throughout for the Apostle in that Chapter treating of the diversity of Gifts and Members of the Body sheweth how by the working of the same Spirit in different manifestations or measures in the several Members of the whole Body is edified saying v. 13. That we are all baptized by the One Spirit into one Body and then v. 28. he numbers out the several dispensations thereof which by God are set in the Church through the various working of his Spirit for the edification of the whole Then if there be no true member of the body which is not thus baptized by this Spirit neither any thing that worketh to the edifying of it but according to a measure of Grace received from the Spirit surely without Grace none ought to be admitted to work or labour in the body because their labour and work without this Grace and Spirit would not be ineffectual § XVI Thirdly that this Grace and Gift is a necessary qualification to a Minister is clear from that of the Apostle Peter 1 Peter 4.10 11. As every man hath received the Gift even so minister the same one to another as good Stewards of the manifold Grace of God If any man speak let him speak as the Oracles of God if any man minister let him do it as of the ability which God giveth that God in all things may be glorified through Jesus Christ to whom be praise and dominion for ever and ever Amen From which it appears That these that minister must minister according to the Gift and Grace received but they that have not such a Gift cannot minister according thereunto Secondly As good Stewards of the manifold Grace of God But how can a man be a good Steward of that which he hath not Can ungodly men that are not gracious themselves be good Stewards of the manifold Grace of God and therefore in the following Verses he makes an exclusive limitation of such as are not thus furnished saying If any man speak let him speak as the Oracles of God and if any man minister let him do it as of the ability that God giveth which is as much as if he had said They that cannot thus speak and thus minister ought not to do it For this If denotes a necessary condition Now what this ability is is manifest by the former words to wit the Gift received and the Grace whereof they are Stewards as by the immediate context and dependency of the words doth appear neither can it be understood of a meer natural ability because man in this condition is said not to know the things of God and so he cannot minister them to others And the following words shew this also in that he immediately subjoyneth That God in all things may be glorified but surely God is not glorified but greatly dishonoured when natural men from their meer natural ability meddle in Spiritual things which they neither know nor understand Fourthly that Grace is a most necessary qualification for a Minister appears by these qualifications which the Apostle expressly requires 1 Tim. 3.2 Tit. 1. c. where he saith A Bishop must be blameless vigilant sober of good behaviour apt to teach patient a lover of good men just holy temperate as the Steward of God holding fast the faithful Word as he hath been taught Upon the other hand He must neither be given to Wine nor a Striker nor covetous nor proud nor self-willed nor soon angry Now I ask If it be not impossible that a man can have all these above-named Vertues and be free of all these Evils without the Grace of God if then these Vertues for the producing of which in a man Grace is absolutely necessary be necessary to make a true Minister of the Church of Christ according to the Apostles judgment surely Grace must be necessary also Concerning this thing a learned man and well skilled in Antiquity about the time of the Reformation writeth thus Whatsoever is done in the Church either for Ornament or Edification of Religion whether in chusing Magistrates or instituting Ministers of the Church except it be done by the ministry of Gods Spirit which is as it were the Soul of the Church it is vain and wicked For whoever hath not been called by the Spirit of God to the great office of God and dignity of Apostleship as Aaron was and hath not entred in by the door which is Christ but hath otherways risen in the Church by the window by the favours of men c. truly such a one is not the Vicar of Christ and the Apostles but a thief and a Robber and the Vicar of Judas Iscariot and Simon the Samaritan Hence it was so strictly appointed concerning the election of Prelates which holy Dionisius calls Sacrament of Nomination that the Bishops and Apostles who should oversee the Service of the Church should be men of most intire manners and life powerful in sound Doctrine to give a reason for all things So also another about the same time writeth thus Therefore it can never be that by the Tongues or Learning any can give a sound judgment concerning the Holy Scriptures and the Truth of God Lastly saith he the Sheep of Christ seeketh nothing but the Voice of Christ which he knoweth by the Holy Spirit wherewith he is filled he regards not learning Tongues or any outward thing so as therefore to believe this or that to be the voice of Christ his true Shepherd he knoweth that there is need of no other thing but the testimony of the Spirit of God § XVII Against this absolute necessity of grace they object That if all Ministers had the saving Grace of God Obj. then all ministers should be saved seeing none can fall away from or lose Saving Grace But this Objection is built upon a false Hypothesis Answ. purely denyed by us and we have in the former Proposition concerning Perseverance already refuted it Obj. Secondly it may be objected to us That since we affirm that every Man hath a measure of true and Saving Grace there needs no singular qualifications neither to a Christian nor Minister for seeing every man hath this Grace then no man needs forbear to be a Minister for want of Grace Answ. I answer We have above shewn that there is necessary to the making a Minister a special and particular call from the Spirit of God which is something besides the universal dispensation of Grace to all according to that of the Apostle No man taketh this honour unto himself but he that is called of God as was Aaron Moreover we understand by Grace as a qualification to a Minister not the meer measure of Light as it is given to reprove and call him to righteousness but we understand Grace as it hath converted the Soul and operateth powerfully in it as hereafter concerning the work of Ministers will further appear So we understand not men simply as having Grace in them as a Seed which we indeed affirm
be truly one must be much more necessary to make a man a Minister of Christianity seeing the one is a degree above the other and has it included in it nothing less than he that supposeth a master supposeth him first to have attained the knowledg and capacity of a Scholar They that are not Christians cannot be Teachers or Ministers among Christians But this inward call power and vertue of the Spirit of God is necessary to make a man a Christian as we have abundantly proved before in the second proposition according to these Scriptures He that hath not the Spirit of Christ is none of his As many as are led by the Spirit of God are the sons of God Therefore this call moving and drawing of the Spirit must be much more necessary to make a minister Secondly all ministers of the New Testament ought to be ministers of the Spirit and not of the letter according to that 2 Cor. 3.6 and as the old Latine hath it not by the letter but by the Spirit But how can a man be a minister of the Spirit who is not inwardly called by it and who looks not upon the operation and testimony of the Spirit as essential to his call As he could not be a minister of the letter who had thence no ground for his call yea that were altogether a stranger to and unacquainted with it so neither can he be a minister of the Spirit who is a stranger to it and unacquainted with the motions thereof and knows it not to draw act and move him and go before him in the work of the Ministery I would willingly know how those that take upon them to be ministers as they suppose of the Gospel meerly from an outward vocation without so much as being any ways sensible of the work of the Spirit or any inward call therefrom can either satisfie themselves or others that they are Ministers of the Spirit or wherein they differ from the ministers of the Letter For Thirdly if this inward call or testimony of the Spirit were not essential and necessary to a minister then the ministery of the New Testament should not only be no ways preferable to but in divers respects far worse than that of the Law for under the Law there was certain tribe allotted for the ministery and of that tribe certain families set apart for the priesthood and other offices by the immediate command of God to Moses so that the people needed not be in any doubt who should be Priests and Ministers of the holy things yea and besides this God called forth by the immediate testimony of his Spirit several at divers times to teach instruct and reprove his people as Samuel Nathan Elias Elisa Jeremiah Amos and many more of the Prophets But now under the New Covenant where the ministry ought to be more spiritual the way more certain and the access more easie unto the Lord our adversaries by denying the necessity of this inward and Spiritual vocation make it quite otherways for there being now no certain family or tribe to which the ministry is limited we are left in uncertainty to chuse and have pastors at a venture without all certain assent of the will of God having neither an outward rule nor certainty in this affair to walk by for that the Scripture cannot give any certain rule in this matter hath in the third Proposition concerning it been already shewn Fourthly Christ proclaims them all Thieves and Robbers that enter not by him the door into the Sheep-fold but climb up some other way whom the Sheep ought not to hear but such as come in without the Call movings and leadings of the Spirit of Christ wherewith he leads his Children into all truth come in certainly not by Christ who is the Door but some other way and therefore are not true Shepherds Obj. § VIII To all this they object the succession of the Church alledging that since Christ gave a call to his Apostles and Disciples they have conveyed that call to their Successors having power to ordain Pastors and Teachers by which power the authority of ordaining and making Ministers and Pastors is successively conveyed to us so that such who are ordained and called by the Pastors of the Church are therefore true and lawful Ministers and others who are not so called are to be accounted but intruders Hereunto also some Protestants add a necessity though they make it not as a thing essential that besides this calling of the Church every one being called ought to have the inward call of the Spirit inclining him so chosen to his work but this they say is subjective and not objective of which before Answ. As to what is subjoined of the inward call of the Spirit in that they make it not essential to a true call but a supererogation as it were it sheweth how little they set by it since those they admit to the ministery are not so much as questioned in their trials whether they have this or not Yet in that it hath been often mentioned especially by the Primitive Protestants in their treatises of this subject it sheweth how much they were secretly convinced in their minds that this inward call of the Spirit was most excellent and preferable to any other and therefore in the most noble and heroick acts of the reformation they laid claim unto it so that many of the primitive Protestants did not scruple both to despise and disown this outward call when urged by the Papists against them But now Protestants having gone from the testimony of the Spirit plead for the same succession and being pressed by those whom God now raiseth up by his Spirit to reform these many abuses that are among them with the example of their Forefathers practice against Rome they are not at all asham'd utterly to deny that their fathers were call'd to their work by the inward and immediate vocation of the Spirit cloathing themselves with that call which they say their Forefathers had as Pastors of the Roman Church For thus not to go further affirmeth Nicolaus Arnoldus in a pamphlet written against the same Propositions called a Theologick Exercitation sect 40. averring that they pretended not to an immediate act of the Holy Spirit but reformed by the vertue of the ordinary vocation which they had in the Church as it then was to wit that of Rome c. § IX Many absurdities do Protestants fall into by deriving their ministry thus through the Church of Rome As first they must acknowledg her to be a true Church of Christ though only erroneous in some things which contradicts their fore-fathers so frequently and yet truly calling her Anti-Christ Secondly they must needs acknowledge that the Priests and Bishops of the Romish Church are true Ministers and Pastors of the Church of Christ as to the essential part else they could not have been fit subjects for that power and authority to have resided in neither
could they have been vessels capable to receive that power and again transmit it to their successors Thirdly it would follow from this that the Priests and Bishops of the Romish Church are yet really true Pastors and Teachers for if Protestant Ministers have no authority but what they received from them and since the Church of Rome is the same she was at that time of the reformation in doctrine and manners and she has the same power now she had then and if the power lye in the Succession then these Priests of the Romish Church now which derive their ordination from those Bishops that ordained the first reformers have the same authority which the successors of the reformed have and consequently are no less Ministers of the Church than they are But how shall this agree with that opinion which the primitive Protestants had of the Romish Priests and Clergy to whom Luther did not only deny any power or authority but contrariwise affirmed that it was wickedly done of them to assume to themselves only this authority to teach and be Priests and Ministers c. For he himself affirmed that every good Christian not only men but even women also is a Preacher § X. But against this vain succession as asserted either by the Papists or Protestants as a necessary thing to the call of a minister I answer that such as plead for it as a sufficient or necessary thing to the call of a minister do thereby sufficiently declare their ignorance of the nature of Christianity and how much they are strangers to the Life and Power of a Christian ministery which is not entail'd to succession as an outward inheritance and herein as hath been often before observed they not only make the Gospel not better than the Law but even far short of it for Jesus Christ as he regardeth not any distinct particular family or nation in the gathering of his Children but only such as are joined to and leavened with his own pure and righteous Seed so neither regards he a bare outward succession where his pure immaculate and righteous Life is wanting for that were all one He took not in the Nations within the New Covenant that he might suffer them to fall into the old errors of the Jews or to approve them in these errors but that he might gather unto himself a pure people out of the earth Now this was the great error of the Jews to think they were the Church and People of God because they could derive their outward succession from Abraham whereby they reckoned themselves the Children of God as being the off-spring of Abraham who was the Father of the faithful But how severely doth the Scripture rebuke this vain and frivolous pretence Telling them that God is able of the stones to raise children unto Abraham and that not the outward seed but those that were found in the faith of Abraham are the true Children of faithful Abraham Far less then can this pretence hold among Christians seeing Christ rejects all outward affinity of that kind These saith he are my mother brethren and sisters who do the will of my Father which is in heaven And again He looked round about him and said who shall do the will of God these said he are my brethren So then such as do not the commands of Christ as are not found cloathed with his righteousness are not his disciples and that which a man hath not he cannot give to another and it 's clear that no man nor Church though truly called of God and as such having the authority of a Church and Minister can any longer retain that authority than they retain the power life and righteousness of Christianity for the form is entailed to the power and substance and not the substance to the form So that when a man ceaseth inwardly in his heart to be a Christian where his Christianity must lie by turning to Satan and becoming a reprobate he is no more a Christian though he retain the name and form than a dead man is a man though he have the image and representation of one or than the Picture or Statue of a man is a man and though a dead man may serve to a Painter to retain some imperfect representation of the man that sometimes was alive and so one Picture may serve to make another by yet none of those can serve to make a true living man again neither can they conveigh the life and spirit of the man it must be God that made the man at first that alone can revive him As death then makes such interruption of an outward natural succession that no art nor outward form can uphold and as a dead man after he is dead can have no issue neither can dead images of men make living men so that it is the living that are only capable to succeed one another and such as dye so soon as they dye cease to succeed or to transmit Succession So it is in Spiritual things it is the life of Christianity taking place in the Heart that makes a Christian and so it is a number of such being alive joyned together in the life of Christianity that make a Church of Christ and it is all those that are thus alive and quickened considered together that make the Catholick Church of Christ Therefore where this life ceaseth in one then that one ceaseth to be a Christian and all power vertue and authority which he had as a Christian ceaseth with it so that if he hath been a Minister or Teacher he ceaseth to be so any more and though he retain the form and hold to the authority in words yet that signifies no more nor is it of any more real vertue or authority than the meer image of a dead man And as this is most agreeable to Reason so is it to the Scriptures Testimony for it is said of Judas Acts 1.25 That Judas fell from his Ministry and Apostleship by transgression So his transgression caused him to cease to be an Apostle any more whereas had the Apostleship been entailed to his person so that transgression could not cause him to lose it until he had been formally degraded by the Church which Judas never was so long as he lived Judas had been as really an Apostle after he betrayed Christ as before And as it is of one so of many yea of a whole Church for seeing nothing makes a man truly a Christian but the life of Christianity inwardly ruling in his Heart so nothing makes a Church but the gathering of several true Christians into one Body Now where all these members lose in this life there the Church ceaseth to be though they still uphold the form and retain the name for when that which made them a Church and for which they were a Church ceaseth then they cease also to be a Church and therefore the Spirit speaking to the Church of Laodicea because of her luke-warmness Rev. 3.16 threateneth to
spue her out of his mouth Now suppose the Church of Laodicea had continued in that luke-warmness and had come under that condemnation and iudgment though she had retained the name and form of a Church and had had her Pastors and Ministers as no doubt she had at that time yet surely she had been no true Church of Christ nor had the authority of her Pastors and Teachers been to be regarded because of any outward succession though perhaps some of them had it immediately from the Apostles From all which I infer That since the authority of the Christian Church and her Pastors is always united and never separated from the inward power vertue and righteous life of Christianity where this ceaseth that ceaseth also But our adversaries acknowledge That many if not most of those by and through whom they derive this authority were altogether destitute of this life and vertue of Christianity Therefore they could neither receive have nor transmit any Christian authority Obj. But if it be objected That though the generality of the Bishops and Priests of the Church of Rome during the apostasie were such wicked men yet Protestants affirm and thou thy self seemest to acknowledge that there were some good men among them whom the Lord regarded and who were true members of the Catholick Church of Christ might not they then have transmitted this authority Answ. I answer This saith nothing in respect Protestants do not at all lay claim to their Ministry as transmitted to them by a direct line of such good men which they can never shew nor yet pretend to but generally place this succession as inherent in the whole Pastors of the Apostate Church neither do they plead their call to be good and valid because they can derive it through a line of good men separate and observable distinguishable from the rest of the Bishops and Clergy of the Romish Church but they derive it as an Authority residing in the whole for they think it heresie to judge that the quality or condition of the Administrator any ways invalidates or prejudiceth his work This vain then and pretended Succession not only militates against and fights with the very manifest purpose and intent of Christ in the gathering and calling of his Church but makes him so to speak more blind and less prudent than natural men are in conveying and establishing their outward Inheritances for where an Estate is entailed to a certain Name and Family when that Family weareth out and there is no lawful Successor found of it that can make a just title appear as being really of blood and affinity to the Family it is not lawful for any one of another race or blood because he assumes the name or arms of that Family to possess the estate and claim the superiorities and priviledges of the family but by the law of Nations the inheritance devolves into the Prince as being ultimus haeres and so he giveth it again immediately to whom he seeth meet and makes them bear the name and arms of the family who then are entitled to the priviledges and revenues thereof So in like manner the true name and title of a Christian by which he hath right to the heavenly inheritance and is a member of Jesus Christ is inward Righteousness and Holiness and the mind redeemed from the vanities lusts and iniquities of this world And a gathering or company made up of such members makes a Church where this is lost the title is lost and so the true Seed to which the promise is and to which the inheritance is due becomes extinguished in them and they become dead as to it and so it retires and devolves it self again into Christ who is the righteous heir of Life and he gives the title and true right again immediately to whom it pleaseth him even to as many as being turned to his Pure Light in their Consciences come again to walk in his righteous and innocent life and so become true members of his body which is the Church So the authority power and heirship is not annexed to persons as they bear the bare names or retain a form holding the meer shell or shadow of Christianity But the promise is to Christ and to the Seed in whom the authority is inherent and in as many as are one with him and united unto him by purity and holiness and by the inward renovation and regeneration of their minds Moreover this pretended succession is contrary to Scripture definitions and nature of the Church of Christ and of the true members For first The Church is the house of God the pillar and ground of Truth 1 Tim. 3.15 But according to this Doctrine the house of God is a polluted nest of all sort of wickedness and abominations made up of the most ugly defiled and perverse stones that are in the earth where the devil rules in all manner of unrighteousness For so our adversaries confess and History informs the Church of Rome to have been as some of their Historians acknowledge and if that be truly the house of God what may we call the house of Satan or may we call it therefore the house of God notwithstanding all this impiety because they had a bare form and that vitiated many ways also and because they pretended to the name of Christianity though they were anti-christian devilish and atheistical in their whole practice and spirit and also in many of their principles Would not this infer yet a greater absurdity as if they had been something to be accounted of because of their hypocrisie and deceit and false pretences Whereas the Scripture looks upon that as an aggravation of guilt and calls it Blasphemy Rev. 2.9 Of two wicked men he is most to be abhorred who covereth his wickedness with a vain pretence of God and righteousness even so these abominable beasts and fearful monsters who look upon themselves to be Bishops in the apostate Church were never a whit the better that they falsly pretended to be the Successors of the Holy Apostles unless to lie be commendable and that hypocrisie be the way to Heaven Yea were not this to fall into that evil condemned among the Jews Jer. 7.4 Trust ye not in lying words saying The Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord are these throughly amend your ways c. as if such outward names and things were the thing the Lord regarded and not inward holiness or can that then be the pillar and ground of Truth which is the very sink and pit of wickedness from which so much error superstition idolatry and all abomination springs Can there be any thing more contrary both to Scripture and Reason Secondly The Church is defined to be the Kingdom of the dear Son of God into which the Saints are translated being delivered from the power of darkness It is called the Body of Christ which from him by joynts and bands having nourishment ministred and knit
together increaseth with the increase of God Col. 2.19 But can such members such a gathering as we have demonstrated that Church and Members to be among whom they alledge their pretended authority to have been preserved and through which they derive their call can such I say be the body of Christ or members thereof or is Christ the head of such a corrupt dead dark abominable stinking carcase If so then might we not as well affirm against the Apostle 2 Cor. 6.14 That righteousness hath fellowship with unrighteousness that Light hath communion with Darkness that Christ hath concord with Belial that a Believer hath part with an Infidel and that the Temple of God hath agreement with Idols Moreover no man is called the Temple of God nor of the Holy Ghost but as his vessel is purified and so he fitted and prepared for God to dwell in and many thus fitted by Christ become his body in and among whom he dwells and walks according as it is written I will dwell in them and walk in them and I will be their God and they shall be my people It is therefore that we may become the Temple of Christ and people of God that the Apostle in the following verse exhorts saying out of the Prophet Wherefore come out from among them and be ye separate saith the Lord and touch not the unclean thing and I will receive you and I will be a Father unto you and ye shall be my Sons and Daughters saith the Lord Almighty But to what purpose all this exhortation and why should we separate from the unclean if a meer outward profession and name be enough to make the true Church and if the unclean and polluted were both the Church and lawful successors of the Apostles inheriting their authority and transmitting it to others Yea how can the Church be the Kingdom of the Son of God as contrary distinguished from the Kingdom and Power of darkness and what need yea what possibility of being translated out of the one into the other if those that make up the Kingdom and Power of darkness be real members of the true Church of Christ and not simple members only but the very Pastors and Teachers of it But how do they increase in the increase of God and receive Spiritual nourishment from Christ the Head that are enemies of him in their hearts by wicked works and openly go into perdition Verily as no metaphysical and nice distinctions that though they were practically as to their own private states enemies to God and Christ and so servants of Satan yet they were by vertue of their office members and ministers of the Church and so able to transmit the succession I say as such invented and frivolous distinctions will not please the Lord God neither will he be deluded by such nor make up the glorious body of his Church with such meer out-side hypocritical shews nor be beholden to such painted sepulchres for to be members of his body which is sound pure and undefiled and therefore he needs not such false and corrupt members to make up the defects of it so neither will such distinctions satisfie truly tender and Christian Consciences especially considering the Apostle is so far from desiring us to regard that as that we are expresly commanded to turn away from such as have a form of godliness but deny the power of it For we may well object against these as the poor man did against the proud Prelate that went about to cover his vain and unchristian-like sumptuousness by distinguishing that it was not as Bishop but as Prince he had all that splendor To which the poor rustick wisely is said to have answered When the Prince goeth to Hell what shall become of the Prelate And indeed this were to suppose the body of Christ to be defective and that to fill up these defective places he puts counterfeit and dead stuff instead of real living members like such as lose their eyes arms or legs make counterfeit ones of timber or glass instead of them But we cannot think so of Christ neither can we believe for the reasons above adduced that either we are to account or that Christ doth account any man or men a whit the more members of his body because though they be really wicked they hypocritically and deceitfully cloath themselves with his Name pretended to it for this is contrary to his own doctrine where he saith expresly Joh. 15.1 2 3 4 5 6 c. that he is the Vine and his Disciples are the Branches that except they abide in him they cannot bear fruit and if they be unfruitful they shall be cast forth as a branch and wither Now I suppose these cut and withered branches are no more true branches nor members of the Vine they can draw no more sap nor nourishment from it after that they are cut off and so have no more vertue sap nor life What have they then to boast or glory of any authority seeing they want that life vertue and nourishment from which all authority comes So such members of Christ as are become dead to him through unrighteousness and so derive no more vertue nor life from him are cut off by their sins and wither and have no more any true or real authority and their boasting of any is but an aggravation of their iniquity by hypocrisie and deceit But further would not this make Christ's body a meer shadow and phantam Yea would it not make him the head of a lifeless rotten stinking carcase having only some little outward false shew while inwardly full of rottenness and dirt and what a monster would these men make of Christ's body by assigning it real pure living quick Head full of vertue and life and yet tied to such a dead lifeless body as we have already described these members to be which they alledge to have been the Church of Christ. Again the members of the Church of Christ are specified by this definition to wit as being the sanctified in Christ Jesus 1. Cor. 1.2 But this notion of succession supposeth not only some unsanctified members to be of the Church of Christ but even the whole to consist of unsanctified members yea that such as were professed Necromancers and open servants of Satan were the true successors of the Apostles and in whom the Apostolick authority resided these being the vessels through whom this Succession is transmitted though many of them as all Protestants and also some Papists confess attained these offices in the so called Church not only by such means as Simon Magus sought it but by much worse even by witchcraft murther traditions money and treachery which Platina himself confesseth of divers Bishops of Rome § XI But such as object not this succession of the Church which yet most Protestants begin now to do distinguish in this matter affirming that in a great apostacy such as was that of the Church of Rome God may raise up some
best of them for he has better skill of Languages and more Logick Philosophy and School Divinity than any of them and knows the Truth in the notion better than they all and talk more Eloquently than all those Preachers But what availeth all this Is it not all but as Death as a painted Sepulchre and dead Carcase without the Power Life and Spirit of Christianity which is the marrow and substance of a Christian Ministry and he that hath this and can speak from it though he be a poor Shepherd or a Fisher-man and ignorant of all that Learning and of all those questions and notions yet speaking from the Spirit his Ministry will have more influence towards the converting of a sinner unto God than all of them learned after the flesh as in that Example of the old man at the Council of Nice did appear § XXIII And if in any Age since the Apostles daies God hath purposed to shew his power by weak instruments for the battering down of that carnal and heathenish wisdom and restoring again the ancient simplicity of Truth this is it for in our day God hath raised up witnesses for himself as he did Fisher-men of old many yea most of whom are labouring and mechanick men who altogether without that learning have by the Power and Spirit of God struck at the very root and ground of Babylon and in the strength and might of this Power have gathered thousands by teaching their Consciences into the same Power and Life who as to the outward part have been far more knowing than they yet not able to resist the vertue that proceeded from them Of which I my self am a true witness and can declare from a certain experience because my heart hath been often greatly broken and tendered by that vertuous Life that proceeded from the powerful Ministry of those illeterate men so that by their very countenance as well as words I have felt the evil in me often chained down and the good reached to and raised What shall I then say to you who are lovers of learning and admirers of knowledg Was not I also a lover and admirer of it who also sought after it according to my age and capacity But it pleased God in his unutterable love early to withstand my vain endeavours while I was yet but eighteen years of age made and me seriously to consider which I wish also may befall others that without holiness and regeneration no man can see God and that the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom and to depart from iniquity a good understanding And how much knowledg puffeth up and leadeth away from that inward quietness stilness and humility of mind where the Lord appears and his heavenly wisdom is revealed If ye consider these things then will ye say with me that all this learning wisdom and knowledg gathered in this faln nature is but as dross and dung in comparison of the cross of Christ especially being destitute of that Power Life and Vertue which I perceived these excellent though despised because illeterate Witnesses of God to be filled with and therefore seeing that in and among them I with many others have found the heavenly food that gives contentment let my Soul seek after this learning and wait for it for ever § XXIV Having thus spoken of the call and qualifications of a Gospel Minister that which comes next to be considered is What his proper work is how and by what rule he is to be ordered Our adversaries do all along go upon outwards and therefore have certain prescribed rules and methods contrived according to their humane and earthly wisdom We on the contrary walk still upon the same foundation and lean alwaies upon the immediate assistance and influence of that Holy Spirit which God hath given his Children to teach them all things and lead them in all things which Spirit being the Spirit of order and not of confusion leads us and as many as follow it into such a comely and decent order as becometh the Church of God But our adversaries having shut themselves out from this immediate council and influence of the Spirit have run themselves into many confusions and disorders seeking to establish an order in this matter For some will have first a chief Bishop or Pope to rule and be Prince over all and under him by degrees Cardinals Patriarchs Archbishops Priests Deacons Sub-deacons and besides these Acoluthi consotari ostiarii c. And in their Theology as they call it Professors Batchelors Doctors c. And others are to have every Nation independent of another having its own Metropolitan or Patriarch and the rest in order subject to him as before Others again are against all precedency among Pastors and constitute their subordination not of persons but of power as first the Consistory or Session then the Class or Presbytery then the Provincial and then the National Synod or Assembly Thus do they tear one another and contend among themselves concerning the ordering distinguishing and making their several orders offices concerning which there hath been no less contest not only by way of verbal diâ—pute but even by fighting tumults wars vastations and blood-shed than about the conquering overturning and establishing of Kingdoms And the Histories of late times are as full of the various Tragedies acted upon the account of this Spiritual and Ecclesiastical Monarchy and Common Wealth as the Histories of old times that gave account of the wras and contests that fell out both in Assyrian Persian Greek and Roman Empires These last upon this account though among those that are called Christians have been no less bloody and monstrous than the former among Heathens concerning their outward Empires and Governments Now all this both among Papists and Protestants proceedeth in that they seek in imitation to uphold a form and shadow of things though they want the Power Vertue and Substance though for many of their orders and forms they have not so much as the name in the Scripture But in opposition to all this mass of formality and heap of Orders Rules and Governments we say the Substance is chiefly to be sought after and the Power Vertue and Spirit is to be known and waited for which is one in all the different names and offices the Scripture makes use of as appears by 1 Cor. 12. often before mentioned There are diversities of Gifts but the same Spirit And after the Apostle throughout the whole chapter hath shewn how one and the self same Spirit worketh in and quickeneth each member then in the 28 verse he sheweth how thereby God hath set in the Church first Apostles secondly Prophets Teachers c. And likewise to the same purpose Eph. 4. he sheweth how by these Gifts he hath given some Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists some Pastors some Teachers c. Now it was never Christs purpose nor the Apostles that Christians should without this Spirit and Heavenly Gift set
it are answered § XIII The most usual is that these Revelations are uncertain But this bespeaketh much ignorance in the opposers for we distinguish betwixt the thesis and the hypothesis that is betwixt the proposition and supposition For it is one thing to affirm that the true and undoubted Revelation of God's Spirit is certain and infallible and another thing to affirm that this or that particular person or people is led infallibly by this Revelation in what they speak or write because they affirm themselves to be so led by the inward and immediate Revelation of the Spirit The first is only by us asserted the latter may be called in question The question is not who are or are not so led but whether all ought not or may not be so led Seeing then we have already proved that Christ hath promised his Spirit to lead his Children and that every one of them both ought and may be led by it If any depart from this certain Guide in deeds and yet in words pretend to be led by it into things that are not good it will not from thence follow that the true guidance of the Spirit is uncertain or ought not to be followed no more than it will follow that the Sun sheweth not light because a blind man or one who wilfully shuts his Eyes falls into a ditch at Noon day for want of Light or that no words are spoken because a deaf man hears them not or that a Garden full of fragrant Flowers has no sweet smell because he that has lost his smelling doth not savour it the fault then is in the Organ and not in the Object All these mistakes therefore are to be ascribed to the weakness or wickedness of men and not to that Holy Spirit Such as bend themselves most against this certain and infallible Testimony of the Spirit use commonly to alledge the example of the old Gnosticks and the late monstruous and mischievous actings of the Anabaptists of Munster all which toucheth us nothing at all neither weakens a whit our most true Doctrine Wherefore as a most sure Bullwark against such kind of assaults was subjoyned that other part of our Proposition thus Moreover these Divine and inward Revelations which we establish as absolutely necessary for the founding of the true Faith as they do not so neither can they at any time contradict the Scriptures Testimony or found Reason Besides the intrinsick and undoubted Truth of this assertion we can boldly affirm it from our certain and blessed Experience For this Spirit never deceived us never acted nor moved us to any thing that was amiss but is clear and manifest in its Revelations which are evidently discerned of us as we wait in that pure and undefiled Light of God that proper and fit Organ in which they are received Therefore if any reason after this manner That because some wicked ungodly devilish men have committed wicked actions and have yet more wickedly asserted that they were led into these things by the Spirit of God Therefore no man ought to lean to the Spirit of God or seek to be led by it I utterly deny the consequence of this Proposition which were it to be received as true then would all faith in God and hope of Salvation become uncertain and the Christian Religion be turned into meer Scepticism For after the same manner I might reason thus Because Eve was deceived by the lying of the Serpent Therefore she ought not to have trusted to the promise of God Because the old World was deluded by evil Spirits Therefore ought neither Noah nor Abraham nor Moses to have trusted the Spirit of the Lord. Because a lying Spirit spake through the four hundred Prophets that perswaded Achab to go up and fight at Ramoth Gilead Therefore the Testimony of the true Spirit of Micajah was uncertain and dangerous to be followed Because there were seducing Spirits crept into the Church of old Therefore it was not good or uncertain to follow the Anointing which taught all things and is Truth and no Lye Who dare say that this is a necessary consequence Moreover not only the Faith of the Saints and Church of God of old is hereby rendered uncertain but also the Faith of all sorts of Christians now is liable to the like hazard even of those who seek a foundation for their Faith elsewhere than from the Spirit For I shall prove by an inevitable argument ab incommodo i. e. from the inconveniency of it that if the Spirit be not to be followed upon that account and that men may not depend upon it as their Guide because some while pretending thereunto commit great evils that then nor Tradition nor the Scriptures nor Reason which the Papists Protestants and Socinians do respectively make the rule of their Faith are any whit more certain The Romanists reckon it an error to celebrate Easter any other ways than that Church doth This can only be decided by Tradition And yet the Greek Church which equally layeth claim to Tradition with her self doth it otherwise Yea so little effectual is Tradition to decide the case that Polycarpus the Disciple of John and Anicetus the Bishop of Rome who immediately succeeded them according to whose example both sides concluded the question ought to be decided could not agree Here of necessity one behoved to err and that following Tradition Would the Papists now judg we dealt fairly by them if we should thence aver that Tradition is not to be regarded Besides in a matter of far greater importance the same difficulty will occur to wit in the Primacy of the Bishop of Rome for many do affirm and that by Tradition that in the First Six Hundred Years the Roman Prelates never assumed the Title of Vniversal Shepherd nor were acknowledged as such And as that which altogether overturneth this presidency there are that alledg and that from Tradition also that Peter never saw Rome and that therefore the Bishop of Rome cannot be his Successor Would ye Romanists think this sound reasoning to say as ye do Many have been deceived and erred grievously in trusting to Tradition Therefore we ought to reject all Traditions yea even those by which we affirm the contrary and as we think prove the Truth Lastly in the Council of Florence the chief Doctors of the Romish and Greek Churches did debate whole Sessions long concerning the Interpretation of one Sentence of the Council of Ephesus and of Epiphanius and Basilius neither could they ever agree about it Secondly as to the Scripture the same difficulty occurreth the Lutherans affirm they believe Consubstantiation by the Scripture which they Calvinists deny as that which they say according to the same Scripture is a gross error The Calvinists again affirm absolute reprobation which the Arminians deny affirming the contrary wherein both affirm themselves to be ruled by the Scripture and Reason in the matter should I argue thus then to the Calvinists Here the
above intimated will appear The same argument will hold as to the other branch of the position That it is not the primary adequade rule of faith and manners thus That which is not the rule of my faith in believing the Scriptures themselves is not the primary adequate rule of faith and manners But the Scripture is not nor can it be the rule of that faith by which I believe them c. Therefore c. But as to this part we shall produce divers arguments hereafter as to what is affirmed That the Spirit and not the Scriptures is the rule it is largely handled in the former proposition the sum whereof I shall subsume in one argument thus If by the Spirit we can only come to the true knowledge of God If by the Spirit we be to be led into all truth and so be taught of all things Then the Spirit and not the Scriptures is the foundation and ground of all Truth and knowledg and the primary rule of faith and manners But the first is true Therefore also the last Next the very nature of the Gospel it self declareth that the Scriptures cannot be the only and chief rule of Christians else there should be no difference betwixt the Law and the Gospel As from the nature of the New Covenant by divers Scriptures described in the former Proposition is proved But besides those which are before mentioned herein doth the Law and the Gospel differ in that the Law being outwardly written brings under condemnation but hath not life in it to save whereas the Gospel as it declares and makes manifest the evil so it being an inward powerful thing also gives power to obey and deliver from the evil Hence it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is glad tidings the Law or Letter which is without us kills but the Gospel which is the inward Spiritual Law gives life for it consists not so much in words as in vertue Wherefore such as comes to know it and be acquainted with it come to feel greater power over their iniquities than all outward Laws or Rules can give them Hence the Apostle concludes Rom. 6.14 Sin shall not have dominion over you For ye are not under the Law but under Grace This Grace then that is inward and not an outward Law is to be the Rule of Christians hereunto the Apostle commends the Elders of the Church saying Acts 20.32 And now Brethren I commend you to God and to the Word of his Grace which is able to build you up and to give you an inheritance among all those that are sanctified He doth not commend them here to outward laws or writings but to the Word of Grace which is inward even the Spiritual Law which makes free as he elsewhere affirms Rom. 8.2 The Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death This Spiritual Law is that which the Apostle declares he preached and directed people unto which was not outward as Rom. 10.8 is manifest where distinguishing it from the Law he saith The Word is nigh thee in thy heart and in thy mouth and this is the Word of Faith which we preach From what is above said I argue thus The principal Rule of Christians under the Gospel is not an outward letter nor law outwardly written and delivered but an inward Spiritual Law ingraven in the heart the Law of the Spirit of Life the Word that is nigh in the heart and in the mouth But the letter of the Scripture is outward of it self a dead things a meer declaration of good things but not the things themselves Therefore it is not nor can be the chief or principle rule of Christians § III. Thirdly That which is given to Christians for a Rule and Guide must needs be so full as it may clearly and distinctly guide and order them in all things and occurences that may fall out But in that there are many hundred of things with a regard to their circumstances particular Christians may be concerned in for which there can be no particular Rule had in the Scriptures Therefore the Scriptures cannot be a Rule to them I shall give an instance in two or three particulars for to prove this Proposition It is not to be doubted but some men are particularly called to some particular Services there being not found in which though the act be no general positive duty yet in so far as it may be required of them is a great sin to omit for as much God is zealous of his Glory and every act of Disobedience to his will manifested is enough not only to hinder one greatly from that Comfort and inward Grace which otherwise they might have but also bringeth Condemnation As for instance Some are called to the Ministry of the Word Paul saith there was a necessity upon him to preach the Gospel wo unto me if I preach not If it be necessary that there be now Ministers of the Church as well as then then there is the same necessity upon some more than upon others to occupy this place which necessity as it may be incumbent upon particular persons the Scripture neither doth nor can declare If it be said that the qualifications of a Minister are found in the Scripture and by applying these qualifications to my self I may know whether I be fit for such a place or no. I answer The qualifications of a Bishop or Minister as they are mentioned both in the Epistle to Tim. and Tit. are such as may be found in a private Christian yea which ought in some measure to be in every true Christian so that that giveth a man no certainty every pacity to an office giveth me not a sufficient call to it Next again By what Rule shall I judg if I be so qualified how do I know that I am sober meek holy harmless Is not the Testimony of the Spirit in my Conscience that which must assure me hereof And suppose that I was quallified and called yet what Scripture Rule shall inform me whether it be my duty to preach in this or that place in France or England Holland or Germany whether I shall take up my Time in Confirming the Faithful reclaiming Hereticks or Converting Infidels as also in Writing Epistles to this or that Church The general Rules of the Scripture viz. to be diligent in my duty to do all to the Glory of God and for the good of his Church can give me no light in this thing Seeing two different things may both have a respect to that way yet may I commit a great error and offence in doing the one when I am called to the other If Paul when his Face was turned by the Lord toward Jerusalem had gone back to Achaia or Macedonia he might have supposed he could have done God more acceptable service in Preaching and Confirming the Churches than in being shut up in Prison in Judea but would God have been pleased
have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the Righteous And he is the Propitiation for our Sins and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole World The way which our Adversaries take to evite this Testimony is most foolish and ridiculous The World here say they is the World of Believers For this Commentary we have nothing but their own assertion and so while it manifestly destroys the Text may be justly rejected For first let them shew me if they can in all the Scripture where the whole world is taken for Believers only I shall shew them where it is many times taken for the quite contrary as the world knows me not the world receives me not I am not of this world Besides all these Scriptures Psal. 17.14 Isa. 13.11 Matth. 18.1 John 7.7 8.26.12.19.14.17.15.18 19.17.14.18.20 1 Cor. 1.21.2 12.6.2 Gal. 6.14 Jam. 1.27 2 Pet. 2.20 1 Joh. 2.15.3.1 and 4.4 5. and many more Secondly the Apostle in this very place contradistinguisheth the World from the Saints thus And not for ours only but for the sins of the whole world What means the Apostle by ours here Is not that the sins of Believers Was not he one of those Believers And was not this an universal Epistle written to all the Saints that then were So that according to these mens comment there should be a very unnecessary and foolish redundancy in the Apostles words as if he had said he is a Propitiation not only for the sins of all Believers but for the sins of all Believers Is not this to make the Apostles words void of good sense Let them shew us where ever there is such a manner of speaking in all the Scripture where any of the Pen-men first name the Believers in concreto with themselves and then contradistinguish them from some other whole world of Believers That whole World if it be of Believers must not be the world we live in But we need no better interpreter for the Apostle than himself who uses the very same expression and phrase in the same Epistle c. 5.19 saying We know that we are of God and the whole world lieth in wickedness there cannot be found in all the Scripture two places which run more parallel seeing in both the same Apostle in the same Epistle to the same persons contradistinguisheth himself and the Saints to whom he writes from the whole world which according to these mens commentary ought to be understood of Believers as if John had said We know particular Believers are of God but the whole World of Believers lieth in wickedness What absurd wresting of Scripture were this And yet it may be as well pleaded for as the other for they differ not at all seeing then that the Apostle John tells us plainly that Christ not only died for him and for the Saints and Members of the Church of God to whom he wrote but for the whole world Let us then hold it for a certain and undoubted Truth notwithstanding the cavils of such as oppose This might also be proved from many more Scripture testimonies if it were at this season needful All the Fathers so called and Doctors of the Church for the first four centuries preached this Doctrin according to which they boldly held forth the Gospel of Christ and efficacy of Death inviting and intreating the Heathens to come and be partakers of the benefits of it shewing them how there was a door open for them all to be saved through Jesus Christ not telling them that God had predestinated any of them to Damnation or had made Salvation impossible to them by with-holding Power and Grace necessary to believe from them But of many of their sayings which might be alledged I shall only instance a few Austin on the 95 Psalm saith The Blood of Christ is of no less value than the whole World Prosper ad Gall. c. 9. The redeemer of the World gave his blood for the World and the World would not be redeemed because the darkness did not receive the Light He that saith the Saviour was not crucified for the redemption of the whole World looks not to the vertue of the Sacrament but to the part of Infidels since the blood of our Lord Jesus Christ is the price of the whole World from which redemption they are strangers who either delighting in their captivity would not be redeemed or after they were redeemed returned to the same servitude The same Prosper in his answer to Vencentius's first objection Seeing therefore because of one common nature and cause in Truth undertaken by our Lord all are rightly said to be redeemed and nevertheless all are not brought out of Captivity the property of Redemption without doubt belongeth to those from whom the Prince of this World is shut out and now are not vessels of the devil but Members of Christ whose Death was so bestowed upon mankind that it belonged to the Redemption of such who are not to be regenerated But so that which was done by the Example of one for all might by a singular mystery be celebrated in every one For the Cup of Immortality which is made up of our Infirmity and the Divine Power hath indeed that in it which may profit all but if it be not drunk it doth not heal The Author de vocat Gentium lib. 11. cap. 6. There is no cause to doubt but that our Lord Jesus Christ died for Sinners and wicked Men and if there can be any found who may be said not to be of this number Christ hath not died for all he made himself a Redeemer for the whole World Chrysistom on the 1. chap. of John If he inlightens every man coming into the World how comes it that so many men remain without Light For all do not so much as acknowledg Christ how then doth he inlighten every Man he illuminates indeed so far as in him is but if any of their own accord closing the eyes of their mind will not direct their eyes unto the beams of this Light the cause that they remain in darkness is not from the nature of the Light but through their own malignity who willingly have rendred themselves unworthy of so great a gift But why be lieved they not Because they would not Christ did his part The Arelatensian Synod held about the year 490 Pronounced him accursed who should say that Christ hath not dyed for all or that he would not have all men to be saved Ambr. on Psal. 118. Serm. 8. The mystical Sun of Righteousness is arisen to all he came to all he suffered for all and rose again for all And therefore he suffered that he might take away the Sin of the World But if any one believed not in Christ he bros himself of this general Benefit even as if one by closing the Windows should hold out the Sun-beams the Sun is not therefore not arisen to all because such a one hath so robbed himself of its heat But the
him on whom God therefore truly accounteth Righteous and Just. This is so far from being the Doctrine of Papists that as the generality of them do not understand it so the learned among them oppose it and dispute against it and particularly Bellarmin Thus then as I may say the formal cause of Justification is not the works to speak properly they being but an effect of it but this inward Birth this Jesus brought forth in the heart who is the Well-beloved whom the Father cannot but accept and all those who thus are sprinkled with the Blood of Jesus and washed with it By this also comes that communication of the goods of Christ unto us by which we come to be made partakers of the Divine Nature as saith Peter ep 2. c. 1. v. 4. are made one with him as the Branches with the Vine and have a title and right to what he hath done and suffered for us So that his Obedience becomes ours his Righteousness ours his Death and Sufferings ours And by this nearness we come to have a sense of his Sufferings and to suffer with his Seed that yet lies pressed and crucified in the hearts of the ungodly and so travel with it and for its Redemption and for the repentance of those Souls that in it are crucifying as yet the Lord of Glory Even as the Apostle Paul who by his sufferings is said to fill up that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ for his Body which is the Church Though this be a Mystery sealed up from all the wise men that are yet ignorant of this Seed in themselves and oppose it nevertheless some Protestants speak of this Justification by Christ inwardly put-on as shall hereafter be recited in its place Lastly though we place remission of sins in the Righteousness and Obedience of Christ performed by him in the flesh as to what pertains to the remote procuring cause and that we hold our selves formally justified by Christ Jesus formed and brought forth in us yet can we not as some Protestants have unwarily done exclude works from Justification for though properly we be not justified for them yet are we justified in them and they are necessary even as causa sine qua non i. e. the cause without which none are Justified For the denying of this as it 's contrary to the Scriptures Testimony so it hath brought a great scandal to the Protestant Religion opened the mouths of Papists and made many too secure while they have believed to be Justified without good works Moreover though it be not so safe to say they are meritorious yet seeing they are rewarded many of those called the Fathers have not spared to use the word merit which some of us have perhaps also done in a qualified sense but no ways to inferr the Popish abuses above mentioned And lastly if we had that notion of good works which most Protestants have we could freely agree to make them not only not necessary but reject them as hurtful viz. that the best works even of the Saints are defiled and polluted For though we judg so of the best works performed by man endeavouring a conformity to the outward Law by his own strength and in his own will yet we believe that such works as naturally proceed from this Spiritual Birth and formation of Christ in us are pure and Holy even as the Root from which they come and therefore God accepts them Justifies us in them and rewards us for them of his own Free Grace The state of the controversie being thus stated these following Positions do hence from arise in the next place to be proved § IV. First that the obedience sufferings and death of Christ is that by which the Soul obtains remission of sins and is the procuring cause of that Grace by whose inward workings Christ comes to be formed inwardly and the Soul to be made conformable unto him and so just and justified And that therefore in respect of this capacity and offer of Grace God is said to be reconciled not as if he were actually reconciled or did actually justifie or account any just so long as they remain in their sins really impure and unjust Secondly that it is by this inward Birth of Christ in man that man is made just and therefore so accounted by God wherefore to be plain we are thereby and not till that be brought forth in us formally if we must use that word justified in the sight of God because Justification is both more properly and frequently in Scripture taken in its proper signification for making one just and not reputing one meerly such and is all one with Sanctification Thirdly that since good works as naturally follow from this birth as heat from fire therefore are they of absolute necessity to Justification as causa sine qua non i. e. though not as the cause for which yet as that in which we are and without which we cannot be Justified And though they be not meritorious and draw no debt upon God yet he cannot but accept and reward them for it is contrary to his Nature to deny his own Since they may be perfect in their kind as proceeding from a Pure Holy Birth and Root Wherefore their judgment is false and against the Truth that say that the holyest works of the Saints are defiled and sinful in the sight of God For these good works are not the works of the Law excluded by the Apostle from Justification § V. As to the first I prove it from Rom. 3.25 Whom God hath set forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood to declare his Righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Here the Apostle holds forth the extent and efficacy of Christs death shewing that thereby and by Faith therein remission of sins that are past is obtained as being that wherein the forbearance of God is exercised towards mankind So that though men for the sins they daily commit deserve Eternal Death and that the Wrath of God should lay hold upon them yet by virtue of that most satisfactory Sacrifice of Christ Jesus the Grace and Seed of God moves in love towards them during the day of their visitation yet not so as not to strike against the evil for that must be burned up and destroyed but to redeem man out of the evil Secondly if God were perfectly reconciled with men and did esteem them just while they are actually unjust and do continue in their sins Then should God have no Controversie with them How comes he then so often to complain to expostulate so much throughout the whole Scripture with such as our Adversaries confess to be Justified telling them that their sins separate betwixt him and them Isa. 59.2 For where there is a perfect and full reconciliation there there is no separation Yea from this Doctrine it necessarily follows either that such for whom Christ died and whom he hath
is ever taken away here And how injurious are they to the Efficacy and Power of Christ's appearance Came not Christ to gather a People out of sin into Righteousness out from the Kingdom of Satan into the Kingdom of the Dear Son of God And are not they that are thus gathered by him his Servants his Children his Brethren his Friends Who as he was so are they to be in this World Holy Pure and Vndefiled And doth not Christ still watch over them stand by them pray for them preserve them by his Power and Spirit walk in them and dwell among them even as the Devil on the other hand doth among the reprobate ones How comes it then that the Servants of Christ are less his Servants than the Devils are his or is Christ unwilling to have his Servants throughly pure which were gross Blasphemy to assert contrary to many Scriptures Or is he not able by his Power to preserve and enable his Children to serve him which were no less Blasphemous to affirm of him concerning whom the Scriptures declare that he has overcome Sin Death Hell and the Grave and triumphed over them openly and that all power in Heaven and Earth is given to him But certainly if the Saints sin daily in Thought Word and Deed as these men assert they serve the Devil daily and are subject to his Power and so he prevails more than Christ doth and holds the Servants of Christ in bondage whether Christ will or not But how greatly then doth it contradict the end of Christs coming as it is expressed by the Apostle Eph. 5.25 26 27. Even as Christ also loved the Church and gave himself for it That he might sanctifie and cleanse it with the washing of Water by the Word That he might present it to himself a glorious Church not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing but that it should be holy and without blemish Now if Christ hath really thus answered the thing he came for then the members of this Church are not always sinning in Thought Word and Deed. Or there is no difference betwixt being sanctified and unsanctified clean and unclean holy and unholy being daily blemished with sin and being without blemish § VI. Fourthly this Doctrine renders the work of the ministry the preaching of the Word the Writing of the Scripture and the Prayers of the Holy men altogether useless and ineffectual As to the first Eph. 4.11 Pastors and Teachers are said to be given for the perfection of the Saints c. till we all come in the unity of the Faith and of the Knowledg of the Son of God unto a perfect man unto a measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ. Now if there be a necessity of sinning daily and in all things then there can be no perfection For such as do so cannot be esteemed perfect And if for effectuating this perfection in the Saints the ministry be appointed and disposed of God do not such as deny the possibility hereof render the ministry useless and of no profit seeing there can be no other true use assigned but to lead People out of sin into Righteousness If so be these ministers assure us that we need never expect to be delivered from it do not they render their own work needless what needs preaching against sin for the reproving of which all preaching is if it can never be forsaken Our Adversaries are exalters of the Scriptures in words much crying up their usefulness and perfection Now the Apostle tells us 2 Tim. 3.17 that the Scriptures are for making the man of God perfect And if this be denyed to be attainable in this Life then the Scriptures are of no profit for in the other life we shall not have use for them It renders the Prayers of the Saints altogether useless seeing themselves do confess they ought to pray daily that God would deliver them from evil and free them from sin by the help of his Spirit and Grace while in this world But though we might suppose this absurdity to follow that their Prayers are without Faith yet were not that so much if it did not infer the like upon the Holy Apostles who prayed earnestly for this end and therefore no doubt believed it attainable Col. 4.12 labouring fervently for you in Prayers that ye may stand perfect c. 1 Thes. 3.13 5.23 c. § VII But Fifthly this Doctrine is contrary to common reason and sense For the two opposite Principles whereof the one rules in the Children of Darkness the other in the Children of Light are Sin and Righteousness And as they are respectively leavened and acted by them so they are accounted either as Reprobated or Justified seeing it is abomination in the sight of God either to Justifie the Wicked or Condemn the Just. Now to say that men cannot be so leavened with the one as to be delivered from the other is in plain words to affirm that Sin and Righteousness are consistent and that a man may be truly termed Righteous though he be daily sinning in every thing he doth And then what difference betwixt good and evil Is not this to fall into that great abomination of puting Light for Darkness and calling good evil and evil good since they say the very best actions of God's Children are defiled and polluted and that those that sin daily in Thought Word and Deed are good men and woman the Saints and Holy Servants of the Holy Pure God Can there be any thing more repugnant than this to common reason Since the subject is still denominated from that accident that doth most influence it as a Wall is called white when there is much whiteness and Black when there is much blackness and such like But when there is more Unrighteousness in a man than Righteousness that man ought rather to be denominated Unrighteous than Righteous Then surely if every man sin daily in Thought Word and Deed and that in his sins there is no Righteousness at all and that all his Righteous actions are polluted and mixed with sin then there is in every man more Unrighteousness than Righteousness and so no man ought to be called righteous no man can be said to be sanctified or washed Where are then the Children of God where are the purified ones where are they who were sometimes unholy but now holy that sometimes were darkness but now are Light in the Lord There can none such be found then at this rate except that unrighteousness be esteemed so And is not this to fall into that abomination above mentioned of justifying the ungodly This certainly lands in that horrid Blasphemy of the Ranters that affirm there is no difference betwixt good and evil and that all is one in the sight of God I could shew many more gross absurdities evil consequences and manifest contradictions plied in this sinful Doctrine but this may suffice at present by which also in a good measure the probation of the
would affirm it never attainable then should there never be a place known by the Saints in this world wherein they might be free of doubting and despair Which as it is most absurd in it self so it is contrary to the manifest experience of thousands Thirdly God hath given to many of his Saints and children and is ready to give unto all a full and certain assurance that they are his and that no power shall be able to pluck them out of hand But this assurance would be no assurance if those who are so assured were not established and confirmed beyond all doubt and hesitation If so then surely there is no possibility for such to miss of that which God hath assured them of And that there is such assurance attainable in this life the Scripture abundantly declareth both in general and as to particular persons As first Rev. 3. v. 12. him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God and he shall go no more out c. which containeth a general promise unto all Hence the Apostle speaks of some that are sealed 2 Cor. 1.22 Who hath also sealed us and given the earnest of his Spirit in our hearts Wherefore the Spirit so sealing is called the earnest or pledge of our inheritance Eph. 1.13 In whom ye were sealed by the holy Spirit of Promise And therefore the Apostle Paul not only in that of the Romans above nored declareth himself to have attained that condition but 2 Tim. 4.7 he affirmeth in these words I have fought a good fight c. which also many good men have and do witness And therefore as there can be nothing more manifest than that which the manifest experience of this time sheweth and therein is found agreeable to the experience of former times so we see there have been both of old and of late that have turned the Grace of God into wantonness that have faln from their faith and integrity thence we may safely conclude such a falling away possible We also see that some of old and of late have attained a certain assurance sometime before they departed that they should inherit eternal life and have accordingly dyed in that good hope Of and concerning whom the Spirit of God testified That they are saved Wherefore we also see that such a state is attainable in this life from which there is not a falling away For seeing the Spirit of God did so testifie it was not possible that they should perish concerning whom he who cannot lye thus bare witness The Tenth Proposition Concerning the Ministry As by this Light or Gift of God all true knowledge in things Spiritual is received and revealed so by the same as it is manifested and received in the heart by the strength and power thereof every true Minister of the Gospel is ordained prepared and supplyed in the work of the Ministry and by the leading moving and drawing hereof ought every Evangelist and Christian Pastor to be led and ordered in his labour and work of the Gospel both as to the place where as to the persons to whom and as to the time wherein he is to minister Moreover who have this authority may and ought to preach the Gospel though without hamane Commission or Literature as on the other hand who want the Authority of this Divine Gift however learned or authorized by the Commission of Men and Churches are to be esteemed but as deceivers and not true Ministers of the Gospel Also who have received this holy and unspotted Gift as they have freely received it so are they freely to give it without hire or bargaining far less to use it as a Trade to get Money by yet if God hath called any one from their Employments or Trades by which they acquire their Lively-hood it may be lawful for such according to the liberty which they feel given them in the Lord to receive such temporals to wit what may be needful for them for meat and clothing as are given them freely and cordially by those to whom they have communicated Spirituals § I. HItherto I have treated of those things which relate to the Christian Faith and Christians as they stand each in his private and particular condition and how and what way every man may be a Christian indeed and so abide Now I come in order to speak of those things that relate to Christians as they are stated in a joynt fellowship and Communion and come under a visible and outward society which society is called the Church of God and in Scripture compared to a body and therefore named the Body of Christ. As then in the natural body there be divers members all concurring to the common end of preserving and confirming the whole body so in this Spiritual and mystical Body there are also divers according to the different measures of Grace and of the Spirit diversly administred unto each member and from this diversity ariseth that distinction of persons in the visible Society of Christians as of Apostles Pastors Evangelists Ministers c. That which in this Proposition is proposed is What makes or constitutes any a Minister of the Church what his qualifications ought to be and how he ought to behave himself But because it may seem somewhat preposterous to speak of the distinct Offices of the Church until something be said concerning the Church in general though nothing positively be said of it in the Proposition yet as here implied I shall briefly premise something thereof and then proceed to the particular members of it § II. It is not in the least my design to meddle with those tedious and many controversies wherewith the Papists and Protestants do tear one another concerning this thing but only according to the Truth manifested to me and revealed in me by the testimony of the Spirit according to that proportion of wisdom given me briefly to hold forth as a necessary introduction both to this matter of the Ministry and of Worship which followeth those things which I together with my Brethren do believe concerning the Church The Church then according to the grammatical signification of the word as it is used in the Holy Scripture signifies an assembly or gathering of many into one place for the Substantive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 comes from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I call out of and originally from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I call and indeed as this is the grammatical sense of the word so also it is the real and proper signification of the thing the Church being no other thing but the society gathering or company of such as God hath called out of the World and worldly Spirit to walk in his LIGHT and LIFE The Church then so designed is to be considered as it comprehends all that are thus called and gathered truly by God both such as are yet in this inferiour World and such as having already laid down the earthy Tabernacle are passed into their
heavenly Mansions which together do make up the one Catholick Church concerning which there is so much controversie out of which Church we freely acknowledge there can be no Salvation because under this Church and its denomination are comprehended all and as many of whatsoever Nation Kindred Tongue or People they be though outwardly strangers and remote from those who profess Christ and Christianity in words and have the benefit of the Scriptures as become obedient to the holy Light and Testimony of God in their hearts so as to become sanctified by it and cleansed from the evils of their wayes For this is the Universal or Catholick Spirit by which many are called from all the four corners of the earth and shall sit down with Abraham Isaac and Jacob. By this the secret Life and Vertue of Jesus is conveyed into many that are afar off even as by the blood that runs into the Veins and Arteries of the Natural Body the Life is conveyed from the Head and Heart unto the extremest parts There may be members therefore of this Catholick Church both among Heathens Turks Jews and all the several sorts of Christians Men and Women of integrity and simplicity of Heart who though blinded in something in their understanding and perhaps burthened with the Superstitions and formality of the several Sects in which they are ingrossed yet being upright in their Hearts before the Lord chiefly aiming and labouring to be delivered from iniquity and loving to follow righteousness are by the secret touches of this Holy Light in their Souls inlivened and quickened thereby secretly united to God and there through become true members of this Catholick Church Now the Church in this respect hath been in being in all generations for God never wanted some such witnesses for him though many times slighted and not much observed by this World And therefore this Church though still in being hath been oftentimes as it were Invisible in that it hath not come under the observation of the men of this World being as saith the Scripture Jer. 3.14 One of a City and two of a Family And yet though the Church thus considered may be as it were hid from wicked men as not then gathered into a visible fellowship yea and not observed even by some that are members of it yet may there notwithstanding many belong to it as when Elias complained he was left alone 1 Kings 19.18 God answered unto him I have reserved to my self seven thousand men who have not bowed their knees to the Image of Baal whence the Apostle argues Rom. 11. the being of a remnant in his day § III. Secondly the Church is to be considered as it signifies a certain number of persons gathered by Gods Spirit and by the testimony of some of his servants raised up for that end unto the belief of the true Principles and Doctrines of the Christian Faith who through their hearts being united by the same love and their understanding informed in the same Truths gather meet and assemble together to wait upon God to worship him and to bear a joynt testimony for the Truth against Error suffering for the same and so becoming through this fellowship as one family and houshold in certain respects do each of them watch over teach instruct and care for one another according to their several measures and attainments Such were the Churches of the Primitive time gathered by the Apostles whereof we have divers mentioned in the Holy Scriptures And as to the visibility of the Church in this respect there hath been a great interruption since the Apostles days by reason of the apostasie as shall hereafter appear § IV. To be a member then of the Catholick Church there is need of the inward calling of God by his Light in their Heart and a being leavened into the nature and Spirit of it so as to forsake unrighteousness and be turned to righteousness and in the inwardness of the mind to be cut out of the wild-Olive-tree of our own first faln nature and ingrafted into Christ by his Word and Spirit in the heart And this may be done in those who are strangers to the History God not having pleased to make them partakers thereof as in the V. and VI. Propositions hath already been proved To be a member of a particular Church of Christ as this inward work is indispensibly necessary so is also the outward profession of and belief in Jesus Christ and those holy Truths delivered by his Spirit in the Scriptures seeing the testimony of the Spirit recorded in the Scriptures doth answer the testimony of the same Spirit in the heart even as face answereth face in a glass Hence it follows that the inward work of Holiness and forsaking iniquity is necessary in every respect to the being a member in the Church of Christ and that the outward profession is necessary to be a member of a particular gathered Church but not to the being a member of the Catholick Church yet it is absolutely necessary where God affords the opportunity of knowing it the outward testimony is to be believed where it is presented and revealed the summ whereof hath upon other occasions been already proved § V. But contrary hereunto the Devil that worketh and hath wrought in the mystery of iniquity hath taught his followers to affirm That no man however holy is a member of the Church of Christ without the outward profession and that he be initiated thereunto by some outward Ceremonies And again That men who have this outward Profession though inwardly unholy may be members of the true Church of Christ yea and ought to be so esteemed This is plainly to put Light for Darkness and Darkness for Light as if God had a greater regard to words than actions and were more pleased with vain professions than with real holiness But these things I have sufficiently refuted heretofore Only from hence let it be observed that upon this false and rotten foundation Antichrist hath builded his Babylonish Structure and the anti-Christian Church in the apostasie hath hereby reared her self up to that heighth and grandeur she hath attained so as to exalt herself above all that is called God and sit in the Temple of God as God For the particular Churches of Christ gathered in the Apostles dayes soon after beginning to decay as to the inward Life came to be over-grown with several Errors and the hearts of the professors of Christianity to be leavened with the old Spirit and conversation of the World Yet it pleased God for some Centuries to preserve that life in many whom he emboldened with zeal to stand and suffer for his Name through the ten Persecutions But these being over the meekness gentleness love long-suffering goodness and temperance of Christianity came to be lost For after that the Princes of the earth came to take upon them that Profession and that it ceased to be a reproach to be a Christian but rather became a means to
preferment men became such by birth and education and not by conversion and renovation of Spirit then there was none so vile none so wicked none so profane who became not a member of the Church And the Teachers and Pastors thereof becoming the Companions of Princes and so being enriched by their benevolence and getting vast treasures and Estates became puffed up and as it were drunken with the vain pomp and glory of this World and so marshalled themselves in manifold orders and degrees not without innumerable contests and alterations who should have the Precedency So the vertue life substance and kernel of the Christian Religion came to be lost and nothing remained but a shaddow and image which dead image or carcass of Christianity to make it take the better with the superstitious multitude of Heathens that became engrossed in it not by any inward conversion of their hearts or by becoming less wicked or superstitious but by a little change in the object of their superstition not having the inward ornament and life of the Spirit became decked with many outward and visible orders and beautified with the gold silver precious stones and the other splendid ornaments of this perishing world so that this was no more to be accounted the Christian Religion and Christian Church notwithstanding the outward profession than the dead body of man is to be accounted a living man which however cunningly embalmed and adorned with ever so much gold or silver or most precious stones or sweet ointments is but a dead body still without sense life or motion For that Apostat Church of Rome has introduced no less ceremonies and superstitions into the Christian profession than was either among Jews or Heathens and that there is and hath been as much yea and more pride covetousness unclean lust luxury fornication profanity and atheism among her teachers and chief Bishops as ever was among any sort of people none need doubt that have read their own authors to wit Platina and others Now though Protestants have reformed from her in some of the most gross points and absurd doctrines relating to the Church and Ministery yet which is to be regretted they have but lopt the branches but retain and plead earnestly for the same root from which these abuses have sprung so that even among them though all that mass of superstition ceremonies and orders be not again established yet the same pride covetousness and sensuality is found to have overspread and leavened their Churches and Ministery and the life power and vertue of true religion is lost among them and the very same death barrenness dryness and emptyness is found in their ministery so that in effect they differ from Papists but in form and some ceremonies being with them apostatized from the life and power the true primitive Church and her Pastors were in so that of both it may be said truly without breach of charity that having only a form of godliness and many of them not so much as that they are deniers of yea enemies to the power of it And this proceeds not simply from their not walking answerable to their own principles and so degenerating that way which also is true but which is worse their setting down to themselves and adhering to certain principles which naturally as a cursed fruit bring forth these bitter fruits these therefore shall afterwards be examined and refuted as the contrary positions of truth in the Proposition are explained and proved For as to the nature and constitution of a Church abstract from their disputes concerning its constant visibility infallibility and the primacy of the Church of Rome the Protestants as in practice so in principles differ not from Papists for they ingross within the compass of their Church whole Nations making their infants members of it by sprinkling a little water upon them so that there is none so wicked or profane who is not a fellow-member no evidence of holiness being required to constitute a member of the Church and look through the Protestant Nations and there shall no difference appear in the lives of the generality of the one more than of the other but he who ruleth in the children of disobedience reigning in both so that the reformation through this defect is but in holding some less gross errors in the notion but not in having the heart reformed and renewed in which mainly the life of Christianity consisteth § VI. But the Popish errors concerning the ministry which they have retained are most of all to be regretted by which chiefly the life and power of Christianity is barred out among them and they kept in death barrenness and dryness there being nothing more hurtful than an error in this respect for where a false and corrupt ministry entreth all other manner of evils follows upon it according to that Scripture adage like people like priest For by their influence instead of ministring life and righteousness they minister death and iniquity The whole back-slidings of the Jewish congregations of old is hereto ascribed The leaders of my people have caused them to err The whole writings of the Prophets are full of such complaints and for this cause under the New Testament we are so often warned and guarded to beware of false Prophets and false Teachers c. What may be thought then where all as to this is out of order where both the foundation call qualifications maintenance and whole discipline is different from and opposite to the ministry of the primitive Church yea and necessarily tends to the shutting out a Spiritual ministry and the in-bringing and establishing a carnal This shall appear by parts § VII That then which comes first to be questioned in this matter is concerning the Call of a Minister to wit what maketh or how cometh a man to be a Minister Quest. Pastor or Teacher in the Church of Christ. We answer by the inward power and vertue of the Spirit of God For as saith our proposition Answ. having received the true knowledg of things Spiritual by the Spirit of God without which they cannot be known and being by the same in measure purified and sanctified he comes thereby to be called and moved to minister to others being able to speak from a living experience of what he himself is a witness and therefore knowing the terror of the Lord he is fit to perswade men c. 2 Cor. 5.11 and his words and ministery proceeding from the inward power and vertue reaches to the heart of his hearers and makes them approve of him and be subject unto him Our adversaries are forced to confess that this were indeed desirable and best but this they will not have to be absolutely necessary I shall first prove the necessity of it and then shew how much they err in that which they make more necessary than this Divine and Heavenly call First That which is necessary to make a man a Christian Arg. so as without it he cannot
up a shadow and form of these orders and so make several ranks and degrees to establish a carnal Ministry of mens making without the Life Power and Spirit of Christ this is that work of Anti-christ and Mystery of Iniquity that hath got up in the dark night of Apostasie but in a true Church of Christ gathered together by God not only unto the belief of the principles of Truth but also into the Power Life and Spirit of Christ the Spirit of God is the Orderer Ruler and Governour as in each particular so in the general and when they assemble together to wait upon God and worship and adore him then such as the Spirit sets apart to the Ministry by its Divine Power and Influence opening their Mouths and giving them to exhort reprove and instruct with Vertue and Power these are thus of God ordained and admitted into the Ministry and their brethren cannot but hear them receive them and also honour them for their works sake and so this is not monopolized to a certain kind of men as the Clergy who are to that purpose educated and brought up as other carnal Artists and the rest to be despised as Laicks but it is left to the free Gift of God to chuse any whom he seeth meet thereunto whether rich or poor servant or master young or old yea male or female And such as have this call verifie the Gospel by preaching not in Speech only but also in Power and the Holy Ghost and in much fulness 1 Thes. 1.5 and cannot but be received and heard by the Sheep of Christ. § XXV But if it be objected here Obj. that I seem hereby to make no distinction at all betwixt Ministers and others which is contrary to the Apostle saying 1 Cor. 12.29 Are all Apostles Are all Prophets Are all Teachers c. From thence they insinuate that I also contradict his comparison in that chapter of the Church of Christ with a humane body as where he saith verse 17. If the whole body were an Eye where were the hearing If the whole were hearing where were the smelling c. Also the Apostle not only thus distinguisheth the Ministers of the Church in general from the rest of the Members but also from themselves as naming them distinctly and separately Apostles Prophets Evangelists Pastors and Teachers c. As to the last part of this objection to which I shall first answer Answ. it is apparent that this diversity of Names is not for to distinguish separate Offices but to denote the different and various Operations of the Spirit a manner of Speech frequent with the Apostle Paul wherein he sometimes expatiates to the Illustrating of the Glory and Praise of God's Grace as in particular Rom. 12.6 Having then Gifts differing according to the Grace that is given us whether Prophecy let us Prophecy according to the proportion of Faith Or Ministry let us wait on our Ministring or he that Teacheth on Teaching or he that Exhorteth on Exhortation Now none will say from all this that these are distinct Offices or do not or may not co-incide in one person as may all these other things mentioned by him in the subsequent verses viz. Of Loving being kindly affectioned Fervency of Spirit Hospitality Diligence Blessing Rejoycing c. Which yet he numbers forth as different gifts of the Spirit And according to this objection might be placed as distinct and separate Offices which were most absurd Secondly in these very places mentioned it is clear that it is no real distinction of separate Offices because all acknowledg that Pastors and Teachers which the Apostle there no less separateth and distinguisheth than Pastors and Prophets or Apostles are one and the same and co-incide in the same Office and Person and therefore so may be said of the rest For Prophecy as it signifieth the foretelling of things to come is indeed a distinct Gift but no distinct Office and therefore our Adversaries do not place it among their several orders neither will they deny but that both may be and have been given of God to some that not only have been Pastors and Teachers and that there it hath co incided in one Person with these other Offices but also to some of the Laicks and so it hath been found according to their own concession without the limits of their Clergy Prophecy in the other sense to wit as it signifieth a speaking from the Spirit of Truth is not only peculiar to Pastors and Teachers who ought so to Prophecy but even a common priviledg to the Saints for though to Instruct Teach and Exhort be proper to such as are more particularly called to the work of the Ministry yet it is not so proper to them as not to be when the Saints are met together as any of them are moved by the Spirit common to others For some acts belong to all in such a relation but not only to those within that relation competunt omni sed non Soli thus to see and hear are proper acts of a man seeing it may be properly predicated of him that he heareth and seeth yet are they common to other Creatures also So to Prophecy in this sense is indeed proper to Ministers and Teachers yet not so but that it is common and lawful to other Saints when moved thereunto though it be not proper to them by way of relation because notwithstanding that motion they are not particularly called to the work of the Ministry as appears by 1 Cor. 14. where the Apostle at large declaring the order and ordinary method of the Church saith ver 30 31. But if any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by let the first hold his peace For ye may all Prophecy one by one that all may learn and all be comforted Which sheweth that none is here excluded But yet that there is a subordination according to the various measures of the Gift received the next verse sheweth And the Spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets For God is not the Author of confusion but of peace Now that Prophecying in this sense may be common to all Saints appears by the 39 verse of the same Chapter where speaking to all in general he saith Therefore Brethren covet to Prophecy and verse 1. he exhorts them saying Covet Spiritual Gifts but the rather that ye may Prophecy Secondly as to Evangelists the same may be said for whoever preacheth the Gospel is really an Evangelist and so consequently every true Minister of the Gospel is one else what proper office can they assign to it unless they should be so foolish as to affirm that none were Evangelists but Matthew Mark Luke and John who wrote the Account of Christ's Life and Sufferings And then it were neither a particular office seeing John and Matthew were Apostles Mark and Luke Pastors and Teachers so that there they co-incided in one and indeed it is absurd to think that upon that particular account the
is not to be forgotten but indeed to be kept upon record for a perpepetual remembrance of him and his brethren for he frankly answers after this manner We have not freely received and therefore are not bound to give it freely The answer I confess is ingenious and good For if those that receive freely are to give freely it would seem to follow by the rule of contraries that those who receive not freely ought not to give freely and I shall grant it Only they must grant me that they preach not by and according to the Gift and Grace of God received nor can they be good Stewards of the manifest Grace of God as every true Minister ought to be or then they have gotten this Gift or Grace by money as Simon Magus would have been compassing it since they think themselves not bound to give it without money again But to be plain I believe he intended not that it was from the Gift or Grace of God they were to preach but from their acquired arts and studies which hath cost them much labour and also some money at the University and therefore as he that puts his stock in the publick bank expects interest again so these Scholars having spent some money learning the art of preaching think they may boldly say they have it not freely for it hath cost them both money and pains and therefore they expect both money and ease again And therefore as Arnoldus gets money for teaching his young Students the art of preaching so he intends they should be repayed before they give it again to others It was of old said Omnia venalia Romae i. e. All things are set to sale at Rome but now the same proverb may be applied to Franequer And therefore Arnoldus's Students when they go about to preach may safely seek and require hereby telling their hearers their masters maxim Nos gratis non accepimus ergo neque gratis dare tenemur But then they answer again that they find them and their Master to be none of his Ministers who when he sent forth his Disciples gave them this command Freely ye have received freely give and therefore we will have none of your teaching because we perceive you to be of the number of those that look for their gain from their quarter § XXIX Secondly the Scripture testimonies that urge this are in the same nature of these that press charity and liberality towards the poor and command hospitality c. But these are not nor can be stinted to a certain quantity because they are deeds meerly voluntary where the obedience to the command lieth in the good will of the giver and not in the matter of the thing given as Christ shew in the Example of the widows mite So that though there be an obligation upon Christians to minister of outward things to their ministers yet there can be no definition of the quantity but by the givers own consents and a little from one may more truly fulfil the obligation than a great deal from another And therefore as acts of charity and hospitality can neither be limited nor forced so neither can this If it be objected that Ministers may and ought to exhort perswade yea and earnestly press Christians if they find them defective therein to acts of charity and hospitality and so may they do also to the giving of maintainance I answer All this saith nothing for a stinted and forced maintainance for which there cannot so much as the shew of one solid argument be brought from Scripture I confess Ministers may use exhortations in this as much as in any other case even as the Apostle did to the Corinthians shewing them their duty but it were fit for Ministers that do so that their testimony might have the more weight and be the freer of all suspition of covetousness and self-interest that they might be able to say truly in the sight of God that which the same Apostle subjoyns upon the same occasion 1 Cor. 9.15 16 17 18. But I have used none of these things Neither have I written these things that it should be so done unto me For it were better for me to die than that any man should make my Glory void For though I preach the Gospel I have nothing to glory of for necessity is laid upon me yea woe is unto me if I preach not the Gospel For if I do this thing willingly I have a reward but if against my will a dispensation of the Gospel is committed unto me What is my reward then Verily that when I preach the Gospel I may make the Gospel of Christ without charge that I abuse not my power in the Gospel Thirdly As there is neither precept nor example for this forced and stinted maintainance in the Scripture so the Apostle in his solemn farwel to the Pastors and Elders of the Church of Ephesus guards them against it Acts 20.33 34 35. But if the thing had been either lawful or practised he would rather have exhorted them to be content with their stinted hire and not to covet more whereas he sheweth them first by his own Example that they were not to covet or expect any mans Silver or Gold Secondly that they ought to work with their hands for an honest lively-hood as he had done And lastly he exhorts them so to do from the words of Christ because it is a more blessed thing to give than to receive shewing that it is so far from a thing that a true minister ought to aim at or expect that it is rather a burthen to a true Minister and cross to him to be brought upon necessity so to lack § XXX Fourthly If a forced and stinted maintainance were to be supposed it would make the Ministers of Christ just one with these hirelings whom the Prophet cryed out against For certainly if a man make a bargain to preach to People for so much a year so as to refuse to preach unless he have and seek to force the People to give it by violence it cannot be denyed that such a one preacheth for hire and so looks for his gain from his quarter yea and prepares War against such as put not into his mouth but this is the particular special mark of a false Prophet and a hireling and therefore can no ways compet to a true Minister of Christ. Next that a superfluous maintainace that is more than in reason is needful ought not to be received by Christian Ministers will not need much proof seeing the more moderate and sober both among Papists and Protestants readily confess it who with one voice exclaim against the excessive revenues of the Clergy and that it may not want a proof from Scripture what can be more plain than that of the Apostle to Timothy 1 Tim. 6.7 8 9 10. where he both shews wherewith we ought to be content and also the hazard of such as look after more and indeed since that very obligation of giving
become a Proverb that the KIRK is always GREEDY Whereby the Gift and Grace of God being neglected they have for for the most part no other motive or rule in applying themselves to one Church more than another but the greater Benefice For tho they hypocritically pretend at their accepting of and entring unto their Church that they have nothing before them but the Glory of God and the Salvation of Souls yet if a richer Benefice offer it self they presently find it more for God's Glory to remove from the first and go thither And thus they make no difficulty often to change while notwithstanding they accuse us that we allow Ministers to go from place to place and not to be tied to one place but we allow this not for the gaining of money but as moved of God for if a Minister be called to Minister in a particular place he ought not to leave it except God call him from it and then he ought to obey for we make the will of God inwardly revealed and not the love of money and more gain the ground of removing Secondly From this abuse hath proceeded that Luxury and Idleness that most of the Clergy live in even among Protestants as well as Papists to the great scandal of Christianity For not having lawful Trades to work with their hands and being so superfluously and sumptuosly provided for they live in Idleness and Luxury and there doth more Pride Vanity and Worldly Glory appear in their Wives and Children than in most others which is open and evident to all Thirdly They become hereby so glewed to the love of money that there is none like them in malice rage and cruelty if they deny their hire they rage like drunken men fret fume and as it were go mad A man may sooner satisfie the severest Creditor than them the general voice of the poor doth confirm this for indeed they are far more exact in taking up the Tithes of Sheep Geese Swine and Eggs c. and look more narrowly to it than to the members of the Flock they will not miss the least mite and the poorest Widow cannot escape their avaritious hands twenty Lyes they will hear unreproved and as many Oaths a man may swear in their hearing without offending them and greater evils than all this they can overlook But if thou owest them ought and refuse to pay it then nothing but war will they thunder against thee and they will stigmatize thee with the horrible Title of Sacriledg and send thee to Hell without mercy as if thou hadst committed the sin against the Holy Ghost Of all People we can best bear witness to this for God having shewn us this corrupt and Anti-Christian Ministry and called us out from it and gathered us unto his own Power and Life to be a separate People so that we dare not joyn with nor hear these Anti-Christian hirelings neither yet put into their mouths or feed them O! what malice envy and fury hath this raised in their Hearts against us that tho we get none of their wares neither will buy them as knowing them to be nought yet will they force us to give them money and because we cannot for conscience sake do it our sufferings have upon that account been unutterable Yea to give account of their cruelty and several sorts of inhumanity used against us would make no small History These avaritious Hirelings have come to that degree of malice and rage that several poor labouring men have been carried hundreds of miles from their own dwellings and shut up in prison some two some three yea some seven years together for the value of one pound sterling and less I know my self a poor Widow that for the tithes of her Geese which amounted not to five shillings was about four years kept in prison thirty miles from her house Yea they by violence for this cause have plundred of mens goods the hundred fold and prejudiced much more yea hundreds have hereby spilt their innocent blood by dying in the filthy noisom holes and prisons and some of the Priests have been so inraged that Goods thus ravished could not satisfie them but they must also satisfie their fury by beating knocking and wounding with their hands innocent men and women for refusing for Conscience sake to put into their mouths The only way then soundly to reform and remove all these abuses and take away the ground and occasion of them is to take away all stinted and forced maintainance and stipend and seeing those things were anciently given by the people that they return again into the publick treasure and thereby the people may be greatly benefited by them for that they may supply for these publick taxations and impositions that are put upon them and may ease themselves of them And whoever call or appoint teachers to themselves let them accordingly entertain them And for such as are called and moved to the Ministry by the Spirit of God those that receive them and taste of the good of their Ministry will no doubt provide things needful for them and there will be no need of a Law to force a hire for them for he that sends them will take care for them and they also having food and raiment will therewith be content § XXXIII The sum then of what is said Is that The Ministry that we have pleaded for and which also the Lord hath raised up among us is in all its parts like the true Ministry of the Apostles and primitive Church Whereas the Ministry our adversaries seek to uphold and plead for as it doth in all its parts differ from them so on the other hand it is very like the false Prophets and Teachers testified against and condemned in the Scripture as may be thus briefly illustrated 1. The Mintstry and Minister we plead for are such as are immediately called and sent forth by Christ and his Spirit unto the work of the Ministry so were the holy Apostles and Prophets as appears by these places Matth. 10. verse 1.5 Eph. 4.11 Heb. 5.4 1. But the Ministry and Ministers our opposers plead for are such as have no immediate call from Christ to whom the leading and motion of the Spirit is not reckoned necessary but who are called sent forth and ordained by wicked and ungodly men such were of old the false Prophets and Teachers as appears by these places Jer. 14.14 15. item chap. 23.21 and 27.15 2. The Ministers we plead for are such as are acted and led by God's Spirit and by the power and operation of his Grace in their hearts are in some measure converted and regenerate and so are good holy and gracious men such were the Holy Prophets and Apostles as appears from 1 Tim. 3.2 3 4 5 6. Tit. 1.7 8 9. 2. But the Ministers our adversaries plead for are such to whom the Grace of God is no needful qualification and so may be true Ministers according to them though they be ungodly
other are still moved either to preach pray and praise and so in this our Meetings cannot be but like the Meetings of the primitive Churches recorded in Scripture since our adversaries confess that they did preach and pray by the Spirit And then what absurdity is it to suppose that at sometimes the Spirit did not move them to these outward acts and that then they were silent since we may well conclude they did not speak until they were moved and so no doubt had sometimes silence Acts 2.1 Before the Spirit came upon them it is said They were all with one accord in one place and then it is said the Spirit suddenly came upon them but no mention is made of any one speaking at that time and I would willingly know what absurdity our adversaries can infer should we conclude they were a while silent But if it be urged that a whole silent meeting cannot be found in Scripture I answer supposing such a thing were not recorded it will not therefore follow that it is not lawful Answ. seeing it naturally followeth from other Scripture precepts as we have proved this doth for seeing the Scripture commands to meet together and when met the Scripture prohibits prayers or preachings but as the Spirit moveth thereunto if People met together and the Spirit move not to such acts it will necessarily follow that they must be silent But further there might have been many such things among the Saints of old though not recorded in Scripture and yet we have enough in Scripture signifying that such things were For Job sate silent seven daies with his Friends together here was a long silent meeting See also Ezra c. 9.4 and Ezekiel c. 1.14 20.1 Thus having shewn the excellency of this Worship proving it from Scripture and Reason and answered the objections which are commonly made against it which though it may suffice to the explanation and probation of our Proposition yet I shall add something more particularly of Preaching Praying and Singing and so proceed to the following Proposition § XVIII Preaching as it 's used both among Papists and Protestants is for one man to take some place or verse of Scripture and thereon speak for an hour or two what he hath studied and premiditated in his Closet and gathered together from his own inventions or from the writings and observations of others and then having got it by heart as a school boy doth his lesson he brings it forth and repeats it before the people and how much the fertiler and stronger a man's invention is and the more industrious and laborous he is in collecting such observations and can utter them with the excellency of speech and humane eloquence so much the more is he accounted an able and excellent preacher To this we oppose that when the Saints are met together and every one gathered to the Gift and Grace of God in themselves he that ministreth being acted thereunto by the arising of the Grace in himself ought to speak forth what the Spirit of God furnisheth him with not minding the eloquence and wisdom of words but the demonstration of the Spirit and of Power and that either in the interpreting some part of Scripture in case the Spirit which is the good Remembrancer lead him so to do or otherwise words of exhortation advice reproof and instruction or the sense of some spiritual experiences all which will still be agreeable to the Scripture though perhaps not relative to nor founded upon any particular chapter or verse as a text Now let us examine and consider which of these two sorts of preaching be most agreeable to the Precepts and Practice of Christ and his Apostles and the Primitive Church recorded in Scripture For First as to their Preaching upon a text if it were not meerly customary or premeditated but done by the immediate motion of the Spirit we should not blame it but to do it as they do there is neither precept nor practice that ever I could observe in the New Testament as a part of the instituted Worship thereof But they alledge that Christ took the Book of Isaiah and read out of it and spake therefrom and that Peter Preached from a sentence of the Prophet Joel I answer That Christ and Peter did it not but as immediately acted and moved thereunto by the Spirit of God and that without premeditation which I suppose our Adversaries will not deny in which case we willingly approve of it but what is this to their customary conned way without either waiting for or expecting the movings or leadings of the Spirit Moreover that neither Christ nor Peter did it as a setled custom or form to be constantly practised by all the Ministers of the Church appears in that most of all the Sermons recorded by Christ and his Apostles in Scripture were without this as appears from Christ's Sermon upon the Mount Matth. 5.1 c. Mark 4.1 c. and Paul's Preaching to the Athenians and to the Jews c. As then it appears that this method of Preaching is not grounded upon any Scripture precept so the nature of it is contrary to the preaching of Christ under the New Covenant as exprest and recommended in Scripture for Christ in sending forth his Disciples expresly mentioneth that they are not to speak of or from themselves or to sore cast before hand but that which the Spirit in the same hour shall teach them as is particularly mentioned in the three Evangelists Matth. 10.20 Mark 13.11 Luke 12.12 Now if Christ gave this order to his Disciples before he departed from them as that which they were to practice during his abode outwardly with them much more were they to do it after his departure since then they were more especially to receive the Spirit to lead them in all things and to bring all things to their remembrance John 14.26 And if they were to do so when they appeared before the Magistrates and Princes of the Earth much more in the Worship of God when they stand specially before him seeing as is above shewn his Worship is to be performed in Spirit and therefore after their receiving of the Holy Ghost it is said Acts 2.4 they spake as the Spirit gave them utterance not what they had studied and gathered from Books in their Closets in a premeditated way Franciscus Lambertus before cited speaketh well and sheweth their Hypocrisie Tract 5. of Prophecy chap. 3. saying Where are they now that glory in their Inventions who say A brave Invention a brave invention This they call invention which themselves have made up but what have the Faithful to do with such kind of Inventions It is not figments nor yet Inventions that we will have but things that are solid invincible eternal and heavenly not which men have invented but which God hath revealed for if we believe the Scripture our invention profiteth nothing but to provoke God to our ruin And afterwards Beware saith he that
would then follow that all those that have this baptism are saved by it Now this consequence would be false if it were understood of Water-baptism because many by the confession of all are baptized with water that are not saved but this consequence holds most true if it be understood as we do of the Baptism of the Spirit since none can have this answer of a good Conscience and abiding in it not be saved by it Fifthly that the One Baptism of Christ is not a washing with Water as it hath been proved by the definition of the One Baptism so it is also manifest from the necessary fruits and effects of it which are three-times particularly expressed by the Apostle Paul as first Rom. 6.3 4. where he saith that so many of them as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his Death buried with him by Baptism into death that they should walk in newness of Life Secondly to the Gal. 3.27 he saith positively For as many of you as have been baptized unto Christ have put on Christ. And thirdly to the Col. 2.12 he saith that they were Buried with him in Baptism and risen with him through the Faith of the operation of God It is to be observed here that the Apostle speaks generally without any exclusive term but comprehensive of all he saith not some of you that were baptzed into Christ have put on Christ but as many of you which is as much as if he had said every one of you that hath been Baptized into Christ hath put on Christ. Whereby it is evident that this is not meant of Water-Baptism but of the Baptism of the Spirit because else it would follow that whosoever had been Baptized with Water baptism had put on Christ and were risen with him which all acknowledg to be most absurd Now supposing all the visible members of the Churches of Rome Galatia and Coloss had been outwardly Baptized with Water I do not say they were but our Adversaries will not only readily grant it but also contend for it suppose I say the case so they will not say they had all put on Christ since divers expressions in these Epistles to them shew the contrary so that the Apostle cannot mean Baptism with Water and yet he meaneth the Baptism of Christ i. e. of the Spirit cannot be denyed or that the Baptism wherewith thes were Baptized of whom the Apostle here testifies that they had put on Christ was the One Baptism I think none will call in question Now admit as our Adversaries contend that many in these Churches who had been Baptized with Water had not put on Christ it will follow that notwithstanding that Water-baptism they were not Baptized into Christ or with the Baptism of Christ seeing as many of them as were Baptized into Christ had put on Christ e. From all which I thus argue Arg. 1. If the Baptism with Water were the one Baptism i. e. the Baptism of Christ as many as were Baptized with Water would have put on Christ. But the last is false Therefore also the first And again Arg. 2. Since as many as are baptized into Christ i. e. with the one baptism which is the baptism of Christ have put on Christ then Water-baptism is not the one baptism viz. the baptism of Christ. But the first is true Therefore also the last § V. Thirdly since John's Baptism was a Figure and seeing the Figure gives way to the Substance albeit the thing figured remain to wit the one baptism of Christ yet the other ceaseth which was the baptism of John That John's baptism was a figure of Christ's baptism I judg will not readily be denyed but in case it should it can easily be proved from the nature of it John's baptism was a being baptized with Water but Christ's is a baptizing with the Spirit Therefore John's baptism must have been a figure of Christ's But further that Water-baptism was John's baptism will not be denyed that Water-baptism is not Christ's baptism is already proved From which doth arise the confirmation of our Proposition thus There is no baptism to continue now but the one baptism of Christ Arg. Therefore Water-baptism is not to continue now because it is not the baptism of Christ. That John's baptism is ceased many of out Adversaries confess but if any should alledg it otherwise it may be easily proved by the express words of John not only as being insinuated there where he contra-distinguisheth his baptism from that of Christ but particularly where he saith John 3.30 he Christ must increase but I John must decrease From whence it clearly follows that the encreasing or taking place of Christ's Baptism is the decreasing or abolishing of John's Baptism so that if Water baptism was a particular part of John's Ministry and is no part of Christ's baptism as we have already proved it will necessarily follow that it is not to continue Secondly Arg. If Water-baptism had been to continue a perpetual ordinance of Christ in his Church he would either have practised it himself or commanded his Apostles so to do But that he practised it not the Scripture plainly affirms John 4.2 And that he commanded his Disciples to baptize with water I could never yet read As for what is alleged that Matth. 28.19 c. where he bids them baptize is to be understood of water baptism that is but to beg the question and the grounds for that shall be hereafter examined Therefore to baptize with Water is no perpetual ordinance of Christ to his Church This hath had the more weight with me because I find not any standing ordinance or appoyntment of Christ necessary to Christians for which we have not either Christ's own practice or command as to obey all the Commandments which comprehend both our duty towards God and man c. and where the Gospel requires more than the Law which is abundantly signified in the 5. and 6. Chapters of Matthew and elsewhere Besides as to the duties of Worship he exhorts us to meet promising his presence commands to Pray Preach Watch c. and gives precepts concerning some temporary things as the washing of one anothers Feet the breaking of Bread hereafter to be discussed only for this one thing of baptizing with Water though so earnestly contended for we find not any precept of Christ. § VI. But to make Water-baptism a necessary institution of the Christian Religion which is pure and Spiritual and not carnal and and ceremonial is to derogate from the New Covenant Dispensation and set up the legal Rites and Ceremonies of which this of Baptism or washing with Water was one as appears from Heb. 9.10 where the Apostle speaking thereof saith that it stood only in Meats and Drinks and divers Baptisms and carnal Ordinances imposed until the time of Reformation If then the time of Reformation or the Dispensation of the Gospel which puts an end to the Shaddows be come then such Baptisms and
therein he did not by vertue of his Apostolick commission but rather in condescendence to their weakness even as at another time he circumcised Timothy Our Adversaries to evade the Truth of this Testimony usually alledge that by this is only to be understood that he was not sent principally to baptize not that he was not sent at all But this exposition since it contradicts the positive words of the text and has no better foundation than the affirmation of its assertors Answ. is justly rejected as spurious until they bring some better proof for it he saith not I was not sent principally to Baptize but I was not sent to baptize As for what they urge by way of confirmation from other places of Scripture where not is to be so taken as where it 's said I will have mercy and not sacrifice which is to be understood that God requires principally mercy not excluding Sacrifices I say this place is abundantly explained by the following words and the knowledg of God more than burnt Offerings by which it clearly appears that Burnt offerings which are one with Sacrifices are not excluded but there is no such word added in that of Paul and therefore the parity is not demonstrated to be alike and consequently the instance not sufficient unless they can prove that it ought so to be admitted here else we might interpret by the same rule all other places of Scripture the same way as were the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 2.5 That your Faith might not stand in the wisdom of men but in the Power of God it might be understood it shall not stand principally so How might the Gospel by this liberty of interpretation be perverted If it be said That the abuse of this baptism among the Corinthians Obj. in dividing themselves according to the persons by whom they were baptized made the Apostle speak so but that the abuse of a thing doth not abolish it I answer it is true it doth not Answ. provided the thing be lawful and necessary and that no doubt the abuse abovesaid gave the Apostle occasion so to write But let it from this be considered how the Apostle excludes baptizing not preaching though the abuse mark proceeded from that no less then from the other For these Corinthians did denominate themselves from those different persons by whose preaching as well as from those by whom they were baptized they were converted as by the 4 5 6 7 and 8 verses of the third chap. may appear and yet for to remove that abuse the Apostle doth not say he was not sent to preach nor yet doth he rejoyce that he had only preached to a few because Preaching being a standing ordinance in the Church is not because of any abuse that the Devil may tempt any to make of it to be forborn by such as are called to perform it by the Spirit of God Wherefore the Apostle accordingly chap. 3.8 9. informs them as to that how to remove that abuse but as to Water-baptism for that it was no standing Ordinance of Christ but only practised as in condescendence to the Jews and by some Apostles to some Gentiles also there so soon as the Apostle perceived the abuse of he let the Corinthians understand how little stress was to be laid upon it by shewing them that he was glad that he had administred this ceremony to so few of them and by telling them plainly that it was no part of his commission neither that which he was sent to administer Some ask us how we know that baptizing here is meant of water and not of the Spirit Quest. which if it be then it will exolude baptism of the Spirit as well as of Water Answ. I answer such as ask the question I suppose speak it not as doubting that this was said of Water-baptism which is more then manifest for since the Apostle Paul's message was to turn People from darkness to Light and convert them to God and that as many as are thus turned and converted so as to have the answer of a good Conscience towards God and to have put on Christ and be arisen with him in newness of life are baptized with the baptism of the Spirit But who will say that only these few mentioned there to be baptized by Paul were come to this Or that to turn or bring them to this condition was not even admitting our Adversaries interpretation as principally a part of Paul's Ministry as any other Since then our Adversaries do take this place for Water-baptism as indeed it is we may lawfully taking it also urge it upon them Why the word baptism and baptizing is used by the Apostle where that of Water and not of the Spirit is only understood shall hereafter be spoken to I come now to consider the reasons alledged by such as plead for Water-baptism which are also the objections used against the discontinuance of it First some object that Christ who had the Spirit above measure was notwithstanding baptized with Water As Nic. Arnoldus against this These Sect. 46. of his Theological Exercitation I answer so was he also circumcised it will not follow from thence that Circumcision is to continue for it behoved Christ to fulfill all Righteousness not only the Ministry of John but the Law also Therefore did he observe the Jewish Feasts and Rites and kept the Passover It will not then follow that Christians ought to do so now and therefore Christ Matth. 3.15 gives John this reason of his being baptized desiring him to suffer it to be so now whereby he sufficiently intimates that he intended not thereby to perpetuate it as an Ordinance to his Disciples Secondly they object Matth. 28.19 Go ye therefore Obj. and teach all nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost This is the great objection Answ. and upon which they build the whole Superstructure whereunto the first general and sound answer is by granting the whole but puting them to prove that Water is here meant since the text is silent of it And though in reason it be sufficient upon our part that we conclude the whole expressed in the place but deny that it is by Water which is an addition to the Text. Yet I shall premise some reasons why we do so and then consider the reasons alledged by those that will have Water to be here understood The first is a maxime yielded to by all Arg. that we ought not to go from the literal signification of the Text except some urgent necessity force us thereunto But no urgent necessity in this place forceth us thereunto Therefore we ought not to go from it Secondly that Baptism which Christ commanded his Apostles Arg. was the One Baptism id est his own Baptism But the One Baptism which is Christ's Baptism is not with Water as we have already proved Therefore the Baptism commanded by Christ to his Apostles was not
but seeing that is denied and proved to be false nothing from thence can be gathered he speaking of the Baptism of the Spirit which we freely confess doth remain to the end of the world yea so long as Christ's presence abideth with his Children Obj. § IX Thirdly they object the constant practice of the Apostles in the primitive Church who they say did alwaies administer Water-baptism to such as they Converted to the Faith of Christ and hence also they further urge that of Matth. 28. to have been meant of Water or else the Apostles did not understand it in that in baptizing they used water or that in so doing they walked without a commission I answer that it was the constant practice of the Apostles is denied for we have shewn in the example of Paul that it was not so since it were most absurd to judg that he converted only these few even of the Church of Corinth whom he saith he Baptized nor were it less absurd to think that that was a constant Apostolick practice which he that was not inferiour to the chiefest of the Apostles and who declares he laboured as much as they all rejoyceth he was so little in But further the conclusion inferred from the Apostles practice of baptizing with water to evince that they understood Matth. 28. of Water-baptism doth not hold for though they baptized with water it will not follow that either they did it by vertue of that commission or that they mistook that place nor can there be any medium brought that will infer such a conclusion As to the other insinuated absurdity that they did it without a Commission It is none at all for they might have done it by a permission as being in use before Christ's Death And because the People nursed up with outward Ceremonies could not be weaned wholly from them And thus they used other things as Circumcision and Legal Purifications which yet they had no commission from Christ to do to which we shall speak more at length in the following Proposition concerning the Supper But if from the sameness of the word because Christ bids them baptize and they afterwards in the use of water are said to baptize Obj. it be judged probable that they did understand that commission Matth. 28. to authorize them to baptize with water and accordingly practised it Although it should be granted that for a season Answ. they did so far mistake it as to judg that water belonged to that baptism which however I find no necessity of granting yet I see not any great absurdity would thence follow for it is plain they did mistake that commission as to a main part of it for a season as where he bids them go teach all Nations since sometime after they judged it unlawful to teach the Gentiles yea Peter himself scrupled it until by a Vision constrained thereunto for which after he had done it he was for a season until they were better informed judged by the rest of his Brethren Now if the Education of the Apostles as Jews and their propensity to adhere and stick to the Jewish Religion did so far influence them that even after Christ's Resurrection and the pouring forth of the Spirit they could not receive nor admit of the teaching of the Gentiles though Christ in his commission to them commanded them to preach to them What further absurdity were it to suppose that through the like mistake the chiefest of them having been the Disciples of John and his Baptism being so much prized there among the Jews that they also took Christ's Baptism intended by him of the Spirit to be that of Water which was John's and accordingly practised it for a season it suffices us that if they were so mistaken though I say not that they were so they did not always remain under that mistake else Peter would not have said of the Baptism which now saves that it is not a puting away of the filth of the flesh which certainly Water-baptism is But further they urge much Peter's baptizing Cornelius in which they press two things First that Water-baptism is used even to those that had received the Spirit Secondly that it is said positively he commanded them to be baptized Acts 10.47 48. But neither of these doth necessarily infer Water baptism to belong to the New Covenant Dispensation nor yet to be a perpetual standing Ordinance in the Church For first all that this will amount to was that Peter at that time baptized these men but that he did it by vertue of that commission Matth. 28. remains yet to be proved And how doth the baptizing with water after the receiving of the Holy Ghost prove the case more than the use of Circumcision and other Legal Rites acknowledged to have been acted by him afterwards also no wonder if Peter that thought it so strange notwithstanding all that had been professed before and spoken by Christ that the Gentiles should be made partakers of the Gospel and with great difficulty not without a very extraordinary impulse thereunto was brought to come to them and eat with them was apt to put this Ceremony upon them which being as it were the particular Dispensation of John the fore runner of Christ seemed to have greater affinity with the Gospel than the other Jewish Ceremonies then used by the Church but that will no waies infer our Adversaries conclusion Secondly as to these words and he commanded them to be baptized it declareth matter of fact not of right and amounteth to no more than that Peter did at that time pro hic nunc command those persons to be baptized with Water which is not denied but it saith nothing that Peter commanded Water-baptism to be a standing and perpetual Ordinance to the Church neither can any man of sound reason say if he heed what he sayes that a command in matter of fact to particular persons doth infer the thing commanded to be of general obligation to all if it be not otherwaies bottomed upon some positive precept why doth Peter's commanding Cornelius and his Houshold to be baptized at that time infer Water-baptism to continue more than his constraining which is more than commanding the Gentiles in general to be Circumcised and observe the Law We find that at time when Peter Baptized Cornelius it was not yet determined whether the Gentiles should not be Circumcised but on the contrary it was the most general sense of the Church that they should And therefore no wonder if they thought it needful at that time that they should be baptized which had more affinity with the Gospel and was a burthen less grievous Obj. § X. Fourthly they object from the signification of the word Baptize which is as much as to dip and wash with water alledging thence that the very word imports a being baptized with water Answ. This objection is very weak For since baptizing with water was a Rite among the Jews as Paulus Riccius sheweth even before
which God is the alone proper and infallible Judge who by his Power and Spirit can alone rectifie the mistakes of Conscience and therefore hath reserved to himself the power of punishing the errors thereof as he seeth meet Now for the Magistrate to assume this is to take upon him to meddle with things not within the compass of his jurisdiction for if this were within the compass of his jurisdiction he should be the proper judge in these things and also it were needful to him as an essential qualification of his being a Magistrate to be capable to Judge in them But that the Magistrate as a Magistrate is neither proper Judge in these cases not yet that the capacity so to be is requisite in him as a Magistrate our adversaries cannot deny or else they must say that all the Heathen Magistrates were either no lawful Magistrates as wanting something essential to Magistracy and this were contrary to the express Doctrin of the Apostles Rom. 13. or else which is more absurd that those Heathen Magistrates were proper Judges in matters of Conscience amongst Christians As for that evasion that the Magistrate ought to punish according to the Church censure and determination which is indeed no less than to make the Magistrate the Churches Hang-man we shall have occasion to speak of it hereafter But if the chief members of the Church though ordained to inform instruct and reprove are not to have dominion over the Faith nor Consciences of the Faithful as the Apostle expressly affirms 2 Cor. 1.24 then far less ought they to usurp this dominion or stir up the Magistrate to persecute and murther those who will not yield to them therein Secondly this pretended power of the Magistrate is both contrary unto and inconsistent with the nature of the Gospel which is a thing altogether extrinsic from the rule and government of political States as Christ expressly signified saying his Kingdom was not of this World and if the propagating of the Gospel had had any necessary relation thereunto then Christ had not said so but he abundantly hath shewn by his Example whom we are chiefly to imitate in matters of that nature that its by perswasion and the Power of God not by Whips Imprisonments Banishments and Murtherings that the Gospel is to be propagated and that those that are the propagators of it are often to suffer by the wicked but never to cause the wicked to suffer When he sends forth his Disciples he tells them he sends them forth as Lambs among Wolves to be willing to be devoured not to devour he tells them of their being whipped imprisoned and killed for their Conscience but never that they shall either whip imprison or kill and indeed if Christians must be as Lambs it is not the nature of Lambs to destroy or devour any It serves nothing to alledge that that in Christ and his Apostles times the Magistrates were Heathens and therefore Christ and his Apostles not being Magistrates nor yet any of the Believers could not exercise the power because it cannot be denied but Christ being the Son of God had a true right to all Kingdoms and was righteous Heir of the Earth Next as to his Power it cannot be denied but he could if he had seen meet have called for legions of Angels to defend him and have forced the Princes and Potentates of the Earth to be subject unto him Matth. 26.53 So that it was only because it was contrary to the nature of Christ's Gospel and Ministry to use any force or violence in the gathering of Souls to him This he abundantly expressed in his reproof to the Sons of Zebedee who would have been calling for Fire from Heaven to burn those that refused to receive Christ. It is not to be doubted but this was a great crime as now to be in an error concerning the Faith and Doctrin of Christ. That there was not Power wanting to have punished those refusers of Christ cannot be doubted for they that could do other Miracles might have done this also and moreover they wanted not the president of a holy man under the Law as did Elias yet we see what Christ saith to them Ye know not what Spirit ye are of Luke 9.55 for the Son of man is not come to destroy mens lives but to save them Here Christ shews that such kind of zeal was no waies approved of him and such as think to make way for Christ or his Gospel by this means do not understand what Spirit they are of But if it was not lawful to call for Fire from Heaven to destroy such as refused to receive Christ it is far less lawful to kindle Fire upon Earth to destroy those that believe in Christ because they will not believe nor can believe as the Magistrates do for Conscience sake and if it was not lawful for the Apostles who had so large a measure of the Spirit and were so little liable to mistake to force others to their judgment it can be far less lawful now for men that experience declareth and many of themselves confess are fallible and often mistaken to kill and destroy all such as cannot because otherwise perswaded in their minds judge and believe in matters of Conscience just as they do And if it was not according to the Wisdom of Christ who was and is King of Kings by outward force to constrain others to believe him or receive him as being a thing inconsistent with the nature of his Ministry and Spiritual Government do not they grossly offend him that will needs be wiser than he and think to force men against their perswasion to conform to their Doctrin and Worship The word of the Lord saith not by Power and by Might but by the Spirit of the Lord Zach. 4.6 But these say not by the Spirit of the Lord but by Might and Carnal Power The Apostle saith plainly we wrestle not with Flesh and Blood and the weapons of our warfar are not carnal but Spiritual but these men will needs wrestle with Flesh and Blood when they cannot prevail with the Spirit and the Understanding and not having Spiritual Weapons go about with Carnal Weapons to establish Christ's Kingdom which they can never do and therefore when the matter is well sifted it is found to be more out of love to self and from a principle of pride in man to have all others to bow to him than from the love of God Christ indeed takes another method for he saith he will make his People a willing People in the day of his power but these men labour against mens wills and Consciences not by Christ's power but by the outward Sword to make men the people of Christ which they can never do as shall hereafter be shewn But thirdly Christ fully and plainly declareth to us his sense in this matter in the parable of the Tares Matth. 13. of which we have himself the Interpreter ver 38 39
because they are not able but could they get force would be as ready to lead those the same way that lead them Where is the faith and patience of the Saints For indeed it is but a small glory to make a vertue of necessity and suffer because I cannot help it Every thief and murderer is a Martyr at that rate experience hath abundantly proved this in these last centuries For however each party talk of passively obeying the Magistrates in such cases and that the power resides in him yet it is apparent that from this Principle it naturally followes that any party supposing themselves right should so soon as they are able endeavour at any rate to get uppermost that they might bring under those of another opinion and force the Magistrate to uphold their way to the ruin of all others What Engine the Pope of Rome used to make of his pretended power in this thing upon any pretence of dislike to any Prince or State even for very small heresies in their own account to depose Princes and set up their subjects against them and give their dominions to other Princes to serve his interest they cannot be ignorant that have read the life of Hildebrand and how Protestants have vindicated the liberty of their consciences after this same manner is apparent They suffered much in France to the great increase and advantage of their party but how soon they found themselves considerable and had gotten some Princes upon their side they began to let the King know that they must either have the liberty of their Consciences or else they would purchase it not by suffering but by fighting And the experience of other Protestant States shews that if Henry the Fourth to please the Papists had not quitted his Religion to get the Crown the more peaceably and so the Protestants had prevailed with the Sword they would as well have taught the Papists with the Faggot and led them to the Stake so that this Principle of Persecution on all hands is the ground of all those miseries and contentions for so long as any party is perswaded that it is both lawful for them and their duty if in power to destroy those that differ from them it naturally follows they ought to use all means possible to get that power whereby they may secure themselves in the ruin of their adversaries And that neither Papists nor Protestants judg it unlawful to compell the Magistrate if they be strong enough to do it to effect this Experience shews it to be a known Popish Principle that the Pope may depose an Heretick Prince and absolve the People from the Oath of fidelity and the Pope as is above-said hath done so to divers Princes and this Doctrine is defended by Bellarmin against Barclay The French refused Henry the Fourth till he quitted his Religion And as for Protestants many of them scruple not to affirm that wicked Kings and Magistrates may be deposed and killed yea our Scotch Presbyters are as positive in it as any Jesuits who would not admit this present Charles the Second though otherwise a Protestant Prince unless he would swear to renounce Episcopacy a matter of no great difference though contrary to his Conscience Now how little proportion these things bear with the primitive Christians and the Religion propagated by Christ and his Apostles needs no great demonstration and it is observable that notwithstanding many other superstitions crept into the Church very early yet this of Persecution was so inconsistent with the nature of the Gospel and liberty of Conscience as we have asserted it such an innate and natural part of the Christian Religion that almost all the Christian Writers for the first three hundred years earnestly contend for it condemning the contrary opinion § V. Thus Athanasius It is the property of Piety not to force but to perswade in imitation of our Lord who forced no body but left it to the will of every one to follow him c. But the Devil because he hath nothing of Truth uses knocks and axes to break up the doors of such as receive him But our Saviour is meek teaching the truth whosoever will come after me and whosoever will be my Disciple c. but constraining none coming to us and knocking rather and saying My Sister my Spouse open to me c. and entreth when he is opened to and retires if they delay and will not open unto him because it is not with swords nor darts nor souldiers nor armour that Truth is to be declared but with perswasion and counsel And it is observable that it was the impious Arians who first of all brought in this doctrine to persecute others among Christians whose successors both Papists and Protestants are in this matter whom Athanasius thus reproveth further Where saith he have they learned to persecute Certainly they cannot say they have learned it from the Saints but this has been given them and taught them of the devil The Lord commanded indeed sometimes to flee and the Saints sometimes fled but to persecute is the invention and argument of the devil which he seeks against all And after he saith in so far as the Arians banish those that will not subscribe their decrees they shew that they are contrary to Christians and friends of the devil But now O lamentable saith Hilarius it is the suffrages of the earth that recommend the religion of God and Christ is found naked of his vertue while ambition must give credit to his name The Church reproves and fights by banishments and prisons and forceth herself to be believed which once was believed because of the imprisonments and banishments her self suffered She that once was consecrated by the terrors of her persecutors depends now upon the dignity of those that are in her communion She that once was propagated by her banished Priests now banisheth the Priests And she boasts now that she is loved of the world who could not have been Christs if she had not been hated of the world The Church saith Hierom was founded by shedding of blood and by suffering and not in doing of hurt The Church increased by persecutions and was crowned by Martyrdom Ambrose speaking of Auxentius saith thus whom he viz. Auxentius could not deceive by discourse he thinks ought to be killed by the sword making bloody laws with his mouth writing them with his own hands and imagining that an Edict can command Faith And the same Ambrose saith that going into France he would not communicate with those Bishops that required that Hereticks should be put to death The Emperor Marcio who assembled the Council of Chalcedon protests that he would not force nor constrain any one to subscribe the Council of Chalcedon against his will Hosius Bishop of Cordua testifies that the Emperor Constance would not constrain any to be Orthodox Hilarius saith further that God teacheth rather than exacteth the knowledg of himself
Joh. 5.44 Jer. 10.3 Acts 10.26 Matt. 15.13 Col. 2.8 John 17.3 John 7.48 49. Aug. ex Tract Epist. Joh. 3. Lib. 1. Storm Paedag. Lib. de veland virginibus cap. 1. Hpist Paulin. 103. De incarnatione verbi Dei Hom. 30. upon the Gospel In thesau 10. lib. 13. cap. 3. In Psal. 84. John 1.1 2 3. Eph. 3.9 Joh. 16.13 14 26. Euseb. Hist. Ecclesi lib. 5. cap. 26. Conc. Flor. Sess. 5. decreto quodam Concl. Eph. Act. 6. Sess. 11. 12. Council Flor. Sess. 18.20 Conc. Flor. Sess. 21. p. 480. seqq John 16. verse 13. Rom. 8. verse 14 Concil Laod. can 59. in cod Ecc. 163. Concil Laod. held in the Year 364. excluded from the canon Eccl. the Wisdom of Solomon Judith Tobias the Maccabees which the Council of Carthage held in the Year 399 received Hieron epist. 28 ad Lucin pag. 247. Epiphan in Anchor Tom. 2. oper Gal. 1.8.9 Rom. 3.10 Ps. 14.3 53.2 Mat. 7.16 Ezek. 18.32 33.11 1 Cor. 12.7 * Calv. in cap. 3. Gen. Id. 1. Inst. c. 18. S. 1. Id. lib. de Praed Idem lib. de provid Id Inst. cap. 23. S. 1 a Beza lib. de praed b Id de praed adart 1. c Zanch de excaecat q. 5. Idem lib. 5 de nat Dei cap. 2. de praed d Paraeus lib. 3. de amiss gratiae c. 2. ibid. c. 1. e Martyr in Rom. f Zuing. lib. de prov c. 5. g Resp. ad Vorst part 1. p. 120. Upon Job lib. 1. cap. 11. So saith the Westminster Confession of Faith Chap. 11. Sect. 1. * Eph. 2. verse 15. 1 Joh. 4. verse 10. Ezech. 16. verse 6. 1 Pet. 2. v. 22.24 3.18 Tit. 2.14 Phil. 3. verse 10. * I do not only speak concerning men before conversion who afterwards are converted whom yet some of our Antagonists called Antinomians do averr were Justified from the beginning but also touching those who according to the common Opinion of Protestants have been converted whom albeit they confess they persist alwaies in some misdeeds and sometimes in hanious sins as is manifest in Davids Adultery and Murder yet they assert to be perfectly and wholly Justified Heb. 11.6 Joh. 3.18 Luk. 13.3 Apoc. 2.5 Rom. 8.13 Heb. 7.26 1 Pet. 2.22 De Just. con Bell. lib. 2. cap. 7. pag. 469. Disp. de Iust. Thes. 3. ver 4 loc de Iust. ad Eph. In cap. 2. Tom. 3. de Sanct. lib. 10. cap. 1. In cap. 3. ad Tit. ver 7. In Apol. Confess Aug. In Gen. cap. 15. ad verb. Credidit Abraham Deo pag. 161. Lib. 3. Reg. cap. 9. ver 4. pag. 681. In Rom. 4. ad ver 16. In considerat modest de Just. lib. 2. Sect. 8. Inst. lib. 3. cap. 11. Sect. 15. In Exam. Concil Trid de Inst. pag. 129. In cap. 2. ad Eph. ver 4. loc de lust Thes. 15. In Gen. pag. 162. Arg Epistolae praefixiae dissert ann Impress Paris ann 1597 pag. 78. Impress Genevae 1586. In medulla S. Theologiae lib. 2. cap. 1. Thesi 30. Job 8.13 These are the words of the Westminst larger Catechism Object Phil. 3. ver 14. Matth. 10. ver 8. * As was betwixt the Bishop of Rome and the Bishop of Constantinople Hos. 4.9 Joh. 10.1 * Succession * Who gives himself out Doctor and Professor of the Sacred Theology at Franequer Matth. 12. v. 48. c. Mark 3. ver 33. c 2. Cor. 6. v. 17 18. * In the life of Benedict 4. Of Joh. 16 of Sylvester 3. of Boniface 8. of Steph. 6 of Jean 8. Also Onuphrius annotations upon this Papass towards the end * Franciscus Lambertus Avenionensis In his book concerning Prophecy learning tongues and the Spirit of Prophecy Argentorat Excus anno 1516. de prov cap. 24. Heb. 5.4 * So Nic. Arnoldus Sect. 32. upon the 4 These * Ibid. Nic. Arnoldus Inst. * Lucae Osiandri epit hist. Eccles. lib. 2. cap. 5. cent 4. See also 2 Pet. 2. ver 3. vers 4. vers 11. Acts 21.9 Isa. 56.11 Matth. 10.4 Isa. 30. verse 20. Prov. 27. verse 19. Isa. 10.20 26.3 Eph. 4.23 1 Sam. 10.12 1 Cor. 6.17 * If any object here that the Lord's Prayer is a prescribed form of Prayer Obj. and therefore of Worship given by Christ to his Children I answer first This cannot be objected by any sort of Christians that I know Answ. because there are none who use not other Prayers or that limits their Worship to this Secondly this was commanded to the Disciples while yet weak before they had received the dispensation of the Gospel not that they should only use it in praying but that he might shew them by one example how that their Prayers ought to be short and not like the long Prayers of the Pharisees and that this was the use of it appears by all the Prayers which divers Saints afterwards made use of whereof the Scripture makes mention for none made use of this neither repeated it but used other words according as the thing required and as the Spirit gave utterance Thirdly that this ought so to be understood appears from Rom. 8.26 of which afterwards mention shall be made at greater length where the Apostle saith We know not what we should pray for as we ought but the Spirit it self maketh intercession for us c. But if this Prayer had been such a prescribed form of Prayer to the Church that had not been true neither had they been ignorant what to pray nor should they have needed the help of the Spirit to teach them Prov. 18.10 John 18.36 Col. 2.15 Acts 7.48 Isa. 1.16 17. Prov. â—7·1â— Inst. Job 2.13 Prov. 21.4 Eph. 4.5 1 Pet. 3.21 Rom. 6.4 Gal. 3.27 Col. 2.12 Joh. 3.30 1 Cor. 1.17 1 Cor. 1.14 Obi. Confir Matth. 9.13 Refut John 3. verse 34. Allegation Obi. * In the 4 book of his Instit. chap. 15. Quest· 1 Cor 6.17 John â— 60 66. John 6.35 55. 2 Cor. 6.14 John 6.53 John 6.57 John 6.56 verse 16. Inst. lib. 4. cap. 17. Matth. 26.16 Mark 14.22 Luke 22.19 Matth. 26.26 Mar. 14.22 Lu. 22.19 1 Cor. 11.23 Obi. Anws And likewise the other oriental versions as the Arabick and Aethiopick have it the same way Obi. Phh. 5.13 Luke 9. v. 55 56. Matth. 7. v. 12 13.29 Tit. 3.10 Rom. 14.23 Matth. 10.16 Matth. 28.18 2 Cor. 10 4. Psal. 110.3 Athan. in epist. ad solit vit ag ibid. Athan. Apol. 1. de fuga sua tom 1. Hill contra Aux Hieron epist. 62 ad The. Ambr. epist. 32. tom 3. Ambr. epist. 27. Marc. epist. ad Archimand c. Mon. Eg. in acta concil Chalce * Hosius epist. ad Constir apud Ath. in epist. ad solit vit tom 1. (a) Hil. l. 1. ad Const. (b) Ambr. comm in Luc. l. 7. (c) Cypr. epist. 62. (d) Tertu Apolog. cap. 24. Id. Apolog. c. 28. Idem ad Scapul e. 2. Luth. lib. de captivitt Babylonica History of the Council of Trent Calv. Inst. c. 19. Sect. 14. Eph. 5.11 1 Pet. 1.14 Joh. 5.44 Jer. 10.3 Acts 10.26 Matth. 15.13 Col. 2.8 * After this manner the Papists used to disapprove the sobriety of the Waldenses of whom Reinerius a popish Author so writeth But this sect of the Leonists hath a great shew of Truth for that they live righteously before men and believe all things well of God and all the articles which are contained in the creed only they blaspheme and hate the church of Rome Obi. Eccles. hist. lib. 4. pag. 445. Phil. 3.20 1 Sam. 2.30 Heiron in his Epistle to Celant admonisheth her That she was to be preferred to none for her nobility for the Christian Religion admits not of respect of persons neither are men to be esteemed because of their outward condition but according to the disposition of the mind to be esteemed either noble or base he that obeyeth not sin is free who is strong in vertue is noble Let the epistle of James be read * This history is reported by Casaubonus in his Book of Manners and Customs pag. 169. In this last Age he is esteemed an uncivil Man who will not either to his inferior or equal subscribe himself Servant But Sulpitious Severus was heretofore sharply reproved by Paulinus Bishop of Nola because in his Epistle he had subscribed himself his Servant saying Beware thou subscribe not thy self his Servant who is thy Brother for flattery is sinful not a testimony of humility to give their honors to Men which are only due to the One Lord Master and GOD. Rom. 12.2 Athan. in pass cruc Domin Hier. lib. Ep. part 3. tract 1. Ep. 2. Ans. Matth. 5.43 Eph. 6.12 2 Cor. 10.4 Ja. 4.1 Gal. 5.24 Isa 2.4 Mich. 4.3 Isa. 65.25 Joh. 18. v. 36. Matth. 26. v. 52. Rom. 12. v. 19. Marc. 8. v. 34. Luc. 7. v. 28. Luc. 3. v. 14. Esth. 3.5 Job 32.21 22.
and ought so to be understood doth appear from the other part By the washing of Regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost seeing Regeneration is a work comprehensive of many good works even of all those which are called the Fruits of the Spirit Now in case it should be objected that these may also be called ours because wrought in us and also by us many times as instruments I answer It is far otherwise than the former for in the first we are yet alive in our own natural state unrenewed working of our selves seeking to save our selves by imitating and endeavouring a conformity to the outward Letter of the Law and so wrestling and striving in the carnal mind that is enmity to God and in the cursed will not yet subdued But in this second we are Crucified with Christ we are become dead with him have partaken of the Fellowship of his sufferings are made conformable to his death and our first man our old man with all his deeds as well the openly wicked as the seeming righteous our legal endeavours and foolish wrestlings are all buried and nailed to the Cross of Christ and so it is no more we but Christ alive in us the Worker in us So that though it be we in a sense yet it is according to that of the Apostle to the same Gal. c. 2. v. 20. I am Crucified yet nevertheless I live yet not I but Christ liveth in me not I but the Grace of Christ in me These works are especially to be ascribed to the Spirit of Christ and the Grace of God in us as being immediately thereby acted and led in them and enabled to perform them And this manner of speech is not strained but familiar to the Apostles as appears Gal. 2.8 For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the Apostleship of the Circumcision the same was mighty in me c. Phil. 2.13 For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do c. So that it appears by this place that since the washing of Regeneration is necessary to Justification and that Regeneration comprehends works works are necessary and that these works of the Law that are excluded are different from these that are necessary and admitted § XI Thirdly they object that no works yea not the works of Christ in us can have place in Justification Obj. because nothing that is impure can be useful in it and all the works wrought in us are impure For this they alledg that saying of the Prophet Isaiah c. 64. v. 6. All our Righteousness are as filthy rags adding this reason that seeing we are impure so must our works be which though good in themselves yet as performed by us they receive a tincture of impurity even as a clean water passing through an unclean pipe is defiled That no impure works are useful to Justification is confessed Answ. but that all the works wrought in the Saints are such is denyed And for answer to this the former distinction will serve We confess that the first sort of works above mentioned are impure but not the Second because the first are wrought in the unrenewed state but not the other And as for that of Isaiah it must relate to the first kind for though he saith all our Righteousness are as filthy rags yet that will not comprehend the Righteousness of Christ in us but only that which we work of and by our selves For should we so conclude then it would follow that we should throw away all Holyness and Righteousness since that which is filthy rags and as a menstruous Garment ought to be thrown away yea it would follow that all the Fruits of the Spirit mentioned Gal. 4. were as filthy rags whereas on the contrary some of the works of the Saints are said to have a sweet savour in the nostrils of the Lord are said to be an Ornament of great price in the sight of God are said to prevail with him and to be acceptable to him which filthy rags and a menstruous garment cannot be Yea many Famous Protestants have acknowledged that this place is not therefore so to be understood Calvin upon this place saith That it is used to be cited by some that they may prove there is so little merit in our works that they are before God filthy and defiled but this seems to me to be different from the Prophets mind saith he seeing he speaks not here of all mankind Musculus upon this place saith that it was usual for this People to presume much of their legal Righteousness as if thereby they were made clean nevertheless they had no more cleanness than the unclean Garment of a man Others expone this place concerning all the Righteousness of our Flesh that opinion indeed is true Yet I think that the Prophet did rather accommodate these sayings to the impurity of that People in legal terms The Author commonly supposed Bertius speaking concerning the true sense of the 7 Chapter of the Epistle to the Romans hath a digression touching this of Isaiah saying This place is commonly corrupted by a pernicious wresting for it is still alledged as if the meaning thereof inferred the most excellent works of the best Christians c. James Coret a French Minister in the Church of Basil in his Apology concerning Justification against Alescales saith Nevertheless according to the counsel of certain good men I must admonish the Reader that it never come into our minds to abuse that saying of Isa. 64.6 against good works in which it is said that all our Righteousness are as filthy rags as if we would have that which is good in our good works and proceedeth from the Holy Spirit to be esteemed as a filthy and unclean thing § XII As to the other part that seeing the best of men are still impure and imperfect therefore their works must be so It is to beg the question and depends upon a Proposition denyed and which is to be discussed at further length in the next Proposition But tho we should suppose a man not throughly perfect in all respects yet will not that hinder but good and perfect works in their kind may be brought forth in them by the Spirit of Christ neither doth the Example of Water going through an unclean Pipe hit the matter because though Water may be capable to be tinctured with uncleanness yet the Spirit of God cannot whom we assert to be the immediate Author of those works that avail in Justification and therefore Jesus Christ his works in his Children are pure and perfect and he worketh in and through that pure thing of his own forming and creating in them Moreover if this did hold according to our Adversaries Supposition that no man ever was or can be perfect it would follow that the very Miracles and works of the Apostles which Christ wrought in them and they wrought in and by the Power Spirit and Grace of Christ were also impure and imperfect
such as their Converting of the Nations to the Christian Faith their gathering of the Churches their Writing of the Holy Scriptures yea and their Offering up and Sacrificing of their Lives for the Testimony of Jesus What may our Adversaries think of this Argument whereby it will follow that the Holy Scriptures whose perfection and excellency they seem so much to magnifie are proved to be impure and imperfect because they came through impure and imperfect Vessels It appears by the confessions of Protestants that the Fathers did frequently attribute unto works of this kind that Instrumental work which we have spoken of in Justification albeit some ignorant persons cry out it is Popery and also divers and that Famous Protestants do of themselves confess it Amandus Polanus in his Symphonia Catholica cap. 27. de remissione peccatorum pag. 651. places this These as the common opinion of Protestants most agreeable to the Doctrine of the Fathers We obtain the remission of sins by Repentance Confession Prayers and Tears proceeding from Faith but do not merit to speak properly and therefore we obtain remission of sins not by the merit of our Repentance and Prayers but by the mercy and goodness of God Innocentius Gentiletus a Lawyer of great same among Protestants in his examin of the Council of Trent pag. 66 67. of Justification having before spoken of Faith and Works adds these words But seeing the one cannot be without the other we call them both conjunctly instrumental causes Zanchius in his 5 book De Natura Dei saith We do not simply deny that good works are the cause of Salvation to wit the instrumental rather than the efficient cause which they call sine qua non And afterwards Good Works are the instrumental cause of the possession of Life Eternal for by these as by a means and a lawful way God leads unto the possession of Life Eternal G. Amesius saith that our obedience albeit it be not the principal and meritorius cause of Life Eternal is nevertheless a cause in some respect administring helping and advancing towards the possession of the life Also Richard Baxter in the book above cited pag. 155. saith that we are justified by works in the same kind of causality as by Faith to wit as being both causes sine qua non or conditions of the New Covenant on our part requisite to Justification And pag. 195. he saith It is needless to teach any Schollar who hath read the Writings of Papists how this Doctrine differs from them But lastly because it is fit here to say something of the merit and reward of works I shall add something in this place of our sense and belief concerning that matter we are far from thinking or believing that man merits any thing by his works from God all being of Free Grace and therefore do we and always have denyed that Popish notion of meritum excondigno nevertheless we cannot deny but that God out of his infinite goodness wherewith he hath loved mankind after he communicates to him his Holy Grace and Spirit doth according to his own will recompence and reward the good works of his Children and therefore this merit of congruity or reward in so far as the Scripture is plain and positive for it we may not deny neither wholly reject the word in so far as the Scripture makes use of it For the same Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies merit is also in those places where the Translators express it worth or worthy as Matth. 3.8 1 Thess. 2.12 2 Thess. 1.5 8. concerning which Richard Baxter saith in the above cited book pag. 8. But in a larger sense as promise is an Obligation and the thing promised is said to be debt so the performers of the conditions are called worthy and that which they perform Merit although properly all be of Grace and not of Debt Also those who are called the Fathers of the Church frequently used this word of merit whose sayings concerning this matter I think not needful to insert because it is not doubted but evident that many Protestants are not averse from this word in the sense that we use it The Apology for the Augustine Confession Art 20. hath these words We agree that works are truly meritorius not of remission of sins or Justification but they are meritorious of other rewards Corporal and Spiritual which are indeed as well in this Life as after this Life And further Seeing works are a certain fulfilling of the Law they are rightly said to be meritorious it is rightly said that a reward is due to them In the acts of the conference of Oldenburgh the Electoral Divines pag. 110 265. say In this sense our Churches also are not averse from the word merit used by the Fathers neither therefore do they defend the Popish Doctrine of merit G. Vossius in his Theological These concerning the merits of good works saith We have not adventured to condemn the word merit wholly as being that which both many of the Ancients use and also the reformed Churches have used in their confessions Now that God judgeth and accepteth men according to their works is beyond doubt to those that seriously will read and consider these Scriptures Matth. 17.26 Rom. 2.6 7 10. 2 Cor. 5.10 Ja. 1.25 Heb. 10.35 1 Pet. 1.17 Rev. 22.12 § XIII And to conclude this Theam let none be so bold as to mock God supposing themselves justified and accepted in the sight of God by vertue of Christ's Death and Sufferings while they remain unsanctified and unjustified in their own Hearts and polluted in their Sins lest their hope prove that of the Hypocrite which perisheth Neither let any foolishly imagine that they can by their own works or by the performance of any Ceremonies or Traditions or by the giving of Gold or Money or by afflicting their bodies in Will-worship and voluntary humility or foolishly striving to conform their way to the outward Letter of the Law flatter themselves that they merit before God or draw a debt upon him or that any man or men have Power to make such kind of things effectual to their Justification lest they be found foolish boasters and strangers to Christ and his Righteousness indeed But blessed for ever are they that having truly had a sense of their own unworthyness and sinfulness and having seen all their own endeavours and performances fruitless and vain and beheld their own emptyness and the vanity of their vain Hopes Faith and Confidence while they remained inwardly pricked pursued and condemned by God's Holy Witness in their Hearts and so having applyed themselves thereto and suffered his Grace to work in them are become changed and renewed in the Spirit of their minds past from death to Life and know Jesus arisen in them working both the will and the deed and so having put on the Lord Jesus Christ in effect are cloathed with him and partake of his Righteousness and Nature such
40 41. where he expounds them to be the children of the wicked one and yet he will not have the servants to meddle with them lest they pull up the Wheat therewith Now it cannot be denyed but hereticks are here included but these servants saw the Tares and had a certain discerning of them yet Christ would not they should meddle lest they should hurt the Wheat thereby intimating that that capacity in man to be mistaken ought to be a bridle upon him to make him wary in such matters and therefore to prevent this hurt he gives a positive prohibition But he said Nay ver 29. So that they that will notwithstanding be pulling up that which they judg is Tares do openly declare that they make no bones to break the commands of Christ. Miserable is that evasion which some of our adversaries use here in alledging these Tares is meant of Hypocrites and not of Hereticks But how to evince that seeing Hereticks as well as Hypocrites are children of the wicked one they have not any thing but their own bare affirmation which is therefore justly rejected Obj. If they say because Hypocrites cannot be discerned but so may not Hereticks Answ. This is both false and a begging of the question For those that have a Spiritual discerning can discern both Hypocrites and Hereticks and those that want it cannot certainly discern either seeing the question will arise Whether that is a Heresie which the Magistrate sait his so And seeing it is both possible and confessed by all to have often faln out that some Magistrates have judged that Heresie which was not punishing men accordingly for Truth instead of error there can no argument be drawn from the obviousness or evidence of heresie unless we should conclude heresie could never be mistaken for Truth nor Truth for heresie whereof experience shews daily the contrary even among Christians But neither is this shift applicable to this place for the servants did discern the Tares and yet were liable to hurt the wheat if they had offered to pull them up Obj. § III. But they object against this Liberty of Conscience Deut. 13.5 where false Prophets are appointed to be put to death and accordingly they give example thereof The case no ways holds parallel those particular commands to the Jews and practises following upon them are not a rule for Christians Answ. else we might by the same rule say It were lawful for us to borrow from our neighbours their goods and so carry them away because the Jews did so by God's command or that it is lawful for Christians to invade their neighbours Kingdoms and cut them all off without mercy because the Jews did so to the Canaanites by the command of God If they urge that these commands ought to stand except they be repealed in the Gospel Obj. I say Answ. these precepts and practises of Christ and his Apostles mentioned are a sufficient repeal for if we should plead that every command given to the Jews is binding upon us except there be a particular repeal then would it follow that because it was lawful for the Jews if any man killed one for the nearest of kindred presently to kill the Murderer without any order of Law it were lawful for us to do so also And doth not this command of Deut. 13.9 openly order him who is enticed by another to forsake the Lord though he were his brother his son his daughter or his wife presently to kill him or her Thou shalt surely kill him thy hand shall be first upon him to put him to death If this command were to be followed there needed neither inquisition nor Magistrate to do the business and yet there is no reason why they should shuffle by this part and not the other yea to argue this way from the practice among the Jews were to overturn the very Gospel and to set up again the carnal ordinances among the Jews to pull down the Spiritual ones of the Gospel Indeed we can far better argue from the analogy betwixt the figurative and carnal state of the Jews and the real and Spiritual one under the Gospel That as Moses delivered the Jews out of outward Egypt by an outward force and established them in an outward Kingdom by destroying their outward enemies for them so Christ not by overcoming outwardly and killing others but by suffering and being killed doth deliver his chosen ones the inward Jews out of mystical Egypt destroying their Spiritual enemies before them and establishing among them his Spiritual Kingdom which is not of this world And as such as departed from the fellowship of outward Israel were to be cut off by the outward Sword so those that depart from the inward Israel are to be cut off by the Sword of the Spirit for it answers very well that as the Jews were to cut off their Enemies outwardly to establish their Kingdom and outward worship so they were to uphold it the same way But as the Kingdom and Gospel of Christ was not to be established nor propagated by cutting off or destroying the Gentiles but by perswading them so neither is it to be upheld otherwise Obj. But secondly they urge Rom. 13. where the Magistrate is said not to bear the sword in vain because he is the minister of God to execute wrath upon such as do evil But heresie say they is evil Ergo. Answ. But so is Hypocrisie also yet they confess he ought not to punish that Therefore this must be understood of moral evils relative of affairs betwixt man and man not of matters of judgment or worship or else what great absurdities would follow considering that Paul wrote here to the Church of Rome who was under the Government of Nero an impious Heathen and persecutor of the Church Now if a power to punish in point of Heresie be here included it will necessarily follow that Nero had this power yea and that he had it of God for because the power was of God therefore the Apostle urges their obedience But can there be any thing more absurd than to say that Nero had power to judg in such cases Surely if Christian Magistrates be not to punish for Hypocrisie because they cannot outwardly discern it far less could Nero punish any body for Heresie which he was uncapable to discern And if Nero had not power to judge nor punish in point of Heresie then nothing can be urged from this place since all that 's said here is spoken as applicable to Nero with a particular relation to whom it was written And if Nero had such a power surely he was to exercise it according to his judgment and conscience and in doing thereof he was not to be blamed which is enough to justifie him in his persecuting of the Apostles and murdering the Christians Obj. Thirdly they object that saying of the Apostle to the Gal. 5.12 I would they were even cut off which trouble you Answ. But how this imports any more
than a cutting off from the Church is not nor can be shewn Beza upon the place saith We cannot understand that otherwise than of Excommunication Such as was that of the incestuous Corinthian And indeed it is madness to suppose it otherwise for Paul would not have these cut off otherwise than he did Hymenaeus and Philetus who were Blasphemers which was by giving them over to Satan not by cutting off their Heads The same way may be answered that other argument drawn from Rev. 2.20 Where the Church of Thyatira is reproved for suffering the woman Jezebel Which can be no other waies understood than that they did not excommunicate her or cut her off by a Church censure for as to corporal punishment it is known that at that time the Christians had not power to punish Hereticks so if they had had a mind to it Fourthly they alledge Obj. that Heresies are numbred among the works of the Flesh Gal. 5.20 Ergo c. That Magistrates have power to punish all the works of the Flesh Answ. is denyed and not yet proved Every evil is a work of the Flesh but every evil comes not under the Magistrates cognisance Is not Hypocrisie a work of the Flesh which our adversaries confess the Magistrates ought not to punish Yea is not Hatred and Envy there mentioned as the works of the Flesh and yet the Magistrates cannot punish them as they are in themselves until they exert themselves in other acts which come under his power But so long as Heresie doth not exert it self in any act destructive to humane society or such like things but is kept within the sphere of those duties of doctrin or worship which stand betwixt a man and God they no waies come under a Magistrates power § IV. But secondly this forcing of mens consciences is contrary to sound Reason and to the very law of Nature For man's understanding cannot be forced by all the bodily sufferings another man can inflict upon him especially in matters Spiritual and Supernatural 't is arguments and evident demonstrations of Reason together with the power of God reaching the Heart that can change a man's mind from one opinion to another and not knocks and blows and such like things which may well destroy the Body but can never inform the Soul which is a free agent and must either accept or reject matters of opinion as they are born in upon it by something proportional to its own nature To seek to force minds in ony other manner is to deal with men as if they were brutes void of understanding and at last is but to lose ones labour and as the proverb is to seek to wash the Blackmore white By that course indeed men may be made Hypocrites but can never be made Christians and surely the products of such compulsion even where the end is obtained to wit an outward assent or conformity whether in Doctrin or Worship can be no waies acceptable to God who desireth not any Sacrifice except that which cometh througly from the Heart and will have no constrained ones so that men so constrained are so far from being members of the Church that they are made ten-times more the Servants of Satan than before in that to their Error is added Hypocrisie the worst of Evils in matters of Religion and that which above all things the Lord's Soul most abhors But if it be said their error notwithstanding is thereby suppressed Obj. and the scandal removed I answer besides that this is a method no waies allowed by Christ Answ. as is above proved surely the Church can be no waies better'd by the accession of Hypocrites but greatly corrupted and endangered for open Heresie men be aware of and shun such as profess them when they are separated from the Church by her Censures but secret Hypocrites may putrifie the Body and leaven it ere men be aware And if the Dissenters prove resolute and suffer boldly for the Opinions they esteem right experience sheweth that such sufferings often tend to the condemnation of the sufferers but never of the persecutors for such suffering ordinarily breeds compassion and begets a curiosity in others to inquire the more diligently into the things for which they see men suffer so great losses so boldly and is also able to beget an opinion that it is for some good they do suffer it being no waies probable that men will venture all meerly to acquire fame which may as well be urged to detract from the reputation of all the Martyrs unless some better arguments be brought against it than a Halter or a Faggot But supposing this principle that the Magistrate hath power to force the Consciences of his Subjects and to punish them if they will not comply very great inconveniencies and absurdities will follow and even such as are inconsistent with the nature of the Christian Religion For first it will naturally follow that the Magistrate ought to do it and sinneth by omission of his duty if he do it not Will it not then hence be inferred that Christ was defective to his Church who having power to force men and for to call for legions of Angels so to do did notwithstanding exert that power but lest his Church to the mercy of the wicked without so necessary a bulwark Secondly seeing every Magistrate is to exercise his power according to the best understanding he hath being obliged so to do for the promoting of what he in conscience is perswaded to be Truth Will not this justifie all the Heathen Emperors in their persecutions against Christians Will not this justifie the Spanish Inquisition which yet is odious not only to Protestants but to many moderate Papists How can Protestants in reason condemn the Papists for persecuting them seeing they do but exercise a lawful power according to their Conscience and best understanding and do no more to them than the sufferers profess they would do to them if they were in the like capacity Which takes away all ground of commiseration from the sufferers whereas that was the ground that gained of old reputation to the Christians that they being innocent suffered who neither had nor by principle could hurt any But there is little reason to pity one that is but dealt by according as he would deal with others For to say they have not reason to persecute us because they are in the wrong and we in the right is but miserably to beg the question Doth not this Doctrin strengthen the hands of persecutors every where and that rationally from a principle of self preservation For who can blame me for destroying him that I know waits but for an occasion to destroy me if he could Yea this makes all suffering for Religion which of old was the glory of Christians to be but of pure necessity whereby they are not led as Lambs to the Slaughter as was the Captain of their Salvation but rather as Wolves catched in the snare who only bite not again