Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	common_a	great_a	time_n	1,430	5	3.2096	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A94297	Of the government of churches; a discourse pointing at the primitive form.	Thorndike, Herbert, 1598-1672.	1641 (1641)	Wing T1055; Thomason E1102_1; ESTC R203782	63,264	216

assigned his proper services Which further appeareth when he urgeth the example of their sacrifices that were offered before the Temple being first visited 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p. 54. But the Presbyters of that Christian Church he exhorteth with these words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Brethren saith he let every one of you give thanks to God that is Celebrate the Eucharist in his language in his own order being in a good conscience not stepping out of the set rule of his Ministery Perhaps his meaning is that they should celebrate by turns Howsoever here is my reason that there was then no Bishop there because then there could not have been so much debate about the order in celebrating the assemblies of Christians which as shall be shewed afterwards were not to be held but upon appointment of the Bishop with advice of the Presbyters being a mark of schisme to assemble otherwise And if this be not enough there is another to second it Whatsoever may be argued from the dissensions at Corinth one saying I am of Paul another I am of Cephas to shew that there was no Bishop there when the Apostle writ this and in his absence still continueth in force at the time of writing Clemens his Epistle The whole subject whereof is to quell such another dissension as this but onely that it was not under such colourable names of Paul and Cephas and Apollos as he complaineth but which is remarkable to prove my intent was as he saith p. 62. a mere faction for the love of one or two persons against the Presbyters no Bishop bearing any part either at one end or other of it Neither is it marvel that this Church should be still without a Bishop for some ten or twentie years perhaps after the death of the Apostle so many companions of the Apostles being then alive Clemens at Rome Titus in Crete Timothy at Ephesus Dionysius at Athens others elsewhere to furnish whatsoever assistance they had received from the Apostle during his time no otherwise then did Timothy and Titus to those Churches wherein they had planted Presbyteries before they had Bishops And this must be the answer if any man ask the question how Bishops came to be propagated through all Churches the answer must be They were made in due time by the heads of neighbouring Churches which we shall discern anon when we come to speak of the course held from the beginning in the choice and constitution of Bishops And by the practice of the Church it should seem the aim was afarre off to propagate Bishops according to the first practice of the Apostles For as they planted Presbyteries to govern Mother-Churches in Mother-Cities so when it became questionable which Churches should have Bishops and which not the matter was regulated according to the greatnesse of Cities or the multitude of Presbyters which the service of the Churches in them required whereof the Bishops were to be heads And therefore in the Councel of Sardica Can. vi it is provided that there should be no Bishop in towns or small cities where one Presbyter might serve but in those places where Bishops were of old time or if a place became so populous that it might deserve to have a Bishop that is either in Cities that had been so populous of old time as to have Bishops or which should afterwards become so populous But the xvii Can on of the Chalcedon Councel providing against innovation in Dioceses taketh order neverthelesse that when a place is promoted by the Emperour to be a Citie the form of the Church shall go along with the form of the Common-wealth that is it shall have a Bishop and his Diocese the territory of that Citie There is here a difference in the particular and yet the same generall ground of both Canons the practice of the Apostles ordaining Presbyteries to govern the Churches which they had planted in Cities the heads whereof were Bishops after their departure And this seemeth to be the reason why the seats of Cathedrall Churches are wont to be Cities And by this means Italy is so full of Bishopricks because it is so full of Cities CHAP. VII Presbyters govern with the Apostles in Scriptures Nothing done in the Church without their advise Why both ranks are called Sacerdotes Presbyteri Antistites and the like HAving hitherto justified the ground whereupon we go and shewed that Bishops came after the Apostles to be heads of Presbyteries in consequence hereunto it must now be averred that the government of Churches passed in common by Bishops and Presbyters as from the beginning the Presbyters governed with the Apostles themselves If in that great action of the Councel at Jerusalem the Elders of that Church bore their part with the Apostles what cause have we to think they did lesse when they were dispersed S. James alone remaining there If they concurred with S. James in his advise to S. Paul about a matter of greatest weight how to deal with those of the Circumcision that believed shall we imagine they did not do the like with his successours If S. Peter call the Presbyters of the Churches to which he writeth his fellow-Elders it is to the purpose to put them in mind of their share in that office which he chargeth himself with If the Apostle of the Gentiles charge the Elders of the Church of Ephesus Acts xx 18. with their part of that care of Christs flock after his departure which he for his time had performed over them shall we think them eased of it because Timothy came to be Bishop there Rather let me conceive this to be the cause why Timothie's instructions are addressed in the singular number to him alone without mention of his Presbyters because they were to receive their charge by themselves about the same time So farre is it from me to think that his Presbyters were not to concurre in assisting that course of government wherein he alone is directed by the Apostle to proceed And if we can go no further in proving this point out of Scripture the reason must be because as appeareth by that which hath been said the Scriptures for the most part speak of that time when Bishops yet were not but the Apostles themselves To which purpose neverthelesse there will be still something to be said out of the Scriptures in the particulars which we shall survey In the mean time let us take notice of a few passages among many more out of Ecclesiasticall writers to argue the generall whereof we speak Ignatius Epist ad Trall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We cannot understand righter what the Presbytery meaneth then out of these words a Colledge or bench of Assessours to the Bishop in sacred matters The Commentaries under S. Ambrose his name upon 1. Tim. v. 1. speak home to this purpose Nam apud omnes utique gentes honorabilis est senectus unde Synagoga postea Ecclesia Seniores