and he makes these two Tribunals so independant one on the other as hotly to maintain that he would rather suffer death or banishment than permit the appeals of Consistorial Sentences to the Magistrate TO be short the Congregational way hath this advantage over all the other establishments of Religion both the National Popish Episcopal and Presbyterian Church these cannot subsist but with a subordination of Consistories Colloquies Provincial and National Synods things which are not practicable but under Secular Powers either which may approve them or else may tolerate them whereas the Congregational way subsists not only under good Emperours as were Constantine the Great and Theodosius the first but also under the Pagan Dioclesians and under an Arrian Constantius for what persecution soever may be raised against this way nothing hinders but that a Minister who watches over a small flock may go to visit the Members from house to house to administer spiritual pasture and food to them for their nourishment and growth in grace To conclude the excellence of this way appears in this that it is far less exposed to persecution than any other and that the Presbyterian and the Episcopal do fall into it when the Magistrate is contrary to them CHAP. IX That the most Judicious Divines of France and other places without any thoughts of it do naturally fall into the Hypotheses of the Congregational Churches Of the Judgment which ought to be made of their Confession of Faith of their discipline and conduct I Could also streng hen all that I have said by the testimony of our new Doctors by that of Mounsieur Rivet Mounsieur Mestrâ—zat Monsieur Pajon Monsieur Claude and others showing that they undesignedly fall into the Opinion and Judgment of the Independants in laying down 1. THAT there is no other visible Church of Divine right than that which is assembled together in one place to attend upon the preaching and hearing of the word upon prayer and the participation of the Sacraments and it is in this manner that the Confession of the Church of England Article XIX defines the Church 2. THAT such a Church is Independant either on other Churches or on Synods that it may very well take from one or other advice and Counsel but it ought not to submit to their Commands 3. THAT no person can be forced to be a Christian nor to joyn with one Church rather than with another 4. THAT this Church hath liberty to do its own business its self or to connect into one body in the same manner as the Churches of France have done that it hath the liberty to retire from that connection or confederacy as the Churches of Metz and Sedan have done 5. THAT this Church to which the Christian is joyned is obliged to seek and to preserve a strict communion of Faith and Charity with the other Churches but yet hath a liberty of having a separate discipline 6. THAT this church ought to receive the fraternal admonitions of the other Churches and of their Synods in the same manner as a Synod of Africk acted upon the dissention which hapned between Innocent the first Bishop of Rome and the Church of Alexandria as Barlaam recites it I could also find these maxims in the Writings of the English Divines and show that in treating of the nature of the Church or of any other matter of divinity they have kept the language of the Independants or at least have approved of their practices The Learned Jackson Chap. 14. of the Church sayes that for these two causes one may lawfully frame Congregations distinct from others to have a separate Communion 1. WHEN they impose such practises as are contrary to Faith and Charity 2. WHEN they forbid wayes that are apparently most edifying and tend more to the increase and strength of Piety and Salvation than those which are now in use Dr. Stillingfleet assures us in pag. 109. of his Ireniâ—uâ—n that when in one and the same Territory Judgments and Churches are different the one from the other a Christian ought to joyn to that which retains most of the Evangelical purity He is bound to adhere to that Church that retaineth most of the Evangelical purity And in pag. 116. he sayes that a Christian is obliged to separate from Churches although Orthodox in the essential matters in case they retain some mixture of corruption in the practise His Words are a mixture of corruption as to the practise I could find the opinion of this Learned Doctour in several places up and down Monsieur Claude his Book where having laid down to us for a principle that the power of the Keyes and that of binding and loosing only is reposed in the faithful people of God he draws this Conclusion from it that private Churches ought to get to themselves such Members as they know to be more particularly the faithful and to remove from it the worldly persons to whom God hath not affixed that power of binding and loosing nor committed the management of the Keys of the Kingdome of Heaven I could ascend as far as Luther and Melancton to justifie the separation even from Churches that have not any errour in their Doctrine Luther in cap. 4. Geneseos Etiamsi praeterea nihil peccatum esset in Doctrina Pontificia justas tamen fuisse causas cur ab Ecclesiá Romanâ nos sejungeremus BUT the Independants have reasonably outvied Luther and the other Doctors for they hold though the Church of Rome should not have any defects either in Doctrine or Discipline yet they were not to be condemned for separating from Rome and for being independent on the Romish Church and her Synods more then to find fault with the Church of Sedan which is separate from that of Metz in regard of any dependance one upon the others or upon the Synods that were common with them In a word it is a thing as natural and as reasonable for a Church to divide it self into two other Churches which may each do their own business separately as for one family to be divided into two others whereof each hath the liberty to govern themselves according to their own way and fancy THUS you have in all this discourse if I am not much mistaken the Justification of the carriage and government of the Congregational way and very clear and full proofs of their conformity with the Ancient Christians As also their Confession does evidence that which they have with the Apostolical in a more plain free expressive and incontestable manner than any of the confessions that are collected in the Corpus or Syntagma Confessianum so far are they from being the work of persons distracted and Enthusiasts as some of our Divines have fancied that you might altogether with as much reason put among the productions of Fools and mad men the three most excellent and consummated pieces according to the Judgment that Alexander More has made of them the Epistle of Calvin before his Institutions
in his Catechisme yet it is most certain that from the second age they were distinguished in names and offices that the first Priest or Bishop attended more peculiarly upon preaching in publique and the Priests and Deacons upon the functions of lesser consequence as alms-giving c. from whence it is that we read so often of the first Bishops of Rome that such a one created so many Priests so many Deacons and that Hyggen in the year 141. created fifteen Priests fifteen Deacons and six Bishops That Eleutherius in the year 184 ordained 12 Priests 8 Deacons and 15 Bishops not to serve in the Church of Rome but in other places where the Bishop who had ordained them was to attend upon the preaching in publick and the Priests and Deacons upon the other functions of the holy Ministry for their Ministry was less fixt they went to break bread from house to house they instructed they comforted they confirmed Christians and those whom they called Fideles in the profession of the Christian Religion and in the Practise of Piety and drew over Jews and Gentiles to them and they baptized them adding every day some or other to the Church of Jesus Christ to be saved In a word they formed almost as many independant Churches as there were families but which then did not constitute a Communion distinct from that of the same Fideles in the greater and more numerous Assemblies and where they assisted not only at the hâ—aring of the word but also at the participation of the holy supper and all the sacred Ceremonies as Mounsieur le Sueur tells us I must needs make one observation here which will be of no mean consequence as to what I have said about the diversity of the names of Bishop Priest Elder Sacerdote and Deacon in the same Ministry against those who would fain perswade us that not only this Intendance of a Bishop over the Priests but also the prerogative that they attribute to themselves of having alone the Authority and the right to ordain Pastors is of divine right and by the Institution of the Apostles I must needs observe I say that since the words and the Offices have been distinguished Christian Antiquity never thought this Intendance and Prerogative to be of divine right because it was in the liberty of a Bishop to abandon the order or office of Bishop without quitting the office of Priest or of Minister of Jesus Christ and indeed without being able to do it unless he were constrained to it by the sentence of deposition They did deprive themselves then of an humane arbitrary and Mutable order unto which they were called by men but they could not divest themselves of that which they had received from Jesus Christ That was the Judgment of the Councel of Ancyra in the year 314. which having deposed some persons from the Episcopacy lest them in the Presbytry This is what the sixth Oecumenical Councel did Canon twenty which deposed a Bishop but did not take from him the Presbytry so that if there was then an Indelible Caracter it was not that of Bishop but that of Tresbyter and this is the farther confirmed and more strongly by this consideration that as it was an Usurpation or at least a Right purely humane when one of the Members of the Presbytry who was called Bishop attributed to himself alone the right and the office of Preaching in publick and not of communicating it to others but only as far as he pleased The same Judgment ought to be made of this Intendance over Priests and this prerogative to ordain and to conclude that neither Episcopacy nor the power to ordaine nor that to preach in publick which one person reserved peculiarly to himself were of Christ's Institution THIS is if I am not mistaken an observation which has not as yet by any been thought on but which is the unravelling of all the difficulties that those great men Mounsieur Daille the Father Mounsieur Larroque c. On one side and Mounsieur Pearson Bishop of Chester on the other have formed concerning either the Establishment or the overthrow of Episcopacy And here now is the Resolution of the words of Saint Jerome which have put so many people on the rack and have spent both so much pretious time and paper Quid facit Episcopus quod non facit presbyter exceptâ— ordinatione Which words Marsillius de Padoüa understands of the power that the Bishop reserved alone to himself by a right purely humane to regulate the Affairs of the Church because it would be a thing altogether absurd to make Saint Jerome say that Jesus Christ had in all things equalled the Priest to the Bishop except the power to ordain And now also you may see by all these declarations and discoveries a very strong establishment of the Congregational way But I now will return from this digression to pursue the subject I left off for it THE conduct and Government of the Christians under the time of Persecution and before that of Constantine differ'd very much from the manner which was observed when the Emperours were Christians and when they assembled together both more publickly and in greater numbers enjoying their full liberty As a Rigorous discipline under those Christian Emperours could not be practised but upon a small number in great Towns as Rome Antioch Alexandria Canstantinople c. Most of the persons who could not be distinguished one from another in the Crowd and Multitude and on whom they could lay nothing by way of reproach either entred into no discipline and were neither Poenitentes nor Catechumeni or else they passed for those who were called fideles and whom they never so much as question'd whether they were baptized or not For Saint Ambrose who was looked upon as a very good man and one of the fideles that frequented the Religious Assemblies both in publick and private was neither in orders nor baptized when the people of Milan took him and carried him away as a holy body to be a Bishop Will they say that after he was a Bishop he passed through all the degrees of discipline or penitence and that he was a Catechumen and afterwards a fidelis which name was given only to those who were called Lay or Secular persons And the example of Constantine the great who was baptized at the very point and moment of his death and that of Satyrus the brother of Ambrose and of Valentinian whom that Father so highly commends and who died before they were baptized are a very strong proof and argument for that which I here maintain NOW those of the faithful who were so rather in reality than the name did not under those Christian Emperours quit their good custome of converting their houses and their families into so many little Churches they performed there the same exercises of Piety both during their repasts and out of them BUT I must here make one remark by the way upon the passage of
THE CONFORMITY OF THE Discipline and Government Of those who are commonly called INDEPENDANTS To that of the ANCIENT PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANS By Dr. Lewis Du Moulin sometime History Professor of Oxford Qui repertâ veritate aliquid ulterius discutit mendacium quaerit Valentinianus Martianus LONDON Printed for Richard Janeway 1680. THE TABLE OF THE CHAPTERS CHap. 1. Of prejudices in General and of the force of the objections commonly urged against the Tenets and principles of Nestorius to serve by way of Introduction to the prejudices that are formed against the Independants Pag. 1. Chap. 2. The advantages of the Congregational may above any other Establishment of the Church beside That it is the most reasonable and that all others have insuperable inconveniences p. 3. Chap. 3. That upon the Ground of this Hypothesis that every supreme Authority either in the Popish or the Presbyterian Church is subject to ernour Monsieur de Condom hath reason to approve of the Congregational may and the independancy of particular Churches on any other Authority than that of Jesus Christ in his word p. 8. Chap. 4. That the design of the Congregational Churches is most holy and most reasonable when they labour to retain a conformity of Faith with the other reformed Churches but take the liberty to differ from them in matter of discipline Of the Veneration they have for Calvin and for the Churches which follow his Doctrine and discipline p. 12. Chap. 5. That the Congregational Churches do most rationally establish the Authority of Synods and Pastors and the nature of the Church p. 14. Chap. 6. An Answer to those who say that the Congregational way is incompatible with the Civil Power and that it deprives the Magistrate of the right he hath to the Government of the Church that it is introductory of Irreligion Ignorance and Schism in the Church p. 16. Chap. 7. That the Congregational way has been practised in all Ages of the World p. 23. Chap. 8. Of the great Benefit and Advantage that comes from the Establishment of the Congregational way in the World p. 34. Chap. 9. That the most Judicious Divines of France and other places without thinking of it do naturally fall into the Hypotheses of the Congregational Churches Of the Judgment which ought to be made of their Confession of Faith of their discipline and conduct p. 38. Chap. 10. Of the Wise and Prudent carriage of the Independants and of their way to get further off the Church of Rome than any other and to condemn all the wayes of Reconciliation with it and the Churches that hold any Communion with Rome That the indeavour to come near it is damnable and pernicious as is sufficiently seen in the present posture of the affairs of England p. 43. Chap. 11. A continuance of the same matter concerning the wise carriage of those Churches that are for their way Congregational when they condemn all manner of speaking like to Rome and all practises that do any whit savour of theirs and the six Maxims on which the Pope and his Church are founded a Confirmation of that by a History taken out of the Life of Joseph Hall p. 47. Chap. 12. An Apology for the Author of the Conformity of the congregational Churches with that of the Antient Primitive Christians That a disinteressed person such as he is is the most fit to write about these matters Of the Obligation he hath to the Bishop of Condom for the light he hath given him p. 53. Chap. 13. The Explication of one difficulty which runs throughout the whole precedent discourse p. 58. Chap. 14. Remarks upon the Fault that some may find in the Title of this discourse p. 60. Chap. Ult. An Answer to those who accuse the Independants for being the Authors of the late Civil Wars in England and particularly for having had an immediate hand in the death of KING CHARLES the first p. 68. THE CONFORMITY OF THE GOVERNMENT Of those who are commonly called INDEPENDANTS With that of the ANCIENT PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANS CHAP. I. Of prejudices in General and of the force of the Objections commonly urged against the Tenets and Principles of Nestorius to serve by way of Introduction to the prejudices that are formed against the Independants 'T IS above fifty years since some learned and judicious Persons as well of the Gown as others have now brought to light an important and necessary truth which the strength of prejudice and a General and Opinionative blindness that hath lasted for more than this thousand years hath kept under a Bushel 'T is that of Nestorius which the eminent Authority of Cyril has made to pass during all that time and even from the third Oecumenical Councel for an absolute lie and with which all the learned both the general and particular Councils all the Fathers and all the new Doctors of both Communions have been so successively prepossessed that they have thought it nearly concerned their honour not only to deny it but even to be continually throwing their Anathema's at the head of the poor Nestorius whom they have made to pass for an abominable Heretick although at the bottome Nestorius was he of the two who was by far the more Orthodox and the honester man and on the other hand Cyril was the Heretick For it is with the Authority of Cyrillus as with that eminent Authority of the Church of Rome to which Monsieur Aâ—â—auld would have all men fixed and with which he thought to overwhelm and undo Monsieur Claude NOT to make any Application of this History to what has happened to my self in particular as to the necessary truths I have promulged and advanced I will content my self with fixing to one which is like to that of Nestorius 't is that about those who are called Independants who though they will not yield in exactness of living or in holiness of Doctrine to any of the Protestants in Europe for they are led more than other Christians by the Spirit of Jesus Christ which is a Spirit of meekness moderation and of a sound mind and they are farthest off from the spirit of malignity and Persecution and their Doctrine hath more of conformity with that of the Apostles and the Primitive Christians than any of the others and though to conclude their confession of Faith is the most Nervous and sinewy the most Orthodox and coutched up in terms so strong and powerful that of all pieces which yet have appeared in the World fince the Writings of the Apostles it is the most full and perfect Yet have they had the unhappiness to be loaded with injuries by our Synods and by those of our Divines who are the most eminent in learning and of a life and piety the most exemplary and that too in a manner altogether inhumane and barbarous so far as that Monsieur Amyâ—auld calls them Fools Enthusiasts and such as are infamous in their lives Monsieur D' Aille the Father says of them that it
their Faith their Religion nor the guidance of their manners to an Authority which is subject to errour but only to the Word of God which is an infallible Authority Upon this ground the Bishop of Condom hath reason to condemn the Synod of Charenton for having taxed the Judgement of the Independants with Errour which consists as sayes the Synod in what they teach that every Church ought to be governed by its own laws without any dependance upon any in matters Ecclesiastical and without any obligation to acknowledge the authority of Synods for its governance and conduct THEN a little after this same Synod decides that this Sect is as prejudicial to the State as to the Church that it opens a door to all sorts of Irregularities and extravagancies that it takes away all the means of bringing any remedy to them and that if it had field-room enough it would form to it self as many Religions as Parishes or particular Assemblies THESE last words sayes the Bishop discover that it is principally in matters of Faith that the Synod would establish dependancy since the greatest inconvenience that he takes notice of into which the faithful people of God would fall by independancy is that they would frame as many Religions as Parishes then says he of necessity according to the Doctrine of that Synod each Church and by a stronger reason each particular must depend as to what respects faith upon a supreme Authority which resides in some Assembly or in some body to which Authority all the faithful people of God ought to submit their Judgement THIS Bishop could take notice of nothing more unreasonable and more extravagant in our Synods than to oblige a private person to submit himself in matters of Faith to the Judgment of an Assembly whose decisions are not the Word of God that is to say not infallible 'T IS true that pre-supposing all Supreme Authority in the Church whether in the Protestant or Romish is subject to errour the Government of the Adversaries of Rome of Independants or other Protestants is equally justifiable when they refuse to pay submission to the Authority of Rome since that it is incomparably more defective than that which the Protestants set up in their Churches BUT on the other side if it be true that upon this ground the Government of the Independants is more justifiable and more reasonable than that of other Protestants who blindly submit themselves to a Tribunal subject to errour and whose conduct and gonance is beyond all comparison further off from Reason than is that of the Papists for pre-supposing that the Authority of Rome is infallible the submission which the people pay to that supreme Authority is so much the more reasonable as that of the Protestants is the less when they submit to a supreme Authority which they themselves believe is subject to errour IN short the Bishop of Condom hath great reason to be sure that the Protestants are mightily beside the Cushion and to blame for condemning the Infallibility of Rome so long as the Incontestability and indisputableness which they invest their supreme Authority withal carries the same Obligation along with it to obedience and submission A great Divine of ours who relates the Judgement of the Protestants hereupon libr. 1. cap. 8. de Clavibus expresses himself in these words Hujus ligamenti quo Pastores Ecelesiae constringunt peccatores tanta est vis certitudo ut Christus pronunciet si quid ligaverint pastores in terris id fore ligâ—tum in coelo id est Deum Ratum habiturum hanc ligationem potest fieri aliquando ut ligatio sit injusta vult tamen Christus eam ratam esse non enim fas est homini qui injuste excommunicatus est invaaere sacram Coenam invitis Pastoribus irrumpere in communionem Ecclesiae IS not that to tell us that a man excommunicated unjustly is as much obliged to submit himself to the excommunication pronounced against him by an Authority which hath erred as when it is given by an Authority which hath not erred And is not that to tell us that in every way whither justly or unjustly a person delivered to Satan as is the general opinion of all Protestants excepting my Father that to deliver to Satan and to excommunicate are one and the same thing ought not to dispute oâ—â— resist that Authority which hath delivered him up to that evil Spirit To conclude is not that to speak in the Language of the Canon Si papa distinct 40 which will by no means permit a person cast thus to the Devil although against all right and justice by the Authority of the Pope to resist that supreme Authority THE Bishop likewise hath no less good Reason to be sure that the conjunction of all the parts of Romish Church in one body would be unreasonable if they were not cimented by infallibility and to divest it of its Infallibility is to break it in pieces is to cast every of its least parts into Independancy and to give liberty to every of them to govern themselves according to their own mode and way and to do their business by themselves BUT here we should observe as we go along that of two depths of Satan the Ecclesiastical Power and Infallibility the first is a Lie an Imposture and a cheat but that presupposing that it is not a cheat but a thing that is good and true and the use of which is necessary in the Church Infallibility is naturally and reasonably a consequence of it And in truth our Reformers have placed Incontestability in the room of Infallibility But it is true also that if Infallibility be a pure cheat the other is a pure and absolute tyranny and it is less reasonable in not being a natural consequence of Ecclesiastical power incontestability is a thousand times worse than Infallibity except it be in one thing and that is that it hath not been of so long a Duration 'T IS here no doubt wherein the illuminations of humane Reason were not so great to our first Reformers as to the generation of men in this Age For as those soresaw in it that a submission of so many Princes and people who differed in Customes Laws and Languages to an Authority subject to errour was not only unreasonable but also impossible to prevent the revolt both of Kings and people they with a great deal of Justice invested it with Infallibility AND 't is here too that the Bishop of Condom triumphs over us and has great reason for it on his side when he reproaches us that we have been deficient in our Politicks in not erecting among us an infallible Tribunal and that we are much to blame for obliging the faithful people of God with so much rigour and severity to submit to a tribunal subject to errour but those of Rome are not so for they oblige their people to submit to one that is infallible BUT the Independants as they are led by
the illumination of grace and reason so likewise are they most reationally and with great Justice and Piety disengaged not only from a pretended Infallible Tribunal but also from the Tyranny of such dependance or submission to an Authority subject to errour AS to the Assertion of the Synod of Charenton that the Sect of the Independants opens the door to all manner of Irregularities and Extravagances that Assertion I say seems plausible at the first as in truth it is not only plausible but most reasonable in matters purely Civil in which if there were not a last Resort and Refuge and Appeal from Court to Court in the Territories of a Soveraign there would be as many Courts erected Independant one on the other not only as there are Families but as there are private persons Which inconvenience is not one in matters of Religion Faith Doctrine and Divine Worship in which the Conscience of every one is the last resort wherein the business is to be judged without any further Appeal and where none ought to be constrained but exhorted and perswaded A Synod is to perswade a particular Church to embrace such a Faith but it hath neither right nor power to force it Now a particular Church is to do the same as to one of its Members and if it carries any constraint with it it no longer acts as a Church and as an Assembly of Christians and faithfulâ— people but as a Magistrate at least like an Arbiter and Judge to whom Jesus Christ sent the planteth in the eighteenth Chapter of St. Matthew in these words tell it to the Church that is to say tell it to an Assembly which had neither any Court nor any power nor Jurisdiction and where the party intimated mightly decline or refuse the Judgement without damage as it appears by those words of Jesus Christ if he dres not hearken to the Church For by these words let him be unto thee c. Jesus Christ does not command the Church to proceed to an Excommunication of that party that has done the wrong but he advises the offended party to cite the other who has deprived himself of the quality of a Brother before the natural Judges as well of the Publicans as of the Heathens the one being the Ministers of the State and the other being of the Religion of the Emperour In short the Church as such and considered as Christians and honest men hath no more jurisdiction that a Colledge of Philosophers CHAP. IV. That the design of the Congregational Churches is most holy and most reasonable when they labour to retain a Conformity of Faith with the other Reformed Churches but take the liberty to differ from them in matter of Discipline Of the veneraiton they have for Calvin and for the Churches which follow his Doctrine and Discipline THE design of producing their Confession of Faith is to shew that it is the very Masterpiece of an extreamly juditious Government and as it was the work of persons most perfect in the Study of Divinity the principal design they had in the composition of their Confession was to declare and testifie to the World that altho every Church might take the liberty to differ from others in discipline they ought nevertheless to labour above all things to retain and keep the same faith in matters that are essential with all the Reformed Churches This is what the Congregational party have done with great care and circumspection in the making of their Confession for beside that they do but a very little differ from that of the Presbyterians and that they do not at all divide from them but in matter of Discipline they have also indeavoured to have their Faith conformable to the Doctrine of the Church of England and as to their Discipline it is very simple and naked they have no other than that which Saint Paul gives in three words to wit That every thing in the Church should be done Decently and in Order They have especially had an eye to the practice of the Churches under the good Roman Emperors under Constantine Theodosius Martianus and Justinian under whom they kept a strict uniformity in Faith and that correspondence was maintained by letters which they called Literae Testimoniales Circulares Ecclesiasticae Formatae tho otherwise they took the liberty to differ one from another even under one and the same Emperour in Discipline in Customes and in Ceremonies Saint Austin Epist ad Tanuarium 119. Epist 86. ad Casulanum Presbyterum permits any Church to differ from others in Ceremonies and in manner of Government provided that they agree with them in Unity of Faith The Historian Socrates libr. 5. cap. 21. tells us that there was not to be found two Churches in all the Roman Empire which observed one and the same form of Prayers to God The Jesuit Mainbourg how zealous soever he is to the Uniformity of Rome in his Doctrine and discipline yet he ceases not to say and to maintain that the diversity of usages customes and practices is compatible with the unity of Faith One ought not says he never to separate for the diversity and customes which may be different the one from the other without the wounding the Vnity of Faith Pag. 303. of his third book of the Treatise of Schism among the Grecians I have read as much in a great Lawyer it is Godefrey the Son Certissima olim fidei contesseratio erat unà Eucharistiam sâ—mere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dicebantur non in eadem disciplina sed fidâ— WE must also do them this justice that there are no Doctors who have a greater Veneration for the Doctrine and memory of Caloin nor who desire with more ardent zeal to have a strict and close Communion with the Churches which follow the Doctrine of that holy man than their Pastors altho they believe that they may have as I have said the liberty to differ from them in matter of discipline without thinking themselves guilty either of separation or schism CHAP. V. That the Congregational Churches do most rationally Establish the Authority of Synods and Pastors and the nature of the Church 'T IS a great wrong and injury done to the Independants to affirm that they condemn Synods since on the contrary they Establish the true use of them as the Bishop of Condom who hath more charity for them than other Synods and our Divines acknowledge The Independants says he do not refuse to embrace and comply with the decisions of Synods when after they have duely examined them they find them not unreasonable that which they refuse to do is to submit their Judgement to that of any Assembly or Society subject to errour THE Independants argue as Mr. Pajon does Though Jesus Christ himself says he should come down from Heaven to dwell on the earth again with all the rayes of Glory that are roand about him to teach us and to guide and direct us yet it would be impossible for us
Omnipotentiam non credunt 'T IS true they are accused for depriving the Magistrate from the same Authority and Soveraign Intendence over the Ecclesiastical State as over that of the Civil But notwithstanding they do sufficiently satisfy all reasonable and considerate persons of this in the four and twentieth Chapter of their Confession Beside those who condemn that collaterality of Governments and of Tribunals the one Ecclesiastical and the other Civil in one and the same territory and who believe that it comes from the forge of Antichrist and that it hath introduced Popery into the world do not trouble themselves about resolving the difficulty nor about assigning to each his Lawes his Courts his Officers his Soveraign and the measure of his Power and Authority I add that as the force and efficacy of Laws does not consist in whither they are Ecclesiastical or Civil nor in their goodness justice and truth but in the will of him or those who sit at the Helm of Affairs the Congregational Churches must of necessity acknowledg the force of all those Laws whither for the Ecclesiastical or the Civil State only they affirm that as the Magistrate is not Infallible he may possibly abuse his right and orr either in the publication or the execution of his Laws of what Nature soever they be and as they are not obliged to obey all Civil Laws no more are they obliged to obey all Laws Ecclesiastical they affirm also that as the Empire of Jesus Christ in matters of Religion is not over the bodies but over the hearts of men the Magistrate who is the Protector and Defender of the visible Church of Jesus Christ in his Territories sins extremely when he makes Laws and Ordinances that do violence to the bodies of his Subjects and that take from them that liberty which every man ought to have in the choice of his Religion and in the manner of serving God BUT that crime which is imposed on them supposing it to be one is incomparably less than that of Presbyterian Churches all which follow the establishment and the practise of Calvin who set up in Geneva an Ecclesiastical Tribunal Independant and distinct from that of the Magistrate insomuch that a learned man named Monsieur Jurieu has writ a large Book wherein he endeavours to prove that the Soveraign Magistrate considered as such has not any jurisdiction nor Intendence over the Collected Churches in his Dominions and that he hath no other right than that of Inspection and considered as a Christian and one of his principal Members wherein Monsieur Jurieu is more Independant than the Independants themselves and he does not afford so much Authority to the Magistrate over the Churches that are collected within his Territories and Dominions as the Independants do THE Independant Churches and their Pastors are very wide from these thoughts and practises For the Authority of every Congregation being as that of every Family what liberty soever it has to govern it self according to its own way and humour it is not neither in right nor in power nor even in will to set up a Tribunal distinct from and Independent on that of the Magistrate AFTER all a Prince who should endeavour to establish an Arbitrary Power in his Kingdom that should depend only upon God and his Sword might imagine he should be less hindred by several thousands of Independant Congregations not only on him and on his Courts but also the one Independant on the other than by one entire body of all those Churches which should set up by their deputies an Ecclesiastical Tribunal distinct from and Independant on the Civil For the strengeh of all those Independant Congregations would be like that of several threads which may easily be broke one after another whereas the strength of all those Churches joyned in one body would be like to that of all those threads twisted together which it would be almost if not absolutely impossible to break or to undo but by the same way that Alexander took to break the Gordian-knot AS the Independent Churches do come the nearest to those of the Apostles so likewise they are further off than any of the other reformed Churches from that thought and practise which has accomplished the Mystery of Inquity which is nothing else but the Empire of the Clergy and so consequently That of the Pope in the Empire of the secular Powers under the Mask and Disguise of Religion and Ecclesiastical power AS to the Objection that is made against them that in case there should be no other Ecclesiastical Establishment in a Kingdom than theirs the three fourths of the Inhabitants would live in great negligence and a gross Ignorance of Religion To that they say that their way does not exempt Pastors from attending upon the Office of their Ministry at all times and places both within and without their particular Congregations and to take the same pains as the Presbyterian Ministers do for what repects the preaching of the word in the most publick places also they do very much approve that the Magistrate should erect Academies and Colledges assign Tithes and Revenues and Temples establish persons to be imployed in the instruction of people in publick to invite them to it and to excite the Ignorant to frequent the Schools and the Lectures of the Professors of Arts and Sciences where they should go for the love of vertue and knowledge without being constrained AS to the crime of Schism which is imposed on them as their being seperate from all the visible Churches of Jesus Christ in the same manner as the Donatists the Novatians and the Luciferians did 't is a false Accu sation Those who accuse them of Schism do not understand the nature of Schism 1. 'T IS not Schism when a particular Church separates from another Church as the Church of Luther from that of Calvin nor the Protestants from the Papists nor even one particular reformed Church from some other with which it made before but one body of a Church But true Schism is formed among the Members of one and the same particular Church as was that of Corinth 2. 'T IS not Schism when a number of Hereticks separate from the Orthodox party of a particular Church to make a Congregation apart to the end they may profess their heresie with greater liberty but it is an Apostasie and an abandoning and forsaking of the Orthodox faith or Church of Jesus Christ which is Catholick and visible and upon this ground the Church of Rome is not a Schismatical but an Apostate Church although it be one for the first reason because that what ingagement or tye soever all its Members have to one head however they are not all agreed together Schism properly is when the Members of one Church are at variance as were those of the Church of Corinth and upon that account there is alwayes a Schism in the Romish Church 3. THERE is no Schism among several particular Churches that
differ one from the other in discipline but that retain and keep all the same foundation and ground of faith and who have for that point a great union and a strict correspondence with other Churches And this being so no more is there any Schism when the Congregationals are Independant on other Churches and on their Synods but when their Churches are so among themselves 4. THERE is no Schism among several particular Churches that agree in one and the fame faith and discipline as are those of Metz and Sedan but do their own business apart independantly not only on one another but likewise on the Synods 'T is with Independant Churches or with several other particular Churches as with several families or Neighbourhoods or those that are pretty distant the one from the other who may all be good friends and live in good Intelligence together without any thing of Schism or rupture between them and yet every one does their own particular business by themselves 5. THE Congregational men are no more guilty of Schism when they form to themselves Congregations distinct from Parishes contrary to the command of the Magistrate 't is a disobedience not to a National Church which Jesus Christ hath not instituted much less invested with either Jurisdiction or power to make Laws in matters of Religion but to the Magistrate whom to disobey is not Schism but a crime of laesoe Majestaetis or rebellion but yet it ceases to be that too when it acts only from this principle of obeying God rather than men NOW this clearing up of the Nature of Schism which strongly establishes the Independancy of the Churches and makes it altogether reasonable does not destroy the Confederation of the Churches into one body even under a national Synod when for the mutual preservation of these Churches against a common Enemy that persecutes them they are constrained to make but one body of State or of Churches such as is the Confederation of our Churches in France But then that necessity does not destroy the natural liberty of every particular Church to be Independant 't is a Confederation established with prudence in that manner as was that of the Cities of Achaida and as is at this day that of the Low-Countries and of the Swizers the conjunction of which into one body and under one and the same jurisdiction does not divest any Town or Province of their natural freedome and liberty to be Independant on one another THERE is however this temper and menage to be observed in this Religious Confederation that it ought to be made not by vertue of the Power of binding and loosing and of the Keys of the Kingdome of heaven which it is pretended that God hath committed to Pastors or Synods but by vertue of a confederated discipline which is in the place of a Magistrate Also the Councel of Monsieur Amyraule should be observed and it is the same that the Cities of Achaia observed before viz. that nothing should pass in the general Assembly but what has been first reviewed and approved of by every particular Church AND this is that wherein the prudence of our first Reformers in France have been wanting when they sat up a discipline by vertue of an Ecclesiastical power distinct from that of the Magistrate and from that which has its operation upon the heart by the Ministry of the word and of a power fastened to the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heaven and to that of binding and loosing by vertue of which power they depose and excommunicate that is to say as Monsieur Claude says they deliver up a person to the Devil but they also deliver him to him in the name and Authority of Jesus Christ that so the people may not imagine this power to be that of the Magistrate or of the confederate discipline but of Jesus Christ the Mediatour and King of his Church and by vertue of the power that he exercises over it and of which the Pastors and Ministers are the depositers AS to those who blame as much the separation of the Independants as that of the Donatists the Novatians and Luciferians it is ill grounded the vice of the Donatists was in that they owned no other Church of Jesus Christ in the World than theirs for they rebaptized those who came from the Catholick Church to them the Independants are far from these thoughts and practices they do as those who having a particular care of their health withdraw into a better place and sounder Air but yet they do not think but that they may do very well in places where the Air is not so good BEFORE I go to another Chapter I shall take notice that the result of the thoughts and of the practises of the Congregationals their Churches and their Pastors do come to these two Maxims 1. THAT to establish peace and true Religion in the World and among Christians we must go back to the Materia prima of the Congregational Churches which is that every person and every Society hath the liberty to deliberate and consult about the choice of a Religion and of the way to serve God and to take upon that point the counsel of wise and sincere persons provided that that counsel tends not to Irreligion and to some Establishment of such maxims which shock the natural Notions concerning the existence of a God his Providence the Immortality of the soul the necessity of a Divine Worship provided also that the manner which every person and every Church hath chosen to govern it self by doth not trouble the State in which one lives unless that trouble happen by accident in the manner that Jesus Christ sayes of the Gospel which excites troubles and brings Wars and contentions into the World 2. THAT this maxim of a national Church in every Territory with an uniformity of Doctrine and discipline distinct from the civil Tribunals in jurisdiction and officers hath introduced the Pope into the World that it hath been it is and it will be the cause that there never will be a Church in the World in its true purity unless Almighty God reserves some among the Congregational Churches CHAP. VII That the Congregational way has been practised in all Ages of the World I Could easily shew that for above this four thousand years before Jesus Christ and even during the height of Popery and in the bosome of the Church of Rome God hath alwayes reserved some true Worshippers of Jesus Christ by the way of Congregational Assemblies there were an infinite number of them in the Roman Empire during the persecution that was set on foot by the Arrians and when as St. Jerome sayes all the World were Arrians BUT to come more particularly to the thing they have had Independant Churches in all times and in all places before the Law and under the Law in the time of Jesus Christ and of the Apostles and after the Apostles there were of them in the time of Exos the Son of
is impossible I say that he can suffice and attend upon the Instruction of all those Auditors and of every one of them in particular which is most easy to be done by the way that the Pastors of Independant Churches take whereof every Congregation is not at the most above two hundred persons and who are also eased and help'd by their Coadjutors in the work of the holy Ministry so that this kind of Congregational way seems to be the accomplishment of the Prophesy concerning the Covenant of Grace which God was to make in the lest times with his people where there shall be no more need to have recourse to the Bishop or to his Curate for receiving instruction because every person who is in the Covenant of Grace as the greatest number of those who compose those Congregations do belong to that Covenant shall be filled with the knowledge of the Lord and the Pastor himself shall go to visit his sheep and take a particular care of them So likewise this is the way of the Pastors of the little flock of Jesus Christ to whom he will give the Kingdom THERE are also other Considerations which confirm me absolutely in this opinion that God in a more especial manner approves of the Congregational way One is that most an end in all others the Ministers are influenced by worldly interest by ambition and the desire of ruling that its Establishment could never be made without noise and without the opposition of the Magistrate and the people for they have been always against this erection of a National tribunal Independant on the Magistrates who never had given their consent to it till after the advocates and pleaders for this national tribunal had been indefatigably buzzing into their ears these fair and specious Remonstrances that it was the voice of God and of Jesus Chriâ—t that the world should be governed by two Collaterall powers This is what the Decretals made the Kings and the people to believe in the ninth age and they strongly insisted that the Bishop of Rome was to be at the head of the Ecclesiastical power and to prescribe laws to them by the Ministry of his Clergy for the regulating of Religion and for the Affaires of the Church And this is what Calvin also made those to believe who left the Church of Rome when he erected a Tribunal for the matters of Religion in which the Magistrates should not be seen in the quality of Magistrates but only as Members of the consistory But yet a Tribunal that should be as much invested with Incontestability and with a power not to appeal from it as that of Rome is with Infallibility And this is what Calvin carryed by main force not only against the will of the Magistrate and of the people of Geneva but against the practise of all Churches and against the Judgment of all the Divines of his time BUT it hath not been so with the Establishment of the Congregational way to which the people have had as great an Inclination and natural forwardness as the Pastors themselves Which has been seen in England for above this forty years For of more than sixscore persons who made up the Assembly of Ministers there was above a hundred of them for the Presbyterian Government and about eight or ten for the Congregational way and two only Coleman and Lightfoot for the opinion of Erastus Yet nevertheless when it came to the Execution and practise there was not one of ten thousand people that would submit to the Presbyterian Government And one of them who was the most Eminent confessed to me that being Pastor of the greatest Parish in London he was never able to establish in it a consistory nor find any that would be of it but a pitiful Scotch Taylor This difficulty was not seen as to the Congregational way for whereas only the Pastors were for the Presbyterian way there were proportionably as many people as Ministers who joined in the Assemblies of the Congregational way Which they did with more heat and fervour than the Parliament would have had them in so much that they were forced to publish a Declaration by which they exhorted the people to put off the gathering of Churches till the Parliament had made a more publick regulation thereof As to the opinion of Erastus though it was not approved in the Assembly but by two Divines it had notwithstanding the applause of most of the Magistrates of the learned and more illuminated who were not of the Gowne which discovers 1. THAT Interest is the Toole and Engine that moves most men in the world and that if the Magistrates were for an Intendance which the Presbyterians would take away from them these were no less in love with and eager of it 2. THAT it is very probable that the Advocates of the Congregational way were sincere whilest their number had a just proportion of Ministers Magistrates and People that were much for it I proved in the sixt Chapter of my Jugulum causae that of these two truths the first was put beyond all peradventure that Totus Mundus exercet histrionem that the greatest men do oft times mix some grain of wordly interest with that of Heaven adding not the Vtile to the honestum but the honestum to the Vtile espousing or quitting their Opinion according as they are actuated by the moving principle of sua cuique Vtilitas as Tacitus speaks For they resemble Pope Pius II d. who being a Cardinal submited the Pope to the Council but he changed his Opinion as soon as ever he came to be Pope himself Much about twenty years since the Learned Dr. Stillingfleet preferred the Presbyterian Government to the Episcopal but now he has had several fat benefices bestowed upon him and he is advanced to the Deanry of S. Paul Episcopacy is most excellent both in his esteem and opinion and in his writings THIS way is so much the more excellent just and reasonable as it hath a Compatibility with the Government of a National Church which makes but one entire body with that of the Republick as under the legal Oeconomy whereas the Government of a National Church distinct and Independant upon that of the Republick is not compatible with any government neither with that of the Magistrate nor with that of the Congregational Churches though the government of this latter might be compatible with all kinds of Government if it would be suffered for a multitude of small Congregational Churches is as much compatible with the Civil State as is a multitude of Families because neither the one nor the other do form to themselves a body by their deputies which establishes a Tribunal distinct from and independant on that of the Civil State whereas the Popish Episcopal and Presbyterian Government erects a Tribunal in every Territory independant on all others Calvin gave the first Model of it in Geneva Volui sayes he ut Judicium Ecclesiasticum disticium esset à Civili
that of Thuanus before his History and the Preface of Casaubon in his Edition of Polybius 'T WILL no doubt be expected that I should add the order which is observed and practised in the Independant Churches to their confession which ought to follow but as they profess a perfect harmony among themselves so likewise they do not believe this same absolute necessity as to that which concerns discipline for excepting some few Apostolical and perpetual Rules which admit no change according to times and places concerning the equality of Pastors that choice that every Church is to make of its Pastor in which Monsieur Mestrezat and Monsieur Claude make the true ordination to consist the solemn benediction of that Pastor by fasting and prayers and the refusal they make of their Ministries and of their Members which some call Excommunication and deposition excepting I say these acts their order is to do all things decently and in order in the Church as Saint Paul requires But they are governed as all other Societies and as they explain themselves in the first Chapter of their confession of faith Article VII in these words There are some circumstances in the Government of the Church and in divine Worship which are common with all the actions of men which are practised in all societies and which might â—o be regulated by natural light and Christian prudence according to the general rules of the word of God which are always to be observed THIS is all the discipline which the Independâ—nts practise then Government is that of well order d Râ—publicks that cannot possibly be too exact for the regulating of manners but which have but very few Lawes for that of Polity they are far from that Maxim in pâ—ssima republicà pluri ne leges BUT how â—ise soever their carriage and government be how sound and Orthodox their Doctrine and how exact and scrupulous their â—ives yet they cannot escape the tyrâ—â—ny of those little sincere judgements which the most learned and grave persons have made of them so that it need be no surprize at all if the Doctors of Rome how illuminated soever and sincere they have seem'd to be have had for so many Ages and have still to this day so great an Aversion for our Religion how holy soever it is and have passed judgments so little favourable of it as to draw from our Morals consequences that are as far from purity and truth as they are from our intention This I say need be no surprize at all to us since that Amyrauld Daillé and so many others of their gown have not passed any less sinister judgment of a generation of men as holy as any in the World I mean of the Independants no more than of their carriage government and Doctrine AS to their carriage and Government whether in private or in the Church I do not believe there are any better regulated more Wise more Prudent more Illuminated nor more Religious As to their Doctrine their Confession of Faith shall Witness what it is since that of all those that have appeared in the World of that Nature it is a peice the most Perfect Pure and Orthodox And in which it may well nigh be said the Christian Religion may be found compleat though there should onely be remaining that single piece in all the Booksellers Shops in the World CHAP. X. Of the Wise and Prudent carriage of the Independants and of their way to get further off the Church of Rome than any other and to condemn all the wayes of Reconciliation with it and the Churches that hold any Communion with Rome that the indeavour to come near it is damnable and pernicious as is sufficiently seen in the present posture of the affairs of England THOSE who shall approve of the wise conduct of the Congregational Churches in the composing of a Confession that hath so much conformity with the purest Churches of Jesus Christ will be easily perswaded that neither Wisdome nor Prudence have been wanting to them when with that conformity of Faith that there is between them and the Churches that are at greatest distance from Popery they have preserved to themselves their liberty as to matter of discipline to do their business a part independantly one on the other and on all other Authority beside that of Jesus Christ without making use of that way of Reconciliation which hath been practised in all Ages by the means of conferences and Synods which have rather sharp'ned and exasperated spirits and perpetuated quarrels than any ways appeased and hushed them and whereof all the advantage that can be hoped is at most to make such an accord as it may be dissembles or disguises or else suppresses the truth THIS is no more than what appeared in the Colloquy of Poissy where the greatest defenders of Transubstantiation and those who combated and opposed it as a vile Monster of Rome concurred together upon the Article of the real presence in the Eucharist And this is what appear'd also in the Overture of Reconciliation which was made in the year 1578. in the Synod of Saincte Foy with the Lutherans by the means of a formulary or president of such a profession of Faith as should be general and common with all Churches as they proposed to draw up but that Overture could only tend to a Reconciliation as difficult as that of finding a Medium between Transubstantiation and the Opinion of our Churches which is contrary to it Certainly our Churches were never able to draw back from the purity of our Doctrine nor from the sincerity with which they express it without being at the same time guilty of great prevarication And moreover the Lutherans would never have yielded to go off from their ingagement to Luther and his Consubstantiation If both had complied and met at half way it would have been a most wretched peace quae as Saint Austin speaks fit dispenaio veritatis THE present posture of the Affairs of England is a very clear and convincing proof that the Indeavour of those Reconcilers how good soever their designs were is ruinous both to Church and State There has been an attempt for above this last Age to get into a Neighbourhood and Vicinity with Rome thinking to sweeten the spirits and tempers of those of its communion to draw them over to ours or at at least to make but one Communion of two In the beginning of the Reformation there were several of the Ceremonies retained and fifty years afterwards others of them were introduced they have attempted to bring in Images and so to pass from thence to worshipping of them Every where the Altars are new set up on purpose no doubt to make there the Sacrifice of the Mass to Smoak which is apparent by the bowings and cringings to those Altars or at least to the places where they are set or as some will have it be to the East The Ordination of Romish Pastors is held for good and for that
of the true Church of Jesus Christ and on the other hand that of the other Reformed Churches because they were not Episcopal is rendred void and null and because they had not the â—ark of the beast upon their fore-head whereat Monsieur Claude is extreamly offended Nay they have gone to that extremity that one Henry Dodwell hath newly published a large Book where he labours to prove and establish this maxim that there where there is no Episcopal Ordination there is no true Church no Minister of Jesus Christ no Sacrament and no Salvation They have lest out those expressions that are a shock and offence to Rome that the Pope is the Antichrist the man of sin and the Son of Perdition the Doctors of the Church of England as Thorndike Tailor Bramhal Patrick Sherelock c. have sweetned the Doctrines of Rome to make them rellish and go down the better with the Protestants In a word to compleat the design they had to testifie their kindness for Rome they have persecuted them most who are got at greatest distance from it They have made the Image of their persons and of their devotion to tread the Stage to render them both odious and ridiculous They have loaden them with calumnies in the same manner as the Pagans of old cloathed the Christians with Bears skins and Lyons skins to stir up the rage of Mastiff Dogs against them they have treated them with the Appellations of Schismaticks and Rebels who have been concerned deep in the late Conspiracy a thing that gives one a horrour to think of And the mildness and most gentle treatment is that of Fanaticks Enthusiasts and Medlars that perpetuate the division between the English and the Romish Church and hinderers of their coming together To conclude as Tacitus sayes proximorum odia sunt acerrima their aversion and hatred are so great against the Presbyterian Puritan and Independant party that these words are very frequently in their mouths and it is their discourse both as they walke along the Streets and set at their Tables that they would rather be Papists than Presbyterians 'T is then a thing much to be wondred at that whilest the Prelatical party have so much love and kindnsss for Rome and so much aversion for Calvin and our Churches in France as to rase them out of the number of the Churches of Jesus Christ to reject the ordination of their Pastors as Null and to tear in pieces with calumnies the puritanical party only for this reason because it hath a veneration for our Churches and for the Memory of Calvin 't is I say a very suprising thing and much to be wondred at that our Pastors in France at least the greatest part should make their Court to that Episcopal party and call those faithful people in England Enthusiasts Fanaticks and Hypocrites who separate from the Doctrines Customes Practises and Lives of those that Persecute them But yet a People who by the Purity of their Doctrine the holyness of their Lives and their Conformity with Calvin and his Disciples keep off and retard the Introduction of Paganisme in England and the Judgements of God upon the Nation Certainly it is a very surprising thing that the Fat of the Prelates Kitching and the lustre of their Hierarchy should so dazle the eyes of our great men in France as to postpone in their esteem the best the most holy and the most numerous Party of the People of England to that which glitters and dazles most and which now have the uppermost seats in the Synagogues BUT that Church which will have all or nothing shews more heat and vehemency against these Reconcilers than against those that protest against all Reconciliation with Rome which imitates the Lyon in the Apologue that devoured the Asse for desiring to share with him THE Church of Rome which is said to be Infallible is an immoveable Rock the Reformed at least the English Church is a floating Boat upon the Water which is fastened to that Rock by a Rope now he that thinks to draw it to him will be much deceived for he will but pullhimself nearer to the Rock 'T is true that neither the whole body of the Clergy of England which set at the helm of Affairs nor any of them has been concerned in the late attempt upon the life of our most gracious King but it is true also that the Papists had never been brought or tempted to think of such a thing if they had not been strongly perswaded that the life of the King was the only Impediment why those who had already come over three parts of four of the way to Rome had not finished the rest of their Journey to them CHAP. XI A continuance of the same matter concerning the wise carriage of those Churches that are for their way Congregational when they condemn all manner of speaking like to Rome and all practises that do any whit savour of theirs and the six Maxims on which the Pope and his Church are founded a Confirmation of that by a History taken out of the Life of Joseph Hall T IS then with good reason that the Independants condemn all the Overtures of Peace and Reconciliation and believe that they have been attempted in vain from time to time between the Catholicks and the Arrians the Greeks and the Latins the Protestants and the Papists the Lutherans and the Calvinists the Episcopal and the Presbyterians and these from the Congregational men they condemn I say all these Overtures of Peace and Reconciliation unless the two parties that are both under Error and that are both at an equal distance from the truth be reduced to a Medium that may bring them to some Establishment without this they are very much perswaded that to compose all the differences which are in matters of Religion there is no other method than theirs which is that every Christian makes himself of that Assembly which is according to his Opinion and that the Church of which he is a Member do not persecute those who are otherwise perswaded THEY are not then led by any extravagancy of Reason when they put among the Ideas of Plato these six maxims with which the World is so strongly possest 1. THAT a Civil State ought to tolerate but one Religion 2. THAT all the Churches collected in that State ought to associate and joyn themselves into one body which may be of the same extent as the Civil State 3. THAT that body Ecclesiastical is distinct in Jurisdiction and Independant on that of the Republick and that there ought to be no appeal from Consistories and Synods to the Magistrate 4. THAT this Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction is exercised by vertue of a divine right positive and perpetual and by the power of the Keys and of that of binding and loosing given by Jesus Christ either to the Church or to its Pastors 5. THAT the Churches ought to be all united by the same bond of Faith and Discipline under the
not to believe Transubstantiation A Learned English Dr. named John Hales hath written a Learned Treatise upon this Subject where he condemns this way of Reconciliation that sayes one thing and believes another and that turns again to Rome and he exhorts his Brethren to condemn rather the use of it than to justifie it He sayes also that Martyn Bucer was the first of the Reformed that made use of this way of speaking IT must be confessed that as the weakness of those great lights of Reformation Bucer Calvin and Reza was very great when they explained those Scriptures concerning the Lords Supper by a Comment that was more obscure than the Text nor hath it been less great in those that have come after them when they have explained the words of Jesus Christ in S. John VI. concerning the fleshly eating to the Sacramental and Spiritual eating and when they have made long comments upon the words of Calvin to sweeten and smooth the harshness of them instead of condemning them this obstinacy in adhering to errors hath brought in the pretended infallibility into the Church of Rome and the Incontestability into the Reformed Churches Inter caetera mortalitatis incommoda hoe est errandi necessitas erroris amor Seneca NOW these ways of speaking which simbolize with those of Rome and which give it occasion to insult and triumph over us makes me remember what I have read in the Memoirs and specialties that Joseph Hall hath made of his Life and absolutely convinces me of this truth that it has been so unlikely that they who have believed they might gain upon Rome by retaining some of their ways and modes of speaking or their practises should have succeeded therein that on the contrary She has been so much the more set and hardened against us and have gone so far in it as to make us and their Religion far more reasonable than ours He sayes that in his journey to the Spadan Waters for his health he had before a great company of persons of quality both Papists and Protestants a very hot dispute with a Sorbonist a Prior of the Carmelites who maintained that the Kneeling practised in the Church of England at the receiving of the Eucharist strongly shewed that she believed Transubstantion for that kneeling and the belief of Transubstantiation were things inseparable and always went hand in hand together and since the one had never been believed in the Church without the practise of the other and since it was a distraction of reason and a wicked practise to carry their adorations to Elements that were only Bread and Wine this kneeling of necessity must be a natural consequence of the belief of Transubstantiation Bishop Hall adds that as the company was divided in their judgments and that several of them joyned with those of Rome in condemning this kneeling unless it was a consequence of Transubstantiation more than two thirds of the company were so heated against the poor Bishop that he had not the liberty to speak nor to stand up in defence of the Church's Opinion For if they had given him time to speak he had alleadged the Rubrick of the Church of England which undeceives the Communicants from the thoughts that they might possibly have that that Kneeling or Adoration is carried out to the Bread and the Wine But beside that there is not of a hundred Communicants one who reads the Rubrick it might have happened that those who were so violent against Bishop Hall would have pleasantly stopt his mouth with the Apologue which Beza writ in a Letter to the good Arch-Bishop Edmund Grindal who seeing that he was offended at this kneeling after Transubstantiation was banished endeavoured to cure him of the scandal he had taken making him to know that the Rubrick of the Church of England would give him enough wherewith to be satisfied Upon which Beza returned him this story A Lord having built his house near to the high way where he left a great stone that he had no occasion for just in the road several persons coming by in the night stumbled at it and did hurt themselves and often complaints being made to him about it and intreaties that he would take it out of the way he was very obstinate a long while and was resolved not to meddle with it but being wearied by the continual solicitations that were made to him he bethought himself to set over the stone a Lanthorn with a light Candle in it to warn people of it but that Admonition proving troublesome too one of his friends came and gave him this good Counsel Sir if you would be at quiet take away both stone and Lanthorn together The stone of stumbling is this kneeling at the Sacrament and the Rubrick is for a light and Declaration to signifie to the Communicants that this kneeling is not done to the bread and wine but to Jesus Christ If you take away both you will take away the scandal and the remedy to the scandall You will bring back the way with which Jesus Christ instituted the holy Supper who gave it not kneeling but in the posture of those who take their ordinary repasts at their Tables so that Jesus Christ never required any Genuflexion either at the time or place THESE two stories hit as we generally say two birds with one stone For they may relate to that neerness of assinity with Rome which I have already spoken of above and which I have showed has rather sharpened and embittered the Spirits and tempers of those of that communion to plot against the sacred person of the KING and against his Government than it has any wayes sweetned them and moreover they discover that those who go furthest off from the Doctrines and practises of Rome who renounce all reconciliation with Her as the people of the Congregational way do have most conformity with the blessed peace-Makers of whom Jesus Christ speakes and whereof the Character of the Children of God which he gives them upon this respect carryes them so much the farther from all thoughts of Rebellion CHAP. XII An Apology for the Author of the Conformity of the congregational Churches with that of the Antient Primitive Christians That a disinteressed person such as he is the most sit to write about these matters Of the Obligation he hath to the Bishop of Condom for the light he hath given him I Think my self here obliged to add an Apology as to my own account for what I have said as to the Independant Churches I do imagine I shall be accused at first for having made the description of the congregational way not according as it is in effect but in that manner as Xenophon did the Cyropaedia to be the perfect model of a Prince They will say that any other interest than that of the inward knowledge I have of the goodness truth and holiness of the Congregational way ought to have excited me to commend it so as I have done That I
commend what I do not approve in the bottome of my heart since I do not joyn my self to it They will say likewise that I have had no other design than to gain my own Sentiments credit with which they say I am most fondly in Love in adjusting them to those of the Independants and because I condemn Ecclesiastical power and Excommunication which I have undertook to possess the World with the belief of that so they should banish the use of it To which I answer that though I should joyn my self to their Assemblies it would be no argument that I should approve of all the things they did and all they believed as they cannot conclude by my not joyning to their Congregations that I have not the Congregational way in greater and higher esteem than any other As I am a Frenchman and by the grace of God of the reformed Church I joyn to the Church of my own Nation to which I am so much the more strongly invited by the holiness of the Doctrines and lives of our excellent Pastors Monsieur Mussard and Monsieur Primerose and because they administer the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper in the same manner as Jesus Christ did it with his Disciples not having any thing to give me offence in their conduct unless that they are not absolutely undeceived of the practise of our Pastors in France of excommunicating in the Name and Authority of Jesus Christ and of interposing the same sacred Name and the same sacred Authority to excommunicate as St. Paul made use of to deliver the Incestuous person over to Satan though they cannot find this Authority of excommunicating in all the Bible nor justifie it unless they elude that harshness of expression by this way of sweetning that their only intention is to declare that those sinners of whom they make the number take the Lord's Supper to their Condemnation if they do not repent before-hand AS for other accusations although I believe that of all Establishments of Religion that of the Independant Churches is the most Apostolical yet I do not believe it is infallible and I cannot approve of all they say nor all they practise concerning discipline nor concerning the use of the Ecclesiastical power and excommunication though this usage be not in all the same nor in all the Churches because some among them do retain it jure societatis vi virtute paoti federis eniti However it is both of them make use of Ecclesiastical power and excommunication very innocently for they do not set up a National Tribunal Independant on the Magistrate and they Attribute to their Synods no other Authority than that of perswasion both from wise and experienced persons Moreover from the manner that they express themselves in the VII Article of the first Chapter of their Confession of Faith one may conclude that beside the Jurisdiction which works upon hearts by the word they acknowledge no other than that which is taken by a natural right and that wisdom and prudence has not been wanting to them by their having in a joynt consent agreed in one and the same Doctrine because it is of divine and perpetual right but in not having established any thing determinatively to be a perpetual rule upon an Arbitrary and changeable matter and of humane right as is the discipline of the Churches and the Authority of the Pastors in their conduct and government BUT although they should have retained some usage of the Ecclesiastical power and excommunication which are so many Reliques of Rome that have accomplished the Mystery of iniquity and brought the Pope into the world they would be no less priviledged than St. Paul and the other Apostles who after they had received the holy Ghost in greater measure than all the holy men that had been before them yet they alwayes retained some leven of affection to the Mosaical Ceremonies If the Christians that came from Paganisme have alwayes kept some pollution of it it ought not to be any great surprise to see the purest Churches in the World yet not throughly cleansed from all the Impurities of Rome FOR these considerations I feed my self with the hopes that the Ministers of the Independant Churches who are too much illuminated long to remain in the belief and use of this illusion of Ecclesiastical power which hath brought Episcopacy that is the first step of Ascention to the papacy and after that Excommunication and Infallibility and that they would put in practise instead of excommunication that denuntiation which S. Paul recommended to his Disciple and son Timothy it is that in case any disorderly or wicked person of the Congregation cannot be perswaded to change his opinion and life and voluntarily to leave the Communion of the Church it should be published aloud in the face of the Church and the faithful should be exhorted to shun his company and in case that he persevere in such refractoriness he ought to be expelled by force as well from the Table of the Lord as from the Church And this is what may be practised by a natural right de jure societatis without any need of making such expulsion of credit by the Keys of the Kingdome of Heaven and by the power of binding and loosing In short I hope they will be perswaded by this consideration that the benefit which comes by the Ecclesiastical power and Excommunication will never recompence the pernitious effects that they have produced NOW I believe that these three considerations that I am a Physician that I am a Frenchman and that I do not joyn to any one certain Congregational Assembly as a Member of it will give more Authority and credit to the relation I have made of their government and conduct and make it less the suspected than if I were of their Number of their Nation and a Divine by Profession For if I were qualified in three wayes I could not speak as a person disinteressed but as having a personal inclination to the way I should have espoused And that is the weakness of all those who plead for their own cause as we learn from S. Austin and Optatus Milevitanus who were of this opinion that a sincere Pagan or Heathen whether a Physitian a Sophister a Philosopher or belonging to the Magistracy were more competent Judges in matters of Divinity and differences among Christians than persons of the Priesthood and Sacerdotal function AS S. Paul could not elect a more disinteressed person to gain the Christian Religion credit in the minds of men and to write his Gospel as he calls it and the Acts of the Apostles than S. Luke the Physitian to whom the world is more obliged than to a thousand S. Chrysostomes and S. Austins and to all the persons of the Sacred Order without so much as excepting the very Apostles themselves I believe that the same Judgment ought to be made of me and that my quality of a Physitian ought to give stronger
impressions of the goodness of the Congregational way in the minds of men than would that of a Divine of a Minister of the Gospel or any other person ingaged by profession either to the Episcopal Presbyterian or even to the Congregational way As Reason and Grace in the hopes of glory are the three Ressorts or principles which have alwayes moved and governed me in all the course of my life and in all my Writings so have they been always less violent by the prejudices and interests in the profession I make of a Physician than if I had been either a Divine or a Lawyer I ought here also to acknowledg my Obligation to the Bishop of Condom not only for the first hints of this truth that the Congregational way is of all the Establishments of Discipline and Government the most conformable to reason to the holy Scripture and to the practise of the Apostles and the Primitive Christians but for having absolutely confirmed me in this truth though the design of that Bishop has not been to put the Congregational way above the Romish but only to discover and this he hath done by Arguments that come very near to demonstration that going upon the hypothesis of the necessity of seting up a Tribunal in the Church and of the submission of the people to that Tribunal as being the only Rampiâ—r of the Orthodox Faith and the only means of Uniting Christians preserving peace and good order among them it is incomparably more reasonable that such submission should be made to an infallible Tribunal than to One that is subject to Error and that upon this ground of all the Ecclesiastical ways in the World which acknowledg that every Ecclesiastical Tribunal either supreme or subordinate that every Councel either Oecumenical or Topical is fallible and subject to errour the Congregational way which refuses all manner of submission to a Tribunal subject to errour is the most reasonable and the most just CHAP. XIII The Explication of one difficulty which runs throughout the whole precedent discourse AS it was in my thoughts to finish this discourse by the word Finis a Learned Presbyterian coming in and having apprehended my design put one objection to me against the defeat and overthrow I pretend to make of the necessity of a Tribunal in the Church he said that since that Tribunal which requires the people to submit themselves to it is as much set up in an independant Church as in a National and since both presuppose that that Tribunal is subject to errour the submission of the people is altogether as reasonable to the Tribunal of a National Church as to that of a Congregational I confess there is some weight in this objection which Monsieur Jurieu has not thought of but which nevertheless is easie to be answered according to the principles I lay down 1. THAT all manner of Government Presbyterian Congregational National Episcopal Hierarchical Papal is of the same nature with that of the Magistrate 2. THAT the submission required and given to all manner of Ecclesiastical Government is of the same nature with that which is required and given to a Civil and Political government the Ressorts of which are not the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven nor the power of binding and loosing but the will of the strongest and most numerous that hath so ordain'd it 3. AND consequently that the Censures of excommunication and deposition being of the same nature with the Law of the Magistrate the validity of which is not in the Justice nor equity of the thing but in the will of those that decree and ordain it they ought to be accounted as a Civil punishment THESE three considerations destroy that erection of an Ecclesiastical Tribunal which is equal with the Civil in one and the same Territory since both being of the same nature it would be a pure piece of Gallimaufrey and hotchpot to offer to establish two Civil Governments in one and the same dominion or Territory which should be independant one on the other ALSO this difficulty is easie to be overcome according to the principles of the Independants The Inconvenience of an Excommunicated or deposed person unjustly by his Congregation is not great so long as it does not extend beyond his Jurisdiction and that of a hundred Congregations in one Territory it is impossible but that at least there might be one to recompence the Justice of his cause which is not a thing feasible if he be struck by a National Judgement unless he leaves his Country And since the person oppressed is in the liberty of framing to himself a Congregation Independant on all the Churches of the world though it be but of seven or eight persons his innocence and legitimate right will easily furnish him with the means to do it I add further that a person who is sensible he is guilty of disorders can easily conceal them in the crowd of a National Church which he cannot so well do in a small number of persons and commonly prevent the Censure of his Congregation and not expect that they should excommunicate him and drive him out of it which is done in that manner as St. Jerome and Bishop Godeau would have the Heretick of whom S. Paul speaks in the 3 of Titus 11. knowing that he that is such i. e. an Heretick is subverted and sinneth being condemned of himself To do when he excommunicated himself and saved his Church that trouble IT must not be forgot that tho there is no Government so perfect wherein one cannot find some faults and some Inconvenience yet it is certain there is found less in the Congregational way whereas you may find almost an infinity in that of the National whereof a thousand persons that deserve the censure of the Church there is not one of them that undergoes its because its discipline is like to spiders Webs where the Fly 's are taken but the Birds pass through and where it is impossible in a Town or a Church of many thousands of Christians that one Bishop or Pastor can possibly have an exact inspection over them whereas in a Congregational Church composed but of a few persons and those all cull'd out of the multitude who fun after Vanitics and Vices one has but little or no use of excommunication and deposition and where Avarice Ambition Heresies and quarrels do not enter as in National Churches THESE considerations give me to hope that the learned and illuminated of the Congregational way will agree and joyn with my principles or Hypotheses to establish the true nature of their Jurisdiction and to undo with case the difficulty of the objection although according to their principles it resembles the Foils which touch the person but do not wound it For in case of a wound they have a thousand remedies to heal it presently whereas there is no remedy either against Infallibity in the Church of Rome or against incontestability in a National Church CHAP.