Church of Rome and for hindering his Legates from gathering a Council and refusing to come to Rome to answer it Epist. 32. He calls the King of France a ravening Wolf and unjust Tyrant Many great persons he forced to separate after Marriage because they were in the fourth degree of Consanguinity Epist. 51. He tells the King of Denmark that not far from Rome there was a Province possest by vile and sluggish Hereticks and desireth him to send his Son with an Army to conquer them What Province he meaneth I am not certain unless it was the Waldenses § 44. Reader we are greatly beholden to Binnius who hath recorded as Oracles 27 sentences called THE POPES DICTATES by which you may partly know what Popery is 1. That the Roman Church was founded only by our Lord. 2. That only the Bishop of Rome is rightly called Universal 3. That only the Pope can depose Bishops and reconcile them 4. That his Legates must preside in Councils though they be of inferior degree before all Bishops and may pass on them the sentence of deposition 5. That the Pope may depose those that are absent 6. That with those that are excommunicated by him among other things we may not dwell in the same house 7. That to him only it is lawful to make new Laws for the necessity of the time and to congregate new people of Canonical to make an Abbaty and contrarily to divide a rich Bishoprick and unite poor ones 8. That only he may use Imperial Ensigns or Escucheons 9. That all Princes must kiss the feet of the Pope only 10. That only his name may be recited in the Churches 11. That it is the one only name in the World 12. That it is lawful for him to depose Emperors 13. That it is lawful for him in case of necessity to remove Bishops from seat to seat 14. That he may ordain a Clerk from any Church whither he will 15. That one ordained by him may govern another Church and must not take a superior degree from another Bishop 16. That no Synod without his command may be called Universal 17. That no Chapter nor no Book may be accounted Canonical without his authority 18. That his sentence may be retracted by none and he alone may retract all mens 19. That he ought to be judged of no man 20. That no man must dare to condemn any one that appealeth to the Apostolick Seat 21. That the Greater causes of all Churches must be referred to him 22. That the Roman Church never erred nor as the Scripture witnesseth will ever err 23. That the Bishop of Rome if he be Canonically ordained is undoubtedly made Holy by the merits of St. Peter as St. Ennodius Bishop of Papia witnesseth and many holy Fathers confess as is contained in the Decrees of Pope Symmachus 24. That it is lawful for subjects to accuse by his Command and licence 25. That he may depose and reconcile Bishops without Synodal meetings 26. That he is not to be accounted a Catholick who agreeth not with the Roman Church 27. That he may absolve the Subjects of unjust men from fidelity These are put by Bin. among Gregory's Epistles p. 1196. as the Popes Dictates If I had not translated them from such an unquestioned Author that followeth Baronius some would have thought they had been but the forgeries of some Protestant accuser and that the Popes have no such tenents What one is here that is not false and how many of them are horridly arrogant The reading of them would tempt a doubting man to think that the Pope is the Eldest Son of the Prince of Pride exalting himself above all that is called God and arrogating Christ's prerogatives and therefore Antichrist If any would know what Popery is A great part of the description is here given you by their greatest Pope himself and by their chief Historians § 45. Much of his 4th Book of Epistles is to require Princes Prelates and People to forsake the Emperor and choose another and to excommunicate all that will communicate with him yet in his 11th Epist. he reciteth himself how lamentably with tears three dayes in the frost barefoot he begged for pardon and how the compassionate People thought the Pope hard-hearted and tyrannical for not yielding and that at last two Ladyes and an Abbot overcame him to absolve him § 46. Lib. 4. Epist. 28. He tells the Spaniards also that their Kingdom was St. Peter's property But why did he trouble himself to lay claim to particular Kingdoms Would not his claim to all the world serve turn for the particulars Lib. 5. Epist. 4. He clameth the Isle of Corsica § 47. That it may appear that the presumptuous usurpations of the Pope were not consented to by many Bishops he oft complaineth that many Bishops of France Italy and Germany were against him He abundantly chideth and threatneth several particular Bishops for resisting and disobeying him Lib. 6. Epist. 4. he writeth thus to the Bishop of Liege Having read the Letters of your Brotherhood we did not a little wonder that you wrote that which became you not in reverence of the Apostolick seat but that you did with biting invective reprehend me for absolving your Parishioner that lately came to us as if the Apostolick seat had not authority to bind and absolve whomsoever we will and wheresoever we will Know therefore that we are greatly moved against your temerity Indeed one of the tricks of the Papal ambition was to be the Asylum of all wicked fugitives that fled from Church justice in all Countries near them to shew favour to all condemned sinners that would but fly to Rome and appeal to them from the Justice of their Pastors yea and of their Princes too which made their friends to be rather many than good § 48. And the Church of Rome was not yet rich enough with all the Principalities it had got They still kept on the trade of enriching the Pope to save their souls Binnius p. 1233. honoureth us with a record among Gregory 7th Epistles viz. In the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost in the 6th year of the Pontificate of Gregory 7th I Marro Son of Gisler dwelling in the Dukedom of Spoletane for the Redemption of my own and my Parents souls do give deliver and offer to St. Peter Prince of the Apostles and on his Altar all that belongeth to me of the Castle called Moricicla c. Did Christ think how easily Rich men might be saved by giving to the Pope in the name of St. Peter when he said It was harder for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven than for a Camel to go through a Needle 's Eye § 49. Lib. 7. Epist. 3. He saith They that are Latines do all of them except a very few praise the cause of Henry and defend it and charge me with too much obstinacy and impiety against him And if the Latines did so what did the
them what good they had done the City For when they came thither they found three or four bawdy houses but at their departure they left but one But this one reached from the East Gate of the City to the West gate § 194. The Pope returneth into Italy and seeketh to get men to ruine Conrade the late Emperor Fridericks Son The King of Englands brother Richard is first invited but deniâ—d due help and refuseth King Henry the third himself at last is drawn in and furnisheth the Pope with a great deal of money and the Croisado Soldiours are turned against Conrade from the relief of Palestine Bitter accusations against him are published by the Pope which Conrade answereth He and Robert Grosthead the famous Learned holy Bishop of Lincoln dying near together the Pope biddeth all that belong to the Church of Rome to rejoyce with him because these two their greatest enemies are gone And if such wise and holy men as this Bishop were numbered with the enemies of the Pope we may conjecture what he was and did and whether all the Christian World were then his Subjects and whether Rome then needed reformation § 195. But though the King of England had so far served him it was not enough Nothing less than all would serve as Matth. Paris tells us when the King would yet be King and did not fully obey the Pope which he manifested in his rant against this rare and excellent Bishop of Lincoln the occasion of which I think well worthy of our recital as it is in Matth. Paris Anno 1453. pag. 87â— 872. A credible Monk though oft reviled by Baron and Bin for telling truth This Bishop was one of the famousest men in the whole world for knowledge piety and justice The Pope had sent him an order as saith Matth. Paris he often did to him and other English Bishops to do somewhat which the Bishop judged to be unjust It was not so bad as an interdict to silence Christs Ministers but whether it was the promoting of bad Ministers or hindering or excommunicating good men some such thing it was as you may see by what followeth The Bishop writeth a Letter to the Pope and Cardinals in which he tells them That he would obey the Apostolical precepts but that was not Apostolical which was contrary to the doctrine of the Apostles Christ saying he that is not with us is against us And that cannot be Apostolical that is against Christ as the Tenour of the Popes Letters were His non obstante so often repeated shewed his inconstancy and his blotting the purity of the Christian Religion and perturbing the peace and quiet of Societies a torrent of audaciousness procacity immodesty lying deceiving hardly believing or trusting any one on which innumerable vices follow And next after the sin of Lucifer which in the end of time will be that also of Antichrist the son of perdition whom the Lord will destroy with the Spirit of his mouth there neither is nor can be any other sort of sin so adverse and contrary to the doctrine of the Apostles and the Gospel and so hateful detestable and abominable as to kill and destroy souls by defrauding men of the care of the Pastoral office and Ministry which sin those men are known by the most evident testimonies of the sacred Scripture to commit who being placed in power of pastoral care do get the salary of the pastoral office and ministry out of the milk and the fleece of the sheep of Christ who are to be quickened and saved but administer not to them their dues For the very not administring of the Pastoral ministeries is by the testimony of Scripture the killing and destroying of the sheep And that these two sorts of sins though unexpectedly are the very worst and beyond all comparison exceed all other sort of sin is manifest by this that they are in the two existent foreâ—aid things though with disparity and dissimilitudes directly contrary to the best things And that is the worst which is contrary to the best And as for these sins as much as in them lieth one of them is the destruction of the Godhead it self which is superessentially and supernaturally best and the other is the destruction of that conformity and deiâ—ication of souls by the gracious participation of the Divine beams which is the best thing essentially and naturally And as in good things the cause of good is better than the effect so in evils the cause of evil is worse than the effect is manifest that the introducers in the Church of God of such most mischievous destroyers of holy formation and deification in the sheep of Christ are worse than the destroyers or murderers themselves the nearer to Lucifer and Antichrist and in the greater degree of mischief or priority by how much the more superexcelling and by the greater and diviner power given by God for edification and not for destruction they were the more bound to exclude and extirpate such most mischievous murderers or destroyers from the Church of God It cannot be therefore that a holy Apostolick Seat to which all power is given by our Lord Iesus Christ the holy of holies for Edification and not for destruction as the Apostle testified should command or require any thing that bordereth on or tendeth towards so hateful detestable aud abominable a thing to Iesus Christ and so utterly pernitious to mankind or by any way endeavour any thing that tendeth thereunto For this were either a defection or a corruption or an abuse of Christs own power which is evidently most holy and most full or it were an absolute elongation from the Throne of the Glory of our Lord Iesus Christ and the next sitting together of the two foresaid Princes of darkness and of hellish punishments in the chair of pestilence Nor can any one with unspotted and sincere obedience who is a subject and faithful to that same Seat and not by schism cut off from Christ and that holy Seat obey the said mandates and precepts or any endeavours whatever and whensoever they come yea though it were from the highest order of Angels but must necessarily contradict them and rebel with all his strength or power And therefore Reverend Lords from the duty of obedience and fidelity in which I am bound to both the parents of the holy Apostolick Seat and from the Love which I have to Vnion in the body of Christ with it I do only filially and obediently disobey contradict and rebel to the things which in the foresaid Letter are contained and specially because as is before touched they do most evidently tend to that sin which is most abominable to our Lord Iesus Christ and most pernitious to mankind and which are altogether adverse to the Sanctity of the holy Apostolick Seat and are contrary to the Catholick Faith Nor can you discretion for this hint conclude or decree any hard thing against me because all my
b By what Authority c Who made you the Governors of the Empire Judges of such matters Are Rebellions of Sons the Fathers fault d Must the King answer to a Court of Bishops all the evils that he permitteth the Bishops and such others to do e Lotharius had got the Nobles to begin f O humble Princeâ—â— O trayterous Prelates (g) It s pity but he had better Judges (h) It s like he lookt for better measures (i) Of a trayterous Son and Subjects (k) Was this keeping the fifth Commandement and Honouring the King O wicked Son and wicked Prelates l O insulting Traytors (m) They wrote him his Lesson confessed his sins for him (n) A Traytor in open Rebellion o O Oath (p) Against the Arms of his own Sons (q) Rebels must not be resisted in the Lent or Easter (r) Bâ—t a Bishop that doth but differ from the rest in a word must be banished * Here is a new sort of Imposition of the Bishops hands to depose a King so as never to be restored But it failed An. 835. In France Claudius Taurinensis set against Image-worship and going to Rome c. And Ionas Aurel writeth against him citing some of his Sentences too strong for the Answerer but in his Preface professeth that he never read or saw his Book Was not this an excellent Confuter * Thinking they would have resisted him The Pope submitted himself to all that was desired of a Subject till Ludovicus was gone ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ * Because he was made Deacon only by Ebbo ☜ ☜ ☜ * What a Council would those make ☜ ☜ * At Metz. ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☞ ☞ * Saith Harmar to his in Bin. p. 876. Ad hortos a Basilio spectante Michaele interfectus est ☞ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☜ * i.e. I pray you give up your Crown ☞ ☞ ☞ * Did the Church then hold that the Pope was the Supreme Ruler and Judge ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ * How oft have such Oaths and Subscriptions been condemned in Councils And yet alas ☜ ☞ ☜ ☜ * By you * So great and holy a man also against the Pope * Luther was not the first ☜ ☞ So Epist. 62. for another Murderer See also Ep. 184 185 189 190 192. ☞ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☜ * we now know them ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☞ Saith Baronius and Binnius But in the 12th saith Pâ—atina and in the 8th say others What certainty is here ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ * Luitpr aud l. 1. c 8. Anno 897 ☞ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ See Petaâ—â—s Hist. or l. 8. c. 1◠☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ Binius p. 1057. Frodoard in Chronic ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ How many Canons did John and his perjured Adherents violate ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☜ Platina speaks this of John 16. called by him the 17th ☞ ☞ ☞ * He had saith Platina been Schoolmaster to Otho and the King of France and other great men Platina after others tells a terrible story of his Covenant with the Devil and his confession But I rather believe Onuphrius's vindication from that ignorant age This Othâ— was but a Child of ten years of age when he was made Emperor ☞ ☜ ☜ * Onuphr will tell you better that it was the 20th (*) So say Platina and many others also ☞ ☞ (*) Though a King may not ordain a Bishop Question whether he may remove an ordained Bishop from one Church to another the people only accepting him by free consent ☜ ☜ * Remember that rindx rindx lindx rindx rindx lindx lindx rindx An. 1059. (*) But others say the Emperor's consent also was put in lindx lindx rindx Bin. p. 1132. rindx ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ (*) And are Prelates so bad too that rule the Church (*) Was it a mark of a reprobate to obey the King against the Pope b And are there more Popes saved c How few Popes ever wrought miracles d It 's worth the enquiry what is the reason that we have no holy days Churches or Masses named for the honor of Kings save a few of late that were devoted to the Pope * Ah poor Pope then that must answer for all the world or Church even for those at the Antipâ—des which Pope Zachary believed not But you use to say that Kings are not for souls but for the body ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ * These were no Protestant Bishops and either wronged him or he was greatly changed ☜ ☜ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ * See in the Schoolmen what they hold particularly Menrisse de Trinit And Petaâ— de Trinit ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☜ * That is so called by themselves so that not only the denying of transubstantiation but also the Henrician heresie that is Royalty or that Kings are not to be deposed by Popes is here included and all Royalists to be exterminated or else the King to be deposed for not doing it a what upon suspicion ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ * O bountiful Pope ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☜ The Emperor saith Mat. Paris was forced to return from Ierusalem and make a truce because the Pope took his Cities in his absence and sought to betray him to the Soldan ☞ ☞ ☜ Mat. Paris an 1254. p. 893. ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ * Or pardoning Id. ibid. ☜ * The Bishop was for Magna Charta and the countreys liberties * Quod tamen saith he nec faceâ—e potuit nec debuit ☞ * Or Nassau or Holland as they diversly called him ☜ Mat. Paris p. 904. 905. ☞ But Platina saith this was done in Victor the 4ths days ☞ ☜ ☞ He died the first year ☜ ☜ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☜ They forbad any below a Bishop to examine or judge a Priest as his ordinar◠☜ ☜ ☜ The Emperour Lodoviâ— died ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☜ * A calumâ—◠†Vâ—der the Turks ☞ * What was the Church then â— * Which Councils have judged Heresie †Like a Lay Chancellour and his Surrogate ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☞ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ Bin pag. 319. ☞ See the old Reformers Doctrine ☞ ☞ ☜ ☜ ☞ ☞ ☞ ☞ See Paul Iovius and Guiâ—câ—ardine ☞ ☞ See the History of Charles Prinâ—e of Spains's death ☞ ☞ ☞ Councils by Anathema's
Church-History OF THE GOVERNMENT OF BISHOPS AND THEIR COUNCILS ABBREVIATED Including the chief part of the Government of Christian Princes and POPES and a true account of the most troubling Controversies and Heresies till the REFORMATION Written for the use especially of them I. Who are ignorant or misinformed of the state of the Antient Churches II. Who cannot read many and great Volumes III. Who think that the Universal Church must have one Visible Soveraign Personal or Collective Pope or General Councils IV Who would know whether Patriarchs Diocesans and their Councils have been or must be the cure of Heresies and Schismes V. Who would know the truth about the great Heresies which have divided the Christian World especially the Donatists Novatians Arrians Macedonians Nestorians Eutychians Monothelites c. By RICHARD BAXTER a Hater of false History LONDON Printed by B. Griffin for Thomas Simmons at the Princes Arms in Ludgate-Street MDCLXXX THE PREFACE THE great usefulness of History needs not many words to prove it seeing natural inclination it self is so much for it and reason and experience tell men that they cannot spare it as to Natural Civil or Religious use God himself hath highly commended it to us by writing the Sacred Scriptures so much Historically yea and making some of it part of the necessary Articles of our Creed Children that yet understand not the Doctrinal part of the Bible do quickly take delight in the Historical part which prepareth them for the rest Ignorant and ungodly persons that have no true sense of Sacred Doctrine can yet understand and with lesse aversness and weariness read the history Melancholy and sad persons who can hardly bear long Doctrinal studies are often eased and recreated with useful History Man is a part of the Vniverse and every man is a part of the world of mankind and therefore thinketh the case of the whole to be much of his concerne And were not narrow selfishnes much of our Pravity we should take the universal and publick good and Gods Love to it and Pleasedness and Glory in it to be much more our end and the object of our desire and delight than any personal felicity of our own It is a Monster of inhumanity in the Doctrine of the Sadducees Spinosa Hobbes and their bruitish followers that they set up Individual self interest as a mans chiefest end and object of rational Love and desire and own no Good but that which Relatively is Good to me that is either my personal life and pleasure as the end or other things as a means thereto Though Grace only savingly cure this base inhumane maladie yet common reason beareth witness against it and only sense and reason captivated by sense do patronize it Put not the question to a reasonable man though wicked what he can do or doth But what in reason he should do and he cannot deny but that he should think of a more excellent person at the Indies that never will do anything for him as more amiable than himself much more many thousands such And as Goodness and Amiableness are all one so that which is best should be loved best And he that would not die to save his Country is worse than sober Heathens were And he that would not rather be annihilated than all or halfe the world should be annihilated is so basely selfish that I should sooner believe that analogical Reason ruleth some bruites than that true Reason determineth this mans choice Spinosa taketh the Knowledge of our Union with Universal nature which he calleth God to be mans perfection and his chief good in comparison of which sensual Pleasure Riches and Honour are but troubles further then they are a meanes hereto And if he had better known God as the Creator and Governour and end of the material Vniverse which he took to be God and had joyned holy Uniteing Joyful Love to the Universe and specially to the Heavenly Society and above them all to God himself unto this Knowledge and extended it to the perpetuity of an Immortal state he had been happily in the right which missing he became a pernicious seducer of himself and others But thus nature and Grace do loudly tell us that each part should be greatly concerned for the whole and therefore every one should desire to know as much of the whole as he is capable and as tendeth to his duty and delight And how small a parcel of Time or Men or Actions are present or in our daies How little knoweth he that knoweth no more than he hath lived to see What Religion can he have who knoweth not the History of Creation Redemption or the giving of the Holy Ghost or the planting and propagating the Church and also what will be when this life is ended But it is not all History that is needful or useful to us There are many things done which we are not concerned to be acquainted with But the History of the Church of the propagation of the Christian faith and what the Doctrine was that was then received and how it was practised promoted and defended and how it was corrupted invaded and persecuted is of so great use to posterity that next to the Scripture and the illumination of Gods Spirit I remember nothing more needful to be known When Philip Nerius set up his Oratorian exercises at Rome as to win the people they found it necessary to use large affectionate extemporate prayers and expositions and Sermâ—â—s so the next thing found necessary was to bestow constantly one exercise in opening Church-History to the people And this did both entice their attentions by delight and also by fitting reports more to the Papal interest than to the truth did greatly bewitch them into a confident beliefe that the Papal sect was all the true Church and all other Christians were but sectaries and branches broken off and withered and therefore to be burned here and hereafter abusing Joh. 15. 5. c. And I have oft thought that the right use of such an Historical exercise in an ordinary congregation would be of great use to the ignorant vulgar and unlearned zealous sort of Christians For I find that for want of the knowledge of Church-History and how things have gone before us in all former times many errours and sins are kept up that else would more easily be forsaken To instance in some few I. As it was the craft of Baronius who performed that exercise in Nerius his Conventicles at Rome to write afterward his Church-History in Latin so voluminously that few but the Clergie byassed by interest would read it and so the Clergy might be the credited reporters of all to the vulgar so to this day the Papist-Priests contrive to be the Masters and reporters of Church-History as well as of unwritten Tradition and to keep the Laity so far ignorant of it that when they tell men confident stories for their advantage few or none may be able to contradict them and so their report
the Parliaments complaints of Popery Arminianism and Arbitrary Illegalities and after saith Hist. Presb. p. 465. 470. The truth is that as the English generally were not willing to receive that yoak so neither did the Houses really intend to impose it on them though for a while to hold fair quarter with the Scots they seemed forward in it This appears by their Declaration of April 1646 Nor have they lived to see their dear Presbytery setled or their Lay-Elders entertained in any one Parish of the Kingdome that 's false on the other side and yet all must be done by this Parliament as Presbyterians four years before when they were Episcopal distasting only the persons and actions of Bishop Laud Wren and some other present Bishops If I find a man like Schlusselburgiâ—s fall Pell-mell with reproach on all that differ from him or Dr. Heylin speak of blood with pleasure and as thirsty after more as of Thacker Vdall c. or as designing to make Dissenters odious as he and most of the Papists Historians do as the Image of both Churches Philanax Anglicus the Historical Collections out of Heylin I will believe none of these revilers further than they give me Cogent proof I hear of a Scots Narrative of the Treasons Fornications Witchcrafts and other wickedness of some of the Scottish Presbyterians and as for me the Author knoweth not what to call me unless it be a Baxterian as intending to be a Haeresiarcha being neither Papist nor of the Church of England nor Presbyterian nor Independent c. To this I say I have no acquaintance with any Scots Minister nor ever had in my life except with Bishop Sharp that was murdered and two other Bishops and two or three that live here in London therefore what they are I know not save by Fame But though I have heard that Country asperst as too much inclin'd to Fornication I never before heard the Religious part and Ministers so accused Either it is true or false if false shame be to the reporters if true what doth it concern us here or any that are innocent any further than to abhor it and lament it and to be thankful to God that it is another sort of men that are called Puritans in England and that in all my acquaintance with them these 56 years which hath been with very many in many Countries I remember not that ever I heard of one Puritan man or woman save one accused or suspected of fornication and that one yet living though openly penitent hath lived disowned and shamed to this day but I have heard of multitudes that revile them that make a jest and common practice of it Try whether you can make the Inhabitants of this City believe that the Nonconformists or Puritans are fornicators drunkards or perjured and that their accusers and haters are innocent men that hate them for such Crimes But it s possible that you may make men of other Countries or Ages believe it and believe that we wear Horns and have Cloven Feet and what you will but I fear not all your art or advantages on those that are acquainted with both sides But the misery is that faction ingageth men to associate only with their party where they hear reproaches of the unknown dissenters from whom they so estrange themselves that the Neighbours near them are as much unknown to them save by lying same as if they lived an hundred miles from them I remember Mr. Cressey once wrote to me that he turned from the Protestant Religion to the Roman because there was among us no spiritual Books of Devotion for Soul Elevations and affectionate Contemplation And I told him it was Gods just Judgment on him that lived so strange to his Neighbours because they are called Puritans and to their Writings which Shops and Libraries abound with had he read Bishop Halls Mr. Greenhams Mr. Ri. Rogers Mr. Io. Rogers Mr. Hildershams Mr. Boltons Mr. Perkins Mr. Downhams Mr. Reyners Dr. Sibbes c. yea or no better than my own the Saints Rest the Life of Faith the Divine Life the Christian Directory c. or had he read the Lives of Divines called Puritans or but such as two young men published partly by my self Ioseph Allen and Iohn Ianeway he would never have gone from the Protestants to the Papists because of our formality and want of an affectionate spiritual sort of devotion especially knowing what excess of formality is among the Papists and how much it is of the Clergies accusation of the Puritans that they are for too little form and too much pretence of spiritual devotion But if any called Religious or Puritans or Presbyterians be vicious I know no men that so heartily desire their punishment and ejection as those that are called by the same names I thank God that these twenty years while neither Wit Will nor Power hath been wanting against them I have scarce heard of two men if one that have been judged and proved guilty of any such immorality of all the ejected silenced Ministers in this Land I would I could say so of their Adversaries II. And now I must speak to the Accusers speeches of my self I thank you Sir that you feigned no worse against me if I am an Haeresiarcha why would not you vouchsafe to name that Heresie which I have owned I have given you large Field-room in near 80 Books and few men can so write as that a willing man may not find some words which he is able to call Heresie A little learning wit or honesty will serve for such an hereticating presumption 2. I never heard that Arminius was called an Arminian nor â—â—ther a Lutheran nor Bishop Laud a Laudian but if you be upon the knack of making Names you best know your ends and best know how to fit them to it 3. But seriously do you not know my Judgment will not about 80 Books inform you how then can I help it 4. No but you know not what Party I am of nor what to call me I am sorrier for you in this than for my self if you know not I will tell you I am a CHRISTIAN a MEER CHRISTIAN of no other Religion and the Church that I am of is the Christian Church and hath been visible where ever the Christian Religion and Church hath been visible But must you know what Sect or Paâ—â—y I am of I am against all Sects and dividing Parties But if any will call Meer Christians by the name of a Party because they take up with meer Christianity Creed and Scripture and will not be of any dividing or contentious Sect I am of that Party which is so against Parties If the Name CHRISTIAN be not enough call me a CATHOLICK CHRISTIAN not as that word signifieth an hereticating majority of Bishops but as it signifieth one that hath no Religion but that which by Christ and the Apostles was left to the Catholick Church or the Body of Jesus Christ on Earth
General Council there yet both approved by Popes § 83. The Council accuse Rome § 87. Rome's jurisdiction excluded § 87. Adders to the Creed filioque anathematized Pope Martin and Hadrian condemn Photius and enrage the Greek Emperour against them § 89 91. Bishops and Lords depose Carolus Crassus he is put to beg his bread § 92. The Pope above Emperours as Heaven above Earth Kings are Servants and not above the Clergie their Masters § 93. A King ruling ill decreed to be a Tyrant Bishops and Priests lying with their own Sisters restrained but no Bishop is to be accused by a Presbyter nor judged under seventy two Witnesses nor Priests under forty two c. He that would lye with his Sister before so many deserved blame Murderers of Priests denyed Flesh Wine Coaches c. § 96 97. Formosus perjured was the first Bishop that ever was made Pope § 99. CHAP. 11. The Progress of Councils till Leo the 9th especially in the West The Bishops depose Odo and set up Charles § 1. The Virgin Mary's Smock works wonders § 2. Bloud and confusion in Italy § 3. Bishops to be obeyed before Earls and Magistrates Clergy-men must not be put to swear No Presbyter to be depos'd but by six Bishops § 5. Two wicked Popes at once Stephen Iudgeth Dismembreth and drowneth dead Formosus and re-ordaineth those ordained by him § 7 8. The Bishops in Council approve it yet now Papists detest it § 9. When Popes are Infallible § 10. Popes undo what their Predecessors did § 12 13 14 15 17. Platina's description of a Malignant Pope § 14. Popes Crown for fear and uncrown and Crown others § 15. Bishops turn and return and cry Peccavimus Reordinations forbidden § 16. Bad Princes the cause of bad Bishops § 17. Wicked Christians on whom the Pope durst not use Discipline § 17. Schismes and violence on Popes § 18 19 20. Sergius made Pope the third time keeps it by Whores and Whoredom the most wicked of men saith Baron and Bin. § 22. Formosus again executed dead § 23. Questions to the Papists of their holyness and Succession § 24. Photius last deposition and the Murders of Emperours at Constant § 26. A Whore Ruleth at Rome § 21. She maketh her Fornicator Pope Baronius and Binnius hard put to it § 62. Earl Heribert's Son not five years old made Archbishop so Rhemes § 30. Ratified by Pope John lamented by Baron that by this Example other great men did the like Johns end by a Whore § 30. None to marry within the seventh degree as incest § 31. Sergius bastard-Son under age made Pope John by a Whore and destroyed after a Monster saith Binnius § 35. None to fast privately but by the Bishops consent § 36. The King of Denmark made Christian by Henry King of Germany § 39. St. Peter made the example for many Bishopricks to one Bishop § 40. Albericus ruleth and mangleth the Pope § 41. The Bishops judge the Infant before the perjured Monk to be Bishop of Rhemes § 43. The treasons and changes in France § 44. Tryphon illiterate finely cheated of his Patriarchate Const. § 46. Councils do and undo between the two Bishops of Rhemes § 48 49 50. John XII Lawful Pope wanted all things necessary to a Pope say Baronius and Binnius § 51. Notes hereon § 52. Pope John dismembreth his Cardinals § 53. He fled § 53. The Bishops depose him and make another by Otho's means § 54. The horrid charges against Pope John sworn § 53. Baronius and Binnius against his condemnation answered § 56. Two Popes and Churches § 57. Not yet known who was the true Pope § 59. John killed in Adultery § 60. Another Antipope perjuriously chosen § 61. A Martyr § 62 64. An interruption of the Succession by Baronius and Binnius account § 65. Otho saveth them The next imprisoned and strangled § 67. Boniface VII runs to Constantinople with the Church Treasure § 69. Two more Popes § 69 70 72. Boniface murders another Pope and gets in dyeth and is drag'd about the Streets § 74. John XV durst not dwell at Rome § 75. Huâ—o Capet turneth the Bishops § 78. Popes fighting John XVII blinded mangled disgraced kill'd § 84. Seven Electors of the Emperour settled § 85. Gerbert how made Pope § 87. The King of Hungary Converts the Transilvanians § 87. Good Kings § 90. Leutherius Archbishop of Seus against Transubstantiation § 91. Two Popes fighting The King of Hungary converted by the Emperour Henry § 95. The first burning of Hereticks Manichees § 97. Henry the Emperour leaveth his Wife a Virgin § 100. Benedict IX a deboist boy-Pope put out again § 103. Gets in again A third enters at once The Cerberus hired all out by dividing the Church-rents between them do resign but the hirer as pacificator is made Pope § 103. Six that had been Popes alive at once One honest Pope that could not read made a fellow Pope to do it § 104. Gregory VI. The illiterate reconciling Pope variously described put out with the other three and a Fifth chosen § 107. Benedict gets in the third time § 107. Another gets in by Poyson and dyeth the 23 day § 110. Baron answered § 111. The Monster Bened. 9. is he that condemned Berengarius § 112. Leo 9th of the Resurrection Renounceth the Title of Vniversal Patriarchs as of the bawd of Antichrist Peter not Vniversal Apostle Bishops equal varied by City priviledges save in Africa by seniority The Romish Church usurped by no Pastors § 205. Michael Patr. of Const. Rebaptizeth Papists saith they had no true Baptism or Sacrifice § 205. A Roman Council pardon simoniacal Bishops and Priests lest the Church be utterly destitute § 206. The Popes hold a Council in France against the King ' s will A Bishops horrid Crimes and a miracle there Still Clergie and People must chuse every Bishop 207. CHAP. 12. The continuation till the Council of Constance Councils against Berengarius § 2 c. Adulterous and Symoniacal Bishops A miracle § 4 9. Hildebrand a Sub-deacon presideth in Councils and deposeth Bishops and Excommunicateth § 9 10. Bishops by Excommunication rule K. Ferdinand § 12. Milan separated from Rome 200 years § 16. Another Schism § 17 18. Hildebrands new Foundation of Popes by Cardinals Election § 22. Notes hereon § 22. A Roman Council forbids hearing a Fornicator Priest § 23. Bloody fights between two Popes Five years schism § 25. P. Alexander giveth England to William the Conqueror § 27. Councils for each Pope § 28 29. Gods word affirmed violable § 30. Hildebrands War in Rome Italian Bishops against him His hard work Obedience to the Pope forbidden by a Council at Mentz He deposeth the Emperour for seeking to diminish the Majesty of the Church and absolveth his sworn Subjects An Antipope made that sate 21 years the 23d schism The Emperour barefoot in frost three days begs pardon and promiseth obedience He is again cursed by the Pope in Council as
Feed the Flock of God which is among you not out of your reach and hearing in a vast Diocess taking the oversight not by constraint but willingly and on willing men not for filthy lucre but of a ready wind neither as being Lords over Gods Heritage but being Examples to the Flock and when the chief Shepherd shall appear ye shall receive a Crown of Glory that fadeth not away § 11. Nothing is more certain than that the Church for above 300 years had no power of the Sword that is forcibly to meddle with and hurt mens Bodies or Estates except what the Apostles had by miracle And to this day no Protestants and not most Papists claim any such Power as of Divine Institution but only plead that the Secular Powers are bound by the Sword to destroy such as are judged Hereticks by the Bishops and to punish such as contemn the censures of the Church § 12. He that would see more for the Power of Princes vindicated from the Clergies Claim and Usurpation may find much in many old Treatises written for the Emperours against the Pope collected by Goldastus de Monarch and in Will. Barclay but much better in Bishop Bilson of Obedience and in Bishop Andrew's Tortura Torti and in Bishop Buckridge Roffensis of the Power of Kings and much in Spalatensis de Repub. § 13. The Vniversality of Christians is the Catholick Church of which Christ is the only Head or Soveraign but it is the duty of these to worship God in solemn Assemblies and to live in a holy Conversation together and to join in striving against sin and to help each other in the way to life therefore Societies united for these ends are called Particular Churches § 14. When the Apostles had converted a competent number of Christians they gather'd them into such Assemblies and as a Politick Society set over them such Ministers of Christ as are afore described to be their Guides § 15. These Officers are in Scripture called sometime Elders and sometimes Bishops to whom Deacons were added to serve them and the Church subordinately Dr. Hammond hath well described their Office in in his Annotat. which was to preach constantly in publick and private to administer both Sacraments to pray and praise God with the People to Catechize to visit and pray with the sick to comfort troubled Souls to admonish the unruly to reject the impenitent to restore the penitent to take care of the poor and in a word of all the Flock § 16. The Apostles set usually more than one of these Elders or Bishops in every Church not as if one might not rule the Flook where no more was necessary but according to their needs that the work might not be undone for want of Ministers § 17. They planted their Churches usually in Cities because Christians comparatively to the rest were few as Sects are among us and no where else usually enough for a Society and because the Neighbour-scattered Villages might best come to the Cities near them not but that it was lawful to plant Churches in the Country where there were enough to constitute them and sometimes they did so as by Clemens Roman ad Corinth by History appeareth § 18. Grotius thinketh that one City at first had divers Churches and Bishops and that they were gathered after the manner of the Synagogues and Dr. Hammond thinketh that for some time there were two Churches and Bishops in many Cities one of Jews and one of Gentiles and that in Rome Paul and Peter had two Churches whom Linus and Cletus did succeed till they were united in Clemens § 19. There is great evidence of History that a particular Church of the Apostles setling was essentially only a Company of Christians Pastors and People associated for personal holy communion and mutual help in holy Doctrine Worship Conversation and Order Therefore it never consisted of so few or so many or so distant as to be uncapable of such personal help and Communion But was ever distinguished as from accidental Meetings so from the Communion of many Churches or distant Christians which was held but by Delegates Synods of Pastors or Letters and not by personal help in presence Not that all these must needs always meet in the same place but that usually they did so or at due times at least and were no more nor more distant than could so meet Sometimes Persecution hindred them somtimes the Room might be too small Even Independent Churches among us sometimes meet in divers places and one Parish hath divers Chappels for the aged and weak that are unfit for travel § 20. Scotus began the opinion as Davenport Fr. a Santa Clara intimateth and Dion Petavius improved it and Dr. Hammond hath largely asserted it that the Apostles at first planted a single Bishop in each Church with one or more Deacons and that he had power in time to ordain Elders of a different Order Species or Office and that the word Elder and Bishop and Pastor in Scripture never signifie these subject Elders but the Bishops only and saith he there is no evidence that there were any of the subject sort of Presbyters in Scripture-times Which concession is very kindly accepted by the Presbyterians but they call for proof that ever these Bishops were authorised to make a new Species of Presbyters which were never made in Scripture-times and indeed they vehemently deny it and may well despair of such a proof § 21. But for my part I believe the foundation unproved that then there was but one Elder in a Church and think many Texts of Scripture fully prove the contrary But I join with Dr. Hammond in believing that in Scripture-times there was no particular Church that had more stated meetings for publick Communion than one For if there was so long but one Elder there could be but one such Assembly at once for they had no such Assemblies which were not guided by a Presbyter or Bishop in Doctrine Worship Sacraments and Discipline And they used to have the Eucharist every Lords day at least and often much more And one man can be at once but in one place § 22. I have elsewhere fully proved that the ancient Churches that had Bishops were no bigger than our Parishes and few a quarter so big as the greatest of them and consisted of no more than might have such present personal Communion as is before described the proofs are too large to be here recited Ignatius is the plainest who saith that this was the note of a Churches Unity that To every Church there was one Altar and one Bishop with his Fellow Presbyters and Deacons And elsewhere chargeth the Bishop to take account of his Flock whether they all come to Church even Servant-men and Maids Clemens Romanus before him intimateth the like mentioning even Country Bishops Martyr's Description of the Christian Assemblies plainly proveth it Tertullian's Description of them and many other passages in him prove it more fully He professeth that
Governours besides Magistrates but such as Philosophers in their Schools who were appointed to set up Holy Societies for Divine Doctrine Worship and Holy Living and to Guide them accordingly by Teaching Worship and Government by the Word forbidding them the Sword or Force they are said to have the Keys of the Church and the Kingdom of Heaven because as Grace is Glory in the seed the Church is Heaven in the seed and the Pastors were the Administrators of Sacraments and Church-priviledges and therefore the Judges who were fit for them who should be Baptized who should Communicate and in what rank and who should be denied these admonished or excluded and who should as far as belongeth to others be judged meet or unmeet for Heaven And so the Christian Societies were to be kept clean and not to be like the polluted World of Infidels And the Pastors had no other power to use but were to judge only those within and leave them without to Gods own judgment and to the Magistrate who was not to punish any one for not being in or of the Church or for departing from it which is a grievous punishment it self But Magistrates being then Heathens the Christians were hard put to it for the decision of their quarrels For the love of the world and selfishness were but imperfectly cured in them They went to Law before Heathen Judges with each other and this became a snare and a scandal to them S. Paul therefore childeth them for not ending differences by Christian Arbitrators among themselves as if there were none among them wise enough to Arbitrate Hereupon the Churches taking none to be wiser or trustier than their Pastors made them their Arbitrators and it became a censurable scandal for any to accuse a Church-member to a Magistrate and to have Suits at Law By this means the Bishop becoming a Stated Arbitrator thereby became the Governour of the Christians but with his Presbyters and not alone But because Bishops had no power of the sword to touch mens bodies or estates but only to suspend them from Church-Communion and Excommunicate them or impose penitential Confessions on them therefore they fitted their Canons which were the Bishops Agreements to this Governing use to keep Christians under their Government from the Magistrates And so they made Canons that a Fornicator or Adulterer should be so long or so long suspended and a Murderer so long and so of the rest § 36. And when Constantine turned Christian he had many reasons to confirm this Arbitrating Canonical power to the Christian Bishops by the Civil Sanction 1. Because he found them in possession of it as contracters by mutual consent and what could a Christian Prince do less than grant that to the Christians which they chose and had 2. Because the advancement and honour of the Teachers and Pastors he thought tended to the honour of their Religion and the success of their Doctrine upon the Heathens with whom they dwelled Grandure and Power much prevail with carnal minds 3. Because he had but few Magistrates at first that were Christians and none that so well knew the affairs of Christians as their own chosen Bishops And he feared lest the power of Heathen Magistrates over the Christians might injure and oppress them 4. He designed to draw the Heathens to Christianity by the honouring of Christians above them 5. And withal his interest lay most in their strength For they were the fastest part of his Souldiers and Subjects that for Conscience and their own Interrest rejoyced to advance and defend him to the utmost when he lost many of the Pagans and they were not of the spirit of the old Pretorian Souldiers that set up and pulled down Emperours at their pleasure Had Constantine faln the Christians had much faln with him and had the Christians been weakned he had been weakened They were become his strength And he fore saw not the evils that afterwards would follow Some must govern and there were then no wiser nor better men than the Bishops and Pastors of the Churches And their interest in the Christian people that chose them was greatest As now all differing parties of Christians among us Papists Presbyterians Independents Anabaptists would desire nothing as more conducing to their ends than that the King would put the greatest Power especially of Religion into the hands of those Teachers whom they esteem and follow even so was it with the Christians in the days of Constantine And hereupon Laws were made that none should compel Christians to answer in any Court of Justice saving before their own Bishops and so Bishops were made almost the sole Governours of the Christians § 37. By this means it is no wonder if multitudes of wicked men flock'd into the Church and defiled and dishonoured it For the Murderer that was to be hanged if he were no Christian was but to be kept from the Sacrament if he were a Christian and do some confessing penance which was little to hanging or other death And so proportionably of other Crimes Bad Christians by this device were multiplyed The Emperour also being a Christian worldly men are mostly of the Religion of the Prince or highest powers § 38. And no man that can gather an effect from an effectual cause could doubt if neither Nazianzen or any Historian had told it him but that proud and worldly men would strive then to be Bishops and use all possible diligence to obtain so great preferment Who of them is it that would not have Command and Honour and Wealth if he can get it While the great invitation to the sacred Ministry was the winning and edifying of Souls those that most valued Souls desired it yet desired it to be kept from such Poverty and Persecution as exposed them to hinderance and contempt But when Riches Reputation and Dominion were the Baits who knoweth not what sort of Appetites would be the keenest Christ telleth us how hardly Rich men are good and come to Heaven Therefore when Bishops must be all Great and Rich either Christ must be deceived or it must be as hard for them to be honest Christians as for a◠Camel to go through the Needles eye And thus Venenum funditur in Ecclesiam § 39. The World being thus brought into the Church without the cure of the worldly mind and the Guides being so strongly tempted to be the very worst no wonder if the Worldly Spirit now too much rule the Church and if those that are yet of the same Spirit approve plead and strive for what they love and despise the business of the Cross and Christian Humility and Simplicity to this day And if Bishops have done much of their work accordingly ever since Constantine and much before it hath been the Devils Work to carry on his War against Christ and Piety under Christ's own name and the pretence of Piety as an Angel of Light and Righteousness and Unity and to set up Pastors over the Church
Shepherd and the Bishop of our Souls 5. That he hath used them to enlarge confirm preserve and edefie his Church to this day 6. That he maketh the best of them to be the best of men 7. That he putteth into the hearts of all good Christians a special love and honour of them 8. That he useth even the worser sort to do good while they do hurt especially some of them 9. That Satan striveth so hard to corrupt them and get them on his side 10. That Religion ordinarily dyeth away or decayeth when they fail and prove unable and unfaithful 11. That Christ commandeth men so much to hear receive and obey them and hath committed his Word and Keys to them as his Stewards 12. And hath promised them a special reward for their faithfulness and commanded all to pray for them and their preservation and success And the nature of the things tells us that as knowledge in lower things is not propagated to mankind but by Teachers man being not born wise so much less is heavenly wisdom And therefore it is that God is so regardful of the due qualification of Ministers that they be not blind guides nor novices nor proud nor careless sluggards nor self-seeking worldlings but skilful in the word of truth and lovers of God and the souls of men and zealous and diligent unwearied and patient in their holy work And when they prove bad he maketh them most contemptible and punisheth them more than other men the corruption of the best making them the worst § 48. Therefore let us make a right use of the pride and corruption of the Clergy to desire and pray for better and to avoid our selves the Sin which is so bad in them and to labour after that rooted Wisdome and Holiness in our selves that we may stand though our Teachers fall before us Let every man prove his own Work and so he shall have rejoicing in himself and not in others only Gal. 6. But let us not hence question the Gospel or dishonour the Church and Ministry no not any further separate from the Faulty than they separate from Christ or than God alloweth us and necessity requireth As we must not despise the needful helps of our Salvation nor equal dumb or wicked men with the able faithful Ministers of Christ on pretence of honouring the Office so neither must we deny the good that is in any nor despise the Office for the Persons Faults § 49. Especially let us take heed that we fall not into that pernicious Snare that hath entangled the Quakers and other Schismaticks of these times who on pretence of the faults of the Ministers set against the best with greatest fury because the best do most resist them and that revile them with false and railing language the same that Drunkards and Malignants use yea worse than the prophanest of the Vulgar even because they take Tythes and necessary Maintenance charging them with odious covetousness calling them Hirelings deceivers and what not Undoubtedly this Spirit is not of God that is so contrary to his Word his Grace and his Interest in the World What would become of the Church and Gospel if this malignant Spirit should prevail to extirpate even the best of all the Ministry Would the Devil and the Churches Enemies desire any more The very same Men that the Prelates have silenced near 2000 in England these fifteen or sixteen years together are they that the Quakers most virulently before reviled and most furiously opposed § 50. Nor will the Clergies corruption allow either unqualified or uncalled Men to thrust themselves into the Sacred Office as if they were the Men that can do better and must mend all that is amiss Such have been tryed in Licentious Times and proved some of them to do more hurt than the very Drunkards or the ignorant sort of Ministers that did but read the holy Scriptures Pride is too often the reprehender of other Mens Faults and Imperfections and would make other Mens Names but a stepping-stone to their own aspiring Folly As many that have cryed out against bad Popes and Prelates that they might get into the places have been as bad themselves when they have their Will No wonder if it be so with the proud revilers of the Ministry § 51. There is need therefore of much Wisdome and holy care that we here avoid the two extreams that we grow not indifferent who are our Pastors nor contract the Guilt of Church-corruption but mourn for the reproach of the solemn Assemblies and do our best for true and needful Reformation that the Gospel fail not and Souls be not quietly left to Satan nor the Church grow like the Infidel World and yet that we neither invade nor dishonour the sacred Office nor needlesly open the nakedness of the Persons nor do any thing that may hinder their just endeavours and success we must speak evil of no man either falsly or unnecessarily § 52. I thought all this premonition necessary that you make not an ill use of the following History and become not guilty of diabolism or false accusing of the Brethren or dishonouring the Church And that as God hath in Scripture recorded the Sins of the ungodly and the effects of Pride and of malignity and Christ hath foretold us that Wolves shall enter and devour the Flock and by their Fruits of devouring and pricking as Thorns and Thistles we shall know them and the Apostles prophecied of them I take it to be my duty to give you an Abstract of the History of Papal and aspiring Prelacy usurping and schismatical and tyrannical Councils as knowing of how great use it is to all to know the true History of the Church both as to good and evil § 53. Yea Bishops and Councils must not be worse thought of than they deserve no more than Presbyters because of such abuses as I recite The best things are abused even Preaching Writing Scripture and Reason it self and yet are not to be rejected or dishonoured There is an Episcopacy whose very Constitution is a Crime and there is another sort which seemeth to me a thing convenient lawful and indifferent and there is a sort which I cannot deny to be of Divine Right § 54. That which I take to be it self a Crime is such as is aforementioned which in its very constitution over-throweth the Office Church and Discipline which Christ by himself and his Spirit in his Apostles instituted such I take to be that Diocesane kind which hath only one Bishop over many score or hundred fixed Parochial Assemblies by which 1. Parishes are made by them no Churches as having no Ruling Pastors that have the Power of Judging whom to Baptize or admit to Communion or refuse but only are Chapels having preaching Gurates 2. All the first Order of Bishops in single Churches are deposed as if the Bishop of Antioch should have put down a 1000 Bishops about him and made himself the sole Bishop of their
Churches 3. The Office of Presbyters is changed into semi-Presbyters 4. Discipline is made impossible as it is for one General without inferiour Captains to Rule an Army But of this before § 55. Much more doth this become unlawful 1. when deposing all the Presbyters from Government by the Keyes of Discipline they put the same Keyes even the Power of decâ—etive Excommunication and Absolution into the hands of Laymen called Chancellours and set up Courts liker to the Civil than Ecclesiastical 2. And when they oblige the Magistrate to execute their Decrees by the Sword be they just or unjust and to lay Men in Goals and ruine them meerly because they are Excommunicated by Bishops or Chancellours or Officials or such others and are not reconciled And when they threaten Princes and Magistrates with Excommunication if not Deposition if they do but Communicate with those that the Bishop hath Excommunicated 3. Or when they arrogate the power of the Sword themselves as Socrates saith Cyril did Or without necessity joyn in one person the Office of Priesthood and Magistracy when one is more than they can perform aright § 56. And it becometh much worse by the tyrannical abuse when being unable and unwilling to exercise true Discipline on so many hundred Parishes they have multitudes of Atheists Infidels gross ignorants and wicked livers in Church-Communion yea compel all in the Parishes to Communicate on pain of Imprisonment and ruine and turn their censures cruelly against godly persons that dare not obey them in all their Formalities Ceremonies and Impositions for fear of siâ—â—ing against God And when conniving at ignorant ungodly Priests that do but obey them they silence and ruine the most faithful able Teachers that obey not all their imposing Canons and swear not and subscribe not what they bid them § 57. Undoubtedly Satan hath found it his most successful way to fight against Christ in Christs own name and to set up Ministers as the Ministers of Christ to speak indirectly against the Doctrine Servants and interest of Christ and as Ministers of Light and righteousness and to fight against Church-Government Order Discipline and Unity by the pretences of Church Government Order Discipline and Unity and to cry down Schism to promote Schism and to depress Believers by crying up Faith and Orthodoxness and crying down Heresie and Errour Yea to plead God's Name and Word against himself and to set up Sin by accusing Truth and Duty as Sin § 58. II. That which I take for Lawful Indifferent Episcopacy is such as Hierome saith was introduced for the avoiding of divisions though it was not from the beginning When among many Elders in every single Church one of most wisdom and gravity is made their President yea without whom no Ordinations or great matters shall be done The Churches began this so early and received it so universally and without any considerable dissent or opposition even before Emperours became Christians that I dare not be one that shall set against it or dishonour such Episcopacy § 59. Yea if where â—â—t men are wanting to make Magistrates the King shall make Bishops Magistrates and joyn two Offices together laying no more work on them than will consist with their Ecclesiastick work though this will have inconveniencies I shall not be one that shall dishonour such or disobey them § 60. III. The Episcopacy which I dare not say is not of Gods institution besides that each Pastor is Episcopus Grâ—gis is that which succeedeth the Apostles in the Ordinary part of Church-Government while some Senior Pastors have a supervising care of many Churches as the Visiters had in Scotland and are so far Episcopi Episcoporum and Arch-bishops having no constraining power of the Sword but a power to admonish and instruct the Pastors and to regulate Ordinations Synods and all great and common circumstances that belong to Churches For if Christ set up one Form of Government in which some Pastors had so extensive work and power as Timothy Titus and Evangelists as well as Apostles had we must not change it without proof that Christ himself would have it changed § 61. But if men on this pretence will do as Rome hath done pretend one Apostle to be the Governour of all the rest and that they have now that Authority of that Apostle and will make an Universal Monarch to rule at the Antipodes and over all the World or will set up Patriarchs Primates Metrâ—politans and Arch-bishops with power to tyrannize over their Brethren and cast them out and on pretence of Order and imitating the Civil Government to master Princes or captivate the Churches to their pride and worldly interests this will be the worst and most pernicious tyranny § 62. And as it is not all Episcopacy so it is not all Councils that I design this History to dishonour No doubt but Christ would have his Church to be as far One as their natural political and gracious capacities will allow And to do all his work in as much love peace and concord as they can And to that end both seasonable Councils and Letters and Delegates for Concord and Communication are means which nature it self directeth them to as it doth direct Princes to hold Parliaments and Dyets In the multitude of Councellours there is safety Even frequent converse keepeth up amity In absence slanderers are heard and too oft believed A little familiarity in presence confuteth many false reports of one another which no distant defences would so satisfyingly confute And among many we may hear that which of few we should not hear How good and pleasant is it for Brethren to dwel together in Unity And the Concord of Christians greatly honoureth their holy profession as discord becometh a scandal to the world But all this and the measures and sort of Unity and Concord which we may expect and the true way to attain it I have fuller opened in a Treatise entitled The true and only tâ—rms of the Concord of all Christian Churches § 63. When Christians had no Princes or Magistrates on their side they had no sufficient means of keeping up Unity and Concord for mutual help and strength without meetings of Pastors to carry on their common work by consent But their meetings were only with those that had nearness or neighbourhood And they did not put men to travel to Synods out of other Princes Dominions or from Foreign Lands much less did they call any General Councils out of all the Christian Churches in the world But those that were capable of Communion by proximity and of helping one another were thought enough to meet for such ends § 64. And indeed neither nature nor Scripture obligeth us to turn such occasional helps into the forms of a State-policy and to make a Government of friendly consultations And therefore though where it may be done without fear of degenerating into tyranny known times of stated Synods or meetings of Pastors for Concord are best as once a
be true that thou sayest that the face of God is like ours then curse the Works of Origen which deny it If thou deny this be sure thou shalt receive at our hands the punishment due to the impious and open enemies of God O brave disputing Were these mortified Monks Theophilus told them he would do what they would for he hated the Books of Origen But that which ripened the mischief was that the Religious Houses of Egypt having four brothers excellent men for their overseers Theophilus was restless till he got them away to him one of them Dioscorus he made a Bishop others living with him perceived that he was set upon heaping and hoarding money and that all his labour tended to gathering Dr. Hanmer translating this puts in the Margin This Bishop hath more fellows in the World And noting how Theophilus to revenge himself persecuted his own Opinions saith This is a sin against the Holy Ghost would dwell with him no longer but returned to their Wilderness Theophilus prone to anger and revenge endeavoured by all means to work them mischief And the way he took was to accuse them to the Monks for saying to him that God had not a body nor humane shape And he himself was of the same Opinion yet to be revenged of his Enemies he stuck not to oppugn it and sent to the Monks not to obey Dioscorus or his Brethren for they held that God had no body whereas Scripture saith that he hath eyes ears hands and feet as men have which with Origen they deny By this treachery he set them all together by the ears one side calling the other Origenists and the other them Anthropomorphites so it turned to bickering among the Monks yea to a deadly battel And Theophilus went with Armed men and helped the Anthropomorphites So you see if Socrates say true how wickedly this Sainted Patriarch lived and how he came so much engaged against the Origenists whose errours doubtless were worthy blame but many good persons who honoured Origen for his great worth and owned not his errours were called Origenists because they honoured him And that which was erroncous in him was consistent with far greater Learning Piety and Honesty than Socrates Isidore Pelus and others thought there was in Theophilus Either credible Socrates and others were gross Lyars or this Patriarch and Saint was a downright knave or acted like one § 40. Now we are upon it let us prosecute Chrysostome's History â—urther He was a studious holy Monk of a House near Antioch After Nectarius death he was chosen Bishop for his meer piety and worth He was a man of great piety and honesty and an excellent tongue and as good a life but bred in a Cell and not to Courtship knew not how to slatter Courtiers and Court-Prelates He was naturally sharp and cholerick and his conscience told him that a Bishop must not be a dawber nor flatter the greatest wicked men For Bishops in that Age were the Preachers not having a thousand Congregations to preach to He saw even the Clergy addicted to their appetites and he kept a Table for them but eating with great temperance he always eat alone He rebuked the Luxury of the Court and particularly of the Empress who conceived a deadly hatred against him And the Custome of the Court was for the Women much to influence both Emperour and Courtiers and then what Bishop soever was too precise for them and bold with their sins to get a pack of the Worldly Clergy presently to meet together and depose him For Synods of Bishops not the Pope had then the power They would not be seen in it themselves but a Patriarch of Alexandria should call a Synod and do it presently Chrysostome was a man of no Courtship to take off their edges but the worse Courtiers Bishops and Priests were the worse he spake of them And all the honest plain people believed and loved him but the rich and great Prelates abhorred him His own Clergy hated him because he would reform them Those that would not amend he Excommunicated Which they could not bear so that one of his Deacons Serapion openly said to him O Bishop thou shalt never be able to rule all these as thou wouldst unless thou make them all tast of one whip Every one was his Enemy who was his own and was engaged by guilt against his Discipline and Doctrine The Guilty hated him His Hearers loved him Swift-Writers took his Sermons which tell us what he was to this day And it was honesty and policy in Innocent Bishop of Rome to own him who had worth to add to the reputation of his defendants Among other of his accusations one was that Eutropius an Eunuch Chamberlain to the Emperour procured a Law against Delinquents taking the Church for a Sanctuary And shortly after being to be beheaded for a crime against the Emperour he took the Church for a Sanctuary himself And Chrysostome from the Pulpit Preached a Sermon against him while he lay prostrate at the Altar Also he resisted Gainas the Arian who turned Traytor and was destroyed Another cause of Chrysostome's disturbance was that one Severianus Bishop of Gabale in Syria came into Constantinople and Preached for Money and drew away the hearts of the People while Chrysostome was about choosing a Bishop for Ephesus Serapion a turbulent Deacon quarrelled with the Syrian Bishop and would not reverence him The Bishop said If Serapion die a Christian Chirst was not Incarnate Serapion tells Chrysostome the last words without the first Chrysostome forbids Severianus the City The Empress taketh his part and importuneth Chrysostome to be reconciled to Severianus But the Core remained Socrat. l. 6. c. 10. § 41. Socrat. c. 11. Shortly after Epiphanius the Collector of Heresies came from Cyprus to Constantinople and there irregularly in Chrysostomes Diocess played the Bishop ordained a Deacon and called together the Bishops that were accidentally in the City and required them to Condemn the Books of Origen which some did and some refused saith Socrates cap. 12. Obscure men odd Fellows such as have no Pith or Substance in them to the end they may become famous go about most commonly to purchase to themselves Glory and Renown by dispraising such men as far excel them in rare and singular Virtues Chrysostome bore patiently Epiphanius's fault and invited him to take a Lodging at his House He answered him I will neither Lodg with thee nor Pray with thee unless thou banish Dioscorus and his Brethren out of the City and subscribe with thy own Hand the Condemnation of the Works of Origen Chrysostome answered that such things are not to be done without deliberation and good advice Epiphanius in Chrysostome's Church at the Sacrament stands forth and Condemns Origen and Excommunicateth Dioscorus a Bishop and reproveth Chrysostome as taking their part Chrysostome sent word by Serapion to Epiphanius that he did violate the Canons 1. In making Ministers in his Diocess 2. In
administring the Communion without his Licence and yet refusing to do it when he desired it Wherefore he bid him take heed lest he set the People in an uproar for if ought came amiss he had his remedy in his Hands Epiphanius hearing this went away in fear and took Ship for Cyprus The report goeth saith Socrates cap. 13. that as he went he said of Iohn I hope thou shalt never dye a Bishop And that Chrysostome answer'd him I hope thou shalt never come alive into thy Countrey And it so fell out For Epiphanius dyed at Sea by the way and Chysostome dyed deposed and banished § 42. The Empress Eudoxia was said to set Epiphanius on work Chrysostome being hot made a Sermon of the faults of Women which was interpreted to be against the Empress She irritated the Emperour against him and got Theophilus to call a Council against him at Quercus near Chalcedon and Constant. Thither came Sâ—verianus and many Bishops that Chrysostome had deposed and many that were his Enemies for his strictness but especially time-servers that knew the will of the Empress if not the Emperours When they summoned him to appear before them He answered that by the Canon there must be more Patriarchs and he appealed to a General Council yet not denying to answer any where if they would put out his Enemies from being his Judges and that in his own Patriarchate But they sentenced him deposed for not appearing The People were presently in an uproar and would not let him be taken out of the Church The Emperour commanded his banishment To avoid Tumult the third day he yielded himself to the Souldiers to be transported The people hereupon were all in an uproar and it pleased God that there was an Earthquake that night Whereupon the Emperour sent after him to intreat him to return When he came back he would not have officiated till his Cause was heard by equal Judges but the People constrained him to Pray and Preach which was after made the matter of his Accusation Theophilus was hated as the cause of all and Severianus as the second After this Theophilus turned his Accusation upon Heraclides Bishop of Ephesus put in by Chrysostome They condemned him unheard in his absence Chrysostome said that should not be The Alexandrians said It was just They went hereupon together by the Ears and some were wounded and some were killed and Theophilus glad to fly home to Alexandria but was hated by the People § 43. After this a Silver Image of the Empress was set up in the Street and Plays and Shows about it which Chrysostome perhaps too sharply reproached This provoked the Empress to call another Council which deposed Chrysostome for seizing upon his place before a Council restored him He ceased his Office The Emperor banished him His People in passion set the Church on Fire which burnt down the Senatours Court for which grievous sufferings befell them Upon this they forsook the Church and the new Bishop Arsacius an old useless man and gathered Conventicles by themselves and were long called Ioannites from his Name and taken for Schismaticks But they never returned till the Name and Bones of Chrysostome were restored to Honour § 44. The Novatians quarrelled with Chrysostome as too loose in his Doctrine and too strict in his Life because he said in a Sermon If you Sin an hundred times the Church Doors shall be open to you if you repent And Chrysostome angry with Sisinnius the Novatian Bishop told him There should not be two Bishops in one City and threatned to silence him from Preaching He told him that he would be beholden to him then for saving him his labour But Chrysostome answered him Nay if it be a labour go on § 45. XCV A Council in Africk to renew the Priviledges of Churches for Sanctuary that none that fled to them for any Crime should be taken out by force Justice was taken for Wickedness § 46. XCVI Two Councils met one at Const. to judg Antonius Bishop of Ephesus for Simony and many other Crimes Another at Ephesus to judg six Bishops for Simony § 47. XCVII About An. 400. A Council of 19 Bishops at Toletum repress the Priscillians and make divers Canons for Discipline as that a Clergy-Man shall have power over his offending Wife by force but not to put her to death that a man that hath no Wife but one Concubine shall not be kept from Communion though some think that this Concubine is truly a Wife but not according to Law but private Contract and more servile Many other better there be There is adjoyned a Regula fidei of many Bishops approved by Pope Leo in Bin. p. 563. To which are adjoyned Anathematisms against the Priscillians One of them is If any one say or believe that other Scriptures are to be had in Authority and Reverence besides those which the Catholick Church receiveth let him be Anathema Yet the Papists receive more Another is If any one think that Astrology or Mathematicks is to be believed or trusted let him be anathema There are in Bin. divers Fragments cited as of the Tolet. Councils One saith that Arch-Presbyters are under the Arch-Deacons and yet have Curam animarum over all the Presbyters Another determineth that there shall be but one Baptismal Church which is there called The Mother Church with its Chapels in the Limits assigned And another distinguisheth of Offerings made at the Parish Church and Offerings at the Altars which sheweth that then there were no Altars but where the Bishop was § 48. XCVIII Two Councils were held at Carthage about 401. The later about the Donatists § 49. XCIX An. 402. Was the Council Melevitan about certain Bishops quarrels and who should be the highest Bishop in Numidia § 50. C. An. 403. Was the Synod ad Quercum which deposed Chrysostoâ—◠§ 51. Câ— An. 403 404 c. There were seven Councils in Africk against the Donatists to procure Honorius to suppress them by the Sword not as a Heresie but because they rose up by Fire and Sword against the Catholicks and abused and killed many But when Attalus invaded Africk the Emperour proclaimed Liberty for them to quiet them which he after recalled Another Synod was held against them at Cyrta One at Toletum about Ordinations and one at Ptolemais to Excommunicate Andronicus an oppressing Governour § 52. CII The Donatist Bishops held a Council decreeing that when a sentence of banishment was passed on them they would not forsake their Church but rather voluntarily die as many did by their own hands For they took themselves to be the true Church and Bishops and the rest persecuting Schismaticks § 53. CIII The Concilium Diospolitanum of 14 Bishops in Palestine acquitted Pelagius upon his renouncing his Errours § 54. An. 416. A Council at Carthage of 67 Bishops condemned Pelagius and Câ—lestine whom the former had absolved § 55. CV A Council of 60 Bishops at Milevis condemn Pelagius The 22.
Calamitous Divisions which these Prelates and their Councils made He said that Cyril writ against Nestorius that there was but one nature in Christ c. Haec omnia impietatis plena He tells how Cyril preposessed the Bishops before they met and made his hatred of Nestorius his Cause How he condemned Nestorius two days before Iohn of Antioch came How afterward they condemned and deposed one another How Nestorius was in hatred with the Great men of Constantinople which was his fall How Iohn and Cyril's Bishops or Councils would not Communicate with each other How they set Bishops against Bishops and People against People and a mans Enemies were those of his own household How the Pagans scorned the Christians hereupon For saith he no man durst travel from City to City or from Province to Province but each one persecuted his neighbour as his enemy For many not having the fear of God by occasion of Ecclesiastical zeal made haste to bring forth the hidden enmity of their hearts against others he instanceth in some Persecutors and sheweth how Paulus Emisseuus helpt to heal them § 29. In the eleventh Action two Bishops strive for the Bishoprick of Ephesus Bassianus and Stephen that had been Dioscorus Agent And in their Pleas each of them proved that the other intruded by violence into the place both he that first had it and he that thrust him out and took his Seat and one of them made his Clergy swear to be true to him and not forsake him And while the Bishops were for one of them the Judges past Sentence to cast out both and all consented § 30. But after all the crying up of Leo ' s Epistle this Synod set so light by Leo as that some say against his Legates Will they made a Canon 28. That every where following the Decrees of the Fathers and acknowledging the Canon which was lately read made by the 150 Bishops we also Decree the same and determine of the Priviledges of the holy Church of Constantinople new Rome For the Fathers did give or attribute rightly the Priviledges to the Throne of old Rome because that City ruled or had the Empire And moved by the same consideration the 150 Bishops Lovers of God gave or attributed equal Priviledges to the Throne of New Rome rightly judging that the City which is honoured with the Empire and the Senate and enjoyeth equal Priviledges with ancient Queen Rome should also in things Ecclesiastical be extolled and magnified being the second after it The Popes Legates hand Boniface is subscribed to all and Eusebius Doril thus subscribed Sponte subscripsi quoniam hane regulam sanctissimo Papae in Vrbe Roma ego relegi prescentibus Clericis Constantinopolitanis eamque suscepit And this Council was after over and over approved by the Roman Bishops § 31. It in is this Canon notorious 1. That the whole General Council and so the universal Church did then believe that the Popes or Roman Priviledges were granted by the Fathers that is by Councils and stood not by divine appointment 2. That the reason that the Fathers granted them was because it was the Imperial Seat Had they believed that the Apostles had instituted it they had never said that the Fathers did it for this reason and that Constantinople should be equal or next it for the same reason 3. The Church of Constantinople never claimed their Prerogative jure divino as succeeding any Apostle and yet jure Imperii claimed equal Priviledges By all which it is undeniable that the whole Church in that Council and especially the Greeks did ever hold Rome's Primacy to be a humane institution upon a humane mutable reason What the Papists can say against this I have fully answered against W. Iohnson in a Book called Which is the true Church § 32. The Question now is What concord did these late Councils procure to the Churches Ans. From that time most of the Christian World was distracted into Factions hereticating damning deposing aâ—d too many murdering one another One party cleaved to Dioscorus and were called by the other Eutychians These cryed up the Sufficiency of the Nicene Councils Faith as that which they were baptized into and would have no addition nor diminution and condemned the Calcedon Council and excommunicated and deposed those that would not Anathematize it Those that were against them they called Nestorians On the other party were those that had cleaved to Nestorius by name and had been persecuted for his Cause And these were a separate Body and cryed down the other as Eutychians Those called Orthodox or Catholicks cryed down Nestorians and Eutychians by name indeed defending the same Doctrine as Nestorius except as to the fitness of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the chief of Nestorius his first adherents perceiving that indeed they were of one judgment united with these against the Eutychians I have shewed that all of them seemed to make all this stir but about some Words which one party took in one sense and the other in another For these words the Bishops cast the Christian World into confusion destroyed Love and Unity under a pretence of keeping the Faith so that the Church was lamentably militant Bishops against Bishops in continual enimity and rage The Emperours at their wits end not knowing how to end the Ecclesiastical odious Wars And the Heathens hardened and deriding them all and their Religion § 33. When the Council was ended and Proterius made Bishop of Alexandria in Dioscorus stead the City was in so great discontent that the Emperour Martian was fain to send a Lay-man to mollifie them for they would not endure a Calcedonian Bishop They set more by Dioscorus than before so that Binnius incredibly saith they offered him Divine Honour § 34. It was not long till Martian dyed and then they let the World know that it was Emperours and not Popes or Councils that they regarded They thought then they might shew their minds and what they did Liberatus in Breviario Evagrius Nicephorus and others tells us at large But I will give it you in the words of the Egyptian Bishops which conformed to the Council Bin. p. 147. One Timothy Elurus of Dioscorus Party who had gathered separated Congregations before since the Council of Calcedon got some Bishops of his own Party to make him Archbishop The people soon shewed their minds though it deposed their Archbishop They set up Timothy and he presently made Ordinations of Bishops and Clerks c. while he thus went on a Captain Dionisius came to drive him out of the City The people rage the more against Proterius He gets into the Baptistry to avoid their rage a place reverenced even by the Barbarians and the fiercest Men But these furious people set on by their Bishop Timothy neither reverencing the Place the Worship nor the Time which was Easter nor the Office of Priesthood which is a Mediation between God and Man did strike the
the more for this Accusation he seemed an Hypocrite indeed but whether an Heretick I know not The Scot Heretick is accused as denying the Church Canons and the meaning of some Fathers despising the Synods Laws saying that he may still be a Bishop for so he was though he had two Sons in Adultery saith Boniface perhaps in Marriage and as he saith holding that a Man may marry his Brothers Widow and that Christ at his Descent delivered all Souls out of Hell This was a foul Error indeed if truly charged These were charged by Boniface and the Roman Synod to be forerunners of Antichrist and how like are Aldebert's Pretensions to many Roman Saints A Prayer also of Aldeberts was read in which he prayed to Angels under several strange names Bishops and Presbyters had Votes in this Council and subscribed the Hypocrites condemnation Bin. p. 218. But there is no certainty that he named more than three Angels § 23. Stephen the 2d was chosen Pope by ALL THE PEOPLE after Zachary and dyed four days after suddenly § 24. Stephen the 3d was chosen by all the People saith Anastasius Aistulphus King of the Longobards threatned Rome took their Gifts and demanded their Subjection The Pope after Gregory the 2d's Rebellion was glad to send to the Emperor to crave an Army to save Rome and Italy when he could get no help from Constant. he sent to Pepin King of France One that he had made King by Rebellion was obliged to help him and by an Army forced Aistulphus to covenant to restore Ravenna and many other Italian Cities not to the Emperor whose Agent claimed his right and was denied by Pepin but to the Pope to reward him and get the pardon of his sins Aistulphus broke his Covenants Pepin with another Army forceth him to deliver them and returneth Aistulphus dyeth Desiderius a Captain by Usurpation invadeth the Kingdom Radchis that had been King before and went into a Monastery and the Nobles of the Longobards resist the Rebel He sendeth to the Pope offering him all that he could desire more Cities to help him The Pope maketh his own bargain with him as he did with Pepin and Charles Martell before and by the help of the French setleth the Rebel Desiderius in the Kingdom Pepin maketh a Deed of Gift of all the foresaid Cities to the Church of Rome Was this Constantine's Gift He gave away another Mans the Emperor's Dominions and with Desiderius's additions now the Pope is become a Prince § 24. CCXXVIII We come now to a great General Council of 338 Bishops at Constantinople An. 754. under Constantine Copronymus against the worshiping of Images The Adversaries of it will not have it called the 7th General Council because divers Patriarchs were absent and it decreed say they against the Truth They not only condemned the worshiping of Images and Germanus Constantinus Georgius Cyprius Jo. Damascenus and other Worshipers of them as Idolaters but destroyed the Reliques of Martyrs and exacted an Oath of Men by the Cross and the holy Eucharist that they would never adore Images but execrate them as Idols nor ever pray to the holy Apostles Martyrs and blessed Virgin saith Baronius and Binnius p. 235. But the 15th and 17th definitions of this Council recited in the 2d Nicene Council shew that they were not so free from praying to the Virgin Mary and Saints as we could wish they had For they decree we must crave her intercessions and theirs but they forbad praying to their Images § 25. The Acts of this Council not pleasing the Adversaries are not delivered fully to us but it fell out that their Decrees are repeated word by word in the 2d Nicene Council and so preserved § 26. There is one Doctrinal definition of this Council owned also by their Adversaries the 2d Concil Nicen. which by the way I will take notice of about the glorified Body of Christ and consequently ours after the Resurrection that it is a Body but not Flesh Bin. p. 378. defin 7. Siquis non confessus fuerit Dominum nostrum Iesum Christum post assumptionem animatae rationalis intellectualis Carnis simul sedere cum Deo Patre atque ita quoque rursus venturum cum Paterna Majestate judicaturum vivos mortuos non amplius quidem Carnem neque incorporeum tamen ut videatur ab iis à quibus compunctus est maneat Deus extra crassitudinem carnis Anathema To which saith the Nicene Council by Epiphanius Huc usque recte sentiunt Patrum traditionibus convenientia dicunt c. Two sorts I would have take notice of this 1. The Papists who say that the Bread is turned into Christ's very Flesh when he hath no very Flesh in Heaven And therefore the meaning must be of the Sacramental Sign that it is the Representation of that real Flesh of Christ which was sacrificed on the Cross. 2. Some prejudiced Protestants that think he that saith Our Bodies and Christs in Heaven will not be Flesh and Blood formally and properly so called but spiritual glorious Bodies doth say some dangerous new assertion such gross thoughts have gross heads of the heavenly state To these I say 1. You contradict the express words of God's Spirit 1 Cor. 15. Flesh and Blood cannot enter c. That it is meant of Formal Flesh and Blood and not Metaphorical Sin is plain in the Context see Dr. Hammond on the Text. 2. Give but a true definition of Flesh and Blood and it will convince you of itself 3. You see here that you maintain an Opinion which these two even adverse General Councils anathematized § 27. By this Council we may see how little General Councils signifie with the Papists either as to Infallibility Authority or preservation of Tradition longer than they please the Pope As to their Objection that call it Pseudo-septimum that the Pope was not there I answer 1. No more was he by himself or Legate at the first of Constant. called the 2d General Council as Binnius professeth 2. Is not the Church the Church if the Pope be not there Then he may choose whether ever there shall be more General Councils as indeed he doth § 28. CCXXIX An. 756. King Pepin called a Council in France declaring that things were so far out of order that he could attempt but a partial Reformation leaving the rest till better times The first Canon was that every City have a Bishop of old 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signified every such Town as our Corporations and Market-Towns are And by all the old Canons and Customs except some odd ones every such Town of Christians was to have a Bishop and in Phrygia Arabia c. the Villages had Bishops saith Socrates c. And in many places the Villages had Chorepiscopos which Petavius Annot. in Epiphan Arian fully proveth were true Bishops And yet then the most of the People in most Countries were without the Church
Irene will do as the Pope would have her She is as much for Pictures as the Pope himself She calling this Council at Constantinople the old Soldiers bred up under the former Emperors being against Images haeresin medullitus imbiberant saith Binnius p. 396. Would not endure them in Constantinople but routed them At which the Empress being troubled dismissed the Bishops till they had purged the Army of those old Soldiers and then she called the Bishops to Nice and there they knowing their errand before-hand damned themselves and their Brethren that had held the former universal Synod and set up Images again § 55. By the way I appeal from Pride and Ignorance to Christian Sobriety and Reason how the taking down of Images can in the Roman sense be called an Heresie unless it be an Article of Faith that Images must or may be used And can any Man that ever read and believed the Scriptures and the Writings of the first four hundred years believe that having or worshiping of Images or Saints by Images is an Article of Faith or necessary to Salvation The best of them that any Man can plead with Modesty is that they are indifferent or lawful and useful to some Persons The Papists tell us now that they would not compel us to bow toward Images but leave it to our liberty Must it be Heresie and the Christian world cast into distractions about it when yet this Image-worship is Idolatry in the sense of one part of Christians and but indifferent and convenient to the ignorant that have other helps enow in the sense of others O what a Plague hath it been to the world to have a worldly Clergy invade the Churches § 56. At the meeting of this Council we have first the Call and Title in which 1. The Emperor and his Mother are called the Governors of the whole world Orbis Terrarum And yet our Papists as W. Iohnson in his Novelty represt c. would make Men believe that if they find but such a saying of a Council or of the Church it must needs signifie more than the Empire even all the Earth indeed 2. It 's expresly said over and over that this Council was called by the Emperor and by their Decree and Command Tharasius beginneth with telling them the need of Reformation for Images and reporting how they were assaulted at Constantinople when they met there and so removed to Nice c. § 57. Next the Letters of the Empress and her Son are read in which they are before made know what they must do They are told what Paul Const. on his Death-bed said for Images and that Tarasius would not take the Patriarchate till he had promise of a Council to restore them and some hopes of it The Emperor here saith that he called and Congregated the Synod and that ex universo terrarum orbe out of the whole earthly world and yet it was only out of the Roman Empire § 58. When the Bishops business was so well made known by the Woman that called them first three Bishops that had been lately forward speakers against Images in the former General Council under Constantine did humbly confess their sin to the Council and asked forgiveness that is Basil. Ancyrae Theodorus Myron and Theodosius Amorii And first Basil Bishop of Ancyra gave them his Creed in which he professed to believe in the Trinity and to embrace the intercession of the Mother of God and of the heavenly Powers and of all the Saints and with all honour to receive and embrace their holy Reliques firmly believing that he may be made Partaker of their holiness Also that he embraceth the venerable Images which the Oeconomy of our Lord Iesus Christ c. and of the inviolate Virgin our Lady the Mother of God and of the holy Apostles Prophets Martyrs and all Saints and giveth them due honour Rejecting and cursing with all his mind that called the 7th Synod that was gathered by a depraved mind and madness a false Council as alien to all Piety and Religion impiously barking against Ecclesiastical Legislation reproaching venerable Images and commanding them to be taken out of the Churches c. And to shew his zeal and lead others the way he delivereth in nine Curses or Anathemas One against those that demolish Images Another against those that expound the Scripture words against Idols and Gentile Images as against Christians Images Next he execrateth all that embrace not Images so it is now become necessary unto salvation Another Curse is against those that favour them that are against Images c. Was not the Church ill used by her Bishops when they are sure to be cursed by them one year cursing all that be for Images and another cursing all that be not for them Was it such a cursing Clergy to make a cursed Church that Christ ordained And that the Council might not suspect that this Bishop was a Temporizer and changed his Opinion with the Times first he professeth to declare all this With his whole Soul Heart and Mind and next he wisheth That if ever by any means he revolt again from Images he may be alienated from God the Father Son and Holy Ghost and the Catholick Church And thus he renounceth Repentance cursing himself if ever he repent § 59. Tharasius and his Synod glorifie God for this excellent Confession And next cometh Theodore Bishop of Myros and he doth the like and is joyfully received And next cometh Theodosius Bishop of Amorium and he more dolefully lamenteth that being a sinner and seduced he had blattered out many evils untruly against venerable Images and therefore confessing his fault he condemneth and curseth or detesteth himself resolving hereafter to do the same thing which he had cursed or spoken ill of and to teach it to the world and begging to be received among Christians though unworthy Next he offereth his Libel viz. First I approve receive salute and venerate before all things the intemerate Image of our Lord Iesus Christ our true God and the blessed Mother Virgins who brought him forth without seed whose help protection and intercession I pray for night and day that she may help me a sinner as having that power from him whom she brought into the world Christ our God And I receive and venerate the Images of Saints Apostles Prophets Martyrs Fathers Eremites not as Gods c. And with all my mind I beseech them to intercede with God for me that I may find mercy in the day of judgment On the same account I venerate the Reliques of Saints c. So he proceedeth also to his Curses and first he anathematizeth all that venerate not Images Then he curseth those that reproach them And next that speak evil of them And next he curseth those that do not from their hearts teach Christian People the veneration of holy and honourable Images of all Saints which from the beginning pleased God Qu. 1. Where shall we
have Painters enow 2. Where shall we have Money to pay them 3. Where shall we find room to hold them 4. Is not here a new Article of Faith and a new Commandment necessary to Salvation 5. Was not their Church Universal as it stood before all or most here cursed 6. Was it not a hard matter to be saved or be a Conformist on these terms when a Man that did but doubt of Images yea that did not teach them to the People and that from his heart must be cursed 7. Was not such a cursing sort of Bishops a great Curse Shame and Calamity to the Church Did they not tempt Infidels to curse or deride them all while they thus cursed one another even their Councils Tharasius joyfully received all this and Constantine Bishop of Constance in Cyprus said That this Libel of Theodosius drew many tears from him I suppose of joy And now they all saw the way § 60. But now cometh a Crowd more to do their Pennance Hypatius Bishop of Nice Leo Rhodi Gregory of Pisidia Gregory of Pessinunt Leo of Iconium Nicolas of Hierapolis Leo of Carpathium And now Tarasius was sure of them he groweth more upon them and will know of them Whence it was that in the last Council they did what they did against Images whether it was through meer Ignorance or by any reason that drew them to it If through Ignorance he bids them give a Reason how they came to be so ignorant If upon any Reason to tell what that Reason was that it might be refuted Leo Bishop of Rhode answered We have sinned before God and before the Church and before this holy Synod Ignorance made us fall from the Truth and we have nothing to say in our own defence Tharasius would know what Reason now moveth and changeth them some say because it is the Doctrine or Faith of the Apostles and Fathers Another alledgeth a saying as of the Antioch Council and another as of Isidore Pelus which the learned Reader examining may see what proof it was that Images were brought into Churches by it 's worth the noting But another alledgeth the Apostles and Prophets Tradition But what 's the proof And did not the Council at Constant nor the Bishops in the Reign of the three former Emperors know what Tradition was Was it unknown till now How came it now known then Or who told it this Council when the last knew it not Or if the last were false Knaves how shall we be sure that these were honest Men Or that the same Men were suddenly become wise and honest Tharasius asketh one of the Bishops Leo How it came to pass that he that had been ten or eight years a Bishop never knew the Apostolical Tradition for Images till just now He answered Because through many Ages or Times Malice endured and so wicked Doctrine endured and when this persevered for our sins it compelled us to go out of the way of Truth but there is hope with God of our salvation But Constantine Cypr. answereth him You that are Bishops and Teachers of others should not have had need to be taught your selves Leo replied If there were no expression of sin in the Law there would be no need of Grace Another Hypatius replied with the rest We received ill Doctrine from ill Masters Yea but saith Tarasius The Church ought not to receive Priests from ill Teachers Hypatius Bishop of Nice replieth Custom hath so obtained § 61. Hereupon the Synod desired to be informed on what terms Hereticks were to be received when they returned so the Canons were brought and read And though many Canons and Fathers have said that no Repentance for some Crimes must restore a Man to the Priesthood though it must to the Church and there is an Epistle of Tarasius put by Crabbe before this Council in which he determineth that a Simoniack may be received upon Repentance to Communion but not to his Office yet Tarasius here being desirous of their return knowing that these Penitents that renounced the errors of their Education and former practice would draw others to conformity with them did resolutely answer all that was objected against their reception § 62. Here in Crab. p. 472. a question fell in upon their reading the Proofs that repenting Hereticks were by the Church to be restored to their Bishopricks and Priesthood What Hereticks those were And it was answered that they were Novatians Encratists and Arrians and Manichees Marcionists and Eutychians And then one asketh Whether this Heresie against Images was greater or less than all those And Tharasius answereth like a Stoick Evil is always the same and equal especially in matters Ecclesiastical in the Decrees of which both great and small to err is the same thing for in both God's Law is violated O Learned Patriarch worthy to be the setter up of Church-Images A venerable Monk that was Vicar of the Oriental Patriarch answereth That this Heresie is worse than all heresies and the worst of all Evils as that which subverteth the Oeconomy of our Saviour Note Reader how the Patriarchal Thrones did govern the Church and this Council and by what reasons Images and Saints intercessions were set up Arrianism Manicheism Marcionism no Heresie that denied the essentials of Christianity no evil was so bad with them as to deny Church-Images c. And so the late General Council and Bishops for three Emperors Reigns had been under the worst of Heresies and Evils worse than Arrianism itself § 63. But here Constantine the Notary of the Const. Patriarchate happily brought in so pertinent a Testimony as much made for the pardon of the penitent Bishops He read out of the Council of Calcedon how the Oriental and other Bishops that had lately set up Eutyches and Dioscorus in the 2d Ephesian Council cryed at Calcedon We have all sinned we all ask forgiveness And how Thalassius Eusebius and Eustathius cryed We have all erred we all ask forgiveness And after them Iuvenal and after him the Illyrican Bishops cryed We have all lapsed we all ask pardon And so the President was undeniable and effectual These were not the first Bishops that went one way in one Council under one Prince and cryed peccavimus for it as Heresie in the next § 64. But Sabas the Monk starts yet a greater doubt than this and that is whether they had true Ordination and so were true Bishops For seeing they were bred in the times of Heresie which had prevailed under so many Emperors and had Heretical Teachers it 's like they had Heretick Ordainers seeing the late Council shewed what the Bishops then were And the Fact was confest that they were Ordained by Bishops that were Hereticks that is against Church-Images and praying to Saints for their intercession and using Reliques The Bishop of Rome's Vicars pleaded hard against their Ordination but Tarasius knew what a breach it would make in the Church if a General Council
only to Creatures under Heaven intend to give it to Creatures in Heaven for they appropriate it elsewhere to God by which they greatly differ from Aquinas and such Papists § 71. Note also that whether well or ill both these adverse Councils curse Pope Honorius as an Heretick see Crab. p. 560 c. § 72. Another Argument which the first 7th Council at Const. useth against Images in Churches is that Christ himself hath chosen and instituted such an Image as he would be represented by and that is the Bread and Wine in the Sacrament and therefore we must not presume to make another as if he had not done it well This sheweth that this General Council and the Church then held that the Bread was not nullified nor become Christ's Essence but was the Image or Representation of his broken Body and so called The Body of Christ as we say of Caesar's Image This is Caesar. But the adverse Council or the Answer raileth at this as an abominable Speech Crab. p. 567. as if the Sacrament might not be called The Image of Christ though de re they seem not at all to differ saith the Constantine Council Imaginem totam electam viz. substantiam panis mandavit apponâ— ne scilicâ—t humanâ effigie figurata idolatria induceretur A Deo tradita Imago Carnis ejus panis scilicet Divinus impletus est Spiritu Sancto cum poculo quoque sanguinis lateris illius vivificantis Haec igitur vera incarnatae dispensatienis Christi Dei nostri Imago sicut praedictum est quam ipse nobis verus naturae vividus Creator propriâ voce tradidit § 73. Note also Crab. p. 568. that the Constantin Council plead That this use of Images began neither by the Tradition of Christ nor of the Apostles nor of the Fathers And that the Answer saith that The Veneration of Images was delivered with many other things without Scripture from the Apostles time c. Here note 1. How those Papists in particular which I have elsewhere answered are confuted who say that Tradition is universal sure known constant and no Churches pleaded Traditions against each other at least in necessary things or Faith but if we have not the right now it must be because the Councils went all to Bed in one mind and rose in another You see here that the 2d Nieene Council took the Doctrine of the former to be Anathematized Heresie and that 338 Bishops in one of the Councils and the most under many Emperors and 350 Bishops in the other Council pleaded Tradition against each other But sure any Man that hath read the Fathers of the first 300 or 400 years will easily see which of them was in the right excepting the sign of the Cross. 2. Note also that it is here confessed that there is no Scriptural Tradition of this use of Images § 74. In the Definitions of the Constantine Council it is to be noted 1. That they are not so much against the intercession of the Virgin Mary or Saints as the Protestants mostly are nor as the Papists make them For Crab. p. 589. they say Defin. 15. If any confess not holy Mary ever a Virgin properly and truly the Parent of God and superior to every Creature visible and invisible and doth not with a sincere Faith crave her Intercessions as having this liberty with him that is born of her God let him be Anathema And Defin. 17. If any confess not that all who from the beginning to this day before the Law and under the Law and in the Grace given of God being Saints are venerable in the presence of God in soul and body and doth not seek their intercessions as having liberty with God to intercede for the world according to Ecclesiastical Tradition let him be Anathema Were not these Men high enough in Creature-worship to escape the Curse of Hereticks 2. I noted before how they do Defin. 7. conclude that Christ's Body glorified is not proper Flesh and yet not incorporeal but his true Body § 75. That you may see that this Council were of one mind in the conclusion they all say Omnes se credimus Omnes idem sapimus Omnes approbando probando volentes subscripsimus c. We all thus believe against Images We are all of one mind We all subscribe willingly as approving c. Only Germanus George and Manzurus supposed to be Damascene are found among the Anathematized Dissenters Crab. p. 592. § 76. The 7th Action of the Nicene Synod containeth their Definition in which they deny indeed Latria to Images but yet say more than before That they that see the Pictures may come to the memory and desire of the Prototypes as by the sight of the Cross and by the holy Gospels and holy Oblations For the honour of the Image resulteth to the Prototype and he that adoreth the Image in it adoreth the described Argument So that they that began lower in the conclusion came up to Adoration They all profess full consent and curse all that bring Scripture against Images and that call them Idols c. They curse the last Council as Rugiens Conciliabulum and three dissenting Bishops and three former Patriarchs of Const. two more Bishops they add They curse all that receive not Images and all that salute them not in the Name of the Lord and his Saints and that care not for unwritten Tradition of the Church Next they write an Epistle to the Empress and her Child applauding them and adding that Denying Latria to them they judge them to be adored and saluted and pronounced every one Anathematized that is so minded as to stick at and doubt of the Adoration of Images and this as empowred by God's Spirit so to curse them which Anathema say they is nothing else but separating them from Christ. Judge now what the use of such Councils was To curse Men and separate them from Christ and that if they do but doubt of adoring Images Reader if thou believe that in these Heretications Separations and Damnations of such they were of Christ's mind and did his work and served not his Enemy against him and his Church I am not of thy mind nor am ever like to be Another Epistle they wrote to the People and one Tharasius sent to Adrian § 77. Some Canons of theirs are added of which this is the third Every Election of a Bishop Priest or Deacon which is made by Magistrates shall remain void by the Canon which saith If any Bishop use the Secular Magistrates to obtain by them a Church let him be deposed and separated and all that communicate with him The 4th Canon is Paul saith I have desired no Mans silver or gold c. If therefore any one exacting money or any other thing or for any affection of his own shall be found to drive from his Ministry or to segregate any one of his Clergy or to shut the venerable Temple forbidding in it
he was taken up again the first time and buried again But I suppose that it was but his Fingers that were cast in the first time and the Corps after or else he was found after the first time Platina saith It is reported but not of any certainty that some Fisher-men found the Corps and buried it â—t St. Peters Church and that while it was doing the Church Images bowed to it It 's well Vncertainty was put into the Story and that some thought this moved Sergius to envy but that indeed it was because Formosus party were against his Papacy It seems by this that the Fisher-men found him after the first casting into Tyber or else his burial by them could not be called the occasion of Sergius fact So little rest had this Popes Carkass being twice buried twice taken up twice judged and executed after death and twice cast into Tyber But saith Platina Popes now seeking and getting the Popedome by liberty and ambition disregarding Gods Worship exercised enmity against one another no otherwise than do the cruellest Tyrants glutting their own lusts the more securely when there are none left to restrain Vices This wicked Man for almost seven Years enjoyed the fruits of his iniquity § 24. Here Baronius and Binius forget to answer the great difficulty 1st How the Roman succession escaped from being interrupted 2. And also where was the Roman Church while such Reigned as were no Popes 3. And also where was its Holiness and Infallibility when it had the worst of Men as they say themselves thus set over them as their Heads But they are careful Nequis pusillanimus ex hoc facto scandalum accipiat lest weak minded persons should be scandalized by this And they tell us as a wonderful providence of God That so great was the reverence to the Church of Rome that even when such Men invaded the Popedome unlawfully being even in the Churches censure rather Apostatical than Apostolical yet those that did but hear who was Pope especially the Northern Countries that were far off obeyed them so that any Man may understand by how great a providence God Governeth the universal Church which when it was set on Fire at the will of Whores and all mischiefs and scandals did increase and it was feared it would be divided by a great schisme yet God defended it from all heresy and schisme all Nations persisted in one bond of Faith and Covent of Obedience Indeed Gods providence is wonderful that saveth his true Church from such wicked usurpers and keepeth a Union of all in Christ But this is no honour to the wicked usurpers when now fifteen schismes had divided them and many more afterward nor was it any honour or blessing to them that gave up their Kingdoms to such usurpers If these were no Popes but intruding Whore-mongers was it a blessing to the World to be deceived and to take those for Popes that indeed were none But had not they then a seeming Church and indeed none when an essential part was Null § 25. CCCVIII They say that Anno 909. A Council at Soissons ordered some Reformation § 26. Leo called Philosophus Son to Basilius Macedo this while was Emperour in the East who being formerly suspected and imprisoned by his Father upon some suggestion of Photius and Santabacenus was revenged on them when he Reigned and deposed Photius and put him into a Monastery This is the rest that Ambition procureth Thus Sin is the misery of the Sinner Alexander his Unckle was Gardian to Leo's Son the Father being Dead Nicholas had before been made Patriark and upon offence deposed and Euthymius put in his place But Alexander deposed Euthymius and restored Nicholas and having spent thirteen Months in Drunkenness and Lust Bled to Death and Constantine seven Years old with his Mother Zoe Reigned alone Constantine Ducas rebelling is subdued The Bulgarians Conquered by Leo Phocas General who thereupon aspiring to the Crown was slain Eight Years after Zoe is removed and one Romanus Lecapenus made Guardian and Caesar He advanced three of his Sons to the like honor to strengthen himself and made his other Son Theophilact Patriark instead of Stephen though he was but sixteen Years old He Married his Daughter to the Bulgarian King and then began to despise the Emperour and prefer himself God punished this by permitting his own Son Stephen to depose and banish him into an Island At last Constantine awaked and deposed them all and ruled himself in Drunkenness and Debauchery fifteen Years and then dyed or as some say was killed by Romanus's Sons After him Nicephorus Phocus a succesful Warrior but a bad Man Ruled The Church called him bad for oppressing them with Taxes His Wife Theophanon and Iohn Trimisces who succeeded killed him Thus hath the World been Governed and this is the profit of Ambition § 27. The next Pope is Anastatius the 3d. who sate two Years and two Months In this time the Eastern Emperour Leo published Constitutions which Baronius and Binius p. 1053. deride as ridiculous in imitation of Iustinian because he presumed to make Church Laws § 28. Lando was the next Pope Anno 912. and sate 6. Months and 22. Days say Baronius and Binius This Man at the importunate instaâ—ce of that most potent most noble and most impudent Whore Theodora who had prostituted one of her Daughters Marozia to Pope Sergius and the other Theodora to Aldebert Marquess of Tuscia and hereby had obtained or kept the Monarchy of the City who was Pope if this Whore was Monarch did create John whom she most filthily doted on a Presbyter of Ravina the Bishop of Bononia and Peter Arch-Bishop of Ravenna being Dead he made him there Arch-Bishop And a little after so filthy an act he Died. Luitpraud l. 2. c. 13. § 29. Next cometh this same Man Anno 912 Iohn 10. saith Platina and others the Son of Pope Sergius by the Whore Marozia say some but it s not like because Marozia killed him But it s more probable as Onuphrius noteth that it was not this Iohn but the next that was Son to Sergius and Marozia This Pope saith Baron and Bin. is he that the famous Whore Theodora for great comeliness of person doted on and saâ—th Luitpraud got him made Arch-Bishop of Ravenna and after Pope of Rome that she might not lye with him so seldome as the distance between Rome and Ravenna would necessitate So say they this impudent Man being powerful at Rome by the strength of a Whore is made a false Pope and wicked invader of the Seat where they shew how this Whore obtained her power But was this no interruption of the succession neither nor a nullifying of the Papal Church while he sate 13. or as Onuphrius 14. Years and more No saith Baron and Bin. He that was an Invader Theif and Robber by the after Consent of the Roman Clergy became the lawful Pope of Rome 1. We see then what the
not temporal estates under them to take any oath of allegiance or fidelity to any Lay-man The 44. is to invalidate Lay-Ruler's Laws about ecclesiastical matters as Glebes Mortuaries c. the rest I pass by § 196. In this Council besides the Albigenses and Abbot Ioachim Almaricus a learned man was condemned they say he said that All Christians were Christs members and they add how truly is doubtfull suffered by the Iews with him that Christ's body was no more in the sacrament than in another thing That Incense as offered in the Church is Idolatry That every Christian is bound to believe that he is a member of Christ That if Adam had not sinned there should have been no generating in Paradise nor difference of sexes We must take these things on the report of such as Sanders with some other that they charge on him for which when they had killed him with grief they dig'd up his corps and burnt it as they were then burning multitudes of the living § 197. In this Council Stephen Laughton Arch-Bishop of Canterbury was deposed for taking part with the Barons of England against King Iohn whose case was now become the Pope's when he had given him his Kingdom in so much that when the Arch-Bishop confessed and begged absolution his Holiness answered By St. Peter Brother thou shalt not so easily get absolution who hast done so many and so great injuries not only to the K. of England but to the Church of Rome § 198. Let the Reader note that 1. General Councils are the Papists religion 2. That this is one of their greatest approved General Councils 3. That therefore by their Law and Religion they are bound to exterminate all Protestants and that all Princes must be deposed that will not execute it and their dominion given to others that will 4. That all Protestants and others called Hereticks are dead men in Law and want but judgment and execution where their Law is in force 5. That the Henrician heresie is one that is judged such by their Councils 6. That therefore not only all Protestant Kings but all Papists that are for the safety and power of Kings against the Popes pretended power of condemning and deposing them are Hereticks to be exterminated and burnt by many Canons 7. Therefore Kings are beholden to the Protestant reformation disabling the Pope to execute his Laws and Religion for their Crowns and lives 8. That when ever any King or others set up Popery and the power of their Laws and Councils in a Kingdom that is reformed the subjects are presently dead men in Law being to be destroyed as Hereticks though Policy or want of power may hinder the execution 9. Qu. Whether it be lawful for any King or in his authority so to destroy his Kingdom or to make all or the generality of his subjects dead men in Law 10. Whether by these Laws the Pope and his consenting Bishops have not published themselves to be hostes Regum et Regnorum if not humani generis and are not so to be esteemed § 199. Note also that D. Heylin in his Certamen Epistolare against me answereth that it is not Kings but temporal Lords that are mentioned in this Council and that he and Bishop Taylor and Bishop Gunning and Bishop Pearson in their dispute published by Terret or Iohnson and others before them have maintained that these Canons were but proposed by Pope Innocent and not consented to and passed by the Council But to the first It is clear 1. that by Domini Temporales Councils ordinarily mean Emperors and Kings as well as any others 2. That the words of the Council are express eâdem nihilominus lege servatâ circa eos qui non habent Dominâ—s principales And to the 2d I answer 1. The Church of Rome actually taketh this for one of their approved General Councils and will not be beholden to our Bishops for their friendly favour and excuse And therefore it is all one to us whether the Council consented or not 2. Mr. Henry Dodwel in his late considerations how far Papists may be trusted by Princes c. pag. 167 pag. 174 c. hath fully answered all the reasons given by these Bishops as Terret did in part before and hath added abundant proof that these Canons were passed in that Council 1. From the Council at Oxford where Stephen Laughton himself was 2. From Mat Paris who is alledged for the contrary 3 From Gregory 9th's decertals 4 From the case of Iohn Blunt elect Bishop of Canterbury recited by Mat. Paris an 1233. 5. From Otto the Pope's Legate in M. Paris an 1237. and that London Council 6. From the Popes Letter to Otto an 1238 in M. Paris 7. From Honorius the 3d's condemnation of Rich. de Marisco Bishop of Durham 8. From P. Clement the 5th's Bull for King Philip the Fair. 9. From the Council of Tarragon 10. From the Council at Vienna under Clement 4th 11. From the General Council at Lyons under Gregory 10th 12. From the Sabine Council in Spain 13. From a Council at Toledâ— under Benedict 12th 14. And from the Council of Trent 15. From the Common sense of the Case of Abbot Ioachim 16. And of the word Transubstantiation 17. And of annual confession All taken as setled by this Council So that as the Papists will not accept of this Charity of our Bishops in excusing their Religion from this part of guilt so there is little place indeed for an excuse § 200. The Papists themselves though they have many other Councils and instances to prove the Popes Claim and Practice of deposing Princes yet will not let go this as being a famous General Council But when here in England they would excuse their Religion from Rebellion they use to say that this being not an Article of Faith but a Canon of Practice they are not bound to take it as infallible To which the said Mr. Henry Dodwell ibid. pag. 185. hath largely answered to which I refer the Reader adding only that That which must be Believed to be of God is not alway matter of practice yet what must be done as by the wiâ— of God must alwaies be first the matter of faith we must believe that it is God's will before we can obey it as his will The full answer see as aforecited § 201. In the performance of the Laws of this Council multitudes called hereticks were burnt Their St. Dominick preaching to the people to perswade them to take arms under the Sign of the Cross to destroy the Hereticks for to get pardon of their sins so that from first to last many hundred thousand some say two millions but that seemeth too much were killed in France Savoy Germany Italy and other Countreys see Sam. Clerk Martyrol and Arch-Bishop Vsher deâ—success Eccles Thus hath Papal Rome been built and maintained by Blood Rebellion and Confusion under pretence of Church Purity Unity and Government and all by
shew for it than they If others stick on this let me tell them that Magistracy is as truly from God as the Ministry And let ever a King on Earth shew me an uninterrupted succession giving him Title to his Crown and I will shew him a more undoubted succession or Title to my Ministry But here 's no room to discuss this Question 9. Object But you are Parish Priests and no true Ministers because you have not true Churches Answ. All the Christians in our Parishes that consent are our Flock And we undertake to prove the truth of such Churches not only against scorn but against all the Arguments that can be brought 10. Object But you have not the Spirit and therefore are no true Ministers Answ And how prove you that we have not the Spirit The approvers admit none but such as they think have the Spirit He that is sanctified hath the Spirit Prove us unsanctified and we will resign our Office Object You read your Sermons out of a Paper therefore you have not the Spirit Answ. A strong Argument I pray you take seven years time to prove the consequence As wisely do the Quakers argue that because we use Spectacles or Hour-glasses and Pulpits we have not the Spirit It is not want of your abilities that makes Ministers use Notes but it 's a regard to the work and the good of the Hearers I use Notes as much as any man when I take pains and as little as any man when I am lazy or busie and have not leisure to prepare It 's easier to us to preach three Sermons without Notes than one with them He is a simple Preacher that is not able to preach all day without preparation if his strength would serve especially if he preach at your â—ates 11. Object But the true Ministry is persecuted but so are not you but are Persecutors of others Answ. 1. For our persecuting others be so merciful as to prove it to us that we may lament it If punishing wicked men and Seducers be persecuting not only Paul was such that wished they were cut off that troubled the Galatians but God himself would be the greatest of all persecutors that will lay you in Hell without repentance and then you will wish your old persecution again And if we be not persecuted what means the reproaches of you and all the Drunkards and Malignants about us But I pray you envy us not our lives and liberties and a little breathing time Do you not read that The Churches had rest throughout all Judea and Galilee and Samaria and were edified and walking in the fear of the Lord and in the comfort of the Holy Ghost were multiplied Acts 9. 31. Envy not a little prosperity to the Church Doth not Paul pray that the Gospel may run and be glorified and that we may be delivered from unreasonable wicked men 2 Thes. 3. 1. Sometimes you can say that more glorious days are promised and that the Saints shall rule the world Unmerciful men It is but a while ago since we had our share of sufferings Since that the Sword hath hunted after us Many of our Brethren are yet in America that were driven thither at this time in Spain and Italy and Germany and Savoy Alas what do our Brethren suffer in the same Cause and Calling that we are in And do you reproach us with our mercies if we be out of the Furnace but a little while in one corner of the world Object 12. You work no Miracles to confirm your Doctrine Answ. It is true nor do we need It is confirmed by Miracles long ago If we brought a new Gospel or as the Papists gave you not our Doctrine on the credit of Scripture but Scripture and all on our own credit then you might justly call for Miracles to prove it But not when we have nothing to do but expound and apply a Doctrine sealed by Miracles already Again I say Let any Prince on Earth that questions our Calling shew his Title to his Crown or any Iudge or Magistrate to his Office and if I shew not as good a Title to mine lâ—t me be taken for a Deceiver and not a Minister Christian Reader as ever thou wouldest be sanctified confirmed and saved hold fast to Christ Scripture Ministry and Spirit and that in the Church and Communion of Saints and abhor the thoughts of separating them from each other A second Sheet for the MINISTRY Iustifying our Calling against Quakers Seekers and Papists and all that deny us to be the Ministers of Christ. THe corruption of the Romish Church being most in the Errours and Vices of the Priests which made men abhor the offering of the Lord 1 Sam. 2. 17. the reproach which they brought upon themselves did much prepare men to hearken to the Reformers The observing of this and of the necessary dependance of the people on their Pastors hath caused the Papists to bend their force against the Ministers of the Reformed Churches and to use all their wit to defame their Persons and Callings and make them seem ignorant unworthy or no Ministers to the people On this Errand they send abroad their Agents this is the saving Gospel that the Seekers Quakers and their Brethren preach that the Scripture is not the Gospel or Word of God and that we are no true Ministers Whatever Doctrine we are preaching the Opposers work is to call us Deceivers and ask How we prove our selves true Ministers My work therefore at this time for the sake of the ignorant in our Assemblies shall be to acquaint them with our answer to this demand And I shall give it you in order in certain Propositions Prop. 1. Both in the Old and New Testament there is mention of two distinct sort of Ministers of Gods appointment First such as received some new Revelationâ— either a Law or a particular Message immediately from God so that the people could not be sure that their Doctrine was true till they were sure that the men were sent of God These were called Prophets in the Old Testament and Apostles Prophets c. in the New So Moses received the Law from God and the following Prophets their particular Messages So the Apostles received the Gospel from Christ and so did the Seventy and other Disciples that conversed with him and other Prophets and Evangelists had it by immediate inspiration All these were necessarily by Miracles or some Infallible Evidence to prove their own Call before the Hearers could receive their Doctrine for this was their Message The Lord hath commanded me to say thus or thus to you or The word which the Lord spake to me is thus or thus This sort of Ministers the Papists and Seekers do confess But besides these there is a second sort of true Ministers whose Office is not to receive from God any new Doctrine Law or Message but to proclaim the Laws already delivered and teach men the Doctrine already revealed and to oversee
worthy to be talkt with that believe no body and confess themselves such Lyars that they would have no body believe them It was not all that saw Christs Miracles or Resurrection or the Apostles miracles It seems the rest were not bound to be Christians Even as Clem Writer told me that no man is bound to believe that Christ did Rise again or the rest of Christianity that seeth not Miracles himself to prove it adding withall that indeed Antichrist may do Miracles and so it seems for all the talk miracles themselves would not serve if they saw them 11. Is it not to put a scorn on God Almighty to lay that the Glory of all his most miraculous works should be buried to all that saw them not and that Parents should not tell them to their Children or Children should not believe them if they do 12. It s injurious to Posterity that the knowledge of the most wonderful works of God shall be only for the good of them that see them and that all ages after shall be never the better 13. It tends to make men mad and as Ideots that must know and believe no more then they see what kind of folks must these be that know not that there is either Prince or Parliament City or Countrey or any folks in the world but those they have seen This will stand with trading converse Subjection Societies and its doubtful whether such are capable of managing estates or should not be put under others as Ideots 14. Children cannot learn to read nor speak without some kind of belief of them that teach them nor can they obey their parents nor learn any trade nor obey Physitians so that this conceit of incredulity is against the Nature livelihood and life of man 15. And they would tie God to be at the beck of every unreasonable Infidel that shall say Though all the Town have seen thy Miracles yet I will see my self or else I will not believe 16. They expect that God should overturn the course of Nature for if Miracles be as ordinary as the operations of Nature they are confounded 17. And by this they would cross themselves and make Miracles uneffectual For if they were ordinary few would be moved by them as any proof of a Divine Testimony were it as ordinary for the Sun to go backward as forward who would take it for a Miracle To this Clem Writer answers me that Miracles were convincing in the first Age when they were common Answ. How common Not as natural operations Nor so as for all Countreys or persons to see them 500 saw Christ at once after his Resurrection 5000. were once miraculously fed but as this was not every days work so what was this to others And in that it was but for an age and rarely in after ages shews that they were not for every mans eyes 18. What need we more proof then actual experience that God doth not often now work miracles And he that saith the Gospel and Christian faith and Church and Ministry are therefore ceased its like will not take it ill to be taken himself for an Heathen or Infidel 19. And we have experience of millions that still do actually and stedfastly believe in Christ without Miracles and many have laid down their lives on that belief therefore without miracles men may believe But to this Clem Writer saith to me These believers of all sorts condemn each other as Hereticks Answ. But not as Infidels None but the ignorant or passionate condemn all other sorts as Hereticks The sober do not And it is not enough to prove you a bastard if an angry Brother call you so 20. Because this sheet alloweth me not room I intreat the Reader to peruse these Texts which tell him aloud that the word and works of God must be believed by Tradition though without Miracles Exod. 10. 1 2. 12. 14 17 26 27 42. Deut. 11. 2. to the 22. 29. 22. to 28. Iosh. 4. 6 7. 22. 24. to 32. Psalm 48. 13. 78. 1. to 9. 102. 18. 145. 4. 89. 1. Ioel. 1. 2 3 4. Acts 1. 8. 2. 32. 5. 30 31 32. 10. 38. to 42. 13. 30 31. 1. 22. 4. 33. 22. 15. 26. 16. 23. 11. 2 Tim. 2. 2. Iohn 20. 29. 19. 35. 15. 27. 12. 17. 5. 33. 1. 15 32 34 Luke 4. 22. 1 Pet. 5. 1. And that you would read my Determination of this very Question in my Book against Infidelity I proceed to the next Proposition 3. This ordinary Ministry for teaching ruling and publick worship was ordained by Christ to continue till his coming and doth yet continue and did not cease when the extraordinary Ministry ceased I prove it Matth. 16. 18. Vpon this Rock will I build my Church and the Gates of Hell shall not prevail against it The Church never did nor can subsist without its Officers who are an Essential part of it as it is a Political Body and the first and most eminent part as it is a Community And therefore if the Ministry be extinct the Gates of Hell have prevailed against the Church And then Christ is overcome or hath broke his promise and then he were not Christ So that if Christ be Christ the Church and Ministry continue So Luke 1. 33. He shall reign over the House of Jacob for ever and of his Kingdome there shall be no end Isa. 9. 6 7. Of the encrease of his government and peace there shall be no end Psalm 145. 13. Thy Kingdome is an everlasting Kingdome and thy Dominion endureth throughout all Generations Christ ruleth by his Officers in his Church if Church or Ministry had an end his Kingdome had an end and he reigned not for ever Matth. 28 20. Loe I am with you alway even to the end of the world To this express promise Clem. Writer hath no wiser an answer but that it is conditional If they teach men to observe all things that Christ hath commanded then he will be with them else not Repl. This is your forgery here is no such words but an absolute promise His being with them is to support and help them in his work And will you feign Christ to promise them help on condition they do it without The further Cavils against this Text and others the London Ministers in their Vindication have answered at large Eph. 4. 11 12 13. The Pastâ—rs and Teachers are given to the Church for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry for the edifying of the body of Christ till we all come in the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God to a perfect man c. Extraordinary and ordinary Officers are here conjoyned who between them are to perfect the building the first laying the foundation and the others building thereon 1 Tim. 6. 13 14. I give thee charge in the sight of God that thou keep
Isydore Pelusiota that knew him describe as heynously proud and turbulent and Socrates as the first Bishop that himself used the Sword Dioscorus raged at the second Council of Ephesus against dissenters and all in Zeal against Nestorian Heresie But what dreadful work his Eutychian Party and Successors made I have elsewhere shewed And all as against Heresie The Anthropomorphite zealous Egyptian Monks thought it was Errour â—nd Heresie which they so furiously opposed when they forced Theophilus Alexand to dissemble to save his Life It was zeal against Origens Heresie and Errour which set Epiphanius and Theophilus Alexand. upon their irregular and inhumane opposition to Chrysostome What abundance of gross Errours doth Philastrius vend while he thinks that he reciteth other Mens Errours I have given a Catalogue of them elsewhere Besides the inconsiderable Errours which he calleth Heresies It was zeal against the Arian Heresie which made Lucifer Calaritanus occasion the Schism between two Bishops at Antioch and after become the Head of a separating Party because he would not receive the returning Arians into Communion as others did And it was zeal against Heresie that made others for this account him a Heretick and call his Followers Luciferians It was zeal against Errour which made both the Novatians and the Donatists run into Errour and keep up their Parties as more pure from the Crimes of Idolaters Traditors Libellaticks and other Criminals Sulpitius Severus describeth Ithacius as a man that cared not what he said or did and the rest of the Synod of Bishops about him as unfit to be communicated with that would bring Christianity it self into reproach by their furious opposition to Hereticks And who would have thought but these Bishops had been very good men themselves that were so zealous against the Priscillianists as to procure the Death of some and the Banishment of others and bring Martin himself and other strict abstemious people into the suspicion of Priscillianism It was a zeal for Christ and against supposed Errour which raised the doleful contention about the corruptibility of Christ's Body one Party calling the others Phantasiasticks and the other calling them Corrupticolae into which Errour the Emperour Iustinian himself did lapse and become a zealous Heretick as the Orthodox Party called him And even S. Hilary Pictav l. 10. de Trinit seemeth not free when p. 205. he saith In quem quamvis aut ictus incideret aut vulnus descenderet aut nodi concurrerent aut suspensio elevaret afferrent quidem haec impetum passionis non tamen dolorem passionis inferrent ut telum aliquod aut aquam perforans aut ignem compungens aut aera vulnerans Omnes quidem has passiones naturae suae infert ut perforet ut compungat ut vulneret sed naturam suam haec passio illata non retinet dum in naturâ non est vel aquam forari vel pungi ignem vel â—ra vulnerari quamvis natura teli sit vulnerare compungere forare Passus quidem Dominus Iesus Christus dum caeditur dum suspenditur dum crucifigitur dum moritur sed in Corpus Domini irruens passio nec non fuit passio nec tamen naturam passionis exercuit Cum poenali ministerio illa desaevit virtus corporis sine sensu poenae viâ—â— poenae in se desaevientis excepit Yet it was against Heresie that the good Father defended this worse than many of Philastrius yea or Epiphanius ' s Heresies Pag. 208. saith he Metum Domino haeresis ascribit Timuisse tibi O Haeretice Dominus gloriae passionem videtur Pag. 216. Non vis impie haeretice ut transeunte palmas clave Christus non doluerit neque vulnus illud nullam acerbitatem teli compungentis intulerit Interrogo cur pueri ignes non timuerint nec doluerint So p. 217 218. you see how little heed is to be given oft to good mens outcries against Heresie He spake much better ibid. pag. 231. In simplicitate fides est in fide justitia est in confessione pietas est Non per difficiles nos Deus ad beatam vitam quaestiones vocat nec multiplici eloquentis facundiae genere solicitat In absoluto nobis ac facili est aeternitas Iesum suscitatum à mortuis per Deum credere ipsum esse Dominum confiteri And Lib. 11. p. 332. initio Non enim ambiguis nos erraticis indefinitae doctrinae studiis dereliquit vel incertis opinionibus ingenia humana permisit statutis per se oppositis obicibus in libertatem intelligentiae voluntatisque concludens ut sapere non nisi ad id tantum quod praedicatum à se fuerat nos sineret cùm pâ—r definitam fidei indemutabilis constitutionem credi aliter atque aliter non licâ—ret § 17. And it is not only particular persons but many General Councils that have erred and persecuted others as if all the while they were but cleansing the Church of the most odious Heresies The many Councils of the Arians I may after touch upon viz. at Tyre Ariminum Syrmium c. I will before its time here mention that of Sardica What horrid Heresies and Villanies do they lay to the charge not only of Marcellus but of Athanasius of Paulus Constant. of Iulius Bishop of Rome of Prothogenes and others whom they excommunicate as if they had been the very plagues of the earth See the Copies of their Epistle in Hilary Pict Fragments p. 434 c. § 18. And because Papal Approbation is made by the Papists the mark of an unerring and infallible Council note that even the Arian Council of Syrmium was expresly approved by Pope Liberius in his Exile as you may see in Hilary ibid. p. 426 427. saying Itaque amoto Athanasio à communione omnium nostrûm cujus nec Epistolia à me suscipienda sunt dico me parem cum omnibus vobis cum Vniversis Episcopis orientalibus seu per universas provincias pacem unitatem habere Nam ut verius sciatis me verâ fide per hanc Epistolam ea loqui Dominus frater meâ—s communis Demoâ—ilus qui dignatus est pro suâ benevolentiâ fidem catholicam exponere quae Syrmium à pluribus fratribus co-episcopis nostris tractata exposita suscepta est ab omnibus qui in praesenti fuerunt hanc ego libenti animo suscepâ— in nullo contradixi consensum accommodavi hanc sequor haec à me tenetur sane petendum credidi Sanctitatem Vestram quiae tam pervidetis in omnibus me vobis consentaneum esse dignemini communi auxilio ac studio laborare quâ—tenus de exilio dimittar ad sedem quae mihi divinitus credita est revertar In reciting of which Hilary thrice saith Anathema tibi Liberi praevaricator If they say that Liberius did this in his Exile through fear or suffering I answer his Sufferings were small and Hilary annexeth another of his Epistles to
the Arian Bishops in which he sweareth or calleth God himself to witness that it is not for his Sufferings which are not great but for the Peace of the Church of which he knew those Bishops to be Lovers and which is better than Martyrdom that he did what he did § 19. I. Before these there were many Provincial Councils called to decide the Controversie of the time of Easter and as that at Rome in Palestine Pontius and one in France went one way so that of Asia under Polycrates Ephes. went another way professing to stick therein to the Gospel and the Tradition of their Fathers For which Victor would needs excommunicate them which Irenaeus sharply reprehendeth It s worth the noting That as the wrong party pleaded Tradition so the right party pleaded Reason and Scripture as you may see in Beda's Fragment of the Palestine Council sub Theoph. Caesar. Bin T. 1. p. 132. And that the main argument used was the Divine Benediction of the Lords day which they may note that question the ancient observation of that day § 20. II. The next Council recorded Bin. p. 135. is one at Carthage under Agrippinus which decreed the re-baptizing of those that were baptized by Hereticks For which they are commonly now condemned § 21. And Binnius noteth that they had this from their Countryman Tertullian whose zeal against Hereticks was so hot that he would have nothing no not Baptism common with them so Baron an 217. n 1 2 3. an 258. n. 19 20. Yet is this man now numbred with Hereticks § 22. III. The Concilium Labesitanum is the next in order where one Privatus was condemned for an Heretick mentioned by Cyprian Epist. 55. But saith Binnius what his Heresie was is not known nor mentioned § 23. IV. Next we have an Arabian Council in which the Errour of the Souls Mortality allowing it only to rise again with the Body at the Resurrection was excellently oppugned and expugned by Origen but it was by that Origen who himself is called a blasphemous Heretick § 24. V. The next mentioned Council Bin. p. 158. was at Rome about the restoring of the Lapsed upon Cyprian's motion A business that made no small dissention while Lucianus and some others made the Church-door too wide and Novatus and Novatianus made it too narrow and Cyprian and the Roman Clergy went a middle way bitter and grievous were the Censures of each other and long and sad the Schisms that did ensue the rigour of the Novatians being increased by their Offence at other mens sinful latitude and tepidity § 25. By the way it is worth the considering by some Papists who make both a Bishop Essential to a Church and a Pope to the Church-Universal and deny Church-Government to Presbyters that this Council is said to be called by the Roman Clergy the Presbyters and Deacons when the Church had been a year or two without a Bishop through the sharp persecution of Decius upon Fabian's Death And it is to the Roman Clergy Presbyters and Deacons that Cyprian at this time wrote divers of his Epistles as they wrote to him insomuch that Binnius sticketh not to say that in this interregnum the Roman Clergy had the care or charge of the Vniversal Church Quaer How far their Government even of Bishops whom they Assembled in this Council was Canonical or valid § 26. VI. After this there was another Council at Carthage and two at Rome and one in Italy and another at Carthage about the same Controversie where it was determined that the Lapsed should be received to Repentance and after a sufficient space of Penance should communicate but not sooner And that the Bishops that lapsed should be uncapable of Episcopacy and communicate only with the Laity upon their penance Yet Cyprian in time of a renewed Persecution thought meet to relax this and take in the Penitent presently lest they should be discouraged under Suffering But Foelicissimus one of his Deacons made himself the Head of a Faction by taking men in by his own Authority too soon and Novatus and Novatian as is said being against their taking into Communion at all the Councils excommunicated them all as Schismaticks Where note that Novatus an African Priest that went to Rome and got Novatian ordained Bishop did not deny them Pardon of Sin with God but only Church-Communion 2. Nor did he deny this to other great Sinners repenting but only to those that lapsed to Idolatry or denying Christ. But the Novatians long after extended it to other heynous Crimes as upon supposed parity of Reason § 27. VII Next this we have Cyprians African Council in which after the censuring of some that reproached a Pastor they condemn a Dead Man called Victor because by his Will he left one Faustinus a Presbyter the Guardian of his Sons which the Canons had forbidden because no Ministers of God should be called from their sacred Work to meddle with Secular things Therefore they Decree that Victors Name shall not be mentioned among the Dead in Deprecation nor any Oblation made for his Rest. Non est quod pro dormitione ejus apud vos fiat oblatio aut deprecatio aliqua nomine ejus in Ecelesiâ frequentetur The case of the Clergy is much altered since then And whether the penalty had more of Piety as to the end or Errour in the rigor and the matter as if it were a Punishment to the Dead not to be offered for or prayed for I leave to further consideration Cypr. li. 1. Epist. 66. § 28. VIII The next Council we meet with is Concil Iconiense an 258. where the Bishops of Cappadocia Cilicia Galatia and other Oriental Provinces at Iconium in Phrygia Decreed that the Baptisms of Hereticks their Ordinations Imposition of Hands and other sacred Actions were invalid For which saith Baronius an 258. n. 14 15 16. Pope Stâ—phen Excommunicated all these Oriental Bishops and Reprobated the Council and would not receive or hear their Legates Of which Firmilianus Caesar. Cappad writeth to Cyprian against him § 29. IX At the same time Euseb. lib. 7. c. 6. tells us there was also a Synod at Synadis yea divers in other places that all decreed the same thing for rebaptizing those that were baptized by Hereticks and that this had been the Bishops opinion of so long time before that Eusebius durst not condemn it Vid. Baron Anno 258. n. 17. But it is now commonly condemned § 30. X. If they had confined their opinion of rebaptizing to such Hereticks as are strictly so called that renounce any essential Article of the Faith they might have made the Controversie hard But as Hereticating increased so their own difficulties increased And now the Novatians were pronounced Hereticks it grew a hard question whether all that the Novatians had baptized must be rebaptized And for this an African Council Anno 258. concluded affirmatively Because all that are baptized are baptized into the Church But Hereticks are not in the