doctrine is meant Sacraments and by Sacraments is meant Prayer as to say that by Fellowship is meant notâ—ing else but the exercise of doctrine and Sacraments and Prayer And if these as they are distinctly named be distinct ordinances and may not be confounded then Fellowship being named in the same manner imports something distinct from them all and may not be confounded with them nor with any of them no more then the other may be confounded one with another And if so then as this Fellowship may import the communion of their gift and goods one for the helpe of another so it must first of all imply a combining of themselves into Church-state by mutuall agâ—eement consent or covenant Furthermore when the Apostle writâ—th that by experience of the Corinthians liberall contribution to the poore Saints men glorified God for their professed subjection to the Gospel of Christ 2. Cor. 9. 13. he plainly imployes thereby that the Corinthians had made a profession or promise of such subjection to the Gospel as did comprehend this particular of distributing to the necessitie of the Saints among other things And their liberall distribution which he there speaks of was looked at as one point of their reall performance of that subjection to the Gospel which they had before professed and promised Now the Church-Covenant is nothing else but the professing or promising of such subjection and therefore this place is another proofe of Church-Covenant Besides it hath been shewed afore in Argument 3. that those places which speake of being added to the Church of joyning or assaying to joyne unto the Church Act. 2. 47. and 5 13. and 9 26. are not expounded according to the full meaning of them when they are understood of any other joyning if joyning in Covenant be left out And therefore the Scriptures of the New Testament do beare good witnesse unto Church-Covenant though as we said before the Scriptures of the Old Testament might have been sufficient if the New Testament had spoken nothing of it But Baptisme makes men members of the visible Church and therefore the Covenant is needlâ—sse This is answered in the Answer to the fourth of the 32. Questions where it is shewed at large that Baptisme â—s a seale of the covenanâ— betweene God and the Church but neither makes the Church nor members of the Church nor alwayes so much as proves men to be members This Church-Covenant is a late devise and was not known in ancient time and therefore is to be rejected Fiâ—st True Antiquitie is that of the Scriptures Now sith Church Covenant is warranted by the Scripture as hath been shewed before in this discourse it cannot be charged to want true Antiquitie When the Papists are wont to charge the doctrine of Protestants with Novelty and such as was never heard of before Luther the Orthodoxe are wont to answer that if the doctrine do not agree with the Scripture then let it be condemned for Noveltie and if it do it is warranted by the best Antiquitie even the testimonie of God himself who is the Antient of dayes Our Faith saith Doctor White is in all points the same that is contained in the Scripture and so consequently of the same Antiquitie and therefore all they that say it came up but of late must first prove it contrary to the Word of God or else hold their peace White Way 44. 1. And the same we say in this particular of the Church-Covenant Secondly And yet they that search the Stories and Writers of the times and ages next after the Apostles may find some testimonie of Church-Covenant in those dayes For instance Iustine Martyr in his Apol. 2. makes mention of three things which were required of all that were admitted into the Church as members {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} that is regeneration and soundnesse in the Faith and a promise to walke in obedience to the Gospel And generally this was the practise of all those times that never any man was admitted to Baptisme nor his children neither but they put him to answer three questions Abrenuntios whereto he answered Abrenuntio Credis whereto his answer was Credo and Spondes to which he answered Spondeo So that here was an open declaration of his Repentance from dead works and of the soundnesse of his Faith in the two first particulars and an open binding himself by covenant or promise to walke according to the Gospel in the third But much needs not to be said in this point unto them that do acknowledge Scripture Antiquitie to be sufficient though after times should be found to swerve from the Rules and Patterns that are therein contained If Church-Covenant be so necessarie then all the Reformed Churches are to be condemned as no Churches for they have no such Covenant They that have knowne those Churches not onely by their writings and confessions of their faith in Synods and otherwise but also by living amongst them and being eye-witnesses of their Order do report otherwise of them viz. that they are combined together by solemne Covenant with God and one another Zepperus speaking of the manner used in the reformed Churches in admitting the children of Church-members to the Lords Table when they came to age and have been sufficiently catechised and instructed in the doctrine of Religion tells us that such children are admitted to the Lords table by publick profession of Faith and enâ—ring into Covenant Consâ—etum est saith he ut qui per aetateâ—iâ—que Doctrinâ Catecheticâ profectum ad sacram Coenam primum a 〈◊〉 fidei confessionem coram totâ Ecclesiâ publice edant pâ—r parentes aut qui parentum lâ—co sunt jussû ministri in Ecclesiae 〈◊〉 producti quòâ—que in illa confessione per Dei gratiam 〈◊〉 ac juxta illam vitam instituere insuper etiam disciplinae Ecclesiasticae ultrò ac sponte suâ subjicere sese velint spondeant atque stipulentur Polit. Eccles. lib. 1. Cap. 14. p. 158. that is The manner is that they who by reason of age and proficiencie in the doctrine of Catechisme are first admitted to the Lords Supper should publickly before the whole Church make confession of their faith being brought forth into the sight of the Church by their parents or them that are instead of parents at the appointment of the Minister and likewise should promise and covenant by the grace of God to continue in that Faith which they have confessed and to lead their lives according to it yea and moreover to subject themselves freely and willingly to the discipline of the Church These words we see are full and plaine that children are not in those Churches received to the Lords Supper without personall confession of Faith and entring into Covenant before And if they tooke this course with children come to age there is as much reason or more that the same course should be holden with men of yeers when they are admitted members And so
professing thereof outwardly would not have been sufficient for the admitting of them unto Baptiâ—me Now this Word which they received was an exhortation to Repentance for sinne and to Faith in the promise ver. 38. 39. and to obedience in severing themselves from others and saving themselves from that untoward generation ver. 40. And therefore when they openly professed that they gladly received this word there was an open professing of their Repentance for sinne ver. 40. of their Faith in the promise and of obedience to the Commandement which is nothing else but the very summe of Church-Covenant yea and further their very preparation to this repentance faith and obedience in that true compunction and sorrow of soul was also openly made manifest ver. 37. But yet there would not be such long narrations of every one severally as now are used when men do enter into Church-Covenant when each one makes a good long speech in the profession of his Faith and Repentance When the thing is certaine as was shewed before that they did openly professe repentance faith and obedience it is not difference in the length or largenesse of their speâ—ches in expressing of themselves that can make any difference in the thing Majus minus non diversisicant speciem And we denie not but they might be briefer because there was not such need they should be long in regard of some difference betweene them and us their time and ours First there were the Apostles present to heare their confessions and to judge thereof who were men of very good discerning and therefore briefer expressing of mens selves might suffice whereas the best Christians yea the best Ministers amongst us are not to be compared to the Apostles and therefore as we need more time for study and for preparation for our Sermons then they did so likewise we need more time to heare and try the soundnesse of mens repentance towards God and faith towards our Lord Jesus Christ Yet this we may adde withall that if the Apostles and those primative Christians men of such excellent discerning were sometimes deceived and could not alwayes so discern but that some Hypocrites would creep into the Church as the example of Ananias and Saphira doth witnesse how much more need is there that the Churches of God in these dayes being far inferiour to them should be very watchfull and circumspect in trying the spirituall estates of them that offer to come into the Church Secondly their times also differed from ours for their Christianitie was a matter of reproach and danger of excommunication Ioh. 9. 22. of imprisonment Act. 4. 3. and 5. 18. and the like And therefore to see men now to make open profession of their faith in Christ Jesus whose servants and disciples were so hated and who himselfe but a while before was crucified this was not an ordinarie matter and therefore in words men might be the briefer when they came to be received into the Church But our times in New England do not persecute Christ and Christians and Christian Churches but countenance them and protect them and therefore there is more need now to be more studious in examination of mens estates when they offer themselves for Church members when the Jews were in favour many of the people of the Land became Jews Esth. 8. 17. But why is there so little proofe of this Church-Covenant in the New Testament 1. Suppose the New Testament said nothing of it yet it might have ground sufficient from the Scriptures of the old Testament for if it was Gods revealed will in those dayes that a companie should become a Church and particular persons become members of that Church by way of Covenant we may be sure it is so now likewise unlesse covenanting were peculiar to the Jewish Paedigogie indeed if it had never been used in those times but were some new ordinance peculiar to the dayes of the New Testament in such cases also a ground from the Scriptures of the New Testament were necessarie as there is in all such things wherein there is any change or variation from what was used in those times afore Christ as that there should not be Nationall Churches but congregationall and not one visible Church but many that there should be baptisme and the Lords Supper these are matters that are not found in the old Testament nor were appointed to be used in those dayes and therefore we must have warrant for them in the New and so we have But for the Covenant it is otherwise it is no new ordinance peculiar to the dayes of the Gospel nor any Leviticall ordinance peculiar to the Jewish Pedigogie and therefore the Scriptures of the Old Testament that give warrant for it may be sufficient as hath been shewed afore 2. And yet there is not wanting good warrant for it that it ought to be used in the dayes of the New Testament For 1. the Prophets do foretell it Isa 56 6 7 and 44 5. and Ier. 50. 5. Ezâ—k 20. 37. and in sundrie other places to omit the rest at this time because some of them have been spoken of before Onely let those words of Isa. 44. 5. be well considered and see if they do not plainly hold forth that in the dayes of the New Testament men should openly professe their faith and solemnly bind themselves by Covenâ—nt to be the Lords people one shall say I am the Lords and another shall call himself by the name of Iacob and another shall subscribe with his hand and sirname himself by the name of Israel These words are so plaine for open professing of faith in the Lord and open binding of mens selves by Covenant unto him as we conceive nothing need be more 2. The Apostâ—es do sufficiently testifie that such a thing was practised in heir dayes 〈◊〉 how should we understand that fellowship in the Gospel in its full latitude and breadth Phil. 1. 5. if this combining into Church fellowship be no part thereof yea when it is said they continued stedfastly or as the word {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} may well be translated they strongly did cleave together or hold together in such a Fellowship which was not preaching and hearing the doctrine of the Apostles nor Sacraments noâ— Prayer but a thing distinct from all these If this combining themselves into a spirituall fellowship and societie of Church-state be no part thereof we know not how to understand it nor what that fellowship should meane If Doctrine and Sacraments and Prayer had not been particularly mentioned in the same place it might have been thought that the Fellowship in which they so steadfastly clave together had been no more but their coming together to observe these said ordinances and their communion therein But when all these are particularly mentioned and Fellowship mentioned among them as a thing distinct from the rest we may not confound it with the rest We might as well say that by
the same Zepperus speaking of the consociation of Churches amongst themselves by mutuall confsederation hath these words which as they may be applyed to the combining of many Churches so may they be combining of many members of the same Church {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} illa {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} quam in Symbolo profite nunc Apostolico nihil aliud hic requirit vult quam obligationem omnium Ecclesiae membrorum confoederationem c. that is that communion of Saints which we professe in the Creed doth require and meane nothing else but an obligation of all the members of the Church and a binding of them together by Covenant Polit. Eccles. li. 3 c. 8. p. 721. To these testimonies of Zâ—pperus those words may be added of Mr. Parker our own countreyman a man of singular note for learning and holinesse who also himselfe lived sometimes beyond Sea in the reformed Churches and there ended his dayes so that we may safely give the more credit to his testimonie he having so good meanes fully to know the state and order of those Churches Now he speaketh of a Solennis forma absque quâ in Ecclesiae alicujus communionem nullus ritè recipitur of a solemne forme without which no man is rightly received into the communion of the Church hath these words Hic mos ille est reformatarum Ecclesiarum non solum in lapsis restituendis sed in extraâ—eis imò quibuscunque recipiendis qui ad habitandum alicubi conâ—ident etsi fortè in Ecclesiâ illius loci quo ante commorabantur juxta hanc formam admissi prius fuerant Examinat Presbyterium plebs consentit quisque testes vitae suae secum adfert vel testimonia saltem publicatur nomen cujusque competentis pro concione admonetur quisque siquid haebeat quod excipiat ut denunciet presbyteris Si nihil contrâ— adferatur admittitur quidem sed non nisi solerni pactione cum Deo cum Eâ—clesiâ Spondet verò Ecclesiae se ambulaturum prout sanctam illam communionem decet Disciplinae illius Ecclesiae subjacere velle se fratribus illius communionis invigilaturum juxta Christi prae ceptum Matth 18. 17. ut pra-veniantur sanenturque seandala illi ad studium bonorum operum provehantur That is This is the manner of the reformed Churches not onely in restoring such as have fallen but in admitting of strangers yea of all whoever they be who do sit down in any place for habitation though perhaps they have been formerly admitted after the same manner in the Church where they have formeâ—ly dwelt The Presbytery doth examine the people do consent every man brings with him witnesses of his life or at least-wise testimonies The name of each one that desires to be a member is published in the Assembly every one is admonished if he have any exception against the party to bring it to the Presbytery If nothing be brought against him then indeed he is admitted but yet no otherwise then by a solemne covenant with God and the Church And to the Church he promiseth that he will walk as becometh that holy Fellowship that he will be subject to the discipline of that Church that he will watch over the brethren of that Communion according to the Command of Christ Mat. 18. 17. that offences may be prevented and healed c. Polit. Eccles. lib. 3. cap. 16. 4. Pag. 171 172. Much more he hath to the same purpose in that place alledging sundry Canons and Decrees of Synods of reformed Churches wherein they have determined that none should be received into their Churches but by this way of solemne Covenant And others that have lived amongst them may have been eye-witnesses that this is their usuall practise But what shall be said of the Congregations in England if Churches must be combined by Covenant Doth not this doctrine blot out all those Congregations out of the Catalogue of Churches For what ever Covenant may be found in the reformed Churches in other parts yet it is plaine that she English have none Though we deny not but the Covenant in many of those Congregations is more impâ—â—cite and not so plaine as were to be desired and what is amisâ—e in them in their materialls or in want of explicite combining of pure matter or in any of their wayes wee will not take upon us to defend yet we hope we may say of them with Master Parkâ—r Polit. Ecclâ—s lib 3. cap. 16 1. pag. 167. Non abâ—st ea realis substantialis quanquam mag is quà m par erat implicita coitio in foedus â—aque voluntaria professio fidei substantialis quâ Deo gratia essentiam Ecclesiae idque visibilis hacusque sarâ—am tectam in Angliâ— conservavis That is there wants not that reall and substantiall comming together or agreeing in Covenant though more implicate then were meete and that substantiall profession of Faith which thanks be to God hath preserved the essence of visible Churches in England unto this day The reasons why wee are loath to say that the Congregations in England are utterly without a Covenant are these First Because there weâ—e many Christian Churches in England in the Apostles time or within a while after as Mâ—ster Fox sheweth at large Act. Mon. lib. 2. beginning pag 137 where he reporteth out of Gildas that England received the Gospel in the time of Tiberius the Emperour under whom Christ suffered and that Ioseph of Arimaâ—hea was sent of Philip the Apostiâ— from France to England about the yeare of Christ 63. and remained in England all his time and so he with his fellowes layd the first foundation of Christian Faith among the Britaine people and other Preachers and Teachers comming afterward confirmed the same and increased it Also the said Master Fox reporteth out of Tertullian that the Gospel was dispearsed abroad by the sound of the Apostles into many Nations and amongst the rest into Britaine yea into the wildest places of Britaine which the Romans could never attaine unto and alledgeth also out of Nicâ—phorus that Simon Zelotes did spread the Gospel to the West Ocean and brought the same into the Iles of Britaine and sundâ—y other proofes he there hath for the same point Now if the Gospel and Christian Religion were brought into England in the Apostles times and by their means it is like that the English Churches were then constituted by way of Covenant because that was the manner of constituting Churches in the Apostles time as also in the times afore Christ as hath been shewed from the Scripture before in this discourse And if Christian Congregations in England were in those times combined by Covenant then eternitie of Gods Covenant is such that it is not the interposition of many corruptions that may arise in after times that can disanull the same except when men wilâ—ully breake Covenant and reject the offers of the
in their lives yet the doctrine is such that whosoever beleeveth and liveth according to it shall undoubtedly be saved and many thousands have been saved therein and therefore Assemblies united by Covenant to observe this doctrine may be true Churches when the Assemblies of Papists and others may be false although they also were combined by Covenant the reason of the difference rising from the difference that is in the doctrine and Religion which they severally professe and by Covenant binde themselves to observe the one being fundamentally corrupt and consequently pernicious The other in the fundamentall points Orthodoxall and sound Secondly It must be remembred also which was intimated before that if fundamentall corruptions be professed in with impenitency and obstinacy then God may disanull the Covenant on his part and give a Bill of divorce to such a people Iere. 3. 8. Now experience and the Scripture also doth witnesse of the Jesuited and Trâ—nt-Papists that they repented not of the workes of their hands of worshipping Devills and Idolls of Gold c. neither repented they of their murthers nor of their sorceries nor of their fornications nor of their thefts Rev. 9. 20 21. But now for the Parish Assemblies in England we hope that we may safely say they doe not sinne of obstinacy but of ignorance having not been convinced and many of them never having had means to be convinced of the corruptions that are amongst them in respect of their constitution and worship and Ministery and so the Covenant remaining among them may prove them to be Churches when it cannot stand the Papists in like stead they being impenitent and obstinate Which we doe not speake to justifie the Parishes altogether as if there were not dangerous corruptions found in them nay rather the Lord be mercifull to the sinnes of his people wee may lament it with teares that in respect of their members and Ministery in respect of their worship and walkings in many of those Assemblies there are found such apparent corruptions as are justly grievous to a godly soule that is enlightened to discerne them and greatly displeasing to the Lord and indeed had need to be repented of betime least otherwise the Lord remove the Candlesticke and unchurch them Rev. 2. 5. In a word the corruptions remaining are just causes of repentance and humiliation but yet in as much as the Articles of Religion which they professe containe such wholesome doctrine that whosoever beleeveth and walketh according thereunto in sinceritie shall undoubtedly be saved and in as much as the corruptions are not persisted in with obstinacy therefore wee deny not but they have the truth of Churches remaining But this opinion of Church-Covenant is holden by none but the Brownists or those of the Separation and therefore it is not to be received This ground cannot be made good that none but they of the Separation are for Church Covenant for all the Reformed Churches generally as was shewed before in Answer to Objection the tenth are for it in their judgement practise and shall all they be condemned for * Brownists or maintaining unlawfull Separation from the Church Also Master Parker and Doctor Ames men of our owne Nation famous for holinesse and learning and moderation both of them plead for Church-Covenant and yet neither of them were Brownists but bare witnesse against that riged Separation â—or Doctor Ames his judgement of Church-Covenant may be seene in his Medulla Theol lib. 1. cap. 32. 14 15 17. Fideles non constitunt Ecclesiam particularem quamvis simul forsan plures in eodem loco conveniant aut vivant nisi speciali vinculo intersese conjuâ—guntur c. That is beleevers doe not make a particular Church though perhaps there be many of them that meete together and live in the same place unlesse they be joyned together by some speciall bond amongst themselves for so one Church would many times be dissolved into many and many Churches confounded into one Now this bond is a Covenant either expressed or implicite whereby beleevers do binde themselves particularly to performe all such duties both towards God and mutually to one another as pertaine to the nature of a Church and their edification And thereupon no man is rightly admitted into the Church but by confession of his Faith and stipulation or promise of obedience These words doe plainely and fully shew his judgement of Church Covenant to be the very same that is held and practised in New-England at this day And that he was not for that severitie and regiditie of separation may be cleared from sundry of his workes wherein he plainly and fully beares witnesse against the same and namely in his Fresh suite against Ceremonies pag. 207. and in his second Manuduction wherein he purposely and at large deales in this Argument of Separation Sure it is Master Canne in his Booke wherein he goes about to prove the necessitie of separation from the Non-Conformists principles doth professedly and expressely oppose himselfe against Doctor Ames in the point of Separation which shewes how farre the good Doctor was from favouring that way when they most zealously therein doe count him to be a speciall opposite of theirs as indeed he was And for Master Parker his judgement of Church-Covenant was heard before in part where he so much approveth the practise of the Reformed Churches in this point And much more may be seene of his judgement herein in the sixteenth Chap. of the third booke of his Pâ—lit Ecclesiastica And yet in the same place and likewise lib 1. câ—p 13 14. of the same Treatise he plentifully and plainly shewes his dislike of the wayes of Separation as is also acknowledged in an Admonition to the Reader prefixed before that Booke by â— R. suo suorumque nomine So that this Assertion appeares to be untrue wherein it is said that none but Brownists and Separatists doe approve of Church-Covenant As for the Inâ—erence from this ground that therefore Church-Covenant should not be received because it is pleaded for and practâ—â—ed by the Separatists We Answer that this will not follow unlesse it could be proved that the Separatists hold no truth or if they hold a truth wee must not hold it that so it may appeare wee differ from them Either of which it were unreasonable to affirme If the Papists hold sundry Articles of Faith as that there is a unitie of the Divine Essence and Trinitie of Persons that Jesus Christ is God and man and that true Messiah that was promised and the onely Saviour of the world and many such like must wee deny these things because they are holden by the Papists This were as unreasonable as to condemne the doctrine of the Resurrection because it was maintained by the Pharisees Act. 23. 8. And so we say of Church-Covenant holden and practised by them of the Separation as also many other truths are maintained by them No reason that truth should be refused because the
Separatists maintaine it When Doctor Bancroft in a Sermon at Pauls-Crosse had avouched that the Superioritie of Bishops above other Ministers is by Gods owne Ordinance and to make the contrary opinion odious affirmed that Aerius perâ—iâ—ting in it was condemned for an Heretique by the generall consent of the whole Church and that Martin and his Companions doe maintaine the same opinion of Aerius What saith learned Doctor Reinolds hereunto in a Letter to Sir Francis Knolls who required him to shew his judgement herein Touching Martin saith he if any man behave himselfe otherwise then in discretion and charitie he ought let the blame be laid where the fault is and defend him not but if by the way he utter a truth mingled with whatsoever else it is not reason that that which is of GOD should be condemned for that which is of man no more then the doctrine of the Resurrection should be reproved because it was maintained and held by the Pharisees Wherefore removing the odious name of Martin from that which is sinceritie and love is to be dealt with c. And the very same doe wee say to them that would make Church-Covenant to be odious because it is held by those of the Seperation who are commonly called Brownists If men behave themselves otherwise then they ought we defend them not therein but if they hold any truth mingled with whatsoever else wee would not have that which is of God to be condemned for that which is of man truth should not be refused because of other corruptions that may be found in them that hold it If you with them hold Church-Covenant you iustifie them in all their Wayes of seperation and erronious opinions Not so for many of them hold that there are no visible Christians that stand members of the Parishes in England and that it is not lawfull to hold any private Religious communion with such persoâ—s and that the parishionall Assemblies are none of them true Churches and that it is not lawfull to hear any of those Ministers to preach the Word none of which are justified at all by holding Church-Covenant though they do hold the same There is no such necessarie and inseparable connexion betweene these opinions and that of Church-Covenant that he that holds this must needs hold the other also But the time hath been when your selves did not hold Church-Covenant as now you do when you were in England you were not of this mind and therefore no marvell if your change since your coming to New England be suspected and offensive If you change your judgement and practise in this manner God knows whether you may come at last and therefore men may well be afraid of holding with you in this point which your selves did not hold when you lived in your native Countrey Some of us when we were in England through the mercie of God did see the necessitie of Church-Covenant and did also preach it to the people amongst whom we ministred though neither so soone nor so fully as were meete for which we have cause to be humbled and to judge our selves before the Lord But suppose we had never knowne nor practised the same before our coming into this countrey yet if it be a truth of God there is no reason why we should shut our eyes against the light when God holds it forth unto us nor that others should be offended at us for receiving the same For by the same reason men might still continue in their sinnes and not make any progresse in knowledge and holinesse that so they may not seeme unconstant which were contrary to the Scripture wherein we are commanded nor to fashion our selves according to the former lusts of our ignorance 1. Pet. 1. 14. But to be changed Rom. 12. 2. and renued Ephes. 4. 23. and put off the old man and put on the new Ephes. 4. yea to grow in grace and holinesse 2. Pet. 3. 18. and be stronger and stronger Iob 17. 9. that our good workes may be moâ—e at the last then at the first Revel. 2. 19. Sure it is the Apostle tells the Corinâ—hians and Ephesians that the time had been when they were not the same men that now they are when he wrote unto them and yet he doth not blame them for leaving their former opinions or practise but commends them for it 1. Cor. 6. 11. Ephes. 2. 3. c. And it is said of Apollos an eloquent man and mighty in the Scripture that when he came to Ephesus the way of God was expounded unto him more perfectly by Aquila and Priscilla whereas before he was instructed in the way of the Lord knowing onely the Baptisme of Iohn yet this was no dispraise at all to him that now upon better information he would change his judgement to the better nor unto them that were the means thereof Act. 18. 25 26. Nullus pudor est ad maliura transire The time hath been and we may be humbled for it when we lived without God in the world and some of us in many sinfull courses and shall any be offended because we are not still the same and when God called us from the wayes of sin and death to the Fellowship of his grace in Christ yet some of us lived a long time in conformity to the ceremonies imposed in our native Countrey and saw not the evill of them But when God did open our eyes and let us see the unlawfulnesse thereof we cannot see but it would have been a with-holding the truth in unrighteousnesse and a great unthankfulnesse to God for light revealed to us if we should still have continued in that course through an inordinate desire of seeming constant and therefore it is not any just cause of offence that we have changed our judgement and practise in those things when we once perceived the Word of God to disallow them Indeed it hath been sometime objected against Mr. Cartwright and others that desired the reformation of the Churches in England in regard of Discipline and Church-Order that they which stood so much for Reformation in Discipline did in after times adde and alter some things beyond what they saw at first and what themselves had formerly desired and that therefore being so mutable and inconstant in their apprehensions they were not to be regarded nor hearkened unto to which Objection Mr. Parker makes full Answer in Eccles. lib. 2. ca. 36. p. 307. where he sheweth from the Scripture and the testimonie of Bishop Iewel Doctor Reinolds and others that in the Reformation of Religion God brings not his servants into perfection in knowledge and zeale at the first but by degrees so as they grow and make progresse in these things in such wise that their good works are more at the last then at the first as was said of the Church of Thyatira even as the man that had been blind when Christ restored him to his sight could at the first but see men like trees walking and afterward saw every man cleerly and therefore it is no good arguing to say these men have altered and corrected such things from what their apprehensions were at first and therefore they are not to be regarded Now if this be no good arguing against Mr. Cartwright and those that in England have been studious of Reformation as indeed it is not then it is no good Argument against us in this matter of Church-Covenant to say we now hold and practise otherwise then we have done in former time If any shall here reply that change from conformity to the ceremonies to Worship God more purely is warranted by the Word and therefore not blame-worthy and that the same may be said of the case of Apollos of the Corinthians and Ephesians forementioned and of Cartwright and the rest in his times We answer that this is true and thereby it appears that it is not simply the changing a mans opinion or practise that can be counted blame-worthy or offensive but changing without warrant of the Word and therefore in point of Church-Covenant the issue must not be whether we or others have formerly known and practised it but whether it have ground from Gods Word For if it have as we hope have been proved before in this discourse then the observing of it can be no cause of just offence unto others nor imputation of inconstancy to our selves though in time past we had not had so much light as to discerne the necessitie and use thereof The good Lord pardon every one that prepareth his heart to seek God though he be not cleansed according to the purification of the Sanctuary and grant unto all his Churches and servants that theâ—â— love may abound yet more and more in knowledge and in all judgement that they may discerne the things that differ and approve the things that are excellent and by his Spirit of truth be led forward into all truth till Antichrist be utterly consumed with the breath of his mouth and the brightnesse of his coming and the holy City new Jerusalem come down from God out of heaven as a Bride adorned for her husband the Lambe the Lord Jesus to whom be all glory of affiance and service for ever Amen FINIS Object 1. Answer Object 2 Answer Object 3 Answer Object 4. Answer Argu. 2. Object 1. Answer Obj. 2. Answ. Obj. â— Answer Argu. 3. Argu. 4. Argu. 5. Object Answer Argu. 1. Argu. 2. Object Answer Argu. 3. Object 1. Answer Obj. 2. Answ. Obj. 3. Object 4. Answ. Object 5. Answ. Argu. 4. Argu. 5. Object Answer Argu. 6. Objâ—ct 1. Answer Object 2. Answ. Obj. 3. Answ. Obj. 4. Answ. Obj. 5. Answ. Obj. 6. Answ. Reply Answ. Obj. 7. Answ. Obj. 8. Answ. Obj. 9. Answ. Obj. 10. Answ. Obj. 11 Answ. Obj. 12. Answ. * By Brownists and Separatists you are to understaÌ„d those of the rigeâ— Separation Reply Answ. Obje 13. Answ. Reply Answ.
her selfe unto her husband And the performance of such duties as the Church and the member owe one unto another is a branch of that marriage-Covenant wherein they are tyed to Christ for Christ himselfe in his Covenant requires not onely that they should give up themselves to him but also that they should performe these duties one unto another And accordingly it is said of the Churches in Macâ—donia that they gave up themselves first to the Lord and then to us by the will of God 2 Cor. 8. 5. True it is they doe also binde thâ—mselves by Covenant one unto another but in that respect the Covenant is pâ—operly a brotherly Covenant like that 1 Sam. 20. 8. Amâ—s 1. 9. because there the engagement is to one another as brethren fellow members and fellow-helpers and not as to one head or Lord as it is in respect of Christ and therefore in that respect it is not so properly a marriage-Covenant as it is in respect of Christ though duties to one another are promised in their Covenant with one another and also in their Covenant with Christ In briefe thus They promise unto Christ duties to him and duties to one another according to him and so their Covenant is a marriage-Covenant with Christ They promise also to one another duties to one another and so it is a brotherly Covenant Another Title given to the Church which also proves that a Church is made by Covenant is the Title of a Citie or Citie of God Psal. 87 3. 48 1. 8. 122. 3. Ephes 2. 19. The Argument lyeth thus If a true Church be a Citie of God then a Church becomes a Church by Covenant But every true Church is a Citie of God Ergo The Assumption is proved by the Scriptures forealledged The Consequence of the Proposition is plaine in reason for every Citie is unâ—ted by some Covenant among themselves the Citizens are received unto 〈◊〉 Civitatis or right of Citie priviledges by some Covenant or Oath And therefore it is so likewise in this Citie of God the Church and men become Citizens of the Church by solemne Covenant The third Argument may be drawne from the meanes of reforming and restoring a Church when it is corrupted which is by entring into Covenant a new with God 2 Chron. 15. 10. 29. 10. Neh. 9. 38. 10. 28 29 Ier. 50. 4 5. The reason may be taken thus If a Church decayed is to be restored and refoâ—med by renuing Covenant with God then it was instituted and erected at the first by way of Covenant The reason of which Consequence is because abuses and corruptions are to be reformed by bringing things back to the first Institution Thus Christ reâ—ormes the abuses of marriage by bringing them to the first Institution of that Ordinance From the beginning it was not so Mat. 19. 8. And thus Paul reformeth the Abuses of the Lords Supper by telling them what was the first Institution thereof 1 Cor. 11. 23 c. And thus the Lord Jesus calling on the declining Church of Ephesus for reformation bids her remember from whence shee is fallen and repent and doe her first workes Rev. 2. 5. Now the Assumption is plaine from the Texts above alledged that at the reforming of a Church there is to be a renuing of Covenant and thence it follows that at the first erecting of a Church there was the making of a Covenant with God for els this renuing of Covenant would not have been the way to reforme it The fourth Argument is taken from that which doth dissolve a Church which is the dissolving or breaking of the Covenant Zach. 11. 9 10 14. If dissolving the Covenant be that which doth dissolve the Church then the making of Covenant is that which constitutes a Church The reason of the Consequence is plaine because otherwise the Covenant might be dissolved the Church stand still if it were not the making of the Covenant that did constitute the Church But if dissipating stones in a building doe dissolve the house then the compacting and conjoyning of them is that which makes the house If separation of soule and body be that which destroyes the man that then we say he is not it must needs be the uniting of them that did constitute make the man and so it is 〈…〉 case And that dissolving the Covenant is that which disâ—olâ—ves a Church is plaine from the Text alledged Zach. 11. Where the breaking of the two staves of beautie and bands that is the unchurching of the Jewes is interpreted to be the breaking of the Covenant that God had made with that people and the brotherhood that was between Iudah and Israel The fifth Argument is taken from the distinction which God hath appointed amongst Churches and the confounding of all Churches into one if there be not this Covenant to distinguish them If Churches be distinct Societies and may not be confounded then Churches are compacted and combined by Covenant But the former is true Ergo That Churches are distinct Societies is plaine in the Scripture where we have mention of many Churches in one Countrey or Province Gal. 1. 1. 1 Thes. 2. 14. Of seven Churches in Asia Rev. 1. 4. and of all the Churches 1 Cor. 14. 33. Rev. 2. 23. Ephesus is not Smyrna nor Smyrna is not Thyatira nor either of them Pergamus but each one distinct of themselves having Officers of their owne which did not belong to others vertues of their owne for which others are not praised corruptions of their owne for which others are not blamed If it were not thus then when Laodiâ—ea is condemned for lukewarmenesse or Ephesus for declining all the rest should be reproved also And when Philadelfia is praised all the rest should be praised also which we see is otherwise Now from hence the Consequence is certaine that therefore they are combined by some Covenant each one amongst themselves for there is nothing els without this that wil sufficiently distinguish them The Spirit of God and Faith in their hearts is common to all Christians under heaven and in heaven also and therefore this is not the thing that makes distinction Nor is it habitation in the same Towne together for that may be common to such Christians as are not of this Church and usually is to many that are no Christians As it is with Companies in London as the Company of Goldsmiths c. that many others dwell in the same Towne with them yea it may be in the same streete that are not of their Company and therefore it is not meerely habitation that doth distinguish them from others but some combination and agreement amongst themselves So it is not habitation in the same Towne that distinguisheth Churches and Church-members from other men but their mutuall agreement and combination and joyning themselves together in an holy Covenant with God If the Spirit of God and Faith in their hearts cannot distinguish one Church from
be no more then so Suppose Saul to have dwelt in the same house afore his conversion in which he dwelt after which is not unpossible nor unlikely yet we see he was no member of the Church at Hierusalem afore his conversion no nor of some time after though he might have dwelt in an house in the midst of the Christians and Church-members there The members of the Dutch and French Churches in London or other Townes in England are not members of the Englishâ—Congregations or Churches no more then the English are of theirs and yet they dwell promiscuously together in the same Sâ—recte of the same Towne Towne-dwelling would not make a man a free-man of a Company in London or some other Corporation for many others dwell in the Towne with them yea it may be in the same streete that are not free of their Company and so it is in this case But the reason why such as dwell in Towne with the Church are not members thereof may be because they frequent not their Assemblies Idiots and Infidells might come into the publick meetings among the Corinthians 1. Cor. 14. 23 24 25. yet Idiots and Infidells were not therefore members of the Church And Saul after his conversion might have come in among the Church in time of publick duties and have seene and heard all that they had done yet this would not have made him of one body with them Some Indians Moores and other naturall persons come into our meetings in New-England some of their owne accord and others by the Command or Counsell of their Masters and Governours yet no man can say that all these are hereby made Church-members Wherefore seeing neither conversion nor loving affection nor cohabitation nor coming into their meetings doth joyne a man as a member of the visible Church for some men have all these and yet are not members and others are sometimes members of the visible Churches and yet want some of these are hypocrites and want sound conversion it remaineth therefore that as sound conversion makes a man fit matter for a Church So profession of his Faith and of his subjection to the Gospel and the Churches approbation and acceptance of him which is the summe of Church-Covenant is the formall cause that gives him the being of a member But joyning doth not alway signifie joyning in Covenant Philip joyned to the Eunnuchs chariote and dust to mens feete Act. 8. 29. Luke 10 11. and yet there was no Covenant and therefore men may joyne to the Church without any Covenant The word indeed may expresse any close joyning whether naturall as the branch is joyned to the Vine or an arme or other member to the body or artificiall as when two stickes were joyned to become one in Ezekiels hand Ezek. 37. Or when Carpenters or Masons doe joyne pieces of stone or Timber together to make one house Neh. 4. 6. Ezr. 4. 12. but is not onely the force of the word that is stood upon But when joyning is used to expresse such joyning wherein a man voluntarily takes on him a new relation there it alwayes implyes a Covenant whether the relation be morall and civill or religious and Ecclesiasticall We speake of voluntary relation for there are naturall relations as betweene parents and children and these need no Covenant there is no Covenant to make a man a Parent or a childe There are also violent relations as between Conquerour and Captives and in these there is no Covenant neither but others are voluntary and these alwayes imply a Covenant and are founded therein whether they be morall and civill as between husband and wife Pro. 2. 17. between Master and servants Luk. 15. 15. between Prince and subject between Partners in Trade 2 Chro. 20. 35 36 37. where the Covenant or agreement is that men shall bare such a share of charges and receive such a share of profits or religious as between Minister and people between the Church and the members all these are done by way of Covenant A man cannot joyne himselfe to a woman as her husband but by way of Covenant A man cannot joyne himselfe to another as a servant or apprentise but by way of Covenant And so may we say of all the rest nor into any body corporate but by the same way and means If men be united into a body politick or incorporate a man cannot be said to be joyned to them by meere heartie affection unlesse withall he joynes himselfe unto them by some Contract or Covenant Now of this nature is every particular Church a body incorporate 1 Cor. 12. 27. Yee are the body of Christ c. and hath power to cast out 1 Cor. 2. 7 8 as a body incorporate and therefore he that will joyne unto them must doe it by way of Covenant or Agreement and so this Answer to this Objection may be a fourth Argument to prove the point in hand that joyning in Covenant is that which makes a man a member of a Church All voluntary relations all relations which are neither naturall nor violent are entred into by way of Covenant But he that joynes into a Church as a member or enters into a Church doth take upon him such a relation Therefore joyning to a Church as a member is by way of Covenant A fifth Argument may be drawne from the power which all Churches Officers and members have over all their members in the Lord If all Churches Officers and members have power in the Lord over all their members then joyning in Covenant is necessary to make a man a member of a Church but the former is true therefore the latter is true also The Assumption in this Argument that all Churches have power over their members is proved from 1 Cor. 5. 4 5. 13. where the Apostle reproveth the Corinthians for suffering the Incestuous man amongst them and commands them to deliver him to Saâ—an and cast him out from amongst them Now this he would not have done if they had had no power over him or if there had been any roome for them to say wee have nothing to doe with him wee have no power over him And the same is prooved in other Scriptures also as Mat. 18. 17. Psal. 149. 6. 7 8 9. And the Consequence of the Major Proposition viz. that then members doe engage themselves by Covenant is proved by this reason That Churches have no power over such as have not engaged themselves by Covenant and committed power unto them by professing to be subject to all the Ordinances of Christ amongst them The truth whereof may appeare by two Reasons First Because all Christians have power and right jure divino to choose their owne Officers to whom they commit their soules Act. 6. 1. 14 23. where the word {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} {non-Roman} imports choosing by Election and so the word is used and translated 2 Cor. 8. 19. he was chosen by the Churches
man can say that entring into the same the second time or a third or a fourth doth disanull the first or cast dispaâ—agement upon the same The covenant of works given to Adam was not blamed or saulted because it was renewed in Sinai The Covenant of Grace was first given to Adam in Paradise after his fall afterward to Abraham then to the people of Israel under types and shadows And againe after the coming of Christ in the flesh yet none of these doth disanull the former or argue the same to be â—aulty and the reason is because it is still the same Covenant though renewed upon new occasions and in some particulars in some other manner And the like we say concerning Church-Covenant or the Covenant which a man makes when he enters into the Church viz. that it is not another Covenant contrary to the Covenant of Grace which every beleever is brought into at his first conversion but an open profession of a mans subjection to that very Covenant specially in the things which concerne Church estate into which estate the man is now entring It is not lawfull to make such a Covenant as the Church-Covenant because it is not in our power to keep it and we do not know whether God will give us power This ground is very true that no man hath power of himselfe to any thing that good is but all a mans power and abilitie must come of God through Châ—ist 2. Cor. 3. 5. Phil. 2. 13. Ioh. 15. 5. But the inâ—erence is not good that therefore it should be unlawfull to ento into Church-Covenant for 1. By the same reason all promises are unlawfull and all covenants whatsoever as the covenant of marriage the covenant of service yea and the personall covenant oâ— Grace when a particular soule promiseth faith and new obedience for there is none of these no not the covenant of Marriage which a man is able of himself to keep as the adultery of David and Bathsheba among others doth plainly prove 2. God hath promised to give power to them that in self-deniall seek it of him and trust to his promise for it Ezek. 36. 27. Ier. 31. 33. Rom. 6. 14. Ier. 32. 40. The true inference therefore from this ground from mans disabilitie to performe were this that therefore a man should not enter into Church Covenant in his owne strength for that was Peters fault in promising not to deny Christ but to die with him rather but Church-Covenant as also all other promises should be entred into in an humble looking up to Christ Jesus for help and assistance to performe Thou therefore my sonne be strong in the grace that is in Christ Iesus 2. Tim. 2. 1. God disalloweth covenants of mans making and so our Church-Covenant in those words But not by thy Covenant Ezek. 16. 61. God doth not reprove them there for making Covenant for then he were contrary to himselfe who elsewhere called them to do it Exod. 29. Deut. 29. and commended them for it Psal. 50. 5. Yea and in that very place of Ezek. 16. acknowledgeth a Covenant betweene him and them Ver. 60. 62. But the meaning is he would do them good but not for their good keeping the Covenant of works for they had very sinfully broken it ver. 59. but even as he saith elsewhere not for their sakes or for their righteousnesse Ezek. 36. 32. Deut. 9. 4 5 6. But what force is there in this arguing viz. If God will do us good but not for our good keeping the covenant of works then it is not lawfull to promise obedience to the covenant of Grace in such things as concerne Church estate All men may easily see that here is a plaine non sequitur This entring into Covenant may keep out many good men from joyning to the Churches because they are not satisfied about it and therefore it is better laid aside It is not impossible but good men may for a time be unsatisfied about it till they understand the nature and use of it and yet the thing be warrantable enough for all that in the sight of God the Tribes were troubled at the Altar set up upon the banks of Jordan by the two Tribes and an halfe till they understood the intent and use of it and for what purpose it was erected and then they were satisfied Iosh. 22. And the same may be said of Peters eating with the Gentiles which at the first was very offensive to them of the circumcision till they understood what Peter had to say for his defence therein and then they rested well satisfied Act. 11. But if men understand what the Church-Covenant is there is no reason that good men should be troubled at it it being nothing else but a promise of obedience unto the Gospel of Christ or of such duties as the Gospel requireth of all Christians in Church-estate For will good men refuse to obey the Gospel or submit to the ordinances of Christ or will they refuse to professe and promise so much If a man understand what it is and what we meane by it and yet refuse to enter into it when he hath opportunitie thereto such refusing is no part of his goodnesse but is to be reckoned amongst his corruptions It is ignorance at the best and if not so then it may be perversenesse of will or some want of will to performe obedience to the Gospel And surely there is smal hope that such would yeeld subjection and obedience to the Gospel who do refuse to professe or promise it But the Scripture Act. 2. 41. tels of joyning to the Church without any Covenant For it was not possible that 3000. should enter into covenant in one day Two things may be said in Answer to this Objection First that 3000. were not so many but that joyning in Covenant might easily be done by them all in one day For 1. it was at Penticost at which time of the yeer the dayes were at the longest And 2. the Scripture tels us that David made a Covenant with all the Tribes of Israel in one day 2. Sam. 5 1 2 3. The Articles of the covenant betweene David and the Tribes and so betweene this 3000. and the Lord might be openly declared and they both the one and the other might by some signe or other expresse their consent thereunto in one day Secondly as joyning in Covenant is a thing that might be done so it is more then probable that indeed it was done by those 3000. soules For it is said ver. 41 that they gladly received the word that is they openly professed that they did with all their hearts receive it for this receiving of the Word is noted as a condition upon which they were admitted to baptisme and therefore it was not onely an inward receiving of it in their hearts but also an open professing that they did receive it for an inward receiving of it in their hearts without an open
Gospel through obstinacy which we perswade our selves they are not come unto and consequently the Covenant remaines which hath preserved the essence of Churches to this day though the mixture of manifold corruptions have made the Covenant more implicite then were meeâ—e Secondly Because there want no good Records as may be seene in Seldens History of Tithes to prove that in former times in England it was free for men to pay their Tithes and Oblations where themselves pleased Now this paying of Tithes was accounted as a dutie of people to their Minister or sheepe to their Pastour and therefore seeing this was by their owne voluntary agreement and consent their joyning to the Church as members thereof to the Ministery thereof as sheepe of such a mans flock was also by their owne voluntary agreement and consent and this doth imply a Covenant It was not the precincts of Parishes that did limit men in those dayes but their owne choice Thirdly Those Questions and Answers ministred at Baptisme spoken of before viz. Do st thou renounce I doe renounce doest thou beleeve I doe beleseve doest thou promise I doe promise as they were used in other places so were they also in England and are unto this day though not without the mixture of sundry corruptions Now this doth imply a Covenant And when the children came to age they were not to be admitted to the Lords Supper before they had made personall Confession of their owne Faith and ratified the Covenant which was made at their Baptisme by their Parents which course indeed afterward did grow into a Sacrament of Confirmation but that was an abuse of a good Order If here it be said that the Members of the Parishionall Assemblies are not brought in by their owne voluntary profession but by the Authority and Proclamation of the Prince and therefore they have no such Covenant The Answer is that the Christian Prince doth but his dutie when he doth not tollerate within his Dominions any open Idolatry or the open worship of false Gods by baptized persons but suppresseth the same and likewise when he gives free libertie to the exercise of all the Ordinances of true religion according to the minde of Christ with countenance also and encouragement unto all those whose hearts are willingly bent thereunto Ezra 1. 13 7 13. And therefore this practise of his cannot overthrow the â—reenesse of mens joyning in Church-Communion because one dutâ—e cannot oppose nor contradict another And suppose that this course of the Magistrate shouâ—d seeme to be a forcing of some to come in for members who were unfit in which case it were not justifiable yet this doth not hinder the voluntary subjection of others who with all their hearts desired it When the Israelites departed out of Aegypt there went a mixed multitude with them many going with them that were not Israelites indeed Exod. 12. And in the dayes of Mordeâ—ay and Hesthâ—r many of the people of the lands became Iewes when the Iewes were in favour and respect Est. 8. 17. and so joyned to them not of their owne voluntary minde nor of any sincere heart towards God but meerely for the favour or feare of men yet this forced or feined joyning of some could not hinder those that were Israelites indeed from being Israelites nor make the Iewes to be no Iewes no Church-members And the same may be said in this case Suppose the Magistrates Proclamation should be a cause or an occasion rather of bringing some into the Church who came not of their owne voluntary minde but for feare or for obteining favour yet this cannot hinder but others might voluntarily and freely Covenant to be subject to the Gospel of Christ Such subjection and the promise of it being the thing which themselves did heartily desire though the Magistrate should have said nothing in it If any shall hereupon inferre that if the Parishionall Assemblies be Churches then the members of them may be admitted to Church priviledges in New England before they joyne to our Churches Such one may finde his Answer in the Answer to the tenth of the thirty-two Questions Whereunto we doe referre the Reader for this point Onely adding this that this were contrary to the judgement and practise of the Reformed Churches who doe not admit a man for member without personall profession of his Faith and joyning in Covenant though he had formerly been a member of a Church in another place as was shewed before out of Master Parker Lastly If any say that if these reasons prove the English Congregations to have such a Covenant as proves them to be Churches then why may not Rome and the Assemblies of Papists goe for true Churches also For some man may thinke that the same things may be said for them that here in Answer to this eleventh Objection are said for the Parishes in England Such one must remember two things first that we doe not say simply a Covenant makes a company a true Church but as was said before a Covenant to walke in such wayes of worship to God and edification of one another as the Gospel of Christ requireth For who doubts but there may be an agreement among theeves Pro. 1. A confederation among Gods enemies Psal. 83. A conspiracy among the Arabians the Ammonites and Ashdodites to hinder the building of Hierusalem Neh. 4. 7 8. And yet none of these are made true Churches by such kind of confederacies or agreements And so wee may say of the Assemblies of Papists especially since the Counsell of Trent If there be any agreement or confederacy among them it is not to walke in the wayes of the Gospell but in wayes contrary to the fundamentall truths of the Gospel as Idolatâ—y in worship Heresie in doctrine and other Antichristian pollutions and corruptions and therefore if they combined in these things such combinations will never prove them true Churches The Church is the Pillar and ground of truth 1 Tim. 3. 15. But the Religion of Papists is so farre from truth that whosoever liveth and beleeveth according to it without repentance cannot be saved Witnesse their doctrine in the point of vilifying the Scriptures and in point of free-will and of Justification by works of the Popes Supremacy of the Sacrifice of the Masse of worshipping of Images c. In regard of which and such like the Holy Ghost saith that their Religion is a Sea become as the bloud of a dead man and every soule in that Sea dyeth Rev. 16. 3. And therefore agreement in such a Religion will never prove them to be true Churches nor any Assemblies of Arrians Antitrinitaries Anabaptists or Famelists supposing them also to be combined by Covenant among themselves But now for the Assemblies in England the case is farre otherwise for the Doctrine of the Articles of Religion which they professe and which they promise to hold and observe though some things are amisse in some of those Articles and though many persons live contrary
both that they beleeved what God promised and that they would be obedient to what he required If any shouâ—d have claimed Church-fellowship saying I beleeve the promises but would not binde himselfe to any duties of Evangelicall obedience this had been a taking hold of the Covenant by the halves a taking of one part of it in seeming and pretence and a leaving of another but it would not have been sufficient to have brought a man into the fellowship of the church Such of the Congregation of Israel as would not come to Hierusalem to enter into Covenant were to be separated from the Church in the dayes of Ezrya Ezra 10. 8. And therefore such as being strangers should refuse to enter into it could not be admitted into the Church So that the taking hold of Gods Covenant which is there required to make these strangers members of the Church is a beleeving in heart on the God of Israel and an open profession that they did beleeve and likewise a promise of obedience or subjection unto the God of Israel and an open professing of such obedience and subjection and that is the joyning in Covenant which we stand for before a man can be a member of a Church even an open profession of Faith and of Obedience A third Argument is taken from those Scriptures which shew that men become members by being added to the Church or being joyned to them Act. 2. 47. 5. 13. 9. 26. If men become members of the Church by being added or joyned then joying in Covenant or professing of subjection to the Gospel or Covenant of God is that whereby a man becomes a member of a Church But the former is true as appeares by the Scriptures forementioned and therefore the latter is true also But all the doubt in this Argument will be concerning the consequence of the Major Proposition but that may be made good by this reason and the confirmation of it viz. that a man cannot be added or joyned to the Church by any other meanes without this joyning in Covenant The truth of which Assertion will appeare by shewing the insufficiency of all other means without this joyning in Covenant and that may be done in Answer to the Objections ensuing When men were added to the Church it may be no more is meant but thaâ— God did convert them and worke Faith in their hearts and that converting of them was the adding of them to the Church This cannot be all for first Saul was converted and had faith wrought in his heart and yet he was not at the first received for a member of the Church at Hierusalem though he assayed to be joyned unto them till they were better satisfied in his spirituall estate by the testimony of Barnabas Act. 9. 26 27 28. And those strangers Isa. 56. as was said before were joyned to the Lord by being converted and having Faith wrought in their hearts and yet they doe lament it with griefe that they were not joyned as members to the visible Church The Lord hath separated me from his people say they ver. 3. The old saying is true concerning the visible Church There are many wolves within and many sheepe without Secondly Those that were joyned were beleevers before they joyned for it is said divers were added ver. 14. Thirdly Those that were added to the Church were added and joyned to them by such an act as others durst not put forth Act. 5. 13. Of the rest durst no man joyne unto them and therefore it was not by the irresistable act of God in converting of them but by some volunâ—ary act of their owne choice and consent for Gods converting grace depends not upon mans daring or not daring to receive it If to be joyned be no more but to be converted then when it is said Some durst not be joyned the meaning should be they durst not be converted nor suffer Faith to be wrought in them which is grosse Arminianisme suspending the converting grace of God upon the free will of the creature Fourthly And as this joyning which others durst not doe cannot be meant of being converted So if it be well considered what the thing was wherein they durst not joyne it may appeare that it was nothing els but this that they durst not agree and engage themselves to be of their body and societie that is they durst not joyne in Covenant with them For it cannot be meant of dwelling in the Towne with them for this they both durst doe and did nor is it onely of joyning to heare the Word in their assembly for this also they durst doe and many did it in great multitudes so that many by hearing the Word became beleevers and were added to the Lord both of men and women ver. 14. at this very time when it is said of some they durst not joyne unto them Nor is it of joyning to them in affection or approbation of their way for this they also durst doe and did expresse so much in magnifying and commending them when yet they durst not joyne unto them ver. 13. Which magnifying of them doth imply that they heard their doctrine and saw their practise and approved it and highly commended them for the same Wherefore seeing this joyning which some durst not doe cannot be meant of being converted nor of joyning in habitation nor of joyning in affection nor in hearing the Word in their Assembly nor of approbation and expressions that way it remaineth that it must be meant of joyning in that neere relation of Church-fellowship amongst them so as to be engaged by voluntary consent and agreement to be members of their Church Fiftly If joyning to the Church were no more but to be converted then he that were converted were joyned as a member of every visible Church throughout the world which were a great confusion of that Order and distinction of Churches which the Lord hath appointed Men may be joyned to the Church in heartie affection and love and yet without any Covenant True but this will not make them members of that Church for then Saul was member of the Church at Hierusalem afore he was joyned a member for he was joyned to them in heartie affection afore and therefore assayed to joyne as a member and so were they that durst not joyne Act. 5. 13. yea then a man should be a member of many Churches yea of all Christian Churches in the world for he is to love them and beare heartie affection to them all The true members of the Churches in England are united in heartie affection to the Churches in Scotland in Holland in France in New-England c. And yet they are not members of all these Churches nor subject to their censures as members are But the reason of that is because they doe not dwell among them in the same Towne Neither would habitation with them in the same Towne make a man a member of the Church there if there