will it followe the Pope teaching Heresie that all Papists are to followe him and that when he goeth to hell for teaching errors according to the Chapter si papa dist 40. that Kellison and his consorts are to goe after him Kellison supposeth that he cannot erre But this sheweth that his faith is built vppon supposals yea such supposals as by euident demonstrations are declared to be false Finally this ground of the mission of the Popes and their adherent Masse-priestes is ouerthrowne by Kellison his owne discourse For if the Popes bee not S. Peters or the first Bishops of Romes successors then are they as Kellison saith intruders and false Prophets nay theeues and Robbers But Saint Peters successors they cannot be hauing First no vocation to be Apostles Secondly taking on them an Office that S. Peter neuer had to wit to mannage both the swords to dispose of kingdomes to cut christian mens throates that will not receiue their marke and leauing S. Peters office in feeding Christes shéepe Neither are they the lawful successors of the first Bishops For first they are no Bishops as neither hauing lawfull election by the people and Clergie but onely by certaine new vpstart electors called Cardinals nor preaching or dooing the worke of a Bishop Secondly they haue deuised a new Doctrine and faith diuers from that which the first bishops of Rome taught as their decretales shew Thirdly they haue taken vppon them an vniuersall power both in temporall and ecclesiasticall matters which the Christian Bishops of Rome in times past neuer had nor challenged The Masse-priests consequently being authorized by the Pope cannot pretend any lawfull calling or mission But were they cleare of this exception yet can they not iustifie their mission For first they are called ad sacrificandum pro viuis et defunctis that is to sacrifice for quicke and dead But of such a calling there is neyther ground nor memoriall in the holy scriptures or auncient fathers Secondly they teach not the Doctrine of the Apostles and their successors but of the Popes decretales and of the Schools Sophisters Lastly they are the market slaues of Antichrist hauing their crownes shauen and their handes annointed with his oyle and with him they fight against the Saints of God Of their abhominable villanies I will say nothing at this time although I haue iust occasion being prouoked thereto by the vniust slaunders of this greasie Masse-priest against maister Luther and Maister Iohn Caluin of reuerend memorie That part of my defence shall be reserued to a greater volume Secondly this K. excludeth scriptures from being a foundation of religion Wherin he hath great reason if we respect the doctrine of Papists For how can they admit scriptures for a foundation that rayle against them flye from them and cannot stand if their authoritie were most eminent and to bee preferred before all humaine deuises but this sheweth the Kellison is a better Mason to build Babell and the synagogue of satan which is vpholden with humane traditions and the Popes sword theÌ„ the Church of God which is built vppon the Prophets and Apostles Iesus Christ being the cheefe corner stone His third foundation as it seemeth is laid vpon Councels and Fathers For of them hee talketh much Lib. 1. C. 4. but neither doth he name what Councels nor what Fathers nor what writings of Fathers he meaneth matters of verie important consideration For foundations must be certaine But among the councels actes and writings of Fathers there are many thinges neuer established by councels nor taught by Fathers Furthermore the Fathers themselues will not haue their writings taken for canonicall or authenticall scriptures as may bee prooued by infinite testimonies But I will heere onelye alleadge one or two Quamuis sanctus sit aliquis post apostolos saith Hierome in Psal 86. quamuis disertus sit non habet authoritatem He saith plainely that no Father after the Apostles time hath authoritie The same Father sheweth that onely Scriptures are the foundation of the Church and Augustine lib. 2. Contr. Crescon c. 31. hath these words literas Cypriani non vt canonicat habeo The like he saith epist 19. ad Hieronymum and epist 48. shewing that there is great difference betwixt scriptures and the writings of Fathers Finally diuers Heretikes haue pretended councels and Fathers His last and moste authenticall foundation is the supreme iudgement of the Pope But that sheweth that popish religion is rather from man then God and that the Papists are rather the synagogue of Antichrist relying vppon his decretales then the church of God that is built vpon also plainelye declare that there is no certainty in popish Religion standing vppon the humor of a man whose opinions are repugnant to other popes and whose minde may change and cause him to vtter contrarie Doctrines Thirdly it sheweth that Popish Religion is absurd being grounded vpon the opinions and sentences of ignorant impious men Finally grant this then the Papists if the Pope deny Christ must all goe to hell with him Likewise Stapleton handling of purpose this argument in the preface of his booke of Doctrinall principles deliuereth vnto vs these seauen principles and foundations of faith First the Catholike and Apostolike Church Secondly the power of the same church in teaching and iudging matters of faith infallibly Thirdlye the persons in whome this power doth reside Fourthly the meanes by which they proceede in teaching judging Fiftly the chiefe heads about which that power is conuersant Sixtly authoritie to interpret Scriptures infallibly and lastly power to deliuer Doctrines not conteined in Scriptures But if he had beene bound in statute staple I doe not thinke he could haue spoken more absurdly or impiously falslye For First if hee talke of principles demonstratiue of the christian faith then should he not haue talked of single words and termes as he doth but of propositions or Scriptures conteining the primarye propositions of the Christian faith Secondly if the rude fellow had but had one graine of pietie he would not haue left out the holy Scriptures out of the number of christian principles Thirdly the Church to speake properlye is built vpon a foundation and is not the foundation of the Church
and Sodomites teach rebellion murder of Princes periurie equiuocations and diuers other pointes of Doctrine repugnant both to Religion and ciuill pollicy In the first Chapter of his 8. Booke hee affirmeth Kellisons calumniatitions as if our doctrine sauored of Atheisme refuted that certaine poyntes of our Doctrine open a gappe to a deniall of the diuine Majesty But when hee commeth to particulars hee powreth out of his wide mouth a streame of impudent slaunders First hee saith wee are not afrayd to auouch that God is the author of all sinne and wickednesse and that he hath ordained vs to sinne from all eternitie that wee sinne by Gods will and commaundement and that he vrgeth vs to sinne And concludeth that wee make God cruell and tyrannicall as commaunding vs that which wee cannot performe wanting free-will and punishing vs for faultes which wee cannot auoyde But first hee doth not so much as offer to prooue his charge eyther out of the Doctrine of the Chuch of England or out of any mans wrightinges whose name is of any note in our Church Nay hee knoweth wee teach contrarie to that which he imputeth vnto vs. May he not then be ashamed to charge his aduersaries with matters so false and improbable Secondly hee is neither able to conuince Maister Caluin of any such impious Doctrine nor hath he reason to make so greate clamours if anye one priuate man of our teachers should hold any point of erroneous Doctrine Lastly before hee come at his conclusion hee must make better proofe of his premisses if he meane to haue the particulars of his suruey to passe without censure He must also vnderstand that albeit we haue not freewil or liberium arbitrium in discerning the thinges of God and dooing thinges pleasing to his diuine Maiestie it followeth not that God is therefore cruell or tyrannicall because by our owne default we became vnable to performe the Lawe and blinde in discerning matters tending to eternall life The rest of the first Chapter containeth a long inuectiue against Atheistes and certaine weake arguments brought to prooue that there is a God But as in the first hée toucheth his owne fellowes so in the second hee confirmeth them in their Atheisme being able to bring no better arguments to confute them and in the whole behaueth himselfe fondly and vnlearnedly First hee saith that neither reason nor faith nor both together are able to discouer what God is But therein hee discouereth by his owne confession that hee is a poore Surueyor of Religion not knowing what God is and a silly Doctor of Diuinitie if hee deny that Scriptures teach vs what God is as farre as is necessarie for vs to know Pag. 642. he saith that creatures in God are increate infinite perfect and that all of them in God are God Which assertion first taketh away the distinction betwixt God and creatures Next aduanceth creatures to a diuine being And thirdly commeth neere to Seruetus his impiety For if a creature in God is God why may not Kellison also say that God in a stone is a stone and in Iron Iron as Seruetus did if Bellarmine in praefat ante tom 1. disput say truly Neither can it excuse him that God foresawe and foreknew all thinges and as Philosophers say had ideaes in him For this deuise of ideaes is a Philosophical fancy and yet cannot make Kellisons assertion good seeing the platonicall philosophers distinguish ideaes from the thinges them-selues and make them separate from them Pag. 645. he talketh of conuincing a God-head and sayth that the world by Philosophers is called Alle. But the first speech is impious seeming to import that he meaneth to ouercome God and to confute him as hee hath alredy endeuored to confute his truth The second proceedeth of ignorance For hardly will hee bee able to shew in what tongue Philosophers call the world Alle. Pag. 648. he belyeth Caesar where hee maketh him say that the first inhabitants of England sprang out of the earth as herbes or Toad-stooles Caesar in his commentaryes talketh neyther of hearbes nor Toad-stooles and vtterly reiecteth this falshood Pag. 649. he would gladly prooue that there is a God by the conuulsions of men possessed And pag. 650. by Witches Hee sayth also that such as are possessed by Deuils somtimes howle like Dogges somtime yell like Wolfes But his argumentes from Witches and possessed with Deuils prooue the Deuill rather then God Secondly his proofes are weake being drawne rather from illusions and counterfet trickes then from matters euidently true Lastly it is hard to be beleeued that he hath heard any that eyther howled like Dogges or yelled like Wolfes These proofes therfore are liker to draw men to infidelitye then otherwise Afterward he talketh idlely of the heauy and lumpish nature of the earth an element as it seemeth predominant in him of the Common-wealth of Bees so well ordered that a Statist may learne policy from it as he beleeueth of the leapes of Hares of Foxes and Fearne bushes of Spiders and spider-webs and such like vaine and idle similitudes But what should I follow or runne after him that runneth so farre not onely from his argument but from himselfe also In the second chapters rubrike he affirmeth that our Doctrine ruineth al Religiō But in the Chapter it selfe there is no ground brought for proofe of his assertiō Only in the latter end he doth afresh charge vs with holding that God is the author of all sinne And thereof concludeth that those which beleeue this must needes haue cold hearts in Religion But we haue declared his antecedent to be false and fantasticall What then shall we need to beat downe his ruinous consequent The rest of this Chapter containeth diuers poyntes of popish Doctrine cōcerning Gods true worshippe Heretikes and their markes Christes honor Priestes an sacrifices succession vnity vniuersality here idelye repeated and formerly refuted Pag. 671. he beareth vs in hand that the moderne Romish Religion is most conformable to the Doctrine planted by the Apostles But he shall not be able to prooue all his life halfe of that which he hath affirmed in one line He saith he hath prooued it in his commentaries in secunda secūda But his proofes are weake and therefore dare not abide the light If he come forth with his proofes of his Religion heerafter we will pray him also to shew that the Romish Doctrine of blowing vp Princes and Parliament-houses with Gun-powder of breaking of oathes of lying and equiuocating of the Popes vniuersall Monarchye of kissing the Popes Pantoufle of iustification by confirmation extreme vnction Mariage and orders ex opere operato of taking Christ with the teeth of transubstantiation halfe communions priuate Masses prayer in a tongue not vnderstoode worship of Saintes and Angels and the rest of those Popish Heresies which we refuse are conformable to that Religion which was first planted by the Apostles In the third Chapter hee affirmeth that in contempt of the Churches authority
we bring all ReligioÌ„ into contempt But how prooueth hee that wee contemne the Churches authoritie First he sayth it is a maxime and almoste an article of fayth among vs that the true Church which once was hath erred grossely and in no lesse matters then fayth justification merit free-will workes satisfaction Purgatory prayer to Sayntes worship of Images number vertue of Sacraments sacrifice and such like But if hee meane the whole Catholique Church this is neither article nor maxime nor opinion of ours that the whole Church hath erred grossely If he meane the Pope and his adherents and parasites why should not they erre as well as the Churches of Antioch Alexandria Hierusalem and Constantinople That they haue indeed erred we haue already prooued and offer our selues alwayes ready to prooue and it is most apparant for that their Doctrine is not only diuers but also contrary to the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles and namely in the points aboue specified Next hee sayth Luther cared not for a thousand Churches and Caluin Beza and others despised all the Councels and ancient Fathers But neyther the contempt of the Synagogue of Rome nor the reiection of diuers Conuenticles assembled by Popes nor the refusall of diuers counterfet Bookes alledged vnder the name of Fathers or of some Fathers singuler opinions doth argue anye contempt of the true Church or of lawfull councelles or of the authenticall writinges and common Doctrines of Fathers Further I would haue thought that reason might haue taught him talking so long of Religion that priuate mens sayinges and opinions should not so often haue beene imputed generally to vs or to the whole Church To prooue that contempt of the Churches authoritie bringeth Religion into contempt hee alleadgeth that wee cannot knowe which is Scripture which not but by the voice of the Church But first this is nothing to vs which doe much esteeme the authoritie of the Apostolike and Catholike Church We say also that euerie priuate man is to reuerence the iudgement of the true Church But what is this to the Romish synagogue that is not the true church againe what is this to the Pope that is an oppressor of the church and an enemie of Christian Religion if Kellison wil contend that the sentence of the Pope which neither vnderstandeth nor percase can reade Scriptures in the originall tongues must needes be followed in deciding the controuersies about Canonical scriptures his owne schollers wil laugh at him that maketh a betilheaded fellow iudge in matters of religion a blinde man iudge of colours If he refer men to the particular church of Rome that now is it will bee said that she cannot bee iudge and partye and that the auncient Church is much to bée preferred before her Saint Augustine wee confesse among manye other reasons was enduced also to beleeue by the churches authoritie So likewise are many more then he But K. remooueth all other reasons and motiues in matter of discerning scriptures and maketh his moderne Church a necessarie cause and almost sole motife of faith as if none were to beleeue eyther scriptures or any other Article of faith vnlesse hee bee resolued by the Pope and the moderne Church of Rome Blasphemously also hee affirmeth that the Romaine Church being contemned wee can no more assure a man of Scripture then of a Robin-hoodes tale But to vse these comparisons is blasphemye To make so much of nothing and to stand so much vpon a blinde Pope and to preferre the Romaine moderne Church before the auncient and all other moderne churches is foolery In the fourth Chapter he beareth his Reader in hand that wee reject some bookes of Canonicall Scripture and for proofe saith that Luther reiected the Booke of Iob Ecclesiastes and all the Gospels saue that of Iohn and that we reiect the Bookes of Iudith Tobia Ecclesiasticus Wisdome and the Machabees But these latter Bookes hee shall neuer prooue to be canonicall vnlesse wée take the Canon largelye as Saint Augustine sometimes seemeth to doe S. Hierome in prol galeato Athanasius in Synops Gregorius Nazianzenus in carminibus Epiphanius in lib. de pond mensur and the moste and best Fathers esteeme of them no otherwise then we doe The calumniation concerning Luther wee haue answered already But saith K. they will needes receiue Scripture at the Roman Churches hand And of this hee would inferre that as well we ought to follow that Church in the number of bookes as in receiuing canonicall Scripture vpon that Churches warrant This sâ—ith hee but hee taketh that for graunted that no man yeeldeth him For wee take the Scriptures as the Church of Rome her selfe did from the Prophets and Apostles We doe also assure our selues that the iudgement of the Apostolike Church is farre to be preferred before the iudgement of the Apostaticall moderne Romish Church Lastlye wee answere to his argument that wee haue diuers arguments to assure vs of the authoritie truth and number of canonicall bookes of Scriptures beside the testimony of any one particular Church as for example the testimony of Scripture it selfe the likenesse Maiestie antiquitie truth stile of Scripture and such like In the fift chapter he endeuoreth to prooue that our dissensions in Religion doe open a gappe to contempt of Religion And thereupon talketh his pleasure of Caluinistes and Lutherans Puritanes Protestants soft and rigid Lutherians Zuinglians Bezites Anabaptistes Libertines Brownistes Martinistes family of loue and damned crew But first the damned crew is by vs damned In this late conspiracie of Papists Edward Baynham that is knowne to bee of the damned crewe was choson for a fit maÌ„ to goe as nuntio from this damned crew to the Pope Anabaptistes Libertines the family of loue are more among the Papists then among vs. We say to them anathema maranatha The Brownistes and Martinistes wee generally condemne The rest are the names of slaunder deuised by Papistes To answere his obiection therefore wee say that the Churches of Germanye France and other countries doe well agree and priuate men doe submitte themselues to the determination of a free generall councell and in the meane while to their nationall Churches The groundes of his sixt chapter are laide vpon the Popes head-ship For because wee want a visible head hee supposeth wee giue great aduantage to Atheistes But as the Popes headship is a matter rather fancied then prooued out of Scriptures or Fathers so what so euer is thereupon built the same is founded vpon fancie and not worth a head of Garlike That Saint Peter did rule both the Apostles and all the church as Christes vicar generall and head of the Church it cannot bee prooued All the Apostles were called alike and sent to teach and administer the Sacraments alike They had also the keyes of the Church giuen to them by one ioynt commission and Paul professeth that the principall of the Apostles gaue vnto him nothing But had Peter had any such monarchy as is
sottish intollerable He cōmeth to the King as he saith armed with hope constrayned by necessitie in the name of the Kings Catholike subiects in the name of the Catholike Church in the name of all Catholike Princes and of all the Christian worlde nay in the name of the great King of heauen and earth But as the common Prouerbe is The hilles trauaile and out commeth a ridiculous Mouse For first what hope can this armed fellowe pretend to obtaine fauourable audience either of the King or State that not onely rayleth on true religion and the Kings true subjectes but also pleadeth for such as of late sought to destroye both the King and State Againe how can he and his consortes talke of comming armed with hope when Catesbie and his followers came armed with yron to cut the Kings throte and to take away our liues and when his armes are not hope nor arguments but bitter Inuectiues dartes of slaunder and malicious fictions Thirdly no man is compelled by necessitie to play the Vice and that without all colour or vizor of modestie For what is more Vice-like then for such a pild compagnion to pretend the name of all the Christian worlde and all Catholike Princes being not able to shewe commission either from any Prince or any part of the Christian worlde Fourthlye not onely all the Catholike Church but also all Catholike Princes doe disauow this presumptuous fellowes pretended Commission renouncing his impious doctrine concerning the faith and Sacraments his trecherous opinions concerning the Popes vsurped authority in deposing and killing Christian King's his wicked defence of the worship of Saints and Angels and all his idle declamations lewd lyes heathenish impostures false doctrines heresies Fiftly the Papists of England for the most part doe euill deserue the name of subjectes But were they ranked among subjectes yet are they not to be ranked among Catholikes seeing they receiue the errors of the modern Synagogue of Rome erre in the faith How-soeuer they think of themselues they haue no reason to allowe their pild Proctors pleading for others who putteth them among theeues and murderers and concludeth that Papists are to haue a tolleration of their opinions because Theeues and murderers are now pardoned We say his conclusion is weake and simple For faultes once committed are more easily pardoned then a lycence graunted to commit faultes euer heer-after Further offences against our brethern are more easilye remitted then offences that are directly committed against God Sixtly if Princes that liue vnder the Pope and are his vassals would prefer any sute to the King they would cōmend it to wiser Agents and not to such a balde compagnion Seuenthly it is a grosse conceit of a raw diuine to thinke that the Christiā world euer beleeued in the Popes triple Crowne or guard of Switzers or embraced the doctrine of the Conuenticle of Trent and Schoolmen concerning Traditions Sacraments Purgatory Indulgēces worship of Saints and Angels and such like poyntes of Popish sayth Finally if this counterfet Legat doe not shew his Commission vnder Seale and plainly proue the Popes Decretales the doctrine of the Conuenticle of Trent School-men the Popes two swordes and all the trash of Poperie he is to be rejected as a frantike forger of newe Commissions and disauowed by his clyents as a foolish and simple pleader His reasons for tolleration of Popery are either grounded vpon false positions or else want forme of good conclusions That which he sayth of the Kinges Predecessors that with Crowne Scepter and Sword they mainteyned the moderne doctrine of the Romish Church is vtterly false For they neuer beleeued that the Pope had power to take away their Crownes or that Christians like Canibals did eate Christs flesh with their teeth and swallowe it downe into their bellyes or other moderne Romish errors heresies and impieties But did any ancient Princes maintaine errors that bindeth not their posteritie to continue therein We are not to folowe the steppes of our parents where them-selues tread awrye Constantine left the Paganisme of his auncestors The auncient Kinges of Spayne were Arians yet doe the later Kinges of Spayne detest Arianisme False it is also that the people of Scotland in time past were of the same faith which this Kellison teacheth at Doway It may bee they built Abbeyes worshipped Saints vsed some popish ceremonies more then christian religiō required But K. must prooue that they beleeued the doctrine of the Cōuenticle of Trent al the Popes decretales offended in jdolatrie as grossely and obstinately as the Papists doe now or else hee trifleth out time in vaine Thirdly hee speaketh not onely falsely but also absurdly where he promiseth honour to such Princes as imbrace Poperie For what can be more dishonorable then for Kings to become vassals to lose halfe their Subjects halfe their authoritye halfe their reuenues doth Kellison suppose it honorable for Kings to be controlled deposed killed or can any free English man endure to be subiect to Italians and strangers Fourthly vainely doth this declaimer promise felicitie to the Realme declyning to popery There can be no greater bondage nor miserie for mens soules then to be entangled with popish lawes traditions and censures Base it is to endure the Masse-priestes extortions and pillages greeuous to see the land deuoured by Caterpillers Fiftly we confesse it is honorable to conquer Heresie but this honor belongeth not to Princes blinded with poperie which is nothing else but a masse or compendium of diuers heresies Contrarywise if Masse-priests were rooted out and Gods true Religion in euerie quarter sincerely receiued then should we neither feare the wrath of God threatned against jdolaters and contemners of Religion nor the enmitie opposition of men hauing no meanes to hurt vs but by the practises mutinies of Papists Sixtly neither is the Religion professed in England new nor is popery old And therein I wil ioyne issue with this Surueyor if hee dare maintaine the contrarye Hee braggeth much but the surfet of popery hath distempered his wits Seauenthly it was honorable we confesse for Constantine to restore Christian Religion But what maketh this for poperie which was not in the world in the daies of Constantine nor many ages after Furthermore when Kellison shall be at any leysure and not troubled with his Gunpowder plots of high treason then we will shew and prooue to his teeth that poperie is a corruptiō of faith a declination frō Christian Religion to errors heresies Finally to secure the Kings life and the peace of the State this wise Orator offereth oathes But Christian people are too well acquainted with the practises of Papists to trust them eyther vpon oathes bands or pledges Of late while they were moste forward to offer oathes and all securitie that could be deuised then Pearcy and his mates were sitting powder vnder the Parliament house and laying a plot for a general massacre of all true Christians and for a
Rebellion of al discontented Persons and Papists Further they teach that oathes are not to be performed to Hereticks easily doth the Pope dispence with them Who then is so patient as to endure this simple fellowes foolish prating these cut-throate Priestes will murder honest men their soules shal sue them for periury is not this trow you a goodly deuice Whether he speake for his owne cause or against vs his idle talke is not much to be regarded that either affirmeth matters nakedly vpon his owne bare word or bringeth no better witnesse then Nicol Borne Genebrard Baronius Thomas Aquinas such like or alleadgeth Scriptures impertinently and falselye or else belyeth his aduersaries shamefully Against Caluin hee bringeth a place out of his Institutions as if he taught that by religion men might disobey Princes lawes a matter neither taught nor euer thought vpon by him To what end then bringeth he allegations out of Scriptures and Fathers to disprooue this rebellious position would hee haue all the world to see that Papists disobeying Princes vpon the Popes warrant repugne both to Scriptures and Fathers His skill in Diuinitie we may easily conjecture not to be singular For first he preferreth the will of man in his conuersion before Gods grace Religion sayth he is not transfused with flesh and blood but infused by God with consent of our will and operation of grace Secondly he maketh mans blood an oblation for sinne and a mediation of others conuersion Thirdly he assigneth Aureolam martyrum that is a degree aboue the coÌ„mon glory of Gods Saints as a rewarde due to Martyrs for their passion Fourthly he sayth Many Virgins haue liued in the flesh like Angels But to say that man can liue without sinne is Pâ—â—gianisme Lastly his groundes are out of Tho. Aquinas and the School-men Is it then like that his Babylonian building wil long stand His notable simplicitie is euery where apparant For seeking king the Kings fauour he rayleth on Religion professed by the King Pleading for the Pope he ouerthroweth the authoritie of the Pope For if the authoritie of Kings be from God then cannot Popes discharge subjectes from their dutie and obedience to Princes Shewing him-selfe vnable to write or to dispute yet most simply he chalengeth vs all into the field offring to dispute with vs. Lastly wanting other meanes he maketh the King a petitioner vnto him-selfe His honesty cannot be great that rayleth against the dead flattereth such as are able to fauour him belyeth both the liuing and dead By Popes sayth he alwayes Countryes haue beene conuerted Yet for many yeares haue they giueÌ„ ouer preaching and lately haue suffered the Turkish religioÌ„ to eniambe get ground vpon Christians He saith further That our Church began but yesterday that our teachers want authoritie that our doctrine hath the markes of heresie that we pull at Christs diuinitie make him no redeemer spirituall Phisitian law-giuer Priest nor Iudge but make him ignorant desperate and damned He chargeth vs further that we haue neither Priest Sacrifice Sacrament nor Prayer matters impudently and without all colour of truth auowched as shall plainly appeare by our answer If when he commeth to dispute he bring no more truth Children will â—isse him out of Schooles for an impudent and lying compagnion These being the principall poyntes and whole somme of this rude Orators pleading before his Majestie wherein no dout he hath made the fairest shew he could of such base wares We may easily imagine that his speech to the common reader is more rude harsh and disioynted In the beginning of his epistle he ruÌ„neth out like a wilde discourser into a long sencelesse and vnreasonable speach concerning inanimate vnreasonable creatures But it must needes be a dull dead and vnreasonable cause that hath such dead vnreasonable aduocates to plead for it He turneth the Sunne into a Cocke a Candle and birds into Carpenters brute beastes into hearbists But whereto tendeth this brutish discourse voyde both of the light of the Sunne and of the light of reason doth he place his consortes among feathered fooles or else among brute beasts from sencelesse creatures in which ranke we may place a good parte of this Surueyer and his consortes he leapeth to brute beastes and froÌ„ brute beastes to man And yet nothing he writeth that may beseeme a sensible creature much lesse a reasonable and discreete man The end and marke of all his wilde vagary is this to shewe that because God hath giuen vs a will wholy bent to good and an vnderstanding naturally enclined to truth auerted from all vntruthes he hath therfore made an exact Suruey of the new ReligioÌ„ as he saith But first these things hang no better together then if he should say he would to Rome because Totnam is foure miles from London and Doway is turned Spanish For man may haue an vnderstanding and will and yet frame no such false surueyes Nay if this surueyor had either had any vnderstanding or good purpose he would neuer haue imployed his labour in such a lewde peece of seruice Further neither dooth mans wil desire any good thing tending to eternall life or vnderstand any such thing so long as he is vnregenerate by Gods grace The wordes of the Apostle are cleare There dwelleth no goâ—d thing in my flesh And againe the naturall man vnderstandeth not the things that are of God Thirdly if mans will vnderstanding had beene so inclined as he pretendeth then would Kellison neuer haue liued vnder the yoke of Poperie nor beleeued the absurdities of popish Religion of which we shall speake God willing particularly heereafter Fourthly so farre is his suruey from exactnesse as a surfet of foolery from sound vnderstanding and reason Finally nothing shall this K. bee able to alleadge in our Religion that abhorreth eyther from reason or rule of good vnderstanding The mission and calling of our Bishops and Ministers shal be iustified against all the barking of Masse-Priestes and Iesuites The markes of Hereticks shall be wiped from our selues deeply imprinted vpon our aduersaries Our Doctrine shal be cleared from the vniust imputations of our aduersaries and euerie indifferent man satisfied that we neither empayre Christes honor nor deny his Preesthood But contrariwise the Papists communicate Christs honor to creatures his preest-hood to Masse-Priestes We shall also proue by plaine euidence that we vpholde the authoritie of Princes and their lawes which the Papists ouerthowe and despise Wee doubt not further to demonstrate that none of vs euer taught that God is author of sinne or cruell or tyrannicall in his proceedings Finally we should bee much ashamed if vices and all impieties were not better censured and punished in England then in Italy Spaine and other popish Countries These matters which Kellison vanteth that hee will make good against vs haue been not onely formerly obiected vnto vs by William Raynoldes and D. Gifford in their rayling volume intituled Caluino-turcismus but also
Mother of errors and the greate Whore described Apocalyps 17. Gregory the first wanteth much of the learning of former Fathers yet is neither he nor his messenger Austen so bad but that his successors were farre worse Furthermore we doe not beleeue that so wise a man as Gregory the first is reputed would write so foolish Bookes as the dialogues that goe vnder his name and are so full of olde wiues tales and fabulous toyes But should Luther Caluin or others ouerlash in speaking of Fathers yet to doe this K. fauour I am content to ioyne with him vpon this issue that the Fathers of the Church in their authentical writinges in the greatest controuersies betwixt vs and the Papistes are for vs and against them And of this hee could not be ignorant but that he is onely a Schoole pedant and an ignorant broacher of new opinions and not versed in the writings of the Fathers Against vs he alleageth the most reuerend learned Father Toby Matthew most worthy Bishop of Durham but he doth offer him singuler wrong as that reuerend Bishop will alwaies testifie Afterward he bringeth in Genebrard a professed enemy whose deposition is no more worth then if this ketler should out of his malice speake it Luthers scruples grew not vpon doubt of the Fathers doctrine but of the long approbation of the Masse and other abuses In fréewill for substance of doctrine we doubt not of the Fathers fauour against the Papistes Finally he sayth The Fathers haue the infallible assistance of Gods holy spirit in exposition of Scriptures and that those which reiect them reiect also the councels of the Church and the authority of Pastors by which the Church is directed And finallye open a gate to all Heresies But heere are manye absurdities hoodled together without truth or order For First he supposeth most falsely that all the Fathers are reiected by vs. Secondly he confirmeth the expositiō of Fathers to be equal to the determination of the Pope which neither his holy Father nor his owne consortes will graunt Thirdly not euerie one that reiecteth Fathers in some things dooth therefore reiect councels or all the pastors of the Church Finally albeit diuers late Councels were reiected and the testimonies of fathers not admitted without choise yet the definitions of Councels which are apparently deduced out of Scriptures and the Fathers authentical expositions consonant to the rule of faith might bee approued by those which haue authoritie in the Church which euerie priuate man is to followe vnlesse by some equall or greater authoritie that resolution be reuersed But if Kellisons Doctrine were confessed then might the Pope goe shake his eares For what shold we need to goe to him if the Fathers haue Gods holy spirit infallibly assisting them in the exposition of Scriptures againe if denying of the authoritie of Fathers were the opening of a gap to all Heresies thē did the Popes open gaps to al Heresies who in their decretaline expositions of hoc est corpus meum feede my Sheep and drinke ye all of this and infinit such like textes of scriptures decline quite from the common interpretation of Fathers and nothing regard their authoritie The fift Chapter is partly a Scholastical exercise concerning the motiues that may enduce men to beleeue the Christian fayth and partly an inuectiue against vs for that we admit not the rinegued Masse-priestes sent vs hither by the Pope their counterfet miracles And thereupon he would conclude that we want those probable meanes to enduce reasonable men to be of our religion which the Papists haue But first his dispute concerning probable motiues to the fayth is nothing else but a vaine discourse of his owne foolish motions disioynted opinions and improbable fancyes For not onely the Pagans of olde time but also the Turkes now may better alleage antiquity consent authority of mission the subduing of the worlde to their religiō miracles and such like motiues then the Papistes séeing Popery is nothing else but a corruption of Christian religion that is neither so auncient as Arianisme nor so largely spread abroad as Paganisme and Turcisme Neither are the Papistes for learning comparable to the auncient Philosophers Secondly whatsoeuer this K. speaketh of mission it maketh against the Masse-priestes that come both without authority and without any message deliuered by Christ or his Apostles vnto them For neuer shal he prooue the Popes vsurped authority though he should liue to the worldes end nor that Masse-priests are to sacifice for quick and dead and to cut the throat of Princes which be the principal poyntes of their mission Thirdly we offer to prooue that we haue not onely those probable motiues which he speaketh of as miracles consent antiquity and such like to enduce men to like of our religion but also the worde of God the testimony of the auncient apostolike Church and many sure groundes which our aduersaryes want Neither néeded this K. to brag much of Bellarmine or Suarez seeing their positions stand refuted without answer but that he which can say little him selfe must néeds relye on others Fourthly nothing hath this babler to obiect either against the authoritye of our teachers or their doctrine which is not more vnsauery then Colewortes twice or thrice sodden Where he calleth Boy Masse-priestes olde teachers and their doctrine also olde and our teachers and doctrine newe he like a poore disputer beggeth that which he cannot by argument effecte or conuince and like a foolish pleader talketh of matters preiudiciall to him selfe Nay when he shall come to tryall he shall find that the Fathers in all poyntes of fayth are for vs and not for the Pope whose triple-Crowneship and decretaline doctrine they neuer knewe Fiftly where he like a curre barketh at the memory of the renowned Father Bishop Iewel and snarleth at the most famous learned man the Lord of Plessis Marlj as if they had corrupted and mis-alledged Scriptures and Fathers and by vntruthes and weake proofes abused they readers the first is iustified by maister Whitakers against al the barkings of his malicious enimies the second hath verified his allegations against al his accusers by the original words of the authors by him alledged in a late edition of his booke both these verifications stand without reply But if we should goe about to collect all the lyes slaunders impostures corruptiōs falsifications errors fooleries fond conclusions absurd assertions without ground and imperfections of Bellarmine Baronius Suarez Harding Saunders Alan Stapleton and their mates they would fill Cart-loades of volumes Finally all this long discourse is as farre from the purpose as Kellison is farre from learning and honesty For heere hee should reason against the grounds of our Religion But groundes are one thing and motiues another those being certaine these probable and oftentimes not concludent But were hee not a beetle-headed Surueyor as he is a polshorne sacrificer of Baal he would haue forborne to touch this poynt of motiues
vnlesse he will haue both a building without a foundation and a foundation beside the building Fourthly it is an absurd course to separate the power of the Church and the persons in whome the same consisteth from the Church Fiftly what more ridiculous then to call a forme of proceeding a principle of Christian Doctrine Sixtly all Articles of the faith may be called heads but it is meere foppery to thinke that Christian Religion hath as many foundations as seuerall Articles Finally it is moste absurde to beleeue that eyther the Pope or the Church of Rome doth interpret scriptures infallibly or hath the power to adde Articles not contained in Scriptures to the Christian faith If then Stapletons meaning be that all traditions not written and all interpretations of the Pope and his adherents and all the Popes determinations and decretales and the sayings of the fathers and Councels allowed by the Pope are the foundations of faith then doth he endeuor to build Babylon not Hierusalem fantasticall deuises and monstrous chimeraes and not the true faith the kingdome of Antichrist and not Christes church Nay if these were foundations of faith then would it follow First that the foundation of the Romish faith is not yet fully laide For as yet all their decretales and determinations are not fully published Secondly we should not know where to finde this faith these traditions and interpretations and opinions of Fathers all of them being not yet resolued Thirdly the Romish faith should be a meere humane deuise standing vpon humane fancies Finally it should be contrary to it selfe and to scriptures for such are the Romish traditions and interpretations and allegations of fathers Canus in his Booke de Locis Theologicis layeth downe ten groundes from whence all arguments in controuersies of Diuinitie in his opinion are deriued The first is holy Scripture The 2. traditiō The 3. is the authoritie of the Catholik church The 4. is the authority of general councels The 5. is the authoritie of the Church of Rome The 6. is the authoritie of the holy Fathers The 7. is the authoritie of Schoolemen Canonists The 8. is naturall reason The 9. is the authoritie of Philosophers and ciuill lawyers The last is the authoritie of humane histories But first it is no smal wrong to ioyne with holy scriptures not onely the writing of Fathers but also the writings of Schoolemen canonists and profane writers Secondly it is the ouerthrowe of faith to found the same vppon vncertaine and vnknowne traditions Thirdly it appeareth heereby that the faith of Papists for the moste part is an humane opinion being grounded vpon men nay vpon humane reason Finally his groundes are not onely changeable for the moste part but also contrarie one to another That is prooued not onely by the mutability of the decrees of councels Doctrine of councels Schoole-diuines Canonists and prophane authors but also by traditions themselues of which diuers are abrogated and ceased This may be demonstrated by traditions by testimonies of Fathers actes of Councels the doctrine of Thomistes and Scotistes Canonists ciuill Lawyers and profane writers For not onely profane writers haue shewed themselues ignorant of matters of faith but both Schoolemen and fathers haue held contrarie opinions as shall be prooued when neede is by diuers particulars Bellarmine in his Preface in lib. de pont Rom. is not ashamed to apply these words of the Prophet Isay Behold I will put a Stone in the foundation of Sion vnto the pope There also hee auoucheth the Sea of Rome to bee the foundation of the Faith Likewise in the end of his preface de verbo dei he seemeth to holde that the sence of Scriptures is to be fetched from the Popes See and sencelesse decretales Lastly the same man doth as confidently alleadge the Pope decretales as Saint Paules Epistles Gelasius in the Chapter Sancta dist 15. ordeineth that the Histories of Martyrs and their sufferings are to bee receiued And commonly the Romish Church doth prooue her traditions partly out of such legends and partly out of their missals porteses and other rituall Bookes Kellison therefore when he looketh vpon the ruinous foundations of the Romish faith hath little reason to talke against the foundations of our Christian faith For First we all agree that the writings of the Prophets and Apostles are the principles and foundations of our faith and thus both Scriptures and Fathers doe teach vs. But the Papists as may appeare by that which I haue alleadged doe one differ from another Canus doth not once mention the Pope among his theologicall places which to Stapleton and Bellarmine is the principall foūdation of the worke Contrarywise Stapleton leaueth Scriptures out of his reckoning of principles of faith which Canus confesseth to be a moste solide foundation of faith Canus againe numbreth diuers foundations and places theologicall which others doe not once mention Secondly albeit we doe not build our faith principallye eyther vpon the actes of councels or testimonies of Fathers further then they build their Doctrine vpon holy Scriptures yet in the interpretatiō of Scriptures wee doe not neglect the authoritie of councels and Fathers But the Papists albeit they seeme to found their faith vpon the authoritie of councels and Fathers yet regard them not one straw if it be the popes pleasure to determine contrarie vnto them Thirdly our faith is built vpon the rocke Christ Iesus but the faith of the Romanists is built vppon the straw and stubble of popish traditions determinations and as they say vpon the Pope who to them is the supreme iudge and pole-starre of faith shining out of his papall Chaire Fourthly our faith is the Christian faith being built onely vpon the word of God Theirs is a decretaline an humane faith being built vpon the Popes decretales and humane inuentions Fiftly our groundes are immoouable and agree well one with an other But their groundes are mutable and contrary one to another Sixtly they cannot deny our groundes vnlesse they will blaspheme against holy Scriptures But vpon their owne groundes they are not yet well agreed We doe generally refuse them and antiquity was ignorant of them Seuenthly our groundes are safe and sure But he that foloweth the Pope or beleeueth all that is written in the Breuiaryes and Missals cannot assure him felfe that he is in the right Finally it is a thing most ridiculous to beleeue that whatsoeuer an vnlearned Pope or a man voyd of religion determineth in matters of fayth is to be holden as a matter and firme Article of fayth For as well may a blind man iudge of colours as a blind and irreligious Pope of matters of religion But we are assured that the Prophets and Apostles haue truly declared vnto vs the whole counsaile of God Open your eyes therfore deere Christians and suffer not your selues to be abused by the impostures of Masse-priestes You see they are not resolued in the foundations of fayth And doe you
think that these men entend the edification of Gods Church who â—rre in the maine principles and foundations of fayth and cannot stand vnlesse the Pope who hath manifestly declared himselfe an enemy of religion may sit iudge in his owne cause Chap. 3. Kellisons Motiues to Popish religion compared with the Motiues that may enduce men to embrace true Christian religion Therein also the true motiues to Popery are touched KEllison in his first Booke and fift Chapter talketh of Motiues to Christian religion but so coldely and barely as if his cause wanted life and motion First he telleth vs pag. 106. that our Sauiour Christ proued his Mission by prophecyes and miracles Among other miracles hee talketh of the strange coÌ„quest which the Apostles made of Idolatry Secondly he sayth we want reason and authoritye to perswade men to our religion being not comparable eyther to auncient Fathers or to Bellarmine Suarez and such fellowes in wit or learning or good life or antiquity or number or dignity Thirdly he talketh of consent succession But First the example of our Sauiour Christ the conquest made by Christs Apostles ouer Idolatrye maketh against the idolatrous papists For neither can the Pope prooue his vniuersall Monarchy by Prophets or by miracles nor hath any Christian man reason to adhere to papistes that want confirmation of their Popes and Masse-priestes Mission and yet bring into their Churches heathenish idolatry and much false and erronious doctrine and namely concerning the 7. Sacramentes the sacrifice of Christs body and blood in the Masse for quicke dead Popish purgatory and teaching that man by power of free will is able to worke his owne saluation that we are to make vowes and confessions to Saints to offer sacrifice in honor of them that we are to satisfie for sinnes whose guilt is remitted in Purgatory that the Pope hath power to deliuer soules out of Purgatory by his Indulgences that his Chaire is the foundatioÌ„ of the church and such like doctrines of deuils Secondly the ancient Fathers are wholy against the papistes in these poynts As for the Popes of Rome and their parasites Bellarmine Suarez and the rest they are not such as are to be bragged vpon eyther for learning wit good life or any vertue Thirdly neither are the papistes comparable in number to the Turkes Paâ—aÌ„s nor haue they eyther true succession or consent or antiquity that maketh for them Nay if the papistes would stand to these motiues they were cleerly gone For neither haue they prophesies or miracles for them Nor can the Pope or the Masse-priests prooue their mission by miracles nor doth antiquity make for them As for good life this K. may be much ashamed to speake of it the filthynes of Popes Cardinals Masse-priestes Monkes Nonnes and Friars being so notorious to the worlde and recorded in so many storyes and actes of Councels What then is the reason that so many adhere to papistes and what are the motiues that enduce so many to like their religion Forsooth first Fire and Sword For they kill all that will not receiue the Popes marke or that once mutter against their idolatrous religion Secondly secret and trecherous practises against all that shall once dare to professe the truth Masse-priestes brewe treason and rebellion Iesuites set on assassinors The Pope hath his Agents with all Princes Neither doth he or his Agents omit any occasion to stirre vp Princes to make warre against them that professe the truth and to persecute them to death Thirdly excoÌ„municating and killing and poysoning of Kings opposite to the Popes tyranny By the Popes practice K. Henry the 8. and Quéene Elizabeth were often in danger here in England By the trechery of the Leaguers King Henry the 3. was slayne and Henry the 4. wounded and brought to great extremity in France Henry of Lucemburgh was poysoned by a Dominican Fryar Frederic the 2. was empoysoned and in the end murdered as Matthew Paris doth signifie and this no dout by the Popes practise The 5. of Nouember anno 1605. a trayne of gunpowder was layd by certaine Papistes vnder the vpper house of Parliament purposing to destroy the King the Quéene the Prince the nobles and commons there assembled and by their destruction to replant popery in England The treason discouered they broke forth into open rebellion Fourthly slaundrous Libels as the inuectiues of Alan and Parsons against Quéene Elizabeth and the State of Saunders against Her and her Parents and Counsaile of the Leaguers and Iesuites against King Henry the 3. and 4. of France and the rayling discourses written against Luther Zuinglius Caluin Beza Knox and all godly men declare Fiftly their impudent lies and fables in setting foorth their owne Religion and discommending the truth and such as eyther now or in time past professed it as the fabulous tales of Iacobus de voragine Surius Baronius and diuers writers of popish Histories will testifie Sixtly their publishing of counterfet bookes vnder the names of Fathers and the corrupting of Fathers by their expurgatorie indexes 7. Their impudent falsification of ancient Fathers and other writers as may bee prooued out of the allegations of Bellarmine Stapleton and other popish Proctors 8. Their false imputations laide vpon others and their impudent denials of thinges done by themselues 9. The diligent suppressing of the Books of holy Scripture and all Bookes written in vulgar tongues concerning matters of religion 10. The prohibiting of Christians to dispute reason or question of matters of faith 11. The ignorance blindnes of christians that know nothing but onely such matters as the false Fryars and Masse-priestes tel them 12 The impudent clamors raylings of this generation in Pulpits lying and slaundring all that professe the Gospell sincerely 13. The rigor of auriculer confession by meanes whereof the Popish faction vnderstandeth all mens secrets 14. The bloody crueltie of the popes agentes executioners and inquisitors Finally the rewardes and prayses that are giuen to those that trauaile eyther by writing or practise to maintaine the Popes cause Without these motiues all the motiues mentioned by Kellison were to no purpose As for vs wee haue two principall motiues to hold vs in the truth which would also mooue others to draw vnto vs if they knew them The first is the truth and iustice of our cause The next is the impieties blasphemies abhominations fooleries absurdities iniustice of Popery For the truth of our Religion weâ— offer to bring Scriptures councels Fathers antiquitie consent true succession law reason and all other proofes required in the iustification of Religion The reasons to deterre men from Popery we shal God willing deduce at large in a particular discourse Thus much may serue to requite Kellisons discourse of motiues to Religion for the present Chap. 4. Of the markes and properties of Heretickes THe name and nature of Heresie beeing so odious it is not to be maruelled if the Patrons thereof disguise themselues in their tearmes names
to deliuer publikely their mysteries but in silēce to cōteine thē in secret Non oportere saith he omnia ipsorum mysteria effari sed in abscondito continere per silentium Tertullian also saith they hide their mysteries in secret ne margaritam porcis sanctum canibus iactarent that is least they should cast Pearles to swine and holy things to Dogges So likewise the Papists pronounce their Canon in secret and will not that lay men shal dispute of matters of faith and thinke it is not fit that holy Scriptures in vulgar tongues should be read eyther publikely or of all Christians without restreint Some also adde the same reasons which Heretickes abusing Christes wordes doe bring viz. least pearles should bee giuen to Swine and holy thinges to Dogges 9. Clement of Alexandria Lib. 7. Strom. telleth vs that Heretickes being conuinced doe oftentimes deny their Doctrine So likewise Papists openly refuse to professe that the pope hath power to commaund the Subiects to cut their Kinges throates and will not graunt that images are to bee worshiped with diuine worship Yet to their followers in secret they doubt not to propound these pointes without scruple of conscience 10. Heretickes denying their faith to God seldome keepe faith to men as the example of the Pricillianists doth plainely declare Herein therfore the papists doe plainely shew whome they follow teaching that faith is not to be kept with Heretickes and dispensing with oathes moste easily The Rhemists in their annotations vpon the 23. of the Actes doe expressely teach their followers to breake their oathes and to runne into wilfull periurie 11. The liues of Hereticks are verie leud loose libera sunt illis omnia et soluta saith Tertulliā de praescr Theodoret lib. 1. haeret fab in praefat saith their obscenity is such that the Stage Players would be ashamed to speake or heare it And what he saith not we may imagine by the popes of Rome whose abhominable beastlinesse modest eares refuse to heare Publikelye they maintaine Stewes and nothing among Masse-priestes and Fryars is more common thē vnnatural lust The Pope and his lawes they feare of Scriptures they speake vnreuerently God they feare not 12 They farre excell all men in pride and will not haue their dooings or doctrine◠examined Heerein they resemble Mahomet who would not haue any question made of his law But the pope excelleth both Mahometans and all other Hereticks He will bee honored as God If he should drawe innumerable soules with him to hell yet will hee not be taxed for it as appeareth by the Chapt. Si papa dist 40. His determinations as his folowers hold are in fallible Finally by our aduersaryes discourse and by their owne confession they may also plainely be conuinced to be Hereticks For first it is the propertie of Heretickes saith he Lib. 2. cap. 1. To go out of the Church to depart from the faith He might also haue added teaching Doctrines of Deuils and forbidding to marry and commaunding to abstaine from certaine meates and then the matter would haue beene very cleare For moste wickedlye they disgrace marriage in the Chap. proposuisti dist 82. As if married folkes liued after the flesh could not please God and forbid their priestes Fryers and irreligious orders to marrie They doe also restreine their Monkes frō eating flesh forbid lay-men to eate it vpon certaine daies But albeit he hath concealed these wordes from vs yet hath he said sufficient For teaching a new faith neuer knowne to the Apostles nor taught by them the Papists are clearely gon from the faith and hauing receiued a newe head of their Church and new foundations of their Doctrine and strange formes of sacraments they are closelye departed out of the Catholike church imbrace the particuler faith of the Pope Neither can this their departing be denyed or concealed for as Arius by denying of Christes diuinitie and equalitie with the Father and Nestorius for making two persons of Christ and other Heretickes for teaching singular pointes of Doctrine contrarie to the doctrine of the Apostles were said to depart out of the Church and so to abandon the societie of the faithfull although they might pretend succession and still claymed the title of the Church and of Catholikes so the papists if they teach any new Article of faith not taught by the Apostles and auncient Church they are departed out of the Apostolike and Catholike church Secondly he saith that later standing and noueltie is a marke of Hereticks And this hee goeth about to proue by Scriptures and Fathers But he might well haue spared his labour for wee doe not deny it Nay vpon this ground we professe that wee are able manifestly to demonstrate the Papists to be Heretickes For such a societie as the Pope and his adherents are was neuer séene for a long time after the Apostles If Kellison say contrarie let him leaue his pedātery shew his triple-crowned Pope with two swords treading vpon Princes neckes and cutting their throates and ruling the world his purple Cardinals his shauen Masse-priestes his Monckes Nonnes and Fryars and their retinue to haue continued since the Apostles times Furthermore the doctrine of the carnal eating of Christes flesh of transubstantiation of the subsistence of accidents in the eucharist without their substāces of the communion vnder one kind of the popes vniuersal headship of purgatorie of indulgences and other pointes decreed in late conuenticles would be shewed and prooued If Kellison can deriue these Doctrines from the Apostles his holy Father will giue him his blessing if not by his owne confession his owne consortes are to be anathematized as Heretikes and the Pope for the head of them In his third Chapt. of his second booke he saith that particular names takē frō Sect-maisters are notes of Heretickes which is also a third argumēt to prooue him his consorts Hereticks being al called of their grād sect maister the Pope papists some of Benedict being termed Benedictines others of Francis and Dominicke Franciscans and Dominicans and of Ignatius Ignatians and some of Thomas and Scotus Thomistes and Scotistes Nay leauing the common name of Christians and catholikes they will be called Catholike Romans Against them therfore the word◠of Hierome contr Lucifer may aptly be turned out of which wee may conclude that they are not the Church of Christ but the Synagogue of Antichrist Neither doth Iustine speake any thing against the Valentinians and Marcionistes or Cyprian against the Nouatians concerning the imposition of their names but the same may be applyed against the Papists In his fourth chapter he maketh it a propertie of Heretickes to renew old Heresies Which although it be not incident to all Heretickes yet it is a verie eminent qualitie in the papists For from the Simonians they haue borowed their practise of buying and selling ecclesiasticall matters and the vse of Concubines from the Carpocratians they haue taken the worship of images from the Collyridians the
saying of Masse or offering their wafer Cakes in honour of our Lady from the Marcionistes the baptisme of Christians by women and their limbus patrum from the Valentinians Manicheies their opinion of the being of Christs body in the Sacrament without soliditie from the Pelagians the denyall of originall sinne in the blessed virgin the perfection of iustice and impeccabilitie of Christians Finally they haue deriued diuers other branches of old condemned Heresies from other Heretickes as at large I haue shewed in my late challenge His fift marke of an Hereticke is want of succession A simple marke if wee doe well consider it For neither in the beginning of the world nor in the time of Aaron was there anye succession of knowne priestes in the world Likewise neither our Sauiour Christ nor Peter did succeede the priestes of the Lawe For Christ was a priest after the order of Melchisedech and Peter was by Christ designed an Apostle hauing none to goe before him But to confesse succession to bee a marke of the Church and want of succession a marke of an Hereticke yet would this one property of Heretickes much blemish the Romish See For neither are the Popes Bishops or Peters successors nor can the Papists deriue their Doctrine of the popes vniuersall power of his two swords of his espousals with the church of his indulgences of the carnal eating champing Christs flesh with the téeth of TraÌ„substantiation of the CoÌ„munion vnder one kinde of adoring the Sacrament and the Crosse with diuine worship of making vowes confessions and prayers to Saintes and such like pointes of decretaline Doctrine from the Apostles or any Apostolike men which as Tertullian sheweth is a necessarie point in succession Ego saith he sum Heres Apostolorum sicut cauerunt testamento suo sicut fidei commiseruÌ„t sicut adiuraueruÌ„t ita teneo As if he shold say none can be the Apostles heires but such as kéepe the doctrine coÌ„tained in their testameÌ„t The same father in the same place excludeth heretikes as strangers enemies holding a contrary doctrine to the Apostles Furthermore the pole-shorne Masse-priests sacrificing Christes body and blood really in the Masse for quicke and dead and diuers purposes caÌ„not deriue their pedegree eyther from the Apostles or from the Priestes and ancient Doctors of the church Finally this forme of gouernment and Doctrine which is now in the Church of Rome cannot bee confirmed by any succession of Bishops and Priests Nay that rotten succession of Popes whervpon the cause of Papists doth hang as vpon a thrid of a Spider-web hath no other ground and certainty then the testimonie of Anastasius the Popes blinde bibliothecary Martin Polonus Platina Sanders Genebrard Illesca and such like base fellows which no Christian I trow wil admit for the Basis and foundation of his faith His sixt marke of heretikes is dissension in Doctrine and this he prooueth in a long and tedious discourse But with this mark he brandeth his owne consortes for Heretikes For they dissent not onely from the auncient Fathers But one from another most manifestly That is aparent by diuers treatises written of controuersies This is prooued by the differences of Thomistes and Scotistes and of all Schoolemen one from an other Neither doe they differ in small matters but in the highest pointes of Religion as namely whether the holy Ghost proceede more principally from the Father then the Son about the diuine notions about the atributes of God about Meritum Congrui about the cause of predestination about the thing designed by the word hoc in these wordes hoc est corpus meum about the conception of the blessed Virgin and all matters of diuinitie as the treatises of Schoolemen doe plainely shew Bellarmine also doth in moste controuersies no lesse earnestly dispute against his owne consortes then against vs. Neither is it materiall that all of them professe themselues willing to abide the Popes determination For vntill he determine somewhat their contentions are endlesse And albeit they then cease to contend yet their differences in opinions appeare neuerthelesse The seauenth chapter of his second Booke discouâ—seth of a seauenth marke of Heretikes and therein he endeuoreth to prooue al to be Heretikes that follow a particular sect Nowe who seeth not that this toucheth the Papists in generall that restreining themselues within the Romish Church followe the Popes sect And are bound by their Doctrine to follow him although he leade them with him to the pit of hell The Monkes also and Fryars follow the heades and rules of their seueral sectes without looking whither they leade them The eight marke of an Heretike saith he is to be condemned by the church or else as he saith afterward by generall Councels which doth no lesse touch his holy Father then the rest For coÌ„trary to the forme of the Nicene councel c. 4 He giueth libertie to Abbots to consecrate Bishops and contrarie to the 5. Cannon absolueth those that are excommunicated by other Bishops Contrary to the 6. Canon hee inuadeth the dioceses of other Patriarkes contrarye to another order hee separateth Priestes from their wiues With Eutyches condemned in the councell of Chalcedon hee beleeueth the Christ hath a bodie neither solide nor palpable nor like to ours For such is that body which he supposeth to be in the Sacrament Likewise all the old Heresies which hee holdeth are condemned by the whole Church Lastly all true Christians doe inwardly abhorre Popish impieties idolatries and Heresies Finally the Papists generally in the Chapt. ad abolendam de haeret condemne them for Heretikes that teach contrarie to the Doctrine of Christes Church concerning the Sacraments But this doth notoriouslye touch themselues For where the Scriptures mention onely baptisme and the Lordes supper as seales of Gods grace they increase the number of Sacraments and make seauen Where Christ said take and eate they say offer heaue hang vp and carry about Where Christ ordeined that all communicating one kinde should also receiue the other they sacrilegiously depriue the people of the cuppe Finallye they teach that Christians are iustified by confirmation and extreame vnction and that all their Sacraments haue like effectes Thus we see hee hath marked his owne consortes with the markes of Heretikes But hee shall neuer bee able to fasten his markes vppon vs. In the beginning of his second Booke hee talketh after his declamatorie manner of the diuels disguising himselfe in the habit of a young gallant like percase to the young Iebusites and Masse-priestes that going about to seduce simple soules attire themselues like gallants or of a Fryar Hee assureth also his disciples that he is discryed eyther by his staring eyes or stinking sauor or horned head or forked feete or base voice But first we would gladly knowe of him why the deuill should rather speake in a base then in a meane voice and next how hee commeth so well acquainted with him that hee knoweth his whole description from his hornes
to his clouen feete And lastly how it hapned that speaking of the Deuill in the first part of the period he forgot himselfe in the second speaketh of some member of the Deuill and of an Hereticke what are Heretikes discerned by their staring eyes and forked feete and such like partes he telleth vs also of the pecking of Birdes and the counterfeting of alchymistes grauers and Heretickes putting grauers of idolatrous images nere to Heretikes as they doe well deserue But what is that to vs if heretikes be such as counterfet religion and yet are gone out of the Church then concerneth it vs nothing For with our mouth we professe and with our hart we beleeue all the Christian and Apostolike faith and dissent not from the Apostolike church in any one article of faith professed publikelye for a thousand yeares after Christ Nay wee doe onely relinquish the Papists as Christians in old time left the Arians and Donatists and as some now leaue the Mahometans wherein they haue forsaken Christ and his truth Either then must this K. shew that as former heretikes haue done we broach some doctrine contrarye to the ancient faith or else hee talketh idelye of going out of the Church Maister Luther he left the Papists hauing once folowed their opinions but not in any point of faith but rather where they taught contrary to the faith Secondly neuer shall he prooue either that the professors of our Religion are of a later standing then the moderne Papistes or that our religion embraceth nouelties For Luther is not our founder nor any of late time but the Apostles of Christ Iesus whose doctrine left in deposte to the church we embrace detesting all prophane nouelties of Papistes Neither doe we bring in any new faith but reiect the popish later Heresies and corruptions though to some they seeme olde But saith Kellison the faith hath neuer increased in substāce but onely in explicatiō as if their Doctrine of traditions of Romish interpretations of the latin vulgar translation of the 7. sacramēts of iustificatiō by orders and extreme vnction of transubstantiation of the carnall eating chāping with the teeth of Christes flesh of the sacrifice of Christes body blood in the Masse vnder the accidentes of breade wine for quicke and dead and the Popes vniuersall Monarchie were matters of no substance or else as if the substance of these Articles had beene euer beleeued in the Church This he would insinuate but the noueltie of them is so apparent that his consorts are much puzled when they come to search them in auncient writers Thirdly we neither call our selues Lutherians Caluinistes Zuinglians nor any such particular names Neither is it materiall that the Papistes doe call vs in scorne by these names For who doth credite the malicious tearmes of enemies nay in this point we are more cléere then the papistes that call themselues some Franciscans some Dominicans some by other names which we doe not Fourthly wee renounce all old Heresies condemned by auncient Councels and pronounce Florinus that held God to bee the author of sinne Anathema The like we say of Eunomius Pelagius and their consortes Neither was Caluin of other opinion but that his malicious enemies doe falsely impute vnto him that he should teach that God is the author of sinne Wee doe not say with Iouinian that all sins are equall nor denie to the bodies of Christians decent buriall Nor did Hierome writing against Vigilantius allowe prayers to Saints departed or the merits of Monkery or teach as the Papistes doe of vigils or lightes set vp in churches at noone time But suppose he shold holde opinions cōtrary to the truth yet are not his wordes a rule of Heresie The second synod at Nice allowed a certaine reuerence doone to images but nothing so much as the Papistes now giue to them But whatsoeuer that synode decreed in that point the same was reprooued in a synod at Frank-ford and neuer generallye receiued eyther in the East or West Churches Aerius was reputed an Hereticke for Arianisme and not for finding fault with superstitious oblations for the dead Whatsoeuer his opinion was it toucheth vs nothing that doe allow the orders of the Church established among vs. Finally we anathematize the Heresies of the Simonians Menandrians and others whome he ridiculously surmiseth to haue bene condemned for denying the real presence of the Messalians and Caians whome he imagineth to haue beene accounted Heretikes for denying the sacramentes to conteine grace as the Papistes hold it of the Nouatians that denyed repentance to publike sinners of the Gnostikes Manichees and Encratites whome hee ignorantlye surmiseth to haue beene condemned for denying marryage to bee a Sacrament of Heluidius Rhetorius and all other auncient condemned Heretikes If then this Hereticke will obiect Heresies to vs hee must both set downe the wordes of the Heresie condemned by the Catholike Church and prooue that wee holde such an Heresie Fiftly wee want no proofe of our Religion which may be drawne from true succession For we do not only communicate in matters of faith with the Apostles but also with the auncient Bishops of Hierusalem Antioche Alexandria and Rome almost for a thousand yeares Wee succeede also to the Bishops of England before Bishop Cranmer in al things which they taught well and according to the Catholike fayth But could we shew no line of succession yet if we agree in doctrine with the Apostles and first Bishops of the Christian Church it is sufficient Ad hanc formam prouocabuntur ab illis ecclesiis saith Tertullian de praescript aduers haeret quae licet nullum ex apostolis vel apostolicis authorem suum proferant vt multo posteriores quae denique quotidie instituuntur tamen in eadem fide conspirantes non minus apostolicae deputantur pro consanguinitate doctrinae He telleth vs playnly that they are Apostolike Churches that teach the same Doctrine albeit they were not founded by the Apostles or Apostolike men nor had any succession of Bishops Likewise hee sheweth that they are the Apostles heires that hold that fayth which is conteined in their Testament Seeing then we do only publish Apostolicall Doctrine and purge away Popish errors our Churches are most truly Apostolicall But sayth K. pag. 196. This is to make bare Scripture judge of our Doctrine and as much as if we should say that the Church of God fayled and that the Synagogue of the Diuell possessed the world many yeares Hee telleth also how Luther in his preface before the disputation of Lipsia vanted that he had first published Christ But first this is a common abuse of Heretikes to call Scriptures bare Secondly false do clearely disperse this cloud of slaunder But his foolish attempt may giue cause to vs to touch both him and his consortes for their manifold and blasphemous impietyes In the beginning of his third Booke he sayth that as the Stoickes commend Zeno the Platonickes Plato the Peripatetickes Aristotle the
heauen to be deserued by such as loue God 18. They doe holde for the moste parte that Christ from the first instant of his conception was vir perfectus and had the perfect vse of reason and did merit But this being graunted there is no difference betwixt a man and an Embryo or Childe newly conceiued and Christ must needes haue a soule and body of an other nature then other men 19. Although Christ bee the vniuersall mediator of all mankinde yet Petrus de Tarentasia and Richard de media villa teach that praelates and Saintes are called particular mediators praelati viri sancti say they dicuntur particulares mediatores personarum quarundam 20. They deny that Christ was a man during the time that he lay in the graue In that time also Antisiodorensis dooth denie him to be our redeemer as this word redeemer signifyeth the worker of the mysterie of our redemption But if he were then no mā then was our Sauiour sometimes no man so the mystery of the vnion of the two natures is dissolued if then he was no redeemer then he lost the honor of the redemption of mankinde neither of which can be affirmed without grosse inconueniences 21. Albertus and others say that Diuels carrie their hell about with them Which if it bee granted then the hell of Papistes is no determinate place neither is it in the bowels of the earth but also aboue the earth and in the ayre and in the Popes chamber when the deuill is there 22. Bellarmine lib. 1. de missa C. 2. saith that in a true sacrifice that is offered to God it is required that it bee destroyed His wordes are ad verum sacrificium requiritur vt id quod offertur deo in sacrificium planè destruatur If then the Papists offer vp the verie bodie and blood of Christ in the Masse as they teach then they destroy Christes bodie and blood and depriue vs of Christes body But this is a most blasphemous assertion to say that Christes bodie and blood may be destroyed and such fellowes deserue of all Christians to bee abhorred as blasphemers and abolishers of Religion 23. They holde that not onely wicked and reprobrate men but also that Dogges and hogges may eate vp Christs true bodye But that is contrarie to all Religion not onely to cast holy thinges but also the redeemer of the world to Hogges and Dogs 24. They beleeue and teach that Christes body is in the Sacrament really although it bee neither seene nor felt there They beleeue also that the same body is both in heauen visible and in the earth inuisible at one time But this dooth quite ouerthrowe Christes humane nature For neuer was there man in the world that had such a bodie 25. Bellarmine lib. de incarnatione Cap. 11. saith that God is able to turne all the world into bread and that all this bread may bee turned into Christes body But it is moste absurd to thinke that Christ hath a bodie so great as all the world or that al the world is no bigger then a mans body or that one mans body may bee in all places 26. They pray vnto Saints to helpe them and to intercede for them But what is more absurd then to leaue Christ and to pray to those of whome they haue no certaintie whether they be saued or not if they say they are assured they are saued they speake absurdly For if they teach aright that no man can assure himselfe of his owne saluation then they teach men absurdly to assure themselues of the saluation of all those that are canonized by the Pope 27. They ouerthrowe the groundes of artes and rules of reason and sence where they teach that Christes bodye and blood is really in the sacrament and offered vp continually for quicke and dead For reason and Arithmeticke teach vs that many vnityes make a number that one one make two But this ground the Papists destroy For albeit vpon this Altar is one bodie and at the same time another vpon an other yet doe they denye that in this case one one make two They say also that albeit Christes body bee entyre vppon three hundred seuerall altars yet there are not diuers bodies vppon the Altar Sense also teacheth vs that wee receiue breade and wine But they will haue vs rather to beleeue the Pope then our owne sences Philosophye teacheth vs that no bodye can come to a place or goe away without locall motion But these teach that Christes bodie beginneth to bée in the Sacrament and departeth from thence againe the formes being corrupted without locall motion 28. All Christians beleeue that Christ is the redeemer of the world and the sole and absolute mediator betwixt God and man But Papists in their Masse make their Priestes mediators betwixt God and Christes body that lyeth on the altar as they say and that in pitifull sort included in a small roome Supra quae saith the Preest speaking of consecrated hoastes propitio ac sereno vultu respicere digneris accepta habere as if God wold not looke vpon his Sonne nor accept him without their mediation And againe iube haec perferri per manus sācti angeli tui in sublime altare tuum that is commaund this sacrifice viz. of Christes bodie and blood to bee carryed vp vnto thy high altar by the handes of thy holy Angell So they make Christ a weake and impotent mediator that cannot ascend into heauen without the Preests Prayers and helpe of Angels 29. They beleeue that their soules are redeemed by Masses for that they boldely affirme in the Canon by indulgences and merits of Saintes and by our owne satisfactions as it appeareth by their common positions in their Doctrines of indulgences merits and satisfactions 30. They destroy Christes Preest-hood and that two waies First as if he had offered no perfect Sacrifice for mans sinne they continually offer vp sacrifices for quicke and dead Secondly as if his prayer were not heard they runne to our Lady to Angels and Saints and make them their mediators Our Lady they call the gate and S. Peter the Porter of heauen 31. They denie Christ to remaine a Preest for euer after the order of Melchisedech when they teach that their Masse-priests are after the order of Melchisedech and that Christ offereth not now but by these Vicar-priestes 32. They deny Christ to be the onely head foundation and teacher of his Church giuing equall authoritie to vnwritten traditions and popish decretales and to Christes doctrine Finally no man can talke more wickedly and dishonorablye of Christs person ond offices then Kellison Page 256. he saith the word was mute But what could the Arians speake more dishonorably of the eternall word then to say he was mute He saith also that Christ with one word or teare might haue redeemed vs. But this abaseth the greatnesse of his power and diminisheth the merit of his passion Page 261. He affirmeth that Christes passion
as you haue alwayes professed the true Christian and Apostolike faith and detested all errors and abhominations of Popery so still endeuour zealously to maintaine the same truth against all the calumniations treacherous practises of all such as audaciously and impudently oppugne the fayth and seeke to draw men into errors God will honor those that seeke his honor vnfeynedly and such as cary themselues as lukewarme shall be cast out of his mouth and deemed vnworthy to rest in his holy Mountaine Thus relying vpon your fauor I commend this Treatise to your Lordship and your Lordship to the Almightyes protection beseeching him to blesse you and yours in this life and in the life to come to giue you a crowne of glory promised to all those that shall perseuer to the end and manfully and seriously contend for the maintenance of truth and the setting foorth of Gods Glory Your Lordships in all dutifull affection Matthew Sutcliffe The Contents of the Booke THe Preface to the Reader wherein Kellisons two Epistles or preambles are censured and diuers poyntes noted in the title and front of his Booke Chapter 1. Kellisons fond conceit error concerning the foundations of our religion is noted and diuers errors of his first booke refuted Chap. 2. The foundations of Popish religion discouered to be most weake and foolish Chap. 3. The motiues to Popish religion mentioned by Kellison compared with the motiues of true religion Therein also the true motiues to Popery are expressed Chap. 4. Of the markes and propertyes of heretikes Chap. 5. An answere to Kellisons calumniations against the doctrine professed in the Church of England concerning Christ his person and his two natures Chap. 6. A collection of certaine absurd blasphemous assertions of the Papists concerning Christ his incarnation person natures and offices Chap. 7. An answere to Kellisons calumniations charging vs either to haue no religion at all or a gracelesse religion Chap 8. The Surueyors calumniations against our doctrine concerning God refuted Chap. 9. That our doctrine giueth due obedience and respect both to Princes and to their lawes Chap. 10. That our doctrine leadeth men to vertue deterreth them from vices Chap. 11 A rejection of Kellisons slanderous accusations imputing in his 8. booke Atheisme contempt of religion to the professors of true religion in the Church of England THE PREFACE TO THE READER Conteyning a briefe Censure vpon the Title and the front of Kellisons Suruey and his two liminare Epistles and Praeambles THe Deuill as we read Iob 1. is said To compasse the Worlde and to walke through it and experience teacheth vs that he is a very busie curious Surueyer We are not therefore to thinke it strange if his children do immitate their father and proue great compassers of the world and contriuers of plots and surueyes to bring men within the circle of their owne errors Among the rest one Kellison a copper kettle Masse-preist hath shewed him-selfe a great compasser of sea and land to winne proselytes to the Synagogue of Antichrist and a busie and captious surueyer to espye motes in our Christian faith for this end hath set out a large volume called The Suruey of the new Religion But first we say to him as Christ said to a man of his qualitie Hypocrita primū eijce trabem c. Hipocrite first cast the beame out of thine owne eye and then thou shalt more easily see to take a mote out thy brothers eye So we pray him to discharge his Romish religion of the just imputation of noueltie then he may with more reason taxe others for maintayning newe religion As for our Religion it is vniustly and absurdly termed newe For as Ignatius said in his Epistle to the Philippians Christ is our antiquitie And in religion that is most ancient that is from the Apostles as Tertullian doth signifie If then our Religion be from Christ and is grounded vpon the holy Scriptures and not vpon late Decretales and the opinions of Popes School-men and Canonists how is the same reputed newe doth not Kellison remember that the somme of our whole desire is that Popish nouelties and the late Tridentine doctrine being abolished we may returne to the ancient Catholike and Apostolike faith Absurdly also he his consorts repute the Romish moderne religion to be ancient seeing the same as it differeth from the religion professed in the Church of England is nothing but an hochpot of heresies and erroneous corrupt doctrine either deriued from late School-men or first established by the late Conuenticles of Trent Florence Constance and Lateran or by little and little confirmed by corrupt custome The Popish Masse as it now standeth is but a late patcherie In the olde ordinall of Rome it appeareth that neither priuate Masses nor halfe Communions nor Transubstantiation nor the sacrifice of Christs body and blood contayned vnder the accidents of bread and wine for quicke and dead nor the adoration of the Sacrament with latria nor prayers to Saints and for the dead were in vse in ancient time The Fathers doe no where teach that brute beasts receiuing a consecrated hoast eate Christs flesh or that Christs flesh is receiued downe into mens bellyes nay they teach quite contrary The Bishops of Rome for many yeares vsed not the temporall sworde Neither was the Pope Lord of Rome vntill the time of Boniface the 9. Gregory the first condemned both the vniuersall authoritie of one Bishop ouer the rest and the adoration of Images Neuer was it imagined before the time of the Conuenticle of Trent that euery pield Masse-priest as ofte as he said Masse wrought three miracles The necessitie of auricular confession was first decreed by Innocent the third The number of 7. Sacraments albeit before talked of idly by School-men was not by any publike authoritie receiued before the Conuenticle of Florence Finally it is easie to shew that the Popes doctrine concerning Indulgences Purgatorie the worship of Saints and Images extreame vnction and other poynts of religion in controuersie betwixt the Papists and vs is lately brought in and more newe then that religion which we professe which by Kellison is lewdly and falsely called newe Many wonder also why he should call his Treatise A Suruey of the newe Religion seeing the poyntes which he handleth are neither matters of religion nor professed by vs nor proued against them vpon whome they are fathered by Cochleus Staphylus Genebrard Bolsec Stapleton Sanders and such like lying parasites He professeth him-selfe a Doctor but his Discourse declareth him to be in the number of those of whome the Apostle speaketh 1. Tim. 1. Which would be Doctors of the Law and yet vnderstand not whereof they speake nor whereof they affirme If he haue no more knowledge then he hath shewed in this Suruey he is a Doctor and professor of Diuinitie of a lowe price Little certes doth he vnderstand what that profession meaneth that could not distinguish his owne
Prince yet should he haue forborne to offer that which both to him and all true Christians cannot chuse but be most vngratefull and odious Beside these absurdities our surueyor hath runne into diuers grosse errors For first he compareth the King to an Idole where he maketh him like a Neptune Lord of the Oceā Sea So he is not only a worshipper of Idoles but also would gladlie make an Idole of the King Secondly in setting forth the Kings prayses he speaketh contraries now representing his majestye sitting in a Throne of terror and not long after calling him the myldest Prince in Europe But what is more contrarie then terror and mildnesse and what Sect in sauage crueltie can be compared to Papists that of late haue attempted by fire and Gun-powder to destroy him whome they confesse to beethe myldest Prince in Europe Thirdly he taketh from the King all authority in Ecclesiasticall causes which he reserueth to his holy Father and his dependants and although in termes he doe not abridge the Kings right in his Tēporalities yet euery one knoweth that Papists make Kinges the Popes subjects and giue to the Pope power to censure and depose Kings which none can maintaine but such as are disloyall to Princes and slaues to Popes Fourthly most cunningly he doth insinuate that Kings and Princes are beholding to Priestes for their Kingdomes because they receiue of them as he saith their consecration Crownes and Scepters So this prating Masse-priest doth not only treacherously subject Kinges to the Popes sword and censures but also absurdly tyeth their right and inheritance to the Crowne to the rite of consecration Finally not content to debase the Kings Royall state and to deminish his right he compareth himselfe in his Priest-hood most proudly to Christ himselfe and his holy Apostles But none but the disciples of Antichrist make them-selues in priest-hood comparable to Christ nor doe any but false Apostles make the Apostles sacrificers and aequall themselues to the Apostles Now these errors he acknowledged not nor can excuse His inciuility he would gladly excuse and defend But his defence is worse then the offence it selfe For the first saith he Adrian the Emperour will excuse me who commended vnto Minutius his proconsul of Asia as a thing of importance Ne nomen condemnaretur sed crimen He maketh also along discourse relating vnto vs how wrongfully Christians were hated for the name But what affinity is there betweene the names of Christians and the names of sacrificing Masse-priests Againe how can the cyclopicall priests of Baal pretend to be successors eyther of the Apostles or of auncient Bishops Did euer any auncient Bishop or other Doctor of the Church say that the priest did swallowe downe Christes body whole into his bellie againe if that which is offered be consumed as the Papists themselues teach How can this priest K. defend that hee offereth vp Christ vnder the accidents of Bread and Wine vnlesse like the Iewes he murder Christ or at the least deuoure him Furthermore Adrian in his Epistle to Minutius Fūdanus hath not these wordes ne nomen condemnaretur sed crimen as it is euident by the wordes of this Epistle reported by Iustine Martyr in his second Apologie Finally we do not oppugne Masse-priests for the name of priestes as this dreaming suruey or imagineth but for because being made priestes beyond the Seas they are alwaies ready at their creators the Popes cōmaund to attempt against Princes to trouble his state to rayse sedition as the late attempts of Watson Clarke of Pearcy and his mates set on by Priestes and Iesuites to blow vp the whole Parliament and to make a general massacre and Rebellion doe plainely declare For the second he telleth vs that he is come from the great Monarch of heauen to salute the King and that he is Gods Legate and therfore not to be denyed audience when the Ambassadors of the Kings of the earth are heard with so fauourable a countenance But if he come from the Monarch of heauen why doth he not shewe forth his warrant and proue his heauenly angelical mission If he be Gods true Legat why doth he hide his false face If he will be respected as earthly Ambassadors then must he shewe forth a Commission as earthly Ambassadors doe Otherwise he will be taken for the Legat of Sathan set on by the Pope to write heretical discourses and scurrilous Libels to infect the peoples mindes with a distast of truth and with superstitious heretical and disloyal humours not Gods Ambassador sent to the King to declare his will God certes neuer gaue any man commission to perswade the Popes tyrannical authoritye the sacrifice of the Masse for quicke dead the 7. sacraments the worship of Saints and Images after the Romish facion and such like doctrines Further he addeth That the lowest Subiect may crye Viue le Roy. But what maketh that for him that held him-selfe for no subject of our late Queene being excōmunicate by the Pope thinketh it not lawful to subject himselfe to the King that now is if the Pope should take Armes against him and excōmunicate him Furthermore such as he is are rather to be reputed tall and stout Traytors then low or lowlie subjects crying not viue le Roy with any true heart but as Iudas cryed al hayle to Christ when he betrayed him or as Squire that was sent by the Iesuite Walpoole to empoyson the late Queene cryed God saue the Queene when he put poyson on the Pommell of her Saddle If then the Pope shall once beginne to display his Banner and thunder out his excommunications against the King then we are not to doubt but as now Kellison cryeth God saue the King so then he would cry downe with him downe with him and with all that followe him and take parte with him For such as ment to blow him vp with Powder not being excōmunicat would not I think spare him being made subject to the Popes thundring censures For the third hee answeareth first that it doth agrandise a Kinges greatnes to accept of little presentes And next that he offereth himselfe as his Maiesties faithfull seruant Lastly he standeth on stilts of high termes and telleth vs that he offereth the worship of God the saluation and safetie of the King and his subiects and the peace of his people But neyther is his Booke a little present being a large fardle of wast paper nor can so big a lubber passe for a small guift although in truth both be of so low a price that he might much be ashamed to make offer of either to so iudicious a Prince but that he wanteth both shame iudgemēt Beside that it may be a questiō how he can giue himselfe to the King that hath already giuen himselfe bodye and soule to the Pope whose mark he carrieth on his shauen Crowne A faithfull Seruant certes hee cannot be to the King seeing no man can serue two Maisters Pearcy
these Cardines terrae or rather terren and carnall Cardinalls may goe in vltimos fines terrae that is into the vtmoste endes of the earth to seeke for their mission The Monkes and Fryars are no where mentioned in Scripture vnlesse it be Apocalyps 9. Where wée finde that Locustes did issue out of the smoke of the bothomlesse pit whereby is signified that by their smoky traditions they should obscure the light of the Gospell They succeede not Pastors and Teachers For their profession is pouertie chastitie and obedience to monkish rules and not to teach or administer Sacraments Hierome and all antiquitie put monkes after Priests and range them in another order Fryars entred but lately into the Church vnder the conduct of Dominicke and Francis Their authoritie is wholy from the Pope and other commission can they shew none Masse-priestes are not sent to preach and administer the Sacraments but to sacrifice Christs bodie and blood vnder the accidents of bread and wine for quick and dead as appeareth in the formall wordes of their ordination But such a mission is no where found in Scripture For our Sauiour instituting the Sacrament of the Eucharist said accipite edite bibite That is take eate drinke and not sacrificate pro viuis et defunctis that is Sacrifice for quicke dead True it is that he saith hoc facite that is doe this But hoc facere doth no where eyther in Scripture or prophane Authors signifie sacrifice this Virgil is alleadged where one saith cum faciam vitula But if they bring no better proofes the Masse-priests will prooue themselues as wise as Calues For it is one thing to say facere vitula and facere hoc Beside that Virgil yet was neuer esteemed a good interpreter of Christes wordes To omitte Scriptures this sacrificing Preest-hood of the Romanistes hath no proofe out of Fathers For no where in any authenticall writing of theirs is any mention made of such an ordination Nay it is apparant that the same was first talked of by idle Schoolemen and authorized after a sort by the conuenticle of Florence vnder Eugenius the fourth Finally neither doe Scriptures nor Fathers mention any such real carnal and corporall sacrifice of Christes body and blood made in the Eucharist vnder the accidentes of breade and wine for the sinnes of the quicke and dead as I haue fully demonstrated in my Bookes de mâ—ssa against Bellarmine Nay the Canon it selfe dooth signifie that the sacrifice of the Church is offered as well by the people as the Priest as these words declare qui tibi offerunt But the Papists wil not say that the people offereth vp Christs body Further the Masse-priest prayeth that God would be pleased to accept the sacrifice but it is absurd to make a Masse-priest mediator for Christs body and blood If then they bee false Prophets Theeues Robbers that come without missioÌ„ or sufficient warrant then are the Popes of Rome Cardinals Monkes Fryars and Masse-priests false Prophets Theeues and Robbers And that may in part also bee prooued by the confession of our aduersarie For if as hee saith all are to bée reputed such that can neither shew ordinarie calling from the Apostles nor extraordinarie from the spirit of God then are they to bee shunned as false Prophets and false teachers and punished seuerely not onely as men lately besmired with Gunne-powder but also as false Theeues Robbers For extraordinarie calling they pretend none ordinarie calling authorized by Gods word they haue none as hath in part beene prooued Further we say that whereas two thinges are to be respected in ordination of Bishops Ministers of Gods word viz. the rite of ordination the substance of the function whereto they are ordeyned in the popish Church our aduersaries haue neither of these two lawfull First they haue no impositioÌ„ of hands by Bishops For they haue no lawful Bishops allow the impositioÌ„ of hands of Abbots Further their Bishops are no successors of the Apostles but the popes creatures that is rather a temporal prince then a Bishop The Monks and Fryars are rather called to doe pennance then to preach wheÌ„ they are shorne Secondly their Priests are not called to preach and baptise which was the forme and substance of the mission of the Apostles and their successors but to sacrifice Christes body and blood vnder the accidents of breade and wine for quicke and dead which forme and function neither Kellison nor all the rabble of Romish Priests and Fryars shall euer prooue to bee auncient lawful or authenticall Against our Bishops Priests and Deacons no such matter can be excepted For first it caÌ„not be denyed but that our Bishops were lawfully ordeined by imposition of handes of other lawfull Bishops The Ordination of Bishop Cranmer other Bishops then liuing the Papistes themselues cannot deny to be lawfull But from them other Bishops folowing receiued the rite of consecration Bishop Parker was consecrated by the imposition of handes of Bishop Barloe Bishop Couerdale Bishop Scory and two Suffragans mentioned in the Acte of consecration yet to be seene which not onely had succession from such Bishops as our aduersaries account lawfull but in deede were lawfull Bishops Our bretherne in Germany and Zuizzerland had imposition of handes from Luther Zuinglius Oecolampadius Bucer and others in France from Farel in Scotland from Knox and others whome the Papistes cannot deny to haue bene lawfully ordeined Priests at the least if their owne formes were lawfull And from these men their successors al other Pastors Ministers of the Church haue receiued the rite of impositioÌ„ of handes or ordination to the Ministery Neither is it materiall that the first preachers of the Gpspel in these Countries were not Bishops and so called as it was in England For suppose no Bishop would haue renouÌ„ced the heresyes of Popery nor haue taught sincerely should not inferiour ministers teach truth and ordeine other teachers after them Furthermore they wanted nothing of true Bishops but the name and tytle Finally the rite and imposition of handes by such as are called Bishops is not so necessary but that in a defection of Bishops of a nation and in case of other extreme necessitye Ministers may lawfully be ordained by other Ministers which is prooued first for that generally the Presbytery or Ministery of the Church hath right to impose handes and next for that the Keyes are called Claues Ecclesiae and not Claues Episcoporum and lastly for that necessitie admitteth not the obseruance of all ceremonyes As for example admit a multitude of Christians should goe into the Indiaes without ministers it is not to be supposed but they haue power to appoint Ministers among them selues in this case of necessitye Secondly it is certaine that the Bishops and Ministers of reformed Churches haue bene sent to preach and so administer the Sacraments by such as had authoritye in the Church and that they haue executed their function accordingly Why then
should any deny them to be truly the Apostles successors Finally the defection of ordinary Priestes in the Romish Church being extraordinary we may not imagine that all ordinary rites and formes were to be obserued in the vocation of such as by the instinct of Gods holy spirit were stirred vp extraordinarily to restore the decayed partes and ruines of Gods Temple But sayth Kellison pag. 9. If their Preachers be sent by an ordinary mission let them shewe their succession And heere hee alleageth Tertullians wordes lib. de praescript aduers haeret concerning the orders of Bishops and succession from the Apostles And two places out of S. Augustine in Psal contr part Donati And contr epist fund where he speaketh of the succession of Bishops Againe he vrgeth vs if any thing were extraordinary in those which first reformed the Church to prooue their mission by miracles and runneth into a long discourse of the visibilitie of the Church of miracles and prophesies To which wee answere first that if the succession of Bishops were the onelye proofe of an ordinarie mission the Papists themselues were in bad tearmes hauing no proofes of their succession of popes so much bragged of but the testimony of Anastasius Platina Naucler Sabellicus Onuphrius Genebrard Baronius such like hungrie parasites of the Pope iarring and contending one against another like mastye Curres about a bone Secondly the Greekes Antiochians and Aegiptians pretend to this day succession of Bishops and yet are grossely fallen froÌ„ the faith want true Bishops Thirdly Tertullian S. Augustine speak of successioÌ„ of Bishops but neither of theÌ„ denyeth theÌ„ to bee Bishops or pastors that are not ordeined by a Bishop who was not ordered with al soleÌ„nities Fourthly we shew such a succession of Bishops as the Papists theÌ„selues cannot controle deriuing theÌ„ coÌ„cerning order externall formes from Bishops allowed by our aduersaries and concerning succession of Doctrine from the Apostles Fathers and auncient Bishops of the primitiue Church Fiftly the question concerning the visibilitie of the Church is diuers from that which concerneth succession For I hope K. will not say that hee euer saw the succession of Romish Bishops or that any Apostle saw his successors Lastly wee alleage that the old Prophets were sent extraordinarily and yet wrought no miracles Diuers apostolicall men likewise haue beene raysed vp by God at diuers times and yet wee reade not that eyther all of them prophecied or wrought miracles This being our answere of which Kellison could not be ignorant but that hee is eyther ignorant of matters in question or else voide of honesty and good dealing what is it I pray you that hee is able to alleadge against the vocation and mission of Gods ministers in our Churches First saith he Page 11. They say that the Apostles which were the first Bishops and Pastors had for a time their lawfull successors but that at the length the church fayled and the Pastors with it But while he talketh of mission he lyeth shamefully and without all commission For first wee distinguish both Bishops and ordinarie pastors from Apostles So doth the Apostle also Ephe. 4. Secondly we deny that Christs Church euer hath fayled Thirdly wee teach that the Apostles haue alwaies had some successors albeit neither in one place nor without all interruption If then he haue not fayled in true dealing let him set downe the authors names that haue affirmed this which hee reporteth and relate their words sincerely age 13. he addeth that Luther disobeyed the Pope and the Church and deuised a new Religion to cloake his villany But first the Pope and the Church are euill yoaked together For Christs sheepe heare not the voice of strangers Secondly these words of villany come out of his shop of mallice Lastly neuer shall this K. prooue that Luther deuised any new Religion For he onely impugned late errors and sought to bring Christians backe to the auncient Catholike faith Thirdly he shapeth an other answere for vs Page 14. maketh vs to say that wee had predecessors but they were inuisible But this abuse with he offereth vs is too grosse palpable for neither doe we make our predecessors inuisible Nor doe we denie that the ancient fathers holy Bishops of old time as they taught the Catholicke and apostolike faith and no more were out predecessors Fourthly hee telleth vs that such as pretend extraordinarie sending runne vnsent But he taketh vppon him too too arrogantlye to limit Gods power and seemeth plainely to contradict Gods word S. Paul Ephes 4 mencioneth Euangelists without limitation either of times or places and Saint Iohn Apocaly 11 foresheweth that God will giue power to his two witnesses preaching against the Kingdome of Antichrist and the abuses of their times Neither doth either Optatus or CypriaÌ„ or the Apostle speake any word against vs herein Optatus Lâ—b 2. contra parmen speaketh of some intruding donatists Cyprian of certaine presuÌ„ptuous Nouatians which as the Arch-priests Iesuites and Masse-priests doe in EnglaÌ„d thrust theÌ„selues into the ministerie in Africk without warrant The Apostle Eph. 4. leaueth out the Pope therefore ouerthroweth our aduersaries cause But hee saith not one word why Pastors and teachers may not sometime either hee sent extraordinarily or furnished with extraordinarie power Finally albeit the Church be built vpon a Rocke yet particular Churches Citties may fall into errors and hardly can bee reformed without some extraordinarie helpes Fiftly he affirmeth Page 19. that extraordinarie mission is alwaies to be prooued by extraordinarie signes and tokens of Prophecies or miracles And to this purpose hee feyneth that both Luther and Caluin endeuoured to prophecy and to worke miracles But the first is disprooued by the examples of the prophets and Apostles For neither doe we reade that all the prophets wrought miracles nor that all the Apostles prophesied Furthermore the Godly Martyrs of old time and the auncient Bishops were often indued with extraordinarie graces yet did they not all worke wonders and prophecy The second is disprooued both by our Doctrine and practise For neither doe wee now practise miracles or stand vpon prophecies nor doe wée teach that the Doctrine of truth is to be confirmed with miracles or prophecies To conuince vs this K. produceth the testimonye of Cochleus Surius Staphylus Genebrard Fontanus Bolsec and such like fellowes But their testimonies are not worth a Nut-shell being hired to speake shame of the popes aduersaries Hee is verie light of beleefe that giueth credit to the wordes eyther of enemies or hired parasites Finally he concludeth Page 28. that we haue no assurance of our Religion by the authoritie of our Preachers being able to say no more then false Apostles for proofe of their authoritie Hee doubteth not also to affirme that both Brownists and those of the family of Loue may as well alleadge Scriptures and pretend to bee sent of God as Caluin and Luther But first he sheweth himselfe a simple Doctor of Diuinitie
and titles The Valentinians as Tertullian in his Book against them testifieth did colour their most vaine and filthie deuises with holy names titles and arguments of true religioÌ„ Sanctis nominibus titulis argumentis verae religionis vanissimà atque turpissima figmenta configurantes So likewise doe Papistes vnder colour of Catholike religion present to their followers their hereticall Dâ—â—trine concerning the being of Christes bodie in many places transubstantiatioÌ„ the carnall eating of Christes flesh with the mouth the deuouring of Christes body by brute beastes and the merits of congruitie Vnder the title of Gods true worship they commend the seruice of the blessed Virgin the adoration of Angels of Saints and of their images vnder the name of the sacrifice of praise and thankes-giuing they shadow the abhominable idolâ— of the Masse and vnder the name of succession the greeuous yoake of the Popes Tyrannye But as Wolues muffled in sheepes cloathing are discerned by their Woluish qualities so Hereticks are discouered by certaine markes and hereticall properties The which if Kellison would or durst haue set downe truely then would it haue appeared that Papists and not we are Heretikes For first Heretikes are they that teach new Doctrine in the Church Haerest deputatur saith Tertullian Lib. de praescript quod postea inducitur But such is the decretaline and Trent doctrine of traditions iustification Sacraments purgatorie indulgences worship of images Angels and Saints Secondly they flye the light of Scriptures and speake euill of them Therefore Tertullian calleth them lucifugas scripturarum and Ierenaeus Lib. 3. aduers haeres c. 2. saith when they are conuinced by Scriptures they fall to accuse Scriptures as if they stood not well or wanted authoritie or were to bee wrested to diuers sences or else as if truth could not bee sound by those that are ignorant of tradition Cum ex scripturis arguuntur in accusationem conuertuntur ipsarum scripturarum quasi non recte habeant neque sint ex authoritate quia variè sint dictae quia non possit ex his inueniri veritas ab hâ—â— qui nesciant traditionem And doe not the Papists flye the light of Scriptures forbidding them to bee read publikelie in vulgar tongues and punishing such as haue Scriptures translated into their mother tongue without licence doe they not also say that Scriptures are like a nose of waxe or as Kellison saith waxy and that they depend vpon the Church and that the truth cannot sufficiently be knowne without tradition Thirdly Heretickes teach otherwise then the Apostles did Therefore the Apostle 1. Tim. 1. gaue order to Timothy that hee should charge some that they should not teach otherwise Vnde extranei inimici apostolis haeretici saith Tertullian de praescript adu haeret nisi ex diuersitate doctrinae quaÌ„ vnusquisque de suo arbitrio aduersus Apostolos aut protulit aut recepit Whence are Heretickes strangers and enemies to the Apostles but by reason of the diuersitie of Doctrine which euerie one of his owne head either deuised or receiued contrarie to the Apostles This qualitie is also incident to the Papistes that not onely teach otherwise then did the Apostles but haue also added to the Apostles doctrine all that trash which wee desire to be scoured away as being contrarie to the apostolike forme of doctrine Fourthly Heretickes stand much vpon false miracles and prophesies as the examples both of Montanistes and Seuerians doe shew There were also certaine Heretickes called mirabiliarij confirming all their Doctrines with miracles Tertullian de praescrip aduers haeret Sheweth that Heretickes shall commend the authoritie of their teachers in raysing the dead curing the weake and fore-prophecying things to come adijcient multa de authoritate cuiusque doctoris haeretici illos maxima doctrinae suae confirmasse mortuos suscitasse debiles reformasse futura significasse In which pointes the Papists doe followe them at the heeles bragging of the miracles of Dominic Francis Ignatius Xauerius and other their Romish Saints and making miracles prophecies markes of their Church and motiues to enduce men to like of their Religion Fiftly Hereticks commonly stand vpon traditions as wee may reade in Irenaeus Lib. 3. c. 2. And because Christ said he had many things to say to the Apostles which they could not theÌ„ beare imagine that their deuises were conteined in these concealed Doctrines Omnes etiam insipientissimi haeretici qui se Christianos vocari volunt audacias figmentorum suorum quas maxime exhorret sensus humanus saith Augustin tract 97. in Ioan. bac occasione euangelicae sententiae colorare conantur vbi dominus ait adhuc multa habeo vobis dicere sed non potestis portare modò The same humor is likewise in the Papists and diuers of them vse these words of our Sauiour to that purpose albeit S. Augustine calleth them therefore most foolish Heretickes Sixtly our Sauiour Christ sheweth that false Prophets shall come vnto vs in the habit and cloathes of Sheepe but are inwardly rauening Wolues The same we finde partly verified in the Arians and Donatistes but moste expressely in the Papistes For albeit they will bee called Catholikes and Christes sheepe yet they deuoure true Catholikes like Wolues and massacre all that once dare open their mouthes against their idolatries and hereticall imaginations Their inquisitors tribunals are full of blood of innocents and their garments are red with blood and carrie euident markes of their crueltie In France they haue massacred old and young men and women and spared none that came in their way farre passing in crueltie both the Donatistes and Arians 7. To defend their peruerse erroneous Doctrine Hereticks are wont to detruncate and by false expositions to peruert holy scriptures Tertullian de praescript saith of marcion that to fit his purpose he cut the Scriptures at his pleasure ad materiam suam caedem scripturarum confecit Hierome in epist ad Galat. c. 5. saith hee may bee called an Heretike that vnderstandeth the Scriptures otherwise then the sence of the holy Ghost requireth albeit he be not yet departed out of the Church So likewise the Papists abuse the holy Scriptures moste shamefully in their allegations cutting them and forcing them contrarie to the meaning of the holy Ghost The old Latin translation of the Bible cutteth off and addeth to the originall text and yet will they needes haue it authenticall These words of Isay ecce ponam in fundamentis Sion lapidem c. in praefat in lib. de pontif Rom. Bellarmine most impudently detorteth to the Pope Likewise doe the Papists abuse these wordes Hierem. 1. ecce constitui te hodie super gentes to prooue that the Pope is made head of nations These words bibite ex hoc omnes they conster as if none of the communicants but the preest were to drinke of the chalice 8. Hereticks conceale diuers of their false lewd Doctrines Iraeneus lib. 1. c. 23. saith that they holde that they are not
other places of Scriptures They alledge I confesse some words of the instituon of the Eucharist and that which Daniel speaketh of the dayly sacrifice and Malachy of the cleane oblation But they fit not the impure Masse nor the Idolatrous sacrifice of Baals priests destroying Christes institution and offring that which hee commaunded not to be offered but to bee receiued in remembrance of his death and Passion The Fathers also were ignorant of the histrionicall sacrifice of the Masse-priestes Neither was there any certaine Law or Doctrine established for it before the wicked conuenticle of Trent had enacted their sacrificing Lawes All which is prooued in my Bookes de missa against Bellarmine which this K. doth not make any hast to answer Nay he is more absurd then Bellarmine where he sayth that Christ powred out his blood at his last Supper For then hee should haue offered a bloody sacrifice at his last Supper and powred out his blood twise To conclude where he thinketh to commend vnto vs his massing sacrifice he sheweth that Popish religion is nothing but mere nouelties and fooleries surpassing the reach of common vnderstanding His third bolt is thus formed Lib. 4. c. 3. they haue noe certentie of Sacraments at all ergo no Religion And to prooue his antecedent he sayth that if any will forsake the Catholique Church and her beleife of seuen Sacraments that hee hath no morrall nor probable assurance of any Sacraments But first we deny that the particuler Church of Rome is the Catholique Church Secondly we affirme that the Catholike Church for a thousand yeares did neuer heare of 7. Sacraments onely and properly so called Thirdly it is absurd to thinke that the institution of confirmation and extreme vnction did aswell proceed from Christ as Baptisme and the Lordes Supper or that they worke like effectes Matrimony orders and repentance we confesse haue their originall from God but neuer as Sacraments of the new Testament For they were in vse before Christes time and want both formes of wordes and certaine signes and promises annexed to signes all which are necessarily required in true Sacramentes Kellison braggeth of proofes of Scriptures and Fathers for all matters But where are they we can see none brought by him Nay his Maister Bellarmine hath bewrayed the pouerty of his cause in this behalfe to no little discredit of himselfe and discomfort of his consortes If then they haue eyther no Religion or a gracelesse Religion that haue no assurance of seuen Sacraments as this K. confesseth then is Kellison and his company left either without Religion or with a gracelesse Religion Onely this is his comfort that if we haue no graceful religion yet he hath a greasie Religion and hopeth to be iustified partly by the greasing of his handes shauen crowne and partly by extreme vnction beeing well greased departing out of the world that hee may burne like a candle in purgatorie and slippe like an Eele out the gripes of Lucifer The fourth bolt is thus framed by this foolish surueying fletcher They detract from the dignitie of Sacraments and attribute litle vnto them Ergo they haue no Religion or a gracelesse religion But how doth hee prooue that we diminish the dignitie of Sacraments or attribute lesse vnto them then is due hee alleadgeth how some call them badges or signes and saith that we deny that they giue grace or effectuate any iote of sanctification in our soules more then the Sacraments of the olde law did But first no man among vs will say or euer did say that they serue onely for signes or badges of Christianitie and haue no other vse Secondly we all confesse that God worketh sanctification by the sacraments of the new testament albeit Gods power is not so tyed to sacraments as the Papistes teach who affirme that they conteine grace and giue that to the signe that is properly wrought and effected by Gods grace Thirdly wee teach that the Sacraments of the new Testament are Sacraments of things passed and exhibited as the sacraments of Moyses lawe were of things future yet we deny not that God wrought grace by them as hee dooth by these And this is consonant both to holy Scriptures and fathers Finally wee doe not derogate any thing from true Sacraments that by the word of God is due vnto them albeit wee preferre baptisme and the Lordes Supper before the pretended Sacramentes deuised by the aduersaries But if those haue no Religion that detract from the Sacraments then haue Papistes but a poore religion which rebaptise oftentimes those which are by vs baptised and in liewe of the holy Eucharist haue thrust into the Church the idole of the masse They haue also corrupted the Doctrine both of repentance of orders making their auriculer confession and humane absolutions and satisfactions parts of penance contrarie to all antiquitie and reordaining those that are duelye ordered by vs. Finallye they make their Preestes and Monks and Fryars to forsweare marriage and separate married folkes for Religion violating the rites of their owne pretended Sacraments The fift bird-bolt of this dog-bolt is shot against Luther Caluin Brentius Melancthon and diuers other learned Diuines whome hee chargeth to haue taken away in effect those Sacraments which they seeme to allow of But first hee should haue vnderstood if both his wits and brayne had not fayled him that there is great difference betwixt priuate opinions and Religion Secondly lewdely doth he prooue that which maliciously hee obiecteth vnto particulers Luther neuer said nor thought that eyther the wordes of baptisme as they are instituted by Christ may bee omitted or that the element of water may bee changed into beare or milke or other liquor Nay therein we reprehend the Papistes for that they are to bolde not onely in changing and adding wordes but also in taking away the Elements in the administration of Sacraments The which appeareth in that they haue thrust in these wordes aeterni and mysterium fidei into Christes wordes in the institution of the Cuppe and haue added to baptisme salte spittle and other elements and taken away the Cup from the communicates Caluin also with all his might defendeth the integritie of Christs institution both concerning the wordes and elements of the sacraments neuer called Christes words magical charmes albeit the Papists with wordes and a puffe of winde as with a charme thinke to transubstantiate bread wine into the Lordes bodie and blood Buccer in c. 26. Math. dooth not deny that wordes are necessarie in the Eucharist His wordes set downe will cleare him from Kellisons slaunder Luther where he saith that Children beleeue saith nothing but that which S. Augustine and others haue said before him Of actuall faith in Children he saith nothing albeit this K. doth actually and falsely report it Caluin lib. 4. Instit c. 16. 18. saith not that S. Iohn baptistes baptisme was as good as Christes baptisme but that his baptisme was one with Christes baptisme which is
also prooued for that Christ was baptized by Iohn and for that the Apostles were baptized with no other baptisme Neither dooth the example Act. 19. prooue it to bee different For eyther they were not well baptized that were baptized into Iohns baptisme or they were not rebaptized but onely had imposition of handes and the baptisme of Gods spirit True it is that caluin denyeth womē power to baptize so wold that aduersaries also if they did not corrupt al good orders But that addeth to the dignitie of the sacramēt He saith further that some that are not baptized may be saued And so the aduersaries graūt also especiallye when eyther Martyrdome supplyeth baptisme or a man seeketh baptisme and cannot haue it in time That the Children of the reprobate are not to be baptised or that the Children of the faithfull neede not to bee baptized Caluin neuer sayd nor thought Neither dooth hee say that wee receiue bare signes in the Lords supper but the communion of the body and blood of Christ If then this surueyor would haue set downe these learned mens wordes truelye then should hee haue had no reason to charge them with taking away the Sacraments or derogating from them But the Papistes while they depend wholy vpō the préests intention and chop and change wordes in the holy institution and take away not onely the substance of bread and wine but also the Cup from the communicantes doe indeede depriue Christians of the Sacraments Thomas Aquinas p. 3. q. 66. saith that baptisme may bee administred in lixinio that is in lye and Albertus in Brodio that is in pottage Dionysius Carth. in 4. sent dist 3. q. 2. saith that our Ladies name may be added to the name of the Trinity and yet all remaine good Potest in inuocatione beatae mariae fieri baptismus cum inuocatione Trinitatis Finally they teach that Dogs Hogs may eate the Sacramēt of the Eucharist vse to baptise belles These are the men therefore that abuse the Sacraments and depriue Christians of them not Luther or Caluin His sixt and last bolt is directed against the Liturgie and prayers of the Church But as in other places so heere also the man shooteth at rouers ranging vp and downe in an idle and tedious discourse concerning the excellency of prayer which no man calleth in question But that which in the title of his Chapter hee proposeth to himselfe hee forgetteth and cannot prooue viz. that eyther wee haue no prayer or else disorders in prayer Hee is not ashamed to affirme that wee haue no prayers at al on working daies But that is confuted both by common experience and the publike orders of the Church On Holy daies hee saith we spend our time in yelling out Geneua Psalmes So the Deuill teacheth him to yell out blasphemyes against the prayses of God in Psalmes translated out of holy Scriptures And why thinke you forsooth because wee admit not the filthie idolatrous prayers of the Masse and breuiaries and for that also wee pray in tongues vnderstood and with our spirit and vnderstanding and for that we vse not their Baals songs But when Christians consider how Papistes pray like Parrats not vnderstanding what they say and sing their monkish Hymmes call vpon they knowe not whome and send vp their prayers before stockes and stones they haue no occasion eyther to mislike our Prayers or Psalmes or to allow their owne Neither is it materiall that wee beleeue not that Prayers merit heauen or satisfye for our sinnes or that man naturally hath liberum arbitrium both in knowing and dooing thinges pleasing to God For albeit they merit not yet they both obtaine thinges necessarie and remooue thinges hurtfull Againe albeit wee cannot satisfye for our sinnes by prayers yet by them we obtaine remission of sinnes for which our Sauiour hath sufficiently satisfyed Finally albeit the natural man by freewil and nature dooth neither vnderstand the thinges of God nor pursue after thinges pleasing to God yet directed by Gods holy spirit by prayers wee obtaine Gods grace that both enlightneth our vnderstanding and helpeth our weakenes So in all these cases prayer is profitable Furthermore albeit wee teach that man is iustified by faith and that euerie true Christian led by Gods spirit is to assure him selfe of Gods fauour yet are wee not to neglect the meanes nor to contemne Prayers which are exercises of our faith and helpe to confirme vs and are meanes to obtaine thinges necessarie for vs. The Surueyor therefore that concludeth against the meanes because wee assure our selues of the end promised vnto vs through Christ Iesus is but an ideot disputer For albeit wee hope to attaine to the end yet wee doe not deny ordinarie meanes Chap. 8. The Surueyors calumniations against our Doctrine concerning God refuted AS it is a heynous Heresie to make God the author of sinne and condemned in Florinus and Blastus so it is a heynous calumniation to charge innocent christians with so heynous a crime as to hold God to bee the author of sinne All this notwithstanding Kellison a Surueyor as hee calleth himselfe but not for Christ but for Antichrist will needes affirme that wee make God the author of sinne and wickednes But what if we teach contrarie will it not appeare that the author of sinne was author also of this shamelesse and sinfull slaunder well then let vs see what is publikelye professed by the reformed churches In the confession of the French Church we reade that God is not the author of euill and that he is cleare of all blame for thinges done euill The Heluetian Churches condemne Florinus and Blastus for maintaining the contrarie Doctrine Damnanus say they Florinum Blastum omnes qui deum faciunt authorem peccati The same also wee doe both in our writinges and Sermons publikely teach and professe Neither can this K. alleadge either sentence or word to the contrarie But saith he lib. 5. c. 1. Caluin and his followers auouch that God immediatelye and directlye is the author of wickednes and Melancthō in Rom. c. 8. auoucheth that Dauids adultery Iudas treachery were as much the work of God as S. Paules vocation He saith also that Beza diuers others haue like sayings But first wee are vniustly charged with euery priuate mans opinions neither will our aduersaries thinke it reason in their owne case to bee so vsed Secondlye Caluin is much wronged by this foule mouthed curre For he is so farre from saying that God is the author of all wickednesse that expressely lib. 1. instit c. 18. he teacheth that God is author of no wickednesse Falsely also dooth he charge Caluin to say that God not onely foreseeth mans sinnes but hath created him of determinate purpose to that end Hee saith onely that God dooth not onely permit men to doe what they will but dooth gouerne their actions and direct them to such endes as he appointeth not that he willeth or acteth their sinne
by those against whom S. Iohn S. Iames S. Peter and S. Iude writeth as Augustine testifieth and then by Simon Magus and Eunomius and lastly by Luther and Caluin But heerein hee resembleth the Iewes Luke 11. that attribute the miracles of Christ to the power of Belzebub For this Doctrine of iustification by faith without workes is the Doctrine not of Satan as this Satanicall Masse-priest affirmeth but of the holy Ghost We conclude saith the Apostle Rom. 3. that a man is justified by fayth without the works of the Law Neither doth he vnderstand the works of the ceremoniall Law or works done by force of free-will For then he would not haue excluded all the workes of the Law nor denyed that Abraham was iustified by workes Furthermore he would only haue concluded that man is not iustified by the ceremoniall Law or by workes done by the force of free-will without grace S. Augustine also lib. de fid et oper c. 14. teacheth vs that man is first iustified and then doth good workes His wordes speaking of good works are these sequuntur iustificatum non praecedunt iustificandum They follow him that is justified and goe not before in him that is to be iustified As for those Christians that turned the grace of God into wantonnesse as Saint Iude sayth and the rest against whome the Apostles wrote they did altogether contemne good workes a matter much condemne and farre from vs. Simon Magus likewise Eunomius gaue themselues ouer to a dissolute life and Eunomius promising saluation to his followers beleeuing only speaketh not of the true fayth of Christ but of his owne wicked and Hereticall fayth But Luther and Caluin neither speake against good workes nor conteÌ„ne them nor allow of their opinions that contemne good workes but only exclude them from being the cause of iustification or concurring in the act of iustification before Gods tribunall seate Otherwise they exhorte all Christians to good works and highly prayse them as the fruites of our iustification and very acceptable in Gods sight And this Doctrine they deuised not of their owne brayne but receiued it from the Apostles and the ancient Fathers of the Church Cum dicit apostolus saith Saint Augustine de fid et operib C. 14. arbitrari se iustificari hominem per â—â—dem sine operibus legis non hoc agit vt praecepta contemnaÌ„tur sed vt sciat se quisque per fidem iustificari etiam si legis opera non praecesserint When the Apostle sayth that hee beleeueth man to be justified by fayth without the works of the Law he entendeth not that the commaundements should be despised but would that euery man should knowe that hee is justified by fayth albeit the workes of the Lawe goe not before Against vs therefore neither the words of Iude nor of other apostles make any thing But against our aduersaries if S. Augustine bee Iudge they ayme directly arbitrantur saith he Lib. de fid et operib c. 15. per quasdam poenas ignis eos posse purgari ad salutem percipiendam merito fundamenti Hee saith the certaine in his time errooniously beleeued that such as liue lewdly may be saued through fire holding the foundation And against such hee disputeth and applyeth the Apostles wordes Secondly our aduersarie telleth vs that Luther and Caluin teach that good-works are mortall sinnes and that faith according to Caluins opinion is sinne But that is rather a lewd sinfull tricke to impute that to any which hee neuer wrote nor thought Nay it appeareth manifestlie that they teach contrarie Thirdly hee asketh a question where we reade in Scriptures that only faith justifieth But this question we haue alredy answeared And now we say further that this is found in all places where either the Law and works are excluded from causing iustification or else we are said to be iustified freely and by grace or else are taught that the iust doth liue by fayth The Apostle Gal. 2. sayth if justice be by the Law that Chirst dyed in vaine And Gal. 5. volentes iustificari per legem à gratia exciderunt While they sought for justice by the Law they fell from Christ Neither is our aduersaries exception of any moment where hee sayth that the workes of the ceremoniall Law and of the Gentiles are only excluded by the words of the Apostle For he doth not onely speake of the Gentiles but of Abraham that was the Father of the faithfull denyeth that he was iustified by works The prophet Dauid also Psal 32. pronouÌ„ceth him blessed to whome God imputeth no sin Which sheweth that it is not the ceremoniall Law but the whole Lawe whose transgressions are imputed to vs. And the Apostle generally excludeth all workes for which a reward is due from iustification Ei qui operatur merces non imputatur secundum gratiam He addeth also how fayth may be sayd to justifie But he might haue remembred that here he is no teacher but an aduersary We do therfore rather expect arguments then documents from him His exposition of faith iustifying as a disposition or as a worke is farre from truth and from the meaning of the Apostle who excluding our workes placeth our true iustification before God in Gods mercy and Christs iustice made ours by fayth To conclude this point seeing none are saued but such as are iustifyed and none are iustifyed by workes of the law but such as performe the whole law it is manifest that before God which is so iust and holy and leaueth no sin vnpunished no sinner is iustified by the workes of the law If it were otherwise then would it folow that Mary Magdalen and other great sinners transgressing the law were iustified by the law Fourthly he saith It is an absurd heresie to say that faith caÌ„not be without workes But if he speake of a true liuely and iustifiing faith he is rather an absurd heretike if he say that the same may be without good works The apostle saith that faith worketh by charity and that the iust doth liue by faith But liuely faith is actiue S. Augustine also lib. de fid et oper c. 16. dooth testifie that true faith cannot bee voide of workes fides Christi saith he fides gratiae Christianae id est ea fides quae per dilectionem operatur posita in fundamento nâ—minem perire permittit So it appereth it deserueth not the name of Christian faith that worketh not by charitie In this place also this K. accuseth the Lutherans Caluinistes as he calleth them for their euill life But this is onely an ordinarie phrase of his rayling stile For not those that exclude workes from causing our iustification before God but such as albeit they pretend faith and works yet neither haue true faith nor good workes are guiltie of this accusation If we please to parralell those whome hee calleth Lutherans and Caluinistes with the Popes Cardinals Masse-priestes and their adherentes I doubt not but they will
no more Further repentance bringeth with it newnesse of life and a care to auoide sinne afterward and not as K. surmiseth a boldnesse in sinning The fift Chapter conteineth nothing almost but vaine repetitions and odious calumniations against Maister Luther and Caluin and other Godly mē First he saith that they condemne the iust mans good deedes as mortal sinnes But this hath bin declared to bee a mortall or rather capitall slaunder For althogh they hold that euen in the workes of good men there are imperfections and that many actes to vs seeming good are euill yet they no where say that the iust mans good deedes are mortall sinnes in the wordes by K. alleadged partially there is no such matter Secondly hee chargeth them to teach that the faithfull mans euil deedes are good and honest But therein hee dealeth vnfathfully and dishonestly For they doe not diminish mens sinnes but commend Gods great mercy that imputeth them not albeit they be very great and heynous Thirdly hée affirmeth that Caluin teacheth that originall sinne hath blotted out the image of God in man But if all the vntruthes of this slauderous Suruey were blotted out the rest would scarce serue to stoppe one Vinegar bottle Caluin saith that the image of God in man is not lost by his fall but onely blemished and defaced The same man where he speaketh of the workes of Infidels saith not that all of them are sinnes but that they sinned all in their morrall actions And this he prooueth out of Augustine lib. 4. contr Iulianum Finally none of vs teaching that our will is vnable to performe any good worke tending to the attaining of eternall life dooth eyther teach contrarie to scriptures or ouerthrowe Artes or extinguish reason or make all sinnes equal albeit this K. in his brablement dooth charge vs therewith In the sixt Chapter he runneth beside himselfe and entreth into a tedious declaration concerning free-will and diuers odious repetitions of the same matters But what will you say is this to the purpose Forsooth no more then if hee should tell you what commaund he had in time past ouer the Hogsheades in my Lord Vauxes Sellar For we do not deny free-will in all thinges as did the Manachees who held that sinne proceeded not from our will but from the substance of the euill soule and therfore are iustly refuted by Saint Augustine in his Booke de duab anim c. 11. neither did Luther deny free-will simply but only in thinges that concerne the attaining of the Kingdome of heauen Furthermore neither doth Luther teach that free-wil goeth necessarily that way which either the spirit spurreth it or the Diuell vrgeth it as this lewd Sycophant ridden and spurred on by no good spirit shamefully lyeth nor doth Caluin affirme that Gods prouidence and predestination taketh away free-will as hee desperatly and imprudently chargeth him neither do we either teach that man sinneth vnwillingly or deny that he hath his will free in naturall ciuill matters What thē is it that pincheth this thick-skind fellow Forsooth because we say that the naturall man neither discerneth the thinges that are of God nor by his free-will is able to performe them This is it which the semipelagian Papistes mislike and against which Doctrine Kellison marshalleth all his forces if such weake stuffe at the least may bee termed forces And first he endeuoreth to prooue free-will But if by this word he vnderstand only an abilitie wil to doe wickedly then we deny not but mā hath free-will If by free-wil he vnderstand that will and power in spiritual matters and concerning eternal life which the conuenticle of Trent and other Romish teachers doe meane then he may do well to take a larger terme to prooue his Doctrine That conuenticle sess 6. c. 1. et 5. speaking of free-will in matters concerning eternall life saith it is only attenuated and weakned and not extinguished or lost by the fall of Adam Gabriel Biel Lib. 2. d. 27. 4. teacheth that a man by force of free-will may remoue the barre of Gods grace that is mortall sinne because hee may cease from the consent and act of sinning yea hate sinne and frame his will not to commit sinne Homo existens in peccato mortali saith he potest remouere obicem hoe est peccatum mortale quia potest cessare à consensu et actu peccandi imò odisse peccatum et velle non peccare Commonly they hold that man in his naturall faculties was left sound after the fall that the will by the force of nature is able to dispose it selfe to receiue grace that the same is able by the force of nature to auoyde euery mortall sinne and to fulfill the Law of God as touching the substance of the act But the Scriptures teach vs that the vnregenerate man is dead and sould vnder sinne 1. Cor. 2. Wee read that the naturall man vnderstandeth not the thinges that are of God and that they are foolishnesse vnto him And 2. Cor. 3. that all our sufficiencie is of God Si ad aliquid idonei sumus id ex deo est saith the Apostle Secondly he saith if man haue no free-will that then all vice may goe for currant But if hee meane free-will and the power therof according to the Doctrine of the Papistes then his conclusion wil not passe for currant nor will his vize-ship prooue more vicious holding with vs according to the Doctrine of the Scriptures and Fathers then he now is esteemed defending the decretales of Popes and Copper Doctrine of Schoole-men The seauenth Chapter of his 7. Booke containeth an inuectiue against vs as if we taught that all Gods commaundements are simply impossible But heerein it seemeth that wilfully he◠mistaketh our Doctrine that hee might the better vent his swelling eloquence to his gaping and witlesse Diciples For we neither hold that the Law is simply in it selfe impossible nor teach that it is impossible simply for the regenerat man to performe the Law of God in part But we say that the vnregenerate cannot performe any Law of God in such sort as hee should and that the regenerate cānot so perfectly performe the whole law as he ought And this we know is the doctrine of the holye Apostles Fathers of the Church Saint Peter Act. 15. saith the Law was a yoake which neither the Disciples of Christ nor their Fathers were able to beare Quid tentatis deum saith he vt imponatur iugum super ceruices discipulorū quod neque patres nostri neque nos portare potuimus Saint Paul Rom. 7. speaking of himselfe saith the Law was spirituall and he carnall sold vnder sinne And Rom. 8. the affection of flesh is death and enmitie against God and is neither subject to the Law of God nor can bee Saint Ambrose in Galat. 3. saith that the commaundementes of God are so great that it is impossible to keepe them Tanta sunt mādata vt impossibile sit seruari ea Likewise lib.
accompt it a matter very heynous Fiftly next to Lucifer the Pope excelleth in pride He treadeth on Princes neckes he giueth his feete to bee kissed hee rideth on mens shoulders he is called a God on the earth and vsurpeth his honor Such also are the Prelates and the rest of the popish Clergie Auentinus lib. 6. annal in praef sheweth they excell in pride and with goods giuen to the poore keepe Dogges Horses Harlots Pauperum alimentis canes equos scorta alunt Sixtly neuer was idlenesse more in price then since Monkes and Fryars came into the world They deuoure the fruites of the painefull labour of others and intend nothing but to eate drinke sleepe and to inioy carnall pleasures Of such we may say with the Apostle 2. Thess 3. Hee that laboureth not let him not eate Seauenthly albeit the Masse-priestes Monkes Nonnes and Fryars forsweare marriage yet not sect of Religion or state of men or women is more impure Honorius Augustodunensis speaking of Nunnes saith they are more common then Harlots Omnibus fornicarijs peius prosternuntur In England most horrible abhominations were found in the visitation of Abbyes Petrus de Alliaco lib. de reformat Eccles and Theodoric à Niem in nemore vnion diuers others shew that albeit Priestes were not marryed yet commonly they kept Harlots and that now is euident in our times by common experience Sacerdotes moderni saith Holcot in lib. sap lect 182. sunt similes sacerdotibus Baal sunt angeli apostatici sunt similes sacerdotibus Dagon sunt sacerdotes priapi sunt angeli abyssi The Priestes of his time he resembleth to heathen Priestes and sheweth how much they were subiect to lechery and heathenish impieties Finally the Doctrine of Popery is a doctrine full of licenciousnesse the Popes of Rome take vpon them to dispense with all sins and wickednes Their indulgences as the Germans Grauam 3. complaine are causes of many mischiefes hinc stupra say they incestus adulteria periuria homicidia furta rapinae foenora ac tota malorum lerna They take vppon them to absolue moste wicked sinners à poena culpa Nay euerie Masse-priest challengeth to himselfe power to giue absolution to such as come to confession The Iesuites of late absolued them before hand which by gun-powder went about to blow vp the Parliament house HaÌ„mond the Iesuite absolued Pearcy Catesby and their fellowes taking armes against their King and Countrie While men hope to satisfie for their sinnes in purgatorie they deferre repentance to the last breath Their enemies they tye with yron bondes Alexander the 3. would not release the Emperor vntill he had trod on his necke with his feete and vsed him with greate indignities Contrarywise they promise heauen to their friends though laden with greeuous siâ—s They hold euerie transgression of the Popes decretales to bee sinne This is therefore a Religion that both promiseth reward to cutthroates greeuous sinners and by their indulgences absolutions and fancies of purgatory hold a sinner so fast bound in sinne that there can bee no hope for him to bee loosed as long as he followeth their wicked Doctrines As for Luther and Caluin they are farre from such wicked courses They teach christian liberty But they extend it not so that they exempt Christians eyther from the obedience of Gods lawes or mans lawes but onely from the cursse of the law and from humane traditions that they binde not mens consciences They distinguish Christ Moyses And so would Kellison too but that hee talketh hee knoweth not what Of Moyses his law they make diuers vses and onelye detract from it the effect of iustification and saluation by reason it accuseth man of sinne and is not fulfilled The Apostle also teacheth if iustice were of the law that Christ had dyed in vaine Of the author and original of sinne and of conscience they teach most Christianlye following therein the Doctrine of the Apostles and holy Fathers of the church The pride of the Pope his adherents they detested and refused both by wordes and examples and so farre were they from idlenesse and allowing of idlenesse that they thought him vnworthy to liue or eate that laboured not in some honest and lawfull vocation Concerning chastitie they taught as truely as the Papists wickedly They shewed that it consisted not in forswearing marriage but in abstinence from all filthie thoughtes actes and speeches That which some impute to Luther of taking the Mayde when the wife refuseth is a meere calumniation He sheweth onely what some doe or at the least threaten to doe and not what they ought to doe Of the degrees of consanguinitie they teach better then the Pope They neuer taught that a man might marrie his brothers wife or his Neece or his Sister as the Popes haue doone Finally they hold no sinners fast bound in sinnes but shew the right way how to rise from sinne by faith in Christ and true repentance clearing those doubts which before had entangled many Christian soules and brought them to vtter destruction If then this K. had not had his conscience seared his eyes seeled and his vnderstanding darkned in these points he would haue seene and acknowledged the deformities of his owne fellowes Doctrine and abstained from accusing others Chap. 11. A reiection of Kellisons slaunderous accusations imputing in his 8. Booke Atheisme and contempt of Religion to the professors of true and Christian Religion in the Church of England COnsorte not thy selfe with detractors saith Salomon Prouerb 24. For their destruction shall come vppon them suddenly But Kellison was not so wise as to borrowe light from so wise and prudent a King He hath chosen rather to imitate fooles who as if all their treasure were in their tongues count it gaine to speake lewdely of their betters Istic est thesaurus stultis in lingua situs saith plautus in paenulo vt quaestui habeant malè loqui melioribus Forgetting his friendes in Italy Spaine and other countries groaning vnder the captiuity of Antichrist in his preface he chargeth his natiue couÌ„try of England as vnfortunate for ingendring a certaine Monster called Atheistes But if our Countrie men had lesse frequented Italy there had béene farre lesse Atheisme then in England now there is It is well knowne that Machiauelisme came from Italy and rose not in England and how Englishmen Italienated are said to be like Diuels incarnated Furthermore if the Masse-priestes as they haue brought with them the dregges of Popish heresies had not also brought with them the sinnes of Sodome and mixed diuine Religion with temporall policies and state practises seeking with fire and Gun-powder to reestablish in this kingdome the Popes tyranny then had he had no colour of this imputation Neither dooth this any way concerne vs that professe Religion heere in England beeing the proper crime of the Italianated and Hispaniolized Masse-priestes and their consortes that beeing inspired with the malicious spirit of Antichrist liue like Atheistes