praise thee we sing unto thee we bless thee we glorifie thee we worship thee through our Great High-Priest thee the very true God the unbegotten inaccessible Being for thy great glory O Lord heavenly King God the Father Almighty O Lord God the Father of Christ that spotless Lamb that taketh away the sin of the World receive our prayer thou that sittest upon the Cherubims For thou only art holy thou only O Jesus art the Lord the anointed of God our King to whom be Glory Honor and Worship ascribed This was that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 morning Prayer or Hymn so called in the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Constitutions and 't was usual at the close of the holy Sacrament And if it was not this Hymn which Pliny mean't some other of the like nature it was which he pointed to And so from all these Testimonies put together I do conclude that in the Apostles days there were certain set Forms of praise which was one main part of the ordinary Service then in their peculiar and select Assemblies 2 As touching Prayers which made up the other part of Gods Worship S. Paul saith to Timothy 1 Tim. 2. 1 2. I exhort that first of all Supplications Prayers Intercessions and giving of Thanks be made for all men for Kings and for all that are in authority c. 1. Here it is clear that the Apostle doth enumerate several sorts kinds and parts of devotion making a plain distinction and difference between supplications against all evil things and Prayers for all good things and Intercessions for others as well for themselves and Tanksgivings for mercies already received There is no doubt but he meaneth several distinct offices unless we be so impudent as to affirm that S. Paul heaped up many words to no purpose 2. It is clear that he required that these several offices should be observed these distinct Acts of Devotion should be performed in the Christian Church and to shew the necessity of it the Apostle exhorteth Timothy to take care of it first of all 3. It is as clear that the whole Church of Christ hath conceived and taken for granted in all Ages that the Apostle in this place did intend to fix a certain Rule of Devotion and did order a Platform and Model to be observed in all publick Services and especially at the Celebration of the holy Communion Indeed the words of S. Paul do not force us to believe that he required Prayers to be composed and digested into a certain Form although that expression 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may bear that sense but yet the Judgement of the Church was that the Apostle did design and intend to have a standing Rule and Model of Devotion set up S. Chrysostome puts the Question what doth the Apostle mean when he saith I exhort that first of all supplications prayers c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith that excellent and Ancient Father S. Paul meaneth that this must be done in our daily services and this saith he we do daily both at Morning and S Chrysost in 1 Tim. 2. 1. Evening Service such Supplications Prayers Intercessions and Thanksgivings they had prescribed and fixt and in using them they did conceive that they answered the Apostles design and did according to his Order Directions and Appointment To the same purpose S. Ambrose upon Haec Regula Ecclesiastica est tradita a Magistro Gintilium qua utuntur sacerdotes nostri ut pro omnibus supplicent c. Ambros Comment the place saith This is an Ecclesiastical Law delivered by the Doctor of the Gentiles and observed by our Priests to pray for all men and particuarly for Kings c. Questionless the good man conceived that the Church was obliged by virtue of this Apostolical precept to use some constant Forms of Prayer for all men in general and especially for such as were in Authority And though this was done frequently in the time of Publick Service for fear they should fall short of their duty yet S. Austin was of opinion that S. Paul In hujus Sacramenti Sanctificatione distributionis preparatione existimo Apostolum jussisse proprie fieri 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 id est Orationes S. Aug. ep 59. ad Paulin. Sol. q. 5. had an eye chiefly to the time when the Blessed Sacrament was celebrated and that then these charitable Prayers were commanded to be made as in their proper and fit place And to confirm S. Austins opinion I observe of the Church of England that though Prayers for all men and for Kings be directed by her to be made in several places of her Liturgy yet in the prayer for the whole Church before the Communion particular mention is made of this command of the Apostles as if in her judgement S. Paul required such Prayers to be used at that time chiefly In a word the manifest agreement of all Liturgies in this particular and the constant uniform and universal practise of all Christians from the beginning all along using certain Forms of Supplication Prayer Intercession and Thanksgiving for all men and for Kings especially and that too in the Communion-office is a loud and clear argument to me that they conceived this their practice to have been according to the Apostles order and those their Forms to have been according to the Apostles mind And hence I conclude that either the whole Catholick Church hath not yet understood St. Pauls sense but has been clearly mistaken in his meaning which I hope will never be granted or else that that carries much truth in it which Durantus Cites out of Haymo viz. that the Blessed Apostle Durant de Rit Eccl. lib. 2. c. 33. directing his words to Timothy did in and by him deliver unto all Bishops and Presbyters and to every Church a Form how they should celebrate the Sacrament and pray for all men which Form or Model the whole Church doth observe From all which the least that we can gather is that certain Forms of Divine service were allowed and approved of even in the Apostles time But to speak freely it seems very probable that the holy Apostles did in their ordinary Ministrations observe Forms of Prayer themselves notwithstanding those extroardinary assistances of the Spirit which they were blest with I do not say that they Prayed by Book as they did in following Ages Nor do I mean that they tied themselves to words as they did when the miraculous Gifts of the holy Ghost ceased but this I do affirm as highly probable that the Apostles used a certain Form or Method and that the matter and substance of their ordinary services was for the most part the same My reasons are these three chiefly 1. Because St. Paul advised Timothy who was gifted as well as others 1 Tim. 4. 14. to a fixt Rule Model and Form of Publick Devotion which advice it is not likely that he would have given unto him had not he himself and his
Affections 't would compose our Minds and our Affairs too 't would not only make us live together with one mind in an House but moreover it would establish our House and make it strong and firm and safe over our Heads For 't is not every difference in Opinion that exposeth a Church or a Nation to danger but 't is fighting and quarrelling about the Main way that ruins all We know that among the Turks there are several Sects and Parties and different persuasions and yet the Ottoman Empire holds though it be a most Arbitrary and Tyrannical Policy and the Interest of Mahomet is carried on though it be a most palpable and fulsome Imposture because though they jangle in matters of lesser moment yet they are true to their Common Interest and agree in the Main and closely adhere to their general Model of Government Religion and Worship In like manner among the Romanists themselves who boast so much of the Unity of their Church there are many very Considerable Divisions and more perhaps than there are among Us and those as hotly maintained and yet Herod and Pilate know how to agree against Christ the Scotists and Thomists the Molinists and Jansenists the Dominicans and Jesuits and the rest are wise enough to hang together under the Laws of their Church they go quietly and hand in hand in the main way they conspire in one Common Form they are tite to their Government and keep close to their Rubricks and Establishments and as long as the Pope can but keep things in this Channel either by the Terrours of the Inquisition or by other Politick Arts he knows that his and his Churches Interest is safe and he needs not make use of his pretended Infallibility to determine those points which are controverted I wish that we would learn so much wit of the Adversaries of True Religion as not to fall out there where the safety of us all is concern'd but walk together like Friends in that plain way which the Ancient Church hath beaten out before us and the Laws of our Land have fenced in for differences in matters of Speculation and points disputable could not hurt us or lay us open to danger if some among us were but True to our Common Interest if they would but stick to our Establishments which are the Rampiers and Bullwarks of the Church if they would but be as zealous for Christ as the Turk is for Mahomet or as the Jesuit is for Him whom some suppose to be Antichrist Nothing in all Probability can give us Rest to our Souls and Security to our Nation and Prosperity to our Religion but this one thing to seek after the good Old Way Men may please themselves with Fancies and try many fruitless Conclusions and make experiments of this and of that Expedient but the World will see in the end that nothing but the observing of the Old Path will put us into a good posture 4. But yet fourthly there is one huge Advantage more which the performance of this matter would bring unto us and that indeed which I shall chiefly insist on and it is this That it would justifie our whole Cause before all the World and cut off all just occasion from those who wrongfully upbraid us all for Innovators and under that pretence trepan many a Soul Where say they was your Religion before Luther Now the Dissenter is not able to answer this Question truly throughly or to satisfaction because a great part of his Religion was no where in the world no not in Luther's days and so the Romanists have a continual and unanswerable Objection to fling in his teeth But the Church of England as it is establish'd hath a fair and full Plea that her whole Religion was long before Popery that it was in the world in the days of the Apostles that it was in the Liturgies of the primitive Churches that it is to be seen still in the Tomes of the Greek and Latin Fathers nay she can justifie her Cause out of those very Writers in communion with the Roman Church both before and since the time of Luther whose Books they like dishonest men have corrected purged and mangled by the Expurgatory Indices lest they should tell tales I do not intend now to vindicate the Doctrine of our Church in this respect for that is not so much to my present purpose and our Faith hath been by others abundantly proved to be exactly consonant to the Sence of Scripture and to the Faith of all Orthodox Christians in the purest and best Ages and by this we are ready to stand or fall let the Papist bark at us till his Tongue and his Heart aketh But my purpose is to justifie the Government and Discipline of our Church to be the same which was used in Christian Churches from the beginning and that against a sort of men among our selves who accuse us of Superstition as the Papists do accuse us of Schism though God be blessed we are guilty of neither We tell our Dissenting Brethren that our way which they have forsaken is indeed the old Path we affirm our Government to have been Primitive and Apostolical and we say too that our Discipline Rites and way of Worship is the same generally which was establish'd in the first and best times and this I shall endeavour now to prove in some measure by instancing in particulars that men who desire satisfaction herein may see that the Frame of our Religion is de facto very ancient and that on that account besides many others it ought to be upheld and maintain'd which is the thing I have already argued for and withall that our Charge of Innovation would be unjust and ridiculous did we but unanimously resolve to tread in this Path our Brethren then would be free from guilt as well as our selves 1. The first thing to be spoken to is our Form of Government I mean our Episcopacy the thing that is such an Eye-sore to Papists Atheists and Schismaticks It is clear that for 1500 years it was the onely kind of Government in the Church And whatever some Learned men have pretended I believe you can scarcely instance in any ancient Churches perfectly and completely formed that were not under the care and government of Bishops in our present Sence of the word Bishops presiding over them either in person or by their Authority Those great Luminaries of the Church to whom the World hath been and is so much beholding the Austins Cyprians Chrysostoms Basils Cyrils Gregories and Ambroses were famous and renowned Prelates some of them Metropolitanes some Patriarchs all of them Bishops Those Fathers of the third Century after the Apostles as Theodoret Jerom and others who thought the Names of Bishop and Presbyter to be indifferently and promiscuously used in the Scripture did not mean to impair the just honour and dignity of Bishops for they acknowledged that though the Names were in common yet the Office Power and
to pray by delivering to them a most perfect Form of his own conception And then that the Apostles themselves who were acted by the same Spirit should likewise conceive and give unto Christians Forms also I think no wise man will wonder and that they used not the Lords prayer themselves in all their Services I think none but a mad man will have the confidence to assert All which things being duely considered I will take upon me to affirm that as Set Forms of Divine Service were used by the Jews before and in the life-time of our Saviour and by all Christians after the Age of the Apostles so in that intermediate juncture of time between the Ascention of our Saviour and the setling of Christianity set Forms of divine service were for certain allowed and in all probability practised used and transmitted unto the Church by the Apostles themselves and their Fellow-labourers whose names were written in the Book of life And so the first thing is dispatched which I undertook to make out touching the Ancient use of Set Forms of Divine Service in General Thus far to be sure we tread in the old ways in that we worship the God of our Father as our old Fathers did by a set and prescript Form 2. Next I proceed to speak of this form in particular I mean our English Liturgy about which there have been longer contentions then were once between the Angel and the Divel disputing about the Body of Moses I shall not insist either upon Jude 9. the Order or the Expressions contained in our Service-book because all Churches of old have taken the liberty of varying somewhat in these respects though the main Body of their Liturgies was in a manner the same But my intent is to take notice of the substance of our Service-book and to observe what an Eye our Learned and pious Reformers had to the Ancient Model when they compiled this and to shew how agreeable our standing and ordinary offices are to those of Old in their general Frame and Contexture The incomparably Learned and Moderate Grotius though he was a Foreigner Grot. Ep. ad Gedeon a â—oet yet did us the right to affirm as a thing that was clear and certain that the Liturgy of the Church of England was sufficiently correspondent to the usages of the Ancient-Church And if knowing men would but take the pains to consider and compare the particulars they would find that our Liturgy is not onely agreeable to the oldest and Best but moreover that it is the most pure and most perfect Liturgy that is now known to be in the whole world We begin as it becometh sinners and Penitents with an The Confession De Missa lib. 1. c. 3. humble and hearty confession of our offences And if the Noble Du Plessis may be credited so did the Jews begin their service to which the Apostles and their Disciples did all conform The same was the custome of Christians in following times So the Authour de Autoritate ordine Officii Muzarabici tells us of the Christians in Spain who were mingled with the Arabs that they began their Service with a General Confession And so we find in the Rubrick at the beginning of the service on the Feast of St. De Aut. Et Ord. Off. Muzar c. 37. James faciâ prius confessione uti fit in Missis Latinis juxta usum Toletanum antiquum dicitur Introitus Confession being first made as in the Latine services it is usually done according to the Ancient use of Toledo the Introit is said In like manner Cassander tells Cassand Liturgic Cap. 1. 2. us of the Armenians that their Priest having put on his habits said the Confession before the Altar with bended knees and his head bowed down according to the custome of the Latines In both these Testimonis mention is made of the custome of the Latine Churches that the Confession of the Spanish course was according to the way of the Latines and that the Confession in the Armenian course was according to the custome of the Latines so that in the Latine Churches as well as in these Service was begun as with us with a general confession Now as for the Greek Church St. Basil tells us that Basil ep 63. ad Cler. Neocaesar in his time they did rise betimes a good while before day and went to the house of prayer and there with pain and affliction and incessant tears made Confession unto God and that with one mouth and with one heart every one professing his Repentance with his own tongue Indeed St. Basil saith that when this first course was over at break of day they made Confession again using a Penitential Psalm and so doth our Church order the one and fiftieth Psalm to be used after Morning Prayer and Litany on the first day of Lent and on other special days of See the Commination Fasting but 't is clear from his words that the first thing the Greeks did was to joyn in a solemn and devout Confession of their sins at their publick meeting together In like manner the Lords Prayer is constantly used in the The Lords Prayer â—nirance to our Morning and Evening Service And this is agreeable to the Ancient practice of the Church We meet together saith Tertullian that we may offer holy violence unto Tertul. Apol. c. 39. God besieging him by prayer there Prayer is intimated to have been their first business But then he saith elsewhere that the Lords Prayer was premised and used first as the foundation of their Devotion to which they Premissâ Iegitimae ordinaria oratione quasi fundamento accidentium jus est desideriornm jus est superstruendi c. Tert. de Oratione might add and on which they might build other occasional prayers having used that before And as touching our frequent use of the Lords prayer any man that consults the Ancient Liturgies may see how agreeable it is to the old way That short Address O Lord open thou our lips together with the Response And our mouth shall shew forth thy praise are part of Psal 51. 15. And it has been noted before that The Versicles the Jews used that Form before their Prayers and that Christians continued the use of it and is still to be seen in the Liturgy ascribed to S. James and in S. Chrysostomes The Doxology is a short Confession of our Faith in the The Gloria Patri Blessed Trinity and an Act of Adoration and Worship and moreover an Argument of the holiness of our purposes and therefore is fit to be used often as a signification that all our confessions praises prayers c. are intended and directed all of them to the Glory of God the Father Son and Holy Ghost That it was of Ancient and Vniversal use both in the Eastern and Western Churches is most certain and that it was used at the ends of Psalms before the fourth Council
to order the public Service of God and to take care that decency and a grave decorum might be in Christian Assemblies He was to see that such as would be Bishops and Deacons should be rightly qualified c. 3. 2. and himself to keep up his Authority by being an Example of Believers He was to allot a double Portion of c. 4. 12. maintenance to Elders that Ruled well under him and c. 5. 17. laboured in the Word He was to take cognizance of the 19. irregularities of Presbyters but with this caution that he should not receive an Accusation against an Elder but before two or three Witnesses And such as sinned he was to Rebuke before all He was to hold Ordinations but with 20. this Proviso That he should lay bands suddainly on no man 22. Briefly St. Paul gave him a plenitude of that power which he had himself And if to Model Churches to prescribe Rules to confer holy O deus to command examin judge and reprehend O fenders Openly and even Presbyters themselves I say if these are parts of Episcopal Power then was Timothy a Bishop indeed And I should be loth to see half that Charter given to a single Presbyter as is here given to Timothy by this Great Apostle 3. The third instance to shew that the Apostles setled the Episcopal form of Government is Titus whom Antiquity acknowledgeth to have been Metropolitan of Crete an Island consistng of an hundred Cities and to have been intrusted with the power of Modelling and Governing of all the Churches there That St. Paul left him there is clear from his own words and Tit. 1. 5. questionless his design was that Titus should remain and continue there unless summoned away upon some Emergency and for a Time only and even then St. Paul promised to send either Artemas or Tychicus to be his Vicar and Procurator c. 3. 12. in his absence Now that Titus was indeed a Bishop superior in Authority to Presbyters and invested with a Superintendency and Power over all his Clergy doth plainly appear from the Authority he had both to Ordain and to Judge of so many Bishops as St. Chrysostom declares he had For this cause Chrysost Hom. in Tit. 1. it was that when the Apostle himself could not stay in Crete to put every thing into due Order but was obliged to be gone he left Titus behind him to set in order the things that Tit. 1. 5 11. c. 2. 10. were wanting and unsettled at S. Paul's departure to ordain Bishops and to dispose of them into Cities into every City one to provide against the heterodox Preaching of Deceivers to stop their mouths to silence them and to rebuke them sharply and to admonish Hereticks once and again and then to excommunicate them upon their Contumacy This was Titus his Office and this was plainly the Exercise of Episcopal Power and Jurisdiction And to confirm this further two things are observable First that this Authority was given to Titus alone not to a College of Presbyters which 't is presumable S. Paul appointed before his going away but to Titus singly for this cause left I thee in Crete that thou shouldest set things in order that thou shouldest ordain c. This argues a supreme and a sole Superintendency and Authority in Titus Secondly that there was a necessity for S. Paul's committing this Authority unto him for otherwise the things that were wanting could not be set in order nor could Ordinations or Censures be there for this cause left I thee in Crete Which is a manifest Argument that the Presbyters in Crete had no power either to ordain or to excommunicate or to do such acts of Jurisdiction for then why was Titus left to those purposes And yet we see S. Paul left him and for this cause left him so that unless we will offer violence to the Sence of Scripture we must confess that Titus was left and fix'd at Crete as Bishop and Metropolitan of the whole Island To these three Apostolical Bishops I might add many more Const Apost l. 7. c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whose Names we meet with in Ecclesiastical Writers either occasionally and scatteringly mentioned as in Irenaeus Eusebius and divers others or more orderly collected as in the Book of Constitutions commonly called Apostolical But because the truth of this dependeth upon the Credit of Church History which yet we have no reason to question I shall forbear further Instances having already and I hope sufficiently shewed out of Scripture that the Order and Authority of Bishops was in being 〈◊〉 in the Apostles days and from them continued and transmitted to succeeding Ages 2. Having done then with the Proof of the Affirmative I proceed next with what brevity I can to answer that grand Argument usually brought to make good the Negative viz. that the Names of Bishop and Presbyter are indifferently and promiscuously used in the Apostolical Writings as if onely one Order of men were meant by them As for instance in Tit. 1. 2 5. Paul tells Titus that he left him in Crete as for other reasons so for this that he should Ordain Elders or Presbyters in every City Then ver 6. he layeth down the Qualifications of these Elders and as a reason for it he saith ver 7. for a Bishop must be blameless c. Here a Bishop and a Presbyter seem to be not two distinct Orders but one and the same and so some say that by a Presbyter is here meant a Bishop and others affirm that by a Bishop is here meant a Presbyter and hence are willing to conclude that in the Apostles time they were not thought to be two distinct Offices but Bishop and Presbyter to be one both in Name Order and Authority and so Prelacy must fall to the ground without any help from Scripture For the removing of this Difficulty three things are to be observed 1. That Aerius the Heretic was the first that ever found out or insisted on this Community and Identity of Names for the Writers before him in the first and second Age after the Apostles did not discourse at this rate could not discover such a promiscuous use of the words 2. The Catholick Writers after Aerius who thought as he did that the Names of Bishop and Presbyter were common in the Apostles days did not yet think as that Heretic did affirm that the Office and Order were ever the same No they held that though Bishops were sometimes called Presbyters and Presbyters Bishops yet Bishops were a rank of Ministers above Presbyters both in Degree and Authority even in the Age of the Apostles 3. But then there is one Observation more for which I must thank a very Learned Prelate of our Church viz. that notwithstanding Vindic. Epist Ignat. p. 184. this Construction and late Pretence of the Promiscuous use of the words yet it doth not appear that the Scripture gives the Titles of
brought away the hollowed things out of mine house and so on from the 13. to the 15. verse of the same Chapter And to all this they were to add a set and a formal Prayer look down O Lord from thy holy Habitation from Heaven and bless thy people Israel and the Land which thou hast given us as thou swarest unto our Fathers vers 15. And then lastly as concerning the Sons of Aaron the Priests their Office was in Gods name to bless the Congregation after the daily Service was finisht and their custome was to go up together upon an eminent place for that purpose and there all of them lifting up their hands and the People bowing their heads one of the Priests was to pronounce the Blessing and he was tyed to a certain Form which is still Visitation of the sick retained in our Liturgy On this wise ye shall bless the Children of Israel saying the Lord bless thee and keep thee the Lord make his face to shine upon thee and be gracious unto thee the Lord lift up his countenance upon thee and give thee peace From all these instances it doth plainly appear that the whole publick Service of God in all its Parts whether they did concern the People or the Levites or the Priests was of Old transacted by them according to set and solemn Forms at the Temple It is well known that besides the Temple at Jerusalem which was the only place of Sacrifices the Jews had especially after the long Captivity many Synagogues up and down in Cities at home and abroad where they were dispersed and we are told that in Jerusalem it self there were no less than an hundred and eighty Synagogues The exact time is not known when they were first Erected but that the Moral and standing Service of God was ministred in those Synagogues is altogether out of Question and some are of opinion that this Moral Service was answerable to that which was but with more solemnity celebrated at the Temple However that this Service Mr. Thorndike Rel. Assemb p. 227. was performed by Book is evident and plain For in every Synagogue there was an Officer part of whose business it was to read the Service This was that Minister spoken of in Luke 4. 20. One who was inferior to the Rulers and Elders of the Synagogue and correspondent to a Deacon in the Christian Church as the Learned Grotius tells us And Buxtorf affirms In Loc. Buxt in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rel. Assemb p. 56. that Precibus cantu Ecclesiae praeibat he went before the Congregation in Praying and Singing And the Learned Author before mentioned tells us out of Maimonides that when he stood up to Prayer he had his back to the people and his face towards the Elders and the Sanctuary and thence he rationally collecteth that he prayed according to a prescript Form because it is not to be supposed that an Inferiour Officer in the Synagogue should direct the Prayers of his betters but upon this ground because the Prayers had been composed afore by fit and competent persons and so might be Ministred by their Inferiours the Deacons of the Synagogues Besides the Noble and Learned French Protestant Du Plessis hath given us this account of the ordinary De Missa lib. 1. c. 3. Synagogue Service that it began with that general Confession of Sins which was used at the Temple over the Sacrifices the Form whereof is fetcht by him out of P. Fagius and by Mr. Ainsworth out of Maimonides O Lord thy people the house of Israel have sinned In Levit. 16. 21. and done iniquity and trespassed before thee O Lord make Attonement now for the sins and for the iniquities and for the trespasses that thy people the house of Israel have sinned and unrighteously done and trespassed before thee as it is written in the Law of Moses thy Servant Then followeth the singing of several whole Psalms composed by David and other Prophets together with set Prayers of Thanksgiving I conceive he meaneth those eighteen Benedictions which we find frequently mentioned and which the Jews say Ezra composed after the return from Babylon and if I mistake not Dr. Hammonds sense where he Citeth Seldens Notes upon Entychius these Prayers were begun with View of the direct Psal 51. 15. O Lord open thou my lips and my mouth shall shew forth thy praise the very form of words retained in S. James Liturgy and in ours before the Introite and concluded with Psal 31. 6. Into thy hands I commend my Spirit for thou hast redeemed me O Lord the God of Truth After this followed the Reading of the Law and the Prophets which was not Arbitrary left to the Readers pleasure what parts of Scripture to make choice of but certain Lessons were appointed for the day and the Law was divided into fifty four Sections and the Prophets into as many portions for every week a portion so that the Office was prescribed for the whole year Moreover the Scriptures being read at large they went to their Prayers again for the Church and for the Common-wealth for publick blessings and for particular private Mercies and so the Ruler of the Synagogue dismissed the Assembly with the usual and solemn Benediction I cannot imagine what more is needful to shew that the publick Service of God among the Jews was ordered into certain and set Forms both at the Temple and in their Synagogues that is that they had their Liturgy and Common-Service Book as the Christian Church had in after Ages and as the Church of England hath still Only I shall add Ex abundanti that even their more private Devotions were Prescript and Formal also And I instance in the solemnity of the Passover which was kept in their Private houses they had set Forms of words whereby they declared the meaning of the Mystery and of the institution of the Lamb the bitter Herbs and the unleavened Bread and this Declaration was called a shewing forth of the Passover to which the Apostle alludeth when he saith of the Lords Supper that it is a shewing forth of the Lords death 1 Cor. 11. 26. They had set Forms of words for the Consecration of the Bread and the Wine over the Bread they said Blessed le thou O Lord our God the King of the World which bringest forth Bread out of the Earth and over the Cup they said likewise Blessed be thou O Lord our God the King of the World which Createst the fruit of the Vine Lastly the whole action was concluded with singing of Psalms beginning at the hundred and thirteenth and so on to the end of the hundred and eighteenth which six Psalms were called by them the great Hallelujahs And I question not but as our Saviour used the usual or the like Form when he blessed the Bread and Wine so also that they used that great Hallelujah when the Evangelist tells us that He and his Disciples sang an Hymn and
meet and right that we should praise thee the very true God who art before all of whom the whole Family in Heaven and Earth is named the only Being without production without beginning and so on he goes rehearsing the Divine Attributes which I conceive is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or praise which Justine speaks of Then he largely mentioneth Gods Creating the World and all things in it his goodness to the first Man both before and after his fall his providence towards the Sons of Adam before and under the Law his particular favour to the seed of Abraham their redemption from Egypt c. for all which mercies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Cyri◠Catech. ◠Glory be unto thee O Lord Almighty there is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mentioned by Justine After this he proceeds to the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 blessing God for the wonderful work of the World's Redemption by Christ for his Conception Incarnation Birth Life Doctrine Miracles Passion Resurrection and Ascension into Glory 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 we give thanks to thee O Almighty God not as we ought but as we can and we fulfil thy Commandment for in the same night that he was betrayed he took Bread c. where the Minister repeates at large the History and words of the Institution of the Sacrament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Cyril ubi supra beseeching God to send down the Holy Ghost upon the offerings and so at last at the close of this long prayer of Consecration he proceeds to pray as the Deacon did before for the holy Catholick Church and for all its Members at the end whereof the Congregation answered Amen So it was in the book of Constitutions and so Justine affirms that the President did 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 send up prayers again in a like manner the same after a sort with what had been sent up before and so that Ancient Writer S. Cyril tells us that after Consecration they did pray for the general peace of the Church for the quiet of the World for Kings c. In a word all the Old Liturgies gives us a plain full and concurrent account of this matter and whosoever shall seriously weigh and impartially consider the joynt suffrage and agreement of Antiquity as to this matter he must either betray his weakness or filthily belie his own Judgement if he doth not conclude that prescribed and set Forms of Divine Service were in use universally in Justine Martyrs time nay that Justine doth manifestly point to that Form in S. James Liturgies or Clements Constitutions such a clear agreement and correspondence there is between the account we find in him and in those other Records 3. This thing then being cleared that there were prescript Forms of Divine Service in the Primitive times of Christianity and even in that Age which was the very next to the Apostles I proceed to shew the third thing viz. that in the Holy Apostles time and in that interval between the burial of the Synagogue and the setling of the Christian Church set Forms of Divine Service were allowed also For confirmation whereof I think no Considerate man will deny that the Apostles and their Disciples conformed to the innocent Rites and Customes among the Jews and joyned with them in the ordinary moral service of God which was appointed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 S. Chrys in Act. 2. 46. to be used daily 1. For first S. Luke tells us Luk. 24. 53. that after our Lords Ascension they were continually in the Temple praising and blessing God Though they had frequent peculiar coetus or Assemblies of their own yet they never withdrew themselves from the solemn Congregation of the Jews that they might not scandalize any but they continued daily in the Temple with one accord Act. 2. 46. That was the place whither they constantly resorted to Morning and Evening service For that being Moral it was utterly repugnant to the designe of Christianity to have destroyed it Some other offices indeed such as the Celebration of the Lords Supper as being proper to their Profession were to the Super-added to the ordinary service and for that purpose their custome was to adjourn from the Temple to the Caenaculum Sion or that upper room mentioned Act. 1. 13. The House was hard by the Temple if not part of it and there they brake bread in that House not as we render it House by House but in the House because they See Dr Hammond in loc and Mr. Medes Disc on 1 Cor. 11. 22. were not permitted to celebrate this Mystery in the Temple but yet the Temple was the place of their ordinary Devotion and there the service was by prescript Form In like manner we read of Peter and John that they went up together into the Temple at the hour of Prayer being the ninth hour Act. 3. 1. And from the whole History of the Apostles Acts it appears that S. Paul and others were wont ever to resort to the Synagogues at the usual days and hours and as it is improbable that they would have been so punctual as to the time and place of publick service had they not Conformed to the service it self so it is incredible that they should have found such easie access had not the Elders of the Jews lookt upon them as men of the same piece with themselves saving only in those points touching the Messiah's coming and the Necessity of such Ceremonies as were Typical or shaddows of better things 2. Again it is clear that the Apostles were very careful as far as it was consistent with their duty to give no offence unto the unbeleiving Jews but by all possible ways of compliance to gain them over unto Christianity in somuch that St. Paul who was one of the most stickling Apostles profest before Festus Act. 25. 8. that neither against the law of the Jews nor against the Temple had he offended any thing at all He declared before Foelix Act. 24. 12 that they never found him in the Temple disputing with any Man neither raising up the people neither in the Synagogues nor in the City And he told the Jews at Rome Act. 28. 17. that he had committed nothing against the people or customes of their Fathers In a word he allowed the Jews the use of Circumcision thought it was needless and he circumcised Timothy with his own Hands though it seemed extra-regular and in every particular they all went Act. 16. 3 as far as the Laws of Christianity would give leave that they might not exasperate any Now is it imaginable that men who were so willing to abate of their Liberty and to comply with the Jews even in things that were Ceremonial and Transitory should hold off in things that were their Duty and oppose that service of God which was substantial and permanent I mean the received Prayers Praises and Thanksgivings 3. But
of Toledo and in Cassians time which was above twelve hundred years ago is as certain The only question is about the time when it was first appointed and commonly it has been said that the Fathers of the Nicene Council ordered it which yet was about the year three hundred twenty five But Questionless the use of it is much Elder For the Arrians corrupted and altered it saying Glory be to the Father by the Son in the Holy Ghost But had it been an Hymn newly appointed at Nice instead of altering they would have utterly rejected it But the Hymn was in use long before for we find it in Clemens Alexandrinus who lived about Anno 190. And 't is likely that 't was derived from an higher Fountain though Clem. Alex. Poedag that 's high enough and if the three hundred and eighteen Fathers at Nice ordered a constant use of it at the end of every Psalm and in other parts of Liturgy to secure Religion from the poyson of the old Arrians methinks it should be as Religiously observed now to secure our Faith from the poyson of Socinians Quakers and other Modern and Blasphemous impugners of the Doctrine of the ever Blessed and most Glorious Trinity It has been likewise an old and general custome at the opening of the Service and before the set repetitions of Davids Psalms to sing some Hymn which was called the Introit or The Introit Entrance Hymn The reason of the Appellation is given by Rhenanus in his Notes upon Tertullian as he is Cited by Durantus Durant de rit lib. 2. cap. 11. because it was sung while people were entring into the Church and before the Congregation was quite full And Rhenanus saith that it was a Psalm of David In the book concerning the order of the Musarabe 't is said that Judica me Deus did follow the Confession I suppose the twenty sixth Psalm is there meant But our Church useth the ninety fifth as being a solomn Invitation to stir up mens Devotion and to inflame their zeal and to prepare their hearts for the due performance of the rest of the Service and for that reason was intended by the Psalmist for Publick Assemblies And in this matter the Church of England followeth the steps of Pious Antiquity For Cassander speaking of the order of Cassand Liturgic c. 7. S. Chrysostomes Liturgy tells us that about the beginning of the Service the Readers did say or sing that Psalm Entituled Venite exultemus And by what we find in the Ritual of Jacobus Goar it is evident that this Psalm was generally used throughout the Eastern Churches Consequent to this are the Psalms of David A Book never to be used enough because it containeth the marrow and flour of holy Scripture and is the Repository of Devotion The Psalms and Lessons Therefore it made up a great part of the Jewish Liturgy as it doth of ours and all Christians in all Ages have had this admirable Exercise in such esteem that the Service of God was never performed without it St. Paul and S. James mention it as an excellent piece of Divine Service in their times and by all Records of Antiquity in following Ages we find that Christians were wonderfully zealous in this point that they were wont for the most part to sing them that they spent much time in this Divine and Heavenly exercise and that they Sang not some ends and shreds but whole Psalms and a great portion of the Psalter at a time insomuch that Lucian that old Scoffer at Christ and Christianity jeered the Church for spending a great part of the night in singing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of Hymns or Psalms For St. Basil tells us that they did rise to it very early and very long before day and having made solemn Confession of their sins they did rise from prayer and fall as we do especially in Cathedral and Collegiate Luc. in Philop Basil ep 63. Precibus subinde intersertis noctem superant Id. ibid. Laod. Concil Can. 17. Churches to the singing of Psalms and so spent the remaining part of the night The truth is so intent and earnest they were upon this matter that to make it the less tiresome they did insert Prayers between whiles yea and read some Chapters and Lessons out of the Scriptures and then fall to singing again So it was appointed by the Laodicean Council that between the Psalms there should be Lessons read for which Balsamon and Aristenus give this Constit lib. 2. Cap. 57. reason least people should be tired with continued Singings And before that Council we find it prescribed in the Apostles Constitutions that two Lessons should be read out of the old Testament and then that they should sing again and then other portions of Scripture out of the New Testament likewise And correspondent to this is the usage of the Church of England interlacing Hymns and chiefly some Psalms of David between Lesson and Lesson Of which Hymns the Te Deum is the first which is certainly The Hymns as old as St. Ambrose and some have confidently told us that assoon as that great Luminary of the Church S. Austin had been baptized by S. Ambrose both of them did in a Divine Rapture break forth into this Form of Praise The truth of the story must depend upon the Credit of its Authours But this is plain that ever since it has been used by the whole Vniversal Church and when I consider its admirable strain and other excellencies I am apt to think that the Spirit of God moved upon the face of those Waters where it was conceived The Song of the three Children commonly called the Benedicite is but a larger Edition of the one hundred forty eigth Psalm and was framed in imitation of the style of Psalm 136. And that it was used above a thousand years ago by the whole Catholick Church all over the World we have the Can. 13. whole Council of Toledo to bear us witness besides other single Testimonies of the use of it in the first Ages of Christianity The rest of our Hymns are all of Divine composure and as old as our Saviours time And why they may not be Sung being parts of Scripture as well as other Psalms and Hymns passeth my skill to know For if they whom S. Apol. 15. 3. John saw in Heaven did sing the Song of Moses what hinders but we on Earth may sing the Song of the Holy Virgin or the Song of Zachany or the Song of Simeon Certainly we cannot follow a better Pattern than what was shewed on the Mount Our Service concludes as it did of old both in the Jewish and Christian Church with several Prayers And though The Prayers these Prayers are not to be found in any Ancient Liturgies in so many express words except that excellent Prayer of S. Chrysostome yet the substance and matter of them is to be found in all For nothing is
Bishop and Presbyter indifferently and promiscuously to those of both Orders There is no necessity for us to admit of a community of Names because those places which seem to infer this Community may be fairly understood though we do appropriate the name of Bishop to a Bishop and the name of Presbyter to a Presbyter This will appear from a particular view of the several Texts which if we can understand without being obliged to confound Names then farwell that grand Principle which the Classical Divines have taken for granted and which is the main and sole Argument to prove a parity and equality of power among all Church Officers above the Degree of Deacons One famous place alleaged is Acts 20. 17. there S. Paul sends to Ephesus and calls the Elders or Presbyters of the Church to him at Miletus and then he saith ver 28. Take heed unto your selves and to all the flock over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 overseers or as it should be rendered Bishops Here say they the Names of Presbyters and Bishops is given to the same men and so the Office and Power of these men was the same But I pray my Masters why so What necessity is there for this positive Assertion Were none with S. Paul at this time but Presbyters Yes Irenaeus who lived near the Apostles time will tell you Iren. adv Haer. l. 1. c. 14. that S. Paul called together both Bishops and Presbyters Were none there but the Clergy of the City of Ephesus Yes the same ancient Writer tells you that the Clergy of all the Cities round about were there too In Mileto convocatis Episcopis Presbyteris qui erant ab Epheso à reliquis proximis civit atibus The Bishops and Presbyters were called from Ephesus and from other neighbouring Cities And indeed S. Pauls words do intimate thus much for saith he ver 18. Ye know from the first day I tame into Asia after what manner I have been with you at all seasons Now S. Paul had been with the Bishops and Presbyters of other Cities in Asia besides Ephesus and S. Paul's speaking to them and appealing to their Knowledge of his Behaviour doth plainly argue that they were with him now and that this Convention did consist of very many of the Asiatic Bishops and Presbyters There is then neither necessity nor reason to imagine that onely the inferiour sort of Clergy appeared at the Apostle's Summons much less that he should call them Bishops Rather it is presumable that as he spake to all in general so that he directed his speech chiefly to the most honourable and principal part of that Reverend Assembly and that he called them Bishops who were so in truth and told them that the Holy Ghost had made them Bishops over their respective Charges so addressing himself immediately and more particularly to them whose Office it was to superintend the Flock of Christ and to obviate the Incursion of Wolves And thus this place may be fairly understood without confounding of Names without offering violence to History or without robbing the Bishops to give their Title and Honour unto Presbyters because it is reasonable to conceive that the Apostle convened Bishops and Presbyters too and spake directly and immediately to the Prelates of whom 't is likely that Timothy was the chief and to the rest accommodating himself collaterally secundarily and by Grot. in loc way of reflexion Another place which has been hotly urged in this Controversie is that mentioned before in Tit. 1. 5 6 7. where Titus is left in Crete 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that he might constitute Presbyters city by city if any were blameless the husband of one wife for a bishop must be blameless saith the Apostle Now they who accuse Bishops as Corah did Moses and Aaron for taking too much upon them triumph mightily Num. 16. from this Text as if the Names of Bishop and Presbyter were clearly synonimous But upon due examination we find that the Apostle's Sence doth not at all carry it this way much less is there a necessity for us to understand him after this manner For all that S. Paul requires of Titus here seemeth to be this that he would advance the Presbyters which were under him and ordain them Bishops and dispose of them into Cities fixing each of them to a certain Cure that is such of them as were approved men for a Bishop must be blameless This Sence is easie and the thing is probable For questionless there were many Presbyters now in Crete whether ordain'd by S. Paul before his departure or by Titus himself afterwards I will not dispute but many Presbyters there were it being impossible for Titus to take a due care of so considerable an Island without Assistants 'T is likely therefore that when S. Paul was going away either he left Presbyters behind him or appointed Titus to ordain some to take part of his burthen and advised him not to prefer them hastily but to prove them first and then to ordain them Bishops having made sufficient experiment of their Abilities and Fitness for so great a Trust And in this Epistle sent to him from Nicopolis he minds him of that which he order'd him before viz. that upon proof and tryal made of his Presbyters he should promote them and set them over Cities over every City one for saith he a Bishop must be blameless So that according to this easie and fair Construction there can be no pretence of any confusion of Names because the Apostle doth not mean that Titus should take Deacons or Laymen into the Order of Presbyters but that he should advance such as were Presbyters already into the superiour Order of Bishops and having first consecrated and ordained them to assign each of them his Diocese and City that they might be invested with their Episcopal Authority and Jurisdiction too And this seems to be that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Constitution or Promotion of Presbyters which the Apostle requireth here Other places there are where St. Paul speaketh of Bishops and Deacons only without taking notice of an intermediate rank of Clergy as 1 Tim. 3. he gives instructions for the Ordination of Bishops and Deacons And in Phil. 1. 1. he saluteth the Saints at Philippi with the Bishops and Deacons Whence the Adversaries of Episcopacy do conclude that by Bishops there Presbyters are intended otherwise we must suppose them to be past over wholly which is not to be conceived the Apostle would do But by their good leave I do assert that where the Apostle mentioneth Bishops he ever meaneth such as are truly and properly Bishops not including Presbyters under that Notion And for the clearing of the Objection three things are observable 1. First that when Churches began to be gathered many Epiph. haeres 68. times it happened that two Churches were in one and the same City the one consisting of believing Jews the other