Vessals and others 30 January 1671 Doâ—niâ— con Young 17 Novem 1666 Lo. Drumsâ—ies con Smart 18 July 1668 Lâ—dy Drum con L Drum 13 Feb 1666 Drummond con Skeen 19 June 1662 Dâ—ummoâ—d con Campbel 5 July 1662 Drummond con Starling of Airdoch 23 Ian 1669 Dâ—ummond of Rickartoun con Feuars of Botkennel 17 Ianuary 1671 Dun con Duns 25 Feb. 1666 Dumbar of Hemprig con Lo. Frazer 18 Feb 1663 Dumbâ—r of Hemprig con Lo Frazer 11 Iuly 1664 Dumbar con E Dundee 5 Iuly 1665 Dumbar con Lo Dussus 14 Iune 1666 Sir David Dumbar oâ— Baldoon con Dick and others 22 Feb. 1671 Sir David Dumbar of Baldoon con Sir Robert Maxwel 14 Iuly 1671 Duncan con Town of Arbroth 17 Novemb 1668 Dundas con the Lairds of Ardrosse and Touch 18 Feb. 1671 Merchants in Dundee con Spâ—uce an Englishman 3 Novemb. 1666 Countess of Dundee con Straitoun 24 Feb. 1669 L. of Durit con Râ—lict and Daughters of umquhil Dâ—rie his Brother 6 Feb. 1666 Durie con Gibson 28 Feb 1667 ECcles con Eccles 7 Decemb. 1664 Edgar con Edgar 17 Ianuary 1665 Edgar con Colvils 2 Decemb. 1665 Town of Edinburgh con L. Leâ—s and Veitch 8 July 1664 Town of Edinburgh con Sir William Thomson 6 June 1665 Edmistoun con Edmistoun 4 Iune 1662 E. Eglintoun con L. Cunningham-head 27 Ianuary 1676 E. Eglintoun con L Cunningham-head 23 June 1666 Elies con Keâ—th 15 Decemb. 1665 Eleis con Cassâ—e 24 Ianuary 1666 Eleis con Wishart and Keith 27 Feb. 1667 Eleis con Keith 16 Iuly 1667 Mr. Iohn Eleis con Inglistoun 23 Iuly 1669 Eleis of South-side con Carss 28 Iune 1670 Mâ—nister of Elgin con Parochiners 30 Iune 1670 Elphingstoun con Murray 4 Feb. 1662 Elphingstoun of Selmes con Lo. Rollo and Niddrie 1 Feb. 1665 Lo. Elphingstoun con L. of Quarrel 19 Feb. 1669 E. Errol con the Parochiners of Urie 16 Ianuary 1663 E. Errol con Hay of Crimonmagat 23 Feb. 1667 Executors of Fairlie con Parochiners of Leswaid 5. Iuly 1662 FAirfowls con Binning 4 Ianuary 1666 Fairholme con Bisset 18 Ianuary 1662 Faiâ—ie con Inglis Iune 23 and 24 1669 Executor of Fairlie con Parochiners of 1662 Fairlâ—e con Creditors of Sir William Dick 14 December 1666 Falconer con Dowgall 24 Iune 1664 Falconer con E. Kinghorn 3 Feb. 1665 Mr. David Falconer con Sir Iames Keith 14 Iuly 1668 Farquhar con Lyon 3 Decemb. 1661 Farquhar con Magistrats of Elgin 2 Iuly 1669 Ferguson con Ferguson 23 Iune 1663 Ferguson con Gairdner 25 Iune 1664 Ferguson con Stewart of Ashcock 1665 Ferguson con Parochiners of Kingarth 1 Feb. 1671 Fiddes con Iack 19 Iuly 1662 Findlason con Lo. Cowper 22 Ianuary 1666 Findlay con E. Northesk 25 Iune 1670 Procurator-Fiscal of the Commissariot of Edinburgh con Thomas Fairholme 23 June 1665 Fleming con Forrester 17 Iuly 1661 Fleming con her Children 26 Iuly and 19 20. of November 1661 Fleming con Fleming 13 Feb. 1663 Fleming con Gilles 18 Iune 1663 Fleming con Fleming 16 Novemb. 1664 Fleming con Fleming 3 Iuly 1666 Sir Iohn Fletcher Supplâ—cant 3 Feb. 1665 Forbes con Innes 8 Ianuary 1668 Forbes con Innes 20 Feb. 1668 Forbes of Watertoun con Châ—in 28 Iune 1671 Forsyth con Patoun 17 Feb. 1663 Mr. Alexander Foulis and the Lo. of Collingtoun con Tennents and the Lady Collingtoun 9 Feb. 1667 Fountain and Brown con Maxwell 14 Iuly 1666 Lo. Frazer con the Laâ—rd of Philorth 18 and 23 Iuly 1662 Frazer con Frazer 11 Feb. 1663 Frazer con Frazer 3 Iuly 1668 Sir Alexander Frazer con Keith 16 Decemb. 1668 Fullertoun con Viscount of Kingstoun 8 Ianuary 1663 GAirdner con Colvill 10 Iuly 1669 Gairns con Arthur 19 Decemb. 1667 Gairns con Sandilands 12 Iuly 1671 Galbraith con Colqâ—houn 12 Novemb. 1664 Râ—â—â—ct of Galriggs con Wallacâ— of Galriggs 19 Iune 1668 Sir Iohn Gibson con Oswald 13 Iune 1668 L. Gight con Birkinbeg 12 Decemb. 1661 Town of Glasgow con Town of Dambarton 6 Feb. 1666 Glass con Hadden 10 Iuly 1669 Glen con Home 19 Feb. 1667 L. Glencorss younger con his Brother and Sisters 10 Ianâ—â—ry 1668 Glendinning con E. Nithsdale 22 January 1662 Goldsmiths of Edinburgh con Haliburtoun 10 December 1664 Goodlaâ— con Nairn 8 Decemb. 1668 Gordon of Lesmore con Leith 10 June 1663 Gordon con Frazer 3 July 1663 Sir Lodovick Gordon con Sir John Keith 31 July 1666 Gordon con Sir Alexander Mcâ—â—lloch 17 Feb. 1671 Gordon con Sir Alexander Mcâ—ulloch 22 Feb. 1671 Gordon con L. of Drumm 22 June 1671 Grahame con Ross 24 January 1663 Grahame con Ross 5 Feb. 1663 Grahame of Hiltoun con the Heretors of Clackmannan 13 July 1664 Grahame con Browns 7 January 1665 Grahame con Bruce and Martine 7 Feb. 1665 Grahame and Jack con Brian 3 January 1666 Grahame con Towris 26 Feb. 1668 Grahame con L. Stainbyres 26 Feb. 1670 Grant con Grant 15 January 1662 Grant con Grant 24 Feb. 1666 Grant con Grant 11 January 1668 Gray con Dalgarno 7 Feb. 1662 Gray con Oswald 28 June 1662 Creditors of the Lo. Gray con the Lo. Gray 27 Feb. 1666 Gray con Forbes 15 June 1667 Gray con Howison and Gray 24 June 1668 Gray con Keâ— 23 July 1669 La. Greenhead con Lo. Lour 10 Feb. 1665 Greenlaw con â—5 Ianuary 1663 Greggs con Weems 30 Iune 1670 Greirson con Mcilroy 13 Feb. 1668 L. Grubbet con More 2 Iuly 1669 Guin con Mckeâ—â— 19 Iuly 1665 Guthrie con L. Sornbeg 18 Novemb. 1664 Guthrie con L. Mckersâ—oun 25 July 1671 HAdden and Lawder con Sherswood 13 June 1668 Hadden con Campbel 25 January 1670 Hadden con L. Glenegies 28 July 1671 Halliburton con E. Roxburgh 25 June 1663 Halliburton con Porteous 23 Novemb. 1664 Lady Halliburton con Creditors of Halliburton 27 July 1670 Merchants of Hamburgh con Capt. Dishingtoun 24 Feb. 1668 Duke Hamilton con Scots 24 Iune 1664 Duke Hamilton con L. Clackmannan 14 Decemb. 1665 Duke Hamilton con Duke Bucleugh 24 June 1666 Duke Hamilton con L. of Allardyce 6 Decemb. 166â— Duke Hamilton con Maxwel of Mureith 29 Feb. 1668 Duke Hamilton con Fewars of the Kings Property 14 Iuly 1669 Duke Hamilton con Blackwood 14 and 28 Iuly 1669 Hamilton con Rowan 13 Decemb. 1661 Hamilton con Mcferling 28 Feb. 1662 Hamilton con Hamilton 21 Feb. 1663 Hamilton con Mitchel and Keith 18 Iune 1663 Hamilton con Esdale 9 Iuly 1663 Hamilton con Tennents 27 July 1665 Hamilton con Duke Hamilton and Bishop of Edinburgh 21 Iuly 1666 Hamilton con 2 Ianuary 1667 Hamilton con Symontoun 16 July 1667 Hamilton con Lo. Belhaven 14 Decemb. 1667 Hamilton con Hamilton 7 Iuly 1668 Hamilton con Bain 15 Ianuary 1669 Hamilton con Harper 16 Feb. 1669 Hamilton con Hamilton aâ—d the Viscount of Frendraught 22 Iune 1669 Lady Lucia Hamilton con Lairds of Dunlop Pitcon and Creditors of Hay of Mountcastle 15 Jan. 1670 Lady Lucia Hamilton con L. of Pitcon and others 8 Iuly 1670 Lady Lucia Hamilton con Boyd of Pitcon 15 Iuly 1670 Executors of Walter Hamilton con Executors of Andrew Reid 20 July 1670 L. Haining con the Town
Annat it was not confirmed and could be extended to no more but the half of 1654. The Pursuer answered to the First That the Presbytrie had no power to dispose of that Steipend by the Act of Parliament 1644. because the Defunct was only Suspended ab officio which makes not the Kirk Vaick maxime seeing the Defunct was Reponed by the Synode and never desposed and as to the Decreet at the Defenders Instance it was given without calling the Defunct whom he was in mala fide to misken To the second That the Act of Prisbytrie cannot prove unless it had been subscribed by the Defuncts own hand matters of Steipend not being the proper work of Presbitries but proper for civil Judges especially seeing the Defunct was Suspended for Preaching for the Engagement 1648. Against which that Presbytrie protested and so the Act being Eairtester is the more suspect To the Third The Annat not being in bonis defuncti but indulged by the Law to the Wife Bairns and nearest of Kin to the Defunct Minister and so originally their Right though upon occasion of his Service the same needs no Confirmation and the Defunct having right proprio jure to the whole Year 1653. Surviving both Terms Anne signifying a Year further must be the heal Year one thousand six hundred fifty and four The Lords Repelled the first Defense and found the Suspension of the Minister not to make the Steipend Vaccand and had no respect to the said Decreet whereto the Defunct was not called They found also the second Defense not probable by the Act of Presbytrie and found that the Anne needed no Confirmation but that the Anne did only extend to half a Year more then the Defunct had right to proprio jure Laird of Lamirtoun contra Alexander Kennedy Farl of Levin Eodem die EOdem die The Laird of Lamertoun upon the Improbation mentioned Iuly 24. Did then desire that Alexander Kennedy producer of the six Bonds quarrelled might be examined in presentia and his Person Sequestrated and Secured and warrand granted to examine new Witnesses The Lords superceided to give answer till they considered the Process and now having considered the same and finding that the direct manner of Improbation was not Competent because the Witnesses were dead and that the Pursuer had insisted in the Indirect manner and had obtained warrand for Inspection of the Dispositions taken in the Cause both of Alexander Kennedy himself and of the Witnesses then adduced and had given in Articles of Improbation and the Defenders Articles of Approbation Replyes and Duplyes both which being considered by the Lords they found grounds of Suspitionâ— and therefore granted all the desires of the Supplication and Ordained Alexander Kennedy to be keeped close Prisoner in the Tolbooth till he were re-examined and Witnesses hinc inde to be examined by some of the Lords in the Vaccancy upon what either Parties should desire which seemed periâ—ent to the saids Lords Examinators Dame Elizabeth Fleming contra her Children November 14. 1661. DAme Elizabeth Flemming Relict and Executrix to Umquhile Malcome Flemming Merchant in Edinburgh and Tutrix dative to his Bairns having formerly pursued an Action of Exoneration against her Children in which she gave up as an Article of her Accompt a hundred pounds Sterling payed by her to Patrick Scot of Langshaw whereupon she had retired her Husbands Bond and taken a discharge upon the back thereof and had taken her Husbands name therefrom whereanent the Defenders alleadged That this being a cancelled Paper could establish no Debt against them neither could Patrick Scots discharge prove against them that it was a debt restand by their Father and payed since his death as Patrick's Testimony and Oath could not prove much less his Declaration in wri whereupon the Lords had ordained Patrick Scots Oath to be taken ex officio upon the truth of the Debt and when it was payed to him and by whom who having Dâ—poned that it was payed by this Pursuer after her Husbands Death The Lords did allow the Article Now the Cause being wakened at the Pursuers instance and Sir Iohn Gibson now her Husband one of the Clerks The Defenders further alleadged that Patrick Scots oath ought not to have been taken and could not be sufficient to prove against them that this was a true Debt and payed by their Mother but it behoved to be presumed if it was a Debt at all to have been payed by their Father and the Bond cancelled by him and left amongst his writs and found by their Mother there and now after her second Marriage made use of against her own Children albeit she made no mention of it before And therefore the cancelled Bond being no Writâ— subscribed by the Defunct cannot prove nor can Patrick Scot's Discharge or his Oath make it up nor any other thing except the Defenders own Oath or Writ seeing Witnesses are not admitted in cases of this Importance Secondly though it were Evidently and Legally Instructed and Proven yet the Debt was payed by the Mother she can have no allowance of it because she payed Voluntarly not being Tutrix nor Executrix at that time and cancelled it and took a discharge of it and so it is both unwarrantably done and must be presumed to have been of purpose to gift it to her Children out of her opulent Fortune having given above fourty thousand pounds to the second Husband The Pursuer answered That the alleadgances were most Irrelivant for as to the first anent the Probation of the truth of the Debt and payment by the Executrix It is sufficiently proven by the cancelled Bond at which the Witnesses Names are yet standing by Patrick Scot's Discharge and Oath already taken who is a Person inconcerned and above all exception and if need bees it is offered to be proven by many Witnesses above exception who saw the Bond un-cancelled after the Defuncts Death which is abundantly sufficient to take away the Presumption that it was retired and cancelled by the Defunct himself and that such Probation was Legal and Warrantable was formerly found by the Lords of Session upon the 7th of March one thousand six hundred twentie nine betwixt Falconer and Blair where an Executor pursuing the Hetr for relief of a moveable Debt produced only the Defuncts cancelled Bond without a discharge and these same points being alleadged The Lords found that the Action ought to be sustained and the truth of the Debt and the Payment after the Defuncts decease to be proven by the Creditors Oath or after his decease by the Heirs Oath and it is unquestionable That the Lords in matters obscure as to the Probation may ex â—obâ—li officio take all manner of Tryal for finding out the Truth by Oaths of Parties Witnesses or any other manner of way in matters of greatest moment which being here already done and the Testimony so clear and of so unquestionable a Person as Patrick Scot there remaines no doubt but the Debt was
con Cuningname 28 Iuly 1669 Leslie con Guthriâ— 19 Feb. 1670 Leslies con Iaffray 22 Iune 1671 Letter from the Kâ—ng 14 Iune 1665 Lo. Leye con Porteous 15 Feb. 1666 Lindsey and Swinton con Ingles 5 July 1670 Lindsey of Mount con Maxwel of Kirkonnel 20 Iuly 1671 Town of Linlithgow con Town of Borrowstoâ—nness 30 Ianuary 1663 Town of Linlithgow con Town of Borrowstounness 13 Feb. 1663 Litle con E. of Neidsdaile 20 Ianuary 1665 Litle-Iohn con Dutchess of Monmouth 20 Feb. 1667 Litster con Aitoun 2 Iuly 1667 Livingstoun con the Heir of Forrester 22 Iuly 1664 Livingstoun con Sornbeg 23 Novemb. 1664 Livingstoun con Beg 6 Feb. 1666 Livingstoun con Lady Glenegies 13 Iuly 1666 Livingstoun con Burns 15 Iune 1670 Lochs con Hamiltoun 18 Novemb. 1664 Lockhart con Kennedie 13 Feb. 1662 Lockhart con Lo Bargenie 22 Feb. 1666 Logans con Galbreath 26 Ianuary 1665 Logiâ— con Logie 11 Decemb. 1662 Lo Lour con E. Dundee 6 Feb. 1663 Lo Lour con La. Craig 22 Iuly 1664 Lo. Lour con 20 Ianuary 1665 Lo. Lovat con Lo. Mcdonald 16 Iune 1671 Loyson con the L. Ludwharn 15 June 1669 L. Ludwharn con L. Gight 21 July 1665 Heirs of Lundie con E. Southesk 12 July 1671 Lyon of Murresk con L. of Ersk 17 June 1664 Lyon of Murresk con Farquhar 10 Decemb. 1664 Lyon of Murresk con Heretors of the Shire 7 Feb. 1665 Lyon of Murresk con Gordons and others 15 Feb. 1666 MAgistrats of con the E. Finlatour 24 Ianuary 1666 Mair con Stewart 22 January 1667 Maitland con Leslie 27 Feb. 1668 Maitland of Pitrichie con L. of Gight 15 Decemb. 1669 E. Marischal con Braâ— 18 June 1662 E. Marischal con Leith of â—hitâ—haugh 14 Iuly 1669 Masson con 27 Iune 1666 Creditors of Masson con Lo. Torphichan 19 Ianuary 1669 Mastertoun con strangers of Ostend 24 Feb. 1668 Mathieson con Gib 14 Iuly 1665 Maxwel con Maxwel 13 Feb. 1662 Lady Diana Maxvel con Lo. Burlie and others 15 Feb. 1667 Maxvel con Maxvel 15 Novemb. 166â— Maxvel con Maxvel 11 Iuly 167â— Maxvel con Maxvel 21 Iuly 1671 L. May con Ross 23 Feb. 1667 Mâ—alexander con Dalrymple 9 June 1668 Mcbrair con Sir Robert Creiâ—hton 20 Feb. 1666 Mcclaud con Young and Girvan 20 Decemb. 1665 Mcclellan con the Lady Kircudburgh 13 Feb. 1669 Mccrae con Lo. Mcdonald 6 July 1671 Mculloch con Craig 2 Decâ—mb 1665 Mcdougal con L Glenorchie 24 Iune 1663 Mcgill con Ruthven 22 Novemb. 1664 Mcgill con Vâ—scount of Oxenfoord 17 Feb 1671 Mcgreeger con Menzies 24 Feb 1665 Mcintosh con Robertson 26 Iuly 1662 Mckenzie con Ross 18 Feb 1663 Sâ—r George Mckenzie con Fairholme 7 Decemb 1666 Sir George Mckenzie con Mr Iohn Fairholme 25 July 1667 Sâ—r George Mckenzie con L. of Newhal 30 July 1668 Sir George Mckâ—nzie con Mr Iohn Fairhoâ—me 14 Feb. 1668 Mackenzie con Roberâ—son 23 Decemb 1668 Mckenzie con Ross 14 Ianuary 1669 Mckie con Stewart 5 July 1665 Mcmorland con Melvil 28 Iune 1666 Mcpherson con Mâ—cleud 29 Iune 1666 Mcpherson con Wedderburn 14 Ianuary 1668 Mcqueen con Marquess of Dowglas and Peirson 26 Ianuary 1670 Lo Melvil con the Laird of Fairnie 4 Feb 1662 Menzies con L. Drum 25 January 1665 Menzies con L. Glenorchie 24 June 1663 Mercer of Aldie con Rouan 24 Feb 1665 Merstoun con Hunter 9 Ianuary 1663 Milleâ— con Howison 5 June 1666 Milleâ— con Watson 21 Iuly 1666 Miller con Bothwel 22 Iuly 1671 Milne con Hume 7 Iuly 1664 Milne con Clerkson 21 Feb 1667 Lady Milâ—toun con L. Milntoun 26 Iuly 1662 L. Milntoun con Lady Milntoun 4 Ianuary 1666 L. Milntoun con Lady Milntoun 27 Feb. 1663 L. Milntoâ—n con Lady Milntoun 25 Feb. 1667 L. Milntoun coâ— Lady Milntoun 26 Feb 1668 L. Milntoun con Lady Milntoun 30 July 1668 L. Milntoun con Lady Milntoun 31 Ianuary 1671 L. Milntoun con Lady Milntoun 14 Iuly 1671 Minister of north Leith con Merchants of Edinburgh 10 Feb 1666 Mâ—nister of con the L. Elphinstoun 16 Iune 1666 Mitchel con Hutcheson 24 Iuly 1661 Dame Gâ—ils Moncrief con Tennents of Newtoun and Yeoman 9 Feb 1667 Moncrief of Tippermalloch con Magistrats of Pearth 26 Iuly 1670 Children of Mouswal con Laurie of Maxwaltoun 14 Feb. 1662 Lady Moâ—swal con 15 Feb. 1662 Monteiâ—h con Anderson 28 Iune 1665 Monteith con Anderson 15 Decemb. 1665 Monteith con L. Glorat 7 Decâ—mb 1666 Monteith of Carrubber con Boyd 2 Decemb. 1669 Montgomerie con Lo. Kirkudbright 20 Decemb 1661 Montgomerie con Peter 19 July 1662 Montgomerie con Montgomerie 22 Iuly 1662 Montgomerie con Brown 28 January 1663 Montgomerie con Hume 22 Iuly 1664 Collonel Montgomerie con Wallace and Bowie â—4 Iâ—ne 1665 Collonel Montgomerie and his Spouse con Stewart 24 and 27 Ianuary 1666 Coll. Montgomerie con the Heirs of Hâ—lliburton 17 Feb. 1663 Montgomerie con Rankine 23 Novemb. 1667 Moffat con Blâ—â—k 24 Iune 1664 Morison's Relâ—ct con the Heir 12 Feb. 1663 Daughâ—ers of Mr. Iames Mortoun Supplicâ—nt 26 Novemb 1668 Parson of Morum con the Lâ—s of Beâ—rfoord and Beinstoun 6 July 1666 Sir George Mouat con Dâ—mbar of Hemprig 22 Feb. 1665 Mow con Dutcheâ—s oâ— Buccleugh 7 July 1663 L. Muchrum con L. Mercoun and others 20 Decemb. 1662 Muir con Frazer 27 July 1665 Muir con Sterling 19 Feb. 1663 Muirhead con 27 July 1664 E. Murray con L. Gâ—ant 9 January 1662 Sir Robert Murray con 8 Feb. 1662 Murray con 17 June 1665 Murray con Executors of Doctor Guild 16 Iune 166â— E. Murray con Hume 2 Ianuary 1667 Creditors of Sir Iames Murray con Murray 1 Feb. 1667 Murray of Oâ—htertyre con Sir Iohn Drummond 22 Feb 1670 Murray of Ochtertyre con Gray 16 Decemb 1670 Murray con Murray 12 Iuly 1671 Murray con E. Southesk and others 28 July 1671 Mushet con Duke and Dutchess of Buccleugh 28 Ianuary 1668 NAper con Gordon of Grainge 12 Feb 1670 Naper con E. Eglintoun 14 Feb. 1671 Nasmyth con Iaffray con 25 Iuly 1662 Nasmyth con Bowar 1 Iuly 1665 Neilson con Meinzies of Enoch 21 Iune 1671 Lo. Newbyth con Magistâ—ats of Elgin 17 Feb 1665 Lo. Newbyth con Dumbar of Burgie 18 Decem 1666 Newman con Tennents of Hill and Mr. Iohn Preston 8 Ianuary 1669 Nicol con Hope 8 Ianuary 1663 Nicolson con rewarâ— of Tillicutrie 14 Ianuary 1662 Nicolson con L. Bughtie and Babirnie 14 Novemb. 1662 Sir Thomas Nicâ—lson con L Philorth 18 Decemb 1667 Nisbet con Lestâ— 8 Iuly 1664 Nisbet con Murray 23 Novemb. 1664 Nisbet con 5 June 1666 E. Nâ—rthesk con Viscount of Stormond 28 Feb. 1671 Norvel con Sunter 20 Decemb. 1664 Norvel con Sunter 29 Iune 1665 OGilvie con Stewart 11 Decemb 1662 Ogilvie con Grant 7 Iuly 1664 Ogilviâ— con 21 Feb. 1666 Ogilvie con Lo. Gray 17 Iuly 1666 Oliphant con Dowglas 3 Feb 1663 Sir Lauerance Oliphant con Sir Iohn Drummond 6 and 9 Ianuary 1666 Oliphant con Hamilton 2 Ianuary 1667 Lady Otter con L. Otter 8 Ianuary 1663 Lady Otter con the Laird 16 Feb 1666 PAllat con Fairholme 7 Fâ—b 1665 E. Panmuire
truely owand and payed by the Relict after her Husbands decease As to the second Point there is no necessity in Law for Executors or Tutorâ— to have Sentence unlesse it be in Cases of Competition to secure themselves against other Creditors pursuing afterwards or Cases dubious where the Probation is not clear but to pay a clear Debt without burdening Pupils with unnecessary expenses of Law against which the Pupils can now alleadge nothing wherein they were prejudged by voluntar payment such payments were never Repelled Especially in the Case of a Woman paying so soon after her Husbands death nor can it be presumed a Donation because Donations are never presumed but must be clearly proven and it is very ordinar to those who have Interest to pay the Debts and Confirm afterwards The Lords considering the whole Circumstances found the Article not to be allowed a beâ—t they were clear that the Debt was true and really payed by the Executrix yet seeing she payed not being then Executrix nor Tutrix and cancelled the Bond without taking Assignation they thought she could not distresse her Children with it but that it was a Donation in their favour Dame Elizabeth Flemming contra Iohn â—ibson and Flemming November 19. 1661. INter eosdem There was another Article of the said accompt whereby the said Dame Elizabeth Flemming having lent out a sum of money in the Name of Malâ—ome and Andrew Flemming's two of her Bairns she craved that the said Sum should be taken in part of payment of the Portions of the whole Bairns or at least in so far as was more nor the Portions of these two Bairnes might be declared to belong to her self It was answered for the Bairns that this Bond was a Donation by the Mother out of her own means in favours of her Children and could not be imputed as a part of their means because First The Bond did bear the Money to be lent by her in her Childrens name and not in her own Neither did it bear to be as a part of the Bairns means nor in satisfaction thereof as she had specially taken other Bonds in these same Bairns names and so presumed consideratly to gift the Sum to these two Bairns of whom one was a pocthmus Child born eight moneths after his Fathers Death and so was not thought upon by his Father nor provided with Legacies as the rest were Secondly The Tenor of the Bond bears expresly the Sum to be payable to the Mother in Liferent and one of the Children is substitute Heir to another in case they had not Children of their own Whereas another would have fallen Heir of Lyne to them viz. An intervenient Brother and to them both the Mother her self and her Heirs were substitute The Pursuer answered That supposing this were a Donation yet it being a free gift the mother might do it upon what Terms and Conditions and what way she pleased Ita est by the Tenor of the Bond. It is provided that she shall uplift the Sum during her Life and the Children after her decease by which Clause she is more nor a naked Life-renter and seeing this Clause must be interpret cum effectu the only meaning of it can be That during her own Lifetime she might uplift the Sum and dispose of it at her pleasure and so evacuat the fee in her Childrens Persons seeing there is nothing to oblidge her to re-imploy it for the Bairns use if she should once uplift it it as when a Father Infeft his Son in his Lands reserving his own Liferent with power to Dispone during his own life there the Father is Liferenter yet by that Reservation he may annull and evacuat the Sons Fee even so here For which two Practicks of Dury was adduced that a Father providing a Sum to himself and his Wife and the longest liver of them two and failzing of them by Decease to his Son the Son being Infeft in Fee and in the other Practick the Father being expresly infeft in an Annualrent for his Lifetime Yet the Lords found that the Father during his lifetime might uplift the sum and Dispose of it at his pleasure The Lords found by the Tenor of the Bond that the Mother had Constitute her self expresly Liferenter and the Children Feears And that the power to Charge for the Money did bear nothing of a power to her to Dispose of it but was only the ordinar Reservation adjected after the Clause of Annualrent in these words but prejudice of the said Annualrent to her during her life and after her Decease to â—he Bairns to uplist the money and so that albeit she was not expresly oblieged to re-imploy it yet she Constituting her self Liferenter without a power to Dispose of the Fee did sufficiently obliege her to re-imploy the sum And as to the Practicks the case clearly differed in this that there the Father and Mother were not Constitute Liferenters in the sum though the Father was mentioned Liferenter of an Annualrent accessory to the sum But the Clause being to the Father and Mother and after their Decease to the Son It was clear by the common Practicks that the Son was not Feear but Heir Substitute so that the Father was Feear and might Dispose at his pleasure November 20. 1661. In the foresaid Cause It was further alleadged for the Tutrix that the Bond in question could not be accounted a Donation notwithstanding the Reasons before adduced in so far as she was Debitor to the saids two Bairns for their Portion quia debitor non presumitur donare and therefore Provisions granted by Husbands to their Wives albeit they mention not the Contract of Marriage but love and favour And so in the Terms of a Donation yet it is alwayes interpret to be in satisfaction of a prior obliegement in the Contract of Marriage and not that both the posterior and former Provision are due to the Wife It was answered for the Bairns that though Donation be not presumed yet when by the Nature of the Deed done it appeareth to be animo donandi I it is truly such albeit it bear not the name of a Donation especially in this case Which Law excepteth from that general Rule that Parents bestowing sums for the use of their Bairns from their natural affection are alwayes presumed to gift and not to satisfie any former Provision unless it were so exprest Upon which ground an Infeftment granted by a Father to his Son though but a Bastard Redeemable upon a sum of Money was not found in satisfaction of a former Bond granted by him to that natural Son as is observed by Dury upon the 24. of Iuly 1623. Stuart contra Fleming But here not only is this Bond not in satisfaction of the former Portion but bears a Clause of a Liferent and of a return to the Mother which are incompatible with an intention of satisfaction The Lords found the Bond to be in satisfaction of the Bairns Portions pro tanto
1664 Broun con Scot 9 Ianuary 1666 Broun and Dâ—ff con â—issat 18 Iuly 1666 Broun con Happiland 29 Ianuary 1668 Broun con Iohnstoun 1. Feb. 1669 Broun con Sibbald 12 Feb. 1669 Bruces con E. Mortoâ—n 16 Iune 1665 Bruce con E. Mortoun 28 Nâ—vemb 1665 Bruce con L. and Lady Stenhops 20 Feb. 1669 Countess of Buccleugh con E. Taâ—ras 7. Feâ— 16â—2 Duke of Duccleugh con Parochiners of 22 Iune 1671 Children of the E. of Buchan con the Lady Bâ—â—han 23 Feb. 1666 Buchan con Taits 11 Feb. 1669 Buchannan con Osouâ—n 24 Iuly 1661 Lady Burgie con Tennents 18 Iuly 1667 Lord Burly con Sime 30 Ianuary 1662 Lord Burly con Sime 25. Novem. 1662 Dame Rachel Burnet con Leapers 23 December 1665 Buâ—net con Iohnstoun 17 Iuly 1666 Burnet con Nasmith 19 Iune 1668 Burnet con Swain 30 June 166â— Ioachim Burn-master con Captain Dishingtoâ—n 29 Iune 1671 Lady Bute and her husband con Sheriff of Butâ— 5 Ianuary 16â—â— Butter con Gray 17 Feb. 16â—5 con Brand 3 January 1667 con Edmistoun 6 January 1665 con Wilson 2 Ianuary 16â—â— con John and Hary Rollocks 1 Feâ— 1666 con E. Kinghorn 23 Ianuary 1666 con Heâ—gh Mcculloch 29 Feb. 1666 con the Sheriff of Inverness 21 Feb. 1666 CAlderwood con Schaw 14 Novem. 1668 â— Callender con Monro 20 Feb. 1662 Campbel con Bryson 10 Ianuary 1664 Campbel con Campbel 22 Feb. 1665 Campbel con Doctor Beatoun 23 Novem. 1665 Campbel con Dowgal 14 Decem. 1667 Campbel con L. Glenorchie 25 July 1668 Canham con Adamsone 25 June 1664 Canham con Adamsone 7 Novem. 1666 Canna con 10 Iuly 1666 Mr. Walter Cant con Loch 27 Iune 1665 L. Carberry con Creditors 30. Ianuary 1663 Lady Carnagy con Lo. Cranburn 11 Ianuary 1662 La. Carnagy con Lo. Cranburn 19 Feb. 1662 La. Carnagy con Lo. Cranburn 30 January 1663 La. Carnagy con Lo. Cranburn 5 Feb. 1663 Countess of Carnwath con the Earl 27 Feb. 1667 Cass con Mr. Iohn Wat. 18 Decem. 1666 Cass con Sir Robert Cunninghame 26 Ianuary 1671 E. Cassils con Agnew 6 January 1666 E. Cassils con the Tennents of Dalmortoun 11 Decemb 1666 E. Cassils con the Sheriff of Galloway 10 Decemb. 1669 Countess of Cassils con E. Cassils 22 Feb. 1670 Countess of Cassils con the E. Roxburgh 18 July 1671 Cathcart con Mccorquodel and Mirk 8 Feb. 1670 L. Cesnock con Lo. Bargainy 23 Decem. 1665 Chalmer con Dalgarno 27 Feb. 1662 Chalmer con Lady Tinnel 24 Novem. 1665 Chalmer con Bassillie 30 Iune 1666 Chalmer and Gairns con Colvils 16 Novem. 1667 Chalmer con Wood 27 Feb. 1668 Chapman con White 18 Ianuary 1667 Charters con a Skipper 13 Ianuary 1665 Charâ—rs con Parochiners of Currie 8 Ian. 1670 Charters con Neilson 29 Iuly 1670 Cheap con Philip. 19 Decem. 1666 Cheap con Philip 5 Ianuary 1667 Cheap con the Magistrats of Falkland 18 Iune 1670 Chein con Chriâ—â—â— 4 Iuly 1667 Cheiâ— â—on Christy 30 Iune 1668 Cheiâ— con 〈◊〉 5 Decem. 16â—5 Children of Moâ—swal con Laurie of Maxwelâ—â—â—n 14 Feb. 1662 Children of VVolmet con Mr. Markâ—â—â— 19 Feb. 1662 Children of â—olmet con Dowgâ—â—s and Dankeâ—â—â— 20 Nevem 1662 Chiâ—â—â—me con Rennies 6 Feb. 16â—8 Chisolme con Lady Brae 26 January 1669 Clappertoun con L. of Ednem 11 Decem. 1662 Clappertoun con L. Torsonce 20 January 1666 Cleland con Stevinson 5 Feb. 1669 Clerk con Clerk 2 Decem. 1662 Lo. Justice Clerk con Rentoun of Lambertoun 13 Feb. 16â—7 Lo. Juâ—â—â—ce Clerk con the L. of Lambertoun 23 November 1667 L. Justice Clerk con Home of Linthil 28 Feb. 1668 L. Clarkintoun con L. Corsbie 3 Decemb. 1664 L. Clerkingtoun con Stewart 20. Iuly 1664 La. Clerkingtoun con the L. and the young Lady 9 Ianuary 1668 Cochran con 22 Feb. 1668 Cockburn and Gillesâ—ie con Stewart 18 Feb. 1669 Mâ—nâ—ster of Cockburns-path con Parochiners 7 Feb. 1668 Colledge of St. Andrews Supplicant 16 July 1661 Old Colledge of Aberdeen con the Town 13 July 1669 Colquhoun con Creditors 18 Ianuary 1662 Colquhoun con Watson 15 Feb. 1668 Colquhoun and Mcnaire con Stewart of Baâ—scob 1 Iuly 1668 Colvil con Executors of Colvil 15 Iuly 1664 Lady Colvil con Lo. Colvil 14 Decem 1664 Colvil con Lo. Balmerino 6 Iuly 1665 Lo. Colvil con Town of Culross 27 Feb. 1666 Lo. Colvil con the Feuars of Culross 15 Decem 1666 Commissars of St. Andrews con the L. of Bussie 4 Iuly 1665 Captain Conningsbiâ— con Captain Mastertoun 7 Feb. 1668 Corstorphine con Martines 21 Decem. 1666 Couan con Young and Reid 9 Feb. 1669 Lo. Couper con L. Pitsligo 3 Iuly 1662 Town of Couper con Kinocher 24 Iune 1664 Lady Craig con L. Lour 7 Decem. 1664 La. Craigcasse con Neilson 12 Novem. 1664 Cranstoun con Pringle 13. Decem. 1665 Cranstoun con Wilkieson 10 Iuly 1666 Cranstoun con Wilkieson 20 Feb. 1667 Crawfoord con E. Murray 8 Feb. 1662 Crawfoord con Prestoun Grange 15 Iuly 1664 Crawfoord con Auchinleck 17 Ianuary 1666 Crawfoord con Duncan 7 Iune 1666 Crawfoord con the Town of Edinburgh 31 Iuly 1666 E. Crawfoord con Rigg 21 July 1669 Crawfoord con Anderson 24 Iuly 1669 Crawfoord con Halliburton 20 Iune 1671 Credâ—tors of Kinglassiâ— 26 and 27 Feb. 1662 Creditors of Iames Masson 30 Novem. 1665 Creditors of Andrew Bryson 14 Novem. 1662 Creditors of the Lady Couper and Balmeâ—ino con Lady Couper 25 Novem. 1669 Crichton and her spouse con Maxwel of Kirk-house 27 Ianuary 1666 Daughters of Crichton of Crawfoordstoun con Broun of Eglistoun 22 Ianuary 1669 Cruckshank con Cruckshank 16 Iune 1665 L. Culteraus con Chanman 16 Novem. 1667 Cumming con Lumsden 4 Iuly 1667 Cunninghame con Dalmahoy 1 Feb 1662 Cunninghame con the Duke of Hamiltoun 5 Decem. 1665 Cunninghame con Lyel 1 Feb 166â— Cunninghame con L. Robertland 4 Iuly 166â— DAes con Kâ—le 19 Iuly 1667 Dallas con Frazer of â—nnerallochie 31 Ianuary 1665 Dalmahoy con Hamiltoun 6 Decem. 16â—â— Minâ—ster of Dalâ—ymple con E. Cassills 27 June 166â— Deanes con Bothwel 5 Feb. 16â—â— Dennistoun con Sâ—mple of Falwood 16 Iuly 1669 Mr. David Dewer con Paterson 26 〈◊〉 1667 Dick con Sir Andrâ—w Dick 13 Ianuary 16â—â— Dick con Ker 26 â—une 1668 Dukie con Monâ—gamery 14 Ianuary 1662 Mr. Robert Dickâ—on con Mr. Maâ—k Kâ—r 21 Iuly 1665 Dickson con â—â—me 16 Novem 1665 Mr. Robert Dickson con James Graham 19 Ianuary 1671 Executors of the E. of Diâ—ltoun con the Duke of Hamiltoun and others 18 Iuly 1667 Dobie con Lady Stoniehill 18 Decem. 1667 Dobie con Lady Stoniehill 28 January 1668 Dodds con Scot 16 Feb. 1671 Donaldson con Harower 3 Iuly 1668 Dove con Campbel 4 Ianuary 1668 Doâ—glas con 22 Novem. 166â— Dowglas con Lindsey 2 Decem. 1662 Dowglas con L. Wadderburn 19 July 16â—4 Dame Elizabeth Dowglaâ— and Lockermacus her â—uâ—band con L. Wedderburn 24 Feb. 166â— Dowglas con Cowan 29 July 1665 Mr. James Dowglas con 〈◊〉 28 Junâ— 166â— Dowglas Lady Wamâ—rey con the L. Wamâ—â—â—y 22 Jâ—â—â—ary 1668 Dowglas of Lumsden con Dowglas 22 June 1670 Dowglas of Kâ—â—head con his
of Selkirk â— 15 Feb. 1668 Harlay con Hume 18 Iuly 1671 Harper con Hume 14 Ianuary 1662 Harper con Hamilton 29 Iuly 1662 Harper con Vassals 25 Iuly 1666 Harrowar con Haitly 13 Iune 1667 Hay con Hume 24 Iune 1662 Hay con Seaton 28 Iune 1662 Hay con Mâ—rison 17 Feb. 1663 Hay con Corstorphin 19 Iune 1663 Hay con Nicolson 16 Iuly 1663 Hay con Collector of the vacand Stipends 17 Iune 1664 Hay con Magâ—strats of Elgin 23 Novemb. 1664 Hay con Littleâ— Iohn 16 Feb. 1666 Hay con Magâ—strats of Elgin 12 Iune 1666 Hay con Magistrats of Elgin 5 Iuly 1666 Hay con Dowglas 10 Iuly 1666 Hay con Little-Iohn 14 Decemb. 1666 Hay of Strouie con Feâ—ars 22 Iune 1667 Hay con Drummond and Hepburn 26 Novemb. 1667 Hay con Town of Peebles 20 Ianuary 1669 Hay con Town of Peebles 19 Feb. 1669 Doctor Hay con Iameson 8 Iune 1670 Hay con Magistrats of Elgin 18 Iune 1670 Henrison con L. Ludwharne 22 Decemb. 1666 Henryson con L. Ludwharne 4 Ianuary 1667 Henryson con Henryson 31 Ianuary 1667 Henryson con Henryson 14 Novemb. 1667 Henryson con Birnâ—e 27 Feb. 1663 Henryson con Anderson 18 Novemb. 1669 Hepburn con Hamiltoun 12 Decemb. 1661 Hepburn con Hepburn 22 Ianuary 1662 Hepburn con Hepburn 25 Feb. 1663 Hepburn con Nisoet 16 Feb. 1665 Heretors of Don con Town of Aberdeen 26 Ianuary 1665 Heretors of the Milne of Keithick con Fewars 29 June 1665 Heretors of Don con Town of Aberdeen 29 Iuly 1665 Heretors of Johns-milne con Fewars 9 Feb. 1666 Heriots con Fleming Messenger and his Cautioners 19 Ianuary 1666 Heriot con â— Town of Edinburgh 25 June 1668 Hill con Maxwel 5 Feb. 1663 Hill con Maxwells 5 Decemb. 1665 Hogg con Hogg 2 Ianuary 1667 Hogg and others con Countess of Hume 3 July 1667 Hogg con Countess of Hume 10 Decemb. 1667 Hogg con Countess of Hume 10 Decemb. 1667 Humes con Bonnar 14 Decemb. 1661 Hume con Pringle 3 January 1662 Hume con 10 June 1665 Hume con the Tennents of Kello and Home 13 June 1666 1666 E. of Hume con Wodsetters 5 Iuly 1666 Dame Margaret Hume con Crawsoord of Kerse 10 July 1666 Hume con Creditors of Kâ—llo and Hume 12 Decemb. 1666 Hume con Tennents of Kello and Hume 24 Ianuary 1667 Countess of Hume con Tennents of Alcambus and Hogg 5 Feb. 1667 Hume con Creditors of Kello 28 Iune 1667 Hume and others con Hume 6 July 1667 Hume con Tennents of Kello 23 July 1667 Hume con Seaton of Meinzles 13 Ianuary 1669 Hume con E. Hume 14 Iuly 1670 Hume con Scoâ— 7 Feb. 1671 Hume con Lo. Justâ—ce Clerk 28 June 1671 Hume con Lo. Justice Clerk 4 July 1671 â— Hume con L. Ryslaw 18 Iuly 1671 Hospital of Glasgow con Campbel 19 July 1664 Howison con Cockburn 17 Novemb. 166â— Hâ—nter con Wilsons 13 Decemb. 1667 Hâ—nter con Creditors of Iohn Peter 11 June 1670 Marquess of Hunâ—ly con Gordon of Lesmore 22 〈◊〉 1665 Hutcheson con E. Cassals 3 Decemb. 1664 Hutcheson con Dickson 6 Ianuary 1665 JAck con Fiddes 24 Iuly 1661 Iack con Pollock and Rutherfoord 23 Feb. 1665 Jack con Movat 13 Iune 1666 Iack con Iack 15 Iuly 1669 Jack con Borthwick 2 Feb. 1670 Jaffray con Iaffray 4 Decemb. 1669 Jameson con Mcclied 3 Decemb. 1661 Ierdin of Applegirth con Iohnstoun of Lokerbie 24 Feb. 1670 Inglis con Hogg 22 Decemb. 1664 Inglis con L. Balâ—our 25 Iune 1668 Innes con Wilson 4 July 1665 Innes con Innes 5 January 16â—0 Johnstoun con Applegirth 7 Feb. 1662 Johnstoun of Sheenes con Broun 14 Iuly 1665 Iohnstoun con Mcgreegers 19 Iuly 1665 Iohnstoun con Tennents of Achincorse 22 Iuly 1665 Iohnstoun con Iohnstoun 21 Feb. 1667 Johnstoun con Cunningham 19 June 1667 Johnstoun con Sir Charles Erskine 6 Feb. 1668 Johnstoun con Paroâ—hioners of Hodonie 18 Iuly 1668 Iohnstoun of Sheenes con Arâ—old 22 Iuly 1668 Johnstoun con Sir Charles Erskine Lord Lyon 19 January 1669 Irwing con Mccartney 30 January 1662 Irwing con Strachan 24 Iune 1665 Iurgan con Capt. Logan 23 Iuly 1667 Iustice con Stirling 23 Ianuary 1668 Lo. Justice Clerk and Sir Alexander his Son con E. Hume 15 Iune 1670 Lo. Iustice Clerk con Fairholme 23 Feb. 1671 K Sir Iohn Kâ—â—th con Sir George Johnstoun 28 July 1671 Kello con Pâ—xtoun 3 July 1662 Kello con Pringle 31 January 1665 Kello con Kennier 5 January 1671 Kennedy con Hutcheson 8 July 1664 Kennedy con Weir 23 Feb. 166â— Kennedy con Agnew of Lochnaw 27 Iuly 166â— Kennedy and Muâ—e con Jaffray 24 June 1669 Kennedy con Kennedy of Cullen 8 Iuly 1670 Kennedy con Cunninghame and Wallace 12 July 1670 Ker con Parochâ—oners of Carriden 26 July 1661 Ker con Ker of Fairniâ—lie and others 9 July 1662 Ker con Hunter and Tennents of Cambo 8 Fâ—b 1666 Ker con Children of Wolmet 25 Feb. 1667 Ker con Ker 18 July 1667 Ker con Ker 5 Feb. 1668 Ker of Cavers and Scot of Golden-berrit Supplicants 6 January 1670 Ker con Downie 7 January 1670 Ker con Nicolson 28 January 1671 Kidd con Dickson 29 June 1666 L. Kilbirnie con Heiâ—s of Tailzle of Kilbirnie and Schaw of Greenock 20 January 1669 Lady Kilbocho con the L. of Kilbocho 20 Decemb. 166â— Kilchattans Credâ—tors con Lady 16 January 1663 Kincaid con L. Fenzies 26 Feb. 1662 E. Kincairn con L Rossyth 24 Feb. 1669 E. Kincairn con L. Pittarâ— 3 Feb. 1670 King's Advocat con E Mortoun 25 Feb. 1669 E. Kinghorn con L. Udney 3 Iuly 1666 E. Kinghorn con L. Udney 15 January 1668 Viscount of Kingstoun con Collonel Fullertoun 22 Feb. 166â— Kinross con L. Hunthil 10 Decemb. 1661 Kinross con L. Hunthil 25 July 1662 Kintore con Boyd 27 Ianuary 1665 Kintore con the Heir of Logan of Coaâ—field 9 July 1669 Kirkaldy con Balkanquell 9 July 1663 Kirktouns con L. Hunthill 12 Feb. 1662 Kirktouns con L. Hunthill 31 January 1665 L. Knaperin con Sir Robert Farquhar 9 Novemb. 1665 Kyle con Seaton 28 Iune 1665 L. Lambertoun con E. Levin 24 Iuly 1661 L. Lambertoun con E. Levin 3 and 11 dayes of Iuly 1662 L. Lambertoun con Hume of Kaimes 9 Iuly 1662 L. Lamingtoun con Chieâ—ly 29 January 1662 Lâ—nglands con Spence of Blair 17 Iune 1670 Langtoun con Scot 17 Decemb. 1670 E. Lauderdaâ—e con the Tennents of Swintoun 7 January 1662 E. Lauderdale con Wolmet 13 Iuly 1664 E. Lauderdale con the Viscount of Oxenfoord 11 Feb. 1665 E Lauderdale con Viscount of Oxenfoord last Feb. 1666 E. Lauderdale and Wachop con Major Biggar 7 Decemb. 1667 Laurie con Sir Iohn Drummond 18 Feb. 1670 Laurie con Gibson 4 Feb. 1671 Laurie con Sir Iohn Drummond 7 Feb 1671 Leckie con 20 Feb. 1663 Lâ—ith con L. Lismore and others 14 Iuly 1666 Lennox of Woodâ—head con Nairn 24 Iune 1662 Lennox con Linton 5 Feb. 1663 Lermont con Russel 9 Decemb. 1664 Lermont con E. of Lauderdale 12 Iuly 1671 Leslie con Gray 10 Ianuary 1665 Sir Iohn Leslie con Sinclar of Dun 22 Decemb. 1665 Leslie
1668 Strachan con Morison 22 Feb. 1668 Strachan con Gordons 7 July 1671 Straitoun con the Countess of Hume 10 Decemb. 1667 Street con Home and Bruntsfield 9 June 1669 Street con Masson 27 July 1669 Swintoun con 18 July 1662 Lâ—dy Swintoun con the Town of Edinburgh 19 Feb 1663 Swintoun con Notman 10 June 1665 Swintoun con Brown 18 Decemb. 1668 Sword con Sword 16 January 1663 E. Sutherland con Mâ—intosh 22 July 1664 E. Sutherland con Gordon 1 Decemb. 1664 E. Sutherland con the Earls of Erâ—ol and Marischal 3. January 1667 TLa. Tarsapie con L Tarsapiâ— 20 Decemb. 1662 Collector General of the Taxation con Dâ—rector of the Chancellarle c. 22 January 1669 Collector General of the Taxaâ—ion con Mr. and Servants of the Mintâ—house 22 January 1669 Taylor con Kintie 15 June 1666 Telziâ—fer con Maxtoun and Cunninghame 29 June 1661 Telziefer con Maxtoun and Cunningham 4 Iuly 1661 Tailziefer con L. Soâ—nbeg 6 Decemb. 1661 Tailziefer con Geddes 11 Novemb. 1665 Lo. Thesaurer and Advocat con Lo. Colvil 20 â—â—b 1667 Thomson con Mckittrick 3 July 1662 Thomson con Reid 15 June 1664 Thomson con Town of Edinburgh 14 Feb. 1665 Thomson con Henderson 4 Decemb 1665 Thomson con Binning 10 July 1666 Thomson con Mckittrick 21 Iuly 1666 Thomson con Stevenson 19 and 13 Decemb. 1666 Thomson con E. Glencairn 21 July 1668 Tâ—orntoun con Milne 29 June 1665 Tipertie con his Credâ—tors 3 January 1662 Lo. Torphichan con 8 Feb 1662 Tosh con Cruckshank 16 July 1666 La. Towiâ— con Barclay 9 Novemb. 1669 La. Towie con Barclay 26 January 1670 Trench con Watson 18 Feb. 1669 Exeâ—utors of Trottâ—r con Trotter 20 Novemb. 1667 Lairds of Tullialland and Condie con Crawfoord 16 and 17 June 1664 E. Tullibardin con Murray of Ochtertyre 12 Feb. 1667 Tweedies con Tweedies 22 Decâ—mb 1666 URquâ—art con Blair 14 July 1665 Urquhart con 〈◊〉 4 Decemb. 1666 Sir John urquhart Supplicant 7 Decemb. 1669 V Collector of the Vacand Stipends con Parochiâ—ners of Maybol 10 Feb. 1666 Veitch con Lyell 18 Ianuary 1662 Veitch con Paterson 2 Decemb. 1664 Veitch of Daick con Williamson 9 Decemb. 1664 Veitch con Dâ—ncan 7 Decemb. 1665 Vernor con Allan 24 June 1662 WAchop con L. Niddrie 15 Iuly 1662 Wallace con Fork 19 June 1662 Wallâ—â—e con Edgar 22 Ianuary 1663 Wallace con Mckerrel 9 Ianuary 1669 Wardlaw con Gray 20 Novemb. 1662 Wardlaw con Frazer 21 Feb. 1663 Wat con Russel 16 Novemb. 1665 Wat con Halliburton 14 Iune 1667 Wat con Campbel 8 Feb. 1671 VVatson con Elies 27 June 1662 Watson con Fleiming 6 Feb. 1666 Watson con Fewres of Duckennan 21 Iune 1667 Watson con Law 12 Iuly 1667 Watson con Sympson 1 Feb. 1670 L. Wedderburn con VVardlaw 13 Feb. 1666 Wedderlies Children 24 January 1663 Weems con Cunninghame 24 Iuly 1662 Weems con Lo. Torphichan 25 Iuly 1661 Sir Iohn Weems con the Laird of Tolquhon 8 Feb. 1668 Sir Iohn Weems con Wil. Campbel of Ednample 21 Iuly 1668 Sir Iohn Weems con Forbes of Tolquhon 2 Ianuary 1669 Sir Iohn Weems con Farquhar of Tauley 23 January 1669 Whyte con Crocket 4 Decemb. 1661 Whyte con Hume 25 Novemb. 1665 Whyte con Brown 30 Novemb. 16â—5 Whytehead con Straitoun 16 Novemb. 1667 Wilkit con Ker 24 Iune 1662 Will con Town of Kirkaldie 11 Feb. 1671 Wilson con Thomson 26 June 1662 Wilson con Murray 27 Iune 1662 Wilson con Hume of Linthil 2 Decemb. 1664 Wilson and Callender con 12 January 1665 Wilson con Magistrats of Queensâ—errie 2 Ianuaâ—y 1668 Winraham con La. Idingtoun 19 Iuly 1665 Winrham con Elies 15 Decemb. 1668 E Wintoun con the Countess of Wintoun 16 Feb. 1666 E. Wintoun con Gordon of Letter-â—errie 15 July 1668 Wishart con Arthur 4 Feb. 1671 La. Wolmet and Dankeith con Major Biggâ—r 24 January 1668 La. Wolmet and Dankeith con Major Biggaâ— 14 Iune 1671 Wood con Neilson 13 Iuly 1669 Wright con Sheil 16 Iune 1665 YEomaâ— con Oliphant 29 Iuly 1662 Yeoman con Oliphant 22 Ianuary 1663 Yeoman con Oliphant 21 Decemb. 166â— Yeoman con Oliphant 5 Ianuary 166â— Youngâ—r con Johnstoun 30 Iune 1665 Younger con Iohnstoun 28 Novemb. 1665 FINIS ERRATA SEveral Errors has escaped the Press in the Authors absence and the rest being but Literal Faults the Judicious and Candid Reader will easily correct them PAge 53. l. 9. Osburn r. Osburns nam p. 57. l. 12. acratus r. lucratus p. 43. earister r. thereafter p. 64. l. 20. on by there r. Town p. 71. l. 21. instructions of offence r. instrument of offer p. 72. l. 31. Defender r. Pursuer l. 34 grant r. granter p. 81. l. 6. if r. yet p. 91. l. ult Suspender r. Charger p. 92. or by r. to p. 98 l. 23. to r. by p. 100. l. 14. and r. he p. 101. l. 15. the second Annualrent dele p. 105. l. 11. initiable r. â—mitable p. 107. l. 21. defender r. pursuer p. 108. l. 21. Laws r. Lands p. 110. l. 36. pursuer r. suspender p. 112. l. â— in r. no p. 114. l. 23. actorialis r. actio râ—alis l. 24 â— valued r. valâ—d p. 116. l. 18. differred r. decerned p. 118. l. 27. and 28. And dispone the Tenement deâ—e l. 40. debitor r. debate p. 120. l. 41. lands r. bonds p. 122. l. 4. deposition r. depositation p. 152. being r. and therefore writs being p. 126. l. 33. â—nstruct r. inâ—ert p. 128. l. 11. therefore r. the pursuer p. 140 l. 1. though r. the p. 141. l. 20. would r. could noâ— l. ult was r. was not p. 142. l. 19. have been vincus r. not have been unicus l. 20. bâ— r. exchanging p. 146. l. 20. observed r. reserved p. 150. l. 23. first r. fifth p. 160. l. 16. the r. by l. pen iâ— he r. who p. 162. l. 17. needful r. wilful p. 166. l 2. bl r. â—ight searz p. 180. l. 22. defuncti maritis r. defunctae matris p. 181. l. 31. no dele p. 188. l. 40. inmoveable dele 191. l. 25. a sufficient r. this p. 194. l. 19. bl r. incumbent l. 28. heretor r. heretable p. 195. l. 19. transaction r. translation l. 21. heir r. her son l. 36. confiâ—mation r. confinio p. 196. l. 37. their r. her p. 200. l. â—4 bl r. knew p. 202. l. 25. past r. past fâ—ra was l. 42. which r. 4th p. 219. l. 17. could r. would not 220. l. 15. Heâ—r r. Heâ—r of line p. 231. l. 9. power r. so near p. 236. l. 18. answered dele p. 251. l. 42. Pursuer r. Children p. 252. l. 7. Children r. Pursuer l. 42. to dele p. 253. l. 39. were r. neither l. 40. seem r. some p. 269. l. 35. likeas in his office r. in his office likeas p. 281. l. 14. minister r. master p. 292. l. 42. reduced r. deduced l. 43. others r. and p. 309. l. 3. with r. which 480. l. 10. emmitted r. ommitted p. 483. l. 29. without consent r. with consent p. 490. l. 10. he did not sell
was found not jure accrescendi to belong to the Surviver but 〈◊〉 Heir Substitute to the Deceassing without Children yet so as not to be lyable as Heir in solidum but quo ad valorem Iuly 3. 1666. Fleming contra Fleming A Clause in a Writ bearing a Narrative as a Testament and leaving such a 〈◊〉 Heir and Donator to such Tenenements and Assigning him to the Evidents with power to him after return to Recal was found effectual though not formal to inforce his Heir to perfect the same Ianuary 31. 1667. Henrison contra Henrison The same was renewed upon full debate November 4. 1667. and the being of the Writs in the granters hands after his Retuâ—n was found a sufficient Evidence of Recalling it but its coming back in the hands of the other party was found not sufficient to Revive it but they were ordained to instruct how they came by it whether as delivered back again by the Granter or found amongst his Papers November 14. 1667. inter cosdem A Clause obliging a party to pay such a sum as being the Annualrent of such a sum without any obligation for paying the principal exprest was found not to imply an obligement to pay the principal as acknowledged due but was found to constitute the Annualrent perpetual and not for the Womans life though it exprest not Heirs and Assignâ—ys February 2. 1667. Power contra Dykes A Clause in a Bond bearing a sum to be lent by a Father for himself and as Administrator for his Son aâ—d payable to the Father and after his decease to the Son but bearing that it was the Sons own Money not expressing how or from whom it came was â—ound to constitute the Son Feear and the Father Naked Liferenter February 14. 1667. Campbel contra Constantine A Clause disponing Lands was found to carry the Miln if the Lands were a Barony or if the Miln was not exprest in the Authours own Right otherways that it could not pass as part and perâ—inent February 15. 1667. Countess of Hume contra Tenents of Oldcambus and Mr. Rodger Hog A Clause in a Contract of Marriage whereby the Husband is obliged to take the conquest to the future Spouse in Conjunctâ—ee and the Heirs betwixt them Which failing the Heirs of the Mans Body which failing the Wifes Heirs whatsoever was found not to constitute the Wife Feear upon the â—ailing of Heirs of the Mans Body but the Husband February 20. 1667. Cranstoun contra Wilkison A Clause in the dispositive part of a Charter Cum privilegio piscaudi in aqua c. was found not to be a sufficient Right of Salmond-fishing unless Salmond-fishing had been thereby possesâ— forty years without interruption and so it is only a Title for Prescription February 27. 1667. Earl of Southesk contra Laird of Earlshall A Clause in a Bond bearing sums to be payed to a Man and his Wife and their Heirs beaâ—ing Annualrent though no Infeftment followed was found to give the Wifes Heirs no share seing the Money appeared not to have been hers and was presumed to be the Mans and he surviving did Revock the Substitution as a Donation betwixt Man and Wife Iune 19. 1667. Iohnstoun contra Cuninghame A Clause in an Assignation by a Father to his Daughter bearing a power to alter during his Life was found not to take effect by an Assignation to a third party who instantly granted a Back-bond bearing his Name was but in trust to do diligence and obliging himself to denude in favours of the Father his Heiâ—s and Assigneys but was not found to operate for the Fathers Heir but for the Daughter his Assigney Iuly 17. 1667. Scot contra Scot. A Clause in a Tack setting 14. Aâ—kers of Lands presently possest by the Tacks-man was found not to limite him to 14 Aikers of any present Measure seing he had possessed still since the Tack these 30. years albeit it was alleadged that besides 14. Aikers there were six Aikers severally â—enned and possest by different persons before that Tack Iuly 19. 1667. Daeâ— contra Kyle A Clause in a Bond bearing a sum borrowed from Husband and Wiâ—â— and payable to the longest liver of them two in Conjunctfee and to the Heirs betwixt them or their Assigneys which failing to the Heirs or Assigneys of the last liver was found to constitute the Husband Feâ—ar and the Wife Liferenter albeit she was last liver and the Heirs by the last Clause were but Heirs of provision to the Husband in case the Heirs of the Marriage failed Ianuary 26. 1668. Iustice contra Barclay his Mother A Clause in a Bond whereby a Woman obliged her self to enter heir of Line to her Father and to resign certain Lands in favours of her self and the heirs of her body which failing to the heirs of her Father and obliged her self to do nothing contrary to that Successionâ— whereupon Inhibition was used before her Marriage was found effectual against her and her Husband whom she Married thereafter and disponed the Lands to him and his heirs as being a voluntar deed without an equivalent cause onerous albeit by the said Bond of â—ailzie the heir of provision behâ—ved to be the heir to the Woman her self without discussing whether deeds done for causes onerous without collusion would be effectual against the said heir of provision Ianuary 28. 1668. Binnâ—â— contra Binnie A Clause in a second Contract of Marriage that the heirs of the Marriage should have right to Tacks acquired during the Marriage was found to extend to a new Tack obtained of Lands then possessed by the Father unless he had a Tack thereof before in Writ which if not expyred the new Tack would not be esteemed conquest if the new Tack were given for the old Iuly 3. 1668. Frazer contra Frazer A Clause in a Testament leaving a Legacy to a second Son in satisfaction of all he could befal by his Fathers deceass was found not to be in satisfaction of a debt due by his Father to that Son as having uplifted a Legacy left to him by his Mothers Father both not being above a competent provision by a Father in his condition to his Son December 15. 1668. Winâ—â—â—am contra Eleis A Clause in a Contract of of Marriage providing all the Husbands Goods and Gear acquired during the Marriage to the Wife for her Liferent use was found to be with the burden of the Husbands debt and only to be meaned of free Gear and not to exclude the Husbands Creditors at any time contracting December 23. 1668. Smith contra Muire A CLAVSE OF CONQVEST in a Wifes Contract of Marriage who was competently otherwayes provided was â—ound to carry the Lands conquest with the burden of a sum which the Husband declared under his hand to be a part of the price though the same would not hold in the burdening of heirs of conquest December 20. 1665. Lady Kilbocho contra Laird of Kilbocho This sum was due to the Seller of the
the Whitsâ—nday at which the Buyer was to Enter February 22. 1670. Murray of Auchtertyre contra Drummond A Disposition of Lands and universal Legacy both contained in one Infeftment in which there is a Sum provided to Children not being particularly annexed either to the Disposition of Legacy the Disposition of Lands being found null as being in a Testament the universal Legacy was found burdened with no part of the Provision seing by the Nullity of the Disposition the Children had Right to their Portion of the Lands which exceeded the Sum they were provided to February 1. 1671. Pringle contra Pringles A Disposition granted by a Person who was insolvent and thereafter notoriously Bankrupt was not reduced as not proceeding upon a necessary cause or as being a preference of one Creditor to another none having done diligence in respect the Disposition was granted for a Bargain of Victual sold and delivered a Month before the Disposition in question whereby the Disponer was alleadged to become Bankrupt but it was not decided whether a notorious Bankrupt could after he was so known prefer one Creditor to another when none of them had done diligence Iuly 20. 1671. Laird of Birkenâ—â—g contra Grahame of Craig A Disposition of Lands was found to imply an Assignation to the Reversion of a former Wodset and that it needed no intimation the Infeftment on the Disposition being Registrate though a posterior Assigney had first redeemed November 18. 1664. Guâ—hrie contra Idem December 5. 1665. Beg contra Beg. DIVISION of Lands and a Muire betwixt Co-heirs was reduced upon a considerable inequality though not near the half value and though the division proceeded upon the Reducers oâ—n Brief of division December 2. 1669. Monteith of Corruber contra Boid A DONATION was not presumed by a Mother to her Child by giving out Money in her Name with power to uplift and re-imploy in so far as she was debitor to the Child but pro reliquo December 20. 1661. Fleming contra her Children Donation of Aliment by a Mother to her Son who had no other means was presumed to Liberate him from Repetition but was not found so against his Step-Father for the years after his Marriage Iune 25. 1664. Melvil contra Ferguson Donatiâ— inter Virum uxorem was found Revockable albeit it was not a pure donation but in lieu of another quo ad excessum seing it was notabilis excessus November 20. 1662. Children of Wolmet contra Lady Wolmet and Dankeith her Husband Doâ—atio inter virum uxorem was sustained to recal the acceptance of an Infeftment in satisfaction of the Wifes Contract February 12. 1663. Relict of Morison contra his Heir Donation betwixt Man and Wife Revockable was found not to extend to a Contract of Marriage though made up during the Marriage there being none before November 22. 1664. Mâ—gil contra Ruthven of Gairn Donatio inter virum uxorem was found not revockable if it were granted upon consideration of what fell in by the Wife after her former Provisions though that would also have belonged to the Husband jure mariti yet might be the ground in gratitude of a Donation Remuneratory November 23. 1664. Halyburtoun contra Porteous Donatio inter virum uxorem being in question where there was no Contract of Marriage but an Infeftment of all that the man then had and after a second Infeftment but stante matrimonio The Lords found that the first was valide there being no Contract before but they reduced the second finding no remuneratory provision of the Wife to answer both November 23. 1664. Inter eosdem Donatio inter virum uxorem was found not to reach an Infeftment of Lands to warrand and make up the principal Lands in the Contract such a Rent albeit there was but a personal Obligement in the Contract and that the Obligement to Infeft in Warrandice was therein satisfied and extinct November 24. 1664. Nisbit contra Murâ—ay A Donation was presumed of Aliment by a Goodfire to his Daughters Child who was long in his House and after the Mothers death continued still without any agreement with the Father Iuly 21. 1665. Ludquharn contra Geight Donatio inter virum uxorem was found relevant to recal a Bond granted by a Hâ—â—band to his Wife bearing that he thought it convenient that they should leave a part and therefore obliged him to pay a Sum yearly for her aliment albeit it bear also that he should never quarrel or recal the same as importing a Renunciation of that priviledge February 6. 1666. Living stoun contra Beg. Donation betwixt Man and Wife was found to extend to a Charter bearing Lands and a Miln where the Contract of Marriage bear not the Miln and that it was not as an Explication of the parties meaning and so was revocked by a posterior disposition of the Husband to another February 5. 1667. Countess of Hume contra the Tenents of Oldâ—aâ—â—us and Hog Donation betwixt Man and Wife was found not to extend to a donation by a Husband to his Wifes Children of a former Marriage of her Goods belonging to him jure mariti and so was not revockable as done to the Wife though to her Bairns at her desire Ianuary 15. 1669 Hamiltoun contra Baynes A Donation by a Husband to his Wife by a Tack of his whole Lands not Liferented by her and bearing for Love and Favour and for enabling her to Aliment her Children and bearing a small duty in case there were Children and the full Rent if there were none was found valide as being remuneratory to make up the defect of the value which by Contract her Liferent Lands were obliged to be so much worth Superceeding to give answer wheither the Tack would be null at the instance of Creditors lending Sums after the Tack as latent and fraudulent if it were not proven remuneratory or wheither a donation betwixt Man and Wife is null and pendent as a Bairns Portion till the Husbands death and if the borrowing thereafter would prejudge the same there being no Lands left un-liferented thereby Ianuary 26. 1669. Chisâ—holm contra Lady Braâ— Donation betwixt Man and Wife revockable was found not to extend to Wife Subscribing her Husbands Testament by which her Liferent Lands were proâ—ided to their Daughter which was not â—ound alike as if it had been in favours of the Man himself who is naturally obliged to provide his Daughter Iuly 12. 1671. Murray contra Murray Donation by a Man to his Wife by a great additional Iointure where she was competently provided before was found not to be taken away by a posterior Testament made in lecto providing a less additional Iointure without mention of the former and being conditional that the said last addition should be at the Testators Fathers disposal if he returned to Scotland and he having returned and having Ratified the fiâ—st additional Ioynture the same was Sustained Iuly 18. 1671. Countess of Cassils contra Earl of