the Elderships should have the power of excommunicating all offenders even Princes themselves Hereupon in a just indignation he expressed his abhorrence of this bold seditious Proposition yet with great indiscretion he causelesly vented his wrath against Excommunication as it was a Church Discipline His Arguments improved by his Followers are these He supposed Excommunication did totally cut off the excommunicated from the internal and invisible Communion of the Church whereupon his Followers argued If the power of Excommunication be in the Church Officers then it lies in their power to save or damn men But his supposition is false and the inference of his Followers is wild as one and the most learned of them hath observed for he saith finis hujusmodi disciplinae c. The end of this discipline not final Sentence was is so still that the censured being deprived of the spiritual privileges of the Church they might be humbled to salvation This is the whole truth and nothing but the truth for its onely a barr from the external visible Society of Believers not to exclude men from heaven but to encline them to put themselves in a capacity to be received again into the peace of the Church for the enjoyment of those great privileges of holy commerce which all men religiously affected earnestly desire and value A method of Discipline which Christ and his Apostles thought proper to reduce and reclaim sinners It is medicinal in Saint Augustine's expression To. 9. Serm. de Poeniten med if that Tract be his ordained and applied for edification not destruction if for destruction it is for that of the Flesh that the Spirit might be saved 1 Cor. 5. 15. or it s a Chastisement the censured are thereby chastised of the Lord that they should not be condemned with the world 1 Cor. 11. 32. which Chastisement is not sweet or joyous for the present but grievous yet yieldeth the peaceable fruits of righteousness to them that are exercised thereby Heb. 12. 11. 2. Excommunication say they is a censure inferring a civil Penalty therefore if the Church makes use of it she enlargeth her Phylacteries by an encroachment on the civil Power But where do those wrathfull Objectours find this or how can they prove it It was always reckoned in the Catalogue of spiritual gifts practised by the Church for spiritual ends and uses and exercised upon the members of the Church qua tales in that capacity onely if upon contempt hereof a civil Penalty was incurred this proceeded not from the quality and nature of the censure but from the authority of the civil Magistrate who so far respected the Church that he made provisions against the contempt of her Discipline That which the Church aims at is either to reduce the offender or to warn others or to discharge her duty in discountenancing and disowning dangerous prevailing Heresies Schisms and Scandals all which are of spiritual concernment and cognizance 3. The Bishops claim this power by Divine Right and why not Forsooth this is contrary to the Oath of Supremacy and sets up two Supremes in one Kingdom This is an high Charge I am persuaded if the great Turk was acquainted with this noble Argument he would in a rage destroy all the poor Christian Bishops in his Empire or else he would scorn and deride it as it justly deserveth For the Argument runs thus Ministers by a Divine Right challenge a power to baptize Proselytes communicate Christians and doe other offices belonging to their Functions Therefore they set up two Supremes in one Kingdom or thus The Scripture declareth the Holy Ghost made them Overseers to feed the Church of God sure they may pretend to Divine Right who derive their title from the Holy Ghost Therefore the Scripture contradicteth that Supremacy which it establisheth But in sober sadness did none of the first Christian Emperours or after Kings understand their Religion and Prerogative did they ever declare the Imperial and Episcopal power were incompatible were they all so blind they could not espie this so obvious an inconsistency or did any of our own great Councils before that of 40. ever make such a determination As for our own Kingdom we may without disparagement to their great wisedoms compare many of our Kings with the ablest of any or all of them King Henry the Eighth was a wise Prince one that would not bate an Ace of his Sovereignty yet he never scrupled at the Divine Right of Episcopacy Q. Elizabeth was as jealous of her Prerogative and as zealous for it as the highest and most masculine Spirit yet she reverenced and maintained the Order The greatest for Learning and Judgment the Father and the Son were as Prelatical as the Prelatists What King James his opinion was of Episcopacy is before related what it was concerning his Supremacy which he cogently asserted he thus expressed Premonition p. 108. It consists not in making Articles of Faith but in commanding obedience be given to the word of God in reforming Religion according to his prescribed will in assisting the spiritual Power this is to be noted with the temporal Sword in procuring due obedience to the Church mark this too in judging and cutting off all frivolous Questions and Schisms as Constantine did and finally in making a decorum to be observed in all things and establishing Order in all indifferent things King Charles the First of blessed memory hath above and beyond all others resolved the case in his answer to Henderson's Papers in his Reply to the Answer of the Isle of Wight Divines Rel. Car. fol. 691. and in his final Answer fol. 709. Sir Henry Spelman in his large History of Titles p. 157. thus stated it God hath committed the Tabernacle to Levi as well as the Kingdom to Judah and though Judah hath power over Levi as touching the outward Government even of the Temple it self yet Judah meddled not with the Oracle and the holy Ministery but received the will of God from the mouth of the Priest This is evident God for the promoting of Piety and Justice among men hath ordained two distinct Powers the Regal and the Sacerdotal which in the times of the Patriarchs were formally united and inseparably followed the first born of the male kind in every Family This he seemed to alter in the persons of Moses and Aaron investing Moses the younger Brother with the Regality Aaron the elder in the Priesthood both these received their Commissions from God Num. 16. Every power is the Ordinance of God but the Regal as Supreme the Sacerdotal as Subordinate which subordination is not essential or causal but moral by virtue of God's Constitution and accidental for Order's sake Certainly God who gives all power can order a subordination of powers derived from him the one to be superiour the other inferiour and God was pleased to dispose the distribution of those under the Mosaical dispensation that as the Priests were not to usurp the Regal for Abimelech was
pretend great zeal against Ignorance and Sin and the other is aggrieved at promiscuous Communions though both of them by their barkings and bawlings against this Church and the Discipline and Government thereof have and do still obstruct the methods which she hath provided as remedies against those maladies Now that those Offices which she hath determined for those ends are proper and very instrumental through the assistence of the Divine grace which accompanies and inanimates them to devoutly affected Christians most effectual thereto they will be necessitated to acknowledge by observing the Order prescribed which lies thus Every Infant is to be solemnly matriculated into the Church by holy Baptism these baptized in a competent time are to be catechised in the principles of Christian Religion and then to be confirmed by the Bishop and are required to give attention to the reading and preaching of the word of God Being thus prepared they are admittable to the great mystery of the holy Eucharist and for neglect of these means the offenders are liable to the censures of the Church That these methods are Scriptural and Apostolical most of the Dissenters acknowledge some of them indeed scruple at Confirmation but Calvin conceives it to be originally Apostolical with whom more than a whole Jury of reformed Divines have given in their Verdict Mr. Baxter thinketh it would quiet the wrangle about the formality of a Church Covenant and Membership Mr. Brinsley of Yarmouth was of opinion it would remove all the fears and jealousies of vain Disputers Calvin is positive this office was performed by the Bishop from the beginning and Mr. Dallee commends that of S. Hier. Episcopus c. in Dial. inter Orth. and Lucef In this I blame the Presbyterians and Independents because at present they hang together by the tails but for all the fair copies of their Countenances if their wished and laboured for turn come their faces will look several ways If the Presbyterians get the start and keep their ground for a while they will soon proclaim the Independents to be Babylonians If the Independents once more out-wit the Presbyterians and turn them out of power and trust then the Independents will face about and tell them roundly they are Egyptians SECT 5. As for the Papists the best they can brag on is their unity of which they rant highly that they and they onely have found out the true way to it this is a mere bravado to which a wise and learned person made heretofore this return viz. Let me see the Jesuits and Seculars reconciled in England a Dominican and Jesuit in Doctrinal Papistry French and Italians in state Papistry then I shall allow them a little to vapour their oral and conclave Traditionists are hard at it in their confutations of each other their great heads of Unity Pope Sixtus and Clemens fell very foul one with another they cannot agree about the Supremacy of a Pope and a Council nor which of their four or five Churches is the infallible one the Popes and Councils have declared several ways upon the points which obviates their common shift viz. Their clashings and bickerings are but in scholastick opinions and niceties for then the definitions of Popes and Councils are no matters of Faith But here again they quarrel for some assert a Doctrine is heretical by its repugnancy to what is revealed by Christ others affirm a Doctrine is heretical because the Church hath declared so it s the former sort thus confutes If the Doctrine be heretical from the Churches declaration then the Church hath power to make Articles of Faith about which also there is a great bustle among them for some of them peremptorily deny the Church hath any power to make Articles of Faith but most of the Canonists and all the Popes Exchequer men affirm it so schismatically are they divided about their Church the Head thereof with the terms and objects of their pretended Unity when these are smartly objected to them their onely salvo is Their Rule would be a means to hold them in unity if it were followed Very good for the plain English of this is their Rule about which they so smartly wrangle and concerning which they could never yet agree will or may be a means of unity when they are agreed about it In opposition whereto we assert the Rule which we propose is not flexible like theirs but infallible viz. the sure word of God duly applied for the application whereof we take in the consentient judgment of the universal Church in matters of Faith and in points of practice the constant usage thereof these we stand to because if they be not the true means of unity the true Church of God which always relied on these and no other had never any If to this some Romanists give assent as some of them do they are so far English Episcopal Protestants From all which premised there is great reason and good warranty to conclude that under the Government of King and Bishops the Civil Power is most safely fixed mixt Communion Ignorance and Sin are most effectually provided against Unity and Obedience storngly guarded therefore whatsoever good or desirable can be expected from Erastianism Presbyterianism Independency or Popery is really experimented in Episcopacy and therefore this in true polity ought to be retained and supported the other modes are not to be admitted or entertained not the Erastians for they play at fast and loose with Kings and the Church they respect no Government present to which their submission is compliance not obedience Not the Presbyterians for they encroach upon and vilifie Kingly authority if they find a King they will if they dare shackle him or in our Northern expression houghband him Not the Independents for with them Kings are the Peoples Creatures and Trustees neither will they permit him with their good wills to intermeddle in Church Affairs Not the Pontificians for reasons given by the learned Doctor Stillingfleet and that honourable Person who seconded him It is therefore the clear interest of the Crown if it would have a Church National to govern by it ought to be Protestant Episcopal as a late ingenious Writer hath observed lest if it be held of the Pope Kirk or People in Capite it totter and fall That Probleme which Dr. Prideaux Ep. Ded. ad fasc Contro An suprematus Papalis sit potiùs Antichristianus quà m Presbyterianus aut Enthusiasticus may hence easily be resolved if we be not too palpably partial we must declare them all or none at all to be Tyrannical or Antichristian The best Argument ever yet produced to prove the Pope to be Antichrist is his bold challenge over all Kings and Monarchs to depose them and dispose of their Crowns and Dignities which if it be good it will hold as strongly against all other Sectaries for they are as truly the Limbs of Antichrist who preach and press Rebellion against their lawfull Sovereign and those commissionated by
the seventy Disciples which were not empty Titles but had distinct Offices the former not onely invested with dignities above the other but with power over them as appears by the Election of Matthias Now Christ was entrusted with the Keys Isa 22. 22. and honoured with the Sceptre Psal 45. 6. God committing the Government to him as the great Shepherd and Bishop of our Souls 1 Pet. 2. 25. having the Key of David Rev. 3. 7. This he ordered by an immutable Law which neither could expire or be repealed For all power was given to him both in Heaven and Earth Matt. 28. 18. a power not onely to protect but to rule the Church not onely to rule the Consciences of its Members but externally to order and administer it as a publick Society a power to rule in himself or by Proxy and Delegates therefore it follows in the exhibition thereof that charge Go ye c. v. 19. without demurr or dispute For I have the power to commission you and do command you to execute it I have received it from my Father thus to exercise that power and empower you and to it I was solemnly consecrated by the descent of the Holy Ghost as S. Luke expresseth it Act. 10. 38. God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power which at least imports thus much As by the ceremony of anointing God promoted persons to high Dignities and Offices so Christ was regularly advanced to his prelatical Function to be the first and chief Bishop in the Christian Church from whose fulness all others were to receive grace for grace Num. 2. Christ having performed this Office in person took care that after his Ascension into Heaven the holy Apostles should succeed him whom he separated for this Office and over and above authorised them to depute and substitute others to keep the succession of Rulers This he consigned and passed over to them Luk. 22. 29. I appoint you a Kingdom as my Father hath appointed me Accordingly at the octaves of his Resurrection he both confirmed them Joh. 20. 21. As my Father hath sent me even so I send you and also consecrated them by that solemn Form ever since observed in the Catholick Church either in terms or words equivalent Receive ye the Holy Ghost This fully conserred on them the habitual power which actually they were not licensed to exercise till as he was they were authorized by the descent of the Holy Ghost and endued with power Luk. 24. 49. which happened soon after his Ascension Eph. 4. 11. when he took off this suspension and at Pentecost sent the promise of the Father upon them the Comforter Joh. 15. 26. the Holy Ghost Act. 1. 8. And so they were baptized with the Holy Ghost and with Fire which sate upon each of them Act. 2. 3. that every of them might be a respective Plenipotentiary in the Administration of his Kingdom This sitting of the Fire upon each of them as it destroyeth the Erastian Supposition for the Apostles were neither Civilians nor common Lawyers or Statesmen so it prejudgeth both the Papal and Presbyterian pretensions The Papal because it sate not upon one S. Peter which might have entitled him to a Jurisdiction over the rest but upon each of them that what power one of them had all and each of them had For before Christ had warranted to them twelve Thrones for every Apostle one Matt. 19. 28. as Camero hath observed that every one might enjoy the same entire authority and supremacy The Presbyterian because it sate not upon all as fellow Collegues or Common-council-men but as so many single Persons not that they could not or did not for a time act jointly but that it sate upon all and every of them so that the power was granted to them jointly and severally whereupon when they took their circuits to their several apartments they severally exercised their Function and Office Bullinger's conjecture is We have no Canonical Records of the Government of the Church but in the Acts of the Apostles where the Platform is described and exemplified in the person of S. Paul from whose example and practice we are to conclude how the rest of the Apostles first planted and then governed the Church Bul. part 2. Epit. Tempor rerum Tab. 6. de Apostal c. But evident it is S. Paul acted as a single person without any dependence upon all or any of the Twelve Therefore if this observation hold all the rest planted and governed severally if this fail the state and condition of their employment will enforce it For if they depended after the College was broken up upon any one or the whole Community they could not effectually have executed their Commission because upon every exigent especially when they removed from one Province to another they must have had the consent of that one or the whole to license and authorize them which was utterly impossible to obtain For they then being dispersed into several Regions of great distance one from another they must give up their work till at every occasion they had received orders whether to undertake and how to manage it Very few or none of them knew where to find S. Peter if they did they had no Post-office to transmit and return expresses and the College after it was dissolved never assembled again Impossible therefore it was for them to execute their Commission validly under those circumstances unless each of them had been a Plenipotentiary by the tenour thereof Num. 3. As Christ invested the Apostles with this power in a due subordination to himself so they in virtue of his investiture were to constitute others to succeed them in the principals thereof Confessedly the Apostolical Office was to reside in the Church for ever So J. O. Independ Catech. p. 119. and the ordained by them were of the same Order with them so WÃ lo p. 43 44 144. upon which account the title of Apostles was allowed in Scripture to many of those whom the Apostles had separated for the work of the Ministery Calvin speaks faintly to the point on 1 Cor. 4. 9. Tales interdum vocat Apostolos malo tamen c. yet at last he comes off more frankly telling us plainly who those us Apostles last were Qui in ordinem Apostolicum post Christi Resurrectionem asciti fuerunt As Apollo Sylvanus Pisc c. is very liberal S. Paul gave them this title Eo quod eodem munere fungerentur Saint James was ordained Bishop of Jerusalem by the Apostles in the nineteenth of Tiberius saith Blondel in Chron. p. 43. the next year after Christ's Ascension by his account which in his censure of the Pontifical Epistles he affirms from all antiquity and Walo p. 20. assures us he was none of the Twelve yet he is called an Apostle Gal. 1. 19. which Blondel Apol. pro sent Hier. p. 50. thus confirms Saint Matthew the Apostle was a Bishop and Saint James the Bishop was called
Concord l. 6. c. 4. sect Igitur observes Indeed in the Latin Church Presbyters did lay on hands with the Bishop at the Ordination of a Presbyter yet this was observed not for its validity but for its solemnity and attestation For the African Fathers who ordered it ascribed the entire power to the Bishop Cod. Afric c. 55. 80. and even at Rome besore S. John's death Presbyters were settled in several Parishes by Enaristus Caron p. 44. and therefore we may believe before that the same was done in earlier converted Churches Mr. Toung in his Notes on S. Clem. 1. Ep. ad Cor. out of a Book which Mr. Petty brought from Greece hath this Sentence S. Peter was in Britain 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 settled Churches by laying hands on Bishops Priests and Deacons It will not be amiss to superadd how far the Waldenses concurred in judgment upon this case with the Church of England which we find Parsons third part of the Three Conversions of England cap. 3. p. 44. who relates from Vrspurg Trithem Antomin and others that they onely approved three Ecclesiastical Orders at which his tender Conscience was moved viz. That of Deaconship Priesthood and Bishops which is very probable for the Fratres Bohemi to continue a succession of Bishops sent twelve men to the Waldenses in Austria to be ordained Bishops by their Bishops which was accordingly done and Corranus a Spaniard one of the Waldenses flying thence into England was retained a Preacher at the Temple and dedicated a Dialogue to the Lawyers there an 1574. in the close whereof he maketh a confession of his Faith where he declares his judgment herein I hold saith he there be divers Orders of Ministers in the Church of God viz. Some are Deacons some Priests some Bishops to whom the instruction of the People and the care of Religion is committed This we are sure of S. Bernard complains heavily many Bishops were of their Communion This was the primitive Establishment Conc. Cart. 3. and 4. Chal. Act. 1. for which reason Nazian in Vita Basil enforms us that he rose to his Bishoprick 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By the order and rule of spiritual ascent one degree after another So S. Hier. writes of Nepot in Ep. Fit Clericus per solitos gradus c. Num. 7. If S. Augustine's known and generally approved rule be admitted then the Order of Bishops is truly Apostolical because maintained in all Apostolical Chruches before any general Council had determined it And Tert. his Sorites will make it good which was that is truest which is first that is first which was from the beginning that was from the beginning which was from the Apostles that was from the Apostles which was inviolably and religiously observed in all Apostolical Churches Calvin speaks fairly to the case and so doth Beza too if their words may be taken who have tricks to eat them in the former saith the Bishops of the ancient Church made many Canons with that circumspection they had nothing almost contrary to the word of God in their whole Oeconomy l. 4. Instit c. 1. sect 14. but more fully thus they did not frame any other form of Government in the Church than that which God prescribed in his word The latter averreth what was then done was done optimo Zelo if so then they did it from warranty either from the Scripture or universal Tradition S. Hierome himself once said it was an Apostolical Tradition and when he said it was a Custome he proved it a good one because ordered for a good end as a safe remedy against Schism and an Apostolical Custome because taken in the Apostles times when one said I am of Paul c. which happened an 58. The disparity of Bishops and Priests was so religiously maintained in the primitive Church that the Fathers in the Council of Chalc. Act. 1. adjudged it sacrilege to bring down a Bishop to the degree of a Presbyter and the Doctrine of parity was condemned as flat Heresie in Aerius because he positively affirmed that there was but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. one Order one Honour one Dignity in the Priesthood Dr. Crack Defens Eccl. Anglic. contra Arch. Spal p. 242 243. Bishops then as they were settled in matricibus Ecclesiis the Apostolical mother Churches so have been continued in all successive Ages without any considerable opposition for 1500 years which is so strong and cogent an argument to some who have not been over-fond of Episcopacy they have resolved it unanswerable since the Order hath been canvassed by some yet is still retained either in the Name or Thing in all the Eastern and Southern Churches generally in the Western and Northern reformed and others unless in two or three petty Associations in comparison of the rest where by reason of some cross circumstances it cannot be obtained though highly approved and much affected by most of their learned men never disowned or abominated by any but those whose zeal for the good Old Cause is immoderate S. Augustine's expression insolentissima insania insolent madness Num. 8. If these Structures be built upon the Foundation of the Apostles Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner Stone the Fabrick is as firm as Mount Sion which may not be removed For if the Apostles did settle Bishops in their several Plantations and these such as the Prelatists plead for then that is the one necessary Government to be retained in the Church For the Apostles being inspired by the Holy Ghost they did then act and order the Church according to his directions Amesius himself resolves what is Apostolical Stands by Divine Right his words are Med. Theol l. 2. c. 15. n. 28. The Apostles were acted by the Divine Spirit no less in their Institutions than in the very Doctrine of the Gospel propounded by word or writing This he delivers to assert the Divine Authority and unalterableness of the Lord's day and will therefore hold here For if Episcopacy stand in the Church by the same authority that the Lord's day doth which Dr. Hammond hath fully proved then it hath the same Divine Authority for its Establishment This King James saw and so Premonition p. 44. is very positive That Bishops ought to be in the Church I always maintained as an Apostolical Order and so the Ordinance of God The Dissenters who allow of Church Government as such have often declared what concerns the rule of Government in the Church by Officers appointed by Christ is unchangeable Now that the Bishops are those Officers hath been evidenced from Scripture Rules and Precedents and confirmed by the suffrage of a cloud of Witnesses who as they accord in their Testimonies so were faithfull unto death some whereof were the chosen Witnesses of Christ's Resurrection some were immediate Successours to those ordained by the Apostles others of the highest reputation in the Church for testifiers of Catholick Tradition all of them had and still have such credit in the
and Feast days nor with the solemn appointed Sacrifices because prescribed Prayers were then to be observed but onely at the Free-will Offerings and then too with these restrictions they should not be extemporary but prepared Prayers nor were they permitted to the whole Congregation which was tied up to the daily Offices Those places of Saint Paul Eph. 3. 19. Col. 3. 16. are a plain reference to the Jewish practice for there he useth those three Greek words by which the Septuagint renders the three Hebrew Mismorim Tehillath or Rabbinice as Buxt Tehillim and Shirim Diod. interprets this Text by reference to Psal 55. 17. as others to Dan. 6. 10. Num. 4. Primitive practice is deduced 1. From Acts 13. 2. where the Church is said to be solemnly at her Liturgy ministring not to the people by Alms or other acts of Charity but to God in the acts of his Worship in publick Prayers and other parts of the Evangelical Ministery saith Diod. This is agreeable to that Text Acts 2. 42. which in Mr. Calvin's judgment delineates the true state of the Church treating of publick Prayers And to that Acts 4. 24. when the hundred and twenty Converts prayed unanimously and uniformly there were no dissenters amongst them nor mutes all joyned and all in one Form and this a set Form as it is set down in the Text. 2. From 1 Cor. 11. 5. every man and woman c. This at first sight is obvious all of both Sexes prayed and prophesied and from the Context this was done in the publick Assemblies when the Church met v. 20. and this according to an Apostolical Tradition which S. Paul charged them to keep v. 2. But what then is this praying and prophesying 1. This praying here is not by an extemporary faculty or volubility of language it may be questioned whether that was then in use for if when S. Paul Rom. 12. Gal. 5. Eph. 4. 1 Cor. 12. enumerated the gifts of the Spirit he gave a full Catalogue thereof then this pretended gift is begged because no such is mentioned in that Company that of praying by the Spirit 1 Cor. 14. 15. was praying in an unknown Tongue v. 14. which required an interpreter however this be those gifts were not common to all Believers neither was any of them communicated to select persons for popularity and ostentation but for profit and edification yea their proper purpose was to prevent that licentiousness that was taken from the pretence thereof and even to restrain arbitrary prayers and to confine the gifted to such suggestions as the holy Spirit dictated to them this is evident the Apostle censures some of the pretenders for clashing one with another 1 Cor. 14. 21. it was never heard that the Spirit was given to any to pray upon their own heads or according to their own lusts interests and passions but supposing there were such a gift yet it was not to be used at every meeting for if an Interpreter were wanting at any such meeting then all they had to doe was either to resort to the Common Prayers or to break up and be gone neither lastly was this gift given promiscuously to all of all Sexes it being pretended as a peculiar to the Minister or some inspired person endowed therewith therefore praying here must be praying in the Church v. 20. 22. by the Churches prayers according to the order and custome thereof 1 Cor. 14. 40. and then the meaning is Every man or woman meeting at the Church or observing the customary constituted devotions ought to be thus habited and thus to demean themselves 2. By Prophesying here we are not to understand prediction of future events nor the gift of interpreting what was spoken by the gift of Tongues 1 Cor. 14. v. 2 3. nor for speaking to men for edification 1 Cor. 12. 29. all are not Prophets nor is it to be taken passively as some imagine for hearing a Prophecy for then every one that hears a Prophecy is a Prophet and by the same reason every one that hears a Sermon is a Preacher and a reason ought to be rendred why praying should not be interpreted passively as well as prophesying but the notion here is the same with that of 1 Sam. 10. 5. 1 Chron. 25. 1. Luk. 1. 67. for singing Psalms and Hymns so the sense is perspicuous viz. Let every man and woman singing and praising God in the Church appear in such habits as are suitable to their Sex This should not seem odd to them who allow all to sing but silence the whole Congregation in the act of Prayer because in such singing the Psalms which are used contain in them prayers supplications intercessions and thanksgivings but others are verily persuaded that all both men and women have joynt interest in the publick Service of God with the officiating Ministers who as they are for order's sake to direct and lead the Congregation so all assembled have their parts to act A bare corporal presence is mockery and dalliance an Eye or Ear service will never be accepted as the reasonable service of God Thus it hath been from the beginning which is our Saviour's way of arguing Matt. 19. 8. ever since men called upon the name of the Lord for thus it was practised in the Patriarchal ages as our Greg. hath exemplified p. 120 121. Under the Law examples are numerous Ex. 15. 1. 1 Chron. 15. 36. and 29. 20. 2 Chron. 6. 29. the manner is described Ez. 3. 10 11. and the practice proved Psal 34. 3. and 107. 8 15 21 31. Mr. Selden observes the Eighteen composed Prayers by Ezra began with that Psal 51. 15. O Lord open thou our Lips to which the People answered And our mouths shall shew forth thy praise the very Form retained in S. James his Liturgy which is very much for its credit and in ours soon after the beginning S. Paul urgeth it as a Gospel duty Rom. 15. 6. to glorifie God not with distracted or divided minds but with one mind not that of the Minister onely but of all as one in consort for that form v. 11. viz. Praise ye the Lord was the Peoples Hallelujah our Saviour with the Disciples sung the great one on which Musculus observes Ipse ita praelocutus est ut verba illius fuerunt excepta vicissim reddita just as the people with us repeat the Confession Lord's Prayer c. S. Paul reports the unlearned had his Amen to give in at the Eucharist but probably he did more in the other Offices if we believe Just Mart. Apol. 2. sub fin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. where he distinguisheth between the joynt Prayers of Priest and People and those peculiar and proper to the Minister his part lay in those Offices which solely depended on the power of the Keys as Absolution Consecration of the Elements and Benediction the rest which had no such relation were common both to Minister and People who were to accompany him as it
on my forehead the banner of the Cross The custome then being ancient and innocent because observed in the best times it ought to be retained and for its better observation be enjoyned by authority certainly not laid aside to gratifie humorous people 3. As for kneeling at the receiving of the holy Sacrament though there be not so clear a constat yet this is plain the Ancients used the same gesture they did at prayer which never was that of sitting which neither in it self hath nor in the esteem of the Ancients ever had any thing of reverence Tert. de Orat. c. 12. protests against it and Amesius c. 18. de Consc p. 191. rejects it because not expressive of reverence nor approved in Scripture Now kneeling was the ordinary custome Euseb l. 8. c. 5 8. standing was at particular times and places which they used as a significant Ceremony yet when they stood they bowed the body after the manner of worshipping which is sufficiently proved by that received rule Nemo manducat c. Let none communicate but he who first adores so that ordinarily they kneeled when they received and when they did not they worshipped The best reformed Churches use kneeling and the best learned of those who do not acknowledge it a gesture of humility and reverence which where it is constituted ought to be uniformly observed The Genevians in their Annot. on the harmony of Confessions are well content every particular Church should use her liberty in such cases particularly they make mention of kneeling at the Communion and use of all such Ceremonies as now are observed by the Lutherans Copes Organs c. and had been used before by Papists Annot. Sect. 14. Obs 4. ad Confes Bohem As an upshot to this when an English fugitive Separatist proposed his Thesis de Adiaphoris at Geneva he could not be permitted to discuss them The whole may be drawn up in this order Ceremonies are lawfull things some of this kind are expedient these expedients ought to be significant these may and occasionally ought to be imposed these so imposed are to be observed and those we practise caeteris paribus are to be settled rather than any other because thereby we honour our first Reformers we obey our lawfull Superiours we keep up our alliance with other reformed Churches sure with the chiefest and best and which is more we hold a firm correspondence with the primitive and present Catholick Church CHAP. VI. AS for the observation of Holidays the Grandees of the Sectarians seemed once willing to admit Festivals provided they were not called Holidays which was nothing else in them but a silly sour singularity and morosity for more learned and much better men than they never scrupled at the name Mr. Perkins Demonst Problem p. 232. n. 6. asserts this Holy they are not in and for themselves but for the holy duties then performed to God Dr. Rivet in Ex. 20. p. 167. declares A relative holiness belongeth to them and they might very properly be called Holidays ratione finis in respect to their ends and uses being separated for holy exercises So they were constituted and observed in the primitive Church S. Chrys Hom. in Ascen hath assured us The Catholick Church observed six recurring anniversary Solemnities in memory of Christ's Nativity Epiphany Passion Resurrection Ascension and mission of the Holy Ghost The matter of fact is notorious In the Reign of Dioclesian an 294. and by the Greek Menology on the twenty fifth of December the Christians assembled to commemorate the Birth of our Lord whereof the Emperour having received intelligence commanded the doors of the Church to be shut and fire set to it which soon consumed both them and it Julian in an hellish design joyned with the Christians in their publick Assembly on the sixth of January called the Epiphany The Festival for it 's called by Phil. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Fast of our Saviour's Passion was solemnly celebrated and that from long custome Eus l. 2. c. 16. The dispute so early started about the time of the observation of Easter puts that beyond dispute Just Mart. Resp ad Orthod 115. speaks of its being kept 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the Apostles time Euseb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vid. Eus l. 5. c. 23 24 25. and S. Aug. Ep. 119 ex authoritate Scripturarum universae Ecclesiae consensione The Ancients called Ascension Tessaracostae Scal. de Emend Temp. many are their Homilies on that day Conc. Elib c. 43. treats of Whitsuntide as an ancient Solemnity censuring all those who neglect it as Hereticks The matter of fact is backed with a good reason For if the primitive Christians were strict in the observation of the Birth-days as they were called but indeed Death-days of the Martyrs we cannot imagine they would be forgetfull fo the joyfull days wherein the Lord and the Lord of the Martyrs begun continued and perfected the work of the Redemption of mankind But evident it is those days were religiously observed S. Cypr. l. 3. Ep. 6. expressed his great care and zeal those commemorations and solemn Offices should not be slurred Rivet in Ex. 20. p. 154. saith Ratio postulat c. Reason requires that not onely certain days but sufficient be retained even as many as the right constitution safety good of the Church and the glory of God requires For we being exonerated from the Jewish yoke may have more ought not have fewer days for the service of God than they had but they had more than one in seven some whereof were of humane institution This he confirms p. 163. Quod de die c. that which was expresly said of the Seventh-day by analogy and parity of reason respects any day which the Church hath appointed and in common use hath observed for holy Meetings whereupon all Interpreters do conceive not onely the Lord's day but all other lawfully instituted Festivals are comprehended under the Fourth Commandment But a good word from Geneva may doe more service than all other authorities and reasons Hear a whole gang of Genevians at once Every Church may use her liberty in observing Ember-days and Holidays consecrated to the godly memory of the Saints Annot. in Harm Confess Sect. 16. Obs 1. ad Conf. Boh. and retain the use of singing Christian Hymns and Songs upon the Holidays Obs 2. Zanch. in Expl. c. 2. ad Col. so far approves them that though he thinks there is no absolute necessity for them yet there is a profitable necessity in their due observation Bishop Dav. in his exposition of the same words hath furnished us with three substantial reasons who will may consider them CHAP. VII THE last which is opposed is the Doctrine of the Church exemplified in the Book of Articles The Independent Sophi hath expressed so great kindness for 36 of them that by his Verdict woe be to him that shall dispute them no less correction will satisfie his tender Conscience than exile but away
to enterprise any thing which might infringe or abate the tenour of the Law The Presbyters and Deacons of Rome writing to S. Cypr. l. 2. Ep. 7. are very positive Quid magis c. What can be more necessary either in times of peace or persecution than to exercise due severity according to Divine order S. Augustine fully Tract 11. in Joh. Admirantur Donatistae c. The Donatists wonder that Christian Princes should bestir themselves against the detestable dividers of the Church but to abate their wonderment he subjoyns this reason Si verò c. If they did not labour to suppress them how could they give an account to God of their power which they had received from him because it is the duty of Christian Kings that they in their times preserve their Mother the Church in peace That smart saying of his Ep. 73. Possid is not to be forgotten Magis quid agas c. Think rather what course you are to take with those who will not obey Laws and how to handle them than to trouble your self to make it appear that their disobedience to Laws is sinfull This also shews that the Christian Emperours did make severe Laws against the Schismaticks of those times so did Constantine and his Sons Aug. Ep. 166. Ed. Bas To. 2. so did Valentian Gratian Theodosius Arcadius but Justinian took the safest course for the Hereticks being great traders he came even with them none should trade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. but the Orthodox the rest had six months given them to consider whether they would conform or no. Evident it is that as the Emperours handled them sometimes more severely sometimes more remissly as the exigence of their affairs and state of the Empire would permit the Church and State did accordingly enjoy their peace and quiet or else were pestered with intestine broils and mischiefs The Governours of the Church were not behind hand to doe their part for the Laodicean Council forbids them admission into the Church c. 6. prohibits any Orthodox man to give his Sons or Daughters in marriage unto them c. 31. yea not to pray with them c. 33. and though it be true S. Aug. and Optat. called the Donatists Brethren yet at last they would not that was after that they had rejected or laid aside the use of the Lord's Prayer as many of our Fanaticks have done But above all Solomon prohibits the removal of what had been long settled by paternal power Prov. 22. 28. which the Ephesine Fathers with many other Ancients have applied to Church Customs and Constitutions Hereupon all wise men have dreaded the dissolution and abolition which is the Puritans work of Reformation of what hath been firmly established by good authority finding the provoking and irritating of humours by medicines in order to a cure have oft proved mortal and have oft resolved a tolerable sore is much better than an hazardous application for a remedy The Lawyers have a saying Better a mischief than an inconvenience which can signifie onely this that a remedy by admitting onely an inconvenience hath oft proved more mischievous in the event than the mischief they endeavoured to avoid because every notable change of State is apt to produce a world of unavoidable mischiefs it being morally impossible upon the exchange of a mischief for an inconvenience to prevent a new set of mischiefs which are not ordinarily found till they be felt It is notorious that even preposterous and unseasonable pressures of present remedies against either some present conceited mischiefs or fansied inconveniences hath choked the heart of all the main and principal concerns which ought first to have been respected and frustrated all those great ends whose advancement hath been pretended and whilst the greatest care of our Patriot Reformers should have been neither to tempt God nor to weary and harden his Vicegerent they have most impudently imprudently and wickedly provoked both by their rebellious actings and preposterous courses Heu probatum est witness not to go farther back our late Exclusioners and No-money-men Num. 3. Admitting a change be submitted to this will not gain nor secure those that are given to change For upon every such change they are ready ever and anon to change their principles and practices The Donatists the great Grandsires of our Sectaries did so at first they yelped Quid Imperatori c. What had the Emperour to doe in Church affairs but S. Augustine tells us with the change of the times they changed their note for taking their time they petitioned Julian the Apostate supplicantibus Rogatiano Pontio saith Opt. for liberty of Conscience which he readily granted them upon an hellish design ut per sacrilegas dissensiones as S. Aug. that by their sacrilegious dissensions he might destroy Christianity hip and thigh root and branch if possible Thus it fared with our Boutefeus they sadly complained and heavily declaimed against those Laws and do yet which our most Christian Kings had enacted for the keeping their Subjects in obedience with penalties upon the seditious disturbers of the peace and transgressours of Law upon the same Donatistical principle yet upon the lamentable change of the times they procured from the Junto's Keepers and Noll cruel Edicts against the regular Sons of the Church which were executed as Bishop Sanderson truly noted without justice or mercy that they had reason to complain as S. Augustine did of the Donatists they were so mischievous ut Barbarorum facta c. That the actings of Barbarians were more mild than theirs Aug. Ep. 122. Num. 4. All the forementioned Petitioners did earnestly solicite for the Religion established by Law avouching a change thereof was unjust most impious and uncharitable They had reason so to doe for that above-cited Text Prov. 22. 28. doth at least insinuate that it is contrary to all Religion equity and prudence upon every motion or singular humour of absurd and unreasonable Male-contents or Phantasticks to discompose or unhinge what our prudent and fatherly Governours have industriously set for the publick peace and tranquillity and have been long received with the approbation and full satisfaction of all good and peaceable Subjects But there is another Text Prov. 24. 21 22 which probably wrought on them to be so zealous for the established Religion My son fear thou the Lord and the King and meddle not with them that are given to change for their calamity shall rise suddenly and who knoweth the ruine of them both A sad caveat this destruction is awarded not onely on the changelings but on the moderate medlers who are agitatours mediatours and apologizers for them who though they will not justifie them yet dare plead for them speak a good word for them and as much as they can with safety to themselves palliate and smother their crimes These though stylo novo they be called or miscalled the moderate sober party yet they answer not the name For they are either crafty designing
was a wild man his hand was against every man and every man's hand was against him Gen. 16. 12. They conclude all the Christian world besides their Brethren in iniquity to be Antichristian and all Christian Chruches condemn them as Schismaticks They dissent from this Christian Church whereof they are or ought to be Members and in that respect they dissent from the Catholick Church primitive and successive But this say some is hard measure they are our Brethren and our Protestant Brethren In good time that now at last upon a mischievous design which is easily understood and might be soon manifested Malignants from 40 to 60 should be taken in into the number of the Brethren sure we are they received harder measure from these their false Brethren than Jacob did from his Brother Edom Obad. 10 c. They are in the Scripture notion strange Brethren who can find in their hearts to plunder and murther their now lately adopted Brethren But how comes these dear Brethren with a mischief to be dubbed Protestants Are they so called because they dissent from all Protestant Churches Protestant signifies with them another thing than a reformed Catholick which every Protestant is or else he is no true Protestant Three acceptations of the word Protestant are now in fashion for first Protestants are a Set of pretenders in opposition to and exclusion of all others who profess Christianity if this be their notion they are pure Donatists and the exclusioners have as much Antichristian pride and uncharitableness as the Pope or his most bigotted Papalins it 's an assumed name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Greeks name it who justly esteem every such a badge of division and apostasie Lact. a Latin too thought so Christiani esse desierunt c. They cease to be Christians who forsaking the name of Christ usurp to themselves humane and alien denominations Or secondly Protestants are but Antipapists all who renounce the Communion of the Church of Rome and oppose the Pope's Sovereignty without any more to do commence Protestants in short they are no Papists therefore they are Protestants or which is far more absurd they are enemies sworn and foresworn enemies to Episcopacy and Monarchy and they then are true Protestants The Demagogues and Sectaries do frequently thus sense it which is indeed to reproach it and make it odious to all who love peace and truth For then all Doctour Stillingfleet's Gnats which are now metamorphosed into Vipers then all Doctour Burgesses putredinous Vermin of bold and frantick Sectaries so he honoured them Ser. before Comm. Nov. 5. 1641. who erewhile were his Bandogs which he let loose and hounded on the King and Bishops must be honoured with this title Then Socinians Anabaptists Familists Antinomians Swinckfeldians yea all Mr. Baxter's Jugglers the Hiders whom he subdivides into Vanists Paracelsians Weigelians Behminists c. with his Seekers whom he again subdivides into six more vile ranks must be dignified with this not to be despised as not to be too much extolled title Or lastly Protestants were those learned and pious men who endeavoured the retrieval of the Primitive Catholick and Apostolick Faith and Usages from the innovations and corruptions which had overspread and polluted the Church What they did was to reduce the Church into its primitive state in the simplicity and purity of Faith and redress abuses in practice reserving still a power in each particular Church to determine for it self what God hath left undetermined for unity order and edification with the closest consonancy to the rules and observations of the ancient Catholick Doctours and Fathers If this which indeed is the true notion of the Appellative be intended the Dissenters are to all intents and purposes for ever barred from any claim to it unless they mend their manners which is scarce to be hoped For as a learned man observed They know they are in the wrong as well as we can tell them but all the world will not make them confess and amend As the case now stands they cannot challenge any right either to the name or to the thing Not to the name for neither they nor any of their Sect were in Germany an 1529. when the Disciples were first called Protestants upon a protestation and appeal from the Decree of Spira unto Coesar and a General Council Nor to the thing For neither they nor any commissioned by them did ever subscribe to the Augustan Confession neither will they now be concluded by it nor will they submit to the harmony of Confessions industriously drawn as the proper Test of Protestancy to distinguish true Protestants from false pretenders to the name It is therefore mere mockery to affirm them Protestants who protest against true Protestancy and the resolutions of all formed Protestant Churches But if they must be called so it must be by an odd Figure the same by which a schismatical traiterous Conventicle patched up of Clergy-men States-men Sword-men and Lawyers was once called an Assembly of Divines Their agreement if any such there be in the same common principles of Faith which are arbitrary as to them will not gain them the denomination of Protestant nor beget the relation of Protestant Brethren For then the Pope and his adherents must be Protestants and our Protestant Brethren to boot and with great reason because they earnestly contend for the first Principles of the Oracles of God and Doctrines of Christ which several of the Fanaticks either oppose or scruple Dr. Stillingfleet will not blame the Papists for believing too little but too much which these heretical Blades are faulty in too as well as they The Pope or Church of Rome by a presumed infallibility of judgment from a Divine endowment assumes a power to declare which in practice is to mint and coin Articles of Faith so the Sectaries hold forth their singular opinions and Enthusiastical dotages as demonstrations of Spirit More plainly thus The Roman Chairman with his Conclave or a Council takes upon them to define false or disputed opinions as matters of Faith which thereupon they enter into their Creed to be believed as absolutely necessary to salvation The Sectarian Chairmen with their Benchers and Associates pass Problems in their Systemes and Synods for Divine Revelations and Principles of the Doctrine of Christ which they exemplifie in their Catechisms and Confessions of Faith as the Oracles of God Now they are as infamous prophane prevaricators of Divine Law who preach up their private fancies and sentiments for infallible Soul-saving Doctrines as those who equalize their particular Traditions with the infallible word of God The learned and judicious Bishop Davenant thought so Adhort ad Pacem Eccles c. 1. p. 43. I says he think it is all one to obtrude our controverted points on the Consciences of men in the same degree of necessity with the most perspicuous Doctrines of the Gospel as to confound unwritten Traditions with the written word of God Mr. Newcomen a sprig
an ambulatory or menstruous Creed nor with an arbitrary monstrous superintendency voted and unvoted and revoted backward and forward according to the sense and interests of the Chairman and his crew in S. Stephen's Chapel Neither will we be satisfied or own a civil or common Law hotch-potch Church according to the device of the Counter-plot as the three Inventors gave it a Name one whereof is an outlawed Traitour the second a Church Trepanner the third a giddy Changeling For I demand Was the Church of England when Popish a true constituted Church according to its first settlement by Christ and his Apostles and subsequent example of the Primitive Church because it was so established by Law or not If it were we have done the Papists business they need not prove us we have proclaimed our selves Schismaticks in separating from a true constituted Church by Christ's and the Apostles order antecedently such before any humane Sanction if not then a legal settlement may be Antichristian which in that very respect stands in great need of a Reformation For as to attempt a Reformation of that which is founded on Divine Authority and stands by Divine Law is a contradiction to the indispensable and irrevocable will of the Founder so to reform what hath been introduced by mere humane authority without any warranty either general or special from a grant of our Law-giver is a pious Christian duty provided that in the management thereof nothing be done repugnant to any other Divine Law and our duty But let what can be suggested for the promotion of this new project it will be baffled by the two notorious Ringleaders of the Faction For if Mr. Baxter's onely true way of concord will not pass he and his Comrades will be as clamorous and stirring if they dare as ever J. O. is positive All lawfull things are not to be done for the Churches peace which quite undoes it Confessed it must be that several of the Partisans conceive a full union cannot be expected yet to comprehend and condescend to those who will occasionally and partially conform may go far towards a peace In good time can this be a way to true Christian peace when Mr. Baxter hath given us fair warning not to trust them plainly telling us Apol. for Nonconf p. 90. they are onely Instruments to undermine us and will turn against us as soon as they have opportunity Neither will their coming to Church as they delusorily and hypocritically call it clear them from the guilt of Schism because this Church being both founded and settled upon Divine Right in all its Superstructures there arises an obligation constantly and throughly to communicate with it and observe its Rules and Orders which not to doe is sinfull Separation and to abett or countenance those who doe not is to partake of their sin For it is not love devotion or duty which draws them but cunning interest and fear which drives them to this outward auckward conformity The best any can make of it it s an act of compliance cannot be an act of Christian allegiance and obedience to lawfull Superiours which is a work of Faith incorporate with the other good works of Faith issuing from the supernatural power of God's Word Spirit and Grace Certain it is that the men for whom this favour is moved do publickly and honestly declare which is next to a moral impossibility that they ever will that Kingly power is originally and immediately from God that Prelatical Episcopacy is a Divine Apostolical Institution that some circumstances and adjuncts in the external ministeries of Divine Worship not expresly prescribed by God may and ought to be adhibited therein for decency order and edification they are not to be trusted and if frequent experiences will not make us so wise as to neglect them and all such motions for them we are fit to be begged and once more undone We are yet again efforted with a troop of tantum nons who are still bleating for connivence forbearance and moderation which in effect is to solicite the Laws be outlawed though herein they would give better evidence of their moderation and modesty if they left that solely to the resolution of the Government Take these we must as we find them and we shall find them vary as the wind does they can blow hot and cold with one breath that trimming Proverb is their Rule There is no living at Rome and fighting with the Pope and let the Government sink or swim they will keep themselves out of harms-way If possible to make sure of this world they will have friends of all parties for which end they can at present swallow the Oath of Allegiance take the Test and upon another occasion vomit a fulsome Remonstrance Address or Association but by all means they will make infallible provisions for heaven in order whereto if they be in health they are for the Church and if in safe policy they may for a Conventicle too yea from the Church to a Conventicle and back again if sick they will not refuse the Offices of the Church but will admit them de bene esse yet for their transire and viaticum they must have a voluntary conceived prayer by a moderate Sneak who can play fast and loose with the Church Offices and to make sure work the Sacrament must be re-administred by one of the same batch or a zealous Holder-forth In my judgment these of all other Sects are the most dangerous because the more close and reserved we cannot say they are either flesh or fish nor discover whether they be Hawk or Buzzard they are animalia imperfectè mixta but this we know much mischief hath hapned by this false disguised and miscalled moderation to evidence which it will be requisite to exemplifie this in some all are too numerous and would be too bulky instances and to give in the opinion of two who in their times were reputed moderate learned men and excellent preachers 1. It hath been mischievous to the Church The Samosatenian Heresie was brought in under a mistaken charitable pretence to reconcile the Jewish and Christian Religion The Heresie of the Monothelites was set up on a design to moderate the Heresie of Eutyches The Eusebians propagated the Arian Heresie by their moderate endeavours to compose the difference betwixt them and the Catholicks Some Novatian Bishops to satisfie the scruple of a convert Jew thought fit to leave it though the matter of it was an approved practice as a thing indifferent which soon raised a Schism and this Schism in a short time begot another Theoph. Alex. favoured the Originists in hope to recover some at least from that Sect but S. Hier. told him roundly his moderation therein was very offensive to holy men because thereby he emboldned and strengthned the already over insolent and peevish Faction What Greg. Naz. got or rather lost by his easiness of temper is too large to relate and so it is of many more