him know that he thereby makes a Schism in the Church which Christ is for having kept one And whether he be Bishop Priest c. he shall be the same to us as Andronicus himself is If any shall communicate wîth one out of communion he himself shall be shut out of communion say the Apostolical Canons If any Bishop or Presbyter receive to communion those who are deservedly cast out of the Church for their crimes he shall be lyable to like Punishments says the Council of Carthage And if any Bishop Priest or other of the Clergy appear to communicate with Persons out of communion the shall also stand excommunicate himself as one who confounds the Canons and Order of the Church say the Fathers in the Synod of Antioch The Reason of all this is because Christians as I said and as the African Fathers observe though dispersed over the most distant Places and Countries are but one Society and though multiplyed into the greatest Number of Assemblies yet all these make but one Body We ought to signifie to each other what is acted in any of our Churches says Alexander Bishop of Alexandria in his Synodical Epistle to all Churches upon his Deposition of Arius and his Adherents that whether one Member or Church suffer or rejoyce all the other Members or Churches may suffer or rejoyce with it or give mutual support and confirm each others Acts and Sentences And this because the Catholick Church is but one Body and we are commanded in the Holy Scriptures to keep up therein the bond of Uaanimity and Peace And Synosius threatning the Receivers of those whom he and his Church had put under Excommunication taxes them therein as I have observed for making a Schism in the Church which Christ is for having kept one The several Orthodox and Regular Churches of Christendom are all Members one of another And from that Communion which ought to be among Members of the same Body what belongs to one belongs to all and what is broke off from one is broke off from all The Canon says Balsamon speaking of the 2d Canon of the Council of Antioch which forbids the communicating of other Churches with those who communicate not with their own Church says all Temples and Oratories wheresoever they are make but one Church And therefore if any Person is cast out of the Church and regularly shut out of the Temples and Oratories of the Orthodox in one Country he ought to be shut out of the Temples and Oratories of all and not to be received to communion by the Clergy of other Countries And like Regard all particular Churches are bound to have to each others Reconciliation and Re-union of Members as to their separation and exclusion of them As in binding so also in loosing our Lord ratifies the Acts of his Officers and Vice gerents in all Churches Whatsoever you shall loose or remit on Earth the same shall be loosed or remitted in Heaven Mat. 18. 18. Jo. 20. 23. And in relaxing or remitting censures as well as in laying of them upon Offenders among their respective Charges Orthodox Bishops act in the Person of Christ as St. Paul says 2 Cor. 2. 10. or as Judices vice Christi Judges that sit in Christs place as St. Cyprian notes of them Till their own Bishop has received them or a Synod has cleared them no other Bishop must receive them to communion says the Canon of Antioch before cited And after he has once received them into his Communion no other Bishops must reject them from theirs They are then re-united again to the Body and are Brethren and Members and as such must be admitted to the Communion of Saints by all other Orthodox Members of the same Body and Brotherhood in all places And thus again they are Schismaticks and break that Unity of one Body which Christ has appointed among all Churches who unduly receive and associate with any other Orthodox and Lawful Churches Schismaticks or Excommunicates If they would keep one with all Orthodox Churches as they must look upon all who are duly united to them as united to themselves so must they look upon all who are duly seperated and broke off from them as seperated and broke off from themselves And to do otherwise is to break this one Communion which is to bind all Orthodox Christians into one Body and to make a Schism in the Catholick Church And in further care and provision for the maintenance of this Catholick Accord and Communion among all Churches by the Ancient Rule of the Church all Orthodox Bishops and Churches were to keep up an Intercourse by communicatory Letters Since the Catholick Church is but one Body and we are commanded in Scripture to keep up the Bond of Unanimity and Peace therein the consequence hereof is that we write or signifie to each other what is transacted in any of our Churches that all the rest as Members may bear their part in the same says Alexander Bishop of Alexandria in his Synodical Epistle which I cited before And Siricius of Rome and together with him the whole World is united in one Communion and Society with us by the Intercourse of communicatory Letters says Optatus of the Church of Africk as it stood divided from the Donatists By these Letters an Account was given to other Churches of any Bishops Advancement when he was Ordained Bishop of his Church or of his own Faith to shew that he and his Church were Orthodox and so duly qualified for Union with other Orthodox Churches and fit to be owned as Members of the Body and admitted as Partners in the Communion of Saints And of their own Members or Ministers their Schismaticks or Excommunicates that among all who should come to them from thence other Churches might know whom they were to receive and whom they were to reject as either of the same or of a different Body with themselves And also of any other Church-Acts or Concerns wherein they could either claim the ratification or desired the concurrence or needed the aid council or support or could bear the burdens help the wants or congratulate the well-fare or prosperity of one another Now as to these communicatory Letters certifying each others Members or Ministers Schismaticks or Excommunicates c. the Catholick Rule of the Ancient Church was That no Strangers or Forreigners should be admitted to the Communion of any Church without them If they who came were Clergy-men they were to bring commendatory Letters testifying their Orders Or if Laity pacifical and communicatory declaring they were in Communion with their own Churches No Stranger or Forreigner shall be received without pacifical Letters say the Council of Antioch And no foreign Bishops Priests or Deacons shall be received without commendatory Letters say the Canons of the Apostles If there come any strange or unknown Clergy let them not by any means be any where received
a Schism from other Catholick Bishops as if they made it from himself And if still he will Communicate and joyn himself to them he violates Unity and joyns in a Schism as any other Man would do who should do the same And being found in the Schism with them he would have been treated as they were and have fallen from the Communion of all other Orthodox and Catholick Bishops whose Rule was to refuse and shun the Communion of Schismaticks and of their adherents and partakers Communicating with men out of Communion he himself would be put out of Communion as the aforecited Councils say And thus it was with Marcianus Bishop of Arles when he fell to Communicate and joyn himself to Novatian who was set up as a Schismatical Anti-Bishop against Cornelius the Rightful and Canonical Bishop of Rome Thereby says St. Cyprian he himself became separate from our Communion and from the Fraternity of Catholick Bishops because Novatian was so to whom he joyned himself The Bishops met in Council in Africk answering him when he sought their Communion that not one of them could communicate with him since he had set up Altar against Altar at Rome and made a Schism from Cornelius who before was Legally Ordained the Bishop of that Church 4. Besides for surer maintenance of Union and to compact several Churches together into a closer dependance there are other Heads of Union among the Bishops themselves Such are Metropolitanes and Primates as Titus I conceive was left by St. Paul at Crete where he was to ordain Elders or Bishops in every City and Timothy at Ephesus where he is Directed how he shall exercise jurisdiction and receive accusations against Bishops which Metropolitanes and Primates are to Unite and incorporate many Bishops and their Dioceses into one Province or several Provinces by their Concurrence into one National Church And such an Head of Union the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury is among the Bishops in the English Church And the Ecclesiastical Union to be kept up among us is a Provincial yea a National Union We are to stand united by our Articles and Homilies Liturgy and Canons And these unite not only the Christians of each Diocess or District to their respective Bishops as so many Diocesan Churches but likewise the Bishops and People of all Diocesses into the Provinces of Canterbury and York and those two Provinces into one National Church Accordingly those Articles and Homilies Liturgy and Canons which are the Rules of keeping Unity among us are Provincial and National Acts pass'd by concurrence of Convocations of both Provinces where the Bishops and Clergy meet in Union with and dependance on their respective Metropolitanes who are the respective Heads thereof Now in care of Unity and the Communion of Saints the respective Bishops of each Province or Country are to keep dependant and united to their Metropolitanes The Bishops of every Nation ought to know him who is their Primate and to account him as their Head say the Apostolical Canons It behoves every Man to know his own proper measure say the Fathers in the Council of Constantinople and that neither a Presbyter contemn his own Bishop nor a Bishop contemn his own Metropolitane And bating the case of Heresie if any Bishop on pretence of other personal Crimes shall depart from the Communion of his Metropolitane before Synodical Sentence pass'd upon him he is guilty of Schism and though there is nothing else against him the Holy Synod decrees him to incur a Deposition And so strict was this dependance upon the Alexandrian Patriark or Metropolitane of Egypt binding them in all things to wait for his Sentence to do nothing without him nor beside or against his Approbation that on the deposition of their Metropolitane Dioscorus in the Council of Chaliedon the Egyptian Bishops pray they may not be compell'd to subscribe Pope Leo 's Epistles before they had a New Metropolitane to head them and accordingly their subscription was respitted by the Council till they should have got one And for maintenance of this Union of several Diocesses into one Province by a joynt-dependance of the several Bishops on their Metropolitane and adherence to him it has been the great Rule of the Catholick Church that none shall be made a Bishop of the Province without him In Consecration of Bishops the validity of all that is done shall be reserved to the Metropolitane says the great Council of Nice and if any one is Ordained a Bishop without his consent it determines and calls it a thing altogether manifest that he ought to be no Bishop It has likewise been another Rule thereof for the same purpose that no Synods for the common Concern of the Province be held without them The Metropolitanes being to summon the Bishops of the Province and it not being lawful for any to make Synods of themselves without them who have the Metropoles committed to them as the Council of Antioch declares Yea that no matters of common concern to the Church in any Country or Nation be transacted without him The Bishops of every Country and Nation being in duty bound to own him who is the chief among them c. and to do nothing that looks beyond their own Precincts or Diocesses or referring to the common state of the Church without his sentence as is Ordained in the Apostolical Canons and repeated in the Council of Antioch And the more firmly to secure this regard and dependance which for maintenance of this Provincial Union is due from Bishops to their Metroplitanes they make solemn Oath at their Ordination to pay all due Riverence and Obedience to him as in our own Office of Consecration And as there is this Provincial and National Union of Churches which is thus secured by the dependance of Bishops on their Meropolitanes so may there be National and Provincial Schisms or Breaches thereof And such there are when Bishops and their Clergy and People break off from their Metropolitane not falling or receding from his Ecclesiastical Authority over them and create to themselves an opposite Primate whom they set up against him For then they will make ordinations and hold Provincial or National Synods and dispatch matters of common or National concern without him so breaking all the Rules Provincial or National Union and dividing themselves from their Head as he is call'd in the Apostolical Canons And when once an Anti-Primate or Metropolitane is made the Head of a Schism it spreads it into all Dioceses which will own him and profess to bear Canonical Obedience and Subjection or adhere to him So that in such a Schism all Dioceses of the Province come in who do not disclaim the Schismatical Head and stand off from him 5. Lastly when there is not only a setting up of Schismatical and opposite Heads but moreover this is done in opposition to pure worship and Doctrine and to support unchristian
but none at all This Ordination of Novatian against Cornelius intail'd a great Division and Competition of opposite Heads upon the Church And the Novatians as may be seen in Sozomen could produce a Succession of Bishops set up to head their Party against the Catholick Bishops in the great Churches But yet excepting St. Cyprian and the Africanes whom St. Basil Notes to have strained the Effects of Schism too far and to have out-shot the Mark in these Points though these were Anti-Bishops the Catholick Church did not look upon them and the Priests Ordain'd by them as meer Lay-men or null their Ordinations Baptisms or other Church-ministrations For on their Return to the Catholick Church the great Council of Nice Decrees That such of them as should be found in the Clergy should be in the same Order and Degree as they had been Ordained to in their own Party And that * having received imposition of Hands or being Ordained before So according to their Degree they should remain in the Rank of the Clergy So that in any City or Town if there were none else in Orders they still should be the Bishops and Priests thereof But if at the Time of their Reconciliation there should be a Catholick Bishop or Priest living there that then the Catholick should have Preference and the Novatian should be content with the Title of a Bishop without the Administration or with a Presbyter or Chorepiscopus's Place that there may not be two Bishops in a City at once Yea and before such Return or Reconciliation to the Church in great straitness or want of opportunities for Worship otherwise the Catholicks resorted to their Churches to partake of Ministerial Offices from them as Sozomen reports they did in the Arian Persecution under Constantius The Other was the Schism of the Donatists begun by Men professing the same Faith by the setting up of Majorinus as and opposite or anti-Anti-Bishop against Caecilian the true and Canonical Bishop of Carthage This Schism set Africk in a Flame and quickly multiplyed into a Number of anti-Anti-Bishops and their Abettors to confront the regular Bishops of the African Churches The Case of these Anti Bishops came about the Year of Christ 314 to be determined by the Synod under Melchiades at Rome And there to heal the Division Melchiades and the Synod as St. Austin relates declared their readiness to send Communicatory Letters to them even to those that appeared to be of Majorinus 's Ordination And decreed that wherescever by reason of the Breach there were two Bishops he should be confirmed who was first Ordained and that for the other another Church or Bishoprick should be provided Which St. Austin applauds as an innocent and perfect a provident and pacifick Judgment And afterwards in the Council of Carthage under Aurelius about the Year of Christ 419. whereas St. Austin himself was present concerning the Reception of the Donatists into the Church 't is decreed That the Donatist Clergy on their return to the Church shall be received in their proper Honours or Degrees of Orders like as 't is manifest they have been received in Africk in Times foregoing And when any People or Diocess are converted from Donatism if at the time of their Conversion they have Donatist Bishops who come over with them without Controversie say they in another Canon they may have them still Besides these famous Instances of opposite or anti-Anti-Bishops the same may likewise appear of others Flavianus from a Presbyter of that Church was set up as an anti-Anti-Bishop and Ordained at Antioch against Paulinus who had for a good while lived a Bishop of the Orthodox in that Church and by Agreement with his Competitor Meletius sworn to by Flavianus himself was to hold it alone without any New Opposition after Meletius 's Death This Paulinus moreover after the setting up of Flavianus against him was owned for the Bishop of Antioch not only by the Bishops of Egypt of Arabia and Cyprus but also by the Bishop of Rome and the Occidentals who directed their Synodical Epistles to him and none to Flavianus as is related by Socrates and Sozomen But yet Flavianus's Ordination was not judged null the great Chrysostom himself having his Priests Orders from him as may be learn'd from Pallqdius and whilst he was one of his Presbyters preaching such excellent Homilies as we have of his to the People of Antioch And without any pretence of Nullity in his Ordination on account the Church was fill'd by Paulirus at the time thereof after the death of Paulinus and of his Successor Euagrius without any New Ordination he was admitted to Communion both by the Bishops of Alexandria and Rome who had rejected him as a Schismatical Bishop whilst Paulisus and Euagrius were alive In the Succession of Bishops in the Church of Rome there have been numerous Ordinations of opposite or anti-Anti-bishops which have made no fewer than 27 Schisms And some of them of long continuance that by the Ordination of Clemens 7th as an Anti-bishop against Urban 6th being reckoned to have lasted Fifty Years But neither these Anti-bishops nor those Ordained by them have been thought to want the Powers of Orders nor to make any breach of the continued Series and Succession of Apostolical Ordination in that Church Nor is it judged to do so by our selves we concluding our own to be a right and uninterrupted Succession of Orders and not difowing it in good part at least to be derived from them In the Arian Persecution of Athanasius and the Orthodox Faith numerous were the unjust Deprivations of Orthodox Bishops as of Athanasius at Alexandria Paulus at Constantinople Liberius at Rome Asclepas at Gaza Lucius at Adrianople c. These Bishops being deposed for their adherence to the Truth there was a Nullity in their deprivations as I shewed before and notwithstanding those deprivations they still fill'd those Churches and were the true Bishops thereof and accordingly were communicated with and received as such by the Western Synods And that because the depositions were not really for other Faults which were falsly fixed upon their Persons but for their holding the Nicene Faith as the Sufferers pleaded and upon Examination the Synods and the Emperour Constans found But on their depositions Anti-bishops were set up against them and obtruded on their seeral Churches * as Gregory and afterwards George were against Athanasius at Alexandria and Eusebins of Niconiedia and after him Macedonius were against Paulus at Constantinople and Felix against Liberius at Rome and Quintianus against Asclepas at Gaza not to mention others in other places And yet these anti-Anti-bishops being for the most part Hen â—â—ul as well as Schismatical Bishops were not held to want the Powers of others nor if any of them left their Heresies and returned to the Faith of the Church was there any new Ordination required of them or of
are one Eph. 5. 31. because the Husband is the Head of the Wife v. 23. And so likewise of Christ and his Church that they are one Eph. 5. 31 32. because he is the Head of his Church v. 23. And one way whereby as St. Cyprian observes our Lord sets off the Uniting of his Sheep as one Flock is by uniting them under himself as the one Shepherd Joh. 10. 16. 'T is the joint-union and dependance on one Master of the Family which makes one House and on one General which makes one Army and on one KING which makes one Kingdom And so on one and the same Church-heads and Governours which makes one particular Church For the Apostle compares the Union of many Persons into one Church or Politick Society to the Union of many Members into one Natural Body 1 Cor. 12. Which Union is made by the adherence and dependance of the Members on the Natural Head For the several Members are no longer one Body nor one with each other after once they are cut off and parted from it As to the Unity we take a Body when the Apostle says there is one Body for that which is under one Head So that if there be but one Head there is but one Body saith St. Chrysostom The Union of the Church therefore as one particular Sâ—ciety which Schism breaks consists chiefly in keeping united to Church-Heads and Governours Church-Rulers are the Heads which make the several Parts one with another or as the Scripture sometimes speaks the Joynts and Ligaments which tye the respective Members and compact the whole Body together The whole Body of the Church saith St. Paul is fitly joyned together and compacted by that which every Joynt i. e. each Pastor or Church-Governour supplies Eph. 4. 16. And we are all the Body of Christ and Members in particular as he says again as we are under the same Governours which he has set over that Body having in the Church set as first Apostles so after them Governments viz. Bishops and Presbyters for the standing Governance and Administration thereof 1 Cor. 12. 27 28. More particularly the Heads of Union in any Church-societies are the BISHOPS in their respective Churches They are the Head of the Body of the Church as Presbyters and Deacons are as the Hands thereof as Zonaras observes on the 55 and 56 Canons of the Apostles For since the death of the Holy Apostles the Bishops are the chief spiritual Heads and the ordinary and standing Governours of Christ's Church They above all others are those Guides or Rulers whom the Members of the Church are call'd to remember and obey Heb. 13. 7. 17. The Angels of the Churches unto whom as the Heads thereof our Lord directs himself when he sends the several Letters to the Churches Rev. 2. 1 7 8 11 c. They stand to head the Members of Christ and to unite and compact them together under him the chief Bishop appearing at the Head of their respective Churches as his Deputies who represent his Person and supply his place acting in the Person of Christ as St. Paul or vice Christi in his place or stead as St. Cyprian whom we ought to respect as the Lord himself as St. Ignatius says So that for Church-members to keep the Union of any Church is to keep subject and dependant on him who is the lawful Bishop thereof Thus St. Ignatius makes mens return from Schism to the Unity of God to lye in their return to the subjection and consistory of their lawful Bishop They make the Church or one Body who hold on Communion and keep one with him and with those Presbyters and Deacons who adhere to him and officiate under him The Church saith St. Cyprian is a People united to their Bishop or a Flock adhering to their Shepherd Whence you may know the Bishop always to be in the Church and the Church to go along with the Bishop And they break off from the Unity of the Church who break off from him and they go to set up another Church if they go to set up another Bishop against him If any are no longer with the Bishop says the same St. Cyprian they are no longer of the Church And to consent to the setting up of another Bishop is the same as to consent to the setting up of another Church says he to those Confessors at Rome who had agreed to the setting up of Novatian against Cornelius Thus is the one Bishop at the head of his Clergy and People to unite and keep together a Christian Church all the Oblations whereof are to be in his Communion and with his Allowance as the one Altar among the Iews was to keep together the Jewish Church For they were to have but one Altar of Burnt-offering at Jerusalem whither all were to come for Sacrifice and were sorbid to set up an Altar any where else And because of his being set for the same purpose of Unity as that was therefore is the Bishop and his Communion call'd unum Altare the one Altar and making an Anti-Bishop is call'd setting up aliud Altare another Altar in the Ancient Language And therefore in pressing the great duty of Unity on the Ancient Christians the Fathers enjoyn them most strictly to stick to their Bishops This is done by St. Cyprian and before him by Ignatius that blessed Martyr and Contemporary of the Apostles Take care all of you says he to follow the Bishop wheresoever the Bishop appears to be there let the Multitude be with him Like as wheresoever Christ goes the Catholick Church goes too Let my part be with those says he again who keep subject to the Bishop yea let my Soul be pawn'd for theirs As many as are God's and Jesus Christ's keep with the Bishop says he in another place pressing them to Union and warning them against Schism And because the Church is to be but one therefore there is to be but one Bishop in a Church for the Members all to adhere to or for the Body to associate and unite with This was and ought to be the Ecclesiastical Rule as was affirmed by Cornelius saying there ought to be but one Bishop in a Catholick Church And as is also declared by the Great Council of Nice Now as the Union of any Churches lyes mainly in keeping united to the Bishops So Schism which is a breach of Union in those Churches will lye chiefly in breaking off unduly and dividing from them Especially in setting up of opposite Bishops or in making a second Bishop in a Church against a former Orthod x and Rightful Bishop yet living and claâ—ming which makes a most plain and consummate Schisin For in the same Church two opposite Bishops are two opposite Heads And two Heads will make two Bodies those who set up the New One against the Old as likewise all they who afterwards come over to
him making a New Body under him which apparently destroys Union and makes two out of one And thus we fee it doth in all Societies If an Opposite General is set up by a mutinous Party it divides the Army or if an opposite King is set up in a Realm it makes a Sedition and divides the Kingdom Or if the same is done in a College a Family or other Societies as well as in a Church opposite Heads do unavoidably make opposite Bodies and visibly destroy the Unity of any Society by breaking into two Societies or into as many as there shall be opposite Heads thereof Accordingly the Ancients place the Schism of Church-Members in breaking off from Rightful Bishops or setting up others in the same Church against them Thus in the Apostolical Canous the Schism of Presbyters of other Clergy or Laicks is express'd by their setting up another Altar and assembling separately in contempt of the Bishop So also the Council of Carthage declares concerning any Presbyters who should do the same after they had been sentenced and segregrated by their Bishops that therein they are Makers of Schisms And the second General Council rejects men as Schismaticks tho' they give out that they confess the Right Faith if they assemble and hold Congregations in opposition to their Canonical Bishops Hence says St. Cyprian come Schisms and Heresies because Men envy and contemn their Bishops They have risen and do rise from this viz. from some proud Persons presumptuous contempt of the Bishop who is one and presides over the Church Especially if they set up an anti-Anti-Bishop and oppose a second Bishop to the first or to one Canonically Ordained already and rightfully possess'd of the same Church This was the Case of Novatianus whom the three Italian Bishops which he call'd to Rome for that purpose ordained Bishop of Rome against Cornelius who was already the Rightful and Canonical Bishop of that place This setting up of Anti Bishops St. Cyprian tells them is erecting an Adulterous Head a second Bishop being no more to be admitted to the same Church than a second Husband to the same Wife whilst the former lives and a spurious or adulterate Chair And bids them know that after once a Bishop is lawfully made and Ordained in any Church they can no ways set up another Bishop against him in the same place He calls it erecting unlawful Priesthoods and opposing against the True Altar and Holy Sacrifice a False and Profane Altar Sacrilegious Sacrifices And he aggravates the Novatian Schism by saying they had not only broke off from the Bishop and Church but had proceeded against the Ordinance of God and Catholick Unity to set up against him another Bishop an adulterous and contrary Head And on like setting up of Anti-Bishops after others were first in place Optatus Charges the Donatists with Schism afterwards These setters up of opposite or Anti-Bishops first break off themselves from their own Bishop before they can set another up against him And being broke off from their Bishop they are broke off from the Church which is in Episcopo as I shewed before or goes along with the Bishop those Members only making the true Body which adhere and keep to the Head and those ceasing to be any longer of the Body who are separated from the Head And therefore these opposite or Anti-Bishops and opposite Altars that blessed Martyr still says are foris and extra Ecclesiam and have receded ab Ecclesia that is are not within but without the Church Now from this Account of Church-Union in any particular Churches and of Schism which lyes in the unjust Breach thereof I shall observe these three Things 1. First That when a second or opposite Bishop is set up in any Church against a former Orthodox one who is still Bishop thereof the Anti-Bishop and they who set him up and adhere to him make the Schism For the other with his Adherents as the same Head and Members abide still where they were and are still the same Church But the Anti-Bishop and his Followers are gone out from them which Optatus gives as a plain Proof against the Donatist Bishops that the Schism lay at their doors They have broke themselves off and by erecting themselves into an opposite Head and Body make a new and opposite Church Consenting to set up another Bishop they consented therein to set up another Church as I observed before from St. Cyprian So that they rend that Body which by keeping wholly to one Bishop before was but one into several pieces and break one Church into two Churches This I say they do if the former Bishop is Orthodox For if he is Heretical Heresie as I shall shew dissolves the Union and cancels the Obligation of Adherence between such Head and Members They are bound to own him as their Head and to be one with him as his true and genuine Members whilst he is at the Head of Christian Doctrines and necessary Truths but not when he falls off from them into damnable Heresies and Unchristian Errors And if he is still the rightful Bishop of that Church If he voluntarily quits his Right and Relation to them and gives it up by his own Resignation they are no longer bound to adhere to him For these Unions and Dependances are contracted by the consent of Mens own Wills and are kept up betwixt these Heads and Members not by natural but voluntary Communications So that if a Bishop throws up his own Relation and will no longer preside over them as Head of a Church they are no longer bound to keep in Dependance and Subjection or to stick to him as Members thereof Or if he loses it against his Will by a just sentence and deprivation that also discharges the Members from their Union and Dependance and sets them free to receive and to unite themselves to another in his place But if neither Death has put an end to his Relation nor he has thrown it up by his own Resignation nor is deprived thereof by the finishing of a Regular Process and Synodical Sentence against him he is still the Bishop of his CHURCH and will bar and keep out any other Person from being Ordained a Bishop over them A Bishop can by no means be constituted in that Church whose own Bishop is yet alive and stands vested with his proper Honour unless of his own accord he renounce his Bishoprick And as to making a vacancy by deprivation it behoves first that the cause of him who is to be cast out of his Bishoprick be canonically examined and the Process against him be fully brought to an end And then after he is canonically deposed another may be promoted to his Bishoprick say the Fathers in the Council of Constantinople But if even a Synod of Bishops shall deprive an Orthodox Bishop of any Church for adhering to the
not going over to the Mutineers or than a King and his Loyal Subjects would be in a Kingdom for not turning over and submitting to the Rebels But as the Anti-Bishops and their Party make the Schism by departing from the lawful Head and true Body they must amend it by returning to it And they stand answerable to God so far as I see for all the Guilt and sad Consequences and Effects thereof if they refuse so to do 2. Secondly The Unity of any Church doth not go with the greatest Numbers but when a Schism is made by a defection of Members from their spiritual Head and setting up of Anti-Bishops the Schism is still the same how numerous soever the Members are that break off For breaking off from their rightful Head and Governour as I have shewn makes the Schism And then the greatness of the Number of those who do so can only make it a greater Schism Number in Schism or in any other ill thing may add Confidence and leave less Hope of reclaiming those who are engag'd therein For Multitude as the Antient Author of the Comment on St. Matthew printed among the Works of St. Chrysostom observes is the Mother of sedition and of contumacy and incureableness therein whereas Paucity or Smalness of their Number is the Mistress of Discipline But it doth not lessen the Guilt nor alter the Nature of it but Schismaticks are answerable for their Schism be they never so many of them That which makes any meeting of Orthodox Christians offering up a regular and establish'd Service to be in the Unity of the Church is their meeting under one who officiates therein according to their own Bishops approbation and allowance For the Unity of the Body lyes in keeping one with him And the Catholick and Canonical Rule as I shall afterwards shew of keeping one with them is by celebrating all Publick Offices and Divine Service with their allowance and approbation So that where any Presbyters or Deacons perform the establish'd Offices according to the mind of their own Orthodox and Rightful Bishops they officiate in the Unity of the Church though it be but to a few and to those met in Corners And where any others celebrate their Offices without the Licence and against the Approbation of their own Orthodox and Rightful Bishops they officiate in a Schism though it be among the fullest Congregations and with secular encouragements and in the publick Authorized Churches The having their Orthodox and true Bishops Approbation and Concurrence makes them no Schismaticks and their Meetings no Conventicles when Conventicle notes not a small or secret but a schismatical Assembly as it always doth when it is a Word of Infamy and Reproach The Canon counts it a Conventicle when any Minister in a private Oratory against the allowance and approbation of him who is chief Priest in the Country says Balsamon on the Canon forbidding Ministrations contrary to the Bishops mind and approbation And it has not been so strange a sight in the World as every good mind would wish it had to see Schismaticks from the Body make a more Numerous Party than those who keep united to it In the Division of Israel from Judah under Jeroboam the Israelites who fell off from the One Altar at Jerusalem to other Altars of their own erecting were guilty of the Schism Tho' they who stuck to that one Altar were but two Tribes and those defectors who broke off from it were Ten. The Arians as they were Hereticks for subverting the true Faith so likewise were they all Schismaticks by breaking off from the Communion of their Rightful Bishops as of Athanasius at Alexandria of Paulus at Constantinople of Lucius at Adrianople of Asclepas at Gaza of Marcellus at Ancyra c. and by enjoyning all every where to break Communion with them and to receive and communicate with those Anti-Bishops whom they had set up against them And in the Patriarchate of Alexandria more particularly the Meletians who before had made a Schism in that Church fell into their Party as Schism to maintain it self too often yea always says St. Jerom takes up with and ends in Heresie But these Arians who made the Schism were abundantly more Numerous than those faithful Christians who kept to the Unity of the Catholick Church the whole World at one time groâ—ning as St. Jerome says and admiring to see it self turn'd Arian Again the Donatists were notoriously guilty of the Schism made in the African Churches But yet when they over-run Africk they could glory and vaunt themselves in their diffuseness and in the greatness of their Number So that Schism is compatible with the greatest Numerousness of Adherents if that Number is of Men combined together against their Orthodox Righful Bishops and the Unity of the Church with the smallest Numbers if that Number is of Members that constantly adhere to them And this may likewise appear from those Similitudes of the Unity betwixt the Head and Members the Tree and Branches c. whereby the Ancients set out the Unity of the Church For be the Branches more or fewer which keep united to the Body they make the Tree And be the Members few or many which stick on to the Head or living Trunk they make the Body And so be their Numbers greater or less do the Adherers to the Orthodox Rightful Bishop make the one Church Indeed as the Root has the Branches so the Bishop has the Clergy and People virtually in himself That is as he gets Proselytes he can make them Christians and out of these he can Ordain Presbyters and Deacons So to Head a Body of Clergy and People professing Christianity which according to the sense of the Primitive Fathers is a Christian Church And thus a Bishop though appearing only with a few Members about him will make a Church and is qualified duly to spread it and to make it more Numerous As the blessed Apostles did when they set up at first to gather Churches and as the first Bishops did also who were taken out of the first Converts and Ordained at the Head of them to be Bishops of those who should afterwards believe So that the reduceing of an Orthodox Rightful Bishop to a comparatively little Number of Adherents will not hinder him and his Followers from making up the one Body and being the one Church And as such our Lord-will give ear to them as St. Cyprian observes though they be but two or three gathered together in his Name rather than to a greater Number of Schismatical Dividers To this Promise of his Presence with two or three or such small Numbers our Lord premises says he that these two or three be in the Unity of the Church and preserve the Concord of Peace And shews himself thereby to be more with two or three such Petitioners than with a great Number of Schismatical Dividers And if Number of Adherents will not much less
Teachers which he gave as Gifts for the edifying or compacting and building up all Christians into this Body of Christ v. 8. 11 12. To these Pastors the Spirit has given different Offices Rom. 12. 4. One having the Office of ministring another of teaching another of ruling v. 6 7 8. Or different Administrations 1 Cor. 12 5. setting some in the Church in the station of Apostles some of Teachers some of Governments v. 28. placing some in higher some in lower stations according to the measure of that Grace or Office the Word Grace being often used to express Ministerial Powers which he saw fit to commit to them Eph. 4. 7. 11. But all those different Offices are set for keeping all Christians in one Body Rom. 12. 4. 5. and all the Diversity of Ministries is to continue them the Body of Christ and to cement the Members who are many into one Body 1 Cor. 12. 27 28. v. 12. 20. and all the variety of Gifts i. e. of Offices v. 11. or distributions of higher or lower stations are for edifying or laying together the Members into this Body and for preserving the Unity thereof Eph. 4. 4 8 12. The Head of this Body is Jesus Christ himself And from Christ the Head all the Body is knit together says St. Paul by those joynts and bands which minister neurishment i. e. by the Pastors who are set to feed it Col. 2. 19. From Christ the Head says he again the whole Body is fitly joyn'd and compacted together by those joynts which make supplies according to their measure or according to their several stations in the work of the Ministry Eph. 4. 15 16. And on account of this use of their uniting all Christians under Christ the Head into this one Body or all the several Societies of Christians into one Church when this one Church is compared to a Natural Body they are represented as the Joynts and as the Bands or Ligaments which unite and compact the Members as they are by St. Paul in these places And thus it was in the Opinion of the Ancient Church who placed the Unity of all Churches in the Unity and Accord of all the Bishops thereof The Catholick Church which is one saith St. Cyprian is cemented or coupled together by the glue or joynt accord of its Bishops adhering mutually to one another All faithful People are joyn'd together into the solid Unity of one Body by the glue of this Concord And to fall from this Concord and separate from the College of Bishops is to separate from the Bond of the Church as he elsewhere says To keep up this Unity in the whole Church they believed all BISHOPS strictly obliged to keep Unity among themselves We Bishops who preside in the Church ought above all Men to keep firmly united that we may maintain the Episcopate it self one and undivided They looked upon the Bishops of all the several independant Churches to be as so many Members of one great Fraternity or College Optatus calls them the College of Bishops And before him St. Cyprian styles them the College and Corporation of Priests and calls all other Bishops his Collegues Particular Bishopricks are all Members one of another and all together as he says are to make but one Great Episcopate And among this Multitude of Bishops as there is but one Church so there is but one Chair And as three Persons in the sacred Trinity make up but one God wherein the power of all three is one and undivided So doth all the great Diversity of Prelates make up but one Priesthood says Symmachus Now this Unity the Bishops and Pastors keep up among several Churches not by the Subjection of all other Bishops to some one or more set up above all the rest Particularly not by the paramount Authority and Jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome which is neither to be found in Scripture nor is agreeable to the Accounts thereof nor to the Belief and Practice of the Primitive Church nor to the Universal Diffusedness designed for Christs Church under all the Divisions of Kingdoms and Interruptions of secular Accord and Correspondence here on Earth But by maintaining Fraternal Concord and Communion among themselves They cement into one Episcopate concordi mâ—merositate by their Concord under this Numerosity as we are told by St. Cyprian They are bound or coupled into one body by the glue of mutual Concord as he says again Which Ecclesiastical Concord and Fraternal Communion lyes in owning each other and all the Christians of their several Churches as Brethren and Members and in ratifying the great Acts of Society pass'd among them as if they had been pass'd among themselves And in having this Communion not Arbitrary and Discretionary which may be fixt at will upon their own terms and either kept up or rejected as they please But a Communion kept on out of bounden Duty and by Rules being to give account to Christ the chief Bishop for the breach thereof To this it is requisite that they profess the same true Faith and Christian Worship This is the Foundation of all other Communion among them The one Body being made up of those who hold to the one Faith Eph. 4. 4. and the Communion in this Body being required between those who communicate in this one Faith and Worship as shall be shewn more fully afterwards And among all Orthodox Bishops and Churches who profess the true Christian Faith and Worship the Rules of Communion and Correspondence required by Christ for keeping up this Unity of his Body are such as these 1. That all Orthodox Bishops and Churches receive each others Members as if they were their own Members All the Members of Christ's Church are Fellow-Citizens or enfranchised Denizens wheresoever they come and upon any new Change of Place or Christian Country have no need of a new Naturalization They ought to find a home in all Churches and may claim their Baptismal Priviledges or the benefits of the Christian Coporation or Society and can not justly be repulsed or denyed the same as being free of the whole Body For Baptism which makes them Members by the institution of Christ incorporates them all not only into those several Churches or Congregations where they receive it but into the whole Body or Fraternity We are all baptized whether we be Jews or Gentiles into one Body says St. Paul 1 Cor. 12. 13. And accordingly no Church must exclude them as Strangers or Forreigners but own and receive them as Fellow-citizens as Members as Domesticks as Brethren and of the same Family with themselves And this is necessary to maintain that Brotherhood which Christ has constituted among all his Members every Christian being Brother to another so that Brother is usually put to signifie a Christian in the Holy Scripture They must also own and receive their Orders when they have been lawfully call'd
to officiate in another City without their own Bishops Letters commendatory says the Great Council of Chalcedon And the Granting of these Letters was reserved to the Bishops Without their own Bishops Letters commendatory is the Expression of the now cited Canon of Chalcedon And others under the Episcopal Order are restrained from granting them Even those Câ—untry Presbyters whom Balsamon on the Canon calls Protopapas and who as being in the Country where the Bishops were not usually at hand to write them had more pretence of granting them as Zonaras intimates And who else but the Bishops of the several Churches should be capable to grant these Letters For since the Church stands and is fixed upon the Bishops as St. Cyprian tells the Lapsi it is not for any without the Bishop to write Letters as they had done to himself in the Name of the Church But more especially was the Grant thereof reserved to the Primates and Metropolitanes who were to write and receive Synodical Letters and to keep up Communion between the Churches of several Provinces Thus St. Basil expresses his Communion with all Churches by all Churches sending communicatory Letters to him and receiving the same from him And on the Deposition of Marcianus at Arles St. Cyprian desires Stephen Bishop of Rome to signifie to him who was substituted in his place that he might know to whom he should send the Brethren and direct his communicatory Letters And this the Synod of Antioch gives us a Reason of their writing to Dyonisius of Rome and Maximus of Alexandria and to all other Bishops on their placing of Domnus in the See of Antioch upon the Deposition of Paulus Samosatenus Which say they We therefore signifie to you that you may write your communicatory Letters to him and receive the like from him So that none who were out of Communion with their own Bishops and Metropolitanes could be allowed to communicate any whereelse CHAP. III. Of just Grounds to break off Communion particularly of making impious and unlawful things or unrighteous Usurpations and Incroachments the Terms of their Communion FRom what I have said in the Two preceding Chapters without inquiring further into any lower degrees and instances thereof I think it may competently appear what Schism is and who the Persons are that may justly be charged therewith either as breaking off from their own Church by unjustly throwing off and dividing from their own Orthodox and Lawful Bishops or as breaking off from other Churches by unjustly refusing Communion to their Members or by unjustly granting it to their Schismaticks or Excommunicates And more particularly that they are guilty of this great and dangerous Sin of Schism who unjustly turn Subjects or side with Anti-Bishops set up over them against their own Orthodox and Lawful Bishops Yea though such Defectors to the Anti-Bishops make the greatest Numbers or are set up by the civil State as the civilly establish'd or endowed Church And that all other Churches and their Members are guilty of the same who shall own and come in to them and admit them into their Communion and keep on Communion with them I say they are Schismaticks who by any of these ways shall break off from others unduly and without just Cause But some things are a just Ground to breako ff either Dependance and Subjection to our own Bishops or Communion with other Churches Some things as I come next to shew not being to be born nor otqers to be parted with for the Love of external Peace and Union And when these can be justly and duly alledged for standing off 't is always justifiable and commonly necessary to break Communions However to break off Resorting to their Assemblies though at the same we should still allow their Members to resort to ours For this later many times may be allowed longer where it can be done without scandal especially before the Church has proceeded judicially to censure and excommunicate the offending Parties as it was allow'd to the Romanists and accepted by them for several years in the beginning of Q. Elizabeths Reign and also to the Dissenters in later days And if there are such Pleas for breaking off either from any Persons or Churches there is no Breach of Gospel-Union nor Blame of Schism in such Cases And of these I shall now 2. In the Second Place give some Account That when we see any Persons or People breaking off either Subjection to their former Bishops or Ecclesiastical Concord and Fraternal Communion with other Churches we may understand where Schism is and where it is not to be charged and be more clear in several Matters of Importance in this Argument Now such just Ground there is for the Members of any Church to break off Communion either with their own Bishops or with other Churches when they can alledge either some things against the Terms of their Communion or others against their Persons and Doctrines 'T is a just Ground to break off from them if they make impious and unlawful things or unrighteous Usurpations and Incroachments the Terms of their Communion Or though nothing of this can be alledged against the Terms if Heresie can be justly objected to their Persons These I say are just Grounds and give a Liberty to break off from the Communion of any Persons or Churches And I chuse rather to express it by this giving them a Liberty than by imposing on them a conscionable Necessity to do so For some Grounds give a Liberty to break Communion either with their own Bishops or with other Churches which do not in conscience necessitate Men as Unrighteous Usurpations and Incroachments when they are made the condition thereof For though Men need not submit to them yet if they are pleased to do it they ordinarily may do so without Sin and suffer such Incroachments in then own Wrong Besides the Duty of uniting with any particular Persons or Churches is bound upon us by certain Things or Qualifications in those Persons or Churches which oblige us to their Communion and Dependance And as the Being and Presence of those Things and Qualifications binds it on so doth the Failure thereof unbind the same and set Men at Liberty to go off from them I say to go off from them not to go off from all and hold on communicating with none For when they are no longer bound to communicate with such particular Bishops or Churches yet are they still bound thereto with others or under a general obligation to Communion I mean when they have opportunity for the same which is presupposed to all obligation of actual Exercise and Discharge thereof by this like as it is by all other Affirmative Duties The Communion of Saints professed in the Creed obliges us to communicate as we have opportunity in all Christian Offices with all true Christians who still retain those Qualifications I spoke of Though it leaves us free to stand off from any others who have
Corruptions of both Then the way of worship and Tenets themselves are Formed into Parties Men are divided then in opinion and devotion and each way has a distinct body or society visibly to bear them up and profess them And when opposite Communions are thus set up for opposite Worship and Articles mens Communion must go according to their Opinion of the worship and Doctrine For in a breach made for these it will not be expected that men should Unite themselves to those of a contrary minde and keep off from those of the same minde but take part with those who agree with themselves We must Chuse the Church for the sake of the Religion and Unite to that as Christs True Church which sticks to the True Religion Church-Unity and Association always supposing and following True Christian worship and Doctrine but never tying any to go off and separate themselves from the same as I shew'd †before Such will be the effect of the preceding Apostolical and Ecclesiastical Rules for keeping the Unity of the Church and for avoiding Communion with the Schismatical breakers thereof and their Assemblies when a Schism is made by setting up Anti-Bishops to Head immoral or otherwise sinful worship Doctrines or Practices as in the foremention'd Cases The meeting or Communicating in a Schism has a Guilt and Criminalness of its own tho' the matter of all the Prayers were Good and the Preaching Orthodox which they were call'd to communicate in â—â— It alone were a Bar to Communion and would have the forecited Effects as I have shewn But 't is stronger when 't is set up for the Maintenance of Error and corrupt Devotion and when Men are 〈◊〉 into Schism to be drawn on to other Wickedness viz. to make 〈◊〉 of Moral Conscience and to prophane God by immoral-Prayers as they are in the above-named Cases CHAP. VI. Of Ordinations of Anti-Bishops which though always Schismatical are not always Nullities WHat I have said in the foregoing Chapter I think may be sufficient as to the Point of Communion with Anti-Bishops and then Adherents But I conceive it may not be amiss to add something further concerning their Orders since the validity or invalidity thereof â—â— of greatest Consequence and Importance to the Church at such Times One thing indeed is said by St. Cyprian about the Ordaining an opposite or anti-Anti-Bishop against another in a Church already fill'd as when Novatiâ—n was set up at Rome against Cornelius viz. That the anti-Anti-Bishop is no Bishop whence some conclude that in reality he has not the Episcopal Powers conferr'd on him Since after the first there cannot be a second Bishop says he or two Bishops at once in the same Church whosoever is Ordain'd after one is already in who ought to preside alone he is not really a second Bishop but no Bishop at all And if such opposite or Anti-Bishops receive or retain no Episcopal Powers 't is sure they can confer none And then they are really neither Bishops not Priests who are Ordained by them And so neither good Baptisms at least according to the Opinion of the Africanes nor good Sacraments which are of their administring As St. Cyprian and the Africanes answerable to this nulling of the Ordinations null also the Baptisms made by Schismaticks And then on every Ordination of Anti-Bishops against them there would be a new and indispensible Necessity for all the suffering and oppugned Bishops to insist upon their own Powers and Claims lest otherwise the Church should neither have Bishops nor Priests nor the People any valid Sacraments and Church Administrations For the Anti Bishops receiving no Power or Authority for these Administrations from their Ordainers their Ordination being null as he says They can not be impowered according to the Christian Rules of conferring Powers without a New Ordination The conferring of Orders or of Ministerial Powers is tyed by our Lord himself to a particular way viz. Imposition of hands by impowered Persons In point of Orders as of Baptism and the Holy Eucharist the effect is affixed to the Rite of God's Institution So that such Imposition of Hands must give them And if the former Imposition of Hands was null in these Competitions they can not have these Powers of Orders but by a New one The receding of the former Bishop or his ceasing to make any further Competition were they already vested with these Powers by their own Ordination would give the Anti-Bishops scope to exercise the same and to do it alone without any Rent or Division But such Recession is no Ordination nor gives them the Episcopal Powers if they had them not before Yea I add nor would any mere Allowance or after-Ratification of Synods confer the same as I conceive without such New and Valid Imposition of hands When Men pretend they have already received these Spiritual Powers meet Allowance admits of their Pretences But I see not how that alone should confer the Powers if before they wanted them Nor doth mere saying I allow thee to be a Bishop or a Priest without Words not only pre-supposing but actually and from that time conferring Authority upon the Persons seem enough to make them such Which in my Apprehension would make little of the Power of Orders and would be a very lax and cheap Salvo to make good the Usurpations which either now or at any time heretofore have been made by Sectaries upon the Priests Office Besides when they would empower Persons even Synods themselves or Bishops met there can not confer Orders as I say more than Sacraments by what way they please but are bound up as I apprehend to Divine Institutions and are not left to dispose of Ministerial or Episcopal Powers by way of Sentence or of Legislation but only by Imposition of Episcopal Hands But however it might be in the Opinion of St. Cyprian and the African Church of that Age the Africans carrying the effect of Schism farther than others to the Nulling of their Baptisms and Ordinations I think this nulling of all Ordinations of Opposite or Anti-Bishops or making them null in themselves is no Catholick Doctrine nor did the Church tye it self thereto or procede thereby in other Ages The two most Famous Schisms headed by opposite or Anti-Bishops in the Primitive Times and consisting of Men who retain'd the same Faith with the Catholick Church were those of the Novatians and Donaâ—ists But the Ordinations of Anti-Bishops were allow'd to make Men Bishops and Priests in both these Cases One was the Schism of the Novatians which I think presents us with the first setting up of Anti-Bishops in the Christian Church against other Bishops keeping to the same Faith that was profess'd by themselves and which is of the more Account in this Case because of this St. â—yprian himself speaks saying on Account of Novatian when he set up as an Anti-Bishop against Cornelius that the second Bishop is not really secundus but nullus not a second
says they have them if they will use them and the Acts of Orders are not Nullities which are done by them There is no Question now to be made saith he and it has been a thing discussed considered and established through the whole World that they who are broken off from the Unity of the Church do for all that retain both their Baptism and their Orders or Power of Baptizing When correcting the Error of their Schism they are received to the Unity and Peace of the Church if it seem needful or expedient to have them bear their former Offices their Prelates are not to be Ordain'd again but as their former Baptism so their former Ordination remains intire in them For their Fault lay in their Schism which is corrected by their being settled anem in the peace of Uâ—ity not in the holy institutions either of Bapism or Orders which wheresoever they are really are of validity Yea and when on such reception to the Communion of the Church it seems expedient not to admit them to the administration of their former Orders yet even there adds he is not the power of Orders withdrawn from them but remains still lodged in them Which also may appear from hence because on their Reconciliation they are not made to stand among the Penitents as other Offenders among the people are and there to receive penance and absolution by imposition of hands Which is omitted towards them not because it would be an injury to their persons Schism being as Criminal if not more Criminal in them than it is in others but because it would be an injury to their Orders which Orders therefore must be still inherent in them at that time to give them that Exemption For no person in Holy Orders as Bishops Priests and Deacons was lyable or ever made to do penance by the ancient Rules and Discipline of the Church And before them St. Cyprian and the Africanes of his Age together with Firmilian of Caesarea in Cappadocea carryed the effect of Schism so far as quite to set asi e all Ministerial Acts of Schismaticks And on that Account they equally null'd both their Ordinations and their Baptisms The powers of Baptizing and Ordaining and of doing other Ministerial Acts are powers of the Holy Ghost And by Schism in their Account the Schismaticks fell from the Grace of the Holy Ghost and having lost it themselves were no longer empowered to confer it on others either in Baptism or Ordination being thence forward as to these powers as meer Lay-men as St. Basil recites their Opinion But this St. Basil thinks was a straining things too far and others of Asia as he says were altogether of another Opinion So in his Canonical Epistle which was received into the Code of the Universal Church by the sixth Council in Trullo he admits those Ministerial Acts and Baptisms when done by Bishops or by others of their Ordination in a Schism Yea and even Cyprian and those Africanes who were for nulling these Acts and Baptisms of Scismaticks seem to have been for this only in regard to their own Communion or by denying Communion to them in their own Churches in way of asserting Discipline and Canons but not to have thought them naturally and essentially null in themselves And this I think is plain from hence Because though in care to keep up Discipline they null'd these Acts as to their own Communion in the case of any of their own Members Yet they declare that if any other Churches admit them they will not break Communion with them on account thereof We judge none nor will exclude any from our Communion who shall be of another Opinion says St. Cyprian at the Head of the Council of Carthage when they made this Determination And again in another Council when they writ to Stephen of Rome to concur with them in rejecting not only the Baptism but the Ordination of Men in Heresie or Schism and in receiving them when they returned to the Church only to Lay-communion They declare that if any of their Brethren who have imbihed another Opinion are still for sticking to their former Sentiments they are not forcing any nor for breaking Communion with those who are for preserving that Bond of Concord and Peace which ought to be upheld in the College of Bishops So that if any Persons of such Baptism or Ordination came to them with Communicatory Letters from any other Bishops they would admit them to all Acts whether of Lay or Clerical Communion in Carthage and Africk which they had been admitted to at home the denyal whereof as I shewed before had been to break Communion with other Churches which they disclaim And if they would admit them to communicate thus with them in their Churches they could not think either their Baptisms or Ordinations null in themselves For the Communion professed in the Creed is a Communion of Saints or Christians who are listed or made Christians by Baptism and Clergy-men by Ordinaetion and there is no admission of Un-baptized Persons to those Acts which are proper to the Faithful or of Un-ordained Persons to those Priviledges and Functions which are peculiar to the Clergy in the Church 〈◊〉 Christ. But against all this it may be Objected that there it to be but one Bishop at once in a Church as St. Cyprian alledges and as the great Council of Nice afterwards provides and that the Bishop in the Church is the Principle of Unity And that the admission of the Ordination of Anti-bishops will be against the Nature of the Spiritual Monarchy the Nature of Monarchy not admitting of two at once And as the Throne can hold but one so the Electors where the Monarchy goes by Election can chuse but one who being once chosen they can elect no more nor can confer the same powers on any other till the Throne becomes vacant again But as to the Bishops being the principle of Unity that respects the Peoples Duty of holding Communion with him his being the Principle of Unity to the Church binding the Church to depend on him and incorporate under him and to communicate with him And as to this the Members who are already subject to a rightful Bishop are not to admit of a second Bishop That is if such an one is set up they are not to unite themselves to him and turn over to his Communion as I think may sufficiently appear from what I have above discoursed on that Point but are to stand off from him as from one that makes a Schism And thus every Church as a Spiritual Monarchy is not to be possessed by two at once since all must adhere to one And though the second who is set up in opposition be a Bishop yet he is not their Bishop nor may any of them break off from their rightful Head to joyn in his Communion But though the Anti-bishop in any
a Bond each of them pro solide i. e. for the whole sum These local Limitations and Appropriations of Precincts to have every Bishop the Bishop of some place and to have but one Bishop at a time in a City or Place are great and necessary Rules 't is true of Order and Unity And all the Pastoral Powers are most highly served by having them to direct their Exercise and would be mightily disturbed and hindred of their end by the want thereof So that they are conscientiously and carefully to be observed and maintain'd in the Church But their Necessity is for Order and Unity not for the Being of Episcopacy And when there are two Bishops heading seperate Churches at once in a place that duplicity must only prove one to be a Schifmatick but doth not prove him as I think may sufficiently appear from what has been here discoursed to be no Bishop Nay while this separation of Churches could be without the Guilt of Schism as it was in the first standing off of the Jews from the Gentile Converts and as the blessed Apostles themselves allow'd it should be for a time till the Jews could be brought to see the Lawfulness of communicating with Gentiles which was contrary to all their former received Opinions I say whilst such separation was to be tolerated without imputation of Schism to suit the necessity of the Church during their prejudices 't is very likely there were two Bishops set up in the same place by the Holy Apostles themselves Thus in the City of Rome 't is probable that at first there were at once two Churches one of Jews and the other of Gentiles gather'd there by the two Great Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul Epiphanius says of both these Apostles that at Rome they were both the first Apostles and the first Bishops And sets down the Bishops in the first Succession of that Church double Of the Roman Bishops this says he is the succession Peter and Paul Linus and Cletus Clemens Euirdstus Alexander Xystus and so on And this is thought to be the best Reconciliation of those various accounts of the first Successors to the Holy Apostles in that Church And the like may reasonably be thought of other Churches where Jews and Gentiles lived intermixed Epiphanius noting it as a thing extraordinary and unusual in the Church of Alexandria which was a place much inhabited and resorted to by the Jews and where the first Church was planted by St. Mark who was made Bishop thereof by St. Peter the Apostle of the Jews that it had never at any time had two Bishops in the same City at once like other Cities So that what the having of two Bishops in the same City at once strikes at is the Duty of Church-Unity But where it could be tolerated without imputation of Schism and was not destructive of the required Unity as it was not in those first beginnings of the Church when God was pleased for a time to tolerate the former separation between Jews and Gentiles till the Jews had out-grown their Prejudices against communion with Gentiles it was not destructive of or inconsistent with the Being of Episcopacy Thus is not the opposite or Anti-bishops Ordination but only his Communion excluded by having but one Bishop in a Church at a time and by the rightful Bishops being the Principle of Church-Union Because another is their rightful Bishop he can not be the Bishop of that place or Diocess since they can not have two Bishops at once And because that other is their principle of Union they are not to communicate with him as I have shewn at large in the preceding Chapters But though he is not their Bishop nor is to have the communion of the Faithful by reason of his Schism yet he may be a Bishop and have the powers of Orders by imposition of Episcopal Hands in his own Ordination So that among such Anti-bishops and their adherents we are to lament the loss of Unity and Church communion but not of all Orders and Baptisms as if by such Schism they were rendered utterly uncapable either to baptize or ordain and so were like to have neither Priesthood nor Christianity left among them CHAP. VII Of the Excuseableness of the Peoples receiving Ministerial Offices from Men in a Schism rather than live without any at all BUT under such Divisions the rightful Bishops and Clergy supposing the sufferers to be in the right may be too few to give general opportunities for all those good Christians who would keep to them to communicate in Ministerial Offices And in vast numbers of places for the People to shun communion with the Clergy adhering to the Anti-bishops or taking part with them will be to have no communion at all in any Ministerial Offices since they can not have them from any others I do not say it will be so with the Clergy themselves whose part and place being to afford Ministerial Offices they need not want them unless they please and if they can have any though but one or two to joyn with them therein they may minister in an Holy Assembly who have Christ in the midst of them as he himself says But though they will not fall under this necessity nor have such ground to plead the favour of this Case yet the People often may And supposing the Schism what is to be done by the People in this case If they are careful to shun these Ministerial Offices from the hands of Schismaticks in places where they can have them from others may they not without imputation of overlooking the criminalness of Schism have recourse to them as a Make-shift especially if they profess and give out that they do it only on that account where they can have none else or rather than live without any at all I hope they may and that the necessity of having publick Worship and Ministerial Offices will excuse the faâ—iltiness and obliquity of having it at the hands of one communicating in a Schism or out of the Unity of the Church To perswade this I observe that Schism is breaking the one Body into Parties or making sedition in the Church And the spirit of Schism or the malignity of having to do with a Sedition or Party is as it is an owning or espâ—usal thereof and that in opposition to the true Body But when in mere necessity men who live among them have to do with such and profess they take up with them only because they are in want of others whom as they ought so they gladly would associate and joyn with such profess'd serving of their own necessity and disapproving of the others Party is not to own and espouse them And much less is it to take their part and stand by them against the true body since this coming near them at all is only for want thereof and before they appear to oppose the right they should be put into the
Images but also in their Synagogues or High Places But now all this Communion of the good people among them was Communicateing with those who Minister'd in a Schism For the Altar at Jerusalem God himself had appointed as the only Altar whereon they should offer any burnt offering setting it up for the Principle of Union or as that which should compact together or keep at one all the Tribes of the Jewish Church and Nation And the New Altars at Dan and Bethel were set up by Jeroboam in opposition to the one Altar at Jerusalem As were also all those other Altars which the people set up and whereat they offer'd sacrifice and burnt incense in the usual places of their Religious Assemblies all the Children of Israel being required every Sabbath Day and at other set-times to hold holy Convocations in all their Dwellings Or in their High-Places where Jeroboam built him Houses for Worship at the same time when he set up his Golden Calves at Dan and Bethel and made Priests for them of the lowest of the people out of which Priests of High-places he took some to be Priests at his Altar at Bethel At which high-places when they were free from all Heathen Idols the people for their devotion and convenience were very prone and strongly bent to offer their incense and oblations as their Ancestors had done in the days of Samuel and also of Solomon before the building of the Temple And thus Prone they were not only in the ten Tribes of Israel but in that of Judah too where under great and careful Reformations of Religion in other respects we read so often of the peoples burning incense still and offering sacrifices in the high-places As under Jehosophat and Azariah and Jotham and under Mannasseh after his Repentance and Restoration to his Throne when though he reformed Religion nevertheless the people did sacrifice still in the high-places yet unto the Lord their God only So that the Priests in the ten Tribes offering all their sacrifices at one or other of these opposite altars set up altar against altar and call'd all the people to take part with new altars or to become guilty of a Schism Of the Criminallness and danger whereof they were admonish'd by Hezekiah who sent Posts and Proclamations thro' all Israel to invite and call them to come and keep the pass-over at Jerusalem according to what is written And this to prevent Gods further wrath and carrying of the Remnant away to Babylon whither for this among other provocations he had already carryed part of them Yet the necessity of some publick worship or ministerial offices Legitimated this Communion of good people in all lawful services with these Schismatical Ministers after the division when the Kingdoms being no longer one the people were stopped from going up to worship at Jerusalem 2. It did the same in Legitimating Communion with the Schismatical Novatians when the Catholicks were sore straightned by the persecuting Arians and at a loss for ministerial offices in other places The persecuting Arians were not for Tolerating opposite Communions but for forceing all others to Communicate with themselves Persecuting as Socrates relates not only the Catholicks but also the Novatians because tho' Schismaticks as to point of Discipline and Anti-Bishops they were Orthodox concerning the Nicene Faith But their greatest severities were against the Catholicks to whom as Sozomen sayes they left no Oratories treating the Schismatical Novatians something more gently to whom as Socrates adds they allowed three Churches even in the Royal City or Constantinople it self Now in this want of Catholick Oratories or of Ministerial Offices in adherence and unity with their own Bishops The Catholicks say Socrates and Sozomen resorted to the Novatian Churches and joyned in their Assemblies and Prayers And yet at that time when they did this the Novatians were Schismaticks who having an Anti-Bishop of their own distinct from the Catholick Bishop of that Church and being incorporated as a Distinct Body under him thereby kept up two Heads and two Bodies in the same Church which I think is plainly a state of Schism Yea and those Rigors of refusing reconciliation to those who had falln in persecution on pretence whereof they fell into this Schism at first by ordaining Novatian an anti-Anti-Bishop at Rome against Cornelius they still kept on And by reason of this which they alledged and insisted on as their Original or Ancient Precept they refused as the aforesaid Authors testifie to come to a perfect Union And accordingly the Communion which they both mention as passing betwixt them is a Communion in Prayers because according to this Ancient Precept alledged the Novatians denyed the Communion of Mysteries or Sacraments which are the Seal of Remission which in the case of those who had fallen they would reserve as Socrates observes to God himself So that what Communion the Catholicks thought it excusable to hold with them in this Necessity or want of Ministerial Offices from their own Clergy was held with men who plainly Officiated in a state of Schism 3. It did the same in our own great Rebellion when our Bishops were all driven cut and Deposed with the King For then the Orthodox and Loyal-Adherents of the King and Bishops took up with the Communion of the Parish Churches and thought that for the sake of publick worship and ministerial offices they might do so where they had no Ministers of their own to Communicate with And yet what Assemblies were not only in a more barefaced and wicked Rebellion but also in a more Flagrant Schism than the establish'd and complying Churches and Assemblies of that time So that in the Opinion of those our Ancestors it was a good excuse for having Divine offices in such Assemblies when they could have better no where else 4. Lastly this necessity of having some Ministerial offices is generally thought to Legitâ—mate Communion in those Churches which have no Bishops Thus it is in some Forreign Protestant Churches who have no Bishops to Head and Unite them as our own Churches had not here at home in the days of the Great Rebelâ—ion And yet the people there must Unite with their ministrations because they must Unite with some They must have some Divine service and Religion And if they must have it they must resort to some who Minister it And if they can have no Ministration thereof in an Episcopal Communion they must take up with it from such other as they can have I speak of the case of the People in those Churches and it is not the Clergies but their Liberty of taking up with Ministerial Offices from the hands of Schismaticks in want of others which I am here discoursing of And in their case the necessity is full for their excuse For 't is plain they can not have those Ministrations in Episcopal Communion
not expect from it the Benefits and Assistances of any secular mixtures which were derived to them by Incorporation As to this point of Schism several good Minds may think that though by setting up opposite or Anti-Bishops against them in their respective Sees others have already made it yet may it be in the Power of the seinjured Sufferers by their Receding and Submission thereto to remedy and put an end to it And 't is like many Serious and hearty Lovers of Peace and of those Churches may at such times be apt to wish that for the sake of Unity they would do so Indeed where they may be free to do as they please that is when no part of Faith or good Practice is like to suffer by it nor the safety and welfare of those Souls committed to them is haâ—â—rded thereby much may be said to good Pastors not to insist too much on their Personal Rights and Privileges but to forego and give them up for the Peace and Tranquility of the Church Their Spiritual Powers are committed to them not as to Lords of Gods Heretage therewith to seek and serve themselves but as to Stewards that look after it for another or as Sheepheards thereby to serve and Benefit their Flocks Their Powers are all a Ministry to promote Religion and serve the Church by parting with any thing of their own for its good as their Great Master did not to please or aggrandize their own Persons being given them for Edification or wherewith to build up the Church not for Destruction or the pulling of it down Accordingly the Pastoral Spirit is a generous Publick Spirit Nothing is more opposite thereto than narrow private Aims and seeking of themselves nor more required thereby than neglect or denial of themselves for the Safety and Profit of their Flocks and Care or Sollicitude for others It lies as the Blessed Apostle saith in Naturally caring for the Churches In Seeking not their own things but the things which are Iesus Christs In not seeking their own Profit but the Profit of many that they may be saved In making themselves Servants to all when thereby they could Profit the State of Religion and their Flocks though it were by Incumbring and Prejudicing themselves becoming all things to all Men that by all means they may save some And therefore when it has only been a cause of their own Persons or Personal Claims but not of Religion or of the Interest of the Church Good and Holy Bishops have thought it became the Pastoral Spirit rather to receed and sit down under the Injuries than that for their Sakes a Fatal Schism should be kept on in the Church If this Schism be for my Sake send me away or I will depart whither you please and do what the People would have me that the Flock of Christ with the Presbyters over it may be kept in Peace Was what St. Clemens Romanus St. Paul's Fellow Labourer recommended to the Heads of Parties in the Church of Corinth and press'd by the Example of Moses who was* content to be blotted out of the Book of Life to save the Israelites and of those Kings who even among Heathens devoted themselves to Death for the Preservation of their own Countries We ought to endure any thing rather than hat the Church of Christ should be divided Yea 't is not only as Glorious but more Glorious in my Judgment to suffer Mantyrdom for keeping out Schism in the Church than for not Sacrificing to Idols saith Dionysius of Alexandria to Novatus on the division made at Rome If I am any way the cause of your Division I am not better than the Prophet Jonah Throw me into the Sea so that thereby the Tempest of those Troubles may cease from you Whatever you see needful to that end I chuse to suffer Tho' I am blameless and have been no cause of these Troubles yet for your Unanimity and Peace-sake I am content to be thrust out of the Throne and to be expell'd the City says Gregory Nazianzen in his Speech to the Synod on the contest of Maximus Cynicus for his See of Constantinople And we are ready to leave this Prelacy to whom you will provided that way the Church may continue one said St. Chrysostom when at Constantinople others as he complains had unlawfully ascended the Episcopal Throne and thereupon a Seperation was made from him But in Cases where the injured Sufferers are still bound to insist on their Powers and to stand up for Religions Sake and the Churches this way of curing a Schism by their receeding has no place And therefore this Obligation to exercise their Ministries I have fixed the Debate upon in the case of such deprived Bishops and Ministers For if they stand bound in Duty at such times to exercise their Ministrations though never so desirous of Peace and Unity they cannot oure that Schism which others have made by letting their Ministrations fall And besides it 's directly meeting that Pretence and fully answering it I think it plainest to be apprehended and more powerful to operate on the Minds of those who are to be directed and resolved in this Dispute CHAP. II. Of the Immoral ways introduced by a wrong payment of Allegiance THE Bishops and Clergy who are deprived by the State when they cannot comply with the foresaid Changes and Impositions on such Revolutions notwithstanding the deprivation of State still retain their Episcopal and Sacâ—rdâ—tal Powers That is they are as true Bishops and Priests as they were before They are still endowed with the Powers of Orders and their use thereof would be as valid tho' not as to secular Claims and Privileges which are the Gift of Princes yet as to the real Effects of the Covenant of Grace or to purely Spiritual purposes as they would have been had they not been so deprived For these Powers are not derived from the State nor from any secular Authority They are called the Powers and Keys not of any Kingdom of this World but of the Kingdom of Heaven Mat. 16. 19. Iesus Christ was a Spiritual King disclaiming all secular Authority or Power of the Sword and declaring his Kingdom was not of this World nor to be upheld by his Servants Fighting with the Sword And he instituted all Church Powers yea these he instituted before the Church came to be Incorporated with the State and made no new Institution or alteration therein afterwards And when secular Powers turn'd Christians they became the Members of an empower'd Church and were let in by Ministers and privileged to claim Ministrations from Powers antecedently received from Christ and not at all needing to be received from them nor capable of being conferr'd by them as having never been confer'd on them Nor are these Powers to be held only during the Will and Pleasure of the State For then they could not be retained against its Mind And
Church or spiritual city wherein Christians are incorporated into one Body is not only the Church of one place or Country wherein all the Members may Embody and Associate under the same Governors as the Church of Rome Alexandria or Antioch But the collection of all particular Christian Societys or the whole number of independant Churches Existing in all times and diffused through all places For all these our Saviour has ordained to be one Society or Spiritual Body Of them he speaks or of all that do or shall believe on him when he prays to his Father that they all may be one Joh. 17. 11. 20. 21. And of them St Paul speaks when he says both of Jews and Gentiles distributed into so many distinct Churches that by the Cross of Christ they are all reconciled to God in one Body Eph. 2. 16. And when he says of Baptism which being duly received in any Church makes a man free of all other Christian Churches that by one spirit we are all baptized into one body whether we be Jews or Gentiles 1 Cor. 12. 13. And of the Unity of this Church or Collection of all Believers do those Scriptures speak which represent all that are in Heaven and all that are in Earth as one whole Family Eph. 3. 15. As one House-hold 1 Tim. 3. 15. and Gal. 6. 10. or as one City Heb. 12. 22. Whence accordingly all who are at any time in this world are said to have their Citizenship or Corporation in Heaven Phil. 3. 20. And all who are admitted into Christs Church here to be Fâ—llow-Citizens with the Saints and Domesticks with Prophets and Apostles and with all others who are gone to God before Eph. 2. 19. What is the one Body saith St Chrysostom on the words of St. Paul there is one Body 'T is all believers of every place saith he both those who now are and who formerly have been and who hereafter shall be And as to the Union of these Spiritual bodys or societies both the Members of each particular Church must keep Unity or make one society with their own Church And every particular and independant Church with its Members must keep Unity and make one society with all other particular and independant Churches The Members keep Unity with their own Church by due dependance and subjection or by keeping subject and dependant on their own Lawful Bishops And one particular Church keeps Unity with all other independant and sister Churches by Fraternal Communion or the Communion of Saints in the Holy Catholick Church profess'd in the Creed that is by their readiness to Unite with their Religious Assemblies to own their Members and to ratify their Church Acts as if they were their own or had been sped by themselves And this way of fraternal communion as well as the other of keeping under the same visible Governors by due dependance and subjection is a way to Unite them not only as a Sect who all hold and profess the same Doctrines and Opinions but also as a Society or as one Body For by this bond of fraternal communion they stand obliged not only to Unity of Doctrine as men of the same sect but to unity as of internal so of external society and incorporation as fellow citizens For such are the obligations of receiving mutually each others Member as their own free denizens of admitting of their baptismal claims and Church Priviledges of Ratifying of their Church-Acts and Censures of Associating with their Church services and Assemblies and of standing together as one body and brotherhood for the same common Tenets and Religious interests as if they were incorporated under the same External Heads or were the members of the same particular Church And this is to unite them in the great things of society particularly of a spiritual society which lyes mightily in communion in spiritual acts and offices And accordingly Uniting in the same Sacraments which are the Highest Acts of Church Communion is set out for a way of Uniting all in one body or corporation We being many are one body by being all partakers of that one bread 1 Cor. 10. 17. And we are all baptized into one body 1 Cor. 12. 13. So that all Christian Churches who under one common Father as Domesticks or under one Lord and King as Fellow-citizens are incorporated upon one Charter or New-covenant to live by the same Laws and out of the same Hopes and in enjoyment of the same Church-rights and Priviledges and have one common Form of Incorporation to Naturalize or Enfranchise them thereinto viz. One Baptism are to transact as one society by keeping up one fraternal Communion among themselves Now both this Union of subjection towards their own Church and its Lawful Heads and of fraternal communion towards all other equal and independant Churches all good Christians are bound to keep up unless some obstacles happen in either which are of force to put a bar thereto or give discharge thereof And such obstacles either in our own Bishops or in other equal and independant Churches are Heresy when once openly profess'd by them Or their fixing unlawful Terms of Communion puting sinful things into their sacred offices or not allowing any to Communicate with them without believing or professing some false Doctrine or partaking with them in some evil worship or thing Or Tyrannical Usupation on their Brethrens Libertys not admitting other Churches to their Communion unless they will give up their own rights and freedoms and become their Subjects When such exceptions lye against any Bishops or against any Churches they have lost their claims of union But all Church-Members are bound I conceive by all the numerous and earnest commands of keeping Unity to continue subject to their Lawful Bishops as all Churches are by the same to keep up Communion with other Churches if they cannot produce any such just obstacles in bar thereof Now Schism is a sinful breach of this union of Church Society Either in the Members of any particular Church when they unjustly break off their subjection and dependance upon their own Church Or in any Particular Churches when they unduly break off Fraternal Communion with other Churches denying to Assemble with them or Communicating with such as stand Excommunicated by or have made a Schism from them First One Great way of Schism is in respect of Particular Members when against the Gospel duty and Commands of Unity they unduely throw off their subjection and dependance upon their own Bishops and break off from the Unity of their own Church One way of Uniteing Societies or Bodys of Men is by uniteing them under the same Heads They are all one Body and Members one of another as keeping under and being United to the same Head and Governor Thus of the Association of Man and Wife which is the Original Society and makes a Family which is the ground work of all other Societies it is said that they two
to spiritual Powers and to the Work of the Ministry in their own Churches For Ordination as well as Baptism is not only in respect to the Church of such a Place but to Christ's Church at large Limitations there are as to the Exercise of these Powers as may make for the preservation of Order and Union And in care of Unity and Peace Bishops and Priests of any Church must observe these in acting Episcopally or Sacerdotally whilst they converse in other Churches But having any where received a Lawful and Canonical Ordination they are to be owned as Ministers of Christ wheresoever they come and need no more to be Ordained than other Members need to be baeptised over again So that they are Schismaticks and break this Unity of the Body appointed to be kept up between all particular Churches and their Members who reject the Members or Canonical Ministers of any other Orthodox Churches As they do who Unchurch them or deny Communion to their Members unless they will submit to unrighteous Claims and Usurpations or joyn in unlawful Worship or erroneous Doctrines or who reject their Lawful and Canonical Ministers unless they will receive new Orders which are so many Breaches of that Brotherhood which Christ has Ordained among Churches and are the making of a Schism in the Catholick Church 2. All Orthodox Bishops and Churches are to refuse each others Schismaticks and Excommunicates as if they were their own Schismaticks or Excommunicates And upon their Reconciliation and Re-union to their own Churches to let them in and receive them again as if they had been immediately reconciled and re-united to themselves Which ways of mutually receiving or rejecting of priviledging or debarring Members make that Unity of Discipline which by Order of Christ and according to the Sense and Belief of the Primitive Fathers is one great way of compacting the vast number of Christian Societies into one Body or of keeping up the Unity of Christs Church All we Christians are incorporated or made one Body says Tertullian as by the Belief of the same Religion and the Covenant of Hope so by the Unity of Discipline And when any one Bishop or Church has done any thing We are all thought to have done the same by appearing associated and united in the same consent of consure and discipline say the Clergy of Rome to St. Cyprian 1. They are to refuse each others Schismaticks as if they were their own Schismaticks For as the holding on civil Communion with Traytors is judged Treason So is holding on spiritual Communion with Schismaticks judged Schism They must take part and keep one with the Church And so whilst the Breach lasts must disclaim and keep off from those separate Members who stand divided and broke off from it avoiding those that cause Divisions as St. Paul orders Rom. 16. 17. Accordingly St. Basil lets the Neocaesareans know when they seemed about to break and divide from him and from his Church of Caesarea that if any avoided or broke off from his Communion they would be broke off withal from the Universal Church which held Communion with him We ought not to have Communion in Prayers with any Heretick or Schismatick says the Council of Laodicea Nor ought they who are not of the Assemblies of one Church to be received or allowed to assemble in another Church says the Council of Antioch If he who is not to be received in one Church be received without commendatory Letters in another let both him who is Received and his Receivers be excommunicated say the Apostolical Canons Whosoever says St. Cyprian speaking of the Schism of Felicissimus who had schismatically broken off and divided from himself shall joyn himself to his Conspiracy and Faction may know that he can no longer communicate with us in the Church since he thereby voluntarily chuses rather to separate himself from the Church 2. They are to refuse each others Excommunicates as if they were their own Excommunicates For whatsoever is this way regularly bound in Earth our Lord declares shall be ratified or stand bound in Heaven Mat. 18. 18. Jo. 20 23. And if it is confirmed in Heaven it must stand good and not be thwarted or reversed by any of his Followers here on Earth When the Members among any Societies of Christians for their disorderly walking and not hearing of the Church are cast out thereof they are thrown not only out of the Church of that place but out of Christ's Church at large whereof all other Churches are Members or out of all Christian Churches into the state of Heathens and Publicans as our Lord says Mat. 18. 17. Accordingly Synesius Bishop of Ptolemais in his sentence of Excommunication denounced against Andronicus and Thoas and their Complices says Let no Temple of God be open to them but let every Religious Place or Chappel be shut against them And St. Basil bids the Neocaesareans take heed how they break communion with him because after once he should exclude them no other Catholick Churches which all owned him and held communion with him would any longer own or communicate with them Till they are regularly absolved and reconciled again all other Bishops and Sister-Churches are bound to refuse and repel such Excommunicates as they come to their knowledge Thus Synesius requires of all Sister-Churches and of all Christians to shun the communion of Andronicus and Thoas and their Adherents And 't is not lawful to communicate with Persons out of communion says the Council of Antioch If any either of Clergy or Laity is excommunicated by his own Bishop let none else receive him to communion till his own Bishop has received him again or a Synod has cleared him say the FATHERS of that Council again And concerning those either of the Clergy or Laity who are excluded from communion by the Bishops which are in every Province let the Sentence be valid according to the Canon which decrees That they who are cast out by some shall not be admitted by others says the Great Council of Nice Thus when any Persons or Churches are schismatically or by means of just Censure and Penalty out of Communion with one Orthodox Church by the Rules of Catholick Communion and Accord among Churches according to the mind of Christ and of the Primitive Church ought they to be out of the communion of all Orthodox Churches And if any either Christians or Churches will still hold on communion with such Persons by the foresaid Rules of Union and the Canons of the Catholick Church they are thereby made like unto them and turn makers of a Schism and are to lose the benefit of Communion themselves If any says Synesius in his Excommunicatory Sentence of Andronicus c. shall contemn our Church as being the Church of a small City receiving those whom it has cast out as if Observance were not due to it by reason of its Poverty Let
necessary warnings nor Faithful Ministers let fall their Ministrations in the foresaid Cases on pretence of preserving unity or preventing Schism in the Church 2. Secondly it is another just ground to break off from them if they make unrighteous usurpations and incroachments the Terms and condition of their Communion Both Bishops and Churches may turn Tyrannical and Arrogant Usurpers upon their Brethrens Liberties not admitting their own Members to their Communion without acknowledging and submitting to their unjustly and illegally assumed powers nor other Churches unless they will give up their own rights and freedoms and become their Subjects And when they will allow Communion to none unless they are content to purchase it at such rates good Christians may pass them by and unite themselves to other Churches where they will be more justly and fairly dealt with The Communion of Christians is a Commuuion of Brethren upon Brotherly terms not of Captives who must submit to any terms or bear what hardships and incroachments are put upon them by their Conquerors They are not bound to purchase unity by enslaving of themselves or any brethrens communion by receiving their yoke and giving up their own rights and liberties as the Church of Rome demands all other Churches both of the East and West should do to purchase hers And thus St. Paul declares he would not give up their liberties when false brethren turn'd invaders thereof viz. the Judaizers in their pressing the Circumcision of Titus to whom he gave place by subjection no not for an hour when they sought to bring them into bondage Gal. 2. 4 5. CHAP. IV. Heresy a just Ground to break off Communion THe last ground which I shall mention of breaking off or of being set loose from the Communion either of Bishops or Churches is though none of the foresaid obstacles can be pleaded against the Terms of their Communion if yet 3. Thirdly Heresy can be justly objected to their persons and Doctrines Church Members are not bound to keep dependant on the persons of their Bishops nor one Church to keep Communion with other Churches if once they defect from the true worship and Doctrine of Christ. This worship and Doctrine are the Ground and Foundation of Christian Society and unity The Church is a Body of Men Associated for them And must be one Society by keeping united under their Bishops or Associated with other Churches in them They must keep one in standing together upon this bottom not in going off or departing from it For clearing these matters it is to be observed that our Saviours first end in coming into the world was to publish a Religion I am come a light into the world saith he of himself Jo. 12. 46. I must Preach the Gospel for therefore am I sent Luk. 4. 43. On this account he calls himself the Way the Truth and the Life Joh. 14. 6. And tells Pilate that for this end was he born and for this cause came he into the world that he should bear witness unto the Truth Joh. 18. 37. And this Truth or Religion lyes in his Doctrine of worship faith and Practice Or in his Teaching all his Disciples what way they are to worship God what they are to believe concerning him or other things which concern their Eternal Salvation and what they are to do for him Now this Doctrine was like to be most advantageously profess'd and this Worship to be best paid if it were not left to single persons or to scatter'd Families to do it separately by themselves But had its several professors incorporated into one Regular society and united body for the joynt profession and performance thereof Such Regular society would hold it out by more orderly and effectual Ministration and keep men to it by the Authority of Discipline and be a common help and spur to excite and aid each other mutually and carry them on and a cover and shelter to back embolden them therein A Regular Society or Church incorporated for the Profession thereof St. Paul says is a Pillar and Ground or Stay to publish and support it Accordingly when Religion was left to be born out by smaller societies and sometime even by single families as in the Patriarchical Age we see it was sometimes almost lost and always made a very small progress But when a whole Nation was incorporated into one Church for the profession and payment of it as it was among the Jews it spread further in power and influence and gain'd more proselytes And lastly when all Nations as fast as they turn'd Christians were embodyed in one society for the same intent as a Light set upon a candlâ—stick or as a City placed on a hill it desplayed its force far and near and strengthen'd incomparably more hearts in it and drew more eyes after it And therefore our Lord intended and ordered in the next place that all who embraced this Religion should incorporate or unite together in one Church or Society for the Profession of it Accordingly he has made baptism wherein every professor takes upon him this Religion to incorporate him or enter him a member of this Church Baptism as St. Paul notes uniteing us all in one body and as many as are baptized into Christ are all one in Christ Jesus And requires of every professor of this Religion that he Keep on professing it in the unity of this Church And that all of his Religion pay this worship and profess this Doctrine not separately by themselves but socially in joynt Communion with others So that all who come to embrace the Christian Religion must perform the worship and profession thereof in Christian Society or in the Unity and Communion of Christs Holy Catholick Church But we are first to be all of this Religion and then to profess and perform it in the Unity and Communion of this Church The Doctrine and Worship I say which makes us Christians are the Foundation of that Society and Unity which is to be upheld in the Christian Church Thus on Peters Confession our Lord declares he would build his Church Mat. 16. 16 18. And the Uniteing of Christians into one Temple St. Paul says is by their being built on the Apostles and prophets i. e. On their Doctrines about worship faith and practice Eph. 2. 20. 21. And when our Saviour prays so earnestly ly for the Unity of his Church at what time he was about to leave it he limits it to this that they may be kept one in Gods Name Joh. 17. 11 and calls the Gathering or Uniteing together of Christians in Congregations wherein he will be in the midst of them their gathering together in his Name Mat. 18. 20. In his Name that is in his Doctrine or Profession of Faith and Worship Name with relation to Masters and Teachers being usually put for Doctrine As to bear my Name before the Gentiles is to bear my Doctrine Act. 9. 16. and teaching in
Souls endangered by such Salvo's it was the Duty of true Prophets and Priests among them and would be so in all other places on like occasions by their preaching and Ministrations to keep up sound knowledge among the People in these Points yea tho' such preaching and ministrations made a Breach between them and those defecting Teachers And it was the Peoples duty to follow any among them who would teach them better when they could have such Teachers as they had in our Blessed Lord and his Apostles Whatever Allowance under the favour of Necessity men may have to keep on with such of which Plea of necessity I shall say more hereafter yet where there is choice of others more Orthodox they are no longer tyed to such Pastors as openly and obstinately preach up damnable practices to disgrace Religion and endanger Souls Bear they may for a time in hopes of Reformation and because it is easier to prevent than to patch up Breaches wise Lovers both of Peace and Truth would not be hasty in coming to extreamities But if still they will persist and go on in such pernicious Ways and Doctrines good People and Pastors may withdraw themselves from their Communion as St. Paul says in the places already cited And the Reasons of breaking off on such defections from necessary points either of faith or practice are still more urgent if there is no Liberty left in any Churches for other Pastors to stand up ministerially or exercise their Ministry in defence of those necessary points whilst they continue with and adhere to them For then the Concealment and Suppression of necessary Truths is made a condition of Communion and other Pastors if they will hold on with them must suffer that good thing which has been committed to their Trust to be extinguish'd without standing up according to their duty and solemn undertaking to minister the same Which will make it necessary for all who will choose to stand by Christ and his Truths rather than by such his Apostatizing Servants and Corrupters thereof to depart from them When therefore the Bishops and Pastors of any Church fall off from ministring necessary Christian Doctrine or Worship and especially when they come to allow their Communion to none who will go on administring the same they thereby loosen the bands of Union and break that spiritual dependance and relation which the People and other inferiour Pastors ought to have upon them They are no longer the true Joynts to compact the Members nor the Head of Unity to keep together the Body of the Church And thus it was at the Reformation under Queen Elizabeth with the Popish Bishops whose corrupt Worship and Doctrine yea and rigorous exaction of complyance with both from all who expected to hold Communion with them had set their Churches at liberty to go off from them as I formerly observed and to seek more Orthodox Bishops in their room And so it would be in the case of other Bishops especially of those who espouse a Schism and communicate with Anti-Bishops in opposition to the true Bishops if they fall from ministring necessary Christian Truths whether of Faith or of Moral Doctrine and Worship as in the fore-mentioned Cases And when the Church is thus loosed of its dependance on their Persons by the defection of such erring Bishops It may be free to unite it self to other Orthodox Bishops Either to receive such an one for its own local Bishop as was done at the Reformation by substituting Orthodox and Reformed Bishops into the Sees of Popish Bishops Or till it can have that by receiving the Benefit of Episcopal and Priestly Acts from any other Orthodox Bishops and Clery as they can be met with It may fetch all Orthodox Ministrations and spiritual Functions from other places when it cannot have them from an Orthodox Pastor or in the Unity of the Church at home This it may do says St. Cyprian in this Case As well as the Mariners when their own Port is sanded or otherwise insecure may pass it by and put in at another Or as well as the Travellers when their own Inn is beset with Thieves may take up their Lodging at another which is more safe And as the People of such defecting Bishops and Pastors may seek out and unite themselves to others for all necessary Ministrations so may those other Orthodox Bishops and Clergy who are sought to be free to receive and supply them This is plain of both because the Church whereof the one are Members and the other are Bishops or Priests is a Catholick Church For being Catholick its Baptisms and Ordinations are Catholick and make as the one Christians so the other Bishops and Priests that must be owned for such over all the Christian Church and not only in some limited Parts or Districts thereof And betwixt the Members of this Catholick Church there is to be a Communion of Saints so that the one may receive as Members and the other administer all spiritual Acts and Functions as Pastors as there is opportunity and as need requires When the Orthodox Members of such defecting Pastors come to them considering the Catholicism of the Church tho' never so far remote in place they must own them as their Brethren and professing the Communion of Saints they must receive them to their Communion When shuning the Rocks in their own defecting Church they seek a more safe harbour in theirs 't is their part to receive them with a prompt humanity and to give them such reception as was given to him who had faln among Thieves in the Gospel not only to let them in but to take all due and needful care of them saith St. Cyprian Yea and as Christian Bishops they are to look upon this Reception and these Ministrations as one part of their Episcopal Charge For they are Bishops of the Catholick Church as well as of their own Sees and have relation to the whole Church as well as to their own Diocess The Administration he has received is not only for his own Flock but for the Church in common says St. Ignatius of the Bishop of Philadelphia And Christ has committed to you not only your own but the Universal Church says Eleutherius to the Gallicane Bishops And though as being more especially Bishops of that place they have more particular Obligation to look after their own Flocks Yet as Catholick Bishops they must be concerned for the whole Church and look on it or any destitute parts thereof as their own as occasion requires It behoves us all to extend our Care and watch over the Body of the whole Church whose Members are disposed through each of the varicus Provinces say the Presbyters and Deacons of Rome to Cyprian on his informing them of the Deposition of Privatus Lambesitanus the Heretick And unum Gregem pascimus though we be many Pastors yet we are to look upon all as one Flock says St.
Cyprian in this case Though holding it in Partnership we are several Bishops yet as there is but one Church so there is but one Episcopate says he again whereof every particular Bishop holds a part but holds it so as to stand obliged and answerable on occasion not only for his own particular proportion but as Partners in a Bond each of them pro Solido as the legal Phrase is or for the whole Sum. Thus Eleutherius told the Gallicane Bishops That for this very Cause Christ had committed to them the Universal Church that they should labour for all and not neglect to afford Help to any as their Needs should require And Simplicius of Rome told Acacius of Constantinople That to approve himself faithful in his Episcopate he must strive for Catholick Unity and the Decrees of the Fathers not only in that Church where he presided but wheresoever he could And Chrysostom says St. Eustathius Bishop of Antioch had well learned by the Grace of the Holy Ghost that a Bishop of the Church ought to take care not of that Church alone over which he is specially appointed but of the Universal Church through the World This general Care has appeared conspicuous in the Lives and Labors of Holy and Faithful Bishops as of Cyprian Alexander and Cyril of Alexandria Eustathius of Antioch and Chrysostom And of the Great Athanasius who took as much care of all other Churches as he did of his own as St. Basil says Nor ought they to be hinder'd from such Ministration and Reception of the Members of other Churches by any Canonical Rules for Unity in the Church For that Heresie or Defection from Christian Doctrine whether in Faith or Practice and from Christian Worship which sets aside the Obligations of Unity towards those defecting Bishops and Pastors must also of course therewith set aside those Canonical Rules which are for maintenance thereof So that the Ecclesiastical Rules of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. of Clergy and People doing nothing in Church-communion without the Allowance of their Bishop and of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. of ones not officiating or ordaining anothers Subjects or intermâ—dling in anothers Diocess are no Rules nor of Force towards such Persons And accordingly at Arles when Marcianus their Bishop was faln to the Novatians Cyprian thought it behoved him and other Bishops to see the Needs of the Faithful there supplyed That they might no longer be left a Prey for Wolves without all hopes after the Novatian Rigour of the Churches Peace and Communion after once they had faln And under the Arian Hereticks the Great Athanasius when out of his own District held Ordinations in other Churches as he passed through them as Socrates reports Even the Great Council of Constantinople in that very Canon which forbids Bishops to intermeddle either in Ordinations or in other Ecclesiastical Administrations without their own Precincts yet makes an Exception of those Churches that are in Barbarous Nations for whose Relief they might do this As Eminent Preachers when they went among them might still confirm those they had gained to the Faith in other Provinces according to their Custom Which though against the Canons the Council still allow'd say Balsâ—mon and Zonoras upon the Canon for the necessity of the thing And thus also Presbyters and People may hold Assemblies independant on their own Defecting Bishops or on any others The Apostolical Canons allowing Priests to have Meetings separate from their Bishops when they do it as condemning them of Impiety in Doctrine or of Injustice in Administration as deposing them for the sake of Truth or of a good thing c. And the Council of Constantinople though it forbids Inferiours before Synodical Sentence to cast off the Communion of their Superiour on pretence of Criminal Causes as Fornication Symony or Transgression of the Canons as Balsamon comments yet allows it in case of Heresie condemn'd by former Synods or by the Holy Fathers so soon as he begins bare-faced to teach it in the Church And the Council of Carthage when it Condemns Presbyters for setting up separate Altars from their Bishops makes this Exception unless they have against him a just Expostulation And an Allegation of False Doctrine or leading the Church wrong is such a just Expostulation as Balsamon observes upon the Canon These Rules for preserving Order and Concord among Bishops and Churches are binding towards any Bishops who are in the Unity of the Church and are Orthodox But if either they are faln to set up Unchristian Worship or Doctrine or as I observed before are turned Schismaticks or set up as Anti-Bishops in Christ's Church They bind none towards such Bishops They are no longer Heads of Union and so cannot claim the Benefit of these Rules for Unity which by their Schism or Defection is at an end towards them Thus doth Heresie or a defection from necessary Doctrine or Worship discharge Church Members from their Spiritual and Canonical dependance and union with their defecting Bishops and Pastors Priests are no longer tyed to such erring Bishops nor the People to either in such Cases So that a defection to sinful Worship and damnable Doctrine bereaves Men of all ArguÌ„ments from Scripture or Canons for their Subjects to depend on them or to unite with them If therefore in any division of a Church it can truly be Objected to one side that they are saln from holy and true Worship and Doctrine it is not for them to plead the duty of Union or to tell People of their Obligations to unite with them If before they were the true Heads and the Regular and Canonical Bishops of those places yet would their falling into those Unchristian Errors strip them of those Claims The Union taught by Christ and the Holy Scriptures and directed by the Rules and Canons of the Church supposes Men Orthodox but is not to unite with such defectors Nor is any Charity which they can pretend to in seeking to keep all others united to themselves the Charity which he requires For that Charity which is the end of the Commandment must be out of a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned as St. Paul says 1 Tim. 1. 5. It must be out of a pure heart and a good conscience and so is only a seeking to have them one with us whilst we go together in keeping the Commandments or in the practice of good things not like the Charity or Love of Thieves and Murderers that associates and binds them together in the practice of ill things as St. Chrysostom notes And it must also be out of faith unfeigned and so is a seeking to unite them to our selves not in dangerous Errors but only in Orthodox and Christian Doctrines Whereas the pains that is taken to bring all over to them in the Breach of Gods Laws and embracing of Unchristian
removed from the Honour of the Priesthood and Clerical Orders Accordingly Basilides the Bishop after he had denyed and cursed Christ was very thankful as he says and looked upon it as a great Favour to him that he could be received to communicate as a Lay-man And likewise Trophimus the Bishop when he had sacrificed to Idols was admitted as he tells Antotianus only to communicate as a Lay-man not to usurp the Priests Office any more as some malicious persons had inform'd him which made Antonianus complain of the same to Cyprian as a Violation of this known Rule of Discipline And in Vertue of this being the known and received Rule of the Church the Donatists sought to invalidate and overthrow the Ordination of Caecilian against whom they had set up their Anti-bishop Majorinus at Carthage pretending that Caecilians Ordainers particularly Faelix of Aptisng had been Traditors in the precedeing Persecution or had faln from Christ and deliver'd up their Bibles to be burnt by their persecutors Which Charge had it been true as it was false would have been received and owned for a just Exception on both sides And the Catholicks would have rejected Caecilian till he could make out some better Ordination as well as the Council of Nice did these Egyptian Anti-bishops that had no better Ordainer than Meletius who stood guilty of the like Offence But it was rejected in Caecilians Case as being a malicious Forgery the Donatists thereby impudently laying their own Crimes on others hoping that would hinder men from inquiring after the same in themselves Indeed as Epiphanius relates this Matter Meletius made this Schism and Ordained these Anti-bishops not after he had sacrificed to Idols and had been Synodically condemned by Peter for the same but whilst he as well as Peter was a stout Confessor for the Faith against Idols and in his Zeal for the Discipline of the Church against Peters easiness in admitting the Lapsers who sought to them whilst they were together in Prison for the peace of the Church But Athanasius who was nearer to this Transaction and who after some others was chosen to suâ—ceed Peter in the same Church is more like to understand the Truth of this Affair than Epiphanius was Whom Baronius and Petavius look upon as mislead into this account by some false Acts or Histories of the Meletians who dealt injuriously with Peter and the Catholicks in Egypt like as the Donatists did with Caecilian and those Catholicks in Africk on whom they labour'd to fix the Crime of being Traditors whereof the Catholicks were free but they themselves were notoriously guilty Thus though their Orders were valid in themselves without which they could have been received at no time yet have they not always availed to Claim and obtain the Churches Communion without which the persons could not be received by the Faithful to exercise the same And this has been when the Church saw fit and expedient to insist upon the Rules of Unity in Ordinations and more vigorously to assert Ecclesiastical Law and Discipline And this it might assert or relax as it saw Cause Ecclesiastical Law and Discipline is not a Rule of indispensible Obligation to the Church but such as it may and oft-times has receded from on great reason and necessity What Rules the Church makes the Church may alter and go off from in particular Cases as need shall require and as may best serve those ends for which it made them Accordingly Rules of Discipline have not been one and the same in all Ages For to omit others the ancient Councils asserted the free Election of Bishops nominated here by the Prince to the Bishops of the Province And for bid the Translation of Bishops from poorer to richer Sees And the Attendance of Bishops about Courts of Princes the Council of Antioch confirmed afterwards at Chalcedon and in Trullo forbidding them to go to the Emperor without the approbation and Letters of the Metropolitane And excluded both Bishops and Clergy from intermealing and incumbring themselves with Secular Trusts and Administrations All which are otherwise in these latter Ages And such Rules of Discipline as have been observed more strictly have not had one equal and uniform Tenor of Observation but have been sometimes remitted and sometimes exacted and stood upon as the Church was driven thereto by prudential Reason Thus it has been with the Canons or Rules of Discipline about Ordinations Which as the Church has sometimes insisted on as I noted to vacate the Ordinations which any Bishops made against them I mean to deny the Persons its Communion without which whatever powers of Orders they had received they could not be received in any Assemblies of the Faithful to exercise the same So were they at other times relaxed and over-ruled by the necessities of the Church and the Persons on their reconciliation admitted to officiate in vertue of such Orders as I think may abundantly appear by the fore-cited instances And this very Reason is given for it by the African Fathers in the Synod of Carthage when they admit of the Ordinations of the Donatists which the Transmarine or Italian Synod had rejected telling Pope Anastasius that this Reception of them to the same Orders was for the great necessity of Africk for a †better provision for Catholick Unity and for the benefit and peace of the Church These instances and proofs I think may be sufficient to shew that Anti-bishops and others of their Ordination have Orders though being in a Schism the Faithful ought not to joyn with them in their use thereof Their Schism makes them Sinners in receiving and in using their Orders and shuts out others from communicating therewith But it doth not utterly destroy and null their Orders nor must it be said I conceive that by such sinful Ordination they receive nothing or that whatever they had formerly received they lose by falling into Schism so as that thenceforward they have no Orders nor are Bishops or Priests at all The Donatists indeed as St. Austin reports asserted this and taught that by breaking off from the Church though men did not lose the Baptism which they had received before yet they lost their Orders or the Authority and Power of Baptizing And on pretence thereof they re-baptized those who since the Breach had been baptized by any of the Catholick Clergy As to which he owns that whilst they continue in their Schism they sin in exercising their Orders They do not do right saith he in giving Baptism to others whilst they themselves are broken off from the Church And it is to their own destruction so long as they have not the Charity of Union The having Baptism themselves and confering it on others are both pernicious whilst they continue out of the Bond of Peace But though they ought not to use these powers till they have amended their Schism yet as he
him either as his Mouth unto his People or as their Mouth unto Himself in publick Assemblies or Congregations Such likewise are those set and solemn Times for worship which he has instituted both among Jews and Christians and which are all design'd for publick worship in Joynt-Assemblies Yea even our Prayers which are the Acts of worship express communion and joynt-society being put up according to his appointment in the plural number he having taught us to say Our Father which art in Heaven and give us this day c. which speaks the communion and concurrence of more besides our selves And the Holy Sacraments those most eminent Acts and Instances of worship are ordained for Asts of society and partnership or of communion therein We are all baptized into one body And We being many are one bread and one body And The bread which we break is the communion of the body of Christ and the cup of blessing which we bless is the communion of the blood of Christ as St. Paul says And because by their institution they are not only to be Acts of worship but of publick worship or of joynt-concurrence or communion therein therefore doth our Church allow no Sacrament even to the Sick without three or two at the least to make a Congregation and condemns the private and solitary Masses of the Church of Rome which are eaten by the Priest alone Such is the natural obligation and such the necessity and importance of publick worship which is one of the greatest visible supports of Religion without which 't is to be feared it would sink and be in danger to fail in the Earth Whereas the paying of this worship in Church-Unity and dependance on a Bishop though it be a duty too yet is a duty more of positive obligation For to have Bishops and to pay all our publick worship in communion with them is no natural duty which always was incumbent on all men but came in with Christianity by positive Institution or particular Revelation And besides though important in it self yet in comparison it is of less importance not only the natural parts of the Ministration but the positive too as the Holy Sacranients c. being I conceive of more Weight And though the want of this Union under our own Bishops by the opposite Passions and angry Tempers which Schism introduces doe greatly eat out true devotion yet doth it not make so wide a breach and waste therein as the want of any Ministerial Offices at all would do Now in any competition of Duties the Rule is that things of positive obligation shall give way to things of natural obligation and positives of less importance to positives of more importance in those cases and times where we can not do both The natural there takes place of the positive and the greater sets aside the less Particularly as to the keeping up Religion and Church-unity and Association if in any case we can not maintain both but a competition happens to arise between them the care of Church-unity must give way to the care of Religion We must look then to keep up as much Church-unity as we may do in keeping up Religion which being once lost Church-unity and association signifies nothing And not begin the other way to content our selves with keeping up so much of Christian Religion as we do in strict observance of the Rules of Church-society and Union For Christs first and chief design was to plant and preserve the Religion And that Church-unity which is either valuable or desireable in the sight of God is Church-unity with true Religion not Church-unity without it and we are tyed to keep up Church-union for Religion's not Religion for Union's sake as I shewed before And therefore the duty and obligation to communicate in some Ministerial Offices will be a fair excuse for doing this out of the way of Church-unity or dependance on our own Bishops when both can not have place And thus I think the Scripture determines in such cases and that 2. These abatements are what God himself has been willing to make on such necessity in other like duties He has not required that men should stick so fast to those duties or parts of duty which are inferior or subservient or appendages unto others as that for their sakes they should drop other duties which are principal or superiour to them nor is he willing that in care of preserving their practice of lesser Vertues inviolable they should at any time let the weightier fall So that to think he will abate and relax something of the duty of Church-union when that is necessary to keep on the more important duty of publick Ministration and that he doth not the the People up to such strict care of communicating in the Unity of the Church as must drop and let fall all communion in Ministerial Offices when they are not to be had but at the hands of those who minister in breach thereof is only to think that he is ready to make the same equitable allowance on any competition in these as he doth on like competitions in other duties And that Almighty God is willing to make these abatements on such necessity and competitions I conceive may sufficiently appear by the following Instances Circumcision and Sacrifice and the Sabbath are all positive duties But Circumcision and Sacrifice being of more importance they were to take place of the Sabbath and whensoever it so fell out that they could not observe both men might be excused in breaking the Sabbath Rest to labour in Circumcision as they did whensoever the eighth Day of the Childs Age which was appointed for his Circumcision fell to be on the Sabbath Day or in Sacrifices with the labour whereof the Priests in the Temple continually prophaned the Sabbath and were blameless as our Lord determines And God himself declares I will have Mercy before Sacrifice which imports according to our Lords allegations and applications of it that Men should drop the duty of Sacrifice to attend the duty of Mercy when for the time they must let one fall and could not pay both So making the necessity of performing natural duties an excuse for the omission of positive and the necessity of performing more important duties an excuse for the omission of less important when there is a necessity of letting one fall Thus also it was a positive duty and rule among the Jews that the Priests should kill the Sacrifice according to what is said in the Law Lev. 1. 4 5. The People who brought it as it is there order'd were to lay their hands upon the head of the Sacrifice But it was left to the Priests to kill it as Josephus relates Whence the Priests were able to give the number of the Paschal Sacrifices at any Passover as they did to Cestius Gallus as the same Author testifies And this is the account of the Jewish Doctors
withholding the Cup from the People which Christ has appointed to be received by all the Communicants as well as the Bread Or what good Prayers and Oblations they do put up to God may be all in an unknown Tongue which is not to pray in that way that is necessary for Christians who are to offer up a spiritual worship which is to be done by praying with understanding Or the evil parts which are intermixed with the good are indispensably to be performed together with them and he who would communicate in one must not be allowed to let the other alone As there can be no receiving of the Sacrament without worshipping it in the Church of Rome It imposing a complyance with its Corruptions as a condition to those who would partake in any sound parts of its Offices And these are such hindrances of Communicateing with that Church in the Mass which are not to be urged in Bar of Communion under all immoral mixtures of worship and devotions And much less is the allowance of some communion under such immoral mixtures to be extended for a justification of the same communion in the Assemblies of Jews yea or even of Mahometans on pretence of joyning in like manner only with the Good but standing off from the ill parts of their Offices For that Church-Communion which as Christians in our Creed we all profess to believe and seek is the Communion of Saints that is in the language of those times of Christians not any Church communion of Professed Unbelievers But suppose that in a Christian Church retaining all the Essentials of Faith or Articles of the Creed all that is necessary in Christian Worship is to be had pure and unspotted and in a Tongue which all understand but some immoral petitions or Prayers are intermixt therewith which people may be Tolerated to pass over and to express dissent from whilst they shew Concurrence with all the good Prayers which come along with them Are they barr'd from such Communion by such mixtures As to this it may depend much upon the degree thereof according as the evil passages are Tolerable or Intolerable I mean not to be done as if any man were to expect a Toleration to do a wicked Action but to be born on the point of this unlawfulness In care of keeping Union much would be bore withall for peace and in hopes of seeing a cure thereof whilst more modesty is shewn in these unrighteous and immoral petitions And in want thereof other ways for the benefit of Communicateing in some Ministerial Offices and publick devotion men would bear more If such unlawful and immoral passages were fewer in number and occurr'd more seldom in the service to shock and gall good mindes or if they are any ways uncertain and less Peremptory in signification and some way or other accomodable to an innocent and lawful sense Good people though they could not Concur in would yet more patiently endure them But they are less to be born when more express and unavoidable in signification and more grown in number So that as any Assemblies multiply these petitions they increase these difficulties and discouragements to those who for the sake of peace yea or on the setting up of a Schism after which they are no longer bound to maintain Ecclesiastical Peace and Union with them for the benefit of having publick Offices and Ministrations would fain meet at their publick service If once the Minglers of such immoralities in Prayers shall to this impediment of immoral mixtures add another viz. Of breaking the Unity of the Church especially by setting up of Anti-Bishops and forming a Elagrant Schism There is an end of beaning with these mixtures for the sake of peace and for maintenance of Communion with them For this peace and Union is not to be kept with Schismaticks as I have shewn the Scriptural and Ecclesiastical Rules being not to seek but to shun Communion with such Persons It is to keep United to those Bishops who are the Orthodox and Rightful Heads and to such as depend on them and adhere to them not to such Heterodox Dividers as break off from them So that this bearing with the irksomness of such mixtures for the sake of Union is a Reason of bearing only before the Formation of the Schism but is never to be urged that way more but has all its force turned another way when once that is done Or before such Formation of a Schism the immorality of those petitions may be so express and unavoidable the iniquity of them so staring and hainous or the repetitions thereof so numerous and the use thereof so flxed and setled that good people neither would nor ought to bear them could they have any opportunity of doing otherwise Indeed sin and wickedness especially in any plane gross and great instances thereof if once evidently made the matter of worship and put up in Prayers sets people at liberty in any Church as I have shewn to refuse them and joyn in others whose matter is pure and sinless When once therefore corruption gets into the matter of Prayers and sin makes a part of sacred offices it gives a liberty for people to withdraw from those Prayers though administred by their Lawful Pastors and if any Ministers Regularly empower'd will give them the opportunity thereof to change them for a pure and sinless service And still the higher and more open the iniquity of such Prayers or Clauses and the more numerous the Repetition of them is the more are they not only set free but forced and necessitated to this And the more answerably are the Orthodox and Faithful Ministers necessitated to afford them opportunities thereof Lovers of Peace out of an Ardent desire of Union may forbear a while so long as those Churches are more modest in their Corruptions or whilst there may be hopes of cureing them especially at the begining and of closing the breaches And this Allowance of forbearance for a time in Case of such Corruption of Worship is no more than we see is made in Case of Heresy which is a Corruption in Faith This Corruption of Faith as well as Corruption of Worship gives a discharge of Communion as I have shewn And yet Communion is not so discharged thereby but that it may be kept on for a time as I observed it was with the Arians in the beginings of that Heresy The Rule being not to reject an Hâ—retick from Communion whilst he may be thought sanable or not till he has had a first and second Admonition And thus it was judged and practiced by those Orthodox at Antioch who kept a meeting for some time in the Arian Assemblies under Leontius after their error and impiety was introduced into their publick Offices and Ministrations and was put up to God in Derogatory Doxologys In which Union of Assemblies these Orthodox were Headed and lead on by Flavian and Diodorus that admirable Pair of best Men as they
Christs Name is filling Jerusalem with his Doctrine Act. 5. 28. ver 41. And the Priests and Rulers forbidding the Apostles to speak to any Man in his Name is forbidding them any more to preach his Doctrine Act. 4. 17. 18. And so when our Lord prays to his Father that his Disciples may be kept in his Name to the end that they may be one he notes the necessity of continuing in his Doctrine to their keeping his so much desired Union Jo. 11. 17. Accordingly he adds that they may be one as we are viz. he and the Father For their Unity is by this way among others viz. by keeping to the same Word or Doctrine he teaching them what he had from his Father v. 8. And this is to be kept one after his departure as they had been kept one before as he continues to pray v. 12. For before they had been united in his Word which he gave unto them and which they had received and kept v. 6. 8. Thus also St. Paul tells us that the giving of Pastors and Teachers to Edâ—fie or compact us all into one Body of Christ is for edifying us in the Unity of the Faith and of the Acknowledgment of the Son of God Eph. 4. 11 12 13. And that the Church is to be one Body in holding to the oâ—e Faith Eph. 4. 4 5. And this has been the currant sense of the Christian Church The Vertue which keeps the Church together is Faith saith the Pastor Hermes as he is cited by Clemens of Alexandria We are constituted one Body of Christ and Members â—re of another by having the same Faith with him and with one another say the Fathers in the sixth general Council By the joyning of Charity and Faith Christ binds us up â—â—to one Body in himself saith St. Gregory the Great And we Christians are a Society says Tertullian incorporated on a Belief of the same Religion Or as he elsewhere expresses it confederated in the Fâ—llowship of the same Profession As to Points of Faith I understand this more particularly of those Points which are more important and call'd Fundamental and are all contain'd in the Apostles Creed These are the necessary and grand Points of the Christian Religion and the Belief thereof makes us Christians and accordingly they are all profess'd in our Baptism when we take this Profession upon us And this Faith is one necessary Bond of Union to keep Christians together in one Society Their first care must be to keep to this Faith which makes them Christians and in this Belief of the Christian Religion their next care must be to keep to any particular Society or Christian Church Other Points of Belief which are more remote from the Foundation do not so generally influence Mens Salvation nor so necessarily break off Communion but that Men may hold on joyning in the same Offices notwithstanding their embracing of some erroneous Opinions And under such Errors Peace and one Communion were pressed by the Apostles I conceive on the Churches in their Days But these being more necessary and essential to the Religion are more necessary also to the keeping of Society and Communion which is to be kept up among those who are united and agreed in this Religion And since all Church Association is to be on this bottom of Chrian Worship and Doctrine good Christians Unity or Dependance on their Bishops or one Churches Communion with other Churches is only to be whilst the Bishops and Churches themselves keep united to Christian Worship and Doctrines 'T is to their Bishops as to their Spiritual Teachers on whom they are to attend as obedient Disciples and so whilst they instruct and train them up in God's Truths not in ungodly Errors 'T is to them as they are Christs Ministers and so whilst they minister his Word not their own As joynts Eph. 4. 16. Col. 2. 19. And joynts are to compact or pin the Materials or Members together whilst they rest upon the Ground and Bottom viz. the Doctrine not when they start aside and go off from it And of an Heretick St. Paul says that he is turned aside or like a corner-stone started out of the Building So that the other Parts are no longer to be knit together into one spiritual House by him When People come at first to be Church-Members and to unite under their Bishops the Doctrine and Worship is first laid as the Ground-work for both the Head and Members to stand upon Thus we see it was in the first Formation of Churches and setting up external Union and Dependance under Bishops The Christian Doctrine was first taught and received which was the Foundation laid I have laid the Foundation says St. Paul when he had planted the Faith 1 Cor. 3. 10. And on the Foundation so laid a Church was raised and Bishops chosen out of the first-Fruits of the Converts as St. Clemens says and set over those that believed And ever since before Men receive Baptism to make them Church-members there is a Profession made of the Doctrine of the Apostles both in Faith or the Articles of the Creed and in Practice or the Commandments So that 't is Bishops heading of this Doctrine and Worship which bring Members to incorporate and unite under them And as their heading it brings People to them so their rejecting or defecting from it loosens the Tye and sets them free to go off again Their Fellowship with the Apostles and our Obligation to hold Fellowship with them is tyed to their keeping the Apostolical Declarations of what they had heard or seen 1 Jo. 1. 3. And in the Account of the Communion of the Primitive Christians the Fellowship of the Apostles and of the Bishops their Sucessors is linked to the Apostles Doctrine and to their breaking of Bread and Prayers Act. 2. 42. If a Bishop then defects from Christian Doctrine and Worship or falls into Heresie or Unchristian Worship that is a Discharge of his People from their spiritual Dependance and Relation and supersedes the Obligation of keeping Unity under him If we the Apostles or even an Angel from Heaven should preach any other Gospel unto you than that which we have already preached unto you let him be Aâ—athema or Accursed that is have no more communion and commerce with him than with those whom the Synagogue or Church has cut off Anathema being the Word for one excommunicate both in the Scripture and in the constant Language of the Church Gal. 1 8 9. And this he says as St. Chrysostom notes not only against those who subvert the whole Gospel but against those who go a little beside it or overthrow any Parts thereof And if a Church defects from the same it sets other Churches loose in like manner from the Obligation of holding on communion with them Unity of Faith binds them mutually to observe the Rules of fraternal communion and defection in Faith
gives discharge from them Accordingly this the Clergy of Rome put the granting or denying communion upon in their Answer to Marcion Telling him they could not receive him to communion in their Church without his Fathers consent and allowance because his Father the Bishop of Sinope who had cast him out of communion was of the same Faith with themselves And this discharge such defection gives upon the evidence of the Fact it self before synodical Cognizance or judicial sentence and declaration thereof As for other Crimes which concern only the Persons or conversation of Bishops not their Doctrine or Ministrations they give no discharge to the Clergy or People who are subject to them before the offending Bishops are regularly deprived for the same by judicial sentence And if before synodical sentence any Clergy or People break off from their Bishops or Bishops from their Metropolitanes or Metropolitanes from their Patriarks on pretence of them they make a Schism and are censured by the Church for so doing If any Presbyter or Deacon says the Council of Constantinople on pretence of Crimes meaning such personal Crimes shall dare to withdraw themselves from 〈◊〉 Communion of their Bishop or Bishops from their Metropolitane or Presbyters Bishops or Metropolitanes from their Patriack before Synodical cognizance and perfect condemnation past upon him He makes a Schism and shall incuâ— the penalty of deposition But as for Heresie or any damnable corruptions of Doctrine or Ministrations they give this discharge as soon as the Bishop c. is notoriously guilty of them before any Synod has sate or Sentence has pass'd upon him Thus St. Jerome expounds that Passage an Heretick is condemned of himself Tit. 3. 10. 11. Which says he is therefore said of Hereticks because when other Offenders as Fornicators Adulterers Murderers are not cast out but by the Sentence of the Bishop or Church censures Hereticks on the other hand pass sentence upon themselves on their own accord receding from the Church which recession seems to be a condemnation of their own conscience As many as attempt any tâ—inâ— against those Constitutions of the Fathers which concern the Faith thereby without more ado incur and bring on themselves the Censures coâ—tained in the Canons says Thalassius Bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia in the Great Council of Chalcedon When an Offence is only against the Canons of the Church the Desence of the Divine Canons we know is proper only to the Bishops but the Desence of the right Faith belongs not only to them but to every Orthodox Christian say the Holy Monks against the Patriark Anthimus faln to the Heresie of the Eutychians in their Libâ—l in the Council of Constantinople under Agapetus and Mennas Though no Synod has before condemned him yet he that has prevaricated and deserted the Orthodox Faith as Acacius he says had done by communicating with the Eutychians has enough for which he ought to be deny'd communion As also any one who before being a Catholick shall fall to communicate with any Heresie is justly thought to be thereby removed from our Society says Pope Gelasius Though in case of other Crimes they may not do it before Synodical Sentence yet in case of any Heresie condemn'd by the Holy Synods or Fathers they may depart and separate from the Communion of their Prelate say the foresaid Canons of Constantinople when once he comes to preach it publickly and to teach it bare-fac'd in the Church And then to withdraw from him before Synodical cognizance is not to incur the foresaid Canonical pains but to shew themselves worthy of that Honour which belongs to the Orthodox 'T is not to condemn Bishops say they but Pseudo-Bishops their Teachers not to rend the Unity of 〈◊〉 Church by a Schism but to study to free it from Schisms and Divisions So that in these Cases when the Defection of Doctrine and Worship is apparent and plain to their eyes and ears the People and Clergy may judge for themselves and withdraw from the Communion of such Heretical or Erroneous Pastors And accordingly the Apostolical Rules to the People are without staying for the declaration of a Synod if any turn a bringer of false Doctrine contrary to what they had delivered without more ado to hold him as Anathema or as one Excommunicate Gal. 1. 8. 9. and not to bid him God speed 2 Jo. 10. 11. By such defections then from Christian Doctrine or Worship the Ligaments of Union are broken towards the Governours of any Church or between one Church and another and there accrues a Liberty without any Breach of the Unity of the Church 1. For People to break off from their own Local Guides or for People and Clergy to break off from their own Bishops Tho' they were Apostles or Angels from Heaven they are to be held then as Anathema as St. Paul says that is not as Heads of Unity and Church-communion but as Excommunicate Men. If they cause Divisions from the Doctrines we have learned he bids the Church mark and avoid them Ro. 16. 17. The Peoples duty of adhering to and following them is no longer than they continue to be followers of Christ 1 Cor. 11. 1. c. 4. 18. But if they break off from his Truth and turn False Prophets however they come dress'd up in soft Pretences or in Sheeps-cloathing he tells us to beware of them and to fly them as Wolves Mat. 7. 15 16. to look to them and avoid them as St. Paul cautions against the Judaizers Phil. 3. 2. If they become bringers of False Doctrine bid them not God speed nor receive them into your Houses saith St. John 2 Jo. 10. 11. Thus when John of Jerusalem fell to erre in Point of Faith Epiphanius writ to the Monks as St. Jerom says that till he gave satisfaction in Point of Faith none of them should communicate with him And Ierom himself asks him where it is required that they should come under his Communion before such satisfaction were given And tells him 't is because of their difference in point of Faith that they may not communicate with him A People says St. Cyprian that would fear God and obey his Precepts ought to separate it self from an erring Prelate Such Persons if Metropolitanes are no longer to have neither any Authority over the Bishops of their Provinces nor the Communion of the Church as is decreed in the General Council of Ephesus They are to leave their Guides when they fall to misguâ—â— them and to stand off from their Persons lest they be corrupted with their Tenets And this is no more than is needful for them even in point of Caution being their keeping out of the way of Temptations which our Lord directs us to for a general Guard of all Vertues And standing off thus from Heretical Leaders they will approve themselves in the midst of Heresies by being stedfast in the Truth 1.