Selected quad for the lemma: church_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
church_n ancient_a see_v time_n 3,368 5 3.1320 3 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A09383 A commentarie or exposition, vpon the fiue first chapters of the Epistle to the Galatians: penned by the godly, learned, and iudiciall diuine, Mr. W. Perkins. Now published for the benefit of the Church, and continued with a supplement vpon the sixt chapter, by Rafe Cudworth Bachelour of Diuinitie Perkins, William, 1558-1602.; Cudworth, Ralph, 1617-1688. 1604 (1604) STC 19680; ESTC S114465 595,047 756

There are 29 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

at Athens and they giue this reason of it because after the sending of Timothie to Thessalonica Paul and he meete not at Athens againe but at Corinth And Baronius affirmeth that it seemes to haue beene written presently after that Sylas and Timotheus came to him to Corinth out of Macedonia by comparing Act. 18. 5. with 1. Thess. 3. 6. Annal. tom 1. pag. 457. l. 1. And Emman●●i Sa doth censure the Syriacke postscript which saith it was sent from Athens by Timothie seeing that Timothie was then absent The like they affirme in the argument of the second Epistle for albeit the Greeke postscript hath it that it was written from Athens yet they rather thinke it was written from Corinth where Paul aboad a yeare and sixe moneths Act. 18. 11. because the title is like vnto the first Epistle Paul and Sylvanus and Timotheus c. And Baronius saith that it should be written from Athens impossibile est affirmare because it was written soone after the former as may appeare by the inscription Paul and Sylvanus and Timotheus they continuing together but the former was written from Corinth as hath bin prooued and therefore the latter specially considering that Paul went thence from Athens and aboad at Corinth a yeare and a halfe and returned not backe againe to Athens but went to Ephesus Annal. tom 1. pag. 457. l. 2● Adde hereunto that whereas the postscript of the 1. to Timothie saith it was written from L●odicea the chiefe Citie of Phrigia Pacaciana the Rhemists notwithstanding in the argumen● affirme that it is vncerten where it was written though it be commonly said to haue beene written at L●odicca yet it seemeth to be otherwise because it is like he was neuer there as may be gathered by the Epistle to the Colossians which was written at Rome in his last trouble a little before his death for Coloss. 2. 1. Paul seemes to insinuate that he was neuer at that Laodicea of Phrigia neare to Colossos and Hierapolis and that they neuer saw his person Besides neither Pl●nie who writ after Paul nor any other ancient classique author doth make mention of Phrigia Pacaciana so that it seemeth to haue beene so called long after Pauls discease the first mention that is made of it as some haue obserued beeing in the acts of the 5. Synode of Constantinop Baronius is of opinion that it was written from Macedonia Tom. 1. pag. 564. grounding his coniecture vpon 1. Tim. 1. 3. as I besought thee to abide at Ephesus when I went into Macedonia so doe The same doth Athanasius affirme in his Synopsis and Theodoret in his preface vpon that Epistle Againe the subscription of the 2. to Timothie that it was written from Rome vnto Timothie the first Bishop elected of the church of Ephesus cannot well stand as some thinke with that of S. Paul 2. Timothie 4. 5. Doe the worke of an Euang●list seeing that Euangelists were not tied to personall residencie to abide in one place as Bishops and pasters are but were to goe from place to place to confirme the Churches planted by the Apostles But the discussing of this argument whether Timothie were an Euangelist properly so called and whether the same man could not be an Euangelist and a bishop requireth a longer discourse then can be affoarded to this short treatise Lastly the postscript of the Epistle to T●tus saith it was written from Nicopolis of Macedonia the deuisers of which assertion ground their opinion vpon Titus 3. 12. where Paul saith be●iligent to come to me to Nicopolis for I haue determined there to winter mistaking the text for he saith not be diligent to come to me to Nicopolis for I haue determined here to winter as beeing there alreadie but I haue determined there to winter By which it is plaine that when Paul wrote to Titus he was not at Nicopolis as the postscript affirmeth and so we see the text which they alleadge for them maketh most against them And this is the iudgement reason of Baronius Annal. tom 1. pag. 575. l. 33. Antuerp howsoeuer Claudius Espencaus shifts his fingers of it and passes it ouer in silence Thus much concerning Subscriptions a word or two touching Inscriptions or titles prefixed before Epistles That these be no part of scripture written by the Apostles but added to the Epistles by some others it may appeare by these reasons First generally if titles were canonicall as well as the epistles themselues the Fathers would neuer haue doubted as they did whether Paul were the author of the epistle to the Ebrewes or not seeing in all copies saue one as Beza hath obserued it beareth his name but some of them ascribe it to Barnabas as Tertullian others to Luke as Jerome witnesseth others to Clement Oecumenius infitleth it only thus The epistle to the Ebrewes without adding the name of Paul or any other as the penner of it and so Hentenius a papist doth translate it out of Occumenius Secondly some epistles as those seuen written by Iames Peter Iohn Iude haue vnfit titles prefixed before them in that they are called sometime Canonicall specially of the Latine church and sometime Catholick chiefly of the Greek church neither of which were euer giuen them by any Apostle or Apostolique writer For first touching the title Canonicall it may seeme strange that this inscription should euer haue been appropriated vnto them which is common with them to the whole word of God as though in them were contained a more perfect and absolute rule of doctrine and manners of things to be beleeued and practised then in the other bookes of holy writ considering that sundrie Diuines albeit erroniously I confesse haue beene so farre from giuing vnto them this preheminence aboue the rest of the bookes of Scripture that they haue altogether reiected them as no part of Canonicall Scripture by name the epistle of Iames the 2. of Peter the 2. and 3. of Iohn and that of Iude of all which it was doubted in auncient time as we see in Eusebius and the Syrian church receiueth them not to this day as beeing not in the Syriacke translation and Caietan a popish writer and the Lutherans at this present reiect them as may appeare by their writings Secondly that this inscription was added to these Epistles without sufficient ground and warrant of reason may appeare in that no reason can be giuen why these seuen should be called Canonicall rather then the Epistles of S. Paul or that to the Ebrewes whosoeuer was the penner thereof For whereas the ordinarie Glosse saith they are called Canonicall because they were receiued into the Canon with the other epistles by that reason they should be no more Canonicall then the rest nay not of that authenticall at least of that vndoubted authoritie the rest are of seeing they hardly obtained to be registred in the Canon with the rest as Canonicall Lastly this title was neuer giuen to these Epistles by the Greek church which was more auncient
couenant they are children of God and originall sinne which is in them is couered from their first beginning and not imputed to them The vse There was no absolute necessitie of circumcision For they which died before the eight day were borne holy and consequently in the couenant and therefore might be saued And thus Baptisme was not of absolute necessitie for the children of beleeuers are borne holy and Christian and therefore dying in the want of baptisme may for all that be saued The seale of the couenant is not of like necessitie with the couenant it selfe Secondly here we learne that it is not the act of baptisme to conferre the first grace but onely to confirme and seale it vnto vs. Adoption and life beginnes not in baptisme but before If the roote be holy the branches springing thenee are holy We are borne Christians if our parents beleeue and not made so in baptisme Lastly if we be borne holy it is our shame that we haue made no more proceeding in holines then we haue done the most remaine ignorant and vnreformed and they of the better sort either stand at a stay or goe backward The second point is concerning Iustification in the 16. v. of which sundrie things are there propounded And first I will beginne with the name The word Iustifie is borrowed from courts of iudgement and signifies a indiciall act Otherwhiles it is put for the action of the iudge and then it signifies to absolue or to pronounce innocent Thus Paul saith Act. 13. 39. That we are instified from all things from which we could not be iustified by the law of Moses that is absolued or cleered Againe he opposeth iustification to accusation and condemnation Rom. 8. 33. Now the contrarie to condemnation is absolution Sometimes againe the word iustifie signifies the act of the partie iudged or of the witnesses and then it imports as much as to giue testimonie or to declare and approoue Thus Iames saith Abraham was iustified by workes chap. 2. v. 22. that is declared and approoued to be a iust man by workes In the former signification is the word vsed where the holy Ghost deliuereth the doctrine of iustification as in this place The vse Here we see how to distinguish betweene Iustification regeneration and renouation Regeneration is vsually in scripture the change of the inward man whereby we are borne anew Renouation is the change both of the inward and outward man that is both of heart and life Iustification is neither but a certaine action in God applied vnto vs or a certaine respect or relation whereby we are acquit of our sinnes and accepted to life euerlasting Secondly we must here note that the Teachers of the Church of Rome mistake the word Iustification For by it they vnderstand nothing els but a physicall transmutation of the qualitie and disposition of our hearts from euill to good And by this mistaking they haue made a mixture or rather confusion of law and Gospel Thirdly here we see what is to be the disposition of the partie iustified for by the consequent we may learne the antecedent A man therfore that would be iustified must come before the iudgement seat of God and there must he plead guiltie and be his owne aduersa●ie condemning himselfe and beeing pressed with the terrours of the law he must flie and make his appeale to the throne of grace for pardon in Christ and then he shall be acquit or iustified from all sinner Thus much doth the word 〈…〉 stifie import Thus came the Publican before God Luk. 18 when he said Lord be mercifull to me a sinner and departed iustified Thus in the sift petition we are taught to come euery day into the presence of God and to acknowledge our debts and to vse the plea of mercie saying Forgiue vs our debts The second thing to be considered is the subiect of iustification or the person to be iustified and that is man generally signifying that a Man is iustified The holy Ghost speaketh thus generally for two causes The first is because all men without exception haue need of iustification euen they which are regenerate Rom. 3. 23. And in this place Paul saith that he and Peter and the rest haue beleeued in Christ that they might be iustified by faith Here we are to take notice of the miserable condition of prophane and secure Epicures who neuer so much as dreame of any iustification The second reason is because God communicates the benefit of iustification generally to all sorts of men and this he doth in the Ministerie of the word in which he beseecheth men to be reconciled to God 2. Corinth 5. v. 21. This must be an inducement vnto vs to come vnto Christ humbling and iudging our selues that we may be iustified God himselfe from heauen vseth reasons vnto vs daily to mooue vs to the practise of this dutie What meane these gratious and continuall preseruations of Prince and people Church and land By them we see it is the good pleasure of God to giue vs a time to seeke his kingdome and righteousnes wherefore let vs not neglect the day of visitation but take the time while it serues that we may turne vnto God and be accepted of him and escape the woe pronounced vpon Corazin and Bethsaida The third thing to be considered concernes things excluded from iustification as false causes namely the works of the Law Here it may be demanded what works are meant I answer first not onely workes of the Ceremoniall but also of the morall law For all men know that ceremoniall actions are of no vse vnlesse they be ioyned with morall duties of loue and mercie And if Paul meant onely Ceremoniall workes he needed not to haue made so long a discourse against iustification by workes for he might haue ended the whole matter in a word or twaine by shewing that the ceremoniall law was abrogated by Christ. Secondly I answer that not onely workes done before faith are excluded but also workes that follow faith and are done in the estate of grace For Paul here reasons thus If no flesh be iustified by workes then not we beleeuers but no flesh at all is iustified therefore not we beleeuers Dauid Psal. 143. reasoneth on the same manner No flesh shall be iustified in thy fight therefore I cannot though otherwise I be thy seruant in keeping thy commandements When Abraham was the father of all the faithfull and was come to the highest degree of faith and abounded in good workes yet was he not then iustified by workes Rom. 4. 1 2. Paul kept a good conscience before God and men Act. 23. and yet was he not iustified therby 1. Cor. 4. 4. And he saith that we are not saued by the workes which God hath ordained that we should walke in Eph. 2. 9 10. And the workes that God hath ordained for vs to walke in are the best workes of all euen workes of grace Againe he saith that we are not saued
parents are likewise to be baptised The grounds of their baptisme are these First the commandement of God Matth. 28. 18. Baptize all nations c. in which wordes the baptisme of infants is prescribed For the Apostles by vertue of this commission baptised whole families Act. 16. 31. and 38. Againe circumcision of Infants was commanded by God Gen. 17. 14. and Baptisme in the new Testament succeedes in the roome of Circumcision Col. 2. 11. therefore baptisme of infants is likewise commanded The second ground is this Infants of beleeuing parents are in the couenant of grace for this is the tenour of the couenant I will be thy God and the God of thy seede Gen. 17. 7. It may be said that this promise was made in this sort onely to Abraham because he was to be the father of the faithfull Ans. It pertaines to all beleeuing parents Exod 20. God promiseth to shew mercie to thousands of them that loue him Act. 2. 39. Peter saith to the Iewes that heard him preach The promises belong to you and to your children Paul saith If the parents beleeue the children are holy 1. Cor. 7. 14. If holy then are they in the Couenant now they are holy because we are in the iudgement of Christian charitie to esteeme them all as regenerate and sanctified secret iudgements in the meane season left to God Now then because infants are in the couenant they are to be baptised For this is the reason of S. Peter To whome the promises belong to them belongeth baptisme but to you and your children belong the promises therefore you and your children are to be baptised Act. 2. 38 39. It may be obiected that we cannot tell whether infants be indeede the children of God or no and if they be not children of God we may not baptize them Answer The same may be said of men of yeares for we knowe not whether they be indeede the children of And therefore we may by the like reason exclude them from all sacraments Againe we are to presume in all likelihood that infants of beleeuing parents are the children of God because in their conception and birth God begins to manifest his election shewing himselfe a God not onely to the parents but also to their seed Secondly it is obiected that infants haue no faith and consequently that baptisme is vnprofitable vnto them Ans. Some thinke they haue faith as they haue regeneration that is the inclination or seede of faith Others say that the faith of the parents is also the faith of their children because the parents by their faith receiue the promise of God both for themselues their children And thus to be borne in the Church of beleeuing parents is in stead of the profession of faith To this second opinion I rather incline because it is the auncient and receiued doctrine of the Church Thirdly it is alleadged that infants know not what is done when they are baptized Ans. For all this baptisme hath his vse in them for it is a seale of the couenant and a meanes to admit them into the fellowship of the visible Church whereof for right they are members A father makes a Purchasse for himselfe and his children at the time of the sealing the children know not what is done and yet the purchasse is not made in vaine for them It may be demanded whether the children of Turkes and Iewes are to be baptized Answ. No because the parents are forth of the couenant Secondly it is demanded whether the children of professed Papists are to be baptized Answ. The parents are persons baptized in the name of the father sonne and holy Ghost And though the Papacie be not the church of God yet is the church of God hidden in the papacie and to be gathered out of it and for this cause baptisme remaines still in the Church of Rome For this cause I thinke that infants of professed Papists may be baptized two cautions obserued the first that the foresaid parents desire this baptisme the second that there be sureties which promise the education of the child in the true faith Thirdly it may be demanded whether the children of wicked Christians that is of such as hold in iudgement true religion and denie it in their liues may be baptized Ans. They may for all without exceptiō that were borne of circumcized lews whereof many were wicked were circumcised And we must not onely regard the next parents but also the auncestours of whome it is said If the roote be holy the branches are holy Rom. 11. Vpon this ground children borne in fornication may be baptized so be it there be some to answer for them beside the parents And there is no reason that the wickednesse of the parent should preiudice the childe in things pertaining to life eternall Lastly it may be demanded whether the children of parents excommunicate may be baptized Answ. Yea if there be any beside the parents to answer for the child For the parents after excommunication remaine still for Right members of the Church hauing still a right to the kingdome of heauen out of which they are not cast absolutely but with condition vnlesse they repent and in part that is in respect of communion or vse of their libertie but not in respect of right or title euen as a freeman of a corporation imprisoned remaines a freeman though for the time he hath no vse of his libertie The third Circumstance concernes the time Here one question may be mooued How oft baptisme is to be administred Answ. but once for the efficacie of baptisme extends it selfe to the whole life of man and we are but once borne againe and once ingrafted into Christ. Here let it be obserued that the gift of regeneration is neuer vtterly extinguished for if a man be the second time borne againe he must be baptized againe and againe because baptisme is the sacrament of insition It may be said that a man may remain stil ingrafted into Christ by his own wickednesse make himselfe a dead member I answer that all the members of the mysticall bodie of Christ are liuing mēbers The spirituall temple is made of liuing stones 1. Pet. 2. 5. And marke what Paul saith all the bodie of Christ increaseth with the increasing of God Col. 2. 19. and Eph. 2. 21. Beleeuers are of the bone and flesh of Christ nowe there is no part of the bone and flesh of Christ that dieth The last Circumstance is touching the place that is the publike assemblie or congregation of the people of God Because baptisme is a part of the publike Ministerie and a dependance vpon the preaching of the word of God Secondly the whole congregation is to make profit by the enarration of the institution of baptisme and lastly the said congregation is by praier to present the infant baptized vnto God and to intreat for the saluation thereof the praier of many beeing most effectuall The eight and last point followes concerning the vse
of the Apostles 2. Tim. 3. 14. Hence it appeares to be a fault in sundrie priuate persons when they read the Scriptures to gather priuate opinions to broch them to the world This practise hath beene the foundation of heresies and schismes in the Church Secondly Paul writes with consent that he might the better mooue and perswade the Galatians to receiue his doctrine which he is nowe to deliuer Hence it appeares that the Consent of Pastors and people is of great excellencie For the better conceiuing of it and the meaning of the text I will handle three points The first is what is the force of consent wherein stands it and where it is nowe to be found For the first Consent is of force to prepare the heart and to mooue it to beleeue as Augustine saith I had not beleeued the Gospell except the authoritie of the Church had mooued me And this is all it can doe For it is the word that is the obiect and the cause of our faith the word it selfe workes in vs that faith whereby it is beleeued And Paul in this place vseth consent not to worke a faith in the Galatians but onely to stirre vp a liking of his doctrine Two errors of the Church of Rome must here be auoided One that Consent is a certaine marke of the Church It is false for Consent may be among the wicked in the kingdome of Antichrist Reuel 13. 16. In the kingdome of darkenesse all is in peace Againe dissention may be among the godly as betweene Paul and Barnabas Paul and Peter in the church of Corinth there were schismes 1. Cor. 11. Consent therefore simply vnles it be ioyned with true faith and true doctrine is not of force to declare vnto vs the true Church The second errour is that the catholike consent of beleeuers in pointes of religion is the true and liuely scripture and that ●he written word is but a dead letter to it and to be iudged by it for his sense and meaning But all is contrary For the written word is the first perfect pattern of the mind and will of God and the inward consent in the hartes of men is but a rude and imperfect extract and draught of it The second point is wherein standes this consent it must haue his foundation in Christ thence flow to the members as the oile from Aarons head to his garments Psal. 133. and it standes in three things consent in one faith and doctrine consent in affection whereby men be of one hart Act. 2. 47. consent in speach 1. Cor. 1. 10. The third point is where it is now to be found The Papists say that they haue true and perfect consent among themselues and that fathers and Councells be on their side and that we haue no consent among our selues I answer first that they haue not the cōsent which they pretend for the proper points of Popery were not known to the apostles nor to the Apostolicall churches but were taken vp in the ages following by little and litle Secondly such doctrines as the papists make articles of faith are but opinions and coniectures in the fathers and Councles Thirdly the things which the Papists hold are the same peraduenture in name but they are not the same indeede with that which the fathers hold neither are they holden in the same manner as for example the purgatory which the fathers hold is a thing far different from the purgatory of the papists and so all the rest Of consent they may bragge but they cannot shew it As for our selues we all consent in the foundation of religion There is difference about the descent of Christ into hell The thing we all hold namely a descent the difference is in the manner whether it be vertually or locally There is difference about the paines of Christ in his agony and passion yet all acknowledge the infinite merit and efficacy of the death of Christ. There is difference about the gouernement of the visible church on earth For the substance of gouernemant all agree but for the manner of execution and administration they doe not That Christ is present in the Eucharist that his body and blood is there to be eaten and drunken all our churches agree and the difference is only touching the manner of his presence namely whether it be spirituall or locall And this is the mercy of God that in all our differences the foundation of religon is not rased Let vs pray for the continuance and increase of this consent Thus much of the persons that write now follow the churches to which the Epistle is sent to the churches of Galatia At this time the Galatians had made a reuolte and were fallen from iustification by the obedience of Christ so as Paul was affraid of them Chap. 4. and yet he called them churches still vsing great meekenes moderatiō His example must we follow in giuing iudgement of churches of our time And that we may the better doe this and the better releeue our consciences marke three rules The first is that we must rightly consider of the faultes of churches Some are faultes in manners some in doctrine If the faults of the Church be in manners and these faults appeare both in the liues of ministers and people so long as true religion is taught it is a church so to be esteemed and the ministers must be heard Math. 23. 1. Yet may we seperate from the priuat company of bad men in the church 1. Cor. 5. 11. and if it be in our liberty and choise ioyne to churches better ordered If the errour be in doctrine we must first consider whether the whole church erre or some few therein If the errour be in some and not in all it remaines a church still as Corinth did where some denied the resurrection because a church is named of the better part Secondly we must consider whether the church erre in the foundation or no. If the errour or errours be beside the foundation of religion Paul hath giuen the sentence that they which build vpon the foundation haie and stubble of erronious opinion may be saued 1. Cor. 3. 15. Thirdly inquiry must be made whether the church erre of humane frailty or of obstinacie If it erre of frailty though the error be in the foundation yet it is stil a church as appears by the example of the Galatiās Yet if a church shall erre in the foundation openly and obstinately it seperates from Christ and ceaseth to be a church and we may seperate frō it may giue iudgement that it is no church When the Iewes resisted the preaching of Paul and had nothing to say but to raile Paul then seperated the Church of Ephesus and Rome from them Act. 19. 8. 28. 28. It may here be demaunded why Paul writes to the Galatians as brethren and calls them Churches seeing they haue erred in the foundation and are as he saith vers 6. remooued to another
the rest were eie-witnesses and eare-witnesses of the sayings and doings of Christ and in that they were guided by the infallible assistance of the spirit both in preaching and writing their Testimonie touching the things which they wrote must needes be authenticall If it be said that counterfeit writings may be published to the world vnder the name of the Apostles I answer if they were in the daies of the Apostles they by their authoritie cut them off and therefore Paul saith If any teach otherwise let him be accursed And they prouided that no counterfeits should be foisted vnder their names after their departure And hereupon Iohn the last of the Apostles concludes the new Testament with this clause If any man shall adde vnto these things God shall adde vnto him the plagues that are written in this booke Reu. 22. 18. If any demand of what value is the testimonie of the Church I answer consider the Church distinct from the Apostles and then the testimonie thereof is farre inferiour to the Apostolicall testification concerning the word of God For the Church is to be ruled by the testimonie of the Apostles in the written word and the sentence of the Church is not alwaies and altogether certen nor ioyned with that euidence of the spirit wherewith euery testimonie Apostolicall is accompanied Furthermore that we may be capable of these two testimonies and take the benefit thereof we our selues for our parts must yeilde subiection and obedience to the word of God In this our obedience shall we be assured that it is indeed of God as our Sauiour Christ saith Ioh. 7. v. 17. This doctrine touching the certentie of the word is of great vse For when the minde and conscience by meanes of the double testimonie before mentioned plainely apprehends it there is foundation laid of the feare of God and of iustifying faith before we be assured that the scripture is the word of God it is not possible that we should conceiue and hold a faith in the promises of God And the want of this certentie in many is an open gappe to heresie apostacie Atheisme and all iniquitie Secondly by this it appeares that the Church of Rome erreth grossely in teaching that we cannot knowe the scripture to be the word of God without the testimonie of the Church in these latter times and that without it we could haue no certentie of religion whereas the testimonie of the spirit or the euidence thereof in scripture with the testimonie of the Apostles will doe the deede sufficiently though the Church should be silent The second maine point is That it is necessarie that men should be assured in their consciences that the calling and authoritie of their teachers is of God It may be demanded howe we in these daies should be assured hereof I answer thus a diuers consideration must be had of the first Ministers of the Gospel and of their successors Touching the first Ministers and planters of the Gospel within these 80. yeares We must consider that a calling is of two sorts Ordinarie and Extraordinarie Ordinarie is when God calls by the voices and consent of men following the laws of his word Extraordinarie is when God calls otherwise And this he doth 3. waies first by immediate voice Thus God called Abraham and Moses and thus were the Apostles called The second is by the message of a creature Thus Aaron and the tribe of Leui was called by Moses Elizeus by Elias Philip was called by an angel to baptize the Eunuch Act. 8. 26. The third is by instinct Thus Philip a deacon preached in Samaria Act. 8. 14. Thus the men of Cyprus and Cyrene preached among the Gentiles and the hand of God was with them though otherwise they were but priuate persons Act. 11. 19 20. Of this kind was the calling of the first preachers of the Gospel It may be obiected that they did not confirme their callings and doctrine by miracles which they should haue done if their callings had beene extraordinarie I answer they preached no new doctrine but the old auntient doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which they had heretofore confirmed by miracles Now old doctrine needes no newe miracles but new doctrine such as are the Popes decrees decretals Againe it may be alleadged that men may falsly pretend extraordinarie calling I answer if three rules be obserued they cannot The first is that extraordinarie neuer takes place but when there is no roome for ordinarie The second that they which plead a calling extraordinarily must be tried by the word both for doctrine and life for this is an infallible way to discouer false teachers Math. 7. 22. Deut. 13. 1. 5. Iohns authoritie is said to be from heauen because his baptisme that is his doctrine was so Luk. 20. 2. The third is that extraordinarie teachers in these last daies after they haue brought men to receiue the Gospel are to be ordained as other ordinarie ministers after the laws of gods word For they are not extraordinarie in respect of their doctrine which is the doctrine of the word nor in respect of their office or function in which regard they are Pastors teachers and not Apostles or Euangelists but their callings are extraordinarie in respect of the common abuse of the office of teaching and in respect of the common corruption of doctrine These 3. rules as caueats obserued we may easily perceiue who are called extraordinarily who not and they are all fully verified in the first preachers of the Gospell Thirdly it is obiected that they which are lawfully called are ordained by them whose auncetours haue bene successiuely ordained by the Apostles I answer Succession is threefold The first is of persons and doctrine joyntly together and this was in the Primitiue Church The second is of persons alone and this may be among infidels and heretikes The third is of doctrine alone And thus our Ministers succeede the Apostles And this is sufficient For this Rule must be remembred that the Power of the keyes that is of order and iurisdiction is tied by God and annexed in the new Testament to doctrine If in Turkie or America or els where the Gospel should be receiued of men by the counsell and perswasion of priuate persons they shall not neede to send into Europe for consecrated Ministers but they haue power to choose their owne Ministers from within themselues because where God giues the word he giues the power also Touching the Successours of the first preachers their calling was altogether ordinarie and they were ordained of their predecessours It is obiected that their callings are corrupt I answer thus All actions Ecclesiasticall that tende to binding or loosing appertaine properly to the person of Christ and men are but ministers and instruments thereof And therefore to call men to the ministerie and dispensation of the Gospel belongs to Christ who alone giueth the power the will the deede And the Church can doe no more but testifie
kingdome of the Messias was an earthly kingdome and with this opinion the Disciples of Christ were tain ●ed IV. They held that the keeping of the morall lawe stood in externall obedience as appeares by the speeches of Christ reforming their errours Math. 5. 6. 7. chap. V. They maintained a naturall freedome of the will in the obseruing of the law Luk. 18. Lord I thanke thee saith the Pharisie I doe thus thus VI. They held a iustification by the workes of the lawe without the obedience of the Messias Rom. 9. 3. VII Beside the written word and law of Moses they had many vnwritten traditions which they obserued precisely and the obseruation of them was accounted the worship of God Math. 15. 3. 9. Other points they held but these are the principall It may further be demaunded how the Iewes could hold such hereticall damnable opinions and yet be the people of God Answer They had for their parts forsaken God but God had not forsaken them because the Temple was yet standing and the sacrifices with the outward worship yet remained among them In this regard they were still a reputed people of God Againe they are called a people of God not of the bigger but of the better part and the better part was a small remnant of them that truely feared God and beleeued in the Messias Of which sort were Ioseph Marie Zacharie Elizabeth Simeon Anna Ioseph of Arimathia Nicodemus Againe it may be demanded howe the Iewes beeing such a people of God should fall away to so dānable a religion Answer They neither loued nor obeyed the doctrine of Moses and the Prophets and therefore God in iudgment left them to the blindenesse of their owne mindes and the hardnesse of their own hearts Isai. 6. The like may be our case If we loue and obey not the Gospel more then we haue done our religion may ende in ignorance superstition and prophanenesse as theirs hath done The second thing in Pauls example is his conuersation whereby he liued and conuersed according to his religion The like should be in vs. For the profession of the faith and godly conuersation are to goe together Phil. 1. 27. Faith in the hart is a light and workes are the shining of this light Math. 5. 16. Christ hath redeemed them that beleeue from their vaine conuersation 1. Pet. 1. 18. Heere many of vs doe amisse disioyning faith and good life And this fault is the greater because it is an occasion to our aduersaries to mislike and reiect our religion Pauls conuersation hath two partes his persequution of the church and his profiting in his religion Persequution properly is the afflicting of the people of god for their faith and religion In this we are not to follow Paul but to doe the contrary that is by all meanes to seeke the good of the church After Gods glory immediatly we are to seeke the comming and aduancement of the kingdome of God Now this kingdome is a certen estate and condition of men whereby they stand subiect to the word and spirit of God And this subiection to God and Christ is the propertie of them that be members of the church of God All both rich and poore conferred something according to their abilitie to the building of the Temple which figured the church of God The fault of our times is that we build our selues and our worldly estates and little respect the common good of the church In the persequution of the church by Paul two pointes are to be considered the manner and measure or accomplishment The manner is that he persequuted the church extreamely or aboue measure That which Paul did in his religiō we must doe in ours The good things that we are to doe we must doe them with all our might Eccles. 9. 10. our dutie is to keepe our hartes in the feare of God and we must doe it with all diligence Prou. 4. 24. It is our duty to seeke gods kingdome and we must take it with violence To enter into life is our duty and we must striue to enter To pray is our duty and we must wrastle in praier Rom. 15. 30. Iosias turnes to God with all his harte The law requires that we should loue God with all the powers of body and soule and with all the strengh of all the powers In earthly things we must moderate our thoughtes cares but spirituall duties must be performed with all our might The accomplishment of persequution is that Paul wasted the church and made hauocke of it Here I consider 2. points what is wasted who is the waster For the first it is the church Here 2. questiōs may be demāded the firist is how the church can be wasted Answer In respect of the inward estate thereof which standes in election faith iustification glorification it cannot be wasted In respect of his outward estate it may be wasted that is in respect of mens bodies and in regard of the publike assemblies and the exercises of religion The second question is why God suffers his enemies to wast his owne church Answer Iudgement beginnes in Gods house and his iudgements sometime are very sharpe whether they be inflicted for triall or correction of sinnes past or for the preuenting of sinnes to come As in the bodie sometime there is no hope of life except armes and legges be cut off euen so is it in the church Hence it appeares that there shall be a last iudgement and that there is a life euerlasting in heauen because the wicked man florisheth in this world and the godly are often oppressed The waster of the church is Paul By whome we learne that sinne where it takes place giues a man no rest till it hath brought him to a height of wickednes Hatred hauing entred into Caines heart leaues him not till it haue caused him to imbrue his hands in his brothers bloud Coueteousnes makes Iudas at length to betray his master and hange himselfe Blind zeale makes Paul not only to persequute but also to wast the church Therefore it is good to auoide the first beginnings yea the very occasion of sinne The second part and point in Pauls conuersion is that he profittes in his religion Thus should we profit in the gospell of Christ. It is gods commandement be ye perfect as your heauenly father is perfect that is indeuour to come to perfection All the faith we haue or can obtaine is little enough in the time of temptation Iob that said in his affliction though the Lord kill mee I will still trust in him saith also that God wrot bitter things against him and made him to possesse the sinnes of his youth It is a token that a man is dead in his sinnes when he doth not growe or increase in good things 1. Pet. 2. 2. In this regard great is the fault of our daies for many are wearie of the gospell many stand at a staie without profiting many goe backward The cause
obedience is that Paul did not communicate with men that is conferre and consult with them touching his doctrine and calling And this he amplifies by a comparison thus He did not consult with any man no not the Apostles of Hierusalem And he addes a reason of his doing because they were but flesh and blood in respect of God and indeede it is vnmeete to consult with men touching the matters of God Hence I gather that Gods word whether preached or written doth not depend on the authoritie of any man no not on the authoritie of the Apostles themselues it is sufficient to authorize it selfe Christ receiues not the testimonie of man Iohn 5. 34. And it is an errour to thinke that the Church doth authorize the word and religion in the consciences of men For the Church it selfe is founded on the word The Church cannot consist without faith nor faith without the word Secondly hence I gather that there is no consultation or deliberation to be vsed at any time touching the holding or not holding of our religion He that will followe Christ may not put his hand to the plough and then looke backe againe to his friends to see what they will say Luke 9 61. He that would be wise must denie his owne wisdome and become a foole 1. Cor. 3. 18. The three children would not consult touching the worshipping of the image but said be it knowne to thee O king that we will not worship thy gods Dan. 3. When the iudge gaue Cyprian the martyr leaue to deliberate a while whether he would denie his religion he answered that in diuine matters deliberation is not to be vsed By this I gather that the Schoolemen haue done euill which haue turned all diuinitie into Questions and haue made of the articles of our faith a questionarie diuinitie Secondly by this we are taught that in the day of triall we may not consult of the change of religion but we must be resolute and tread vnder foote the perswasions of flesh and blood Thirdly our obedience to God must be without consultation We must first trie what is the will of God and then absolutely put it in exequution leauing the issue to God Abram is called of god to forsake his countrie kindred Gen. 12. he derectly then giues attendance to the commandement and goes as it were blind fold he knowes not whither God promised him a childe in his old age he beleeues God without any reasoning or disputing the case with himselfe too or fro Rom 4. 20. But the common manner is though we knowe the will of God to dispute the case and to consult with our friends and to practise according to carnall counsell Eue listens to the counsell of Satan and neglects Gods commandement Saul beeing forbidden to offer Sacrifice in Gilgal till Samuel came to doe it consults with himselfe whether he may doe it or no and followes his owne reason against Gods commandement and lost his kingdome for it And this kind of deliberation whereby mē consult what is to be done is the cause of the manifold rebellions of men in the world In that man is tearmed here flesh and blood we are taught not to put confidence in man we are taught to humble our selues before God we are taught euery day to prepare our selues against the day of death and the day of iudgement yea to account euery new day as the day of death because we are but flesh and blood The third point is where Paul first preached namely in Arabia and Damascus Arabia is a region of the world where Mount Sina standes and where the children of Israel wandered 40. yeares The inhabitants thereof were of two forts some more ciuill and some barbarous Ciuill as the Israelites Amalechites Madianites c. Yet were they professed enemies of the people of God Barbarous as the Easterne part of Arabia to ward Babylon For the inhabitants dwelt in Tents and liued like wilde and sauage men by robbing and stealing and consequently by killing Isai. 13. 20. Ierem. 3. 2. Here we see Pauls estate and condition when he first begins the exequution of his Apostolicall function God then laies vpon him a sharpe and waightie triall For he goes alone into Arabia and he must become a teacher to his owne professed enemies yea to a sauage generation of whose conuersion he had no hope in mans reason And this hath bin an vsuall dealing of God with his owne seruants When Moses was called to deliuer the Israelites and was in the way the Lord for a defect in his family comes against him to destroy him Exod. 4. 24. Da uid is annointed king of Israel and withall Saul is raised vp to persecute him and to hunt him as men hunt Partridges in the mountaines Ionas is called to preach to Niniue and withall God forsakes him and leaues him to himselfe so as he is cast into the sea and deuoured of a fish and after this beeing deliuered he must goe preach at Niniue When Christ was in his baptisme as it were inaugurated the Doctor of the Church presently after before he begun to preach he is carried into the wildernesse to be with wild beasts and to be tempted of the deuill Mar. 1. v. 12. And the reasons of this dealing of God are manifest by this meanes sinnefull men are made fit for the office of teaching For the saying is true Reading praier and temptation make a Diuine Againe by this meanes they are caused to depend on the prouidence and protection of God and they are made fit for the assistance and presence of Gods spirit who dwels onely with them that are of humble and contrite hearts Nowe then let not them that in any notable change of their liues finde notable temptations be discouraged for this is a condition that befalls them by a wise and speciall prouidence of God For it was the spirit of God that led Christ into the wildernesse to be tempted after his baptisme Againe here we are taught to acknowledge three things in God His power in that he sets vp his kingdome where it is most oppugned and raignes in the middest of his owne enemies namely the wicked and sauage Arabians according to that in the Psalme 110. v. 2. His goodnes in that he sends Paul to preach repentance to the people that are in the snare of the deuill at his will 2. Tim. 2. 26. His trueth in that he nowe fulfils things foretold by Dauid Psal. 72. 10. The kings of Sheba Saba shall bring gifts that is Ethiopians and Arabians 18. Then after three yeares I came againe to Ierusalem to visit Peter and abode with him fifteene daies Paul hauing prooued before that he learned not the Gospel of any man no not of the Apostles at Hierusalem goes about nowe to answer exceptions that might be made against his reason And first of all it might haue beene obiected that he was seene at Hierusalem sundrie times and therefore in all likelyhood
went thither to be instructed To this he answers three things that he went thither three yeares after his conuersion and not before that he went to visit Peter that he abode there fifteene daies For the first where he saith he preached 3. yeares in Arabia and Damascus and then after went to Hierusalem and abode there fifteene daies for some speciall causes we see Paul is readie and able to make a good account of the spending of his time both for daies and yeares And good reason for time is pretious and great care ought to be had of the expending of it After Pauls example we must so liue that we may be able to giue a good account of the spending of our daies That this may be done we must learne to number our daies and to redeeme the time To number our daies is to consider the shortnesse of our liues and that we are euery day subiect to death and withall seriously to bethinke our selues of the causer of this our condition namely our sinnes both originall and actuall When this twofold consideration takes place we then beginne to number our daies The numbring of our time and the parts thereof brings vs to the redeeming of it To redeeme our time is to take time while time serues specially for spirituall vses and for the amendement of our liues When time is thus numbred and redeemed then shall the good account be made before God and men Wherefore miserable is the case of them that spend their daies in idlenes in riot and sporting in chambering and wantonnesse For they neither number time nor redeeme it and therefore they are farre from any good account The second point is that Paul goes vp to Hierusalem to visit Peter that is to see him to be acquainted with him to talke and conferre with him Hence it appeares that there is a lawefull kind of peregrination or pilgrimage in that Paul iourneies frō Arabia to Ierusalem to see Peter Thus the Queene of Saba went vp to Ierusalem to heare the wisdome of Salomon The lawe of God was that all the males in Israel should thrise in the yeare goe vp to the place which god had appointed Deut. 16. This law was practised by Elkana Anna 1. Sam. 1. by Ioseph and Marie by the Steward of Candaces queene of Ethiopia Act. 8. Neuerthelesse Popish pilgrimage is vtterly to be condemned for two causes One is because it is made a part of Gods worship whereas nowe in the newe testament all religious distinction of places is abolished 1. Tim. 2. 8. Lift vp pure hands in euery place vnto God Some alleadge that vows which were not commanded were neuerthelesse parts of Gods worship among the Iewes I answer though men were not commāded to vowe yet the matter and forme of vowes was commanded And in that God commanded the manner of vowing he allowed the acte of vowe-making let the Papists shew the like allowance for their pilgrimage The second reason is because popish pilgrimage is not to liuing men but to the Reliques and images of dead men which kind of peregrination was neuer vsed in the world till after the Apostles daies For pilgrimage to reliques came in 300. yeares after Christ and pilgrimage to Images after 600. yeares In that Paul goes about to visit Peter the Papists gather the Primacie of Peter ouer all the Apostles but falsely For this visitation argues reuerence and reuerence is giuen not onely to superious but also to equalls Againe primacie is twofold Primacie of order and Primacie of power Primacie of order was due vnto Peter in that he was first called to be an Apostle and he was in the faith before Paul And in this regard he was reuerēced of him The third point is that Paul abides with Peter at Ierusalem and that fifteene daies His abode with Peter was in token of mutuall consent and fellowship Like should be the consent of the Ministers of the Gospell For their office is to publish and perswade peace betweene God and men to which they are vnfit that cannot maintaine peace among themselues And all beleeuers should be of one minde speaking and thinking the same things and this cannot be vnlesse there be a consent of them that are guides This consent therefore is to be maintained and greatly to be praied for And when there cannot be consent of iudgement by reason of humane frailtie yet so long as the foundation is maintained there must be consent in affection And iniuries offered may not dissolue this bond Though the Church of Ierusalem suspected Paul and would not at the first acknowledge him for a Disciple Act. 9. 26. yet did he for his part accept of their loue and fellowship Whereas he addes that his abode with Peter was but for 15. daies hereby he signifies that he learned not the Gospell of him for it could not be learned in so short a space neither could Paul by the teaching of any man become an Apostle in so little time 19 And none other of the Apostles sawe I saue Iames the Lords brother It might happily be obiected against the former verse that Paul might be taught of some other Apostle beside Peter and that at Ierusalem to this he answers two things One that there was none of the Apostles at Ierusalem but Iames beside Peter before named the second that he did but see Iames. Here I gather that if there be any mother church in the world it is rather Ierusalem then Rome because the Gospel was first preached there went thence into the whole world and Ierusalem was for a time guided by two of the cheefe Apostles Iames and Peter In that Iames is called our Lords brother three things may be demanded One which Iames this was Answer It was Iames the sonne of Alpheus for he liued 14. yeares after this Gal. 2. 9. whereas Iames the sonne of Zebedeus liued not so long because he was put to death by Herod The second thing is how Iames should be the Lords brother Answer In scripture children of the same wombe are brethren men of the same bloud are brethren as Abram and Lot Gen. 13. 8. Men of the same countrie are brethren thus Sauls countrimen are called his brethren 1. Chron. 12. 2. And Iames is called our Lordes brother not beacuse he was of the same wombe but because he was of the same bloud or kindred for Elie had two daughters Marie espoused to Ioseph Marie Cleophas who afterward was maried to Alpheus of whome came Iames here mentioned Iames therefore was the cosin-german of Christ. Therefore Heluideus failed when he went about to insringe the perpetuall virginitie of the virgin Marie out of this place as if she had more sonnes beside Christ. The third thing is what benefit Iames had by beeing the Lords brother Answer He is here called the Lords brother only for distinctions sake in respect of the other Iames the sonne of Zebedeus and this brother-hood doth not make him the better Apostle or
God are imperfect in this life and therefore they are ioyned with many frailties and actions of faith are mixed with sundrie defects and sinnes Now then we are to be exhorted to make a conscience of lying and to speake the trueth from our hearts And there be many reasons to induce vs to the practise of this dutie First it is Gods commandement Iam. 3. 14. Secondly lying is a conformitie to the deuill and by truth we are made conformable to God who is truth it selfe Thirdly we are sanctified by the word of truth Ioh. 17. 17. and guided by the spirit of truth and therefore we are to detest lying and deceit Fourthly truth is a fruit of Gods spirit Gal. 5. and a marke of Gods child Psal. 32. v. 2. he hath the pardon of his sinnes in whose spirit there is no guile and Psal. 15. 2. he shall rest in the mountaine of God who speakes the truth from his heart Lastly destruction is the lyers reward Psal. 5. 6. God will destroy them that speake lies and they must haue their portion in the lake that burnes with fire and brimstone Reuel 22. 15 Thus much of the answer to the obiection now followes the confirmation by oath before God Here it may be demanded how these words can be a forme of swearing Ans. In an oath there be foure things The first is an Asseveration of the truth The second is Cenfession whereby the partie that is to sweare acknowledgeth the power presence and wisdome of God in searching the heart and that he is both witnes iudge of all our doings The third is Invocation of God that he would be a witnesse with vs and to vs that we speake the truth The last is Imprecation that God would be a iudge to take reuenge vpon vs if we lie Now then the forme of an oath is a certen forme of wordes in which not all but some of the principall parts of an oath are expressed and the rest concealed and yet to be vnderstood Ierem. 4. 2. there is the forme of an oath The Lord liueth and here onely confession is expressed The forme of swearing I call God to witnesse to my soule 2. Cor. 1. 23. expresseth the third part namely inuocation The words Ruth 2. 17. The Lord doe thus and thus vnto me is an Imprecation The common forme The Lord thee helpe through Iesus Christ is partly praier and partly imprecation And the forme in this place is directly a confession that God is present to witnes and iudge the truth Thus commonly in all formes of oaths one part is expressed and the rest are infolded Here first we learne that the forme of an oath is to be plaine and direct in the name of God and not indirect or oblique in the name of the creatures Gods name concealed And it is the flat commandement of God Math. 5. 34. It is alleadged that Paul 1. Cor. 15. 31. sweares by his reioycing in Christ. I answer the words of Paul by my reioycing are not an oath but an obtestation for the meaning of his wordes is this that his sorrowes and afflictions which he indured for Christ would testifie if they could speake that he died daily Thus Moses called heauen and earth to witnes without swearing for in an oath the thing by which he sweares is made not onely witnes but also iudge Neuerthelesse it is not vnlawfull to name the creatures in the forme of an oath if they be considered as pledges presented vnto God that he should punish vs in them if we lie Thus Paul sweareth I call God to witnes to or vpon my soule Here they are to be blamed whose common fwearing is by the creatures as by their faith by their troth by the Masse Marie by this bread by this drinke c. Secondly here we learne to vse an oath onely in the case of extremitie namely when a necessarie truth is to be confirmed whē this cannot be don by any reason or proofe to be foūd among men vpon earth then may we flie vnto heauen for proofe and make God our witnes Thus Paul confirmes his owne calling when all other proofes failed And it must further be obserued that in extremities he vseth an oath but seldome This seemes to condemne their wickednes that crie at euery word in their common talke before God before God Thirdly before we sweare we are to vse great meditation consideration and preparation and therefore Paul in swearing vseth a word of attention and saith Behold I speake it before God This condemnes the rash and customable swearing of men in their common talke who also in that they commonly and rashly sweare commonly forsweare themselues In that Paul confirmes his writings by oath it appeares that they are of God For if he had sworne falsly God would haue taken reuenge vpon him and his writings before this which he hath not done Whereas Paul saith Before God I speake it he teacheth vs after his owne example to bring our selues into the presence of God to walke before him as Enoch did Gen. 5. 22. and as Abraham was commanded Gen. 17. 1. and to doe whatsoeuer we doe as in the sight and presence of God and to be afraid to sinne because of his presence This is the true feare of God and this is the right practise of religion 21 After that I went into the coasts of Syria and Cilicia and I was vnknowne by face to the Churches of Iudea which were in Christ. 22. But they had heard onely some say He which persequuted vs in times past now preacheth the faith which before he destroied 23 And they glorified God in me Here Paul answers an other obiection which may be framed thus Though Paul learned not the Gospel of the Apostles at Ierusalem yet might he happily learne it of them in other Churches of Iudea To this Paul answers three things The first is that he went from Ierusalem into Syria and Cilicia The second that he was not knowne in person to the Churches of Iudea but onely by hearsay and he sets downe the report that went of him The third is that the Churches of Iudea did not disgrace and slander him but they glorified God for him Of these in order For the first that Paul went from Ierusalem straight into Syria and Cilicia the regions of the Gentiles there be two causes One because Paul was ordained specially to be the Apostle of the Gentiles Act. 9. 15. Rom. 15. 16. The second because Cilicia was his owne countrey for he was borne in Tarsus a towne in Cilicia and his loue to his countrey no doubt was great For in the like case he could haue wished himselfe to be accursed for his countrimen the Iewes From this first answer I gather two things First if any Apostle aboue the rest be the Pastour and vniuersall Bishop of the Church ouer the whole world it is Paul and not Peter because he specially was ordained to teach and conuert the nations The second is
concerning faith and good life is inseperably annexed to his person and in it are we to rest The principall voice of the iudge and the definitiue sentence is the written word And the office of the Church is no more but to gather declare testifie and pronounce this sentence It is obiected that when a question is propounded the scripture cannot speake nor Christ in the Scripture but the Church onely I answer againe that God ascribes to the written word a voice or speech Rom. 3. 19. and the scripture speakes sufficiently to the resoluing of any mans conscience in all matters pertayning to saluation Again they alleadge that the Church is before the scripture and therfore it beeing most auncient must be the Iudge I answer that the Church was before the writing of the word but not before the word which is written For the church presupposeth faith and faith presupposeth a word of God Vpon this our doctrine they further vpbraid vs that we wil be tried by nothing but by the scriptures euen as the malefactour that will not be tried by the Quest but by the euidence I answer for the satisfying of our aduersaries we submit our selues to the triall of the Church and Councels so be it the three cautions before remēbred be duly obserued specially that all things be iudged and tried by the written word and by reasons gathered thence Againe the Papists hence gather that the scriptures are to be approoued by the Church Ans. Thus much we graunt yet so as we hold that the principal approbatiō of the word wherby we are mooued to beleeue and obey is in the word frō the word and not from the church For the scripture hath his euidence within itselfe which is sufficient to make vs beleeue the word to be the word though the Church should say nothing The third point is concerning the persons with whome Paul conferred namely with them that were the cheife that is with them that were in price and account as Peter Iames c. Here we see what is the honour and worshippe that is due to excellent men namely a pretious and reuerend estimation Thus the name of Dauid was in price in Israel for his vertues 1. Sam. 18. last And thus with the Papists are we content to honour the Saints Again here the Papists gather that they are hereticks that after Pauls example will not go vp to Rome to Peter and his successour to haue their doctrine and religion tried and examined I answer first we are content to be tried by the writings of Peter Iames Iohn Paul c. And this is the commandement of God in doubtfull cases To the Law and the testimonie Isai 8. Secondly I answer that we haue a commandement not to goe vp to Rome at this day to haue our religion tried Reuel 18. Come out of Babylon my people Thirdly I answer that the Bishop of Rome is Peters successour not in teaching but in denying Christ. And the learned Papists confesse that for this succession they haue but a humane faith grounded vpon humane historie The fourth point is the Ende of the conference Least I should runne that is least I should preach or had preached in vaine These words of Paul are not simply to be taken For the Ministerie of man and euery sermon brings forth the fruite which God hath appointed And whether it be vnto the hearers the sauour of life or the sauour of death it is alwaies a sweet sauour vnto God The words therefore carrie this meaning Least my preaching should be of lesse vse and profit or againe least I should preach in vaine in respect of that good which is looked for at the hands of an Apostle And this Paul speakes because a rumor went abroad that his doctrine in many things was contrarie to the other Apostles And by this meanes many were kept from receiuing the Gospell and the faith of weake beleeuers was quenched Now then the ende of the conference was to stay this false report that the Ministerie of Paul might haue passage and that with greater profit Hence the Papists gather that the doctrine of Paul was vncerten and vnprofitable till it was approoued by Peter I answer that Paul sought the approbation of his doctrine at the hands of Peter and the rest not because it was vncerten and vnprofitable but because it was slaundered and the slaunder was that he taught otherwise then Peter did Nowe to cut off this slander he vseth meanes to manifest his consent with Peter and therefore seekes approbation at his hand Againe when Paul saith Least I should runne in vaine he giues vs to vnderstand that the Ministerie of the word is not a worke of ease or pleasure but a labour nay a continued labour like to the running in a race It were therefore to be wished that ministers of the Gospel would so labour and walke in this calling that they might be able to say with Paul I haue fought a good fight I haue finished my course c. 2. Tim. 4. Thirdly hence it appeares that all beleeuers should haue a certen knowledge of their faith and religion The procuring of this was the thing that Paul aimed at in this conference with the Apostles at Ierusalem We must not be as children carried away with euery winde of doctrine Eph. 4. 14. Gods word requires faith in vs and faith presupposeth certen knowledge The first and second commandements require that we knowe God and his will distinguish him from false gods and his worshippe from false worshippe Here comes the fault of our times to be considered most men among vs doe not knowe their religion neither can they distinguish it from errour and false religion A foule negligence We take paines to learne trades and occupations that we may haue wherewith to preserue this temporall life what a shame then is it that we learne not better to know the doctrine of true religion whereby our soules are to be saued Lastly here we learne that the office of the Minister is not onely to teach and preach but also to studie and take care howe by preaching he may doe the most good 3. But neither yet Titus which was with me though he were a Grecian was compelled to be circumcised After the Conference followes the Approbation which was giuen to Paul It stands in foure things The first that the Apostles did not compell Titus to be circumcised v. 3. The second that they added nothing to his doctrine v. 6. The third that they gaue him the hands of fellowship v. 7. The laste that at his departure they required of him nothing but the giuing of Almes v. 16. For the first the words And Titus was not compelled to be circumcised carrie this sense I for my part was readie to circumcise Titus if there had beene a meete occasion false brethren would haue imposed a necessitie vpon vs then I and Titus refused and the Apostles did not vrge me to circumcise him Here it may
be demanded howe this text can well stand with Act. 16. v. 3. for there Paul circumciseth Timothie a Grecian and here he refuseth to circumcise Titus though he were a Grecian I answer thus Circumcision was at this time a thing indifferent From the first institution to the comming and specially to the death of Christ it was a thing commanded a Sacrament and a part of Gods worship Againe after the planting of the Church of the newe testament it was vtterly abolished and a thing in respect of vse vtterly vnlawfull In the middle time that is while the Gospel was in publishing to the world and the Church of the newe Testament was yet in founding it was a ceremonie free or indifferent It may be obiected that the whole Ceremoniall law was abolished in the death of Christ I answer it was so and circumcision was abolished in respect of faith and conscience yet so as the vse therof was left to the libertie of the people of God for a while Circumcision at this time was as a corps that is dead yet vnburied and onely laid out and so it must remaine for a time that it may be buried with honour It may againe be obiected that baptisme was come in the roome of circumcision and that therefore circumcision was but an idle and emptie ceremonie I answer it was not vsed as a Sacrament at this time or as a part of Gods worship or as a matter of necessitie but onely as a free ceremonie and that onely then when it tended to the edification of men Beeing then a thing indifferent it might as occasion serued be vsed or not vsed Therefore Paul condescending to the weaknes of the beleeuing Iewes circumcised Timothie and that he might not offend the godly and hinder Christian libertie he refused to circumcise Titus Here a great question is answered whether we may vse things indifferent as oft as we will and howe we will The answer is No. Things are not called indifferent because we may vse them indifferently or not vse them when we will and how we will but because in themselues or in their owne nature they are neither good nor euill and we may vse them well or ill we may againe not vse them well or euill Furthermore there be two things which restraine the vse of things indifferent the lawe of charitie and the lawes of men The lawe of charitie is this Things indifferent in the case of scandall cease to be indifferent and are as things morall that is either forbidden or commanded Paul saith if to eate flesh be to the offence of his brother he will eate no flesh while the world stands 1. Cor. 8. 13. And though he circumcised Timothie yet would he not circumcise Titus least he should offend the godly and by his example hurt Christian libertie Likewise the good lawes of men whether ciuill or Ecclesiasticall tending to the common good and seruing for edification restraine the vse of things indifferent so that they which shall doe otherwise then these lawes command with a contemptuous or disloyall minde are guiltie before God yet here two cautions must be remembred One that the lawes of men doe not chaunge the nature of things indifferent for it is the propertie of God by willing this or that to make it good or euill Neither doe they take away the vse of things indifferent For libertie graunted by a soueraigne power cannot be reuersed by an inferiour power Therefore humane lawes doe no more but temper and moderate the ouer common vse of things indifferent The second caution is That when the ende of a law ceaseth when there is no contempt of the authoritie that made the law when no offence is giuen a thing indifferent remaines in his free vse without sinne or breach of conscience Againe here we learne that a thing indifferent when it is made necessarie to saluation as Circumcision was is not to be vsed This conclusion serues to ouerthrow the Popish religion For it stands in the obseruation of things indifferent as meates drinkes apparell times c. And the vsing or the not vsing of them is made necessarie euen in regard of mans saluation For the abstinence from things that are by nature indifferent is made a part of Gods worship and meritorious of eternall life For example to marrie or not to marrie is for nature a thing indifferent and therefore when abstinence from marriage is made necessarie as it is in diuers orders of men and women the nature of the thing is changed which God hath left free and it is a doctrine of deuills which is taught Here againe we learne to make difference of persons Some are weake some are obstinate Weake ones are such as hauing turned vnto God and carrying in their hearts a purpose in all things to please God neuerthelesse doe sundrie things amisse vpon simple ignorance or badde custome till they be better informed Of these Paul saith that he became all to all that he might saue some 1. Cor. 9. 22. and for their sakes he condescended to circumcise Timothie And if we that haue scarce a drop of mercie in vs must thus beare with them that are weake much more will God doe it who is mercie it selfe The good shepheard brings home the stray sheepe vpon his shoulders he carries his lambs in his bosome Isa. 40. 11. He will not quench the smoaking flaxe Isa. 42. he spares them that feare him as a father spares his child Malach. 3. 17. This beeing alwaies remembred that weake ones truly turne to God and carrie in their hearts an honest purpose not to sinne against his lawes at any time wittingly and willingly Obstinate persons are such as professe the faith and yet hold and practise bad things of wilfull ignorance and of malice These persons are not to be borne with nor to be respected and in respect of them Paul would not circumcise Titus Lastly in that Titus was not compelled to be circumcised it may be demanded whether Recusants may be compelled to the exercises of religion I answer yea for exercises of religion are not things indifferent as Circumcision was Iosias made a couenant with the Lord and he caused all his subiects to stand to it 2. Chron. 34. 32. The king at the marriage feast of his sonne saith of the guests Compell them to enter in Luk. 14. 23. It is obiected that men may not be compelled to beleeue I answer it is the commandement of God prooue the spirits 1. Ioh. 4. 1. and this commandement pertaines to all persons Therfore though men may not be compelled to beleeue yet may they be compelled to come to the congregation to heare our sermons and therein the reasons and grounds of our doctrine that they may trie what is the truth and cleaue vnto it For this is their dutie 4 For all the false brethren that crept in who came in priuily to spie out our liberite which we haue in Christ Iesus that they might bring vs into
bondage 5 To whome we gaue not place by subiection for an houre that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you Paul had said before that Titus was not compelled to be circumcised now he addes For all the false brethren that is though the false brethren did what they could to the contrarie Here then Paul sets downe who were the cause that Titus was not circumcised namely certaine persons at Ierusalem and them he sets forth by two properties they are false brethren and they crept into the Church Touching the first by it we learne that the Church of God vpon earth euen when it is at the best hath wicked men and hypocrites in it In Adams family there is Cain in the Arke there is Cham in Christs family or schoole there is Iudas In the Church of Ierusalem planted and gouerned by the chiefe Apostles there be false brethren The true sheepe be often without and wolues within Therefore we may not so much as dreame of a perfection of the Church of God vpon earth so long as wicked men be mixed with true beleeuers Againe these aduersaries of Paul are called false brethren because they ioyned Circumcision with Christ as a necessarie cause of iustification and saluation Hence it followes that the Church of Rome is a false Church because it ioynes workes with Christ in the case of our iustification and that as meritorious causes Their second propertie is that they crept into the Church which I conceiue on this manner The Church of God is as a sheepefold or house Ioh. 10. 1. Christ is the onely dore Now Pastours that teach Christ aright are saide to enter in by this dore they which teach any other way of saluation are said to clime in an other way and they which teach Christ ioyning some other thing with him in the cause of saluation are said to Creepe in because in appearance they maintaine Christ and yet because they adde something to Christ they neither enter nor continue in the true Church with any good warrant from God In this they are like the serpent Liuing creatures were all placed in Eden and Man was placed in the garden of Eden called Paradise and so were not beasts How then comes the serpent in why in all likelihood it crept in And so doe false brethren into the Church Hence I gather that false brethren are not true and liuely members of the visible Church though they be members in appearance For if they were in their right place they should not be said to creepe in The true members of the Church creepe not into the mysticall bodie but are built and set vpon the foundation by God It may be alleadged that they are baptised and thereby made members of the Church I answer that faith makes vs members of Christ and consequently of the true Church and baptisme doth but seale our insition into Christ and serues as a meanes of Admission into the outward societie of the congregation and the outward washing doth not make any man a member of Christ. Againe it followes hence that false brethren are not members of the Catholike church For the visible church is part of the Catholike and therefore they which are not reall members of the true visible church are not members of the Catholike Againe in that false brethren creepe into the congregation hence it appeares that no man can set downe the precise time when errours had their beginning For the authors thereof enter in secretly not obserued of men The enuious man sowes his tares when men be asleepe Math. 13. It sufficeth therefore if we can shew them to be errours by the word though we cannot designe the set time when they began The time when a shippe sinketh we often obserue but the time when it first drew water we doe not Let the Papists thinke vpon this Paul hauing thus declared who were the causes that Titus was not circumcised goes on and shewes how they were causes The effect and summe of his declaration is this They vrged the obseruation of the Ceremoniall law as necessarie and hereupon we resused to circumcise Titus First therefore Paul sets downe how they vrged circumcision and that by three degrees First they come in priuily Secondly they spie out their libertie Thirdly they labour to bring them into bondage Againe Paul sets downe the manner of their refusall in three things We gaue not place for an houre We gaue not place by subiection We gaue no place that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you The first degree or steppe in their vrging of circumcision was that They came in priuily that is they ioyned themselues in fellowship with the Apostles in shew pretended the furtherance of the Gospel yet indeed meant nothing lesse though their fraud wickednes was not perceiued Here then the foūdation they lay of all their naughtie dealing is their dissēbling which Paul here notes condemns On the contrarie our dutie is to be indeed that which we professe our selues to be to professe no more outwardly then we are inwardly and to approue our hearts to god for that which we professe before mē The second steppe or degree is that they spie out the libertie vvhich Paul and the rest had by Christ that is they conferre with the Apostles and inquire of them what libertie they haue by Christ in respect of the Ceremoniall lawe of God and this they doe not of a minde desirous to learne but for aduantage sake There be two kinds of spying one lawefull the other vnlawefull Lawefull as when in iust and lawefull warre we inquire into the counsells and doings of our enemtes Numb 13. 1. Vnlawefull when men prie into any thing or matter to finde a fault Thus hypocrites spie faults in the persons and liues of men that they may haue somwhat whereby to disgrace them Math. 7. 4. Thus Atheists prie into the scriptures that they may confute them Thus sundrie hearers come to sermōs that they may carpe Thus our enemies inquire into our religion that they may finde as they suppose exceptions vntruthes and contradictions And in the Church of Ierusalem false brethren inquire how farre Christian liberty extends that they may ouerthrow it This kind of spying is a common fault we must take heede of it and apply the eie of our minde to a better vse First we are to be spies in respect of our owne sinnes and corruptions to spie them out Lam. 3. 40. Let us search our waies and inquire and turne againe to the Lord. Again we are to plaie the spies in respect of our spirituall enemies that we may finde out the temptations of the flesh the world and the deuill Thirdly we must be as spies in searching of the Scriptures Ioh. 5. 39. that we may vnderstand the words of the lawe of God and find comfort to our soules The third and last degree of vrging is that the false brethren seeke to bring the Apostles in bondage
hearts come vnto Christ and beleeue in him and that by the faith of Christ that is with a faith ioyned with hope loue and new obedience Then shall the promise of pardon and life euerlasting be giuen to vs. Vpon this ground persons in despaire and grieuous offenders may see a plaine way to helpe and succour themselues For the worke of the law concluding vs vnder sinne by the mercie of God tends to our saluation if we will vse the good meanes Lastly Paul saith the promise is made not to euery one that beleeueth according to any faith of his owne but to them that are true beleeuers by the faith of Christ. Therefore euery man shall not be saued in his owne faith and religion but onely they that are of the faith of Christ. 23 For before faith came we were kept vnder the law and shut vp vnto the faith which should afterward be reuealed 24 Wherefore the law was our schoole-master to Christ that we might be made righteous by faith 23 But after that faith is come we are no more vnder the schoole-master Paul in the 19. v. had said that the law was for transgressions till the seede come to which the promise was made And here he makes a more large declaration of his owne meaning The summe of all that he faith may be reduced to a comparison of things vnlike on this manner Before the comming of faith we were vnder the dominion of Moses law but after faith was come we were free The first part of the comparison is amplified by a double fimilitude the law was a Guard vnto vs v. 23. and the law was our schoolemaster v. 24. the second part of the comparison is in the 25. v. Faith That is the Gospel or the doctrine of remission of sinnes and life euerlasting by Christ exhibited in the flesh We We Iewes I Paul a Iew and the rest of that nation Law That is the whole Oeconomie policie and Regiment of Moses by lawes partly morall partly Ceremoniall and partly Iudiciall Kept Compassed or guarded Because the lawe before Christ was to the Iewes as a guard of armed men to inclose and keepe them that they should not depart from God and from their allegiance to him vnto the sinnes idolatries and superstitions of the Gentiles Vnto the faith That is till the faith come Afterward reuealed From the creation to the law the Church of God was in one familie and the rest of the world beside was no people of God From the law till Christ the Church of God was inclosed in the nation of the Iewes and all the world beside no Church or people of God And this distinction of a people and no people stoode some time after the comming of Christ. Math. 10. 5. Goe not into the waie of the Gentiles and into the cities of the Samaritans enter ye not After the ascension of Christ this distinction ended because the mysterie of mans redemption was then more plainly reuealed and it began then to be reuealed to the whole world Coloss. 1. 26 27. and Rom. 16. 25. Thus we see that the law serued for transgressions because it was to the Iewes as a Guard to keepe them in the compasse of their dutie that they fell not away to sundrie transgressions The vse This shewes the greatnes of our corruption and that the very frame of our heart is euill continually that the Lord must be faine to set his lawes about vs as a Guard of armed men to keepe vs that we sinne not Againe here we see the vse of Gods lawes which serue to preuent restraine and cut off sinne into which otherwise men would fall vnlesse they were compassed and guarded by laws Some obiect for freedome of will on this manner If the lawes of God cannot be kept they are in vaine but they are not in vaine therefore they may be kept Ans. The maior or first part of the reason is not true For there are other vses of the law of God then the keeping of them for they serue to restraine and preuent open offences and to keepe men in order at the least outwardly An other vse of the law of God was to conclude and shut vp the Iewes into the vnitie of one faith and religion For this cause the Iewes had but one temple one Mercie-seat one high Priest c. Hence it followes that in a godly and Christian Common-wealth where true religion is established there may be no tolleration of any other religion For that which is the end of Gods laws must also be the end of all good lawes in all Common-wealths and kingdomes namely to shut vp the people into the vnitie of one faith The Church of the Iewes is called a fountaine sealed a garden inclosed Cant. 4. 12. a vineyard hedged in Isa. 5. 5. Psal. 80. 13. And here we see what is the hedge or wall of this garden or vineyard namely the regiment or policie of Moses by a threefold kind of law This admonisheth vs to respect and with care to obserue good lawes because they are as it were hedges and fenses of all good societies and the breaking of them is the pulling downe of our fense Where Paul saith till the faith be reuealed Note that the faith or the Gospel was not reuealed to the world till the last age after the comming of Christ. It may be said it was alwaies reuealed to all men but not so cleerely as in these last daies Ans. It was not reuealed to all either darkly or cleerely before the comming of Christ. Act. 14. 16. God suffered the Gentiles to walke in their owne waies Eph. 2. 12. they were without God and without Christ. Rom. 15. 20. Paul preached where Christ was not so much as named Hence it followes that the Vocation of men to life euerlasting is not Vniuersall because Christ was neuer Vniuersally reuealed Neither is mans Redemption vniuersall in respect of the whole world For Redemption by Christ was not reuealed to all nations before the comming of Christ and a benefit to be apprehended by faith if it be vnknowne is no benefit Lastly it is erronious that some teach namely that grace supernaturall is vniuersall that is that the power to beleeue in Christ and the power to turne to God if men will is generally giuen to all But this cannot be because it is not giuen to all men so much as to heare of Christ and to know him Seeing faith is now come it may be demanded what is the Guard whereby we are kept now Ans. The precepts of the morall law The sayings of the wise are as nayles or stakes fastned to range men in the compasse of their owne duties Eccles. 12. 11. Againe the peace of God or the assurance of our reconciliation with God is a Guard to keepe our hearts and senses in Christ. Phil. 4. 7. If this will not doe the deede God hath in store his corrections and iudgements to be as an hedge to hemme vs in Hos.
the couenant of Grace and therefore we must acknowledge the father to be our father the Son to be our Redeemer the holy Ghost to be our comforter and seeke to grow in the knowledge and experience of this It may be demanded whether baptisme may not be administred in the name of Christ alone or in the name of God without mention of the persons in the Godhead Ans. No. For the true forme of baptisme is here prescribed If it be said that Peter biddes them of Ierusalem repent and be baptized into the name of Christ. Act. 2. 38. I answer that Peters intent in that place is to set downe not the forme of baptisme but the ende and scope thereof which is that we may attaine to true fellowship with Christ. The fourth point is concerning the endes of baptisme which are foure The first is that baptisme serues to be a pledge vnto vs in respect of our weaknes of all the graces and mercies of God and specially of our vnion with Christ of remission of sinnes and of mortification Secondly it serues to be a signe of Christian profession before the world and therefore it is called the stipulation or interrogation of a good conscience 1. Pet. 3. 21. Thirdly it serues to be a meanes of our first entrance or admission into the visible Church Lastly it is a meanes of vnitie Read Eph. 4. 5. 1. Cor. 12. 13. The fifth point concernes the Efficacie of baptisme Of which there be foure necessarie questions The first is whether the Efficacie of baptisme extend it selfe to all sinnes and to the whole life of man For answer I will set downe what we teach and what the Papists We teach that the vse of baptisme inlargeth it selfe to the whole life of man and that it takes away all sinnes past present and to come one caution remembred that the partie baptised stand to the order of baptisme which is to turne vnto God and to beleeue in Christ and so to continue by a continuall renouation of faith and repentance as occasion shall be offered Reasons may be these First the scripture speakes of them that had long before bin baptised and that in the time present baptisme saueth 1. Pet. 3. 21. and ye are buried by baptisme into the death of Christ. Rom. 6. 4. And in the future tense it is saide he that beleeueth and is baptised shall be saued And Paul saith that the Church is cleansed with the washing of water that it may be presented glorious and without spot vnto God Eph. 5. 26. And all this shewes that baptisme hath the same efficacie after which it had before the administration thereof Secondly the couenant of grace is euerlasting Isa. 54. 10. Hos. 2. 19. and the couenant is the foundation or substance of baptisme therefore baptisme is not to be tied to any time but it must haue his force so long as the couenant is of force And this appeares by the example of the Galatians who are now fallen away to an other gospel after their baptisme and yet are instructed and directed by their baptisme Lastly it hath bin the doctrine of the ancient Church that all sinnes are done away by baptisme euen sinnes to come The doctrine of the Papists is that baptisme takes away all sinnes that goe before the administration thereof and that sinnes after baptisme are not taken away by baptisme but by the Sacrament of pennance But the doctrine is erronious as may appeare by the arguments which they vse Argum. first Circumcision had no vse after the administration thereof for the abolishing of sinne Therefore neither hath baptisme Ans. Circumcision had And this appeares because the Prophets put the Iewes in minde of their circumcision when they fell away from God bidding them to circumcise the foreskin of their hearts Ier. 4. 4. Arg. 2. The Apostles vsed to call them that sinned after baptisme to confession of sinne and to repentance or pennance Act. 8. 21. 1. Ioh. 1. 9. Ans. This makes for vs for in so doing they bring men to their baptisme and to the order set downe there which is that the partie baptised must first of all turne to God and beleeue in Christ and there is no new order set downe afterward but onely a renewing of this first baptismall order both in the Ministerie of the word and in the supper of the Lord. And whereas they make a distinction of pennance the vertue and pennance the sacrament placing the vertue before and after baptisme and the sacrament onely after for this they haue no word of God Arg. 3. If a man be inlightned that is baptised and then fall againe he cannot be renewed by repentance which is in baptisme Hebr. 6. 6. Ans. The text speakes not of them that fall after baptisme but of them that fall away by an vniuersall Apostasie denying Christ. For it is said v. 7. that they crucifie Christ againe that is crucifie Christ crucified and so make a mocke of him and tread vnder foote the blood of Christ. Hebr. 10. 29. Againe the text speakes not particularly of repentance in baptisme but of all repentance whatsoeuer yea of repentance after baptisme For there is no place for repentance where Christ is renounced Arg. 4. Pennance as Hierome saith is a second table after a shipwracke Ans. Repentance indeede is a second table or bord whereby a sinner fallen from his baptisme returnes againe to it and so comes to the hauen of euerlasting happines Thus then we see that baptisme is the true sacrament of repentance for repentance pertaines to the inward baptisme The vse If baptisme serue for the whole life of man then if thou be in any miserie or distresse haue recourse to thy baptisme and there shalt thou finde thy comfort namely that God is thy God if thou truly turne and beleeue in him Secondly remember euery day the obligation of homage wherewith thou hast bound thy selfe to God specially in thy temptations remember it and see thou stand to it and make it good The second question is whether baptisme abolish Originall sinne or no The answer of the Papist is that it doth so as in the partie baptised there remaineth nothing that God may iustly hate and therefore he saith that Originall sinne after baptisme ceaseth to be sinne properly We teach and are to hold that the perfect and intire baptisme in which the outward and inward baptisme are ioyned together abolisheth the punishment of sinne and the guilt that is the obligation to punishment and the fault yet not simply but in two respects first in respect of imputation because God doth not impute Originall sinne to them that are in Christ secondly in respect of dominion because Originall sinne raigneth not in them that are regenerate Neuerthelesse after baptisme it remaines in thē that are baptised and is still and that properly sinne Paul saith Rom. 7. 20. If I doe that I would not it is no more I that doe it but sinne that dwelleth in
of this world in ciuill societie the second is the regiment or the kingdome of heauen which stands in iustice peace of conscience ioy in the holy Ghost In the first estate there are sundrie differences of persons that beleeue some fathers and mothers some children some masters and seruants some magistrates and subiects In the second estate there are no outward differences of men but all are members of Christ and all one in him Thus must the text be vnderstood Obiect II. Beleeuers are gouerned by Gods spirit and therefore outward gouernment by magistrates is needlesse Answ. In the visible Church hypocrites are mingled with true beleeuers and they are not gouerned by Gods spirit but by the spirit of the deuill and therefore in respect of them ciuill authoritie is requisite Againe true beleeuers are but in part gouerned by the spirit for the time of this life And for this cause ciuill gouernment is requisite for the ordering of the outward man and for the protection of the Church Obiect III. They that are in Christ are freed from sinne and consequently from subiection which followes vpon sinne Answ. Subiection is either politique or seruile Politicke is when men are subiect for their own good and this was before the fall yeilded by Eve to Adam Seruile subiection when they are subiect for the good of their masters and this onely comes of sinne Againe subiection with ioy was before the fall subiection ioyned with paine and miserie followes vpon sinne Gen. 3. 16. The second question is whether bondage in which some are Lords others bond-men or slaues may stand with Christian religion Answ. It may in the countries where it is established by positiue lawes if it be vsed with mercie and moderation Righteons Abraham had in his owne house bondslaues Gen. 17. 13. God did permit the Iewes to buy the children of the Canaanites Leuit. 25. 45. Paul saith If any man be calied beeing a seruant or bondman let him not care for it 1. Cor. 7. 21. Obiect I. Be not seruants of men 1. Cor. 7. 23. Ans. That is in respect of conscience the subiection whereof must be reserued to God Obiect II. Christians haue libertie by Christ and where libertie is there may be no bondage Answ. Christians obtaine by Christ spirituall libertie in this life and bodily libertie in the life to come Obiect III. Bondage is against the lawe of nature Answ. Against the law of pure nature created in innocencie not against the lawe of corrupt nature the fruite whereof is bondage Obiect IU All are one in Christ therefore the difference of bond men and free-men must cease Ans. All are one in respect of the inward man or in respect of faith and fellowship with Christ but all are not one in respect of the outward man and in regard of ciuill order The sense then of the text is this There are distinctions of men in respect of nation some Iewes some Gentiles in respect of condition some bonde some free some rich some poore some in authoritie some in subiection c. in respect of sexe some men some women yet in Christ Iesus all are euen as one man The vse By this text we may expound another 1. Tim. 2. God would haue all men to be saued that is not all particular persons vpon earth but all kinds For here Paul saith all are one in Christ that is men of all nations of all conditions and of all sexes Againe the name Jewe apposed to Gentiles signifies not onely men of the tribe of Iuda but all circumcized persons of all tribes Rom. 2. 28. and thus it is all one with an Israelite And thus we see howe to expound the place of scripture 2. Chron. 21. 2. where Iehosaphat king of Iuda is called king of Israel The words Iuda and Israel are sometime opposed Iuda signifying the kingdome of the two tribes Iuda and Beniamin and Israel signifying the 10. tribes Sometimes againe they are Synonima and are put one for another as Psalm 114. 1 2. and in this text And Iuda at this time was indeed the true Israel of God and Iehosaphat without any fault in the text as some suppose is truely called king of Israel Thirdly they which are of great byrth and of heigh condicion must be pnt in mind not to be heigh minded nor to dispise them that are of lowe degree for all are one in Christ the obscure and base person hath as good part in Christ as the greatest men that be Therefore we may not swell in pride for outward things The king must not lift vp his hart against his brethren Deut. 17. 20. rich men saith Paul must not be high minded 1. Tim. 6. 17. Iob would not despise the cause of his handmaid Iob. 31. 13. Naaman a great man respected the counsell of his seruants 2. King 5. 13. Fourthly all beleeuers must be on hart and mind 1. Cor. 1. 10. In the kingdome of Christ the wolfe and the lamb dwell together Isai. 11. 6. And good reason for all are on in Christ. And we haue great cause to be humbled when schismes coutentions and differences arise in points of religion For that shewes that hypocrites are mingled with true beleeuers and that we are but in part as yet vnited to Christ. Lastly hence we learne not to hate any man but alwaies to carrie in mind a purpose to doe good to all by thought word and deed and to doe good to men in respect of their names their goods their liues And this wholy mind and purpose must alwaies beare sway in vs. there is no hurt in the mount of the Lord. Isai 1● 9. Men turne their swords speares into mattocks sithes that are of the kingdom of Christ. Isai 2. 4. because they are one with Christ by the bond of on spirit v. 29. And if ye be Christs then are ye Abrahams seed and heires by promise Before Paul had taught v. 7. 8. 9. that all beleeuing gentiles were the children of Abraham and not the Iewes only Here he returnes to the same point againe and prooues it by a new Argument thus Christ is the seed of Abraham v. 16. and all gentiles beleeuing in Christ are parts of him and one with him therefore they also are children of Abraham and heires of all the blessings of God The intent of Paul in these words is to establish and confirme an argument which before he had vrged in this chapter against patrons of workes in the case of our iustification it may be framed thus As Abraham was iustified so are all they that beleeue in Christ instified for they are Abr●●ams children and succeed him v. 29. but Abraham was iustified by faith without workes therefore all beleeuers in Christ are so iustified Let the Argument be obserued for it makes against the Papist who if he studie till his head and heartake shall neuer answer it In this verse Paul sets down the fruit and banefit that comes by the gift of adoption to
made by their children without or against their consent Ans. The scripture giueth them authoritie either to ratifie such contracts or to make them void Num. 30. 6. the father may make void the vow of the child pertaining to Gods worship much more a matrimoniall promise If a yong man deflowre a maide and this be found in equitie he is to be compelled to marrie her Deut. 22. 28. yet by Gods law this may not be except the father consent Exod. 22. 17. The third question is whether a marriage made without and against the consent of parents be a marriage or no Ans. It may be called a politicke or ciuill marriage because it is ratified in the courts of men according to humane lawes and by this meanes the ishue is freed from bastardie Neuerthelesse it is not a diuine or spirituall coniunction or marriage as it ought to be because it is flat against the commandement of God Touching the callings of children they are to be ordered and appointed at the discretion of parents For if the parent may order the vowe and the marriage of the child then much more the calling Here take notice of the impietie of the Romane religion There are three especiall estates whereby man liues in societie with man the Church the Commonwealth the familie In the Church that religion sets vp another head beside Christ in the Commonwealth it sets vp an authoritie that serues to curb and restraine the Supremacie of Princes in causes Ecclesiasticall In the familie it puts downe the authoritie of the father for it ratifieth clandestine contracts and it giues libertie to children past twelue or fourteene yeares of age to enter into any order of religion against the consent of their parents Againe parents must be put in minde to know their authoritie to maintaine it and to vse it aright for the good of their children specially for their saluation And children must be warned in all things honest and lawfull to yeeld subiection to their parents and in this subiection shall they find the blessing of God Againe here is set downe the office of parents and that is to prouide meete ouerseers and Tutors for their children after their departure When Christ vpon the crosse had the pangs of death vpon him he commends his mother to the tuition of Iohn Ioh. 19. 26. When widdowes and Orphanes are wronged God himself takes vpon him the office of a Tutor in their behalfe Exod. 22. 22. And this shewes that it is a necessary dutie to be thought vpon Thirdly here the dutie of children is set downe and that is that they must be subiect to their Tutors and gouernours as to their owne fathers and mothers Ruth loued Naomi and claue vnto her as to her owne mother Ruth 1. 16. Christ was subiect to Ioseph who was but a reputed father Luk. 2. last The sonnes of the Prophets obay their masters as their owne fathers 2. king 2. 12. and so doe the seruants to their master 2. king 5. 13. Nowe I come to the second part of the similitude v. 3. Euen so we that is the Iewes and all the people of God in the olde testament Were children were as children in respect of the Christian Church in the new Testament Were in bondage The Iewes are said to be in bondage in respect of vs because they were subiect to more lawes then we are and they wanted the fruition of the liberty which we inioy They had the right of sonnes but they inioyed not their right as we doe and this is their bondage For otherwise libertie in conscience frō hell death sin they had euen as we now haue Rudiments of the world that is the lawe or Ministerie of Moses and it is so called in respect of a more full and plentifull doctrine in the ministerie of the newe Testament And it is called the Rudiments of the world because Iewrie was as it were a little schoole set vp in a corner of the world the lawe of Moses was as it were an a b c or Primar in which Christ was reuealed to the world in darke and obscure manner specially to the Iewes The vse Here we see that the people of the old Testament were for right heires as well as we and therefore they had right to all the blessings of God The difference betweene vs and them is onely in the manner which God vsed in dispensing the foresaid blessings to vs. Againe the fathers of the olde Testament before Christ were but as children in respect of vs now Thus much saith Paul in expresse words And they were so two waies First in respect of the Mosaicall regiment because they were kept in subiection to more lawes then we Secondly they were so in respect of reuelation because God hath reuealed more to vs then to them Read Luk. 10. 24. It may be said we now are the best of vs but children to Abraham and the Prophets whether we respect knowledge or faith Answ. It is so If we compare person and person but it is otherwise if we compare bodie with bodie and compare the Christian church with the Church of the Iewes before Christ then we exceede them and they are but children to vs. This must teach vs all to be carefull to increase in knowledge and in the grace of God that we may be answerable to our condition And to liue in ignorance as the most doe is the shame of vs all For in respect of the time we should all be teachers Heb. 5. 12. and yet God knows the most are very babes For aske a man how he lookes to be saued he will answer by seruing God and by dealing truely Now his seruing of God is his saying of his praiers and his praiers are the Beleefe and the ten Commandements This is a poore seruing of God fitter for babes then for men of yeares It is further to be obserued that Paul saith the fathers of the old Testament were in bondage vnder the lawe after the manner of seruants specially by reason of rites ceremonies And hence it followes that the obseruation of a religion in which are manifold bodily rites and figures is a kind of bondage and pertaines to the Church for the time of her infancie or minority Let this be remembred against the Romish religion for it is like to that of the Iewes in the olde Testament standing for the greatest part in bodily rites in differences of meates and drinkes in differences of times places garments in exercises and afflictions of the bodie in locall succession in the collation of grace by the worke done and such like This is manifest to them which know● the masse which indeede is nothing but a masse of ceremonies Therefore the Romane religion is a childish and babish religion and if it were of God yet is it not fit for the church of the newe Testament that is come forth of her minoritie Religion that stands in the afflicting of the body is but a shadow and an
appearance of humilitie Col. 2. 23. And the true worshippers of God in the new Testament worship him in spirit and trueth Ioh. 4. v. 24 The fulnesse of time or the full time is that time in which the captiuitie of the Church endeth and her libertie begins This time was ended 4000. yeares from the creation and it is called a full time because it was designed and appointed by the will prouidence of the heauenly father For he is Lord of time and all seasons are in his hand and his will or prouidence makes times fit or vnfit Marke then that is the onely full and fit time for the inioying of any blessing of God which he by his prouidence appointeth This must teach vs when by praier we aske any good thing at Gods hand not to prescribe any time vnto God but to leaue it to his prouidence Againe if thou liue in any miserie waite on the Lord and be content For that is the fit best time of thy deliuerāce which God hath appointed Lastly thou must be admonished to pray to god for grace and mercie and to turne to him this daie before to morrowe For this is the time which God hath appointed for these duties this is the day of grace and therefore the onely fit time Heb. 3. 7. Psal. 32. 6. Thus much of the similitude nowe I come to the first reason whereby Paul confirmes his maine argument Christ hath purchased and procured your libertie therefore the time therof is come and past For the better clearing of this reason Paul sets downe the waie and order which was vsed in procuring this libertie And it containes fiue degrees The first is the sending of the sonne the second his incarnation the third his subiection to the law the fourth our redemption from the laws the fift the fruition of our adoption v. 4. 5. The first the sending of the sonne is in these words In the fulnesse of time God sent forth his sonne That we may attaine to the sense of this great Mysterie sixe questions are to be propounded The first is what is meant by God Answ. The father the first person Eph. 1. 3. Blessed he God the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ 2. Cor. 1. 3. and Ioh. 20. 17. And he is called God not because he partakes more of the godhead then the sonne or the h. Ghost but because he is the first in order of the three diuine persons and he is the beginning of the sonne and the H. ghost and hath no beginning of his own person because he doth not receiue the godhead by communication from any other In this respect he is called God more commonly then the sonne or the holy Ghost The second question is How the father sends the sonne Answ. By his counsell and eternall decree whereby the sonne was designed to the office of a Mediatour and consequently to become man Act. 2. 23. And thus is he said to be sealed of the father Ioh. 6. 27. and to be sanctified and sent into the world Ioh. 10. 36. And therefore this sending implies no alteration or change of place The third question is whether the sonne was sent with his owne consent or no Ans. Yea the decree of the father is the decree of the sonne and the holy Ghost because as they are all one in nature so are they all one in will All the persons then haue a stroke in this sending yet for orders false the father is said to send because he is first The fourth question is how the father can send the sonne considering they are both one Ans. In the doctrine touching the Trinitie Nature and person must be distinguished N●ture is a substance common to many as the Godhead A person is that which subsisteth of it selfe and hath a proper manner of subsisting as the father begetting the sonne begotten the H. Ghost proceeding Now the father and the sonne are one indeed for nature or godhead but they are not one for person Nay thus they are really distinct The father is not the sonne nor the sonne the father And thus doth the father send the son The fift question is why the sonne is so called Ans. Because he was begotten of the father by a perfect and eternall generation not to be vttered of man or conceiued And we must be warned not to conceiue it in any carnall or humane manner For an earthly father is in time before his sonne and the sonne after but God the father and the sonne are coeternall and not one before or after the other for time An earthly father is forth of the sonne and the sonne forth of the father but God the father is in the sonne and the sonne in the father An earthly child is from his father by propagation but the sonne is from the heauenly father not by propagation but by communication of substance Lastly the heauenly father begettes the sonne by communication of his whole substance and so doth no earthly father The last question is whether the Sonne be God For it is here said God sent his Sonne Ans. He is God For he that is sent forth from God was before he was sent forth And the sonne is said to be sent forth because he was with God the father before all worlds Ioh. 1. 1. and because he came from the bosome of his father v. 18. Obiect I. The sonne is sent of the father and he that is sent is inferiour to the father and he that is inferiour to God is not God Ans. Two equalls by common consent may send each other and therefore sending alwaies implies not inequalitie Againe inferioritie is of two sorts inferioritie of nature and inferioritie of condition The first doth not befall Christ because for nature he is one and the same with the father The second agrees vnto him because of his owne voluntarie accord he abased himselfe and tooke vpon him the shape of a man Phil. 2. 5. Obiect II. God hath his beginning of none the sonne hath his beginning of the father therefore he is not God Ans. The sonne in respect of his person is of the father but in respect of his godhead he is of none The sonne of God considered as he is a sonne is of the father God of very God But considered as he is God he is God of himselfe because the godhead of the sonne is not begotten more then the Godhead of the father Obiect III. The sonne was made Lord in time Act. 2. 36. therefore no God Ans. Christ as he is the sonne of God was not made Lord in time but is by nature an eternall Lord as the father And he is said to be made Lord in respect of his condition as he is God-man and that in time in respect of both his natures In respect of his manhood because it is receiued into the vnitie of the second person and exalted to the right hand of God in heauen In respect of his Godhead the maiestie and Lordship
on the Lords day But this doctrine seemes not to stand with the fourth commandement It seemes to be a truth more probable that euery seauenth day in the weeke must be set a part in holy rest vnto God for this is the substance of the fourth commandement And it is also very probable that the Sabbath of the new Testament is limited and determined by our Sauiour Christ to the Lords day For Paul and the rest of the Apostles obserued the first day of the weeke for a Sabbath day Act. 20. 7. and he saith Whatsoeuer ye haue heard and what ye haue seene in me that doe Phil. 4. 9. Againe it was the decree or constitution of Paul that the collection for the poore should be the first day of the weeke at Corinth now this collection in the Primitiue Church followed preaching praier sacraments and it was the conclusion of all other exercises in the assemblie 1. Cor. 16. 2. And this first day of the weeke is called the Lords day Apoc. 1. 11. and it is so called because it was dedicated and consecrated to the honour of Christ our Lord. And who is the author of this Dedication but Christ himselfe the Lord of the Sabboth It is alleadged that the Sabbath and the commandement touching the Sabbath is Ceremoniall and vpon this ground they take libertie keep no Sabbath at all But the truth is that the commandement touching the Sabbath is not wholly Ceremoniall It may be the first words Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it and the words In it thou shalt doe no manner of worke c. are spoken of the Iewes Sabbath but the wordes Sixe daies shalt thou labour and the seuenth day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God are morall and containe a perpetuall truth Therefore the words of Paul must be conceiued with an exception of the Sabbath day which is the seuenth day in euery weeke which day Christ hath limited by his Apostles to the Lords day The vse This text of Paul discouers vnto vs a great part of the superstition of the Popish Church in the obseruation of holy daies First beside the Lords day they appoint many other sabbaths whereas it is the priuiledge of God to appoint an ordinarie day of rest and to sanctifie it to his owne honour Secondly they bind mens consciences to the obseruation of their holy daies which Paul here forbids and Col. 2. 16. Thirdly they place the worship of God in the obseruation of their holy daies but God is worshipped in vaine by mens precepts Matth. 15. Fourthly they place a great holines in their festiuall daies more then in other daies Fiftly they dedicate many of their holy daies to the honour of Saints and Angels whereas the dedication of ordinarie and set daies is a part of diuine or religious worship Lastly their holy daies for number are more then the festiuall daies of the Iewes and thus they bring people into their old bondage nay to a greater bondage then euer the Iewes indured in respect of daies and times It may be said that the Church of the Protestants obserue holy daies Ans. Some Churches doe not because the Church in the Apostles daies had no holy day beside the Lords day and the 4. commandement inioynes the labour of sixe daies Indeede the Churches of England obserueth holy daies but the Popish superstition is cut off For we are not bound in conscience to the obseruation of these daies neither doe we place holines or the worship of God in them but we keepe them onely for orders sake that men may come to the Church to heare Gods word And though we retaine the names of Saints daies yet we giue no worship to saints but to God alone And such daies as contained nothing in them but superstition as the conception and assumption of the virgin Marie we haue cut off Thus doth the Church with vs obserue holy daies and no otherwise Indeede the ignorant multitude among vs faile greatly in the obseruing of daies For they greatly solemnise the time of the birth of Christ and then they keepe few or no markets but the Lords day is not accordingly respected and men will not be disswaded from following of faires on that day Againe to obserue daies of good bad successe according to the constellations of the heauens is an heathenish fashion to be auoided For it is here condemned in the Galatians Here therefore we must be put in minde not to obserue the planetarie houres for men suppose that the houres of the daie are ruled by the planets and hereupon that some houres are good and luckie as they say and some vnluckie that men are taken with planets and borne vnder vnluckie planets But these are heathenish conceits Neither must we respect our Horoscope or the time of our birth and the constellation of the heauens thē as though we could hereby know what should befall vs to the end of our daies And we must not put difference of daies as though some were luckie vnto vs and some vnluckie according to the course of the starres The like I saie of the Criticall daies that is the 7. and the 14. daie after that a man beginnes to be sicke For they are groūded vpon the aspects of the moone which are not to be regarded And the Climactericall years are not to be obserued as dangerous and dismall The obseruatiō of the signes is of the same nature For the 12. signes are nothing els but 12. parts of the first mooueable which is but a supposed heauen Therefore there is no danger in the thing but in our conceit We are to feare God and not to feare the starres neither are we to make differences of daies in respect of them as though the affaires we take in hand should prosper the better or the worse in respect of their different operation Gods commandement is Feare not the signes of heauen Ierem. 10. 2. And good reason For no man can by learning knowe the operation of the starrs because their lights and operations are all mixed togither in all places vpon earth and therefore no obseruation can be made of this or that starre more then of this or that hearbe when all hearbes are mixed and compounded togither Againe the operation of the starres is by their light and light hath no operation but in heat or cold moisture or drinesse In this respect though we may well obserue the full and the change of the moone it is foolishnesse to ascribe the regiment of our affaires to the starres they beeing matters contingent which depend on the will and pleasure of man Lastly it is a great ouersight to hold sundrie of the starres to be malignant and infortunate in respect of vs whereas they are the creatures of God and their light serues for the good of man In a word we are not to make difference of daies neither in respect of holines nor in respect of good or badde successe V. 11. I am afraid
c. In these words the Apostle sets forth the greatnesse of the Apostasie of the Galatians by the effect thereof which was to cause him to feare least he had bestowed labour in vaine amōg them First the occasion of the words must be considered and that is expressed in the former words ye obserue daies and moneths And hereupon he saith J am in feare of you And thus Paul teacheth that workes set vp as causes of saluation with Christ make void the Ministerie and grace of God It may be said this is meant of ceremoniall workes and so it is true I answer it is indeed spoken of ceremoniall workes but it must be inlarged to all workes without exception For Paul saith c. 5. v. 3. If ye be circumcised ye are bound to fulfill the whole lawe Hence then it followes that the doctrine of iustification by workes is an errour in the foundation and beeing distinctly and obstinately maintained there is no hope of saluation Againe here we see the fidelitie of the Apostle Paul and it stands in two things the first is his painefull and wearisome labour to gaine the Galatians to God The second is his care that the foresaid labour be not in vaine And in this example of his we learne three things The first that they which are or desire to be dispensers of the word must doe it not for the bellie or for lucres sake or for the praise of men but simply for this ende that they may gaine soules to God The Scribe that would haue followed Christ for gaine was repelled with this answer that Christ had not so much as a place where to lay his head Math. 8. 20. and to preach for by-respects is to make a marchandise of the word of God 2. Cor. 2. 17. The second is that ministers after the example of Paul must be labourers indeed 1. Cor. 3. 9. and workemen 2. Tim. 2. 15. And they must shewe themselues to be so by their care and industrie in winning soules to God And it is not sufficient now and then to make a discourse vpon a text Thirdly Ministers of the word must be watchmen Ezech. 3. 14 and Heb. 13. 17. their office is not onely to gaine and call men to God but also to preserue and keepe them in Christ which are alreadie called Thirdly here we see the condition of the Church of Galatia and of all other visible Churches vpon earth that they are subiect to Apostasie It may be said how can this be considering true beleeuers cannot fall away Ans. In the visible church on earth there are foure kinds of beleeuers The first are they which heare the word without zeale and they are like the stony ground The second are they which heare knowe and approoue the word The third are they which heare knowe and approoue the word and haue a taste of the power thereof and accordingly yeeld some outward obedience The fourth are they which heare knowe approoue and keepe the word in that they beleeue it and are turned into the obedience of it The three first may fall quite away the fourth cannot And by this meanes it comes to passe that visible Churches vpon earth may fall away because of them that professe the faith three to one may vtterly fall away The vse This must teach vs that are members of the visible Church to feare and to suspect our selues and not to content our selues because we haue some good things in vs but we must labour to be sealed vp to the daie of our redemption and to lay vp a good foundation against the time to come 1. Tim. 6. 18. By seeking to haue in vs such good things as are proper to the Elect as vnfained faith in Christ and conuersion to God from all our sinnes It may be demanded how Pauls labour should be in vaine Ans. It was in vaine in respect of his owne desire and affection to saue all the Galatians secondly it was in vaine in respect of the whole bodie of that Church wherof many were hypocrits It was not in vaine in respect of the elect nor in respect of the counsell of God Isa. 55. 11. Againe it may be demanded what must be done when the labours of our callings are in vaine Ans. We must follow the calling and commandement of God whether we haue good successe or no and whatsoeuer come of it Paul feares least his labour is in vaine and yet he still labours When Peter had laboured all night and caught nothing he saith at the commandement of Christ In thy word will I cast out my net Luk. 5. And thus to doe whatsoeuer follows is true wisedome and the feare of God For it must suffice vs that the worke we take in hand is pleasing vnto God And though it be in vaine in respect of men it is not so before God Isa 49. 4. and 2. Cor. 2. 18. This must euery man remember in his place and calling for the establishing of his minde against all euents V. 12. Be you as I for I am euen as you I beseech you brethren ye haue not hurt me at all The words in this verse to the 16. verse are an answer to an obiection The obiection is this we see now by these sharpe reproofes that Paul hath changed his minde toward vs and that he hath turned his loue into hatred The answer is be as I I am as you the speech is very effectuall and significant and it is like the common prouerb Amicus alter ego alter idem that is a mans friend is all one with himselfe The sense of the words is Be as I looke that your minds be not estranged from me but tender me euen as your own selues for I Paul am the same that euer I was I respect and tender you euen as mine own selfe And least the Galatians should say see ye not how Paul commands imperiously be ye as I therefore he addes I beseech you brethren I command you not In the next words he addes a reason of his answer thus Hatred presupposeth a hurt or wrong to be done ye haue done me no hurt or wrong therefore ye may not thinke that I hate you When Paul saith be as I I am as you we learne that there must be a speciall and mutuall loue betweene the teachers and the people Paul saith that he did inlarge his heart for the Corinthians and he requires the like of them 2. Cor. 6. 11. 13. Teachers must shewe their loue by tendering the saluation of the people by all meanes euen as their own soules Paul could haue found in his heart to haue beene accursed for his countrimen the Iewes Rom. 9. 〈◊〉 He desired that he might be offered vp as a drinke offering vpon the sacrifice of the faith of the Philippians Phil. 2. 18. When the Israelites had sinned Moses stands in the breach as it were in the face of the Canon betweene the wrath of God and them by his praier to stay the iudgement of
Paul saith It is written In the testimonie I consider three things the condition of two Churches the change of the condition the ioy that is vpon the change The condition of the Church of the new Testament in these words Barren that bearest no children thou that trauelest not the desolate Barren The Christian Church is so called because by the vertue and strength of nature it beares no children to God no more then Sara did to Abraham Ioh. 1. 13. 1. Cor. 3. 7. Secondly it is so called in respect of the beginning thereof when the Iewish church was yet standing till the spirit of God was powred forth vpon all flesh after the ascension of Christ and before this the number of them which were conuerted to God was very small and therefore Christ himselfe complained that he spent his strength in vaine Isai 49. 1. Thirdly it is so called in respect of the latter times of the church in which Christ shall scarce finde faith vpon the earth Luk. 18. 8. Further that the church is barren it is declared by the signe because she neither brings forth child nor beares Desolate that is without husband in appearance by reason of the crosse and affliction and without children because at the first the christian church was constrained to hide herselfe in the wildernesse Reuel 12. 14. It may be demanded howe the catholike church should be desolate Answ. The estate of the church is twofold inward or outward The inward estate stands in the true knowledge of God in Christ in comfort touching remission of sinnes and life euerlasting in the hearing of our praiers in protection and deliuerance from all spirituall enemies in the gifts of the spirit faith hope loue c. In respect of this estate the church is all glorious within and neuer desolate Psal. 45. 13. The outward estate of the Catholike church stands in visible assemblies in the publike Ministerie of the word and sacraments in a gouernment according to the word of God In respect of this second estate the Church may be in desolation This was the condition of the Church in paradise vpon the fall of our first parents of the Israelites at Mount Horeb when they worshipped the golden calfe and in the daies of Elias Rom. 11. 3. and afterward 2. Chron. 15. 3. When Christ suffered the sheapheard was smitten and the sheepe were scattered After Christs ascension all the earth worshipped the beast Reu 13. 12. Hence it followes that the Catholike church is not a visible estate or companie of men vnder one visible head because in respect of her outward estate shee may be for a time in desolation And as this is the estate of the church so is it also of the mēbers thereof They shall be hated of all men Luk. 21. 17. Men shall thinke they doe God good seruice when they kill them Ioh. 16. 2. And Christ himselfe was a man without forme or beautie Isai. 53. 2. Hauing an husband in these wordes the condition of the Iewish church is set forth that shee is married or espoused to God who is her husband Ezech. 16. 8 9. Ose. 2. 19. The like may be said of any other church and namely of the church of England The vse This must teach vs to dedicate our bodies and soules to God and Christ and to giue the maine affections of our hearts vnto him as our loue and our ioy c. Secondly we must adorne and trimme our selues with grace that we may please our husband Psal. 45. 12. Thirdly we must be the glory of Christ as the wife is to her husband 1. Cor. 11. 7. and that is by subiecting our selues to Christ and his lawes Againe if we be●roath our selues to Christ indeed we may assure our selues that Christ is our Christ and that he hath giuen himselfe vnto vs and consequently that he will sanctifie vs Ezech. 16. 9. protect vs as an husband doeth his wife Gen. 20. 16. and indowe vs with all things needfull for this life and the life to come Ezech. 16. 10 11. The second point is the change of the church of the newe Testament because shee shall cease to be barren and bring forth many children This is the promise of God and hereupon Paul concludes that the church is a mother of all beleeuers both Iewes and Gentiles Obserue that the promise of God is of infinite vertue in his time and place In the beginning God said let there be this or that and it was so Of like vertue is Gods promise if we can waite his leisure God promised that after 430. yeares the Israelites should be deliuered out of Egypt presently when the time was expired nothing could hinder the promise Read Exod. 12. 41. Therefore our dutie is to rest on Gods promises in all times both in life and death The third point is the ioy vpon the change Reioyce Here are two things to be considered The first who must reioyce Answ. The church Gods kingdome is the place of ioy Rom. 14. 17. Reioycing belongs to the people of God Psal. 68. 3. 106. 5. The musicke of the Temple was typicall and figured the ioy of the Catholike Church where is the assurance of remission of sinnes and life eternall The second point is in what must the church reioyce Ans. In the redemption of Christ and the fruit thereof the conuersion of sinners to god For the prophet had shewed at large the passion and sufferings of Christ Isai 53. and hereupon he saith Reioyce thou barren The Israelites were commanded to feast and to be merrie before the Lord Leuit. 23. 40. 1. Chron. 29. 32. that is before the Lords Arke which was the pledge of his presence Now this Arke was a figure of Christ and the myrth before the Arke signified that the foundation of all our ioy lies in our Reconciliation with God in Christ. The angels in heauen greatly reioyce at the conuersion of a sinner and at the returne of the prodigall sonne the fat calfe is killed The vse It is false that religion breeds Melancholie and cuts of all mirth It doeth not abolish mirth but rectifie it nay it brings men to true and perfect ioy Our first and principall ioy must be that we are in Gods fauour reconciled to God by Christ Luk. 10. 20. In Dauid the head of his ioy was the good estate of the church Psal. 137 6. And all other pettie ioyes must flow from this and be sutable to it Breake forth this signifies that the church vpon earth is as it were pent in with present greife Our ioy in this life is mixed with sorrow The paschall lambe was eaten with sowre hearbes to signifie that we feele no sweetnesse in the blood of Christ till we feele the smart of our sinnes We here must reioyce in trembling Psal. 2. 11. Ioy is sowne for them that are vpright in heart Psal. 97. 12. Crie in our earthly ioyes we must be moderate and sparing we must not eate to much hony
that is another cause of dissention 1. Corint 3. 3. The second point concernes the qualitie of these dissentiōs When Paul saith if ye bite and deuoure c. he signifies that they were fierce and violent And such commonly are dissentions for religion as appeares by the persecution in Queene Maries daies the heate whereof nothing could slake but mans blood Againe he signifies in these very wordes that they were bru●ish and beastlike more beseeming wolues lions dogges then men This must teach vs to detest railing cursing euill speaking fighting vnles it be in the case of necessarie defence for by these actions we degenerate to the condition of beastes and repell from vs the worke of grace for Christ of lions wolfes beares hath made vs his sheepe and lambes Isai. 11. The third point is touching the effect of contention that is the ruine desolation of the Church The diuision of the members among themselues is the dissolutiō of the whole bodie Differences in points of religion breed doubting doubting hinders faith and inuocation and the free course of the Gospell and where these be hindred the Church goes to decay And by reason of the dissentions that be in these last daies many liue as Atheistes and will be of no religion By this we are to be admonished to studie and to vse all meanes to maintaine Christian peace and concord Eph. 4. 3. To this end we must remember one generall rule Rom. 12. 18. haue peace with all men And withall we must obserue the cautions which Paul addes one is if it may be with good conscience for there are some with whome there is no peace vnles we sooth them in their vices or denie our religion either in whole or in part The second is If it lie in you for sometime men are accused and must of necessitie defend themselues These two cautions obserued peace must be had with all men It may thē be demanded why do not the Protestans make a Pacification with the Papists Ans. we are content so to do in respect of ciuill societie but not in respect of religion We haue a commandement to the contrarie Reuel 18. 4. come out of Babylon my people and touch no vnclean thing where a pacification is made both the partes must yeeld somewhat but we may not yeeld in any point of our religion to the Papists In an Instrument of musick the stringes out of tune are set vp or set downe to the rest and the strings that are in tune are not stirred Euen so the Papists are to turne to vs we are not to turne to them our religion beeing the doctrine of the prophets Apostles Peace is three-fould Church peace Ciuill peace Houshould peace All these are to be maintained Touching Church peace I giue 3 rules The first is that for the ending of differences in religion there must be conferences in a free or christian councell the spirits of the prophets is subiect to the prophet 1. Cor. 14. ●2 when there arose differences in the Churches of Iudea the Apostles and elders came together to inquire of the matter Act. 15. 6. And this is a thing much to be desired in these daies specially in these Westerne partes of the world It may be demanded why did not the Protestants ioyne with the Papists at the councell of Trent Ans. from the first session it was more then 6 yeares before any safe conduct was giuen to the Protestants and at their appearing in the councell exception was taken against their letters and they dismissed And when they appeared the second time vpon new safe conduct the councell was the next day reiorned for 2 yeares And when safe conduct was giuen the 3 time the Protestant princes refused to send their diuines because they had bin twice mocked Moreouer the councell was not a free councell because the Pope himselfe was both partie and iudge The second rule There must be a christian toleration one of an other Eph. 4. 2. here that we mistake not I propound 2 questions One is in what must there be a toleration Ans. A toleration presupposeth an errour or defect in our brother An errour is either in iudgement or manners An error in iudgment is either in the foundation of religion or beside the foundation in lighter matters if the errour be in the foundation there is no toleration of it If it be in some lesser matter a toleration is to be vsed according to the rule of the Apostle if ye be otherwise minded God will reueile it Phil. 3. 15. when others see not that which we see we must not presētly cōdemne them but tolerat their ignorance till God reueile his truth vnto them Againe errors in manners be of 2 sortes some without offence as hastines frowardnes vaine gloriousnes c. these we must tolerate Pro. 19. 11. and others with open offence and such admit no toleration 1. Cor. 5. 11. The second question is to what ende must we tolerate the infirmities and ignorances of our brethren Ans. Toleration must tend to the good and edification of men Rom. 15. 2. We must not so tolerate as that we approoue of the least vice or betray the least part of Gods truth It may here be demanded whether there may not be a toleration for Poperie Ans. No. The toleration of two religions in one kingdome is the ouerthrow of peace Againe Poperie is a religion both hereticall and schismaticall It may be said that faith and conscience is free I answer though faith in the heart and conscience in it selfe be free in respect of mans authoritie yet is not the publishing of faith and the profession of conscience free in like sort but it stands subiect to the power of the Magistrate The third rule Euery man in his place specially teachers must set themselues to build the Church Iud. v. 20. Eph. 4. 12. Indeede the truth is to be defended but marke how The truth must be confessed when time and occasion serues without opposition this done all contentions laid aside we must set our selues to build the Church And the rather Ministers of Gods word in England must remember this because while we are striuing among our selues in sundrie points of difference the Papist our common enemie gets ground Touching ciuill peace it must be remembred that the peace and good estate of Ierusalem stood in this that it was made the seate of Gods sanctuarie and the throne of iustice Psal. 122. When the Arke was in the house of Obed-Edom all things prospered with him Now in the new Testament the preaching of the Gospel inuocation of Gods name with the vse of the Sacraments come in the roome of the Sanctuarie Ciuill peace then is maintained when men yeeld subiection to the Gospel of Christ which brings peace to all that receiue it Touching houshold peace I giue two rules One is that gouernours of families must vrge and compell all vnder them to admit at the least outwardly the practise of
talents left vs to imploy to our masters aduantage If thou hast receiued them saith Paul why boastest thou thy selfe as though thou hadst not receiued them 3. Be it that a man be in Christ and sanctified yet he hath no greater right to the merits of Christ nor greater part in them then he which is lesse sanctified for though sanctification hath degrees and a certaine latitude yet iustification hath none So that a mā is in trueth nothing of himselfe 1. Because he hath his beeing and beginning of nothing and tendeth of his owne nature to corruption and nothing 2. In that he is not that which he imagineth himselfe to be 3. Though he haue some gifts and graces of God yet is he nothing because he is farre short of that which he ought to be 1. Cor. 8. 2. Vpon these considerations Abraham acknowledgeth himselfe to be but dust and ashes Gen. 18. 27. Dauid comparing himselfe with the magnificence of Saul saith What am I or what is my fathers house 1. Sam. 18. 18. Nay whether we consider man absolutely in himselfe or relatiuely in respect of other creatures as those glorious bodies the sunne moone starres we may say with the Prophet Dauid Lord what is man that thou art mindefull of him or the sonne of man that thou regardest him Psal. 8. 4. Paul confesseth himselfe to be nothing in of or by himselfe but by the grace of God saith he I am that I am 1. Cor. 15. 10. And againe I was nothing inferiour to the very chiefe Apostles although I am nothing 2. Cor. 12. 11. The Apostle affirmeth of euery man which thinketh he knoweth some thing that he knoweth nothing as he ought to know 1. Cor. 8. 2. and of many that they are puffed vp and know nothing 1. Tim. 6. 4. For a swelling conceit and emptines vsually goe together The second generall thing to be obserued in the words is this That it is naturall for men to thinke too well of themselues to magnifie themselues aboue others in their conceits and in a manner to deifie themselues and to nullifie others in comparison of themselues and this ouerweening of a mans selfe is a branch of pride For a man looking vpon himselfe through the spectacles of selfe-loue doth thinke euery small gift of God which he seeth to be in himselfe to be farre greater then in truth it is imagining meere shadowes to be substances or molehills to be as bigge as mountaines For as a man that is in loue doth thinke the blemishes and deformities in his loue to be ornaments which make her more beautifull So those which with Narcissus are in loue with themselues and do●e vpon their own gifts iudge the vices which they see to be in themselues to be vertues Simon Magus though a wicked wretch a limme of the Deuill a sorcerer c. yet had this conceit of himselfe and gaue it out also that he was some great man Act. 8. 9. to wit the great power of God v. 10. The Church of Laodicea thought shee was rich and increased with goods and had neede of nothing whereas shee was wretched and miserable and poore and blind and naked Apoc. 3. 17. And so the skarlet strūpet thought her selfe a Queene and that shee was out of all daunger of downefall when shee was alreadie fallen Apoc. 18. 2 7. Yea this corruption is so naturall that euen the regenerate themselues who are in part sanctified are tainted therewith and generally they that haue receiued greater gifts of knowledge of sanctification c. are most ready to ouerweene their owne gifts except God giue them grace to resist this temptation for knowledge puffeth vp 1. Cor. 8. 1. The Apostles themselues contended which of them should seeme to be the greatest Luk. 22. 24. Yea in all ages there haue beene some in the Church ouerweening themselues as in Christs time the Iustitiarie Pharisies after them the Catharists or Puritanes who both proudly and odiously called themselues by that name thinking themselues without sinne the Donatists that they were a Church without spot or wrinkle the Iovinianists that a man cannot sinne after the lauer of regeneration The Pelagians that the life of a iust man in this world hath no sinne in it at all and of later times the Semi-Pelagian heretike who will be something of himselfe and will haue some stroke in his first conuersion wil concur with Christ in the worke of Iustificatiō It will be said Papists ascribe all the praise to God Ans. So did the Pharisie Luk. 18. 11. and yet a wicked Iusticiarie for all that Now all this ariseth from sundrie causes the first is the bitter roote of pride that was in our first parents when as they affected a higher place in desiring through discontment of their owne estate to deifie themselues and become equall to the highest Maiestie in knowing good and euill The second is the ouermuch considering the good things we haue as when the Pharisie considered that he gaue tithe of all that he possessed that he fasted twise a weeke that he was not thus and thus as other men Luk. 18. The third is the comparing of our selues with the infirmities that we see to be in others the Pharisie was puffed vp by comparing himselfe with extortioners vniust men adulterers and with the Publican The fourth is the false flattering and applause of men which sooth vs vp in our humours in perswading vs to be that which in truth we are not as the people flattered Herod when they gaue a shout and said The voice of God and not of man Act. 12. 22. The third point is that they which thus ouerweene their gifts in thinking themselues somewhat when they are nothing doe notably deceiue themselues as those that thinke they haue the substance when they haue but the shadow as those that dream they are Kings or Princes being in truth but base persōs or to vse the Prophets similitude Esa. 29. 8. Like as an hungrie man dreameth behold he eateth when he awaketh his soule is emptie or like as a thirstie man dreameth and loe he is drinking and when he awaketh behold he is faint and his soule longeth Men are deceiued two waies either by others or by themselues by others as by flatterers they are deceiued occasionally by themselues causally or properly For he that doth iudge himselfe to be that which indeede he is not he may happely please himselfe but he doeth but please himselfe in an errour for in trueth he deceiueth himselfe in his imagination the Apostle Iames saith If any man seeme specially to himselfe to be religious and yet refraineth not his tongue he deceiueth his owne heart his religion is vaine Iam. 1. 26. So likewise they that are only hearers of the word therfore thinke that all is wel enough with thē though they be not doers therof deceiue their owne selues Iam. 1. 22. And verely this corruption is so great that as men can
nothing but blood This teacheth the hearers likewise to rest contented with the bare word without hungring after new doctrines as the Athenians after newes or beeing drawne away from the simplicitie that is in Christ by the subtiltie of seducers or by deuises and quiddities of mans braine Let those therefore which loath Manna long for Quailes remember that if God giue them their desire he will also giue them their desert Let them take heede lest he punish them with a famine not of bread nor a thirst of water but of hearing the word Amos 8. 11. And let those that haue itching eares in heaping vp to themselues a multitude of teachers take heede also that they haue not tingling eares when they shall heare of the iudgements of God for the contempt of his word Further whereas Paul saith He that teacheth is to be maintained it is a good Item for all idle drones that will not labour and all dumme dogges that cannot barke they may not expect the maintenance which is due vnto the Ministers for it is ge nerally true of all men and much more true of the Minister that he which will not labour must not eate And great reason it is that he which looketh for his hire should doe his worke he that would liue of the sacrifice should minister at the altar he that lookes to be fedde with corporall bread should breake vnto his hearers the bread of life he that would reape carnall things should sow spirituall things he that would not haue his mouth muzzeled should thresh out the corne he that would drinke of the wine should plant the grape he that lookes for milke should feede the flocke that is he that will liue of the Gospel should teach the Gospel It is a maxime not onely of the Canon law but grounded vpon the law of nature that beneficium postulat officium a benefit requireth a dutie or more plainly a benefice requireth an office and diligence in the office They therefore that c●re not so much for the feeding of the sheepe as for the feeding of themselues and feare not so much the losse of the flocke as the losse of the fleece doe not onely violate the law of God but euen the law of nations and the law of nature Againe hence I gather that those that labour in the word and doctrine may lawfully take wages albeit they haue sufficient of their owne to maintaine themselues it is the very equitie of this text For if they that are instructed in the word are to make those that instructed them partakers of their goods then it is lawfull for them which instruct and teach to receiue something in recompence of their labour seeing that the labourer is worthie of his wages Yet this one caueat must be remembred that if receiuing of wages be a hindrance to the Gospel as it would haue beene in Paul it is not lawfull for we may not so vse our libertie as that we thereby hinder the free course of the Gospel We may here further perceiue the great want of deuotion which is in most men of these daies For as the crie of the poore in the streetes and at our dores is an argument that there is no mercie no bowells of pitie and compassion So in that there are so many needie poore wandring Leuites which would gladly serue for a morsell of bread or a sute of raiment it is a pregnant proofe there is very small deuotion in men for the maintenance of religion especially in those which are so straight laced and short sleeued in bestowing any thing for the good of the Ministerie and yet in keeping of houndes and hawkes and worse matters in maintaining players iesters fooles and such like are very lauish and profuse to their great cost This hath beene the practise of the world and the contemptible estate of the Ministerie in former times Foure hundred false prophets were richly prouided for at Iezabels table 1. King 18. 19. whereas the true Prophets of God in the meane time were faine to hide their heads hauing scarse bread and water and that not without daunger Well her practise shall condemne a number of professours nay our forefathers zeale and forwardnes notwithstanding they liued in blindnes shall condemne our coldnes in this behalfe what speake I of our forefathers euen the stones in the ruinated Abbies and other religious houses shall rise vp in iudgement against vs for those places could maintaine thirtie or fourtie idle bellies which did nothing but nuzzle men in superstitious idolatrie whereas now the same place will not competently maintaine one or two to instruct them in the way to eternall life And no maruaile for we take from the Church as fast as they gaue to it In old time they were wont to say What shall we giue the man of God 1. Sam. 9. but now with the sacrilegious Church-robbers they say Come and let vs take the houses of God in possession Psal. 83. 12. The Iewes were exceeding forward and liberall in their contribution to the Tabernacle some brought gold others siluer silke pretious stone the meaner sort rammes skinnes goats haire c. so that more thē enough was offered by thē in such sort that Moses was forced to cause a proclamation to be made to stay the people from offering Exod. 36. 5. 6. This their example in beeing so forward to contribute to the materiall Temple shall condemne our backwardnes in conferring so little to the Ministers who are the liuing temples of God and to the ministerie which is in the place of the altar for looke by how much God hath diminished the cost of the altar and the charges of the ceremoniall worship vnder the old Testament by so much more doth he require the Ministerie to be maintained and spirituall worship furthered in the New Lastly if they that doe not put too their helping hand to vphold the Ministerie are to be condemned what condemnation trow we thē belongs to sacrilegious persons that robbe the Church of her reuenewes and deuoure holy things 7 Be not deceiued God is not mocked for whatsoeuer a man soweth that shall he also reape Here the Apostle preuenteth sundrie secret obiections against the former precept v. 6. For the Galatians might plead for themselues in this manner Whereas thou enioynest vs to make those which instructed vs in the word partakers of all our goods alas we cannot doe it It is an vnreasonable thing thou exactest of vs for as for some of vs we haue a great familie and charge to looke vnto wife and children to prouide for and for them we must prouide otherwise we dente the faith and are worse then infidells 1. Tim. 5. 8. others are poore and needie fitter a great deale to receiue then to giue and those that can giue are not so to giue that others may be eased and they thēselues pinched 2. Cor. 8. 13. And as for the Ministers themselues many of them are couetous and
appearance to excell For as Satan though a blacke deuill an angel of darkenes doth change himselfe into a white deuill as though he were an angel of light so that a man can hardly distinguish his wicked suggestions from the good motions of the spirit of God and therefore may say as Ioshua said to the angel art thou on our side or on our aduersaries Ioshua 5. 13. So his instruments transform themselues as though they were the Apostles of Christ and ministers of righteousnesse 2. Cor. 11. 13 15. In the old Testament false prophets were accustomed outwardly to conforme themselues to the habite and attire of the holy men of God in wearing a rough garment as Elias and the rest of the prophets did Zach. 13. 4. Vnder the newe Testament in the time of Christ the Pharises in hypocrisie vnder a shewe of long praier deuoured widdowes houses Matth. 23. 14. In the Apostles time false teachers with their wil worship as touch not taste not handle not which had a shewe of wisdome in voluntarie religion and humblenesse of minde and not sparing of the bodie did vndermine the religion of God Coloss. 2. 21 22 23. And after that in the primatiue Church the heretickes called Catharists vnder a shewe of holinesse fasting praier c. did sowe most damnable heresies in the Church And as in former times the Iewes vnder the glorious titles of the children of Abraham the schollers of Moses the temple of the Lord the temple of the Lord made many proselytes by deceiuing the soules of the simple So at this day vnder the glorious titles of the Church of Councels fathers antiquitie consent vniuersalitie the pretented Romane Catholikes haue ensnared many a simple soule and no maruaile considering that these are the times of which Christ foretold that false prophets should deceiue if it were possible the very elect Matth. 24. 24. And of which Saint Paul prophecied that Antichrist should come through the efficacie of Satan with all power and signes and lying wonders and in all deceiue ablenesse of vnrighteousnesse among them that perish 2. Thess. 2. 9 10. And all this is done by outward shewes and semblances which our Sauiour Christ tearmeth sheepes cloathing and it stands in these foure particulars First in great swelling titles as the onely true Catholike Church the Vicar of Christ the Oecumennicall Bishop most profound illuminate Angelicall Seraphicall Doctors Iesuits the onely true followers of the doctrine and example of Iesus c. Secondly in pretended zeale and deuotion whereby they would perswade that their religion is the onely true religion all others which swarue from it are nothing but false and fabulous and this they doe three waies First 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by hauing God alwaies in their mouthes crying in hypocrisie with the false prophets Lord Lord Matth. 7. 22. Or as the Iesuiticall faction doe Iesu Maria. Secondly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with enticing words consisting in probable reasons and persuasiue arguments Coloss. 2. 4. Thirdly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with faire and flattering words to deceiue the hearts of the simple Rom. 16. 18. By which three meanes the Iesuites haue preuailed much in Princes courts in these latter daies Apoc. 16. 14. Thirdly in the glorious outside of holinesse of life and conuersation in not sparing the bodie by whipping of themselues as Baals priests lanced themselues till the blood gushed out 1. King 18. 28. in strict fasts canonicall houres hard fare badde lodging course apparrell and such like Lastly in rare and excellent gifts of prophecy tongues eloquence miracles c. And thus they make Pauls shew of godlinesse 2. Tim. 3. 5. to be Peter cloake of wickednesse 1. Pet. 2. 16. so that as the Deuill with faire words put Eue into a fooles paradise till at length he had driuen her out of the terrestriall Paradise and made her also hazard the celestiall So his ministers false teachers by faire and flattering speeches deceiue the minds of the simple and cause them to fall from their owne stabilitie By this we may see how hypocrites and false teachers stand especially vpon outward things as externall rites and ceremonies which are but deuices and doctrines of men Matth. 15. 9. The Pharisies made much adoe about washing the outside of the cuppe and of the platter when as the inside was full of rapine and all vncleannes Matth. 23. 25. very curious about washing of their hands before meate Mark 7. 3. and yet carelesse to wash their hearts frō wickednes Ier. 4. 14. precise in small matters as in tything of mint annise and cummine but profane in the practise of the waightier things of the law as iudgement mercie and fidelitie Matth. 23. 23. whited tombes faire without and filthie within v. 27. Thus the Popish worship consisteth especially in outward things which may please the senses of carnall men as in vocall and instrumental Musicke to please the eare censings and perfumes to delight the smell guilding and painting with other sights and spectacles to affect the eye And at this day in the Masse which they account the very marrow of their Mattins there is nothing but dumme shews histrionicall gestures and tricks fitter to mocke apes withall then to edifie the people For whereas in former time they were wont to say Let vs goe heare a Masse now the common saying in Italie is this Let vs goe see a Masse Let vs therefore trie the spirits before we trust them and especially in matters of religion follow Christs precept not to iudge by the outward appearance Ioh. 7. 24. But to iudge of Prophets by the fruit of their doctrine Matth. 7. 16. and of their doctrine by the touch-stone of the word Isa. 8. 20. so that though the Deuill transforme himselfe into an angel of light nay though an angel from heauen preach any other thing beside that we haue receiued from Christ we must hold him accursed and in so doing we shall follow Christ his practise who was prudent in the feare of the Lord and did not iudge by the sight of his eyes nor reprooue by the hearing of his eares Isa. 11. 3. The second note and marke of these false teachers is that they compell men to be circumcised The word compell hath great emphasis for it signifieth that they did not conuince the iudgement or perswade the will and affection of the Galatians but enforced them against their wills for though circumcision be nothing of it selfe as Paul saith yet to be compelled to receiue circumcision and to place iustification in the vse of it sinne in the neglect of it is the readie way to ouerturne Christ the foundation of our saluation Gal. 5. 4. Here suodrie questions are to be answered First it may be demanded whether it be lawfull to compell men to embrace religion as the false Apostles compelled the Galatians to circumcisiō Ans. The Magistrate may ought to compell obstinate Recusants to professe true religion for he is ●●stos vtriusque
attire forbidding of mariage to some orders of mē For when things indifferent are made necessarie the nature of them is changed Vpon this ground Ezekiah brake in peeces the brasen serpent when the Israelites began to worship it 2. King 18. 4. First let vs obserue out of these words they compell you to be circumcised that Paul doeth not only vse Christian pollicie but dealeth very rhetorically excusing the Galatians as though they were constrained against their wills to doe as they did laying all the blame vpon the false Apostles and so doth closely alienate their affection from these seducers who would haue them circumcised either by voluntary submission or by violent compulsion the like godly pollicie we ought to vse in dealing against heretikes and false teachers that the peoples mindes may be estranged from them take no loue of their doctrine nor liking of their persons Here we haue a second note of false teachers which is not onely to retaine ceremonies themselues but to vrge them vpon others and constraine men to the obseruing of them for they were more earnest and forward in vrging circumcision their owne deuise then the keeping of the morrall lawe and so are all seducers The Pharises did vrge their owne ceremonies as washing before meate washing of pottes cuppes and beddes c. more then the commandement of God And the Papists vrge the Len● fast more strictly thē fasting from finne which is the onely true fast Isay. 58. 6. And their owne stories doe shewe that men haue beene more seuerely punished for eating flesh vpon good friday then for commi●●ing of simple fornication or following of strange flesh They stand more in vrging the outward worshipping of an image or a peece of bread then the inward spirituall worship And as they haue made the Saints daies equall with the Sabboth daies so haue they made the prophanation of them an equall sinne and haue punished it with equall punishment It is further to be obserued howe they abuse circumcision for whereas by Gods ordinance it was but a seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4. 11. they peruerting the end of it make it a meritorious cause of saluation and therefore compell men to be circumcised it is Gods worke they make it their owne worke yea such a worke as by which they hope to be saued And this their dealing may fitly be paralleled by the Popish practise at this day in making baptisme which is but a signe and seale of grace to be the proper immediate and physicall cause of conferring grace by the worke wrought Almes praier and fasting which are but signes and testimonies of iustification to be causes thereof Nay their owne deuises of confession satisfaction supererogation to be meritorious causes of iustification saluation Lastly see here howe the peruersenesse of the corrupt heart of man doth thwart the ordinance of God As long as circumcision was commaunded by God most abhorred it for the heathen testifie so much that the Iewes were odious for it But nowe beeing abolished they take it vp againe receiue it and vrge it as a thing necessarie to be obserued vpon paine of damnation Whereas if God should enioyne it againe they would no doubt account it as heauie yoke which neither they nor their fathers were able to beare This improuing of that which God cōmands approuing that which he forbids argues the great corruption of the heart and that the wisedome of the flesh is not onely an enemie but euen flat enmitie against God Rom. 8. 7. It must therefore teach vs to captiuate our reason and to subiect our wills to the will of God in all things The third propertie of these false Apostles is the teaching of circumcision that is of false doctrine because they would not suffer persecution for the crosse of Christ that is for preaching the true doctrine of the Gospel concerning Christ crucified It may be demanded whether it was necessarie that those which taught not circumcision but spake against it should be persecuted To which I answer that it was necessarie according as Paul affirmeth Gal. 5. 11. If I teach circumcision why doe J yet suffer persecution The reason was this The Romane Emperour had giuen libertie to the Iewes to liue according to their owne lawes and that without molestation or disturbance in all places of the Romane Emperie so that if a Iewe became a Christian he had the priuiledge of a Iewe so long as he kept the ceremoniall lawe and taught no departing from Moses whereas they which taught that ceremonies were abrogated and that men were iustified onely by faith in Christ wanted this priuiledge and so were persecuted of no men more then of the Iewes either by themselues or by incensing others against them 1. Thess. 2. 15. 16. The false Apostles therefore to auoide persecution coyned a newe Gospel in matter of saluation ioyning Christ and Moses iustification by faith and by workes So that here we haue another character and marke of false teachers which is to labour by all meanes to enioy the world and to eschewe the crosse and rather then they wil suffer persecution to make a hotch-potch of religion as we may see not onely by this particular but by the course of the historie of the Church and in latter times by the Interim vnder Charles the fift and the sixe articles vnder Henrie the eight by our mediators and reconciliators who either as it is said of old Consiliator labour to accord fire and water or else like hucksters mixe wine and water for their owne aduantage and by all neuters and mungrils in religion who houer in the winde because they would stand sure for all assaies or winne the fauour of great men that they might not stand in the way of their preferment This is the sinne of the multitude among vs who desire to haue Christ but they will none of his crosse they would be with him vpon mount Tabor but not not vpō mount Caluarie crowned with glorie but not crowned with thornes Further we may hence gather an essentiall difference of true and false teachers the one seekes the good of the Church the other seeks thēselfe the one the glorie of God the other their owne glorie It is obserued by Popish priests and others that though the Iesuits pretend they doe all things in ordine ad Deum yet they intend themselues doing all things in ordine ad seipsos● it beeing the marke they shoote at in all their Machiavellian plottes and pollicies that they may haue cum digmeate ocium a Lordly command and a lasie life Againe here we see that the loue of the trueth and of the world the feare of the face of man and the feare of God can neuer stand together As also howe dangerous a thing it is to be addicted to the loue of the world for it hath beene alwaies the cause of reuolt in that men neuer imbraced religion so as that they could be contented
causes 351. 6 Of the churches reioycing 358. 37 It is one in number and no more 351. 37. How the church is troubled vide Trouble The catholike church why called our mother 35. 2. 17 Where our mother is to be found 352. 25. The order to be vsed in the censure giuen vpon a church 9. 10 Ierusalem the mother church rather then Rome 61. 15 The church was before the writing of the word but not before the word 77. 6 It is inuisible 352. Of Circumcision 79. 32 Circumcision considered according to the circumstance of time three waies 373. 15 Circumcision in it selfe a thing indifferent yet not to be vsed if it be vrged as a matter of absolute necessitie 614. 35 Ciuill vertues and a ciuill life are no better then sinnes 16. 10 What is the combate that naturall man haue 417. 28 The cause of the spirituall combate and the persons in whome it is 417. 5. The vse of the combate 419. 1 The commandements of God are not grieuous three waies 190. 15 Concealements of the truth sometimes lawfull 63. 13 How it must be vnderstood that in the commandement the sinnes of the fathers are visited vpon the children 521. 29 Papists make three degrees of concupiscence 252. 11 Concupiscence vide Lust. Conference of Pastor and people necessarie 338. 13 How conscience is free and how subiect to the power of the Magistrate 410. 1 Three obiections remooued that the lawes and traditions of the church bind Conscience as truly as the word of God 369. 21 The consent of Pastors and people excellent 6. 25 What is the force of consent 6. 27 Consent no certen marke of the church 6. 37 The catholike consent of beleeuers in points of religion is not the true and liuely Scripture 7. 5. Consent standes in three things 7. 15. Consent not to be found amongest the papistes 7. 18. Consent is to be found amongest vs in the foundation of religion 7. 23. Consider our selues and others 467. 468. 469. Constancie vid. standing Consultation not to be vsed in matters of religion nor in obedience 56. 19. 37. The vse of the contemplation of Christ by faith 162. 30 The effect of contention 408. 6 Contentions some lawfull some sinfull 436. ●5 Contract in some cases may be dissolued 209. 11 Sinnes after conuersion are pardonable 462. 4 Three causes of Pauls conuersion 46. 32. The order and dependance of causes in a sinners conuersion 47. 13 Fiue Questions of Pauls conuersion vide Paul Conuersion wrought by certain degrees 336. 20 Corruption not felt by corruption but by grace 528. 33 Couenants beeing lawfull are to be kept with heretykes and enemies 208. 23. What couenants with losse are to be kept and what not ibid. 30 Couenants of two sorts legall and euangelicall 569. 6 The couenants of workes hath two properties 348. 27 Conferences and councels are laudible 75. 32 Three caueats in gathering a councell 76. 5 For this ending of differences in religion there must be conferences in a free or christian councell 408. 37. Why the protestants ioyned not with the papists in the councell of Trent 409. 5 Fiue rules for our libertie in vsing the creatures vid. Libertie why we ought to take vp our crosse and follow Christ certaine reasons 620. 5 what is mens by the crosse of Christ. 630. 16. Crucifying is either the action of Christ or our action of Christ threefold 451. 7 Three meanes to crucifie the flesh 451. 26 Reasons why a man hanging on a tree is cursed 202. 8 What the curse is that Christ was made for vs 198. 19 How Christ was a curse ibid. 28 Whether Paul did well in cursing his enemies 396. 30 Whether we may curse ours 397. 10 How we should vse the imprecations in Dauids Psalmes 397. 18 D A fourefould kind of obseruation of daies 314. 4 Against the Popish obseruation of holy daies 316. 7 How Protestants obserue them 316. 28. Against obseruing daies of good bad successe 317. 2 Two rules to be obserued for the right manner and measure of eating and drinking vide Eating Christs temporall death did counteruaile eternall death vide Death Wee must carrie our selues as dead men in three respects 144. 29 There are two degrees both in the first and second death 199. 20. 24. What debate is 436. 3 There is a deceit called dolus bonus 64. 2. Of men deceiuing themselues 508. 30. A man may be deceiued both in diuine and humane things sundry waies 546. 19 A man deceiues himselfe two wries 546. 20. The heart of man deceitfull 546. 40. from whence that springeth 547. 3 Good desires distinguished from carnall d 〈…〉 es by three properties 297. 32 Of the desires of our hearts and that they are cryes and how 598. 6 Of the league of compact with the deuil 429. 20 VVhat is the chiefe principle in diuinitie 433. 24 VVhat drunckennes is 439. 11 Two things in this sinne ibid. 14 To be giuen to drincking is a sinne 439. 21. Inducements to detest drunckennes 439. 30. Arg. for drunkennes answered 440. 20. E Two rules to be obserued for the right manner and measure of eating and drincking 439. 5 Electiō ariseth not of the will of man but of the grace of God 40. 27. How we may attaine to the assurance of our election 47. 31 There is a double election 194. 14 Gods election is the roote of all the gifts of God is vs. 308. 15 The meere grace of God is the cause of our election 360. ●6 In religion there ought to be a holy emulation 44. 36 There is a good emulation and a carnall emulation 436. 8 whether Paul did well in cursing his enemies 396. 30 whether we may curse our enemies vide Curse Enmitie vide Hatred Enuie what it is 437. 36 Error in the foundation or beside the foundation of religion 8. 30 Error of humane frailue or of obstinacie 8. 35 No man can set downe the precise time when errors had there be ginning 84. 12 Error is either in iudgement or māners both are of two sorts 409. 20. In the examination of our selues foure rules must be obserued 218. 8. The contagion of euill examples must be cut off in the societie of men 109. 40 Excommunication when to be vsed 390. 32 Offenders are not to be excommu nicated at the first but orderly to be proceeded against 393. 9. 486. 37. F Faith is of great vse in the kingdome of God 382. 32 when faith first begins to breede in the heart 240. 30 How faith in Christ is conceiued in the heart 241. 5 whether faith may be lost 69. 25 what Iustifyng faith is as the Papists define 123. 32 The obiect of Abrahams faith was double 123. 38 what true iustifying faith is 124. 35 Faith and confidence are two distinct gifts of God 125. 11 Two causes why a beleeuer is saide to liue by faith 149. 16 How men liue by faith 149. 24 Faith considered two waies 175. 34 That we may liue by faith we
of canonicall Scripture 655. 20 Reasons why we must prouide for the poore 100. 35 The Gospell must be preached though all men be offended 396. 15. Preaching containes foure ministeriall actions 54. 17 Effectuall and powerfull preaching of the word stands in two things 160. 39. Preaching must be plaine 160. 11 Necessarie for all men 165. 20 The word must be dispenced in the infirmitie of mans flesh for diuers causes 323. 7 The benefits of preaching 326. 27 Prayer to Saints and Angels is carnall prayer 299. 29 Pray onely to God ibid. 300. 14 The right manner of seeking the praise of men 455. 1 Primacie is 2 of order of power 60. 18. Authoritie of the Church no principle 433. 39. Externall and bodily priueledges are of no moment in the kingdome of Christ. 382. 1 Gods promises lie as voide till the particular time of their accomplishment 204. 20 The promise made to Abraham is a couenant or testament and how 211. 30. Christ is the foundation of all the promises of god partly by merit partly by efficacie 313. 2 Why beleeuers are called children of promise 360. 8 Prouerbiall sentences are not at all times true in euery particular 550. 36. Gods prouidence vseth euill things well 348. 22 Subiectiō to punishment hath three parts 365. 13 There are seuerall degrees of punishments in hell 555. 556 R The workes of redemption exceed the works of creation 14. 19 Of the redemption of man from vnder the law 288. 19. c. Christ the onely redeemer 311. 9 Three markes of regeneration 241. 40. The gift of regeneration is neuer vtterlie extinguished 262. 29 What true regeneration is 377. 35 The workes of the regenerate are mixed with sinne and in the rigour of iustice deserue damnation obiections remooued 419. 9. 15. Of the reioycing of the Church vide Church Two groundes of reioycing vide glorying Reioyce signifying to glorie 517. 11 Obiection against reioicing in ones selfe vide glorying VVhat rules are to be obserued in the reioycing in the testimonie of a good conscience vide glorying False reioycing wherein it confisteth 519. 13 Reioycers are of foure sorts 519. 16 To reioyce in a mans selfe what 517. 18. The cheife principle in religion what 433. 24 Whether it be lawfull to compell men to imbrace religion 614. 5. The Magistrate may compell obstinate recusants to professe true religion ibid. 8. Obiections to the contrarie answered ibid. 25 Pauls manner in reproouing 18. 8 Libertie in reproouing with three caueats 103. 13 Why we vse not in preaching personall reproofes as Iohn Baptist did 393. 16 The manner of reproofe vide Restore He that is iniuried is fitter to reprooue him that offered the iniurie then any other 474. 39 Reproofes must not be deferred 460. 22. No wonder that sinners be loth to be reprooued 460. 37 A treatise of Christian reproofe 469. 31. Who are to be reprooued ib. 35 Reproofe belongs not to those that are out of the visible Church 470. The greatest Princes are subiect to reproofe 471. 15 Onely open skorners and persecuters of the word are not to be reprooued 472. 10 Men are to be reprooued for any sinne knowne ibid. 10 And for wrongs offered vs. 474. 20 Obiection against reproofes answered 47● 12 Who are reprooued 477. 1. 37. In fiue cases we are not bound to reprooue others offending 478. 13. In what manner are men to be reprooued set downe in ten rules 579. 37. The bitternesse of reproofe is to be allaied foure waies 483. 17 A man may reproue another foure waies 484. 8 In fitting our reproofe to the offence committed we must put a difference betwixt sinne finne 484. 28. In three cases we are not priuatly to reprooue but publikely to detect offenders 487. 15 The Pastour ought to be resident with his Hocke for two causes 337. 10. Restitution vide Satisfaction As oftē as our brother falls we must restore him 461. 5 Who are to be restored ibid. 17 Spirituall men are more for to restore those that are fallen then any other 463. 3 The manner how we must restore 464. 28. Reuelation is of two sortes 36. 11. Extraordinarie reuelation is foure waies 36. 15 The reuelation which Paul had is extraordinarie 36. 22 Reuolt what and the kindes thereof 18. 29 Remedies against reuenge 445. 8 Reward is double of honour and of debt 569. 37 Reward presupposeth not alwaies debt 571. 14 God giueth rewardes foure waies 571. 29. The phrases of speech of rewarding double or seuen fold what they signifie in the Scripture 552. 31. Pauls rule what it is 641. 33 The Papists rules Lesbian rules 642. 20. Monkish rules vaine and wicked 642. 28. We must be runners in the race of God 386. 19 We must runne well and to the end 387. 7. 22. S Of the institution of the Sabbath 315. 9 20. Sacraments conferre not grace by the worke wrought 254. 21 whether there be now in the church of God any sacrifice or oblation of Christ 161. 29 Whether the Saints may fall away totally and finally 586. 20 There is but one way of saluation 22. 5. Preuision of faith and good workes no cause of saluation 47. 20 The saluation of beleeuers is most sure 47. 27 The manner and way of our saluation 229. 21 The sanctification of the name of God hath two parts 72. 10 There is a double sanctification 193. 21. Satisfaction must be made for wrongs done 98. 39 Who must satisfie 99. 21 To whome 99. 28 What 99. 38 When 100. 9 In what order and manner 100. 15. Schisme and heresie differ vide Heresie The Papists schismatikes and not we 437. 21 For the auoiding of schisme and sedition two rules ibid. 29 Slanders vse to be raised vpon euery light and vniust occasion 395. 18. Scripture is both the glosse and the text 352. 36. 434. 3 Scripture hath sundrie senses according to the Papists 345. 35 When the Scriptures speakes figuratiuely and when properly 346. 30. The Scriptures by themselues are sufficient to saluation 24. 24 The Scriptures are as certen as if they had beene written by God 27. 5. The authoritie of the Scripture dependes not vpon the testimonie of the Church 27. 20 It is necessarie that men should be assured that the Scriptures are of God 31. 30 The testimonies whereby this assurance may be obtained 31. 35 In Scriptures there is diuine and infallible authoritie 353. 15. The meanes to decide controuersies 356. 29 Bookes of Scripture in the new testament haue a threefold difference 608. 9 Bookes of Scripture why called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as also Kethubim by the Iewes 659. 25 The Scriptures why called Canonicall 641. 38 Seditions what 435. 15 The separation of Paul from the wombe what it is 46. 35 To make a faire shewe in the flesh signifieth foure things 610. 33 Simulation what and the sorts 105. 36. Sinne where it takes place giues a man no rest till it hath brought him to a height of wickednes 43. 39. What a sinne of
infirmitie is 108. 32. Sinnes be of two sorts 224. 27 Difference betweene the godly and vngodly in sinning 443. 3 Originall sinne hath two parts 365. 5. A common fashion to extenuate sinne 389. 56 We must resist euery particular sin 390. 25. It is the nature of sinne to set all things out of order 460. 4 God rewardeth sinnes in the same manner according to the nature of sinne 557. 558. Sinne driues men beside themselues 460. 8. Sinners must not delay their repentance ibid. 21 Sinnes committed after a mans conuersion are pardonable 462. 4. 5. In euery knowne sinne we are wrōged 473. 33 Sinne a burden to whome vide Burden Sinne a spirituall burden 528. 27 How we may be cased of the burden of sinne 529. 36 How sinne is finite and how infinite 554. 2 3 4. Solitarie and Monastick life against the light of nature 643. 13 Why the second person is called Sonne 280. 1 Whether the Sonne be God 280. 14. Two kinds of sorrow 137. 39 A point of great skill to bring a soule in order and frame againe 460. 29. Three things to be considered in the soule the substance the faculties and the qualities 637. 10 What is meant by vvhat soeuer a man sowes that shall he reape 550. 10. Sowing what it signifies in the scripture 550. 20 Obiections against this prouerbiall speech whatsoeuer a man sowes that shall he reape 550. 551. The distinction of sowing to the flesh and to our flesh 553. 36 By sowing to the flesh what is ment 564. 1. 10. To sow to the spirit what it is ibid. 20. The Spirit hath fiue properties 418. 38. What is the spirit a treatise 411. 21. 35. All exercises of Christian religion are to be in the spirit 381. 29 The operation of the spirit is threefold 146. What the Spirit signifies 163. 35 what is meant by the giuing or sending of the spirit 204. 35 In what order the spirit is giuen 205. 3. we receiue the spirit for sixe endes ibid. 20. why the holy Ghost is called the spirit of the sonne 293. 39 The manner how the holy Ghost is sent 294. 35 Foure works in the spirit in causing beleeuers to crie Abba father 295. 32. The spirit of grace in Christians is more excellent then that of creation in two respects 412. 27 Of the operation of the spirit 412. 39. The whole worke of the spirit may be reduced to factions 413. 8 The spirit makes vs change and renew our actions in three respects 413. 21. The lust of the spirit hath two actions 416. 32 The office of the spirit is first to regenerate secondly to guide the regenerate 421. 14. 16 In this guidance there are foure actions of the spirit ibid. Subiection to the worke of Gods spirit hath two parts 422. 1 The propertie of the workes of the spirit a treatise 442. 33 The efficacie of the spirit 443. 6 What it is to liue and walke in the spirit 452. 453 A signe whereby to know whether a man hath in his heart the spirit of God or no. 454 4 Spirituall men opposed to carnall are of two sorts 463. 24 Spirituall men are more fitte to restore those that are fallen then any other 463. 31 Diuers good and euill things are tearmed by the name of spirit 466. 5. Two kinds of spyings 85. 6 Of standing fast in libertie the manner and time of it 372. 17 Two kinds of subiection 269. 11 Subiection to the spirit hath two parts vide Spirit Succession is of three sorts 35. 3 The successours of the first preachers had an ordinarie calling 35. 17. Fiue vses of our sufferings 170. 10 T A propertie of false teachers is to vrge earnestly their owne ceremonies vpon others 617. 20 A propertie of false teachers to teach false doctrine for auoiding of persecution 618. 26 The essentiall difference betweene true and false teachers 619. 24 Another propertie of false teachers to compell others to obserue that which they themselues will not obserue 622. 18 Another note of false teachers to pretend religion to cloake their wickednes 623. 36 The propertie of false teachers is to set a faire show vpon the matter 611. 14. Temperance what foure rules for the practising of it 448. 3 By what law Tēths are due 232. 3 10 Of what value the testimonie of the Church is 33. 4 There must be a christian toleration one of another for the maintenance of church peace 409. 16 In what it stands ibid. 17 To what end it serues 409. 32 Whether there may not be a tolleration for Popery 409. 37 Vnwritten Traditions tendered as a part of gods word are abominations 24. 29 The church is troubled three waies 391. 33. Reasons to mooue men to speake deale truly 447. 26 The time of all euents determined by God 49. 2 Due time how it may be vnderstood 582. 13 We must make a holy profitable vse of time 598. 1 We must redeeme the time lost in three respects ibid. 37 Obseruations of times which be forbidden 600. 6 The kindes of vnlawfull obseruation of time either Iewish or Heathnish and wherein they consist 600. 11 Lawfull obseruation of time twofold diuine or humane 601. 4 Humane obseruation of time threefold 601. 5 V What the desire of vaine glorie is 454. 33 Excuses hereof taken away ibid. 38 They that haue receiued good gifts of God are many times most vaineglorious 455. 38 Remedies of pride and vaineglorie 456. 20. What vncleanes is 425. 21 Of our vnion with Christ. 145. 23 264. 39. Substantiall and spirituall 264. 30 In what respect they are said to be one with Christ 265. 1 Vnitie is not an infallible inseperable marke of the church 407. 18 Though men were not commanded to vow yet the matter and forme of vowes was commanded 60. 5 W What wantonnes is 425. 28 Reasons both in general and speciall that make men wearie of well doing 576. 38 How farre forth the will worketh in the receiuing of grace 11. 16 The absolute will of God cannot be resisted 360. 36 The determination of mans will by the will of god doth not abolish all freedome of will 361. 4 Man hath no freedome of will in good duties before his conuersion 417. 13 What witchcrafteis a treatise of the ground and kindes of it 429. 16 What is a witch 430. 38 Signes that serue to discouer a witch 431. 29. False and vncertaine signes 342. 1 Wiues among the Iewes of two sorts 343. 23 The word is the cause and obiect of our faith 6. 32 The word of God is the matter of the ministerie and how it is to be taught heard 29. 30 35 It depends not vpon the authoritie of the church 56. 11 But vpon it selfe 77. 18 The word must be dispensed in the infirmitie of mans flesh for diuerse causes vide preach Labourers in the word may lawfully take wages though they haue sufficient of their owne to maintaine themselues 543. 18 There be no meritorious workes to
but onely by the Latin church as might be prooued by manifold testimonies if it were a thing necessarie to be stood vpon Neuerthelesse howsoeur this inscription cannot be defended yet it may be excused and tollerated as a title of distinction to distinguish them from the other epistles As we see the Iewes diuiding the olde testament into 4. parts the first they called the law or 5. bookes of Moses the 2. the former prophets viz Ioshua Judges 2. bookes of Samuel 2. bookes of the Kings the 3 the later prophets as Esay Ieremie Ezechiel and the small prophets the 4. they called Kethubim which in English is as much as the scriptures not as though those 11. bookes were more properly scripture then the Pentateuch of Moses or the bookes of the former and later prophets but onely for distinction sake they were so called And they are tearmed of the 70. and of the Greeke church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is holy writts not because they had a peculiar holines proper to them aboue other parts of Gods word seeing all scripture is equally giuen by diuine inspiration nor as though the amanuenses of these bookes were more holy then the other pen-men of the holy Ghost nay contrarily it is doubted by some of Salomon who penned three of these bookes whether he were elected or reiected whereas it is not doubted of the rest but onely as I haue alreadie said to put a note of distinction betwixt them and other bookes in naming of them as Hugo de S. Uict hath well obserued In this sense this title Canonicall may be giuen to these Epistles without danger but if we shall vnderstand it in any other sense we shall be so farre from beeing able to defend it that we shall not be able to excuse it The second title which is giuen them is that they be called Catholike which inscription is as vnfit as the former for they are so called as some would haue it because they were writtē and directed to the whole Catholike Church consisting both of Iewes and Gentiles But that is not true seeing Iames chap. 1. 1. directeth his Epistle onely to the 12 tribes that were dispersed and not to the Gentiles And Peter who was an Apostle of Circumcision 1. Epist. 1. 1. writeth onely to the strangers the Iewes that dwell here and there throughout Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bythinia Others thinke they are tearmed Catholike for that they were not sent to one man or familie or citie or countrey but generally to the whole bodie companie and societie of the Iewes wheresoeuer dispersed ouer the whole earth But neither in this sense can they fitly or truly be tearmed Catholike forasmuch as two of these seuen viz. the second and third of Iohn were written to particular persons the one to the elect Ladie the other to Gains And by this reason the Epistle to Timothie that to Titus and Philemon may be called Catholike as well as these Againe be it graunted that they were all directed to all the Iewes yet I see not why the Epistle to the Ebrewes may not as well chalenge this title to be called Catholike as any of these seuen considering it was written to all the Iewes and onely to the Iewes Thirdly others affirme them to be called Catholike because they containe Catholike doctrine such as appertaineth to all men generally of what estate place condition or calling so euer they be But in this sense all Pauls Epistles may be called Catholike Epistles For whatsoeuer is written is written for our learning that we through patience and consolation of the Scriptures might haue hope Rom. 15. 4. Secondly the word Catholike is not so ancient for Pacianus an auncient father saith it was not vsed in the Apostles daies His wordes are these Sed sub Apostolis enquies nemo Catholicus vocabatur esto sic fuerie vel illud indulge cum post Apostolos haereses extitissent diuersisque nominibus Columbam Dei atque reginam lacerare per partes sciudere niterentur nonne cognomen suum pleb● Apostolica p●stulabat quo incorrupti populi distingueret vnitatem ne intemeratam Dei virginem error aliquorum per membra laceraret that is But thou wilt say vnder the Apostles no man was called Catholique well be it so yet admit this withall when after the Apostles there were heresies and men beganne to rend in peeces and diuide gods done and Queene by sundry different names did not the Apostolike people require their surnames whereby they might distinguish the vnitie of the vncorrupt people least the error of some should rend in sunder gods vndefiled virgin where we see Pacianus doth freely grant that this surname Catholike was not in vse in the time of the Apostles Which testimonie Baronius doth notably dissemble in shewing the originall of this name out of Pacianus affirming but not proouing it to be as ancient as the Apostles Now this errour hath not onely befallen the Latin and Greeke copies but the Syriacke likewise as may appeare in the title prefixed before the most ancient Syrian trāslation where we shal find these words The 3. Epistles of the 3. Apostles before whose eyes our Lord was transfigured Iames Peter Iohn In which inscription be couched 2. soule errours First in that this translator maketh but 3. epistles of James Peter and Iohn whereas there are sixe he omitting the 2. of Peter the 2. and 3. of Iohn as also that of Iude as no part of holy scripture therfore the Syriack church as I haue alreadie said doth not receiue these Epistles into their Canon vnto this day The second is in that he affirmeth Iames before whom our S. Christ was transfigured in mount Tabor to be the author of this epistle For that Iames before whome Christ was transfigured in the mount was Iames the sonne of Zebedeus and brother of Iohn Matth. 17. 1. After sixe daies Iesus tooke Peter and Iames and Iohn his brother and brought them vp into an high mountain and was transfigured before them Which Iames could not possibly be the penner of this epistle for he was slaine by king Herode long before the destruction of Ierusalem and the dispersion of the 12. tribes Acts 12. v. 2. About that time Herode the kinge stretched forth his hand to vexe certaine of the Church and he slew Iames the brother of Iohn with the sword Therfore Iames the author of this epistile was Iames the sonne of Alphaeus For to faine an other Iames the brother of our Lord as some haue done is childish seeing it is plaine by sundry places of the N. T. that there were but two of that name mentioned in Scripture Iames the sonne of Zebedeus called Iames the greater and Iames the sonne of Alphoeus brother to Iude called the lesser and brother of our Lord. GRATIAS TIBI DOMINE IESV COMMON PLACES HANDLED IN THIS Commentarie The first figure shewes the page the second the line 1 HOw a man may