were yet weake in faith or hinder others of that Nation from beleeving in Him Besides be it that Christians did hold themselves freed from the observance of the Sabbath yet being among those who still made conscience of it even to superstition as did the unconverted Jewes it could not but prove very incommodious to their speedy and farre flight which the greatnesse and suddennesse of the danger required in as much as thereby they should expose themselves to the fury of those who were no lesse zealous in compelling others then superstitious in observing it themselves In these respects our Saviour might well admonish his Disciples to pray that their flight might not bee on the Sabbath day and yet not teach them to observe the Sabbath after his death or that while the observation of it lasted they should thinke themselves so tied in conscience of it that they might not on that day flie farre to save their lives and much lesse to establish the Morality of the Lords Day which neither He nor his Apostles nor the following ages of the Church till within these few yeares ever designed by the name of the Sabbath without some difference added to distinguish it from that of the Jewes For though we finde it sometimes called our Sabbath or the Sabbath of Christians in regard that in the maine end of it it succeeded that yet generally the Sabbath simply put and without addition notes the Iewish Sabbath or the Day on which it was celebrated which is our Saturday and the day before that which we keepe which is therefore called by the Evangelists and S. Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one or the first day from the Sabbath and by S. Iohn in the Revelation the Lords Day by which name or that which the same day had among the Gentiles viz. the Sunday it hath ever since been knowne in the Christian world But I will leave these and now returne thither whence for the answering of these objections I have digressed And having seene the nature and severall degrees of Morall Precepts and in generall that the fourth Commandement hath in it somewhat not moral That I may apply these things to our present purpose and manifest the truth thereof I will more particularly inquire into the nature of that Commandement and in it distinctly consider these 4. things First A Day or time set apart for Gods service Secondly the seventh day or one in the revolution of seven Thirdly the particular seventh there mentioned namely the seventh from the Creation Fourthly the strict surcease or rest from ordinary labours on that day For the first of these It cannot be denied but that the very Law of Nature it selfe to use the words of a Worthy of our Church requireth no lesse the sanctification of times then of places persons and things For which cause it hath pleased God heretofore as of the rest so of times likewise to exact some parts by way of perpetuall homage And that as Aquinas it is morall that man should depute some time of his life for the service of God For there is in man a kind of naturall inclination that to every thing necessary there bee a time assigned as to our bodily refection sleepe and the like Whence also to the spiritnall refection of the soule whereby the soule is refreshed in God by the dictate of naturall reason a man deputes some time And so to have some times for holy Offices comes under the Morall Law and is absolutely of the Law of Nature written in the heart of every man being involved in that principle which even depraved nature hath ever acknowledged viz. that God is to be worshipped And therefore Amesius hath well observed that thus farre the time of Gods worship falls under that precept which exacts the worship it selfe and as God when he created the world is said to have concreated time with it so when he ordained religious actions he appointed also to the same a time for them as a necessary circumstance without which they could not be performed And as the time in which such actions are done so that some Day or Dayes should be destinated and set apart for the more solemne performance of those actions may seeme to be a dictate of the same Law of nature in as much as the Heathens who had no other guide but the law of Nature had their solemne Feasts and set Dayes in all ages consecrated to the worship of their Gods whereby they manifested though not the knowledge of the true God yet their acknowledgement of that Principle That God is to be worshipped and the conveniencie of assigning some Dayes peculiarly to that end For the second That one day in the revolution of seaven should be thus set a part this cannot be said to be absolutely of the Law of nature Nature being ignorant of this without the instruction of the written Law in which God hath revealed his pleasure concerning the Quota pars or how much of our time hee requires to be consecrated to Him And this will easily appeare to any that doth without prejudice consider it For it is an easie thing to give an estimate of what Principles are naturall and written in the hearts of all men and what are gotten by instruction discipline and information Now men may by the light of Nature from the creature climbe up to the knowledge of the Creator and from the nature of God conclude his worship and from the nature of his Worship conclude a time as to all other things to be due to it But to goe further and to determine what part of our time wee cannot For it will not follow that because some time is due therefore the seaventh day more then the eighth of every moneth which was observed by the Graecians in honour of Neptune or any other day above or under that number And for this cause it is saith Saint Chrysostome that in the giving of this Commandement concerning the Sabbath which hee calls a Precept not made knowne to us by our conscience God added a reason as because Ged rested the seventh day from all his worke and againe because thou wast a servant in Egypt c. Whereas in those Precepts that are purely morall as when he saith Thou shalt doe no murther hee onely gives the precept without giving any reason at all Why so saith that Father because our conscience had taught us this before so that God speakes as to those that knew and understood reason sufficient for the Prohibition Neither doth Eusebius though alledged by some to that purpose any way contradict this when he saith That not onely the Hebrewes but all almost both Philosophers and Poets acknowledged the seaventh day to be sacred For here it is not questioned whether the Gentiles which wanted the law of God to informe them did hold the seaventh day as hallowed but whether they were induced by the instinct of nature so to account it
the fourth Commandement as it enjoynes the externall observation of the seaventh day is not morall either of these wayes Whence S. Augustine saith That among all those ten Commandements that onely of the Sabbath is figuratively to be observed whereas as hee after saith Wee observe the other Commandements there properly as they are cōmanded without any figurative signification And generally the Ancients as Calvin hath truly observed called this Precept a shadow which as he there saith was truly but not fully said of them And therefore they do better and more fully expresse the nature of this Cōmandement which say it is partly morall and partly ceremoniall So Peter Martyr and generally all Divines both reformed and others use now to speake Now if any shall therefore thinke it unworthy a place in the Decalogue and to be rankt with those precepts which are morall and of perpetuall observance Aquinas may seeme to give them full satisfaction who saith 1. that the Precept concerning the Sanctification of the Sabbath is put among the Precepts of the Decalogue for that which is moral in it 2. That this Precept as Ceremoniall ought rather to have a place in the Decalogue then any other The other Ceremonies being signes of some particular effects of God but this of the Sabbath was a signe of a generall benefit viz. the Creation of the Vniverse So that that which Amesius will have a most certaine rule and received among all the best Divines as he calls them That all and onely the Morall precepts were delivered by the voyce of God himselfe and by Him written in the tables of stone is not true unlesse Saint Augustine Calvin Martyr c. be in his esteeme none of the best Divines Yet perhaps wee may admit that rule so farre as to say That all the Morall Precepts are contayned in the Decalogue and that every Precept there contayned is Morall though all of every Precept be not so but may have something that is ceremoniall annexed to it which haply God thought good to place among the morall precepts to intimate the perpetuall necessity of having some ceremonies in the Church though that ceremonie be not necessarily perpetuall but with the rest of that nature to expire at the death of Christ which though wee admit yet cannot any justly charge us that wee diminish any of the tenne words or that wee expunge one Commandement out of the Decalogue in as much as wee affirme that onely which was ceremoniall in this Commandement to bee expired and out of date and that there is in it a morality still remaining which retaines its full power of obligation and exacts the same obedience under the same penalty which it did at its first promulgation or inscription in the heart of Adam In which respect the Church hath good cause still to use her accustomed Antiphona at the repeating of this Commandement as well as at any of the rest and to pray Lord have mercy upon us and encline our hearts to keepe this law And here because some who love to have this Commandement termed morall though thereby they intend no more then what hath beene already granted use so to argue as if they did not acknowledge it at all to be ceremoniall it will not be amisse before wee proceed any further to answere some of the principall arguments that are brought to this purpose And I wil begin with that of our Saviour Math. 5. 17. Thinke not that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets I came not to destroy but to fulfill Which words in their opinion make strongly for the morality and perpetuall obligation of the fourth Commandement For from hence they argue to this purpose That which our Saviour did not destroy but fulfill is still in force but hee did not destroy the law contayned in the Decalogue Therefore it is still in force For answere hereunto I say That in this argument two things are by them supposed First they suppose that by the Law in this place is meant only the law contained in the Decalogue or ten Commandements Secondly That our Saviours fulfilling and not destroying this law was the ratifying and perpetuating of the observation of it under the Gospel If wee grant them both these wee shall condemne the Christian Church for altering the day from the seventh to the eight or first day of the week which cannot stand with this exposition of our Saviours speech who in the words following saith expresly That not one jot or title shall passe from the Law But both these are beside the meaning and intent of our Saviour as will easily appeare to any that with indifferency doth consider his words For First the Law which our Saviour here speakes of is of larger extent and latitude and comprehends not onely the Decalogue or law morall but the Ceremoniall and judiciall also As being indeed put for the Pentateuch or five bookes of Moses And so The Law and the Prophets as much as Moses and the Prophets Which formes of speech are used as a Periphrasis of the old Testament of which these two are the maine essentiall parts The Bookes of Moses so containing and describing the Law that they reserre whatsoever else they containe unto that receive their denomination from it as from the principall subject of them The Prophets that is their Bookes comprehend all the rest of the old Testament which the Hebrewes divide into the former and latter Prophets and the Hagiographa All which though they be not Prophesies being written by divine inspiration and by holy men as they were moved by the Spirit of God may justly be termed The word of Prophecy and passe under the name of the Prophets That the Law is taken in this sense is manifest by the use of the same phrase else where Where not only the duties commanded in the Decalogue but Christ and faith in him is said to be taught and witnessed by the Law to which purpose the Apostle S. Paul useth the same phrase Acts 28. 23. Rom. 3. 21. Now what word in all the Decalogue gives witnesse to Christ or perswades the faith which is required in him Certainly however some have found not onely the faith in Christ but the Sacraments also of the New Testament commanded in the Decalogue yet there is no one word there which imports any such thing Yea the very context evinces thus much for our Saviour having thus prefaced his exposition of the Law keeps not himselfe within the bounds of the Moral Law as appeares verse 18. And therefore Interpreters generally upon this place shew how our Saviour did not destroy but fulfill the Ceremoniall Law also as well as the Morall which were altogether needlesse if by the Law that onely were understood Now the Law being as it must needs be thus largely taken any man may easily perceive that the not destroying but fulfilling of it is not the ratifying and the perpetuating of
the observation of it under the Gospel for who sees not that upon this ground they might conclude for Circumcision and the legall Passeover and Sacrifices with all their typicall Rites and Ceremonies as well as for the Sabbath The truth is our Saviour as hee was to fulfill not onely the Morall but the Ceremoniall and Iudiciall Law also so he speakes of all and did indeed not destroy but fulfill them all though in a different manner 1. He fulfilled the whole Law by his actuall and personall obedience to it and by supplying the defects of it that it being unable to justifie us in it selfe might by the helpe of his grace and accession of faith in him bee able to performe that which otherwise it could not 2. He fulfilled the Ceremoniall Law and so the Iudiciall too so farr as it was typicall besides his subjection to them by a reall exhibition of that whereof they were shadowes And though by this meanes their observation according to the letter of the Law ceased yet did hee not hereby destroy but perfect them according to that of the Apostle speaking of Circumcision which was a legall Ceremony Doe we then saith he make voide the Law through faith God forbid yea we establish the Law This place then expounded according to the truest meaning and intent of our Saviour makes nothing for the totall morality of the fourth Commandement nor is in the least contradictory to what I have delivered concerning it Secondly they argue from the Institution of the Sabbath which was say they in the beginning of the World in the time of mans innocencie when there was no need of Ceremony and therefore it was morall and perpetuall To this I answere 1. That it is not universally true that whatsoever precept was given to Adam in Innocency was therefore Morall and perpetuall for then the Symbolicall Precept of not eating of the forbidden fruit must be such which no man I suppose will affirme 2. If it be true which Willet hath affirmed and that by ten reasons which he there alledgeth that Adam fell the same day that he was created then did he fall before the giving of the Precept for the observation of the Sabbath and had it not in the state of Innocencie But the truth is this is a meere conjecture disputable any way so as a man may better oppose whatsoever is affirmed then solidly conclude any thing 3. If it bee not false that the Sabbath was then instituted yet it hath and may not without good reason be doubted of That place which is brought for it Gen. 2. 2. doth not convincingly prove it And if the reasons which are alledged for the prolepsis in that place bee without prejudice considered their opinion who so expound it will not seeme improbable as 1. That there is no mention any where made of it to have beene observed by the Patriarchs 2. Where it is first spoken of Exod. 16. it is spoken of as a new thing not knowne to have beene observed before 3. In that it is called a signe betweene God and the Israelites that he was their sanctifier and deliverer out of Egypt which it could not bee if it were given to all Nations in Adam But lastly granting the whole Argument I would faine know how that day that was then instituted and sanctified could cease and another be substituted How could it bee Morall and perpetuall and yet determine with the Iewish Church The words which are brought as the Institution say God rested the seventh N. B. and for that cause God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it viz. that seventh day on which hee rested The Text doth not say God rested the seventh day and therefore he would have one of the seven to be sanctified That is but the exposition or glosse not the Text the word of man not of God But some may haply say That the particular day was alterable and upon good ground was altered This I grant but say withall that he which holds the Sabbath to be instituted before the fall and for that cause Morall and perpetuall cannot so say but either hee must wave his owne Principles or cry up the Jewish Sabbath postliminiò Secondly they argue from that of our Saviour Matth. 24. 20. who foreshewing the destruction of Jerusalem to his Disciples adviseth them to pray that their slight bee not in the Winter neither on the Sabbath Day If say they this Precept had beene Ceremoniall then had it beene all one to fly on the Sabbath day as on any other day because all Ceremonies were before that time which was not till forty yeares after Christs Ascension to bee abrogated But in that Christ doth allow this feare of flying on the Sabbath Day more then on any other day of the weeke hee shewes plainely that the force of the Sabbath was not abrogated by his resurrection and therefore no Ceremony Thus they argue To which it were answere sufficient to shew that hereby they still rush upon the same rocke and while they labour to establish a needlesse morality of the Lords Day they unawares bring in Iudaisme For the Sabbath day there cannot with any shew of reason bee taken though now a dayes it is too common so to take it for the Lords Day and if our Saviour did intend by bidding his Disciples pray that their flight might not happen on the Sabbath day to intimate the necessity of the observation of that Day by Christians Then did S. Paul crosse our Saviours intent in numbring that among the shadowes which vanished at Christs death and then hath also the Church of Christ ever since erred in so accounting it and condemning the observation of it with an Anathema to those that in this point shall be found to Iudaize S. Chrysostome is so farre from thinking that the Sabbath which our Sauiour there speaks of did belong to Christians that upon that ground hee expounds that speech of our Saviour as spoken not to his Apostles but to the Iewes Thou seest saith he that he speakes to the Iewes for the Apostles were not to keepe the Sabbath c. But grant that it were spoken to the Disciples yet can no such thing bee thence collected as they would have For our Saviour had good ground so to advise his Disciples notwithstanding God at that time required no keeping of the Sabbath For though the Ceremonies of the Law and this among the rest were dead with Christ yet were they not buried as I have shewed nor the practise of them deadly till the Temple was destroyed till which time even the Apostles themselves were zealous of the Law and retentive of their old Ceremonies to which weaknesse of theirs our Saviour there accommodates his speech willing rather that their owne experience in the destruction of the Temple should teach them that harsh lesson of the abolishing of the Legall Ceremonies then by a praemature urging it to startle such as
far to be extended is not on all hands agreed upon Some there are who when they come to define this liberty they pin it up within so narow a room that it proves either none at all or to no purpose Amesius saith There is nothing can be brought out of Scripture cōcerning the strist observatiō of the Sabath which was commanded to the Iewes which doth not in the same manner belong to all Christians except the kindling of fires and the dressing of ordinary dyet And these he thinkes it probable too that the Iewes might ordinarily doe on their Sabbath though upon speciall occasions they were forbidden them so that he seemes to retract that liberty which before he granted them But others doe freely grant these and some few like them as making of beds carrying of burthens to wit on speciall and urgent occasions and these they allow by this name of workes of Christian liberty Egregiam vero libertatem A great liberty no doubt and worthy that precious blood by which it was purchased But two things may here be demanded First how it will appeare that Christians have this liberty And here for ought I can see we must be contented to take their own authority for Scripture they alledge none to purpose Those two places which are cited by Elton on this occasion speak no such thing besides that which is there sayd whatever it be proves no peculiar liberty belonging to Christians which the Iewes had not For in them our Saviour justifies his Disciples from transgressing the Sabbath which was then in force but doth not shew what might be done afterward when by his death the Sabbath should be abrogated If they alledge that our Saviour bad the sicke man on the Sabbath to take up his bed which may seeme to have some reference to making of beds or carrying of burthens It may be answered that our Saviour doth not there shew what might ordinarily be done but by his authority gives a speciall dispensation to the sicke man to take up his bed c. without which dispensation the man could not have beene excused from breaking the Sabbath So that here is no certainty according to their principles for any thing to be done which the Jewes might not doe but that men must for all their pretended liberty either Iudaize or else adventure for this small liberty with a doubting conscience Secondly It may also be demanded How wee shall know that onely this liberty is allowed Christians This also we must take upon their credit For reason or Scripture they alledge none at all And if they without either reason or Scripture shall take upon them to give lawes to the Church of God and prescribe bounds to Christian liberty I see no cause why wee may not upon solid grounds of Scripture and reason assert that liberty which of right belongs to us as purchased by the all precious blood of our deare and Blessed Saviour And this will appeare if we consider what rest or cessation from labours is on this day required First then for that it is a day of Gods publique and solemne worship to bee performed by the whole Church which cannot as hath beene shewed be performed unlesse there bee a vacation from ordinary and common worked a vacation therefore and resting from these as they are impediments to Gods service is on that day required as necessary Yet not so necessary no not in the times of publique assemblyes but that the workes which necessity imposeth upon men and rarer occasions in mens particular affaires subject to manifest detriment unlesse they be presently followed may with very good conscience draw men aside sometime frō the ordinary rule considering the favourable dispensation which our Saviour grounds upon this Axiome The Sabbbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath Which rule if it held for the Iews on their Sabbath is certainely no lesse in force at this day for Christians In the use of which notwithstanding some cautions must bee observed As first that men pretend not necessity or charity when it is covetousnesse or a carelesse neglect or contempt of Gods publique worship upon which ground no doubt it was that the Emperor Leo repealed that liberty which by Constantine was granted to Husbandmen and the Counsell of Matiscon forbids men to frame a necessary to themselves of yoking their Oxen therein allowing both a just dispensation in necessity forbidding the unjust pretence of necessity where none is Secondly men must take heed that they do not by their negligence or improvidence and forgetfulness draw a necessity upon themselves in which regard the word Remember which God prefixed to the fourth Commandement is yet in force to exact our care and mindfulnesse so to provide before hand that the dutyes to which this day is consecrated bee not by our default omitted or hindered Thirdly that being necessarily hindered or forced to omit the solemne publique dutyes of the Day we do as much as may be by private devotions meditations make supply of that defect Againe such is the reverence that is due to the solemne publique dutyes of devotion that they require not onely a surcease from other workes thoughts for the time of their performance but also a decent preparation before-hand that wee looke to our feete when we enter into the house of God put off our shooes before we stand upon holy ground that so our thoughts and affections which are naturally bent upon the world and not easily withdrawne from it may be raysed to a disposition befitting so sacred an employment In which respect it is convenient if not necessary that til the publike service of God be ended men intangle not themselves with unnecessary businesses or give themselves to sportings or recreations whereby their mindes should be hindered from the right preparing of themselves or due performance of those holydutyes Lastly it is good and commendable to spend the rest of that day in holy meditations private prayer reading and calling to minde what wee have read or heard These workes as they are at all times profitable and beseeming Christians so on that day they are most seasonable and suitable to those publique actions of Devotion which are the proper worke of the Day Thus S. Augustine exhorteth his Auditors on this day to sequester themselves from worldly businesses that they may be employed in these works and the Councill of Matiscon yea and our owne Church Canons prescribe the spending of this day and other holy-dayes devoted to Gods service in these and the like religious imployments And therefore they who thus spend the Lords day if it be done without superstition or judging other mens liberty cannot therefore justly be condemned Now by this it is easie to judge of our liberty First then here is a liberty in case of necessity though thereby the solemne dutyes of Gods worship bee hindered Secondly a liberty in