assisting Interests to those three Estates The rest is divided into twenty Chapters with several Sections and Observations in them as followes CHAP. I. SECT I. The form of the Kings Warrant for Summoning this Parliament SECT II. Observations on the Names and Progresses of the Names of our English Kings more Especially and Prophetically of the Names of Carolus or Charles as also of variations of the words in the Titles of several Kings of England fixt in this Warrant SECT III. Observations and proceedings on this Warrant shewing the Kings Prerogative in Summoning Parliaments Of the difference between Warrants and Writs in signing and Sealing in Generals and particulars The variation of the form of Warrants Advised by the Kings Privy Council How that Council differs from the Great Council of Parliament The Warrant is first issued to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper The Lord Chancellors Warrant to the Clerks of the Pettybag Of the first Digest of Writs kept there called the Parliament Pawn How these Pawns were Anciently us'd CHAP. II. A Transcript of the Pawn for this Parliament began the Eight of May 1661. Divided into twelve Paragraphs whereof the five first concern only the House of Lords the seven other the House of Commons Observations on this Pawn The reasons of placing figures on the Margent of the Pawn The Reason of the different Dates of Writs in the Pawn Why some of the Writs are abbreviated in the Pawn Of General Writs viz. Original and Judicial and of Parlimentary Writs viz. Brevia Clausa Patentia Exemplars and Consimilars The difference of the Lords Writs and Commons Writs The agreement of Writs in the Pawn Derivative Writs not in the Pawn are Equivalent to those in the Pawn Of Exemplar and Consimilar Writs viz. both in the Lords and Commons Houses The method propos'd for treating of these Writs CHAP. III. Of the Act of Precedencies divided into observations That the Act of Precedency is concern'd in the Lords House only The nature of the Act The Title of the High Court of Parliament used in that Act The Siting and calling over the Lords different from the method in the Act Why some Titles are named in the 4th Paragraph of the Act omitted in the 8th Of the Woolsacks in the Lords House Of the four degrees of State Officers which are placed by this Act. How the Pawn and Acts do disagree therein Of such as sit in the Lords House yet not mentioned in the Act but in the Pawn Of former Proceedings in the House of Lords omitted in this Act. CHAP. IV. Of the Degrees concern'd in the Act of Precedency SECT I. Of the Kings Privy Councellors Of the word Council apply'd to individual Persons and to an Assembly Of the Kings Privy Council Of several other of the Kings Councils Of the Kings Great Council or Parliament Of the Number and Quality of the Persons constituting the Privy Council Of the Antiquity of Councils Of the Nature and condition of Councellors in our Councils Elected for merit Of lesser Councils and Parliaments in this Kingdom Of the Privy Council and Parliament how sometimes mixt SECT II. Of the Princes of the Blood Of the seven degrees of the Blood Royal whose places are appointed by the Act of Precedency That any of the seven are Prior to all other degrees of Nobility That in their absence the Arch-Bishop hath precedence SECT III. Of the Kings Vicegerent Declaring the Kings Supremacy in the Church of England The great power granted to the Vicegerent in Church affairs None made since the 31 of H. the 8th but supply'd by Bishops SECT IV. Of Bishops The Antiquity of Bishops The meaning of the Word Of their Jurisdictions Of the Convocation Houses where they sit as Bishops and in Parliament upon a Baronial account How plac'd Call'd Lords Spiritual Anciently they did manage the Chief Offices of the Kingdom Of their Priviledge in the Lords House SECT V. Of the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper Referred to Chap. the 8th SECT VI. Of the Lord Treasurer Referred to Chap. the 9th SECT VII Of the Lord President of the Kings Council Of it's Antiquity Discontinuance and Supply Of other Lords Presidents SECT VIII Of the Lord Privy Seal It 's Antiquity and several Titles How granted Considered as Master of Requests Of his Seals and other Seals Of his Clerks concern'd in the Summons of Parliaments Of his Antiquity in Sitting in the Lords House Formerly supply'd by Ecclesiasticks now by Temporal Lords These three last mention'd Great Officers are thus Plac'd whether they be Nobles or not SECT IX Of the Lord Great Chamberlain Rais'd by Merit Had lands given to hold in Grand Sergiantry consisting of great Immunities The Antiquity of the Title Confer'd on some Noble Person whereby he sat in Parliament Made Hereditary his Employments in Accommadations for Parliaments SECT X. Of the High Constable His Antiquity since the 12 of Hen. 8. granted but pro hac vice at Coronations c. Their Power formidable to former Kings Devolv'd into Lord Marshal Of other Constables of lesser Qualities but still of gaeat use Of such of the Higher sort as were formerly Summoned to Parliaments SECT XI Of the Earl Marshal Of his Power and Jurisdiction Of the Original of the Title Of the Courts and Offices under him especially the Court of Chivalry and Heraulds A description of them Of their Employments relating to Parliaments Of the Earl Marshals Summons to Parliaments and how it became Hereditary SECT XII Of the Lord Admiral of England How the Title sprung Of his Power and Jurisdiction guided by the Civil Laws not repugnant to the Common Always plac'd in the hands of some of the Chief of the Nobility Had antiently their Sumons to Parliaments and so continue SECT XIII Of the Lord Steward Of the Orthography of the Name and Antiquity of the Office Of several Offices under that Title and particularly of the Title of this Office and of his Antient and Present Summons to Parliaments and of his Vses there SECT XIV Of the Lord Chamberlain of the Kings House Of his Authority and usefulness before in Parliaments Of Antient Presidents of Summoning him to Parliaments SECT XV. Of the Principal Secretary of State When the Act of Precedency was made he was the 12th Officer of State a Number of Esteeme the difference of his Writ when his Summons are single without annexing some Noble Degree to it CHAP. V. SECT I. Of the Decrees of Nobles From whence the word Nobility is derived Divided into Majores and Minores The Majores into 5 degrees the Minores into three the Majores makes the Lords House the Minores the Commons House SECT II. Of Dukes Duke from the Latin word Duco Dux Antiently Earls were Prior to Dukes in England How Dukes got the Priority Of the several Titles attributed to Dukes Duke and Earl promiscuously us'd And of the name Grace apply'd to Dukes in England Dukes were in England before they were formally Created The time
Decree made in the Star-Chamber which is Printed in Poltons Abridgment he is Stiled Defensor Fidei in terra Ecclesiae Anglicanae Hiberniae Supremum Caput which was 5 years before the Supremum Caput was settled by Act of Parliament but as a preparative to it in the 22 of his Reign he is stiled Praepotentissimus Metuendissimus Angliae Franciae Rex and only Fidei Defensor is added and no mention of Supremum Caput Then in the 30 year of his Reign he is Stiled Defender of the Faith and Lord of Ireland and on Earth Supream Head immediately under Christ of the Church of England In the 32. year he left out the word immediately and the next year the words under Christ So that in the 33 of his Reign the Title was Hen. by the Grace of God King of England France and Ireland Defender of the Faith and of the Church of England and also of Ireland on Earth Supream Head And thus by making himself King of Ireland he disobeyed the Pope in placing Defender after Ireland and this Title continued thus all his Life and the Circumscription on his Great Seal wrot accordingly and so did his Son Edward the sixth on His Great Seal and in Publick Acts. And the like did Queen Mary in the first year of her Reign but upon her Marriage with King Philip in the second year of her Reign and first of both their Title was King and Queen of England and France Naples Jerusalem and Ireland Defenders of the Faith Princes of Spain and Cicily Arch-Dukes of Austria Duke of Milan Burgundy and Brabant Countess of Hasburgh Flanders and Tyroll quite jostling out Supream Head during their Reigns When Queen Elizabeth came to the Crown the Circumscription of her Great Seal was Elizabetha Dei gratiâ Angliae Franciae Hiberniae Regina Fidei Defensor yet she maintained both Titles of Defensor and Supream during her Reign When King James came to the Crown the Circumscription of his Broad Seal was also Jacobus Dei gratiâ Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex Fidei Defensor and no more yet he maintained the other Point both in his Government and Writings as may be read in his Praemonition to all Christian Monarchs and his Declaration against Vorstius and his Defence of the Right of Kings against Cardinal Perrone and in several of his Speeches in Parliament leaving men at liberty as Queen Elizabeth did to use the Title of Supream Head in their Pulpits and Evidences as they thought fit so as the learned Cambden in his Dedication of his Britannia to King James instead of Defensor writes him Propugnator Fidei When King Charles the First came to his Crown the Circumscription of his Great Seal was Carolus Dei gratiâ Rex Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Fidei Defensor and no more yet to justifie both Titles in the seventeenth year of his Reign he caused the 39 Articles which were agreed on in the fourth of Queen Elizabeth to be reprinted and in the Front did publish his own Declaration in these words Being by God's Ordinance according to our just Titles Defender of the Faith and Supream Governour of the Church within these Our Dominions He therein declares That the Articles of the Church of England allowed and authorized heretofore do contain the Doctrine of the Church of England and requires his Subjects to continue in the uniform profession thereof And then as to the Discipline he further declares himself Supream Governor of the Church of England and that if any difference arise about the external Policy concerning Injunctions Cannons or other Constitutions whatsoever thereunto belonging the Clergy in their Convocations is to order and settle them having first obtained leave under his Majesties Broad Seal so to do and he approving their said Ordinances and Constitutions So here the word Supream Head is changed into Supream Governour When King Charles the Second came to the Crown the Circumscription of his Broad Seal was Carolus Secundus Dei gratiâ Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex Fidei Defensor and no more yet to justifie both Titles the very same year of his Return Anno 1660. he publish'd a Declaration to all his loving Subjects well worth the reading concerning Ecclesiastical Affairs which shews both his Christian condescention to his Subjects and Justifications to those two Titles for which he is styl'd by Writers Supream Moderator Now though in all Parliament-Writs which have come to my view and in other publick Acts and Writings since the first of Queen Elizabeth to this time after the words Defender of the Faith except in their Broad Seals there is added only one c. which I conceive was done for brevity and must be understood in relation to the Act of 36 Hen. 8. never yet repealed and every man had then and hath still liberty in their Deeds or Pulpits to mention the full Titles but by degrees about the year 1640. it began to cease in Pulpits and soon after in Pens contenting themselves with the c. These and other matters seeming trivial though proving dangerous in the consequences were yielded to as condescentions to gratifie a dissenting party in England who very probably were incited thereunto by underworking Papal Contrivers being excellent Artists in spurring on the least humour of Schism in this Church and so dealing in little things till greater were ripen'd in which latter they often made Attempts as may be read in Queen Elizabeth King James King Charles the First and this present King's time yet without success except in the Assassination of King Charles the first which was manag'd with such dexterity that it was made difficult to judge whether some of the English Dissenters in those times or the Romish Incensors were the chief Actors And after that it was carried on by a subtil way of redeeming their credits in this King's Preservation at Worcester yet still underhand endeavouring to subvert the whole Fabrick of this Kingdom as was discovered about the end of this Parliament 1678. which determin'd my publick Employments and therefore shall leave that Subject to other Pens Thus the new Empire of Rome and the old Empire of England have strugled through many Ages for Supremacy It is the Interest of England to be quiet within its own liquid Arms and so increase it self with other Kingdoms and States by a real mutual Traffick and Commerce But it is the Interest of Rome to be troublesome and increase it self in all Kingdoms and States without any real commutation or advantage to any but it self Yet it is difficult to make the Dissenters to the Church of England believe that the way which they take in opposing Rome will in time be destructive to their own Designs and Opinions Some of the Dissenters to the Church of England see and know this yet are so inveigled by such Dissenters to the Court of Rome who pretend to be for that Church but not for
particular names who were called both Disciples and Apostles but the Selected 12. were of an higher nature for some of them were also called Evangelists and none of the Disciples had that Title except St. Luke one of the 4. nor any call'd an Apostle except those 12. but St. Paul Gal. 1. v. 1. And these 12 Apostles were of so eminent a Degree that it is said in the Revelations Cap. 21. and 14. that the names of the Twelve Apostles were writ on the 12 Foundations of the Heavenly Jerusalem After these 12. Christ did Constitute 70. other Disciples of a lesser Degree but the names of these 70. are no where certainly to be found however we have the Scripture to justifie the number of Seventy and there were also those who were called Presbyteri also Deacons of which Deacons the Ecclesiastical Stories tell us of 7. by name but no number of the names of the Presbyteri however these remaining Apostles Disciples Presbyters and Deacons were soon reduced into the Title of Bishops in all places not by ordinary Institution but by an higher and a more extraordinary Function and these Bishops among themselves had also several eminent Titles of distinction within few years after Christs death according as their charge of Souls did extend viz. Episcopus Patriarcha Archiepiscopus Papa Presbyter Inspector Pastor Curator Observator Minister Custos animarum which 7 last Titles being but descriptions of the Office of the 4 chiefest viz. Bishops Patriarchs Archbishops and Popes I shall speak first of these 4. 5. It is evident that the first eminent Title in the Ecclesiastical affairs of Christianity was the Title of Bishop the Presbyteri still submitting to the Bishop whenever he was placed over them This Title of Bishop as I said was placed on some of the Original Apostles and Disciples as St. James St. Mark c. for the word Episcopus doth properly signifie one that doth Inspect or Circumspect all the concerns of Christian Religion so as those who live under him may be instructed to a Good and Pious Life sutable to the Rules of Christianity whose duty is more particularly exprest in St. Pauls First Epistle to Tim. Cap. 3. so that the word Episcopus as the Superior Order was more generally used than any other Title wherever Christianity was practised Yet other Titles were also used in several parts of the World as they did agree with the Idiom of their native Language viz. The Hebrews called their Bishop Princeps Sacerdos Patriarcha Patriarcha was also apply'd to the Fathers or chief of every one of the 12 Tribes as upon a Civil account so also upon the Ecclesiastick The Syrians Presbyter Pastor Minister and Curator animarum The Arabians Pastor and Observator animarum The Aethiopians Papa Pastor and Custos animarum The Graecians Patriarcha Archiepiscopus Pastor animarum all which are thus so rendred into Latine by Dr. Walton's Polyglotta from the Oriental tongues so as the 4 chief Titles and the others having but one signification and those Titles dispersed into several Regions every one using what they thought fit in their own Territories I shall only betake my self to Episcopus and Papa as having been used not only in Brittain and Rome but more universally in most parts of the World unless we admit Presbyter from Presbyter-Johns Country to be an Ecclesiastical Title So having shewn the meaning of the word Bishop in general the Antiquity of it is not to be past over The Jewish Graecians did use it in their Old-Testament for in Psal the 109.28 they read Episcopatum ejus accipiet alter which very Text St. Luke cites in the First of the Acts v. 20. upon the Election of Matthias to be an Apostle instead of Judas viz. Let another take his Bishoprick which shew that the word was in use among the Graecians before Christs time and was no new imposed word upon the Christians but a compliance with Jewish Titles to win the circumciz'd Jews in Greece and this may be said that though Rome did change the name from Bishop to Patriarck Archbishop and Pope which signifies no more than Father or chief Father yet Brittain hath been very constant to the name of Bishop and did not take upon it Archbishop till the Emperor Constantius Chlorus or the Pope thought it worthy of that Title 6. In this Section I place Brittain before Rome because our Histories tell us that Aristobulus was ordained Bishop of Brittain and Joseph of Arimathea there with him 5 years before Linus the first Bishop of Rome was made Bishop of Rome and so now I shall take a short view of the Priority and Successions in both places relating to the subject of this Treatise Aristobulus is affirmed as I said to be the first Bishop of Brittain and some few years before any Bishop was Constituted at Rome but what the names were of such Bishops as succeeded him is uncertain for the reasons before given but the Story relates That about an 100. years after Christ one Lucius was King of Brittain and was the first King of this Island who embraced the Christian Religion Whereupon he sent Damianus and Fugatius to Eleutherius then Pope of Rome so it is very probable they were Bishops and Successors to Aristobulus and Instruments of the Kings Conversion for none else could be supposed to make attempts on the King but such whose eminent Titles and Employments did give them the more opportune admission and doubtless these were very considerable Persons especially Damianus whose very name continues at Rome even to this day in great renown for we find that at one time a Bishop was of that name and at another time a Bishop Cardinal and a Church is still in Rome dedicated Sancto Cosmo and Damiano belonging to one of the 14 Deacon-Cardinals These two Bishops or at least eminent Persons were sent to Eleutherius to confer about the ordering of the Church-Affairs and it seems they did acquaint the Pope as appears by that Letter that King Lucius had the Old Testament and the Writings of the Apostles called the New Testament so that the Christian Doctrine being fixt here there seemed nothing more to be done than to settle the Discipline and the means for its support wherein it may be justly collected that the King desired such concurrence with the Pope of Rome as might not disoblige him or the Roman Emperour Commodus to whom he was a Tributary and with whom in all Civil matters this King stood then more fair and quiet than his Predecessors had done before him 7. I have given a brief account of the Managers of the Christian Religion in Brittain from Aristobulus to Damianus and Fugatius in the time of King Lucius I will now see what was done at Rome in that time concerning which their Histories tell us that Linus was the first Bishop who according to computation was 5 years after Aristobulus was Bishop of Brittain but St. Jerome is as zealous to have
St. Peter the first Bishop of Rome before Linus as Ireneus to have Linus the First two great Fathers of that Church so that if St. Peter be first then we must account 13 to Eleutherius before named if Linus then Eleutherius is the 12th and with this computation of Ireneus most Histories do agree The first Eight of these Twelve had no other Title than Bishop till Eugenius the Ninth of that See took upon him the name of Papa or Pope and afterwards Hildebrand call'd Gregory the 7th challenged it as his sole right to be called Pope and so Eleutherius being the 4th Pope from Eugenius and the 9th in Succession from Linus did return a kind Answer to King Lucius by two eminent Persons which the Pope also sent viz. Helvanus and Meduanus and with them a Letter which may be read at large wherein in the Pope takes notice that the Old and New Testament were then in Brittain and in that Letter leaving the ordering of Ecclesiastical affairs in Brittain to the King declared him to be Christs Vicar in his own Kingdom which made King Lucius go cheerfully on and as History tells us that whereas the Archflamins had been the chief Managers of the Pagan Religion in this Isle each having one Province the King reduced those Three Provinces to Two and placed Two Archbishops therein and instead of the Flamins did constitute Bishops and so there was an amity between the Archbishops and Bishops of Brittain and the Archbishops or Popes of Rome neither of them strugling for Priority but still carrying on the work of Christianity But the Emperours of Rome declining in their power and the Pope still taking advantage of their declinations grew at last so considerable with the Emperours that they could not safely deny them any thing so that whereas the Emperors of Rome formerly had the disposal of their Popes and the Kings of Brittain of their Bishops and so other Princes in their Territories the Popes by degrees did take the power to themselves to make what Bishops they pleased to summon Councils make Decrees distribute them and enjoyned obedience to their Universal Jurisdiction that the name of Pope might be the more authentick It was used in many parts of the World besides Rome for it is said that about 300. years after Christ Nestorius the Heretick had 6000. Bishops appeared against him which were under the Government of several Popes and this was above 300. years before Boniface the 3d. Popes increasing as well as Bishops who obtained of Phocas then Emperor of Rome that none should be called Pope but the Pope of Rome and though Gregory the first his immediate Predecessor but one declared against it and many Popes before him yet Boniface having obtained this Supremacy what he did in other Kingdoms I shall omit in Brittain to make sure that none should be placed there but such as should be dependent on Rome he confirm'd Augustin a Monk the Archbishop of Canterbury being made so by his said Predecessor Gregory and soon after he and 4 succeeding Bonifaces filled up all the rest of the Bishopricks with such Foraigners or others as had a clear dependance on Rome by Promotions Stipends or Forraign Interests amongst the rest Faelix a Burgundian was made Bishop of Dunwich in Suffolk the fifth Bishoprick then in rank of which I shall speak more and so in a few years after all the Bishopricks which were then and soon after added were filled up with his dependents as also all Abbies Priories Monasteries c. and so continued to be supplied according to his appointment from Rome without any material opposition by the Kings of this Island but such as hereafter mentioned And having this Power it was no hard matter to fix themselves into all Councils within this Kingdom for in all Histories we find them as Actors therein and in respect of their Ecclesiastical Interests one of the Estates and when the name of Parliament was given to our chief Council they were methodically fix'd in the second rank of the Pawns and so in the Clause Rolls and this place in Parliament was never denied them whilst they continued here But the Pope's Power and Supremacy over this Island was ever disgusted by our successive Kings yet being back'd by so great a Temporal Prince as the Pope of Rome joyned with the Interest which by long continuance they had gained from the Emperours the Kings of this Island had little success in their struglings For wâ— see King John tried it to his coâ—â— by single oppositions without the Kingdom 's unanimous Conjunctures Aftewards Henry the Third began again and other succeeding Kings did try what Parliamentary or Municipal Laws could effect and to that end these following Laws were Enacted 7. H. 3. Henry the Third Anno 9. cap. 33. being part of the great Charter that Parliament did grant That all Patrons of Abbies which have the Kings Charters of England of Advowson or have old Tenure or possession of the same shall have the custody of them when they fell void as it hath been accustomed and as it is before declared See Coke Inst 2. Henry the Third Anno 9. cap. 36. being also part of the great Charter the Parliament did grant That if any Man should hereafter give Lands to a Religious House the Grant shall be void and the Land forfeit to the Lord of the Fee and in corroboration and Inlarging of this Statute many other Laws were made 7 Ed. 1. and by 18 Ed. 3. 15 R. 2. and 23 H. 4. called the Statute of Mortmain Edward the First Ed. 1. Anno 35. cap. 1. made the Statute de Asportatis Religiosorum wherein it is declared That the Monasteries Priories and Religious Houses in this Realm were founded by the King and his Progenitors and by the Noblemen and their Ancestors and that no Abbot c. shall lay any Tax on any Religious House to send the same beyond Sea or carry any Goods with them out of the Kingdom and that no Abbots being Aliens shall impose any Tax c. Edward the Second Anno 9. Enacted Edw. 2. That the King by his Letters may absolve Excommunications where they were made in prejudice of his Liberty or Prerogative to shew the King's Power above Ecclesiastick Censures of the Pope and this may be of great Use Edward the Third Anno 25. Edw. 3. That the King went on further by Act of Parliament forbidding under a Praemunire all applications to Rome for obtaining any Ecclesiastick Preferments or in Suing to the Court of Rome for Reversing any Judgments Richard the Second did back this Statute with several other Statutes Rich. 2. viz. in Anno 3. cap. 3. and Anno 7. cap. 12. 15. and Anno 13. cap. 2 3. and Anno 16. cap. 2 5. and in these same Parliaments the Archbishop protested against the Pope's Authority in England And good reason for it as Sir Richard Baker in his History
some few mix'd Observations 3. This great Minister of Justice was anciently made by Letters Patents with the Clause of Quam diu nobis placuerit and so it continued till about the end of Henry the Third and then and ever since he hath not been constituted by Commission or Patent as all the other Judges are but by Writ only in this form Rex c. R. F. Militi salutem Sciatis quod constituimus vos Justitiarium nostrum Capitalem ad placita coram nobis tenend'durante bene placito c. Teste c. And this Writ makes him capable of his Parliament-Writ before recited 4. The Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper of the Great Seal as I said is admitted Chancellor or Keeper by delivery only of the Great Seal to him and taking his Oath without Patent or Writ but this Lord Chief Justice is admitted to his Office by Writ only and all the other Assistants of whom I shall speak do injoy their Offices in their respective Courts by Patent only and all of them durante bene placito except the Master of the Rolls whose Patent is durante vitâ as will be shewn 5. But neither the delivery of the Great Seal to the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper nor the aforesaid Official Writ to the Lord Chief Justice of the Kings Bench nor the respective Patents by which the other Justices enjoy their respective Offices do intitle them to sit in the Lords House without such an especial Parliament Writ of Assistance as is shewn in the Exemplar before recited to which all the other Assisting Writs have a Consimilitude 5. This Parliament or Assisting Exemplar Writ to the Lord Chief Justice of the Kings Bench and all the Consimilars to it mutato nomine titulo Officii agrees in all parts with the Writ to the Lord Chancellor as I have before shewn except the alteration of the words Praedilecto perquam Fideli into Dilecto Fideli which are in this and in all the Writs to the following Assistants 6. The differences between this Writ and that to the Hereditary Lords in Parliament are partly shewn in the Observations on the Lord Chancellors Writ the rest will be shewn 7. This Parliament writ diffeers but in few words from the form of the writ issued in the 15th of Edw. 2 d. from whence I take my rise nor from the Successive Writs to this time which for the satisfaction of others whereby they may see that no new form is obtruded on them I have set here down Verbatim Rex Dilecto Fideli suo Willielmo de Bereford salutem Quia super diversis arduis negotiis nos statum Regni nostri specialiter tangentibus in instante Parliamento nostro die Domincâ prox ' futur ' ante Festum sancti Laurencii prox ' futur ' fecimus summoneri vobiscum cum caeteris de Concilio nostro colloquium habere volumus tractatum vobis mandamus firmiter injungentes quod omnibus aliis pretermissis dictis die loco personaliter intersitis nobiscum cum ceteris de Consilio nostro super premissis tractatur ' vestrumque Consilium impensuri Et hoc nullatenus omittat ' Teste c. In this Writ the words after Regni nostri viz. Ecclesiae Anglicanae are omitted for the Church in those days was almost wholly manag'd by Ecclesiastick Persons who were Conversant in the Civil and Canon Laws c. but in the 26th of Henry the Eighth when the power of the Pope was here abridg'd those words Ecclesiae Anglicanae were entred and continued to this day Also after the word Vobiscum these words ac cum Praelatis Magnatibus Proceribus are omitted but as near as I can collect some of the most eminent of the Professors of the Law as the Lord Chief Justice and Lord Chief Baron c. were sometimes Summon'd by Peeral Writs that is by such Writs that were sent to the Nobles and then the words ac cum Praelatis c. as in Richard the Seconds time to Jo. Cavendish Capital'Justic ' and in Henry the Fifths time to William Hanckford and many more were inserted but when ever they were Summon'd meerly as Assistants the words cum Praelatis c. were left out and so have been ever since Edward the Fourths time 8. This Parliament Writ is directed Capitali Justitiario nostro ad placita c. and so is his Writ by which he enjoys that great Office yet his common and general appelation is Capitali Justitiario Angliae which we call Lord Chief Justice of England and sometimes Lord Chief Justice of the Kings Bench and by some one of those Titles he is called so in several Acts of Parliament and ancient Records as I have hinted and though the word Lord be added to his appellation both in his Assistancies and Office and so to some other of the Assistants yet neither he nor they are to be counted Lords of Parliament for his Writ by which he enjoys his Office which is the Inducement to his Assisting Writ is but durante Placito honore Officii and his Assistance being but durante Parliamento neither of them can six the Title further than the continuance of his Office or Assistance And here it may be observed that the word Vos a word of great eminency always signifying a plural though sometimes apply'd to a single Person is us'd in this Official Writ before mentioned to the this Lord Chief Justice but is not in his Parliament Writ nor in any of the Patents or Parliament-Writs to the other Justices of whom I shall speak in order 9. The antiquity of this great Minister of Justice and his Court is doubtless more ancient under various Titles than from Hen. the Thirds time from whence we vulgarly compute it for the Civilians do acknowledge that Justitiarii sunt umbrae quaedam illorum qui olim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 apud Graecos dicebantur designati ad Custodiam Juris aequitatis However Sir Edward Coke to prove its antiquity tells us of an Epitaph in Ramsy Abby ingraven on Stone in these words Alvinus incliti Regis Edgari Cognatus totius Angliae Aldermannus saith that by Aldermannus is meant Capitalis Justitiarius Angliae and consequently his Assistance in all Councils before the name of Parliament and since that name hath always been esteem'd necessary and as he saith all these Courts of Justice are so ancient that they seem to have their Originals from Custom rather than by Commission 10. His Jurisdiction is so great as well out of Parliament as in Parliament that often times the Lords do wave their own Power and Priviledges of using their own Officers and do direct the Chief Justice to send out his single Warrant to Seize on Persons in case of Treason or Suspicion of it or for other high Crimes or Misdemeanors and the House of Commons have likewise sent to him to come to their House upon the like occasions