humane Counsells are not to be waited for when the Divine suffrages doe lead the way Aurelius our brother an illustrious young man is already approved by our Lord and called by God c. And then Know ye therefore most beloved brethren that He was ordained by me and my Collegues that were present He saith He was wont to consult with the people that they were alwayes to be consulted with he saith not yea by his example he shewes the contrary for He with his Bishops had promoted Aurelius the peoples advise being not required Hee setteth down the cause the people is advised with to give testimony of life and manners but Aurelius had a sufficient testimoniall from his twofold Confession which Cyprian calls a Divine suffrage By the same right Hee declares to his Clergy and people by epistle that Numidicus was to be ascrib'd to the number of the Carthaginian Presbyters and that he had design'd the like honour for Celerinus That in Africa other Bishops also had right of Electing Presbyters the saying of Bishop Aurelius in an African Councill sheweth The Bishop may be one by whom through the Divine grace many Presbyters may be constituted And that the testimonies of the people were not alwaies desired is manifest in the third Carthaginian Councill the words of the Canon are That none be ordained Clerk unlesse he be approved by the testimony either of the Bishops or of the people Wherefore two wayes lead one to the Clergy Popular testimony or Episcopall examination Whence Jerom to Rusticus When you are come to perfect age and either the people or the Prelate of the City shall elect you into the Clergy And in another place Let Bishops hear this who have power to Constitute Presbyters through every City Yea the Laodicean Synod whose Canons were approved by a Councill Oâ—cumenicall rejecteth popular Eclections Upon which place Balsamon notes that the most antient Custome of popular Elections was abrogated by that Canon for the incommodities thence arising as he also notes upon the xxvi of the Canons Apostolicall that Presbyters were of old chosen by suffrages but that custome was long since expired Now let us proceed to the Election of Bishops a thing of so much more moment than the former by how much more care of the Church was imposed on the Bishops than on the meer Presbyters No man denies them to have been chosen by the people that is by the Laity and the Clergy after the Apostles time but this to have been of right immutable no man can affirm For to passe by the examples of them that have been constituted Successors by the deceasing Bishops it is a thing of most easie proof that Bishops were very often chosen either by the Clergy of their City alone or by the Synod of their Comprovinciall Bb. For the right of the Clergy the place of St. Ferom is remarkable At Alexandria from Mark the Evangelest unto Heracles and Dionysius the Bishops the Presbyters alwayes named one to be Bishop chosen out of themselves and placed in a higher degree Naxianzen speaks ambiguously He would Elections were permitted either to the Clergy alone or chiefly to them for so lesse evill would befall the Churches yet withall he shewes this was not observ'd in his time but the suffrages of the richest and most potent men yea the Votes of the people too had the stroke in Elections But the Election made by the Comprovinciall Bishops is approved by the great Nicene Synod without any mention of the people Whereunto agrees the Antiochian adding this If any contradicted such Election the suffrages of the greater part of Bishops should carry it Yet I deny not in many places even in the time of these Synods the people also had their Votes but the custome was not universall It was free untill the Synod of Laodicea was confirmed by an Universall Councill the xii Canon whereof following the Nicene and Antiochian gives the right of Electing to the Comprovinciall Bishops the xiii expresly takes away all Sacerdotall Elections from the multitude Justininian also hath excluded the common people from the Election of Bishops and committed it namely to the Clergy and the prime men of the City By the prime men he means the Magistrates and Officers Among many named the designation of one he committed to the Metrapolitan yet so that if there were a scarcity of able men the Election of one by the Clergy and principall men might stand Notwithstanding this Constitution of Justinian which did not long outlive him soon after there was a return to Synodicall Elections which Balsamon relates were usuall in the East in his time also with this exception that the Metrapolitans were chosen by the Patriarchs the Patriarchs by the Emperours Wherefore we conclude it is neither proved out of the Scripture nor was it believ'd by the antient Church that the Election either of Presbyters or of Bishops did immutably belong unto the people Of this judgementa also they must needs be whosoever have transferred the Election to the Presbytery for were it of Divine and immutable right that the Multitude should Elect the election could not be transferred to the Presbytery more than to any others Neither were the Compromise of any value which we read was often made concerning Election if it be determined by Divine Precept that the common people must choose the Pastor for that sentence What a man doth by another bee seems to doe by himself pertains only to those actions whereof the next efficlent cause is undetermined by Law Certainly the very same thing that wee say was judg'd against Morellius at Geneva that is in that City wherein great honour great right belongs unto the people which Decree the most learned Beza defending That the whole multitude saith he was call'd together and gave their Vote was neither essentiall nor perpetuall In the same place he thinks it sufficient if the common people be allowed to bring in reasons why they are displeas'd at the Election which reasons afterward are lawfully to be examin'd Beza himself commits the Election to the Pastors and Magistrates of the City which is congruent enough to Justinian's Law but is not of right Divine and immutable for how can that be prov'd if Ordination and Confirmation be rightly distinguisht from Election And the antient Church was of another mind permitting to the Bishop the Election of Presbyters and of the Bishop to the Comprovinciall Bishops Wherefore the manner of Election is of the number of those things that are not specially determined by Law Divine but only under generall Rules which command all things to be done in the church for edification in the best order and without confusion But in all things of this nature those generall rules remaining safe wee have demonstrated afore Legislation belongs to the Highest Power Bullinger a man of a very sharp judgement is of the same mind who having alleged many examples of popular
give their votes after the Divine election unlesse Gods pleasure ought not to stand without their good liking but He was numbred with the eleven Apostles as the Syriac and all the antients have interpreted So there is another word in the Acts wherein some are more subtile than is necessary The Apostles are said to have commended the faithfull Lycaonians to God with prayer and fasting after they had ordained them Presbyters in every Church This ordaining is expressed by a Greek word in whose Etymology some have found the suffrages of the people And 't is true that both at Athens and in the Cities of Asia there was a Custome of giving suffrages with the hand stretched forth And if we were delighted with that subtilty 't were easy to interpret the word of the Apostolicall Imposition of hands or Ordination for he that imposeth hands must needs stretch them forth and the next writers after the Apostles use the word in this sense But indeed neither the Evangelists nor other Greek Authors are so curious in their words yea there is scarce any word which hath not enlarged its signification beyond the originall meaning Againe if Luke in this place would have signified a popular election he would not have ascribed the word ordained to Paul and Barnabas as hoe doth but to the multitude Therefore Paul and Barnabas doe the same thing here which in another place Paul would have Titus doe that is or daine Presbyters in every City That which Titus is commanded to doe by the precept of the Apostle the same doth the Apostle here being so authoriz'd by the Spirit of God that he needed not the assistance of the people Lastly the fasting and prayers did not precede the Ordination but intervened between it and the Valediction that it is strange this should be drawn into an argument of popular election when as if the prayer and fasting of the people had preceded this were nothing to the purpose For the people may also fast and pray to God that the election of a King to be made by the Electors may be prosperous and happy yet are not the people therefore the Electors I have seen them who would assert Election to the people by Divine and immutable right upon this ground that the people hath from God a precept to avoid false Pastors But these men doe not observe that this argument if it have any force proves Election to be the right not of the multitude only but entirely of every single person For all and every one must avoid false Pastors with all care And so must every sick man take heed of a rash Physician but no man will therefore say that the City Physician is to be chosen by the Plebeians This may rightly be collected thence before election can come unto effect the people and every one among the people must have power to allege causes if they have any wherefore he that is proposed ought not to be elected For Paul having spoken of Bishops and passing unto Deacons saith And let these also first be proved where requiring that to be observ'd in Deacons which was to be observ'd in Bishops there is no doubt but he would have Bishops to be proved especially seeing he said afore that they must be blamelesse Among the Athenians there was a probation of their Princes the forme whereof was this What Parents and fore-Fathers they were extracted from of what tribe they were of what estate what service they had done the Common-wealth So if a Pastor were to be elected it was justly granted every one to enquire what his behaviour was how married what his children were and the rest which Paul would have observed in a Pastor This is that in the Councill of Chalcedon Let the name of the ordained be publisht for so Lampridius hath exprest it in the life of Alexander Severus When he appointed Governours of Provinces he publisht their names exhorting the people if they had any thing against them they should bring in their evidence for he said it was a great gravamen not to doe that in choosing Rectors for Provinces which the Christians and Jews did in publishing the names of such as are to be ordain'd This is indeed a Luculent Testimony of the old fashion of Christians not much distant from the Apostolicall time For between the decease of John the Apostle and the Reign of Severus are about a hundred years and ten But this place is so far from evincing the Christian Priests to have bin chosen by the people that hence you may rather conclude the contrary For 't is one thing to be admitted to prove crimes or impediments another thing to elect Severus did propose unto the people the Governours names but that they were elected by the Emperour himself no man that hath read History will doubt Yea 't was needlesse to propose the Priests unto the people if the people did elect them It is most certaine in the antient Church after the Apostles age although by right the people might choose their Pastors that was not every where observ'd but the people abstained very often from election by reason of the incommodities of popular Voting retaining in the mean time the right of probation And this is the sense if it be rightly weighed of Cyprian's Epistle to those of Spain wherein some lay the chiefe foundation for Election by the people for he doth not precisely say The people have power of choosing worthy Priests but either of choosing worthy or refusing the unworthy Either is sufficient for Cyprian's purpose that an unworthy person may not creep into the place of a Priest And in the following words hee doth not say a Priest is to be chosen by the people but the people being present Why so that a fit and worthy person may be approv'd by the publike testimony and judgement And a little after that the people being present either the crimes of evill men may be detected or the merits of good men commended How so Because the people most perfealy knowes the life of every one and hath best experience of his conversation Neverthelesse the same Cyprian in the same place declares that to choose a Bishop in the presence of the people was not a thing of universall Custome It is held saith he among us and in all the Provinces almost How weak the arguments are which he allegeth out of Scripture to prove the peoples presence necessary hath been shew'd by others And the cause he brings hath hardly place but where the Pastor of a City is to be chosen out of the people or Clergy of the same But that Elections were not alwayes made by the people appears even out of Cyprian himself in another Epistle which is likewise thought to favour popular suffrages In Ordinations of the Clergy most dear brethren we are wont to consult with you afore and by common advise to weigh the manners and merits of every one but
a Presbyter is ordain'd the Bishop blessing him and holding his hand upon his head let all the Presbyters also that are present hold their hands upon his head by the Bishops hand For the confirmation hereof I dare not bring that of Paul concerning the laying on of hands of the Presbytery because I perceive Jerom Ambrose and other antient and the Prince of all recent writers Calvin interpret Presbytery in that place not the consistory but the Office to which Timothy was promoted And truly whosoever is versed in the Councils and the writings of the Fathers cannot be ignorant Presbytery as Episcopacy and Diaconacy to bee names of Offices And seeing it is certaine that Paul laid hands on Timothy it seemeth neither necessary nor convenient to joyn fellows with him for an Apostolicall act and Collation of miraculous gifts In the meane time I doe not see how this can be refelled even among the Schoolmen Antisiodorensis long since granted it where Bishops are not Ordination may be rightly made by Presbyters For the things that are observed for order sake admit exceptions So in the antient Councill of Carthage it is permitted Presbyters in case of necessity to reconcile penitents and in another place to lay hands on the Baptized Moreover as we have said above it is doubtfull whether Presbyters that neither have Presbyters under them nor a Bishop over them are neerer to Bishops or more Presbyters For of Timothy also Ambrose argues thus He that had not an other above him was a Bishop And we know to take an instance in the Common-wealth many things are lawfull for a Senate having not a King which to a Senate under a Kings Power are unlawfull For a Senate without a King is as it were a King This is our third Assertion The causes were not light why in this age in some places at least for some time Episcopacy was omitted That the causes are temporary Beza himself seems to acknowledge when he saith He is not the man to think the old order were not be restor'd if the ruines of the Church were once repair'd Of these causes the first might be the penury of men sufficient for so grave an Office for if that were a cause just enough while the Church was yong to omit in many places the Episcopall eminence as we heard Epiphanius say why then at the Churches Rise out of the thickest darknesse might not the same cause take place especially in those places where was found not one of the old Bishops that would yield up himself to truth and open his eyes to see the light held forth Another cause of this omission might be the long and inveterate depravation of the Episcopall Office Socrates of old complains some Episcopacies of his time had exceeded the bounds of Sacerdotall purity and were corrupted into Domination Hierax complains in Pelusiot the Dignity of lenity and meeknesse was advanced into Tyranny Nazianzene complains of the ambition of Bishops and for that reason wisheth if not Episcopacy yet at least that perpetuall right of Cities in retaining Episcopall dignity were changed Would to God there were neither Presidency nor preeminence of place nor tyrannicall power that we might all receive our estimate by vertue alone The Fathers of the Ephesin Synod long since professe themselves afraid lest that under the colours of the Sacred Function should commence the pride of secular power And it is easy to find the like sayings in the African Councils But verily never did Ecclesiastical ambition from the Apostles age unto those times advance to such a hight as it hath done since those times to the memory of our Fathers So that now without cutting off the part wherein the cause lyeth the disease seems almost impossible to be cur'd It is true good things are not to be condemn'd because some men abuse them yet the abuse being turn'd into a custome an intermission of the things themselves is not infrequent The Mosaicall Serpent might have remained without Superstition if the thing it self were considered but Ezechiah respecting the grown vice of the people that he might take away the Superstition took away the Serpent I am loth to say that the name and eminence Episcopall by their fault to whom it had fallen had lost all its reverence and was come into the odium of the common people to whom even when they are in errour somewhat sometimes is to be yielded The Romans being evill intreated by the Tarquins took an oath they would no more endure a King at Rome A third cause may be added that in those most infestious times the Preachers of the truth being hated for the truths sake were obliged to acquit themselves not only from the crime of ambition but from all suspition too which when by taking away the Episcopall dignity they sollicitously endeavour'd for all this they escaped not the calumny of their adversaries What reproaches should they not have heard had the change of Doctrine been joyned with the acquisition of preferment I will adde one cause more why in the beginning of the Repurgation Episcopacy was not very necessary God had raised up excellent men of great wit of great learning of great esteeme both among their own and the neighbouring people few indeed in number but such as were able to beare the weight of many businesses Their high reputation amongst all easily supplyed the defect of Episcopacy But if we will with Zanchy-confesse the plaine truth none were indeed more truely Bishops than they whose Authority although this was not their design prevailed even to the overthrow of Bishops Nor is that here to be omitted which we have said already more than once The Ecclesiasticall Government for the most part receives some impression from the Civill In the Roman Empire the Bishops were correspondent to the Dukes the Metropolitans to the Presidents the Patriarchs or Primats to the Vicars or Deputies of the Emperour What marvell is it then if people more accustomed to an Optimacy than Monarchy would have the Church affairs committed rather to the Clergy than the Bishop And these are the causes wherefore I think the Churches may be excus'd which have no Bishops whilst yet they abstaine from a disapprobation of the most Sacred order and withall retaine what Beza judged in no wise to be omitted That was Essentiall saith he which by the perpetuall ordainance of God hath been is and shall be necessary that in the Presbytery some one both in place and dignity the first oversee and governe the action by that right which God hath given him Let us come unto those Assessors whom in many places we see joyned to the Pastors out of the people by an annuall or bienniall Office They call them Presbyters when yet they neither Preach the Gospell to the people nor exhibite the Sacraments Concerning them this is our judgement First we say Those temporary Presbyters are strangers to the Apostolicall and antient Church nor have I seen any that
God the matter and oceasions are by Humane Power withdrawn So Ezechias brake the brasen Serpent so the Emperours shut up the Heathen Temples Fiftly 't is the part of the Highest Power by proposing punishments to draw men to the doing of that which God Commands and deterre them from the contrary as Nebuchadnezar made it death to speak evill of the Hebrews God and the Emperours to offer sacrifice to the God of the Gentiles And in these particulars consisteth as I take it that Office of the Highest Powers which is called by Justinian the preservative of the Divine Lawes meaning such a custody which is also Legislative as Austin speaketh Let the Kings of the earth serve Christ by making Lawes also on behalf of Christ And the same particulars have place in things not Sacred which are likewise defined one way by that Divine Law which the Apostle cals the righteousnesse of God For therefore the Civill Law is said to consist partly of Civill institutions partly of Naturall precepts Concerning which Naturall precepts the Civill Law gives right and liberty to doe them hindrances being remov'd yea commands the same things to be done determines circumstances takes away or streightens the occasions of often transgression Lastly addes a sanction to them by the constitution of punishments which is so manifest that we need spend no more time in this Let us come to those things which by the Divine Law whether written in the hearts of men or in the Holy Bible are not at all determined To determine them either way whether they be Sacred or Profane is the right of the Highest Power Of prophane 't is most known so David of dividing the spoile the Roman Emperouis made constitutions of the solemnities and effects of Contracts and Testaments innumerable other matters Of Sacred things 't is no lesse clear if one I say not diligently read but only look into the Sacred History the Codes of Theodosins and Justinian the Novels the Capitular of Charls the Great Every where examples are so obvious It pertaines hither to institute Offices more for convenience and ornament than for necessity as David did to build or beautify temples as Salomon and Joas or to appoint a Law and manner of building them as Justinian to prescribe the manner of Electing Pastors holding Synods keeping order among Pastors alienation of things dedicate to holy uses all which very many Christian Emperours have done Now if the Highest Power shall exceede the due limits by decreeing and ordeining any thing either in Ecclesiasticall things against the Rules of Faith and Religion prescrib'd by God or in other matters against the perpetuall rule of equity as in both kinds it sometime happons Ecclesiasticall and Civill things doe againe agree in this that as a man cannot be oblig'd to obey men rather than God so if upon refusall force be offer'd there remains the glory of patience no right to oppose force to force So Christ hath caught Peter and Peter us So saith Ambrose Grieve I can weep I can mourn I can any other way to make resistance I cannot I ought not A most holy example of that patience prescrib'd unto us by God is left us by those antient Christians that liv'd under the heavy yoake of the unbelieving Emperours They were men to be feared for their number had they chosen rather to shed others bloud than their own for Tertullian shews how they had filled both the Camp and City That victorious Thebane Legion for Religion sake was contented to lose every tenth man at the Emperours Command and it is memorable that when there was one Christian put to death for tearing the Imperiall edict Commanding Bibles to be burnt Churches to be demolisht and the Christians Crucified the rest of the Christians declared He had justly deserved that punishment So deeply had the voyce of Christ sunk into their minds that forbids to take the sword Every one takes the sword who hath not receiv'd it from God God hath given it to none but the Supreme Powers and to such as they appoint No examples of the old Testament evince the contrary for when we read of the defections of people or Cities from some Kings and the impiety of the Kings set down for the cause therein the divine judgement is described not the deeds of men commended But if the Highest Power that hath undertaken the protection of true Religion be it self therefore opposed by the armes either of forraign or domestick enemies it hath all the right and reason in the world by Arms to defend its own Authority and the lives and fortunes of the Subjects For 't is all one upon the matter whether the opposition be for Religion or any other pretence nor is the Power being Independent more bound to let go the use of Religion than the possession of land at the pleasure of any other whatsoever For He beareth not the Sword in vain It hath been shewed I think sufficiently how the Highest Power hath equall Authority over actions Sacred and Prophane over the externall primarily and in regard of them over the internall also in the second place I say Authority to command and forbid what is commanded already and forbidden by God to determine things left in the midst and permitted to mans liberty and when force is offered under pretence of right to defend it self I say equall Authority over Sacred and Secular actions which Binius also a man of the Roman religion acknowledgeth In generall there is no difference but if we come to particulars 't is confest Authority extendeth not to so many Sacred things because the divine Law hath determined more of them than of the Secular for the secular affaires the Institutes of the Hebrew Common-wealth it is plain oblige not us are almost all circumscrib'd by rules of Nature saving that it may be doubted of some connubiall Lawes whether they be Naturall or out of the Divine pleasure But concerning Sacred matters much is prescribed us in the Gospell and proceeds immediatly from the will of God This being noted I see not any thing more remaining in this question for that a more diligent enquiry and greater care is need-full in things Sacred both because the Law of Nature is more known than the Positive and because errour in Religion is more dangerous this pertains to the question of the Manner to use the Power rightly and changed nothing in the Power it selfe CHAP. IV. The Objections against the Authority of the Highest Fowers about Sacred things are answerd THE right under standing of what is al ready spoken will help any one to answer all that is said against the Authority of the Highest Powers in things Sacted or Ecolefâ—asticall For first that Christ himself not the Highest Powers ordained the Pastorall office that as to the substance of the office Christ also hath set down the rules and that so far as we have before acknowledged Pastors are
that Maintenance is assigned them out of the publick either lands or moneys that Vacation from civill offices and in some causes exemption from the Court of Inferiour Judges is indulged to them All which shewes that their publick Confirmation is by the favour of the H. Power as the Institution of their Office is from God their Ordination by the Pastors Only there remaines to be disputed their Election that is the Application of the Person to the Place or of the Place to the Person That we may handle this question exactly we must have recourse to that distinction set down afore Some things are of immutable right other things are just and right untill it be constituted otherwise In this later way not in the former the Election of a Pastor in any place whatsoever belongs to the Church or Congregation of the faithfull in that place That the Election is rightly made by the Church is proved by the very Law of Nature for naturally every Society is permitted to procure those things which are to their own conservation necessary in which number is the Application of Functions So have the Company in a ship a right to choose the Master Fellow-Travellers their Leader a free people their King Whence it follows if the Divine Law hath not prescribed a certain way of electing and as yet no Humane Law thereof is extant then the Election of their Pastor pertains unto the Church But he that will affirm this Right to be immutable must evince the immutability either by the Law of Nature or by the postive Law of God By the Law of Nature he cannot for no reason persuades it and like examples shew the contrary So many Nations who are under the Command of the best men or of hereditary Kings may not now Elect their King because that which Nature did permit might be chang'd by Humane Law and hath indeed been chang'd He must then have recourse to Positive Law which he will never be able to produce Examples in stead of Law hee must not allege for many things are rightly done which yet are not necessary to be done Nay more not only many things grounded upon examples of the Apostles time but also some things Instituted by the Apostles use hath altered to wit such things which were not strengthned by the force of a Law The Apostles Instituted that the Churches should have Deaconesses which Pliny also shewes to have been among the Christians in his age What Church is there now wherein this Office is retain'd And Beza saith he sees no cause why it should be restor'd The same Beza acknowledgeth the Function of the Deacons to have been perpetuall by Apostolicall Institution who neverthelesse approves the different usage of Geneva The Apostles Instituted that Baptism should be celebrated by immersion which by aspersion is now perform'd Many other things of like sort need not be prov'd abrogated seeing they are prov'd to have been used they are not prov'd to have been commanded But farther it appears not out of the whole History of the New Testament that Pastors were Elected by the people that the manner of Election remained indefinite is more easily collected thence I speak of Pastors for of the receivers of the Churches mony there is not the same reason The Apostles were very sollicitous lest by taking of the publick mony they should incur suspicion or give offence Paul might assume Luke unto himself by his Apostolicall Power and commit to him the custody and disposition of Collections for the poor but he chose rather to permit a free election to the Churches for this reason as himself speaks that no man should blame him in the administration of so copious munificence For the like cause was the election of Deacons remitted by the Apostles to the multitude that no man should complaine of any partiality between the Hebrews and the Hellenists But this was not perpetuall the reason thereof being temporary for in the next times after the Apostles the Deacons were not chosen by the people but by the Bishops the people being sometimes consulted with and sometimes not To proceed with the Pastors the Princes of them the Apostles were elected by God the Father and by Christ I have chosen you twelve I know whom I have chosen saith Christ After that He through the Holy Ghost had given Commandements unto the Apostles whom he had chosen saith Luke Paul an Apostle not of men nor by men but by Jesus Christ and God the Father So them that were in the next degree to Apostles the LXX Evangelists Christ himself appointed This Divine Election to Preach the Doctrine then first brought down from Heaven is signified by the word of sending for after the Election of those LXX it is said pray the Lord to send Labourers into his Harvest and that is pertinent How shall they Preach unlesse they bee sent When Christ was ascended into Heaven the promised Comforter supplyed his place Therefore both to the ambulatory and to the standing Offices the fittest men were chosen by the judgement and testimony of the Spirit but by the Ministry of the Apostles or of them whom the Apostles had made Governours of the Churches So Timothy was admitted to his charge according to the prophecies which went before on him that is saith Theodoret by Divine revelation not by Humane suffrage saith Chrysostomo And Oecumenius generally of that age By appointment of the Spirit were Bishops made not in a common way Hence Paul in his oration to the Presbyters of Ephesus tels them They were made Overseers over the Lords flock by the Holy Ghost Sometimes also Lots were cast that the people might by the event be certified of the Divine judgement The most antient Authour Clemens of Alexandria hath left this written of John the Apostle By Lot He chose the Clergy of those that were signified by the Spirit Nor is it a new thing to use Lofs in the choice of Priests but used also by the Gentiles by the antient institution doubtlesse of the sons of Noah This illustrates the History of Matthias whom I wonder by what argument some have persuaded themselves to have been elected by the people for in Luke there is no foot-step of such election What is said They appointed two Barsabas and Matthias ought not to be referr'd unto the multitude as Chrysostome would have it but as it is the common opinion of the Fathers to those eleven whose names are afore exprest and who by the mouth of Peter had spoken to the multitude These are they who in the words immediatly following are said to have powred out their prayers unto God and to have given forth their Lots that it might appeare not whom the multitude but whom God had chosen for so themselves speak wherefore that which follows is not to be rendred He was chosen by the suffrages of all for who can believe that the people were call'd to
is from the Highest Power that the Canon hath the force of a Law no marvell if the Highest Power upon just causes may recede from that Law either in the whole or in some particular case For Lawes are wont either to be abrogated or temper'd and limited by the Law-givers as afore is shewed Yea there is no need of abrogation or solution of the Law when as the Lawyers agree in this that by the generall words in the Law set down the right of the Highest Power is never conceiv'd to be excluded 'T is true the Examples of Elections made by Bishops prove it is not necessary that Elections be made by the Highest Power the Canons also shew the same Elections are rightly made by Bishops with consent of the Highest Power but neither of these is in question The Question is whether it be also lawfull for the Highest Power to make Election That it is lawfull we have the judgement of the best both among the Emperours and the Bishops In the first Synod of Constantinople Theodosius commanded the names of all that were proposed should be given to him in papers reserving to himself the choyce of one What can be more clear One among all the Bishops propos'd Nectarius the Emperour makes choise of him and persisteth in it against the will of many Bishops who seeing the Emperour would not be remov'd give place and yeild him that reverence which was due unto him in a matter not prohibited by Law Divine Who sees not this was done beside the Canons for according to the Canons the Emperour had no share in the Election but here the Emperour alone electeth that is designs the person The Bishops as also the Clergy and people approve of the Election But 't is one thing to elect another to approve of the Election The Bishops approve because it was their Office after Baptisme to impose hands upon Neitarius as yet a lay man and Catechumen And hert too we observe the Canon was not followed for according to the Canons a Catechumen nor Neophite could not be elected The Clergy also and the people doe approve because to them belong'd the Tryal which how far it differs from Election is shew'd above Many examples we might alleage of Elections not Cunonicall but Imperiall Why the Emperours themselves elected we deny not they had peculiar causes but this pertains not to the question of right but prudence Certainly the Emperours believ'd it to be lawfull for them before they consider'd whether or no it were expedient For of things unlawfull there ought to be no consultation To say the cause hereof was some Divine revelation or inspiration in such an age of the Church is a meer refuge of pertinacious ignorance to say the Domination of the Roman Bishops was the cause of Imperiall elections when as yet that Episcopacy was not turn'd into temporall Dominion is to be quite mistaken in the order of times Nor yet can wee doubt but the more Sanctimony abated in the Clergy and Obedience was slackned in the people the more just cause had the Highest Powers to vindicate Election to themselves In the West that Bishops were most often and for a long time elected by the most Christian Kings of France without any suftrage of the people or Clergy is written in all the French Histories as it were with Sun-beams What was said of the Domination of the Roman Bishops as if he had given occasion to Kings to draw to themselves the Elections besides that it is before answered cannot be applyed to the Bishops of France and to those times when the French Kings did not yet possesse Italy Yea on the contrary because the French Kings used this right in their own kingdome therefore also in Italy did Charls the great assume this to himself that hee might not with lesse power governe Italy than France and Germany For it is most truly observed by Godalstus and others the Decree made in Pope Adrians time pertains only to the Italian Bishops when in other parts the compleat right of Election was in Charls before In vaine also a recourse is had to the wealth of Bishop-pricks the Temporall Jurisdictions annexed to them for even in the times of Charls the Great and much more in the antient and purer times Bishopricks were but poor and slender as is noted by that most searching Antiquary Onuphrius And for Jurisdictions the Bishops in Charls his time had none annexed to their Bishopricks but this came into use at last after the avulsion of Germany from France when the Ottoes were Emperonrs in Germany And the Jurisdictions were so far from being the cause of Imperiall Elections that on the contrary therefore were Jurisdictions granted unto Bishops because the Emperours were most assured of their fidelity being chosen by themselves and thought the custody of Cities might therefore most safely bee committed to them as the same Onuphrius hath observed Some have been deceiv'd by the name of Investiture Because the word is used of Fees especially therefore have they thought all that is sayd of investitures of Bishops to belong to territories and Lands which is a grosse â—rrour for to vest and to invest are old words of German Originall that signify the collation of any right whatsoever and are therefore found in old Authors applyed to all Offices both Civill and Ecclesiasticall It appears by a passage in the life of Romanus Bishop of Rouen about the year 623. that Investiture by the staffe was almost 300. years before Territories were given to Bishops which began under Otto the first Emperour of that name And truly if Investiture had been with respect to Civill Jurisdiction it would have been by the Scepter Sword or Banner as the manner of those times was not by a ring and staffe Wherefore although the most Christian Kings did not challenge to themselves imposition of hands which maketh Presbyters yet these two things they esteemed as their right to joyn this man unto this Church which is signified by the Ring and to conferre upon him Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall that is judgement concerning Sacred affairs with a certaine publike power which is signified by the staffe For to the King himself also when he was first consecrated together with the Scepter was wont to be given a staffe And by this saith Aimonius the defence of the Churches that is a power to maintaine Religion was deliver'd to him from God for the Offices corresponded to the signs as also a Canon was vested by a Book Many ages after when piety had begotten opulency and the daughter laid a snare for the mother the Emperours almost detruded from their most antient right began to shew the indignity of the thing by this argument among the rest because the Bishops by their munificence possessed Lands and territories But never did the Election of them depend upon this alone being more antient than the same munificence Moreover the accessory cannot have so much force as to draw
published by Justinian about the year DXLI at what time the Roman Bishops were at the Emperors devotion and created by them There is also another Constitution of the same Emperour set forth as is thought in the year DLV. and inscribed to the Bishop of C P. Which permits the Founders of Churches or of maintenance to appoint Clericks if yet they be found worthy by the Bishops examination And in the year DLIII a Canon was made is the Councill of Tolen to the same effect About the yeare DCCCXXVII were collected the Constitutions of Charls the Great wherein we find If Laic Patrons present unto the Bishops Cleriks approved both for their life and learning to be consecrated and constituted in their Churches by no means let them be rejected Not only Pastors of inferior degree but Bishops also were constituted by the Dukes of Bavaria and Saxonia by a Right long since derived from the German Emperours as hath been observ'd by others When as without such Grant the Investiture of Bishops as Hermoldus of old hath written is proper to the Imperiall Majestie Wherefore this Right was extracted from the Constitution and Concession of Emperors and Kings and is an Of-spring flowing from the Right of the Highest Power And it is so far from depending on the Popes Authority that on the contrary the makers and Interpreters of the Papall Law have opposed or clipped nothing more eagerly desiring to perswade the world that all benefices are the Patrimony of the Pope Panormitan is chief among them whom I had much rather have for my adversary in such a matter than my Second For I know most of his Comments in this kind are refuted by Covarruvia and Duarenus and other Lawyers and wisemen have herein alwaies differ'd from the Clergy of those times even unto our age See but what the the Holland Senate hath noted in the Trent-acts as contrary to the old Law of our Nation To the IV. Sect. c. 12. In this Chapter the Lay Patrons seem to be grieved To the xxv Sect. c. 4. We must beware lest by uniting Parish Churches and single Benifices prejudice be done to the Lay Patrons and in other places more to the like effect This was then the judgement of the Senate the Keeper of the old Customs of our Country which may more justly be defended by us than what our Ancestors in their unhappy time esteem'd intollerable But what if the Roman Bishops themselves what if Panormitan himself durst not require of Lay Patrons what is now required by vertue of their Authority I will not dispute about the word whether the Collation of the Patron may be call'd Election and yet Clement III. calld it so These words are cited In a Conventuall Church the assent of the Patron is better requir'd not to the election of the Prelate to be made but after it is made the following words which are very materiall being omitted unlesse the custome be otherwise by reason of his Jurisdiction For many ages before and in many places the custome was otherwise and namely in our Holland Witnesse againe the Senate Note that if the first Prebend to be void in Collegiat Churches be assigned to the Readers of Divinity the King and other Lay Patrons whose right it is in the Collegiat Churches of Holland in every Chapter should be deprived of the presentation of the Prebend first to be void In such a Collegiat or Conventuall Church the Pope hardly admitted a Lay Patron but the Emperors Kings and the Princes of our Holland as we now heard have admitted him even to the memory of our Fathers and therefore the Pope fearing he should not be obeyed added to his decree the exception of Custome which many as it now appears if they had a Papacy would not adde That our States abrogated the Right of Patronage neither is true nor can be said without their injury For they mention among the causes of the troubles the Acts of the Trent Synod and shew that nothing did more hinder the publication of them than that the Lay-Patrons complained their Right was infringed by those Constitutions What opinion the States themselves had of the businesse we have heard their own words This is a certain truth that both the election made by the Patrons may upon just causes be rescinded by the Highest Power and all this Right no lesse than other things which are the properties of private men is Subject to the Commands of Law To which restraint if we adde both the exploration of the people and the Pastorall Ordination the corruption of the Church need no more be feared from Noble Patrons than from Rustic Elders Two things remaine to be spoken before I conclude this part concerning derived Right The one is this that the Inferiour powers have by Divine Right us Authority at all about Sacred things What ere they have they have it as by the Supreme which we have elswhere noted Wherefore neither Joseph the Decurion nor the Proconsull Sergius could doe more in the Church than any private person Because neither the former from the great Synedry nor the later from the Roman Emperour had received any Power to dispose of Ecclesiasticall affairs And no man ought to snatch to himself the sword or any part thereof The other is this Being the tuition of the Church is a principall part of the Supreme Authority the Highest Powers will doe wisely if they grant as little as may be of it to the Magistrats And whatsoever they grant let them take care at least to commend these most noble Offices only to their most noble Peers For if the charge of Checker mony and Coine is committed not to the Municipall Judges but to men of higher place how much more doth it concerne the publick safety and the Churches honour that Ecclesiasticall affairs be not devolved to inferior tribunals So in France no Judges below the Parliament have cognizance of abuses of the Ecclesiastic censure nor with us of old below the Senate of Holland But the Inspection of the Church affairs is not easily to be deferr'd to them who are not in the Churches books For seeing both Jews and Christians held it irreligious to carry their private complaints before such as were Aliens to their Law much more unworthy were it and dishonourable in so great frequency of Right believers that the wounds of the Church should be committed to the cure of any other persons but only to the Sons of the Church THE END Soli Deo Gloria Erudito Lectori EX Latinis bonis Anglica non mala me fecisse si censueris est quod gaudeam Fateor autem ne mibi fraudi sit nonnulla hic omissa ea nimirum quae â—ut ipsa Res aut Lector meus faciliùs abesse pateretur Nempe istam navavi operam in eorum praecipuè gratiam qui Latina non attingunt Ingens operae pretium est ut 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉