believe that in this Context our Lord Jesus Christ designed to set up and erect an Earthly Domination in and over his Churches to be administred by the Rules of the Canon Law and the Rota at Rome They must be spiritually mad and ridiculous who can give the least entertainment unto such an Imagination Nor can the Discipline of any Diocesan Churches administred in and by Courts and Officers foreign to the Scripture both name and thing be brought within the view of this Rule nor can all the Art of the World make any application of it thereunto For what some plead concerning Magistrates or Arbitrators they are things which men would never betake themselves unto but only to evade the force of that Truth which they love not All this is fallen out by mens departing from the Simplicity of the Gospel and a contempt of that sense of the words of the Lord Jesus which is plain and obvious unto all who desire not only to hear his words but also to observe his Commands 3 dly Our third Argument is taken from the Nature of the Churches â—nstituted by the Apostles and their Order as it is expressed in the Scripture For they were all of them Congregational and of no other sort This the ensuing Considerations will make evident 1. There were many Churches planted by the Apostles in very small Provinces Not to insist on the Churches of Galatia Gal. 1.1 concerning which it is no where intimated that they had any one Head or Mother Church Metropolitical or Diocesan Nor of those of Macedonia distinct from that of Philippi whereof we have spoken before upon the first coming of Paul after his Conversion unto Jerusalem which was three years Gal. 1.18 in the Fourth year after the Ascension of Christ there were Churches planted in all Judea and Galilee and Samaria Act. 9.31 Neither of the two latter Provinces was equal unto one Ordinary Diocess Yet were there Churches in both of them and that in so short a time after the first Preaching of the Gospel as that it is impossible they should be conceived to be any other but single Congregations What is excepted or opposed hereunto by the Reverend Dr. St. shall be examined and disproved afterwards by itself that the Progress of our Discourse be not here interrupted 2. These Churches were such as that the Apostles appointed in them Ordinary Elders and Deacons that might administer all Ordinances unto the whole Church and take care of all the poor Act. 14.23 chap. 20.28 Now the Care Inspection and Labour of Ordinary Officers can extend itself no further than unto a particular Congregation No man can administer all Ordinances unto a Diocesan Church And this ordaining Elders in every Church is the same with ordaining them in every City Tit. 1.5 that is in every Town wherein there was a Number converted unto the Faith as is evident from Act. 14.23 And it was in Towns and Cities ordinarily that the Gospel was first preached and first received Such Believers being congregated and united in the Profession of the same Faith and subiection unto the Authority of Christ did constitute such a Church-State as it was the Will of Christ they should have Bishops or Elders and Deacons ordained amongst them and were therefore as unto their State such Churches as he owned 3. It is said of most of these Churches expresly that they respectively met together in one place or had their Assemblies of the whole Church for the discharge of the Duties required of them which is peculiar unto Congregational Churches only so did the Church at Jerusalem on all occasions Act. 15.12 22. ch â—1 22 see ch 5.11 ch 6.1 It is of no force which is objecteâ— from the Multitude of them that are said to believe and so consequently were of that Church so as that they could not assemble together For whereas the Scripture says expresly that the multitude of the Church did come together it is scarce fair for us to to say they were such a multitude as that they could not come together And it is evident that the great numbers of Believers that are said to be at Jerusalem were there only occasionally and were not fixed in that Church For many years after a small Village beyond Jordan could receive all that were so fixed in it The Church at Antioch gathered together in one Assembly Act. 14.27 to hear Paul and Silas This Church thus called together is called the Multitude chap. 15.30 that is the whole Brotherhood at least of that Church The whole Church of Corinth did assemble together in one place both for solemn Worship and the exercise of Discipline 1 Cor. 8.8 chap. 14.25 26. chap. 11.17 20. It is no way necessary to plead any thing in the illustration or for the Confirmation of these Testimonies They all of them speak positively in a matter of fact which will admit of no debate unless we will put in exceptions unto the Veracity of their Authors And they are of themselves sufficient to establish our Assertion For whatever may be the state of any Church as unto its Officers or Rule into what order soever it be disposed ordinarily or occasionally for its Edification so long as it is its Duty to assemble in and with all its Members in one place either for the exercise of its Power the Performance of its Duty or Enjoyments of its Priviledges it is a single Congregation and no more 4. The Duties prescribed unto all Church Members in the writings of the Apostles to be diligently attended unto by them are such as either in their Nature or the manner of their performance cannot be attended unto and duly accomplished but in a particular Congregation only This I shall immediately speak distinctly unto and therefore only mention it in this place These things being so plainly positively and frequently asserted in the Scripture it cannot be questionable unto any impartial-mind but that particular Churches or Congregations are of Divine Institution and consequently that unto them the whole Power and Priviledge of the Church doth belong for if they do not so whatever they are Churches they are not If therefore any other Church-State be Supposed we may well require that its Name Nature Use Power and Bounds be some or all of them declared in the Scripture Reasonings drawn from the Superiority of the Apostles above the Evangelists of Bishop above Presbyters or from Church Rule in the hands of the Officers of the Church only from the power of the Christian Magistrate in things Ecclesiastical from the Meetness of Union among all Churches are of no use in this case For they are all consistent with the Sole Institution of particular Congregations nor do in the least intimate that there is or needs to be any other Church State of Divine Appointment CHAP. V. The Sate of the First Churches after the Apostles to the end of the Second Century IN Confirmation of the foregoing Argument we urge the President and
person of an Apostolical Spirit consonant unto the stile and writings of the Apostles themselves a precious Jewel and just Representation of the state and order of the Church in those days And sundry things we may observe from it 1. There is nothing in it that gives the least intimation of any other Church-State but that which was Congregational although there were the highest causes and Reasons for him so to do had there been any such Churches then in being The case he had in hand was that of Ecclesiastical Sedition or Schism in the Church of Corinth the Church or Body of the Brethren having unjustly deposed their Elders as it should seem all of them Giving advice herein unto the whole Church using all sorts of Arguments to convince them of their sin directing all probable means for their Cure he never once sends them to the Bishop or Church of Rome as the Head of Vnity unto all Churches makes no mention of any Metropolitical or Diocesan Church and its Rule or of any single Bishop and his Authority No one of any such Order doth he either commend or condemn or once address himself unto with either Admonitions Exhortations Encouragements or Directions He only handles the cause by the Rule of the Scripture as it was stated between the Church itself and its Elders I take it for granted that if there were any Church at Corinth consisting of many Congregations in the City and about it or comprehensive as some say of the whole Region of Achaia that there was a single Officer or Bishop over that whole Church But none such is here mentioned If there were any such he was either Deposed by the people or he was not If he were Deposed he was only one of the Presbyters for they were only Presbyters that were Deposed If he were not why is he not once called on to discharge his duty in curing of that Schism or blamed for his neglect Certainly there was never greater Prevarication used by any man in any cause than is by Clemens in this if the state of the Church its Rule and Order were such as some now pretend For he neither lets the people know wherein their sin and Schism did lye namely in a Separation from their Bishop nor doth once mention the only proper cure and remedy of all their Evils But he knew their state and order too well to insist on things that were not then in rerum natura and wherein they were not concerned 2. This Epistle is written as unto the whole Church at Corinth so in the name of the whole Church of Rome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Church of God which dwelleth or sojourneth as a stranger at Rome in the City of Rome to the Church of God that dwelleth or sojourneth at Corinth For although that Church was then in disorder under no certain Rule having cast off all their Elders c. yet the Church of Rome not only allows it to be a sister-Church but salutes the Brethren of it in the following words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 called and sanctified through the will of God by our Lord Jesus Christ. The Churches of Christ were not so ready in those days to condemn the persons nor to judge the Church-state and condition of others on every miscarriage real or supposed as some have been and are in these latter Ages 2. This Address being from the body of the Church at Rome unto that at Corinth without the least mention of the Officers of them in particular it is evident that the Churches themselves that is the whole entire Community of them had Communion with one another as they were sister-Churches and that they had themselves the transaction of all Affairs wherein they were concerned as they had in the days of the Apostles Acts 15.1 2 3. It was the Brethren of the Church at Antioch who determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others should go up to Hierusalem to consult the Apostles and Elders See also Chap. 21.22 This they did not nor ought to do without the Presence Guidance Conduct and consent of their Elders or Rulers where they had any But this they were not excluded from And that Church the whole Body or fraternity whereof doth advise and consult in those things wherein they are concerned on the account of their Communion with other Churches is a Congregational Church and no other It was the Church who sent this Epistle unto the Corinthians Claudius Ephebus Valerius Bibo Fortunatus are named as their Messengers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that are sent by us our Messengers our Apostles in these matters Such as the Churches made use of on all such occasions in the Apostles days 2 Cor. 8.23 And the persons whom they sent were only Members of the Church and not Officers nor do we any where hear of them under that Character Now they could not be sent in the name of the Church but by its consent nor could the Church consent without its Assembling together This was the state and order of the first Churches in that Communion which was amongst them according to the mind of Christ they had a singular concern in the welfare and prosperity of each other and were solicitous about them in their trials Hence those who were planted at a greater distance than would allow frequent personal converse with their respective Members did on all occasions send Messengers unto one another sometimes meerly to visit them in love and sometimes to give or take Advice But these things as indeed almost all others that bâ—long unto the Communion of Churches either in themselves or with one another are either utterly lost and buryed or kept above ground in a pretence of Episcopal Authority Churches themselves being wholly excluded from any concernment in them But as the Advice of the Church of Rome was desired in this case by the whole Church of Corinth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it was given by the Body of the Church itself and sent by Messengers of their own 3. The description given of the state ways and walking of the Church of Corinth that is that whole Fraternity of the Church which fell afterwards into that disorder which is reproved before their fall is such as that it bespeaks their walking together in one and the same society and is sufficient to make any good man desire that he might see Churches yet in the world unto whom or the generality of whose Members that Description might be honestly and justly accommodated One Character which is given of them I shall mention only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There was a full or plentiful effusion of the Holy Ghost upon you all so that being full or filled with an holy will holiness of will and a good readiness of mind with a pious devout confidence you stretched out your hands in Prayers to Almighty God supplicating his clemency or Mercy for the pardon of your involuntary sins sins fallen into by infirmity or
I delivered from these thoughts by the late either more sound or more maimed Editions of them And the truth is the corruption and fiction of Epistolical Writings in the first Ages was so intolerable as that very little in that kind is preserved sincere and unquestionable Hence Dionysius the Bishop of Corinth complained that in his own time his own Epistles were so corrupted by additions and detractions so as that it seems he would have them no more esteemed as his Euseb. Ecclesiast Hist. lib. 4. cap. 22. But yet because these Epistles are so earnestly contended for by many Learned men as the genuine Writings of Ignatius I shall not pass by the consideration of them as unto the Argument in hand I do therefore affirm that in these Epistles in any Edition of them there is no mention made or Descâ—iption given of any Church or Churches state but only of that which is Congregational that is such a Church as all the Members whereof did meet and were obliged to meet for Divine Worship and Discipline in the same place What was the Distinction they observed among their Officers of what fort they were and what number belongs not unto our present enquiry our concernment is only this that they did preside in the same particular Church and were none of them Bishops of more Churches than one or of any Church that should consist of a Collection or Association of such particular Churches as had no Bishops properly so called of their own All these Epistle that is the seven most esteemed were written as that of Clemens unto the Bodies or whole fraternity of the Churches unto whom they are directed in distinction from their Bishops Elders and Deacons excepting only that unto Polycarpus which is unto a single person Under that consideration namely of the entire fraternity in distinction from their Officers doth he address unto them and therein doth he ascribe and assign such Duties unto them as could not be attended unto nor performed but in the Assembly of them all Such is the direction he gives unto the Church of the Philadelphians how and in what manner they should receive penitents returning unto the Church that they might be encouraged into that Duty by their Benignity and Patience And many things of the like nature doth he deal with them about And this Assembling together in the same place namely of the whole Church he doth frequenâ—ly intimate and express Some instances hereof we may repeat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Meet all of you together in the same place let there be one Prayer in common of all Epist. ad Magnes This direction can be given unto no other but a particular Church And again to the Philadelphians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Where your Pastor is there follow you as sheep And how they may do so is declared immediately afterwards 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I write with confidence unto your Godly Love and perswade you to use one Faith or the confession of it one Preaching of the Word and one Eucharist or Administration of the holy Sacrament For the flesh of Christ is one and the Blood of Christ that was shed for us in one one Bread is broken to all and one Cup distributed among all there is one Altar to the whole Church and one Bishop with the Presbytery and the Deacons my fellow servants Nothing can be more evident than that it is a particular Church in its Order and Assembly for Worship in one place that he describes nor can these things be accommodated unto a Church of any other form And towards the end of the Epistle treating about the Churches sending their Bishops or others on their occasions he tells them in particular 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It becometh you as a Church of God to choose or appoint a Bishop who may perform the Embassy of God that it may be granted unto them to glorifie the name of God being gathered together in one place It is somewhat difficult how the Church of Philadelphia should choose or ordain a Bishop at this time For they had one of their own whom Ignatius greatly extols in the beginning of the Epistle Nor was it in their power or duty to choose or ordâ—in a Bishop for the Church of Antioch which was their own right and duty alone nor had the Church of Antioch any the least dependance on that at Philadelphia It may be he intends only their Assistance therein as immediately before he ascribes the peace and tranquillity of the Antiochians unto the Prayers of the Philadelphians For my part I judge he intends not the proper Bishop of either place but some Elder which they were to choose as a Messenger to send to Antioch to assist them in their present condition For in those days there were persons chosen by the Churches to be sent abroad to assist other Churches on the like occasions These were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Cor. 8.23 the especial Apostles of the Churches as vers 19. it is said of Luke that he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chosen and appointed by the Churches for the service there mentioned Such was this Bishop who was sent on Gods Errand to assist the Church by his Advice and Counsel as unto the continuance of their Assemblies unto the glory of God though at present their Bishop was taken from them In that Epistle unto the Ephesians he lets them know that he rejoyced at their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their numerous Multitude whom he perswades and urgeth unto a common concurrence in Prayer with their Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And if the Prayers of one or two be so effectual that they bring Christ among them how much more will the consenting Prayer of the Bishop and the whole Church together So he again explains his mind towards the end of the Epistle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Do your diligence to meet together frequently for when you frequently meet together in the same place the powers of Sathan are destroyed And many other expressions of the like nature occur in those Epistles We are no way at present concerned in the controversie about that distinction of Bishops and Presbyters which the Writer of those Epistles doth assert this only I say that he doth in none of them take the least notice or give the least intimation of any Church-state but such alone wherein the Members of the whole Church did constantly meet together in the same place for the worship of God and Communion among themselves And not only so but he every where in all his Epistles to them ascribes such Duties and Rights unto the Churches as cannot be observed and preserved but in particular Churches only Nor doth he leave any room for any other Church-state whatever Although therefore there might have been and probably there was some Alterations in the Order of the Churches from what was of Primitive Institution yet was there as yet no such change in
all true Evangelical Love Faith and Worship were lost Yea this kinde of Communion and Conjunction added unto an implicite dependance on the Authority of the Church was substituted in their room and multitudes were contented with them as those which did bestead them in their neglect of all other Graces and their exercise And I wish it were not so among others who suppose they have all the Love that is required of them if they are freed from such scandalous variances with their Neighbours as should make them unfit for the Communion 4. If this be the only means of Love how do men maintain it towards any not of their own Parish seeing they never meet with them at the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper And if they can live in love with those of other Parishes why can they not do so with those who having the same Faith and Sacraments with them do meet apart for the exercise of Divine Worship in such Congregations as we have described Wherefore 5. The Variance that is pretended to be caused by the setting up of these particular Congregations is a part of that variance which Christ came to send into the world Matth. 10.34 35 36. Think not that I am come to send Peace on Earth I came not to send Peace but a Sword For I am come to set a man at variance against his Father and the Daughter against her Mother and the Daughter-in-law against her Mother-in-Law And a mans Foes shall be they of his own Houshold He was the Prince of Peace he came to make peace between God and men between men themselves Jews and Gentiles he taught nothing enjoyned nothing that in its own nature should have the least inconsistency with Peace or give countenance unto variance But he declares what would ensue and fall out through the sin the darkness unbelief and enmity unto the Truth that would continue on some under the Preaching of the Gospel whilst others of their nearest Relations should embrace the Truth and profession of it What occasion for this variance is taken from the gathering of these Congregations which the way itself doth neither cause nor give the least countenance unto we are not accountable for Whereas therefore there is with those among whom these variances and loss of Love thereby are pretended one Lord one Faith one Baptism one Hope of their Calling the same Truth of the Gospel Preached the same Sacraments administred and whereas both the Principles of the way and the persons of those who assemble in distinct Corporations for the Celebration of Divine Worship do lead unto Love and the practice of it in all its known Duties all the evils that ensue on this way must be charged on the Enmity Hatred Pride and Secular Interest of men which it is not in our power to cure 2. Another end of the Institution of this state is that the Church might be The Ground and Pillar of Truth 1 Tim. 3.15 that is that it might be the principal outward means to support preserve publish declare and propagate the Doctrine or Truth of the Gospel especially that concerning the Person and Offices of Christ which the Apostle subjoyns unto this Assertion in the next words That Church state which doth not answer this End is not of Divine Institution But this the Ministry of these Churches is eminently suited unto There are three things required in this Duty or required unto this end that the Church be the Ground and a Pillar of Truth 1. That it preserve the Truth in itself and in the Profession of all its Members against all Seducers false Teachers and Errours This the Apostle gives in special charge unto the Elders of the Church of Ephesus adding the Reasons of it Act. 20.28 29 30 31. This is in an especial manner committed unto the Officers of the Church 1 Tim. 5.20 2 Tim. 1.13 14. This the Ministry of these Churches is meet and suited unto The continual Inspection which they may and ought to have into all the Members of the Church added unto that circumspection about and trial of the Doctrines Preached by themselves in the whole Body of the Church fits them for this work This is the Fundamental means on the matter the only outward means that the Lord Christ hath appointed for the preservation of the Truth of the Gospel in this world whereby the Church is the Ground and Pillar of Truth How this can be done where Churches are of that Make and Constitution that the Officers of them can have no immediate Inspection into or cognizance of either the Knowledge Opinions and Practices of the Members of their Church nor the Body of the Church know on any evident ground what it is that their principal Officer believes and teaches I know not By this means was the Truth preserved in the Churches of the two first Centuries wherein they had no Officers but what were placed in particular Churches so as that no considerable Errour made any entrance among them 2. That each Church take care that the same Truth be preserved entire as unto the profession of it in all other Churches Their Communion among themselves whereof afterwards is built upon their common 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Profession of the same Faith This therefore it is their Duty and was always their practice to look after that it was preserved entire For a change in the Faith of any of them they knew would be the dissolution of their Communion Wherefore when any thing of that nature fell out as it did in the Church of Antioch upon the Preaching of the necessity of Circumcision and keeping of the Law whereby the Souls of many of the Disciples were subverted the Church at Hierusalem on the notice and knowledge of it helped them with their Advice and Counsel And Eusebius tells us that upon the first promulgation of the Heresies and Phrensies of Montanus the Faithful or Churches in Asia met frequently in sundry places to examine his Pretences and condemn his Errours whereby the Churches in Phrygia were preserved Hist. Eccl. lib. 5. cap. 14. So the same was done afterwards in the case of Samosatenus at Antioch whereby that Church was delivered from the infection of his pernicious Heresy lib. 7. cap. 26 28 29. And this care is still incumbent on every particular Church if it would approve itself to be the Ground and Pillar of Truth And in like manner Epiphanius giving an account of the Original of the Heresie of Noetus a Patropassian affiâ—ms that the Holy Presbyters of the Church called him and enquired of his Opinion several times whereon being convicted before the Presbytery of enormous Errours he was cast out of the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when he began to disperse his Errours 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphanius Haeres cont Noet Haer. 38. Sec. 57. Hence it was that the Doctrine of the Church as unto the substance of it was preserved entire during the two first Centuries and somewhat after
their Rule but left that unto the Discretion and Authority of men as they think meet when they have outward Power for their Warranty But if by these particular Appointments and Framings of Churches with their Order men are disposed of as unto their spiritual concernments beyond the Obligation of the Light of Nature or the moral â—aw We must yet enquire who gave them this Right and Title to make this disposal of them 2. Authority As Right and Title respect the Persons of men to be reduced into a new form of Government so Authority respects the Rules â—aws Orders and Statutes to be made prescribed and established whereby the Priviledges of this new Society are conveyed and the Duties of it enjoyned unto all that are taken unto it Earthly Potentates who will dispose of men into a State and Government absolutely new unto them as unto all their temporal Concernments of Life Liberty Inheritances and Possessions so as that they shall hold all of them in dependance on and according unto the Rules and Laws of their New Government and Kingdom must have these two things namely Right and Title unto the Persons of men which they have by Conquest or an absolute Resignation of all their Interests and Concerns into their disposal and Authority thereon to constitute what Order what kind of State Rule and Government they please without these they will quickly find their Endeavours and Undertakings frustrate The Gospel Church-State in the Nature of it and in all the Laws and Constitution of it is absolutely new whereunto all the World are naturally Forreigners and Strangers As they have no Right unto it as it containeth Priviledges so they have no obligation unto it as it prescribes Duties Wherefore there is need of both those Right as unto the Persons of men and Authority as unto the Laws and Constitution of the Church unto the framing of it And until men can pretend unto these things both unto this Right and Authority with respect unto all the Spiritual and Eternal Concernments of the Souls of others they may do well to consider how dangerous it is to invade the Right and Inheritance of Christ and leave hunting after an Interest of Power in the the framing or forming Evangelical Churches or making of Laws for their Rule and Government This Authority is not only ascribed unto Jesus Christ in the Scripture but it is enâ—â—â—sed unto him so as that no other can have any Interest in it See Mat. 28.18 Rev. 3.7 Isa. 9.6 7 By vertue hereof he is the only Lawgiver of the Church Jam. 4.12 Isa. 22.22 There is indeed a Derivation of Power and Authority from him unto others but it extends itself no farther save only that they shall direct teach and command those whom he sends them unto to do and observe what he hath commanded Matth. 28.20 He builds his own House and he is over his own House Heb. 3.3 4 5 6. He both constitutes its State and gives Laws for its Rule The Disorder the Confusion the turning of the Kingdom of Christ upside down which have enâ—ued upon the Usurpation of men taking upon them a Legislative Power in and over the Church cannot easily be declared For upon a slight Pretence no way suited or serviceable unto their ends of the Advice given and Determination made by the Apostles with the Elders and Brethren of the Church of Jerusalem in a temporary Constitution about the use of Christian Liberty the Bishops of the 4 th and 5 th Centuries took upon themselves Power to make Laws Canons and Constitutions for the ordering of the Government and the Rule of the Church bringing in many new Institutions on a Pretence of the same Authority Neither did others who followed them cease to build on their sandy Foundation until the whole frame of the Church-State was altered a new Law made for its Government and a new Christ or Antichrist assumed in the head of its Rule by that Law For all this pretended Authority of making Laws and Constitutions for the Government of the Church issued in that Sink of Abominations which they call the Canon-Law Let any man but of a tolerable understanding and freed from infatuating prejudices but read the Representation that is made of the Gospel Church State its Order Rule and Government in the Scripture on the one hand and what Representation is made on the other of a Church State its Order Rule and Government in the Canon Law the only effect of mens assuming to themselves a Legislative Power with respect unto the Church of Christ if he doth not pronounce them to be contrary as Light and Darkness and that by the latter the former is utterly destroyed and taken away I shall never trust to the use of men's Reason or their Honesty any more This Authority was first usurped by Synods or Counsels of Bishops Of what use they were at any time to declare and give Testimony unto any Article of the Faith which in their daies was opposed by Hereticks I shall not now enquire But as unto the exercise of the Authority claimed by them to make Laws and Canons for the Rule and Government of the Church It is to be bewailed there should be such a Monument left of their Weakness Ambition Self-Interest and Folly as there is in what remaineth of their Constitutions Their whole endeavour in this kind was at best but the building of Wood Hay and Stubble on the Foundation in whose Consumption they shall suffer loss although they be saved themselves But in making of Laws to bind the whole Church in and about things useless and trivial no way belonging to the Religion taught us by Jesus Christ in and for the Establishment or Encrease of their own Power Jurisdiction Authority and Rule with the extent and bounds of their several Dominions in and for the Constitution of new Frames and States of Churches and new ways of the Government of them in the Appointment of new Modes Rites and Ceremonies of Divine Worship with the Confusions that ensued thereon in mutual Animosities Fightings Divisions Schisms and Anathematisms to the horrible Scandal of Christian Religion they ceased not until they had utterly destroyed all the Order Rule and Government of the Church of Christ yea the very nature of it and introduced into its room a carnal worldly Church-State and Rule suited unto the Interests of Covetous Ambitious and Tyrannical Prelates The most of them indeed knew not for whom they wrought in providing Materials for that Babel which by an hidden skill in a Mystery of Iniquity was raised out of their Provisions For after they were hewed and carved shaped formed and guilded the Pope appeared in the Head of it as it were with those words of his mouth Is not this great Babylon that I have built for the House of the Kingdom by the might of my Power and for the Honour of my Majesty This was the fatal Event of mens invading the Right of Christ and
the outward Calamities that befel the Nation nor the sins of the generality of the People could destroy this Church-State but it continued its Right and exercise unto the Time of Reformation And if it be not so if there be not Causes and Means of the infallible continuance of the Gospel Church-State unto the Consummation of all things the time expresly allotted unto their continuance then was the work of Moses more honourable more powerful and effectual in the Constitution of the Church-State under the Old Testament than that of Christ in the Constitution of the New For that Work and those Institutions which had an efficacy in them for their own infallible continuation and of the Church thereby throughout all Generations must be more Noble and Honourable than those which cannot secure their own continuance nor the Being and State of the Church thereon depending Nothing can be more derogatory unto the Glory of the Wisdom and Power of Christ nor of his Truth and Faithfulness than such an Imagination We shall therefore enquire into the Causes and Means of the continuation of this Church-State and therein shew the certainty of it as also disprove that which by some is pretended as the onely means thereof when indeed it is the principal Argument against their perpetual continuation that can be made use of 1. The Essence and Nature of the Church instituted by the Authority of Jesus Christ was always the same from the Beginning that it continues still to be But as unto its outward Form and Order it had a double State and it was necessary that so it should have from the Nature of the thing it self For 1 The Church may be considered in its Relation unto those extraordinary Officers or Rulers whose Office and Power was antecedent unto the Church as that by vertue whereof it was to be called and erected 2 With respect unto ordinary Officers unto whose Office and Power the Church essentially considered was antecedent for their whole Work and Duty as such is conversant about the Church and the Object is antecedent unto all Acts about it The first State is ceased nor can it be continued For these Officers were constituted 1 By an immediate call from Christ as was Paul Gal. 1.1 2. which none now are nor have been since the decease of them who were so called at first 2 By extraordinary Gifts and Power which Christ doth not continue to communicate 3 By Divine Inspiration and infallible Guidance both in preaching the Word and appointing things necessary in the Churches which none now pretend unto 4 By Extensive Commission giving them Power towards all the World for their Conversion and over all Churches for their Edification Of these Officers in their distinction into Apostles and Evangelists with their Call Gifts Power and Work I have treated at large in my Discourse of Spiritual Gifts The State and Condition of the Church with respect unto them is utterly ceased and nothing can be more vain than to pretend any Succession unto them in the whole or any part of their Office unless men can justify their claim unto it by any or all of these things which concurred unto it in the Apostles which they cannot do But it doth not hence follow that the Church State instituted by Christ did fail thereon or doth now so fail because it is impossible that these Apostles should have any Successors in their Office or the Discharge of it For by the Authority of the Lord Christ the Church was to be continued under Oâ—dinary Officers without the Call Gifts or Power of the others that were to cease Under these the Church State was no less Divine than under the former For there were two things in it 1 That the Offices themselves were of the Appointment of Christ And if they were not so we confess the Divine Right of the Church-State would have ceased The Office of the Apostles and Evangelists was to cease as hath been declared and it did cease actually in that Christ after them did call no more unto that Office nor provided any Way or Means whereby any one should be made Partaker of it And for any to pretend a Succession in Office or any part of their Office without any of those things which did constitute it is extream Presumption It is therefore granted that if there were not other Offices appointed by the Authority of Christ it had not been in the Power of man to make or appoint any unto that Purpose and the Church-State itself must have ceased But this he hath done Eph. 4.11 12. 1 Cor. 12.28 2 That Persons were to be interested in these Offices according unto the Way and Means by him prescribed which were not such as depended on his own immediate extraordinary actings as it was with the former sort but such as consisted in the Churches acting according to his Law and in Obedience unto his commands This Church-State was appointed by the Authority of Christ. The Direction which he gave in his own Person for Addresses unto the Church in case of Scandal which is an obliging Institution for all Ages Mat. 18.17 18 19 20. proves that he had appointed a Church-State that should abide through them all And when there was a Church planted at Jerusalem there were not only Apostles in it according to its first State but Elders also which respected its second State that was approaching Act. 15.23 The Apostles being in Office before that Church State the Elders ordained in it So chap. 11.30 And the Apostles ordained Elders in every Church Act. 14.23 Tit. 1.5 1 Tim. 5.17 whom they affirmed to be made so by the Holy Ghost Act. 20.28 The Churches to whom the Apostle Paul wrote his Epistles were such all of them under the Rule of ordinary Officers Phil 1.1 Rules and Laws are given for their Ordination in all Ages Tit. 1. 1 Tim. 3. And the Lord Christ treateth from Heaven with his Churches in this State and Order Rev. 1st 2d 3d. He hath promised his presence with them unto the Consummation of all things Mat. 28.20 chap. 18.20 and assigned them their Duty until his Second Coming 1 Cor. 11.26 with other Evidences of the same Truth innumerable Our Enquiry therefore is Whereon the Continuation of this Church-State unto the end of the World doth depend what are the Causes What are the Means of it whence it becomes infallible and necessary I must only premise that our present Consideration is not so much de facto as unto what hath fallen out in the World unto our Knowledge and Observation but de jure or of a Right unto this Continuation And this is such as makes it not only lawful for such a Church-State to be but requires also from all the Disciples of Christ in a way of Duty that it be always in actual Existence Hereby there is a warrant given unto all believers at all times to gather themselves into such a Church-State and a Duty imposed on them so
duely discharged the Office of Episcopacy Other distinction and difference of ordinary Officers besides that of Bishops or Elders and Deacons the Church at Rome in those days knew not Such ought to be in every particular Church Of any one single person to preside over many Churches which is necessary unto the Constitution of a Church-state distinct from that which is Congregational Clemens knew nothing in his days but gives us such a description of the Church and its order as is inconsistent with such a pretence 6. I shall add no more from this excellent Epistle but only the account given in it of the first constitution of Officers in the Churches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Our Apostles therefore knowing by our Lord Jesus Christ that there would contention arise about the name of Episcopacy that is Episcopacy itself For this cause being indued with a perfect foresight of things they appointed those fore-mentioned their first Converts unto the Office of the Ministry for the future describing or giving order about the course of the Ministry that other approved men might succeed them in their Ministry These Elders therefore who were so appointed by them and afterwards by other famous men with the consent of the whole Church c. Sundry things we may observe in this Discourse 1. The Apostles foresaw there would be strife and contention about the name of Episcopacy that is the Office itself and those who should possess it This Episcopacy was that Office which the deposed Elders had well discharged in the Church of Corinth This they might foresee from the nature of the thing itself the inclination of men unto preheminence and the instance they had seen in their own days in such as Diotrephes with the former Divisions that had been in this very Church about their Teachers 1 Cor. 1.12 But moreover they were instructed in the knowledge of it by our Lord Jesus Christ through his Divine Spirit abiding with them and teaching them all things This therefore they sought by all means to prevent and that two ways 1. In that for the first time themselves appointed approved persons unto the Office of the Ministry not that they did it of themselves without the consent and choice of the Church whereunto any of them were appointed for this was directly contrary unto their practice Act. 1.15 22 23 26. Chap. 6.3 Chap. 14.23 But that the peace and edification of the Churches might be provided for they themselves spiritually tryed and approved of fit persons so to lead the Church in their choice Wherefore that which is added afterwards of the consent of the whole Church is to be referred unto those who were ordained by the Apostles themselves 2. They gave Rules and Orders namely in their Writings concerning the Offices and Officers that were to be in the Church with the way whereby they should be substituted into the place and room of them that were deceased as we know they have done in their Writings 3. After this was done by the Apostles other excellent persons as the Evangelists did the same These assisted the Churches in the Ordination and Choice of their Officers according unto the Rules prescribed by the Apostles And I know not but that the eminent Pastors of other Churches who usually gave their assistance in the setting apart and Ordination of others unto the Ministry be intended I have insisted long on this Testimony being led on by the Excellency of the writing itself Nothing remains written so near the times of the Apostles nor doth any that is extant which was written afterwards give such an Evidence of Apostolical Wisdom Gravity and Humility Neither is there in all Antiquitie after the writings of the Apostles such a Representation of the State Order and Rule of first Evangelical Churches And it is no small prejudice unto the pretensions of future Ages that this Apostolical person handling a most weighty Ecclesiastical cause makes not the least mention of such Offices Power and Proceedings as wherein some would have all Church-rule and order to consist The Epistle of Polycarpus and the Elders of the Church at Smyrna with him unto the Church of the Philippians is the next on Roll of Antiquity Nothing appears in the whole to intimate any other Church-state or Order than that described by Clemens The Epistle is directed unto the whole Church at Philippi not unto any particular Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This was the usual style of those days so was it used as we have seen by Clemens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it was used presently after the death of Polycarpus by the Church at Smyrna in the account they gave unto other Churches of his death and Martyrdome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the same was the Inscription of the Epistle of the Churches at Vienna and Lyons in France unto the Churches in Asia and Phrygia as we shall see immediately And these are plain Testimonies of that Communion among the Churches in those days which was held in and by the Body of each Church or the Community of the Brotherhood which is a clear demonstration of their State and Order And those whom the Apostle writing to the Philippians calls their Bishops and Deacons Polycarpus calls their Presbyters and Deacons It behoves you saith he unto the Church there to abstain from these things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being subject unto the Elders and Deacons Nor doth he mention any other Bishop among the Philippians And it may be observed that in all these Primitive Writings there is still a distinction made after the Example of the Scripture between the Church and the Guides Rulers Bishops or Elders of it And the name of the Church is constantly assigned unto the Body of the People as distinct from the Elders nowhere to the Bishops or Elders as distinct from the people though the Church in its compleat state comprehendeth both sorts Unto this time that is about the year 107 or 108 do belong the Epistles ascribed unto Ignatius if so be they were written by him For Polycarpus wrote his Epistle unto the Philippians after Ignatius was carried to Rome having wrote his Epistle before in Asia Many are the Contests of Learned Men about those Epistles which remain whether they are genuine or the same that were written by him for that he did write Epistles unto sundry Churches is acknowledged by all And whereas there have in this Age been two Copies found and published of these Epistles wherein very many things that were obnoxious unto just exception in those before published do not at all appear yet men are not agreed which of them ought to be preferred and many yet deny that any of them were those written by Ignatius I shall not interpose in this contest only I must say that if any of his genuine Writings do yet remain yet the Corruption and Interpolation of them for many Ages must needs much impair the Authority of what is represented in them as his nor am
Anâ—yra in Galatia about the year 314 Can. 13. and mention is again made of them in a Synod of Antioch An. 341. and somewhat before at the Council of Neocaesarea Can. 13. and frequently afterwards as any one may see in the late Collections of the antient Canons I verily believe nor can the contrary be proved but that these Chorepiscopi at first were as absolute and compleat in the Office of Episcopacy as any of the Bishops of the greater Cities having their name or denomination from the places of their Residence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not for an intimation of any inferiority in them unto other City-Bishops But so it came to pass that through their poverty and want of Interest their Ministry being confined unto a small Country-Parish perhaps through a comparative meanness of their Gifts or Abilities the City-Bishop claimed a Superiority over them and made Canons about their Power the bounding and exercising of it in Dependance on themselves For a while they were esteemed a degree above meer Presbyters who accompanyed or attended the Bishop of the City-Church in his Administrations and a degree beneath the Bishop himself in a posture never designed by Christ nor his Apostles Wherefore in process of time the name and thing were utterly lost and all the Country-Churches were brought into an absolute subjection unto the City-Church something being allowed unto them for Worship nothing for Rule and Discipline whereby the first state of Churches in their Original Institution sacredly preserved in the first Centuries was utterly lost and demolished I shall add but one Argument more to evincâ— the true state and nature of Evangelical Churches herein namely that they were only particular Congregations and that is taken from the Duties and Powers ascribed in the Scripture unto Churches and the Members or entire Brotherhood of them It was observed before that the Epistles of the Apostles were written all of them unto the Body of the Churches in contradistinction unto their Elders Bishops or Pastors unless it were those that were written unto particular persons by name And as this is plain in all the Epistles of Paul wherein sometimes distinct mention is made of the Officers of the Church sometimes none at all so the Apostle John affirms that he wrote unto the Church but that Diotrephes who seems to have been their Bishop received him not at once rejecting the Authority of the Apostle and overthrowing the liberty of the Church which example was diligently followed in the succeeding Ages Joh. Epist. 3. ver 9. And the Apostle Peter writing unto the Churches on an especial occasion speaks distinctly of the Elders 1 Pet. 5.1 2. See also Heb. 13.24 the body of the Epistle being directed to the Body of Churches Wherefore all the Instructions Directions and Injunctions given in those Epistles as unto the exercise of power or the performance of duty they are given unto the Churches themselves Now these are such many of them as cannot be acted or performed in any Church by the Body of the People but that which is Congregational only It were too long here to insist on particulars it shall be done elsewhere and it will thence appear that this Argument alone is sufficient to bear the weight of this whole Cause The Reader may if he please consider what Representation hereof is made in these places compared together Matth. 18.15 16 17 18. Act. 1.12 23 Chap. 2.1 42 44 46. Chap. 5.11 12 13. Chap. 11.21 22 25 26 28 29 30. Chap. 12.5 12. Chap. 14.26 27. Chap. 15.1 2 3 4 6 12 13 22 23 27 28 30. Chap. 20.28 Rom. 15.5 6 14 25 26. Chap. 16.1 17 18. 1 Cor. 1.4 5. Chap. 5. throughout Chap. 12.4 7 8 9 11 15 18 28 29 30 31. Chap. 14. throughout Chap. 16.10 11. 2 Cor. 3.1 2 3. Chap. 7.14 15. Chap. 8.22 23 24. Chap. 2 6 7 8 9 10 11. Chap. 8.5 Ephes. 2.19 20 21 22. Chap. 5.11 12. Gal. 6.1 Philip. 2.25 26 27 28. Colos. 1.1 2. Chap. 2.3 Chap. 3.16 Chap. 4.9 12 16 17. 1 Thes. 5.11 12 13 14. 2 Thes. 3.6 7 14 15. Heb. 12.13 Chap. 10.24 25. Chap. 12.15 16. In these I say and other places innumerable there are those things affirmed of and ascribed unto the Apostolical Churches as unto their State Order Assemblies Duties Powers and Priviledges as evinces them to have been only particular Congregations CHAP. VI. Congregational Churches alone suited unto the ends of Christ in the Institution of his Church HAving given an account of that State and Order of the Gospel-Churches which are of Divine Institution it is necessary that we declare also their suitableness and sufficiency unto all the ends for which the Lord Christ appointed such Churches For if there be any true proper end of that nature which cannot be attained in or by any Church-state in this or that form it must be granted that no such form is of Divine Appointment Yea it is necessary not only that such a state as pretends unto a Divine Original be not only not contradictory unto or inconsistent with such an end but that it is effectually conducing thereunto and in its place necessary unto that purpose This therefore is that which we shall now inquire into namely whether this State and Form of Gospel-Churches in single Congregations be suited unto all those ends for which any such Churches were appointed which they must be on the account of the wisdom of Jesus Christ the Author and Founder of them or be utterly discarded from their pretence Nor is there any more forcible Argument against any pretended Church-state Rule or Order than that it is obstructive unto the Souls of men in attaining the proper ends of their whole Institution What these ends are was in general before declared I shall not here repeat them or go over them again but only single out the consideration of those which are usually pleaded as not attainable by this way of Churches in single Congregations only or that at least they are not suited unto their Attainment The first of these is Mutual Love among all Christians all the Disciples of Christ By the Disciples of Christ I intend them and them only who profess Faith in his Person and Doctrine and to hear him or to be guided by him alone in all things that appertain unto the Worship of God and their living unto him If there are any called Christians who in these things choose other guides call other Ministers hear them in their appointments we must sever them from our present consideration though there are important Duties required of us towards them also But what is alledged is necessary unto the constitution of a true Disciple of Christ. Unto all those his great command is Mutual Love among themselves This he calls in an especial manner his Commandment and a new Commandment as for other Reasons so because he had given the first absolute great Example of it in himself as also discovered
and Interest of the Papal See having no bottom for or supportment of their Church state and Order but Regal Favour and mutable Laws there have on such Causes and Reasons which I shall not mention ensued such Emulations of the Nobility and Gentry and such contempts of the Commonâ—People as leave it questionable Whether their Adherence unto the Government be not more burdensome and dangerous unto it than were their antient Contests and Oppositions CHAP. VII No other Church-state of Divine Institution IT may be it will be generally granted I am sure it cannot be modestly denied that particular Churches or Congregations are of a Divine original Institution as also that the Primitive Churches continued long in that Form or Order But it will be farther pleaded that granting or supposing this Divine Institution of particular Churches yet there may be Churches of another Form and Order also as Diocesan or National that we are obliged to submit unto For although the Apostles appointed that there should be Bishops or Elders ordained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in every City and Town where Christian Religion was received and Clemens affirmeth that they did themselves constitute Bishops and Deacons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Regions or Villages and Cities yet there was another Form afterwards introduced Theodoret Bishop of Cyprus affirms that there were eight hundred Churches committed to his care Epist. 113. whereof many were in Towns and Cities having no Bishop of their own The whole Country of Scythia though there were in it many Cities Villages and Fortresses yet had but one Bishop whose Residence was at Tomis all other Churches being under him as Zozomen declares lib. 6. cap. 20. So it is at this day in divers Provinces belonging of old unto the Greek-Church as in Moldavia and Walachia where they have one whom they call the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Leader or Ruler that presides over all the Churches in the Nation And this Oâ—der of things that there should not be a Bishop in smaller Churches was first confirmed in the sixth Canon of the Council of Sardis in the Year 347. In Answer hereunto I shall do these two things First I shall shew that there is no Church Order State or Church-Form of Divine Institution that doth any way impede take away or overthrow the Liberty Power and Order of particular Congregations such as we have described Secondly I shall enquire into the causes of Churches of another State or Order as the Power of Magistrates and Rulers or their own choice and consent 1. There is no Form Order or Church state Divinely Instituted that should annul the Institution of particular Congregations or abridge them of their Liberties or deprive them of the Power committed unto them It is such a Church-state alone that we are now concerned to enquire after Whatever of that kinde either is or may be imagined that entrenches not on the State Liberty and Power of particular Congregations is not of our present Consideration Men may frame and order what they please and what advantage they make thereby shall not be envied unto them whilst they injure not any of the Institutions of Christ. But 1. These Churches as they are Churches are meet and able to attain the Ends of Churches To say they are Churches and yet have not in themselves Power to attain the ends of Churches is to speak contradictions or to grant and deny the same thing in the same breath For a Church is nothing but such a Society as hath Power Ability and Fitness to attain those ends for which Christ hath ordained Churches That which hath so is a Church and that which hath not so is none Men may if they please deny them to be Churches but then I know not where they will finde any that are so For instance suppose men should deny all the Parochial Churches in England to be such Churches as are intrusted with Church-Power and Administrations what Church in the first Instance could they require our Communion withal Will they say it is with the National or Diocesan Churches neither of these do or can as such administer Sacred Ordinances A man cannot Preach nor hear the Word but in a particular Assembly The Lord's Supper cannot be Administred but in a particular Congregation nor any presential local Communion of Believers among themselves like that described by the Apostle 1 Cor. chap. 12. and chap. 14. be otherwise attained No Communion is firstly and immediately required or can be required with Diocesan Churches as such Wherefore it is Parochial particular Churches that we are required to hold Communion with We say therefore these Parochial Churches are either really and truely so endued with Church-Power and Liberty or they are not If they are or are acknowledged so to be we have herein obtained what we plead for if they are not then are we required to joyn in Church Communion with those Societies that are not Churches and if we refrain so doing we are charged with Schism which is to turn Religion into Ridicule For 2. It is utterly forreign to the Scripture and a Monster unto Antiquity I mean that which is pure and regardable in this Cause that there should be Churches with a part half more or less of Church-Power and not the whole neither in Right nor Exercise or that there should be Church-Officers Elders Presbyters or Bishops that should have a partiary Power half or a third part or less of that which entirely belongeth unto the Office they hold Let one Testimony be given out of the Scripture or that Antiquity which we appeal unto unto this purpose and we shall cease our Plea But this is that which our Understandings are set on rack withal every day There is a National Church that is entrusted with Supreme Church-Power in the Nation whereof it is Here at the entrance we fall into a double disquietment For 1. we know not as yet what this National Church is here or in France nor of what Persons it doth consist 2. We know not whether this National Church have all the Power that Christ hath given unto the Church or that there is a Reserve for some Addition from beyond Sea if things were well accommodated Then that there are Diocesan Churches whose Original with the Causes and Occasions of their Bounds Limits Power and manner of Administrations I think God alone knows perfectly we do but guess for there is not one word mentioned of any of their concernments in the Scripture And we know that these Churches cannot be said to have all the Power that Christ hath entrusted his Church withal because there is another Church unto which they are in subjection and on which they do depend but it seems they have the next degree of Power unto that which is uppermost But whatever their Power be it is so administred by Chancellors Commissaries Officials in such ways and for such ends that I shall believe a dissent from them and it
Soveraignity over their Consciences was reserved by the Apostles unto the Authority of Christ alone and their Obedience was required by them only unto his commands This is that which I see some would be at To presume themselves to be the Church at least the only Rulers and Governours of it To assume to themselves alone the Judgement of what is Lawful and what is unlawful to be observed in the Worship of God To avow a Power to impose what they please on all Churches pretended to be under their Command so that they judge it lawful be it never so useless or trifling if it hath no other End but to be an Instance of their Authority and then assert that all Christian People must without further Examination submit quietly unto this state of things and comply with it unless they will be esteemed damned Schismaticks But it is too late to advance such Principles a second time He addes from my Paper or as my sense the Apostles gave Rules inconsistent with any determining Rule viz. of mutual Forbearance Rom. 14. But then saith he the meaning must be that whatever Differences happen among Christians there must be no Determination either way But this is direstly contrary to the Decree of the Apostles at Hierusalem upon the Difference that happened in the Christian Churches But they are not my Words which he reports I said not that the Apostles gave Rules inconsistent with any determining Rule but with such a Rule and the Imposition of the things contained in it on the Practise of men in things not determined that is whilst Differences about them do continue as he contends for And 1. Notwithstanding this Rule of Forbearance given by the Apostle expresly Rom. 14. Yet as unto the Right and Truth in the things wherein men are at difference every private Believer is to determine of them so far as he is able in his own Mind Every one is to be fully perswaded in his own Mind in such things so far as his own Practise is concerned 2. The Church wherein such Differences do fall out may doctrinally determine of the Truth in them as it is the Ground and Pillar of Truth supposing them to be of such weight as that the Edification of the Church is concerned in them For otherwise there is no need of any such Determination but every one may be left unto his own Liberty There are Differences at this day in the Church of England in Doctrine and Practice some of them in my Judgement of more importance then those between the same Church and us yet it doth not think it necessary to make any Determination of them no not Doctrinally 3. If the Church wherein such Differences fall out be not able in and of it self to make a Doctrinal Determination of such Differences they may and ought to crave the Counsel and Advice of other Churches with whom they walk in Communion in Faith and Love And so it was in the Case whereof an Account is given us Act. 15. The Determination or Decree there made concerning the necessary Observance of the Jewish Rites by the Gentiles converted unto the Faith by the Apostles Elders and Brethren under the guidance of the Holy Ghost as his Mind was revealed in the Scripture gives not the least Countenance unto the making and imposing such a Rule on all Churches and their Members as is contended for For 1. It was only a Doctrinal Determination without Imposition on the Practise of any 2. It was a Determination against Impositions directly And whereas it is said that it was a Determination contrary to the Judgment of the Imposers which shews that the Rule of Forbearance where Conscience is alledged both ways is no standing Rule I grant that it was contrary to the Judgment of the Imposers but imposed nothing on them nor was their Practice concerned in that erronious Judgement They were not required to do any thing contrary to their own Judgment and the not doing whereof did reflect on their own Consciences Wherefore the whole Rule given by the Apostle and the whole Determination made is that no Impositions be made on the Consciences or Practice of the Disciples of Christ in things relating to his Worship but what were necessary by vertue of Divine Institution They added hereunto that the Gentiles enjoying this Liberty ought to use it without offence and were at Liberty by vertue of it to forbear such things as wherein they had or thought they had a natural Liberty in case they gave Offence by the use of them And the Apostles who knew the state of things in the Minds of the Jews and all other Circumstances give an Instance in the things which at that season were to be so forborn And whereas this Determination was not absolute and obligatory on the whole Case unto all Churches namely whether the Mosaical Law were to be observed among Christians but some Churches were left unto their own Judgement and Practise who esteemed it to be still in force as the Churches of the Jews and others left unto their own Liberty and Practise also who judged it not to oblige them both sides or Parties being bound to continue Communion among them in Faith and Love there is herein a perpetual establishment of the Rule of mutual Forbearance in such Cases nothing being condemned but Impositions on one another nothing commended but an Abstinence from the use of Liberty in the case of Scandal or Offence I had therefore Reason to say that the false Apostles were the only Imposers that is of things not necessary by vertue of any divine Institution And if the Author insinuate that the true Apostles were such Imposers also because of the Determination they made of this Difference he will fail in his Proof of it It is true they imposed on or charged the Consciences of men with the observance of all the Institutions and Commands of Christ but of other things none at all The last things which he endeavours an Answer unto on this occasion lies in those words The Jewish Christians were left unto their own Liberty provided they did not impose on others and the Dissenters at this day desire no more then the Gentile Church did viz. not to be imposed on to observe those things which they are not satisfied it is the Mind of Christ should be imposed on them So is my sense in the places referred unto reported Nor shall I contend about it so as that the last Clause be change for my Words are not they are not satisfied it is the Mind of Christ that they should be imposed on them but they were not satisfied it is the Mind of Christ they should Observe This respects the things themselves the other only their Imposition And one Reason against the Imposition opposed is that the things themselves imposed are such as the Lord Christ would not have us observe because not appointed by himself But hereunto he answers two things 1. That it was agreed
is the matter of Fact that the Apostles appointed onely particular Congregations and that therefore they did not oblige the Christians about in a Province or Diocess to be of that Church which was first erected in any Town or City but they founded new Churches with new Officers of their own in all places where there were a sufficient number of Believers to make up such a Church And this I prove from the instance of the Church of Hierusalem which was first planted but quickly after there were Churches gathered and settled in Judea Gallilee and Samaria They planted Churches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Cities and Villages as Clemens speaks But what saith he is this to the proof of the Congregational way this it is namely That the Churches instituted by the Apostles were all of them Congregational not Diocesan Provincial or National but saith he the thing I desired was that when the Christians in one City multiplyed into more Congregations they would prove that they did make new and distinct Churches He may desire it of them who grant that the Christians did multiply in one City into more Congregations then one which I deny untill the end of the second Century although they might and did occasionally meet especially in times of Persecution in distinct Assemblies Neither will their multiplication into more Congregations without distinct Officers at all help the cause he pleadeth for for his Diocesan Church consisteth of many distinct Churches with their distinct Officers Order and Power as he afterwards describes our Parishes to do under one Bishop Yet such is his apprehension of the Justice of his cause that what hath been pleaded twenty times against it namely That speaking of one City the Scripture still calls it the Church of that place but speaking of a Province as Judea Galilee Samaria Galatia Macedonia it speaks of the Churches of them which evidently proves that it knows nothing of a Diocesan Provincial or National Church he produceth in the justification of it because he saith that it is evident theâ—ne that there was but one Church in one City which was never denyed There were indeed then many Bishops in one Church Phil. 1.1 Acts 20.28 And afterwards when one Church had one Bishop only yet there were two Bishops in one City which requires two Churches as Epiphanus affirms 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haeres 68. S. 6. For Alexandria never had two Bishops as other Cities had Whether he intend two Bishops in one Church or two Churches in one City all is one to our purpose But the Dr. I presume makes this observation rather artificially to prevent an Objection against his main Hypothesis then with any design to strengthen it thereby For he cannot but know how frequently it is pleaded in opposition unto any National Church State as unto its mention in the Scripture For he that shall speak of the Churches in Essex Suffolk Hartfordshire and so of other Counties without the least intimation of any general Church unto which they should belong would be judged to speak rather the Independent then the Episcopal Dialect But saith he p. 236. I cannot but wonder what Dr. O. means when after he hath produced the Evidence of distinct Churches in the same Province he calls this plain Scripture Evidence and practise for the erecting particular distinct Congregations who denies that I say then it is incumbent on him to prove if he do any thing in this cause that they erected Churches of another sort kind and order also But saith he I see nothing like a proof of distinct Churches in the same City which was the thing to be proved but because it could not be proved was prudently let alone But this was not the thing to be proved nor did I propose it to confirmation nor assert it but have proved the contrary unto the end of the second Century This only I assert that every Church in one City was only one Church and nothing is offered by the Doctor to the contrary yea he affirms the same But saith he sect 6. p. 237. Dr. O. saith That the Christians of one City might not exceed the bounds of a particular Church or Congregation no although they had a multiplication of Bishops or Elders in them and occasional distinct Assemblies for some Acts of Divine Worship But then saith he The notion of a Church is not limited in the Scripture to a single Congregation Why so for saith he if occasional Assemblies be allowed for some Acts of Worship why not for others I say because they belong unto the whole Church or are Acts of Communion in the whole Church Assembled and so cannot be observed in occasional meetings do this saith the Apostle when you come together in one place And if saith he the number of Elders be unlimited then every of those may attend the occasional distinct Assemblies for Worship and yet altogether make up the Body of one Church and so say I they may and yet be one Church still joyning together in all Acts of Communion that are proper and peculiar unto the Church For as the meetings intended were occasional so also was the attendance of the Elders unto them as they found occasion for the Edification of the whole Church It may be the Dr. is not so well acquainted with the Principles and Practise of the Congregational way and therefore thinks that these things are contrary unto them But those of that way do maintain that there ought to be in every particular Congregation unto the compleatness of it many Elders or Overseers that the number of them ought to be encreased as the encrease of the Church makes it necessary for their Edification that the members of such a Church may and ought to meet occasionally in distinct Assemblies especially in the time of Persecution for Prayer Preaching of the Word and mutual Exhortation so when Peter was in Prison after the Death of James many met together in the House of Mary to Pray Acts 12.12 Which was not a meeting of the whole Church And that there were such private meetings of the Members of the same Church in times of Persecution among the Primitive Churches may be proved by a Multiplication of instances but still they continued one Church and joyned together in all Acts of Church Communion properly so called especially if it were possible every Lords-day as Justin Martyr declares that the Church did in his time For all the Christians saith he then in the City and Villages about gathered together in one place for the Ends mentioned But still these distinct occasional Assemblies did not constitute any distinct Societies or Corporations as the distinct Companies do in a City But saith he grant one single Bishop over all these Elders and they make up that representation of a Church which we have from the best and purest Antiquity I say we would quickly grant it could we see any warrant for it or if he could prove that so it was
under For the Communion so much talked of amongst Churches is almost come only unto an Agreement and Oneness in design for the mutual and forcible Extermination of one another at least this is the professed Principle of them who lay the loudest claim to the Name and Title with all the Rights and Priviledges of the Church Nor are others far remote from the same Design who adjudge all who dissent from themselves into such a condition as wherein they are much inclined to think it meet they should be destroyed That which animates this contest which gives it Life and Fierceness is a supposed enclosure of certain Priviledges and Advantages Spiritual and Temporal real or pretended unto the Church-state contended about Hence most men seem to think that the principal if not their only concernment in Religion is of what Church they are so as that a dissent from them is so evil as that there is almost nothing else that hath any very considerable evil in it When this is once well riveted in their Minds by them whose secular Advantages lye in the Enclosure they are in a Readiness to bear a share in all the evils that unavoidably ensue on such Divisions By this means among others is the state or condition of Christian Religion as unto its publick Profession become at this day so deplorable as cannot well be expressed What with the bloody and desolating Wars of Princes and Potentates and what with the Degeneracy of the Community of the People from the Rule of the Gospel in Love Meekness Self-denial Holiness Zeal the Universal Mortification of Sin and Fruitfulness in Good Works the Profession of Christianity is become but a sad Representation of the Vertues of him who calls out of Darkness into his Marvellous Light Neither doth there seem at present to be any design or expectation in the Most for the ending of Controversies about the Church but Force and the Sword which God forbid It is therefore high time that a sober Enquiry be made whether there be any such Church state of Divine Institution as those contended about For if it should appear upon Trial that indeed there is not but that all the fierce digladiations of the Parties at Variance with the doleful effects that attend them have proceeded on a false supposition in an adherence whereunto they are confirmed by their Interests some advances may be made towards their Abatement However if this may not be attained yet Directions may be taken from the Discovery of the Truth for the use of them who are willing to be delivered from all concernment in these fruitless endless contests and to reduce their whole Practice in Religion unto the Institutions Rules and Commands of our Lord Jesus Christ. And where all hopes of a general Reformation seem to fail it savours somewhat of an unwarrantable Severity to forbid them to reform themselves who are willing so to do provided they admit of no other Rule in what they so do but the Declaration of the Mind of Christ in the Gospel carrying it peaceably towards all Men and firmly adhering unto the Faith once delivered unto the Saints To make an Entrance into this Enquiry the ensuing Discourse is designed And there can be no way of the Mannagement of it but by a diligent impartial search into the Nature Order Power and Rule of the Gospel Church state as instituted determined and limited by our Lord Jesus Christ and his Apostles When we depart from this Rule so as not to be regulated by it in all Instances of Fact or pleas of Right that afterwards fell out we fall into the confusion of various Presumptions suited unto the Apprehensions and Interests of men imposed on them from the Circumstances of the Ages wherein they lived Yet is it not to be denied but that much Light into the nature of Apostolical Institutions may be received from the declared Principles and Practices of the first Churches for the space of 200 years or thereabouts But that after this the Churches did insensibly depart in various degrees from the state Rule and Order of the Apostolical Churches must I suppose be acknowledged by all those who groan undâ—r the final Issue of that gradual Degeneracy in the Papal Antichristian Tyranny For Rome was not built in a day nor was this change introduced at once or in one Age nor were the lesser Alterations which began this Declension so prejudicial unto the Being Order and Purity of the Churches as they proved afterwards through a continual additional encrease in succeeding Ages Having affirmed something of this nature in my brief Vindication of the Nonconformists from the Guilt of Schisme the Reverend Dr. Stillingfleet in his late Treatise entitled The Vnreasonableness of Separation doth not only deny it but reflects with some severity upon the Mention of it Part 2. Sect. 3. pag. 225 226 c. I shall therefore on this Occasion reassume the consideration of it although it will be spoken unto also afterwards The Words he opposeth are these It is possible that an impartial Account may ere long be given of the state and ways of the first Churches after the decease of the Apostles wherein it will be made to appear how they did insensibly deviate in many things from the Rule of their first institution so as that though their Mistakes were of small moment and not prejudicial unto their Faith and Order yet occasion was administred unto succeeding Ages to encrease those Deviations until they issued in a fatal Apostacy I yet suppose these words inoffensive and agreeable unto the Sentiments of the Generality of Protestants For 1. Unto the first Churches after the Apostles I ascribe nothing but such small Mistakes as did no way prejudice their Faith or Order And that they did preserve the latter as well as the former as unto all the substantial Parts of it shall be afterwards declared Nor do I reflect any more upon them then did Hegesippus in Eusebius who confines the Virgin Purity of the Church unto the days of the Apostles lib. 3. cap. 29. The greater Deviations which I intend began not until after the end of the second Century But 2. To Evince the improbability of any Alteration in Church Rule and Order upon my own Principles he intimates both here and afterwards that my Judgment is that the Government of the Church was Democratical and the Power of it in the People in distinction from its Officers which is a great Mistake I never thought I never wrote any such thing I do believe that the Authoritative Rule or Government of the Church was is and ought to be in the Elders and Rulers of it being an Act of the Office-Power committed unto them by Christ himself Howbeit my Judgment is that they ought not to Rule the Church with Force Tyranny and Corporal Penalties or without their own consent whereof we shall treat afterwards There are also other Mistakes in the same Discourse which I shall not insist upon
Negligence I comprize both the Ignorance Sloth Worldliness Decay in Gifts and Graces with Superstition in sundry Instances that in many of them were the causes of it Dr. Stil pleads that it is very unlikely that the People would forego their Interest in the Government of the Churches if ever they had any such thing without great Noise and Trouble For saith he Government is so nice and tender a thing that every one is so much concerned for his share in it that men are not easily induced to part with it Let us suppose the Judgement of the Church to have been Democratical at first as Dr. O. seems to do is it probable that the People would have been wheadled out of the sweetness of Government so soon and made no noise about it pag. 226. His Mistake about my Judgment herein hath been marked before No other Interest or share in the Government is ascribed by us unto the People but that they may be ruled by their own consent and that they may be allowed to yeild Obedience in the Church unto the commands of Christ and his Apostles given unto them for that End This Interest they neither did nor could forego without their own Sin and Guilt in neglecting the Exercise of the Gifts and Graces which they ought to have had and the Performance of the Duties whereunto they were obliged But for any ingagement on their Minds from the sweetness of Government wherein their concern principally consists in an understanding voluntary Obedience unto the commands of Christ they had nothing of it Take also in general Government to be as the Government of the Church is meerly a Duty Labour and Service without those Advantages of Power Ease Dignity and Wealth which have been annexed unto it and it will be hard to discover such a Nicety or Sweetness in it as to oblige unto Pertinacy in an adherence unto it If the Government of the Church were apprehended to consist in mens giving themselves wholly to the Word and Prayer in watching continually over the Flock in acurate carefulness to do and act nothing in the Church but in the Name and Authority of Christ by the Warranty of his Commands with a constant Exercise of all Gifts and Graces of the Holy Spirit which they have received in these and all other Duties of their Office and that without the least Appearance of Domination or the procuring of Dignity Secular Honours and Revenues thereby it may be a share and Interest in it would not be so earnestly coveted and sought after as at present it is Nor is there any more pertinency in his ensuing supposal of a change in the Government of the Congregational Churches in London in setting up one Man to rule over them all and to appoint their several Teachers c. p. 227. which could not be done without noise It is in vain to fear it Non isto vivimus illic quo tu vere Modo and impertinent in this case to suppose it For it speaks of a suddain total Alteration in the State Order and Rule of Churches to be made at once whereas our Discourse is of that which was gradual in many Ages by Degrees almost imperceptible But yet I can give no security that the Churches of our way shall not in process of time decline from their Primitive Constitution and Order either in their Power and Spirit in Faith and Love or in the outward Practice of them unless they continually watch against all Beginnings and Occasions of such Declensions and frequently renew their Reformation or if it be otherwise they will have better success then any Churches in the World ever yet had even those that were of the planting of the Apostles themselves as is manifested in the Judgment that our Lord Jesus Christ passed on them Rev. 2. and 3. The Negligence of the People which issued in their unfitness to be disposed of and ruled according to the Principles of the first Constitution of Church Order may be considered either as it gave occasion unto those lesser Deviations from the Rule which did not much prejudice the Faith and Order of the Churches or as it occasioned greater Alterations in the ensuing Ages And 1. The great and perhaps in some things excessive Veneration which they had of their Bishops or Pastors did probably occasion in them some neglect of their own Duty For they were easily induced hereon not only implicitely to leave the Mannagement of all Church Affairs unto them but also Zealously to comply with their Mistakes The Church of Smyrna giving an Account of the Martyrdom of holy Polycarpus tells us that when he ascended the Pile wherein he was to be burned that he pulled off his own cloths and endeavoured to pull off his shooes which he had not done before because the Faithful strove among themselves who should soonest touch his Body Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 15. I think there can be no Veneration due to a Man which was not so unto that great and holy Person But those who did so express it might easily be induced to place too much of their Religion in an implicite compliance with them unto whom they are so devoted Hence a Negligence in themselves as unto their particular Duties did ensue They were quickly far from esteeming it their Duty to say unto their Pastor or Bishop that he should take heed unto the Ministry which he had received in the Lord to fulfill it as the Apostle enjoyns the Colossians to say to Archippus their Pastor chap. 4.17 but begun to think that the Glory of obsequious Obedience was all that was left unto them And hence did some of the Clergy begin to assume to themselves and to ascribe unto one another great swelling Titles of Honour and names of Dignity amongst which the Blasphemous Title of His Holiness was at length appropriated unto the Bishop of Rome wherein they openly departed from Apostolical Simplicity and Gravity But these things fell out after the writing of the Epistle of Clemens of those of the Church of Vienna and Smyrna wherein no such Titles do appear 2. Many of the Particular Churches of the first Plantations encreasing greatly in the number of their Members it was neither convenient nor safe that the whole Multitude should on all occasions come together as they did at first to consult about their common concerns and discharge the Duties of their Communion For by Reason of Danger from their numerous Conventions they met in several Parcels as they had opportunity Herewith they were contented unless it were upon the greater occasions of choosing their Officers and the like whereon the whole Church met together This made them leave the ordinary Administration of all things in the Church unto the Elders of it not concerning themselves further therein but still continuing Members of the same particular Church It is altogether improbable what Platina from Damasus affirmes in the Life of Evaristus about the End of the first Century that he
second Century of any one Person who had the care of more Churches than one committed unto him or did take the charge of them on himself But whereas this change did fall out and appears evidently so to have done in the fourth Century we may briefly enquire into the Causes and Occasions of it Churches were originally planted in Cities and Townes for the most part not absolutely for the Word was preached and Churches gathered by the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Clemens testifieth In such Cities there was but one Church whereunto all Beleivers did belong I mention this the rather because our present Author who is pleased frequently to mistake my Words and Principles affirms that the thing which I should have proved is that there were more Churches at first planted in one City than one I know not why I should be obliged to do so because I never said so I do believe indeed that there may be more particular Churches than one in one City and that sometimes it is better that it should be so then that all Beleivers in the same City should be kept up unto one Congregation to the Obstruction of their Edification But that there were originally or in the days of the Apostles more Churches than one in any one City or Town I do wholly deny though I grant at the same time there were Churches in Villages also as will appear afterwards But though there was one Church only in one Town or City yet all the Believers that belonged unto that Church did not live in that City but sundry of them in the Fields and Villages about So Justin Martyr tells us that on the first day of the week when the Church had its solemn Assemblies all the Members of it in the City and out of the Country the Fields and Villages about met together in the same place In process of time these Believers in the Country did greatly encrease by the means of the Ministry of the City-Church which diligently attended unto the Conversion of all sorts of men with some extraordinary helps besides But hereon the Example of the Apostles was overseen For on this account of the Conversion of many unto the Faith in the Towns and Villages of any Province they erected and planted new Churches among them not obliging them all unto that first Church from whence the Word went forth for their Conversion But those who succeeded them being hindred by many Reasons which may be easily recounted from Thoughts of the Multiplication of Churches chose rather to give the Beleivers scattered up and down in the Countrey occasional Assistance by Presbyters of their own than to dispose them into a Chrch State and Order But after a while their Number greatly encreasing they were necessitated to supply them with a constant Ministâ—y in several Parcels or Divisions The Ministers or Elders thus disposed amongst them for their Edification in the Administration of the Ordinances of the Gospel did still relate unto and depend upon that City first Church from whence they came But the Numbers of Beleivers dayly encreasing and a Succession of Presbyters in their distinct Assemblies being found necessary they came to be called Churches though continuing in dependance both for a supply of Officers and for Rule on the first or City Church whereunto they esteemed themselves to belong This was the way and manner of the Multiplication of Christian Assemblies throughout the Roman Empire And hereby all the Bishops of the first Churches became by common consent to have a distinction from and Preheminence above the Presbyters that were fixed in the Country and a Rule over those Assemblies or Churches themselves And therefore when they met together in the Council of Nice among the first things they decreed one was to confirm unto the Bishops of the great Cities that Power over the Neighbouring Churches which they had enjoyned from this occasional Rise and Constitution of them Hereby was a Difference and Distinction between Bishops and Presbiters between Mother and Dependant Churches introduced equally almost in all places without taking any notice of the departure which was therein from the Primitive Pattern and Institution But these things fell out long after the Days of the Apostles namely in the third and fourth Centuries there being no mention of them before But Secondly There was another Occasion of this Alteration which took place before that insisted on For in many of those City Churches especially when the number of Beleivers much encreased there were many Bishops or Elders who had the Rule of them in common This is plain in the Scripture and in the ensuing Records of Church Affairs And they had all the same Office the same Power and were of the same Order But after a while to preserve Order and Decency among themselves and in all their proceedings they chose one from among them who should preside in all Church Affairs for Orders sake unto whom after a season the name of Bishop began to be appropriated Whether the Rule they proceeded by herein was to choose them unto this Dignity who had been first converted unto the Faith or first called and ordained to be Presbyters or had respect unto the Gifts and Graces of those whom they chose is not certain But this way began in those Churches wherein some extraordinary Officer Apostle or Evangelist had long resided It cannot therefore be doubted but they had some Design to represent hereby somewhat of the Dignity of such an Officer and a Resemblance of the continuance of his Presence among them And this I suppose fell out early in the Churches though without Ground or Warrant And the Principal Pastors of other Churches which had not any great Number of Elders in them yet quickly assumed unto themselves the Dignity which the others had attained Justin Martyr in the Account he gives of the Church its Order Rule Worship and Discipline in his Days mentions one singular Person in one Church whom he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who presided in all the Affairs of the Church and himself administred all the sacred Ordinances every Lords Day unto the whole Body of the Church gathered and met out of the City and the Villages about This was the Bishop and if any one desired this Office he desired a good work as the Apostle speaks Whatever Accessions were made unto the Church these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which were either the first converted to the Faith or the first ordained Presbyters or obtained their Preheminence non pretio sed Testimonio as Tertullian speaks upon the account of their Eminency in Gifts and Holiness were yet quickly sensible of their own Dignity and Praelation and by all means sought the enlargement of it supposing that it belonged unto the Honour and Order of the Church it self Under this State of things the Churches encreasing every day in Number and Wealth growing insensibly more and more indies magis magisque decrescente disciplina into a form and
state exceeding the bounds of their Original Institution and becoming unweildy as unto the Pursuit of their Ends unto mutual Edification it is not hard to conjecture how a stated Distinction between Bishops and Presbyters did afterwards ensue For as the first Elder Bishop or Pastor had obtained this small Preheminence in the Church wherein he did preside and the Assemblies of the Villages about so the Mannagement of those Affairs of the Church which they had in Communion with others was committed unto him or assumed by him This gave them the Advantage of meeting in Synods and Councils afterwards wherein they did their own Business unto the Purpose Hereon in a short time the People were deprived of all their Interest in the State of the Church so as to be governed by their own Consent which indeed they also had rendred themselves unmeet to enjoy and exercise other Elders were deprived of that Power and Authority which is committed unto them by Christ and thrust down into an Order or Degree inferior unto that wherein they were originally placed New Officers in the Rule of the Church utterly unknown to the Scripture and Primitive Antiquity were introduced all Charitable Donations unto the Church for the maintenance of the Ministry the Poor and the Redemption of Captives were for the most part abused to advance the Revenues of the Bishops such secular Advantages in Honour Dignity and Wealth were annexed unto Episcopal Sees as that Ambitious Men shamefully contested for the attaining of them which in the Instance of the bloody conflict between the Parties of Damasus and Vrsacius at Rome Ammianus Marcellinus an Heathen doth greatly and wisely reflect upon But yet all these Evils were as nothing in comparison of that dead Sea of the Roman Tyranny and Idolatry whereinto at last these bitter Waters ran and were therein totally Corrupted I thought also to have proceeded with an Account of the Declension of the Churches from their first Institution in their Matter Form and Rule â—ut because this would draw forth my Discourse beyond my present Intention I shall forbear having sufficiently vindicated my Assertion in this one Instance It is no Part of my Design to give an Answer at large unto the great Volume that Dr. Still hath written on this Occasion much less to contend about particular Sayings Opinions the Practises of this or that Man which it is filled withal But whereas his Treatise so far as the Merit of the Cause is concerned in it doth consist of two Parts the first whereof contains such Stories Things and Sayings as may load the Cause and Persons whom he opposeth with prejudices in the Minds of others in which endeavour he exceeds all Expectation and what doth more directly concern the Argument in hand I shall at the end of the ensuing Discourse speak distinctly unto all that is Material of the second sort especially so far as is needful unto the Defence of my former Vindication of the Non-conformists from the Guilt of Schisme For the things of the first sort wherein the Doctor doth so abound both in his Preface and in the first part of his Book as to manifest himself I fear to be a little too sensible of Provocation for the actings of Interest in wise Men are usually more sedate I shall only oppose some general considerations unto them without arguing or contending about Particulars which would be endless and useless And whereas he hath gathered up almost every thing that hath been done written or spoken to the Prejudice of the Cause and Persons whom he opposeth though frequently charged before adding the advantage of his Style and Method unto their Reinforcement I shall reduce the whole unto a few Heads which seem to be of the greatest importance I shall leave him without disturbance unto the satisfaction he hath in his own Love Moderation and Condescension expressed in his Preface Others may possibly call some things in it unto a farther Account But the first Part of his Book is cast under two Heads 1. A Commendation of the first Reformers and their Reformation with some Reflections upon all that acquiesce not therein as though they esteemed themselves wiser and better than they From this Topick proceed many severe Reflections and some Reproaches The other consists in a story of the Rise and Progress of Separation from the Church of England with great Miscarriages among them who first attempted it and the Opposition made unto them by those who were themselves Non-conformists The whole is closed with the Difference and Debate between the Divines of the Assembly of the Presbyterian way and the dissenting Brethren as they were then called Concerning these things the Discourse is so prolix and so swelled with long Quotations that I scarce believe any man would have the Patience to read over a particular Examination of it especially considering how little the Cause in hand is concerned in the whole Story whether it be told right or wrong candidly or with a Design to make an Advantage unto the Prejudice of others I shall therefore only mark something with respect unto both these heads of the first Part of the Book which if I mistake not will lay it aside from being of any Use in our present Cause 1. As unto the first Reformers and Reformation in the Days of King Edward the Plea from them and it which we have been long accustomed unto is that they were Persons Great Wise Learned Holy that some of them dyed Martyrs that the work of the Reformation was greatly owned and blessed of God and therefore our Non-acquiescency therein but desiring a farther Reformation of the Church then what they saw and judged necessary is unreasonable and that what we endeavour therein though never so peaceably is Schismatical But 1. None do more bless God for the first Reformers and the work they did than we do none have an higher Esteem of their Persons Abilities Graces and Sufferings than we have None cleave more firmly to their Doctrine which was the Life and Soul of the Reformation then we nor desire more to follow them in their Godly Design They are not of us who have declared that the Death of King Edward was an happiness or no unhappiness to the Church of England nor who have reflected on the Reformation as needless and given Assurance that if it had not been undertaken Salvation might have been obtained safely enough in the Church of Rome nor were they of us who have questioned the Zeal and Prudence of the Martyrs of those Days in Suffering We have other thoughts concerning them another kind of Remembrance of them 2. The Titles assigned unto them of Wise Learned Holy Zealous are fully answered by that Reformation of the Church in its Doctrine and Worship which God wrought by their Ministry so that none without the highest ingratitude can derogate any thing from them in these things But it is no disparagement unto any of the Sons of Men any Officers of
and Priviledges by vertue of the Law of Christ. Unto this Church which is his Spouse doth the Lord Christ commit the Keys of his House by whom they are delivered into the hands of his Stewards so far as their Office requires that Trust. Now this which we shall afterwards more fully confirm is utterly inconsistent with the committing of all Church Power unto one Person by vertue of his Ordination by another Nothing that hath been spoken doth at all hinder or deny but that where Churches are rightly constituted they ought in their Offices Officers and Order to be preserved by a successive Ordination of Pastors and Rulers wherein those who actually preside in them have a particular Interest in the orderly communication of Church-Power unto them CHAP. IV. The Especial Nature of the Gospel Church-State appointed by Christ. THE Principal Enquiry which we have thus far prepared the way unto and whereon all that ensues unto it doth depend is concerning the especial Nature of that Church-State Rule and Order which the Lord Christ hath Instituted under the Gospel of what sort and kind it is And hereunto some things must be premised 1. I design not here to oppose nor any way to consider such Additions as men may have judged necessary to be added unto that Church-State which Christ hath appointed to render it in their apprehension more useful unto its ends than otherwise it would be Of this sort there are many things in the World and of a long season have been so But our present Business is to prove the Truth and not to disprove the conceits of other men And so far as our Cause is concerned herein it shall be done by it self so as not to interrupt us in the declaration of the Truth 2. Whereas there are great contests about Communion with Churches or Separation from them and mutual charges of Impositions and Schisms thereon they must be all regulated by this Enquiry namely what is that Church State which Christ hath prescribed Herein alone is Conscience concerned as unto all Duties of Ecclesiastical Communion Neither can a chaâ—ge of Schism be managed against any but on a supposition of Sin with respect unto that Church-State and Order which Christ hath appointed A Dissent from any thing else however pretended to be useful yea advantageous unto Church Ends must come under other prudential considerations All which shall be fully proved and vindicated from the exceptions of Dr. St. 3. There have been and are in the World several sorts of Churches of great Power and Reputation of several Forms and Kinds yet contributing Aid to each other in their respective stations As 1 The Papal Church which pretends it self to be Catholick or Universal comprehensive of all true Believers or Disciples of Christ united in their Subjection unto the Bishop of Rome 2 There were of old and the shadow of them is still remaining Churches called Patriarchal first 3 then 4 then 5 of them whereinto all other Churches and professed Christians in the Roman World were distributed as unto a Dependance on the Authority and Subjection to the Jurisdiction and Order of the Bishops of 5 principal Cities of the Empire who were thereon called Patriarks 3 Various Divisions under them of Archiepiscopal or Metropolitical Churches and under them of those that are now called Diocesan whose bounds and limits were fixed and altered according to the Variety of Occasions and Occurrences of things in the Nations of the World What hath been the Original of all these sorts of Churches how from Parochial Assemblies they grew up by the Degrees of their Descent now mentioned into the height and center of Papal Omnipotency hath been declared elsewhere sufficiently 4. Some there are who plead for a National Church-State arising from an Association of the Officers of particular Churches in several Degrees which they call Classical and Provincial until it extend it self unto the limits of an whole Nation that is one civil Body depending as such on its own supreme Ruler and Law I shall neither examine nor oppose this Opinion there hath been enough if not too much already disputed about it But 5. The visible Church-State which Christ hath instituted under the New Testament consists in an especial Society or Congregation of professed Believers joyned together according unto his Mind with their Officers Guides or Rulers whom he hath appointed which do or may meet together for the celebration of all the Ordinances of Divine Worship the professing and authoritatively proposing the Doctrine of the Gospel with the Exercise of the Discipline prescribed by himself unto their own mutual Edification with the Glory of Christ in the Preservation and Propagation of his Kingdom in the World The things observable in this Description and for the farther Declaration of it are 1 The Material cause of this Church or the Matter whereof it is composed which are visible Believers 2 The formal Cause of it which is their voluntary Coalescency into such a Society or Congregation according to the mind of Christ. 3 The End of it is presential local Communion in all the Ordinances and Institutions of Christ in Obedience unto him and their own Edification 4 In particular these ends are 1 The Preaching of the Word unto the Edification of the Church it self and the Conversion of others 2 Administration of the Sacraments or all the Mystical Appointments of Christ in the Church 3 The Preservation and Exercise of Evangelical Discipline 4 Visibly to profess their Subjection unto Christ in the World by the observation of his commands 5 The Bounds and Limits of this Church are taken from the number of the Members which ought not to be so Small as that they cannot observe and do all that Christ hath commanded in due Order nor yet so Great as not to meet together for the Ends of Institution of the Church before mentioned 6 That this Church in its compleat State consists of Pastors or a Pastor and Elders who are its Guides and Rulers and the Community of the Faithful under their Rule 7 That unto such a Church and every one of them belongs of Right all the Priviledges Promises and Power that Christ doth give and grant unto the Church in this World These and sundry other things of the like Nature shall be afterwards spoken unto in their Order according unto the Method intended in the present Discourse Two things I shall now proceed unto 1 To prove that Christ hath appointed this Church-State under the Gospel namely of a particular or single Congregation 2 That he hath appointed no other Church State that is inconsistent with this much less that is destructive of it 1. Christ appointed that Church-State which is meet and accommodated unto all the ends which he designed in his Institution of a Church But such alone is that Church Form and Order that we have proposed In Christs Institution of the Church it was none of his ends that some men might be thereby advanced to
not or is neglected It is therefore fond to suppose that our Saviour should prescribe this Rule for that season wherein there was no need of it and not for those times wherein the Church could not subsist in order without it 3ly The Church here directed unto is a Christian Church For 1. whereas it hath been proved it concerned the times to come afterwards there was in those times nothing that could pretend unto the name of the Church but a Christian Church only The Jewish Synagogues had an utter end put unto them so as that an Address unto any of them in this case was not only useless but unlawful And as unto Magistrates or Arbitrators to have them called the Church and that in such a sense as that after the Interposition of their Authority or Advice a man should be freed from the discharge of all Christian Duties such as are mutually required among the Disciples of Christ towards his Brother is a fond Imagination For 2 It is such a Church as can exercise Authority in the Name of Christ over his Disciples and such as in Conscience they should be bound to submit themselves unto For the Reason given of the Contempt of the Voice Judgment and Sentence of the Church in case of offence is their Power of spiritual binding and looâ—ing which is comitted by Christ thereunto and so he adds immediatley ver 18. Whatever ye shall bind on Earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever ye shall loose in heaven shall be loosed on earth is the Priviledge of a Christian Church only 4thly It is a visible particular Congregation alone that is intended For 1. As unto the Church in other acceptations of that name either for the Catholicâ— invisible Church or for the whole Body of professed Believers thoroughout the world it is utterly impossible that this Dâ—ty should be observed towards it as is manifest unto all 2. We have proved that the first and most proper signification of the word is of a single congregation assembling together for its Duties and Enjoyments Where ever therefore the Church in general is mentioned without the Addition of any thing or circumstance that may lead unto another signification it must be interpreted of such a Particular Church or Congregation 3. The Persons intended offending and offended must belong unto the same society unto whom the Address is to be made or else the one party may justly decline the Judicatory applyed unto and so frustrate the Process And it must be such a Church as unto whom they are known in their Circumstances without which it is impossible that a right judgment in sundry cases can be made in point of Offence 4 It is a Church of an easie Address Go tell the Church which supposeth that free and immediate aâ—cess which all the Members of a Church have unto that whole Church whereof they are members Wherefore 5 It is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tell the Church not a Church but the Church namely whereunto thou and thy Brother do belong 6 One end of this Direction is that the offending and the offended parties may continue together in the Communion of the same Church in Love without Dissimulation which thing belongs unto a particular Congregation 7 The meaning is not tell the Diocesan Bishop for whatever Church he may have under his Rule yet is not he himself a Church Nor is it 8 the Chancellours Court that our Saviour intended Be it what it will it is a disparagement unto all Churches to have that name applied thereunto Nor Lastly Is it a Presbytery or Association of the Elders of many particular Congregations that is intended For the Power claimed in such associated Presbyteries is with respect unto what is already in or before particular Congregations which they have not either Wisdom or Authority as is supposed finally to order and determine But this supposeth that the Address in the first place be made unto a particular Congregation which therefore is firstly and properly here intended All things are plain familiar and exposed to the common Understandings of all Believers whose minds are any way exercised about these things as indeed are all things that belong unto the Discipline of Christ. Arguments pretendedly deep and learned really obscure and perplexed with logical Notions and distinctions applied unto things thus plain and evident in themselves do serve only to involve and darken the Truth It is plain in the place 1 That there was a Church-State for Christians then designed by Christ which afterwards he would institute and settle 2 That all true Disciples were to join and unite themselves in some such Church as might be helpful unto their Love Order Peace and Edification 3 That among the members of these Churches Offences would or might arise which in themselves tend unto pernicious Events 4 That if these Offences could not be cured and taken away so as that Love without Dissimulation might be continued among all the Members of the Churches an Account of them at last was to be given unto that Church or Society whereunto the Parties concerned do belong as Members of it 5 That this Church should hear determine and give Judgment with advice in the cases so brought unto it for the taking away and removal of all Offences 6 That this Determination of the Church is to be rested in on the Penalty of a Deprivation of all the Priviledges of the Church 7 That these things are the Institution and Appointment of Christ himself whose Authority in them all is to be submitted unto and which alone can cast one that is a Professed Christian into the condition of an Heathen or a Publican These things in the Notion and Practice of them are plain easy and exposed to the Understanding of the meanest of the Disciples of Christ as it is meet that all things should be wherein their daily Practice is concerned But it is not easily to be expressed into what horrible Perplexities and Confusions they have been wrested in the Church of Rome nor how those who depart from the plain obvious sense of the words and love not the Practice they direct unto do lead themselves and others into ways and paths that have neither use nor end From the corrupt abuse of the holy Institution of our Lord Jesus Christ here intended so many Powers Faculties Courts Jurisdictions legal Processes with Litigious Vexatious oppressive Courses of Actions and Trials whose very names are uncouth horrid foreign unto Religion and unintelligible without Cunning in an artâ—ficial barbarous Science of the Canon Law have proceeded as are enough to fill a sober rational man with astonishment how it could ever enter into the minds of men to suppose that they can possibly have any Relation unto this Divine Institution Those who are not utterly blinded with Interest and Prejudice wholly ignorant of the Gospel and the mind of Christ therein as also Strangers from the Practice of the Duties which it requires will hardly
Example of the Primitive Churches that succeeded unto those which were planted by the Apostles themselves and so may well be judged to have walked in the same way and Order with them And that which we alledge is That in no approved Writers for the space of 200 years after Christ there is any mention made of any other Organical visibly professing Church but that only which is Parochial or Congregational A Church of any other Form State or Order Papal or Oecumenical Patriarchal Metropolitical Diocesan or Classical they know not Neither Name nor thing nor any of them appear in any of their Writings Before I proceed unto the Confirmation of this Assertion by particular Testimonies I shall premise some things which are needful unto the right understanding of what it is that I intend to prove by them As 1. All the Churches at first planted by the Apostles whether in the greatest Cities as Jerusalem Antioch Corinth Rome c. or those in the meanest Villages of Judea Galilee or Samaria were as unto their Church-State in Order Power Priviledge and Duty every way equal not Superior or Inferior not ruling over or subject unto one another No Institution of any Inequality between them no Instance of any Practice Supposing it no Direction for any compliance with it no one word of intimation of it can be produced from the Scripture nor is it consistent with the nature of the Gospel Church-State 2. In and among all these Churches there was one and the same spirit one Hope of their Calling one Lord one Faith one Baptism whence they were all obliged mutually to seek and endeavour the Good and Edification of each other To be helpful to one another in all things according unto that which any of them had received in the Lord. This they did by Prayer by Advice and Counsel by Messengers sent with Salutations Exhortations Consolations supplies for the Poor and on all the like occasions By these means and by the exercise of that mutual Love and Care which they were obliged unto they kept and preserved Vnity and Communion among themselves gave a common Testimony against any thing that in Doctrine or Practice deviated from the Rule and Discipline of Christ. This Order with Peace and Love thereon continued among them until Pride Ambition Desire of Rule and Preheminence in Diotrephes and a multitude of the same spirit with him began to open a door unto the entrance of the Mystery of Iniquity under pretence of a better Order than this which was of the appointment of Christ. 3. It must be acknowledged that notwithstanding this Equality among all Churches as unto their State and Power that there were great Differences between them some real and some in Reputation which not being rightly managed proved an Occasion of evil in and unto them all For Instance 1. Some were more eminent in spiritual Gifts than others As this was a Priviledge that might have been greatly improved unto the Honour of Christ and the Gospel yet we know how it was abused in the Church of Corinth and what Disorders followed thereon so weak and frail are the best of men so liable unto Temptation that all Preheminence is dangerous for them and often abused by them which I confess makes me not a little admire to see men so earnestly pleading for it so fearlesly assuming it unto themselves so fiercely contending that all Power and Rule in the Church belongs unto them alone But 2. Reputation was given unto some by the long abode of some of the Apostles in them Of this Advantage we find nothing in the Scripture But certain it is it was much pleaded and contended about among the Primitive Churches yea so far until by Degrees Disputes arose about the Places where this or that Apostle fixed his Seat which was looked on as a Preheminence for the present and a security for the future But yet we know how soon some of them degenerated from the Church Order and Discipline wherein they were instructed by the Apostles see Rev. chap. 2. and 3. 3. The Greatness Power Fame or Civil Authority of the Place or City where any Church was planted gave it an Advantage and Priviledge in Reputation above others And the Churches planted in such Cities were quickly more numerous in their Members than others were unless men strictly kept themselves unto the force of Primitive Institutions it was very hard for them to think and Judge that a a Church it may be in a small Village or Town in Galilee should be Equal with that at Hierusalem or at Antioch or afterwards at Rome itself The Generality of men easily suffered themselves to be persuaded that those Churches were advanced in State and Order far above the other obscure poor Congregations That there should be a Church at Rome the Head City of the world was a Matter of great Joy and Triumph unto many and the Advancement of it in Reputation they thought belonged unto the Honour of our Religion Howbeit there is not in the Scripture the least regard expressed unto any of these things of place number or possibility of outward splendor either in the Promises of the Presence of Christ in and with his Churches or in the Communication of Power Priviledges unto them Yet such an improvement did this foolish Imagination find that after those who presided in the Churches called in the principal Cities had tasted of the sweetness of the bait which lay in the Ascription of a Preheminence unto them they began openly to claim it unto themselves and to usurp Authority over other Churches Confirming their own Usurpation by Canons and Rules until a few of them in the Council of Nice began to divide the Christian world among themselves as if it had been been Conquered by them Hence proceeded those shameful contests that were among the greater Prelates about their Preheminency and hence arose that Pretence of the Bishops of Rome unto no less a Right of Rule and Dominion over all Christian Churches than the City had over all the Nations and Cities of the Empire which being carried on by all sorts of evil Artifices as by downright Forgeries shameless Intrusions of themselves impudent laying hold of all Advantages unto their own exaltation prevailed at length unto the utter ruine of all Church Order and worship There is no sober History of the rise and growth by several Degrees of any City Commonwealth or Empire that is filled with so many Instances of ambitious seeking of Preheminence as our Church stories are By this Imagination were the generality of the Prelates in those dayes induced to introduce and settle a Government in and among the Churches of Christ answering unto the Civil Government of the Roman Empire As the Civil Government was cast into National or Diocesan or Provincial in less or greater Divisions each of which had its Capital City the place of the Residence of the chief Civil Governour so they designed to frame an Image of
it in the Church ascribing an alike Dignity and Power unto the Prelates of those Cities and a Jurisdiction extending itself unto Nations Diocesses and Provinces Hereby the lesser Congregations or Parochial Churches being weakened in process of time in their Gifts and Interest were swallowed up in the Power of the others and became only inconsiderable Appendixes unto them to be ruled at their Pleasure But these things fell out long after the times which we enquire into only their occasion began to present it self unto men of corrupt minds from the Beginning but we have before at large discoursed of them 4. Some Churches had a great Advantage in that the Gospel as the Apostle speaks went forth from them unto others They in their Ministry were the Means first of the Conversion of others unto the Faith and then of their gathering into a Church-State affording them Assistance in all things they stood in need of Hence there newly formed Churches in lesser Towns and Villages had alwaies a great Reverence for the Church by whose means they were converted unto God and Stated in Church Order And it was meet that so they should have But in process of time as these lesser Churches decreased in spiritual Gifts and fell under a scarcity of able Guides this Reverence was turned into Obedience and Dependence and they thought it well enough to be under the Rule of others being unable well to rule themselves On these and the like Accounts there was quickly introduced an Inequality among Churches which by vertue of their first Institution were equal as unto State and Power 4. Churches may admit of many Variations as unto their outward Form and Order which yet change not their State nor cause them to cease from being Congregational As 1. Supposing that any of them might have many Elders or Presbyters in them as it is apparent that most of them had yea all that are mentioned in the Scripture had so Act. 11.30 chap. 14.23 chap. 15.6 22 23. chap. 16.4 chap. 20.17 18. chap. 21.18 Phil. 1.1.1 Tim. 5.17 Tit. 1.5 they might and some of them did choose out some one endued With especial Gifts that might in some sort preside amongst them and who had quickly the name of Bishop appropriated unto him This Practice is thought to have had its Original at Alexandria and began generally to be received in the 3 Century But this changed not the State of the Church though it had no divine Warrant to authorise it For this Order may be agreed unto among the Elders of a particular Congregation and Sundry things may fall out enclining unto the reception of it But from a distinct mention if any such there be in the Writings of the second Century of Bishops and Presbyters to fancy Metropolitical and Diocesan Churches is but a pleasant Dream 2. The Members of these Churches that were great and numerous being under the care and Inspection of their Elders in common might for the ordinary Duty of Divine Worship meâ—t in parts or several actual Assemblies and they did so especially in time of Persecution Nothing occurs more frequently in Ecclesiastical Story than the Meetings of Christians in secret Places in private houses yea in caves and dens of the Earth when in some places it was impossible that the whole Body of the Church should so assemble together How this Disposition of the Members of the Church into several Parts in each of which some Elder or Elders of it did officiate gave occasion unto the distinction of greater Churches into particular Titles or Parishes is not here to be declared it may be so Elsewhere But neither yet did this alter the State of the Churches from their Original Institution For 3. Upon all extraordinary occasions all such as concerned the whole Church as the Choice of Elders or the Deposition of them the admission or exclusion of Members and the like the whole Church continued to meet together which practice was plainly continued in the days of Cyprian as we shall see afterwards Neither doth it appear but that during the first 200 years of the Church the whole Body oâ— the Church did ordinarily meet together in one place for the solemn Administration of the Holy Ordinances of Worship and the Exercise of Discipline Wherefore notwithstanding these and other the like Variations from the Original Institution of Churches which came in partly by Inadvertency unto the Rule and partly were received from the Advantages and Accommodations which they pretended unto the State of the Churches continued Congregational onely for 200 years so far as can be gathered from the remaining Monuments of those times Only we must yet add that we are no way concerned in Testimonies or sayings taken from the writings of those in following Ages as unto the State way and manner of the Churches in this season but do appeal unto their own writings onely This is the great Artifice whereby Baronius in his Annalls would impose upon the Credulity of men an apprehension of the Antiquity of any of their Roman Inventions he affixeth them unto some of the first Ages and giving some Countenance unto them it may be from some spurious writings layes the weight of Confirmation on Testimonies and Sayings of Writers many years yea for the most part Ages afterwards for it was and is of the Latter Ages of the Church wherein Use and Custom have wrested Ecclesiastical words to other significations than at first they were applyed unto to impose the present State of things among them on these who went before who knew nothing of them I shall therefore briefly enquire into what Representation is made of the State of the Churches by the Writers themselves who had in the season enquired after or in the Age next unto it which was acquainted with their practice That which first offereth itself unto us and which is an invaluable Testimony of the state of the first Churches immediately after the Decease of the Apostles is the Epistle of Clemens Romanus unto the Brethren of the Church of Corinth This Epistle according to the Title of it Irenaeus ascribes unto the whole Church at Rome and calls it potentissimas literas sub hoc Clemente dissensione non modica inter â—os qui Corinthi erant fratres facta scripsit quae est Romae Ecclesia potentissimas literas lib. 3. cap. 3. By Eusebius it is termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 great and admirable who also affirms that it was publickly read in some Churches Ecclesiast Hist. lib. 3. cap. 14. And again he calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a most powerful writing lib. 5. cap. 7. There is no doubt but some things in the writings of it did befal him humanitûs that the work of such a companion of some of the Apostles as he was might not be received as of divine Institution such was the credit which he gives unto the vulgar fable of the Phenix But for the substance of it it is such as every way becomes a
the surprizals of Temptations not consented to not delighted or continued in your labour or contention of spirit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Apostle speaks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Col. 2.1 was night and day in your Prayers for the whole Brotherhood that is especially of their own Church itself that the number of Gods Elect might be saved in mercy through a good Conscience towards him This was their state this was their Liturgie this their practice 1. There was on all the Members of the Church a plentiful effusion of the Holy Spirit in his Gifts and Graces wherein it may be respect is had unto what was affirmed by the Apostle before of the same Church 1 Cor. 1.4 5 6 7. the same Grace being yet continued unto them 2. By vertue of this Effusion of the Spirit on all of them their Wills and Affections being sanctifyed their minds were enabled to pour forth fervent prayers unto God 3. They were not such as lived in any open sin or any secret sin known to be so but were only subject unto involuntary surprizals whose pardon they continually prayed for 4. Their love and sense of duty stirred them up to labour mightily in their Prayers with fervency and constancy for the Salvation of the whole Fraternity of Elect Believers whether throughout the world or more especialâ—y those in and of their own Church He that should ascribe these things unto any of those Churches which now in the world claim to be so only would quickly find himself at a loss for the proof of what he asserts Did we all sedulously endeavour to reduce and restore Churches unto their primitive state and frame it would bring more glory to God than all our contentions about Rule and Domination 4. It is certain that the Church of Corinth was fallen into a sinful excess in the Deposition and Rejection of their Elders whom the Church at Rome judged to have presided among them laudably and unblameably as unto their whole walk and work amongst them And this they did by the suggestion of two or three envious discontented persons and as it is probable from some digressions in the Epistle tainted with those Errors which had formerly infested that Church as the denial of the Resurrection of the flesh which is therefore here reflected on But in the whole Epistle the Church is nowhere reproved for assuming an Authority unto themselves which did not belong unto them It seems what Cyprian afterwards affirmed was then acknowledged namely that the right of choosing the worthy and of rejecting the unworthy was in the Body of the People But they are severely reproved for the abuse of their Liberty and Power For they had exercised them on ill grounds by ill means for ill ends and in a most unjust cause He therefore exhorts the Body of the Church to return unto their duty in the Restauration of their Elders and then prescribes unto them who were the first occasion of Schism that every one would subject themselves unto the restored Presbyter and say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I will do the things appointed or commanded by the Multitude the Church in the generality of its Members The Plebs the Multitude the Body of the fraternity in the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as they were often called in the Scripture Act. 4.32 Chap. 6.2 5. Chap. 15.12 30. had then Right and Power to appoint things that were to be done in the Church for Order and Peace I do not say they had it without or in distinction from their Officers Rulers and Guides but in a concurrence with them and subordination to them whence the Acts concluded on may be esteemed and are the Acts of the whole Church This order can be observed or this can fall out only in a Congregational Church all whose Members do meet together for the discharge of their Duties and Exercise of their Discipline And if no more may be considered in it but the miscarriage of the people without any respect to their Right and Power yet such Churches as wherein 't is impossible that that should fall out in them as did so fall out in that Church are not of the same kind or order with it But for the sake of them who may endeavour to reduce any Church-state into its Primitive Constitution that they may be cautioned against that great Evil which this Church in the exercise of their supposed liberty fâ—ll into I cannot but transcribe a few of those excellent words which are used plentifully with cogent Reasons in this Epistle against it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is shameful beloved exceeding shameful which is reported of you that the most firm and antient Church of the Corinthians should for the sake of one or two persons seditiously tumultuate against their Elders And herein he proceeds to declare the dreadful scandal that ensued thereon both among Believers and Infidels The Instruction also which he adds hereunto is worthy the remembrance of all Church Members 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is blessed Advice for all Church-Members that he gives Let a man be faithful let him be powerful in knowledge or the Declaration of it let him be wise to judge the Words or Doctrines let him be chast or pure in his works the greater he seems to be the more humble he ought to be that so the Church may have no trouble by him nor his Gifts But to return 5. Having occasion to mention the Officers of the Church he nameth only the two ranks of Bishops and Deacons as the Apostle also doth Phil. 1.1 speaking of the Apostles he says 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Preaching the word through Regions and Cities they appointed the first fruits as the House of Stephan as was the first fruits of Achaia who therefore addicted themselves to the Ministry of the Saints 1 Cor. 16.15 or the first Converts to the Faith after a Spiritual Trial of them as unto their fitness for their work to be Bishops and Deacons of them that should afterwards believe Where there were as yet but a few converted the Apostle gathered them into Church-order and so soon as they found any fit among them appointed and ordained them to be Bishops and Deacons so that provision might be made for the guidance and conduct of them that should be converted and added unto them after they were left by the Apostles These Bishops he affirms to be and have been the Presbyters or Elders of the Church even the same with those deposed by the Corinthians in the same manner as the Apostle doth Act. 20.28 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. It is no small sin in us to reject or cast off them who have offered the Gifts or discharged the Duties of Episcopacy holily and without blame Blessed are the Elders who went before namely as he expresseth it because they are freed from that amotion from their Office which those Elders now amongst them had undergone after they had
their state as to make way for those greater alterations which not long after ensued For they were not introduced until through a defect in the multiplication of Churches in an equality of Power and Order which ought to have been done they were encreased into that multitude for number of Members and were so diffused as unto their habitations as made an appearance of a Necessity of another Constitution of Churches and anothâ—r kind of Rule than what was of original appointment Justin Martyr wrote his second Apology for the Christians unto the Roman Emperours about the year 150. It is marvellous to consider how ignorant not only the common sort of the Pagans but the Philosophers also and Governours of the Nations were of the nature of Christian Churches and of the worship celebrated in them But who are so blind as those who will not see Even unto this day not a few are willingly or rather wilfully ignorant of the nature of such Assemblies or what is performed in them as were among the Primitive Christians that they may be at liberty to speak all manner of evil of them falsely Hence were all the Reports and stories among the Heathen concerning what was done in the Christian Conventicles which they would have to be the most abominable villanies that were ever acted by Mankind Even thâ—se who made the most candid Enquiry into what they were and did attained unto very little knowledge or certainty concerning them and their Mysteries as is evident in the Epistles of Trajan and Pliny with the Rescript of Adrian unto Minucius Fundanus about them In this state of things this our great and learned Philâ—sopher who afterwards suffered Martyrdom about the year 160 undertook to give an account unto Antoninus Pius and Lucius who then ruled the Roman Empire of the Nature Order and Worship of the Christian Churches and that in such an excellent manner as that I know nothing material that can be added unto it were an account of the same thing to be given unto alike persons at this day We may touch a little upon some Heads of it 1. He declares the conversion of men unto the Faith as the foundation of all their Church-order and Worship 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 As many as are perswaded and do believe the things to be true which are taught and spoken by us and take upon themselves that they are able to live according to that Doctrine they are taught to seek of God by fasting and prayer the pardon of their fore-going sins and we also do joyn together with them in fasting and prayer for that end And heâ—ein 1. The only means of Conversion which he insists upon is the Preaching of the Word or Truth of the Gospel wherein they especially insisted on the Doctrine of the Person and Officeâ— of Christ as appears throughout his whole Apologie 2. This preaching of the Word or Declaration of the Truth of the Gospel unto the Conversion of the Hearers be doth not confine unto any especial sort of persons as â—e doth afterwards that Administration of the holy things in the Church but speaks of it in general as the work of all Christians that were able for it as doth the Apostle 1 Cor. 14.24 25. 3. Those who were converted did two things 1. They professed their Faith or Assent unto the Truth of the Dotcrine of the Gospel 2. They took it on themselves to live according to the Rule of it to do and observe the things commanded by Jesus Christ as he appointed they should Math. 28.18 19. 4. To lay a sure and comfortable foundation of their future profession they were taught to confess their former sins and by earnest prayer with fastings to seek of God the pardon and forgiveness of them And 5. Herein such was their love and zeal those who had been the means of their Conversion joyned with them for their comfort and edification It is well known how this whole process is lost and on what account it is discontinued But whether it be done so unto the Advantage of Christian Religion and the good of the Souls of Men is well worth a strict enquiry 2. In the next place he declares how those who were so converted were conducted unto Baptism and how they were initiated into the Mysteries of the Gospel thereby 3. When any was so Baptized they brought him unto the Church which he was to be joyned unto 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Him who is thus Baptiâ—ed who believeth and is received by consent among 〈◊〉 or to be of our number we bring him unto those called the Brethren when they are met or gathered together for joynt prayers and supplications for themselves and for him who is now illuminated and all others with intention of mind c. We have here another illustrious instance of the care and diligence of the Primitive Church about the enstating professed Believers in the Communion of the Church That hereon those who were to be admitted made their publick confession we shall afterwards declare And the Brethren here mentioned are the whole fraternity of the Church who were concerned in these things And Justin is not ashamed to declare by what name they called one another among themselves even to the Heathen though it be now a scorn and reproach among them that are called Christians 4. He proceeds to declare the nature of their Church-meetings or Assemblies with the Duties and Worship of them And he tells us first that they had frequent meetings among themselves they that have any wealth saith he do help the poor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and we are continually together that is in the lesser occasional Assemblies of the Brethren for so in the next place he adds immediately 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 On the day called Sunday there is a meeting of all that dwell in the Towns and Fields or Villages about This was the State the Order the proceeding of the Church in the days of Justin whence it is undeniably evident that he knew no other Church-state or Order but that of a particular Congregation whose Members living in any Town or City or Fields adjacent did constantly all of them meet together in one place the first day of the week for the celebration of Divine Worship 5. In this Church he mentions only two sorts of Officers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Presidents and Deacons Of the first sort in the Duty of one of their Assemblies â—e mentions but one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the President the Ruler the Bishop to whom belonged the Administration of all the holy Mysteries And that we may not think that he is called the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with respect unto any Preheminence over other Ministers or Elders like a Diocesan Bishop he terms him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he that presided over the Brethren of that Church Now certainly that Church wherein one President Elder Presbyter or Bishop did administer the Holy Ordinances in one
place unto all the Members of it was a particular Congregation 6. The things that he ascribeth unto this Leader to be done at this general meeting of the Church every Lords day were 1. That he prayed 2. That after the reading of the Scripture he preached 3. That he consecrated the Eucharist the Elements of the Bread and Wine being distributed by the Deacons unto the Congregation 4. That he closed the whole Worship of the day in prayer 7. In the Consecration of the Sacramental Elements he observes that the President prayed at large giving thanks to God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So vain is the pretence of some that in the Primitive times they consecrated the Elements by the Repetition of the Lords prayer only After the participation of the Eucharist there was a Collection made for the poor as he describeth it at large what was so gathered being committed to the Pastor who took care for the distribution of it unto all sorts of poor belonging unto the Church Hereunto was added as Tertullian observes the Exercise of Discipline in their Assemblies whereof we shall speak afterwards The close of the Administration of the Sacrament Justin gives us in these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Pastor again according to his ability or power poureth forth or sends up prayers the people all joyfully crying Amen c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is as Origen expounds the Phrase often used by himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 lib. 8. ad Cels. according unto the present Ability given unto him This was the state the Order and the Worship of the Church with its Method in the days of Justin Martyr This and no other is that which we plead for Unto these times belongs the most excellent Epistle of the Churches of Vienna and Lyons in France unto the Brethren in Asia and Phrygia recorded at large by Eusebius Hist. lib. 5. cap 1. Their design in it is to give an account of the holy Martyrs who suffered in the persecution under Marcus Antoninus I am no way concerned in what state Irenaeus was in the Church at Lyons whereon after the writing of this Epistle he was sent to Eleutherius the Bishop of Rome which he gives an account of Chap. 4. He is indeed in that Epistle called a Presbyter of the Church although as some suppose it was sundry years after the death of Pothinus whom they call Bishop of Lyons into whose room he immediately succeeded And Eusebius himself cap. 8. affirming that he would give an account of the Writings of the antient Ecclesiastical Presbyters in the first place produceth those of Irenaeus But these things belong not unto our present contest The Epistle we intend was written by the Brethren of those Churches and it was written to the Brethren of the Churches in Asia and Phrygia after the manner of the Scripture wherein the fraternity or Body of the Church was designed or intended in all such Epistles From them was this Epistle and unto those of the same sort was it written not from one Bishop unto another And as this manifests the concern of the Brotherhood in all Ecclesiastical Affairs so with all other circumstances it evidenceth that those Churches were particular or Congregational only Nor is there any thing in the whole Epistle that should give the least intimation of any other Church state knowâ— unto them This Epistle as recorded by Eusebius gives us as noble Representation of the Spirit and Communion that was then among the Churches of Christ being written with Apostolical simplicity and gravity and remote from those Titles of Honour and affected swelling words which the faigned writings of that Age and some that are genuine in those that followed are stuffed withal Tertullâ—an who lived about the end of the second Century gives us the same account of the State Order and Worship of the Churches as was given beâ—ore by Justin Martyr Apol. ad Gen. cap. 39. The Description of a Church he first lays down in these words Corpâ—s sumus de conscientia Religionis Disciplinae unitate spei foedere We are a Body united in the Conscience of Religion or a conscientious Observation of the Duties of Religion by an Agreement in Discipline whereby it was usual with the Antients to express Universal Obedience unto the Doctrine and commands of Christ and in a Covenant of Hope For whereas such a Body or Religious Society could not be united but by a Covenant he calls it a Covenant of Hope because the principal respect was had therein unto the things hoped foâ— They covenanted together so to live and walk in the Discipline of Christ or Obedience unto his commands as that they might come together unto the enjoyment of Eternal Blessedness This Religious Body or Society thus united by Covenant did meet together in the same Assembly or Congregation Corpus suâ—us â—oâ—mus in coeâ—um Congregationem ut ad Deum quasi manu facta precationibus ambiamus orantes And cogimur ad divinarum literarum commemorationem c. Designing to declare as he doth in particular Negotia Christianae factionis as he calls them or the Duties of Christian Religion which in their Churches they did attend unto he lays the foundation in their meetings in the saâ—â— Assemâ—ly or Congregation In these Assemblies there presided the Elders that upon a Testimony of their meetness unto that Office were chosen thereunto President probati quique seniores honorem istum non pretiâ— sed Testimonio adepti And in the Church thus met together in the same place Assembly or Congregation under the rule and conduct of their Elders among other things they exercised Discipline that is in the presence and by the consent of the whole Ibidem etiam exhortationes castigationes censura divina Nam judicatur magno cum pondere ut apud certos de Dei conspectu summumque futuri judâ—cii praejudicium est sâ— quis ita deliquerit ut à communicatione Oratinis conventus omnis sancti commercii relegetur The loss of this Discipline and the manner of its Administration hath been one of the principal means of the Apostacy of Churches from their Primitive Institution To the same purpose doth Origen give us an account of the way of the gathering and establishing Churches under Elders of their own choosing in the close of his last Book against Celsus And although in the days of Cyprian in the third Century the distinction between the Bishop in any Church eminently so called and those who are only Presbyters with their imparity and not only the precedency but superiority of one over others began generally to be admitted yet it is sufficiently manifest from his Epistles that the Church wherein he did preside was so far a particular Church as that the whole Body or Fraternity of it was admitted unto all advice in things of common concernment unto the whole Church and allowed the exercise of their
power and liberty in choosing or refusing the Officers that were to be set over them Some few things we may observe from the Testimonies insisted on As 1. There is in them a true and full representation of the State Order Rule and Discipline of the Churches in the first Ages It is a sufficient demonstration that all those things wherein at the present the State and Order of the Church are supposed to consist are indeed later Inventions not merely because they are not mentioned by them but because they are not so when they avowedly profess to give an account of that State and Order of the Church which was then in use and practice Had there been then among Christians Metropolitan Archbishops or Bishops Diocesan Churches National or Provincial an enclosure of Church-power or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in and for the whole rule of the Church unto Bishops and Officers utterly forraign unto any pretence of Apostolical Institution or countenance had many Churches or many hundreds of Churches been without Rule in or among themselves subject to the rule of any one man standing in no especial relation unto any of them with other things of the like nature been then invented known and in use how could they possibly be excused in passing them over without the least taking notice of them or giving them the honour of being once mentioned by them How easie had it been for their Pagan Rulers unto whom they presented their accounts some of them of the state of their Churches to have replyed that they knew well enough there were other Dignities Orders and practises than what they did acknowledge which they were either afraid or ashamed to own But besides this silence on the other hand they assert such things of the Officers appointed in the Church of the way of their appointment of the Duty of Officers in the Church of the Power and Liberty of the people of the nature and exercise of Discipline as are utterly inconsistent with that state of these things which is by some pleaded for Yea as we have shewed whatever they write or speak about Churches or their Order can have no Being or Exercise in any other form of Churches but of particular Congregations 2. That account which they give that Representation which they make of the kind state and order of the Churches among them doth absolutely agree with and answer unto what we are taught in the Divine Writings about the same things There were indeed before the end of the second Century some practises in and about some lesser things such as sending the Consecrated Elements from the Assembly unto such as were sick that they had no warrant for from any thing written or done by the Apostles But as unto the substance of what concerns the State Order Rule Discipline and Worship of Evangelical Churches there is not any instance to be given wherein they departed from the Apostolical Traditions or Institution either by adding any thing of their own unto them or omitting any thing that was by them ordained 3. From this state the Churches did by degrees and insensibly degenerate so as that another Form and Order of them did appear towards the end of the third Century For some in the first Churches not applying their minds unto the Apostolical Rule and practice who ordained Elders in every Church and that not only in Cities or Towns but as Clemens affirms 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Country-Villages Many disorders ensued with respect unto such Collections of Christians and Congregations as were gathered at some distance from the first or City-Church Until the time of Origen the Example of the Apostles in this case was followed and their Directions observed For so he writes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And we knowing that there are other Congregations gathered in the Towns up and down by the Preaching of the Word of God or that there is another Heavenly City in any Town built by the word of God we perswade some that are sound in Doctrine and of good Conversation and meet for their Rule to take on them the conduct or Rule of those Churches and these whilst they Rule within the Churches those societies of Divine Institution by whom they are chosen they govern them according to the Prescriptions or Commands and Rules given by God himself Adver Cels. lib. 8. Those of whom he speaks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 were the Pastors or principal Members of the Churches that were established When they understood that in any place distant from them a number of Believers were called and gathered into Church order by the Preaching of the Word they presently according unto their duty took care of them enquired into their State and condition assisting them in particular in finding out trying and recommending unto them persons meet to be their Officers and Rulers These he acknowledgeth to be Churches and Cities of God upon their Collection by the Preaching of the Word antecedently unto the constitution of any Officers among them as the Apostles also did Act. 14.22 23. Wherefore the Church is essentially before its ordinary Officers and cannot as unto its continuance depend on any Succession of theirs which they have none but what it gives unto them These Officers thus recommended were chosen as he tells us by the Churches wherein they were to preside and thereon did govern them by the Rule of Gods Word alone Hereby was the Original Constitution and state of the first Churches for a good season preserved Nor was there the least abridgment of the power either of these Churches or of their Officers because it may be they were some of them planted in poor Country-Villages For as no man in the world can hinder but that every true Church hath de jure all the Rights and Powers that any other Church in the world hath or ought to have or that every true Officer Bishop Elder or Pastor hath not all the power that Christ hath annexed unto that Office be they at Rome or Eâ—gubium so there was no abridgment of this power in the meanest of them as yet attempted But this course and duty in many places not long after became to be much omitted whether out of Ignorance or Negligence or unwillingness of men to undertake the Pastoral Charge in poor Country-Churches I know not But so it was that Believers in the Regions round about any City 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 were look'd on as those which belonged unto the City Churches and were not setled in particular Congregations for their edification which they ought to have been And the Councels that afterwards ensued made Laws and Canons that they should be under the Government of the Bishops of those City-Churches But when the number of such Believers was greatly increased so as that it was needful to have some always attending the Ministry among them they came I know not how to have Chorepiscopi among them and over them The first mention of them is in the Synod of
stating of the Subject of our Enquiry 1. The Diversities and Divisions among Churches which respect is to be had unto in the choice of any which we will or ought to joyn unto are of two sorts 1. Such as are occasioned by the remaining Weaknesses Infirmities and Ignorance of the best of Men whereby they know but in part and prophesie only in part wherein our Edification is concerned but our Salvation not endangered 2. Such as are in and about things Fundamental in Faith Worship and Obedience We shall speak to both of them 2. All Christians were Originally of one Mind in all things needful unto Joint-Communion so as that there might be among them all Love without Dissimulation Howbeit there was great variety not only in the Measure of their apprehensions of the Doctrines of Truth but in some Doctrines themselves as about the continuance of the Observations of the Law or at least of some of them as also Oppositions from without unto the Truth by Hereticks and Apostates neither of which hindred the Church Communion of true Believers But the Diversity Difference and Divisions that are now among Churches in the World is the effect of the great Apostasie which befel them all in the latter Ages as unto the Spirit Rule and Practice of those which were planted by the Apostles and will not be healed until that Apostasie be Abolished 3. Satan having possessed himself of the Advantage of these Divisions whereof he was the Author he makes use of them to act his Malice and Rage in stirring up and instigating one Party to Persecute Oppress and Devour another until the Life Power and Glory of Christian Religion is almost lost in the World It requires therefore great Wisdom to deport our selves aright among these Divisions so as to contribute nothing unto the Ends of Malice designed by Satan in them 4. In this state of things until it may be cured which it will never be by any of the wayes yet proposed and insisted on the Enquiry is concerning the Duty of any one who takes care of his own Soul as unto a Conjunction with some Church or other And on the Negative Part I say 1. Such an one is bound not to joyn with any Church or Society where any fundamental Article of Faith is rejected or corrupted There may be a fundamental Error in a true Church for a season when the Church erreth not Fundamentally 1 Cor. 15. 2 Tim. 2.18 But I suppose the Error in or against the Foundation is part of the Profession of the Church or Society to be joyned unto For thereby the Nature of the Church is destroyed it doth not hold the Head nor abide on the Foundation nor is the Ground and Pillar of Truth Wherefore although the Socinians under a Pretence of Love Forbearance and Mutual Toleration do offer us the Communion of their Churches wherein there is somewhat of Order and Discipline commendable yet it is unlawful to joyn in Church Fellowship or Communion with them For their Errors about the Trinity the Incarnation of Christ and his Satisfaction are destructive of the Foundation of the Prophets and Apostles and Idolatry in the divine Worship of a meer Creature is introduced by them 2. Where there 〈…〉 any Church taught or allowed a Mixture of Doctrines or Opinions that are prejudicial unto Gospel Holiness or Obedience no man that takes due care of his Salvation can joyn himself unto it For the Original Rule and Measure of all Church Communion is agreement in the Doctrine of Truth Where therefore there is either not a stable Profession of the same Doctrine in all substantial Truths of the Gospel but an uncertain sound is given some saying one thing some another or that Opposition is made unto any Truths of the importance before menâ—â—oned None can be bound or obliged to hold Communion with it nor can incur any blame by refraining from it For it is the Duty of a Christian in all things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And to joyn with such a Church would 1. Stain their Profession 2. Hinder their Edification 3. Establish a new Rule of Communion unknown to the Scriptures namely besides Truth as might easily be manifested 3. Where the Fundamentals of Religious Worship are corrupted or overthrown it is absolutely unlawful to joyn unto or abide in any Church So is it with the Church of Rome The various wayes whereby the Foundations of Divine Religious Worship are overthrown in that Church by Superstition and Idolatry have been sufficiently declared These render the Communion of that Church pernitious 4. Nor can any man be obliged to joyn himself with any Church nor can it be his Duty so to do where the Eternally fixed Rule and Measure of Religious Worship namely that it be of Divine Institution is varied or changed by any Additions unto it or Substractions from it For whereas one principal end of all Churches is the joint celebration of Divine Worship if there be not a certain stable Rule thereof in any Church of Divine Prescription no Man can be obliged unto Communion therewith 5. Where the Fundamentals of Church Order Practice and Discipline are destroyed it is not Lawful for any man to joyn in Church Communion These Fundamentals are of two sorts 1. Such as concern the Ministry of the Church 2. Such as concern the Church it self There are four things that are necessary Fundamentals unto the Order of the Church on the Part of the Ministry 1. That all the Ministers or Officers of it be duely chosen by the Church it self and solemnly set apart in the Church unto their Office according unto the Rule and Law of Christ. This is Fundamental unto Church Order the Root of it from whence all other Parts of it do Spring And it is that which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or expresly provided for in the Scripture as we shall see If there be a Neglect herein and no other Relation required between Ministers Elders Rulers Bishops and the Church but what is raised and created by Wayes and Rules of mens appointment or if there be a Temporary disposal of Persons into a discharge of that Office without a solemn Call Choice Ordination and Separation unto the Office itself and its work the Law of Christ is violated and the Order of the Church disturbed in its Foundation 2. That those who are called unto the Office of the Ministry be duely qualified by their Endowment with Spiritual Gifts for the Discharge of their Duty is fundamental unto the Ministry That the Lord Jesus Christ doth still continue his Dispensation of Spiritual Gifts unto men to fit and enable them unto the Office and Work of the Ministry that if he doth not do so or should at any time cease so to do the whole Office of the Ministry must cease and the Being of the Church with it that it is altogether useless for any Churches or Persons to erect an Image of the Gospel Ministry by outward Rites and
shall endeavour to cheat his Conscience by Distinctions and mental Reservations in any concernments of Religious Worship I fear he hath little of it if any at all that is good for ought On these suppositions I say the Imposition of the things so often contended about on the Consciences and Profession of Christians as namely the constant sole use of the Liturgie in all Church Administrations in the Matter and Manner prescribed the Use and Practice of all Canonical Ceremonies the Religious Observation of stated Holidays with other things of the like Nature is sufficient to warrant any sober peaceable Disciple of Christ who takes care of his own Edification and Salvation to refrain the Communion required in this Rule of Conformity unless he be fully satisfied in his own Mind that all that it requires is according to the Mind of Christ and all that it forbids is disapproved by him And whereas the whole entire matter of all these Impositions are things whereof the Scripture and the Primitive Churches know nothing at all nor is there any rumour of them to be imposed in or on any Church of Christ for some Centuries of years I can but pity poor men who must bear the charge and Penalties of Schisme for dissenting from them as well as admire the fertility of their Inventions who can find out Arguments to mannage such a charge on their Account But whereas the Dissent declared from that Communion with Parochial Assemblies is that whereon we are so fiercely charged with the Guilt of Schisme and so frequently called Schismaticks I shall divert a little to Enquire into the Nature and true Notion of Schisme itself and so much the rather because I find the Author of the Vnreasonableness of Separation omit any Enquiry thereinto that he might not loose the Advantage of any pretended Description or Aggravation of it CHAP. XI Of Schisme ALthough it be no part of my present Design to treat of the Nature of Schisme yet with respect unto what hath already been discoursed and to manifest our inconcernment in the Guilt of it I shall as was said divert to give a plain and brief Account of it And in our Enquiry I must declare my self wholly unconcerned in all the Discords Divisions and Seditions that have fallen out among Christians in the latter Ages about things that were of their own Invention Schisme is a Sin against Christian Love with reference unto the deportment of men in and about the Institutions of Christ and their Communion in them As for Contentions Divisions or Separations amongst men about that Order Agreement Unity or Uniformity which are of their own Appointment whatever Moral Evil they have had in them they do not belong unto that Church Schisme which we enquire after Such have been the horrid Divisions and Fightings that have prevailed at Seasons in the Church of Rome a departure from whose self-constituted State Order and Rule hath not the least Affinity unto Schisme It will not therefore be admitted that any thing can fall under the note and Guilt of Schisme which hath not respect unto some Church state Order Rule Unity or Uniformity that is of Christs Institution There are three Notions of Schisme that deserve our Consideration 1. The first is that of Divisions among the Members of the same Church all of them abiding still in the same outward Communion without any Separation into distinct Parties And unto Schisme in this Notion of it three things do concur 1. Want of that mutual Love Condescension and Forbearance which are required in all the Members of the same Church with the Moral Evils of Whisperings Back-bitings and evil surmizes that ensue thereon 2. An undue Adherence unto some Church Officers above others causing disputes and janglings 3. Disorder in the Attendance unto the Duties of Church Assemblies and the Worship of God performed in them This is the only Notion of Schisme that is exemplified in the Scripture the only evil that is condemned under that name This will appear unto any who shall with heedfulness read the Epistles of Paul the Apostle unto the Corinthians wherein alone the nature of this Evil is stated and exemplified But this Consideration of Schism hath been almost utterly lost for many Ages whatever men do in Churches so that they depart not from the outward Communion of them it would be accounted ridiculous to esteem them Schismaticks Yet this is that which if not only yet principally the Consciences of Men are to regard if they will avoid the Guilt of Schisme But this Notion of it as was said being not suited unto the Interest or Advantages of any sort of men in the charge of it on others nor any way subservient to secure the Inventions and Impositions of the most is on the matter lost in the World 2. The second Instance of Ecclesiastical Schisme was given us in the same Church of the Corinthians afterwards an account whereof we have in the Epistle of Clemens or of the Church of Rome unto them about it the most eminent Monument of primitive Antiquity after the Writings by Divine Inspiration And that which he calls Schisme in that Church he calls also strife contention sedition tumult And it may be observed concerning that Schisme as all the Antients call it 1. That the Church continued its state and outward Communion There is no mention of any that separated from it that constituted a New Church only in the same Church they agreed not but were divided among themselves Want of Love and Forbearance attended with strife and contention among the Members of the same Church abiding in the same outward Communion was the Schisme they were Guilty of 2. The Effect of this Schisme was that the Body of the Church or Multitudes of the Members by the Instigation of some few disorderly Persons had deposed their Elders and Rulers from their Offices and probably had chosen others in their places though that be not mentioned expresly in the Epistle 3. That the Church itself is not blamed for assuming a Power unto themselves to depose their Elders much less that they had done it without the Consent Advice or Authority of any Bishop or other Church but only that they had dealt unjustly with those whom they had deposed who in the Judgement of the Church of Rome unto which they had written for Advice were esteemed not only innocent but such as had laudably and profitably discharged their Office whereon the whole blame is cast on those who had instigated the Church unto this Proceedure 4. There was not yet nor in an hundred and fifty years after the least mention or intimation of any Schisme in a dissent from any humanely invented Rules or Canons for Order Government or Worship in any Church or Religious Ceremonies imposed on the Practise of any in divine Service that is on any Church or any of the Members of it There is not the least Rumour of any such things in primitive Antiquity no Instance
which having as they thought unduely enough failed in one or two Instances it became the Destruction of a Church state not only in the Churches where such Mistakes had happened as they surmized but unto all the Churches in the World that would hold Communion with them But in these things we have no concernment Other Notions of Schisme besides those insisted on we acknowledge not nor is any other advanced with the least Probality of Truth Nor are we to be moved with outcries about Schisme wherein without regard to Truth or Charity men contend for their own Interest Of those Notions of it which have been received by men sober and learned we decline a trial by none that only excepted that the Refusal of Obedience unto the Pope and Church of Rome is all that is Schisme in the World which indeed is none at all That which is now so fiercely pleaded by some concerning different Observations of external Modes Rites Customes some more or none at all to make men Schismaticks is at once to judge all the Primitive Churches to be Schismatical Their Differences Varieties and Diversities among them about these things cannot be enumerated and so without any disadvantage unto the Faith or breach of Love they continued to be untill all Church Order and Power was swallowed up in the Papal Tyranny ten thousand times more pernicious then ten thousand such Disputes For a Close unto this whole Discourse concerning the original nature and state of Gospel Churches I shall use that Liberty which Love of the Truth puts into my Possession Churches mentioned in the Scripture ordained and appointed by the Authority of Jesus Christ were nothing but a certain number of Men and Women Converted to God by the preaching of the Gospel with their baptized seed associating themselves in Obedience unto Christs Commands and by the Direction of his Apostles for the common Profession of the same Faith the Observance and Performance of all Divine Institutions of Religious Worship unto the Glory of God their own Edification and the Conversion of others These Believers thus associated in Societies knowing the Command and Appointment of Jesus Christ by his Apostles for that End did choose from among themselves such as were to be their Rulers in the Name and Authority of Christ according to the Law and Order of his institutions who in the Scripture are called on various Considerations Elders Bishops Pastors and the like names of Dignity Authority and Office who were to administer all the solemn Ordinances of the Church among them Unto this Office they were solemnly appointed ordained or set apart by the Apostles themselves with fasting Prayer and imposition of hands or by other ordinary Officers after their decease This was the way and method of the Call and setting apart of all Ordinary Officers in the Church both under the Old Testament and in the New It is founded in the Light of Nature In the first Institution of ordinary Church Rulers under the Law the People looked out and chose fit Persons whom Moses set apart to the Office Deut. 1.13 14 15. And in the Call of Deacons Acts 6. The Apostle uses the same Words or words of the same importance unto the Church as Moses did to the People Acts 6.31 asserting the Continuation of the same way and order in their Call And whereas he who was first to be called to Office under the New Testament after the Ascension of Christ fell under a double Consideration namely of an Officer in general and of an Apostle which office was extraordinary there was a threefold Act in his Call the People chose two one of which was to be an Officer Acts 1.23 Gods immediate Determination of one as he was to be an Apostle ver 24. and the obedient Consent of the People in compliance with that Determination ver 26. The Foundation of these Churches was generally in a small number of Believers But their Church state was not compleat until they were supplyed with all ordinary Officers as Bishops and Deacons The former were of of several sorts as shall be proved hereafter And of them there were many in every Church whose number was encreased as the Members of the Church were multiplied So God appointed in the Church of the Jews that every ten Families should have a peculiar Ruler of their own Choice Deut. 1.13 14 15 For there is no mention in the New Testament of any one single Bishop or Elder in any Church of any sort whatever either Absolutely or by way of Preheminence But as the Elders of each Church were many at least more thenone so there was a parity among them and an Equality in Order Power and Rule Nor can any Instance be given unto the Contrary Of these Churches one onely was originally planted in one City Town or Village This way was taken from Conveniency for Edification and not from any positive Institution and it may be otherwise where Conveniency and Opportunity do require it The Number in these Churches Multiplying dayly there was a necessity of the Multiplication of Bishops or Elders among them Hereon the Advantage of some one Person in Priority of Conversion or of Ordination in Age Gifts and Graces especially in Ability for Preaching the Gospel and administring the Holy Ordinances of the Church with the Necessity of preserving Order in the Society of the Elders themselves gave him peculiar Dignity Preheminence and Title He was soon after the Bishop without any disadvantage to the Church For in those Churches in some of them at least Evangelists continued for a long Season who had the Administration of Church Affairs in their hands And some there were who were of Note among the Apostles and eminently esteemed by them who had eminent yea Apostolical Gifts as to Preaching of the Word and Prayer which was the peculiar work of the Apostle These were the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mentioned by Clemens Of the many other Elders who were associated in the Rule of the Church it may be not many had Gifts for the constant Preaching of the Word nor were called thereunto Hence Justin Martyr seemes to assign the constant publick Administration of Sacred Ordinances unto one President And this also promoted the constant presidency of one in whom the Apostolical Aid by Evangelists might be supplyed These Churches thus fixed and settled in one place each of them City Town or Village were each of them intrusted with all the Power and Priviledges which the Lord Christ hath granted unto or endued his Church withal This Power is called the power of the Keys or of binding and loosing which hath respect only unto the Consciences of Men as unto things Spiritual and Eternal being meerly Ministerial Every one of these Churches were bound by the Command of Christ to live in Peace and Vnity through the Exercise of Peculiar sincere and fervent Love among all their Members as also to walk in Peace and useful Communion with all othâ—â— Churches in the
And 2. Such as might be observed any where among the Nations they acted accordingly Those who lived at Jerusalem adhered unto the Temple Worship the whole Church these did so Their Judgement in these things is declared Acts 21.20.21 Thou seest Brother how many thousands of the Jews there are which believe and they are all Zealous of the Law and they are informed of thee that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses saying that they ought not to circumcise their Children neither to walk after the Customes They were not at all offended with Paul that he did not impose the Law on the Gentiles ver 25. but only that as they had been informed he taught the Jews to forsake the Law and to reject all the Institutions of it This they thought unlawful for them And this they spake principally with respect unto the Temple Service as appears by the Advice given unto Paul on this Occasion ver 23 24. Those who lived amongst the Gentiles knew that there was no Obligation on them unto the Sacrifices and especial Duties of the Temple but continued only in the observance of such Rites and Institutions about Meats Washings Days New Moons Sabbaths and the like which the Gentiles were freed from Hence there were two sorts of Churches in those days if not three in Separation more or less from the Apostate Church of the Unbelieving Jews which yet was not finally taken away 1. The Church of Hierusalem and those Churches of Judea which were of the same Mind and Communion with them These continued in the Observance of all the Law and of the Services of the Temple being allowed them by the Apostles 2. Those of the Jews who lived in the Nations and observed all the Rites of the Law which were not confined unto the Land of Canaan And 3. The Churches of the Gentiles which observed none of these things forbearing only their Liberty in one or two Instances not to give the other Offence Some Differences and Disputes happened sometimes about these things and the Practise of them whereon Peter himself fell into a Mistake Gal. 2.14 And there seemes to have been great Disputes about them at Rome chap. 14. Yea it is judged that according unto their different Apprehensions of these things there were two Churches at Rome one of the Circumcision the other of the Gentiles walking in distinct Communion each by themselves However the different Rule of this kind that was between the Churches of Hierusalem and Antioch is sufficiently declared Acts 15. the one Church continuing Zealous of the Law and the other rejoyced for the Consolation of being delivered from it ver 31. Yet was there no Schisme between these Churches but a constant Communion in Faith and Love Such differences in Opinions and Practises were not yet formed into an Interest obliging men to condemn them as Schismaticks who differ from them For not to speak of what Orders and Rules for decency particular Churches may make by common Consent among themselves to make the Observation of Arbitrary Institutions not prescribed in the Scripture upon many Churches to be the Rule of Communion in them and between them which whosoever observe not are to be esteemed Guilty of Schisme which Victor Bishop of Rome first attempted is contrary to the Rules of the Scripture to the Principles of Christian Faith Love and Liberty to the Example of the Apostles hath no countenance given unto it in the Primitive Churches and will certainly make our Differences Endless I judge that in the Beginning of the Chapter the Apostle intends those of the first sort and that as well because he calls them Dogs and the Concision which answers unto the Account he gives of them 1 Thes. 2.14 15 as also because he speaks of them as those who advanced the pretended Priviledges of Judaisme absolutely against Christ the Gospel and the Righteousness of God revealed therein Hereon in opposition unto them he declares that they had nothing to boast of but what he himself had a Right unto as well as they and which he had voluntarily relinquished and renounced for Christ and the Gospel wherein he testifies what he had attained If any one do judge that he intend those of the second sort I will not contend about it because of the severity of Expression which he useth concerning them Gal. 5.12 But discharging the consideration of them the Direction in this place concerns those of the third sort only answering unto that which was prescribed and followed by the Apostles in all Places namely that there should be mutual Forbearance in some Difference of Practise between them and the Gentile Believers His second Enquiry pag. 168 is Whether the Rule which the Apostle lays down be only a Rule of mutual Forbearance I do not find that I said any where that it was only a Rule of mutual Forbearance but that the Words of the Apostle do enjoyn a mutual Forbearance among those who are differently minded pag. 26. And I must here say which I desire to do without offence that there is no need of any farther Answer unto that Part of the Doctors Discourse but a Transcription of that which he pretends to oppose for what is spoken unto that end consists in a perpetual Diversion from the Argument in hand I did not before precisely determine what was the Rule which the Apostle doth intend only proved sufficiently that it was not such a Rule as is pleaded for by the Doctor But the meaning of the Phrase and Expression is plain enough 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is directly used once more by the Apostle Gal. 6.16 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as many as walk according to this Rule and what Rule is that namely what as unto the substance of it he lays down in the Words foregoing ver 14 15. God forbid that I should glory save in the Cross of our Lord Jesus Christ For in Christ Jesus neither Circumcision availeth any thing nor Vncircumcision but a new Creature and as many as walk according unto this Rule that is the Rule of Faith in Christ alone for Justification and Sanctification without trusting unto or resting on any of those things which were in difference among them The Places in Scope Design and manner of Expression are Parallel For this is plainly that which he pleads for in this Context namely that Justification and Sanctification are to be obtained alone through Christ and Faith in him by the Gospel without the least Aid and Assistance from the things that were in Difference among them Wherefore not farther to contend in so plain a Matter the Rule here intended by the Apostle is no Book of Canons but the Analogy of Faith or the Rule of Faith in Christ as declared in the Gospel in opposition unto all other ways and means of Justification Sanctification and Salvation which we ought to walk in a Compliance withal and that with Love and Forbearance towards them that in
be exercised in them without them or their own consent as also their Right unto the choice of their own Officers so that there could be no separation between them on that Account 2. When they begin in good earnest to reform themselves and to take away the unsufferable Conditions of Communion excepted against they may know more of my Judgment if I am alive which I do not believe I shall be as unto Separation though I have spoken unto it plainly enough already 3. It cannot be said that the Churches of the Independents were gathered out of Presbyterian Churches for the Presbyterian Government was never here established and each Party took Liberty to reform themselves according according to their principles wherein there was some difference 4. Had the Presbyterian Government been settled at the Kings Restauration by the Encouragement and Protection of the Practise of it without a rigorous Imposition of every thing supposed by any to belong thereunto or a mixture of Humane Constitutions if there had any Appearance of a Schisme or Separation continued between the Parties I do Judge they would have been both to blame For as it cannot be expected that all Churches and all Persons in them should agree in all Principles and Practises belonging unto Church Order nor was it so in the dayes of the Apostles nor ever since among any true Churches of Christ so all the Fundamental Principles of Church Communion would have been so fixed and agreed upon between them and all offences in Worship so removed as that it would have been a matter of no great Art absolutely to unite them or to maintain a firm Communion among them no more then in the dayes of the Apostles and the Primitive times in Reference to the differences that were among Churches in those dayes For they allowed distinct Communion upon distinct Apprehensions of things belonging unto Church Order or Worship all keeping the Unity of the Spirit in the Bond of Peace If it shall be asked then why did they not formerly agree in the Assemby I Answer 1. I was none of them and cannot tell 2. They did agree in my Judgment well enough if they could have thought so and farther I am not concern'd in the Difference It is therefore notorious that occasion is given unto our refraining free Communion with Parochial Churches by the unwarrantable Imposition of things not lawful for us to observe both in Church Order and Worship nor is it candid in any to deny it though they are otherwise minded as unto the things themselves His second exception is unto a saying which I Quoted out of Justice Hobarts Reports who saith We know well that the Primitive Church in its greatest purity was but voluntary Congregations of Believers submitting themselves to the Apostles and other Pastors to whom they did minister of their temporals as God did move them Hereunto with a Reflection on a dead man I know not why he replies that this is not to the purpose or rather quite overthrows my hypothesis But why so He will prove it with two Arguments The first is this Those voluntary Congregations over which the Apostles were set were no limited Congregations of any one particular Church but those Congregations over which the Apostles were set are those of which Justice Hobart speaks and therefore it is plain he spake of all the Churches which were under the care of the Apostles which he calls voluntary Congregations Answ. 1. Whereas this Argument seems to be cast into the form of a Syllogisme I could easily manifest how asyllogistical it is did I delight to contend with him or any else But 2. The Conclusion which he infers is directly what I plead for Namely that all the Churches under the care of the Apostles were Voluntary Congregations 3. There is Fallacy in that Expression no limited Congregations of any one particular Church no such thing is pretended but particular Churches are Congregations Such were all the Churches over which the Apostles were set and therefore Justice Hobart speaks of them all This then is that which he seems to oppose namely that all the Churches under the care of the Apostles were particular voluntary Congregations as Justice Hobart affirms and this is that which in the close he seemes to grant His second Argument which is no less Ambiguous no less a Rope of Sand than the former is this Those voluntary Congregations over whom the Apostles appointed Pastors after their decease were no particular Congregations in one City But those of whom Justice Hobart speaks were such for he saith they first submitted unto the Apostles and afterwards to other Pastors What then why Justice Hobart could not be such a stranger to Antiquity as to believe that the Christians in the Age after the Apostles amounted but to one Congregation in a City Answ. 1. What this is designed to prove or disprove or how it doth either of them I do not understand But I deny the proposition The Voluntary Congregations over whom the Apostles appointed Pastors were all of them particular Congregations either in one City or more Cities for that is nothing unto our purpose 2. Not to ingage Justice Hobart or his honour I do confess my self such a stranger unto Antiquity if that may be esteemed the reason of it as not to believe that the Christians in the Age after the Apostles amounted to any more than one Church or Congregation in a City and shall acknowledge my self beholding to this Reverend Author if he will give me one undoubted Instance where they so did Only let the Reader observe that I intend not Occasional meetings of any of the Church with or without their Elders which were frequent They met in those dayes in Fields in Mountains in Dens and Caves of the Earth in burying places in houses hired or borrowed in upper Rooms or Cellars whereof a large story might easily be given if it were to our present purpose Dionysius of Alexandria summs them up briefly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Field a Desert a Ship an Inn a Prison were places of our Meetings Euseb. lib. 7. cap. 22. but I speak of stated Churches with their Worship Power Order and Rule But whether there were more such Churches in any one City is a matter of Fact that shall be immediately enquired into All that I here assert and confirm from the words of Justice Hobart is that the Churches in the days of the Apostles were particular voluntary Congregations And the Dr. will find it a Difficult Task to prove that this overthrows my Hypothesis Our Author in the next place opposeth what I affirm'd of the gradual deviation of the Churches after the Apostles from the Rule of their first Institution which hath been already accounted for Sect. 4. p. 224. Upon an occasional Expression of mine about the Church of Carthage in Cyprians time he gives us a large Account of the state of the Church of Carthage at that Time wherein we are not
much concern'd My Words are Vindic. p. 41. Though many Alterations were before that time introduced into the Order and Rule of the Churches yet it appears that when Cyprian was Bishop of the Church of Carthage that the whole Community of the Members of that Church did meet together to determine of things that were of their common Interest according unto what was judged to be their Right and Liberty in those dayes I thought no man who is so Conversant in the Writings of Cyprian as our Author apparently is could have denied the Truth hereof nor do I say it is so done by him onely he takes occasion from hence to discourse at large concerning the state of the Church at Carthage in those dayes in Opposition to Mr. Cotton who affirms that there was found in that Church the express and lively lineaments of the very body of Congregational Discipline Herein I am not concern'd who do grant that at that time there were many Alterations introduced into the Order and Rule of the Church but that the People did meet together unto the Determination of things of their common Interest such as were the choice of their Officers and the readmission of them into the Fellowship of the Church who had fallen through infirmity in time of Persecution or publick offences and divisions is so evident in the Writings of Cyprian wherein he ascribes unto them the right of choosing Worthy and of rejecting Unworthy Officers and tells them that in such Cases he will do nothing without their consent that it cannot be gain-said But hereon he asketh where I had any Reason to appeal to St. Cyprian for the Democratical Government of the Church which indeed I did not do nor any thing which look'd like unto it And he addes that they have this Advantage from the appeal that we do not suppose any Deviation then from the Primitive Institution whereas my words are Positive that before that time there were many Alterations introduced into the Rule and Order of the Church such things will partiallity in a Cause and aiming at Success in Disputation produce M. Cotton affirms that the lineaments of the Congregational Discipline are found in that Church that there is therein a just Representation of an Episcopal Church that is I presume Diocesan because that alone is unto his purpose It is not lawful to make any Church after the time of the Apostles the Rule of all Church State and Order nor yet to be absolutely determined in these things by the Authority of any man not divinely inspired And yet I cannot but wish that all the three parties dissenting about Church Order Rule and Worship would attempt an agreement between themselves upon the Representation made of the state of the Church of Carthage in the dayes of Cyprian which all of them lay some claim unto although it will be an Abridgement of some of their pretensions It might bring them all nearer together and it may be all of them in some things nearer to the Truth for it is Certain 1. That the Church of Carthage was at that time a particular Church There was no more Church but one in that City Many occasional Meetings and Assemblies in several places for Divine Exercises and Worship there were But stated Churches with Officers of their own Members peculiarly belonging unto them Discipline among them such as our Reverend Author doth afterwards affirme and describe our Parochial Churches to be there were none nor is it pretended that there were 2. That in this one Church there were Many Presbyters or Elders who ruled the whole Body or Community of it by common Advice and Counsel whether they were all of them such as laboured in the Word and Doctrine with the Administration of the Sacraments or attended unto Rule only it doth not appear But that they were many and such as did not stand in any peculiar Relation unto any part of the people but concur'd in common to promote the Edification of the whole Body as Occasion and Opportunity did require is evident in the account given of them by Cyprian himself 3. That among those Elders in that one Church there was one peculiarly called the Bishop who did constantly preside amongst them in all Church affairs and without whom ordinarily nothing was done as neither did he any thing without the advice of the Elders and consent of the People How far this may be allowed for Orders sake is worth consideration of Divine institution it is not But where there are many Elders who have equal interest in and right unto the rule of the whole Church and the Administration of all Ordinances it is necessary unto Order that one do preside in their meetings and consultations whom custom gave some preheminence unto 4. That the people were ruled by their own consent and that in things of greatest importance as the choice of their Officers the casting out and the receiving in of lapsed members had their suffrage in the determination of them 5. That there was no Imposition of Liturgies or Ceremonies or any humane invention in the Worship of God on the Church or any members of it the Scripture being the sole acknowledged Rule in Discipline and Worship This was the state and order of the Church of Carthage in those days and although there were some alterations in it from the first divine Institution of Churches yet I heartily wish that there were no more difference amongst us then what would remain upon a supposition of this state For what remains of the Opposition made unto what I had asserted concerning Congregational or particular Churches I may referre the Doctor and the Reader unto what hath been farther pleaded concerning them in the preceding discourse nor am I satisfied that he hath given any sufficient answer unto what was before alledged in the vindication but hath passed by what was most pregnant with Evidence unto the Truth and by a mistake of my mind or Words diverts very much from the state of the Question which is no other but what I laid down before yet I will consider what is material in the whole of his Discourse on this subject SECT 5. p. 234 He says I affirm that as to the matter of fact concerning the Institution of Congregational Churches it seems evidently exemplyfied in the Scripture for which I referre the Reader unto what is now again declared in the confirmation of it And he adds The matter of Fact is that when Churches grew too big for one single Congregation in a City then a new Congregational Church was set up under new Officer with a separate power of Government that is in that City But this is not at all the matter of Fact I do not say that there were originally more particular Churches then one in one City I do grant in the words next quoted by him that there is not express mention made that any such Church did divide it self into more Congregations with new Officers But this
from the beginning However this is no part of our present contest namely whether some while after the days of the Apostles in Churches that were greatly encreased and many Elders in them there was not one chosen as at Alexandria by those Elders themselves to preside among them who in a peculiar manner was called a Bishop But if I mistake not that alone which would advantage his cause is to prove that there were in one City or any where else many not occasional Assemblies of Christians or Church Members but many stated fixed Churches with Officers of their own peculiarly related unto them entrusted with Church Power and Priviledges at least as much as he afterwards pleads to be in our Parochial Churches all under the Government of one single Bishop making up a new Church state beyond that of particular Congregations by their Relation unto him as their common Pastor This I take it is that which should have been prov'd All the difficulty wherewith our assertion is accompanyed ariseth from the multiplication of Believers and the encrease of Churches in the Apostles time or presently after For this seems to be so great as that those in one City could not continue in one Church notwithstanding the advantages of occasional Assemblies The Church of Jerusalem had 5000 in it at the same time the word grew and prevailed at Ephesus and other places whereto I shall briefly answer as hastning unto a close of this unpleasing labour I say therefore 1. Whatever difficulty may seem to be in this matter yet in point of Fact so it was there was no Church before the end of the second Century of any other species nature or kind but a particular Congregational Church only as hath been proved before let any one instance be produced of a Church of one denomination National Provincial or Diocesan or of any other kind then that which is Congregational and I will give over this contest But when a matter of Fact is certain it is too late to enquire how it might be And on this occasion I shall add that if in that space of time namely before the end of the second Century any proof or undoubted Testimony can be produced of the Imposition of the necessary use of Liturgies or of stated Ceremonies of the practise of Church discipline consistent with that now in use in the Church of England it will go a great way in the determination of the whole Controversie between us 2. The admirable prevalency of the Gospel in those days consisted principally in its spreading it self all the World over and planting seminaries for farther conversions in all Nations It did indeed prevail more in some Cities and Towns then in others in some places many were converted in others the tender of it was utterly rejected how be it it prevailed not unto the gathering of such great numbers into any Church solely as might destroy or be inconsistent with its Congregational Institution For not all not it may be half not sometimes a third Part of them who made some Profession of the Truth and attended unto the Preaching of the Word and many of whom underwent Martyrdom were admitted as compleat Members of the Church unto all the parts of its Communion Hence there were many who upon a general account were esteemed Christians and that justly where the Churches were but small 3. It doth not appear that in the next Age after the Apostles the Churches were any where so increased in number as to bear the least Proportion with the Inhaâ—itants of the Cities and Towns wherein they were The Church of Smyrna in the dayes of Polyicarpus may justly be esteemed one of the greatest in those dayes both from the Eminency of the Place and Person who was justly accounted the great Instructer of all Asia as they called him when he was carried unto the Stake But this Church giveth such an Account of it self in its Epistle unto the Churches of Pontus about the Martyrdom of Polycarpus as manifest the Church there to have been a very small number in Comparison of the multitude of the other Inhabitants so as that it was scarcely known who or what they were Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 15. So in the Excellent Epistle of the Churches of Vienna and Lyons unto the Churches of Asia and Phrygia concerning the Persecutions that befell them as they declare themselves to have been particular Churches onely so they make it evident that they bore in number no proportion unto the Inhabitants of the places where they were who could scarce discover them by the most diligent search Euseb. lib. 5. cap 1. 4. As for the Church of Hierusalem in particular notwithstanding the great number of its original Converts who probably were many of them strangers occasionally present at the Feast of Pentecost and there instructed in the knowledge of the Truth that they might in the several Countries whither they immediately returned be instruments of the propagation of the Gospel it is Certain that many years after it consisted of no greater Multitude then could come together in one place to the Mannagement of Church Affairs Acts 15.20 21. Nor is it likely that Pella an obscure place whose name probably had never been known but on this occasion was like to receive any great Multitudes nor doth Epiphanius say as our Authour pretends that they spread themselves from thence to Coelosyria and Decapolis and Basanitis For he affirmes expresly that all the Disciples which went from Hierusalem dwelt at Pella Only he says that from thence the Sect of the Nazarenes took its original which spread it self afterwards in Coelosyria Decapolis and Basanitis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 speaking of that Sect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They dwelled all at Pella Sect. 7. p. 239. He quotes another saying of mine namely that I cannot discern the least necessity of any positive Rule or Direction in this Matter seeing the Nature of the thing and the duty of Man doth indispensibly require it And hereon he Attempts to make advantage in opposition unto another saying as he supposeth of mine Namely that the Institution of Churches and the Rules for their disposal and Government throughout the World are the same stated and unalterable from whence he makes many inferences to countenance him in his Charge of Schisme But why should we contend fruitlesly about these things had he been pleased to read a little farther on the same page he would have seen that I affirm the Institution itself to be a plain Command which considering the Nature of the duties required of men in Church Relation is sufficient to oblige them thereunto without any new Revelation unto that purpose which renders all his Queries Exceptions and Inferences of no use For I do not speak in that place of the Original Institution of Churches whose Laws and Rules are Universal and Vnalterable but our actual gathering into particular Churches for which I say the necessity of Duty is our Warrant and the