he saith thus And I would not speake vnto you Brethren as vnto spirituall mem but as vnto carnall men euen as to Babes in Christ I giue you milke to drinke and not meat for you were not yet able to beare it where he layeth the spirituall man against the carnall man that in regard of carnall affection perceiueth not the things of the spirit of God wherfore it seemeth a strang thing that Sectaries should infer from this text of scripture that euery belieuer hath a priuat (b) S. Irenaeus l. 3. cap. 2. con haer sharpely rebuks Valentinus for leauing tradition and following the priuat spirit thereby constituting himselfe sole iudge and rule of faith reuealing spirit of truth wherby he is enabled with authority to discern matters of faith and iudge all controuersies and to be iudged of no man himselfe vnto the excluding of all outward Teachers As to the second Text the true meaning of it is not that his vnction only doth teach but that the doctrines of christian religion which men teach outwardly by speaking * Aug. trac 3. in Epis Joan. magisteria inquit forensecus adiutoria quaedam sunt admonitiones cathedram autem in caelo habet qui corda dotet his vnction teacheth inwardly by inspiring grace wherby men are made apt to harken to what the Church ministers teach and indeed this docility or aptness to harken to the word of God is a speciall prerogatiue giuen by the spirit of grace vnto the children of the new law and prophesied of in the old law by Ieremy and Isaias As concerning the third Text set down the true sense is this that whosoeuer beliueth in the son of God aright hath in himselfe inward faith which is a diuine gift and therfore called the testimony of God in as much as it witnesseth that no man can * Mat. tues Christus Filius Dei viui caro sanguis non reuelauit tibi sed pater meus come vnto the son Iesus-Christ except it be giuen vnto him by the Father and albeit that the inward testimony of God hath been the Iole cause to draw some men vnto the maruelous light of faith for example Saint Peter beliued the mistery of the incarnation in vertue of an inward inspiration proceeding from God immediatly neuertheless the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary necessary requisit to the conceiuing of christian faith according to the ordinance of Christ that hath constituted outward Teachers to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church to the worlds end that we be not carryed about with euery wind of doctrine which hath been extreme needlesse if he had thought it expedient to supply euery particular belieuer with a priuat reuealing spirit Furthermore from the premises is clearly deducible that the holy scripture cannot lay clame to the dignitie of a supream Iudge because the office therof which is a primary end intended of necessity * Plato in libris quos de repub scripsit Aristoteles in policicis docent in constitutione formatione alicuius reipub vnum ex ijs quae debent 1. per se intentendi esse ipsum IudiceÌ„ pro dirimendis litibus ciuium ad pacem in rep seruandam in the forming of euery common wealth is to declare laws punish peruerse offenders and pronounce sentence of iudgment for the determining all matter in debate that therby vnity and peace may be preserued but the scripturs can chaleng nothing of iuridicall power in order to iudging defining and deciding controuersies of faith these actions importing life hearing and speaking which the scripturs cannot exercise being vnliud things that neither heare nor speak clearly and consequently vnfit to Iudg matters in debate between one and another besids these were not intended in â—he forming of the Church as requisits absolutly necessary to the Gouerment of it for Christ during the time he conuersed on earth writ nothing himselfe nor commaunded his Apostles or disciples to writ and indeed of themselues they were not much (i) According to Eusebius l. 3. hist Eccles cap. 18. the Apoles and disciples of Christ were not greatly solicitous to put down in writing the misteries of christian faith being the employment inioyned them was to preach the Gospel in so much that according to the same Eusebius it was a tradition of those days that they were after a manner necessitated to write and according to S. Hierom de viris illus S. Iohn writ his Gospel in regard of Cherintus and Ebion which denyed the diuinity of Christ And indeed t is euident that the Apostles did not write down the principles of christian religion hauing receiued command ad commission from Christ to preach without any commission to write set vpon writing because of their ingagement in an higher imployment namely preaching of the Gospell and it seems that those few which haue written were vrged or necessitated therunto as was Saint Iohn that writ his Gospell to confute the hereticks Cherintus and Ebion who denied the diuinity of Christ Again among the twelue Apostles Saint Matthew and Saint Iohn only and among the 62. Disciples Saint Luke only only writ the Gospell euen diuers years after Christs Ascention into Heauen insomuch that the christiaÌ„ Church had institutioÌ„ exercised iuridicall authority made lawes exacted obedience vnto them along while before the new scripturs were in being and contrary to the old scripture pronounced sentence of iudgment to the anulling of Circumcision which was a controuersy of faith Wherfore doubtless scripturs were neither primarly intended nor primarly giuen as suprem iudges of all matters in debate concerning faith and religion moreouer Saint Irenaeus who florished in the yeare of our lord 160. expresly (k) Irenaeus l. 3. con haer cap. 4. denyes expresly that christian faith had perished if the Apostles had not left vs the scriptures asserteth that the people of sundry countries without the help of paper or inck had preserued christian faith down from the Apostles to his time the vnwritten supplying the room of the written word for this ancient Father writeth and ascribeth that preseruation vnto apostolicall tradition obserued by the ancient Churches together with the help of inward grace proceeding from the holy Ghost Wherfore as those primatiue Churches did perseruer in the profession of the christian faith for the space of many years without scripturs so the present Church assisted with the like meanes might continue pure without spot or wrinckle although it had nothing of written doctrine and consequently the primary end for which scripturs were intended was not to doe the office of suprem Iudg howeuer all things which were written were written for our learning that wee through patience * L. 1. Machabae cap. 11 Ionathas summus Sacerdos scribens spartiatis dicit se suos in rebus aduersis pro solatio habere libros sacros quod ostendit vsum in quem datae sunt nobis
CHVRCH MILITANT THE CONTENTS God hath giuen to his Church on earth the keeping of all truth that we may not be as children wauering carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by diuine institution pastorall functiōs are of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church vnto teaching christian faith and deciding controuersies pertaining thereto without being liable to errour God hath inuested Church-Gouernours with autority to make laws and ordinances and exacte obediēce vnto them the Church cannot lie hid priuat spirits haue nothing of power to interprete scriptures or to judge matters in debate concerning faith and religion the outward testimony of the Church is the ordinary expedient necessary to the receiuing of christian faith answeres to sundry obiections vrged by sectaries in fauour of a priuat reuealing spirit holy scriptures were neither primarily intended nor primaryly deliuered as supream Judges of controuersies in order to christian faith and religion profoundnes ' of mysteries plenteousnes and shortnes of sentences render the scriptures obscure and intricate to infer the Churches infallibility from the autority of scriptures and scriptutes infallible autority from the infallible testimony of the Church implies no circle of errour faith as to the assent thereof is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures the four principall marks of the true Church taken joyntly agree with the Roman Church onely which is the one holy catholick and Apostolick Church that neuer deuiated from truth THe Church militant is the grownd and piller of truth 1. Tim. 3. as the foundation of an house supporteth and hindereth it from falling So the Church of God sustaineth and preserueth truth that is the doctrine of christian faith from perishing wherefore whosoeuer desireth to find out truth vnto saluation must seek it in the Church which is the certaine keeper and faithfull Guardian thereof the supream prouidence hauing put therein Some Apostles and some Prophets and some Euangelists and some Pastours and Teachers for the consummation of the Saints for the worke of the ministery and for the edification of the body of Christ vntill we all meet together in the vnity of faith and the knowledg of the son of God vnto a perfect man and vnto the measure of the age of the fulness of Christ that we henceforth be no more children wauering and carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by the wickednesse of men and crastines of Satan whereby they lie in waite to bring vs into errour Ephes 4. where the Apostle plainly asserteth pastorall function together with the office of teaching christian faith to be of necessary and perpetuall vse in the Church for the administring of Sacraments auoiding of errours and the confirming of such as shall wauer in religion and truly it cannot be conceiued as to reason probable that Christ coming into the world to be Gouernour of souls and to make vnto himselfe a glorious Church without spot or wrinckle Ephes 5. should not departing out of the world leaue necessary helps to preserue it in holynes (a) god instituted in the old law Deut. 17. à supream Tribunall consisting of Priests for the deciding of matters in debate in order to his people to the end that if inferiour Iudges should differ in iudgment or deuiate from the truth they might recur to the Council of Priests where one chief Iudge that is the high Priest was appointed to prouounce sentence and all others bound to giue obedience therto the law condemning those of pride which resisted or refused the high Priests decision in matters of controuersie again God so specially assisted the said Council with his spirit of truth that the high Priests sentence was infallible though himselfe might erre as a priuat person Wherefore Christ Mat. 23. commanded the people to doe what the Scribs and Pharisies said in regard they sate in the Chair of Moyses And S. Iohn cap. 11. ascribes not the truth of Caiphas prophesing that Christ ought to die for the safety of that nation vnto his speaking as of himselfe but to his speaking as high Priest of that same yeare which rendered him infallible in speaking in consequence of which seeing that God so directed the high Priest in the old law that he could not speake an vntruth from the Chair of Moyses it follows of necessity that Christ in his own new law of grace so specially assistes the high Priest his grand Vicar and supream head of the Church which he built on his beloued Apostle S. Peter that he cannot tell a lye from the Chair of the same S. Peter the first high Priest of the new law after Christ Wherefore the Churches supream Gouernour that succeds in that Chair cannot erre in his decrees that concerne matters of faith or generall manners notwithstanding that he were as wicked as Caiphas From hence plainly appear's the manifest weaknes of sundry sectaries which will haue the supream Priests sentence no longer to bind then hee pronounces sentence in conformity to the word of God for there is no warrantable authority saue that of the supream Pastours Tribunall which can assure vs of the diuine word for the scripture would not be belieued if it were not warranted from the infallible Chair of S. Peter Moreouer sundry sectaries say vnaduisedly that in the old law the sentence of the high Priests concerned only ciuill matters in debate and not controuersies pertaning to faith and religion for as to this point both the second book of paralipomenon and the 24. Chapter of Exodus giue clear euidence against them Besides God hath not vsed lese care in instituting the christrian Church established in a law of grace then in forming the Synagogue of the Iewes established in a law of bondage wherefore * Deus cum primum instituit Cathedrā Moysis in Deutro promisit omnes singulas eius definitiones fore veritatis infallibilis ideo Aug. l. 4. de doct chris ait Pharisaeos scribas id est Pōtisices Mosaicos iudicantes ex Cathedra Moysis non pot uisse malè definire quamuis mali essent quia ad bene definiendum cogebantur à Deo since this had diuine authority and assistance to interpret and teach the old law of Moyses as likewise to decide all controuersies concerning the Iewish religion Deut. 17. doubtless he hath not prouided in a lesser measure for the Church of Christ in order to teaching and interpreting the new law and determining all matters that might be in debate about christian religion Again Christ being about to leaue this Church in order to his visible presence for as many ages as the world shall endure was as prouident and carefull to preserue it pure from schism and heresy as was Moyses to preserue his when he was to absent himselfe from it for a shorter time but Moyses being to goe vp vnto Mount Sinai and there to abide forty dayes and forty nights onely constituted * Exod. 24. exspectate hic inquit Moyses donec reuertamur ad vos
S. Mat. cap. 24. the Church of God bears the name of the kingdom of Heauen And S. Hierom stileth the Church the arke of Noe that contained Leopards kids wolfes and lambs that is to say both good and wicked men dwel in the Church of God and though she is faid Eph. 4. to haue no spot or wrinckle yet that is meant in relation to faith and doctrine which are holy and without blame Howeuer S. Austin l. de perfec iustorum expounds the sacred Text set down also in order to the Church triumphant which is without spot or wrinckle the great house of God wherin are not only vessells of gold and siluer but also of wood and of earth and some for honour and some for dishonour 2. Tim. 2. howeuer no man is so irreuocably a vessell vnto dishonour but that he may be translated into a vessell vnto honour sanctified and meet for our lord IESVS if he will cast from him all his transgressions committed after baptism wherby he was incorporated into this great house which made him a vessell vnto dishonour The Church is called catholick that is vniuersall in as much as it sendeth forth the marueilous light of christian faith from the rising of the sun vnto the goeing douwn therof For Christ that redeemed vs to God by his bloud out of euery kindred and tongue and people and nation Apoc. 5. hath not confined the knowledg of his faith * Aug. ser 13. Ecclesia inquit à solis ortu vsque ad occasum vnius fidei splendore enititur within the bounds of one kingdome Moreouer the Church is rightly named catholick or vniuersall in respect of time that is to say of perpetuall succession of pastours and Teachers for the prouidence of God towards man of necessity preserueth the Church from perishing himselfe hauing prouidently instituted it as the common ordinary way to lead man vnto his kingdom Again its vniuersall because of the obligation euery man hath to embrace it that will aspire to eternall life As out of the arke of Noe there was no deliuerance from the generall deluge (t) According to S. Cyprian trac de vnit Eccle. whosoeuer hath not the Church for his Mother shall not haue God for his Father And according to S. Fulgentius who was contemporary with S. Austin l. de fide Such as are not incorporated into the Church how charitable soeuer they be cannot be saued and this Catholick assertion S. Austin professes likwise li. 4. de baptismo besids according to the holy scriptures no man that is not within the Churches bosome can obtaine heauenly benediction in consequence of which to rebell against or fall from her is execrable and damnable so out of the true Church there is no saluation and indeed the Church is the sole Mother that conceiueth bringeth forth and nourisheth children vnto heauenly blessednes Lastly the true Church is called apostolicall because it hath doth and shall preach in all times to the end of the world christian religion planted by the Apostles vpon whom as the foundation it was built Eph. 2. By the forementioned marks or tokens ioyntly the Church of Christ is shewed and distinguished from euery false congregation The Synagogue of Iews and Mahometans cannot challeng Apostolicall foundation where of Christ himselfe is the Chief corner stone nor catholick propagation from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof for their religion is neither christian nor spread in all parts of the world and the false Churches of sectaries though they carry the name of christian neuertheless they haue nothing of vnity as to the faith of Christ nor of perpetuall succession as to pastours and Teachers down from the Apostles to these present times for they set vp a new mysticall body of Christ composed of reformed members saying that Christ in regard of sundry great scandalls and errours hath elected the old mysticall body wherof he was head afore that is the Roman Church which seemeth a strang thing because that Church according to their own confession was once in possession of the true faith and true religion * Ad Rom. 5. gratias ago Domino Deo quod fides vestra Romana annunciata Est in vniuerso mundo and the Apostle witnesseth as much writing to the Romans I thank my God through Iesus-Christ for you all because your faith Roman is published through out the whole world and no one expresse scripture testimony can be alledged to shew that the Roman Church hath deuiated from that true faith in consequence of which sectaries that will belieue nothing without express scripture ought not to belieue that the Roman Church is deuested of the true faith which it was once in possession of and therby deserted and truly it is not to reason credible that Christ after being marryed to the Roman Church for sundry ages should repudiate her especially hauing promised by the mouth of his holy Prophet that * Sponsabo te mihi in aeternum he will neuer chang the spouse of the new law saying I will espouse thee for euer it is not as to reason credible that Christ that cast out the bill of deuorce practized in the old law should be the first to bring it again into practice nor is it as to reason credible that the spouse which Christ chose without sport or wrinckle and put vnder the conduct of the holy Ghost should cast away her spousall innocence integrity and fidelity and turne to vncleaness fornication and idolatry Wherfore it is plainly euident that the Roman Church is not repudiated or deserted wherefore she and no other is the true Church of Christ that since the first age for 1660. yeares hath not deuiated from one holy catholick and Apostolick faith neither is * Apostolus scribens ad Rom. dicit fidem vestram meam sed fides S. Pau. erat vniuersalis catholica Roman Church and catholick or vniuersall Church less consistent together then christian Church and catholick Church or apostolicall and catholick Church for Christ was a singular person whence the word Christian is deriued and the Apostles were particular men whence the word Apostolicall comes and as the catholick Church is named christian because of Christ that is the supream inuisible head therof and as the catholick Church is called apostolicall in respect of the Apostles which were the foundation of it so the Catholick Church is called Roman from the Bishop of Rome that is the visible head therof subordinate to Christ * Concil Alexand loquens de Roma Eccl. sacer inquit vertex inquo omnis Ecclesia vertitur and indeed the Roman Church taken properly doth not signifie precisely and only that Church which is at Rome but cōprehendeth euery Church through out the whole world that professeth the same faith with it and acknowledgeth obedience to the same (u) According to S. Anaclete S. Anaclete S. Peters disciple and his third successor in the Pontificate
controuersies in debate for as much as they relate to faith Furthermore God who is not an accepter of persons Rom. 15. who is not God of men only but of women also and who desireth to saue all of each sex doubtless instituted a remedy against originall sin in fauour of men and women for as much as the expiation thereof is absolutely necessary vnto saluation wherfore in regard circumcision was the remedy proper to men and could not be applied to women some other expedient was ordained for their cure and although no express mention thereof be made in any part of the old Testament neuertheless that God instituted a remedy for the deliuerance of women * Quod qualeue fuerit illud remedium à Deo institutum ad subueniēdum faeminis quae nascebantur in peccato originali nullibi explicatur in sacris litteris nec porest deduci ex illis from the guilt of originall sin the Iews belieued as an article of faith necessary to saluation and indeed so it was as appeareth from the necessity of it and from the prouidence God hath ouer both men and women and truly to auerre that God was defectiue then in necessary requisits to the saluation of women is a manifest blasphemy wherby it is clear that euen the Iews in the old law held vnwritten besides written tradition as necessary vnto saluation neither is the said unwritten tradition preiudiced by the reply of some sectaries saying that the oblation of women in the Temple according to the law of Moyses did free them of originall sin For that legall offring was common alike to women and men and Christ was both circumcised and offered in the Temple nor by recurring for this deliuerance vnto the circumcision of Parents there being not any passage in the whole Testament of the old law that carrieth the least sound that way or that hath relation to the deliuerance of women from originall sin in vertu of their parents circumcision besides S. Austin and other ancient Fathers expresly teach that baptism is to Christians as circumcision was to the Iewes but no Christian sectary will say that women are sanctified and consecrated to God through their parents baptism for if it were enough for the purging out of originall sin to baptise the male there would be no need at all to baptise the female sex hereby it is clear again that the Iews of the old law allowed and professed vnwritten besides written traditions as necessary to saluation From the premises appeareth that the word of God taken precisely comprehendeth both vnwritten and written traditions in consequence of which vnwritten traditions are not additions to the word of God they being a part therof Wherfore neither Moyses Deut. 4. saying to the people of Israel Ye shall adde nothing to the word which I speake to you neither shall ye take ought from it Nor S. Paul Gal. 1. saying to the Galatians though that we or an Angel from Heauen preach vnto you (h) According to S. Austin tom 7. con liter petiliani l. 3. cap. 6. and tom 9. trac 98. in Io. the particle praeterquam besids in the cited Text imports the particle contra against or contrary so that the meaning is that nothing must be preached against or contrary to the holy scripture And truly this explication appears euidently by the Apostles arguing against those that asserted Iudaism to be consistent with christianism which assertion because it was contrary to the law of Christ the Apostle added the curse set down in the same sentence of the Text. Moreouer the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Latin Interpreter translateth praeterquam is vsed by the Apostle for contra not only in the Epistle alledged ad Gal. but also Rom. 4. besids what we haue preached vnto you let him be accursed condemne vnwritten traditions as sectaries do calumniate the Catholick Church besides sectaries very vnhandsomly and weakly do infer from these two scripture testimonies that no doctrines of faith ought to be receiued saue such as be contained expresly in or by euident consequence deduced from the written word of God for neither of both doe mention the written word of God The word says Moyses which I speake vnto you and that we haue preached vnto you says the Apostle but if it were granted vnto them what they cannot proue viz that Moyses then spoke what he had written afore notwithstanding they could not ouerthrow therby vnwritten traditions vnless they could proue which they can neuer doe that they be additions destructiue of or contrary to the written word of God for such additions only he meant and excluded by the cited scriptures and indeed if S. Paul had meant otherwise he should haue cursed S. Iohn the Euangelist that many yeares after his martyrdome writ reuelations which S. Paul had not preached to the Galatians likwise the Anathema had touched S. Paul himselfe that deliuered sundry passages in the acts of the Apostles which happened after his preaching to the Galatians Howeuer catholicks doe not deny but that traditions which are the vnwritten word be contained implicitly in the written word of God that is to say as in a generall principle from whence they are deducible and the whole word of God is contained in scriptutes yea in this sole Article of the Apostles Creed I belieue in the holy Catholick Church in as much as all the matters pertaining to faith and generall manners and not clearly expressed in holy scriptures are contained expresly in the doctrine of the Church which the scriptures commend vnto vs as infallible and indeed the whole word of God is expounded vnto vs in Christs command Math. 18. If he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and publican in regard wherof ancient Fathers do auerre all doctrines of faith to be contained in scriptures that is as in a generall principle from whence they can be deduced CHAR. XXJ. OF THE CHVRCH TRIVMPHANT THE CONTENTS Souls that remoue out of their earthly habitations cleansd from all vncleanes are instantly translated into Heauen the clear sight of God wherein consisteth heauenly beatitude is not deferd till the generall Resurrection though the office of mediation aduocation and intercession is proper to Christ alone as to the noblest manner therof neuertheless according to the Catholick Church all the Saints mediate and intercede in the sight of God for the faithfull on earth in subordination to Christ the Church of god does not nor neuer did teach that the faithfull on earth ought to mediate and intercede for the blessed in Heauen S. Paul did not mediate or intercede for Onesiphorus that he might obtaine mercy after his soule was beatifyed the ancient Liturgies of the Church approue not of prayers vnto helping of the blessed THe Church triumphant is a holy Congregation of blessed Saints reigning with Iesus-Christ innocēt souls not liable to any guilt of sin as soon (a) 2. Cor. 5. we know
carefully heauenly Angels endeauour to bring mortalls vnto eternall blessedness being they reioyce in the repentance of a sinner Wherefore Orig. hom 1. in Ezech. prayeth his Angel to receiue him conuerted from his former errour reioyce at the conuersion of a sinner Luc. 15. Besids according to the common vsage of the primatiue Church one beleeuing christian bargained with an other that he who went first to Heauen should pray for him that abided on earth Let vs saith S. Cyprian Epis 57. pray mutually one for an other and whether of vs two shall through the diuine mercy be first called for let his loue continue and his prayers not cease for his brethren and sisters in the world In like manner S. Hierome spoke to Heliodorus Epis 1. cap. 2. saying that when he is once in Heauen he will pray for him that exhorted and encouraged him to embrace a monasticall state of life Moreouer in the law of nature Abraham made intercession to an Angel for his sons Ioseph Ephraim and Manasse Gen. 48. the Angel which hath deliuered me from all euill bless these children And albeit it cannot be proued that in any time during the old Testament the people of God prayed directly to the holy Patriarkes and Prophets after their decease in regard then the Saints departed were not translated into Heauen and inuested with whiâ—e cloathes of glory their habitation being vnder the earth as in a prison 1. Petri 2. neuertheless they made intercession to God humbly asking of him mercy and grace through the merits of the said Patriarches and Prophets * Psal 131. memeÌ„to Domini Dauid omnis mansuetudinis eius propter Dauid seruum tuuÌ„ non auertas faciem Christi tui Salomon asked of God meet helpe in regard of his Father Dauids great merits * Exod. recordare Domine Abraham Isaac Jacob scruoruÌ„ tuum and Moyses in respect of the good workes of Abraham Isack and Israel the faithfull seruants of God Likewise the ancient Iews made intercession to God through the prayers of their progenitors departed And the holy Prophet Ieremy (k) Baruch cap. 3. prayeth thus O lord omnipotent God of Jsra Heare the prayer of the dead of Israel and though some sectaries count Baruch as apocryphall neuertheless the ancient Fathers and Councills haue ranked that book with diuine scripture both vnder the name of Ieremy Baruchs vncle and vnder the inscription of Baruch which is more proper Again the Councill of Laodicea in the last canon mentioneth Baruchs lamentations and Ieremyes Epistles Moreouer the Councils of Florence and Trent haue defined this catholick truth after his death praid much for the people of Israel 2. Mach. 75. Neither doth the Prophet Isaias preiudice this catholike truth saying cap. 63. Abraham knew vs not and Israel was ignorant of vs for he meant only that Abraham and Iacob did not acknowledge the Iews of those days for their children because of their greiuous sinns and iniquities as the ancient Fathers interpret that scripture Nor Ecclesiastes when hee saith the dead know noe more and haue reward noe more For his meaning is not to take all vnderstanding and knowledge from soules remoued out of their bodyes but to inculcate vnto vs that it is impossible after our departure out of this world to merit a reward the time of this life being a necessarie requisite there to according to Christs own testimony Io. 9. the night cometh when noe man can worke But now the ingagement mentioned in the character of Purgatory calleth for an answere vnto the Digbean White that hath studied diuinity 40. yeares who as to the contents of this character mainly resisteth the constant (l) Mr. White in the third account of the midle state of souls boldly asserts that though to pray for the blessed be against the common practice of the Church neuertheless he is not of so vveake a stomack as not to digest that morsell so that he maks not only the Church liable to errour as to manners and doctrines vniuersally receiued approued and practiced which is a manifest heresy but himselfe the Churches Reformer and vniuersall practice of the Catholick Church agreeing with so large and euident testimony of scriptures Councills and Fathers as are set down for example in the third accompt of his midle state of souls to proue that the ancient practice of the Church was to pray for the dead euen after their souls were beatified He alledged the 2. Epis and 1. cap. to Timothie where the Apostle thus prays for Onesiphorus Our lord grant him Onesiphorus to find mercy from our lord in that day by which words this knowing Master that hath studyed 40. years to build a Theology on Digbean peripateticks will of necessity proue that S. Paul prayed that Onefiphorus might find mercy after he was beatified Shall I deny saith he the Apostle prayed that Onesiphorus might find mercy euen after his soule was beatified the Text on all sides confessed for bids me what then will our aduersaries say this was not to pray for the blessed common sense permit's them not S. Paul did it But doubtless no knowing man in Theology or ecclesiasticall historie that is vnpartiall dare say for his credits sake that Mr. White doth clearly proue against the whole practice of the Church that the faithfull on earth must pray for the blessed because the Apostle prayed for Onesiphorus saying Our lord grant vnto him that he may find mercy of our lord in illo die in that day for Onesiphorus was not dead when S. Paul prayed that he might find mercy of our lord in illo die In consequence of which Mr. Whites inference from the words alledged carries no weight with it at all being grounded vpon a very false supposall Howeuer the good prayer of the Apostle was not in vain for according to the martyrologes both Latine and Greek Onesiphorus was honored afterward with a crown of martyrdom in Hellespont in consequence wherof doubtless he found mercy of our lord in that day that is in the day of particular iudgment after his death for it is the constant Tenet of the Catholick Church * Apoc. 14. Beati mortui qui in Domino moriuntur à modo iam dicit spiritus vt requiescant à laboribus suis Hic sacer textus osteÌ„dit beatos morientes id est martyres aliosque fideles decedentes perfectè iustos sine omni macula reatu poenae id est obligatione ad poenam noÌ„ expectaturos vniuersale iudicium vt accipiaÌ„t beatitudinem ita explicat S. Aug. l. 20. de ciuit cap. 9. that martyrs by their death suffered for the confessing of Christs faith be perfectly purged of sin both in order to the guilt and paines therof and immediatly possess their glorious crowns which is the beatificall vision as S. Austin lib. de peccatorum meritis expresly teacheth saying he that prayeth for a martyr doth an iniury to a martyr The same doctrine the Councill of Trent ses
as infected with errours crept into it in order to not foundamentall Articles of faith and to assert the quitting of these and not the Roman Church as to the sound part therof in consequence of which Protestants infer the now Roman Catholicks who perseuer in not themselues that rooted out the errours that were crept into the Roman Church to bear the infamous brād of schism thus the distinction of foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith serues the Protestant Reformation and might haue weight with it if any exāple could be produced from any Christian Church preceding the Protestant Reformation that so distinguished between foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith making it damnable to dissent from those and not damnable to dissent from these sufficiently proposed and indeed the going of the Children of Israel on drie ground thorow the mids of the sea the raising of Lazarus vnto life by Christ and sundry other Articles of faith which according to Protestās are not foundamentall neuertheless cannot be denyed without hurt of faith and loss of saluation Wherefore the primitiue Church taught that all Articles of faith sufficiently propounded ought of necessity to be belieued for the first Council of Nice condemned seuerall Hereticks euen for asserting errours which were not against foundamentall Articles of faith namely the Quartadecimani for celebrating the solemnity of Easter at an vndue tyme and Can. 8 made an ordinance forbidding the receiuing of certain hereticks called Cathari into communion with the Catholick Church vnless first they promised in writing that they would embrace and keep all the doctrines therof without making any exception as to foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith * Aug. l. de haeresibus vbi enumerasset multas haereses quarum plures non erant cōtra Articulos fundamentales in fine tamen vniuersaliter de omnibus ait christianus Catholicus ista non debet credere Besides not one scripture testimony or one authority of ancient Father can be alledged to proue that diuine faith is consistent with one sole errour that is against any * S. Chrysos in Gal. 1. ad illud volunt subuertere Quemadmodum inquit in moneta Regia qui parum aliquid amputauerit de impressa imagine totum nunisma reddit adulterinū ita quisquis sacrae fid ei vel minimā particulam suhuerterit in totū corrumpisur idem docet Theodor. l. 4. his cap. 16. 5. Prosper Epis ad Virginem Demetr alienus inquit est à numero fidelium à sorte sanctorum qui in aliquo à Catholica veritate dissentit one Article therof For indeed euery errour against an Article of faith is an errour against faith in cōsequence of which one act of hereticall infidelity expelleth faith as darknes dissipateth light and as one sole mortall sin driueth away christiā charity and although naturall habits as they are got leasurly by frequēt acts of the same liknes ād so lost at leasure by sundry acts of contrary likenes neuertheless faith that is a diuine habit supernaturally infused is wholly lost * Io. 2. qui offendit in vno factus est omniumreus prasertion quoad incturam totius habitus gratiae charitatis qui habitus tam facilè vno peccato mortali quam pluribus deperditur 1. Cor. 6. Rom. 6. stipendium peccati mors vbl dicitur peccati in numere Tingulaeri by any one act of errour that importes a voluntary dissent from any whatsoeuer Article of faith sufficiently propounded and the reason hereof is manifest because whosoeuer so dissenteth reiecteth diuine reuelation together with the veracity of God which is the indiuisible object and consistency of diuine faith and regardeth all the Articles therof alike wherby is plainly euident that t is vnaduisedly and in vain conceiued that the Roman Church is one indiuiduall body partly sound and partly exulcerated or one indiuiduall field that in part is filled with thistles and netles and in part purged of all euil hearbs by the industry of a carefull husband man seeing that the true Church of God is inconsistent with errours against Articles of faith as appeareth by the reasons alledged and indeed the true Church is the spouse of Christ without spot or wrinckle and so shall continue to the end of the world vnder the the infallible conduct of the holy Ghost who will neuer suffer the gates of hell to preuail against her Mat. 18. in consequence of which she shall neuer lose her spousall innocency integrity and fide lity wherfore if we will auerre that the Roman Church was once the true Church of God of necessity she ought to continue so and if we will cōfess that the present Church of Rome containes all foundamentals that is all necessary requisits vnto saluation of necessity the opinion of errours crept in in order to not foundamentall Articles of faith ought to be laid aside But to whom shall it belong to distinguish the foundamentall Articles from not foundamentall and meer arbitrary not to the Pope surely and such Christiās as yeeld obediēce to his Holines because these acknowledge for foundamentall Articles what the Council of Trent hath defined nor to the ancient Church in regard that frō tyme to tyme she hath condemned and excommunicated those which dissented from any poynt of the generall faith or from generall Councils for though the Pelagians Donatists and other sectaries confessed the misteries of the Trinity and Incarnanation and other foundamentall Articles of Christian faith neuertheless they were not tolerated but anathematised by the ancient Church and by the Fathers execrated as Heretiks Yet perhaps it will be answered that the determination belong's to the vnanimous accorde of all those which in any manner confess and worship Christ But if the vniuersall consent of these were required for the making or appointing foundamentall Articles necessary to the obtaining of saluation this should be none viz The Diuinity of the son of God Because the Arians denyed it nor The Diuinity of the holy Ghost Being the Macedonians denyed it nor The blessed Trinity because the Sabellians denyed it Nor the vnion between the diuine and human nature in one diuine Person for Nestorius denyed that vnion wherby euidently appears that t is not possible for Protestāts to determinate which Articles of faith be foūdamētall and which be not foūdamētall That is to set down precisely such Articles of faith as can not be denyed without loss of saluation and such again as to deny is not damnable Howeuer it is euident enough that Protestants haueing neither vnion as to diuine faith nor communion as to the ministery of Sacraments with the Roman Church cannot make a good claim to a visible existence and perpetuall succession of Pastors as deriued from her Again their going out from that Church which they confess to haue been once the true Church of God and still to retaine requisits necessary vnto saluation argueth them guilty of
deadly schism caused by themselues that departed from and not by Catholicks that abided in her In euery ciuill state such as dissobey not such as obey authority such as abrogate not such as conserue the ancient lawes and ordinances such as reject not such as keep the setled customes therof bear the infimous brand to all posterity of being the men that rent and diuided the common wealth but Protestants haue dissobeyed not obeyed abrogated not preserued reiected not obserued the authority lawes and Customes of the Roman Church hauing by their own power only vnder a specious colour of reformation introduced nouell doctrines lawes and rites contrary to the vsage and practice therof wherfore they of necessity bear the guilt of deadly schism and not Catholicks that haue altered nothing Besides Protestants went out of the Roman Church without cause for at the time of their departure the Roman Church retained all requisits necessary vnto saluation for then was there no Christian Church vpon earth Seperated from her so that when the Protestants reformation begun the Roman Church or none was the true Church of God in consequence of which their departure was without cause * Aug. l. 3. de baptis con Donat. c. 2. in fine ait si Ecclesia Romanae sit verae Dei Ecclesia in qua salus haberi potest non habent Donatista sua pracisionis aliquam defonsionem sed exeundo communionem Ecclesiae relinquâ—â—do in quae poteraÌ„t saluari irrucrunt in sacrilegium schismatis For whosoeuer goeth out from a Church wherin he might attaine to saluation goes out without cause and commits sacriledge of damnable schism as the great Doctour S. Austin teacheth in his third book of baptism against the Donatists Moreouer this asserted truth appeares euidently by the foundamentall doctrines of Protestant Religion which are as opposite to the faith of the Roman Church as the ends of a Diameter are ouerwhart and cross For example Protestants commonly teach that good works proceeding from diuine grace can neither iustify nor merit saluation these being prerogatiues of faith only in regard wherof it beares the name of iustifying faith but all ancient and modern Pastors and Doctours of the Roman Church assert that good workes exercised in and by diuine grace doe bring vnto iustification of life and that they are in order to merit causes of euerlasting saluation as wicked workes in order to demerit are causes of perpetuall damnation Protestants commonly teach that the sacrifice of Mass wherin Catholick Priests offer the body and blood of Christ for the liuing and dead is a blasphemous tale and a daÌ„gerous deuise Protestants coÌ„monly teach that confirmation Penance Order Extream-vnction and Matrimony want requisits necessary to an Euangelicall Sacrament Protestants commonly teach that the doctrines of Purgatory Indulgences religious veneration of holy Reliks pertaining vnto and inuocation of Saints are idle fancies and trifles crept into the Church without warrantable authority of scripture testimony Protestants commonly teach sundry other doctrines as foundamentall requisits to their religion clean contrary to the faith of the Roman Church as is manifestly demonstrated in the Characters concerning the outward Sacrifice of Masse Confirmation Penance Order Extrem-vnction Matrimony Purgatory Indulgences and Adoration From the premises is inferred that the Protestant Reformation cannot borrow of the Roman Church visible existence together with continuall succession of Pastors vnto perpetuating that Church in foundamentall Articles of faith vnto excusing from schism Howeuer it cannot be denyed but that Protestants can shew clearly that the whole body of doctrines foundamentall to Protestanism hath been asserted by sundry learned men that liu'd in sundry ages respectiuely long before their reformation began namly Simon Magus taught that faith alone was an expedient sufficient vnto saluation as witnesseth S. Irenaeus and rejected good works as vnnecessary therto as doth attest Clemens Romanus Manichaeus despised the Sacrifice of Masse spoiling Christs Church of all outward sacrifice as witnesses S. Austin Nouatus impugned the Sacraments of Confirmation Eucharist Extrem-vnction and Matrimony as S. Cyprian affirmeth Vigilantius detested the inuocation of Saints and the veneration of their Reliques and likewise single life of Priests as S. Hierom relateth Iulian the Apostat had in detestation the cross of Christ and demolished his statue as Eusebius writeth Aerius condemned prayers and sacrifices offered for the souls departed as S. Austin and S. Epiphanius auerre But that which is exacted of the Protestants is to shew from the first age for 1500. yeares a setled company of Christians and the place country town or village where they liued that taught and preached the whole body of their foundamentall doctrines it is not enough to produce the example of such as at different tymes and in different places agreed with them in two or three of their Articles for that is not sufficient vnto constituting a society of true belieuers because so Turkes and Iewes might be lifted for Protestants these agreeing with them as to sundry Articles namely they deny the Popes supremacy transubstantiation inuocation of Saints and the sacrifice of the Masse Again the fore named sectaries themselues were destitute of visible existence and perpetuall succession and consequently could not deriue either of both vnto the Protestant Church Besides Simon Magus Manichaeus Nouatus Vigilantius c. bear the infamous brand of being condemned Hereticks before the ProtestaÌ„ts reformation begun Howeuer some Protestants there be that endeuour to proue their visible existeÌ„ce in a long line of succession from the Albigenses but vnaduisedly first because this seed of sectaries knowes not to deriue the Genealogy of their own Religion down from the Apostles which is the question in debate wherin satisfaction is expected secondly the Albigenses are condemned Hereticks that taught doctrine impious and blasphemous for example they asserted a good and an euill God denyed originall sin reiected baptism and impugned the resurrection of bodyes By the premises plainly appeareth that Mark Antony de Dominis Bishop of Spalatto his distinction between foundamentall and not foundamentall Articles of faith carrieth nothing of weight with it t' is like a specious building that wantes a good foundation to support it And truly it is as impossible an enterprise to proue the visible existence and perpetuall succession of Protestant Pastours from the Roman Church as it is for Caluinists to shew that the true Church of God laid hid for sundry ages inuisible without perishing which is impossible also for the markes of a liu'd Church are professing of faith preaching of the diuine word instructing of the illiterate and administring of the Sacraments which functions can noe more be executed in a Church that is inuisible then in a Church that is perished FINIS Laus Deo eiusque Matri Sanctissimae omnibus Sanctis Omnia Sanctae Romanae Ecclesiae subiecta sunt
Epis 55. affirm's That infidelity or false faith is inconsistent with the Church of Rome S. Austin Epis 66. auer's that our lord hath plac'd the doctrine of truth in the office and Chaire of the Roman Church and S. Bernard Epis 190. to Pope Innocentius against Abailardus writeth thus We must refer to your Apostle-ship all the scandalls and dangers which may happen in matters of faith for there defects in order to faith ought to be remedied where faith cannot faile for to what Other see was it euer said I haue pray'd for thee Peter that thy faith faile not Although Bishops of Rome that succeed in the Chaire of S. Peter may personally err as priuate Doctours neuertheless none euer did or shall err iudicially or definitiuely that is none of S. Peters successors haue or shall deuiat from the truth in their consistories Courts Councils consultations held concerning matters of faith Religion and generall manners because Christ's prayer I haue pray'd for thee Peter that thy faith faile not protects them Wherfore the ancient Fathers recur'd to Rome and applyed themselues to the Chaire of S. Peter in all matters of controuersy pertaining to Religion and faith namely S. Austin and the Bishops of Affricke vnto Innocentius the first and vnto Celestinus Epis 90 95. S. Chrysostome had recourse to the same Innocentius Epis 1. 2. S. Basil to the Pope in his tyme Epis 52. S. Hierom to Damasus Epis 5. 7 58. and S. Cyprian Epis ad Cornelium expresly affirm's that the cause of all schisms and heresies proceeds from want of obedience to the supream Pastour Nec aliunde saith he haereses obortae sunt aut nata sunt schismata quam inde quod vni Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tempus Sacerdos ad tempus Iudex vice Christi cogitatur From disobeying of lawfull Pastours began the notorious schism of Core Dathan and Abyron who rose vp against Moyses and Aaron whome God had appoynted Chief Rulers ouer them and the rest of the Children of Israël puft vp with proud thoughts of their own abilities and conceipted worthiness they were troubled and grieu'd at the establishing of priesthood in the family of Aaron onely and therefore arrogated to themselues priestly function against the ordinance of God and to the vpholding of their schism coind a new Theology teaching that Moyses and Aaron tooke too much vpon them lifting themselues aboue the people of our lord saying all were alike holy and our lord with euery one of them alike after the same manner all schisms and heresies down from our Sauiour Christ till these dayes haue sprung vp against God's ordinance in euery age some one or other wanton schollar hath drawn Disciples and gathered Accomplices together against the supream Pastour that is the Bishop of Rome and our true Aaron as S. Bernard calleth him l. 2. de consid c. 8. pretending that he tak's too much authority vpon him lifting his own chaire aboue all others seeing that the spirit of God is with euery one of them to teach preach and administer the Sacraments without dependence of him Their intent and aime in rising thus against the supream Pastour of the Church is to persuade the vnlearned that the speciall priuiledges of Pasce oues meas confirma fratres tuos which Christ cōfer'd on S. Peter doe not descend on his successors alone in consequence of which they conceiue it needless to seek to the Bishop of Rome for Confirmation of their new opinions or to value any condemnation in order thereto that proceeds from that Apostolicall Chaire and as all wanton schollars which coyne new notions of Doctrine in order to the mysteries of Christian Religion seditiously rise against the supreame Pastour of the Church so they speake contemptuously of the schooles of orthodox Doctours in regard these be the supream Pastours chiefest consistery and the Churches sanctuary that keeps the Originall Cycli and weights of all Christian doctrine where with they weigh all coyns of new Theologies and such as are found too light are laid aside for the high Priest to condemne and anathematise lest the vnlearned learned be deluded thereby And indeed since the first erecting of scholes Cōnexae sunt saith the learned Canus scholae contemptio haeresum pestes contempt of scholes and heresies are inseperably connected together For example Luther afraid of the originall weights kept in the scholes of Orthodox Doctours sharpned his tongue against all the Vniuersities of those dayes which he called Lupanaria Antichristi the stews or Brodel houses of Antichrist and t' is common alike to all such as coyne or follow new opinions to haue an extream abhorrence from the scholes of Orthodox Doctours But woe to all such wanton schollars as goe out from the rest into seuerall sects for they perish in the contradiction of Core They are clouds without water carried about of winds Trees of Autumne without fruit raging waues of the sea foming out their owne shame and confusion wandring starres to whom is reseru'd the storm of darknes for euer Ep. Cath. Judae because they despise the scholes of Orthodox Doctours rise against the authority of their supream Pastour and cut out of their own braines vnauthorized Models of new sects and Religions As the Prince of darknes by diuine permission transforms himselfe into an Angel of light so he guideth the pencils of Ambitious schollars vnto setting forth false resemblances of true faith The extream wantonness of heady and high mynded Teachers by the crafty dealings of Satan has euen in our dayes turn'd Christianism into great disorder and confusion As the People of Rome through the delusions of Simon Magus were diuided in order to the true Selene some conceiuing her to appeare from one window some from an other and some from as many windowes as darted seeming resemblances of her so very many Christian people especially these of our own nation fince they haue let goe their hold of S. Peters Chaire that is since their falling away from the obedience due to the Church of Rome that first conuerted them to Christianism are of different iudgements as to the true faith deluded by the subtill sleights of new Teachers which according to the seuerall lustes of their high mynds haue diuided them into seuerall sects some be Lutherans some Caluinists some Protestants some Anabaptists some Independēts some fift-Monarke men some Quakers some Deists and some Atheists There are now as many faiths as wills whiles either faith is represented as new Teachers will or as they will so is interpreted and whereas according to one God one Lord and one baptism there is also but one faith men of these dayes are faln away from that which is the onely faith and begin to belieue that there is none at all confounded with the great variety of seeming faiths The ground wherof as t is afore intimated is in regard Non vnus in Ecclesia ad tempus Sacerdos ad
tempus Iudex vice Christi cogitatur Because due obedience is not exhibited to Christ's Vicar and the Chaire by our lords voice founded on S. Peter As in the old law schisms so in the new law heresies spring vp The Childrē of Israël fell into schisms when they fell away from their due Obedience to the Chaire of Moyses and Christians fall into heresies as oft as they rise against the Chaire of S. Peter coyning or following vnauthorised nouelties whereby Christian souls are misled into most desperate precipices of errours in regard whereof I haue been mou'd to write a Theology conform to the ancient Cycli and weights of the holy Churches sanctuary that is to set forth a whole body of Christian doctrine built vpon Scriptures Traditions Councils and Fathers which deserue to be prefer'd before Schollars of new Notions that is Christian people ought to adhere conforme their conciences to and rely their eternity rather on those then these which is the Counsell that the great S. Austin guies in his 2. Booke against Julian the Pelagian Bishop who had brocht new opinions to the preiudice of souls exhorting all Christians to regard rather the learning of the holy Fathers which flourished in the precedent ages and the constant and vniuersall practice of the Catholicke Church then the prophane nouelties vented and spred by the Pelagians Saying Hos antiquos Patres oportet vt Christiani populi vestris prophanis nouitatibus anteponant eisque potius quam vobis eligant adherere My lord herein lies the sole intent of these conceptions which I present you with and vnder your authority aduenture into publick view vnto aduantaging such as are piously sober d Secundum S. Aug. l. 14. de Trinit c. 1. munns Theologiae est pijs opitulari veritatem contra impios defendere and to defend the truth against such as are impiously wanton This is the ayme of my Theologicall discourses and the height of my desires is but this that they may be receiu'd into your Lordships protection which is ground warrantable enough to gaine them credit in regard of the high measure of knowledge which is extraordinary in you beseeming a well studied diuine as appears by your own writings which together with your other gifts of nature and grace renders you admired by all that know your Lordship aright Besides that which alone might embolden me to address these endeauors vnto your Lordship is your eminent nobility The best blood that is in any English subiect run's in your Lordships veins as euidence your paternall and maternall descents from the most renown'd and ancient Houses of Pembrock Northumberland and Derby Again your sundry noble allyances The lord Talbot that was Heire of Shrewsbury maryed your only Daughter a Lady of great vertue and Vere vidua A widow indeed hauing for aboue these 20. yeares continued in her widow hood notwithstanding her Ladyships youth person birth and great doury which made her the ambition of many noble Suitours Moreouer your Lordships onely and most hopefull son marryed to the most accomplished in honour obligingness sweetnes and piety the lady Elizabeth Daughter to Edward Lord Marquess of Worcester which brings forth also an alliance with the most illustrious House of Norfolke Arundell and Surrey Since I am fallen vpon your eminent Nobility has not your owne Lady much added thereto if your House were without an ample series of renowned progenitors might not your posterity haue a glorious Rise from her Ladyship whose eminent vertues haue rendered her memory blessed Nobilitas sola est atque vnica virtus Besides has not that gallant Person the lord Crauen her Ladyships Brother added something of greatnes to your posterity whose braue and gallant actiōs performed a broad in foraine parts haue gain'd much honour to his Country Moreouer the rising of that family is honorable the supream prouidence haueing brought it to the height of Eminence which it now happely enioyes as the same prouidence e Aug. l. 5. de Ciuit. Dei cap. 15. profitetur Deum terrenam gloriam excellentissimi Imperij cōcessisse bonis artibus Romanorum id est vt ipsemet interpretatur virtutibus quibus ad tantam gloriam nitebantur extended the Empyre of the ancient Romans in regard of Morall vertues which were eminent in your ladies Father and Mother the Raisers of it for as much as their zeale to the law of nature that is to do Iustice giuing to euery one what is euery on 's own and to shew mercy vnto the distressed feeding the hungry and cloathing the naked rendered them admired of such as knew them and according to holy Scriptures God exalted the Midwiues of the Hebrew women and made them houses Exod. 1. For their complyance to the law of nature in preseruing of innocent Babes which the Tyrant of Fgypt had commanded them to kill and since I am fallen vpon Gods merveilous rewarding of morall good works in confirmation of this truth I might produce conuincing examples in our own Country where very many in these times through a supream prouidence are aduanc'd to honours dignities and eminent offices that is God hath built them new Houses of nobility or encreased the glory of the old for preseruing loyalty to their king which is the law of nature written in their hearts they feared God and honoured his annoynted against the commandement of the Tyrant of England and therefore are exalted and truly vpon this score the supream prouidence hath built his Grace the Duke of Albermarle a more glorious House thē any subiect in the Christian world this day enioys in as much as through a happy managing of his loyalty he carries the name not onely of Paterpatriae but likewise of Pater Caesaris hauing preseru'd both Caesar and his Countries In consequence of the premises his Maties Catholick subjects that with the effusion of their blood and loss of their Estates haue cherefully performed that duty of nature in order to loyalty may hope that a speciall prouidence in good time will make for them Houses of Ease which shall be the daily prayer of MY LORD YOVR HONORS Most humble and most obedient Seruant GEO. LEYBVRN PREFACE TO THE COVNTRY-MISSIONARY SR Although these holy Characters so named because they describe and set forth the holy Mysteries of Christian Religion containe Theology but compendiously dressed vp neuertheless vvant noe Requisits either essentiall or necessary thereto being built on the foundation of holy Scriptures Traditions Councils and Fathers vvherin lies the consistency of true Theology vvhich as the pillar of fire led the Israëlits by night in their vvay to the land of promise so in as much as it carries the lights of the best Antiquity shevvs Christians their vvay thorovv the darke Mysteries of Christian faith as by night vnto an heauenly Inheritance prefigured in the land of promise that is God hath instituted this diuine science to direct Gouernours of souls in the pursuance of their pastorall function vvhich
of Christian charity towards our neigbour is that it cannot be idle nor fall away and in Heauen it encreaseth CHarity towards our neigbour is a diuine loue deriued from the loue of God as a copy drawn from the originall * S. Greger ait quod per amorem Dei amor proximi gignitur per amorem proximi amor Dei nutritur Yet as the loue of God causeth loue to our neigbour so this doth nourish that passing from and for God vpon our neigbour in consequence of which both loues are reciprocally necessary to each other their consistency depeuds of their vniting together neither of them is loue to blessednes if diuided As God in the creation of time blessed the first day that was one only and is not said to haue blessed the second which made two that being a number of diuision so he blesseth the loue exhibited to himself and to our neighbour for his sake if vndiuided and one only * Aug. l. 4. confess c. 9. Beatus qui amat te amicum in te inimicum propter te he is blessed that loues God for himself and for and in him his neighbour Wherby it is plainly euident that the loue of such as loue by reflexion on worldly aduantages only or principally do not tend to blessednes which is the centre of charity towards our neighbour nor freindship is a right scoare to loue vpon if it be not with conformity and subordination to the loue of God * Mat. 5. qui facit solem oriri super bonos malos pluit super iustos iniustos who as he maketh the sun to arise on the euill and the good and sendeth raine on the iust and vniust so commandeth loue not only to freinds but euen to enemyes these as well as the others being our neighbours * Aug. in psal 115. tom 8. omnis homo inquit est omni homini proximice for each man is each mans neighbour neither is their any thing that makes a Christian * Secundum S. Chrysost nihil est quod sic Deo similes facit vt malignis laedentibus esse placabiâ—â—m so like to God as to loue them that curse him to do good to them that hate him and to pray for them that hurt and persecute him besides in an enemy is the image of God a possibility of iustification to life and capacity of blessednes which are the chief inducements to charity towards our neighbour Hence is euidenced that because the Image of God the possibility of iustification to life and the capacity of blessednes are proper to all men as well others as our selues pesants as kings foes as friends therefore we are bound to loue and respect all a like our neighbour as well as our selues poore as rich foes as friends for there is no iust difference where the true loues motiues are the same The praise and eminency of charity aboue the vertues of Hope and faith though all three are necessary to saluation consist's in the continuance therof after the enjoyment of blessednes the other two falling away and ceasing A Christian soul that shall depart out of this life in charity shall euer keep it in the kingdom of Heauen for charity neuer falleth away or wanteth the acts which are proper vnto it nay the blessed souls now loue * Aug. in Psal 91. si amamus inquit quem non videmus quomodo amaturi sumus cum viderimus more perfectly God whom they see then when they saw him nor and rejoyce in the glorification of the good through mercy * Psal 57. laetabitur iustus cum viderit vindictam Lucae 18. an inquit Deus noÌ„ facit vindictam electorum suorum clamaÌ„tium ad se die nocte and the punishment of the wicked through iustice Also they loue their neighbours more intensly for charity (a) The Apostle teacheth that charity neuer falleth away the prerogatiue of this diuine vertue is that it cannot be abolished in Heauen or cease from the exercise of its own proper innate actions which it had on earth and these it performes in a far higher degree of perfection according to S. Austin l. de cura pro mortuis c. 14. and S. Hierom. increaseth in Heauen whence by necessary consequence followeth that they intercede for their freinds on earth intercession or praier for freinds being the necessary office or act of charity and idle (b) S. Gregory hom 30. super Euang. teacheth that the loue of God is neuer idle if it abstaine from working it is not loue And l. 4. dial saith that exhibition of worke is the tryall of loue charity acting nothing is not charity neither in reason can it be objected to the blessed want of * S. Gregor l. 4. Dial. cap. 33. quid est quod ibi nesciunt vbi scientem omnia sciuÌ„t Loquitur de sanctis in coelo qui clarè intuentur diuinam essentiam knowledg who perfectly know and see him who knowes and sees all things Besides Abraham after his death though then he was not admitted into the kingdom of Heauen had knowledg of Moses and the Prophets books which he neuer saw while he was on Earth and the holy Prophet Ieremie (c) The holy writer of the Machabies 2. cap. 15. affirmes that Ieremy the Prophet dead afore prayed much for the people and Citty of Ierusalem As to this and other books of the Machabies S. Austin l. 18. de ciuit Dei auerres that though they be not comprehended in the Canon or Catalogue of the ancient Iews nenertheless the Catholick Church euer held them as Canonicall also the third Council of Charthage whereof S. Austin was a member counteth the books of the Machabies in the number of diuine Scriptures and for such they are set down in the Decree of Pope Gelasius in a Council of 70. Bishops after his death did pray much for the people and holy city of Ierusalem neither doth such intercession derogat from Christ it being effectuall only through his merits nor can it be displeasing to God * Psal 136. nimis honorati sunt amici tui Deus who will be honoured in his Saints and who promised protection to the Citty of Ierusalem * L. Reg. pretegam inquit Deus hane ciuitatem propter me seruuÌ„ meum Dauid for his own and his seruant Dauids sake CHAR. XVIIJ OF GODS CHARITY TO MAN THE CONTENTS God is an infinite louer of mankind desireth on his part to bring all men to saluation which is the end of their creation Gods will to saue on his part doth not take away free will on mans part life and death good and euill is put before man he can stretch out his hand to which he will God doth not necessitate him to either of both man of himself works euill vnto damnation and God furnisheth meet helps to doe good vnto saluation neither Pharaoh nor Esau had been rejected
sacrifice vnder the forms of bread and wine wherin consist's the similitude of Melchisedechs sacrifice Again to deny that Christ instituted and appointed Priest's as his substitutes to offer euen to the end of the world the sacrifice that himselfe celebrated at his last supper were to deny Christ to be a Priest for euer there being no other meanes to establish his eternall Priesthood then by the sacrifice of Priest's instituted by and substituted vnder him Priesthood being but a power or faculty * Hebrae 5. omnis Sacerdos Pontisex est institutus vt offerat dona sacrificia to offer sacrifice which Christ sitting at the right hand of his diuine Father cannot do in his own person sacrifice taken in the proper sense for an outward visible act of supream worship as of necessity it must be taken wherby plainly followeth that whosoeuer does take away Christ his power to sacrifice does destroy his Priesthood also or render it vnprofitable and vseless and to allow Christ improper spirituall and metaphoricall sacrifice only is not enough to make good his Priesthood as to the order of Melchisedech who offered outward sensible sacrifice of bread and wine Neither can Christ in respect of spirituall sacrifice only be counted more a Priest then euery faithfull man or woman that offereth to God contrition of a penitent heart which is an insensible spirituall sacrifice Psalmo 50. Furthermore Melchisedech in meeting Abraham as he returned from the victory ouer the kings and blessing him is a mysterious representation of Christ who meeteth and blesseth his faithfull seruants returning to their Country of Paradise whence their first parent Adam was eiected with the spoiles of the deuill that eiected him lastly Melchisedeck in taking (e) Abraham payd Tithes to Melchisedech as a duty or homage and not for his own person onely but euen for Leui then vnborn and consequently for the whole Priesthood of Leui's stock acknowledging thereby Melchisedech to be Priest and his superior and of all the leuiticall order payment of tithes is a naturall duty which is done to Priests that thereby they may receiue both honour and liuelihood Iacob vowed to pay tithes Gen 28. Moses appointed them Leuit. 27. num 18. and the ancient Fathers proue them to be due to the Church Pastours Namely S. Cyprian Epis 66. S. Hierom. Epis 1 7. S. Austin ser 1 â—â— de Tempore tithe of Abraham is a type of Christ also who can in equity exact as tithe seruice and obedience of all reasonable creatures whom he hath deliuered out of captiuity by the merit of his death and passion CHAR. IV. OF SACRAMENTS THE CONTENTS The Sacraments of the new law by diuine institution are enabled to produce inward grace vnto iustification of life ex opere operato that is through their own outward sensible working They be soueraign remedies against all kinds of spirituall infirmities the Catholick Church the shop that keepeth the medicinall Sacraments Christ the diuine Apoâ—â—ecary no sinner ought to despaire of sâ—luation while he abideth in a shop of sauing remedies which is the catholick Church SAcraments taken in a large generall sense be outward visible ceremonies employed in corporall creatures or elements wherby men as birds of one feather flock together and * Aug. l. 9. Con. FaustuÌ„ cap 11. in nulla inquit religione homines colligantur inter se sine consortio SacramentoruÌ„ id est sine aliquibus caerâ—monijs sensibilibus Et S. Chrysos hom 83. ideo ait Deum nobis dedisse intelligibilia sub sensibilibus quia constamus anima corpore si vero essemus incorporei incorporea etâ—am dedisset dona id est Sacramenta vnite in the profession of some one Religion true or false the worship of a thing that is indeed or counted a God depending necessarily therof Pagans worshipped the sensible elements (a) Through human weaknes and the crafty dealing of the Deuil certaine people haue been brought to that height of madnes as to think and worship for Gods and godesses the four elements namely fire aire water and earth as likewise other parts of the vniuers especially such as conduced to the generation of any thing From hence the vitall spirit was called the God Iupiter fire the God Vulcan aire the godess Pallas and the earth the godess Ceres of their ceremonies ascribing a diuinity euen to the meanest creatures Iews worshipped the true God vnder corporall creatures wherin they vsed their ceremonies but the multitude therof being numerous difficult and greiuous made their Religion a yoke of bondage The society of christian people are deliuered from the Pagans Idolatry and the Iew 's seruitude being called vnto the liberty wherwith Christ hath made them free to serue and worship one true God vnder * Aug. l. 38. c. 9. ae doc Chris l. 19. con Faus cap. 13. Sacramenta inquit mutata sunt facta sunt faciliora pauciora salubriorae a few ceremonies most proper for an agreable exercise both of body and soul being sensible things most cleane in reference to the body and most precious in order to the soul to wit seuen Sacraments (b) The decree of Pope Eugenius set down in the end of the Councill of Florence asserteth seuen Sacraments which catholick assertion the Council of Trent hath defin'd sess 7. can 10. and Caluin l. 4. instit c. 19. confesseth that the opinion of seuen Sacraments is grounded in antiquity and was vniuersally approu'd mysteriously figured in the seuen pillars wisdome hewed out in the building of her howse Prouerb 1. that is which Christ the eternall wisdome hewed (c) According to S. John the Euangelist cap. 19. When the souldiers savv that Jesus vvas dead one of them vvith a speare pearced his side and fortvvith came there out blood and vvater wherby are signifyed mystically all the Sacraments though two especially namely Baptism which openeth the door vnto and the Euchariste which is the end of all the other Sacraments wherfore S. Austin c. 120. in Ioan. infer's that the Sacraments of the new law came from the side of Christ out of his side in the erecting of his Church Also mysteriously represented in Naamans washing himselfe seuen times in Iordan and in the fiue breads and two fishes wherwith Christ fed and satisfyed many Thousands and taken in the strict proper sense they be outward visible signes or rites of inward invisible sanctity and (d) The Council of Trent cast's an Anathema vpon those which shall assert that the Sacraments of the new law do not containe the grace which they signifie or that they be not effectuall instruments Ex opere operato through their own working of the same grace This Catholick assertion is conform to the doctrine of the ancient Fathers in the first Council of Nice which speaking of Baptism say Aquam vides considera viâ—tiâ—tem Dei in aqua absconditam Thou beholdest water consider the virtue of God that lie's hid
vnto instruction and * Hoc facite in mean coÌ„memorationem id est in memoriam passionis mortis meae Et 1. Pet. 4. Christo passo in carne vos eadem cogitatione armemini Vnde ait S. Bernardus passio Christi est vltimum resugium contra omnes illicitas voluptates visa inquit Christi passione quis tam deliciosus qui non abstineat quis taÌ„ iracundus vt non doleat quis tam malitiosus quem non poeniteat S. Augustinus nullum est ait remedium salubrius quam iugiter cogitare de passionâ— Christi full commemoration of Christ his death and passion in compliance with his own commande as it is plainly obseruable in the garments wherwith the Priest is inuested during the tyme of sacrifice as likewise in the Altar and ornament's therof for example 10. The Amice in as much as it is a linnen cloath which the Priest pulls ouer his face and fasten's in his neck doth signify the ragg of linnen wherwith the Iews blind-folded Christ in mockery when they smote and buffited him saying Prophesie to us o Christ who is he that smote thee Mat. 20.20 The Priests Albe that is a white linnen garment doth represent the rayment in which Herod inuested Christ after that he had despised and mocked him Luc. 23.30 The maniple that the Priest weareth on his left arme and the stole that hangeth about his neck doe figure the cord's and fetters with which the officers of the Iews bound Christ Io. 18. and led him from one place to an other from Annas to Caiphas from Caiphas to Pilat from Pilat to Herod and from Herod to Pilat again 40. The Chasuble that is the vppermost vestment doth express the purple garment the souldiers put on Christ Mar. 25. and the heauy cross also that Christ carried on his shouldiers to mount Caluary 50. The Priests (b) Tonsure that is a round crown made in the heads of Clergy-men is an ancient ceremony and according to S. Bede l. 5. 〈◊〉 S. Peter wore it in remembrance of the crown of thorns wherewith Christ's head was crown'd again S. Anicetus that was Chief Church-gouernour in the first 200. years in a certaine Epistle to the Bishops of France commanded all Priests to cut their haire to the end they might not appear delicate and effeminate like secular men that weare long hair for ornament sake Tonsure that is to say the crown of his head shaued in fashion of a round circle doth shew the crown of thornes which the souldiers platted and put about the sacred head of Christ Mar. 25.60 The sundry crosses that the Priest makes ouer the host and chalice before and after consecration are mysticall representations of the many greiuous torments which Christ endured in pursuance of the generall redemption 70. The eleuation of the host and chalice doth figure the lifting vp of Christ on the crosse and in as much as that ceremony is exhibited a part or seuerally it declares the seperatioÌ„ of Christ's soul from his body and his blood from his veins 80. The diuision of the host into three distinct parts doth shew the three substances in Christ vêªt videlicet the diuine of his person the spirituall of his soul and the materiall of his body and wheras one of the said parts is put into the chalice and as it were buried therin thereby is signify'd Christ's body in the sepulcher likewise the mingling therof with the blood demonstrates that the diuine personality was neuer seperated neither from his soul in his descent into Hell nor from his body lying in the sepulcher 90. The Priest's (c) According to the Decrees of Ancient Councils a Priest ought not to depart from the Altar before he giue his benediction again the people were bound to remaine in the Church till the Priest had blest them and indeed priestly benediction was euer practised In the law of nature Melchisedech blessed Abraham in the written law Moses and Aaron blessed the people of Israel and in the law of grace Christ blessed his Disciples benediction giuen in the end of the sacrifice of Mass relates vnto the peculiar recommendation whereby Christ did recommend his Church at the rendring of his soul into the hands of his diuine Father 10. The Altar representes Mount-Caluary and signifies the cross therin erected on which Christ offering as on an Altar a sacrifice of his own body and blood consummated for euer those that are sanctified Heb. 10. And truly as the name of smoak puts vs in minde of fire because of the necessary mutuall relation to each other for smoak of necessity comes from fire that is the cause therof so the name of an Altar doth relate vnto sacrifice necessarily this being included euen in the definition of an Altar taken in the proper sense for a reall Altar to sacrifice on And such is the Altar employed in the sacrifice of Mass called by the Ancient Fathers the Altar of Christ his body and so meant by the Apostle (d) The Apostle by saying Hebrae 13. that We haue an Altar vvhereof they haue no authority to eat vvich serue in the Tabernacle meant an Altar taken in the proper sense that is an Altar on which is offered the sacrifice of Christs body and blood according to the interpretation of the Ancient Fathers S. Greg. Nazian in ora desorore Gorgonia S. Chrysostom demons an Christus sit Deus S. Austin Epis 86. de ciuit l. 8. Confess c. 27. Theophy in 23. Mat. and of the sacrifice of this Altar those cannot eat which serue in the Tabernacle that is which follow the rites and custom's of the ancient Iews nor those which belieue not in the sacrifice of Christs body and blood But this holy Altar si sometymes cal'd Mensa Dominica The Table of our lord because of the heauenly meat our lords reall body and blood which is eaten and drunk there and indeed Mensa Table according to holy scripture often signifies an Altar namely Isa 65. Malach. 1. likewise S. Austin ser 103. de diuersis discoursing of S. Cyprian's Table so called in order to his holy Reliques which were put vnder the Table or Altar erected in the same place where S. Cyprian had suffered Martyrdom In the same place saith S. Austin a Table though erected to God neuertheless was nam'd S. Cyprians Table not because S. Cyprian had feasted there but in regard he had been sacrificed there and through his Martyrdom procured that Table not that he might feed or be fed at it but that vpon it sacrifice might be offered vnto God to whom himselfe had been made an oblation Haebr 13. saying Wee haue an Altar wherof such haue no authority to eate as serue the Tabernacle and for as much as Christs body is spirituall meate and his blood spirituall drink it is named also our lords Table 1. Cor. 10 you cannot say's the Apostle be partakers of our lords Table and the table of deuills
where God would not be adored by sacrifice this being confined to the Temple at Ierusalem Wherby followeth euidently that such as worship or adore God otherwise then he will himself be worshipped or adored doe not worship or adore him in verity or Truth Sithence God will be adored in one sole Church founded on the merits of Christ all Schismaticks and Hereticks that abandon the communion and vnity therof doe not adore God in verity vnto saluation howeuer they may flatter themselues with their mountaine of Garizim that is with their own fancied worship founded on the mountaine of pride wherfore to such worshippers may be said both according to reason and equity you adore what you know not for saluation is of one Church and such only doe pray worship and adore * Aug. in psal 130. ipse inquit in spiritu veritate orat qui in pace Ecclesiae orat in spirit and truth which pray worship and adore in peace and coÌ„munion of one catholick and apostolick Church wherunto is tyed and coÌ„fined the sacrifice worship and seruice of the new law vnto iustification of life Again though sundry Church-ceremonies be neither commanded nor mentioned (g) The Council of Trent sess 21. c. 2. declares that God hath left power vnto the Church to ordaine and institute what she shall think expedient and conducing to the reuerence of the Sacraments and the aduantages of such as receiue them wherfore Church-gouernours are called dispensers of the mysteries of God 1. Cor. 4. in the holy scriptures farther then vnto an implicite faith neuertheless they are not to be condemned for many things appertaining vnto diuine worship doe not of necessity require an express ordinance Noah built an Altar to God on which he offered a sacrifice of euery clean beast all eit he had no * Noe non iussus altare construxit vt notat S. Ambrosius warrantable authority by speciall precept Abel in like manner vnbidden offered sacrifice that was * Respexit Deus ad Abel munera eius acceptable to the diuine Majesty According to the dictates of nature God is to be worshipped Priesthood to be instituted Hosts to be immolated ministers to be deputed for exhibition of diuine scruice and speciall ornaments are to be ordained and appointed as holy signes to distinguish them from the rest of the people moreouer works of speciall commande euen executed aright are not so pleasing in the sight of God as works * Vulgare apud Theologos est dictum Deus imperat minora de maioribus dat consilium counselled only if they be done according to the rule of a discreet zeale A good work that is done in and for as much as God doth counsell the doing therof is more laudable and noble then a commanded worke because of a greater alacrity and promptitude that is required to the performance of a good work vnbidden Christ * Hierom. l. 1. con Iouia ait Christum plus amare Virgines quia sponte tribuunt quod jis non fuit imperatum bears a more speciall affection to Virgins that doe consecrate vnto him their virginity without a speciall command and indeed it is a more noble action in a man to giue an almes which he is not obliged vnto then to giue it vpon the score of an obligation Furthermore Church-ceremonies ought not to be counted * Augus Epis 40. quaes 3. dicit non esse câ—nsenduÌ„ superstitiosum omne quod christiani cum infidelibus quomodocunque habent communâ— superstitious though Pagans and other Infidells doe vse the same or the like vnto superstition for according to that argument christians should condemne vowed chastity because the Pagans had their vestall Virgins that did binde themselues by vow to a single chast life Christians should pull down Churches because Pagans built Churches christians should abolish sacrifice because Pagans offered sacrifice christians should despise all manner of prayers because Pagans vsed prayers christians should not reuerence honour and worship one true God because Pagans reuerenced honoured and worshipped many false Gods To conclude christians should not weare breeches because the Turks which be Infidells weare breeches howeuer truly according to Tertullian it is an * Pudeat inquit Tertullianus insulsos christianos quod ab Ethinicis IdoloruÌ„ suorum solemni pompa religioso gestu officio superentur exceeding great shame vnto Christians to vse less solemn pompe less ceremony and less reuerence in the seruice of the true God then is vsed by the Heathens in the worship of Idols CHAR. VI. OF BAPTISM THE CONTENTS Baptism is the sole door that openeth a passage into the Church of God The kingdom of Heauen is for euer shut against the vnbaptized that is no man can come to the clear sight of God that is not washt sacramentally afore with naturall water vnder an express invocation of the blessed Trinity de facto or in desire The sanctity of holy faithfull parents cannot render their children that dye without Baptism Heirs of Heauen coheirs and brothers of Christ Through diuine mercy those which dye without Baptism and haue nothing of any other guilt are not punisht with sensible pain after their death they are banisht the court of Heauen onely S. Austins opinion as to this point cleard Baptism ministred aright imprinteth an indelible character or marke in the soul of the baptised Anabaptism confuted Ceremonies pertaining to sacramentall baptism set down and explicated BAptism is a Sacrament of new birth or regeneration vnto iustification of life through the washing of (a) Sensible naturall water is the proper remote matter of necessity requisit to the Sacrament of baptism and accordingly the Council of Lateran haith defin'd it out of the third Chapter of S. Iohn Except that a man be born again of vvater c. and from thence is named a Sacrament of regeneration which is conform to the doctrine deliuered by the Apostle ad Tit c. 3. where he calleth baptism the vvashing of a nevv birth and indeed washing is the immediate and water the remote matter onely so that neither yee hail or snow vnless they be made fluid and thereby proper to wash are a sufficient matter of baptism naturall water vnder an expresse invocation of (b) The true form of sacramentall baptism is I baptise thee in the name of the Father son and holy Ghost which is cut out of Christs own words Mat. 28. Where is required a distinct inuocation of all the three diuine persons Wherefore Pelagius the Pope dis 4. can multi de consecra reiectes baptism administred in the name of Christ only And S. Cyprian Epis 73. ad Jubaia affirmes that the Apostles neuer baptised de facto in the sole name of Christ howeuer he grant's that S. Peter and the other Apostles named Iesus-Christ in the conferring of baptism together with the other diuine persons For example saying J baptise thee in the name of the Father and Jesus-Christ his son
A man must be made a christian through baptism before he can make a progress in christianity through confirmation A man must be made a member of Christ through baptism before he can be a soldier of Christ through confirmation A man must be endued with faith through baptism before he can be deputed to a speciall office in the exercise thereof which is to defend it against the assaults of Tyrants through confirmation A man must be invested with * Hieron diolog con Lucifer cap. 4. quemodo inquit ab Ecclesia recipiet confirmationeÌ„ qui nec dum remissionem peccatorum coÌ„secutus est Docet Arianos qui errabant contra formam baptismi non accepisse spiritum sanctuÌ„ per Sacramentum CoÌ„firmationis grace vnto remission of sins through baptism before he can receiue the holy Ghost vnto perfection through confirmation which does not confer sanctity after the manner of other Sacraments only but also doth * Omnes S. Patres qui agunt de Sacramento confirmationis doceÌ„t baptismi gratiam perfici consummari per gratiam coÌ„firmationis increase and perfect the sanctity receiued afore by baptism it being the complement or consummation thereof Whereby it is plainly euident that albeit this Sacrament is not as baptism a requisite absolutely necessary vnto obtaining eternall blessedness neuertheless it is conditionally necessary to wit as to the armour of grace and (h) According to Pope Vrban dist 5. de consecratione there is no perfect christian that hath not receiu'd the holy Ghost through the imposition of Episcopall hands and Hugo de S. Vict. l. 2. de Sacram. par 7. cap. 3. countes it dangerous to dye without being confirm'd afore which is conform to the doctrine of ancient Fathers S. Dionys Lâ—de Eccles Hierar c. 4. S. Cypr. Epis 72. ad Iubaian which assert that then a man has fulnes of sanctity and is made an adopted son of God when he receiues both the Sacraments baptism and confirmation perfection therof as also to a more ample measure of blessedness then baptisme alone doth effect so that christian catholicks especially such as liue vnder persecution ought to vse extraordinary endeauours for their admittance to this Sacrament the proper office there of being to strenghten them by grace that they may not fall from the Church of Christ * In Epis ad Fabium vti refert Eusebius l. 1. cap. 35. S. Cornelius affirmeth that Nouatus fell into Heresie for the want therof If they haue no conueniency in their own country to repaire vnto a catholick Bishop the spirituall aduantages which they may reape from the Sacrament of confirmation will compence the charges of a journey into forrain parts where catholick Bishops are to be found but this is to be vnderstood in reference to such catholicks as haue ability of body and a competency of temporall fortunes As touching the sensible rites or ceremonies employed in or about the Sacrament of confirmation the most remarkable are two only For example a Bishop in making of chrism breatheth three times in form of a cross on the mouth of the pot or flagon that containeth the said Chrism signifying thereby that euen at that time through episcopall consecration Chrism receiueth virtue from God wherby it is impowered as his instrument to confer strengthning grace to such as doe receaue the Sacrament aright and ceremonies signifying the thing that is done for the time they are employed are profitable by the confession of such * Caluinus in sua harmonia ad cap. 7. S. Marci fatetur caeremonias illas quae habent significationem eius quod tunc fit duÌ„ exercentur esse vtiles as impugne catholick ceremonies The other ceremonie is the reuerence a Bishop exhibiteth to the consecrated Chrism bowing down his head he saluteth saying Haile holy Chrism This ceremony hath nothing of Idolatry for an vnliu'd thing may challenge religious adoration in reference to an other distinct wherin excellency is contained to which religious adoration is due The ancient Iewes adored the Ark of the Testament because of the relation it had to God that is an increated excellency and all Christians doe religiously worship and adore the sacred books of the new Testament in reguard of the word of God therin comprehended And subjects of a temporall Prince do render ciuil reuerence to his chaire of state in relation to his sacred Person if a king or Emperour to which is due ciuill adoration by the law of God and nature in like manner religious worship is exhibited to holy Chrism in as much as it is the effectuall instrument of God to giue armour of grace to such as are baptised and is by speciall benediction deputed to the effecting therof CHAR. VIIJ. OF THE EVCHARISTE THE CONTENTS Christ the night before his passion made his last Testament gaue vnto his Church a legasy of his body and blood in the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form's of bread and wine for to continue the spirituall food of souls till he come to Iudgment The express words of the Testament This is my body This Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood exclude each figure that is inconsistent with the litterall sense intended by the Testatour that vseth not to say one thing literally and mean an other mystically because Christ Said this is my body this Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood no man in reason ought to doubt of it Authorities of Councils testimonies of ancient Fathers and the warrantable practice of both primitiue and modern Churches euince the reall presence of Christ in the Sacrament of the Euchariste in vertue of the same word that was made flesh and made all things of nothing bread is transubstantiated in to the body and wine in to the bloud of Christ who is in Heauen and in the Sacrament at once One body can agree with many places by diuine dispensation Requisit's necessary to a worthy receiuing of Christs body and bloud in the Sacrament THe Euchariste is the (a) The blood of Christ shed vnto remission of sinnes is the proper legacy of the new Testament according to Christs owne words set down 1. Cor. 11. This Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood legacy of the new Testament vnto eternall life that Christ bequeathed to his Church in a Sacrament of his body and blood the night before he suffered his passion in the presence of witnesses without exception which were his Apostles The same body and blood that Christ offered in a sacrifice on the cross visibly to the redeeming of man kind vnto liberty he left in a Sacrament vnder the elements of bread and wine invisibly to the feeding of man vnto eternall life In the bestowing of this legacy Christ who is faithfull in all he promiseth fulfilled the promise he had made long afore and which is set down Io. 6. (b) Christ Ioan. 6. promising and recommending the Sacrament of his body and blood said
his Church to determine how the Euchariste should be ordered and indeed the Church-goucrnours are the proper ministers of Christ and the dispensers of the mysteries of God 1. Cor. 4. in consequence of which the Church has authority to constitute and appoint in order to dispensing the Sacraments what she shall judge expedient according to tyme place and persons but with that prouiso that she alter nothing pertaining to the nature or essence of them muesting his Church with authority and power to dispense and order therein so the integrity and substance of the Sacrament be not prejudiced as in prudence she might thinke fit in regard of places tymes persons and circumstances (b) Communion vnder the form of bread onely was practiced in the primitiue Church according to the best antiquity prouing the lawfullness thereof out of the 2. and 20. chapter of the Acts. For example S. Austin Epis 6. ad Casulanum S. Bede in 20. Act. and indeed many of the first Christians were Nazarits who were bound by their vow not to drink any licour of grapes pum 4. wherfore since the legall ceremonies of the old law were in force as appears by the fame chapter of the Act. doubtless those new Christians receiu'd the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder one kinde onely Besides S. Cyprian that liu'd in the first 300. yeares l. de lapsis set's down two examples of communion vnder one kinde Again S. Hierom in epitap Paul ad Eustach e. 23. S. Austin l. 3. de consensu Euang. c. 23. affirme that Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form of bread onely vnto the Disciples going to Emmaous Moreouer Tertull. l. 2. ad vxor l. de Orat. attest's that it was a practice or custome to take Christs body forthwith or to carrie it home and defer the taking to an other tyme. Lay-communion vnder one kind only was practised in the primitiue Ages as plainly doe euidence scripture and Father-Testimonies preseruing of the Eucharist vnder one sole kinde as spirituall prouision for sick persons which though they were Priests did nor communicate in sickness but vnder one kinde de onely namely bread (c) The custome of communicating Infants continued in Some Churches till the dayes of Hugo de S. Victor who liu'd about the yeare 1130. for l. 1. c. 2. de caeremon he affirmes that the Priest with his finger dipt afore in consecrated wine ministred the Sacramen of the Euchariste vnder the form of wine vnto Babes newly born they being able to suck Besides in the ancient Roman office cap. de Sabbato parents are admonished not to suffer their children to suck milk vntill they had communicated But now the Church for good and iust reasons hath wholy abolished that custome and a principall motiue there of was to resist the heresy which euen in those days the Bohemian Hussits had spread teaching that Infants could not be sau'd without receiuing the Euchariste and an other reason of taking away that practice was the eminent danger of prophaning so holy a Sacrament because of the great number of children and the distribution of the Sacrament vnto Infants in one sole kinde also Namely wine for albeit these could not eat the sacramentall bread yet they might suck the sacramentall wine from the Priest's finger which truly they did according to the custome of some Churches Again lay-communion * ConueniÅt omnes Doctores Caetbolici communionem sub vtraque specie fuisse in vsu in quibusdam Ecclesijs eiusque meminerunt S. Dionys cap. 3. de Eccles Hierarch S. Iustinus Martyr Apolog 2. S. Gregor l. 3. Dial. cap. 36 alijque Patres vnder both kindes was anciently practised at some tymes in seuerall precincts of particular christian Churches as doe plainly shew the writings of primitiue Fathers And S. Leo the first being supream Pastor in Church-gouernment vnder Christ by a speciall ordinance commanded publick lay-communion at Easter vnder both kindes the chiefe intent whereof was to discouer the manichean heriticks who to conceale their heresy these sectaries did foolishly belieue that there was a good and euill God and as foolishly held wine to be created by the euill God and therfore had an abhorrence of it were obserued to receiue the sacramentall bread at Easter which sole kinde was then in practice with Catholicks promiscuously Again lay-communion vnder both kind's was abrogated absolutely and vniuersally because of certain Bohemian sectaries named Hussit's that condemned lay-communion vnder one kinde only teaching both kind's as necessarily required to all Christians vnto saluation In detestation of this heresie as also for other good reasons the generall Councell of Constance obliged all lay-Catholick's to communicate in one kinde and indeed the Church of God ought to exercise her authority to the crushing of all heresies in the bud Yet the Greek-Church continued lay-communion in both kind's though it did not esteem both the species of the Sacrament necessary to saluation For in the generall Councill of Florence which was called with design chiefly to setle concord and vnion between that and the latine Church neither the greek or latine Fathers did except against lay-communion as to the practise thereof vnder one sole or both kinds whereby it is euidently manifest that Christ hat left it in the Churches liberty to determine and appoint the distribution of the communion vnto meer lay-people in one only or both kind's as it shall think fit according to the various condition of tymes places persons and circumstances so that though in this present age lay-communion be giuen in sacramentall bread alone through all the precincts of the easterne Church neuertheless it is in the power of the supreme Pastour to change that into another vsage of both kind's if he shall see as good reasons to moue him thereunto as he seeth cause to continue it vnder one sole kinde viêªt videlicet in opposition and detestation of moderne heresies First in regard of many Lutherans who beleiue that Christs body only is contained with the bread and his blood only with the wine and not all Christ entirely which is a manifest ignorance for wheresoeuer Christ's body is truly really and substantially from the day of his Resurrection there it is truly * Rom. non amplius moritur Christus aliue being impossible for Christ to die again and since the life of the flesh * Leuit. 17. anima omnis carnis in sanguine is in the blood Leuit. 17. it followeth euidently that wheresoeuer Christs body is there his blood is also and since Christ hath deuested himself of no reall thing that he once assumed and whatsoeuer he assumed was vnited hypostatically to his diuine person it is again plainly euident that wheresoeuer * S. Ambrosius vbi carpus Christi Christus est Christs body blood or soul is there is all Christ entire without separation of one part from another and albeit the words that consecrate Christs body according to their proper
autem contritio actus voluntatis non appetitus sensitiui a bitter griese and detestation that a penitent sinner voluntarily conceiues to the punishing of his sin as an offence against God together with a full purpose to confess satisfy and neuer to sin again As the innate heat of new wine put into a close vessel makes to boile the whole substance therof and thereby purgeth out the dregs so the fire of contrition kindled in a penitent soul makes it seeth in teares of bitter sorrow * Psal 50. cor cōtritum humiliatum Deus nō despiciet proinde peccator eliciens contritionem perfectam Deo reconciliatur wherby the filth and vncleanesse of sin together with the ill affection inclining thereto purge away As the heate of the sun doth disperse the black clouds which obstruct its brightnesse so the warmeness of a contrite heart dissipates sins which are the dark clouds obstructing the light therof But there (a) Loue that proceed's from the motiue of charity precisely is perfect and called Amor amicitrae the loue of friendship which imports remission of sinns Loue that comes of the motiue of Gods iustice or feare of him is named Amor benevolentiae loue of good will which is imperfect An example of remission of sinnes by perfect loue or perfect contrition which includes perfect loue without the Sacrament or penance is set down Deut. 4. Jf thou seek our lord God thou shalt finde him if thou seeks him vvithall thine heart and vvith all thy soul be two kinds of contrition the one perfect in as much as a penitent sinner grieueth for and detesteth his sin in regard precisely that he loueth God with all his heart that is maketh Gods own goodness the chief motiue of his loue and in respect therof preferreth him before all earthly enjoyments The other is imperfect and by vsage of speech named Attrition proceeding from a motiue far inferiour to that of a full loue to God For example a sinner conceiueth an act of imperfect contrition or attrition when he grieueth to haue sinned and purposeth amendmēt in regard meerly of the deformity of sin which is it's formall essēce or feare of eternall fire which is the proper effect therof if mortall Perfect contrition was of absolute necessity vnto remission of sins in all times before the establishment of the new law No man euen in the old law did finde God that did not seek him with all his heart and with full tribulation of his soul Deut. 8. which imports perfect contrition notwihstanding the Sacraments and sacrifices thereof they being poor beggerly elements and no effectuall instruments of grace and life Yet in the new law of Christ which is not a law of bondage but of grace not of beggery but of plenty and consequently abounding with sauing priuiledges and prerogatiues aboue the other by diuine dispensation attrition (b) The Council of Trent fess 14. declar's that imperfect contrition called attrition though it be grounded in the feare of Hell or in a serious reflexion on the deformity of sin neuertheless if it exclude an affection to sinning is Donum Dei a gift of God and a motion of the holy Ghost And notwithstanding faith the Council that attrition of it selfe cannot bring a sinner vnto iustification of life howeuer in the Sacrament of Penance it disposeth him thereto Whereby euidently appears that attrition is not the same disposition seperate from that it is ioynt vnto the Sacrament in consequence of which the meaning of the Council is that seeing it is a remote disposition vnto iustification without sacramentall penance ioynt thereto is made an immediate disposition that of necessity procures iustifying grace that of it self is not sufficient enough to bring a sinner vnto iustification of life ioyned to and supported by the Sacrament of penance is an effectuall expedient for the obtaining it and indeed Christians vnder the new law were in a worse condition then the Israëlits vnder the old law if beside perfect contrition God should exact of them as a necessary requisit to remission of sins Confession since he required of the Israëlites perfect contrition only Deut. 4. Wherfore that the trouble implyed in confession of sins might be compensed by taking away the absolute necessity of hearing the other burthen implyed in perfect Contrition Christ hath so instituted the Sacrament of penance in his new law that as water which albeit according to its own naturall propriety hath nothing of heate yet made hot with fire can produce heate so Attrition which though in order to it 's owne vertue is no effectuall instrument of grace to the quickning a dead soul howeuer together with the help of the Sacrament can deliuer out of the lawes of death and restore it to newnesse of life Again if perfect Contrition were of absolute necessity penance ought not to lay claime * Poenitētia est Sacramētum mortuorum nam id ad quod est primo per se institutum est prima gratia sanctificans seu hominem baptizatum in peccata laepsum reconciliare Ita docet Trid. sess 14. can 1. to the Title of Sacramentum mortuorum that is Christ did not institute it for an effectuall help of such (c) The chiefe effect of sacramentall penance is to reconeile vnto God such as haue sinned after their baptism and because mortall sin is the death of the soul sacramentall penance that is specially instituted to confer the first sanctifying grace vnto remitting of deadly offences is called Sacramentum mortuorum a Sacrament of the dead as are dead in sin because it would presuppose allwayes the remission therof perfect Contrition including a full loue of God which is inconsistent with deadly sin and therby would plainly follow that the sacramentall Absolution of a Priest were a meer declaration of sins remitted afore In consequence of which sacramentall penance should not produce the effect which it signifyes to wit remission of sins which is contrary to the nature (d) It is an Article of catholick faith that the Sacraments of the new law produce sanctifying grace ex opere operato that is by the efficacy of their working after the manner of naturall causes which employe their whole actiuity while they worke so that the Sacrament of penance produces ex opere operato a greater or lesser measure of grace according to the greater or lesser dispositions of those which receiue it As to the form of speaking ex opere operato taken in the passiue signification it is ancient Pope Innocentius the third vsed it and the catholick Church in the Council of Trent receiu'd it which makes it a matter of faith of the Sacraments of the new law they being by vertue of their institution practicall Rites or signes for the effecting of sanctifying grace which indeed they signifie and to say that perfect contrition includeth a desire of the Sacrament of penance hath nothing of weight with it to weaken this
for a sinfull Brother and truly this kinde of forgiuing and loosing is common alike to all such as deuoutly and charitably recite that petition of our Lord's prayer Forgiue us our trespasses as we forgiue the trespasses against vs as witnesseth S. Augus trac 58. vpon S. Iohn and doubtless by the mentioned word 's of the Apostle viêªt videlicet Ye ought rather to forgiue and comfort him and whome yee forgiue any thing c. is meant of this generall manner of forgiuing and loosing which is common alike to all the faithfull of the Church but to demonstrate that he himself laid claime to a higher and better kinde of forgiuing and loosing he professeth that he exercised his forgiueness and power of loosing in the person or room of Christ Wherby again appear's that the Apostle did not forgiue this adulterer the rest of the paine enioyned him in order to the rigour of Church-discipline only that is to the intent only that it should aduantage him in the ecclesiasticall Court but also in order to the diuine Court of Iustice that it might benefit him before God and this is so manifest a truth that no sectary can say the contrary without contradicting the Apostles own words viêªt videlicet I forgaue it in the person of Christ that is in the room of Christ and as his Minister to whom Christ had committed his power of loosing and binding vpon earth and indeed S. Paul should haue extreamly preiudiced the said miserable adulterer which were great impiety to think if his forgiuenesse should haue had no weight * S. Cypria Epis 14. agens de relaxatione poenarum impositarum peccatoribus ait illam fieri per intercessionem martyrum vel aliorum fidelium quorum satisfactionibus suffragijs adiuuantur in delictis apud Dominum id est in foro Dei with the diuine Court and been of no value before God for according to that supposall he should haue pardoned a pain of this life in respect wherof the adulterer should haue suffered a far greater in the next because the punishment a man endureth vpon earth is a thousand times lesser then the torment 's of Purgatory and therby S. Paul would haue brought his penitent Corinthian out of the frying pan into the fyer That is out of the prison of the ecclesiasticall Court into the prison of the diuine Court Conformably vnto this catholick doctrine Bishops in the primitiue Church enjoyned sinners penances to satisfye God and to compence the iniury done to him through their sin 's (k) According to Tertullian l. ad martyres and S. Cyprian Epis 10.11.12.13.14 sundry Christians that through frailty fell from the Church in tyme of grieuous persecution were wont to recur vnto the Martyrs and Confessours that their penances might be remitted vnto them and these ancient Fathers did not mean penances or pains enioynd and due only in the Churches Court but due also in the Court of God wherfore S. Cyprian Epis 14. faith expresly that they receiued help and deliuerance from their pains apud Dominum that is in the diuine Court in consequence whereof Indulgences remit penances or pains at the Tribunall of God as due there and not as due onely in order to the Churches Canons as wanton schollars of these dayes vnaduisedly teach for otherwise according to S. Thomas q. 25. a. 1. Indulgences would be more vnprofitable then profitable reseruing the penitent to more grieuous pains in Purgatory Besides according to the holy scriptures whatsoeuer priest 's shall binde on earth shall be bound in Heauen and whatsoeuer they shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heauen in consequence of which God has a Court in Heauen that remits the guilt and paine of sinne accordingly as they be remitted in the Churches Court and indeed if there were no remitting of pains in the Court of Heauen there would be no need at all of the Churches spirituall Treasure consisting of the aboundant satisfactions of Christ and the blessed Saincts and yet that there is this spirituall Treasure is an article of Christian faith for as such a Treasure could not be necessary vnto remission of pains in a ciuil Court so it could not be necessary vnto remission in an ecclesiasticall Court The ground on which the Digbean diuines build their opinion is a damned heresy namely that God does not forgiue us our sinnes as to the guilt thereof except her pardon the pain also as is plainely clear according to the definition of the Council of Trent sess 6. can 30. and this practice was both in order to such as had publickly sinned in reference to which canonicall pain 's were instituted only as also in order to such as had sinned in secret as doe demonstrate Burchard in the 13th book of decretalls and sundry others which haue made a full collection of the canonicall pains Furthermore no man can say without running into manifest errour that the Apostles forgiuenesse or indulgence in order to the penitent Corinthian was but an absolution of excommunication or of his sinne giuen in the Sacrament of penance for first a deliuerance from an ecclesiasticall censure of excommunication is neuer named by scriptures or Fathers a condonation forgiueness or indulgence Again by the Apostles words appeareth that he forgaue part only of the punishment enioyned which cannot be meant of an absolution either from excommunication or sin 's in the Sacrament of penance where there is no sharing out by partes Yet notwithstanding all this the vsage of indulgences was not neer so frequent in the primitiue times as in the subsequent ages because primary Christians carrying the fresh memory of their crucifyed Redeemer and thereby much enflamed with loue towards his sufferings allwayes bore about his dying mortification that his life also might be made manifest in their mortall flesh 2. Cor. 4. so that then there was strict discipline and great penances enioyned sinners For example rigorous fasting much praying and other painfull afflictions * In 1. Concil Nicae cui intersuerunt 318. Patres indicitur poena vndecim annorum Item in Concil Ancyrano iniungitur poena septenij ijs qui bis vel ter Idolis sacrificauerant Porro vulgatum est vnicuique peccato mort ali poenitentiam septem annorum iniungendam esse iuxta Canones pro quo tam en nullus Textus reperiri potest Et contrarium tenet S. Tho. in 4. l. sent dis 20. sanè Gratianus qui allegatur pro contraria sententia non dicit Ecclesiam septemnem poenitentiam in singula peccata statuisse sed tantum pro grauissimis iniungi solitam fuisse deinde dicit illam poenit entiam non taxatam fuisse pro foro interiori sed exteriori constat illos Canones ad forum exteriùs pertinere as by the ancientest Councils appeareth Neuerthelesse such was their feruour of spirit and extream zeale in complyance to Christ's sufferings that they fullfilled them willingly and chearfully few sought after pardons vnto
Ansel in cap. 3. 1. Cor. poenam quam patiuntur animae Purgatorij esse grauiorem omni poena huius vita is more grieuous then all the sufferings of this life for therein is the place and time of executing the diuine Iustice the instrument wherof is true and reall fire that is applyed * Aug l. 2. de ciuit c. 10. docet spirituÌ„ posse pati ab igne corporeo per omnipotentiam Dei for the tormenting of such souls truly and really according to the proportion of the guilt of petty-treasons and debt's they stand charged with yet in as much as they being departed in faith hope and charity which be the spirituall chaines of vnion in order to all the good members of Christ's mysticall body and in as much as it is proper and naturall to the (i) According to the Apostle 1. Cor. 12. members of one and the same body can mutuall helpe one another and it is an Article of Catholick faith that the soul 's in Purgatory are members of one and the same Church and can be help'd through her prayers and suffrages And as to this poynt of doctrine there was ful agreement between the Latin and Greek Fathers in the Council of Florence as clearly appear's by the letters ' of vnion Besides Aerius was counted an Hereâ—ick by S. Epipha haer 75. and S. Austin haer because he denyed that the dead might receiue reliefe through the suffrages of the liuing Moreouer this Catholick truth is asserted by the ancientest Fathers namely S Deny's l. de caeles Hierar c. 7. S. Cyprian Epis 66. and S. Austin l de curae pro mortuis agenda ser 22. de verbis Apos expresly teacheth that the doctrine which assert's that the faithfull departed receiue help by prayers sacrifices and Almes-deeds c. is approu'd by the vniuersall Church members of one and the same body to comfort and help one an other doubtless the souls of Purgatory can be comforted and helped by the prayers and suffrages of the liuing as plainly appeares by the testimonies and Liturgies of primitiue Fathers authorities of Councils and the vniuersall practice of the catholick church that offereth dayly and howerly prayers and suffrages for the faithfull souls of such as die in grace that they may be comforted and deliuered out of the grieuous paines which they endure in Purgatory Besides for as much as they are not (k) According to S. Austin l. 20. de Ciuit. c. 9. the souls of the faithfull departed are not seperated from the Church which euen now is the kingdom of God and indeed the good soul 's of Purgatory are vnited vnto us in charity in regard at their departure out of this world they were in the state of grace again they are vnited vnto vs in faith and hope because these two vertues are not euacuated before the soul's admittance into Heauen seperated from the Church they be in a capacity to receiue benefit euen by Indulgences it being in the Churches power to apply those spirituall treasures for the aduantage of all such children as abide in vnion with her through faith Hope and charity And though prayers Church-suffrages Indulgences c. doe not remit sinnes in the next life these requiring necessarily * Trid sess 6. cap. 7. docet peccatuÌ„ mortale non remit ti sine infusione gratiae at sola Sacramenta in re vel in voto suscepta in funduÌ„t gratiam ex eodeÌ„ Concil sess 6. cap. 4. sed Indulgentia noÌ„ est Sacramentum culpa venialis nunquam tollitur sine aliqua displicentia de tali peccato veniali infusion of grace if mortall or a detestation therof if veniall no man can say but that souls be deliuered thereby out of their pames and translated to the kingdome of heauen without contradicting the authority of ancient Fathers the definition of a generall Councill the Ordinances of sundry Popes and the vniuersall practice of the catholick Church For example S. Austin placeth souls after their purgation in the next life in heauen to expect their bodies lib. 15. de Trinitate cap. 25. Again S. Austin puts no longer bounds to tyme in Purgatory then the matter as to satisfaction for each sinne requireth The Council of Florence defineth the transplanting of suffering soul's out of Purgatory into Heauen before the generall Resurrection Pope Benedict the 12. decreto Benedictus Deus in donis suis rancketh such as hold with pertinacy the contrary doctrine in the number of Hereticks Pope Gregory the first and Pope Siluester afore granted (l) Although an Indulgence be an act of iurisdiction and although the Church militant hath nothing of iurisdiction ouer the souls suffering in Purgatory neuertheless she hath power ouer her spirituall Treasure In consequence of which Indulgences are not granted in order to the dead after the manner of a Iudges absolution but in nature of a suffrage vnto helping of such onely as remoue out of their bodyes in communion with Christ's body and blood wherfore when the Church-gouernours grant Indulgences for the dead they insert the particles per modum suffragij after the manner of suffrages wherby is signifyed that they doe not giue Indulgences in order to the dead as if the dead were continued vnder their iurisdiction but they grant them only as competent recompences or conuenient satisfactions for as much as the faithfull aliue offer them as satisfactory works vnto satisfying the pains due to the sinnes which the dead had committed before they were remou'd out of their bodyes Aud doubtless euery particular belieuer that is in the slate of grace may offer to God their fasting praying and giuing of almes as worthy satisfactions vnto compensing of the torment 's which good soul 's endure in Purgatory Indulgences to such Priests as offered the sacrifice of Christ's body and blood in a Chappel dedicated to the blessed Virgin Mary called by the name of Mariae Liberatricis that they might free one soul out of Purgatory as doth appeare by the ancient Records of the said Chappell and Pope Pascall the first gaue deliuerance of one soul out of Purgatory to Priests celebrating fiue Masses in a Church consecrated to S. Praxes which Indulgence eleuen succeeding Popes confirmed whereunto may be added the Indulgence of Pope Iohn the eight that administred supream Church-gouernment in the yeare 878. granted to souldiers that should loose their life 's in the holy warr for the defeÌ„ce of the Church and this practice was neuer yet reproued by any Council Pope or catholick writer wherfore it seen eth a strange thing that Mr. Thomas White a priuate man and in outward profession a catholick christian should assume so vnauthorized a liberty and vnparalelled boldnesse as to publish a writing in the yeare 1653. entitled An Account of his husbanding the midle state of soul's in contradiction of the (m) According to S. Austin Tom. Epis 118. ad Ianua it is a manifest madnes to call in question
immortality of the soul vsing that scripture-testimony I am God of Abraham God of Isaack God of Iacob and subsumeth thus there is no God of the dead but of the liuing arguing therby that the dead rise again since their souls doe not die with their bodyes Besides it is obseruable (o) Oachinus an Apostata Capucin cutteth an argument out of the cited Chap. Macchabae 2. against Purgatory arguing thus If there were a Purgatory though there were no Resurrection of the dead neuertheless prayers offered for the dead might not be in vaiue because the souls thereby might obtain deliuerance from their pain 's that Ochinus an Apostat Capucin fryer abused the fore mentioned scripture-testimony 2. Macchab. 12. to destroy Purgatory and after the very same way of arguing Mr. White abuseth it to ouerthrow a catholick assertion that teacheth the deliuerance of souls out of Purgatory in vertue of holy Churches suffrages Likewise sundry hereticks haue made vse of the same Text to weaken the authority of the books of Machabies pretending that the words If those that were shain should not rise again containe a manifest errour namely that soul's die with their bodies and rise again wherby is plainly euident that it is no difficult business for a man that is wantonly ambitious to be singular in teaching to cut out of scripture abortiue interpretations and to fit them to his vain vnquiet fancy by which he is biassed But how happens it that Mr. White alledgeth scripture-authority vnto the deteyning of good souls in Purgatory till the generall Resurrection * Mr. White in Dimenso 2. affirmamus itaque nos euideter conuinci ex hoc testimonio non solus poenis Purgatorij animas ante Resurrectionem and to lay claime to euidence in his deduction from thence It is not his custome to fly to that sanctuary for protection of his Nouelties nor to acknowledg euidence enough in the scriptures themselues to determine any controuersy for he expresly writeth that It were as ridiculous to seeke the decision of controuersyes out of the Bible as to cut with a Beatle or knock with a straw howeuer it seemes he hath a good minde to cloath his doctrines in the scripture colour's when that holy liuery how vnhandsomly soeuer put on may serue him for a disguise From the premises is euidenced how little reason Mr. White hath to boast of the two mentioned scripture-Testimonies viz. 2 Machab 12. 1. Cor. 15. vauntingly saying These two texts therfore remaine inviolable as first not to be resisted without manifest violence secondly pointing at the very knot of the controuersy that souls once engaged are not capable of that eminent good of being deliuered from their pain 's before the Resurrection And from these pitifull inferences he passeth vnto other scripture-Testimonies wherby he endeauour's to proue that euen blessed souls haue need of prayers but of his vnnaturall and irrationall arguments as to this point the Character of the Church triumphant shall giue euidence enough CHAR. XVI OF HOLY ORDER THE CONTENTS As God in the old law constituted superiour and inferiour Ministers to serue in the Temple so in the new law he hath appointed Bishops Priests Deacons Sub-Deacons c. one more eminent then an other to dispense diuine misteries in the Church of Christ Though euery Bishop is a Priest neuertheless enery Priest is not a Bishop to confer the Sacraments of holy Order and Confirmation is proper to Episcopall authority onely there be seuen Ecclesiasticall Orders taken in the proper sense corresponding to as many distinct functions exercised in relation to the celebrating of the holy Euchariste clericall tonsure can make noe good claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense Episcopacy in an holy Order the noblest part of the Churches Hierarchy a proper Sacrament and imprint's a speciall character in the soul of him that is ordain'd a true Bishop Bishops and Priests down from the Apostles till these tymes embraced a single life answeres to sundry Arguments made in fauour of Priest's Marriages HOly Order taken in the restrained Ecclesiasticall sense (a) 1. Timoth. 4. Neglect not the grace S. Paul saith that is in thee vvhich vvas giuen thee by prophesy and imposition of hand 's of Priesthood S. Chrysostom hom 13. commenting vpon this sacred Text affirmes that the Apostle meant by imposition of hand 's the Sacrament of holy Order which Timothy receiu'd of him after the same manner Theodoret interprets the sacred Text 2. Timot. 1. Stirr vp the grace of god vvhich is in thee by the imposition of mine hands That is by my ordaining thee who am a Bishop and S. Ambrose writing vpon the same Text implyes in the imposition of hands all the outward actions and words which were done and said ouer himselfe when he was ordain'd a Priest Besides in the primitiue Church when a Bishop confer'd the holy Order of Priesthood he vsed to bless the party ordain'd lye his hands on his head and giue him power to offer sacrifice for the liuing and the dead in the name of our lord that is in the room of Christ In consequence of the premises since in the ordination of Priests grace is giuen by an outward sensible sign holy Order is a Sacrament of the new law and so is desin'd by the Council's of Florence In the Decree of Pope Eugenius And Trent sess 23. can 4. is a proper Sacrament of the new law whereby a reasonable creature of the male sex * Baptismus requiritur in eo qui ordinatur quia baptismus in re suscept us est Janua aliorū Sacramentorum cuius proinde characterem character Ordinis supponit vt patet ex cap. si quis presbyter and baptised is ordained and enabled to perform the ministery of the Euchariste or in the celebration therof to serue after a speciall manner (b) Diaconesses mentioned Epis ad Timoth. could make no more claim to an Ecclesiasticall Order taken in the proper sense then the Religions men and women of those dayes being they had no power or iurisdiction as to the accomplishing or administring of a Sacrament And although Deanship Arch-Deaconship Priorship and Abbat-ship lay claim to something of Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction neuertheless by vertue of their institution and consecration they receiue no power to administer a Sacrament or to serue specially in the administration therof and t' is the same as to Arch Bishops and Patriarchs considered precisely in order to the dignity they haue ouer and aboue the Order of Bishops in vertue of his ordination * Hieron Epis 57. quae est ad Euagrium vt sciamus inquit traditiones Apostolicas sumptas de veteri Ecclesia puta ex Vaticinio Jsaiae cap. 6. Assumam exijs in Sacerdotes Leuitas quod Aaron filij eius Leuita in Templo fuerunt hoc sibi Epistopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicant in Ecclesia S. Hieron locum Isaiae intelligit ad literam de Apostolis
the Apostles to loose the cordes wherwith he was tyed doe represent Christian penance and the power that Christ gaue the Church to loose and remit sins as doe euidence the testimonies of ancient Fathers who also doe expresly assert Christ by his actions to haue prefigured the mysteries of christian religion Howeuer no man can deny without running into manifest errour but that the seuen afore named ecclesiasticall order haue had their begining from Christ's own institution and it matters not that euery Church in the primitiue times was not serued with so many for then in regard of the scarcity of belieuers and want of members to promote to the ministery there could not be so many ordained in so much that for the most part one Church was gouerned by one Priest only or by one Bishop and a Deacon yet after a happy encrease of belieuers and persons proper to exercise ecclesiasticall functions euery Church was supplied with all the seuen orders of ministers and serued according to their distinct offices As touching * Catechismus Trid. cap. de ordine parag 13. ait Parochū debere docere primam Tōsuram esse praeparat ionem quandā ad sacros ordines suscipiendos sicut sunt Exorcismi ad Baptismum sponsalia ad matrimoniū docēt autem Beda l. 4. His. Aug. Baronius Tom. 1. Annal an Christi 58. antiquitatem vsum significationem clericalis Tōsurae clericall Tonsure it is no ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense being only a disposition or preparation vnto ordination as exorcisme is to Baptisme or spousalls vnto Matrimony that is to say it is the first step only to ecclesiasticall promotion howeuer the vsage thereof is ancient as is also the clipping of the haire in the crowne of his head that receiues it wherby literally is signifyed the crowne of royall Priesthood wherunto a Clergy-man is disposed and deputed by Clericall tonsure or the crowne of glory which he expecteth in vertue of Christs death and passion or mystically is represented therby worldly employments and superfluous cares and entertainement's which a Clergy-man ought to cast from him as he doth the haire of his head in the receiuing of Tonsure But Episcopacy as a function distinct from Priesthood hath a good title to ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the consecration of Bishops is called ordination and the Hierarchy of the Church which is a subordination of ecclesiasticall ministers in respect whereof some are more eminent then others in the administration of diuine things doth consist of Bishops Priests and other inferiour ministers wherefore Episcopacy is essentially required thereunto as the noblest Hierarchicall member and indeed that which the Apostle gaue to Timothy by laying on of his hands was Episcopall dignity or Episcopacy according to the interpretation of S. Chrysostome Hom. 13. in 1. Epis ad Timoth. Theophilactus S. Anselm and others Besides the ancientest Fathers doe call Episcopacy an holy Order Anacletus Ep. 3. cap. 1. Caius Pope in the numbring of orders acknowledgeth two orders of Priests the one of Maior Priests that is Bishops and the other of Minor Priest's that is meer Priests Likewise S. Epiphan Haeres 75. Yet the degrees and states of Primates and Patriarchs as distinct offices from Episcopacy lay no claim to the Churches Hierarchy being in respect of Episcopall function one and the same order and the maiority that these can challenge aboue meer Bishops proceedes from human constitution only As the ordination of Priests Deacons and Sub-Deacons c. is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense so is (g) According to the Current of catholick writers since the Council of Trent Episcopacy is a Sacrament taken in the proper sense and the contrary opinion counted erroneous And truly S Austin con Parmeni and other ancient Fathers while they call holy Order a Sacrament they instance in Episcopacy which has diuine institution Act. 20. the holy Ghost appointed Bishops to gouerne the Church and though according to the 2. Toletan Council meer Priest's laid their hands together with the Bishop in the heads of those which were ordain'd which was the custome of some Churches of those dayes neuertheless that imposition of hands as to meer Priest's had nothing of the proper matter and at the most was a condition only requir'd to the validity of the Sacrament of holy Order as now the personall presence of the Parish Priest or some other by him substituted is an essentiall requisit to the validity of Marriage ordination of bishops hauing all necessary requisits therunto viz. outward sensible Rites Grace conferred therby and Christs (b) The Sacrament of holy Order as to Episcopacy Christ instituted Io. 20. when he said to his Apostles As my Father sent me so send I you receiue the holy Ghost And indeed as to reason t' is not probable that Episcopall Order was instituted afore for then doubtless Christ had instituted it at his last supper by the word 's hoc facite do this But these particles according to the Council of Trent sess 21. can 2. were meant of power giuen vnto Priest's in order to the celebrating of the Euchariste own institution which do plainly appeare by the words of the Apostle 2. Tim. 1. stir vp the grace of God which is in thee by the putting on of mine hands that is by ordaining thee a Bishop according to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers Again diuine institution of Episcopacy is deducible sufficiently enough from the Hierarchy of the Church instituted by diuine ordination Episcopacy being the noblest member therof for the Hierarchy (i) According to S. Epiphanius haer 57. or 77. Orders of Church-ministers were perfected by litle and litle onely and he obserueth that the Apostle Epis ad Timot. ad Tit. mention's a Bishop and a Deacon onely because those primitiue Churches had onely those two orders of Ministers in regard there was then exceeding great scarcity of persons fit to be ordain'd and the Council of Trent doth not exact the whole number of Ministers but in such Churches as can conueniently be furnisht with all the Orders doth consist of Bishops Priests and (k) The principall Church Ministers after the Priest's are Deacons according to S. Denys l. de Eccles Hierar c. 23. and 5. the function proper to them is to serue in order to the holy Euchariste Also according to S. Ignat. Epis ad Trullo Deacons were not dispensers of meat and drink but of christian Sacraments Besides according to S. Justin in fine Apologet. Deacons were wont to minister the Enchariste to those which were present and to carry it to such as were absent Again this catholick doctrine appear's evidently by the History of S. Lawrence which S. Ambrose set's down l. 1. offic c. 41. and doubtless to haue care of the poore was the secundary and not the primary office of Deacons ministers Hereby it is cleare that Episcopacy doth imprint a spirituall character in
him that is ordained a Bishop which is the Tenet of all catholick writers that assert Episcopacy to deriue it's institution from Christ and to be an ecclesiasticall order taken in the proper sense for the Council of Tent sess 23. c. 4. can 4. doth define the Sacrament of Order to imprint a character which definition being absolute without restriction or distinction between one order and an other it doth euidently follow that all orders doe imprint a character which is a spirituall signe deriued into the soul wherby a man is muested with power to exercise certain ecclesiasticall functions in order to the ministery of the Eucharist and it matters not that the priestly is more worthy and excellent then the Episcopall character as distinct from it for the impression of a new and distinct character is not grounded in the more or less perfection and excellency of a precedent character but in the distinction of powers and abilities in reference to exercising the ministery of the Euchariste neither Matters it that Fathers and Councils when they number the Sacraments of the new law do acknowledg seuen only comprehending holy order for one for in so numbring of them they consider holy Order in (l) According to the Ancient Fathers ordination of a Bishop and a Priest is said to be one and the same that is taken in the generall sense and holy order so taken is but one Sacrament onely but a Bishop taken in the proper sense euen according to S. Hierom. Dial. con Lucif hath in the Church the preeminence which Aaron had in law of Moses and to meer Priests he giues that Degree of preeminence onely into which the sons of Aaron were inuested Besides s. Epiphan l. de Sacerdot dignit c. 6. calleth Episcopacy a Deified Order and cap. 7. assert's difference between a Bishop and a meer Priest being God exact's not the same thing 's from a Priest as from a Bishop that has preeminence aboue him a genericall signification as it containeth all it's sundry species or kinds Wherfore in as much as according to the rules of Logick what can be rightly affirmed of a thing taken in the generall sense may be also affirmed of all the sundry species contained therin it doth plainly follow that since ecclesiasticall order taken in its genericall signification is a Sacrament and doth imprint a Character euery true species therof is a Sacrament and imprinteth a Character In like manner Fathers and Councils reckoning seuen Orders they do coÌ„prehend Episcopacy vnder Priesthood And for as much as Christ had but one spouse which is the Church a Bishop and a Priest that supplieth his room and representeth his Person in the ministery ought to be married to the Church only * S. Hieron in sua Apolog con Jouin Apostoli inquit vel virgines vel post nuptias contineÌ„tes fuerunt id est absquo vxorum consortio wherfore the Apostles after they were ordained Bishops and Priests led their life 's in all godliness purity and chastity and this apostolicall practice Bishops and Priests down from them to these times haue religiously obserued S. Hierom L. in vigilantium exclaimeth against some Modern Hereticks of those times for taking such of the people only to be Priest's as had (m) According to the second Council of Carthage continency was enioyned to Bishops and Priests the ancient Fathers there assembled declaring with one accord that they ought to obserue it being the Apostles taught it and antiquity kept it Besides the first Council of Nice put forth an ordinance that Bishops Priest's and Deacons should entertaine no woman in their families except Mothers Grand-mothers sisters and Aunts making no mention of wifes From whence S. Basil Epis 17 infer's that to take wifes after the receiuing of holy Order was not permitted And indeed Clergy-men of those dayes had so great a reuerence to chastity that euen the Arian Bishop's ordain'd no man that was marryed as witnesseth S. Epiphan her 37. moreouer it was neuer permitted in the Church of Christ that a Bishop or Priest might marry as appear's by the Testimonies of ancient Fathers of the Greek Church though now this Church faln into schism differs from the Latins in opinion and practice as to such as had wifes before their ordination wiues contrary to the custome of both the Eastern and western Churches that allwaies promoted to the Maior-orders Virginia or such as were esteemed chast and pure from all carnall vncleaness and though in the primitiue times when there was great scarcity of single persons as proper and fit to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub-Deacons the Church-gouernours tooke of married men for the exercising those functions neuertheless these did not accompany with their wiues after their ordination but led their liues in all purity and chastity as did their wiues also according to a mutuall promise of continency and since the Priests of the old law to whom marriage was permitted as it were of necessity to multiply the people of God and who did sâ—adow only in their ministery what the Priests of the new law do really offer in their sacrifices viz. the true and reall body and blood of Christ in memory of his death and passion did abstain not only from the carnall embracement's of their wiues but also from the houses wherin they resided before they were to enter into the Temple for the performance of their spirituall functions respectruely it is most consonant as to reason that Priest's of the new law doe obserue continency together with purity and holyness Besides the vnmarried careth for the things of our lord how he may please him but he that is married careth for the things of the world how he may please his wife 1. Cor. 7. Wherfore such as leaue the world to be ordained Bishops Priest's Deacons and Sub Deacons ought to leade a single life without wifes and truly in regard therof there is less danger of dissipating ecclesiasticall goods and conuerting them to the making vp of inheritance for Clergy-mens children Furthermore Priests vnmarried are in a better condition to reproue the vices of lay-people then if they were married and for as much as they are single men they be less vnquiet contentious and troublesome to their flock not seeking to enrich children which they haue not Iouinianus and VigilaÌ„tius were the first sectaries that stood vp in defence of Priests marriages and Luther and Caluin raysed vp againe that heresy after that it had been dead and buried for many ages teaching that it is not only lawfull for Peiests to marry before but euen after their ordination These are followd by all the sectaries of the present times And knowing well that the opinion contradicteth all antiquity they labour to make it agree with the holy scriptures whence they cut out weak interpretations and form coniecturall deductions only abusing sundry text's for Example God says Gen. 1. bring forth fruit and multiply whence they very weakly
argue a precept obliging all to marry For those words cannot carry a command since they were vttered to men and beast alike which are not capable of a precept howeuer if God therby had commanded marriage it cannot be meant in order to all men joynt and seperate for thence it plainly followeth that Abel (n) In the law of Moses Iosue Elias Elisaeus and Ieremy renown'd for sanctity of life were neuer marryed according to S. Hierom and S. Ambrose Besides 2. Machabae express mention is made of reclus'd Virgin 's in the Temple And it matters not that the sacred Text. Deut. 7. saith that there shall be neither male nor female barren among you For neither the one nor th other was counted barren because of being vnmarried but in regard in marriage they wanted children which kind of barreness was counted in those dayes as a reproach or malediction because God had promised plenty of children to married people that obseru'd his commandement's Iosue Daniel S. Iohn Baptist S. Iohn Euangelist and sundry others which led their life 's in all chastity did transgress a diuine law and consequently sinned mortally which were a blasphemy to say of such godly Persons Again from the words of the Apostle 1. Cor. 7. for to auoide fornication let euery man haue his wife and let euery woman haue her own husband they as weakly infer marriage to be enioyned euery man and euery woman for the Text is meant of such as are married already and so the Apostle doth interpret his meaning saying in the same Chapter Art thou bonnd to a wife seeke not to be loosed Art thou loosed from a wife seeke not a wise be that giueth his Virgin to marriage doth well and be that giueth her not to marriage doth better wherfore the alleadged words be vttered in respect of the marryed the Apostle signifying therby that although it were good for a man not to touch a woman or for a woman not to touch a man but to abide euen as he did a chast Virgin neuerthelesse he asserteth it lawfull for euery married man to vse his wife and for euery married woman to vse her husband that therby fornications and other vncleanesses may be auoided In like manner they abuse the scripture 1. Timoth. 3. and Titus 3. that say a Bishop must be a husband of one wife arguing thence an Apostolicall precept obliging a Bishop to take a wife for it plainly appeares by the Apostles own practice and sundry Council's and the ancientest Fathers-testimonies that S. Paul did not mean that a Bishop after his ordination might marry or if married afore might lawfully perform the act of Matrimony because there is not one example in all antiquity that shews permission giuen (o) According to the custom of the primitiue Church no married man could be ordain'd vnless he had promised afore his ordination continency with his wifes consent as seuerall Councils haue declar'd and Iouinian the Heretick ingenuously confesseth this truth according to S. Hierom. l. 1. adversus Iouinia Thou confesseth saith this great Doctour to Jouinian that he cannot be à Bishop that beget's children in his Diocese othervvise if he be perceiu'd he shall not be counted as a Husband but he condenm'd as an adulterer to the married to be ordained Bishops or Priests vnless first they had made a promise of continency together with their wiues consent thereto and their promise to liue in all continency likewise wherfore the true meaning of the Apostles words is that a man which hath been married more then once ought not to be ordained a Bishop and so of necessity he meant both in regard the place cannot be vnderstood in reference to Polygamie which signifies marriage of one single man with many women together polygamy being inconsistent with Christian religion as also because the (p) According to the ancient Fathers namely S. Hilary in Psal 117. Epiphan haer 5. 8. S. Hierom l. 1. con Iouian S. Austin l. de gra lib. arb cap. 4. S. Paul was neuer married Howeuer Clement Alexandri and onely he asserted a contrary opinion conceiuing that he was able to proue from holy scripture that S. Paul had been married but Theodoret Oecumenius count's it folly to inâ—er from holy scripture S. Pauls marriage Apostle Timothy and Titus were Bishops vnmarried as doth witness all antiquity but S. Paul with great reason permitted such as were but once married to be ordained Bishops because among the people of Creet where he was the chief Church-gouernour it was a difficult business to finde Virgins the * Secundum Baronium in Annal Eccles ad an Christi 58. leges Cretensium cogebant vt quilibet à puero vxorem duceret lawes of that Country commanding euery man and woman to marry as note h Baronius in his Ecclesiasticall Annals Moreouer in fauour of Priest's marriage they doe alledge S. Paul's word's that say Thess 13. Marriage is honourable in all and the bed vnpolluted inferring from thence an obligation vpon euery man to marry which inference doth carry a manifest weakness for it is certaine that the marriage of adulterers and adulteresses is dishonourable and infamous besides marriage contracted between Brother and sister is not honourable wherfore the true meaning of the Apostle is that marriage ought to be honourable among ass that is to say the married ought so to haue marriage in honour as to know how to possess his vessel in honour and holinesse and not in the iust of concupiscence as the Gentils which knew not God 1. Thessal 4. and though marriage in it self be honourable and a great Sacrament neuertheless that doth not hinder the Church to constitute a law obliging the ordained to refrain from marriage since she forceth none to receiue ordination and to prohibit marriage in order to ecclesia â—icks is not to condemne it altogether as vnlawfull and diabolicall as did Simon Magus Saturnius and those other Marcionist's which are meant by the Prophecy of S. Paul 1. Timoth. 4. In the latter times some shall depart from the faith forbidding to marry Furthermore the afore mentioned sectaries to proue the lawfullnesse of their own Priests marriages doe produce S. Paul himself for a President saying that this great Apostle was married and led about his wife by the name of sister 1. Cor. 9. haue we not power to leade about a woman a sister and by the name of a faithfull companion Philip vltimo I beseech thee my faithfull companion wherby doth appeare their extream peruersness or blindness contradicting the consenting testimonies of the ancientest Fathers which assert this Apostles virginity as he himself doth also 1. Cor. 7. therfore I say vnto the vnmarried and vnto the widdowes it is good for them if they abide euen as I doe wherfore doubtless 1. Cor. 9. he doth not mean by a woman a sister a wife but some other deuout Christian woman that after the manner of Iewry did furnish him with necessaries
by Priests of the Church lay Elders because they are not Church-ministers taken in the proper sense neither is it their office to pray ouer the sick and to administer holy vnction vnto remission of sins and it matters not that the Apostle sayes let them bring in Priests wheras the practice of the catholick Church is to employ one sole Priest in the administration of Extrem-vnction for the true meaning therof is let him bring in some one of the Priests the Apostle vseth the signre which Gramarians call Enallogy putting the plurall for the singular number After the same manner Mat. 1. the Angell of our lord appearing to Ioseph says Take the Babe and his Mother and goe into the land of Israel for they are dead that sought the Babes life notwithstanding he mentioneth only Herod saying when Herod was dead c. Lastly in as much as the Apostle asserteth absolutly putting no limitation of time If any be sick among you he plainly sheweth Extrem-vnction (e) Since all the other precepts S. Iames inioyn's in his catholick Epistle concerne christians in all ages t' is not as to reason probable that the sole precept of anointing the sick should be giuen for a short tyme onely and according to Caluin scarcely for the space of one age but this his interpretation the Council of Trent has condemn'd sess 14. doct de Sacram. Extr. vnct and can 2. to be of perpetuall vse in the catholick Church to the worlds end which is essentiall to a Sacrament of the new law wherfore sundry ancient Fathers that liued in the subsequent ages when they speake of christian belieuers reduced through sicknesse to eminent danger of death recommend to them holy vnction as a Sacrament of the new law and alledge for it the authority of S. Iames set down * Hieron Epis 65. ad Pamach oceanum de erroribus Originis in simili re ad fidem spectūte de qua tamen prima concilia nihil definierant sic scribit Confessi sunt quod negabatur tacuerunt de quo nemo quarebat and though the first generall Councill's make no mention of Extrem-vnction neuertheless no man ought to infer from that negatiue authority an argument to the preiudice of so warrantable a doctrine for they declared and defined such point's of christian faith as were questioned and impugned by the Hereticks of those times respectiuely but then no controuersy arose concerning Extrem-vnction By the premises is plainly euidenced that the guift of healing through vnction or laying on of hands (f) S. Marke mentioneth sick persons whom the anoynting with oyle cured And in the last Chapter of S. Marke t' is promised that the imposition of hands shall heale the sick mentioned by S. Mark and practiced in the primitiue times was not this holy vnction that s. Iames prescribeth in the forenamed catholick Epistle for that was a miraculous end owment and no gifts of doing miracles did confer sanctifying grace vnto remission of sins which is proper to a Sacrament of the new law and truly that particular guift (g) Often tymes such as were not Priests heald the sick by anoynting them namely according to S. Hierom S. Hilarion that had not receiu'd the Sacrament of holy Order and according to Tertull. ad scap c. 4. A certain lay-christian named Proculus anoynted with oyle Seuerus the Emperour and recouered him thereby called the gift of healing was extended only to corporall infirmities it could cure the body but not the soul Besides one and the same spirit distributed that and all other guifts of doing miracles seuerally according to his own free will 1. Cor. 12 wherfore neither such only as by ordination were promoted to Priestly ordination nor all those had the guift of healing but to the administring of Extrem-vnction is necessary Priestly ordination for the Apostle sayth expresly If any be sick among you let him bring in Priests of the Church Also our Extrem-vnction requireth oyle of Oliues blessed (h) The Councils of Flor. in the Decree of Eugenius and of Trent sess 14. cap. 1. declare that the oyle that is applyed in and is proper to the Sacrament of Extream-vnction ought to be blessed and consecrated by a Bishop which vsage is conform to the generall practice of the catholick Church and consecrated by a Bishop neither is it applyed to euery sick person but to such only as be incorporated into Christ by faith hope and charity nor to euery part of the sick body but to the Organs of the fiue senses which be the windows that let in sin into the howse of the soul and although our Extrem-vnction be endowed with vertue euen as to the healing corporall infirmities when the supreme prouidence thinketh it expedient for the sick yet the cure of these is the secundary effect thereof only being instituted specially to heale the soul Furthermore to the forementioned healing vnction no determinat form of prayer was annexed as is to our Extrem-vnction for example the Roman Church vseth this form * Concil Trid. expressè docet ritum vsū Extremaevnctionis quem obseruat Romana Ecclesia esse optimum idque patet ex decreto Eugenij ad calcem Concilij Florentini which doubtlesse is the best our Lord in vertue of that holy vnction and his most benigne mercy grant vnto thee Indulgence of all thy offences committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching and indeed the Priest that ministreth Extrem-vnction (i) The necessity of the precept requires that the form of sacramentall vnction which consistes of these word's Per istam sanctam vnctionem pijssimam suam misericordiam indulgeat tibi Dominus quicquid deliquisti per visum auditum c. ought to be repeated fiue seuerall tymes in fiue seuerall anoyntings of the fiue senses I say the precept of necessity requires this ceremony though perhaps neither a fiue fold repeating of the formall words nor a siue fold anoynting of the sick can lay claim to the essence of the Sacrament is bound to anointe the Organs of euery sense and express the name of each one particularly together with a repetition of the said form vnless he shall obserue that the sick person is seiz'd with pangs of present death for then one sole vnction and the naming of all the outward senses respectiuely is sufficient enough as to the essence of the Sacrament and vnto obtaining the fruites therof for example it sufficeth if anointing one Organ only the Priest say our Lord through that holy vnction and his most benigne mercy grant vnto thee Indulgence of all thy offences committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching As to the anointing reins breasts and feet though these vnctions haue nothing of the essentiall matter yet as to them a Priest ought to obserue the custome of that particular Church wherunto he is subiect howeuer decency requireth that he omit to anointe the reins and breasts of sick women CHAR. XIX OF THE
inquit haereses obortae sunt aut nata sūt schismata quam quod Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tē pus Sacerdos Iudex vice Christi cogitatur teaching peruerse things to draw disciples after them wherby is euidenced that no priuat man is an infallible interpreter of holy scriptures neither can know certainly that scriptures are the word of God laying aside the Churches authority For example credence is not giuen to the canon or caralogue of scriptures because of scripture testimony which no where attestes that catalogue in so much that Luther and Caluin down from the begining of their defection to the departure out of the world contended about the number of canonicall scriptures and their adherents of these dayes respectiuely continue in the pursuance of the same dispute Moreouer there is greater reason that the christian faith should rely rather on the Church which * S. Cypri in trac de vnitate Ecclesiae adulterari inquit nō potest sponsae Christi incorrupta est pudicae is an infallible ground and piller of truth then of sole scriptures which are liable to mutations corruptions and false interpretations howeuer scriptures cōsidered in themselues precisely do chaleng equall authority with the Church the same diuine spirit that directeth the tongues of the supream pastours in speaking (o) God by his absolute and extrrordinary power can himselfe alone or by an Angel instruct men and reueale matters of faith and christian religion without the ministery of the Church And doubtless the Apostles had noe other master but God himselfe as to sundry mysteries of christian faith and Christ himselfe confesseth that S. Peter came to the knowledge of his diuine nature by reuelation from God the Father Caro Sanguic non reuelauit tibi sed Pater meus guided the pennes of the Apostles and Euangelists in writing and as the Church beareth witnesse of the scriptures infallible doctrine so the scriptures do witness the Churches infalible authority yet so as that faith in order to its acte of assent is resolued into the Church and not into the scriptures for noe man can prudently belieue any scripture to be the word of God if the Church that is the ground and piller of truth should not declare it for such howeuer Catholicks who doe infer the Churches infallibility from the testimony of scripture and the authority of scripture from the testimony of the Church are noe more guilty of committing (p) According to Euclide a mathematicall circle taken in the proper sense is the passing of one and the same line from and the repassing vnto the same point and by the same way a circle of errour then are Philosophers that assert mutuall causalities or doe argue from a cause its proper effect and from an effect its proper cause for example from the rising of the sun is proued the existence of the day and againe the existence of the day proueth the risiing of the sun wherin there is noe circle of errour which properly consisteth in the coming again of the same thing vnto the same thing from whence it came and by the same way it came but the way of one cause is not the way of an other cause nor the way of an effect is the way of the cause wherof it is the effect in like manner the way of the Church which is a cleare speaking Iudge is not the way of the scriptures which consiste in mute elements of characters and although we belieue that the Church is an infallible proposer of all matters pertaining to faith because of the scripture testimony neuertheless if the scriptures had borne noe witness therof there is euidence of credibility enough to induce vs prudently to belieue the Churches infallibility which euen before the writing of scriptures was beliued neither do we recur to scriptures to proue it (q) In disputs or conferences with such as deny holy scriptures motiues of credibility haue weight with them and that one which S. Austin vseth l. con Epis Faus cap. 4. seems of greattest moment Many things saith he keepe me fast in the bosom of the Catholick Church for example the vnanimous accord of people and nations authority confirmed by miracles .... by antiquity strengthned and the succession of Bishops dovvn from S. Peter the Apostle to vvhom our lord committed the feeding of his sheepe vnto the present Episcopacy but when we haue to doe with such as admit them and euen then we doe not alledge scriptures as the formall cause the Churches infallibility is known by for that is diuine reuelation but as witness of it only for we doe not belieue precisely that the Church is infallible because the scripturs do say it but in regard of many other motiues which do moue vs to giue our assent thereto neither was the church intended for the vse of the scriptures but scriptures for the vse of the Church besides no man without manifesting extream weakness can except against the mutuall testimony that Christ and S. Iohn Baptist gaue of one another or against the disciples of both who belieued their masters to be such as their masters reciprocally had declared theselues to bee The principall marks or tokens of the true Church * Quatuor illa signa dilucide constant ex sacra scriptura ex symbolis Apostolorum Nicae S. Athanasij expressè habentur in sym Constātinop cuius Patres voce apostolicam diuinitus addiderunt are foure set douwn in that Article of christian faith viz I belieue one holy catholick and apostolick Church Albeit that the true Church consisteth of many members yet it is but one body 1. Cor. 12. of Christ in vnity of faith and baptism One lord one faith one baptism Ep. 4. nor can Christ be an author of diuision that is a God of vnion Likwise it is holy for as much as it is the body of Christ that is the fountain of all holyness and enioyes a sacrifice and Sacraments which confer sanctity neither matters it that sundry members of his body are guilty of mortall transgressions For as such as profess any art are counted artificers though they doe not act according to the principalls or rules there-of so the said members in regard they put on Christ (r) According to S. Austin in psal 85. if all christians and true belieuers are baptized in Christ they haue put on Christ as the Apostle reacheth Gal. 3. and if they be made members of his body and say they are not holy they do an iniury to the head whose members are holy by Baptism and become the chosen people of God by faith are called holy although they doe not obserue the ordinances and lawes of either For example 1. Cor. 1. the Corinthians are said to be sanctified in Christ IESVS and holy neuertheless there were among them both the naturall and carnall men The true Church militant is (ſ) According to the Euangelist
can sacro-sancta the Apostolicall sea did not receiue supremacy and preeminence from the Apostles but from our Sauiour himselfe and indeed Christ founded and built his Church vpon S. Peter Mat. 16. Thou art Peter and on this rock I vvill build my Church .... and J vvill giue vnto the the keys of the kingdome of heauen Again Christ praid especially for S. Peter and after his resurrection appointed him to feed all his sheepe and lambs Moreouer S. Peter as head and Prince of the other Apostles called the first Councill which was celebrated between the Ascention and Pentecost And in the second Council mentioned act 15. spoke first and decided the matter in debate Bishop of Rome as lawfull successour of S. Peter in suprem authority and there is not any except the Roman Church that hath published and planted the one holy apostolicall faith from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof which denoteth its vniuersality an order to place there is not any except the Roman Church that can rockon pastours and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from S. Peter to the present times which sheweth its vniuersality in order to time there is not any Church-Gouernour saue the Bishop of Rome to whose definitiue sentence of iudgment (x) S. Anaclete Epis 1. commanded that euery hard question should be referd to the sea Apostolick because saith he the Apostles so appointed by speciall command from Christ Wherefore Tertullian calleth the Pope king of the world and stiles Rome the Chief and Apostolicall seat whether saith he wee ought to recur in all doubtfull matters relating to faith Besids S. Austin that was a member of the African Church Epis 9. addressing himselfe to Pope Innocent in order to the Pelagians whom he impugned writeth thus ... that errour and impiety of the Pelagians the authority of the sea apostolick must anathematize Again the Council of Alexandria cals Pope Felix prophanarum haresium depositor the deposer of prophan heresies hard controuersies of faith haue been referred in all ages Furthermore it is essentiall to the true Church to begett children in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell 1. Cor. 4 that is to say to bring whole countries out of darkness of infidelity into the maruelous light of Christian faith which not any except the Roman Church hath performed Sectaries like partriges haue gathered children * Ieremiae cap. 17. perdix fouet seu congregat quae non peperit Vnde S. Aug. assimilat haereticos perdici which they haue not brought forth but the Roman Church hath begotten vnto Christ a world of children both in the primatiue times for the first 500. yeares and since For Germans Bauarians Vandals Polans Sweds Danes Noruegians Hungarians Normans English and sundry other Countryes since the yeare 600. were begotten in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell by Priests and Bishops of the Roman Church as plainly appears by the ancient and modern histories written of each people respectiuely And as touching our country of Englād that embraced the catholick faith through the preaching of S. Austin a Priest and Bishop of the Roman Church after its conuersion which happened in the reign of S. Ethelbert for near a thousand yeares continued obedient to the Bishop of Rome and constant in the profession of the catholick religion as do euidence our ancient Cronicles laws common laws ordinances Records foundations of Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches vniuersities colleges and hospitalls which remain monuments of these dayes to beare clear witnes of catholick religion wherfore it is a wonder how English Magistrats come to look with so enuious an eye vpon their catholick subiects as to persecute them for conforming their conscience to the full and constant profession of all their christian progenitours CHAR. XX. OF TRADITIONS THE CONTENTS Down from the Apostles to these times the true Church of God hath been directed and gouernd by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Christ or from the holy Ghost by inspiration were deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnritten traditions if the Churches authority and vnwritten traditions were laid a side scriptures would haue nothing of waight with them vnto euincing christian religion Answeres vnto seuerall obiections propounded against the Churches traditions TRaditions are vnwrtten doctrines deliuered by the mouth of Christ or his Apostles and committed vnto the keeping of the Church (a) 1. Cor. 11. as I haue deliuered vnto you saith S. Paul keep my precepts From this sacred Text Theophilact infers that both S. Paul and the other Apostles deliuered many things which they did not set down in writing called traditions not because they are not at all written but in regard there is no express mention thereof in the holy scriptures for t is certaine that the traditions receiued from the Apostles and deliuered as it were from hand to hand for sundry ages are now written as precepts of faith and generall manners necessary vnto saluation Though the whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. Yet it is not the same thing to be a profitable guide in the way of iustce and saluation and to be the sole expedient necessary therunto for a head is both profitable and necessary to preserue a man aliue neuertheless it alone without the society and ministery of the body is not sufficient enough to continue him aliue likewise the Sacrament of Eucharist conduceth to the purchase of eternall blessedness yet cannot effect it without the help of baptism and faith and the Chapter set down expresly asserteth that euen the old scriptures instruct to saluation and notwithstanding the Apostle requireth of Timothy perseuerance in the doctrines which he had heard of him besides what he had learned from them wherin he had been versed from (b) By the particles from his infancy euidently appeares that the Apostle spoke of these scriptures which Timothy had learned in his youth that is he meant the old testament being the new scriptures were not written when Timothy was a youth Wherefore when the Apostle writ vnto him that all scripture is profitable c. he could not vnderstand the whole body thereof as some sectaries vnaduisedly interprete him translating whole for all And indeed when the Apostle writ that Epistle to Timothy the whole body of scripture was not composed S. Iohn had not then put forth his Gosple and his Apocallps he writ after the death of S. Paul him infancy again albeit the scriptures be a great light neuertheless they doe not giue light to all a en within the house of God whose written doctrines they are vnless they be put vpon the candlestick of the Churches definitions and vnwritten traditions for setting these aside scriptures are but a light shining in a dark place 2.
whose souls likwise must be allowed to haue essētiall blessednes afore shall receiue full blessedness that is shall be inuested with a double stole of glory whereof one regardeth the body and the other the soul Of this consummate and perfect felicity speaketh S. Mat. cap. 20. and the Apostle 2. ad Tit. 4. whereby the hire or reward there mentioned is signified full blessedness giuen to all the good labourers together when the euening was come that is to say to all the Saints at the day of the generall resurrection for though all of them were approued by the testimony of faith and translated into the kingdome of Heauen as to their souls neuertheless as the same Apostle teacheth Heb. 11. they receiued not the promiss God prouiding that they without vs shall not be consummate that is (e) S. Aug. ser 4. de festo Innocent nameth the full reward of the blessed which imports the glorification of soul and body the felicity of the generall resurrection And Epis 66. he calleth it the whole mans compleat immortality and Epis 99. he expounds the sacred Text Heb 11. of consummate blessedness and the particles When euening vvas come Mat. 20. of the generall iudgment shall not haue the enioyment of full and perfect felicity till the generall resurrection and indeed S. Paul doth not say that they should not be crowned without vs but that they should not be consummate without vs that is should not receiue the whole promised reward consisting in the blessedness of the soul togeather with the glory of the body which is S. Chris obseruation expressed in his 28. hom vpon the Epistle to the Hebrews and noe man can say that there the Apostle meaneth by promise blessedness as to the soul only without hauing him contradict himselfe for he says in the same Chapter that Dauid Samuel and the other Prophets had obtained promises or promised blessedness without vs which is meant of the souls blessedness obtained at Christs Ascention into Heauen and truly seeing that a pure soul remoued out of the body is capable of beatificall vision as the reward of its merits in reason it is fitting that it should be beatified before the resurrection of the body whereof Christ is our example whose soule was blessed before his resurrection and it matters not that S. Iohn saith Apoc. 6. that he saw the souls of martyrs vnder the Altar for by the word Altar he cannot meane an * Lutherus in gen ex Staphilo 2. p. de tripartita eius Theologia Et Cal. li. 3. Insti cap. 25. docent sanctos homines tātum esse in Atrio paradisi ibique exspectare diem vniuersalis iudicij outward Court or porch of Heauen where some sectaries will needs haue all the Saints to abide without knowing god vnto blessedness till the generall resurrection because the Apostle saith immediatly after in the same Chapter that white stoles were giuen to euery one which signifies the clear vision of God Besids in the following Chapter he expresly affirmeth that they were in the presence of the throne of God and serued him day and night in consequence of which it is plain that souls are not banished Heauen and depriued of the crowne of iustice which is the clear sight of God till the day of generall resurrection Wherefore of necessity the Apostle S. Iohn meant by the word Altar so ne secret intellectuall room vnknown to vs and in the house of God are many lodgings Io. 14. where those blessed souls offer continually sweet in cense of prayses to their Creatour notwithstanding all this the holy Church had not declar'd this catholick doctrine as an express article of faith before the time of Pope Bennet the twelth who was the first that defined it which is noe strang thing for though the present Church laies no claime to new reuelations neuertheless all reuealed doctrines were not at once propounded if the Church had defined the validity of baptism administrated by Hereticks before or in that age S. Cyprian liued he would neuer haue asserted an opinion contrary there to as witnesseth S. Aus who often excuseth him in regard that controuersie arose before the definition of a generall Council and the same may be said of sundry other controuersies pertaining to faith or generall manners which the authority of the Church guided by the holy Ghost hath determined according to the occurring exigence thereof in all times respectiuely in consequence of the premises such ancient Fathers if any such were as denyed the enioyment of the clear sight of God before the generall resurrection in any age preceding the definition of the Catholick Church in reference thervnto are excusable yet it is certaine that euen all Fathers generally doe declare in their writings the doctrine which the Church now propoundeth in her definitions in order to the said controuersy as doe plainly proue Coxius Egid. Bellar. c. and the common vnanimous consent of Fathers ought to be preferred before the priuate opinion of a few only howeuer truly no man can say that euen S. Irenaeus and S. Bernard which seem to speake darkly and as it were doubtfully in relation to the said catholick assertion S. Irenaeus li. 5. aduersus haereses cap. 31. S. Bern. ser 4. de omnibus sanctis did exclude Saints from the clear sight of God or did confine them to an outward Court or porch of Heauen till the generall resurrection without haueing them (f) Albeit S. Irenaeus in some parte of his writings may seem to exclud from heauenly blessedness good souls till the day of generall resurrection neuertheless l. 1. con Haer. cap. 29. l. 2. cap. 63. and in sundry other places he asserts the enioyment of beatificall vision in order to iust souls clensed from all vncleanes before the reassumption of their bodyes the same teacheth S. Bernard Epis ad Fratres de Hyber ser de obitu Humberti Monachi Epis 229. notwithstanding that in some places of his writings he may seem to incline to the contrary opinion Wherefore Sixtus Senensis l. 6. Biblio sanct annota 348. piously aduiseth euery man to expound the sayings of these Fathers in order to the fulnes of glory that blessed souls receiue in the generall resurrection when their resumed bodyes are glorified contradict themselues in other places of their writings and as to Pope Iohn 22. if it was his priuate opinion that the Saints doe not see God face to face till the generall resurrection yet he proceeded not to a definition in reference thereto * Benedictus 12. in extra quae incipit benedictus Deus ait Ioannem 22. morte praeuentum nil potuisse definire circa illam difficultatem as witnesseth Pope Bennet 12. his successour in the Pope dome Besides * Ocamus 2. par sui dialogi cap. 8. Ocham that was a profess'd enemy of Iohn 22. writeth that in a consistory of Cardinalls this Pope declared that as to that matter of controuersy
5. asserteth touching children that die immediatly after baptism notwithstanding they will receiue aduantages in order to their bodies in the day of generall resurrection But as to Onesiphorus Mr. White perhaps will answer that the Apostle supposeth him dead because in the same Chapter t is said Our lord giue mercy to the house of Onesiphorus Yet that form of speech doth not make him dead for the Apostle sayeth Rom. 10. salute them which are of Aristobulus his house and Mr. White cannot make it appeare by any orthodox writer that then Aristobulus was dead again the same Apostle 1. Cor. 10. writeth thus now brethren I beseech you ye know the house of Stephanus and Fortunatus be you obedient vnto such and yet it is certaine that Stephanus and Fortunatus were liuing at that time for the Apostle saith in the same Chapter I am glad of the coming or presence of Stephanus and Fortunatus Howeuer the Latine and Greek Martyrologes ought to carrie more weight with wise and iudicious men then Mr. Whites meer asserting the contrary But let his supposall be admitted gratis what doth he infer thence Mary that the soul of Onesiphorus bath not already found that mercy the Apōstle prayed our lord might grant vnto him because the Apostle praid that Onesiphorus might find it in illo die in that day In earnest a manifest weake inference in regard it relies on a false supposall as the former did viz. that of necessity by illo die thay day is meant the day of generall iudgment neither doth Mr. White produce any proofe besids his own bare assertion to shew that to be the Apostles meaning nor indeed can he produce any for both the words that day as likwise euen the words the day of our lord doe commonly signifie in scripture and namly 1. Cor. 5. 2. Cor. 1. Philip. 1. 1. Thes 2. as doe * Doctores Rhemenses in Annot a. super cap. 3. Epis 1. ad Cor. obserue Catholicke writers either the particular or generall iudgment And doubtless the mentioned Text of the Apostle is truly very fied in respect of particular judgment where vnto euery man is liable immediatly after his death because euery one shall be iudged in the generall iudgment according to the account he giues after his death at the particular tribunall of diuine Iustice and not only the fauour that a soul findeth in the generall iudgment but also the fauour that it finds at the particular iudgment is called in the scripture mercy both the one and the other being shown vpon the score of good works which proceed from the mercyfull grace of God through the merits of our lord Iesus-Christ Hereby plainly appeareth the vnquietness of Mr. Whits hawty spirite for as much as through a sacrilegious ambition he endeauours to wrest the Apostles words to ouerthrow the common practice of the whole Church of God Moreouer in persuance of his vnquiet ambition he passeth from this scripture-text vnto Church Lyturgies bearing himselfe confident to euidence thereby that the vnanimous consent of antiquitie witnes plainly on his side Let S. Iames be our first witness saith he in his lyturgy of the Hierosolymitan Church be mindfull lord God of the spirits and their bodyes whom we haue commemorated or not commemorated who were orthodox from the iust Abell to this present day Thou grant them there to rest in the region of the liuing in thy kingdom in the delights of paradise And to assure the reader that the Hierosolymitan Church which by origine is the Cheif in as much as she begun from the iust Abell could not exclude any he produceth S. Cyrills testimony for which he citeth his first catechesis next faith S. Cyril for the holy Fathers and Bishops departed and of all vniuersally who are dead from amongst vs. The second witness S. Basils Mass or lyturgy Bee mindfull also of all who haue slept in hope of resurrection vnto life euerlasting The third witnes S. Chrys Mass or lyturgy For the memory and remission of their sins who were the founders of this habitation worthy of eternall memory and all who haue slept in thy communion in the hope of resurrection and life eternall our orthodox Fathers and brethren The fourth witness S. Marks Mass or lyturgy Giue rest our lord our God to the souls of our Fathers and brethren who haue slept in the faith of Christ mindfull of our Ancestours from the begining of the world Fathers Patriarks Prophets Apostles Martyrs Confessors Bishops Saints and iust men all the souls of Those who departed in the faith of Christ and moreouer of those whose memory this day we celebrate and our holy Father Marke the Euangelist to the souls of all these giue rest our supream lord and God in thy holy Tabernacle c. and he concludes saith Mr. White to their souls grant rest and admit them to the kingdom of Heauen The fift witnes S. Greg. the great his lyturgy Remember also o lord thy seruants who haue gone before vs with the sign of faith and now rest in the sleep of peace To them our lord and all that rest in Christ wee beseech the grant a place of ease and light and peace From the witnesses set down Mr. White argueth thus So many Patriarchall Churches continually in their publick lyturgyes beseech God in generall tearmes to giue saluation to all the faithfull departed assigning them a place of ease light and peace and where none is excepted all are included and in our case eminent Saints particularly named we cannot therefore doubt but that prayer was anciently offered for the blessed that is to say we cannot doubt but that the ancient Churches offered prayers for such as departed in the faith of Christ that they might find mercy saluation place of ease light and peace euen after their souls were beatified these aduantages according to Mr. White being the motiues on which ancient Churches grounded their prayers suffrages and sacrifices which they offered for such as were already blessed that they might find mercy place of ease light and peace which implies manifest weakness for he contradicts himselfe since blessedness is a clear sight of God importing of necessity saluation mercy place of ease light and peace Wherfore it seems a strang thing that vpon such premises he should conclude with soe much confidence as if the point were euidently clear that the anciēt lyturgyes acknowleged prayers for the blessed as to procuring them mercy saluation place of ease light and peace besides it s not as to reason consonant that the said lyturgyes should require the prayers and sacrifices of the faithfull on earth for the aduantages of the blessed in Heauen since these (m) As to the Churches lyturgyes it is obseruable 1. That in Saint Iames lyturgy these words are set down Let vs celebrate the memory of the most holy immaculate most glorious Mother of God and euer Virgin Mary and of all the Saints that through their prayers vve may obtaine
mercy Whereby it is euident that the Apostle did not conceiue that our prayers might benefit the Saints vnto the obtaining of mercy or an encrease of glory but that wee might be saued and glorified through their prayers 2. S. Basil in his lyturgy prayeth thus O lord let none of vs receiue the holy body and blood of thy Christ vnto iudgment or condemnation but vnto finding of mercy and grace in the society of all the Saints vvhich haue been pleasing in thy sight Patriarcks Prophets Apostles Euangelists Martyrs Confessors .... specially the holy Immaculate Virgin blessed lady Mother of God through vvhose intercession visit vs o God After the same manner S. Chrys prayeth in his lyturgy but Mr. White conceals these parts of the lyturgyes as all moderne sectaries haue done afore altering the lyturgyes as he doth to proue that souls departed are not translated into Heauen before the generall resurrection Nicolaus Cabasalas a Greek Author who about 300. yeares agoe set forth an exposition of the Greek lyturgy affirms cap. 33. that to offer sacrifice for the Saints is to giue God thanks for them For the Saints saith he the Church offereth this rationall vvorship and honour as a thanks giuing to God and especially for the blessed Mother of God vvho exceeds all others in sanctity from whence he infers that a Preist prays not for the Saints but prayeth them that he may be assisted by them in his prayers And cap. 49. saith expresly that if a Preist should properly pray in the Mass for the Saints it would follow that he should pray for the blessed Virgin who is aboue all intercession and more holy by many degrees then the Apostles themselues Besids in the whole Chapter 49. he impugnes those who taught that a Preist prayeth in the Mass for Saints and shews clearly that the Latin praeposition pro. in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in English for is not alwaies a token of intercession but sometymes of thanksgiuing which he proues euidently enough from the words of the lyturgy Again 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sometymes signifies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in the room of an other so that to offer sacrifice for the Saints may signifie to giue thanks to God in the name or room of the Saints in order to the many graces and benefits which his diuine goodness hath confer'd vpon them And though this Author was a schismatick neuertheless he deliuered plainly the sense of the Greek Church and his authority is warrantable being put with the ancient Fathers lyturgies giue clear euidence of prayers and intercessions made to the blessed Saints for the releife of all the faithfull both liueing and dead that stand charged with any guilt or defiled with any vncleanes Again to shew the extreame wantonnes of Mr. Whites witt in order to singularitie t is certaine that down from the first age of the Church to these times he cannot produce one amongst all the ancient and moderne orthodox writers that interprets the said Masses or liturgyes in his sense to wit of prayers and sacrifices offered for the aduantage of the blessed these hauing noe need in regard they are satiated with the plenty of the house of God satisfyed with the fountaine of life conforted with the son of light and inebriated with euerlasting pleasurs Psal 35. wherby t is euidently manifest that although blessed Saints be commemorated in the lyturgyes of the Church and the August sacrifice of Christs precious body and blood is said to be offered for them Neuertheless it is neuer said or meant that such commemorations and offerings were done to benefit them and indeed to offer the Churches sacrifices for the ancient Fathers Patriarcks Prophets Apostles Euangelists Martyrs according to the approued interpretation of all orthodox writers is thereby to celebrate their memory vnto honoring and reuerencing them and to beseech God that through their prayers and intercessions he will heare our prayers and supplications We all saith S. Cyrill Hierosoll catechesi 5. mystigogica where he explaines the words of the Greeke lyturgy beseech thee and offer vnto thee this sacrifice in commemoration euen of those who are dead from amongst vs. First of the Patriarcks Apostles Martyrs that God through their intercessions may receiue our prayers After the same manner speaks S. Austin in his 17. Sermon vpon the words of the Apostle 'T is saith he the practice and custome of the Church which the faithfull know that when martyrs are commemorated at the Altar of God we pray not for them but for the rest commemorated which are dead from amongst vs wee doe pray because it is an iniurie to pray for a Martyr to whose prayers we ought to be recommended Hereby is further euidenced that albeit the lyturgyes especially some of those which Mr. White alledges on his side seem to direct the suffrages of the Church wherof the sacrifice of the Altar is Cheife euen to the helping of such as be departed in the faith of Christ rest in peace and are counted for eminent Saints already Howeuer that seeming apparence ought to be ascribed to the intricacy of the lyturgyes wherin words and sentences are obscurly set down and the meaning of the Church thereby is to be vnderstood in order only to such faithfull departed as haue need of helpe Wherfore S. Tho. supp q. 71. art 8. teacheth that the blessed Saints in regard they haue full enioyment of all things in as much as they are satisfied with the fatnes of the house of God haue noe need of the Churches suffrages and S. Cyrill Cateches afore mentioned where he explicats the words of the Greek lyturgy writeth thus We pray to God for the common peace of the Church for the tranquility of the whole world for kings for souldiers for the sick for the afflicted in sum for all which haue need of help Which shows euidently enough that the ancient Churches neuer offered their suffrages for the helping of the blessed Saints that suffer nothing of want But lord God what crafty dealings Mr. White vseth to bring the stream of Church lyturgyes to run on his side some words he cuts of others cites amiss and especially omits what concernes the B. Mother of God as likwise the ad dresses the Church maks to the Saints of God for helpe through their supplications and intercessions besides to proue more particularly that S. Iames lyturgy of the Hierosolomitan Church allows of prayer for the benefit of the dead vniuersally in as much as it saith be mindfull lord God of the spirits and their bodyes whom we haue commemorated or not commemorated who were orthodox from the iust Abell to this present day Mr. White addeth these words But let vs consider more particularly the point of praying for the blessed the Hierosolymitan Church is by origine the Chief the begining from the iust Abell cannot certainely be supposed to exclude any and S. Cyril the Heire of S. lames in his first Catechesis will assure vs she
hereticall interpretations Howeuer an answer shall of Mr. Whits proofes To wit nor is it saith he infrequent among the pious when they name a Saint or Martyr to adde whose glory God increase Hereby Mr. white either means essentiall or accidentall glory if he vnderstand an increase of essentiall glory in order to the intensnes therof he teacheth an heresy for the Church of God ascribes such an increase of blessednes * Concil Flor. in dee vnionis desinit animas beatorū videre clarè Deum sicut◠est sed alian◠alia perfectius pro diuersitate meritorum Et definitum est sess 6. can 32. iustificatum bonis operibus augmētum gratiae mereri ita profit entur veteres Patres Et ratio distributiua iustitiae exigit vt plus merenti maior reddatur morces to the Saints own merits and not to the prayers of their friends according to that saying of the Apostle 2. Cor. 9. He that soweth sparingly reapes alsoe sparingly and he that soweth liberally shall reap also liberally and indeed it is the proprietie of distributiue iustice to better the reward in order to such as deserue better and God compenseth the merits of his faithfull according to destributiue iustice but if Mr. White vnderstand an increase of accidentall glory either in order to speciall reuelations of mysteries whereof the Saints were ignorant afore or in order to a greater measure of honour and reuerence from the faithfull aliue that makes nothing to his purpose and in that sense may be meant that saying (n) According to the Roman Catholick Church a Priest preparing himselfe to say Mass prayeth thus I vill say Muss and offer in saecrifice the body and blood of our lord Iesus Christ to the prayse of God and the vvhole triumphant Court Now if by praying soe he prayeth for the blessed he prayeth for God also being he promiseth therby to offer sacrifice to the praise of both in cosequence of which S. Paul likwise 1. Tim. 1. prayed for God when he said vnto the king of vvorlds immortall inuisible sole God be bonour and glory for euer and euer amen But were it not an extream madness to think that S. Paul by praying so conceiued that he might bring vnto God an encrease of glorie Howeuer Mr. White will needs haue the words of the prayers set down in the Roman lyturgie after the offertorie Receiue vvhat vve offer to the honour of thy Saints c. to proue it lawfull to pray for Saints that thereby they may find mercy and encrease of glory But S. Thomas 3. p. q. 71. art 8. in resp ad 1. obiec saith that when we celebrate the feasts of Saints their glory is not augmented by that solemnity but we receiue greate benefit thereby and euen so saith he when we giue praise to God we and not God receiue benefit thereby from the premises clearly appeares how vnaduisedly Mr. White in the 3. account of the midle state of souls alleageth S. Greg. to proue that the blessed receiue encrease of glory through the prayers of the faithfull liuing Sed mira sunt qua docet Albius noua sunt mira stupemus noua cauemus Aug. l. 3. con Iulia. Whose glory God encrease and after that sense Christians pray Glory be to the Father to the son and to the holy Ghost Amen CHAR. XXIJ. OF FOVNDAMENTALL AND NOT foundamentall Articles of faith T' Is a moderne distinction that was ingeniously contriu'd by (a) Marke Anthony de Dominis Arch-Bishop of Spalatto became an Apostate fled out of Italy into England in the Reign of king Iames of happy memory and taught that a Christian might be saued in any sect professing the foundamentall Articles of Christian faith as for example said he euery one may attaine vnto saluation either by adhering to S. Thomas doctrine or the doctrine of Scotus Marke Anthony de Dominis Arsh-Bishop of Spalatto and brought into the Protestant Church in order to the said Churches claim vnto as to foundamentall and disclaim from the Roman Church as to not foundamentall Articles of faith that is as to errours in order to such Articles of faith as may be denyed without hurt of faith and loss of saluation though sufficiently propounded in regard whereof they beare the name of not foundamentall * Protestātes communiter constituunt hocdiscrimen inter fundamentales non fundamentales quod scilicet damnabile sit ab illis dissentire cū sufficienter proponūtur non item dissentire à nō fundamentalibus dum sufficienter proponūtur vt vniuersalitatem amplitudinē suae Ecclesiae estendant as disinct frō foundamētals which cā not be reiected without incurring both loss of faith and saluation in consequence wherof Protestans of theses dayes commonly represent the Roman Church as a naturall body that is partly sound and partly vnsound infected with sundry soares and vlcers which is to say that although the Roman Church hath continued alwaies sound at heart hauing neuer deuiated from the true doctrin of Christ as to foundamentall requisits vnto saluation neuertheless she still retaines sundry errours in order to not foundamentall requisits which they pretend to haue purged away and therby make their Church to be the same with the Roman Church as to the sound part therof Marke Antony de Dominis saw a necessity of inuesting the Protestant Church with visible existence least it might appeare to haue perished afore and with perpetuall succession of Pastors and Teachers these being of necessary vse in the gouernment therof for as much as they be essentially required to the professing of faith preaching the diuine word instructing the illiterat and administring the Sacraments which functions could neuer haue been performed if the Church of God wherof these be necessary markes had been inuisible and therby destitute of Pastors for the work of the ministery wherfore to fit vnto the Protestant Church visible existence and a series of Pastors and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from the Apostls he aduiced such as carried on the Protestant Reformation not to quitte all claim to the Roman Church without which visible existence and perpetuall succession of their Church had been impossible since no one society of Christian belieuers appeared vpon earth when the Protestant Reformation begun that was seperated from the Church of Rome Again he saw that by asserting the Romā Church to haue in all times reserued necessary requisits vnto saluation that is foundamentall Articles of faith it might seem as to reason consonant that the Protestants departure from it had been without cause and thereby they as to reason might be counted guilty * Secundum Aug. l. 1. con Epis Parm. cap. 4. schisma omnia scelera supergreditur of deadly schism for going out from and breaking vnity and communion with a Church wherin if they had continued they might haue attained vnto saluation therfore to escape this rock he aduiced again that Protestants should represent the Roman Church