substance with the Creed for so all Creeds and Confessions of Faith if true might be called the Apostles Creed nay the Scripture of the New Testament contains nothing else in Substance the Apostles Creed is that only which is delivered in this Forme and in these wordes which distinguish it from all other Creeds If any now among us who receive it as framed by the Apostles should even for explication or under any other pretence offer to alter the least word or tittle we should count it and that justly high Presumption and Sacriledge and should not esteem it so altered though containing nothing but Truth to be the Apostles Creed Answ The fore-cited places of Scripture evince thus much that a Forme containing the Heads of Religion was delivered not after but before the New Testament was written for else the New Testament could not have born witnesse of it Now the Church saith the Apostles Creed is that Forme for she hath delivered us none other nor entitled any other to the Apostles name in any age past therefore let the Objectours either produce another or subscribe to the Churches Testimony The like Argument may be urged touching any Book of Scripture As for Instance Antiquity tels us that S. Paul wrote an Epistle to the Romans the Church tels us that the Epistle we now have so entitleed is that Epistle and none other therefore if any man will doubt of or deny it let him ether shew another Epistle which S. Paul wrote to the Romans or accept this upon the Church's word As for what the Expositours say on the fore-alleaged Places of Scripture hath been already shewen Those Principles mentioned Heb. 6. 1 2. are some of them Practicall Heads of Christianity which were taught the Catechumeni together with the Creed and because Practicall Points not included in it the Creed being composed for a Summary of pure Doctrinals yet they all refer to the Tenth Article of the Creed namely to Remission of sinnes Repentance as the Antecedent or preparative Baptisme as the outward means and Imposition of Hands in Confirmation as the Complement or Perfection thereof As for other Summaries of Faith they cannot be either so truely or so properly called the Apostles Creed because they want the Attestation of the Church which never acknowledged them for such though otherwise perhaps in substance they agree with it as Paraphrases or parts thereof The New Testament containes many things besides the fundamentall Articles of Beleefe as smaller Doctrinall Points Evangelicall Rules of Practice matters of History Disputes Prophecies c. All extra Fidem besides the Creed the Forme and wordes whereof were delivered by the Apostles as well as the Heads and Substance of the Faith though some now doubt which they were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in expresse wordes As for explicating or altering the Creed we may safely paraphrase or comment on it now though not alter the Text thereof in wordes or sense because it hath been delivered to us totidem verbis by a confest evident Tradition of above 1200 years as the Oppugners of its Authors are forced to yeeld Before it was thus setled there was more liberty of expression because diverse Churches somewhat varied the Forme by reason of succresent Heresis but now it hath triumphed over all and is long agoe setled in full possession of the Christian Faith Besides in all those former variations though the Forme was changed in some few Particulars yet the heads or Articles of Beleefe continued the same It was not therefore sufficient for any confession of Faith to gaine the Title of the Apostles Creed in that it contained nothing but Truth CAP. IV. Testimonies concerning the Creed and the composure thereof by the Apostles taken out of the Greeke Fathers who beare witnesse for the Easterne Churches Some objections against these Authorities partly answered partly prevented YOU have seene what light the Holy Scripture gives us concerning this Creed of the Apostles but this Truth will be farther cleered and confirmed by the concordant Testimonies of the Fathers and most of those the most ancient for Time as living neerest the age of the Apostles and the most venerable for Authority who therefore may best be credited in this matter and well speake for the rest Now in reciting their Testimonies when I produce some of them who in their writings set downe the Creed or Rule of Faith not agreeing totidem verbis expressely in every word and tittle with that which the Church now receives for the Apostles I shall desire my Reader to take notice of these three things 1. First that diverse of the Fathers writing against the Heretickes of their Times mentiond only or chiefly those Articles which were then cald in question by those against whom they wrote whence it is that they doe not alwaies set the Creed downe whole and entire which by the way may well be one Reason why the Article of Christs descent into Hell was omitted in many latter Creeds because never question'd by any of the Hereticks of those dayes The same reason induced the Nicene Fathers to proceed no farther in their Creed than this Article in Spiritum Sanctum And I believe in the Holy Ghost although the old Creed was larger as will appeare more fully in what I shall produce hereafter namely because the Arian controversy required no more 2. Secondly That the Fathers maine care in setting down this Rule of faith was to keep themselves to the same Heads or Articles of the Creed giving themselves somtimes liberty to vary words phrases whence it is that though they alwayes set downe the Creed wheresoever they mention it as the only necessary unchangeable Rule of faith the immoveable Basis of Christianity the distinctive 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or assured marke of a true orthodoxe Christian contradistinguishing him to Pagans Jewes and Hereticks yet somtimes as learned Discoursers they enlarge the parts of the Creed by way of Paraphrase otherwhiles as short Comprisers thereof they contract the sum of it into fewer words according as they saw cause or had occasion offered So Tertullian though he lay downe this for a ground that Regula fidei una omninò est sola immobilis irreformabilis The Rule of faith is only one soley immoveable and umchangeable De Virg. vel chap. 1. Yet whereas he thrise rehearseth it in three severall Tracts he never useth the same words exactly but varyeth his expression now extending now contracting it at pleasure Besides there is an other reason why some of the Creeds end with the Article of the Holy Ghost viz because the four following Articles are virtually included in it which appeares by S. Chrysostomes first Homily on the Creed as shall be shewen by and by As for us of this Age we are not unjustly abridged the like liberty in varying of words or phrases First because these are suspected times wherein the very Grounds of Faith are by many very doubtfully held and by
Division become none as a great entire streame looseth it self and is quite dried up when parted into severall small Channels Now that this day is neere approaching these sad Prognosticks tell us especially the latter wherewith the present Age so greivously labours all which mischeife both heretofore arose amongst us and now tyrannizeth over us for want of a sure Rule or Ground of faith rightly understood and applied The holy Scripture indeed is an aboundantly sufficient Ground of our Beleife and Rule of manners but being exposed as now adayes it is to every mans private Fancy the Glosse too too oft wyer-drawes and corrupts the Text so that we look upon Gods word through a false-coloured Glasse Pretences of a private Spirit and enthusiasticall Revelations with the Anabaptist of right Reason with the Sosinian which is as diverse in men as their fancies or faces make what they please of Scripture and force it to speak their mind thus by perverting it to their own sense they are not judged by but judge the Law and become as S. James in a like Case saith James 4. 11. Not Doers or Beleevers of the Law but Judges The Apostles those renowned Patriarchs of the Christian faith foreseing this evill left us a double Remedy both by Tradition preserved in the Church to be delivered down unto all Ages from hand to hand viz. a Rule or Ground of faith and the exposition or right applying of this Rule The Ground or Rule in the Creed composed by themselves as a Summary of the points of Faith which lie dispersedly here and there in the large volume of the Scriptures The undoubted Exposition and right applying of this Rule they have left us in the writings of the Fathers who were their Successours to whose care and custody they not only committed the Oracles of God in writing and the Creed by word of mouth but the interpretation also of both as they heard them expounded from their own mouthes whil'st they lived and preached amongst them for in vaine had the Apostles given them the words if they had not given them the sense withall whereby to stop the mouthes of Hereticks who arose even at the first preaching of the Gospell as we may see in S. Pauls Epistles This orthodoxe sense is that which is so frequently mentioned in the writings of the Ancient Fathers under the name of Depositum Catholica seu Apostolica Traditio fides Ecclesiae and the like expressions and which Tertullian makes use of to confound the whole Hydra of Heresies in his Book De Praeser adu Haeret. bidding the Hereticks goe to those mother-Churches which the Apostles founded and personally resided in and to which they committed the true genuine Faith where saith he yee shall heare no newes of your upstart heterodoxe Doctrines invented by yourselves wherewith this proud factious Generation infested the Church and led away after them many seduced Proselytes Of this Tradition S. Paul speaks to his Disciple Timothy whom he had left behind him as his Deputy at Ephesus The things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses the same commit thou to faithfull men who shall be able to teach others also 2 Tim 2. 2. And to the Church of Thessalonica Brethren stand fast and hold the Traditions which yee have bin taught whether by word or our Epistle 2 Thes 2. 15. comp v. 5. 6. Observe here the cunning of Satan whereby in all Times but especially in these last and worst he makes way by these his fore-runners for the comming of that great Anti-christ He hath set men on work under pretence of honouring Scripture as the sole Al-sufficient Rule of Faith and of withdrawing themselves from all dangerous Dependance on mens erroneous judgments seeing every man is a liar wholy referring and submitting themselves to the Holy Ghost to be enlightened guided and directed by him some to render suspected others by degrees to enervate and secretly subvert a third sort openly to decry the judgment and Decisions of the Church in the Councils and Fathers when in the interim they are grossly and willingly ignorant that what they denie to Her they ascribe to themselves strongly and confidently asserting that to be the sole meaning of the Holy Ghost which agrees with their opinions confirmes their fore-received Tenents and favours their Side and Faction Now let all the world judge if it will be but an indifferent Arbiter whether it be not more equall to be judged in point of Religion by reverend Antiquity then by upstart giddy Novelty By the Consent of so many Auncient Worthies who living long before our Times are uninteressed and disengaged in our Quarrels then by the partiall Determinations of men educated in and addicted to a Faction By the joynt consent of many then the singular opinion of some one By men eminent for Learning who therefore well could not and for Piety who therefore would not deceive us then by the conceited Ignorance and factious spirit of some proud Novellist start up in this declining wicked Atheisticall Age By those who lived neerest the Apostles Times when the Church was one undevided into Greeke and Latine Romish and Reformed Lutheran and Calvinian when Tradition was fresh and uncorrupted like a streame running pure neere the Fountaine-head which afterwards gathered Dreggs by running farther into the more remote and succeeding Ages then by the Schismatical Directions of latter degenerate corrupt Times Lastly which is farre the most effectuall Argument by those who as they had newly received so constantly unanimously and uncorruptly held the Doctrinall Traditions of the Apostles the genuine sense of Scripture which they themselves left behind them who left the Scripture it selfe then to pinne our Religion upon the sleeves of some Idolized Innovatour who though he pretend the Authority of Gods Word an unerring spirit or the cleare inducements of Reason yet in truth hath nothing but Impudence and his Ipse dixit to maintaine his Assertions This Tradition it is which made the Auncient Bishops and Doctors of the Primitive Church so unanimous among themselves in what Part of the World soever they lived as having the same Deliverers of it who planted all those Churches wherein they succeeded and so taught in all as who received it from the same spirit who received it from the same Christ who received it from the same God the Father as Tertullian deduceth its Pedegree out of St Iohns Gospel Ch. 16. 13. 14 and Ch. 8. 28. Else if they had followed their own private judgements they must needs have often varied in their Determinations Hence it is that they make a great Distinction betweene what they received and published to the world as Depositaries Witnesses Historians and what Expositions or Conclusions they drew from their owne Braines as being their private Opinions in the latter they leave every man to his owne Censure and Judgment to receive or reject them as they find them Consonant to Scripture Antiquity and right Reason but
the Diuids of Pythagoras Socrates c but what we find written I Answer The Creed is best preserved by Tradition for the sense and substance of the Articles because daily in publike use in the Catechumen's mouthes and the Liturgies of the Church yet subject to variation in point of expression by reason of severall Tongues and Dialects in the Christian World as also because of some exegeticall Additions interserted upom occasion of some particular Heresies which arose in this or that Church So Lawes are best preserved by continued Practise though somewhat varying if received in diverse Nations as the Romane Lawes are in some specialty of expression or by way of application to the exigence of the Times and Genius of the People in diverse Countries As for the dependance of Tradition it relies not only upon Memory but upon continuall use and Practise a better means of Preservation then Writing which is daily subject to the fraud negligence and ignorance of Transcribers many differences arising from whence have raised no small trouble unto Learned Criticks how to reconcile them or if irreconcileable to descerne the true Copie The Hebrew Bible was preserved entire in the true reading thereof as being constantly used in the Jewish Synagogues without any Points or Vowels written as now we have it and that for many hundred yeares according to the most received Opinion a Thinge infinitely more difficult then the Preservation of the Creed Wherefore we may not without Reason say that a short Summary of the Faith such as the Creed is is best kept by Tradition especially such an one as is in continuall use and Practise whereof the Fathers here cited give us good reason in summe that Non sunt evulganda fidei mysteria nisi Initiatis Magistro Duce seu Interprete ne sc derisui Profanis habeantur aut malignantium Calumniis paâ—eant ne erroneis Ignorantium aut male feriantium glossematis obiiciantur The whole Word of God was committed to writing because large and full of Variety yet occasionally and by Degrees The like may be said of the many long various Discourses of Pythagoras and Socrates committed to Paper by their Schollers Our Saviours Sermons and Discourses were oft very large his Miracles and memorable passages of his Life almost infinite and so could not otherwise be well preserved then by Writing yet Irenaeus tels us that many Christian Nations had no Scripture amongst them in his Time who notwithstanding kept Christianity diligently amongst them by an old Tradition And on the other side the Fathers tell us that where the Scriptures were to be had the Hereticks oft set forth unsound Books under the Apostles names and corrupted the true Copies of Scripture which they got into their Hands by this means seducing many troubling more to neither of which inconveniences a knowne practised breife Tradition is obnoxious As for the doctrine of the Druids it was carefully preserved as long as the Religion stood by an unwritten Tradition now Christianity hath a promise of continuance unto the end of the world Mat. 28. 20. so needs no more to feare a failing of its doctrine then its Disciples If it be farther objected that all in generall are commanded to confesse Christ and to give an account of the hope that is in them 1 Pet. 3. 15. which seems to make against the second Reason assigned by Cyril of Ierusalem That the Creed was of old committed to writing by Irenaeus Tertullian that when these Reasons and exhortations were made by Ruffin Cyril and Chrysologus the Creed was committed to writing both by themselves and others I answer first that those Precepts belong properly to Christians that is to Persons entered into the Church by Baptisme who had the whole Creed explained unto them but if they extend to the Catechumeni the Confession and Account must be understood more indefinitely and at large to wit of those more easie and generall Principles whereof they were informed by their Teachers Secondly the Creed is therefore call'd a Tradition because not committed to writing by the Apostles as the Gospell and Epistles were though in after Ages it were put in writing by the Fathers and Councills for the more publike Conviction of Hereticks Yet it clearly appeares by the fore-cited Fathers who cannot well be thought ignorant of the Churches custome in their own Times that the Creed was not delivered in writing to the Catechumeni but taught them by word of mouth to learne and professe this teaching or delivery not without an explication of the Catechist or Bishop least otherwise they might chance to erre in the meaning withall it was not delivered all together but line after line as they were able to receive it CAP. III. Testimonies of Scripture touching the Composure of the Apostles Creed especially out of S. Pauls Epistles as the places are accordingly interpreted by Divines of good note both Auncient and Moderne Some doubts against these Testimonies solved THUS much for the History of the Creeds Composure and its manner of Conveyance to after Ages But that the Apostles did first Compile and then deliver this Creed by an orall Tradition to the Christian Church will need farther Confirmation I shall endeavour to prove it by Scripture Antiquity and Reason all which I hope will be found to attest this Truth as joynt-witnesses of what hath bin already produced out of Ruffinus And first by Scripture for though the Creed be not expresly set down in any place of the New Testament because the Apostles for the foremention'd reasons thought not good to commit it unto writing yet S. Paul in diverse places of his Epistles not obscurely alludes unto it under severall phrases of speech apt metaphours which we find afteward applied to the Creed by the auncient Fathers as they may be most probably interpreted are so understood de facto by the judgment of good Authors both of the Primitive and latter Times 1. First Rom. 6. 17. The Apostle tels us of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That Forme of Doctrine and expressly cals it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Tradition as the Ancients constantly stile the Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ye have obeyed from the Heart that Forme of Doctrine which was delivered you that is whereas before Baptisme ye were the Servants of Sinne now now yee have professed your obedience to the Faith by the publike rehearsall of the Creed delivered to the Church in a set Forme by the Apostles to be openly recited before the Congregation at the time of Baptisme a Custome used from the Beginning and still retained in the Church Thus is the place expounded by Anselme our Learned and Renowned Archbishop of Canterbury Quae doctrina est Forma quia imaginem Dei deformatam restituit which Doctrine saith he is stiled a Forme because it restores the defaced Image of God to wit by Baptisme which the Apostle elsewhere calls The Laver of
some cal'd in question Secondly because the Forme is now on all hands confessedly ancient fully setled and strictly enjoyned for so many Ages whereas the Fathers lived in a Time when severall Churches used to vary in the expression of severall Articles and they themselves were knowne Champions of the Faith against the Heretickes which then a rose The case is much the same in the number of Canonicall Bookes which is now a like aknowledged by all and entirely setled at leastwise in those of the New Testament but not so heretofore Or in the Translations of the Bible which every one at the first who had some skill in the Greek Tongue tooke upon him to performe as S. Aug tells us Doct Christ lib 2. cap 12. Yet it is Prudence in the Church to tie her children ordinarily to the use of one translation now though not debarring the learneds recourse unto the Originals when as there are so many Divisions Opinions Suspicions Controversies about matter of Religion and such a multitud of Schismes thence arising which might be probably continued and increased by such a promiscuous license Thirdly that the Fathers in their Catechisticall Paraphrases on the Creed which they made to the Catechumeni before they were admitted unto Baptisme somtimes intermixed matter of a diverse kind viz. Practicall Heads or Points of Christianity equally necessary for the instructioÌ„ of their Auditours so doth Cyril of Jerusalem in his Catacheses And in their other Tracts wherin they dogmatically explain it they ofteÌ„ adde some exegeticall Particles against the Hereticks of those dayes the more clearly to confute them and forearme their Disciples against their poysonous doctrines so some of the Easterne Churches in the First Article of the Creed added these two Attributes by way of exposition to God the Father viz. Invisible and Impassible thus contradistinguishing God the Father to God the Sonne and contradistinguishing themselves to the Sabellians and Patri-passians who confounded the two Persons Yet notwithstanding all these seeming Differences the indifferent Reader will easily find that the aforesayd Symboles or Rules of Faith which they set downe in their writings doe plainly relate to this Creed of the Apostles First because they affirme that they received them from the Apostles whereas no Creed ever bore their name but this one which the Church now acknowledgeth under that Title Secondly because they use the same method in setting downe the Articles and commonly they make use of the same words This premised I come now to set downe their Authorities in order as they lie begining with the most ancient and so descending to latter times And first of the Greeke Fathers who shew what Rule of Faith was received in the Churches of the East These witnesses are eight in number viz. Thaddaeus cited by Eusebius Ignatius Origen Marcellus of Ancyra S. Basil the Great Gregory Nyssen Cyril of Jerusalem and S. Chrysostome 1. Eusebius in his Ecclesiasticall History lib. 1. cap. 13. speaking of the History of our Saviour and Abagarus King of Edessa tels us how Thaddaeus one of our Saviours Disciples being sent to the King after his Ascension was desired by him to relate the History of the Power and comming of his Master to which he replyed that for the present he desired to keepe silence but on the morrow when the King should have caused a publicke Assembly of his People he would then at large discourse upon these following Heads which are the Articles of the Creed concerning our Saviour touching whom only the King wisht him to discourse namely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Where we have these Articles 1. Christs Birth or Incarnation exprest under the name of his Comming and being Sent of the Father answerable to the Scripture language Act. 7. 52. Joh. 17. 3. 2. His Sufering Crucifying and Death 3. His Descent into Hell an Article now so much questioned amplyfied with this circumstance that hee broke in sunder that Hedge mound or Partitian-wall which had of old seperated us from the Communion and Priviledge of the People of God Eph. 2. 14. 4. His rising againe from the Dead amplyfied with the circumstance of raising other Dead with him who had slept in their graves for many Ages for which see Mat. 27. 52 53. 5. His Ascension unto his Father amplyfied with the circumstance of a great multitude which ascended up with him wheras he descended alone which great multitude may be understood either of those Saints whom he raised up with himselfe having rescued them from the power of Death wherof the Devil is the Prince see Col. 2. 15. Heb. 2. 14. Rev. 1. 18. Or rather of the Angels who waited upon him in his triumphant Ascension into Heaven Psal 24. 7 8. And 68. 17 18. Heb. 1. 6 7. And 2. 5 9. As for his Descent into Hell Christ only is mentioned in it not any that bore him company thither for which see Act. 2. 29 31. Esa 63. 1 3. Whence he thus bespeakes the Thiefe upon the Crosse To day shalt thou be with me in Paradise not To day thou shalt descend with me into Hell But if any make doubt of the truth of this story wherin Eusebius brings in Thaddaeus rehearsing these Articles of the Creed I shall desire them impartially to consider that it was found by him in the Records of the Citty Edessa where this Thaddaeus Preached and translated by the same Eusebius out of the Syriaâ—k tongue wherin it was originally written as being the language of that City into Greek according to what he there sets downe thus Eusebius in that place expresly tels us Now what better proofe can we reasonably desire of an historicall Passage than the Publick Records of that place where the Thing was done And what better witnesse of those Records then he that saw them and copied out the originall with his owne hand 2. Ignatius that famous Martyr and Patriarch of Antioch contemporary to the Apostls having occasion to confute som Hereticks of those Times who perverted the true Faith concerning our Saviour thus layes downe the Articles of the Creed which concerne him by way of an Antidote against this poyson of theirs In his Epistle to the Church of the Magnesians thus I desire saith he that ye may have the full knowledg of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Then in his Epistle to the Church of Tralles he sets downe the same Articles in like words which will not be unworthy our comparing Stop your ears saith he when any one speakes to you excluding Jesus Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Compare these to gither and they present us with these Articles which touch our Saviour 1. That he is the Sonne of God begotten of the Father before all Worlds 2. That he was borne in time of the Virgin Mary without the company of man borne truly of the Virgin as as he was begotten of God but not in like manner God and Man being of diverse natures 3. That he suffered was crucifyed died under
Pontius Pilate 4. That he descended into Hell and rose againe after three Dayes 5. That he ascended up to his Father into Heaven and sitteth on his right Hand 6. That he shall come at the end of the world to judge both the quicke and the dead and to render to every man according to his workes But because the doctrine of the Trinity lies more implicitely couched in the Creed he expresseth it more at large in his Epistle to the Church of Philippi in these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is There are not three Fathers nor three Sons nor three Comforters but one Father and one Son and one comforter wherfore the Lord sending his Apostles to teach all Nations commanded them to Baptize in the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the Holy Ghost not into one with three names or into three made man but into the name of three of the same Dignity for one of them only was made man not the Father nor the Comforter but the Sonne alone and that not in opinion or appearance but in Truth If any one question the truth of these Epistles out of which I have produced these passages whether they were written by Ignatius or no I shall desire him as well to disprove as to deny for Else nothing of Antiquity which agrees not with every on s fancy shall escape the note of Bastardy I am sure the Epistle to the Church of Tralles out of which I cited the Articles of the Creed which concerne our Saviour agreeing in substance method and very much in words with the forme we now have is acknowledged for the genuine Epistle of Ignatius not only by Eusebius and St Jerome of old by Maestreus a D. of the Sorbon of late but also by Rivet Videlius two protestant Divines who have narrowly examined the Epistles which are entitled to him purged them of what they suspected as asciticious If any would know more of this Ignatius his Antiquity and Esteeme in the Church which may as well establish as ennoble whatsoever he shall testify in this or any other Particular I shall refer him to Nicephorus Eccles Hist lib. 2. cap. 35. Where he expressly tels us that he was that very child whom we find mentioned Mat. 18. 3. Whom our Blesed Saviour set in the midst of his Disciples as a Patterne of Humility he therefore styles him in the same Place 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is One Taken by Christ borne in his Armes which Relation seemes to give light unto that Title of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the same Ignatius cōstantly assumes to himself in the Front of his Epistles as a peculiar Epithete wherby he specificates himselfe endears his Person to the Churches his Age well accords to the story so doth that passage of his in his Epistle to the Church of Smyrna 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 After the resurrection saith he I saw Christ in body and believe that he remaines so for so not only Maestreus translats it vidi and understands the word of a corporall vision in the presence of our Saviour but Videlius also in his Edition both cōsonantly to Jeron in Ca. Ep. in Dial. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before them Eus l. 3. 30. as I find thē cited And therfore as I conceive the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ought not be takē in an Active sence Deum ferens i in pectore vel mente accoding to that of Damascene speaking of the Greeke Fathers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but in a Passive Borne in Christs armes or led by his hand for though I deny not that the Ancient Fathers of the Church may in a good pious sense be called by succeeding writers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â Deo inflati though inspired by God in a far lower Degree then the Prophets and Apostles yet for Ignatius himselfe to assume the Speciall style of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one divinly inspired as a distinctiue Character severing him from and exalting him above his fellow-Byshops might be not undeservedly censured of Arrogancy a vice which he was least guilty of as appeares by severall pasages in his Epistles Origen in the Proeme of his Bokes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated out of the Greeke by Ruffinus thus informes us Cum seruetur ecclesiastica Praedicatio per successionis ordinem ab Apostolis tradita usque ad praesens in Ecclesiis permanens illa sola credenda est veritas quae in nullo ab Ecclesiasticâ discordat Traditione Illud tamen scire oportet quoniam Sancti Apostoli Fidē Christi Praedicantis de quibusdam quidem quaecunque necessaria crediderunt omnibus credentibus etiam his qui pigriores erga inquisitionem divinae scientiae videbantur manifestissimè tradiderunt Species verò eorum quae per praedicationem Apostolicam manifestè traduntur istae sunt Primo quod unus est Deus qui omnia creavit atque composuit quique ex nullis fecit esse universa quod hic Deus in novissimis diebus sicutper Prophetas suos ante promiserat misit Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum Tum deinde quia Jesus Christus ipse qui venit ante omnem creaturam natus ex patre est qui cum in omnium conditione Patri ministrasset per ipsum enim omnia facta sunt novissimis temporibus seipsum exaniniens homo factus est incarnatus est cum Deus esset Homo mansit quod Deus erat corpus assumpsit nostro corpori simile eo solo differens quod natum ex virgine de Spiritu Sancto est quod hic Jesus Christus natus passus sit in veritae non per imaginem communem hanc mortem verè mortuus est verè enim a mortuis resurrexit post resurrectionem conversatus cum Discipulis suis assumptus est Tum deinde Honore ac Dignitate Patri ac filio sociatum tradiderunt Spiritum sanctum erit tempus resurrectionis mortuorum cum corpus hoc quod in corruptione seminatur surget in incorruptione quod seminatur in ignominiâ surget in gloriâ quod mundus iste factus sit a certo Tempore caeperit pro ipsa sui corruptione solvendus esse Angelos Dei quosdam virtutes bonas quae ei ministrent ad Salutem hominum consummandam Then he ads as the fundamentall principle of all ad extra Quod per Spiritum sanctum Scripturae conscriptae sint The summe of what he saith for he paraphrastically enlargeth some points is this The Doctrine of the Church being successively derived from the Apostles and abiding till that present in the Churchees that only is to be credited as a Truth which in nothing differs from that Eclesiasticall Tradition withall that the Holy Apostles preaching the Faith of Christ most clearly delivered to all Beleevers even to the more dull and simple whatsoever Points they conceived necessary for them the Particular Heads whereof were these which follow
being indeed the Articles of the Creed viz That there is but one God who made all things of nothing That this God sent his Sonne our Lord Jesus Christ begotten of the Father before every Creature by whom all Creatures were made He was incarnate and made man assuming a Body like in all things to us but that it was borne of the Virgin being conceived by the Holy Ghost He truly Dyed not in apearance the comon death of all men for he truly rose againe Having converst with his Disciples after his Resurrection he was taken up into Heaven That the Holy Ghost is associate with the Father and Sonne in the same Honor and Dignity there shall be a time for the Resurrection of the Dead when this body which is sowne in corruption shall rise in incorruption and that which is sowne in dishonor shall rise in glory This world was made and had a certaine time of begining and by reason of ' its corruptability shall be at length dissolved That there are certain Angels of God and good spirits which minister unto him in procuring the salvation of man kind He adds at last an other Traditionall Foundation viz. That the Scriptures were written by the Holy Ghost After all he concluds oportet igitur velut elementis ac fundamentis hujusmodi uti That we ought to make use of these as the first Elemens and Grounds of Christian Religion which he accordingly explaines at large in those foure bookes of his entituled therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Principles of Christianity a worke fit for his office of Catachist which he bore for many years in the Church of Alexandria 4. Marcellus Bishope of Ancyra in Gallatia fellowsuferer with the great Athanasius being accused by the Arians of Sabellianisme as Athanasius also was and by their means expeld his Bishoprick flies unto Iulius Bishope of Rome for succour and having long there in vaine expected his adversaries comming by confronting of whom he desired to have accquitted himselfe at length weary of longer stay he takes his leave of Iulius and leaves behind him an Epistle wherein he makes this Profession of Faith exceeding conformable to that of the Apostles as we read it at this Day 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is I Believe in God Almighty and in Jesus Christ his only-begotten Sonne our Lord conceived by the Holy Ghost and borne of the Virgin Mary crucifyed under Pontius Pilate and buried the third Day he rose againe from the Dead he ascended into the Heavens and sitteth at the right hand of the Father whence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead And I believe in the Holy Ghost the Holy Church the forgivenesse of sinnes the resurrection of the Body the Life Everlasting But this is not all to shew that this Creed was not of his own framing a little after he subjoynes these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Having received this Faith from the holy Scriptures and being taught it of my spirituall Progenitors or Divine Ancestors I both Preach it in the Church of God and have now wrote it unto thee O Iulius This Epistle with the foresaid Creed inclosed we find recorded by Epiphanius in his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haeres 72. Now whom doth Marcellus meane by his Progenitors or Ancestors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to or in God Sure he understands either his Godfathers at the Font or the Bishops of the Church by whom he was instructed in the Ancient Faith Or lastly which seemes to me most probable the Apostles themselves who were the true and proper Fathers or Founders of the Christian Church whence that of S. Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Though you have ten thousand Instructers or Pedagogues in Christ yet have ye not many Fathers It followes there 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For in Iesus Christ I have begotten you through the Gospell 1 Cor. 4. 15. 5. S. Basil the Great in his Tract 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 concerning the Creed or Christian Faith sets downe this Symbole or Confession thereof 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is We Believe and professe one only true and good God the Father Almighty of whom are all Things the God and Father of our Lord and God Jesus Christ and one only begotten Sonne of his our Lord and God Jesus Christ the only True one by whom all things were made both visible and invisible and by whom all things consist who was in the Begining with God and was God and afterward according to the Scripture he appeared upon Earth and conversed with men being in the forme of God he thought it not robbery to be equall with God yet he made himselfe of no reputation and taking upon him the forme of a Servant by being borne of a Virgin and being found in fashion as a man he fulfilled all things which concerned him and were written of him according to the commandment of his Father he became obedient to the Death even the Death of the Crosse and the third Day arising from the Dead according to the Scriptures he appeared to his holy Disciples and to the Rest according as it is written he ascended into the Heavens and sitteth on the right hand of the Father from whence he shall come at the end of this world to raise up all and to render to every one according to his workes when the righteous shall be taken into Life Eternall and the Kingdome of Heaven and the sinners shall be condemned to everlasting punishment where their worme dieth not and the fire is not quenched And in one only Holy Ghost the Comforter by whom we are sealed to the day of Redemption the Spirit of Truth Here we have all the Articles of the Creed but two viz. The Beleefe of the Holy Catholick Church and the forgivenes of sinnes which he sets downe in the ensuing words wherein he largely descants on the gifts of the Holy Ghost towards the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. By which Spirit we are sealed unto the day of Redemption the Spirit of Truth the Spirit of Adoption by whom we cry Abba Father which distributeth and effecteth in every one the Graces of God unto edification according to his pleasure the good Spirit which leadeth into all Truth and establisheth all that believe in the true and exact knowledge in the Godly and Spirituall service and worship and true confession of God the Father and his only-begotten Sonne c. Concluding thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thus we think and thus we baptize 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 into a coessentiall Trinity according to the command of our Lord Jesus Christ who said goe and teach all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Sone and of the Holy Ghost A little after he intimates from whom he received the foresaid confession of faith namely from Christ and his Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. I beseech you saith
who believe in Christ having the Doctrine of Salvation written by the Spirit in their Hearts without inky characters and diligently keeping the old Tradition Believing in one God Maker of Heaven and earth and of all Things therein through Jesus Christ the Sonne of God who out of his most eminent love towards his Creature undertooke to be borne of a Virgin thus uniting God and man in his owne Person he suffered under Pontius Pilate and Rising againe was gloriously receiued into Heaven He shall come againe in Glory the Saviour of those who are to be saved and the Judge of those who are to be condemned casting into everlasting fire the corrupters of the Truth the Despisers of his Father and contemners of his comming 3. Turtullian Lib. 1. adu haeret cap. 13. Having en gaged himselfe in the combate with the whole body of Heretiâ—kes produceth against them the Body of the Faith or Apostolicall Creed under the Title of Regula Fidei which he sets downe in these words Regula est fidei ut jam hinc quid credamus profiteamur illa sc quâ creditur unum omninò Deum esse nec alium praeter mundi conditorem qui universa de nihilo produxerit per verbum suum primò omnium emissum Id uerbum Filium ejus appellatum in nomine Dei variè visum patriarchis in Prophetis semper auditum Postremò delatum ex Spiritu Dei Patris virtute in Virginem Mariam carnem factum in utero ejus ex eâ natum Hominem esse Jesum Christum exinde praedicasse novam legem novam promissionem regni Coelorum virtutes fecisse fixum Cruci tertiâ die resurrexisse in Coelos ereptum sedere ad dextram Patris misisse vicariam vim Spiritus Sancti qui credentes agat venturum cum claritate ad sumendos Sanctos in vitae aeternae promissorum caelestium fructum ad prophanos judicandos Igni perpetuo facta utriusque Partis resuscitatione cum carnis resurrectione that is The Rule of Faith whereby we professe what we believe is this that there is one only God the same with the Creator of the world who made all things of nothing by his Word which he first of al sent forth or which first of all came from him This Word called also his Sonne variously or in diverse Formes appeared in the name of God unto the Patriarches was alwayes heard to speake in the Prophets at length conveyed by the Spirit and Power of God the Father into the Virgin Mary was incarnate in her Womb of her born Man and is Jesus the Christ After this he Published a new Law and the new Promise of the Kingdome of Heaven wrought miracles was fastned to the Crosse rose againe the third Day being taken up to Heaven sitteth on the right Hand of the Father sent the Deputy-power of the Holy Ghost to guide those who believe shall come with Glory to assume the Saints unto the enjoyment of everlasting Life and the Heavenly promises and to adjudge the Profane to everlasting Fire having raised up both Parties by the Resurrection of the Body Then he concludes Haec Regula â Christo ut probabitur instituta nullas habet apud nos quaestiones nisi quas Haereses inferunt quae Haereticos faciunt This Rule instituted as will be proved by Christ himselfe admits of no doubts amongst us but such as Heresies produce and produce Heretiks Thus ye see Tertullian writing in generall as he doth in this Booke against all Heretiks puts downe all the Articles thereof which were opposed by any Heretik either before or in his Age For. 1. Christs descentâ— into Hell is included in the Article of the Resurrection or presupposed by it as in some other Creeds but of this more hereafter 2. The Article of the Catholik Church is not so clearly put downe as the rest because not oppugned till Novatus and Donatus arose which was after Tertullians Death 3. Forgivenesse of Sinnes is implyed in the New Promise of the Kingdome of Heaven whereof this is the First and the Foundation to the rest Yet in another booke of his he makes mention of these two latter Articles namely this of the Church and The Forgivenesse of Sinnes as solemnly profest at Baptisme Cum sub tribus testatio fidei sponsio salutis pignerentur necessariò adilcitur Ecclesiae mentio quoniam ubi Tres id est Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus ibi Ecclesia quae trium Corpus est That is When the Confession of our Faith and the Covenant of our Salvation are engaged under the Authority of Three the Church is of necessity mentioned with them for where those Three are the Father Sonne and holy Ghost there is that Church also which is the Body of those Three De Bapt adu Quintillan cap 6. And alittle after giving the reason why Christ himfelfe did not Baptize in Person he shewes how incongruous it had beene for him to have used the received forme of the Church Ne moveat quosdam quòd Ipse non tinguebat in quem tingueret In paenitentiam Quò ergò illi Praecursorem In peccatorum remissionem quam verbo dabat In semetipsum quem humilitate celabat In Spiritum Sanctum qui nondum a Patre descenderat In Ecclesiam quam nondum Apostoli struxerant That is Let it not trouble any that Christ himselfe did not Baptize in whose name or to what end should he have Baptized To Repentance Why then had he a fore-runner For Remission of sinnes which he gave by his Word In his owne Name which in humility he concealed In the Holy Ghosts who as yet was not descended from the Father into the Church which the Apostles had not as yet built cap. 11. A litle after him S Cyp. in his Epistle to Magnus being the 76. speaking of the Novatians who retained the old wounted forme of wordes in the baptismall Intertogatories expresseth one of them thus Credis remissionem peccatorum vitam aeternam per sanctam Ecclesiam Dost thou believe the Remission of sinnes and Life Eternall by the Holy Church in which words it is cleare that these two Articles were part of the confession of Faith used at Baptisme that Life Eternall was a distinct Article from that of the Resurrection and that the Particle In which Tert. prefixeth to the Articles of the Church and Remission of sinnes is not significant but redundant seeing that S. Cyp. here omitts it compare his Epist to Januarius c. viz. the 70. in Pamel Edit But in two other Tracts he sets downe the Creed more briefly First lib. de virg vel cap. 1. Regula fidei una omninò est sola immobilis irreformabilis Credendi sc in unicum Deum Omnipotentem mundi conditorem Filium ejus Jesum Christum natum ex Virgine Maria crucifixum sub Pontio Pilato tertia die resuscitatum a mortuis receptum in Coelis sedentem nunc ad
it might be so cal'd quia ex eorum scriptis summa fide collectum because the Creed was most faithfully gathered out of the Apostles writings he might well indulge to the doubtfull speaking of some Divines in his Time 11. Confessio Saxonica Artic. 1. Affirmamus clare coram Deo universa Ecclesia in Coelo in Terra nos vera Fide amplecti omnia scripta Prophetarum Apostolorum quidem in hac ipsa nativa sententia quae expressa est in Symbolis Apostolico Niceno Athanasiano Et haec ipsa Symbola eorum nativam sententiam sine corruptelis semper constanter amplexi sumus Deo Juvante perpetuo amplectemur Damnamus etiam constantissimè omnes furores qui pugnant cum Symbolis ut sunt Samosateni Serveti Arii Pneumatomachorum portentosae opiniones aliae condemnatae veris Ecclesiae Judiciis That is We openly affirme before God and the universall Church in Heaven and in Earth that with a true faith we imbrace all the writings of the Prophets and Apostles in that very genuine primitive sence which is exprest in the Creeds of the Apostles Nic. and Athanatius and that we have alwayes constantly imbraced and by Gods helpe will alwayes imbrace these Creeds and their true native meaning without falsifying or depravation we also most resolutely condemne all those mad heresies which are repugnant to the Creeds namely those of Samosatenus Servetus Arius and the portentous opinions of the Pneumatomachi and what others condemned by the Just censures of the Church 12 Bohemica Confessio Fides Apostolica in duodecim Articulos digesta tradita in Symbolo per Nicenam Synodum atque adeò alias confirmata exposita est That is The Apostolick Faith being digested into twelve Articles and dilivered in the Creed hath been confirmed and explained by the Nicene and other succeeding Synods 13. Galliae Confes Art 5. Tria illa Symbola nempe Apostolicum Nicenum Athanasianum idcircò approbamus quod sint verbo Dei Scripto consentanea That is Those three Creeds the Apostolick the Nicene and that of Athanasius we therefore approve of because they are agreeable to the written Word of God And Serrarius the Jesuit whom we may well credit in such a matter in his Tract of the Athanasian Creed informes us that the Calvintan Divines in an Assembly of theirs at Lausanna profest that they agreed with the Lutherans concerning those Ancient Creeds and ascribed to them together with the Sciptare a Judiciary Power or Authority which all ought to obey Whence we may gather that they Judged them to proceed from the same Fountaine to wit from Divine or Apostolick Tradition otherwise they would not have conjoyned them with the Scriptures as the Authentick Judges or Rules whereby all Controversies are to be decided 14. The Church of England in her eight Art of the three Creeds agrees with the rest The three Ceeds Nic. Creed Athanasian Creed and that which is commonly cal'd the the Apostles Creed ought thorowly to be received and observed for they may be proved by most certaine warrants of the holy Scripture From these Foure last Testimonies taken out of the Confessions of the Reformed Churches I gather 1. That they concordantly receive these three Antient Creeds and reject whatsoever Heresy or opinion is repugnant to them from whence it will appeare that they have introduced no new Faith or Religion different from the old much lesse opposite unto it 2. They not only receive the Apostles Creed but also acknowledge it for such and by that name contra distinguish it to the Nicene and Athanasian therefore by that Title they are as justly presumed to acknowledge the Apostles for the composers of the one as the Councell of Nice and Athanasius for the Composers of the other Two 3. The Bohemick Confession tels us that the Nicene Councell and the rest that followed did confirme and expound that Faith which had been delivered in the Creed of the Apostles and distributed according to their number into twelve Articles so then the Apostles Creed was the First and not only the First but the Entire and Compleat Summary of the Christian Faith to which succeding Ages added nothing in their severall Formes of Confession or Beleefe but only explained them 4. The Gallican Church and our Mother of England say indeed that they receive the three Creeds because agreeable to the holy Writ but they say not that they receive them only for that Reason so that this expression doth not any way crosse the fore-delivered Tenent of deriving the Creed immediatly from the Mouthes of the Apostles no more than our Blessed Saviour and his Apostles confirming the Doctrine they taught by the testimonies of Moses and the Prophets prejudiced the truth and infallibility of the Spirit by which they spake See Jo. 5. 39 46 47. Act. 26. 22. Chap. 28. 23. Such an Accessory confirmation renders the Truth more cleare and Full and serves not so much to confirme the Doctrine it selfe as the Persons to whom it is delivered CAP. VII Six Reasons evincing the Apostles to have been the Composers of the Creed which commonly bears their name Some Objections against these Reasons answered The Place where the Creed was Made Of Fundamentalls and Traditions TO the Testimony of Scripture Consent of Antiquity and the joynt concordant Suffrages of our latter Protestant Divines I shall subjoyne in the last Place the Verdict of Reason which waits upon the forementioned Authorities giving strength unto some and light unto others Reason 1. The Title which it bears of the Apostles Creed or Symbole hath been generally acknowledged throughout all ages of the Church never questioned till of late cheefly by our moderne Antitrinitarians That Arch heritick Photinus their Fore-father perverted it indeed with the comments Vt fideliter simpliciter dicta ad argumentum sui dogmatis traheret That he might pervert the generall wordes thereof to the countenancing of or complying with his corrupt Tenents as Ruffinus informes us but he never durst deny either its Authority or its Authors Sure this Generall Tradition and unanimous consent of the Church is no weake Argument to evince the true Authors But to this Reason I find three things Objected Ob. 1. Against the Name Symbolum From whence some draw an Argument that it was joyntly composed by the Apostles because the Word is derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Conferre in unum and so signifies a Collation of many the Metaphor being drawne from Caena collatitia a Supper in common whereto every one of the guests brought his dish of meat or were he laid downe his shot equally with the rest whereas it might be called a Symbole or Collation not because it was gathered a Pluribus sed ex Pluribus not by many men but out of many materialls and this Collation made out of Scripture not by the Apostles themselves but by Apostolick men and their Disciples ab Ecclesiarum Patribus as Eusebius
may not we justly referre that custome to the Age of the Apostles whereof we can find no beginning in the Church But to give you a more Positive and Expresse proofe that place in the First Epistle to Timothy cap. 6. v. 12. where he is said to have made a good Profession before many witnesses is understood of the Profession of the Creed at his Baptisme by S. Jerome and Occumenius And that other passage in Heb. 6. 1 2. of Faith towards God and the doctrine of Baptismes which are there joyned together is understood in the same sense by Chrysostome Augustine Oecumenius Theophylact and of latter times by Calvin and Panaeus as hath been shewed before Then for the instance of S. Peters 3000 cōverts it is not said that they were Baptized all in one day which can hardly be judged probable at that time for want of hands enough to the worke want of water about Jerusalem and the danger of making so publique a Baptisme but added to the Church that is dederunt nomina Christo they put themselves in the list of Disciples or Catechumeni and so became Candidates of Baptisme a custome anciently used in the Church as appears by Tertullian De Baptismo But if by Adding we must needs understand Initiating into the Church by Baptisme we must interpret The same day thus About the same time Day being put for Time by an usuall Hebraisme for which see Deut 27. 2. compared with Ios 8. 30. c. and Luk. 19. 42. As for their Confession of Faith whether the same Day or afterwards I readily grant that it could not be then framed in the words of the Apostles Creed which was not so early composed but instead of that they publiquely attested to the Truth of Saint Peters Sermon which contained the fundamentalls of Christianity that were after succinctly gathered into one Body in the Summary of the Creed which was thence forward the sole forme of Confession or Beliefe used at the time of Baptisme for none other we finde then used Besides some of the first conversions were miraculous and so not to be drawn into example as ordinary set Patternes of the Churches succeeding Practise the Apostles had the gift of discerning faith in the heart and so needed not alwaies expect an open Profession whereas others in following Times who had not the same Gift were tied to the ordinary Rule and method of proceeding thus the same Apostle caused Cornelius and his friends to be Baptized without any formall Profession of their Faith that we read of because he perceived that the Holy Ghost was powred on them Act. 10. 47 48. Reason 3d. The Creeds or Confessions of Faith which were framed by the Councells of Nice Constantinople Chalcedon and the rest that followed or which we find in the writings of the Fathers as in Athanasius Ierome and others are no new Creeds but comments on the old explanations of some points not so fully and clearly exprest which were then called in question and misinterpreted by some Hereticks of those times Now this may serve for a third Argument to prove that these Councells and Fathers had still a very carefull Eye on some former Creed derived from the Apostles unto their Times as a Rule or patterne to square their Symboles by To instance in the two most famous the Nicene and Athanasian The Nicene Creed enlargeth it selfe chiefly in the Point of our Saviours Divinity and that of the holy Ghost withall adding here and there some small Particles by way of Explication 1. To the first Article it addes and of all things visible and invisible thus more distinctly setting downe the parts ornaments and inhabitants of Heaven and Earth and withall condemning the opinion of some ancient Hereticks who made the Angels the Creatours of the world and so exempted these invisible Spirits from the ranke of Creatures 2. To the third Article it addes who for us men and our Salvation came downe from Heaven and was incarnate c. thus setting downe the end of our Saviours Incarnation 3. To the fift Article it addes according to the Scriptures thus shewing how our Saviours Resurrection answered to the foregoing Prophecies of the Old Testament 4. To the seventh Article it addes whose Kingdome shall have no end thus setting downe the necessary consequent of the generall Judgment namely the eternity of his heavenly Reigne Christ having then fully vanquisht and trodden all enemies under his feet 5. To the eight Article it addes these two Epithets which are applied unto the Church by way of explication viz. one and Apostolick the first included in the word Church which is of the singular number the second in the word Catholick for as the Apostles Commission was vniversall so also was their doctrine on which the Church was Founded 6. To the tenth Article it addes I acknowledge one Baptisme for c. thus shewing the meanes or Ordinance of Gods appointing whereby he forgives and cleanseth us from sin Then for the Creed of Athanasius If we cut of the Preface and conclusion which to speake properly are no parts but Adjuncts of it as wherin he shewes the necessity of the Catholick Faith to Salvation that is the evident danger of denying opposing or corrupting any Article of the Faith as the Arians and other Hereticks of those dayes did 1. He explaines at large the mystery of the Trinity which lies infolded in the First Second and Eight Articles of the Apostles Creed wherein we professe to believe in God the Father in his Sonne Iesus Christ and in the holy Ghost for this believing or putting our whole trust and confidence in the Sonne and holy Ghost as well as in God the Father shewes their coequality of power Goodnesse Wisedome and All sufficiency with him and consequently their Identity of nature whence the holy Scripture every where forbids us to place our Faith in or rely upon any Creature but to trust in God alone and when the Creed comes to the Article of the Church which is but an assembly of men though of the best and highest rancke it changeth the style saying not as before I believe in the Holy Catholick Church but I believe the Holy Catholick Church 2. He distinctly unfolds illustrates at large the mystery of our Saviours Incarnation especially by the similitude of the Soule and Body Now this is nought but a Paraphrase on the third Article of the Apostles Creed 3. To the tenth Article namely that of the Resurrection he adds these words all men shall give an account for their workes which shew the end of the Resurrection are besides involved in the precedent Article of Christs comming to judgment for there can be no Judging of mens Actions without a previous examination and giving an Account 4. To the last Article namely that of Life eternall for the good he addes and they that have done evill shall goe into everlasting Fire which necessarily followes by way of opposition besides that it
succeeding Creeds which the whole Church hath for many Ages imbraced they were Framed in generall Councels or confirmed by Generall Practise Now the Catholick Church which received the Creed from the Apostles and preserved â—t as an inviolable Depositum may justly be presumed best to know the meaning of it the Common Mother of Christians can best informe us which is the true sence of the Common Faith and hath sufficienâ— authority to impose it upon Her Children Reas 4. Those Fathers who wrote since the Nicene Councell set downe and explaine that Creed which beareth the Apostles name not that which was framed in the Councell of Nice as appeares by the fore-cited Testimonies Now this they would not nor could have done if the Nicene Creed had been the first The first Father whom we find to meddle with or handle the Nicene Creed is St Cyril Patriarch of Alexandria who flourished an whole Century after the making of it Doth not this plainly shew that the Church had still the prime if not the sole respect to that Symbole or Rule of Faith which the Apostles left her as the maine Basis on which the Faith of her Children was built the Root whereout other Creeds as so many Branches sprung the Fathers who since the celebration of that Councell have explained and commented on the Apostles Creed I have already mentioned viz. Chrysostome Augustine Chrysologus Venantius Eusebius c. Reason 5th It is a received Rule which S. Augustine laies downe lib. 4. De Baptismo cont Donat. cap. 24. Quod universa tenet Ecclesia nec Conciliis institutum sed semper retentum est non nisi authoritate Apostolicâ traditum rectissimè creditur That is That which the universall Church holdeth and hath alwaies retained not being ordained by a Councell is most justly believed to have been derived unto us by the Authority of the Apostles And this rule is grounded upon good Reason besides the Authority of the deliverer for a generall effect must have as generall a cause they must be both of the same latitude and extent now there is no Generall cause imagineable of a publiquely received Doctrine Goverment Ceremony or Discipline in the Catholicke Church such especially as is derived to it from hand to hand time out of mind but the Authority of a Generall Councell which is the Church Representative or the concordant preaching of the Apostles who first planted Christianity in the Churches of the whole world So then to apply this Rule unto our present purpose That the whole Church holds the Apostles Creed experience demonstrates that it hath been alwayes reteined in the Church the Testimonies of the fore-aleadged Fathers shew and that it was not Framed in any Genenerall Councell sufficienty appears both by the copies of those Creeds which were framed in them found varying from that of the Apostles as also by the writing of those Fathers who lived before the first General Councel held at Nice wherein they make mention of a Rule of Faith derived downe to them from the Apostles which some of them also set downe as Irenaeus Tertullian Origen Reason 6th Before the Nicene Creed was framed both the Easterne and Westerne Churches had an Ancient Symbole or Creede Socrat. lib. 5. cap. 6. Which could be no other than that of the Apostles since no other is assigned or mentioned by any good Author First That the Westerne or Romane Church had such an Ancient Symble appeares 1. By the words of Vigilius Byshop of Rome lib. 4. De Eutiche Roma antequam Nicena Synodus conveniret a temporibus Apostolorum usque all nunc ita fidelibus Symbolum tradidit viz. in Jesum Christum Filium ejus Dominum nostrum leaving out the Particle Vnicum That is The Church of Rome even before the Nicene Councell from the very Apostles times till this present in these termes delivered the Creed unto Believers And in Jesus Christ his Sonne our Lord leaving out the Particle Only 2. By Ruffinus in his Tract on the Creed who compares the Aquilean Creed with the Romane and withall tells us that the Creed was believed so ancient in his time that it was then held for an Apostolicall Tradition Now this Ruffinus was a man of note in the Church nine yeares before the first Councell of Constantinople viz. in the yeare 372. when he went with Melama from Rome to Alexandria about which time also S. Ierome wrote letters to him namely his Epist 5. 41. Secondly that the Easterne Churches had an ancient Creed too before the Nicene Councell appears by the same Ruffinus who compares the Aquilean Creed with that of the East as well as with the Romane The same appears by Cyril of Ierusalem who explaines it at large in his Catecheses and this Creed of his explaining we shall find much consonant to that which we now call the Apostolicall only cutting off some few exegeticall Particles which were added to fore-arme his Auditors and other orthodox Christians against succrescent Heresies to which Creed of his he adjoynes also some practicall Grounds for the more compleat instruction and Preparation of them against the time of Baptisme This Cyril was first Catechist then Patriarch of Ierusalem and sate afterwards in the first Councell held at Constantinople where the Easterne Bishops were only present and composed a Creed almost in the same termes with this of Cyril He composed these Catecheses in his youth about the yeare 350 and died in the yeare 386 five years after the celebration of that Councell as the learned Vossius demonstrates out of Leo and S. Jerome compared with a passage in his sixt Catechesis Now as the Fathers of the first Councell at Constantinople laboured not to frame a new Creed but were contented to enlarge the Article concerning the Holy Ghost against Macedonius who perverted it so we may justly suppose that the Nicene Fathers retained the words of that Creed which had been of old received in the East least they might otherwise seeme to have framed a new Faith amplifying only the Article concerning the Divinity of our Saviour which was then called in question by Arius that so it might appeare to the World quaedam tantummodo explicatius dici as the same Vossius rightly conceives Cut off therefore from the Nicene or Constantinopolitan Creed or from that of Cyril which much symbolizeth with it the Additionals unto those two Articles and you have the whole Creed of the Apostles for the Communion of Saints is not a distinct Article but a part or Paraphrase of what goes before Saints being implyed in in Holy and Communion in Church or Congregation Ecclesia which is an Assembly of selected People and Christs descent into Hell is presupposed to the Article of his Resurrection Therefore to think that Cyril in his old Age or Iohn the Patriarch his Successor added all that to the Jerosolymitan Creed which followes the Articles of the Holy Ghost is nothing probable because Cyril doth not barely
command for the observation of these in holy writ nor for many other Church ordinances that might be named Our Church indeed justly blames the Romish for obtruding upon us and other Churches her owne Rituall Traditions as of necessity to Salvation some of which are uncertain others frivolus burthenous superstitious and even contrary to Gods word so did St Augustin long agoe sharply taxe Vrbicus a Romane Presbyter for pressing the Weekly Fast one Saturday as necessary to be observed by all Christian Churches whereas the vsuall Fasting-dayes at that time in all Churches were Wensday Fryday the Saturday fast being a peculiar custome of the Church of Rome But our Church abolisheth not all Traditions as appeares by this of the Creed which she with other Reformed Churches retaines as also by her 34th Article which was on purpose framed touching this subject wherein she intreateth only of Rituall not Doctrinall Traditions telling us that they need not to be alwayes and every where alike but may be diversified according to Times Countries and mens Manners so that nothing be ordained against Gods Word that what soever Private Person purposey and openly breaketh such ought to be openly rebuked and that every particular or nationall Church hath Authority to ordaine change and abolish Cerimonies or Rites of the Church ordained only by mans authority so that all Things be done to Edifying CAP. VIII Severall Objections which some have alleadged against the fore-assigned Authors of the Creed answered at large Certain Creeds compared together whereby their conformity appears to one another and to that of the Apostles HAving thus confirmed the first of the Five Poynts which I proposed to my selfe in the beginning namely that the Apostles were the Framers or Composers of the Creed which commonly bears their name I should now proceed in order to the Rest but that I conceive it necessary to cleare my passage as I goe on by the removall of such Doubts and Objections which like so many rubbs or stumbling-blocks hinder my farther proceeding and obstruct the way The Truth though sufficiently cleare in it selfe yet will shine forth unto others more gloriously when these mists are scattered though firmely establisht yet her strength will appeare more formidable in the overthrow of her Adversaries For there be some and those of no vulgar ranke who have taken great Paines and still delight themselves in overthrowing those ancient fabricks which our forefathers left us building in their roome some slight painted Toy without either strength or use to please the fancy of the contriver not satisfy the judgement or conduce to the profit of the sober Christian A course if prosecuted which will ere long bring the Doome of the Jewish Temple upon the Christian Church that shee will not have one stone left upon another that shall not be thrown downe Math. 24. 2. As for this present Argument though the Reasons which some have brought against it seeme to the objectors more then probable yet I suppose that upon due triall they will appeare lesse then necessary so that they will prove unsufficient to overthrow the constant Tradition of so many Ages and to sway against the streame of so maine a current the joynt Authority and Testimony of so many Doctors of the Church as well Moderne as Ancient I shall therefore set downe their Reasons fully and faithfully yea somewhat more distinctly than they have done and then subjoyne their Answers in severall Object 1. Were the Creed compiled by the Apostles it is not likely that S. Luke writing the history of their Acts would have omitted so principall a matter Sundry other things of farre lesse consequence he hath carefully recorded as the Apostles Decree concerning Ceremonies and things indifferent but of this so important and weighty a businesse the Decree concerning the Rule of Faith he makes not so much as one word mention which certainly he would never have failed to doe had they made any such At least if S. Luke had omitted it in the Acts yet it cannot be conceived how S. Paul and the rest of the Apostles should not speake a word of it in their Epistles I answer First that this is but a negative argument and concludeth not S. Luke makes no mention thereof in the Acts therefore it was never done To give a like instance or two S. Mathew undertakes to write the History of our Saviours Life and Death with the Precedents of the one and the Consequents of the others and yet there be many weighty Passages omitted by him which we find afterwards related by S. Luke and S. Iohn S. Iohn especially composed his Gospell of those particular Actions and Speeches of our Saviour which were left unmentioned by the three former Evangelists yet he himselfe tells us in the conclusion of his Book that There were many other things which Iesus did the which if they should be written every one he supposed that even the World it selfe could not containe the Bookes that should be written Ioh. 21. 25. But to come closer yet to the Argument S. Luke in that Booke of his which is entituled The Acts of the Apostles mentions very few Acts of the Apostles in generall yet hath large Digressions concerning S. Stephen and S. Philip who were no Apostles but Deacons Then he prosecutes the story of S. Peter and S. Barnabas but more at large that of S. Paul whose companion he was in his Apostolicall Peregrinations and yet how many materiall Passages even touching S. Paul doth he omit some of which we find afterwards occasionally recorded by himselfe in his Epistles especially in those of his to the Churches of Galatia and Corinth As for example his Travailes into Arabia after his conversion his Coming to Ierusalem three yeares after and communicating his Gospell with Peter Iames and Iohn his withstanding Peter at Antioch his rapture into Paradise and unto the third Heaven together with many other particulars things sure of greater consequence than his making of Tents at Corinth or the signe of the Ship wherein he sailed to Italy and yet these are exprest the other excluded If it be replyed that this Argument is produced only as probable and yet will hold good unlesse some probable cause of the omission can be assigned why a poynt of so great importance and so necessary is not mentioned when others of lesse weight are and that the Evangelists omit indeed diverse Things which Christ said and did yet set downe all Things necessary to Salvation which was their main end I rejoyne That whosoever goes about to overthrow so old and received a Tradition may justly be required to bring more than probabilities and conjectures if he expect to be believed that this Probability grounded on S. Lukes omission is sufficiently overthrowne by the positive Testimonies of the Ancients which I haue produced to the Contrary that the Composure of the Creed by the Apostles was a businesse confessedly of great importance but the mentioning of it by S.
Luke in the Acts was not altogether so necessary it being enough that it was otherwise testified that lastly S. Luke probably omitted it because it was a thing so vulgarly knowen in the Christian Church the Apostles delivering it to be kept and used wheresoever they Preached Secondly though S. Luke make no expresse mention of this Creed of the Apostles yet S. Paul in diverse of his Epistles not obscurely alludes unto it under severall Formes Phrases of Speech as hath bin shewen at large before so also doth S. Jude v. 3. Thirdly S. Luke sets downe the Apostles Decree concerning the ceremoniall Law because it was the Result of a Generall Councell and that Councell occasiond by a great Dissention in the Church of Antioch which sent to the Apostles about the Resolution of this question Now matters of dissention are the chiefe Theme of Histories and that Councell with the Proceedings and Formes thereof is set downe on purpose as a patterne to all succeeding Ages As for the Creed or Canon of Faith there was no such occasion for the mentioning of it seeing no Cavill then arose about it nor any generall Councell concurred to the Composure of it but only a private meeting of the Apostles Ob. 2d. Not one of the Ancient Fathers who lived within the three first Centuries spake of any such thing in any of their writings and yet they should best know it whose Times were nearest unto the Apostles Then of so many Church-historians who studiously gathered together the confessions of Synods and Anti-Synods not one makes mention of this though a matter of the greatest consequence as being the Rule of Faith and mother of all following Confessions I Answer First That the Ancient Fathers who lived within the three first Centuries make mentiō of the Creed and the Composure thereof by the Apostles I appeale to the former Testimonies cited out of Irenaeus Tertutullian and Origen who all lived within two hundred yeers after our Saviours Assension Secondly Though we have not any Comments extant on the Creed written by the Fathers of the three first Centuries Origen excepted who largely expounds it in his Bookes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yet it is more than probable that more of them expounded it paraphrastically First because Ruffinus who lived in the next Age in the Preface to his Exposition of the Creed tels us of those before him comperi saith he nonnullos illustrium Tractatorum aliqua de his pie breviter edidisse That some famous Authors had wrote piously and briefly on this Subject And a litle after Tentabimus quae omissa videntur a prioribus ad implere That he would endevour to supply what had been omitted by former Writers Secondly because it was the custome of the Ancient Bishops to expound the Creed unto Catechumeni when they came to Baptisme at those two solemne times of the year Easter Pentecost as appears by those Homilies or Catecheticall Sermons now extant of Cyril Chrysostome Austin Chrysollogus and others many more doubtles there were framed by former Bishops which either were never committed to paper or being then writen are now lost 3ly As to the silence of Ecclesiastical Historians touching this subject a little observation will informe us that nouell strange singular Passages are the usuall Arguments of their Pens not things Publick knowne and received such as the Creed is was common then in every Novices mouth So the Romane Historians set not downe their lawes customes court-proceedings as things vulgarly known and of daily practice amongst them the omission whereof rendring their Histories obscure to strangers they are set downe distinctly by Dionysius Halycarnasseus 'T is sufficient that severall Fathers in most Ages occasionally make mention of it when they had to deale with Hereticks who denied or perverted it But that Ancient Church-Historians mention the severall Confessions of Faith which were framed in severall Synods and Anti-Synods as Socrates and others in the businesse of the Arian faction hath this double Reason That they were New and contrary to each other whereas the Apostles Creed was an Old known Tradition and received verbo-tenùs by the Arians as well as the Catholicks whence it was that to unmaske their false Glosses the Catholicks were faine to adde by way of explication unto the second Article of the Creed the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so to cleare the true meaning thereof and distinguish themselves from the corrupters of the Faith Ob. 3d The very Language of the Creed convinceth it to be yonger than the Age of the Apostles for the word Catholick was not knowen in their Time as witnesseth Pacianus in his Epistle to Sympronianus It is likly it was added in after Ages to distinguish the Vniversall Church spred through out the whole world from the Canventicles of Hereticks and Schismaticks suth as the Novatians and Donastists for if it be said this word was added to distinguish the Christian Church from the Jewish Synogogues circumscribed within the limits of the land of Canaan 't is an improbable Reason because in the Apostles Age there were as many if not more Jewes out Palastine than in it as apeares by the History of the Acts. I Answer 1. Some one word might possibly be added in succeeding Times by way of explication to distinguish the True Church from the Conventicles of Hereticks and yet not prejudice the Antiquity of the whole So St Austin seemes to include it in the Epethete Holy for when he comes to this Article hee addes by way of explication to Sanctam Ecclesiam Vtique Catholicam In case of reply that if one word be added why not many and if the Church might doe so in one Age why not at other times I rejoyne That one word might be added then but by way of explication only not to supply a mutilous member or defective Article but the Forme being now setled for so many hundred years such liberty is taken away together with the cause of it the full and genuine sence of the Creed having been abundanty delivered to the Church in succeeding Exegeticall Creeds and expositions of the Fathers so that there is now no need of coyning new words or Phrases by way of explication But Secondly We have no need to make use of this supposall for the word Catholick might very well be placed in the Creed from the Original composure of it notwithstanding whatsoever is produced to the contrary from the testimony of Pacianus for this Pacianus Bishop of Barcelona and contemporary to S. Jerome in his first Epistle to Sympronianus the Novatian which is entituled De Catholico Nomine after he had dealt with him very gently in the begining superscribing his Epistle thus Pacianus Symproniano Fratri to winne him over the more effectually to the Communion of the Church in the Body of his Epistle he useth these words Sub Apostolis inquies nemo Catholicus vocabatur Esto sic fuerit vel illud indulge cum post Apostolos haereses
time of Preaching the Gospell to the Gentiles and incorporating them into the Church was not before revealed as appears by the Series of the story now this conversion of Cornelius is placed by Baronius Aº 41. the very same yeare wherein S. Mathews Gospell according to him was written It is most probable therefore that this Dispersion of the Apostles happened in that Persecution of Herod mentioned Act. 12. for presently after this we find Paul and Barnabas solemnely consecrated and sent away from Antioch by the holy Ghosts command for the performance of this great worke the conversion of the Gentiles Ast. 13. 2 3 4. Whereas before the Gospell was Preached unto the Jewes only or at the most unto the Hellenists who were Jewes by Nation or Religion that is Jewish Proselites at least though they speake the language of the Grecians amongst whom they lived This appears Act. 11. 19 20. And to this accord the words of S. Chrysostome Apostoli praedicaverunt Iudaeis longoque temporis spatio caesi slagellati in Iudaeâ manentes ac demum ab ipsis propulsi in Gentes profecti sunt That is The Apostles Preached unto the Jewes and having been a long time scourged and beaten yet abode in Iewry till at length being driven out by them they went forth unto the Gentiles Hom. 70. in Mat. cap. 22. Compare herewith Act. 1. 8. chap. 13. 46 47. Thirdly S. Austins meaning in those words may well be thus construed The Articles of the Creed lye disperst in the Scriptures of both Testaments which in his Time were fully and compleatly extant and were collected from thence That is partly from the Old Testament then written partly from the History of the New which the Apostles were eye and eare-witnesses of and shortly after committed to writing Otherwise we must make him palpably to contradict himselfe for elsewhere he more then once affirmes that the Twelve Apostles composed the Creed which now bears their name and which he there explaines Object 10th If the Creed were composed by the Apostles latter Ages out of respect unto them would not have added ought unto it as we see they did in the Creeds of Nice Chalcedon and that of Athanasius for the Church of Rome was very slow to adde one particle unto the Constantinopolitan Creed viz. Filioque thereby to signify the Procession of the Holy Ghost from the Son as well as the Father though fully perswaded of the Truth thereof so greatly did they respect those 150 Bishops who composed it although they had made some Canons in prejudice of the former Dignity not only of the Alexandrian but of the Roman See Sure succeeding Ages owed far more reverence to the Apostles Answ Succeeding Ages added nothing to the Apostles Creed but only explained some Articles which by reason of their briefnesse or obscurity had been perverted by hereticall Glosses Now this was no disrespect but in honour of the Apostles thus to vindicate their Creed from false Interpretations and so restore it to its primitive Lustre and Integrity Secondly The Constantinopolitan Creed Framed by those 150 Fathers of the Easterne Church had been confirmed by the Church of Rome in the Synod under Damasus no marvaile then if they were not over forward to adde the Particle Filioque without their consents who were the prime Framers of that Creed least by so doing they should seeme to vary as well from themselves as the Fathers of that Councell Howsoever then that Councell might exalt the Dignity of the Constantinopolitan Patriarch now seated in the Head City of the Empire to the seeming prejudice of the Bishop of Rome yet in matter of Faith such as the Creed there was no disagreement at all and so no ground of Alteration If it be replyed That to charge the Creed writen for the capacity of the meanest with obscurity is something hard that to insert ought or adde to it though by way of explication would be thought great presumption that to think they would adde any thing to it who would not endure that of filioque to be put into a Creed of humane Composure when they agreed in the matter is hardly credible Besides that succeeding Ages have added to the Creed in some Particulars is apparent in the Nicene and if those additions be only explications yet to joyne them with the other Articles and to urge them as necessary accounting all those Heretickes who receive them not is all one as to make new Articles or fundamentall Truthes and withall it secretly taxeth the Apostles Creed of insufficiency and obscurity without those Additions I rejoyne First That the Creed in it selfe is plaine for the capacity of the meanest yet the briefnes generally indefinitenes of some Articles hath laid it open to variety of Glosses and those oft Hereticall which hath forced the Church to deliver the true meaning thereof by exegeticall Additions Seconly As for these explicatory Particles the Fathers fecht them not from their owne Braines but from Apostolicall Tradition Conserved in the Church from hand to hand and attested by the writings of precedent Bishops to whom the Apostles both delivered the wordes of the Creed and the true sence of each Article and hence it is that they urged and imposed their explications on the Church as necessary to be believed Neither Thirdly Is the Apostles Creed hereby argued of Insufficiency or obscurity seeing nothing is added to it as if it were Defective in it selfe or explaind as if it were of it selfe obscure 'T is only vindicated by this meanes from corrupt Glosses and restored to its primitive sense and meaning so the Scripture in like manner though cleare in all necessary Points and more copious by far than the Creed yet hath been abused in all Ages by curious and Daring Heads whence so many large comments on it for remedy to this mischiefe and we see dayly that lawes though as clearly framed as may be yet stand in need of Glosses and Additionall Interpretations when abused by reason of their Generality Lastly As to the addition of the Particle Filioque it is not of the same Nature because it was annext to the Creed contrary to the Decree of the third Generall Councell contrary to the mind and open protestation of the Greeke Church which had framed that Creed at Constantinople and by on part of the Church only viz. The See of Rome her adherents in the west Ob. 11h. If after Ages were forced by new succrescent Heresies to adde something unto the Apostles Creed yet sure if they had thought it to be theirs they would never have taken ought frō it for this had been a ready course to make way for new Heresies wheras we find severall Articles of the Creed omitted by them in their new-framed Symboles Answ The Councels and Fathers which have delivered unto us new Symboles or Confessions of Faith occasioned by emergent Heresies or rather explications of the old Creed in some particulars which were
alleadgeth to disparage it amongst the Reformed Churches is more then hath been proved but if it were it maketh nothing against its Dignity and Authority for such a Conveyance will argue the Church only for the Deriver as the Head Mother or Principall Church of the West not the Originall Composer of the Creed and 't is generally acknowledged that the Church of Rome in the first Ages was most famous for the purity of the Orthodoxe Faith and the uncorrupt keeping of Traditions especially Doctrinall Lastly that the Easterne Churches used other Creeds hath been also disproved if by others be meant Creeds diverse in meaning and in the substance of the Articles Therefore the conclusion namely that the Creed was framed by the Bishop and Clergy of Rome of its own accord falles unto the Ground Thus have I endeavoured not only to bring positive Arguments for the asserting of this Ancient Tradition but withall to answer all those Objections which are brought against it a Taske farre the more difficult of the two First because it is an untrodden Path wherein I had neither Helpe nor Guide no man till these late busy Times having ever presumed to write against the Authority or the Authors Secondly because it is usually a farre easier labour to establish a received Truth then to demolish all the specious objections which are raised against it I shall desire to meet with the same candor in my Reader whosoever he be that shall compare these Arguments and Answers together which I have used towards the Objectors whose Persons I have not so much as named as having no quarrell to them but only contended with their Objections and whatsoever my Answers be their Arguments I am sure are set down at full and to the best advantage least otherwise I might seeme to have fought with my own shadow Let the indifferent Reader see and judge Yet if after all this I be farther asked by the more curious enquirer which of all those Creeds or Symboles that wee meet with in Antiquity and which I have here produced came 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in expresse words from the Apostles neither more nor lesse not the least particle varied I Answer First That this question as it hath much difficulty in it so it hath little necessity for as long as those Creeds agreed in the substance of the Faith it matters little or nothing though there be some variety of expression This indeed might make way for a difference in substance if done rashly upon a private judgement and a designe of countenancing some new opinion but not so when done by the generall consent of the Church assembled in a Synod which is supposed not only to have the words of the Creed but also the true sense thereof kept in her by Tradition as an inviolable Depositum and withall to be directed by the Holy Ghost so as not to erre in any necessary fundamentall Poynt such as the Articles of the Creed are The Socinians indeed would have the Nicene Creed to differ in substance from that of the Apostles but such a censure is not to be much wondered at in them who renew the Heresies condemned by that Creed and by the two Councels which composed it Secondly Amongst all the forementioned Creeds those which we may have most probable recourse unto as the exact Patternes or Modells of the rest the Apostles genuine Births as well for words as matter are the Creed of the Jerosolymitan Church explained by Cyril and the Creed of the Romane Church which we of the West now commonly call the Apostles Creed for these two are most compleat in themselves and most consonant to each others First The Creed of the Jerosolymitan Church is likely to be the Apostles because that was the Antient mother Church of the whole World where Christianity first began and from thence was communicated unto all Nations and wherein the Apostles are said to have composed the Creed before they went unto the Gentilks Secondly The Church of Rome also hath a very faire Plea for her Antiquity and Integrity First Because that Church was founded by the two Prime Apostles Peter and Paul Secondly Because she was in the greatest Repute for the first Ages as the most uncorrupt preserver of the Catholick Faith and keeper of Apostolicall Tradition when other Churches swerved from the Apostolick Doctrine whence it is that the Fathers of those Ages frequently appeale to her in their writings against Hereticks Thirdly Because Heresies arising in other Churches forced them to adde some explicatory Particles to the Creed thereby to vindicate the Faith from Imposture and distinguish themselves from unsound Professors but the Church of Rome had this happinesse for a long while that no Heresy sprang up in her which by infecting her Children inforced her to this necessity for that of the Novatians was about Ecclesiasticall Discipline rather a Schisme then a Heresy and Blastus was a Quartadecuman Erring only about the time of keeping Easter As for Florinus and Praxeas the one was no Romane but a stranger and soon discovered and both upon Discovery were banished as it seems for we heare not of any great harme they did or store of Disciples they led after them Now this felicity of the Romane Church caused them to keep their Creed entire according as they had received it from the Apostles their first renowned Founders without any Alteration or Addition so much as in the manner of expression to which purpose we may consult these three following Testimonies First S. Amb. in his forecited Epistle to Syricius Bishop of Rome exhorts all to believe the Apostles Creed which the Church of Rome hath alwaies preserved intemeratum untoucht and inviolate Secondly Ruffinus in his Exposition of the Creed upon those words I believe in the Father Almighty gives us this Admonition Illud non importunè commonendum puto quod in diversis Ecclesiis aliqua in his verbis inveniuntur adjecta in Ecclesiâ tamen urbis Romae hoc non deprehenditur factum quod ego propterea esse arbitror quòd neque haeresis ulla illic sumsit exordium mos ibi servatur antiquus eos qui gratiam Baptismi suscepturi sunt publicè id est fidelium populo audiente Symbolum reddere utique adjectionem unius saltem sermonis eorum qui precesserunt in fide non admittit auditus in caeteris autem locis quantum intelligi datur propter nonnullos haereticos addita quaedam videntur per quae novellae doctrinae sensus ceederetur excludi That is I think it not unseasonable to give notice that in diverse Churches somewhat is added to these words but not so in the Church of Rome the reason whereof I suppose to be this because neither any Heresy there took its Rise and the ancient custome is there also kept that the Persons who are to be baptized publiquely rehearse the Creed in the audâ—ence of the Church which would not endure to heare the least
are dead long agoe but of the maine Grounds of their Doctrine which are continued by their successors in the Church unto the worldes end CAP XII The fift Head of this Discourse touched in Generall viz. thé Supplementall or exegeticall Creeds framed in Succeeding Ages The Groundes whereon they were framed and their use Some Copies of Creeds set downe as well of the Hereticks as the Orthodoxe both consonant to this of the Apostles THIS Creed of the Apostles was in it selfe a Compleat Rule of Faith sufficient to establish the Church in her Beliefe but in processe of time certaine Hereticks arose who perverted the anciently received Faith in the old Catholck sense and meaning therof yet in outward shew Profession subscribed to the words Such were those Arch-hereticks Arius Macedonius Nestorius Eutyches against whom the foure first generall Councels were cal'd Now to detect and convince these close subtile Hereticks the Church was inforced to Frame some other Creedes or Symboles Nihil mirum videri debet saith S. Hilary quod tam frequenter fides exponi caeptae sint necessitatem hanc nobis furor haereticus imponit that is It is not to be marvelled that the Creed hath been so often explained in severall Formes of Confession the fury of hereticks hath forced us to it New Creedes then these were not for the Sense but only for the Frame and Composure they being nought else but Paraphrases or expositions of the old especially in those two maine Points of the Trinity and Incarnation which were then and I could wish they were not by some now chiefely oppugned the Divells malice and mans curiosity concurring together the Divells malice as being Points of the higest concernement and mans curiosity as farthest removed out of the Reach of our naturall Capacity and beyond the ken of human Reason Now that we may and how far we may lawfully thus explaine the Christian Faith and enlarge the Doctrinals of Christianity let us heare Vincentius Lirinensis who thus expresseth it with a like elegancy and Solidity Forsitan dicet aliquis nullusne in ecclesiâ Christi profectus habebitur Religionis Habeatur sanè maximus sed ita tamen ut verè Profectus sit ille fidei non permutatio Crescat oportet sed in suo duntaxat genere crescat in eodem sc Dogmate eodem sensu eademque Sententiâ Imitetur Animarum Religio rationem corporum quae licet annorum processu numeros suos evoluant explicent eadem tamen quae crant permanent multùm interest inter pueritiae florē senectutis maturitatem iidē tamen ipsi fiunt senes qui fuerant Adolescentes ut quamvis unius ejusdemque Hominis status habitusque mutetur una tamen nihilominus eadēque natura una eadēque Persona sit Parva lactantium membra magna juvenum eadem ipsa sunt tamen Quot parvulorum artus tot virorum siqua illa sunt quae aevi maturioris aetate pariuntur jam in seminis ratione proserta ut nihil novum postea proferatur in senibus quod non in pueris jam antea latitaverat Quod sihumana species in aliquam deinceps non sui generis vertatur effigiem aut certè addatur quippiam membrorum numero vel detrahatur necesse est ut totum Corpus vel intercidat vel prodigiosum fiat vel certè debilitetur Ita etiam Christianae Religionis dogma sequatur has decet profectuum leges ut annis sc consolidetur dilatetur tempore sublimetur aetate incorruptum tamen illibatumque permaneat universis partium suarum mensuris cunctisque quasi membris sensibus propriis plenum atque perfectum sit quod nihil praeterea Permutationis admittat nulla proprietatis dispendia nullam sustineat Definitionis varietatem The sum whereof is this That there may ought to be a proficiency in Religion the greater the better but it must be an increase not a change Religion must proceed on and grow but in the same sense Doctrine and substance like our Bodyes which in processe of Time grow bigger and yet abide the same There is much diference betweene the flower of Youth and the fading of Age yet they are the same still Their Bulke and stature diverse but the same nature and the same Person as before The limbes of Children are little of Men growen large yet both the same the Infant hath as many members as the fulgrowen neither appeares there ought new in the old which lay not hidden and as it were inclosed in the young so that riper Age doth but produce that to open view which the seminall vertue concealed and shut up in a narrower roome But if in processe of Time the humane shape should be changed into that of a diverse kind if ought should be added to the just number of Parts or taken from it the whole Body must of necessity perish grow prodigious or at least insensibly Pine away So the Doctrine of Christian Religion must observe these Rules of Growth that in processe of years it get strength spread hieghten yet stil remaine entire and unaltered in all its parts nothing added changed or cut off Thus he in his Commonitory against Heresies Chapter 28. 29. Now amongst those Explicatory Creeds which unfold and enlarge the Christian Faith in the severall Parts or limbes thereof the Nicene and Athanasian Creeds are the two Principall Framed both much about the same Time generally approved of by the Catholick Church in succeeding Ages and joyntly received with that of the Apostles particularly by our Church of England But before I come to treat of these two distinctly in a double Appendix According to what I proposed in the begining of my Discourse I shall conclude this Chapter and together with it this whole Treatise Concerning the Apostles Creed in setting downe some Ancient Formes or Cenfessions of Faith yet untouched which the Reader may please to compare with it and thereby discerne the variety of expression but agreement in Sense amongst other Bishops and Churches of that Primitive Age as yet unmentioned which will farther enlighten and establish what hath been already asserted And amongst these I shall Place some Confessions even of those Bishops who favoured Arius and Macedonius to shew how neere they came unto the Orthodoxe Formes who therein may serve to shame and testify against the Blasphemies of some moderne sectaries The first of these in Dignity as well as Time is that of Gregorius Thaumaturgus afterwards recited approved of in the fift Generall Councell held at Constantinople The Creed like his name is well worthy our wonder for not only Nicephorus lib. hist 6. cap 17. But Gregory Nyssen also in his Encomiastical Oration of Thaumaturgus gives us this Relation of its Originall and Composure That the Blessed Virgin revealed it unto him by the mouth of S. Iohn whereupon he strait committed it to Paper and left it to the Church which hath since kept and esteemed it as a sacred
so those Bishops wrote their Formulae Fidei and Paenitentiae libelli to him in Latine as Serrarius informes us in his Discourse on this Creed Much more reason had Athanasius to write this his Creed in Latine it being exhibited at Rome in a Synod of Latine Bishops on purpose to satisfy them concerning his Beliefe most of whom in all likelihood understood not the Greek Tongue Thirdly The foresaid reason is fortified by this other that Athanasius himselfe well understood the Latine Tongue and therefore needed not to communicate with them by an interpreter Which skill of Athanasius is not only made probable from the example of other Greeke Bishops as Eusebius Caesariensis Photinus and others of this latter Age also who joyned the study of both Tongues together and from his long abode in the Westerne Parts at severall times as at Triers above two years at Millain and Aquileia and at Rome above 18 moneths but clearly proved from that forecited passage of Nazianzene Orat. 21. Num. 46 47. Which I brought by way of Answer to the eight Objection against the Apostles Creed where he tells us how Athanasius composed the difference between the Greek and Latine Churches about the words Hypostasis and Essentia verborum sententiâ diligenter accurate perpensâ having diligently and accurately weighed the meaning of the wordes at length peswading both Parties that it was but a Logomachia a contention about Termes since both ment the same Thing Now such a Controversy as this could never have been stated with so full a satisfaction to both Parties unlesse he had been furnished with more than ordinary skill as well in the Latine as the Greeke CAP IIII. Some objsctions against what hath beene laid downe answered Especially Nazianzens Testimony concerning the Athanasian Creed is farther cleared and vindicated THus far have I proceeded By way of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in a positive and demonstrative way to assert the Author and Authority of the Athanasian Creed and by the way have enervated most of those Arguments which I have found brought against either But least I should seeme to leave the Tract unperfect by passing by any considerable objection which hath to my knowledg been alleadged against it I shall set downe the objections distinctly and subjoyne some light Strictures by way of Answer Object 1. Thay who ascribe this Creed to Athanasius agree not either about the Time or place Durandus saith it was written in his first Banishment at Triers where he lay hid in a Well to avoid the treacheries of the Arians Manuell Caleca and Baronius say it was wrote to P. Iulius either from his Diocesse at Alexandria or given in writing to him and the Roman Synod when he pleaded his Cause before them that so he might be received into the Communion of the Church of Rome wherein Baronius is deceived more wayes than one first because not only heere but in the the whole worke of his Annals he laboures to prove that in all Ages the Bishop of Rome had full Power to cite absolve or condemne the Bishops of the East and of the whole World Secondly because Athanasius was not accused for matter of Doctrine by the Arians but for matter of fact and his restitution to his Bishoprick opposed by them for Politicall inconveniencies as that his returne had once already caused seditions Slaughters in Alexandria that he had been restored to his See contrary to the Canons as one condemned by the Synod of Tyre and not yet absolved Thirdly because if he had needed to render an account of his Faith to Maximus Bishop of Triers or Iulius of Rome Hee would have used none other than the Necene Creed it being not opportune to have used any other at that Time for feare he migt have been thought to imitate the Arians and Semi-Arians who ever and anon framed new Confessions in their Synods ante-Synods on purpose to depreciate the Nicene Creed as false imperfect or obscure and for this very reason were chiefly hated by the Catholicks Answer 1. The severall opinions about the Time and Place where and when Athanasius Published his Creed are but circumstantiall differences and therefore not destructive of the main busines except we wil therefore deny an Hell because Divines differ about the Place where it is seated and the Time when it was prepared Besides all these differences are easy enough to be reconciled as I have shewed already taking my rise from Possevins judgement As for the Well at Triers what ever Baronius may judge of it yet if it beare that Inscription which Possevine witnesseth it may probably enough have been the Place where Athanasius at first composed this Creed of his either lying in it there for shelter at his first coming to Triers till he had made his innocency known to Constantine the younger and to Maximus the Bishop of the place or inscribing that Title on it in imitation of the Apostles Creed which was framed in a like place as we find it recorded by Fr. Quaresmius an Eye-witnesse in his forecited Testimony 2. What though Baronius ascribe more authority to the Bishop of Rome than in truth is due to him or than Iulius challenged in that Age What if Athanasius acknowledged him not for universall Bishop Neverthelesse he might prudently appeale to him as the chiefe Patriarch of the Christian Church sitting in the head City of the Empire as to a Person disengaged in his quarrell so not to be justly excepted against by his adversaries The appeale was not out of duty but discretion 3. That Athanasius was accused for matter of Doctrine I have already proved and therefore he had good reason to make confession of his faith 4. The Arians and Semi-Arians were hated by the Catholicks for not assenting to the Nicene Councell and for rejecting the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Consubstantiall in explaining the Divinity of the Son of God whereupon they framed new Formes or Confessions of their own contrary to the Decrees of that Councell Yet for all this Athanasius the great Patron of the Nicene Faith might very well compose a larger explanation of those two materiall and mysterious Points of the Trinity and Incarnation then questioned an explanation not contrary as the Arians Confessions but concordant to the Nicene Creed and this he might doe without any more derogation thereto than came afterwards from Ierome Leo other succeeding Fathers who made Confessions of their Faith or Creeds of their own private cōposure at this day extant in their workes Creeds not to be imposed on all Churches but to manifest their owne Beliefe or for the use of some particular Diocesse The Authorities produced to the contrary speake against the fraudulent destructive Symboles of hereticall Synods Ob. 2. This creed is usually left out of the Manuscripts of Athanasius his workes or at least hath not his name prefixt Answ This is not a sufficient Argument to disprove the Author because the other workes
Christopher who thrust Leo the Fift out of his Chaire in the yeare 908. and after seaven Moneths was in like manner dejected by Sergius But Baronius gives a reason to the contrary Anno 888. Nullo pacto possunt tribui ista Christophoro qui invasor Apostolicae Sedis mox sede pulsus perbrevi tempore eam tenuit tumultuosè That is This Addition cannot be ascribed to Pope Christopher who having invaded the Apostolick See was quickly thrust out againe having held it but a very little while and that in great troubles Wherefore with more probability we may attribute this Addition to Pope Sergius his Successour who made this businesse of the Procession his first and chiefe work and sent unto the French Bishops to gather the most solid Arguments they could find against the Errour of the Greekes upon the Receipt of which letters a Synod was called at Soissons 6 Cal. Jul. Aº 909. Wherein Herivaeus Archbishop of Rheimes earnestly exhorts the Clergy to prosecute the question against the Photian Errours and Blasphemies Hortamur vestram Fraternitatem saith he ut unà me cum secundum admonitionem Domini Romanae sedis presidis singuli nostrum perspectis Patrum Catholicorum sententiis de divinae Scripturae pharetris acutas proferamus sagittas ad conficiendam belluam monstri renascentis ad terebrandum Caput nequissimi Serpentis And this may be the reason why the ancient Romane writers never delivered to posterity the name of that Pope who contrary to the Precept and Practise of his Predecessor Leo 3. undertook to adde this Particle to the Creed namely because they were ashamed of such an Author as Sergius an usurper of the See and one of a most infamous life whom if they had alleadged they had laid both themselves and their cause open to the scoffes and railings of the Greekes who would greedily have laid hold on such an advantage Otherwise it were a Thing extreamly improbable that the Clergy and Notaries of the Romane Church should be so grossely negligent as not to insert a matter of this consequence into their publique Registers and that all the Ecclesiasticall Writers of that and the next Age should quite passe over it in silence Especially it being done in a great Synod of Westerne Bishops as the forenamed Bishop of Colosse witnessed in the Councell of Florence when he there disputed in this cause on behalfe of the Romane Church His words are these Cyrillus literis mandavit Sanctum spiritum esse per Filium ac Filii esse ab ipso profluere quam profecto sententiam non dixisset nisi coactus fuisset haereticorum ipsorum opinionem evertere quemadmodum etiam Romanae Ecclesiae contigit nam maximo in Gallia in Hispaniis Schismate imminente cum jam ex filioque passim celebraretur Romano Pontifici fuit necesse in multorum Occidentalium amplae Dignitatis magnique Consilii Patrum Conventu addito ex Filioque Symbolum magis illustrare That is Cyril hath wrote that the Holy Ghost is by the Sonne and of the Sonne and that he proceedeth from him which he had not declared unlesse he had been compelled thereby to overthrow the opinion of the Hereticks as it fell out also in the Romane Church for a great Schisme being now ready to breake forth in the Churches of France and Spaine when as the particle Filioque was commonly used it was necessary for the Bishop of Rome to illustrate the Creed by the Addition of that particle which he did in an Assembly of many Westerne Bishops and those of the greatest Dignity and judgement Sess 7a. About 165 years after the ejection of the Patriarch Photius Michael Cerularius vehemently set himselfe against the Latines accusing them not only concerning the Procession of the Holy Ghost but also concerning Traditions and Ceremonies as for Communicating in unleavened bread fasting on Saturday c. Leo Achridenus Metropolitan of Bulgaria seconded him Michael Psellus Tutor to Michael Ducas the Emperour surnamed Paropinaceus pursued the quarrell and so did Theophylact who flourished about the yeare 1070. Thus began and thus continued the deplorable Schisme between the Churches of East and West the causes whereof were these that follow 1. The Addition of this particle Filioque to the Nicene or Constantinopolitan Creed not only without but against the Consent of the Easterne Churches who had composed that Creed but were never called to that Synod wherein this Alteration was made yea still protested against it But which was more this Addition was made in contempt of the third generall Councell held at Ephesus which expressely forbad it and denounced an Anathema against him whosoever should dare to alter this Creed by Addition or Diminution cap. 7. For though an Oecumenicall Synod cannot absolutely prescribe to another Oecumenicall whence the first Councell of Constantinople added much by way of explication to the Nicene Creed yet it may prescribe Lawes to Inferiour Synods whether Provinciall or Nationall so that nothing ought to be done in the common cause of the Faith but by the common Judgment and determination of the Catholick Church Thus did the Greeks complaine And when the Latines afterward urged the Authority of the Romane See now growing daily greater that the Bishop of Rome by a peculiar priviledge derived from St Peter the Prince of the Apostles was to take care that the Church received no Damage that he had an infallible Judgment by the speciall Gift of the holy Ghost in all controversies of Faith and authority to decide them so that there was no necessity he should expect the judgment of the Easterne Churches and that this was the Priviledge of the first See which had received the Primacy from S. Peter Christs vicar on Earth The Greeks replyed First that S. Peter never chalenged that priviledge to himselfe to judge alone and to be judged of none for being called in question that he had conversed with the Gentiles he was faine to make an Apology for himselfe in the publick audience of the Church Act. 11. And when the Controversy arose whether the Gentiles should be circumcised and observe the Ceremoniall Law no Appeale was made to S. Peter but a Synod was called wherin though he spake first yet Iames as Bishop of Jerusalem the place where the Synod was called decided the question and seemes to have sate therein as President Besides S. Paul resisted him to his face at Antioch and publickly rebuked him for causing others to Judaize by his example as we Read Galatians 2. 14. Which he would not have presumed to doe if he had conceived him endued with such a supereminent priviledge So then there appeares nought in Peter above the rest of the Apostles but a Primacy of order or of Dignity at the most such as is acknowledged to be fit in the Church of God and this Primacy conferred on him either for that he was first called or for his Age or Zeale or that he was commonly the first Speaker
Fides Apostolica OR A Discourse asserting the received Authors and Authority of the APOSTLES CREED TOGETHER WITH The Grounds and Ends of the Composing thereof by the APOSTLES the sufficiency thereof for the Rule of Faith the Reasons of the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Originall Greeke and the Division or Parts of it Hereunto is added a double Appendix the First touching the ATHANASIAN the Second touching the NICENE Creed By GEO. ASHWELL B. D. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Jud. v. 3. Christianus mihi nomen est Catholicus vero Cognomen Pacian Ep. ad Symp. I shall believe that the Apostles Creed was made by them such Reverence I beare to the Churches Tradition untill other Authors be certainly found out K. Ch. 5 Paper to M. Henderson OXFORD Printed by LEON LICHFIELD Printer to the University for Jo. Godwin and Ric. Davis 1653. TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE and my much Honoured Lord Thomas LORD Wenman Baron of Kilmaynham and Viscount Tuam MY LORD THE Age wherein we live as it is unhappy in too many Particulars so in nothing more then that it hath almost lost the ancient Faith amongst so many Factions which pretend to it and exclude others from it Some we have who have maimed it by cutting off certain Articles and others made a Monster of it by heterogeneous Additions Some have destroyed it by corrupting the substance thereof and others discoloured it by counterfeiting its appearance Some have poysoned the Body thereof by the venime of Heresies and others plucked it in pieces by the violence of Schismes But what Remedy to cure these Corruptions and Disorders Sure we can use no better meanes than what the Prophet adviseth us unto To aske for the old Paths and walke therein and so find rest unto our Soules Ier. 6. 16. Or to take that course which our Blessed Saviour made use of in deciding the question of Divorces namely to reduce the matters in Controversies unto the Primitive Institution Mat. 19. 8. By which meanes wee shall find if we make a sober and impartiall search what was the Faith which the ancient Church received from Christ and his Apostles that which she universally profest in the Primitive Times and delivered unto her Children in its native Purity and Perfection Now I shall think my paines most happily bestowed if I may be thought to have contributed in the least unto so good a Worke by this ensuing Discourse the first Rudiments whereof that I may give your Lordship an account of its Composure I drew some years agoe in pursuance of a Collegiate Office which then required me to pitch on some Fundamentall part of Divinity which might best fit the condition and capacity of the Youth who were then my proper Auditours and serve as a Ground-worke to settle them in the Principles of Religion In order to this I thought that I could not make a better choise then by fixing on the Creed which all ages of the Church have entitled to the Apostles and looked on as an exact summary of Christian Religion as to matter of Doctrine But before I pitched on the Body of the Creed it selfe I judged it very expedient if not absolutely necessary to prefixe somewhat by way of Preface touching the Authors and Authority thereof which to mee seeme to stand and fall together for if the Creed were not composed by the Apostles but afterwards gathered out of their writings by some obscure Hand not infallibly guided as theirs but obnoxious unto Errour I cannot as yet see how it can well make good its Title of Apostolick or justly challenge that sacred esteeme which it hath universally obtained from all Sorts and Sects of Christians even from the most pestilent of Hereticks And this I was the rather induced to doe by reason of a certain short Treatise of a Learned Countryman of ours wherein he hath been pleased to lay downe severall Arguments in disprovall of the received Authors the first I suppose who ever proceeded so farre and thought fit to imploy his wit and paines on so unhappy a Subject And these Arguments of his as Novelties usually spread farther and take much at their first appearance in the world we have found since not only entertained but improved also and augmented in number by a more Learned Forreiner I could heartily wish that they had bestowed their paines upon some other Subject whereby they might have gained a more safe repute unto themselves and a more solid advantage to the Publick both which are purchased not by battering and beating downe what is already well built and setled but by repairing the Decayes and Breaches of the Christian Church or by building on the old Foundations whereas we may too justly say of such endeavours as these in matters of Faith what the Apostle by an elegant antithesis speaks in a matter of fact viz. The eating of Things offered to Idols wherein the Trespasser most dangerously Scandalized his Brother that by this ill-managed knowledge of his he did aedificare fratrem in ruinam Edify his weaker Brother but in a most perverse sense not to feare God but to fall quite away from him As to my own particular the objections of these two Learned men served opportunely to awaken mee unto a more serious and exact Review of those ancient Records which the Primitive Church hath left us wherein finding just Ground as I conceived for asserting the received Authors and Authority of the Creed by many concordant Testimonies of those first and best Ages and those seconded by the suffrages of the most eminent Divines of these latter Times although divided into Parties and differing in many other Poynts I undertooke to examine the force of the Arguments alleadged to the contrary in which though I found at the first sight some faire Probabilities sufficient to startle an unwary Reader yet upon a deliberate comparing them with the Consent the Cleerenesse and the Authenticalnesse of the contrary proofes I could by no meanes see such a Proportion of weight and force in them as to overthrow the combined strength of such an Army of witnesses But whether or no my answers to these objections will appeare satisfactory unto others I must leave unto those others to judge who see not with my eyes as I doe not with theirs Yet I hope that these my endeavours will meet with Pardon at least though they come farre short of that perfection which they may chance to look for and I could wish for when they please to consider the ancient and acknowledged Right of the Cause I plead for the number and Authority of my witnesses by whom I am supported together with the newnesse of the contrary Arguments which as no Age before ever saw so no Man to my knowledge ever went about to solve The first attempts in any kind are usually rude and imperfect much more when they proceed from an unskilfull and unpractised Hand such as mine which never before ventured on ought which it durst expose unto
to taxe all those of Socinianisme who denie or doubt of the received Authours of the Creed so this I may safely say that unawares they may make way for it as they doe also who decry or debilitate the Authority of the Church and Fathers I have endeavoured therefore in this following Treatise to vindicate as well the Authours as the Authority of the Apostles Creed as being the maine Basis of the Christian Religion to which all succeeding Creeds are in the nature of Paraphrases or Superstructures a worke I conceive too suitable unto the Disease of this Age and so most unhappily requisite an Age wherein the very Principles of Christianity are called in Question and Faith derided as the Portion of deluded Fooles and Idiots An Age wherein some have taken upon them to Correct the Old Creed and others to frame new Ones An Age wherein some accuse our Mother the Church of England for Beleeving too much as the Socinian with some other Sectaries and others for Beleeving too little as the Romane Catholick whose Church hath added to the Creed severall other Articles to be beleeved by all Christians as of necessity to Salvation a Catalogue whereof we may find in the Bull of PIUS 4th among the Acts of their late Tridentine Councill as also in the Romane Catechisme Wherefore I shall indeavour withall to cleare my much honoured Mother from this double crosse-imputation by asserting as well the sufficiency as the necessity of the Creed for Salvation This is the summe and end of my Thoughts which I never intended to make publick when I first composed these notes some yeares agoe for my Collegiate Catechisticall Lectures But when I since daily found many little or nothing to regard the Authority of the Creed and some of no meane note to write against both the Authority and the Authours I reviewed and enlarged them by farther Testimonies of Divines both Ancient and Moderne amongst whom finding an unexpected Harmony and Consent in this matter I undertook to examine the Reasons produced to the contrary which as I hope upon due triall will not be found so weighty and convincing as to overthrow so Old so Generall so Received a Tradition Now having proceeded thus farre and taken no small paines in the Search I presumed to expose them to a more publick view not knowing any who hath hitherto handled this Argument Polemically and in a set Discourse wherein if I have any way failed the Truth I hope will not suffer by my weake Defence but meet hereafter with an abler Patron But if I have so handled it that I can revoke any erroneous Christian fixe the wavering or confirme him that stands I shall have great Cause and good opportunity to rejoyce in contributing the least Mite to the profit of the Christian Church or the praise of Christ our common Saviour who is stiled by the Apostle The Author and finisher of our Faith Heb. 12. 2. To whose blessed Guidance and Protection I commit both thee and my selfe in these darke dangerous and unsetled Times 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Symbolum D. Athanasii QVicunque vult salvus esse ante omnia opus est ut teneat Catholicam fidem quam nisi quisque integram inviolatamque servaverit absque dubio in aeternum peribit Fides autem Catholica haec est ut unum Deum in Trinitate Trinitatem in unitate veneremur neque confundentes Personas neque substantiam separantes Alia est enim Persona Patris alia Filii alia Spiritus Sancti sed Patris Filii Spiritus Sancti una est Divinitas aequalis Gloria coaeterna majestas Qualis Pater talis Filius talis Spiritus Sanctus Increatus Pater increatus Filius increatus Spiritus Sanctus Immensus Pater immensus Filius immensus Spiritus Sanctus Aeternus Pater aeternus Filius aeternus Spiritus Sanctus Et tamen non tres Aeterni sed unus Aeternus sicut non tres Increati nec tres Immensi sed unus Increatus unus Immensus Similiter Omnipotens Pater omnipotens Filius omnipotens Spiritus Sanctus tamen non tres Omnipotentes sed unus Omnipotens Ita Deus Pater Deus Filius Deus Spiritus Sanctus tamen non tres Dii sed unus est Deus Ita Dominus Pater Dominus Filius Dominus Spiritus Sanctus tamen non tres Domini sed unus est Dominus Quia sunt sigillatim unamquamque Personam Deum Dominum confiteri Christiana veritate compellimur Ita tres Deos aut Dominos dicere Catholicâ Religione prohibemur Pater a nullo est factus nec creatus nec genitus est Filius à Patre solo est non factus nec creatus sed genitus Spiritus Sanctus à Patre Filioque non factus nec creatus nec genitus est sed procedens Unus ergò Pater non tres Patres unus Filius non tres Filii unus Spiritus Sanctus non tres Spiritus Sancti Et in hac Trinitate nihil prius aut posterius nihil majus aut minus sed totae tres Personae coaeternae sibi sunt coaequales ita ut per omnia sicut jam dictum est unitas in Trinitate Trinitas in unitate veneranda sit Qui vult ergò salvus esse ita De Trinitate sentiat Sed necessarium est ad aeternam Salutem ut Incarnationem quoque Domini nostri Jesu Christi fideliter credat Est ergò fides recta ut credamus confiteamur quia Dominus noster Jesus Christus Dei filius Deus Homo est Deus est ex substantiâ Patris ante Secula genitus Homo est ex substantiâ matris in Seculo natus Perfectus Deus Perfectus Homo ex animâ Rationali humanâ Carne subsistens aequalis Patri secundùm Divinitatem minor Patre secundùm Humanitatem qui licet Deus sit Homo non duo tamen sed unus est Christus unus autem non conversione Divinitatis in Carnem sed assumptione Humanitatis in Deum unus omninò non confusione substantiae sed unitate Personae nam sicut anima Rationalis Caro unus est Homo ita Deus Homo unus est Christus Qui passus est pro Salute nostrâ descendit ad Inferos tertiâ die resurrexit à mortuis ascendit in Coelos sedet ad dextram Dei Patris Omnipotentis Inde venturus est judicare vivos mortuos ad cujus adventum omnes Homines resurgent cum corporibus reddituri sunt de factis propriis rationem qui bona egerunt ibunt in vitam aeternam qui verò mala in ignem aeternum Haec est fides Catholica quam nisi quisque fideliter firmiterque crediderit salvus esse non poterit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Of the Authours and Authority of the APOSTLES CREED CAP. I. The Dogmaticall part
autem in illis quidem vocabulis ubi de Divinitate fides ordinatur In Deum Patrem dicitur In Jesum Christum Filium ejus in Spiritum Sanctum In caeteris verò ubi non de Divinitate sed de Creaturis ac Mysteriis sermo est In praepositio non additur ut dicatur In Sanctam Ecclesiam sed Sanctam Ecclesiam credendam esse non ut in Deum sed ut Ecclesiam Deo congregatam Remissionem Peccatorum credendam esse non in remissionem peccatorum resurrectionem carnis non in resurrectionem carnis Hac itaque Praepositionis syllabâ Creator à Creaturis secernitur divina separantur ab humanis that is He said not In the holy Church nor in the forgivenesse of sinnes nor in the resurrection of the Body for if he had added the Preposition In there had been the same sense with what went before but now in those passages of the Creed wherein our faith concerning God is digested we say In God the Father and in Jesus Christ his Sonne and in the Holy Ghost but in the residue which speak of the Creatures and the mysteries relating to them the Preposition In is not added for we say not I beleeve in the Holy Church but I beleeve the Holy Church not as in God but as the Church gathered to God likewise we are to beleeve the remission of sinnes not in the remission of sinnes and the resurrection of the Body not in the resurrection of the Body So by this short Preposition the Creatour is distinguished from the Creature and God from man Now Ruffinus was one very well skill'd in the Greek Tongue as who Translated much of Origen out of that Language as well as in the Latine and so deserves the more credit in judging of the Phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Credo in Paschasius also in his Book de Spiritu Saucto written against Macedonius vindicates the true Writing and sense of the Creed as touching this particular in these words Credimus Ecclesiam quasi Regenerationis Matrem non in Ecclesiam credimus quasi in Salutis Authorem nam cum hoc de Spiritu Sancto universa confiteatur Ecclesia numquid in seipsam credere potest qui in Ecclesiam credit in Hominem credit non enim Homo ex Ecclesiâ sed Ecclesia esse caepit ex Homine recede itaque ex hac Blasphemiae persuasione ut in aliquam humanam te aestimes debere credere Creaturam cum omninò nec in Angelum nec in Archangelum sit credendum nonnullorum imperitia praepositionem hanc In velut de proximà vicinaque sentintiâ in consequentem traxit ac rapuit ex superfluo imprudentur apposuit in nullis autem Canonicis de quibus textus Symbolipendet accepimus quia in Ecclesiam credere sicut in Spiritum Sanctum Filiumque debeamus Et ideò cum ab hoc Honore Creatura omnis aliena sit hic in quem credere praecipimur viz. Spiritus Sanctus Deus est quod verbum Divinitati specialiter vox Domini Salvatoris assignat ita dicens Credite in Deum in me credite Et iterum Qui credit in me non credit in me sed in eum qui me misit that is We beleeve the Church as the Mother of our new Birth not in the Church as in the Authour of Salvation For when as the whole Church professeth this of the Holy Ghost can she beleeve also in her selfe He who beleeveth in the Church beleeveth in man for man sprung not from the Church but the Church from man be farre therefore from this Blasphemous perswasion as to think that thou oughtest to beleeve in any humane Creature whereas our Faith is not to be placed no not in an Angel or Archangel The unskilfulnesse of some hath caused them to take the Preposition In from the neighbouring sentence which went before and to apply it to the subsequent rashly imprudently and superfluously whereas we are not warranted by any of the Canonicall Books on which the Text of the Creed depends to beleeve in the Church as we ought to beleeve in the holy Ghost and the Sonne and therefore seeing this Honour is not communicable to any Creature he in whom we are commanded to beleeve namely the holy Ghost is God hence also our Saviour especially applieth this word unto the Divinity saying thus yee beleeve in God beleeve also in me And againe He that beleeveth in me beleeveth not in me but in him that sent me Thus did these Fathers read this Article of the Creed and thus they understood it Credo in that is Colloco fiduciam in Deo which the Scripture appropriats to God alone as to the peculiar object of our Trust and Confidence and wholy denies to Creatures See Psal 146. 3. 44. 7. Jer. 17. 5. 1 Tim. 6. 17. As for that place Exod. 14. 31. the Hebrew word there 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used signifies properly to beleeve the truth or Fidelity of one so may well agree to Moses who spake to the People in Gods name and had so often confirmed the truth of his words by the following miraculous Successe now the word is usually joyned in Construction with a Noune of the Ablative Case having the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 prefixt which is the signe of that Case and therefore should be rather translated if we follow the Hebraisme close Crediderunt in Deo in Mose However the sense is this They beleeved Gods word spoken to them by Moses God as the Author Moses as the Messenger So here 's no opposition but a Subordination and therefore no Derogation to Gods Prerogative But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Greeke and Credo in in the Latine are phrases implying more and answer to the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies to depend or rely on an Infinite Power and goodnesse which therefore both can and will deliver us from all evill and conferre in due time all Good upon us now this is peculiar to God alone and therefore appropriated to him both in the Scripture and Fathers The Particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Hebrew is I confesse oft superfluous Thence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Greek and In in the Latine which answer to it sometimes redound in the Scriptures Creeds and Fathers in their translations out of the Hebrew or imitations of that sacred Tongue yet not alwayes Now to know when these Particles redound when not we are to compare them with other Parallell places of Scripture and Copies of the Creed and then we shall find that though some Greeke Copies of the Creed prefixe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the Article of the Church and the three subsequent ones yet others as those of Marcellus Anoyranus and Chrysostome hereafter to be alleaged omitt it as superfluous but still religiously retaine it in the precedent Articles of the Sonne and Holy Ghost by
which it plainly appeares that they esteemed it essentiall to these but pleonasticall unto those The like may be said of some old Latine Copies of the Creed which yet are very few wherein In redounds by the like Hebrew Pleonasme Ob. 2. The Socinians say they doe all acknowledg the Apostles Creed for the matter though they doubt whether it were composed in this Forme by the Apostles wherein they are not the first nor alone Erasmus seems to have first made question of it after him Calvin and most of his followers wholy yet deny not the Authority but acknowledge the matter to be true Nay the Socinians complaine that whereas the Creed containes all Fundamentall Truthes yet other Articles are obtruded as necessary such as be not contained in the Creed how then can the denyall of the Composure of this Creed by the Apostles any way advantage the Socinians Answ The Socinians deny some Articles of the Creed in the Sense which the Ancient Fathers understood them from whom they received the Creed it selfe for words and ought to have done for meaning and the denyall of the Authors makes them in all likelihood the bolder in their mis-interpretations Then although they hold that the Creed containes all Fundamentall Truthes yet they hold not all the Articles thereof Fundamentall On the other side they unjustly complaine of other Articles obtruded on their Beleefe whereas the Church hath only explained some few Articles of the Creed and vindicated them from Hereticall Glosses and Corruptions warranting those her Expositions by old Catholick Tradition upon a due legall search in an Oecumenicall Synod Lastly the denyall of the Composure of this Creed by the Apostles as a Summary of Truthes ordinarily necessary to Salvation which was the maine end of Composing it much advantageth the Socinians who beleeve not all to be necessary and some not true as they are construed in the old received Sense If Erasmus began first to doubt of the received Authors of the Creed he cannot well be excused for questioning so ancient and establish'd a Tradition whereby no Benefit could redound to the Christian Church but the Faith of many might be startled and Heresies awaked as we have seen by the Event and I am sorry that the Socinians should look on him as they doe though I hope amisse as their first Founder or chiefe Patron in this latter Age by reason of this and some other extravagancies of his Pen so that what Posseuine from others saies of him in relation to Luther may be verified in respect of Socinus in some of his Errours Erasmus innuit Socinus irruit And this Nescio of Erasmus which others have since improved to a Nego was presently censured by the Parisian Divines As for Mr Calvin though he saith indeed that he will not contend with any one about the Authors of the Creed as a Thing in his judgment not overmuch materiall yet he produceeth two Arguments in the same place which evince the Apostles and none others to have been the Composers thereof namely the concordant suffrages of Antiquity and the publike receiving or use thereof presently upon the Rise or originall of the Christian Church Instit lib. 12. cap. 16. 6. 18. But of his Testimony more fully hereafter Ob. 3. It seemes that the Creed containes not the whole Body of the Credenda or Christian Beleefe not all Credenda in generall for there are many thousand more which lie scattered in the Scriptures no nor all Fundamentall Points or necessary Doctrinall Truthes E. G. faith in the Trinity the Canon of Scripture that we are to worship God and goe to the Father by the Sonne the doctrine of Repentance good Works Baptisme Imposition of hands which are expresly called a Foundation Heb. 6. 1 2. none of which are in the Creed Adde hereunto the Deity of the Sonne of God which seems not to be proved by those words in the second Article His only begotten Sonne for he is called the Sonne of God in Scripture in respect of his Conception and Resurrection both which relate to his Humane Nature See Luk. 1. 35. Act. 13. 32 33. Rom. 1. 4. Answ The Creed containes all Fundamentall Points purely Doctrinall or Speculative that is necessary Credenda as opposed to the Agenda or Practicalls of Christianity The Canon of Scripture containes these Fundamentalls dispersedly and is delivered downe to us as the Creed is by Tradition but not comprehended in the Creed for when we name Fundamentals we speake of Matters or Points to be beleeved not of the Bookes which containe those Points The Points cited out of Heb. 6. are all Practicall so also is the worship of God and comming to the Father by the Sonne Baptisme is a Sacrament one of the Agenda's in the Church yet referr'd in the Nicene Creed to the 10th Article as the outward ordinary meanes for remission of Sinnes The Mystery of the Trinity is included in the Creed as hath been already shewed And so is the Divinity of our Saviour in those fore-cited words Vnigenitum Patris Filium The only begotten Sonne of the Father For though he be called the Sonne of God in relation to his Humanity in Luk. 1. 35. because in his Conception or Incarnation the Holy Ghost did supplere vicem Patris by a miraculous overshadowing or rather not simply as man but as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God and man in one Person in respect of that strange Vnion of the Humane Nature in one Hypostasis with the Divine by the supernaturall operation of the Holy Ghost as also in relation to his Raising againe whereby he was chiefly demonstrated to be the true Messiah or Sonne of God the first begotten of the Dead Act. 13. 32 33. Rom. 1. 4. Col. 1. 18. and Revel 1. 5. comp Col. 1. 15. Rom. 8. 29. Yet in the second Article of the Creed he is called the Only begotten Sonne of God with relation to God the Father and in respect of his Divinity which he received of the Father by an ineffable Generation from all Eternity for this Article is placed before his Conception by the Holy Ghost and his Nativity of the Virgin Mary much more before his Resurrection which manifested not made him the Sonne of God and therefore cannot relate to his Manhood but to his Godhead not to his Conception or Resurrection in time but to his Generation from Everlasting CAP. II. The History of the Apostles Composing the Creed out of Ruffinus Five Reasons why the Apostles delivered it to the Church not in Writing but by an Orall Tradition An objection against the preserving of it by Tradition Answered TOuching the Composing of the Creed by the Apostles which is my first Head Ruffinus Presbiter of Aquileia St Jeromes Contemporary and great Emulatour gives us this Relation in the beginning of his Exposition on the Creed Tradunt majores nostri quod post Ascensionem Domini cum per adventum Sancti Spiritus super singulos quosque Apostolos igneae
much of it was not extant when this Epistle was written and therefore cannot be here meant by St Jerome Theodoret to the same purpose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of which he speaks the Doctrine publikely proposed at the time of Baptisme wherein we put off our sinns and put on the spirit what is it but the Creed which was then profest especially since he gives it such a Character of exactnesse that it hath nothing either wanting or wast a fit Periphrasis of the Creed Oecumenius accordeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Poole wherein we are borne anew is the water of Baptisme and the Rule or Doctrine opposed to the Law which ought to satisfie us as that which renders us new Creatures is the Rule of Faith comprized in the Creed Againe to the Philippians the Apostle speaketh in these words Chap. 3. v. 15 16. Let us as many as be perfect be thus minded and if in any thing yee be otherwise minded God shall reveale even this unto you neverthelesse whereto we have already attained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let us walke by the same Rule Where the Apostle useth the very same phrase And this by the way is a good admonition for moderation in Controversies about points of lesser Consequence which grate not upon the foundation that we doe not presently Reprobate those who are otherwise minded but patiently expect their farther Illumination in still keeping our selves without wavering close to those Grounds whereto we have already attained by profession of our Creed in Baptisme The Fathers so understand this Place together with latter Interpreters in their Annotations on it Ambrose Non extra Regulam Disciplinae sapere in conversatione Fidei sed hoc sapere quod Commune sit modestum in Evangelii veritate which is most properly applicable to the Creed for that is the Rule of the Christian Discipline or Faith which is most commonly received and most modestly urged S. Chrysost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Rule saith he receives neither Addition nor Diminution for then it looseth the very essence of a Rule let us walk therefore by the same Faith within the same Bounds What Rule what Faith is this but the Creed which is the Boundary or Limit of the Christian Beleife To him assents Theophilact in the same words Oecumenius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By the Rule saith he he understands the Faith or Creed for as you spoile a Rule by taking away from it or adding to it so is it also in the Faith Anselme construes this Rule of Communis Fidei sensus the Common Sense or Substance of the Christian faith which is comprehended in the Creed Cajetan also of the Regula Fidei morum the Rule of faith in the Creed of life in the Commandements Estius in like manner Hortor vos omnes eâdem Regulâ fidei Doctrinae incedere eandemque Regulam tenere etiam alibi de fide loquens Regulam nominat ut Galat vlt Quicunque hanc Regulam I exhort you to walke in the same Rule of faith Doctrine to hold the same Rule The Apostle elswhere speaking of the Faith cals it a Rule Gal. 6 15 16. 5. Fiftly In his Epistle to the Ephesians exhorting them to unity he sets downe seven motives or grounds thereof and amongst these he reckons One Faith where Faith is cleerly taken for the Object of Faith or Principles of Beleefe which are contained in the Creed whence it followes in the very next wordes One Baptisme that Baptisme wherein we make Profession of this Faith Otherwise if we look on the Habite of Faith or the actuall Celebration of Baptisme we have as many Faiths as Believers and as many Baptismes as Persons Baptised And to clear this Interpretation farther yet if we compare this Text with those words of his Chap. 2. 20. in the same Epistle we shall find the Framers of this Creed Yee are built saith he on the Foundation of the Apostles that is on the Grounds of Faith laid by the Apostles not on their Persons for they are dead long agoe It is added there 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and on the Foundation of the Prophets viz not the Prophets of the old Testament but of the New who were the Apostles Co-partners in laying the foundation of the Christian Church Comp. Eph 3. 5. Act 13. 1 2 3. Math 23. 34. 1 Cor. 12. 28. 14. 29 32. Rev 18. 20 24. 6. Sixtly 1 Tim 6. 20. He thus chargeth Timothy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 O Timothy keep the Depositum or that which is committed to thy trust which Depositum both our Divines and those of the Church of Rome understand of the saving Doctrine of the Gospell which we find for matter of Beleife summed up in the Creed And the following words lead us to this construction avoyding profane and vaine bablings and oppositions of Science falsely so called of which Science the Gnosticks had their name which some professing have erred concerning the Faith Besides the Metaphor of a Depositum well suits with the Creed first in the manner of Delivery the one is committed to our Hands the other to our Eares both a kind of Tradition Then in the strictnesse of keeping not the least parcell of a Depositum is to be diminish'd nor the least tittle of our Creed to be parted with S. Basil therefore would not forgoe one Iota when the Arians would have had him change 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 into 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In this sense Expositours agree both Auncient and Moderne So Jerome Commendatum a nobis servandum tibi fidei Depositum custodi And upon those words before v. 12. thou hast professed a good Profession before many witnesses In Baptismo saith he ab renunciando Seculo Pompis ejus at which time they also constantly made a Profession of the Faith Theophilact likewise by his Depositum understands the Grounds of Faith in opposition to humane Reasoning which falsely usurps the name of knowledge make us erre frō the Faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the faith admits not saith he of disputes Estius construes the words more plainly of a Doctrinall Tradition contra-distinct to the Scripture delivered by Christ and received by the Apostles which containes fully all the Articles of the Faith to which nothing was added by succeeding Councels but the same preserved still explained illustrated and defended against succrescent Heresies His words are these Non solas Scripturas Paulus apud Timotheum deposuerat sed doctrinam sanam viva voce ei tradiderat Praeter Depositi rationem est ut ei aliquid addatur hinc ergò sequitur fidei semel à Christo traditae ab Apostolis acceptae nihil prorsus addi posse neque id agi in Conciliis Fidei causâ congregatis ut novi condantur Articuli Fidei sed ut fidei Doctrina ab initio tradita conservetur explicetur illustretur contra succrescentes
and convince the perversnesse of Hereticks For we have received by Tradition that after the Ascension of our Lord and Saviour to the Father when his Disciples being inspired with fiery tongues by the holy Ghost comming on them spake all manner of languages they being to depart each from other and goe unto all Nations to preach the Word of God decreed first by common Consent to frame a Rule or Prescript to themselves of their after-preaching least departing thus a sunder they might Preach any thing Diverse or differently sounding to those who were invited unto the Faith of Christ All of them therefore being gathered together and filled with the holy Ghost Collected into one a short Summary of their Preaching every one contributing what he thought meet and this they appointed to be given as a Rule unto Beleevers The same Father in his 115th Sermon De Tempore sets downe distinctly all the Articles of the Creed and distributes them in severall according to the number of the Twelve Apostles to each of them one Then in his little Booke De fide Symbolo he also sets downe all the Articles of the Apostles Creed withall he tells us lib 1. Retract cap. 17. Concerning this small Tract that he wrote it as an exposition of the Creed which he was commanded to make before a full Councill of African Bishops Assembled at Hippo Regia when he was yet but Presbyter Ut tamen non fiat illa verborum contentio quae tenenda memoriter competentibus traditur Yet not tying himselfe to that forme of words which is delivered unto the competentes to be got without booke Whence we may observe 1. That there was a certaine Forme of Beleefe delivered to the Competentes or Petitioners of Baptisme which they were to rehearse Memoriter when they came to be Partakars of that Sacrament 2. That St Austin had liberty to vary from this when he made the said exposition namely to vary from it not in the matter but in the manner of expression as other Doctours of the Church before him had done in their more Learned Tracts which they published to the world as we have seene in some former examples Lastly In his Enchiridion to Laurentius cap. 7. he hath these words Ecce tibi est Symbolum Dominica Oratio quid brevius auditur aut Legitur Behold thou hast the Creed and the Lords prayer canst thou heare or Read any thing more breife Where Hearing refers to the Creed as being an Orall Tradition and Reading to the Lords prayer as being written in the Gospell A little after he addes Quomodò invocabunt in quem non crediderunt Propter hoc Symbolum How shall they call on him on whom they have not believed For this cause the Creed was Framed Where he makes Prayer necessarily to depend on the Creed according to that of the Apostle Rom. 10. 14 Therefore according to St Austin the Creed was as necessary from the Begining of Christianity as the Lords Prayer and the Apostles Creed it is which he there explaines 7. Maximus Bishop of Turin in his Homily entituled De Traditione Symboli having spoken before of the word Shiboleth where by the Ephraimites were discouered at the Fourds of Jordan he thus applies it to the Creed Quod Beati Apostoli ut ego reor exemplum sequentes Ecclesiae Dei quam adversus malitiam Diabolici furoris armabant mysterium Symboli tradiderunt ut quia sub uno Christi nomine Credentium erat futura Diversitas signaculum Symboli inter fideles Persidosque secerneret alienus a Fide atque hostis apareret Ecclesiae aut tanquam Baptizatus nescisset aut tanquam Haereticus corrupisset That is Which Patterne saith he as I suppose the Blessed Apostles setting before their Eyes delivered unto the Church of God the mystery of the Creed thereby arming it against the malice of the Divels fury that because under the same name of Christ there would be as they foresaw no small diversity of Professours the Creed as a Marke or Seale should distinguish betwene the true Beleevers and mis-beleevers and he might appeare an Alien from the Faith and an enimy to the Church who pretending to be Baptized was found ignorant thereof or by his Heresy had corrupted it 8. Petrus surnamed Crysologus Bishop of Ravenna hath left behind him sixe Homilies one the Apostles Creed viz. From his 56th Sermon to the 63. 9. Leo the Great Bishop of Rome in his eleventh Sermon of the Passion hath these words Hac Fidei Regula quam in ipso exordio Symboli per Authoritatem Apostolicae Institutionis accepimus Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum quem Filium Dei patris Omnipotentis unicum dicimus eundem quoque de Spiritu Sancto natum ex Maria Virgine confitemur That is By this Rule of Faith which in the Begining of the Creed we have received by the Authority of an Apostolik Institution we confesse the same Jesus Christ our Lord whom we call the only Sonne of God the Father Almighty to be also borne of the Virgin Mary by the Power of the holy Ghost The same Leo in his thirteenth Epistle written to the Emperesse Pulchcria speakes more fully and distinctly of the Creed Ipsius Catholici Symboli brevis perfecta confessio duodecim Apostolorum totidem est signata Sententiis That is That briefe and perfect confession of Faith in the Catholick Creed is distinctly marked forth with twelve Sentences equall to the number of the Apostles 10. Cassianus S. Chrysostomes Deacon and afterwards Presbyter of Marceilles in France at the command of Leo the great wrote seven Bookes De Incarnatione Domini against Nestorius as he himself tels us in his Preface in the sixt whereof he hath these words touching the composure of the Creed Quod Graece 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dicitur Latine Collatio nominatur Collatio autem ideo quia in unum ab Apostolis Domini totius Catholicae legis fide quiquid per universum Divinorum voluminū Corpus immensa funditur copia totum in Symboli colligitur Brevitate perfecta Hoc est breviatum verbum quod fecit Dominus Fidem sc duplicis Testamenti sui in pauca colligens sed sensum omnium Scripturarum in breuia concludens sua de suis condens vim totius legis compendiocissimâ brevitate perficiens consulens sc in hoc ut piissimus Pater vel negligentiae quorundam filiorum suorum vel imperitiae ut non laboraret utique quamvis simplex imperita mens capere quod possit facile etiam memoria contineri vides ergo in Symbolo authoritatē Dei esse verbum enim breviatum faciet Dominus super terram sed Hominum fortasse quaeris ne id quidem deest per Hominem enim id Deus fecit sicut enim immensam illam Scripturarum sacrarum Copiam qer Patriarchas Prophetas maxime suos condidit ita Symbolum per Apostolos suos Sacerdotesque constituit Nihil ergo
in Symbolo deest quod ex scriptis Dei per Apostolos Dei conditum totum in se quantum ad authoritatem pertinet habet quicquid vel hominum est vel Dei quamvis etiam quod per homines factum est Dei existimandum sit quia non tam illorum per quos factum est quam illius credendum esse qui fecit i That which in Greek is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Latines call a Collation a Collation I say because the Apostles of the Lord gathered into one in the perfect Breviary of the Creed wherein they faithfully summed up all the Points of the Catholik Beleef whatsoever is largely diffused through the whole Body of the Scriptures This is that short word which the Lord utterd collecting the Faith of both Testaments and concluding the sense of the whole Scripture in a few briefe Sentences framing this Modell out of his owne materialls and comprising the virtue of the whole Divine Law in a most compendious Summary in this manner consulting as a most indulgent Father to apply a Remedy unto the negligence and Ignorance of some of his Children that so the most simple and unskilfull Novice should not be troubled to comprehend it which might also be easily conteined in memory thou seest therefore in the Creed the Authority of God himselfe for a short worke or word will the Lord make upon the Earth Rom. 10. 28. But perhaps thou requirest the Authority of Men neither is that wanting for God made the Creed by the Ministery of men for as he composd the great Bulke of holy writ cheifly by his Patriarchs and Prophets so he framed the Creed by his Apostles Prejsts There is nothing therefore defective in the Creed which being compiled by the Apostles of God out of the Scriptures of God hath perfectly in it selfe for matter of Authority whatsoever either God or men can contribute although indeed that which was thus framed by men is to be esteemed the Worke of God it not being so much to be ascribed unto those by whome it was made as to him who made it nor to be thought the worke of the Instruments but of the Author Afterward he thus sets downe the Text of the Creed Credo in unum Solum verū Deum Patrem Omnipotentem Creatorem omnium visibilium invisibilium Creaturarum in Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum Filium ejus unigenitum primogenitum totius Creaturae ex eo natum ante omnia Secula non factū Deum verum ex Deo vero homoousion Patri per quem secula compaginata sunt omnia facta qui propter nos venit natus est ex Maria Virgine Crucifixus sub Pontio Pilato sepultus tertiâ Die resurrexit secundùm Scripturas in Coelos ascendit iterum veniet judicare vivos mortuos reliqua in Symbolo quòd Ecclesiarum omnium Fidem loquitur c. I believe in one only true God the Father Almighty maker of all Creatures both visible and invisible and in Jesus Christ our Lord his only begotten Sonne the first Borne of every creature begotten of him before all worlds and not made very God of very God of one substance with the Father by whom the worlds were Framed or Ages set in order and all things made who for our sakes came and was borne of the Virgin Mary Crucifyed under Pontius Pilate and buried the third Day he Rose againe according to the Scriptures and ascended into the Heavens and shall come againe to judge the Quicke and the Dead And the rest that Followes in the Creed which speakes the Beleefe of all the Churches By this Creed he confutes Nestorius through his whole First Booke as by that Faith which was received throughout the whole world concluding in these words Licet omnium ecclesiarum sit quia una omnium fides peculiariter tamen Antiochenae urbis atque Ecclesiae est illius sc in qua tu editus in qua institutus in qua renatuses That is Although this be the Faith of al the Churches which believe al alike yet it is more peculiarly the Faith of the Citty and Church of Antioch to wit of that Church wherein thou O Nestorius wert Borne Bred and Baptized 11. Eusebius Emesenus or rather Gallicanus hath three Homilies extant on the Apostles Creed wherein he sets downe the Creed verbatim and after explaines it Gaigneus Chancellour of Paris set forth these Homilies under the name of Eus. Emesenus grounding his opinion on two places of the Decret wherein these Homilies are cited under his name others have ascribed them to Caesarius Bishop of Arles a third sort to Eucherius Bishop of Lyons a fourth unto Faustus Bishop of Regium because the Author of these Homilies saith that he was made Bishop ex Abbate lirinensi as Faustus was so Bellarmine But the Learned Andreas Schottus more probably entitles them to Eusebius not Bishop of Emesa in Syria a Bishop of Gaule sprung perhaps from that or some other Emesa and thence denominated the Latine style being too elegant for a Translation and savouring of the French Dialect and to confirme this he cites an ancient verse made by a Scholler of Rabanus Maurus wherein such an one is set downe by name though his Diocesse be not mentioned But whoever were the Authour of them his Testimony is of good credit each one of the Five mentioned having beene Ancient and famous Bishops 12. Venantius fortunatus Bishop of Poictiers hath written an explication of the Apostles Creed in the Preface whereof he hath these words Collata Apostolis scientia linguarum adhuc in uno positi hoc est inter se Symbolum unusquisque quod sensit dicendo condidere That is The Apostles having conferd on them the gift of Tongues before their dispersion framed the Creed by mutuall consent among themselves every one contributing what he thought meet And a little after Symbolum Collatio dicitur Graece quia hoc ipsi interse per spiritum Sanctum salubriter condiderunt That is The word Symbole in Greek signifies a Collation because the Apostles joyntly framed it for the common benefit through the assistance of the holy Ghost 13. Isidore Bishop of Sevil lib. de off Eccles cap. 22. speakes thus of the Creed Symbolum competentes accipiunt in quo pauca 〈◊〉 verba sed omnia continentur Sacramenta de totis enim Scripturis haec breviatim collecta sunt ab Apostolis ut quia plures Credentium literas nesciunt vel qui sciunt prae occupationibus Seculi Scripturas legere non possunt haec corde retinentes habeant sibi sufficientem scientiam salutarem That is The Competentes receive the Creed wherein there are but few words but all misteries are therein contained which were breifly gathered out of the whole Scriptures by the Apostles because that many of the Beleevers being unable to read and they who can being hindred by their worldly businesses reteining these few
sentences in memory might have at hand a sufficient knowledge of Salvation To these words he subjoynes the history of the Creeds composure out of Ruffinus which we have had already 14. Rabanus Maurus that Ancient Archbishop of Mentz and the most Learned Man of his Age may well be added unto the former who lib. 1. De Instit Cleric c. 26. thus informes us Catechumenus dicitur qui doctrinam Fidei audit necdum tamen BaptismuÌ„ recepit Competentes sunt qui jam post doctrinam Fidei post continentiam vitae ad Gratiam Chrsti percipiendam festinant ideoque appellantur competentes id est gratiam Christi petentes nam Catechumeni tantùm audiunt necdum petunt competentes autem jam petunt c. Istis traditur salutare Symbolum quasi commonitorium Fidei sanctae Confessionis Indicium quo instructi agnoscant quales jam ad Gratiam Christi exhibere se debeant That is He is cal'd a Catechumene who heareth the Doctrine of the Christian Faith but hath not as yet received Baptisme Competentes are they who after the Dâ—â—â—â—ine of Faith and Strictnesse of life hasten to be made Partakers of the Grace of Christ therefore are called Competentes That is Petitioners for the Grace of Christ for the Catechumeni are only Auditours not Askers but the Competentes are Petitioners c. To these CoÌ„petentes the saving Creed is delivered as a Remembrancer of the Faith and a breviat of that holy confession wherein being instructed they may take notice what manner of persons they ought to shew themselves in reference to the Grace of Christ Where by the Grace of Christ he understands the Priviliges of Baptisme at the Participation whereof they constantly made a Publick profession of their Faith by the Rehearsall of the Creed therefore the Creed could not come much short of the Institution of that Sacrament consequently froÌ„ no other Composers but the Apostles Now for a conclusion to these Testimonies of the forenamed Ancient Fathers both Greek and Latine I shall summe up what they say and proove in this Argument in three short observations 1. They affirme that the Apostles by joynt consent the speciall Concurrence or Inspiration of the holy Ghost framed a certaine set Rule of Faith or Forme of Beliefe and that those Confessions or Rules of Faith which they rehearse in their writings were received from the Apostles and this they build upon the constant tradition of their Ancestours the same evidence which we have for the number Authors and Authority of the Canonicall Books of Scripture This is affirmed by Origen and Marcellus of Ancyra for the Esterne Church By Irenaeus and Tertullian for the Western all foure very Ancient to name no latter ones 2. That in setting downe these Rules or Confessions of Faith they keepe themselves often to the same words ordinarily to the same method but constantly to the same heads or Articles of Faith that is no Head or Article of Beliefe set downe in the Creed of one Church or Father is different in sense from the same proportionably set downe in another much lesse opposite to any diverse Article either precedent or subsequent and for the Difference of expression it is not considerable as being caused by the diversity of Tongues and opposition of Heretickes the Church in those Times both practising and allowing it As for the Imperfection of the Formes though they omit some of them to expresse some of the Articles of the Creed in those full and exact Termes wherein we now have them because either not pertaining to the subject they were handling or not questiond by the Hereticks against whom they wrote or as implyed and inclosed in the Body of those Articles which they set downe by a necessary Dependance so S. Chrys in his fore-cited Homily involves the foure last Articles in that of the holy Ghost as appeares by his explication yet some of them set downe all the Articles as Marcellus Cyrill Jeros Augustin Chrysologus Eusebius Gallicanus Irenaeus also and Tertullian scarce want any one especially Tertullian And for those Fathers whose Formes are more defective they canot be said to differ in substance from the other who deliver the Creed more fully especially seeing they had severall Grounds and occasions for what they so did this is a Diversity only quoad majus minus in quantity not in substance some Articles made for one Fathers purpose some for another more for this fewer for that And they who cite the Creed defectively say that the Formes set downe by them came from the Apostles as well as they who set it downe more fully their meaning is that those imperfect Formes came from the Apostles though not so imperfectly for they affirme not that the Apostles delivered no more Articles than what they there set downe but that what they so set down came from no other than the Apostles St Austin and Leo the Great sufficiently informe us that the Apostles joyntly delivered all the twelve Articles according as we now have them for they distinctly mention and reckon up so many with reference to the same number of the Apostles who composed the Creed but the Fathers in their writings set them not alwayes downe entirely but those only which were opposite unto those Heresies that they were in hand with to confute for urging the Creed as they did by way of Argument and Convictions they might well omit those Articles which made not for their purpose Now as some of the Fathers have thus contracted the Creed so others have enlarged part of the Articles by way of Paraphrase that so they might both distinguish themselves and defend the Church from the Hereticks of those Dayes who seemingly received the Apostles Creed and subscribed to the words but perverted it to a wrong sense by their false erroneous Glosses Withall in their prefaces to this subject they have shewed the severall Reasons or ends for which the Apostles framed it the Delivery thereof by an orall Tradition and the Ancient Custome of rehearsing it in Publick at the time of Baptisme 3. That some of these fore-alleadged Fathers lived before others since the Nicene Councell wherein that Creed was framed which beares the name of the Councell the first which was ever publickly authorized by the Church assembled in a Synod yet they who lived before the Councell make mention of a former Creed as Ireneus Tertullian Origen and Marcellus of Ancyra and they who lived afterward set not downe or explaine the Nicene Creed but one farre more ancient received as they themselves say from the first Founders of the Christian Church as St Basil Cyril Chrysostome among the Greeks St Austin Maximus Chrysologus Eusebius Gallicanus among the Latines which Generall Tradition so fully witnessed by the Fathers of so distant Churches who had no intercourse with each other and in the most ancient uncorrupt Times aloud Proclaimes the Authors and Antiquity of the Apostles Creed CAP.
Emes tels us Hom. 1. in Symb. which appellation agrees to those who lived in latter Times So Canones Apostolorum are called by the Apostles Names though not compiled by them but by Clemens as the Title of those Canons witneseth Yea both Greeke and Latine Fathers have communicated the name Apostle to others to any Bishop the Church of Rome keepe the old stile still The Apostolick See The Apostolick Bulles Our Saxon Predecessours gave the Bishop of Rome the Title of Apostle and Apostolicall Pope Bed hist lib. 2. c. 2 11. Austin the Monke is called Anglorum Apostolus Philip the Deacon is called an Apostle by Tertullian and Epaphroditus by St Paul Phil. 2. 25. So many others besides the Twelve whom St Chrysostome by way of Distinction calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Apostles by way of Eminency were called Apostles who might give name to the Creed as well as the Twelve therefore it is no concluding or necessary Argument It is called the Apostle Creeds Ergo it was made by the Twelve Then for the Title Symbolum that doth not signify such a Collation or Feast in Common but rhe word Symbola and therefore cannot imply or allude to any such composing of the Creed by the joynt concurrence of the Apostles Besides Cajetan ad 2am 2ae qu. 1. art 8. Tels us that Aquinas thinking fit to number the Articles ex parte rei creditae with relation to the matter not the makers of the Creed for this cause passed by that famous distribution of them according to the number of the Apostles because it is accidental to the Articles of Faith whether they be gathered by many or by one as that of Athanasius Answ Good Authors indeed assigne that for the reason and etymology of the Apostolick Symbole that it was an Apostolicall Collation or Collection of the Fundamentall Points of Beliefe by the twelve Apostoles yet not as the principall argument but by way of Appendix and Congruity unto the forementioned Tradition But this distinction saith the objectour or Collation of severall Articles might be made by Apostolick Men and their Disciples out of the holy Scripture and from thence obtaine the name of the Apostolick Symbole But it might be so and it was so are two things If it might be so it might be otherwise sure this private groundles conjecture may well give place to the constant assertion of so many Ancient and learned Authors who affirme the Apostles to have been the Composers of the Creed and give that for the reason of the name which it beares As for the Testimony of Eusebius Hom. 1. in Symb. who is there produced to say that the Creed was written not by the Apostles but by the Fathers of the Churches he hath no such exclusive words as non ab Apostolis quidem but saith that the Fathers of the Churches whom a litle after he calls Magistri the Masters of the sayd Churches Composed the Creed Now who be these but the Apostles exprest by way of Periphrasis for they and they only may properly be called the Fathers or Masters not of this or that Church in particular but of all the Churches in the World their Comission Being generall Goe and Teach all Nations Math. 29. 19. Whereas others were limited to this or that Church as the Apostles pleased to dispose of them and were the Sonnes or Disciples of the Apostles as St Paul termes Timothy and Titus in his Epistles which he wrote unto them 1 Tim. 1. 2. Tit. 1. 4. Hence also it is that St Paul tels his Corinthians 1 Cor. 4. 15. Though ye have ten thousand instructers in Christ yet have ye not many Fathers for in Christ Jesus I have Begotten you through the Gospell And St James in his Epistle to the dispersed Jewes secretly taxing the proud-conceited Rabbins who affected the highest seats in the Synagogues the office of teaching their Brethren My Brethren saith he Be not many Masters Jam. 3. 1. This conjecture therefore deserves as litle faith as it hath foundation that is none at all for the Fathers constantly say it was called The Apostles Creed because Framed by and derived to the Christian Church from the Apostles of Christ and this may justly sway us in this Case for the Title prefixt doth not only beare this construction but more directly points out and inclines us to this meaning Titles being therefore given that they may designe the Authors or Composers of that worke unto which they are prefixt and the Fathers living in the first Ages should best know the Tradition the Title then of the Apostles Creed is not nakedly produced as a convincing Argument but as backt and seconded with the Attestation of Antiquity As for the contrary Instance of the Canons of the Apostles although they beare the name of Clemens in the Inscription who first gatherd them into one Body yet they may well challenge the Apostles for the Authors who first instituted and put them in Practise Then as to the promiscuous use of the name Apostle and Apostolick and the applying of them to the Ancient Bishops it will not hurt at all or prejudice the Title of the Creed Because the Fathers entitle it to the Apostles so cal'd 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by way of Eminency some of them expresly naming the Twelve as Ambrose Ruffine and Augustine others decyphering them by such circumstances as can agree to none other than The Apostles who left the Srciptures to us so Irenaeus Such Apostles who received this Rule from Christ their Master at the very begining of the Gospell and before the rise of any Heresy so Tertullian Such who left us the Faith per successionis Ordinem by a continued line of Episcopall successours so Origen And all the rest name the Apostles indefinitly not limited to a particular See charge or place by any determining circomstance now it is a knowne Rule in Logick concerning ambiguons Termes Analogum per se positum stat pro famosiori Analogato Neither indeed do the instances alleadged shew that the Name was commonly given to every Bishop at large but either to some Episcopall See which the Apostles had personally founded as to that of Rome founded by Peter and Paul or to some speciall Person who planted a New Church or converted a whole Nation to Christianity which is a worke properly Apostolicall as to Epaphroditus of Collosse and Augustin of our Saxon nation in his sense did our Saxō Kings probably give the Title of Apostolick to the Bishop of Rome as well as for the former reason because Gregory the Great sent over Augustine hither with certaine coadjutors to convert our Ancestours from Paganisme The like may be said in proportion of Philip the Deacon who was sent by the holy Ghost with a speciall Commission to convert the Eunuch of Queene Candace and by his meanes the whole Nation of Ethiopia as Church-story tels us But to the criticall quarrell against the word Symbolum that not it but Symbola
Catholick a Tradition doth not a litle confirme me in my Beliefe that the Apostles were the Authors of the Creed First Ruffinus in that place shewes no doubt at all of the Authors as appears by the fore-cited Relation but having before recited the Tradition of his Ancestors and himself accordingly affirmed the Apostles to have been the Authors in these words Symbolum fecerunt Apostoli in his Sermonibus in unum conferendo quod unusquisque sensit Decessuri ad predicandum istud unanimitatis fidei suae Indicium Apostoli posuere Sure those following words qui Symbolum tradiderunt must needs relate to the Apostles as the antecedent Secondly that severall Authors have mentioned this Tradition before the yeere 400 as well as after and those not only of the Westerne but of the Easterne Church I appeale to the fore-cited Testimonies of the Fathers among whom Origen Marcellus of Ancyra and Cyril of Jerusalem were of the Greeke Church and before the yeare 400 whereof the two latter set the Creed downe and Origen tells us that the Apostles delivered it Tertullian and Ambrose were of the Lattine or Westerne Church whereof the former sets it downe and entitles it to the Apostles and the latter names the Twelve Apostles for the Authors citing for proofe both of the Creed and its Composers a perpetuall inviolate Tradition of the Church of Rome now St Amb. flourished before the end of the fourth Century Tertullian long before As for the silencing of the Apostles Creed since the Nicene Councell in the Easterne Church 't is cleere that it was extant amongst them since the Councell for Marcellus sets it downe and Chrysostome explaines it but when the Constantinopolitan Creed was framed it was by degrees it seemes disused because therein included Then as to the Ethiopian Creed it is the very same with the Nicene or Constantinopolitan and communicated from the Greeke Church by the neighbouring Patriarch of Alexandria as in all likelihood we may suppose to that more Southerne People Lastly To the Testimony cited out of the 115. Serm. de Temp. The objector confesseth that the Creed was first rehearsed entire and then explained only he questions the assignation of the severall Articles to distinct Apostles as a spurious piece inserted out of the Margine into the Body of the Sermon the rest he acknowledgeth for genuine but this passage I stand not much upon whether it were so or otherwise for notwithstanding this supposall the Creed may well be styled a Symbole or Collation because agreed on in common by the Apostles they reducing the Number of the Articles to Twelve because themselves were Twelve the Founders or Foundation of the Christian Faith as St Paul cals them Eph. 2. 20. St Jo. Re. 21. 14. Reason 2d. In the Primitive Church the Catechumeni were men instructed in the first Rudiments of Christianity chiefely in the time of Lent Then on Palme-sunday they were called Competentes that is joynt Petitioners of Baptisme and had the whole perfection of the Faith that is the whole Body of the Creed expounded unto them because Easter the assigned Time of their Baptisme then approached This is testified by S. Ambrose Epist 35. lih 5. Sequenti die erat autem Dominica post lectiones atque Tractatum dimissis Catechumenis Symbolum aliquibus competentibus in Baptisteriis tradebam Basilicae That is The next day being the Lords day after the Reading of the Scriptures and the Sermon having dismissed the Catechumeni I delivered the Creed to certain Competentes in that part of the Church which is assigned for Baptisme And by Isidore of Sevil lib. 1. De Eccles Offic cap. 27. De Domin Palm Hac autem die Symbolum Competentibus traditur propter confinem Dominicae Paschae solemnitatem ut quia jam ad Dei gratiam percipiendam festinant fidem quam confiteantur agnoscant That is On this day on Palmesunday the Creed is delivered to the Competentes by reason of the approaching solemnity of Easter that so they may more fully understand and embrace that Faith which they professe their Baptisme now hastening on And wee have already in part demonstrated the same out of the forecited Fathers particularly out of their Homilies on the Creed which they commonly made on Palmesunday to the Competentes who were now ready to be baptized But now when Easter came the solemne time of Baptisme as Pentecost also was before they were admitted to it they made an open confession of their Faith as our Infants now doe in the Person of their Godfathers I aske then what confession of Faith was this which they thus publiquely pronounced at Baptisme No man is so absurd to think that every one was left to his owne discretion to frame it as he pleased but that the Church had a certaine prescribed forme of words or Rule of Beliefe which the Competentes did openly rehearse the same forme no doubt which had been explained unto them on the foregoing Palmesunday now this was no other then the Apostles Creed as appears both by those Homilies of the Fathers upon it which were usually made to the Competentes on Palmesunday as preparatives to their Baptisme as also because we find no other Confession of Faith publiquely received in the Church for above 300 years after the Birth of our Saviour besides this of the Apostles To this agree the words of Saint Jerome cont Lucifer Solenne est in lavacro post Trinitatis confessionem interrogare Credis in sanctam Ecclesiam credis remissionem peccatorum That is It is the custome at Baptisme after confession of the Trinity to aske Believest thou the Holy Church believest thou the Remission of sinnes And long before him S. Cyprian Epist 70. ad Janu ar c. Ipsa interrogatio quae fit in baptismo testis est veritatis nam cum dicimus credis in vitam aeternam remissionem peccatorum per sanctam Ecclesiam Intelligimus remissionem peccatorum non nisi in Ecclesiâ dari That is The very questioning in Baptisme witnesseth the Truth for when we say believest thou the life everlasting and remission of sinnes by the holy Church We conceive that remission of sinnes is not given but in the Church If any one desire to have this Custome of rehearsing the Creed at Baptisme brought higher yet up to the Age of the Apostles that so we may know positively when this forme of Profession began and the rather because when the Apostles baptized 3000 in one day and presently after S. Peters Sermon either no forme was then used or it was a very short one and quickly learned I Answer That the custome of making Homilies on the Creed by the Catechists and Bishops of old for the better instruction of those who were to be Baptized shews that this confession was very anciently practised and Russinus who himselfe was ancient tells us of many Illustres Tractatores many famous expounders of the Creed in this kind before his Time why then
is involved also in the Article of the Generall Judgment as the Account of our workes was If it be objected here that the Creeds or confessions of Faith which we find in the Councels and Fathers cannot be justly called Expositions of the Apostles Creed seeing that those Formes extant in Irenaeus and Tertullian want many Articles which the Creed now hath much lesse have they all which the Creeds of Nice Calcedon and that of Athanasius have I answer that the Creed as it is set downe in Irenaeus and Tertullian is I confesse somewhat defective for which I have before given some Reasons if we will find it full and entire we must have recourse to some famous ancient Church where it was deposited by the Apostles as that of Jerusalem or Rome now to the Creeds of these Churches the Nicene Chalcedon and that of Athanasius have added nothing in substance as appears by what hath been said but only in explication As for Tertullians Creed though it be more imperfectly set downe in his Booke De virg Vel. and that against the heretick Praxeas yet in his Book De Praescrip adv haer Wherein he oppugneth all Hereticks which had infested the Church untill his time some of which scarce left any one Article of the Creed inviolate he sets it downe more fully only he expreseth not distinctly and at large the Article of the Catholick Church and that of Remission of Sinnes for the former had not been yet oppugned by Novatus or Donatus nor the latter by Pelagius who were not then risen notwithstanding we may find even some hints of these wherein the substance of them lies implicitely hid 1. Those words of his qui credentes agat and those other ad sumendos sanctos wherein he expresseth how the Holy Ghost doth guide all Believers and work in them and that our Saviour will come at the last to take the Saints unto himselfe will serve to make up the ninth Article of the Church and Communion of Saints for the Title of Believers is the usuall stile of Christians and of the Christian Church under the New Testament and one Beliefe or Holy Faith is that which makes the Church a Communion of Saints that is of Persons severed and discriminated from those of other Religions but united among themselves Adde hereunto that which the same Tertullian hath in his Booke against Praxeas viz. That the holy Ghost is the Sanctifier of the faith of those who believe in the Father and in the Sonne and in the holy Ghost that is Of the Catholick Church which is a Communion of Saints or Believers 2. Those words applyed to our Saviour That he Preached the new Law and the New promise of the Kingdome of Heaven imply the tenth Article viz. I believe one Baptisme for the Remission of sinnes as it is more amply set downe in the Nicene Creed for by Baptisme we are initiated into this new Law of Christianity and engage our selves to performe it as the condition of the Gospell-Covenant required on our Part as necessary to Salvation whence by a Metonomie 't is taken somtimes as including the Law or doctrine Preached by the Party Baptizing as in that question of our Saviour to the Pharaisees The Baptisme of Iohn whence was it From Heaven or of men Mat. 21. v. 25. Where our Saviours maine end was to convince them that he was the true Messiah from the Word or Testimony of Iohn the Baptist whereby he gave witnesse to him at that time especially when the Pharasees were sent unto Iohn in a solemne Embassy to enquire whether He were the Christ or no Io. 1. v. 19 20 24 26 27. And as by Baptisme we are initiated into this new Law and thereby entituled unto the Kingdome of Heaven and made Inheritours of it so is Remission of sinnes the new Promise the first and newest of the whole Gospell which reconciling us unto God makes us capable of his other Favours to introduce which and prepare us for it Repentance was first Preached by Iohn the Baptist our Saviour and his Apostles Repent for the Kingdome of Heaven is at hand and from which our Saviour tooke his Name thereby signifying the cheife end of his comming Thou shalt call his Name Iesus saith the Angell to Ioseph For he shall save his People from their Sins Mat. 1. 21. 3. As for the last Article viz that of Everlasting Life it is partly implyed in the Article of the Resurrection which as it lookes backward unto Death so it lookes forward on Life Everlasting Death the last enemy being by it subdued partly exprest in the Article of our Saviours Coming to Iudgment the cheife end whereof is setdowne in these words ad sumendos sanctos in Vitae Aeternae fructum to assume his Saints unto the injoyment of Life Everlasting Now this Creed of Tertullian which so nearely symbolizeth with that of the Apostles deserves no meane regard First because he is a very ancient Doctor of the Church as who flourished about the end of the second Century Secondly because his workes are confessedly genuine Thirdly and Chiefly because this Creed of his setting downe was not Framed by him but as he expressely tells us derived from Christ by the mouthes of his Apostles before ever any Heretick appeared in the Church so it was not made because of heresies now risen whereof many arose even in the Apostles Times but before any of them arose not for Remedy but prevention and therefore must needs be very ancient But in the two other places he sets down this Creed or Rule of Faith more imperfectly omitting what made not for his present purpose yet those imperfect Creeds he calls Regulas immobiles irreformabiles inviolable and unchangeable Rules that is in regard of those Heades of Beliefe which he had occasion th … to set downe So that all the Creeds which wee meet with in the Fathers or Councells are to be compared with that which the Church for so many Ages hath acknowledged for the Apostles as so many Copies with the Patterne or Structures with the modell not so well with one another for so they may differ in poynt of quantity and proportion like so many Pictures or Statues made to represent the same body whereof the originall is entire and exactly proportioned but the copies diversely shaped and drawn some too Giant like others too defectively to the middle only or the shoulders If it be farther objected that the Romanists affirme all their new Articles to be only Explications of the old and confesse that Articles cannot increase quoad numerum credibilium sed quoad explicationem yet that we condemne them justly for obtruding those explications as necessary to salvation I answer that the Romanists are justly blamed for obtruding their explications on other Churches as necessary to Salvation because themselves make but a particular Church and yet presume upon a false priviledge of universall primacy and Apostolick Infallibility But as to the Exegericall
set downe the Articles but Catechetically explaine them also together with the rest which precede and there hath been no reason ever yet assigned to make us doubt of the composing of these Catecheses by the same man and at the same Time when he was Catechist which was in his youthfull Age seeing they all alike relish of the same juvenile extemporary stile the consideration whereof hath made some to doubt whether any of them were Cyril's or no because they seemed not elaborate enough for so grave a Patriarch though they seeme indeed to have beene set forth by his Successor Iohn and thence became entitled unto him by some latter unwary Transcriber which may serve to satisfy that objection taken out of Simlerus who in his Index of those Bookes which the City of Auspurgh bought of Antony Eparch of Coreyra reckoneth Joannis Jerosol Catech. Illuminat duâ—deviginti Mystagogicus quinque If any yet desire to have this more fully and clearly demonstrated viz. That the Easterne Churches had an Ancient Forme of Beliefe derived to them from the Apostles and whereto they profest to adde nothing in their following confessions because as it is more obscure so it is more oppugned they may please to consult these following Testimonies 1. Epiphanius in his Booke called Anchoratus having set downe the Nicene Creed as we now have it at large adjoynes these wordes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This Faith saith he was delivered by the holy Apostles and in the Church the Holy City by all the holy Bishops together above 310 in number The same Creed then was delivered by both by the Apostles as the Primitive Authors by the Nicene Fathers as the Expositors The Nicene Creed thus at full set downe by Epiphanius was written seaven years before the first Councell of Constantinople which first added all after the Article of the Holy Ghost unto that forme which the Nicene Fathers had delivered although they were not the first framers of those additionall Articles and having thus compleated the Creed by borrowing the remaining Articles from that of the Apostles confirmed the entire forme by their Synodicall Authority and so commended yea prescribed the whole to the Catholick Church 2. The succeeding Councells in the Easterne Church expressely tell us that they and their Predecessors were neither Authors of any new Faith nor Adders to it but only Establishers and Exposirors of the old The first Councell of Constantinople which was the second Generall calls the Nicene Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 most ancient although that Synod was celebrated but 56 years before the reason therefore of this Title is that they looked upon that Creed not as first composed by the Bishops of the Nicene Synod but as derived and declared out of a Creed ab ultima antiquitate in Ecclesiâ recepto received in the Church from all Antiquity as the Reverend and Learned Primate of Armagh hath rightly exprest it They also decreed to retaine it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as most agreeable to the Sacrament of Baptisme Theod. lib. 5. hist cap. 9. The Bishops Assembled at Tyre Anno 518. professe to embrace the Nicene Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 expounded not made by that Synod Act. Concil 5. Constant sub Mennâ And againe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is That holy Creed whereinto we were all Baptized the Nicene Synod with the assistance of the Holy Ghost hath publickly declared that of Constantinople hath ratified that of Ephesus hath confirmed and in like manner the Great holy Synod of Chalcedon hath sealed The Councell of Chalcedon which was the fourth Generall styles the Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Doctrine unshaken or unmoved from the first Preaching of the Gospell and withall tells us that the Councells of Nice and Constantinople expounded the Faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not adding ought as if the faith of their Predecessors had been deficient but declaring their sense by Scripture Testimonies Evagr. lib. 2. cap. 4. To this agrees also that of the Emperour Iustinian writing to Epiphanius Patriarch of Constantinople we keepe saith he that decree of faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Symbole which was explained by the 118 Fathers in the Councell of Nice which also the 150 Fathers in the first Councell of Constantinople farther declared 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not as though the ancient faith were defective but because the enemies of the Truth partly rejected the Divinity of the Holy Ghost partly denied the Incarnation of God the Word therefore the said Fathers by Testimonies out of Scripture explained this Doctrine more at large Thus he 7. leg Cord. De Summâ Trinitate Fide Catholicâ 3. To give you the Testimony of the Westerne Church for confirmation of the same Truth The Liturgy called Ordo Romanus a Book of known Authority and Antiquity in the Preface to the Nicene Creed hath these words directed to the Persons who were to pronounce it before their Baptisme Audite suscipientes Evangelici Symboli Sacramentum à Domino inspiratum ab Apostolis institutum cujus pauca quidem verba sunt sed magna mysteria In which words the Nicene Creed is called The Evangelicall Symbole inspired by Christ and ordained by his Apostles And another old Latine Liturgy in use about the yeare 700 hath these words of the same Creed Finito Symbolo Apostolorum dicat Sacerdos Dominus vobiscum Where it is also expressely called The Creed of the Apostles that is the same explained and enlarged For these Testimonies I am indebted to the said R. and Learned Bishop Now for a close to these Authorities and Arguments I shall subjoyne the testimony of Franc. Quaresimus of the Order of Minors a Person of good note in the Romish Church as who was made by the Pope his President and Apostolick Commissary in the Holy Land during which office of his he took incredible paines in searching out the Antiquities of Palestine now this Author in his Book called Elucidatio Terrae Sanctae Tom. 2. lib. 4. Perear 9. cap. 1. Brings two opinions concerning the Place wherein the Apostles composed the Creed The first that of Adrichomius who thinkes it probable that the place was Caenaculum Sion a Place famous for many other sacred Actions as wherein our Blessed Saviour celebrated his last Supper and instituted the most holy Eucharist wherein the Holy Ghost descended on the Apostles at Pentecost and wherein they held that famous Councell about the abrogating of the Ceremoniall Law Act. 15. consonantly to which Tradition he brings that saying of the Evangelicall Prophet Out of Syon shall goe forth the Law and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem Isa 2. 3. The second that of Frier Anselme and others that the place where the Apostles framed the Creed was on Mount Olivet three Bow-shootes from the place where Christ is said to have wept over Jerusalem for which he gives this reason Quia est communis in partibus istis Traditio perpetuis
extitissent diversisque nominibus columbam Dei atque Reginam lacerare per partes scindere niterentur nonne cognomen suum Plebs Apostolica postulabat quo incorrupti Populi distingueret unitatem ne intemeratam Dei Virginem Error aliquorum per membra laceraret Where we may observe First That he mentions not at all the applying of the word Catholick to the Church or whole Company of Believers as it is placed in the Creed for this was not cal'd in question by Sympronianus but the aplying of it to particular persons which in the Apostles times were called Disciples or Christians not Catholicks as Sympronianus objected Secondly That Pacianus absolutely granteth not that the word Catholick was not so used in the Apostles Times but only indulgeth so much unto his adversary because notwithstanding this supposall he was otherwise able to convince him upon his own concessions which kind of supposall or indulgence is most usuall amongst Polemick writers there by to winne over and worke upon the Adversary Thirdly That the Reason of the name brought by Pacianus and urged upon Sympronian namely the distinguishing of the true Church from the severall Sects led by denominated from their severall factions and Hereticall heads is very agreeable to the Apostles dayes and so required the like distinctive Epethete for S. Paul blames the Church of Corinth for Schismes and addicting themselves factiously to severall Idolised Teachers which they had chosen to themselves for though he names only Peter Apollos and himselfe yet his Discourse cheifly aimes at some other Popular Preachers and false Apostles as appeares by comparing 1 Cor. 4. 6. 2 Cor. 11. 13 20. And S. John expresly names the Nicolaitans denominated from one Nicolas in his Revel ch 2. v. 15. As for S. Austins involving the word Catholick in the Epithet Holy it proves not that it was not then in the Text of the Creed for it was usual with the Fathers in their Paraphrasticall explications to omit the expression of severall Particles sometimes one sometimes another which yet were cōfessedly in the Creed are expresly mentioned by them in their other Homilies or Tractates as wee may see in Chrysollegus Eusebius Gallicanus and others Thirdly Hereticks arose not only after but even in the very Apostles Times the Tares were scattered presently upon the sowing of the Wheat in the lateplowed field of the Church S. Luke mentions Simon Magus that First-borne of the Devill and Father of Hereticks as the Auncients Style him Act. 8. 9. 24. S. Paul tels us of Hymenaeus and Phyletus 2 Tim. 2. 17. And of Alexander Phygellus and Hermogenes 1 Tim. 1. 20. 2 Tim. 1. 15. Yea S. John informes us in more generall Termes That there were many Antichrists in the world even whilst he lived who denyed the Father and the Sonne 1 Io. 2. 18. 22. These Antichrists then were Hereticks who taught contrary to the Faith of Christ wherefore it is most probable that the word Catholick was placed in the Creed even by the Apostles themselves for the reason before assigned Fourthly The Christian Church might justly be styled Catholick or universall to distinguish it from the Church of the Jewes which was a particular Church confined if not within the Bounds of one Country yet unto one Nation whereas the Christian Church comprehended all Nations and had no other Bounds than those of the world although not actually at the time of making the Creed yet in vertue and power according to that generall Commission of our Saviour to his Apostles Goe teach all Nations Mat. 28. 29. And gaine Ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem and all Judea and in Samaria and to the uttermost part of the Earth Act. 1. 8. The Jewes were so envious and proud as not to receive the Gentiles into their communion or acknowledge them partakers in the promises of the Messiah they would have had them all circumcised and submit to the Ceremonial Law but God broke downe this Partition wall Eph. 2. 14. As he made appeare by the Vision of the Sheet which he sent to S. Peter Act 10. 11. 15. And by the Decree of the Councel at Jerusalem Act. 15. And so gathered all into one Body or Church Catholick so called in respect of Time Place Persons Faith which is therefore called the Common Faith Tit. 1. 4. For this Reason at least the Apostles might justly frame the Article at the very first Composure in these words I believe the holy Catholick Church Ob. 4th The different relation of the Story bewrayes the uncerteinty of it for they give not all the same Article to the same Apostle and some marshall them one way some another Answ First Diversity of opinions in Circumstances not materiall cannot justly call the maine Point in doubt So all Christians believe the Gospell of St Mathew and the Epistle to the Hebrwes to be the Word of God though Divines differ about the language in which and the time when they were writen and they all agree there is an Hell though they doe not about the place where Therefore notwithstanding some slight groundlesse differences some of them of latter inconsiderable Authors wee have no just reason to disbelieve the Apostles Composing of the Creed Secondly As to the various marshalling and order of the Articles it cannot justly argue the uncerteinty of the Tradition because the Bookes of the holy Scripture are also placed in a various method according unto severall Editions and Translations some following the order of the Hebrew Text as the Protestant Churches others that of the Septuagint and the old Latine Translation as the Churches of Greece and Rome Thirdly Neither can the diverse ascribing of them to severall Apostles raise any just doubt of the Composers of the whole for we find not a few Controversies agitated amongst Divines concerning the Authors of severall Bookes of Scipture in the Old Testament of the Bookes of the Judges Kings and Chronicles of the Booke of Job in the New Testament of the Second and Third Epistle of St Iohn and of the Revelation whether Iohn the Elder were the Author of these Epistles and Iohn the Divine of the Revelation as distinct Persons from Iohn the Evangelist Or whether Iohn the Ap. were the Author of all three under 3 several Titles But more especially the Author of the Epistle to the Hebrwes is questioned whether it were Paul or Barnabas Luke or Clemens And yet not withstanding all these Controversies the Christian Church now doubts not of the Authority of these Bookes why should we more doubt of the Authority of the Creed although we know not how certainly to assigne the Distinct Articles to their severall Apostles whenas in truth the more probable opinion is that they joyntly concurd to the framing of them all Ob. 5. If the Creed for matter and forme were from the Apostles and they delivered it precisely in those words wherein we now have it why is it not placed in the
whom the objectour cites I shall returne a more particular Answer First Cyril indeed in that place tels us that the mysteries of the Faith ought not to be delivered unto the Catechumeni simply nakedly but as clothed with scripture and that they should not simply believe him unlesse he brought proofes from thence for what he delivered because the safety of our Faith saith he depends not on the pleasingnes of Rhetorick but on the demonstration of Gods Word written The reason whereof he assignes in the begining of the same Homily 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. The Disciples of the Hereticks by their elegancy of speech and fair soothing tongues under the name of Christians deceive the hearts of the simple they hide the poysoōusdartes of their ungodly Doctrines with sugred expressions of all whom joyntly our Lord saith beware least any man deceive you then he goes on 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for this cause the doctrine of Faith is delivered with expositions thereon So that he would not have the Creed or himselfe believed without Scripture not that the Creed but the Times required such proofe for the Heretickes of those Dayes partly framed new Creeds of their own partly added to altered and perverted the old withall indeavouring to make their doctrine good by seeming probabillities of Reason and flourishes of Rhetorick It was necessary therefore in this case to discover these false Creeds and Interpretations by bringing all unto the Text of Scripture Secondly The other Father Paschasius in the begining of his Booke De Spiritu Sancto written against Macedonius taxeth a false reading of the Creed crept into it through the ignorance of some Transcribers who wrote I believe in the holy Church for I believe the holy Church by this error enervated an Argument usually alleadged by the Fathers for the Deity of the holy Ghost against Macedonius and his Followers Paschasius therefore proves by certeine Places of Scripture that they are commanded to believe in God alone but never in man wherefore seeing the Church consists of a company of men that reading of the Creed must consequently be false which enjoynes us to believe in the Church But what of all this He appealed not in this from the Creed unto Scripture but by Scripture corrects a false reading of the Creed as the Fathers in their polemicall writings against Hereticks frequently correct their corrupt quotations of some places of Scripture by other undoubted places Ob. 8th The Reason assigned why the Apostles composed this Creed discovers the vanity of the Tradition what was that That it might be forsooth to the Apostles a Canon or Rule according to which they should square and conforme their Preaching what to the Apostles to whom Christ promised his Blessed Spirit that should lead them into all Truth Certeinly they needed it not for their owne sakes amongst whom there was no ground of difference nor doubt of the Principles of Christianity And whereas others more probably say it was framed for the Churches sake that shee might have a short plaine yet full confession of Faith as a Formula of Beliefe to be publickly recited at the Time of Baptisme neither will this hold for in the Apostles Age the Confession of Faith was plaine and simple when they came to be Baptized namely in Jesus Christ or in the Father Son and holy Ghost as appeares by the History of the Acts so that the Church had then no need of such a Formula It began not to be required till diverse Heresies brake into the Church Answ First It is readily confest that the Apostles needed no Rule of Faith whereby to square their Preaching as if otherwise they should have erred yet they might well agree one a Canon or Rule of Fundamentals wherewith they thought fit to acquaint all Christians as with Points necessary to Salvation whereas otherwise they might have Preached more at large and intermixt matters of lesser Consequence As for the Authors who bring the Reason alleaged in the objection they lay it downe not in these Termes least the Apostles being seperated each from other ipsi inter se in varias scinderentur partes much lesse thus ne subinde alii abaliis in doctrinâ abirent as is odiously alleaged but Ruffinus renders the reasō thus Ne diversum aliquid his qui ad fidem Christi invitabantur exponerent S. Austin in like words Ne diversum vel dissonum praedicarent his qui ad fidē Christi invitabantur Now diversum and abversum dissonum and absonum are two things there was no feare that the Apostles by being severed each from other should Preach ought contrary to the Truth or to one Another if they had not before agreed uppon a Forme yet they might have Preached somewhat diverse from the Fundamentalls of Christianity namely other Points of inferiour concernment or at least the same in other wordes if they had not agreed on this Rule at their setting forth whence their Auditours might have taken occasion to suspect and argue them of falsehood not believing they were all guided by the same Spirit or to part themselves into factions as it fell out in the Church of Corinth about Paul and Apollos although they taught the same Gospell And what stirres arose in the Church about a Ceremony viz. the time of observing Easter derived frō a different tradition of S. Iohn to the Churches of Asia frō the rest of the Christian world though they all agreed in the main the keeping of the Feast Eusebius others will sufficienly informe us But to come closer to our Subject A notable instance in the very same kind namely in matter of of Doctrin such as the Creed is we find in the Greek and Latine Church about the middle of the fourth Century touching the Grand mystery of the Trinity which yet upon due examination proved only a difference of the tongue language The Controversie is thus set down by Greg. Naz Orat. 21. written in praise of the Great Athanasius Num. 46. 47. The Orientals saith he held one 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Essence and three Hypostases or or subsistences The Latines by Reason of the barrennesse of their Tongue and the narrownesse of expression could not distinguish Hypostasis from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Subsistence from Essence therefore insteed of Hypostasis brought in the new-coind word Persona Gr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to signify the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the proper distinctive Relations of the Three as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signified the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Nature what was the effect of this saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The effect deserved laughter or rather Lamentation this small difference of wordes seemed a diversity of Beliefe for the Orientals suspected the Westrne Church of Sabilianisme because they would not acknowledge three Hypostases but caled them by the name of three Persons And the Western Church suspected the Orientals of Arianisme for holding three Hypostases
contentions dayly growing hotter betweene them had like to have seperated the East and West about a syllabicall difference But Athanasius saith he with much patience and prudence calling unto him and hearing both Parties having examined their meaning and the sense of the words when he found them agreeing in the thing signifyed and at no difference about the doctrine it selfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 granting them the diversity of their Termes he unites them together in the same Truth Secondly Though we hold it most certaine that the Apostles considered single and apart delivered nothing to the Church either by word or writing but what they were specially assisted in by the holy Ghost and therefore most undoubtedly true yet for ought I know as the holy Ghost revealed not all truths to the Apostles at once no not when he descended on them at the Feast of Pentecost but delayed the manifesting of some till afterwards as for example the Conversion of the Gentiles to Peter in the vision of the sheet Act. 10. So he might not reveale some truthes unto them when they were single and apart but only when they met and consulted together For though every one of them by himselfe was infallible in all necessary Points that is so as to deliver nothing contrary to the Faith or Truth of Christian Religion yet without any Derogation to his priviledge they might need the more especiall assistance of the holy Ghost upon their Assembly to instruct them which Points of Faith were necessary to Salvation which not We have a famous Instance of this recorded Act. 15. For when there arose a great question in the Church of Antioch whether the Gentiles newly converted in Syria and Cilicia should be circumcised and obey the Law of Moses That Paul and Barnabas were sent unto Jerusalem about it v. 2. that the Apostles and Elders came together to consider of this matter v. 6. What needed this considering in a solemne meeting if they had been ascertained what to resolve before they met It followes v. 7. That there was much disputing or debate in the Councell Why not even among the Apostles themselves who were the chiefe members thereof At least this disputing might have been spared or cut short by the Apostles as a thing unnecessary if it had not beene thought a good and needfull Preamble unto a finall Decision If the Church had conceived S. Peter or any other of the Apostles an infallible Judge in this Point with out due examination thereof and the speciall assistance of the holy Ghost in a Synod they might have spared both their meeting and dispute But when there had been much disputing and not before they joyntly determined what Lawes to free them from and what to impose upon them as things necessary to be observed v. 28. Namly the abstaining from Bloud and consequently things strangled v. 29. According to that primitive law given to the Sons of Noah Ge. 9. 4. a Law still observed by the Greek Church by the Moscontieth their neighbour churches of Polād which have admitted the Reformation and long observed generally by the whole Western Church even til the Times of Ludovicus Pius as appeares by his and his Father Charles capitular together with the abstaining from Fornication and things offered to Idols which the Apostle makes a species of Idolatry 1 Cor. 10. 19 20 21. And are more clearly against the Morall Law though not so esteemed by the generality of the Gentiles Then and not before they use that stile It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us that is To us in the Plurall to us assembled together Consonantly to this S. Paul tells us more plainly Gal. 2. 2. that long after his conversion and calling unto his Apostleship he went up to Jerusalem by Revelation and communicated the Gospell which he Preached among the Gentiles unto the Apostles who there resided namely to Iames Cephas and Iohn giving this for a Reason least saith he by any meanes I should run or had run in vaine Gal. 2. 2. Now the composing of the Creed wherein were to be comprised the maine Grounds of Christian Religion was a matter of the highest consequence and so might very well require the joynt and serious deliberation of the Twelve together with the speciall assistance of Gods spirit Thirdly To the Reply against the second Reason I Answer That 't is a groundlesse supposall to think that the Persons to be Baptized in the Apostles times were required to believe only in Iesus Christ or in the Trinity alone for First we find other Principles of Christian Doctrine distinctly set downe in Heb. 6. 1 2. And Preached by the Apostles before they Baptized their Auditors for instance the Article of Remission of Sinnes by Peter Act. 10. 43. And by Paul Act. 13. 38 39. The Article of the Creation of the World by the same Paul Act. 17. 24. Secondly As for beliefe in Iesus Christ the Apostles indeed required it as the maine poynt as we read in the History of the Eunuch Act. 18. 37. and of the Jaylor Act. 16. 31. Yet not as the sole poynt for beliefe in the holy Ghost was also required as appeares by the history of the Disciples at Ephesus Act. 19. 2 3 6. 'T is mentioned therefore as the principall and that which virtually includes all the rest for to believe in Jesus Christ as wee ought is to believe the Doctrine which he taught revealed unto the world from the Father as the guide or light to true Blessednesse now what was this but the Gospell of Salvation whereof the Creed for mater of Doctrinalls is the Epitome consult to this purpose Io. 17. 3. And chap. 3. 13. 36. Thirdly As for beliefe in the most Holy Trinity it gives us more scope as that which comprehends all the Articles of our Faith for as to believe in Jesus Christ implicitely conteines all the mysteries of our Redemption viz. His Godhead Incarnation and Birth Passion Buriall Descent into Hell Resurrection Assension Sitting on the right hand of the Father and second comming to Judgment so to believe in God the Father conteines his workes of Creation and Providence which are the Visible effects of his eternall Power and Godhead Ro. 1. 20. And to believe in the holy Ghost involves the whole worke of Sanctification the applying of Christs Benefits to his Church and compleating the Salvation of mankind which are distinctly set downe in the foure last Articles And this S. Chrysostome teacheth us in his first homily on the Creed already cited where his Text ends thus I believe in the holy Ghost but in his explication he thus unravels the Article and layes it open to view in its full extent who brings us to the holy Church she remiteth our sinnes promiseth the Resurrection of the Body and life everlasting This beliefe therefore in Christ or in the Trinity is not to be nakedly simply understood as if no other Particulars were required but with
relation to those other Articles of the Creed which in them lye hid imbosomed for the History of the Acts doth not expresse Passages at large especially such as were ordinarily knowne and practised as the profession of the Creed at Baptisme but briefly toucheth the heads of things the Evangilists doe the like in relation of speeches miracles of our Saviour so that we are faine to compare thē together to find out the several circumstances and make up the Relation entire To prosecute this point a little farther and illustrate it by the like Instance As the Apostles are said to require Faith in Christ and nought else mentioned of the Persons who came to be Baptized so are they said and that oftner to Baptize in the name of Christ without naming any other Person of the Trinity Act. 2. 38 41. And 10. 48. And 19. 5. And yet we cannot imagine that they omitted the mention of the other two Persons First because it was Christs expresse command that they should Baptize all Nations in the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the holy Ghost Mat. 28. 19. Secondly because the Christian Church hath alwayes held that as water is the Essentiall matter so this composure of words is the essentiall Forme of Baptisme and so at no hand to be omitted Wherefore when the businesse of rebaptization was agitated in the Nicene Councell it was determined thus That the Persons Baptized with the formentioned Catholick frō should not be rebaptized as being rightly initiated into the Church though by an hereticall hand but as for the Pauliani the Disciples of Paulus Samosatenus who denyed the Trinity and therefore Baptized in a wrong Forme their Baptisme was pronounced null and invalid those who were so illegally initiated were received by a new Baptisme into te Catholick Church Let us say then with that most ancient Father Irenaeus In Christi nomine subauditur qui unxit ipse qui unctus est ipsa unctio qua unctus est unxit quidem Pater unctus est vero Filius in spiritu qui est unctio that is In the name of Christ is to be understood the Anointer the Anointed and the unction wherewith he was Anointed now he who Anointed is the Father the Person Annointed is the Sonne with the Spirit who is the unction Lastly That the Church had need of such a Formula of Beliefe will appeare both by the Reason mentioned in the objection for Heresies infested the Church from the begining to discover which such a Shibboleth was necessary and if those Heresies had not sprung up so early yet such a Symbole was as necessary at first for prevention as afterwards for Triall But of this more in the next chapter Ob. 9 h S. Aug. saith Verba Symboli per Scripturas sparsa sunt inde collecta ad unum reducta That the words of the Creed lye disperst in the Scriptures from whence they are gathered and reduced into a Forme De Symb. Catech. lib. 1. cap. 1. So likwise Paschasius If so how can the Apostles be the Authors thereof For out of the Old Testament they could not gather that Christ was borne of the Virgin Mary or That he suffered under Pontius Pilate And as for the new many of the Apostles were dead before all was written and James before any was written Answ First The Old Testament may well be said to conteine the whole Creed if not expresly and in the history yet typically and in the Prophecy To instance in those two Articles mentiond in the objection to wit our Saviours Birth and Passion Doth not the Prophet Esay say A Virgin shall conceive and bare a Sonne chap. 7. 14. Yea in the present Vnto us a Child is borne chap. 9. 6. And touching his Passion doth not the same Prophet tel us He was wounded for our Transgressions he was bruised for our Iniquities he is brought as a Lambe to the slaughter he was cut off the land of the living chap. 53. 5 7 8. And King David in his person They pierced my hands and my feet Psal 22. 16. comp Zach. 12. 10. As for the names of the Virgin and the Judge they are no such considerable Additions as to make a new or another Article so much may well be borrowed from the history of the Gospell yet the Article not improperly sayd to be extant in the Prophecy Secondly The Death of Iames mentioned Act. 12. 1 2. Is placed by Chronologers in the yeare 44. After our Saviours Birth But the writing of S. Mathewes Gospell a Booke sufficient to supply all those Articles which are not expresly conteined in the Old Testament as placed by them in the yeare 41. And so two or three yeers before the death of Iames. In the same yeere 44. Baronius and Lorinus place the Dispersion of the Apostles into their severall provinces and the framing of the Creed by joynt Consent as a necessary Preparative thereunto the dispersion caused by the persecution of Herod and the doore of Faith being now opened to the Gentiles as God himselfe had informed them by the Vision shewed to Peter before he converted Cornelius Act. 10. 11. and 15. 7. But this is agreed on all Hands that whether this dispersion were sooner as Corn. a lap placeth it Anno Domini 37. or latter as Appollonius cited by Eusebius lib. 5. cap. 17. that S. Mathew wrote his Gospell before it and that in the Hebrew Tongue the language of the Jewes amongst whom and for whose use he wrote it as Irenaeus Origen and others witnesse though it were soon after translated into Greek by Iames the Lords Brother and Bishop of Jerusalem for an Hebrew Transcript thereof was carried by S. Bartholomew into the Indies and found there by Pantaenus of Alexandria Origens Master as witnesse Euseb lib. 5. cap. 9. Ier. de Scriptor Eccles cap. 36. in Pantaeno And another Transcript thereof was carried by Barnabas S. Pauls fellow-Apostle unto the Gentiles whither he was sent which he used alwaies to carry about with him and which was after found buried with him in Cyprus in the time of Zeno the Emperour lying upon his Breast The same Authors also agree that the Creed was framed by the Apostles a little before this generall Dispersion Therefore when we are told that the Ancients place the composing of the Creed in the next yeare after our Saviours Ascension and consequently before the writing of S. Mathewes Gospell the matter is much mistaken Ruffinus and S. Augustine say indeed that the Apostles composed the Creed after our Saviours Ascension and after the Descent of the Holy Ghost at Pentecost but how long after they determine not They agree it was composed before their generall Dispersion into the severall quarters of the World which happened not in S. Stephens Persecution for then they abode all at Ierusalem Acts 8. 1. nor before the conversion of Cornelius by S. Peter Act. 10. For the set
question'd or denied by the Hereticks of those times have taken nothing from the Apostles Creed as in it selfe superfluous but have in a larger Declaration insisted on some Articles which were controverted by the said Hereticks omitting others about which there was no doubt or question raised and therefore not necessary in that case to be repeated The truth of this will more clearely appeare by the Paraphrases of some Fathers on the Apostles Creed who frequently omit some Articles or parcells of Articles in their explications even in that Age when 't is confest on all Hands that the Creed which is now called the Apostles was fully and compleatly extant And if they omitted some considerable Parts of the Creed when they undertook professedly to explain it because either so plain that they needed no explication or because handled before in some other Homily or Paraphrase we may suppose with greater Reason that the Councels and Fathers omitted some one or few Articles in the composing of their new Symboles which were framed upon some especiall occasion directed against a particular Heresy though the Apostles Creed were then fully extant For proofe of this consult the following Fathers 1. S. Chrysostome who flourisht about the yeare 400. in his first Hom. on the Creed omits these particles maker of Heaven Earth suffered died descended into Hell ascended into Heaven and ends the Text of his Creed thus I believe in the Holy Ghost 2. Petrus surnamed Chrysologus who flourisht about the year 440. in his 57 Hom. on the Creed omits Almighty maker of Heaven Earth suffered under Pontius Pilate died descended into Hell In his 58 Hom. he omits suffered and died rose from the dead descended into hell Catholick which Epithete is also omitted in the other following Homilies though exprest in the 57. After siting at the right hand of the Father he leaves out Almighty as also in the 57 Homily In Hom. 59. he omits maker of Heaven and Earth In Hom. 61. he leaves out the last Article life everlasting as included in the precedent of the Resurrection for Death being conquered by our Rising againe it must needs be a Resurrection unto a life immortall 3. Eusebius Gallicanus usually called Emesenus a Father of uncertain Age but placed by Bellarmine in the yeare 430. in his first Homily on the Creed omits maker of Heaven and Earth as implied in Omnipotent all the Articles between Christs Birth and Ascension although he mention them in his explication He omits also the Article of the Holy Ghost The remission of sins by Baptisme as inclosed in the beliefe of the Holy Catholique Church and the two last Articles viz. of the Resurrection and life Everlasting In his second Homily he omits Almighty maker of Heaven and Earth only Son in the second Article Suffered under Pontius Pilate died 4. Venantius Fortunatus who flourished about the yeare 570. in his Exposition of the Apostles Creed omits Maker of Heaven and Earth our Lord in the second Article rose againe from the Dead sitteth on the right hand of the Father though it be in the explication I believe the Holy Catholique Church the Communion of Saints and Life everlasting which is included as by Chrysologus in the Article of the Resurrection Object 12. If the Creed were framed by the Apostles and by them delivered to all Churches of the World it could never have come into the Fathers mindes to have composed so many Symboles and Confessions which for Perfection must needs give place to that of the Apostles no such therefore was then extant which he must needs grant who knowes that this simple formula was required of those that came to Baptisme whether they believed in God the Father Son and Holy Ghost Math. 28. 19. Answ The Fathers made no new Creeds or Confessions of Faith as hath been already shewen but only explained the old the occasion of which explicatory Creeds is well rendred by the Learned Vossius Non licuit per haereticos in ea simplicitate permanere Haeresibus igitur obortis quarum Architecti vel Patroni sese pro Christianis venditarent ac misere seducerent imperitos coacti sunt addere alia quibus Ecclesiae Doctrina ab Haereticâ item Ecclesiae filii ab haereticis eorum Sectatoribus secernerentur That is The Hereticks would not suffer the Church to continue in the Primitive simplicity of the Faith for Heresies arising whose Authors and abettors carried themselves for Christians and under that name miserably seduced the ignorant the Fathers were compelled to adde other Creeds whereby the Doctrine of the Church might be distinguished from Heresy and the Children of the Church from Hereticks and their followers Thus he De trib Symb. Dissert 1. num 29. Sceondly as to that Forme of Beliefe in the Trinity which the Apostles are said by direction from their Master to have required of those who came to Baptisme Mat. 28. 19. There is no such matter there set downe only they are charged there to Baptize in the Name of the Trinity not in the name of any strange God or of any one Person of the sacred Trinity but of all Three together Yet I willingly grant that faith in the Holy Trinity was required of the Persons which came to Baptisme but not by vertue of that command which was given to the Baptizers not to the Persons who came to be Baptized but this Faith was not the only thing required of them for we read other points numbred amongst the principles or beginings of Christian Doctrine which the Catechumeni were taught as Repentance from dead workes resurrection of the Dead and Eternall Judgment Heb. 6. 1 2. Ob. 13th If the Creed had been Composed by the Apostles with the same sentences words order which we now have and had been so delivered to the Catholick Church there had not been divers Creeds about the yeere 400 according to diverse Churches diverse in the manner of expression and diverse in the number of sentences which diversity will appeare to him that shall compare severall Creeds together especially the Nicene which hath not a few sentences added others alterd with which additions and alterations it was afterwards received and used in the Eastern Churches the Apostles Creed being in a maner excluded Answ First The diversity of severall Creeds in some few words or in the manner of expression is a Circumstance not materiall so the same sense be kept inviolate and all the Heads or Articles of the Faith preserved entire Secondly As to the number of Sentences more in some Creeds and fewer in others we have before assigned some Reasons why one or more articles have beene omitted in some Creeds and so the number made fewer but for the adding of any new Sentences unto the Apostles Creed I constantly deny that the Primitive Church ever did it but on the other side constantly disclaimed it her office being this to preserve the old Faith which was once delivered to
third Day he rose againe according to the Scriptures Christs descent into Hell as we see in this Collation is expressely set downe but in two Creeds namely this of the Apostles and the Athanasian although the Fathers of the first Ages generally acknowledge it and mention it in their writings for which we may looke back on the Creeds of Thaddaeus and Ignatius set downe before The reason therefore why it is omitted in other Creeds I conceive to be this That they held it involved or presupposed in the following word The third Day he rose againe from the Dead For Christ may not improperly be said to have risen the third Day according to both Parts from the Grave in his Body from Hell a low place especially in comparison of Heaven in his Soule So both Parts in this Rising met together from two severall Places whether they had before Descended both which places are set downe in holy Scripture as the Receptacles of the Dead as well Good as Bad so 't is in either a Rising from the Dead and are joyntly called by the names of Sheol Hades Inferi This also S. Chrysostome in setting downe the Creed passeth by Christs ascension into Heaven as being included in or presupposed by that which followes His sitting at the Right Hand of the Father See Gen. 37. 35. Job 26. 6. Psal 86. 13. 139 8. Prov. 15. 11. Isa 13. 9. Luk. 16. 23. Rev. 1. 18. chap. 20. 13. Artic. VI. Apost He ascended into Heaven and sitteth at the right Hand of God the Father Almighty East And ascended into Heaven and sitteth at the right hand of the Father Nic. hath the same Aquil. the same Athan. He ascended into Heaven he sitteth on the right hand of the Father God Almighty Antioch And he ascended into Heaven Article VII Apost From whence he shall come to judge the quicke and the dead East And he shall come to judge the quicke and the dead Nic. Who shall come againe with glory to judge the quicke and the dead of whose kingdome there shall be no end Aquil. From thence he shall come to judge the quicke and the deade Athan. From whence he shall come to judge the quicke and the Dead Antioch And he shall come againe to judge the quicke and the dead Article VIII Apost I believe in the Holy Ghost East And in the Holy Ghost the comforter who spake by the Prophets Nic. And in the Holy Ghost the Lord and giver of life who proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne according to the Latines who with the Father and the Sonne together is worshipped and glorified who spake by the Prophets Aquil. And in the Holy Ghost Athan There is another Person of the Holy Ghost the Holy Ghost is God the Holy Ghost is of the Father and of the Son Neither made nor created nor begotten but proceeding Article IX Apost I believe the holy Catholick Church the Communion of Saints East One holy Catholick Church Nic. One holy Catholick and Apostolick Church Aquil. The holy Catholick Church Where Ruffinus in his explication interprets Holy by that which preserves the Faith or Religion of Christ entire and opposeth the Church to the Conventicles of severall Hereticks which he calls Concilia vanitatis thus explaining the word Catholick and the Communion of Saints Article X. Apost The forgivenesse of Sinnes East One Baptisme of Repentance for the Remission of Sinnes Nic I acknowledge one Baptisme for the Remission of Sinnes Aquil. The Remission of Sinnes Article XI Apost The Resurrection of the Body East And the Resurrection of the Body Nice And I look for the Resurrection of the Dead Athan. At whose comming All men shall rise againe with their Bodies and shall give an account for their own Workes Aquil. The Resurrection of this Body In the Exposition whereof Ruffinus hath these words Et ideo satis cautâ providâ adjectione Ecclesia nostra Aquilegiensis docet quae in eo quod a caeteris traditur Carnis Resurrectionem uno addito pronomine tradit Hujus Carnis Resurrectionem hujus sine dubio quam is qui profitetur signaculo Crucis fronti imposito contingit That is our Church the Aquileian hath warily and providently added the Pronoune This to the Article of the Resurrection of the Body which is delivered without it in other Churches This Body that is which he toucheth who maketh profession of the Creed having the Signe of the Crosse made upon his Forehead whence we may observe not only the Antiquity of the Crosse in Baptisme but the custome also of the ancient Church in adding some exegeticall particles to the Creed as a Thing publickly received and practised in the Christian World Article XII Apost And life Everlasting East And life Everlasting Nic. And the life of the World to come Athan. And they that have done good shall goe into life Everlasting and they that have done Evill into Everlasting fire Aquil. Incloseth it in the precedent Article of the Resurrection in the explication whereof Ruffinus hath these words Dabitur peccatoribus incorruptionis immortalitatis ex Resurrectione conditio ut sicut Deus justis ministrat ad perpetuitatem Gloriae ista peccatoribus ad prolixitatem confusionis ministret paenae That is Sinners also shall rise to an immortall and incorruptible estate so that as God affourdeth the rightious everlasting Glory he also prepareth the sinners for length of shame and sorrow Ob. 14th That Creed which was neithe made by the Apostles nor by any Generall Councell nor was recieved by the Greeke or Easterne Churches but in the Church of Rome and had beene so long recited and used in the Church now about the yeare 400 that then it was held an Apostolicall Tradition which it is certaine was conveyed also by the Church of Rome to other Churches of the West the Easterne Churches in the meane time using other Creeds that Creed was composed by those who had the Government of the Romane Church but there is nought of this which agreeth not to the Creed that we call the Apostles therefore the Bishop and Presbyters of the Church of Rome composed it Answ This is the summary Argument used to disprove the Authors of the Creed and which we have already answered by Parts For that the Creed was composed by the Apostles we have proved at large both by Authorities and Arguments That it was received for the full sense and substance thereof in the Greeke or Easterne Churche appears both by what we have before cited out of the Greeke Fathers especially Marcellus and Chrysostome as also by the foresaid Parallell of the Jerosolymitan Nicene Antiochian and Athanasian Creeds with the Romane and Aquileian That it was held an Apostolicall Tradition by the Church of Rome before the yeare 400 appeares by the forecited Testimonies of the Laine Fathers Irenaeus Tertullian Ambrose and others That it was convaied by the Church of Rome to other Churches of the West which the Objector invidiously
word added but in other Places according as we are informed some passages seeme to be added by reason of certain Hereticks on purpose to exclude the novelty of their Doctrines by expressing the true sense 1. Thirdly Vigilius Bishop of Rome in his 4th book against Eutyches hath these words Vniversitas profitetur Credere se in Deum Patrem omnipotentem in Jesum Christum filium ejus Dominum nostrum Huic Capitulo ob id iste calumniatur cur non dixit in unum Iesum Christum Filium ejus juxta Niceni decretum Concilii Sed Roma antequam Nicena Synodus conveniret à temporibus Apostolorum usque ad nunc sub Beatae memoriae Caelestino cui iste rectae fidei testimonium reddidit ita fidelibus symbolum tradidit nec praejudicant verba ubi sensus incolumis permanet That is The whole Church professeth to believe in God the Father Almighty and in Iesus Christ his Son our Lord Eutyches cavils at this last Article because it runs not thus In one Iesus Christ his Sonne according to the Decree of the Nicene Councell whereas the Church of Rome before the assembling of that Councell from the Times of the Apostles untill this present and under Caelestinus of Blessed memory the rightnesse of whose faith Eutyches acknowledged delivered the Creed in these Termes unto the faithfull neither be the words prejudiciall where the sense is entire So then That the Church of Rome kept the Creed inviolate this Apostolicall Tradition faithfully and entirely witnesse here S. Ambrose Ruffinus and Vigilius And that the Apostles distinguisht it into twelve Articles according to their own number witnesse as hath been shewn before the same S. Ambrose Augustine and Leo the Great But because these two Creeds of the Ierosolymitan and Romane Churches differ something in the Bulke that of Ierusalem being somewhat the larger we may if we please to make them exactly agree cut off those Additionall Particles from the Creed of Ierusalem which were added because of Heresies succrescent in those Easterne Parts But if we let them alone the difference will not appeare considerable rather an admirable Harmony will be observed betweene the so distant Churches of East and West in matter of Faith which otherwise in Discipline and Ceremonies did not a little vary Thus the Churches Coat like that of Christ her spouse was seamles though wrought with diverse Colours CAP IX The Second Head of this Discourse namely The Gounds on which and the ends for which the Apostles Framed the Creed The Suffiiciency also of the Creed fo the Rule of Faith is proved by the Testimonies of Divines as well Moderne as Ancient and those both Romish and Reformed HAving evinced as farre as in me Lyes the first and chiefe Head which I proposed to Treat off namely That the Apostles were the Composers of the Creed which commony beares their Name I come now to dispatch the other three in their order as they lie the which will require but a short discussion and first the Grounds and ends of composiing it First The Apostles had Ground and warrant for composing this Breviary of Faith from diverse Patternes in holy Writ of Gods owne setting King Solomon in the old law contracts the whole Duty of Man into these two precepts Feare God and keepe his Commandements Eccles. 12 13. And a wiser then he in the Gospell our Blessed Saviour reduceth the whole Law unto these two Heads The love of God and our Neighbour Mat. 22. 37. More particularly God the Father in the old Testament concluded the whole law of nature with al its Branches within the compasse of ten short Precepts and those ten he reduced into two Tables Thus we have a perfect Rule of Love and obedience from his Mouth Then God the Son under the New Testament at his Disciples request gave us an exact Forme of Prayer whereby to ground exercise and regulate our hopes and desires There remained now in the compiled some short compleat Rule of Faith which the holy Ghost heere did delivering this Creed unto the Church by the Mouthes of the Apostles to be for ever kept therein as a sacred Depositum Thus have we three Briefe but Full Rules of those Fundamentall Christian virtues Faith Hope and Charity namly The Creed The Lords Paryer and The Ten Commandements delivered unto us by the three Persons of the Sacred Trinity Secondly The Framing of the Creed was most necessary for these two ends tht preservation of Faith and Charity First For the ease and safety of Christians especially of the plainer weaker and more Ignorant sort Many have not the ability or leisure to peruse the whole Body of Scripture and thence to collect those Points of Faith which are necessary to Salvation for they lye confusedly scatterd heere there mixt with matter of a diverse kind yea some Articles of the Creed are not expresly and directly found in any determinate Place of holy writ as the eight and ninth together with the mystery of the Trinity which is therein conteined but depend on Consequences and Logicall deductions which though sufficiently cleare in themselves upon a just arguing or comparing of Places yet it cannot be presumed that every one hath the skill to Frame them so that there would be much feare of errour and danger of mistake in so weighty a Businesse Wherefore it was very expedient or rather absolutely necessary that there should be gathered a summary of these points digested into a method and exprest in plaine tearms and that by an unquestionable and unerring hand that so wee might know what to trust to and have alwayes at hand those maine grounds of our Religion which God requires to be believed by us as necessary to Salvation The whole Scripture is indeed a Perfect Rule of Faith so is it also of our hope and life A perfect Rule of our Life and manners in its precepts and prohibitions of our hope in its Promises severall Patternes of Prayer of our Faith in its Dogmaticall Positions yet as it pleased God to summe up the first in Ten short words as Moses calls the Commandements Deut. 10. 4. And to summe up the second in seven shorter Petitions so it was as requisite that upon the the same Ground the Third should be reduced unto some few Heads as they are now in the twelve Articles of the Creed which therefore we may not improperly call Sepes Credendorum The fence or mound of our Faith without which Boundary we should wander up and downe in infinito Campo in a large field at randome This Reason is touched by S. Austin De fide Symb. cap. 1. Est Fides Catholica in Symbolo nota fidelibus memoriaeque mandata quantum res passa est brevitate Sermonis ut incipientibus atque lactentibus eis qui in Christo renati sunt nondum Scripturarum divinarum diligentissimâ Spirituali tractatione atque cognitione roboratis paucis verbis credendum constitueretur proficientibus
ad divinam doctrinam certa humilitatis atque Charitatis firmitate surgentibus quod multis verbis exponendo esset perficiendum Secondly For the due bounding of our Faith and Charity There are many lesser circumstantiall Points in divinity which Christians may differ about Salva Fide Charitate without prejudice to either but others there be of farre higher Concernment requisite to the very beeing of a true and rightly grounded Christian these we call Fundamentall Points the Nescience of most whereof but the denyall of any is destructive of Salvation whithout ensuing repentance Now it was necessary that these should be knowen and severed from the rest that so the Church might know whome to admit to Baptisme and acknowledg for her Children and on the other side Whom to reject or cut off as Heretickes misbelievers Yea besides that every private Christian might know by this Rule whom to communicate with and whom to fly from and avoid as Heathens and Publicans in our Saviours Language To demonstrate this Father namely that the Creed conteines all Points which a good Christian is bound of necessity to believe I shall produce a Reason or two and thereto subjoine the testimonies of the Ancients which among other Corollaries hence deducible will serve to free the true reformed Churches from that just imputation of Heresy which the Church of Rome hath been pleased to lay upon Them for al of thē generally unanimously imbrace the Creed as appeares by their severall confessions and therfore cannot justly be charged with heresy in the ancient which is the true and genuine acception of the word The reasons are these two which follow First the End for which the Apostles Framed the Creed cannot be imagined to be any other than this viz. To give us a Breviary of the fundamentall Doctrines of Faith Dare we say that the Apostles came short of this their end It must be then either for want of Power or want of will Now to affirme they could not compasse it is little better then Blasphemy and to affirme they would not when they might must needs argue them of grosse negligence in their function and uncharitablnesse to the Christian church faults wholy uncompatible with the Apostolick office and Zeale Secondly The name of Symbole 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Greeke and Regula Fidei The Rule of Faith in the Latine whereby the Ancients style the Creed argue the compleatnesse of it for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies Nota or Indicium the Creed being the note of difference between the true Children of the Church and those who were either unbelievers or misbelievers And the Rule of Faith as Tertullian calls it or The Rule of Truth as Irenaeus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That unerring Rule of Truth which we received in Baptisme from whom Chrysostome and Austin borrowed the terme who opposed the Creed to the Placita of Hereticks and will have them examined ad hujus amussim by the line or Rule of the Creed must be adequate to the Faith or necessary Truth whereof it is a Rule niether larger nor narrower for else it looseth the very nature of a Rule To this Truth the Fathers give in their Suffrages I shall set downe the Testimonies of some who were the most Ancient and the most famous in their Times 1. The Creed is called Breve Evangelium the Epitome or breviary of the Gospell like Homers Workes inclosed in a nutshell according to the saying of S. Bartholomew recorded by Dionys Arear lib de myst Theo. cap. 1. 2. Clem. Romanus in his forecited Epistle Ad Fratrem Domini calls the Creed Summun totius Fidei Catholicae the Summary of the Catholick Faith and farther saith that in it Integritas credulitatis ostenditur The entire or whole Faith of a Christian is declared 3. Ignatius in his Epistle to the Magnesians after he had reckoned up those Heads of the Creed which touched our Saviour concludes thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He who fully knowes and believes these things is Blessed that is as fare as concernes these Articles or this part of the Faith which relates to our Saviour the same holdes in proportion of the rest otherwise not only a right beliefe although full and entire but a good life also are requisite to happinesse 4. Irenaeus tels us that many barbarous Nations who had not the Bookes of Scripture among them yet Sine Charactere vel atramento Scriptam habuerunt per Spiritum sanctum in Cordibus suis salutem Had Salvation wrote in their Hartes by the Finger of the holy Ghost without the helpe of Pen and Inke Where by Salvation he understands the Tradition of the Creed as appeares by the following words so called by a Metonymie because it is a meanes in its kind sufficient to Salvation Thus he lib. 3. cap. 4. The same Father elswhere gives this testimony of the fulnesse of the Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is Neither the most able Orator amongst the Pastors of the Church can say more than this for no man is above his Teacher or Master neither he who is weake in speech can distinguish or speake lesse than this Tradition for there beeing one and the same Faith neither he who is able to speake much of it hath augmented it nor he who is able to say litle hath lessened it at all 5. Origen in the preface of his Bookes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith that the Holy Apostles Preaching the Faith of Christ De quibusdam quidem c. Concerning some Points most plainly delivered unto all Believers even the most dull and slow whatsoever they judged necessary where by Necessaries he understandes the Articles of the Creed which he there reckons up 6. Cyril of Jerusalem in his fift Catechesis speaking of the Creed useth these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we comprehend saith he the whole Doctrine of Faith in a few versicles And afterwardes comparing it unto a small graine of mustard-seed which virtually containes many Branches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so also doth this Creed in a few words comprehend the whole doctrine of Religion which is delivered in the old new Testament 7. Eusebius Galicanus commonly called Emesenus in the begining of his second Homily on the Greed hath these words Hanc nobis fidem velut magnam lampadem Christus adveniens errantibus viam monstraturus exhibuit per quem possit Deus ignotus requiri quaesitus credi creditus inveniri This Faith or Creed saith he like some great Lampe Christ exhibited for his comming thus shewing the way to those in errour By help wherof God who was before unknowne might be sought being sought might be believed on being believed on might be found The same Father in his first Homily derives the name Symbolum from Caena collatitia and then tels us that De utroque Testamento totius Corporis virtus in paucas est diffusa sententias ut facilius animae Thesaurus
non in Arca sed in memoria portaretur The quintessence of the whole Body of Scripture is extracted into a few Sentences that so this precious Treasure of the Soule might be the more easily borne not in a Chest but in the Conscience After this he brings two similies to the same purpose comparing the Creed to a picture wherein are united all the severall Graces of the choisest Beauties and to a Rich Man journying who puts all his wealth into a few Jewells which are easily portable 8. S. Austin in his 181 Sermon De Tempore gives this Elogy of the Creed Symbolum breve est verbis sed magnum est Sacramentis quicquid enim praefiguratum est in Scripturis quiquid praedictum est in Prophetis vel de Deo ingenito vel ex Deo in Deum nato vel de spiritu Sancto vel de suscipiendo omni Sacramento vel de morte Domini resurrectonisque ejus mysterio totum breviter hoc Symbolum continet That is The Creed is litle for words but large in mysteries for what soever was prefigured in the Patriarchs proclaimed in Scripture foretould in the Prophets either concerning God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost or of undertaking the mysterious worke of our Salvation or concerning the Death resurrection of the Lord this Creed doth conteine in briefe 9. Leo the Great in his 13th Epistle written to the Empresse Pulcheria calls the Creed as is fore-alleadged The short and Perfect Confession of the Catholick Symbole distinctly marked forth by the twelve Apostles into so many sentences Tanquam instructa sit munitione Caelesti ut omnes haereticorum opiniones solo ipsius possint gladio detruncari cujus plenitudinem si Eutiches c. As compleatly furnisht with celestiall armour so that the the Heades of all hereticall opinions may be cut off by its sword alone the Fulnesse whereof if Eutiches c. 10. Cassianus in his sixt Booke of the Incarnation of our Lord speakes fully to this purpose Quicquid per universum c. whatsoever is largly diffused throughout the whole Body of the Scriptures is all summed up in the perfect breviary of the Creed The place we have cited more at large chap. 5. 11. Venantius Fortunatus in the preface to his explication of the Creed begins thus Fidei Catholicae totius summam recensentes in quâ integritas Credulitatis ostenditur unius Dei omnipotentis id est Sanctae Trinitatis aequalitas declaratur mysterium Incarnationis Filii Dei c. That is Whilst we declare the summe of the whole Catholicke Faith wherein the entire beliefe of a Christian is set forth with the equality of one Almighty God that is of the Holy Trinity and the mystery of the incarnation of the Sonne of God c. where he useth the very words of Clemens Rom. Which we forecited Then he concludes Cunctis credentibus quae continentur in Symbolo salus animarum vitae perpetua bonis actibus praepareiur Let all those who believe the Things contained in the Creed provide by good workes for the salvation of their Soules and life everlasting that Creed being sufficient for matter of beliefe as good workes are for matter of practise 12. I shall conclude these Testimonies of the Ancients with these words of Erasmus lib. de Rat. verae Theolog. Vtinam nostra credulitas Symbolo esset contenta ubi caepit esse minus Fidei inter Christianos mox increvit Symbolorum modus numerus Would to God saith he our Beliefe had been contented with the Creed when there began to be lesse Faith amongst Christians the Creeds straitwaies increased both in bulk number For the farther clearing of this Truth I shall adde to the Authority of the Ancients the Testimonies of some noted Doctors in the Roman Church who make the Apostles Creed the Breviary of the Faith and the note or signe to distinguish the Orthodox Professors from Hereticks as well as Infidells and so by a necessary consequence free the Reformed Churches from the injurious imputation of Heresy seeing they all unanimously receive the Creed in the old Primitive sense as it was expounded and enlarged by the foure first generall Councells 1. Aquinas 2a 2ae qu. 1. Art 9. speaking of the Apostles Creed useth these words Necessarium fuit fidei veritatem in unum colligi ut facilius posset omnibus proponi ne aliquis per ignorantiam fidei a veritate deficeret Et ab hujusmodi sententiarum fidei collectione nomen Symboli est acceptum It was necessary saith he for the Poynts of the true Faith to be drawn into one from which Collection of Sentences it took the name of Symbolum that so they might the more easily be presented to all and for this end least any one should depart from it through ignorance Whence it will follow that all necessary poynts of Faith are therein contained for if any were wanting there were roome left for ignorance 2. Canisius in his Catechisme maketh this Question Estné brevis aliqua fidei complexio ac summa omnium nobis credendorum Is there any short summary of the faith and collection of all Poynts to be believed He answers Est illa quam 12 Apostoli suo Symbolo tradiderunt quod quidem Symbolum velut illustris not a est qua Christiani ab Impiis qui vel nullam vel non rectam Christi fidem profitentur discernendi ac internoscendi sunt There is namely That which the Twelve Apostles have delivered in their Creed which Creed is a famous marke or signe whereby Christians are to be discerned from those ungodly persons who either professe no faith or not the Right 3. Augerius in his Catechisme proposeth the like question Estné brevis aliqua methodus fidei quae necessario nobis tenenda est Is there any short method or rule of Faith which is necessary to be held by us He answers Est quidem ab ipsis Apostolis tradita quae Symbolum ideo vocari solet quod sit quaedam Illustris notae quâ Christianos distinguimus ab iis qui Idololatrarum superstitionem haereticorum impiotatem comitantur There is such an one and that delivered by the Apostles themselves which is therefore commonly called a Symbole because it is a certain marke of note whereby we distinguish Christians from those who follow the superstition of Idolaters and the impiety of Hereticks 4. The Romane Catechisme set forth by the Decree of the Councell of Trent and of Pius 5. hath these words touching the Creed Hanc fidei formulam Symbolum Apostoli appellârunt quia eâ veluti notâ tessera quadam uterentur quâ desertos subintroductos falsos fratres qui evangelium adulterabant ab iis qui verè Christi militiae sacramento se obligarent facilè possent internoscere That is This forme of Beliefe the Apostles called a Symbole because they made use of it as a certain Token or watch word whereby they might easily discerne
false Brethren who had privily crept into the Church and corrupted the Gospell from those who sincerely bound themselves by Oath in Baptisme to the service of Christ 5. A Catechisme taken out of the Workes of Costerus Pet. de Soto and others set forth by the command of the Arch-Bishop of Triers respons ad 2am qu. saith thus Haeretici quosdam Articulos vel penitùs negant vel interpretationibus depravatis in novas alienasque Sententias detorquent neque ulla unquam extitit haeresis quae non hoc Symbolo damnari potuerit That is The Hereticks doe either wholly deny some Articles of the Creed or by their corrupt interpretations wrest them into new and strange senses neither did there ever arise any Heresy which might not be condemned by this Creed of the Apostles Now how the Church of Rome which gives this Testimony of the fulnesse of the Creed for the Rule of Faith and makes it the Distinctive marke whereby to know her true genuine Children from the Bastardy of Hereticks can justly adde many other Articles to it as Pius 4. doth in his Bull De professione fidei to be believed as necessary to Salvation and for the not receiving of them as undoubtedly Catholick necessary Truths together with the Apostolick Articles condemne the Reformed Churches of Heresy I can see no shadow of Reason except she include these her Dictates in the body of the ninth Article and so inforce them upon us by vertue of the Apostles pretēded Authority interpreting the Article thus I believe the Holy Catholick Church That is I believe whatsoever the Church of Rome usurping the Title of Catholick requireth of me to be believed But this Interpretation will be found obnoxious to a double Errour First Because shee beggs the maine thing in question namely That she is the Catholick Church whereas shee is but a member thereof and that a very diseased one Secondly Because the sense of the word Credo I believe must in all reason be taken in the same sense here as it is in the following Articles unto which it is in like manner referred viz. I believe there is a Remission of Sinnes that there is to be a Resurrection of the Body and Life everlasting So here I believe there is an Holy Catholick Church that is That the Christian Church is Holy and Catholick or Universall Holy for Doctrine and Manners and universall for Place not tied to Greece or Rome or Geneva but generally diffused throughout the whole world To conclude this Point I shall adde some concurrent Testimonies of the Protestant Divines whose agreeing in this with the Church of Rome though much differing in others shewes the Power and cleerenesse of this Truth which extorts a Confession from all Mouthes and withall may serve to stop the violence of some zealous Reformatists who even Reprobate all those that goe not along with them in every new-broached Doctrine and in the Resolution of each Theologicall Controversy These Divines shall be six 1. Luther in his larger Catechisme after he hath set downe the Creed the Commandements and the Lords Prayer he subjoynes In hisce tribus partibus summatim ac nuditér quoad ejus fieri potuit simplicissimè comprehensa sunt omnia quicquid passim in sacris literis longè lateque tractamus That is In these Three are summarily and plainly comprehended whatsoever Things are handled at large in the holy Scriptures The Creed being the Breviary of the whole Scripture for matter of Faith as the ten Commandements are for matter of of Practise and the Lords Prayer for our Petitions Each perfect in its kind 2. Selneccerus in his Paedag. Christianâ saith Certum est in hoc Symbolo Apostolorum contineri omnia Capita totius Christianae Religionis rectè perspicuè ordine That is It is certain that in this Creed of the Apostles are contained all the Heads of Christian Religion rightly clearely and methodically 3. Ioan Gerardu◠a late Learned and Moderate Lutherane in the Epistle Dedicatory to his second Tome of Common Places speaks thus of the Creed Quotquot Doctrinae Christianae c. Whatsoever Collections or Systems of Christian Doctrine which Saint Luke calls Catechises Luke 1. 4. Act. 18. 25. Saint Paul The forme of sound words 2 Tim. 1. 13. The Epistle to the Hebrewes The first Principles of the Oracles of God chap. 5. 12. and the Principles of the Doctrine of Christ cha 6. 1. Clemens of Alexandria 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rude Draughts Origen Principles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dionysius of Alexandria Elements of Divinity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Eusebius lib. 3. cap. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A breviary of the Elements of Religion Nazianzen Theology Theophilus and Lactantius Institutions The most at this day call them Common Places Whatsoever Collections I say in this kind of Christian Doctrine have been written and set forth by diverse Authority from the most ancient times of the Primitive Church the first lineaments as it were and chiefe Heads of them are set forth in the Apostles Creed This Rule of Faith set downe by Irenaeus and Tertullian and styled an Apostolicall Tradition if any one compare with the words of the Apostles Creed he will easily find a great agreement between them sometimes the Apostles Creed sometimes the Scripture it selfe is called the Rule of Faith by the Ancients namely by reason of the exact harmony or concord between both which lookes on the holy Scripture as the fountain and the Creed as a streame thence derived As in Ages past when new Disputes ever and anon arose the Fathers who succeeded the Apostles were enforced to set forth larger and more expresse summaries of the Apostolick Doctrine partly to unfold it more fully partly to vindicate it from corrupt Glosses So also in this latter Age of ours wherein the mindes of many are very farre withdrawn from the Apostolick simplicity by the subtilty of Satan the shortnesse of the Creed is to be explained more at large out of the fulnesse of Scripture and thereby fortified against the corruptions of Hereticks that so we may faithfully preserve in our own persons and deliver over to Posterity the sacred Depositum of the Christian Faith Thus for Jo. Gerardus 4. Calvin Instit lib. 2. cap. 16. § 18. Of this we are undoubtedly assured saith he Totam in eo Symbolo Apostolorum fidei nostrae historiam succinctè destincteque recenseri That the whole History or subject of our Beliefe is contained in the Apostles Creed briefly and orderly 5. Beza on Rom. 12. 6. the place before cited tels us That the Apostles Creed was composed at the very beginning of the Gospels Preaching veluti Evangelii Epitome as a Compendium or short summary of the Gospell and therefore was deservedly called the Rule of Faith by Tertullian 6. Bullinger in the Preface to his Decads tels us That the Generall Councells in setting forth their Creeds changed nothing in the Doctrine of the Apostles neque quicquam novi
adjectum neither added any thing thereto therefore they judged that Doctrine full and compleat Now that by the Doctrine of the Apostles he meanes the Creed appears clearly by the precedent words The forecited Testimonies of Jo. Pappus Chr. Barbarossa and Pet. Martyr say as much which who so please may looke back upon for farther satisfaction CAP X. The Third head of this Discourse namely The severall Reasons or significations of the name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Creed beares in the Originall Greeke THE Apostles Creed is styled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Symbole for more Reasons than one all taken from the severall Significations of the word found even in profane Authors First 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as well as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies Collecta or Collatio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a conferendo that is a Feast or Supper whereto every one of the Guests brought his share either in meat or mony which kind of Feast was also by an other usuall name called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Now this acception of the word well suits with the Creed as having reference both to the Makers and the Matter For the makers or Composers of the Creed were the twelve Apostles parallell in number to the twelve Articles whereof it consists And the matter of the Creed consists of the severall points of Faith gathered out of the whole Scripture and heare United in one methodicall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Breviary This also well consorts with an other signification of the word mentioned by Pliny Nat. Hist. lib. 33. cap. 1. Both Greekes and Romanes saith he in latter Times called a Ring Symbolum Probably from the severall parcels or graines of Gold melted and fashioned into one Orbicâ—e which graines aptly signify the severall Parts and the orbicular figure the Perfection of the Creed This reason of the name we find given by Clemens Romanus Ruffinus Saint Austin Cassianus and Venantius Fortunatus Secondly The word signifies Tessera Pacti a Tally in Contracts a Bond or Indenture such as we make with God in our Baptisme by profession of our Faith in the Creed wherein the Articles of our Covenant with God for matter of Beliefe are comprized from which if we recede we breake our Covenant and so renounce our Christendome thereby forfeiting all the priviledges of our Baptisme This reason of the name is rendred by Chrysologus Hom. 62. in Symb. Placitum vel pactum quod lucri spes venientis continet vel futuri Symbolum nuncupari contractu etiam docemur humano quod tamen Symbolum inter duos format semper geminata conscriptio in stipulatione cautum reddit humana cautela ne cui surrepat ne quem decipiat perfidia contractibus semper inimica Sed hoc inter homines inter quos fraus a quo facta est aut cui facta est semper laedit inter Deum vero homines Symbolum fidei sola fide firmatur non literae sed spiritui creditur mandatur cordi non chartae quia divinum Creditum humana non indiget Cautione And alittle after Sed dicis qui falli non potest quid est quod exiget Placitum Quid Symbolum quaerit quaerat ille propter te non propter se non quia ille dubitat sed ut tu Credas The summe is That in humane Contracts there are required two Symbola or Tabellae the Indenture and the Counterpane and both these in writing to prevent mistakes and cheatings but one only is required in our Baptismall contract or Covenant to wit our Bond giuen to God not in writing but by way of parole publisht in the face of the Church The reason is because God can be neither decieved nor decieve but we unlesse thus bound might through humane frailty more easily depart from the Faith profest and in fringe our Articles not to the decieving of God who knowes us better than our selves but to the destroying of our Grace and the forfeiting of our glory Hitherto also belongs that of Genebrard in his Booke De Trinitate Aristoteles pulchre dixit elementa quae inter se qualitate unâ communicant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Solebant autem Graeci in pactis conventis uti quibusdam tesseris quae loco tabularum syngrapharumque essent ex quibus jus diceretur quae vocarentur Symbola ergo summa fidei compendio verborum concepta ab Apostolis sive ab Ecclesiâ representativâ verè Existit Symbolum quòd ea in judicium Ecclesiae relata declaret penes eum Religionis virtutem esse qui ipsa in suae fidei Probationem confert nam certe penes illum consistit Religionis veritas cui benè credulitate convenit cum doctrinâ Apostolicâ cujus Symbolum est consensionis conventique nota certissima Thirdly The word signifies Tessera Amicitiae or Tessera hospitalis a certaine Token which not only particular men gave to their Friends and Allies but which Citties also publikly be stowed on some well-deserving men that so in their Travailes they might upon producing thereof be friendly received and courteously entertained in the confederate Townes So Budaeus informes us out of Lysias the Orator Now this Confession of our Faith in the Creed hath the same nature and use among all Churches wheresoever disperst over the face of the whole Earth for whosoever brings this Tessera or Token with him is to be received as a Brother But if there come any unto you saith St John and bring not this doctrine receive him not into your House neither bid him God speed 2 Io. 10. To this Sence alludes Leo the Great in his Epistle or Tract against Eutyches Fraterna vos paterna solicitudine commonemus ut inimicos Catholicae fidei hostes Ecclesiae incarnationis dominicae negatores instituto a Sanctis Apostolis Symbolo repugnantes in nullum recipiatis consensionis affectum we warne you out of a fraternall and a fatherly care that ye receive not into your communion the enimies of the Catholick Faith the adversaries of the Church the Denyers of the Lords incarnation and the oppugners of the Creed by the holy Apostles Fourthly The word signifies Insigne militare a military Flag Ensigne or Banner by which Souldiers are knowen to what Captaine or Generall they belong So Herodian in the 4th booke of his history tells us of the Emperour Antonius Caracalla that partly to ingratiate himselfe the more with the Souldiers partly to harden himselfe in warlike exercises 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He sometimes bare on his own shoulders the weightiest Ensignes of the Army Now this signification also well agrees to the Creed for by this Profession of our Faith we shew that we belong to Christ our Generall fighting under his Banner against our three enemies the World the Flesh and the Divell His Cognizance we take on us in our Baptisme by attesting to the Creed either in our own Persons if Adulti or if Infants in Personis Susceptorum Fiftly
before he was begotten and that he was made of nothing or had any other Essence or Substance than that of his Father or that he is obnoxious to change or Alteration such as these the Catholick and Apostolick Church of God doth Anathematize Socr. lib 4. cap. 11. THE FIRST APPENDIX Concerning the CREED of Athanasius CAP. I. Two Reasons why this Creed hath been more oppugned than the Rest It s Authority and Author are vindicated in generall more especially touching the severity of the Preface AMongst all the Creeds this of Athanasius hath met with most opposition First because it hath most resolutely and strictly oppugned the Ancient and Moderne Heresies about those great Poynts of the Trinity and Incarnation for whereas other Creeds proceed by way of simple Confession Narration or Exposition of the Faith I Believe c. This runnes in an higher style more directly repugnant to the corrupters of the Christian Faith Whosoever will be saved must believe c. Both in the Beginning and the close requiring an absolute Assent upon paine of Damnation and tacitely anathematizing all the Adversaries of the Faith So that we may compare the Apostles Creed to a Foundation the Nicene and other Exegeticall Creeds that followed unto a Superstructure but this of Athanasius to a Bulwarke or Defensive worke which guards the House and excludes the enemy from approaching no marvaile then it hath been so much oppugned Secondly because it was the worke and composure of a Private man whereas the other Creeds either challenge the Colledge of the Apostles for the Authors or the Catholick Church assembled in a Synod or at least the Tradition of some Patriarchall or other Ancient and famous Church time out of mind whereas this of Athanasius though relying but upon a single Fathers Authority yet speakes much bigger than the Rest and expressely requires a more exact obedience than any of the other Now this double reason hath raised both it and its Author many Adversaries whereof some have styled the Preface of it Proud and Insolent others have denied Athanasius for the Author so to leave it destitute of a Patron and deprive it of the Authority of so eminent a Champion of the Christian Faith a Third sort have more impudently defamed both Worke and Author and styled it Sathanasius his Creed as one Geo Niger and Valentinus Gentilis as Genebrard tells us in his Epistle to Charles Cardinall of Lorraine prefixed to his Book De Trinitate Among all which Adversaries 't is observable that none have either denied the Author or defamed the Creed but such whom the Church hath noted of Heresy and commonly have been the Ring-leaders to the Rest In this heat and fury of opposition it will concerne us calmely to examine the Truth whereby we shall at once vindicate the Credit both of the Creed and its Composer First for the Truth and Esteeme of the Creed it relies not on the Authority of one single Father who composed it though never so famous in his time and all Ages since among the Orthodox Professors but on the Testimony of the Catholick Church which hath received it and commended it to all her Children as the Buckler of the true Christian Faith neither only so but hath received it of old into her Liturgies and still retaines it an Honour not vouchsafed to any other Creed of a Private mans composing Constantinople Rome and the Reformed Churches have joyntly received it and exposed it to publique use although they very much differ in other Poynts a strong argument of its Verity and Authority Secondly For the credit of the Author whosoever consults Ecclesiasticall History and Nazianzens Encomiastick Oration must needs acknowledge his great fame throughout the Christian World for his Learning Vertue and unwearied Constancy in maintaining the true Faith against the Arian Faction under four Emperors Reignes especially under Constantius Valens when they swayed all which Undaunted constancy of his when the other Bishops generally either complyed with the Enemy or kept silence for feare deservedly purchased this peculiar honor to his Creed as the due reward of his unconquered Faith and delivered his Fame unto succeeding Ages with so loud a Trumpe that we heare Cosmas Laurens proclaime Cum ex S. Athanasii Opusculis aliquid inveneris nec ad scribendum Chartas habueris in vestimentis tuis scribe illud So Sophronii Prat. Spirit Thirdly As to the supposed Pride and Insolency of the Preface with which Termes some have been pleased to dignify it as being too stately for a private Mans worke and too peremptorily excommunicating all Christians who out of Ignorance or mysperswasion imbrace not all the following deepe misteryes contained in it they may please also to take notice that the Creed which followes though for the composure it Have Athanasius only for the Author yet the Faith therin set downe and explained is the common received Faith of the Church derived downe from the Apostles to his Times and since commended by our Catholick Mother to succeeding Ages as the Groundworke of Christian Religion most necessary to be first laid and relyed on and therefore may well beare such a Proeme which refers not so much to the Authority of the writer as to the Creed written the composure was a private Mans but the Creed was Publick the Frame of one but the Faith of All. Then for the strict exacting the beliefe of his Creed from all Christians they may please to observe that it was wrote in opposition to the Arians so that it doth not so directly exclude from Salvation the pure Ignorant as the stuborne Heretick nor somuch condemne the bare nescience as the negation of the Faith which was once delivered to the Saints Jud. 3. though I conceive it to be very hard if not utterly impossible for any Christian to be saved who doth not expresly believe the Substance of the Faith therein explayned especialy in those two Points which he so much insists upon viz. The Trinity and Incarnation the Vision or Fruition of the Blessed Trinity being the last End or Happinesse of mankind and the Incarnation of our Saviour with the consequents thereof being the meanes appointed by God for to compasse it So that the great Athanasius shewed not his Pride in prefixing such a Proeme but rather his mercy and Paternall care towardes the Church by a more expresse Declaration of the necessity of the Catholick Faith which some otherwise might have more oscitantly hearkned to and been lesse carefull to entertaine if not awakned by the Terror of this Preface CAP. II. Severall Testimonies Concerning the Author and Authority of the Athanasian Creed Hving premised thus much in way of a generall Vindication I shall now set downe some speciall Testimonies concerning the Author and Authority of this Creed begining with this latter Age wherein it hath begun to be questioned and so by degrees ascending to the Time of Athanasius himselfe thus at length arriving at the Fountaine Head by the
the latter end of the tenth Century hath these wordes in his Apollogetick which he made to the Kings of France Hugh and Robert Father and Son Primitus de fide dicendum credidi quaÌ„ alternantibus Choris in Francia apud Anglorum Ecclesiam variari audivi Alii enim dicunt ut arbitror secundum Athanasium Spiritus Sanctus a Patre Filio non factus non Creatus sed procedens qui dum id quod est nec genitus subtrahunt Synodicum D. Gregorii se sequi credunt ubi ita est scriptum spiritus sanctus nec ingenitus est nec genitus sed procedens that is I thought meet to speak first concerning the Faith which I find diversly expressed in the French and English Churches for some say as I suppose according to Athanasius The holy Ghost not made nor Created but proceeding from the Father and the Son who in leaving out that particle nor begotten conceive they follow the Synodicall of S. Gregory in which it is thus written The holy Ghost is neither unbegotten nor begotten but proceeding To which words Baron in his Annals ad A. 1001 thus attests Vides lector in his jaÌ„ ante sexcentos annos Symbolum vere ejus esse absque dubitatione credituÌ„ praedicatum thou seest here Reader that above six hundred yeares agoe the Creed which goes under the name of Athanasius was verely believed to be his without the least doubt to the contrary And well might he say so for that ambiguous clause ut arbitror as I suppose in this Testimony of Abbo hath no reference to the Author but to the words and to the various Copies of Athanasius his Creed as appears by the scope and purpose of the Abbot in his Citation 10 That this Creed was asscribed to Athanasius in the Time of Charles the Bald will appeare first out of the second Book of Rathrannus Monke of Corbey written by him against the Greekes a Book not yet extant in Print Secondly out of the first Booke of Aeneas Bishop of Paris written also against the Greeks c. 19. Thirdly out of the Capitulum of Hincmarus Arch-Bishop of Rheims which he gave to the Presbyters of his Diocesse Aº 852. See the first Capit. in Apend Tom. 3-Conc Gall. set forth by Sirmondus But for all three See Armac de Symb. 11. The fourth Councell of Toledo held in the yeare of our Lord 671 according to the edition of Io. Garsia Loaisa and in the third yeare of K. Sisenandus by threescore and two Bishops whereof Isidore of Sevil was one thus professeth its Faith in the words of the Athanasian Creed only somewhat contracting them for thus the Fathers of the councell begin cap. 1. Secundum divinas Scripturas doctrinam quam a Sanctis Patribus accepimus Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum unius Deitatis atque Substantiae confitemur in Personarum diversitate Trinitatem credentes in Divinitate unitatem praedicantes nec Personas confundimus nec substantiam seperamus Patrem a nullo factum vel genitum dicimus Christus descendit ad Inferos ut sanctos qui ibidem tenebantur erueret devictoque mortis Imperio resurrexit mortui resuscitandi sunt ab eo Iesu Christo in die novissimo percepturi ab ipso alii pro justitiae meritis vitam aeternam alii pro peccatis supplicii aeterni sententiam Haec est ecclesiae Catholicae fides Hanc Confessionem conservamus atque tenemus quam quisquis firmissime custodierit perpetuam salutem habebit that is According to the Scriptures of God the Doctrine which we have received from the holy Father we professe the Father Sonne and holy Ghost to have the same Godhead and Substance believing a Trinity in a diversity of Persons and an Unity in the Godhead neither confounding the Persons nor dividing the substance we say that the Father was made of none nor begotten Christ descended into Hell that he might deliver the Saints that were there detained and having conquered the Power of Death he rose againe The Dead are to be raised up by him at the last Day to receive from him some for their righteous deeds life eternall others for their sins the sentence of everlasting punishment This is the Faith of the Catholick Church This Confession we preserve and hold which whosoever shall firmely keepe shall obteine everlasting Salvation 12. In two very Ancient Latine Psalters which are in S. Rob. Cottons Library we find Athanasius his Creed together with that of the Apostles conteining the same number of Heads with that of our Dayes In the former Psalter saith the Reverend Learned Armachanus which we gather to be as old as Gregory the first viz. 1050 years both by the old fashion of the Pictures the largenesse of the Characters Athanasius his Creed bears the name of Fides Catholica as it doth also in an other Psalter of S. Lewis 9th extant in King James his Library the other is called Symbolum Apostolorum In the latter Psalter which was once K. Athelstans That of the Apostles hath Symply the name of Symbolum the other is called Fides S. Athanasii Alexandrini The Faith of S. Athanasius Bishop of Alexandria 13. Boethius that great Scholler and Statesman in the Reigne of Theodorick the Goth in his Book De Trinitate hath these words at the Beginning which referre us plainly enough to the Creed of Athanasius Fidei Catholicae haec de Trinitatis unitate Sententia est Pater inquiunt Deus Filius Deus Spiritus sanctus Deus igitur Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus unus Deus non tres Dii That is This is the Decree of the Catholick faith concerning the unity of the Trinity The Father they say is God the Sonne God the Holy Ghost God therefore the Father Sonne and Holy Ghost are one God not three Gods On which words Venerable Bâ—de our Countryman makes this Glosse Haec est fides quâ credimus quae dicitur Catholica unde in Symbolo Haec est fides Catholica quam nisi quisque crediderit c. Haec est una apud omnes unde Apostolus una fides unum Baptisma that is This is the Faith wherein we believe which is called Catholick whence we say in the Creed this is the Catholick Faith which Whosoever doth not believe c. This Faith is the same among All whence that of the Apostle One Faith One Baptisme 14. S. Augustin in severall Parts of his workes takes whole sentences out of this Creed of Athanasius which shews that it was then extant and used by the Church In his Booke De Trinitate cap. 8. He hath these words Omnipotens Pater Omnipotens Filius omnipotens Spiritus sanctus tameÌ„ non tres Omnipotentes sed unus Omnipotens Ibidem Deus Pater Deus Filius Deus Spiritus sanctus tamen non tres Dii sed unus est Deus that is The Father is Almighty the Sonne Almighty the holy Ghost Almighty and yet there are
reason challenge a belief contrary to the verdict of so many grave Authors so much Ancienter than he especially in a matter of fact such as this is But I suppose Meletius in those words absolutely denies not that Athanasius was the Author of the Creed now entitled to him but that it is not to be fathered on him as 't is now read in the Westerne Church with the Appendix filioque added thereto by the Bishops of Rome but not Originally inserted as he conceives by Athanasius of which I have already spoken Ob. 8. Nazianzens Testimony concerning Athanasius his Creed or Confession of Faith is to be understood of the latter end of that Synodicall Epistle which he sent to the Emperour Jovianus wherein after he had set downe the Nicene Creed he addes these wordes Nonnulli hanc Fidem a Patribus in Concilio Niceno confirmatam antiquare non sunt veriti alii vero simulant assentiri illi reipsâ autem pernegant dum hanc vocem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 perversè interpretantur iisdemque in Spiritum Sanctum loquuntur blasphemè asserendo eum creatum esse factum per filium That is Some have not been afraid to abrogate this Faith Established in the Nicene Councell others there be who feigne to receive it but in truth reject it whilest they interpret the word Homâ—ousion in a perverse sense the same men speake also blaspheamously against the Holy Ghost affirming that he was created and made by the Sonne Then in the close they say Quinetiam neque Spiritum Sanctum a Patre Filio separârunt sed ei unà cum Patre Filio in unâ sanctae Trinitatis fide propterea quod una est in sancta Trinitate Divinitas gloriam tribuerunt That is Neither did they separate the Holy Ghost from the Father and the Sonne but ascribed glory to him together with the Father and the Sonne in the same faith of the holy Trinity because there is but one Divinity in the holy Trinity Theod. hist lib. 4. cap. 3. Answ Whether or no this fragment this foot this Appendix of an Epistle deserve the Title of a Confession of Faith so venerably esteemed by the Churches of East and West of Libellus a Declaration of a Guift truly Royall and Magnificent with which Titles Nazianzen in that place honours Athanasius his Creed let the impartiall Reader judge Besides we may observe for our fuller satisfaction in this particular 1. That these words which the Objector calls Athanasius his Creed referre not to him and to the Bishops of his Patriarchate who wrote the said Epistle but to the Fathers of the Nicene Councell for they run in the third Person neque separarunt gloriam tribuerunt not in the first neque separavimus gloriam tribuimus Therefore they relate to those Fathers who made the Nicene Creed which is immediatly prefixt not to the Bishops who sent this Synodicall Epistle 2. That this Synodicall Epistle was sent in the name of all the Bishops of Egypt Thebais and Lybia whereas the Confession of Faith written by Athanasius was attested by him only or by very few besides So witnesseth Nazianzen in his forecited Oration Primus ille solus aut cum admodùm paucis veritatem palam apertisque verbis promulgare non dubitavit unam trium personarum Divinitatem essentiam scripto confessus quod multis illis Patribus circa Filium prius concessum fuerat idem ipse postea in asserendâ Spiritus Sancti Divinitate superno afflatu consecutus Atque Imperatori donum vere Regium magnificum offert c. That is He first of all and alone or accompanied with very few doubted not to publish the Truth openly and in expresse Termes professing in writing one Deity and Essence of three Persons and that which God had formerly granted to many Fathers viz. the Nicene concerning the Sonne Athanasius obtained the same afterwards by an inspiration from above to assert the Divinity of the Holy Ghost And he presents the Emperour with a Gift truly Royall and Magnificent c. Of what Creed or Confession of Faith can these Words be understood but of that which now bears the name of Athanasius wherein he so clearely and at large asserts the great mystery of the Trinity in Unity and in particular the Divinity of the Holy Ghost in these words The Holy Ghost also is God such as the Father is such is the Holy Ghost The Holy Ghost is of the Father and the Sonne neither made nor created nor begotten but Proceeding Whereas the Nicene Fathers had only vindicated the Divinity of the Sonne then called in question by Arius and his Adherents as Nazianzen heere tels us 3. Nazianzen informes us here of the Time when Athanasius wrote his Creed when very very few 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 durst openly professe the true faith which must needs be meant of the Times immediatly succeeding the Death of Constantine the Great or when he was first deposed by the Synod of Tyre and banished to Triers by the importune calumnies and violence of the Arian Party in the latter end of his Reigne for then there appeared but three Bishops in the cause with him who were in like manner faine to fly into the West as Sozomen witnesseth lib. 3. cap. 7. Whereas after this in the yeare 347. there was a Synod of Orthodox Bishops called together at Sardica a City of Illyricum who professed the Nicene Faith and when Athanasius sent the forenamed Epistle to the Emperour Jovianus his whole Patriarchate subscribed together with him to the Nicene Creed therein inclosed the Emperour being then a Catholick Wherefore it is most probable that Athanasius first wrote his Creed at Triers or when he fled to Iulius Bishop of Rome for succour which Creed he afterwards sent also with that Synodicall Epistle to the Emperour Iovianus by whom he was restored to his See thereby to confute his Adversaries who would have had the World believe that he was justly condemned as erroneous in the Faith The Epistle he sent in the name of the whole Synod The Creed in his own THE SECOND APPENDIX OF THE Nicene or Constantinopolitan CREED CAP. I. The Reason of the double name of this Creed The Composure thereof The Additionall or Exegeticall Particles inserted into it When and by Whom it was conveied to other Churches and brought into Divine Service THIS Creed hath a double name from a double Councell whereof the one began and the other finisht it It was begun in the First generall Councell held at Nice in Bithynia in the yeare 325 thence called the Nicene Creed But it was recited approved and enlarged as now wee have it by the second generall Councell held at Constantinople in the yeare 381 thence called the Constantinopolitan Creed by many latter writers The Nicene Fathers being 318 in number all subscribed to it except five who adhered to Arius and would not acknowledge the Sonne to be of the same Essence or
Substance with the Father by admitting of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Constantinopolitan Fathers were 150 in number who all assented to this Creed And Damasus Bishop of Rome confirmed it for the westrne Church with the suffrages of his fellow Bishops although not present at Canstantinople either in his Person or by Proctor The Nicene Councell was called against Arius who denyed the Sonne to be Coessentiall and Coeternall with the Father Those Fathers therefore enlarged the second Article of the Creed touching the eternall Divinity of the Sonne of God The Councell of Constantinople was called against Macedonius who denyed the Divinity of the holy Ghost whence those Fathers enlarged the eight Article of the Creed which concernes the Third Person of the Trinity As for the Forme of words or Frame of this Creed it had in the first Place Hosius Bishop of Corduba for the Composer who sate in the Councell of Nice as President or Moderator by the appointment of the Emperour Constantine the Great and therefore subscribed in the first Place before Vitus and Vincentius who were the Bishop of Romes Legats as we may see in Binius Conc. Tom. 1. The Composing of this Creed by Hosius we have witnessed by Baronius A. 325 who took it out of the Epist of Athan. ad Solitarios who was present at the Councell the words of Baron are these Consentientibus Catholicis Episc Arianis pariter assentientibus concepta est Catholicae Fidei formula quâ omnia Arianae haeresis capita truncarentur fuit autem ejus formandae Osius imprimis Architectus sapientissimus de quo haec S. Athanasius cum scribit in Arianos ex verbis eorum in eundem Osium apud Constantium conclamantium Hic princeps est Synodorum siquid scribit ubique auditur hic formulam Fidei in Nicenâ Synodo concepit Arianos ubique pro haereticis traduxit that is By the joynt consent of the Catholick Bishops the Arians also agreeing to it there was Composed a Forme of Catholick Beliefe He that Composed it was Osius that most wise Master-builder concerning whom S. Athanasius in his workes against the Arians thus writeth rehearsing their very wordes wherein they cryed out upon him before the Emperour Constantius This is the chiefe President of Synods who if he write ought is hearkned to every where he composed the Forme of Beliefe in the Nicene Synod and hath traduced the Arians every where for Hereticks But the Additionall Particles or supplement of this Creed was made by Gregory Nyssen an eminent Father in the first Constantinopolitan Councell who perfected and compleated the Forme as we now have it So Nicephorus informes us Eccles Hist lib. 12. cap. 13. From that time forward it was held for one entire Creed and promiscuously called by succeeding Ages sometimes the Nicene sometimes the Constantinopolitan Creed It was caled lthe Nicene for the honour of that Councell which was the first Oecumenicall and the Foundation of all the Rest that followed as also because it was conteined virtually and implicitly in the shorter Creed of that Councell So Marcus Bishop of Ephesus in the Synod of Ferrara Sess 5. Conc. Tom. 4. And it was called the Constantinopolitan Creed because finished in that Councell and brought to that perfection wherein we now see it This Creed according as it was framed in the Nicene Synod far shorter than now we have it we may see in these following Authors viz. Athan. Epist ad Iovianum Conc. Tom. 1. pag. 399. Cod. Can. Eccl. Afric p. 19. Ruff. Eccl. Hist lib. 1. cap. 6. Theod. lib. 1. Hist cap. 12. Socr. lib. 1. c. 5. Cass trip hist lib. 1. cap. 17 Niceph. lib. 1. cap. 12. We have already Englished it in the Twelfth Chapter of the precedent Discourse on the Apostles Creed Now I shall set downe the Originall Greeke which runns thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 After this the Fathers of the Constantinopolitan Councell enlarged this Forme partly by adding some explicatory particles and partly by resuming out of the Apostles Creed those Articles wherein it was defective The Explicatory particles were chiefly touching the Holy Ghost The Articles taken out of the Apostles Creed were those which follow the Article of the Holy Ghost Notwithstanding they omitted three passages thereof which were virtually inclosed in the rest that preceded or followed viz. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God of God because it followes very God of very God 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 both which are in Heaven and which are in earth because there went before by whom all things were made 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is Of the substance of the Father because they thought it sufficiently comprehended in the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies more than 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Epiphanius tells us in his Anchoratus viz. A person of one and the same individuall substance with the Father whence the Orthodoxe Christians were differenced from the Arians by the Title of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is of Homoousians or of those who worshipt the Sonne of God under this Title by professing him of the same substance with the Father So then the entire forme thereof as the Westerne Churches now read it by resuming that passage God of God out of the first Nicene forme and adding the word Filioque that is and from the Sonne in the Procession of the Holy Ghost runnes thus the additionall particles being distinguished from the rest by this marke which encloseth them I Believe in one God the Father Almighty maker of Heaven and Earth and of all things visible and invisible and in one Lord Jesus Christ the only-begotten Sonne of God begotten of his Father before all Worlds God of God light of light very God of very God begotten not made being of one substance with the Father by whom all Things were made who for us men and for our Salvation came downe from Heaven and was incarnate by the Holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary and was made man and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate he suffered and was buried and the third day he rose againe according to the Scriptures and ascended into Heaven and sitteth on the right hand of the Father and he shall come againe with Glory to judge both the quick and the dead whose Kingdome shall have none end And I believe in the Holy Ghost the Lord and Giver of life who proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne who together with the Father and the Sonne is worshipped and glorified who spake by the Prophets And I believe one Catholick and Apostolick Church I acknowledge one Baptisme for the remission of sinnes and I look for the Resurrection of the Dead and the life of the World to come That Gregory Nyssen by order of the Second generall Councell held at Constantinople added the particles here inserted is witnessed as I said by Nicephorus Callistus in hist Eccles lib. 12. cap.
following their example are said next to have added it and after them the Romane As for our Church of England venerable Bede tels us hist. eccl lib. 4. cap. 17. That Theodore Archbishop of Canterbury though a Grecian in a Synod which he with his fellow-bishops held at Hatfeild in the yeare 680. Spiritum sanctum ex Patre Filio inenarrabilitur procedentem praedica verunt that is declared the ineffable procession of the holy Ghost from the Father and the Sonne Yet in the Canons entitled Cresconiana the Article touching the holy Ghost runs in the ancient Forme Et in Spiritum sanctum Dominum vivâ—ficatorem ex Patre procedentem cum Patre Filio adorandum conglorificandum qui locutus est per sanctos Prophetas that is And I believe in the holy Ghost the Lord and giver of life who proceedeth from the Father who with the Father and the Sonne together is worshipped and glorifyed who spake by the holy Prophets This Collection of Canons is extant in the Publick Library at Oxford Then for the French Churches Aeneas Bishop of Paris in a Booke of his not extant in Print which he wrote against the errours of the Greekes witnesseth for his Time In fide Catholicâ quam die Dominicâ decantat ad missam universalis Galliarum Ecclesia sic canitur inter caetera Credo in Spiritum sanctum Dominum vivificantem qui ex Patre Filioque procedit qui cum Patre Filio simul adoratur conglorificatur qui locatus est per Prophetas that is In the Catholick Faith or Creed which the whole Church of France singeth at the Communion-Service they sing this among the rest And I believe in the holy Ghost the Lord and giver of life who proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne c. But to examine this controversy more particularly and in order In the yeare 767 there was a Synod held at Gentilliacum in France under Pipin Father to Charlemagne in which the Greeks and Latines disputed concerning the Procession of the holy Ghost So Ado viennensis Facta est tunc temporis Synodus anno Incarnationis Domini 767 quaestio ventilata inter Graecos Romanos de Trinitate utrum Spiritus sicut procedit a Patre ita procedat a Filio that is There was a Synod called in the yeare of our Lord 767 wherein the question concerning the Trinity was agitated between the Greeks and Romans as also whether the holy Ghost proceeds from the Son as he doth from the Father Then in a Synod at Aquisgrane the question was renewed and decided as it seemes upon this occasion because the Particle Filioque was usually added in the singing of this Creed throughout the Gallicane Churches he who moved the question was one John a Monke of Jerusalem The wordes of Ado in his Chronicle concerning this Synod are these Syuodus magna Grani Aquis câ—ngregatur Anno Incarnationis Dom. 809 in qua Synodo de Processione Spiritus sancti quaestio agitatur utrum siâ—â—â— procedit a Patre ita procedat a Filio Hanc quaestionem Joannes Monacus Hierosolymitanus moverat cum Regula Fides Ecclesiastica firmet Spiritum sanctum a Patre Filio procedere non Creatum non Genitum sed Patri Filio coaeternum Consubstantialem To give a finall determination unto this question Bernarius Bishop of Amiens and Jesse or Asius Bishop of Wormes were sent by the Synod together with Adelhardus Abbot of Corbey unto Leo 3 Bishop of Rome who confirmes the decree of the Synod concerning the Procession as agreeing with his Opinion yet speakes very honorably of the Constantinopolitan Fathers who added not the particle Filioque unto whom he would not presume to equall himselfe but withall he expresly chargeth them to raze it out of the Creed The sending of these three by the Synod is mentioned by a Monke of S. Eparch in the life of Charlemaigne the Answer of Leo is set downe in the Acts of the Synod collected by Smaragdus and out of him by Baronius in the yeare 809 wherein after much discourse the said Legates of the Synod thus aske the Pope Ergo ut videmus illud a vestra Paternitate decernitur ut primo illud de quo quaestio agitur desaepe fato Symbolo tollatur tunc demum a quolibet licite ac libere sive cantando sive tradendo discatur doceatur P. Leo answers Ita procul dubio a nostrâ parte decernitur ita quoque ut a vestra assentitur a nobis omnimode suadetur After this as I said before he tooke order that this Creed should be engraven in a silver Table or Scutcheon without that Addition which he well foresaw would prove the Aple of contention between the Churches of East and West and so to be publikly hanged up and exposed to the view of all that so the whole world might see the Romane Church had added nothing to the Creed So Pet. Lâ—mb witnesseth lib. 1. Sent. Dist 11. Anastas in the life of Leo 3. Euthymius Zygabenus in Panopliâ Dogmat Tit. 12. Photius in Epist ad Aquil. Episc apud Baronium A. 883. § 9. Nicetus Choniates in Orthod fid Thesauro Tom. 21. Thus Leo 3d left the Nicene Creed as he found it without the insertion of this Particle Then for Nicholas 1. and his Successour Adrian who deceased in the yeare 872. They seeme not to have added it for Andrew Bishop of Colosse who pleaded in this cause against the Greekes in the Councell of Florence having diligently revised all that belonged thereto denies that Photius although their bitter enemy for their opinion of the Procession ever objected to them their corrupting of the Creed These are his words Photius Romanae Ecclesiae inimicus acerrimus nullam de Synodi additione faciens mentionem in Nicholaum ac Adrianum summos Pontifices literis invectus est Plurimum Much lesse did Iohn the 8. the successour of Adrian make this Addition who sate in the Romane See till the yeare 882. For this Pope allowed the Restitution of Photius to his See and sent his Legats to the Synod held at Constantinople in the yeare 879. of which Synod Photius was President and wherein with the assistance of the Popes Legats whatsoever had been determined against Photius in the times of P. Nicolas and Adrian was abrogated amongst which chiefely that Synod was condemned which had been held in the yeare 869. against Photius by Ignatius then Patriarch of Constantinople and is now counted by the Church of Rome for the 8. Oecumenicall whereas the Church of Greece gives that Title to this wherein Photius Presided in which among other Things there transacted the Nicene Creed was also read without the Addition of Filioque and so subscribed to yea that Addition was interdicted and all this done Consentientibus Ioannis Papae Legatis by the consent of the said Legats of Iohn 8. The Greekes lay the blame of this Addition on Pope
and so rather the Mouth than the Head of the Apostles but there appears no Primacy of order or Jurisdiction over his fellow-Apostles But suppose we should grant said they that Peter had such an unerring paramount privilege yet this might well be personall and annext to his Apostleship not derivable to any Episcopall successour and if derivable why should the Bishop of Rome rather arrogate it to himselfe than the Bishop of Antioch in which City S. Peter first sate Or the Bishop of Alexandria a See instituted by the same Apostle under S. Marke before he ever appointed any Bishop at Rome As for the Grounding of this priviledge on S. Peters martyrdome at Rome where appears any such Dependance or legacy bequeathed by S. Peter that his Infallibility and Supremacy should be annexed to that Chaire alone as to the place of his Death and Buriall 'T is true they confest that the Bishop of Rome was of old accounted Primae Sedis Episcopus The Bishop of the Principall See but withall they said that there was a vast difference between Primacy and Power for if by this pretence he should challenge any Authority or Jurisdiction over the Bishop of Constantinople the Second See Why should not he of Constantinople likewise claime the same Power over the Bishop of Alexandria which is the third And so in like manner Alexandria over Antioch Antioch over Ierusalem An opinion never heard of or entertained in the Church of God The Bishop of Rome therefore had this primacy not by divine right but by humane or Ecclesiasticall that is not from any Apostolicall Priviledge derived from S. Peter but by the graunt of Emperours and Decrees of Councells It was fit that one Bishop should be chiefe for order sake this Honour was given to the Bishop of Rome for the Dignity of his Seat Rome beeing the Head of the Roman Empire For which cause Alexandria had of old the Second place as beeing Praefectura Augustalis the Peculiar of the Romane Emperour so ennobled by Augustus Caesar Antioch the third as the Metropolis of Syria and the Eastern Countryes adjoyning whereas if the preeminency of Sees had been derived from S. Peter the City of Antioch where he sate seven years in person should have beene preferd before Alexandria whether he only sent an other viz S. Marke and appointed him for the first Bishop And for this cause Caesarea too was made the Metropoliticall See of Palestine because it was the seat of the Roman Governor untill the Fathers of the Nicene Councel in honour of Jerusalem where S. James was made the first Bishop of the Christian world and whence the Gospell spread into the whole earth gave the Bishop therof a Patriarchall title that rather of dignity thē Authority for thus runs the seventh Canon of that Councell Quoniam mos antiquus obtinuit vetusta Traditio ut Aeliae id est Hierosolimorum Episcopo honor Deferatur habeat consequenter honorem manente tamen Metropolitanae Civitatis Caesareae propriâ Dignitate that is Because from an old Custome and Tradition honuor hath been given to the Bishop of Aelia that is of Jerusalem let him have Honour accordingly provided that the Dignity of the metropolitan City Cesarea remaine entire For the same cause also when Constantinople was reedifyed made the seat of the Empire and called new Rome by Constantine the Great it was thought fit by the Emperours and succeeding Councells that the Bishop of Alexandria should no longer have the Second but the third Place Constantinople now succeeding in that honour for thus runs the fift Canon of the first Councell of Constantinople Constantinopolitanae Civitatis Episcopum habere oportet Primatus honorem post Romanum Episcopum propter quod sit nova Roma that is The Bishop of Constantinople ought to have the next place of honour after the Bishop of Rome because his City is new Rome And because there could not be two Sedes primae two first or chief Sees the same Councell ordeined that the Bishop of Constantinople should be styled the second Patriarch but in all other things should be of equall Dignity and Authority with the Bishop of Rome So in all the rest whosoever will please to compare the Prelates Sees with the Notitia Imperii shall find that the Church still accommodated her Hierarchy of Mertropolitās Archbishops Bishops unto the state of the Empire the distinction of Provinces and the Dignity of the Cityes according to that ancient Rule Ecclesia est in Republicâ non Respublica in Ecclesiâ The Church is in the Commonwealth not the Common-wealth in the Church 2. The second cause of the Schisme was the Deposition and Excomunication of the Patriarch Photius and of the other Prelats and Abbots his adherents in a great Synod at Constantinople held under the Emperour Basiliu◠and the Patriarch Ignatius in the yeare 869 which businesse was mainly urged and furthered by two Bishops of Rome successively viz. Nicolas the first and Adrian the second 3. The third cause was the Rash and Inconsiderate Zeale of the said Patriarch Photius who first dared to accuse the Romane Church of Heresy because it held that the holy Ghost proceeded from the Sonne as well as from the Father whereas in all former disputes between the Greeks and the Latines whether by word or writing neither party accused his Adversary of Heresy for holding either opinion Yea the Latines Demōstrated that some of the Greeke Fathers spake as they did neither could the Greekes deny it And since this precipitate Censure of Photius not a few of the Romane Divines have in requitall accused the Greeke Church of the same Crime for holding the Contrary 4. The fourth cause was the contention about the Primacy between the Bishops of Rome and Constantinople For Iohn surnamed Iejunator and Cyriacus his successour Patriarchs of Constantinople were very earnest with the emperour Mauritius to obteine the Title Authority of Oecumenicall Patriarchs thereby challenging a Superiority over the Bishops of the whole Christian World from the Dignity of their City which was then the Head of the Romane Empire that of the West being utterly broken and Rome the Ancient Seate thereof for that Cause loosing its former Dignity Now against these their endeavours Gregory the great then Bishop of Rome publickly opposed himselfe and taxed them in expresse Termes of Antichristian ambition saying withall that Dato uni Episcopi universalis Titulo reliquos Sacerdotes honore debito privari The giving of the Title of Universall Bishop unto one doth deprive the other Bishops of their due Honour Yet with in lesse than two years after his Death Boniface the Third his Successour abtained the same Title of the Emperour Phocas which Gregory had so much Decried But the Greeke Prelates would never yeeld to it 5. The fift cause was the busines of Images which brake out after this contention about the Primacy For the Emperour Leo Isaurus and his sonne Constantinus Copronymus
guidance of the Streame or Current 1. Protestant Churches generally receive it under the title name of Athanasius together with the Apostles Creed and that of the Nicene Councell for which wee are to consult the forecited Testimonies of Luther Io. Pappus anb Nic. Selneccerus with the two Confessions of the Churches of Saxony and France attested by the Ingenuous Confession of Serrarius the Jesuit who tels us in his Discourse on this Creed that the Calvinian Divines in an Assembly at Lausanna agreed with the Lutherans as touching the three Creeds ascribing unto them as well as to the Holy Scriptures a Judiciary Power or Authority which all ought to obey which sure they would never have done if they had not thought that the Creed of Athanasius as well as the other two had been derived from the same fountain whence the Scriptures flowed to wit from the Holy Ghost as the Author and the Apostles as the Deliverers which Faith so derived Athanasius more largely paraphrased on especially in those two main Poynts of the Trinity and Incarnation then perverted by Hereticks by this means not altering but clearing the old Apostolick Tradition 2. Ioan. Cazonovius though a profest enemy to the contents of this Creed yet is forced to acknowledge in his first Epistle unto M. Calvin that this Creed is received under the name of Athanasius Non solum in Latina Ecclesiâ sed etiam Constantinopolitanâ Servianâ Bulgaricâ Russicâ Moscoviticâ Not only in the Latine Church but also in that of Constantinople Servia Bulgaria Russia and Moscovia Now this Cazonovius as Genebrard tels us was a Polonian Knight of an eminent Family and together with Gregorius Pauli a Minister the Chiefe of the Trinitarians He wrote against those two Epistles which M. Calvin sent Ad Fratres Polonos and in the Colloquy between the Tritheits and the Orthodox Divines held at Petricow in Poland during the Assembly of the Estates Anno 1565. he was the Scribe or Secretary on the Tritheits behalfe When in that Colloquy hee and his Adherents were urged againe and againe to produce that Greeke Copy of Athanasius his Creed which they gave out to bee different from that received in the Latine Church for he confest a Creed of Athanasius received in the Greeke Church but diverse from the Latine one they could not doe it the truth is the diversity is only in the particle Filioque added by the Latines in the Article of the Procession so that they might as well have said that our Nicene Creed is diverse from theirs whereto it is likewise added But of this more heareafter 3. Gennadius Scholarius Patriarch of Constantinople in his Booke which he wrote in Defence of the the Florentine Councell the yeare after it was Celebrated clearly names Athanasius for the Author of this Creed These are his words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Where he styles Athanasius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Confessor from this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Confession of his Faith and withall sets downe the Beginning of his Creed in expresse Termes as now we read it 4. Eugenius the fourth Bishop of Rome in his Instructions to the Armenians given by him unto them in the forecited Councell of Florence which was celebrated in the yeare 1439 recommends unto them the Creed of Athanasius in these wordes Compendiosam illam fidei Regulam per Beatissimum Athanasium editam cujus Tenor talis est Quicunque vult c. That short Rule of Faith set forth by the most blessed Athanasius according to this Tenor Whosoever will be saved c. 5. Manuel Caleca a Grecian but one who wrote against the Errours of his Countrymen presently after the Councell of Lions celebrated in the yeare 1274 under Gregory the Tenth in which Councell he is thought also to have been present in his Second book Cont. Graecos cap. 20. tels us that Athanasius wrote this Creed and sent it to Julius Bishop of Rome cum insimularetur non rectae fidei when he was accused of erring in the Faith and because some of his Countrymen dissented from him in this Poynt the chiefe if not only reason whereof was because the Latines produced copies of it with this Addition filioque in the Procession of the Holy Ghost he strengthens his Assertion by this double Reason First that Gregory Nazianzen whom he there calls the Divine by way of Eminency makes mention thereof of whose Testimony more anon Secondly That it is sung every Lords Day throughout all the Churches of the West and the Author thereof is so famous that even Children know him Then he subjoynes Let them therefore either produce some other Creed of so Famous a man which the Divine Nazianzen makes mention of and to which the Tradition of the Church bears witnesse or if they cannot let them imbrace that which the Church now receives 6. Jo. Beleth a Parisian Divine Explic. Divin Offic. cap. 40. having told us that there were foure Creeds allowed of by the Church Secundum inquit quod in Primâ recitatur quicunque vult salvus esse c. Quod ab Athanasio Patriarchâ Alexandrino contra Arianos haereticos compositum est licet plerique eum Anastasium fuisse falso arbitrentur The Second of these Creeds saith he is that which is rehearsed in the first service Whosoever will be Saved c. which was composed by Athanasius Patriarch of Alexandria against the Arian Hereticks although many falsely think that Anastasius was the Author 7. Gul. Durantes or Durandus otherwise called Mimatensis who flourished about the yeare 1280 assignes this Creed to Athanasius Rat. Divin Off. lib. 4. cap. 25. For thus he writes Secundum Symbolum Quicunque vult salvus esse c. ab Athanasio Patriarcha in civitate Treveri Compositum that is according to the Creed Whosoever will be Saved c. which was composed by the Patriarch Athanasius in the City of Triers 8. Rodolphus and Hagmo two Franciscan Friers sent with Hugh Peter two Dominicans by Gregory the ninth unto Constantinople in the yeare 1239 to reconcile the Greeks unto the Latines thence called Apocrisiarii Church-legats as well by the Latines as the Greeks have thus determined the difference cōcerning the procession of the holy Ghost from the Son as well as the Father out of the Athanasian Creed Propterea quicunque non crediderit spiritum sanctū a filio procedere in via perditionis est unde S. Athanasius dū exulabat in partibus occidentalibus in expositione fidei quam Latinis verbis reddidit sic ait Pater a nullo est factus c. Whosoever believeth not that the Holy Ghost proceedeth from the Sonne is in the way of Perdition whence S. Athanasius whilest he was an exile in the westerne Parts in his exposition of the Faith which he set forth in Latine saith thus The Father was made of none c. See for this Tom. 3. Eccles Annal. Abrah Bzovii Aº 1239. 9. Abbo Abbot of Floriack who lived about