being therevnto vrged by manifest truth and reason that it is not enough for them vpon their bare wordes to affirme this or that is a tradition Apostolicall or this or that is a doctrine Apostolicall because it is now generally obserued through out all those Churches which communicate with the Bishop of Rome no though at such times when there was no notorious or famous Church on earth to oppose against her and whereof no expresse beginning can bee shewed vnlesse they can withall for such their Traditions ascending vpwards euen vnto the Apostles times or the dayes of their immediate Successors and Schollers clearly and soundly deduct by graue testimonies of Ancient and Catholike authours that such thinges were euer more or lesse obserued and receiued as from the Apostles themselues throughout the Church of Christ if they will refuse this honorable triall of their Traditions and stand only vpon this idle answere and defence that the Church Romane now generally hath them and there is no beginning of them to bee shewed ergo they are Apostolicall they shall shew themselues to be meere wranglers wilfully wedded to most corrupt errours as I will most clearly demonstrate And herein I dare boldly challenge being most confident of this truth any Pontifician whatsoeuer be he Benedictine Fransciscan or Ignatian to shew me some ancient sufficient authority out of Councels or ancient Fathers that whatsoeuer might be obserued or should bee obserued in the later times of the Romane Church whereof no expresse beginning could be shewed should be therfore accounted Apostolicall because generally obserued in her g Epist 118. ad Ianuar. St. Austen indeede is vrged by the Aduersaries to affirme so much of some vnwritten Traditions in his time generally obserued throughout the whole Church but St. Austen is misvnderstood and his rule commonly cited not without corruption misvnderstood because his rule is of such Traditions whereof although nothing is written in holy Scripture yet they are mentioned in approued Authours and Historians more or lesse from the Apostles daies till his times besides great is the difference of 1200. yeares for so long is the time from St. Austens daies to vs for carrying downe of Traditions from the Apostles and in so many ages many thinges vnapostolicall h See Onuphr Genebrard and Platina supra pag. 3. might creepe into particular Churches and consequently into the whole whereof no certaine beginning might be shewed Againe St. Austens rule is commonly mis-cited For whereas that Father writeth thus in effect in his Epistle to i Epist 118. Ianuarius If the authority of diuine Scripture prescribe in any of these rites and ceremonies what is to bee done I I cite not the expresse words of the Father because editions are so different but all haue thus in effect answere there is no doubt to be made but that wee must doe as we reade the like I say if any of these rites which we obserue and the whole Church throughout the world at this present time obserueth for to dispure that we should doe otherwise were insolent madnesse but the Aduersaries commonly when they cite this place leaue out first what he writeth in the beginning of the sentence touching the authority of Scriptures Againe they leaue out commonly those words which restraine his meaning to his daies And in Saint Austens time it is manifest that the Christian Churches were not so diuided as since his times they haue beene and withall that a little before his time the generall Councels of Nice and Sardica had ordered most things and brought many things to light and yet notwithstanding this rule it is well knowne how Saint S. Aust in the same Epistle pronounceth that Christ instituted very few ceremonies Epist 118. Austen complained against multiplicitie of rites and ceremonies brought into diuers particular Churches in his daies wherewith the Christians were more heauily clogged then the ancient Iewes had beene vnder Moses which if it were euer true then it is now amongst the Pontificians most true who haue from their Popes some 1000 of rites and haue also innuerable lawes binding vnder the censure of their curses and heauiest excommunications and so frequently that a man may iustly suppose that there are few of that profession who are not more or lesse touched It is not credible to what number their Excommunications are growne since their tyranical vse of them See Nauar. Man cap. 27. num 50. by their lesser or greater excommunications his holinesse onely excepted who will be bound to no lawes no not to those which he sweareth inuiolably to keepe â—e being indeed that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 exlex iniqnus outlaw which Saint k 2. Thes 2. Paul hath prophecied should sit in the Temple of God as I will more fully declare hereafter But I will demonstrate that there are diuers practises and customes obserued throughout their Roman Church vniuersally wherof no beinning can be shewed which themselues wil not dare to affirme to be Apostolicall and so their rule by their owne confessions shall to the ground First is it not an vniuersall though impious practise throughout the Pontifician Church to paint God the Father in the forme of an old man and God the holy Ghost in the forme of a Doue by the same not onely to represent two persons of the most inenarrable and inexpressible Trinitie but also by the same and in the same to adore and worship those two infinite Persons what will they or can they shew me when this custome prâ—cisely began No I wis what must it therefore be a tradition Apostolicall it were impudencie or meere ignorance so to affirme and I thinke there is none of them as yet so shamelesse as to affirme it Nouell I am assured it is vtterly forbidden by the ancient Fathers of the sixt l Sinod 6. Cano. 82. generall Councell reputed an impudent thing by worthy Iohn m Damas Orthodox sid lib. 4. â—ap 17. Sinod Nicen. 2. act 4. 5. 6. 7. Damascene reputed a renowned Saint in their Church and a famous Patrone for the vse of other Images and by their Italian n Polid. lib. de inuentor Polidore Virgil accounted meere folly and which of their own men o Abulens Lira Alij commenting vpon the fourth of Exodus do not more or lesse condemne it and yet now the present Romane Church is so generally infected thereby with the leprosie of superstitious Idolatry that no man whose heart is zealous of Gods honour cannot seeing it but lament therefore Of this kinde also is the prostrate adoring of the Crucifixe it selfe vpon good Friday generally obserued throughout the Romane Church Can their best antiquarie amongst them shew me a beginning hereof no God wot what is it therefore a tradition Apostolicall shame will not suffer them to affirme it To this I adioyne their most Catholike and vaine custome of adorning their Images like as the old Paynims adorned Venus Iuno Ceres their vaine Gods
us free by your behests From all the sinnes that vs restraine To whose commaunding subiect are Infirmittes and healthes of all Our ill disposed customes cure And vnto vertue vs recall Whose eyes are not shut if here he doe not plainlie obserue how they haue taken the glory of onelie Redeemershippe and Aduocacy from Christ and haue transferred it vpon his Creature how plaine is it that they beg those things from the Apostles which Christ onely doth giue and from whose onely hands we are to expect them to wit peace and saluation Vouchsafe O Christ to open their eyes that seeing they may see and be conuerted and thou O God heale them thou O God restore them to all vertues I should here declare somewhat how the Romane Church trauaileth to make her Religion to seeme and appeare magnificent pompous glorious by deuised shewes a fitte deuise indeed to draw the simple but wiser trauailers and indicious persons obseruing such artificiall and stagelike representations * Diuerse both noble and very worthy Gentlemen haue taken great offence at the Spanish Fopperies in their processions and haue been greatly confirmed to continue still in the single and sincere integrity of the reformed Churches gather another conclusion thereout to wit that their Religion is humane not diuine not agreeing to the true ancient Christian simplicity of Christs Church Do they think that their sumptuous carrying their God vp and downe streetes their publike incensing and adoring of it their deuising of many rich representations to set forth their solemnities will draw the wiser people of such couÌ„tries as are auerted from the Romance Church no God wot there is nothing more auerteth them then such open and heathenish-like kind of worshippes which were neuer dreamed of in ancient Churches nor commended by any ancient institution of any Gouernours of the same The Conclusion But I will make haste towardes the Conclusion of these my motiues yet before I end I am constrained for the satisfaction of others to shew with what conscience and reason I dare aduenture to leaue communion with that Church which is so famous and so conspicuous and which hath beene euer visible for so much as concerneth externall succession an outward kind of profession of many pointes of Christian Doctrme since Christs time as like continuing of succession can be shewed in the Churches of Hierusalem Alexandria c. It cannot be denied but that the Romane Church in the Apostles time was a pure and sound part of the Christian Catholike Church although in her very infancy shee was sliding if you beleeue Onuphrius which moued S. Peter to hasten and returne vnto her and although Onuphrius in annotatan Platmam in vitam Petri. a Euseb lib. 3. hist cap. 31. Eusebius relateth Egesippus to affirme that whilest the Apostles liued the Church was an immaculate Virgine and pure from errour but they being dead there did presently arise those who did impugne the Apostolicall truth notwithstanding these things I doubt not to say that the Romane Church continued long time found in all substantiall matters of Christian doctrine vntill humane Traditions beganne to entermixe themselues with religion instituted by diuine authority which then most apparantlie began when the Church came to enioy temporall peace and prosperity presently after the dayes of Constantine the Emperour in whose time and by whose donation poyson was powred into the Church as the b Vita Silaestri approbata life of Siluester Pope deliuereth of a certain Angelical voice pronouncing as much the operation of which poison shewed it self partly in effect in the time of Damasus when by reason of the competency and contention which was betwixt him and c Ammian Marcellia lib 27. cap. 2 Ra on in Annal. Vrsisine for the Romane See so much bloud was shed that I hope if d I Cortil 2. Marcellin ibid. Sâ—crates l. 2. ca. 11 affirmeth how the Bishop of Rome exalting themselus aboue the limits of Priesthood into temporall dominion contended for the Primcay ouer all other Churches Saint Pauls argument bee true the Romane Church was then very carnall oppressed with such grieuous contentions and not being in vnity of spirite thinking the same thing but hauing such horrible schismes amongst them and I doubt not to affirme but that Damasus more or lesse as hee was delighted according to the fashion of Romane Bishops with sumptuous attendance in his person so also more or lesse brought in sumptuous seruice and pompous ceremonies into the Church and this the Pontificians cannot deny if diuers thinges that bee in Damasus his Pontificall bee truly attributed to that Popes institution and collection which in sundry thinges I beleeue not but this Bishoppe is made a Saint in the Romane calender the Lord knowes for what vertue or when he was first fainted perhappes for his tumultuous entrance or pompuous conuersation in the chaire of Rome in which respect hee may be reputed in some degree the Protoparent of many his Successors These beginnings and entrances of corruption vanity into the Church of Rome obserued which in succeeding times and in ages after ages grew into most horrible grieuous prophanations by the subtlety of Satan whilest the Gouernours of the Churches g Math. 13. were a sleepe that is were lulled with temporall peace and prosperity I seriously first consider those Propheticall wordes of our h Luc. 13. Sauiour in which hee hath foretold that when hee should come he should hardly find faith vpon earth which defection from faith as it was to bee and generally to ouerwhelme the whole world before Christs second comming so who coulde long agoe precisely say when it was to beginne onely after-experience hath demonstrated it and doth tell vs that according to another Propheticall prediction of the most blessed 2 ad Thes 2. Apostle who hath expresly deliuered that this defection and Apostacy should bee when that man should sitte in the temple that is the Church at whose comming the Romane Empire should be taken out of the way and who should extoll himselfe sitting in the Temple aboue all that is called or worshipped as God vpon earth who should also in himselfe and by his followers worke wonders and miraculous prodigies bosting and bragging therein who should also Apostatat from the charity of truth that is from the iustifying faith in Christ Iesus onely that iustifying faith in Christ Iesus onely which is so much and so often commended in sacred Scripture who also should Apostatate from most Articles of Christian doctrine For vaine is that exposition of the Remists who would faine interprete this Apostasie of which the Apostle speaketh to bee from the Pope and from his Primacie and particular Romane Church vaine I say for who will say that a man might not iustly haue departed from the communion of such Popes as k Genehrard lib. 4 Chronol sâ—â—ulo 10. Baron ad aun 900. anno 908. Plaim in vita sapissime in Bonifa
affirmed not that the * See Austen epist 112. epist 1. 9. de Vnit. Eccles ca. 16. clarissime sacred word of God contained in the old and new Testament was an infallible and fundamentall rule of faith but concerning this rule of faith two of the Romane rules of faith to wit Sixtus the fifth and Clement the eight haue beene egregiously ouerruled with the spirit of error and heresie for they haue by their n Epist decret Sixti 5. Clement 8 ante editiones suas two decretall and definitiue Epistles defined two opposite contrary and contradictorious editions by themselues and their deputies being discussed and rediscussed to be the very sayings letter and sentences of the holy Ghost charging and decreeing the same to all Christians vnder the curse of separation from the Church and Gods beauiest displeasure So that Sixtus hath accursed Clement and all approuers of his Bible Clement Sixtus and all the followers and defenders of his edition and although it hath pleased the Authors of the o Praefatio in Biblia Clementis 8. ibidem Preface to Clements edition to auouch in a few lines many thousands of vntruthes and that against their owne knowledge and consciences to wit that Clement did onely amend certaine scapes of the print in Sixtus his edition the which Sixtus himselfe intended to haue corrected as there most lyingly they affirme when as it is as cleare as the Sunne that their two editions haue in them innumerable substantiall differences of whole lines and sentences The which being so can any man but of ordinary iudgement beleeue in good earnest that Romane Bishops with their Cardinals defining ex Cathedra cannot erre For what can be an errour or heresie ex Cathedra if to define hereticall editions of the Bible commaunding the whole Church vnder paine of greatest curse to receiue them be not errour and heresie ex Cathedra This matter tormenteth the aduersarie greatly and by diuers it is diuersly repulsed Some there were in Clements time who excused Clement with the Romane Church which hath receiued his edition but condemned Sixtus The dead indeed bite not and it most concerned the liuing Romanes that their liuing rule erred not This opinion was most strong in Clement his time when I was in Rome and it was greatly fauoured by the Ignatians Others forsooth consider how wilfully they are wedded to the Popes infallibilitie eyther impudently or most ignorantly denie that Sixtus euer made any such decretall Epistle A manifest vntruth to be confuted by a world of witnesses Others grant the Epistle but say it was neuer published This is so manifolde an vntruth as there were editions of Sixtus Quintus Bible before Clements edition all which had his decretal Epistle before them I my selfe haue seene and read of them in Rome but leauing those who make p Isai 28. spem suam mendacium a lie their hope others as Doctor B. and P. W. c. doe affirme that Sixtus indeede did write and publish such an Epistle but he did it as a priuate q This is their câ—mon refuge that wheÌ„ Popes in their decre tall Epistles or their prouinciall Synodes as Celestine Stephen the sixth Honorius Greg. the second decreâ— any hereticall doctrins they doe it all as priuate persons not as Popes althogh it be most euident that they intend to command all and to teach all to doe according to their decrees which by them are concluded in their Synodes person not as Pope and so he might erre O immortall God haue these men eyes and yet see not or will not see are not Sixtus his wordes most expresse that he defineth he decreeth and that out of the fulnesse of his Apostolicall power and doth he not annexe the sentences of excommunication and Gods heauiest displeasure against all such as should refuse or reiect his edition Iesus Christ vouchsafe to open the eies of the misled that they may see the ambitious and erroneous proceedings of those Bishops and renounce their communion and returne to the rocke of thy sacred word which is so by them in part neglected or rather wholly abandoned But I may not thus leaue Clement and Sixtus for I must needs tell their followers that against their owne knowledge and therefore more inexcusably they haue decreed that to be the very sentence of the holy Ghost which without al doubt they could not but more then probably wittingly thinke to be otherwise I will at this present to discouer the ignominie of their fallible Spirits insist only vpon two or three examples and dare herein challenge as in many like all the Pontificians sworne to the Popes infallibilitie to cleare the heads of their Church from most manifest and wilfull errour herein Their first corruption is in Genesis where r In vulgat editio lussu Clem. 8. Genes 3. they reade ipsa conteret caput tuum she shall bruise thy head putting the feminine article for the masculine appropriating that to the Virgin Mary who most worthily is Å¿ Luc. 1. blessed and to bee blessed amongst all women which the holy Ghost prophetically intended precisely of him who was to cast Satan t Ioh. 12. out of his Kingdome and by whose only name and power both his Mother and we doe daily u Rom. 16. treade Satan vnder our feete They publish St. Hieromes either whole or amended translation for they agree not yet whether but the Vulgar x Rhemist Pref. vpon the Testament they confidently call it and because some few manuscripts and readings had the feminine ipsa shee although some of them had otherwise as the y Theolog. Louani in notat Fransc luc Louanists confesse and a Hieron tradit Hebrai in Genes cap. 3. St Hierome also accounteth the other the better reading and doth also so expound it and diuers also of their owne learned b Canus de locis lib. 2. alij Authours suspect that the letter a which maketh of the masculine a feminine crept in by the negligence of the manuscribers yet these Papall correctors contrary to all the Hebrew originals and Chaldaick Paraphrases contrary to all translations of the Septuaginta contrary to the best learned of the Roman Church will needs reade c Genes 3. ipsa shee for the Virgin not ipse he for Christ thereby giuing vs to thinke that they had rather vnderstand this prophecie that the Virgin Mary rather then Christ should bruise the Serpents head out of which doctrine goodly inferences may bee inferred against them I doe in good earnest aske of these Interpreters wherein Satans power ouer mankinde did consist if they answere in sinne as they needes must then according to their owne reading not a hee but a shee bruised the Serpents head and deliuered mankinde from the guilt of sinne Alas into what errours would these ouer-ruling Popes leade vs All the faith of the ancient Churches in the Hebrew Originals Chaldaick Paraphrases and Greeke
and yet should neuer vse the same being so much m Acts. cap. 6. 13. giuen to prayers and preaching but celebrate the diuine misteries with our Lords prayer onely as not onely n Greg. lib. 7. Epist. 64 Cardin Cusan ep 7. Ama larius de Eccle. officys lid 3. Rupert de diuinis off lib. 2. Hieron lib. 3. contra Pelag. Naucler Platina Cassander alii Saint Gregorie but diuers others doe deliuer vsing a Lyturgie as it is described by Saint Iustine doubtlesse more like the English Lyturgie then the Romane Masse I obserued also that downe must the authoritie of all those Historians Platina Almarius Polidore Durandus Durantus and very many others who attribute the institution and ordaining of all parts of the Masse to diuers Popes liuing long after the Apostles down also must that notable miracle written by o Iacobus in vita Grego primi Iacobus à Voragine an Archbishop amongst them in Italy at Genoa the miracle was thus and shewed in the time of Adrian Pope when there was great contention in the Church about the Canon of the Masse Thus it was the missall of Gregorie was laid with that of Saint Ambrose together vpon the Altar in Saint Peters Church and left thereupon all night that God would vouchsafe by miracle to demonstrate which of those two he would approue for the vse of the whole westerne Church God did so accordingly saith the wise Archbishop For the missall of Saint Gregorie was * The Roman Canon hath euer worst successe at such trials for as it was heere rent so Don Rodrigo Archbishop of Toledo aboue 300. and 40. yeares ago reporteth lib 6. cap. 25. of his historie that when trial was made betwixt the Gothian and Toletan Canon and the Romane first by priuate combate of two Knights after by fire et both trials the Toletan Canon preuailed the Knight for the Romane Canon was ouercome and at the second triall the fire consumed the Popes Canon that of Toledo being vntouched rent into leaues and cast vp and downe the bodie of the Church but that of Saint Ambrose laid open vpon the Altar readie to be read and so those ancient sages with Adrian their head gathered that the renting of Saint Gregories missall and scattering of the leaues of the same about the Church did shew that it was Gods will that the same should be vsed throughout the whole westerne Church but Saint Ambroses missall because it was laid open in Saint Peters Church vpon an Altar as readie to be there vsed therefore the same forsooth must be vsed onely in Saint Ambroses Church of Millane What wise coniecturer would not rather haue gathered the contrarie that the missall of Ambrose should be vsed but that of Gregorie despised but had you gone O ye Pontificians ad legem ad testimonium to the law and testimonie to the diuine Scriptures as you p Isai 8. are commaunded and not tempt God with expecting of testimonies from the dead which is dangerous superstitious damnable you would neuer haue so shamefully forgotten your selues And how is it imaginable that if the Apostles instituted a Canon of Masse deliuered to the Romane Church which also Saint Ambrose being made of a Catechumen a Bishop could not but find vsed and practised in his Church of Millane how durst that Bishop afterwards attempt to frame a new Canon for his Church omitting to vse that of the Apostles but perhaps he vsed theirs in the forenoone his own in the afternoone or else the two Canons had their turnes one after another Alas how are the sages of Pharaoh caught in their coniecturing And consider Christian Reader how can this miracle stand if the Canon of Masse had beene instituted by the Apostles and accordingly had beene practised both in France and Italy and other Churches for I hope Masse was said throughout Italie and France before the miracle what needed then Charles the Great to haue assisted with his Imperiall authoritie Adrian the Pope for the bringing in to vse the missall of * It is meere vanity to think that the Canon as it is now was so in Saint Gregories daies Saint Gregorie and the exclusion of that of Saint Ambrose Millane onely excepted where it is now vsed from all other Churches away away with these vanities Againe I demaund how could Scholasticus a priuate person of the Church or Citie of Rome or some otâ—er Church although p Bellarm. lib. 2. de missa cap. 12. Bellarmine the profound Cardinall would to the laughter of all faine q Bellarmine called great pillar of the Church and the Auflen of our time by Eudaemon in his confutation of Anticott pa. 48. haue Saint Peter signified vnder the name of Scholasticus compose the Canon of the Masse if the Apostles had made it and the whole Christian westerne Church had practised it before Did Saint Gregorie know that the Apostle made the Canon and that Scholasticus was onely gatherer or setter together in some better methode of that which the Apostles had composed and the Church of Rome in some sort perhaps neglected till Scholasticus his time and so to need his ordering and amending doubtlesse S. Gregorie nameth r M. Thomas Iames worthily obserueth out of S. Gregorie that Scholastians was a vsual name and often mentioned in S. Greg. lib. 2. epist missa scholastico duci lib. 9. epist 14. epist missa scholastic defensori lib. 7. ep 32. lib. 6. ep 26. lib. 3. ep 38. lib. 6. cp 45. alias Scholasticus as a man wel known to Iohn of Siracuse to whom he wrote that Epistle and I thinke it would proue the wits of Bellarmine and all the Ignatians to find where S. Peter or any of the twelue Apostles were surnamed by the name Scholasticus if S. Gregorie knew this why doth he not expresse it nay why doth he most expresly insinuate the contrary affirming expresly that the Apostles celebrated the dreadful misteries only with the Lords praier In his 64 Epistle of his 7. booke these are his words Orationem vero dominicam c. the Lords praier we therefore said presently after the praiers because it was the custome of the Apostles that they did consecrate the host of oblation at our Lords prayor onely and it seemed to me verie inconuenient that wee should say the prayer which Scholastious had composed ouer the oblation and should not vse the tradition which our Lord had composed ouer his bodie and bloud Thus most expresly Saint Gregorie the which authoritie must downe to the ground or else S. Gregorie be appeached of equiuocating or of ignorance that he knew not the tradition vpon which the Canon of Masse was founded as our present Romanists would now perswade the world But nothing be it neuer so manifest must ouerthrow the Canon of their Masse which indeed is the verie life of the present Pontifician Church and the liuelihood of their Priests Monkes and Prelates and yet through
indeede some doubtfull speeches in Caluines Institutions but if it would please them but to interpret fauourably his speeches in like for as they interpret the speeches of many later Dinines yea and sentences of the very scripture it selfe which in some places seemeth more directlie to make God the Author of sinne then euer Caluine did their calumniating spirit would bee satisfied and know that hee teacheth nothing else then what their own Christian Philosophers do teach therein of Gods immediate and positiue concurring to the entitie and nature of euery sinne and to the entitie and nature of euerie morall or naturall occasion of sinne and if hee should say that God as a vniuersall Cause doth not onely immediately concurre and intrinsecally coworke with morall second Causes in their morall euill actions as you all teach or must teach vnlesse you bee Heretikes but also that God as the Prime vniuersall and supreame independent Cause of all things doth in a kind of priority of nature also preuent and moue such morall second causes in their free morall actions beeing either of vice or of vertue tell mee is there none of your Pontifician Doctours Friars or Monks who teach the same if not farre worse who can be ignorant of this who hath vnderstood of the great * I my selfe when I was some yeere ago in Doway saw this doctrine that God doth moue with a priority of nature of causality and effectually all morall agents in all their actions printed in certaine Theses which were to be defended publikely vnder the moderation of one D. Estius who obstinately as I was there informed defended the same position controuersie betwixt the Ignatians at Doway and some other Professours of that Vniuersity the noise of which scandalous controuersie soundeth euen vp to Rome it selfe there to be determined c. The English Liturgy is most egregiously calumniated to be vaine irreligious a most slanderous imputation for the forme thereof is conformable to all antiquity is very religious and if some priuate disorderly persons sometimes minister not the Sacrament according to the forme there prescribed what of that But I haue often wondered why the speciall absurdities and abuses if there be so many in the Booke of English Common Praier as they pretend haue not been by any of the aduersaries in some special sort largely discouered and confuted considering how often and in how speciall sort the many turpitudes abuses cōtradictions fooleries of their Roman Masses haue been learnedly deciphered Commonly and daily is the Church of England calumniated for giuing vnto the Prince the Title of Supreame head or gouernor of the Church of England which yet is giuen in no other sense then to shew that very power and Supreame Iurisdiction which all Ancient Christian Emperours and Kings in the q 1. Paralipom 28. 2. Paralip cap. 17. 19. Reg. 4. cap. 18. 3. Reg. 2. old Testament and since haue euer more or lesse had in their Kingdomes to wit that for the publike setling establishing execution and administration of all manner of iustice whether in matters of Religion or other Temporall causes the Prince hath Supreame authority and that without his command or permission no man may so much as beare or wagge any rodde of any publike Iustice or gouernment But touching the ministration of Sacraments giuing of Orders giuing the power of the Keies and in or touching defining of faith it is a meere foppery to say the Prince challengeth any such matter in this Kingdome or that any such is giuen him But in al such respects he doth most religiously acknowledge himselfe to be one of the sacred sheepe of Christs sacred flocke vnder Christ his ministeriall Shepheards of the English Churche Remember I pray you how r Parsons his Catholike letter and answer to our Kings Apology Parsons admitteth that the Kings supreamacy as his most excellent and pious Maiesty most religiously and excellently explaneth the same in his Apology for the Oath of Allegeance is allowable and such as may be receiued The truth is you care not so much for what the Prince hath as for that the Pope is excluded from his gainful Supremacy ouer this Kingdom who was accustomed with his Annats Reseruations Vnions Comendaes Expectatiue graces Prouisions Presentations Nominatiōs and with infinite such like ſ 1 ad Tim. 6. nouelties of names and prophanations to corrupt all Church discipline and Religion of this Kingdome as the t Lincoln Epise apud Matth. Paris in Henrico 3. famous and holy Robert Bishop of Lincolne long agoe obiected to your holy Pope Innocent the 4. And heere to note by the way your vanities you thinke it to be eternall blemish to the Church of England for that King Henrie for loue of Queene Anne Bolleyne as you say and to be diuorced from Queene Katharine did exclude the Popes authority out of England meerely vpon fancy and passion But alas your deuise is vaine for it was first giuen vnto him by the learned Vniuersity of Oxford then Pontifician vpon this occasion which I desire you to marke There was earnest suite made by some certaine Pontificians to the Kings Maiesty to condemne Martin Luthers opinions as being the very same in many points with those of Iohn Wicleff who had beene long before often condemned in that famous Vniuersity of Oxford and by many of his former predecessors whereupon the King being desirous to see a copy of Wicleffs Articles one was brought vnto him the which hee seriously perusing found one of them to be thus to wit that the Bishop of Rome had no power nor iurisdiction by right ouer the Church of England Which when the King saw hauing at that time the weighty controuersie about his diuorce with the Bishop of Rome he seemed to like thereof but willing to doe nothing rashlie or against Faith u This standeth recorded in Oxford as M. Thomas James hath affirmed vnto me very lately hee presently dispatched the same Article to the Vniuersity of Oxford to haue it by the learned anew examined and their iudgements freely to bee giuen vpon it the which was accordingly done and the Article approued whereupon that Prince resolued by Consent and Authority of Parliament to exclude the vsurped power of the Bishop of Rome ouer the Church of England which vnder his most tyrannicall oppressions had a long time groned but by this meanes came to be deliuered from the Egyptian seruitude as the holy Bishop of Lincolne long agoe Prophesied it would And if King Henry the 8. vpon your supposed motiues did impugne the Papacy yet I pray you what greater disgrace is it to the Church of England that King Henry should exclude the Popes supremacy then it is to the Church of Rome that he should establish the Statute of sixe Articles for your Masse auricular confession c and what disgrace to your doctrine of adoration of Images because the vsurping and auaricious Empresse x Baron in
7. 8 in Silucst 2 Renedict 9. in Ioh. 8. they themselues account Apostaticall and not Apostolicall who only are related in histories to make vppe the externall number of succession and I pray you what was the case of so many hundreds of Prelates and your owne Cardinals who at Pisa departed from the Romane true Bishoppe true I say for externall succession what of the Prelates of the Councell of Basile which consisted of most Bishoppes of the West who departed from the communion of Eugenius with the Pontificians the vndoubted Bishoppe of Rome What of the Clergy and part of the Church of Rome it selfe who departed from Liberius when Eusebius one of the Romane Church with some others were grieuously persecuted It is a vaine narration of our Ignatians and others to say that this Apostasie prophesied by the Apostle and Christ must be interpreted from the Bishoppe of Rome for it is most euident that it must bee from Iesus Christ himselfe and the true iustifying beleefe in him onely and most vain it is for them to say that the infallibility of doctrine was so tyed to the visible succession of Bishoppes in the Roman particular See for if so how comes it to passe that against Iohn the 23. the true Pope for succession it was proued in a generall i Can constant Sess Councell that hee had pertinatiously thought and often taught that there was no immortality of the soule no resurrection of the body what might not a man haue departed from the communion of this Pope if not then the whole Romane Church which in the councell of Constance apostated from him made that Apostacy of which the Apostle foretold Which if it be true what will become of Paul the fift with his congregation The Remists fearing that the defection from the Romane Empire and destruction of the same should bee a steppe to proue that he who hath ouerthrown the same and set another forme of gouernment in Rome absolute and soueraigne and yet not as of the Romane Emperour doe therefore most shamelesly in their m Annotat. 17. Apocalyps vpon the word Babylon annotations vpon the Apocalipse so separate the gouernment of Rome and of the Church in Rome as though they were not vnited together but remained still in that sort in which they both were in the time when the Apostle made this prediction for thus they write in expresse termes whereby it is plaine say they that whether Babylon or the great Whore doe signifie Rome here or no yet it cannot signifie the Church of Rome which is now and euer was distinct from the terrene empire of the same Thus they without all shame or learning where they would faine put off from the Pope and his Cardinals the reproch of hauing the terrene Empire or gouernment of Rome in their hands which I verily suppose they doe hold so fast that they will not leaue the same n Apocâ—l 7. vntill the tenne hornes which earst as Kinges haue receiued power after the beast that is vpon the decaying and desolation of the beast and haue also ioined for the appointed time power with the beast against the lamb because iointly concurring to vphold the impious superstitions and abhominations of the Whore of whose cuppe they haue all drunke euen almost till they haue vomited it vp againe God putting into the hearts shall eate the Harlots flesh and make her naked desolate consume her with fire This harlot which shall be so eaten and burned by those Kings who had earst drunke of the cup of her whoredomes Whom can shee designe but as * Ibidem Saint Iohn saith that City which had command ouer the Kings of the earth to wit earst in her Emperours after in her Popes and Cardinals should haue power and command ouer the Kings of the Earth the which who seeth not is verified in the City of Rome it selfe as not onely certaine Ancient Fathers but certain p Ribera in 14. Apocal. viega in 17. Reâ—ist in Apocal Bellarmin lib. de Rom Pont. Ignatians themselues also expound it and if it signifie not Rome let the Aduersary produce some other City heere described so that the Beast that was and is not to wit the rule and command of the City of Rome which was before in the Consuls Senators and Commonwealth buf now it is not because it is in the Emperours shall be againe in the * Pontifâ—x c. The Pope and the Purpured Fathers iudge the world Coquae contra Praemon Pope and his purpured Cardinals To proceed where should this defection rather be then in Babylon which S. Iohn hath foretold Now that by Babylon Rome according to the exposition q Hieron in prologo Didimi epist 17. ad Marcel Tertul. lib. aduer Judaeos of the Ancient Fathers is to to vnderstood r Annotâ—m 17. Apocal. the Remists themselues dare not stiffely deny it now as cleare as the Sumit is that therefore Rome is called Babylon because shee hath made drunke with the cup of her whordomes all Kings of the Earth and all Nations who haue pledged her which by no meanes can be expounded of Rome heathenish both in respect that shee did not infect with her whoredomes the Countries and prouinces which she conquered but rather she obteined no Countrey nor Prouince of whose whordomes she drunke not her self by bringing their gods Images into her Capitoll to bee worshipped and adored with the Images of their Romane gods And manifest it is that the Prophet speaketh of a cup of fornication which Kings and Nations were to drinke of somwhat after his time but Rome heathenish and heâ— Emperours were in their ruffe and most triumphing when S. Iohn made this Prophesie againe Å¿ Tertull de resurrect carais cap. 25 Bellar. vnderstandeth that the tâ—n Kings which shal hate the Whore shall diuide the Romane Empire taking kingdomâ— to themseâ—â—es afterwâ—rd destroy Rome it selfe Bellar. lib. 3. de Pout cap. 13. the Kings of the Earth who were to drinke of the cuppe were afterwards to hate this Whore and to make her desolate therefore and in respect of her abominations now this can by no meanes be vnderstood of Heathenish Rome which was long agoe conuerted to Christ and her blemishes of Idolatry washed out by the blood of the Lambe in the the time of Constantine And to say that Rome Christian should be punished for the cup of Whordomes which Rome Heathenish gaue to the Kings of the Earth to drinke of is a meere chimera vnlesse they can shew that the most iust God will punish Jacke as is said for Gill or else they can prooue vnto vs a Pithagarian transmigration of soules from Rome Heathenish into Rome Christian Further it is most apparent as I haue mentioned aboue that the cupps of whordomes heere spoken of should be in the hands of one who had been first r Hierom. epist 17. ad Marcel Rome was then in part the purpured
Whoâ—e and Babylon a Spouse and had for her husband Iesus Christ from whom she was to fornicate and to commit Adultery with her fauourites the Nations and Kings of the Earth to whom also she was to send cupps of fornication to wit of false Doctrines rites and impure superstitious and the same Kings to drinke thereof and to pledge her by louing embracing of her doctrines now as cleare as the Sunne it is that Rome Heathenish was neuer a spouse of Iesus Christ but Rome Christian was and therefore egregiously commended by the u Cap 1. ad Rom. holy Apostle in his Epistle to the Romans Besides to dispute probably the clothing of * Apoâ—alop 7. this Whore with Purple and Searlet in her Pope and Cardinals the writing of the name Mystery according to the like expresse Prophesie of S. Iohn in the Popes Diademe beset with many precious stones * Ibidem the Popes Diademe beset with many precious stones which I very crediblie heard when I was student in Rome not without a kinde of astonishment to haue beene once placed there and sette in that part of the Diademe which was for the Popes forehead but now it is remooued Her persecution against such as giue testimony to the name of Iesus that in it only without anyintermixioÌ„ of humane helpes saluation is to be had These things with many such like agreeing to sacred Scripture testifie that Rome is the Whore And heere I note by the way how incredible the cruelty of that City is against such as giue testimony to the holy name of Iesus For besides their most close couping vp of such as they persecute into their darke chambers in their inquisition their mercilesse separation of them from all friends whatsoeuer the most extreame penurious diet wherewith they afflict them the great iniuries that they offer vnto them in dispoiling them of all they haue whether it be gold siluer or precious stones by which they might releeue themselues the horrible torments and torturings the dreadfull threats of imminent death by certaine tragicall representations c. they are also sworne as I haue beene informed although I will not stand to iustify it at their entrance into the inquisitions neuer to discouer whatsoeuer shall bee done to themselues or whatsoeuer they may perceiue and see done to others in that place O cruell the Pontifician Priests in England doe thinke themselues extreamly dealt withall to be kept together in common Prison with free accesse to each other and with accesse also of friends vnto them except vpon some speciall restraint which as it neuer lasteth but for a time so it is neuer so great but that friends may come at least to the gates of such Prisons to bring them reliefe And in some Prisons about this City they are permitted with keepers or without keepers to passe vp and down the City freely to their friends yea and diuers of them of whom the State is not assecured for their loiallty by the taking of the Oath of Allegeance haue daily this liberty Iudge Christian Reader hereupon what measure the Pope and his measure to such as giue testimony to the dreadfull name of Iesus in respect of that clement course which is taken with such as hee sendeth into this Kingdome directly or indirectly to bring the same to his subiection and command God in his mercies may auert what he and his intend but giue me leaue to speake I see that of y Luc. 16. Christ verified The children of this world are wiser in their generation then the children of light God forbid I should wish the blood of any to be shed yet God forbid but I shold pray for the preuenting of al seducers of soules and the moderate charitable restraining of them But to returne to my purpose that the Church of Rome may be this Whore and fal into false doctrines heare what y Hieron in epitaph Marcel S. Hierome writeth of her pronesse to corruption in his time Heretica c. An Hereticall tempest being risen in these Prouinces brought a ship full of blasphemies into the Romane Port. And feete bemired with dirt did mingle themselues into the pure fountaine of the Romane faith then holy Marcella after shee perceiued that the faith which was praised by the z ad Rom. 1. Apostolicall mouth was violated in many things so that Priests many Monks and especially men of the World were drawne in to assent thereof and the simplicity of the Bishop also was deluded she publikly resisted thus hee Consider Christian reader a woman must make resistance against a shippe of blasphemies and heresies infecting the Roman Church A woman must awake the simple Bishop or else euen then Rome had committed whordome from her spouse Alas there wanted a Marcella in the Church of Rome in the time of Iohn the 22. when that b Gerson in 4. parte serm de paschate Adrian in 4. sent de SacrameÌ„t Confirmat Bellar. lib 1. de Pont. cap. 14. Ioh. Villan bist lib. 10. lege compeudium errorum iohan 22 apud occbam Pope with his Court taught that the Saints departed see not God till the day of iudgemeÌ„t Yea he not only taught it in Rome but also sent his Preachers abroad amongst which Iohn Creature Generall of the Order of Minor-Friers came to Paris where hee preached the same Heresies and would haue continued had not feare of fire which was threatned by the King of France stopped him in his course In like sort was the Romane Church polluted and deluded with her Bishop as c Tertull. lib. ad ucrsus Paxeam Tertullian recordeth when she sent letters of communion to the hereticall Churches of Asia and Phrigia who professed and acknowledged the impious and hereticall doctrine of Montanus and his Prophetisses And as shee hath beene often corrupted in the fountaine so hath her corruption spread it selfe throughout the whole Church to fulfill the Apostasie and defection foretold by Christ and his Apostles And I would demand of these men who rest upon the * Successio sedis c. Succession in See is onely a matter of name succession of faith hath the thing it selfe and truth Greg. Narianzen in orat de laudibus Athanas visible succession onely of the Bishops in the Romane Church the like being to be found in other Churches which themselues condemne for hereticall First what they would haue done if they had beene with Aaron and the whole visible Church of the Iewes where in the desert in worshipping their Golden Calfe they d Exod. 32. pretended to keepe a feast to their Iehouah who had brought them out of Aegypt would they haue obeied Aaron and haue followed the multitude Againe when Elias complained and this after e Psalm 86. 88. 110. 132. see Iereâ—â— 33. greater promises had beene made by God to Hierusalem and their Church then any can bee shewed made to Rome or the Church there that hee f 3. Reg 19.
to interprete this flight of the woman to haue been about the time of Constantius or else to signifie some other particular desolation destitution of the Church when shee was persecuted by the Gentiles I doe not much insist vpon it and yet although this generall destitution of the Church should last but for a short time as they desire yet it quite ouerthroweth their ground of the Churches * Almost all Pontificians acknowledge that in Antichrists time the true Church shall bee in conspicuous without any publike â—â—uicâ— so Bellarmine Dried Sâ—aâ—es Valâ—nt Râ—mists clearely vpon the 2. to the Thes 2. continuall and neuer intermitted manifest and vniuersall conspicuity Further without all question if the e Apocal. 13 whole world shall admire after the image of the beast which image of the beast must of necessity be vnderstood of some kind of Monarchicall gouernment Empire or rule the which like an Image shall represent and stand as it were in stead of the Romane Empire it selfe then doubtlesse the number of those which shall refuse to adore the Image of the beast and to acknowledge the Popes temporall and spirituall absolute Monarchy will not be great but small at the very first till God by the spirite of his mouth shall vouchsafe by degrees to destroy the harlot where the image of this beast resideth To confirme what I haue said I will annexe the prophesie of one Hildegard a religious Virgine whom the aduersaries repute a Saint and f Theodoric Niem 2. lâ—b de priuilegijs Imperij cap. de Oâ—b 2. 3. whose bookes in the which this prophesie is Eugenius the third in a Councel at Treuers at which Saint Bernard was present receiued and approued This deuout Virgine hauing prophesied of a defection that should bee from the Romane Empire she foretelleth also of a general diuision that should be in the church and withall how by reason of the wickednesse pride and neglect of Religion which all would see in the Popes Apostolicall as shee calleth them all Kingdomes * This her prophesie is agâ—â—ing to the doctrine of lâ—aâ—ned 〈◊〉 in his booke of the auâ—â—â—â—ibility oâ— the Pope and in the time of Pope Juliâ—s all the Prelates of France at Touâ—es in a Councell there affiâ—med the same as Iohn dâ— Sâ—â—â—s relateth in Lewis the 12. would thereupon choose vnto themselues Archbishops and Gouernours of other names vnder whom they might and would professe Christ and his pure Religion leauing saith she vnto the Pope Rome alone with a few territories adioyning thereunto vnder such Gouernours and Archbishops saith shee Peoples and Kingdomes shall embrace iustice obserue the ancient customes and disciplines as the ancieÌ„ts were accustomed to do Thus she by which prophecie it is euident what this Saint and all those who approued her books thought of necessary subiection to the Bishop and Church of Rome Not vnlike is that which they write of their Prophetisse g Lib. 4. reuelat cap 57. Brigit shee bringeth in the mother of Christ thus speaking to her sonne Rome is a plentifull field to whom Christ answered thou sayest true but cockle hath ouergrowne this field and therefore it must bee clensed with a sharpe iron it must bee purged with fire and plowed with oxen therefore I will deale with it as he who remoueth plants into another place for h The Bishop of Eâ—hesus was threatned by God to haue his Candlesticke â—emooued out of his â—lace foâ— leauing of his first charity Apocal 2 What presumption therefore 〈◊〉 the Roman Popâ—s to thinke theis Candlestick cannoâ—â—â— remoued who haue abandâ—ned all the primitiue chaâ—ity of the Apostles and are whol degene rated into aâ— câ—taâ—iâ—â— of sin bâ—t I wish theÌ„ to â—ead the â—â— of S. Pauls epist to them such a punishment is prouided for that City as if the Iudge would say flea off the whole skinne draw out of the flesh all the bloud cut all the flesh into peeces and breake all the bones that all the marrow may flow away thus there and if the prophesie of the worthy virgine Meethildis be truly related from her the controuersie with Rome is at an end for shee in expresse termes foretelleth that the Church of Rome should wholy apostotate from the faith of Christ and that there should remain in Germany a poore and persecuted Church which should serue and worship God religiously and purely This is cleare likewise that of Iohn Capistran is as cleare that Rome in time would be so purged and the Popes and Cardinals brought so in order that there would bee none found who would make haste to be Pope contrary to the fashion now i Read dist 79 cap si quis and Baron Anno 912. vsed when no one almost entereth canonically but either by fauor canuasing of some Cardinall or procurement of some Prince or by bargaine as Simon would haue bought power to haue giuen the holy Ghost This Iohn Capistrane whom I mentioned was reputed a Saint by them as likewise was Iohn of Calabria as k Possâ—â—ine in a par verbo Câ—â—â—llus Posseuine in his Apparate affirmeth of him of whome Roger Houeden reporteth that hee should affirme that one l Houâ—d in Ric. 1. who should be Antichrist and a Pope was then born in Rome vulgar is the like prophesie of Ioakim Abbot by me mentioned aboue of Antichrist then born in Rome sundry are the like prophesies which them selues also admit amongst themselues to their owne confusion and yet forsooth they would tie all vnder pain of damnation against all Scriptures and all Antiquity to embrace their nouelties and in no case to forsake Rome but against this their paradoxe I may most iustly vse the words of l Tertul. Apolog. cap. 6. Tertullian vnto them vsed by him in like case vbi religio vbi veneratio c. Where is Religion where worship and reuerence due from you to your Elders in habit liuing discipline sense and last of all euen in speech you haue renounced your Ancestors you alwaies prayse Antiquity but day by day you liue newly thus he so these men in all their vanities of Pardons graines round wafers merites of Saints Purgatory fire transubstantiation adoration of Images c. pretend Apostolicall Tradition but being vrged to shew them to be ancient and to carry them vpward towards the Apostles they faint in the midway and when forsooth they faile they will then vow professe pronounce and protest that although they know no mention made of them yet sure they were all vsed before that time euen from the Apostles dayes and here they stumble into that absurdity which they vainely obiect against others to witte of inuisible inaudible and vnlegible Traditions one of their Rules of faith the practise whereof in ancient times they cannot shew and although the pure Church of Christ had beene for many yeares together so inuisible so inconspicuous that there could no known nor set Congregation be defined
authoritie command and Breefes notwithstanding some of them doe practise I could not but resolue to leaue off conference with them remembring that of the f Isai 6. Act. 28. Prophet Esay vnto the Iewes and vsed also by the Apostle S. Paul in like case Incrassatum est cor populihuius c. The heart of this people is become grosse and with their eares they haue heard heauily and they haue closed their eies lest perchance they should see with their eies and heare with their eares and vnderstand with their hearts and bee conuerted and I heale them This their estate as I did and do from the very bottome of my heart lament so it did greatly increase my doubts mustring themselues to my Conscience against the nouell traditions and vncatholike doctrines of the Church of Rome whereof Christian Reader with thy patience and good acceptance I will communicate part to thy courteous view not because I esteeme my selfe so learned as though I were able to produce any new learning neuer thought on before for in very deed I doe ranke my selfe amongst the meanest of Gods seruants and Priests nor because I doe seeke in matters of Religion to bee applauded by the worlds iudgement or to please humaine censures but alonely that thou maist consider vpon how waightie inducements I haue relinquished the intollerable and pernicious burthen of humaine traditions reared vp against Gods institution that if thou bee wauering from the Firmament of Truth of Gods word and holy ancient Church thou maist with mee bee staied if thou art alreadie seduâ—ed as I haue been thou maist be reclaimed to the sweet yoke of Iesus Christ My heart bleeds to thinke how many in this Kingdome and some of them my speciall acquaintance vertuously and zealously disposed are caried away with most dangerous errors obtruded vnto them only vpon the Roman Bishops prerogatiue of not erring and yet heauen and earth proclaimes that Popes may erre and be Heretikes God of his infinite mercy vouchsafe to open their eies that they may receiue the charity of Truth that they may see that defection and apostasie accomplished in them and their defendants which the g 2 ad Thess 2 vessell of election so long agoe forâ—told and whereof the Prophet and h Apoc. 17. Apostle in his Reuelation so clearelie discourseth shewing that Kings and Nations should be drunke and be bewitched with the Cup of Romes Fornications Fornications hee saith thereby most clearely demonstrating that some Romane Church or Congregation for most cleare it is and best Pontificians deny it not that of Rome hee prophecieth earst a Spouse but after a Strmpet in respect of her spirituall aduoutries first pure but after most impure first Christian but after Antichristian for her doctrines and practises against the most pure doctrine and humble conuersation of Christ first with a cup of Christian simplicity in her hands deuoid of humane dregs but after with a i Ibidem cup full of abominations and corruptions with which shee should delude all Nations and Kingdomes of the earth making merchandize negotiating with the souls of men the which if it should not be already fulfilled in the Roman Church it must bee heereafter at least if the Prophet truly haue forespoken The later of which especiallie touching the merchandizing of soules in auarice how clearlie it is already compleated in the Roman Church diuers earnest professors agreeing in all points of faith with the Romane Church in their times will plainely b In ementitam Constantini donationem testifie a Saepissime as Baptista Mantuanus c In Henr. 3. Valla Robertus Lincolriensis in c Matthew of Paris d In Epist 1. ad Titum Claudius Espencaeus S. e â—ab Cons ad Eugenium Bernard f Constitut Imperial pag. 39 Frederike the Emperour in his Epistle to all Prelates g Baronius 992. Arnulphus in a Synod at Rhemes in Baronius and read Baronius also in the yeere 912. where you shall find him affirming how at the lust of whores diuers Popes most wicked luxurious and auaricious were thrust into Peters chaire and how that custome lasted not for a short while only * Claudius Espencaeus as hee is now set forth is vvholly corrupted you must read his first Edition All these with infinite others do demonstrate the corruptions of the Roman Church would God effectually for the conuersion of seduced soules Wherein I can conceiue no great hope first of all such popish seruants as reape profitte or liuing by that profession nor of such children as are vnder the command of some obstinate recusants nor of any such bankrupts and malecontents as expect alterations and long for troubled waters to fish in nor of such scrupulous good soules as will not dare to peruse or read any part of holy Scripture though of the Rhemists Testament it selfe falsified with their Annotations lest they should proue Heretikes as some of them haue told me or else remaine perplexed in their Consciences nor of some of their Priests who are resolued for the maintenance of their credit conseruing of their meanes and some such other respects with their fauoritesses I meane such like fauours as will mooue men to trauell vp to Rome to procure dispensations for mariages and yet in their absences and long pilgrimages such painfull pilgrimes notwithstanding stripped of their fauouritesses by some of their own brotherhood which haue come betwixt them and home are ready without examination of Scriptures or Fathers to receiue whatsoeuer the Roman Church shal obtrude vnto them Neither may I conceiue hope of any such yonger persons who expect preferment by h One of the most speciall practises of the Pontificians in England to enlarge their religion is to procure matches in mariages doe thou make the inferences Christian Reader There is a mysterie in it if the natures of young spirits be considered who commonly at such seasons are rather full of the heate of carnall loue then of that fire which Christ came to send into this world Luk. 12. matching into some stocke and family the which as it abhorreth the reading of the Scriptures so also is inueterated in Papistrie My chiefest hope may be of those who as they are iudicious so embrace that faith meerely out of conscience and are nothing dependant of others who either through the peremptory auaricious factious and vnchast liues of their Priests or generally for the hatefull opposings and vncharitablenesse amongst them all by which they demonstrate themselues to be no disciples of Christ whose proper badge and stemme is i Ioh. 13. dilection and loue of each other or else through the vaine multiplicity of deuised fables and miracles out of their old Legends and withall through the inexcusable ignorance of their Priests in Gods sacred Scriptures which I dare boldly affirme is so great that there are scarse a hundred amongst diuers hundreths of them in this Kingdome who can tell either how many
bookes there are of Gods Scripture or how many Chapters there are in any of the bookes Or else through the inuallid successes or euents of their vows beeing either not heard or not regarded by them to whom they are made or else through the contiuuall disquietnesse and torment of their consciences in the * I disproue not ' but highly commend the vse of Auricular Confession when it is voluntary without sacrilege vsed for comfort not abused as the very means and cause by which sinners are iustified in the sight of God much like as the Mexicans vsed Auricular Confession Botero Relationi vniuersali Part. 4. lib. 2. nel fine vse of their Sacrament of confession as it is now by them most peruersly abused to the iniurie of Christ subuersion of diuers soules receiuing no * It is not imaginable what inconsolable liues some that are frequente in the vse of Confession as necessary to saluation doe lead there is no stony heart which would not pitie them knowing their torments rest day nor night k Ierem. 16 as seruing Gods who cannot giue it them are growne into some distrust of the Romane Church Of these might bee conceiued some iust hope of their conuersions if they would vouchsafe either to read holie Scriptures or else to read some learned bookes written by some learned Priest or Preacher of the reformed and Catholike Churches of Christendom but I greatly doubt they wil not dare without leaue of their Priests so to doc and I am most assured that by them they shal neuer be permitted A certaine Bishoppe of Italy was not ashamed to tell l Claud Espene Comeut in cap. 1 ad titum Claudius Espencaeus a famous Pontifician that the learned men in Italy it self were afraid to study the holy Scriptures lest thereby they should become Heretikes and that therefore they imployed themselues in commenting vpon the Popes law-bookes deerees and the Decretals the which Booke thoughfull of lies contradictions impertinencies yet because it is the Popes Booke it must be respected whilest the holie Scripture lyeth as it were in the streetes neglected But to these may not that of Christ be iustly obiected Serui nequam wicked seruants out of your owne mouthes I condemn you Assuredly these and like Italianized Prelates of m Luk. 19. which for greatest number consisted the Tridentine Councell are none of those who are reputed blessed by the Prophet n Psalm 2 Dauid for meditating in the law of God day and night But to shorten this my letter addressed vnto thee Christian and Catholike Reader I humblie request thee to accept with charitable interpretation these my Motiues and to pray for my constancy in profession of Gods truth I must needes confesse that I did find great difficulties in this my conuersion First some suggestions by Sathan suborned how greatly this my conuersion would turne to my disestimation with all of the present Roman faith and those my deare and old acquaintance of whom I affirme that they are vertuously disposed for whose saluations vtinam vt Anathema superimpenderer Would God to speake with the o Ad Rom. 9. 2. ad Corint 12 Apostle I might as an Anatheme be sacrificed yea offered and offered againe so that they might be saued Some other lesser difficulties I found all were humane terrene but when I considered that of the p Ad Galat. 1 Apostle if I should seeke to pleasemen I should not bee the seruant of Christ and that of q Luk. 12 Christ Seeke first the Kingdome of God and the iustice thereof and then all these things will bee added vnto you I fully resolued for the charity and r Ad Philip. 3 supereminent knowledge of Christ to esteeme all that is in the world as verie dung and rather to dwell poore Å¿ Psal 83 in the house of God then to dwell in the rich Tabernacles of sinners And in this my resolution I was somewhat the more confirmed in respect that from my verie youth euen then when I was too too zealous an Emulator of all Romane superstitions I haue euer had often suggestions and inspirations in my mind that a time would come when I should be calumniated and greatly abused by the Papists and persecuted by the Pope himselfe whom I then admired as an heauenly Oracle vpon earth but most of all I was filled with such foreapprehensions and presages being in Rome vpon t Anno Dom. 1594 the 20. of June the same day and houre when that glorious and renowned Christian Marsh suffered the cutting off of his right hand the gagging of his mouth by the Counsel of the Ignatian Cowlin who boasteth himself thereof in England after that the pulling tearing and burning of his flesh with hote glowing pincers for many howres together thorow many streetes of the City of Rome and lastly death it selfe by fire with such admirable patience and constancy that the Romanes themselues did greatly admire him therfore His act for which hee was so tormented was because hee had throwne downe their Sacrament as it was publikely carried thorow the streetes of Rome in publike Procession to be adored worshipped and inuocated as God himselfe an idolatrous superstition latelie crept into that Church contrary to the custom and practise of all auncient Churches whatsoeuer And yet notwitstanding all such suggestions and inspirations at that time which I constantly reiected as temptations I did beeing earnestly intreated and vrged thereunto by the Superiours of the English Colledge make an Oration and a most vehement * This Oration was ready penned to me because I had little aboue a day to prouide my selfe for the prpnouncing thereof before so publike an Audience inuectiue against that fact of his in the presence of diuers Cardinals and Prelates assembled together in the English Church to keepe a solemne Masse of the Sacrament some moneth after the death of that glorious Christian But what may I now vpon this euent interpret those presages inspirations and forewarnings else to haue been then sweet motions and inducements from him who as I trust hath segregated mee to preach the Gospell of his beloued Sonne Iesus the which then I passed ouer with a deafe eare but his goodnesse vouchsafing now to open my eare I may not contradict but blesse him eternally for that he hath made me a child of u Ad Rom. 8. â— Pâ—t 2 adoption of acquisition and election beleeuing with x Ad Rom 10. heart and confessing with mouth for my iustification and saluation onely and alonely in Iesus Christ But before I conclude I intreat the Courteous Reader that y Ad Galat. 5. Iacob 2. both by faith and conuersation by godly z Act. 2 frequenting of the most venerable Sacrament of Christs body and bloud by deuout a Ad Col. 3. Jacob. 1 attendance and hearkning to Gods word so daily so clearely so liuely preached in this Kingdome by daily b
Psal 1. meditating in Gods holy Scriptures and aboue all by conseruing his soule c Jacob. 1. 2. Pet. 3. Luk. 8 Matth. 3 impolluted from alliniquity of sinne and the contagion of al worldly desires and solicitudes by exercising d 2. Ad Corint 9 chearefully plentifullie all charitable offices to all such as are in affliction and necessity by keeping his bodie e 1. Ad Thess 4 a cleare vessell from all impurity and impudicity and his tongue from all scurrill f Ad Ephes 5 Ad Rom. 13 and vnseemely speeches seriously to endeauour to make g 2. Pet. 2 sure his vocation and to h 1. Pet. 2. stop the mouthes of such who in respect that some of the reformed Churches especially of the Clergy liue not conformably to their doctrine do blaspheme the sacred Truth of Christs immaculate Gospell I haue seene much into the liues of the Aduerse part the which although I find to bee more impure auaricious proud vncharitable then euer I could haue imagined yet that is not the cause why I left them but the impurities abominations and superstitious impertinencies of their doctrines worships laws and customes which my soule hateth assuring it selfe that if I should still continue in communion with them I could haue no part with Christ my Sauiour to whom for hauing most mercifully i 2. Ad Corint 5. reconciled mee to his Father in himselfe bee onely and alonely with his Father and the holie Ghost Honour and Glorie for euer Amen Yours in Christ Iesus R. S. The Contents of this booke of MOTIVES THe Preface shewing the first occasions inducements and maner of the Authors conuersion The diuision of the Motiues 1. Into Motiues out of the Pontificious Erroneous Doctrines 2. Out of their dangerous and wicked Lawes 3. Out of certaine obseruations touching the dangerous Spirits of sundrie Chiefe English Romanists Page 1. Motiues of Doctrine FIrst Motiue touching Doctrine is out of the Pontifician vnsound rule of Faith to wit the Popes sole Iudgement defining ex Cathedra out of the Chaire as Pastor of the Church Pag. 2. Second Motiue is out of another rule of their faith to wit Apocriphall Scriptures Pag. 27. Third Motiue is out of their most Idle rule of Faith traditions as they doe pretend them Pag. 31. Fourth Motiue is out of the vsurped transcendent power of Popes in Temporals and Spirituals Pag. 41. Fifth Motiue is out of the most Superstitious Romane Doctrine for the Adoration and worshipping of Images Pag. 69. Sixth Motiue is out of diuers obseruations touching sundry superstitious fooleries contradictions and impertinences of the Romane Masse Pag. 86. Seuenth Motiue is out of their most vaine and intollerable Doctrines and abuses touching Indulgences Pag. 119. Eight Motiue is out of their irreligious Doctrine against the vse of the publike Liturgies and Church seruices in knowen tongues pag. 128. Ninth Motiue briefly toucheth their most vnchristian Doctrine of Aequiuocation pag. 137. Tenth Motiue briefly taxeth their tyrannicall denying of Indifferent Reading of holy Scriptures in the vulgar tongues pag. 140. Concerning their wicked Customes and Lawes the Author toucheth onelie a few FIrst the wicked custome and Law by which their Popes strictly forbid that there be any publike commemoration in their Masses for the conuersion of any Infidels Heretikes or excommunicated persons c. or for the temporall prosperity and safety of Soueraignes being by them reputed Heretikes pag. 144. Second hypocriticall law and custome touching their fastings and daies of fasting pag. 148. Third most impure permissiue law for their houses of prostitution euen in Rome it selfe not without great gaine to the Popes Coffers pag. 151. Fourth most vnchristian law that in case of no extremity the venerable Sacrament may bee celebrated without their Massing vestiments altarstones c. and such like humane deuises and institutions pag. 152. Fifth most iniurious law by the which the Laity contrary to the Institution of Christ and practise of all antiquity is debarred of the cup in the most holy and dreadfull Sacrament pag. 153. Sixth vnchristian law is the necessary annexing of the vow of Chastity to all their greater holy orders by occasion of which law the vile impurities of the Romane Cougregation are growne innumerable and inexpressible pag. 154. Touching certaine obseruations out of the Pontifician Spirits FIrst the Author discouereth by diuers notable particulars the disloiall and vnnaturall Spirits of the Ignatian Cheefetaines of the English in the maner of their preaching and their propagation of the Romane Gospell in England pag. 1. alpha 2. Secondly he sheweth in diuers particulars how they doe most shamefully calumniate the Church of England for her Doctrines and her publike Liturgie pag. 13. alpha 2. Thirdly hee sheweth how generally all Pontificians denie consent of Ancient Fathers being produced against diuers points of their nouell Doctrines pag. 20. Fourthly he sheweth how the younger Ignatians doe imitate the vnnaturall and disloiall Spirits of the old pag. 24. In the Conclusion he sheweth more largely both out of Scriptures and Fathers that the Church of Rome notwithstanding her visibility and Conspicuity may Iustly and in respect of her corruptions necessarily ought to be forsaken pag. 32. THE NOVELL AND HERETICALL Rule of the Romane FAITH Diuision of the Motiues THE Sauiour of mankind who hath vouchsafed to illustrate the eyes of him who sate in darkenesse and in the shadowe of death to know his truth will also I hope vouchsafe so to confort him that hee may rather conuert some then confound any of those who call themselues true Iewes and Catholikes which they are not but are indeede only the Synagogues and Congregations of the Bishops of Rome who in a Dictatus Greg. 7. apud Baron anno 1175. As Bell. admitteth Papa properly signifieth a Father that begetteth children and therfore all begotten of him and to him are denominated of him Papists Gregorie the V 11. did first of all by decree assume vnto themselues excluding all other Priests and Bishops from that name Papa the name of Fathers of the whole Church to wit to be only called Papae from which name all their children by denomination are called Papists rather then from Christ Christians which Papae Fathers also somewhat before that time at that time and now also doe peremptorily challenge to bee the only Vniuersall Catholike and immediate Pastours and Fathers of all who do b Ad Rom. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a greek preposition signifieth properly as much as the Latine preposition pro for so taken Math. 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Math. 20. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in composition it signifieth properly for insteed as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In some words of composition it signifieth also opposition as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Yea and in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is also in such a signification to be indifferētly vsed according to the naturall signification of the word inuocate the name of
where are such violent enemies against the Oath of allegeance and esteeme all such as take or allow of it as Heretikes as lapsed from the Catholike Romane faith because say they the Pope in his Briefes hath defined and decreed that there are diuers points in it against the Catholike faith Romane he should say and yet I suppose as very cleare that none of the English Secular Priests did expresly know against what speciall points of faith the Oath was till now of late a certaine i A Briefe declaration c. together with a recapitulation c. by H. I. Ignatian recapitulater vnder a double title promising a double book but bringing forth only a short pamphlet and that a namelesse one and therefore a Libell hath shewed in his namelesse defence of the Romane faith that Pope Paul the 5. in his Breues hath k Pag. 32. Ibidem pag. 56. defined the same Oath to bee hereticall and vnlawfull because it denyeth the Popes power to depose Princes and dispose of Kingdomes an article of faith with him in his libell although not naming himselfe I may iustly say l Rom 1. My eares haue heard many Ignatian Priests constantly affirme that Paul the 5. had defined in his late Breues that the oath could not be taken and that his Briefe was a definitioÌ„ of faith so R. B. G. B. I. F. R. L. M. W. T. T T. F. I. K. with diuers others of that profession erubescit cuangelium he is ashamed of his Ghospell But no meruaile that the Ignatians are so well acquainted with the mysteries of the Popes faith for since their Father Ignatius his beatifying vvho had so many m Apud Ribadin in vita Ignat. idle reuelations I doubt not but that they haue receiued newe illustrations from that Code and Deske of all law faith and right the Popes brest which the ancient Church neuer knew But when n The Recapitulater in the Title of his vnlearned and seditious pamphet and for his traiterous doctrine see him page 43. Promised Leonard Lessius commeth forth with his demonstrations for he would seeme to demonstrate in all his bookes as this pamphletter of Louaine not H. I. but P. W. hath couertly promised doubtlesse he will reueale the hidden mysterie which was not knowne in the Primitiue Church though then darkly working but was to be o 2. Thess 2. reuealed in these times with which the world is likely to end But to returne to what I haue to proue It being manifest that Popes and the Romane particular Church with all those of the societie of Ignatius not excepting any one doe dogmatically maintaine that the Pope defining ex Cathedra is the infallible vncontrollable vnappellable and onely necessarie Iudge in all controuersies of faith it should be lost labour in me to stand to proue that this their position is beleeued by them as a point and article of their faith nay I should say as a principle and very maxime of their faith For can any the simplest idiote doubt but that the infallible rule of faith which declareth faith squareth faith must be beleeued as faith and by faith But by this their nouell article of faith by ineuitable consequence it followeth that they differ in the most fundamentall point of beleefe from all such Fathers Councels and Doctors as did maintaine or as yet doe that the most infallible rule of faith is the doctrine of the Scriptures especially when it is publikely declared out of the same Scriptures by the authoritie of free Generall Councels and the publike voice of the vniuersall Christian Church the which rule of faith as I am most assured all p Conc. Hierosol Act. 15. Greg. in ep 1. ad Corinâ—h apud pateriuÌ„ Vinc Lirin contra hereses cap. 4. S. Austen most clearely contra Donat. lib. 2. contra epist funda tract vltimo in Ioh. contra Crescon alibi sepissime Cyprian lib. de vnitate Ecclesiae in epist ad Pomp. Patres conc chal cedo Sinod 6. 7. 8. conc Constan Basil ConstaÌ„tinus apud Euseb in eius vita Con. Constantinopol in epist ad epâ—sc Rom. congregatos â—arissime apud Zozom l. 5. c. 9. l At this preâ—ent now in â—aris it is required of the Ignatians amongst other articles to wit that the Pope cannot depose Princes c. to subscribe also to the superiority of the general Councel â—boue the Pope ancient Fathers did teach and beleeue so it cannot be doubted but that many learned both in Germanie England and q France doe still professe and maintaine to all whom as to the ancient Fathers and Councels the later Popes with their Pontificians who obstinately maintaine and beleeue this nouell rule of faith must in truth be reputed heretikes yea obstinate heretikes because pertinaciously erring in the very fundamentall rule of all faith And if any learned Priest retort against me and say that as I heere confesse all Papists concurre not to maintaine this pontifician rule of faith and that many Sorbonist Doctors teach it not neither do beleeue it This is true indeed but let him take this inference with him that notwithstanding all their bragges for the certainty of their faith they are yet most vncertaine as being not as yet agreed vpon the rule of faith yea they are so opposite that one side beleeueth as the Pope with his what the other disbeleeueth and condemneth as erroneous yea and this in Councels as in those r Conc. Constan Basil opposite to the Lateran vnder Leo the 10. and the Florent vnder Eugenius the 4. deposed by the Fathers at Basil of Laterane Florence Constance Basill Frankeford Colen c. which being so that themselues are not agreed vpon the rule of faith why will they not giue leaue and allow to true Christians the word of God as it is expounded clearely constantly and vniuersally by the ancient Fathers to be the inerrable rule of faith as his most excellent Maiestie in his learned premonition to Christian Princes iustly requireth and exacteth according to ancient and learned Å¿ Vincent contra heres cap. 4. Vincentius his rule It followeth that I demonstrate this rule of faith deuised by the Popes and Pontificians to support the Romane soueraignties to be meere noueltie and so to prescribe against it by antiquitie This I must now doe contractly not doubting but that I shall haue occasion more to enlarge my authorities and reasons when these my motiues shall be impugned as doubtlesse they will be vnlesse it seeme good to the wise men of Saint Omers as their owne libel termes them to answere them by some libelling ballade as they of late haue thought meete to answere t An answere made vpon Sheldons booke to a priuate friend beginning laugh laugh c. which libell hath ofteÌ„ moued the persons against whom it is to very much laughing at the Ignatians follies and wisdomes with a libell a certaine Priests booke for the oath of allegeance for Quicquid
illis libitum licitum Whatsoeuer liketh them is lawull with them if it be to hoyse vp the Popes soueraigntie First this rule is against the practise of all the u Hierosolimit sub Iacobo â—cen Constantin Eph. Calced Sinod 5. 6. 7. 8. saepe Ancient and Primitiue Church which euer in occasion of controuersies recurred to the doctrine of the Scriptures declared by the generall voice and testimonie of the whole Church by her Bishops Priests and other learned men pronouncing defining out of Gods holy word which was alwaies laid before them being assembled in the general Councels so the eight first generall which the Popes themselues with oath professe to receiue although few of them keepe their oath yea the Apostles themselues who all had infallibility by vertue of their Apostleship of not erring in matters of faith to giue an example to succeeding ages would by common consent and authoritie of the Christian Church not otherwise by Peters sole authority decree and define out of the word of God for out of it x Act. 15 Peter himselfe bringeth allegations for his doctrine touching the controuersie then risen at Antioch about the obseruation of the legall lawes and ceremonies of the old Testament which their example was euer followed as necessary till of latter times when Popes haue presumed to define by themselues alone hauing before made some small Consistorian consultation with which this their prodigious position is in some sort by some y Some of the Ignatians doe idly bring the heresies of Pelagius and the Priscillianists to haue beene onely condemned by the Popes of Rome but this against all histories which mention the condemning of the same heresies by sundrie Councels throughout the whole Church Baron in his Annals Genebrard in Chrono few of themselues colored For scarce any hold it absolutely necessarie And here I aske the aduersarie whether that Axiome receiued by al reiected by none God and Nature doe nothing in vaine and that other In vaine are many things required to doe that which as well or better may be done by fewer may not take place in this question touching the infallible power of defining and decreeing I thinke none so impudent an idiote as to denie it Againe I demaund whether those most reuerend Fathers of the first foure generall Councels which Saint Gregorie equalleth with the Gospell although the manner of his speech be not herein to be imitated and of other later Councels did know these principles and Axiomes and did withall beleeue this Romane rule of faith to wit That the Pope alone had infallible authoritie to define and declare faith and that Christ prayed onely and was heard onely for Peter and his successors that they might neuer erre in faith as the z Rhemist annota in Luc. 22. Rhemists do most heretically teach if they did so why did they not send al their doubts which did so shake the whole Christian world with such horrible commotions and contentions to the Popes of those times Siluester Damasus Lco c. and receiue from themas from Iudges of faith the Oracles of Gods mouths so termed by a Coquae contra Premonit Reg. Coquaeus and Lessius his equiuocating b Recapitulater pa. 13. 32. 56. recapitulater and as the vnappellable determinations of all their doubts In so doing infinite charges many contentions would haue bene auoided and as for scandall none could haue followed because both all those Fathers and the whole Christian Church with them if it please you to beleeue the Pontificians who would so perswade vs did then beleeue and teach that the Popes were the infallible Oracles of God the onely inerrable Iudges in controuersies of Faith and al-though ancient Priests and Bishops perhaps reputed themselues his Senators and Counsellers yet they thought also that they could adde nothing to his infallibilitie But alas good Constantine Theodosius Martian and other Emperors knew not this faith who were at such great charges to summon and assemble those ancient and thrice reuerend Councels Nay Pope Leo himselfe who taketh inough to the Sea of Rome and ioyneth c Epist 89. Peter into the societie of the indiuiduall vnitie to wit of the blessed Trinitie held generall Councels necessary for determining of faith and setling of the peace of the Chtistian Church Read c Leo. epist 24. 23. 26. him Christian Reader in diuers of of his Epistles written to the Emperour Empresse and Cleargie of Constantinople and as thou shalt sinde so iudge Secondly thus I argue Three e Sinod 6. Act. 12. 13. 16. 17. 18 Sinod 7. Act. 7. Sinod 8. Act. 7. generall Councels with diuers Popes as Agatho f Leo. 2. in epist ad Constant Leo g Adrian in Sinad Romae congregata and Theod. Patriar with his councell at Hieru-salem Adrian did condemne yea the Councels accursed and execrated Honorius Pope for a dogmaticall and hereticall Epistle by which he laboured to infect the two Patriarkes of Constantinople and Alexandria with the heresie of Monothelites Can any one then be so frontlesse as to thinke that those Fathers and Popes did beleeue that the Bishoppes of Rome might not bee as they were Bishoppes of that See heretikes or teach hereticall doctrines in their decretall Epistles And the holy Ghost to be so infallibly chained to them that they could not endeuour to infect the whole Church who rather will not thus argue and thus inferre Three generall Councels the which with the fiue other ancienter all Popes at their entrances into the Papacie doe or ought to sweare inuiolably to keepe according to their owne Canons with diuers Popes all antiquitie all later best Pontifician Hâ—storians till h Pigh lib. 4. cap. 8. Hier. Pighius led Bellarmine and Baronius the way to call the matter in queston for which i Canus lib. 6. Canus and k Bannes in 2.2 Bannes scornefully reproue him did accurse or condemne Honorius for a Monothelite heretike Ergo Paule the fifth who is not fuller of Gods Spirit then his predecessor Honorius was in his late l Breue Paul 5. interpreted by the Recapitu later pag. 32. breefe ex Cathedra out of the chaire defining himselfe to haue power to depose Princes and to dispose of Kingdomes may erre and be an heretike as without all doubt he is because contrary to Christs m Matth. 22. institution he assumeth power to forbid Caesars due to be giuen vnto him For what is more due to a Caesar then fidelity and allegeance of subiects but the doctrine of Christ forsooth is expounded and the heresie cleared for he forbiddeth not obedience to Caesars so long as they are Caesars but because he can vncaesar them and vnking them therefore no longer Caesars no longer kings no longer obedience So answered * C. 8. 22. Bellarmine against Doctor Barkly so blundering Coquaeus against his Maiesties Apologie Thirdly was there euer any ancient true Christian Catholike who
consider their goodly inferences thereupon once conuerted should after that for euer confirme establish or vphold the rest in their faith which is to say Peter is that man whom he would make Superiour ouer them and the whole Church whereby we may learne that it was fit in the prouidence of God that he who should be the head of the Church should haue a speciall priuiledge by Christs prayer and promise neuer to faile in faith that none other eyther Apostle Bishop or Priest may challenge any such singular and speciall prerogatiue eyther of his office or person otherwise then in ioyning in faith with Peter and by holding of him Thus they with much more to like purpose wherein the Christian Reader cannot but obserue how eagerly for the Popes sake they pursue Peters priuiledge and would most perniciously against the verie foundation of our Christian religion shew that Christ prayed onely for Peter and that neither the Apostles nor Euangelists by vertue of their Apostleship Offices or any other meanes had infallibility of not erring in faith but by ioyning with Peter and holding of Peter So that Saint Paul writing his fourteene Epistles whereof one was to the Romanes the onely infallible Sea the onely Catholike Apostolike one and holy Church if you beleeue the Pontificians espccially o Valentia in aualis lib. 6. in titulis cap. 9. 10 11. 12. 13. 14. Valentia Saint Iames Saint Iohn and Iude their Epistles Saint Iohn his Reuelation Saint Mathew Marke Luke and Iohn their Gospels had therein instruction from Peter and holding from him thereby they had infallibility that they could not erre otherwise they might haue erred in faith had not Peter to vse their owne phrases confirmed established and vpheld them in their faith If this be not pernicious doctrine subuerting the very bulwarks of Christian Religion what can be such for tell me I pray you all yee the Dowists their successors in often reprinting those corrupt annotations where did eyther the Apostles or Euangelists confesse this dependancie from Peter what record of Scripture or other authenticall Author doth deliuer vnto vs that Peter assisted the Euangelists when they wrote their Gospels Doth not Saint Paul p Galat. 2. expresly protest that he neither receiued the Gospell which he preached neque per hominem neque ab hominibus neither by man nor from men but from Iesus Christ his immediate reuelations doth not the same Apostle expresly say of Peter nihil mihi contulit he gaue me he furthered me nothing meaning of the Gospell of Christ nay rather did not the same Apostle giue somwhat to Peter q Ibidem Quia non ambulante sequndum veritatem Euangelij epist ad Galat. 2. Peter walked not according to the truth of the Gospell and after he was conuerted was heere once strengthened by his brother Paul when indewed with the holy Ghost he reprehended his humane spirit with which moued and misled he walked p not according to the truth of the Gospell What Christian did not euer as reueuerently and religiously embrace any part of Saint Lukes Actes of the Apostles because it was Saint Lukes as the whole Epistle of Saint Peter because it was Saint Peters But these men regard not how they weaken the very foundations of Christian religion so r Ad Ephcs cap. 2. Apocal cap. 21. termed in holy Scripture so that they may enhanse the Popes monarchicall supremacie which is the very life and soule of their religion whom they pretend to be Saint Peters successor in place and Sea and we grant it as the Bishops of Alexandria Antioch Hierusalem Ephesus at this day succeed S. Marke S. Peter S. Iames and Saint Iohn but heauen and earth will proclaime that in conuersation they doe nothing at all succeed Peter and as for doctrine and faith the sacred Scriptures and ancientest Churches prescribe against them Would God imitating Saint Peter they would Å¿ 1. Pet. 5. Pascere gregem verbo Feed their flocke with preaching of the word and holy example of life but alas by temporall possessions giuen by Constantine as it is writteÌ„ in the life of ancient Siluester Pope an Angell pronounced that poyson was cast into the church which more or lesse euer since hath Sanctitatem in pontificibus c. Sanctitie in Popes no man requireth in these times they are reputed best if they be but a little good or not so euill as other mortall men vse to be Papirius Masson in his booke of the Bishops of the Citie in â—ulius the third which booke he writeth notwithstanding to set forth the worthy actes of Popes infected the Bishops of Rome hauing put on for Peters pouertic tiphum seculi wordly pride and pompe not keeping themselues within their owne precincts and limites but thrusting their Sythes into the haruests of other dominering but not ruling the Cleargie and dominering ouer the Princes of the earth to whom they were first subiect both in fact and of right * Bellar. li. 2. de Rom. Pont. c. 29 as Bellarmine himselfe once confessed before his red hat and into what proud auaritious ambitious secular and worldly conuersation and vsurpations the Bishops of Rome haue degenerated the t Contaren Sadolet Poole alij Concil delect Cardin. alior Praelat tomo vltimo Conc. Cornelius Mus or at in Conc. Triden Espen in TituÌ„ Bernard li. 1. de considerat best of their Prelates and learned cannot denie and what maruaile then if they be found to degenerate in faith for the shipwracke of faith either sooner or later euer followeth the shipwracke of good consciences and life The See of the Popes to wit the Romane Particular Church was a branch inserted into the tree of the Iewes Iewish Church for so he is described by the Apostle in his u C. 11. ad Rom. Epistle to the Romanes and therefore she was carefully to looke to her selfe that she fell not for if she should grow proud she should saith the Apostle be shaked off as well as the tree it selfe was reiected and that her onely way to remaine stedfast and firme was to be x Ibidem permanent in goodnesse I wish with my whole heart that the Popes were so good and so religious that they might still deserue to haue the honour due vnto the chiefe Partriark of the West according as his most excellent Maiestie z In his kingly premonition to ChristiaÌ„ Princes professeth he would be willing to acknowledge them if they would returne to that faith and Apostolike beleefe of the Christian Church from which they are horribly degenerated Hauing thus traced the Rhemists with thy patience courteous Reader let me giue thee a taste of Bellarmines dealing for the same proiect to enhance the Popes supremacie In his Dictates at Rome not in his printed worke for they doe not alwaies print what they dictate he most egregiously depraued the sense of that sentence of the holy Ghost a Isai 28. Ecce
courteous Reader how Bellarmine tra uaileth to defend this booke from contradiction Bellar de verb. Dei lib 1. c. 12. Iudiths booke in particular I cannot but meruaile how any one can thinke that the holy Ghost would euer approue that decking and trimming vp of her selfe for such an impure and luxurious proiect thereby to draw m Iud. 10. 12 Holofernes into an vnlawfull burning lust and concupiscence of her if so they will teach and affirme may I not heere charge their doctrine with affirming God to bee the approuer and Authour of sinne more iustlie then they charge Caluin therewith Was not that of the holy Ghost in n Rom 3. St. Paul law and right in Iudiths daies Non sunt facienda mala vt eueniant bona Things that are euill are not to bee done that good may come thereby Besides it is too too apparent that in the story there are some vntruths and vnreconcilable contradictions which are clearelie against the other sacred Scriptures And therefore by euident consequence it is to bee affirmed that the booke is Apocriphall and not of that vndoubted and certaine authority which holy Canonicall Scriptures haue by which onely Dogmata fidei articles of Faith are to bee decreed and tried as the ancient Church euer beleft from whose faith because faith must euer be the same no Christian can without hazard of Saluation depart Against the books of Machabees many particular and vnanswerable doubts might be produced I will content my selfe with two or three Doth not the Author of them I should say the abbreuiatour of Iasons larger history as himselfe p 2. Mach. 2. professeth to be against the faith and doctrine of vndoubted Scriptures approue and admire the fact of q 2. Mach. 14. Razias murthering himselfe doth he not craue pardon of the Reader if he haue not answerably to the condition of a good r 2. Mach. vlt. Historian behaued himselfe belike the holy Ghost who is not accustomed nor cannot acknowledge himselfe nor his Scribes to bee subiect to any humane errour in writing thus here left him but not aboue in the 12. Chapter of this Å¿ 2. Mach. 12 booke where he mentioneth prayers and sacrifices for the dead and yet this by the helpe of false fingers also and therefore he here not there craued pardon if he had not arightly performed his office Doubtlesse hee who will thinke the holy Ghost can craue pardon of man as though he might be subiect to errour hath little of the holy Ghosts grace in him Which things considered with diuers other impossibilities against the truth of historie I cannot be perswaded that t Lib. de Ciuit. Dei 18. c. 36. St. Austin and the Fathers of the Councell of Carthage did otherwise approue them to be read then as a probable historie contayning some good morall matter if reade with u Cont. GaudeÌ„t sobriety to vse St. Austens owne phrase but not as to receiue them into the Canon of sacred Scripture of Gods word And if St. Austen may not bee thought to contradict himselfe within the compasse of halfe a dozen of lines some Manuscriber hath egregiously corrupted him for x Aug. lib. 18. de Ciuit. Dei cap. 36. first hee seemeth clearly and absolutely to affirme that they are not Canonicall and proueth thereupon a truth vpon which hee there discourseth and presently he is made to say thus that although the Iewes receiue not the Machabees into Canon yet the Church of Christ receiueth them but who smelleth not false fingers here especially if infinite like forgeries of Manuscribers be obserued Further I am more confirmed in my iudgement against these bookes because y Dist 15. cap. Sancta Romana Gelasius a Pope of Rome before any greater corruptions had deeply tainted that Church did with a whole Synode in Rome recounting a Canon of the Apostles for the same purpose exclude the Machabees out of the Canon of holy Scriptures and although the Canon beginning Sancta Romana c. in which this exclusion was be now so maymed and mangled that no man can iustly say this part or line of it is sound yet z Anton. 3. part summ l. 18. c. 6. Antonine Archbishop of Florence and a Saint in their Church confesseth that he himselfe had read the exclusion of these bookes out of Canon of Scripture in that decree of Gelasius and according to the Canon of the Apostles there mentioned All these things concurring out of Antiquitie and the vndoubted Churches of Christ with the authority also of some learned Pontificians their later Doctors and that of a Tertull. lib. de praescript Tertullian euer taking place in Christs Church Quod antiquissimum verissimum that which is most ancient is most true What may bee thought of that b Conc. Trident. Sess 4. congregation at Trent who hath giuen equal authority to them with the vndoubted word of God and haue accursed with their idle Anatheme all those who shall with the ancient Church of the Iewes the Nicene Councell which St. Gregorie esteemed as the Gospell with the I aodicene reuerend Fathers and almost all other ancient Fathers reiect them as Apocriphaâ—l Doubtlesse the curse of God against the idle curses of men may be iustly giuen vnto them who c Apocal. vlt. haue added the word of man to his word and haue made the word of man equall with his most infallible and inuiolable word d Iud. Epist Imperet illis Dominus The Lord God reproue them It is not possible if these men had esteemed of the vndoubted Scriptures as all the e Aug Epist 71 ad Marcell in prolog lib 3. de Trin. Epist 1â—1 Ep 166. ad Dâ—natist 〈◊〉 Epist 62 Basil 〈◊〉 de si de 〈◊〉 me Chrysost in opere imâ—â—rfect homâ—lia 49. ancient Fathers did who euer required the writings of all men to be examined and tryed by the certaine word of God they would neuer haue coupled humane authority with diuine and haue equalized them in one degree of truth but they may bee excused in dealing so warily and politikely herein for their desperate cause of Porgatorie fire praier for the dead c. otherwise would to the ground with many like of their superstitious trumperies The third Motiue BEsides the corrupting of the true rule of faith by adding the Apocriphall bookes they haue also depraued the same f Conc. Trident. Sess 4. rule by their vnwritten Traditions Anathematizing all who shall refuse or disesteeme the same Traditions and not hold them in equall reputation with Gods most vndoubted word This rule of Traditions they hold to bee an vnwritten Deposit left in the Romane Church and kept inuiolably by her vntill these times which if they can shew what good Christian is there who wil not with reuerenced esteeme receiue or commend whatsoeuer those most irreprehensible Founders of the Church haue deliuered either concerning faith or Church discipline But I must tell them
Images with rich attire imbrodered garments and robes vpon their massie bodies crownes of gold vpon their stony heads rings vpon their marble or wodden singers bracelets of Amber or Pearle vpon their wristes rich Iewels of Pearle and precious stones hanging about their neckes downe euen to their shining and lasciâ—iouslike breasts drawen by the painters rather to giue occasion of impudike thoughts then religious cogitations Of this their prophane and heathenish custome in their most religious places can they precisely shew me a beginning no I warrant you belike therefore it is an Apostolicall tradition so to affirme I could account it no lesse then blasphemie At least if it will please the Ladies amongst the Pontificians to heare with patience it is no tradition Apostolicall that their sacred Images are often trimmed with the rayments of strompets a thing very frequent in other countries like as in England where very often their Priests * This is a custome so frequent and so common in England that no Priest who hath either shame or honestie can denie it Massing vestiments are framed of the petticotes kirtles or gownes of such persons whereof some are not of the best fame so loathsome a thing that doubtlesse if their images which they adore had sense they would exclaime against the abuse thereof and cry fie These Romane customes so vniuersally obserued doth any man once imagine to be Apostolicall Reade two of Saint p Grèg Epist ad Secundin Epist ad Seren. Gregories epistles read q Epipha Epist ad Johan Hiero. Epiphanius read Thrasius the Patriarks discourse in the seuenth synode at Nice Saint r Augu. in Psal 113. de fid Symbol Austen vpon the Psalms and you will vnderstand what manner of Tradition the vse of God the fathers image and the adoration of images is But here of more anone Againe touching their vniuersall and generall custome of receiuing of the Sacrament vnder one kind as so onely necessary so onely sufficient so onely commaunded for a mans whole life can they shew me an expresse beginning thereof no God wot what must it be therefore a tradition Apostolicall I will not deny but that perhaps some ancient particular Churches might sometimes practise in one kind and yet most of their examples which they bring for that purpose are either of counterfeit bookes or else little to the purpose but I denye and challenge the Aduersary to prooue the contrary that euer any Ancient Apostolicall Church held it sufficient as onely necessary onely commanded to receiue the Sacrament in one kind for a mans whole life They bring some places of Å¿ Luc. 24. Act. 2. 20. Scripture for this purpose But first if the places proue their vse then it is not onely a tradition but a written truth Againe it is as manifest as the sunne that those places they bring doe proue as well against them that their Masse may bee vsed in one kind the Sacrament consecrated in one kind which they detest as the greatest impiety and sacriledge making the sacrifice to consist most intrinsecally and essentially in both kindes that no Pope can dispense against it Again t Rhemist in ca. 1. act Baron annalib anno 48. Christ num 17. Zuares Isingr Catherinus aâ—â—â— their beleefe touching the assumption of the blessed Virgin Maries body at whose due honours I greatly reioyce and beseech Iesus her sonne and Sauiour euer to indue me with a reuerent respect of her greatnesse and her blessings aboue all Women is it not generally receiued and the feast thereof vniuersally practised throughout the Romane Church And is there any one who can shew the time when this beleefe began no God wot What must it bee therefore a Tradition Apostolicall nothing lesse u Baron anno Christ 48. num 9 12. 13. Baronius his Doctrine will ouerthrow that Tradition The x Annotations vpon the first of the Acts verse 14. Rhemists in their annotations vppon the Acts of the Apostles endeuor to proue it out of a counterfeit book of Dionise of Areopage Saint Pauls scholler and they are not there with content vnlesse they may abuse egregiously the same booke also by their manifest and wilfull corruption for they dare assirme that St. Dionyse in that y Dionis lib. de Diuin nomin the Rhemists cite it Epist ad Timoth. booke reporteth that he himselfe heard the melodious singing of Angels at the Virgins monument which lasted for three daies together a thing no where to bee found in that book Again they affirm that Dionyse of Areopage was present at the Virgins departure which hapned as themselues z Their Table of S. Paul and Baro. affirmeth anno Christ 52. deliuer the 48. of Christ And yet withal they auouch that S. Paul came not to Athens til the 52. of Christ where and when S. Dionyse was with Damaris a Acts 17. conuerted so that by their contradictorious account Saint Dionyse was conuerted and made a Christian and presently also at the blessed Virgins death before his conuersion Thus the Rhemish lights of the English Pontificians are caught in their folly when of late I obiected this wilfull corruption and mayne contradiction of the Rhemists to a certain graund b I. C. cheefetaine in this place where I now am I had onely a kind of â—ush for an answere with this graue epiphoneme it is an ill bird that beraieth his owne neast might not I more iustly inueigh against such seducers of youth who by such deprauations seduce their young Fâ—ye and beray their young birds in the neasts of their seminaries where they must take all vpon trust euen as their masters shall please to dictate vnto them and be you most assured they shall heare nothing that shall iarre from the Popes behests and Romane Churches practise whose Souldiers they are trained to fight his battell or holy quarrel as * Sanders in his Letters to an Irish Gentleman Saunders calleth it Againe concerning the vniuersall practise of â—ating of bloud and strangled meates throughout the Pontifician Church can they precisely tell mee when the same began no in sooth what is it therefore a Tradition Apostolicall aske the Apostles and whole Church of Hierusalem concerning this Tradition who decreed by expresse c Acts 15. Canon that Christians should absteine from things immolated to idols from bloud from strangled meate and fornication Loe here is a custome generally obserued no beginning thereof be â—ound and yet no tradition Apostolicall Further it is manifest that the vow or promise of Chastity is d Thom Aquin. 2. 2. q 88. Durand lib. 4 Dist 35 37. aly Scholastâ—c communiter ibidem Sotâ—s de iure iustitia lib. 7. Petrus de Soto in institut sacerd lect 5. Valentia de Celibatu lib. 2. Scotus 4. dist 37. Caiâ—t quod 1. q. â—2 See S. Athanasius Epist ad dracont Sincsius Epist ad Euoptium Polid. lib. de inuento 5. Alphonsus a Castro
verbo sacerdot here 's 4. Euseb li. 4. ca 23. Niceph. lib. 4. cap. 55. not by Gods institution either in the olde or newe Testament annexed to priesthood or Episcopacy and yet as euident it is that now it is generally obserued throughout the pontifician Church to promise chastity but not to keepe it and can any pontifician shewe mee when the custome of adioining of the promise of chast life to priesthood and other holy orders begun no I wis some attributing it to Siricius Pope others to Gregory the first others to Gregory the second others to Gregory the seuenth and what must it be therefore an Apostolicall tradition The Apostles will tell you in one of their Canons where they haue thus decreed e Can. 6. Let not a Bishop or Priest by any meanes vnder pretence of Religion cast off his owne wife but if he shal cast her off let him be excommunicated and if he perseuere let him bee deposed thus they This their tradition they learned not of f Ignati Epist ad Philadâ—lp Ignatius nor g Iâ—â—o Epist 85. Leo the first Pope nor out of the sixth Generall Synode nor the Councell of Gangres nor out of the first Councell of Toledo out of which Gratian h Dist 34. Can. is qui noâ— habet relateth a Canon the seuenteenth in number that he who hath not a wife must or may haue a concubine vnlesse those fathers thought a wife or a Concubine necessary for the laickes only in that hot climate but were perswaded sufficiently of the Continency of their Clergy if so out alasse how is Spaine now become so reretrograde and therefore the permission for concubines in steed of wiues excuseth not them yet by their leaue curteous Reader I cannot but thinke that the like merry custome with that which i Lib. de praesulib simâ—â—iacis Clemangis recordeth is some occasion out of this Canon to wit that the people were so perswaded of their Clergies incontinency that in many parishes they would not otherwise accept of their Priests vnlesse they had their concubines thereby as they thought prouiding for the chastity of their wiues And truly if they would but seriously consider what turpitudes impunities nefarious and abhominable lusts haue repleated the Romane Clergy both religious and secular they would haue little cause to bragge of this their Tradition Apostolicall but this surely is as much Apostolicall as that their other most friuolous and irreligious vse of their hallowed graynes meddals c. the which as they are generally obserued receiued and beleeued throughout the whole Pontifician Church so it is as manifest that they are meere nouelties without any seeming shew of Antiquity at all And yet as nouell as they are to find out the precise beginning of them it would trouble their best Antiquary Let any one of them do it and he shall weare the Lawrell bough for his paines Their vniuersall vse of their round Wafercakes which they vse in their most religious seruice at Masse and for their consecrations will they call them Apostolicall who would not laugh thereat and yet very nouell they are although no expresse beginning of them can be shewed by any aduersary What said I no expresse beginning of them yes the Author of the Roman order as Cassander in his Liâ—urgick reporteth at the beginning bringing in of them into the Church greatly complaineth against them because insteed of great loaues which were offered before by It is very probable that Round wafers and eleuation came into gether but it can not by any Pontifician whatsoeuer be specified when they precisely were brought in although Gâ—mma animae seemeth to bring them in aboue a thousand a hundred yeeres after Christ Gem. an cap. 29. some cite idly a sentence out of Epiphan in Ancorat for this purpose the people now such scraps to vse his words were brought and offered Doubtlesse when Idolatry grew ripest and the eleuation most frequent then came in the round wafers for in all antiquitie there is no other mention made of other bread of the Eucharist then such as good Christian women made at home brought with them to the Churches to be offered and distributed Whereof themselues also tooke part at the holy communion and carried also part away home in cleane linnen cloathes to receiue at conuenient times as Tertulian k Tertul. lib. 2. ad vxorem reporteth whose saying the Papists abuse Such is also their obseruations of Lent as it precisely consisteth of fortie sixe daies of fast and abstinence containing Sundaies and Feries and I challenge any aduersary to shew me a beginning of such a precise Lent of sixe and fortie daies They cannot doe it What must it be therefore in this precise fashion a tradition Apostolicall who would not smile thereat to heare of such a tradition who haue read l Euseb lib. 5. hist cap. 24 Socrat lib. 5. ca 21 Zozamen lib. 7. cap. 19. See Niceph lib. 11. cap. 34. 35. Eusebius Socrates Zozomenus three ancient Historians well acquainted wiâ—h the Lents of the Primitiue Churches who doe so differently distinguish the different obseruation of Lent in diuers Apostolicall Churches of the East and West that whereas Saint Hierome and Saint Ignatius affirme that the fast oâ— Lent or Quadragesme is a tradition Apostolicall they must not be vnderstood of the precise fast of forty daies or sixe and fortie daies abstinence vsed by the Romanes but of some certaine set fast before the holy feast of Easter which was diuersly obserued according to the diuers acceptances of the Catholike and Apostolicall Churches of those times Heare Saint Austen much for this purpose clearly pronouÌ„cing If you m August Epis 8â— ad Cassâ—â— aske my opinion concerning this matter of fasting I finde in the writings of the Euangelists and the Apostles and all the new Testament that we are commaunded to fast but what daies must we fast and what daies we must not fast I finde it not determined by any commaundement of Christ or his Apostles Thus he I haue beene very large courteous Reader in producing many instances to shew that rule of theirs to be vaine vpon which their traditions are built to wit that whatsoeuer the Romane Church generally obscrueth whereof no beginning can be shewed that must needs be a tradition Apostolical infinite like instances might be made yea and most iustly and soundly in all such rites lawes customes and articles of faith which they teach contrary to the true reformed Churches But I haue heere produced so many that I thinke my selfe to haue beene too carefull in prouing that which otherwise of it selfe is most cleare but seeing the life of the Romane religion resteth vpon traditions which they pretend to be Apostolicall ouerthrow them and downe must all that same religion as a learned Priest lately in this house acknowledged to my selfe being vrged thereunto by force of argument and euidence of truth And so to
the Sacrament panem vitae aeternae et calicem salut is aeternae the bread of euerlasting life and the cup of eternall saluation he also desireth God to behold the same sacrifice with a propitious and fauourable countenance like as the sacrifices of Abel Abraham Melchisedech c. The which Priests being of the Law of nature did iustly and necessarily desire God to looke propitiously vpon their sacrifices because they were not perfect with any absolute perfection being only creatures and onely acceptable for the deuotion of the offerers which might bee tainted with sin and imperfection but to say the same of the sacrifice of Christ himself if he were really present and really sacrificed were horrible blasphemy and I demand whether Saint Magdalen kneeling at the foote of the crosse might without sacriledge haue desired God the Father to haue looked downe with a propitious and a fauourable countenance vppon the sacrifice of his infinitely beloued sonne Iesus as he did vpon the sacrifice of Abel to wit a lambe or a sheepe vndoubtedly if Scholasticus beleeued as the Pontificians doe he was an egregious Impostor to ranke the Creator of infinite Maiesty with his creatures and to equalize or compare the sacrifice which was both acceptable and satisfactorious exrigore institiae in the very rigour of Iustice with those imperfect sacrifices of Abel and others which did not nor could not sanctisie the Offerers But further yet in that which followeth he quite ouerthroweth the Papists presence of Christ in the sacrifice for thus he prayeth i Ibid. in Can. Suppliceste Rogamus c. We humbly beseech thee Omnipotent God doe thou commannd these things to be carried by the hands of thy holy Angell vp to thy high Altar into the sight of thy diuine maiesty thus there Here I demaund of them what in their consciences they thinke the Author vnderstood by those words of the praier iube command and haec these things who is heer commanded What Gods speciall Angell Christ himselfe but if you please to vnderstand Saint Michael or some other Angell marke the Consequence Christ himselfe or Saint Michael must carry vp these things either Christ Christ himselfe or Saiut Michael Christ vp to the high Altar before the sight of the diuine Maiesty then what a profound Gramarian was your Scholasticus to call Christ haec these things or else what a Sacrilegious impostor to desire God the Father to command Michael to bring vp and offer vp his infinitely beloued sonne before his Maiesty who euer k Heb. 4. 1. Col. 3. sitteth at his right hand l Rom. 8. making intereession for mankind and all those who seeke to him And if you will vnderstand your demonstratiue Article haec these things of the onely accidents of bread and wine they are in good sooth not worthy carrying so high neither by Christ himselfe nor his Angell Saint Michael Charge not therefore Oye Pontificians Scholasticus with such sacrilegious imaginations had he beleeued as you doe he wold haue prayed either in this or the like sort O most morcifull Father heere before me vpon this Altar lieth onely deere sonne Iesus of infinite dignity and vnspeakeable Maiesty by me sacrificed to thee him in respect of his infinite dignity thou canstinot refuse nor reiect for his sake reiect not refuse not mee thy Priest offering him to thee make me partaker of his graces c. But thou wilt say perhaps Scholasticus did vndoubtedly beleeue Transubstantiation for hee saith that there is a participation of Christs body from the Altar true hee saith so if hee bee not corrupted but what then Christ saide more Eate this is my body know yee not O yee Pontificians that it is a great mysterie It is a Sacrament of the new Testament and as a Sacrament it must be vnderstood vsed practised remember S. m 1. Corin. 10. Paul twice repeating doe this or doe these things in commemoration of me without all question within this space of a 1000. yeares the canon and liturgy of Masse hath beene so often pared clipped that it is hard to say what Scholasticus composed and therfore vnlesse Scholasticus were a contradicting Scholler to himselfe he must needs bee corrupted if in any place of the Canon he seeme to speak for your transubstantiation But I will acquaint thee by the way courteous Reader with a certaine accident when I was writing vpon this very matter in commeth to my Chamber n M. 1. Col. one of the Ancient Priests of this place pretending not to come to conferre but conferring with me perhaps to draw somewhat out of me touching my resolution but he ingenuously confessed to me at last vpon conference that the Apostles did not institute the Canon of the Masse for arguing with him about some other points and about traditios he acknowledged that traditiōs Apostolical must be carried vp hand in hand from Author to Author vntill the Apostles times what then said I thinke you of the Canon of the Masse is it a Tradition Apostolicall yes without all question said hee a tradition Apostolicall shew me then said I how this Canon is carried vp hand in hand from Author to Author from Record to Record till the Apostles times he failed as Bellarmine himselfe must faile for hee could not goe higher then the time of Gregory and yet not authentically and sufficiently to him neither as I easily shewed and so fell downe the Apostolicall Tradition of the Canon but hee replieth for they are resolued to see and not to see yea but the Doctrine of the Canon was a tradition Apostolicall and may bee carried vp to the Apostles times where said I find you then the eleuation and transubstantiation mentioned in or before Saint Gregories time or in Saint Gregory himselfe I came not to reason said hee well then I replied at least you graunt that the very sorme of the Canon as it is now vsed in the Romane Church cannot be carried vp from record to record from Author to Author vntill the Apostles time he ingenuously granted it and so fell downe the Apostolicall tradition of the Canon of the Masse and withall so ended our conference And here also concluding to speake any more concerning transubstantiation out of Scholasticus I passe ouer to another obseruation in this their Canon and wil shew that their Scholasticus did not beleeue Purgatory flames c. And so downe must their suffragatiue and propitiatory sacrifice for the burning soules in purgatory if the Authority of their Masse must stand I finde expressly that those dead persons for whome prayer is now pretended to bee made by the Romane Church as though they were in the flames of Purgatorie are o In Canone msse in erati◠que incipit memente domi c heere most significantly said to rest in Christ to sleepe in the sleepe of peace now I pray the Pontifician Reader to teach mee what peace in Christ what sleepe in rest is it to bee tormented
errour and no Apostolicall tradition because not clearely knowne nor receiued in Saint Austens time who most expresly in the learnedst and perhaps the last booke he euer wrote except his Retractations affirmeth that y August lib. de ciuit dei 21 cap. 26. see also the 16. chapter perhaps it is true note the word perhaps that there is a purging fire after death by which it is most manifest according to other places of him that the Church in his time did not make Purgatorie sire a tradition Apostolicall or article of faith but of late the Pseudosinode and Schismaticall Councell vnder Eugenius the fourth gathered against that of Basil which had deposed Eugenius before and substituted Felix contrarie to the ancient faith of the Latine and Grecke Church determined Purgatotie pains for a point of faith But of these imaginarie and fatuous flames else where perhaps more largely The word of God as it is expounded of the ancient Fathers doth dispell condemne explode them for if there z Epist ad Rom. 8. 2. ad Corinth 5. ad Thes 1. cap. 4. Apoc. cap. 14. be no damnation to those who die in Christ Iesus beleeuing in him with faith working by charitier and if all those who die in him euen from that moment of death rest from their labors and that no sooner the earthly habitation is left off but an heauenly habitation is put on and those who beleeuing Christ loue Christ desiring to be dissolued and to be with him are with him and if generally the Apostle exhorteth and commaundeth that Christians should not be so much as contristated for those who die in Christ in Iesus and by Iesus by whom and in whom they sleepe with many such like sayings who that is not eyther seduced by his education in poperie or else for his ouercredulitie to their Priests misled will beleeue the imaginarie flames of Purgatorie And heere I constantly affirme and the contrarie cannot be shewed to wit that all those Fathers who alowed praier for the dead were more or lesse to be touched with some one of these errours either that the states of the faithfull departed could not be certaine vntill the day of iudgement and that they were to be kept in certaine receptacles till that time and that none of the departed were to see Gods face vntill the day of iudgement a Austen writeth doubt fully here of in his Enchirid cap. 109. where he affirmeth that sacrifice is offered for the dead either that they may haue full remission or else that their damnation may be more tolerable He teacheth the like lib. 1. de orig enime cap 9. 10. lib. de cura pro mortuiâ— cap. 1. Azor. lib. institut 10. cap. 22. affirmeth that it was the doctrine of certaine ancient that their Masse did profit and ease the soules damned in hell or else that the verie soules of the damned in hell might be holden by prayers as Iohn b Damascen erat de mortuis ciacon Aquinas alis Damascene approuingly relating the historie of Trajanes soule doliuered by Saint Gregorie seemeth to hold and all those who account the historie of Falconillas deliuerie by the prayers of Tecla to be authenticall seeme to affirme And as for the historie of Traians deliuerie by Saint Gregories prayers although it be impugned by some later authors yet the historie is to be seene painted in Saint Gregories Monasterie at Rome the which also the great Ignatian Salmeron acknowledgeth by which it is most manifest that the opinion teaching that damned soules in Hell might be holpen or eased by the prayers of some liuing seemed not so extrauagant and improbable in the Romane Church when time was by all which and much * Ciprian seemeth to shew how the commemoratâ—ue sacrifice was offered for martyrs in coÌ„memoration of them Cyprian epist 62. lib. 3. lib. 4. epist 5. in like sort Ciril speaketh in Cateches more that might be said to the same purpose the courteous Reader may obserue how one errour breedeth another to wit vncertaintie of estate of the soules departed vntill the day of iudgement prayers for them prayers for them Purgatorie fire Purgatorie fire requiem Masses and Purgatorie sacrifices for them and their fabulous Indulgences with such like errours There be many other things which I might iustly taxe in the Canon of their Masse as repugnant to all antiquitie and consequently not Apostolicall the dreadfull eleuation of the Sacrament not onely to be reuerenced as a Sacrament of God but to be adored and inuocated as the diuine Maiestie it selfe their carrying vp and downe the said Sacrament in their processions But as execrable rather then as inexcusable I doe abhominate that Papall custome and Nouell fashion of theirs by which they set the Sacrament vpon a white palfrey to be caried before their holinesses whithersoeuer they shall make their progresse to shew perhaps that they will be like the virginall Saints in heauen b Apoc. 14. who follow the Lambe wheresoe uer he goeth O mercifull Sauiour of mankind c Psal 118. tempus faciendi dissipauerunt legem tuam It is high time to doe they haue dissipated thy law in steede of thy diuine Maiestie they haue set vp a God dwelling in their tabernacles in their towers and call the same their God the God of fortitude the God of strength and insteed of that thy onely sacrifice of the Crosse daily honoured inuocated commemorated by thy faithfull Seruants the Chimericall and imaginarie reall carnall sacrifice of your selfe in bread and wine vpon their idolatrous Altars Open their eyes thou who art the onely Sacrifice oblation redemption and deliuerance of all mankinde by that oblation which thou diddest once make for vs all vpon the Crosse looke downe and consider how they abuse thy holy rite and institution which thy Maiestie appointed and all thy ancient Church receiued according as thy d Math. 28. Mark 14. Luke 22. 6. Paul 1 ad corinth 11. Euangelists and Apostle deliuered vnto them that all thy faithfull should receiue the Sacrament whole and intire in both kinds yet now c Conc. Trident. sess 21. comes the Tridentine Fathers and they do not only decree one kind to be enough but they also accurse and execrate they curse and thou wilt blesse all those who shall obserue and teach as necessarie thy institution and shall practise according as all the Prime and ancient Churches did and this their treacherie they will excuse by protesting take a Helen without an excuse so the TrideÌ„tine is named by Espencaus in his Commentarie vpon Titus that the ancient Church neuer vsed the Sacrament vnder both kinds out of opinion of necessity as though your holy institution your commandement deliuered and inculcated by the Apostles and Euangelists did not bind vnder necessitie But they will thus at their pleasures only like the f 2. Thess 2. Outlaw or lawlesse man by whom they were authorised for this described by your
Apostle in his Epistle to the Thessalonians change your law and dissipate the eternall league of the new and eternall testament It will here be expected perhaps that I deliuer my sense and Catholike beleefe touching this most venerable Sacrament It is truly the same with that of the ancient Fathers of the Church in whose words I will by and by expresse my faith the which I see also most clearely agreeing with the reformed Lyturgie of the English Church and the articles concluded and agreed vpon by publike consent in the conuocations of the English Church which Lyturgie and Articles when I lately most seriously perused considered I saw a vehement propension resolution in the authors of thē with all reuerence to embrace what was most agreeing to the word of God to that which the ancient Primitiue Church taught deliuered the which had I neuer read I could neuer so haue thoght of thē the english church Lyturgy therof both are in such vile obloquies with the Pontificiās But I now perceiue that the aduersaries g Isai 28. posuerūt spē fuā mendaciū they haue made not one ly but infinte lies and calumniations against the Church of England their hope for in their schooles and Seminaries they commonly make their aduersaries speake what they list and so to impugne and confute them and teach their young souldiers of Sanders his holy quarrell to doe the like But to returne to my purpose my Catholike faith concerning this dreadfull Sacrament I will deliuer in the words of some of the ancient and Catholike Fathers Saint Austen expounding that h Iob. 6. sentence and commandement of our Sauiour nisi mandus aueritis c. vnlesse you shall eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud you shall not haue life in you i August lib. 3. de doctr Christ cap. 16. saith thus he seemeth to commaund a crime and a wickednesse it is a figure therefore commanding vs to communicate with our Lords passion and that we profitably and sweetly lay vp in our memory that his flesh was wounded and crucified for vs. The same he confirmeth in his k Tractat. 27. in John Treatise vpon S. Iohn where he greatly taxeth the ignorance and mistaking of the Capharnaites who thought that Christ intended to giue them such flesh to eat as themselues were that is true flesh whereas saith Saint Austen Christ in those words couered a grace And in another place vpon the l Psal 98. Psalmes thus he writeth most perspicuously Spiritualiter intelligite c. vnderstand that which I haue spoken spiritually not this bodie which you see you shall eate neither shall you drinke that bloud which they who shall crucisie me will shead I haue commended vnto you a certaine Sacramēt which being spiritually vnderstood will quicken you And how this Diuine misterie being a Sacrament taketh the name of the thing whereof it is a Sacrament heare him clearely declaring the same to m Epist 23. ad Bonif. Bonifacius an Earle in Africke Sacraments saith he haue a certaine resemblance of the things whereof they are Sacraments * See Theodoret for this purpose in dialog impatib and for that resemblance they take the names commonly of the things themselues and therefore as the Sacrament of Christs bodie is after a sort Christs bodie and the Sacrament of Christ bloud his bloud so the Sacrament of faith to wit Baptisme is faith thus he like is the authoritie related in their n De consecrat dist 2. cap. hoc est quod Canon Law Sicut ergo celestis c. Therefore euen as the heauenly bread which is the flesh of Christ after this manner is called the bodie whereas it is truly a Sacrament of the bodie of Christ that which visible palpable mortall was put on the Crosse and the verie immolation which is done by the hands of the Priest is called the passion of Christ the death of Christ and the crucifying of Christ not in truth of the thing but in a signifying misterie so the Sacrament of faith which is Baptisme is vnderstood faith Againe f Contra adimāt cap. 13. Saint Austen non dubit auit c. Our Lord doubted not to say this is my bodie when he gaue a signe of his bodie and therefore vpon Saint c Tract 59. in Iohn Iohn although hee acknowledged Iudas to haue receiued buccellam dominicam the Lords morsell yet he receiued not saith hee bread the Lord but the bread of the Lord of which words what other meaning can there be But that bread of the Lord is onely the outward Sacrament which Iudas receiued but bread the Lord is the same Sacrament receiued by the religious and faithfull who withall beleeueth thinketh loueth and hopeth in and vpon Christ crucified as his Sauiour and so in soule by faith and loue eateth him and receiueth bread the Lord according to that of the same u August tract 25. in Ioh. Father beleeue and thou hast eaten and that of Saint x Bernard serm 3. in Psal qui habitat Bernard when they heard him say vnlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud they said that this is an hard speech and departed from him and what is to eate his flesh and drinke his bloud but to communicate with his passion and to imitate that conuersation which he held To these Fathers for this purpose I adioyne Saint y Ephrem in Harding against the challenge of D. lewel Ephrem thus confessing Inspice diligenter c. Beholde diligently how taking bread into his hands hee blesseth and breaketh it in a figure of his immaculate bodie and in a figure of his precious bloud he blesseth and giueth the Cup to his disciples thus he z Lib. 4. contra Marcio cap 40. Tertullian when he was a sound Christian Catholike thus pronounced Iesus Christ when he tooke bread and distributed it to his disciples made it his bodie saying this is my bodie that is to say the figure of my bodie And a gaine in another a Lib. 3 cap. 19. contra Mar. place he speaketh thus to Marcion God in your Gospell called bread his bodie that by the same thou maist vnderstand that to bread he hath giuen to be a figure of his bodie but a figure it should not be if it were not a bodie of truth thus he I will adioyne two places out of Eusebius who liued then when the Pastours of the Church were most vigilant against all errours and heresies and therefore they would not haue suffered this doctrine in Eusebius touching the Sacrament if it had not beene agreeing to the Catholike faith of that time Christ hauing offered b Eusebius de demonst Euang. lib. 1. cap. 10. saith he himselfe for a soueraigne sacrifice to his Father ordained that we should offer a remembrance thereof vnto God in steede of a Sacrifice which remembrance we celebrate by the
whereof they are Sacraments to wit Sacramentally in signification operation efficacy Saint Irenaeus meaneth as it is most cleare that naturall bread and naturall wine which are the things offered as hee most often and significantly affirmeth Christ confessed to be his body and his bloud the which because they can not be truly and really without implying of contradiction or without destruction of the creatures which he most clearly denieth and is most euidently against all the whole discourse of that Father they must bee therefore the body and bloud of Christ sacramentally according to the doctrine of Saint Austin in Eâ—pist 23. his Epistle to Boniface and according as Baptisme wherewith we are regenerate is called water and the holy Ghost not as though the substance of the Holy Ghost were a substantiall part of the sacrament And whereas the same Father expresly deliuereth thus Quemadmodum enim qui est c for euen as the bread which is from the earth receiuing the inuocation of God is now no more common bread but the Eucharist consisting of two things earthly and heauenly so our bodies receiuing the Eucharist are not now corruptible hauing hope of resurrection It is heere manifest that he will haue the Sacrament and Sacrifice of the Church to consist of two things one earthly the other heauenly that is of bread which is earthly and of the earth and the heauenly which is heauenly because sitting in Christ at the right hand of God his Father and so according to the nature of Sacraments it is easily conceiued how this Sacrament may consist of two things one earthly the element and the other heauenly the thing of the Sacrament like as Baptisme consisteth of g Iohn 3. water and the holy ghost one signifying the other signified one present the other absent one visible the other inuisible one corporall the other spirituall one touching the body the other working in the soule but it is against the nature of Sacraments to haue them truly and really to consist both of the things signified and signifying as together by an essential and real coniunction of presence as is manifest in al other Sacraments with them but especially in baptisme in which a morall and vertuall vnion only not a reall coniunction and * Although the substance of the holy Ghost by his infinâ—ty and immensity bee present in all things euen in the water of baptisme notwithstanding Formally and in respect of this presence he worketh not in the Sacraments presence of the holy Ghost in substance with water and in water is necessary Moreouer this holy Father affirmeth that like as the bread of the Eucharist is not common breade â—â—ter inuocation of God so our bodies receiuing the Eucharist are not corruptible hauing hope of the resurrection consider curteous Reader how our bodies are by this Fathers saying incorruptible to wit by hope of Resurrection not because they are by substance or any intrinsecall quality in them made incorruptible but onely for the relation and the respect to incorruption which they shall put on at the generall resurrection euen so the bread and the wine are still earthly after consecration they loose not their natures as h Dialogâ— Impatib Theodoretus saith but in respect of the sacramentall coniunction respect and relation which they haue to Christs body and his blood they are said with the same body and blood to make the Eucharist and so the Eucharist to consist onely of two things one Earthly and the other Heauenly as this Father deliuereth and this is that which i Ciprian de vnctione Crismat If this book be his the Aduersaries vse it Saint Ciprian saith speaking how bread and wine are the body and blood of Christ different kinds saith hee and names induced to one essence and the signes signifying and the things signified called by the same names And saint Ambrose thus k Amb. lib. 6. ca. 1. de Sacram. therefore for a similitude thou receiuest the sacrament but obteinest the grace and vertue of the true nature I will yet with thy patience curteous Reader adde one sentence of an Africane Father in his booke de fide ad Petrum which booke many assigne to Saint Augustine but the Authour is l Fulgent de fide ad Petrum c. 19 Fulgentius an Auncient Father and Saint firmissime tene c hould most firmely neither in any sorte doubt of this that the onely begotten Sonne of God taking our flesh vppon him did offer himselfe as a sweete smelling Sacrifice to GOD to whome and the Father and the Holy Ghost the Prophets the Patriarkes and Priests in the olde Lawe Sacrificed bruite Beasts and to whom in the new Testament now with the Father and the Holy Ghost the Holy Catholike Church throughout the vniuersall Worlde doth not cease in Faith and Charitie to offer the true Sacrifice of Breade and Wine in those carnall Sacrifices there was a figuration of the flesh of Christ which he should offer and of the bloud which he should shed for the remission of our sinnes in this sacrifice there is a thansgiuing and a remembrance of the flesh which hee hath offered and of the bloud which he hath shed for vs thus hee describing the faith of the Apostolike Church in his time and of the Reformed English Church now Weighing all these authorities with infinite like which may bee brought out of all Antiquity I haue greately meruailed how Transubstantiation hath crepte so farre into the Church as to haue the same defined in so great a Councell as that of Laterane was doubtlesse it is to bee imputed to some hiperbolicall speeches of certaine Fathers and to that disposition of all sorts of people who like as the m Exod. 32. Iewes in the wildernesse desire some visible God to goe before them whom they might adore as present and inuocate and offer sacrifice vnto him but doubtlesse most of all it is to bee attributed to the pride of the Romane Bishops in whose Sees the mistery of iniquitie hath been euer working more or lesse within some small space after the Apostles times that thereby the Prophecie of two Apostles n 2. Thes 2. et Apocal 17. S. Paul and S. Iohn might take place and Rome with her spirituall whorâ— domes might apostatate from Christ and fornicate with the Kings and Nations of the worlde and that of Christ be fulfilled that when the Sonne of man commeth he should hardly finde faith vpon earth It cannot bee doubted but that there haue bene alwaies some still succeeding the Ancient Fathers such as Bertram Berengarius Scotus Wallafrid Alfrike Archbishop of Yorke in his Epistle to Wolstane who more or lesse haue written against Transubstantiation the bookes of whom as well as of diuers others wee may thinke haue beene suppressed as well as that many others for the supporting of Transubstantiation and of many other Popish Positions haue beene deuised by some Popish Monks of the Roman Church before
knowing that he was otherwise of a ciuill conuersation although not deseruing the applause which is now giuen him his conuersation being verie ordinarie himselfe much giuen to drinke hot Sacks of which also he tooke very plentifully the day before his death as very honorable persons do testifie a liquor not fit for such as liue with ease studying little and praying little and haue saturitie of bread and conuerse much amongst womeÌ„ but he is with his Iudge hath receiued accordingly as he was found going hence either good or bad and if his repentaÌ„ce were sincere doubtlesse he hath found mercy Againe dregs because this their Papall h Antonine a Saint with theÌ„ holdeth that the Pope by his absolute power can deliuer all soules out of Purgatorie Anton. 3. titulo 22. cap. 5. Monarchy of the Pope ouer the souls in Purgatory is not to deliuer theÌ„ ther out by way of impetration or intercession only but by way of suffrage iust exchange by paying paine for paine debt with debt the paine of soules with the paine of Christ and his Saints and yet I call these dregs because as it seemeth few PontificiaÌ„s do beleeue them to be of like force as they sound for the most of theÌ„ after they haue procured trentals of Masses vpon trentals for their departed friends soules yet still they remaine in doubt of their friends states and do procure new Masses vpon Masses Doubtlesse it were good his holines would determine what number of Masses is sufficient bing accompanied with his powerfull grains to deliuer a soul out of Purgatory as wel as he determineth what number maner of miracles are sufficient for the inrolling one into his Calender of Saints for otherwise the iudiciall discreet Pontifician will easily grow to suspect that neither Masse nor grain are of so great validity and valor as is pretended if after so many of theÌ„ celebrated for one soule yet still more are required Surely Robert Parsons who died not long ago in Rome had one of these graines plenaries for you shall seldom heare any Ignatian according to their fashion for others pray for the rest of his soule perhaps they repute him a Saint as some seemed to doe in Rome who got some of his haire to keepe it for a relicke therein some what more wise then a certaine person within this Citie of no very good name who washing the night before his death Roberts the Monks feet lately executed at Tiborne pared off some of one of his nailes to keepe the same for a great relicke but Robert Parsons as his life and conuersation was but ordinary not passing vertuous in any respect as all indifferent persons will say who haue conuersed with him so his end was but ordinary in respect of Sanctity and in some respect not like a Saint because as I haue beene credibly informed by those that were there at his death he talked idlely and raued some whole daies before his end a thing though very ordinary with such as dye of burning feuers as it is reported he did yet not vsually in Saints and it is thought that his sicknesse first grew vpon him for that there was a question made about the hauing his bookes examined in the inquisition it had so beene if their great Cardinall Bellarmine with Aquauiua their General had not stood for him as is reported But to returne to indulgences it seemeth that Popes themselues haue little better esteeme of them then dregs who make such hauock of them Great is that priuiledge of the Carmelites who haue obtained of some holy Pope or other that no one of their order shall abide longer in purgatory then vntil the next saturday after their death This their priuiledge was publiquely defended in Paris in the yeer of our Lord 1601. by Iames Rampont a Carmelite vnder the moderation of their most wise and learned Master Bartholmew Girart a Nauarricke as Mounsieur Pierre Moulin deliuereth in his defence of his Maiesties Pierre du moulin en sa defense Article vingtvniesme most Christianlike and learned premonition to all Christian Princes As liberall if not more liberall was Innocent the fourth who graunted to all such as fought by his authority and commaund against Conradus forgiuenesse of all their sinnes not onely for themselues but for their friends also as k Paris in Henrico 3. ad ann 12â—1 Mathew of Paris recordeth like was the greate liberality of Pope l Epist leodien contra PaschaleÌ„ Paschall to the Earle of Flaunders if he would vpon his commaundement despoile and afflict the Church and Cleargie of Leedes for ioyning in true obedience to their lawfull Emperour Henry the fourth with innumerable such like dregges haue Christian People and kingdomes beene bewitched since the time of the Diuels rage and losing Who can sufficiently deplore the miseries of these times Who will not cry out O manners O Times and bewaile these crooked and distorted soules of men bewaile such Marchandizing traffique of soules which is now growne so vsuall that at Rome there is a booke printed called the m Liber intitulatus Taxa cancellariae seu penitentia Apostolicae taxe of the Apostolical penitentiary in which book there are taxes for dispensations for absolutions of all sorts and according to the greater or lesser difficulty of the dispensation and absolution greater or lesser is the mony-taxe for money is all in all and all is vendible at Rome for mony God Altars and all as Baptista Mantuanus long agoe deplored yea n Berv. de considerat ad Eugen lib. 4. cap. 2. Saint Bernard challengeth Eugenius Pope thus Giue me but one in all that populous City of Rome who gaue consent to thy election to be Pope but either it was for present paiment or for hope of paâ—ment If so ô holy Bâ—rnard then hardly was Eugenius an Apostolicall Pope for if Simon who would onely haue bought for money power to giue the holy ghost lost all the lot and part he o Acts. Apo. c. 8. had with Christ as that Peter saide which could not deceiue then Eugenius who really came into the Papacie by Simony as almost all others now doe as both Heauen earth will witnesse hath no lot no part in sermone isto saith p Ibidem Peter in this speech in this Faith and Church of Christ and so Eugenius no Pope and so neither his successours There was lately in this City a very vnlearned Franciscan Frier who had store of this treasure out of the merits of his Parent Saint Francis for all men who knew his conuersation will sweare he had no superfluity of merits of his owne to bestow vppon others and yet hee The worst PoÌ„tifician Priests commonly most â—ought after was daily more frequented and visited then the grauest in the prison where he was for so it is that many English pontificians seeke such ignorant and intemperate Ghostly Fathers as by experience can
the diuine and publique seruice throughout all Churches of the West what else do they intend but that the Pope may reigne throughout all those Churches which more or lesse through his excommunications interdicts promotions presentations and through the imbecility of Princes and the blinde ignorance of Christian people he hath conquered to his tiranny Baptizing them after the name of his See of Rome Romane Catholikes not after the name of Christ Christian Catholikes for Christian is a name now out of vse vnlesse it bee in the reformed Churches of Christ where Christ is truly and only honoured and glorified but howsoeuer the Popes tiranny bee applauded in seruice of vnknowne tongues doubtlesse the u 1. Petr. 5. Roaring Lion laugheth thereat to see by his institution warres to bee proclaimed against Gods Scriptures and all Antiquity God to bee depriued of his Honour which consisteth in the vnderstanding seruice and religion of the heart for he being a spirit x Iohn 4. in spirit and truth hee must bee adored the Christian flocke to bee dispoiled of their spirituall deuotion and comfort which is not possibly to bee had without the conceiuing and vnderstanding of such things by which the spiritual comfort is to be brought and ingendred in their soules They pretend forsooth that the misteries of their Masse will bee had in greater admiration if they be not in a tongue vnderstood by the common people Alas how wisely for I hope their people must vnderstand the mysteries of the Masse and therein be instructed as their Tridentine Catechisme commaundeth and as the Rhemists glory in their preface to the new Testament and if they must bee instructed to vnderstand the Diuine rites and Ceremonies Why may they not bee permitted to haue the seruice in a tongue that they doe vnderstand Their goodly argument that some of the auncient Fathers carried the mysteries of the Church closely in the primitiue daies falleth of it selfe for was not that done in respect of the Infidels and Catechumens but as for the faithfull they all well knew that phrase norunt fideles the faithfull haue knowen and they vnderstood all the mysteries for the most part The primitiue Church practised faithfully that of Christ y Mat. 8. Luc. 12 quod in aure c that which you heare in the eare preach vpon the tops of houses but although you were iustly afraid to haue your Masse mysteries celebrated in known tongues in respect of infinite impertinencies and contradictions that are in it why should you not suffer so much as is read of holy Scriptures in your Liturgies to bee read and song in tongues known to the Church And what may bee thought that Christs Apostles would write their Gospels and Epistles in the Greeke tongue Saint Mathew in his Gospell and Saint Paul in his Epistle to his Countrimen writing in the Hebrew tongue onely excepted but for that the Greeke tongue was most common throughout the East part of the world where Christian Religion was first planted And in the Primitiue Church al * I desire the learned Pontificians to tell me whether the Apoâ—riphall Liturgies of Iames Basil Chrisostom Ambrose yea of S. Peter also which they falsly pretend were not written by them in the most vulgar tongues vsed then in their churches confesse your tiranny O yee Romans and abuse Gods Church no longer Church-seruice was in this part of the World of Europe and that of Asia for most part in the Hebrew Greeke or Latine tongues because the same were more or lesse common where Christianity was first planted as for other countries where the Gospell was preached as first in AEthiopia who is ignorant but that the Churches Liturgie was from the time of the Eunuch vntill this day in the AEthiopian tongue Sclauonians had the like Armenians the like Egiptians the like Grecians the like Latines the like Hebrews the like and what doubt can bee made but that the Indian Conuerts by Saint Thomas had the like And wheresoeuer the Apostles planted any Churches what question can be made but that they did obserue the rule and z 1. Corin. 14. commaundement of the Lord to his Apostles that euery thing should bee done to edification and that glorious prophecie should bee fulfilled euery a Philip. 2. tongue shall confesse to his name yea the very Formes of all Church-seruices doe clearely shew that the People and Clergie were answerablye to conioyne their prayers together and to answere each other as it is deliuered in the b Constitut Apostol Clementis Cirill in Catech. mistagog Iustin Apolog. 2. ad Antoâ—mum liturgiae Iacobi Chrisosto Ambro. Basil saepe constitutions of the Apostles the olde Liturgies and other Auncient Fathers and what else did the comming downe of the Holy Ghost in the formes of so many fiery tongues at Whitsontide else portend and signifie but that euery tongue should confesse the name of our Lorde IESVS and where this more meetely then in their publique assemblies where they were to honour GOD and yeelde to each other all spirituall Comforte and consolation which could not nor cannot bee performed in dumbe and barbarous shewes I cannot heere omit to set downe a point of simplicity of their great Doctor Doctor Harding who answering an obiection made by D. Iewel out of Saint c Basil Hexamer hom 4. Basil affirming that the people together men women and children made a sound in their answers in the Churches in the publike seruice to God like to the sound of a waue striking vpon the Seabanks This profound d Harding answere to Bishop Iewels challenge page 8. Doctor would haue Saint Basil vnderstood onely of the peoples sounding the word Amen wisely insooth Doubtlesse the Doctor was in a dreame or else forgot what Countryman Saint Basil was or of what countrey people that Father speaketh e August in Psal 16. expos 2 Harding supra if he had remembred Greece or euer read any of the Greeke Lyturgies or seene the Greeke publike seruice which vpon the day of Saint Athanasius the Grecians are permitted to celebrate in their owne tongue in Rome he would haue well vnderstood that the Grecian Christians make longer answers and responses in the publike Church seruice then Amen But his answere to an authoritie produced by that learned Bishop out of Saint Austen perhaps is wiser no insooth more fond heare it Quid hoc sit c. what this is saith Saint Austen after we haue prayed to God to make vs cleane from our priuate sinnes we must vnderstand that we ought to sing as with humane reason not with voice as birds doe for Owsels Popiniayes Rauens and Pyes and such like birds oftentimes be taught of men to sound they know not what thus Saint Austen Now it is manifest that these words are to be taken of vnderstanding what is sung but what answereth Doctor Harding to them marry thus These words are to be taken of the vnderstanding of the sense saith
same Church so Apostolicall so Christian that me thought I saw the very Primitiue faith and practise of the Apostles and the verie rites of their Church to be in it obserued And in these obseruations I began more inwardly to be moued because as my knowledge and inclination to allow of the Church of England and to abhorre the Romane heresies and abuses increased so also my soule increased in the loue of God detestation of sinne and auoiding the occasions of sinne the loathing of this life and an earnest desiring to be with Christ whom since my renouncing of Papistrie with the Father and holy Ghost as my soule euidently testifieth vnto me I do most sincerely loue and esteeme aboue all things in this world and so fully with my whole soule heart that me thought I could comfortably and confidently say vnto it with the words of the holy Prophet k Psal 114. conuertere c. my soule be couerted into thy rest for the Lord hath done well to thee And I could not me thought hinder the working of God within me nor refuse that testimony of S. Paul the holy l Ad Rom. 8. Ghost giueth testimonie vnto our soules that we are the children of God yet so if we suffer with Christ that we may also raigne with Christ The ninth Motiue I Should heere adde somewhat largely of their pernicious The ninth Motiue doctrine of equiâ—ocation which hath beene another no small Motiue with me for my conuersion which doctrine the Ignatians haue specialy set a foote at least in practise within this kingdome they forsooth who will not permit that the Scriptures of God should be promiscuously read by the vulgar people haue in their vulgar language in Pamphlets rather libels being without name dispersed throughout this kingdome the pestiferous doctrine of equiuocation with their strange and paradoxicall half propositions Amphibologies propositions forsooth out of their r Treatise of equiuocation written or published by Henry Garnet Ignatian Logicke halfe written halfe spoken halfe concealed and why bring they not in also as well propositions of a triple difference whereof one part may be spoken a second written a third concealed and not vttered and why not propositions of a quadruple difference as part written part spoken part by signes and part by concealment and so make mentall verball written and dum or silent propositioÌ„ all in one to set vp their vaine doctrine of equiuocation Some ingenious Pontificians of my acquaintance there are who do what you can yet you cannot driue this doctrine of equiuocation into their heads but such as haue beene brought vp vnder the Ignatians and are deuoted vnto them they haue their lesson at their fingers ends Not long since there was Å¿ Iohn Koome one of these Ignatian Priests who being examined by the Archibishop of Canterburie not long before his death did not onely denie himselfe to be a Priest but also by religious oath did forsweare the same being challenged for it he excused the same by the art of equiuocation stoutly auouching that he had beene so taught by his master a reader of the societie of Ignatius and indeed it is the doctrine almost of them all that any proposition whatsoeuer is or may be allowed by the art of equiuocation the same also may be confirmed and auerred true by religious oath and yet this equiuocating swearer so ready to forsweare and deny his Priesthood was a most bitter enemie against all such as would take or allow the taking of the oath of Alleageance in any sense whatsoever I could produce many such examples of equiuocating Ignatians one I will not omit of a friend of the Ignatians who wouldfaine haue beene an Ignatian before this but that Master Strange the Ignatian lately banished * R. C. the common collector for Recusants by the art of equiuocatioÌ„ protested to certaine Priests in the Clinke cóplaining of their wants the very day before the 1000 and certain 100 of pounds were taken from him that he knew not in the world where to fetch 20 shall this man had not sorgotten his Accidence rule huic habeo non tibi I dare auouch there is no day passeth in which he doth not religiously vse this art Some three daies since the 9. of Ianuary he hath sent in writing an equiuocating super sedeas that because he was thé sicke with an il stomack for the oath of allegeance he would provide for the Clinke prisoners no longer out of the towre told him that his imperfections should not be laid vpon their order being of such rare pharisaicall perfection forsooth This man is gracious with diuers worthie persons of the feminine sexe into whole fauours he hath wound himselfe so greatly that he can obtaine one of their fauours to weare next his skinne and ouer his whole bodie a whole weeke togither yea in the time of his holy imprisonment to comfort his imprisoned corps Freshly vpon the discouerie of the damnable powder-treason it was his chance to be taken to be brought before the honorable Lord Maior of London by whom being examined vpon suspition of his person and religion and asked whom he thought to be head of the Church of England without any difficulty he answereth thus the King which his answere might well haue deceiued that honorable person if he had not more narrowly obserued some other of his answers in which he found him faultering and thereupon committed him to the Counter where he staid not long he being afterward questioned withall by some zealous Romane Catholicks how he could without deniall of his faith concerning their article of the Popes supremacie acknowledge the King to be supreme head of the Church what replieth he peremptorily I meant not the King of England but the King of heauen the truest word he euer spoke for the King of heauen is indeed the onely supreme head of the Church of England and he added that he thought in respect of the dangers of the times that he might iustly vse such equiuocation Pardon me courteous Pontifician Readers that I thus particularize this man there is more in store I doe it onely that our English Ladies and some worthie persons of the deuout sexe may know what manner of men those are to whom they commit their secrets And if he hereafter deale with some of them as he hath alreadie dealt with a verie worthie Ladie too worthy for him or any other Pontifician Priest they will haue no great cause of Comfort in him or his like I could discipher the spirits of some other equiuocating and dicing westerne Priests to conceale the rest God turne their hearts to consider the states in which they stand and vouchsafe O mercifull Iesus in t 1. Pet. 2. whose mouth was found no guile nor deceit rather to confound them then suffer them to defend their equiuocating practise by your most sacred doctrine and immaculate examples of your purest conuersation The tenth Motive TO proceed
hath been by my selfe euer obserued that such as adict themselues to the reading of holy Scriptures are euer more or lesse inclining to think well of the reformed Churches and of their doctrines which are so liuely deliuered in them and out of my reading of holy Scriptures which I haue euer daily vsed more or lesse it hath fallen out that I haue many times contended for argument sake against some doctrines and practises of the Romane Church and therefore it is that the wise mens libeller chargeth mee with the spirit of Contradiction blessed bee that spirit of contradiction which hath brought me to be a child of adoption as I humbly trust and beleeue I now am z 1. Peter 2. A second Generall Head of Motiues out of their wicked Lawes COnsidering many and vniust Lawes vnto which the Romane Bishops haue against all Christian holy liberty and to the subuersion of many soules and the great dishonour of God tied their followers the which as I haue oftentimes heeretofore greatly admired not seeing how they might be defended so God now vouchsafing to open my vnderstanding I doe greatly detest them For me to expresse all those which are both paradoxicall and pernitious were too great a labour I will therefore touch some few of them which are in truth very many and yet I meruaile they are no more Considering the pernitious and shamelesse Doctrine of Cardinall a Bellar. lib. 4. de pont cap. 5. lib. Pecog in recog li. de summe Pont. cap. 19. Bellarmine who both in his controuersies and in his recognitions reacheth that although the Popes should command any things in their Lawes as Vertues which are Vices yet the whole Church is bound to obey the voice of their pastor and to receiue the same vicious Lawes as if they were Lawes of Vertues but hee will seeme to mitigate this his strange position forsooth by adding that this his doctrine is to bee vnderstood of lawes concerning doubtful Acts of Vertues or Vices not in Acts necessary Thus hee very wisely breatheth heare and cold together and what c Bellar. columeÌ„ Ecclesie et 〈◊〉 tempestutio Augustinus â—â—dâ—mi confutat l Anti. p. 48. O Bellarmine tell me you that are by Andrew Eudemon your Cretensian Ignatian brother called the Piller of the Church and the Augustine of this our time cannot the infalliblenesse of the Popes Spirit so guide and assist him that he shall not erre in proposing any vniuersall law to the Church the which shee is bound to receiue as you say And tell mee O Ignatian pillar what mattereth it to saluation or damnation whether the things of themselues bee necessary or not if the Pope by his Commandement make them so necessarie as the whole Church shall be bound vnder paine of mortall sinne and consequently vnder paine of damnation to receiue them though vitious as you teach alas how perplexed is the state of Pontificians if this Bellarminian doctrine bee true they must commit vice to obey the Pope and so bee condemned therefore or else for the Popes sake God will fauour them so much as not to iudge them according to their workes but according to the Popes corrupt affection contrarie to his generall decree deliuered by his d Ad Rom. 2. 13. Psal 61. Iob. 34. Apostle that euery man shall receiue according to his workes The first Law AMongst many of these Lawes first occurreth to my minde that where-with the vncharitable Popes straightly charge that e Caput à vobis secundo cap. sacris de sententia excomm CoÌ„cil Trident. Sess 22. cap. 2. 6. Aqu. 3. q. 79. art 7. ad 2. Sotus lib 9. de instit q. 2. art 2. ad 3. the sacrifice of their Masse the which they beleeue to bee the propitiatorie oblation and selfe same Christ which was sacrificed for the whole world vpon the Crosse to be offered by any of their Priests for any excommunicated person or by name for any Infidels and Heretikes by them for such reputed whether they be subiects or Soueraignes A law and custome most contrarie to the nature of the propitiatorie sacrifice of the Crosse the which as it was once most sufficiently and abundantly offered for the redemption of all so it should be continually remembred and faithfully beleeued for the saluation of the whole Church of Gods Elect yea and most religiously to be inuocated and praied vnto for the conuersion and saluation of all sinners whatsoeuer Turkes Iewes Heretikes or Infidels for so much as may lie in vs to doe and procure considering that it is the holy f 1. Tim. 2. will of the most immaculate and pious sacrifice of the crosse himselfe that all men should come to the knowledge of his truth for which cause also his blessed Apostle the vessell of election ordained that obsecrations orations postulations and thanksgiuings should be made for all Men for all Magistrates and all such as are in Authoritie and hee giueth the reason of this his ordinance because as much as in him is God would haue all men to bee saued and to come to the knowledge of his truth And although the Pontifician g Remists Annotations in 2. Tim. 2. Remists themselues doe vehemently challenge by these foure different kinds of praiers that the whole order of their Masse is comprehended and specially distinguished citing h Aug. Epist 59 Austens authoritie for the same yet malice suffereth them not to see their owne errout most clearely condemned in this ordinance of the holie Apostle euen as it is by themselues expounded in which hee expresly appointeth that those foure kindes of praiers of which the very second the i Annot. ibidem Remists themselues eagerly expound of that part of their Masse when their Consecration is made and when their Christ sacrificed is most specially offered Obsecrations Orations Postulations and Thanksgiuings and yet who conceiueth their Diuinitie that the word Orations in English in Latine Orationes in Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should signifie properly their Consecration Transubstantiation or Propitiatorie oblation to bee made for all men for Kings who were Heathens when this ordinance was made and all that are in preeminencie But let the holie Apostle ordaine what hee will let the Father St. Austen and others euen in their owne sense expound this ordinance of their propitiatorie Sacrifice yet forsooth the Romane Bishops will seeme to bee so pure that they will not onely refuse Communion with such persons as they doe excommunicate and with Infidels but they will further also out of more then pharisaicall coÌ„tempt renounce the communion of charitie due to enemies and refuse so much as to pray in their publike sacrifice and seruice by name for the * Conflit Clem. lib. 8. cap. 15. conuersion of Infidels or any Heretikes much lesse for any Temporall blessings and prosperities to them yea although they bee their Magistrates their Liege Soueraignes Who knoweth not how the zealous Pontificians and
himselfe was left alone in Israel and that all but hee with Achab and Iezabel the Idolatrous Princes worshipped Baal though euen then and in Israel also not onely in Iuda as the Papists will haue it God had g Ibidem 7000. who had neuer bowed to Baal what would they haue then done would they haue publikely followed the face of that Church and that visible Gouernment and not rather haue beene in society and communion with the inuisible company Or rather I aske would they at that very time haue followed the visible multitude in Iury and Hierasalem which at h Reg 3. cap. 22. 3. Reg. cap. 9. that season did sacrifice and burne incense in the high places by whose Idolatries it cannot be denied but that the whole Church of Iurie was contaminated and polluted at lest with the communion of that Idolatrous multitude although the Priests of Hierusalem withall did offer Sacrifice to the true God of Israel Againe what would these men haue done in the time of Achaz and Manasses in the daies of both which most sacrilegious Kings the Priests with the whole publike visible Church i 4 Reg. 16. 4. Reg. 21. worshipped strange gods would they then haue ioined with the visible Church and haue obeied the Idolatrous high Priest of that time and I hope they will not saie that the Law of k Deuteron 17. Deuteronomy decreeing that who should not obey the high Priests sentence for the time should die therefore did not excuse the whole Church of Hierusalem in obeying Vrias the high Reg. 16. Priest who according as King Achaz of Iuda had commanded him had erected an impious Altar according to that of Samaria setting aside that which God himselfe had appointed vntill the King should determine thereof AgaIne what would these haue done in the time of Annas and Caiphas the high Priests whose precepts and commandements neither Christ nor his Apostles would obey although they sate vpon the chaire of Moses yea and although Christ had before taught the Iewes that they m Math. 18. should doe what the Phariseis and Scribes sitting vpon the Chaire of Moses should teach and command them to doe Belike these men if they had beene in those times regarding the n Deuter. d7 Law of Moses which decreed that whosoeuer disobeied the sentence of the high Priest should die would haue associated themselues with Annas and Caiphas against Christ and his Apostles rather then with the poore contemptible company of Christ disciples which was so small and so inuisible at the time of Christs passion that some of the Aduersaries would seeme to haue it to haue remained and consisted onely in the most blessed Virgin Mary though this most falsely For doubtlesse there were diuers then secretly dispersed in the land of Iewry who beleeued in Christ and had heard nothing of the scandall of the crosse And although o Math. 26. Mar. 14. Luc. 22. Peter with mouth denied and abiured Christ yet I cannot thinke but that faith in his heart was still firme and also that some other of the Apostles and good deuoute women did still in their hearts constantly beleeue in him and were parts of his hidden Church there But the Aduersary will obiect that visible Succession and the Authority of the High Priests in the Church of the old Testament was not a sufficient warrant for such as should follow them commanding any thing against Gods Law Againe that their succession was not to continue but for a time and in the end to bee abolished and quite remooued Good God as though the Law of Deuteronomy were not an euerlasting Law and most expresse for the high Priests authority so expresse that your high Priest now and his p Bellar. lib. 4. de Ron. Pont. â—rp 16. Baron in Annal. Caâ—etan Tollet Stapleton Allen ally Cardinals in his behalfe doe chalenge greatest prerogatiue of power and iurisdiction from the same Good God as though visible succession had not beene promised to be in that place of which q â—sal 131. God said it was his resting place for euer of which Dauid speaking vnto God said thus Arise O God into thy rest thou and the Arke of thy sanctification Of which place King r 3 R g 9. Salomon in his dedication of the Temple spoke such magnificent promises As though Å¿ Ierem. 33 Psal 8. God had not promised visible succession in the 33. of Ieremy in the linage of Leui for euer Protesting that his promise and pact should faile with the day and night before it should faile with the Church of Ierusalem with many yea infinite such like promises in the holy Scriptures and yet notwithstanding the same we see that the succession of that Church is vtterly extirpated How much rather may the Church of Rome haue her succession either extirpated abolished or corrupted the which can shew no speciall promise for her selfe and for her euerlasting establishment there are indeed most firme promises for the Catholike Church of Christ but for the Romane particular Church there are no promses at all if there be any let them be produced And if the Aduersary reply and say the Romane Church was once a Pure Church and a Virgin therefore shee must bee so taken still vnlesse you can precisely shew the time when and by whom corruptions were introduced into that Church Vpon this reply they triumph they insult but it is God wot very vaine for if Cockle and Darnell was to bee sowed by the â— Math. 13. enemy when the Pastors of the Church were a sleepe not sleeping a naturall sleepe but a sleepe of ease security prosperity pleasure ignorance What maruell that the precise time when such cockle and darnell was sowed cannot bee deliuered for tell mee O thou wirty aduersary who should haue specified the time the Pastors they were a sleepe yea and by them sleeping the Diuel sowed cockle and darnell of heresie of idolatry of impurity and therefore a sleeping and a dreaming disputer may I call thee who wouldest bring out sleeping witnesses but yet to satisfie your triumphing reply although the precise times places and persons cannot bee expressed when your heresies first begaÌ„ to take root first to bud or to spring forth yet wee can specifie the very indiuiduall personall singular and speciall persons times and places where when your opinions were first receiued as Articles of Faith and beleefe And what is it not an euident demonstration to shewe any thing to bee nouell and new if it can bee demonstrated when the same was not receiued although the speciall time and maner of the beginning of it cannot euidently bee shewed and demonstrated but onely probably conceiued by some probable coniectures And although the Romane Church doe boast of a visible and a conspicuous company professing Christ although most corruptly continuing from Christs time yet that is not inough vnlesse they can also shew succession in doctrine For a man
who would relie for his saluation vpon the publike and most conspicuous Church professing Christ what should hee haue done in the time of Constantius the Arrian Emperour when the whole visible conspicuous Church ouerwhelmed with Arrianisme decreed in councels so greatly and so dangerously that as u Hierom. aduers Lucâ—feria Saint Hierome reporteth the whole world maruailed how it was become an Arian yea and most lamentable was the face of the visible Church especially in Rome it selfe when Liberius returning out of banishment * Hieron lib. de scriptoribus in fortunat in Châ—on Libertus ipse in Epist ad Episc Orient apud Bellar lib. 4. cap. 9. de Pont. Bellar. ibidâ—m Athanas in Epâ—st ad Soâ—â—t vitam agentes Damasus Pope in Liberio Hilar. lib. contra Constant â—ozom lib. â— cap. 14. Nicepb lib. 9 cap. 37. alij subscribed to the Arian faith which had beene before decreed in diuers publike almost vniuersall Councels of the whole Church as at Millaine at Ariminum c. and by the same subscription confirmed and decreed as a point of Catholike faith what the Bishops before had resolued vpon and subscribed vnto for in the subscription of Bishops and confirmation of Popes consisteth the robour and strength of Romane Articles of faith so infallibly that the whole Romane Church is bound to receiue them to professe them after such decrees and subscriptions And truly the answer which Liberius made before his banishment and whilest hee was constant in the Catholike faith vnto Constantius the Emperor is for the same purpose very worthy reading for whereas the Emperour thus obiected vnto him what was hee and what thought hee of himselfe who would oppose himselfe against all Bishops of the world hee answered not thinking as our men now doe of the Popes sole inerrablenesse neither as daunted with the whole visible multitude against him most resolutely y Theodoret. lib 2. hist cap 16. thus that although hee and Athanasius were z Vbi suut tandem c. Where are they now who exprobrate vnto vs pouerty and do insolently brag of their wealth where are they who define the Church by a multitude and despile the little flocke Gregor Nazianz in Arianos Orat. 11. alone yet the cause of faith was nothing the worse for long ago said hee there were onely three who withstood the Kings hee meaneth Nabuchodonozor commandement but doubtlesse these men who stood so much vpon the visibility of succession and vpon the greatest multitude would vpon the returne of Liberius backe to Rome his sitting in that chaire also some good time before hee againe renounced the communion with the Arrians and their faith to which hee had subscribed before they would surely haue communicated with Liberius and haue despised the contemptible and persecuted Church of Athanasius and Felix with some few Romanes who then rightly beleeued and professed Christ Besides if it bee necessary to ioyne with the greatest multitude professing Christ after the Romane fashion doubtlesse haue was the case of their Romanists in times of their very many very great and grieuous a Certaine Decades of most horrible schismes haue beene in the Romane Church Platina Baron per Anal. schismes when their whole Church hath beene ouerwhelmed with the power of some Anti-Popes besides to argue ad hominem in the time of the Councell of Franck ford when the Bishops of France Germany and England with diuers of Italy decreed against your second Nicene Councell commanding adoration and worshipping of Images what might a faithfull Christian of the West haue done was hee to obey the decree of Franck ford or not if you say yea then your Nicene Councell is condemned if not then alwaies the greatest multitude and the publike visible Pastors though assembled in Councell are not to be obeied which was then very great and conspicuous especially if you had adioyned their authorities with all those Prelates of the East Church who in diuers and suÌ„dry councels vnder Constantine the two Leos who had before condemned the adoration of Images you should haue found the same farre to haue surpassed that of your Tridentine Councell in Germany consisting for most part of your Titulary Italian Bishops In time of the b Coâ—cil Baâ—â— Sess 34. See the Epistle of the Fathers of the Councell of Basile to the Electors of the Empire Tom. 3. Constitutio Imperial pag. 456. Councell of Basile when Eugenius the 4. Pope was deposed and accused by that Councell and Felix elected in his roome by the Bishoppes of France Germany and England with diuers also of Italy and some also of Spaine tell mee were the secret Eugenians in those Kingdomes if there were any bound to follow the greatest multitude of Prelates beware you graunt it for it will not stand with the credite of your visible succession Doubtlesse the state of the Christian Church was such at that time that a Chrrstian was bound onely to adhere to the euerlasting and indeffectible head of his Church Christ Iesus and was no more bound to follow Felix then Eugenius with his councell at Florence the which Schismaticall councell to note by the way was the first that publikely decreed the number of seuen Sacraments and Purgatory fire as soundly and as catholikly as some few yeers after the Tridentine fathers assembled of a few French or Spanish but most Italian Bishops whereof also many were Titular onely and were made to fill vp the number decreed many heretical and most pernicious positions against the ancient and apostolike faith and it is no maruaile they did so egregiously erre for they were not to determine any thing which might displease Rome therefore so soone as some of them beganne to consult about reformation of the Court and Church of Rome with the Bishoppes thereof presently by a peremptory Placet of Pius the fourth the whole Councell was dissolued and their good intentions wholy frustrated they onely leauing behind them their subscriptions to their corrupt decrees which subscriptions notwithstaÌ„ding were neuer made so ful and perfect that the number of the Prelates subscribing hapned to bee one whole hundreth at c Concilium Trident editum a â—innio anie one of their sessions and generall subscriptions But to returne to my purpose if Saint Iohn in his Reuelation doe so clearely pronounce that the woman by whom the Church of Christ is described according to the exposition almost of all is to flee into the desert there to be nourished fauoured and protected by God per tempora tempus dimidium temporis for times for a time and for halfe a time by Apoc. 12. which flight is vnderstood the secretnesse hiddennesse and inuisibility of the true Church not only for three yeers and a halfe as all the Pontificians for most part eagerly doe contend but for some longer time sufficient for the accomplishment of all such things which haue beene foretold by the Prophets but because I would incline