Iewe first and also to the Grecian These wordes are so playne that they neede no exposition Onely thys thynge let vs note that thys repeticion of felicity which abideth the godly tendeth to thys ende that they being allured with the hope thereof might the more earnestly repent For there is no respect of persons before God As touching Paules methode The methode of the reprehension past in this reprehension of the Ethnikes it is after this maner As concerning the the fyrst part of knowledge which is called contemplation he hath proued that they knew God by the creatures but when they knew him they worshipped hym not as they ought to haue done Therefore when they had geuen the glory of God vnto Idols they were delyuered vp by him vnto the lustes of their owne hart vnto shamefull affections and into a reprobate mynde Moreouer as touching the other knowledge which consisteth in the doing of workes he sheweth that they knew right well the iustice of God And that he thereby proueth in that they iudged vprightly in geuing sentence vpon other men But that which they so well knew they performed not at all For both they themselues lyued wickedly and partly they consented vnto them which sinned and partly in seuerely punishing of others they ouerhipped themselues Which men he terrefied in declaryng vnto them that they should not escape the iudgement of God And because they beleued not that the iudgement of God shoulde euer come and that the prouidence of God had no care of thinges humane because they saw by experience that God ceassed from punishing wickednes against the first reason he layeth that we knowe assuredly that the iudgement of God shal be without doubt agaynst those which do such thinges as touching the other reason he sayd that this long tarying of God shal be recompensed with sharpenes of the punishement Whiche yet in the meane tyme is to thys ende proftiable vnto them that they might haue space to repent Whiche thing if they do not they shall fall into the horrible iudgement of God Of whiche iudgement he sayth that he shall render vnto euery man according to their workes And he deuided it into partes namely what the godly and what the vngodly shall looke for and added moreouer that neyther affection nor fauour shall there be of any force and made equal the Iewes with the Gētiles the Gētiles with the Iewes wherof he now bringeth a reason for that before God there is no respect of persons Whether God haue a respect vnto persons This I thought good the more largely to repeat that the methode of those things which are spoken might be throughly vnderstanded But now let vs sée whether this be altogether true that God accepteth not persons which is to deale in the cause according to the worthines or vnworthines thereof not hauing regarde to the conditions or states of them which are to be iudged It semeth vndoubtedly that God hath a respect vnto persons bicause he gaue vnto the Iewes many good thinges and that for this cause namely for that they pertained vnto Abraham Isaac and Iacob and because they were of their séede stocke Yea when the people had made a calfe and deserued worthely all of them to be destroyed Moses An exāple of Moses prayed vnto the Lord and although he confesseth that the cause deserued destruction yet he desireth pardon for them for Abraham Isaac Iacobs sake of whose stocke they came And so he layd before God not the cause but the person Yea and in the 89. Psalme we reade of the séede of Dauid that although they had prophaned A place of Dauid the testament of God and had forsaken his wayes he would in déede visite them with the rod Howbeit for hys seruaunt Dauid sake he would not take from them his mercy Is not this to accept persons and not to weigh the causes And in A place of the ten commaundementes An exāple of the Sodomites the ten commaundementes we reade that he will do good vnto a thousand generations of them that feare hym and kepe hys commaundement And God was contente to spare the Sodomites if there had bene but ten iust men amongest them And he gaue vnto Paule all them that were in shippe when they were in daunger of ship wracke Neither spared he them for the iustnes of the cause but because they sayled in the fame ship together with Paule To the ende these thinges may be more What a person is throughly vnderstanded we must first declare what is in this place vnderstanded by the name of a person And that is nothyng els as we now speake of it then the condition or state or a certaine quality geuen vnto vs either of God through nature or receiued by election Of the first kinde are these to be a man or a woman a father or a sonne of this nation or of that to be borne a prince or a subiect a frée man or a bondeman and suche other lyke taken But these are taken of our owne will and accord to be a minister of the church to be a souldier or a handicraftes man and such other lyke In summe a person consisteth by comparyng of a man either vnto an other man or els vnto certaine thinges or faculties For if Abraham be referred vnto Isaac he is his father if Salomon be referred vnto the Israelites he is their kyng if Aristotle be compared vnto sciences he is bothe learned and also a Philosopher if Cresus vnto riches he is riche vnto which selfe same riches if Irus be referred he is a begger So haue we what a person signifieth Now let vs sée the differences of persons There are certayne persons which Certayne persōs may want good workes but some other cannot may vtterly be wythout good workes as the person of a father or of a brother of a riche man or of a poore man But certayne cannot alwayes want good workes as are the elect the predestinate the members of Christ the faithfull the partes of the church and such other lyke For it is not possible that such men althoughe they sometymes fall should vtterly be without good workes Thirdly there are some persons so ioyned vnto the causes that the cause can not be iudged vnles there be a respect had vnto the person As when one striketh a man whiles he executeth the office of a magistrate or if he which liueth wickedly be a minister of the church and such lyke As touching those persons which are not vtterly without good workes and which are necessary for our saluation God hath so a respect vnto them that if without thē we shall appeare before hys iudgement seat we cannot be saued But of this kynd of persons this sentence of Paul is not to be vnderstand But as touching those persons whiche haue not eyther good or euill workes of necessity ioyned with them we answer that if the causes be so annected that in
one of an other by this meanes loue is more By the institution of the ministery is kept charity God calleth meÌ„ vnto the ministery two maner of wayes entier then if saluation should be ministred vnto vs by Angells Howbeit thys we ought to know that the efficacy of the worde of God or of the sacramentes depeÌ„deth not of yâ— goodnes or holines of the minister This moreouer is to be noted that the sending of God is eyther by himselfe immediately or ells by the calling of the Church for the right ordering whereof there ought not a regard to be had vnto money affinity frendshippe or such like but vnto the worthines of them that are called And ChristiaÌ„s ought to be fully perswaded that although they which chuse the ministers of the Church are sinners yet is not that a let vnto theyr saluation for vnto them is geuen eyther a good pastor or an euill If they haue a good pastor they haue cause to geue vnto God thankes which hath not only prouided that saluation should be ministred vnto them but also hath geuen vnto them an holy and good pastor But if he be an euill pastor let them also acknowledge the goodnes of God which when as they deserued not a good It is a greuous sinne â—o aduance or to tolerate vnworthy ministers pastor suffreth rather the worde and sacramentes of God to be ministred vnto them by such a one then that he would forsake them And yet they to whome it pertayneth to admitte the pastor let them not thinke that they commit a light offence when they eyther aduaunce or tolerate vnworthy pastors And the people when they heare the word of God and receaue the sacramentes ought most chiefely to weigh those thinges which are ministred vnto them whether they hâ— deliuered vnto theÌ„ purely sincerely or corruptly rather theÌ„ to loke vpon yâ— conditioÌ„s or maners of theyr minister although his saluation also is not to be neglected neyther are offences to be tollerated more then must nedes And although Paul in this place entreate of vocations and sending which as I haue sayd is both ordinary and extraordinary yet is it not to be doubted but that he nowe Here is entrcnted of extraordinary vocation but it is rightly eppâ—â—ed vnto the ordinary vocation speaketh of the extraordinary way when as the Apostles were not choseÌ„ by the iudgment of the priestes and bishoppes but were sent thorough out the world at the commaundement of God only Howbeit the thinges which are mencioned in the commendation and prayse of the ministery pertayne also vnto the ordinary vocation of the ministers of the Church There are two things which Paul thinketh are now remayning to be proued namely yâ— the Apostles should be seni of God himself to preach yâ— Gospel secondly the it is not so much to be meruayled at if but few beleued For the confirmation of the first he bringeth a place out of the prophet Esay in the 52. chap. How beautifull are the feete of them whiche bring glad tidinges of peace and which bring glad tidings of good thinges These things are spoken of yâ— deliuery from yâ— captiuity of Babilon but I haue oftentimes admonished yâ— those perticular deliueries either froÌ„ Egipt or from the Assirians other oppressors of the people of yâ— Iewes had to theyr roote foundacioÌ„ iustification from sinnes thorough Christ for captiuites oppressions and other misefortunes forasmuch as they are effects of sinne when they are taken away God is declared to be reconciled by the forgeuenes of sinnes And in that sence is Mathew to be vnderstanded when he writeth that in Christ when he healed the sicke was fullfilled that sentence of Esay He hath borne our infirmities Which although at the first sight it semeth not to agree for that Esay speaketh of the death The rootâ— of the deliuery of the Iewes A place of Mathew of Christ wherein he suffred the punishmentes dew vnto our sinnes and the historye is declared of the healing of disseases yet in very dede it excellently wel agreeth for Mathew considered that the infirmities which Christ draue awaye entred in thorough sinne and those infirmities being gone signified that sinne the cause of them was taken away namely by Christ whome it was necessary that he should be our reconciliator and this argument may be taken á minori that is of the lesse for if the messengers of the redemption from the captiuity of the body were had in honor and admiration and were sent from God vnto the Iewes how much more are the messengers and legates of eternal saluation to be had in honor and admiration which were sent not only vnto the Iewes but also vnto the whole world And that they were sent of God it is very playne by the wordes of Esay For before this sentence cited of Paul he maketh God complayning of the oppressors of his people and promising that forasmuch as they were so cruell agaynst his people that thereby his name was layd forth vnto blasphemies and cursinges he would therefore deliuer hys people And the tiding bringers of this his will he sayth should be very welcome and receaued with great ioy and admiration But the Hebrue veritie hath Vpon the mountaines The wordes of Esay in the 52. chap. are these Mah gan al heharim ragle mebasher mashimiaa shalom mebasher tob Which place the Seuenty interpreters haue thus turned 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yâ— is I am at hand as a pleasantnes or beautifulnes vpon the mountaynes But this particle Paul omitted for that this worde chiefly hath a respect vnto the situation of the citie of Ierusalem The situacion of the citie of Ierusalem which was situated betwen mountaines Therefore in the Psalme it is writteÌ„ The mountaynes are in the circuite thereof Yea verye oftentimes we reade in the Psalmes that the eyes were lifted vp vnto the mountaynes Seing therfore yâ— the messengers should come from the Assirians or Persians they could not come vnto the city vnles they were first sene vpon yâ— mountaines Howbeit this The disciples called out of Galile oracle may also easely be applied vnto the Apostles for forasmuch as they wer called out of Galile as it is playne by yâ— hystory of the Gospell wheÌ„ they were sent â—o preach they weÌ„t hither thither thorough that mountaynes and especially wheÌ„ they came vnto Ierusalem hauing receaued the holy ghost preached yâ— Gospel The preaching of the Gospel was publike and not in coâ—ners there Moreouer by this metaphore is notablye described the coÌ„dition or maner of yâ— preaching of the Gospell For it is not done secretly or in corners but publikely as those thinges are which are séene in open places Which kind of speach Christ also vsed when he sayd The things which ye haue heard of me in your eare preach vpon the house toppe Wherefore it is necessary that the preaching of the Gospell be frée opeÌ„ and perspicuous so that it be
I shall take my iorney into Spayne I wyll come vnto you For I trust to se you in my iorney and to be brought on my way thitherward by you after that I haue bene somwhat filled with your company Therefore also I haue bene oft let to come vnto you The Romans mought by these wordes haue suspected that Paul had contemned them when as he being appointed of God to be the minister of the Gentles had yet notwithstanding in bestowing the benefite and office of hys preaching preferred other nacions before The cause why Paul went not at the beginning to Rome them This was not the cause sayth Paul But forasmuch as ye had alredy heard the Gospell and your fayth was now published thoroughout the whole world but in these places Christ was not yet preached I was hitherto letted by the ministery committed vnto me that I could not come vnto you Paul before in the beginning of this epistle mencioned this selfe same thing I had purposed oftentimes sayd he to come vnto you but hetherto I haue bene letted But there saith Chrisostome he spake nothing of the cause but here he sheweth it namely for that he was stayed in those places which he could not leaue before that he had filled them with the Gospell And what was the cause why he went not to the Thessalonians when yet his desire was thereunto he declared in the epistle which he wrote vnto them For he sayth that Sathan was a let vnto him but he alleadgeth not the planting of new Churches And this difference of causes Origen noteth But I sée also an other cause why the Apostles somtimes were compelled to do contrary to that which they had appoynted in their mynde the admonishment I say of yâ— holy ghost Touching which thing we read in yâ— 16. of the Actes As we passed through Phrigia and the countrey of Galatia we were prohibited by the holy ghost to preach the word in Asia And again in yâ— same place They assayed to go into Bithinia but the holy ghost permitted them not But Ambrose sheweth yâ— there was also an other cause why Paul so earnestly enforced himselfe to preach the Gospell there Why Paul made such spâ—de in going about countrey where Christ had not ben heard of namely to preuent yâ— false Apostles For if they had gotteÌ„ into those places before theÌ„ they would not haue taught Christ very sincerely and if they had once sowed pestilent errors the Apostle succeding them should haue had much more a doo to bring them to good ground agayne For those nations must nedes afterward not only haue learned but also must haue taught to put away the errors wherwith theyr corrupt teachers had enfected them But now seing I haue no more place in these quarters c. He sayth that he had iust cause which letted him that he could not come to Rome Now he putteth theÌ„ in hope of his comming which was next to be spoken of For if I depart hence now sayth he I shall not doo otherwise then my office â–ª requireth And that shall then be after that in these quarters there shal be no more place wherein I haue not built a Church And I haue a great desire to se you Which thing I hope shal shortly come to passe But here the Romanes mought say doost thou then contemn the state of the Apostleshippe and doost thou count it for nothing to come vnto vs to whome the Gospell is alredy preached and doost thou ouerhippe those which as yet haue heard nothing of Christ Paul answereth it shal not be so â–ª But forasmuch as sayth he there is nothing as yet bestowed vpoÌ„ the Spaniards and their whole countrey lieth open for me I thinke now to goo into that countrey And so it shall come to passe that I will come by you that I may a few dayes solace my selfe in the Lord and in the purenes of your fayth and your louing confabulation and spirituall familiarity Here let vs note the obedience of the Apostle which preferred the necessary condition of the Apostleship which was such that it behoued him to go not whither he would but whither nede required before his so great a desire to se the Romanes although the same desire were very iust and honest Erasmus noteth that the Apostle taketh away from this woord Hispania the first sillable For he writeth Spania And paraduenture they so speake in Grecia And when he wrote these letters he was at Corinthus in Achaia But we also at this day in Italy call that contrey no otherwise then Paul doth For we say Spagnia and Spagninolo vtterly cutting of the first sillable For I trust to se you in my iorney and to be brought on my way thitheâ— warde by you after that I haue bene somewhat filled with your coÌ„pany The Apostle desireth not only to haue yâ— fruition of theyr godly and swete familiarity at Rome but also that after he had satisfied both his and theyr desire he might by them be Why Paul desired to be brougâ—t on his way in to Spâ—ine by the Romanes brought into Spayne not that he was affected to any pompe or gorgeous shewes or that he desired as at this day the Popes and Cardinalls doo to bee brought on his way with honour but that euen in the iorney might by them that went with him to communicate his doctrine and exhortations to the Church of Rome and to others For it can not be doubted but that they which would accompanie him in his iorney would obserue and note all things which by the way they eyther heard of him or saw in him that when they came home they might declare the same edifie the Church more firmely It is likely also that Paul forasmuch as he had occasion to trauayle into sondry countries and which were far distant would chiefly picke out such companions as were well knowen in those places cities which they should trauayle thorough that by them might be opened a more redier entrance to preach the Gospell For although the truth of Christ haue no nede of mans helpe but that it can consist without it yet notwithstanding for the more commodious spreading of it abrode it is lawfull for a godly man to vse familiarities frendshippes and societies For he knoweth that all his thinges ar Gods and Christs after that he hath once vtterly geuen and consecrated himselfe vnto him We find also in the latter epistle to the Corinthians the first chapiter that Paul when he should go to IerusaleÌ„ desired to be brought on his way by them to whom he wrote that epistle But whether the Apostle according to his hope went into Whether the Apostle went into Spaine Spayne and by that occasion visited the Romanes it can not by these woords certainely be gathered For the godly sometimes promise vnto themselues many thinges and that with a godly and iust desire which yet haue not successe for they were by coniecture led that it should
are rich beawtifull mighty and in honour they ought to know that this is not the Apostolicall loue Riches indede and beawty and honour are the giftes of God but yet not such that we ought with a singular loue to embrace them And the Church that 〈◊〉 in theyâ— house Paul writeth the selfe same thing of these persons in the first to yâ— Corinthians the last chap either bycause that theyr famely was so godly enstructed that it mought seme to be a Church or els for that the faythfull gathered together into theyr house to celebrate holy assemblies And this interpretacion I thinke to be the likelier although Chrisostome Origen and Ambrose follow the first The first fruites of Achaia They which before all others come to professe religion plainely declare that they litle regard men and the iudgements of the flesh but only follow the impulsioÌ„ of the holy gost Origen in stede of Achaia redeth Asia whome he that will follow let him vnderstand Asia the lesse wherein is Ephesus I meruayle at Ambrose which referreth first fruites to present dignity as though he were placed in some magestrateship or principality which semeth not vnto me very likely and especially for that this word in Christ is added My kâ—nsmen and fellovv prisoneâ—â— Kinred alone could not haue moued him but he the gladlier mencioneth them for that they had suffred together with hym They came to Christ before Paul they are called notable amongst the Apostles not that they were of the number of the 12. Apostles but for that as it is most likely they had sowed abrode the Gospell in many places and had built many Churches Origen thinketh that it is possible that they were of the number of the 72. disciples Which I thinke can not be for they fell away from Christ But how attributeth he this vnto his wife as though the office of the Apostleship could agrée also with her Paraduenture they are called notable amongst the Apostles for that they were well knowen vnto them and were of no small reputation in the Church of Christ This sence I dislike not so that the very wordes be not repugnaunt thereunto Them which are of Aristobulus house He biddeth not them to salute Aristobulus Narcissus made a freman by Claudius Cesar himselfe peraduenture for that he beleued not in Christ Yet he had of â–ª his housholde that were Christians Which self thing is also thought of those whome he addeth the friendes of Narcissus This man was made a frée man by Claudius Cesar and was a man of great might but otherwise wicked an extorcioner and one euill spoken of howbeit Ambrose thinketh that he was an elder In the Lord For all the family of Narcissus beleued not the gospel Vnto these men he ascribeth no titles paraduenture for that they were weake and did not so boldly professe the Gospell Apollo Origen thinketh that Apollo was that Apollo borne at Alexandria but I know not how I should be of his minde touching that For so great a man without doubt should haue bene adorned with some most notable title He therefore peraduenture sayth that these women â—hryphona Tryphosa Persis Mariae laboured for that they had suche a ministery as before we sayde Phebe had His mother and mine He calleth this woman mother bicause of her affection The boke of Hermas is not in the Canon towardes him and not that she was so by nature So before he called Phebe his sister Hermas Origen thinketh that this man was the author of the boke called the booke of the Pastor which scripture he sayth séemeth to him holy and inspired by God which is a plain argumeÌ„t that that boke is not to be receiued as Canonicall VVith an holy kisse This amongst the Hebrues was a token of peace and of brotherly amitie All the churches of Christ salute you Here are ment those churches through which Paul had passed or which were nigh to those places Now brethren I besech you marke them diligently which cause diuision and offences contrary to the doctrine which you haue learned and auoide them For they that are such serue not the lord Iesus Christ but their owne bellyes and with faire speche and flattering deceiue the hartes of the simple For your obedience is come abrode amongst al. I am glad therfore of you but yet I wold haue you arise vnto that which is good and simple coÌ„cerning euill The God of peace shall treade sathan vnto your fete shortly The grace of our Lord Iesus Christ be with you I beseche you brethren marke them diligently which cause diuision and offenceâ— He had willed them before to salute the godly Now he admonisheth them to beware of the wicked He willeth them diligently to marke and to consider them for that as it oftentimes happeneth they can not easely be found out but after loÌ„g time and after that they haue done some great mischief In these words are noted the false Apostles and as Chrysostome sayth diuers of the Iewes which by reason of the ceremonyes of the lawe did cause diuision and dissension in the Churches These men serued theyr voluptuous pleasures and their bealy and not God such as they were also whome the Lord sayd deuoured the houses of widowes Suche men Paule to Timothe calleth intractable vaine speakers deceiuers of mennes mindes and which were of the circumcision They ouerthrow sayth he houses they teache those things which are not meete for filthy gaine sake whose mouth oughte to be stopped A certaine Prophet of theyrs sayd That the men of Crete haue alwayes bene liers â–ª euill beasts and slouthfull bellies And in the latter Epistle to Timothe which crepe into the houses of widowes and lead captiue wemen laden with sinnes always learning and neuer comming to the knowledge of the truth They vse fayre speach sayth he but by theyr flattering they seke nothing else but to deceiue you These are two marks to know false Apostles by They serue theyr bealy and speake fayre or flatteringly Such men sayth Origen ment Christ when he said They come vnto you in shepes Two markes to know false Apostleâ— â–ª by Onely by the word of God false doctrine is discâ—rned from true clothing but within they are rauening wolues shéepes clothing are fayre wordes the gredines of the belly signifieth the rauening of Wolues And Origen addeth See in how great daunger they are which exercise not them selues in the holy scriptures by which only these men are discerned These wordes are diligently to be noted that true doctrine is discerned from fals by the holy scriptures only We make not discordes in the churche as the bondslaues of the Pope falsly slaunder vs but we as muche as lieth in vs and as our bounden duety is resist theyr conspiracye which they haue made against the truthe and with which they haue so long time oppressed it And auoyde them The Church hath no other sword but excommunication This sword the Apostle admonisheth them to vse against
⧠Most learned and fruitfull Commentaries of D. Peter Martir Vermilius Florentine Professor of Diuinitie in the Schole of Tigure vpon the Epistle of S. Paul to the Romanes wherin are diligently most profitably entreated all such matters and chiefe common places of religion touched in the same Epistle ¶ With a table of all the common places and expositions vpon diuers places of the scriptures and also an Index to finde all the principall matters conteyned in the same Lately traÌ„slated out of Latine into Englishe by H. B. ¶ IMPRINTED AT LONdon by Iohn Daye ¶ Cum Gratia Priuilegio Regiae Maiestatis per decennium ⧠These bookes are to be solde at the shop vnder the gate DIEV ET MON DRIOâ— ARISE FOR IT IS DAY TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE AND VVORTHY SIR ANTHONY COOKE KNIGHT PETER MARTIR VERMILIVS OF FLORENCE PROFESSER OF DIVINITIE IN THE SCHOLE OF TIGVRE VVISHETH HEALTH WHen I oftentimes consider with my selfe right honourable Sir whome for godlines and learning I reuerence all those things which happened all that whole time that I dwelt in England it driueth into me a great and manifolde griefe And in especiall it is a grief vnto me that so great an hope of the gospell of Iesus Christe and of pure doctrine in that Realme geuen by the most mighty and most mercifull God and confirmed by the great laboure industry and study of godly men hath now in a maner vtterly pearished It is a griefe vnto me to thinke that that most noble wit most sacred brest and incredible piety of that famous king Edwarde the .vj. of that name your most deare pupill is so sodainely taken from vs. It is a griefe vnto me that so many English men being of great fame renoum as well for theyr piety as for theyr knowledge and nobility are by voluntary exile for religion sake dispersed throughout externe and straunge countreys and they which at home were counted moste noble and heroicall doe now wander abrode as men obscure abiect and in a manner vnknowne to all men But it is well in that this happeneth not vnto them for any wicked actes by them committed or for filthy life but only for the name and doctrine of oure Lord Iesus Christ It is also a griefe vnto me that so great a multitude of godly brethren are as doubtles it is to often from euerye where signified vnto vs moste cruelly for theyr holy profession put to the sworde fire and tormentes whome for as much as they are our brethren and haue to theyr head together with vs one and the selfe same Christ and are members of one and the selfe same body and finally are euen oure owne bowels when we heare to be entreated with so great cruelty and tyraÌ„ny it is not possible but that we also should in minde be shaken with horror and set on fire euen as they are in body tormented and murthered These and a greate many moe things being vnto me a great griefe so that I am nowe in a maner hardened to any newe griefe yet cease I not to haue an eye hither and thither to see if I might by any meanes gette some healthfull and profitable remedy bothe for my selfe and for such like as I am but now I haue long time had experience of that it is in vaine to hope for mannes helpe or for ayd at the worlds hand And therefore I persuade both my selfe also others to withdraw their mindes from the aides of the flesh and to implore the heauenly and diuine helpe which doubtles I see is offred vnto vs two wayes One is that we with prayers turning our selues vnto Christ shold say How long Lord shall the wickednes and fury of Idolatry of supersticions and of the ignorance of the scriptures range abroade on the earth How long Lord shall thy holy Gospell be troden vnder foote We in dede haue sinned we haue ben rebellious against thee and haue not harkened vnto thy wordes for which cause we are iustly and for our euill deserte thus daily put â—o confusion and shame But thou O Lord our God are most iust in all thy workes But on the other side Lord for as much as it belongeth to thy clemency and constancy to haue mercye to spare and most faithfully to kepe thy couenauntes and promises how long Lord how long wilt thou be angry vnto the end Remember not our iniquities of olde Wherefore we beseeche thee that for as much as in these laste times thou hast by pouring abrode thy plenteous light and that being most mighty vouchsafed to make manifest vnto men which lay in darknes yea more then palpable darknes the secretes of thy truth thou woldest once at the length turne away thy wrath and fury from our ingrate mindes and from the most greuous sinnes whereby we haue laid forth thy most holy name and the pure doctrine which we professe to euil speakings and to blasphemies And deliuer thy congregation from the contumelies and oppressions of the wicked which doubtles light not only vpon vs but also vppon the maiesty of thy name Although thou of thyne owne nature be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is vntouchable and not able to be hurt Illuminate O most louing Christ thy face vpon the Church redeamed with thy bloud which is now in a manner vtterly lefte desolate Thy name only and not any other mannes name we call vpon not vndoubtedly trusting to any our own righteousnes but to thy goodnes only and mercy that thou woldest either appoynt an end or measure of those euils and lenify the vexation wherwith we together with our brethren are afflicted or that thou wouldest at the least vouchsafe to geue vnto the hearts of thine such faith and constancy that they fall not away from the profession of true piety yea rather that they may so nobly and valiantly behaue them selues that by their exile emprisonment pouertye ignominy sworde fire and how cruell so euer kinde of death it be the liuely knowledge of thy gospell may more and more shine forth and be made more manifest to the whole world This kinde of ayde and remeady right honorable sir is the first which I see is to be sought for at Gods hands against our euils and which the holy Fathers prophets Apostles and blessed coÌ„fessors of the Christian faith with great fruit vsed in their afflictions Wherfore seing that God heard them praying after this maner or muche like therevnto let vs in no wise distrust but that he will also heare vs when as we haue coÌ„mon with them one and the selfe same cause and one and the selfe same God Vndoubtedly if he heard them he will not despise our prayers but forasmuch as he is alwayes like vnto himselfe if he most louingly and with incredible facilitie receaued theyr prayers he will also fil vs making supplicatioÌ„ vnto him not with a small but with a most ample consolation The second helpe which is also brought vs from God and is euery where
that the Epistle to the Galathians was written at Rome For that in it he vehemently reproueth the obseruers of the rites of the old law touching which matter he spake more gently in those epistles which he had before written and in those which were the last he wrote when he was at Rome For that at the beginning he thought it good somewhat a while to beare with their infirmity whom he thought mought be won vnto Christ vntill they were better instructed But when he afterward vnderstode that the deuil abused this gentlenes so that by his fals apostles he obtruded that obseruation which was then but permitted as a thing necessary to saluation as though Christ with out it were not sufficient he began more vehemently to resist so that he sayd If ye be circumcised Christ is nothing profitable vnto you other thinges which were more sharply written to the Galathians theÌ„ here in this Epistle The Scribe which wrote this epistle as Paul endited it was named Tertius and he sent these letters froÌ„ the port Cenchries which is not farre distant from Corinthe they were caried to Rome by a Christian woman called Phebe The occasion that moued him to write this epistle was this The nation of the Iewes as they had a great pride in themselues so also they alwayes enuied other nations Wherefore at the beginning many of them would not haue had the grace of the Gospell of Iesus Christ communicated but only to the Iewes And they thought although fasly that the promises were dew only to the seede of Abraham as touching the fleshe Moreouer forasmuch as they iudged that the Gospell was to be distributed according to the dignity of the receauers and they saw that the Gentiles were prophane and wonderfully addicted to idolatry they thought them to be vnworthy one whom shoulde be bestowed so great a benefit Yea and the Apostles stayed long before they went to the Gentiles although they had heard that Christ gaue them in charge to go to al nations and to preach the Gospell to euery creature Neither as I suppose wanted there some which went about to auoyde these commaundemeÌ„ts thinking that the Apostles should go to diuers nations to the end to preach Christ to the Iewes which were dispersed thorough out the whole world and not to the Ethnikes and that which was spoken to all creatures they contracted to theyr Iewes for that al the â—arth is sometimes called that part only which pertayned to that Iews But the Apostls being illustrated with the holy ghost were neuer infected with this error Howbeit they differred theyr going to the geÌ„tiles for that they knew that the gospel should fyrst be preached in Iewry and they knew not how long they should abide there Wherefore they wayted to haue geuen vnto them from God an assured signe when they should goe which theyr expectation was satisfied By what signe God first shewed that thes shold preache to the Gentiles For the lord by a vision shewed vnto Peter that the nations were sanctified when he sayd vnto him Say not thou that that is common which God hath sanctified and he impelled him to goe to Cornelius the Centurion vnto whome when he had heard the word of the Gospell God by a visible signe communicated the holy ghost These were manifest tokens that the calling of the Gentiles shold no lenger be differed Of this which I haue spokeÌ„ the Acts of the Apostles beare witnes in which also we read that the Apostles the disciples that were at Ierusalem wondred that the Gentiles had receaued the holy ghost And Peter was accused by reason of Cornelius the Centurion for that he hadde gone to the Gentiles But he defended himselfe both in declaring vnto them the vision whereby he was admonished and also shewing vnto them that the holy ghost had visibly fallen vpon those Ethnikes We read also that after the death of Stephan many of the beleuers went to Antioch and to Ciprus and to other places of the Gentiles but yet taught not Christ but only to the Iewes But wheÌ„ they now by Peters oration manifestly vnderstoode that they should no lenger stay from admitting the Gentiles they thought that though they were put downe The Iewes sought to lay vpon yâ— Gentiles the yoke of the law from the first steppe yet they would stay in the second namely to lay vpon the neck of the GeÌ„tiles conuerted the yoke of the law There were doubtles Iews dispersed thorough out the whole world to whome the pharisies and prests seÌ„t letters not to admitte the doctrine of Christ But they which were now Christians but yet not thoroughly instructed wrote that Christ indede is to be reccaued but yet together with him it behoued them to receaue the ceremonies of the Whereof sprang the trouble in the church law of Moses Hereof sprang no smal trouble and the state of the Church was at that time very vnquiet this was the cause why Paul reproued Peter And the same Paul consented to circumcise Timothe to polle his hed in Cenchries and to offer in the temple at Ierusalem a gift as though he had made a vow This therfore The fault of the Romains and of the GalathiaÌ„s was partly like and partly vnlike was the occasion that moued the Apostle to write this epistle to the Romaines which were sicke of the same dissease that the Galathians were afterward infected with Howbeit the condition and state of ech of these natioÌ„s was not a like For the Balathians were first well instructed of Paul whome afterward the false Apostles and lieng preachers corrupted But contrariwise the Romanes were not at the beginning well taught and as it should seme they receaued together with Christ much of the leuen of Moses but when they knew the falshode they repented wherefore theyr fayth is much commended But by That Peter was flayne at Rome it can not be denyed whome they were first brought to the fayth many put great doubt That Peter went thither and was there slayne for Christs sake I will not deny when as in a maner all the Fathers and the ecclesiasticall histories testifie the same How be it it is not very likely that the Romanes were by him first brought to the fayth But paraduenture they by this meanes came to the fayth for that now a great multitude of the Hebrewes were come to Rome partly being brought thyther by Pompey and partly by reason Iewry was now in subiectioÌ„ to the Romanes and was brought into the forme of a prouince And amongst others many of the faythfull remoued thither Touching Priscilla and Aquilla it is very manifest What they were as it is most likely which preached yâ— gospel fyrst to the Romaines Their reason which neglect this Epistle Commendation of this Epistle to the Romanes by the last chapiter of this epistle By these and such other like of the faythfull the Gospell mought there haue hys beginning but not without
thinges which in the time of the fathers before Christ came were good and we beleue that they were instituted by the selfe same God which is the father of our lord Iesus Christ But to make the discourse of the first part more Abrief content of the whole Epistle playne and vniuersally the vtility of the whole epistle we will briefely touch the summe thereof that it being in that maner layd before our eyes the whole epistle may haue the more light In the first chapiter is set forth vnto vs how that neyther naturall knowledge The first chapiter nor ciuill offices could by any meanes iustifie men for that it is euidently shewed that men endewed with them liued drowned in most horrible sinnes whiche thing shoulde not haue happened if by these thinges they had bene iustyfied In the second chapiter the Iewes are made equall with the Gentiles whose The second chapiter life accused as most corrupt for that they preached that a man should not steale and yet stole that a man should not commit adultery and yet committed adultery that a man should not committe sacriledge and yet committed it thēselues By which it is manifest that the law which they had receaued brought them not to iustification In the third chapiter lest he might seme to deface the law he confesseth that that The third chapiter it was an excellent gift of God but yet not of that kind that it could iustifye He attributeth vnto it other offices namely to bring forth the knowledge of sinne And so he reduceth both the Iewes and the Gentiles to one Christ as to the fountayne and author of all righteousnes And yet notwithstanding he doth not by thys meanes he sayth violate or ouerthrowe the law but most of all establishe it In the fourth chapiter he proueth the selfe same thing which he had before The fourth chapiter put forth by the example of Abraham who before workes and before he had receaued circumcision was for this cause pronounced iust for that he beleued the promise of God This doubtles was imputed to him to righteousnes And to confirm that same he bringeth a testimony of Dauid who saith Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgeuen and whose sinnes are couered Blessed is the man to whome the Lord hath not imputed sinne Which chapiter if be diligently peysed we shall find that in it the Apostle in a maner tē times vseth this word of Imputacion Wherfore it ought not to seme so strange if we also vse it when we affirme that concupiscence lest in vs after baptisme is sinne although it be not imputed vnto sinne and although we are not able to get vnto our selues that righteousnes which is the true righteousnes before God yet if we beleue in him the righteousnes of Christ is imputed vnto vs. In the fift chapiter after that this righteousnes of Christ is apprehended by The fifth chapiter fayth many thinges are declared touching it that is that it is firme and embraseth Christ who died for the weake for enemies wicked men and sinners And in it is set forth a comparison of Christ with Adam For euen as by him all our kind was vitiated and corrupted so by Christ are all the elect renewed yea rather Christ is sayd to ouer passe Adam For he by one sinne infected al men but infinite sins were not able to resist Christ but that he performed that redemption which his will was to performe Yea he so vsed this euill that he gaue the plentifuller grace where the greater plenty of sinnes raigned In the sixt chapiter he ouerthroweth the importunate obiection of diuers The sixth chapiter which hereof inferred that we should sinne freely and liue loosely if as the Apostle had sayd greater grace should there be rendred where were found more sinnes The Apostle answereth that theyr collection was not good forasmuche as we are dead vnto sinne and grafted into Christ we ought vndoubtedly to liue vnto him and not to iniquity In the seuenth chapiter he declareth the maner how we are exempted from The seuēth chapiter the law And that is that forasmuch as in vs whilest we liue here is not a full perfect regeneration and corrupt affections do continually resist the lawes of God by the grace of Christ is brought to passe that we are deliuered from sin although it perpetually inhabite in our members and in our flesh Whereof he concludeth in the eight chapiter that there is no condemnation The eight chapiter to those whih are in Christ Iesus neyther walke they according to the flesh For they haue the spirite of Christ whereby they both liue and also are made pertakers of the resurrection to come they mortifye the deedes of the flesh and in themselues they haue witnes of the selfe same spirite that they are the children of God and by the selfe same spirite they are confirmed in aduersities to suffer them with a constāt and valiant mind and they haue this spirite making intercession for them which draweth them to expresse the similitude of the image of the sonne of God and at the last bringeth to passe that they can neyther be accused nor condemned before God In the ninth chapiter he answereth vnto the Iewes which contēded that these The ninth chapiter promises were bestowed vpon theyr nation only and were not powred vpon the Gentiles Vnto whome he sayth that touching this matter all thinges are done by the election of God whereby he hath mercy on whome he will and whome he will he hardneth And he compareth God to a potter who of one and the selfe same clay maketh some vessells to honour and some to contumely In the tenth chapiter he entreateth of the effectes of thys election namely that The tenth chapiter some embrace fayth and other some reiect it And he also declareth that Christ is the end of the law and that the law requireth this that we should beleue in Christ And hereby he proueth that the Iewes attayned not to righteousnes for that they went about to obtayne it by their owne merites and by their owne workes but the Gentles attayned vnto it for that they claue vnto fayth And all those thinges he confirmeth by the oracles of God that the Iewes I say were made blynde and that the Gentiles were receaued In the eleuēth chapiter he mitigateth that hard reprobation of the Iewes which The eleuenth chapiter he had set forth and declareth that not all vtterly were reiected but putteth them in good hope that for asmuch as their roote is holy many also of that nation shal be holy howbeit they are in the meane tyme excluded as touching vs which were wilde Oliue trees that we might be grafted into the good Oliue tree And after that this is accomplished they shall agayne be receaued And so he knitteth vp this discourse that God hath shut vp all vnder sinne and he is compelled at the lengh to cry out O the
to visite our neighbours namely to haue alwayes some spirituall gifts redy to communicate vnto them And on the other side we ought to be prompt With what mind ChristiaÌ„s ought to assemble together What peregrinations and what writings are had in the pâ—pacy easely to receaue if any spirituall profyte or commodity be offred vnto vs by their commyng vnto vs. But now a dayes they vse peregrinacions or pilgrimages to images and to worshippe reliques of the dead and not to succor the liuely temples of Christ The bishop of Rome writeth sometymes but yet only pardons bulles and curses He sendeth men to compound and dispence for sondry kinds of sinnes and to release vowes But none of these doth he fréely but they are altogether instituted for gayne and to scrape mony together To strengthen you Here is added the cause why he so much desired to come vnto the Romanes namely to strengthen them This is it which Christ The office of an Apostle is to coÌ„firme the brethren commaunded Peter And thou at the length when thou art conuerted confyrme thy brethren By these woordes is signifyed that the Romanes were not constante for they semed now redy to receaue the religion of the Iewes And yet because he would not offend their mindes that which he had before spoken of their confirmation he straight way lenefleth and mitigateth wyth these words which follow That I may receaue exhortation together with you Here he knitteth himselfe also with their infyrmity as though he also had neede of instruction And assuredly there is none in the Church placed so high that he can not receauâ— None so hygh in the Church but that he may be holpen by inferiours some confyrmacion and edifycation of the weaker Neyther doth God vse to geue all thynges vnto all men but that the weake ones haue oftentymes some singular and priuate gifte of God whereby to helpe the stronger Wherefore if Paule which was a piller of the Church stronger then any yron harder then the diamond confesseth that he myght profyte himselfe through these mens exhortacion why shoulde we then doubt of our selues But if the fayth of the Romanes were so great that it was now euery where published what neded they of any confyrmation We answere that fayth is in deede of hys ownâ— Our fayth needeth alwayes to be increased nature sure and constant and if it be such which iustefyeth it ought vtterly to differ from opinion that we doubt not of the verity of the other part but forasmuch as we are weake and do on euery side slippe being assaulted of our fleshe the deuill and the world we haue neede continually of the increase of faith Peter beleued truly in Christ when he sayd Saue me otherwise I perish But the Lord sayd vnto him O thou of little fayth why doubtedst thou By whiche wordes Peter was tought that the daunger hong not ouer him eyther by reason of the waters or of the tempest but through the want of faith Wherefore these thinges do nothing disagree betweene themselues that the fayth of the Romanes was to be magnifyed and that yet neuertheles they had neede of confyrmacion We might reade that which we haue here interpreted concerninge exhortacion as if there had bene mencion made of consolacion as though Paule shoulde haue sayde therefore I will come vnto you not only to strengthen you but also to stirre vp a mutuall consolaciyn and that through the fayth which is found as well in me as in you For they which mete together when they perceaue themselues not to be of a sundry opinion but of one and the selfe same opinion vse excedinglye to reioyce Wherefore Chrisostome and the Greke annotacions do admonishe vs that consolacion in this place may be taken for ioy Neyther ought we to doubt whether this consolacion should be betweene the Romanes themselues or betwéene them and Paule Because the wordes which follow séeme to dispatch that doubt in that it is sayd Through the mutuall fayth which both ye and I haue Neyther did he rashely make mencion of faith Forasmuch as the property thereof is to powre Fayth is compared vnto leuen it selfe into an other euen lyke leuen which when it hath leuened one part of the dow goeth forward into the next part But they are to be counted as colde beleuers which to theyr power labour not to make other of the same mynde that they are now of which thyng if it myght be brought to passe vndoubtedly so many should be amended as are drawen by theyr admonishment For what soeuer sinne we committe the same commeth of the imbecillity of fayth And by these wordes Paul bringeth to an equality those thinges which he hath spoken affirming that there should come a common gayne both vnto himselfe and vnto the Romanes by their mutuall metyng together And fayth is required on ether party as touching Paule that he might be able to obtaine the gifts which he wished vnto the Romanes agayne as touching them that they might receaue those thinges which were to be ministred vnto them by Paule I would not that ye should be ignorant brethern Ambrose readeth thys text otherwise after this maner I know ye are not ignorant brethern he expoundeth it that the Romanes were certified of the minde of Paule by such as beleued in Christ which continually went to Rome as by Aquila Priscilla and others who knew right well Paules purpose and determination But we will follow the common reading according vnto which the Apostle séemeth to preuent them as though they should haue sayd why then hast thou differred thy comming vnto vs seing thou so much desirest it Paule answereth that he oftentymes assayed to come vnto them but it would not be because he was alwayes letted To the Thessalonians he sayth that Sathan was the let that he could not come to Thessalonica And in the latter to the Corrinthyans he maketh mencion of a grenous persecution which he suffred in Asia and that he was tempted aboue his strength so that he almost dispayred of his life and therefore hys comming to Corinth was prolonged longer then he had appoynted But here he expresseth not of whom he was letted But there might be thrée kindes of lett es First God which by manifest oracles sometymes called hym Lett es which might hinder Paul from going to Rome The Romanes seme to be lesse esteemed of Paule then the other nacions It is not for the seruant to enquire out the counsels of his master backe from his appoynted enterprises as it appeareth in the 16. chapter of the Actes an other kinde is the necessity of Churches which euery day increased new and new lastly aduersities and persecutions whiche were stirred vp by Sathan Chrisostome hath noted that because Paule hath not expressed the cause why so great a city which ruled then ouer all should be lesse estemed then many other obscurer cities and prouinces humaine sence and reason myght therefore be
offended But he represseth thys inquision as curious and which becommeth not godly myndes It is sufficient sayth he that we know that all thynges are done by the prouidence of God Neyther ought we to thynke that any mortall man can better prouide for hys creatures then God himselfe can Neyther let vs thinke that the Romanes were therefore the worse estemed and prouided for because Paule came so late vnto them And he may be an example vnto vs not to be much curious in enquiring after such thinges He hath left the cause vnspoken of and paraduenture he enquired not for it As seene as he sawe that he was letted strayght way he obayed without enquiring the ChrysostoÌ„e was not of thys opinioÌ„ that the Romanes wâ—r first conuerted vnto Christ by Peter causes for as much as it is not for seruauntes to search out the counsels of theyr Lord. And when I consider these thynges I thinke I may thereby gather that Chrisostome was not fully perswaded that the Romanes were fyrst by Peter the Apostle conuerted vnto Christe before Paule came thether For then answeare might easely haue bene made The city of Rome was not vtterly forsaken of God whilest Paule was occupied otherwhere for Peter preached God performeth things that are forspoken that is predestinate after an other manner at an other tyme then the sayntes thynke for the Gospell there This is further to be noted that God oftentymes vseth to accomplish those thynges which are alredy appointed and desired of the saincts to be done but yet at a farre other tyme and after an other maner and way then they decreed wyth themselues to doo it Iacob when he heard that Ioseph hys sonne should be worshipped of hys brethren and also euen of hys parents began to thinke that to be a thyng odious and which coulde not be brought to passe without excéeding great troubles And therefore he did not gladly geue eare vnto it And yet did God performe the same but yet by a far other meanes then he thought So that Paule should go to Rome it was both decréed by the prouidence of God and also he excedingly desired it but it came to passe farre otherwise then euer Paule thought For he when he came to Ierusalem and was so euill handled there that he was in daunger of hys lyfe was compelled to appeale vnto Cesar and God vsed that occasion to sende hym to Rome which he afterward shewed vnto hym by a vision when he suffred shipwracke For he sayd vnto hym Euen as thou hast borne witnes vnto me at Ierusalem so also shalt thou doo at Rome Wherefore we ought alwayes to be mindefull of that place in Ieremy the 10. chapter a mans way is not in hys owne hand neyther is it in man to walke and to direct hys steppes It is God which boweth vs whethersoeuer he will And though he sendeth not forth his angels which should expressedly teach vs what he will haue vs to do yet he is wont to vrge vs by a God vseth necessities and occasions in stead of Aungels Why Paul came so late to Rome certayne necessity and to bring in occasions whereby to driue vs to do that which he hath alredy before decreed and appoynted wyth hymselfe And yet of the cause of thys delay there semeth somewhat to be written in the last chapter saue one of this epistle For he signifyeth that necessities of other Churches letted hym and occasions of preaching the Gospell which were more commodious and more necessary which were offred him in other places For there when he had written that he had nowe filled all places with the Gospell thoroughout all those regions was very desirous to see them neyther had any more to do in those regions he promised shortly to take his iorney toward theÌ„ To haue some fruite among you also Origene complayneth here of the darke construction or confused readinge which he very obscurely goeth about Origene Hyperbaton to restore But in my iudgement it is playne and easy inough if all this And I was letted euen to this day be written by interposition or a parenthesis For then shall the sentence be that he was oftentymes redy to come to haue some fruite among them as he had among other nacions He sayth not arrogantly that he will bring them fruite but rather that he will receaue and take fruite of them Which fruite was to be strengthened and stablished in Christ And Whereby faythfull scoolemasters are knowne Our desires should not preuent the iudgement of God this is a certayne token of faythfull scholemasters if they count the profyte of theyr disciples their fruite and aduantage Although there are some enterpreters which expound this sentence of the reward which should be geuen vnto Paule for preaching the Gospell among the Romanes But the fyrst interpretacion is more playne and more agreeable vnto the wordes of Christ wherein he sayth Ye haue not chosen me but I haue chosen you that ye should go forth and bring fruite But Paule semeth by hys desire to preuent the will of God which thing profitable seruauntes ought not to do For they must wayte for the commaundement of their Lord neyther must they resist when he commaundeth any thing For God was almost angry wyth Moses for that he refused to go vnto Pharao and so was he with Ionas the Prophet because he detracted God sometymes suffreth the godly to be deceaued concerning his will but he streyghtway correcteth theÌ„ to go vnto Niniuie Betweene these two daungers the meane ought to be obserued Paule whatsoeuer he saw that he thought would aduaunce the glory of God the same did he straight way excedingly desire which is also the nature of other holy men In the meane tyme God suffreth them to be deceaued howebeit he forsaketh them not For strayght way he boweth theyr willes whether it pleaseth hym that is to those thinges which do in very deede illustrate hys name And godly men must beware that they put not lettes agaynst the We must not put impediments agaynst the vocation of God The Apostles desire to go to Rome was besides hys determination calling of God They must bow themselues before God like drawing beastes to be gouerned with the bridell of hys will Neyther is this to be omitted that thys desire of the Apostle was besides his determinacion For he had determined as it is written in the 15. chapter of this epistle not to build vpon an other mans foundacion but there rather to preach Christ where his name had not before bene heard of For I am debtter both to the Greekes and to the Barbarous to the learned and to the vnlearned Now he addeth an other cause of his will The fyrst was to bestow vpon them some spirituall gift to strengthen them and to take some fruit of theÌ„ But now he sheweth that necessity vrged him hereunto least he might haue seemed to haue bene a busy fellow This necessity is taken
obiecte vnto vs the Gospell younge menne whyche are studious of the Gospel yea euen theyr own senses and humane reason cryeth agaynst them saying are ye not ashamed of thys new doctrine Are ye so blynde that ye see not that by thys meanes good workes are condemned the worshipping of God perisheth the minstery of the church is troden vnder foote the dignity of priesthode is abiected ecclesiasticall riches are vtterly spoyled what patrones or supporters of learned men shall ye haue hereafter Did your elders which went before you both in thys Mecoenate◠vniuersity and in others being both doctors notable men follow these steps Vnto these men also ought we to aunswere we are not ashamed of the Gospell howsoeuer you speake ill of it If so be they wil say we haue the Gospell yours A collatio◠of the doctrine of the Papistes of the Gospell is a new doctrine Let vs answere them agayne In such sort is that the Gospel which ye haue as that is the Gospell to set forth fayned worshippinges of god casting away and dispising the sincere worshipping described vnto vs of God as it is to worshippe stockes and images as is to obtrude vowes whereby such men are drawen away from matrimony which aboue others haue most neede therof as is to go on pilgrimages vnto Images to worshippe the bones of Saynctes to inuocate the dead and an infinite number of such other like Wherefore ye ought to be ashamed of your doctrine and not we of the Gospell of Christ Let it be diligētly examined what we by the same gospel iudge of the What maner of doctrine ours is honour of god We attribute all thinges vnto hym only we wil in all thinges depend of hym only Farther see what our iudgement is concerning the worshippyng of hym We desire to retayne the same pure and holy as it is delyuered vs in the holy scriptures What do we thinke of good works we vrge them continually and requyre to haue them done of vs so perfectly that we thinke alwayes that something remayneth not perfectly done of vs vnto whiche we should leuel and whereunto we ought to direct all our endeuors What iudge we as concerning the holy ministery we trauayle to haue it to be in great estimation as by which God worketh our saluacion What of Sacraments That they should be kept pure and vndefyled and be reduced vnto that vse whereunto Christ instituted them What iudge we of magistrates that they should be obeyed and that we should be subiecte vnto them in all thinges so that they commaund nothing agaynst the word of God What of poore and miserable men that we should helpe and relieue them What of publike peace and tranquillity That it be kept yea euen with the los of our goods What of sciences and good learning That they should be mayntained and aduaunced Why do ye obiect auncientnes vnto vs There is nothing that we more desire then to haue thynges brought to their olde estate Ye haue brought in new thinges we require againe the estate of the primitiue Church and desire to haue againe the institucions of the Apostles Wherefore there is no cause why we should be ashamed of the gospel of which such as complain do rather lament the losse of theyr commodities then that they can accuse our doctrine And if anye Troubles and discommodities are not to be ascribe◠vnto the Gospel troubles or discommodities happen they are not to be ascribed vnto the doctrine but vnto those which vnder the pretence of Christ and of the gospell doo seeke those thinges which are their owne and not the thinges which are Iesus Christes But now let vs see Paules reason why he is not ashamed of the gospell of Christ Because it is the power of God to saluacion to euery on that beleueth It is the power that is the organe and instrument wherby God sheweth forth hys power to saluation For together with the woord of God and the gospell are instilled grace and the holy ghost and especially remission of sinnes by whiche we are renewed and made safe And yet this knittinge together of mans saluation wyth the gospell is not naturall that is of necessitye so that the gospell The Gospell is not a naturall instrument but at the pleasure of God This diffinicion hath the cause efficient end and instrument of receauinge the Gospel A similitube of the Sacraments The sum of the whol controuersy concerning iustificatiō Why in iustification mencion is made chiefly of the power of god The difference betwene the righteousnes of the law and of the Gospel This phrase of speach to take holde by fayth is not strange nor rare in in the holye scriptures beyng geuen and set forth saluation should streight way follow of necessitye For it is needefull that God doo also inwardly moue the harts of the hearers as in the Actes of the Apostles we reade it was doone vnto the woman that sold silke Wherfore the gospel is to be counted an instrument arbitrary which God vseth according to hys will Many thynke that thys definition is taken of the cause efficient For in it is expressed the power of God whiche maketh vs safe Then is added the fynall cause namely that thys power of God is to saluation neyther is that lest vnspoken of whereby we are made able to take hold of so greate a benefyte and the same is fayth For it is added to euery beleuer For they which come to heare the Gospell and wante fayth receaue nothyng but wordes and the Gospell to them is no Gospell Euen as in the Sacraments they which are without fayth do in deede receaue the simboles or signes but they haue not the fruyte and thing of the sacraments Here is now touched the chief poynt of all the controuersy For in that it is sayd that saluacion cometh of the Gospell vnto euery one that beleueth is sufficientlye declared that we are iustifyed by fayth and not by works nor by our owne strength nor by philosophy nor by ceremonies of the law Neither did he without cause make mencion of the power of God For that before we can be saued our enemyes ought to be vanquished that is the deuill death hell and in especiall sinne Hereby playnly appeareth also the difference betweene the righteousnes of the lawe and the righteousnes of the gospell The righteousnes of the lawe is to do and to worke He that shall do these thinges shall liue in them sayd Moyses as it is alleaged to the Galathyans and shall in this Epistle be afterward intreated of in hys place But contrarywyse the ryghteousnes and saluation of the Gospell is by fayth vnto all thē that beleue For it is fayth which taketh hold of the mercye and promes of God although there haue bene some which durst affirme that this kind of speach to take hold by fayth is straung that is not vsed in the holy scriptures But they are excedingly deceaued It is
he made all thinges whatsoeuer he would it can not be auoyded but that the will of God after some maner concurreth to the producing of sinne But this thing ought we alwayes to haue before our eyes that one the selfe same thinge as it proceedeth from vs is sinne but as it is of God it is no sinne Therefore if in thys question we should aunswere simplye we ought to say that God is not the cause of sinne in that it is sinne Because he as we haue alredy often sayde inflicteth those thinges whiche in vs are sinnes as punishementes and wythdraweth his grace from such as haue deserued Whether a man endued with the grace of God can fall into sin The grace of God is not alwaies of one and the selfe same efficacye euill and oftentymes ministreth vnto them occasions of falling to the ende they should iustly be punished And if thou wilt demaund whether a man endued with grace and not forsaken of God can fall I would answere that the grace of God is not alwayes after one and the self same maner For sometymes by the iust iudgement of God it is more remisse and by it our hart and mynde are not so strongly and with such efficacy chaunged And then a man may fall and often tymes committe greuous sinnes But when it is of efficacy and mighty and when it fully beareth dominion in our hartes it preserueth vs from the greuouser sort of sinnes so much as in this life is possible But to returne to that which we were in hand with we can not deny but that God after a sort is the cause of sinne whether we consider the action whiche is naturall or the taking away of strengthes and grace although that happen not but through our fault For so sayd Oseas Thy perdition or destruction commeth of thee O Israell but thy saluation commeth from me Wherfore when it is sayd that God is the cause of sinne we must graunt that not to be spoken properly forasmuch as we haue in our selues sufficient cause of sinne And although we cauel neuer so much of other sinnes yet what shall we say of Originall sinne Vndoubtedly there is none which doubteth but that it is inflicted to vs of God for the auengement and punishment of the first fall And we are so borne with it that it can not be sayd that we draw it by any other proper sinne before committed of vs. But in these thynges we must deale moderately and in a Christian assembly we must speake warely For if a man streight way shall absolutely and simply say that God is the cause of sinne he shall not say true and the thyng not beyng well vnderstoode will cause many to be offended and men wyll excuse It must be aunswered by partes theyr wycked actes and go about to lay the cause of them vpon God The matter may be declared by partes and the truth may in such maner be spoken that all maner of offence may be auoyded But which is the best way thus to deale The Maneches we haue alredy shewed A great many heretofore haue erred in thys matter The Maneches for that they woulde not make the almighty God the author of sinne because they perceiued the Scriptures to be repugnaunt vnto theyr sentence appoynted two beginninges and framed vnto themselues two Gods one good and an other euil one of the old Testament and an other of the new one the Creator of thys visible worlde an other the father of our Lorde Iesus Christ They thoughte that by this meanes they could conciliate those thynges which are euery where written in the holy scriptures The good God they vtterly denied to be the cause of sin But the author of it they made the god of this world whome they pronounced to be euill They abused a place of the latter epistle A place of the latter Epistle to the Cor to the Corinthians where it is sayd In whome the God of this world hath blinded the hartes of the vnbeleuers Behold sayd they to make blynde pertayneth not not in any case vnto the good God but vnto the God of this worlde But thys place nothinge helpeth them For we may thus vnderstande it that God hath blynded the hartes of the vnbeleuers which are sayd to be of this worlde And after this maner doth Augustine read it Farther peraduenture by it is signified the Deuill whome Christ and also Paule calleth the prince of thys worlde with his fellowes powers aduersaries vnto vs the gouerners of this worlde and of darkenes Neyther is it any meruayle if he be called a God for so was he counted and worshipped of the infidels For the Scripture vseth sometymes to name thinges not as they are but as they are counted Moreouer there is no cause why but that we may vnderstande by the God of thys worlde the true God which hath created this world that is thys visible world and the self same God is the father of our Lorde Iesus Christ Neither is it a thyng vnsemely for hym to blinden the hartes of the vnbeleuers when as Paule in this place saith that he deliuered them vp both vnto theyr owne lustes and also into a reprobate mynde Yea and Christ also sayth of hymself that he came into iudgement that they which saw should be made blynde and they which were blynde should see But vnto those thinges which we haue now spoken of as touchyng occasions A place of Iames. Whither God tempteth men namely that God sometimes ministreth suche occasions by whiche men destitute of grace and the holye Ghoste are stirred vppe to sinne a place of Iames seemeth to be repugnaunte who in hys 1. chapter writeth thus God tempteth not to euill And yet we cannot deny but that the scriptures sometymes testefye that God tempted the Israelites Abraham and others Augustine de consensu Euangelistarum deuideth temptations into two kyndes Namely that some are to Two kinds of temptacion proue and other some to deceaue And he graunteth that God somtimes tempteth to proue but neuer to deceiue But this distinction semeth not to be sufficient For one and the selfe same temptation when it ighteth vppon a godlye man profiteth to trye hym wyth all But if it happen to an vngodlye person and one that is destitute of grace it serueth to seduce him As in the desert the temptacions as touching Moses Aaron Iosua and Chaleb were probations and trials but vnto others they were prouokementes vnto sinne And yet it sufficiently appeareth that God was the author of them Wherefore An other distinction of temptacions The Greeke schooles Howe God is not the author of inward temtations laying a part Augustines distinction there is an other which is more allowable which is read in the Greeke Scholies namely that there are certayne temptations vtterly outward whose beginning or cause we haue not in our selues as aduersities and persecutions but there are other temptations which seeme to burst
ascribe vnto God but to be counted or pronounced iuste For euery man doth not when he is afflicted acknowledge God to be good Of that minde was Daniell when he sayd Vnto thee belongeth righteousnes but vnto vs confusion of face God suffred Peter the Apostle Dauid the kyng and Moses to sinne that calling them backe agayne vnto hym and geuing vnto them the thynges which hee had promised them he might the more declare hys goodnes But because some men myght thinke that by those wordes may be gathered that men which professe pietie although they liue wickedly yet shall notwithstanding obtayne the promises of God if thys be generally true that our incredulitie or noughtines are no hinderaunce vnto the promises of God we must therfore make a distinction A distinction of the promise of God betwene the promises of God For there are some onely touching outward thynges and tend onely to temporall good thinges as that their publicke wealth should be preserued that the kingdome shoulde continue in the stocke of Dauid and that Christ should take fleshe of hys séede The sinnes and vnbeliefe of meÌ„ could nothyng hinder the bringing to passe of these thynges In déede in yâ— meane tyme came captiuities and afflictions howbeit at the length the promise of God as touchyng all these thynges tooke place There is an other kinde of promises touching those thinges which pertayne vnto our saluation And vnto these in déede the vngodly do not attayne And yet can we not therefore inferre that by our wicked doinges the promises of God are frustrated For they pertayne not generally vnto all men but onely vnto those which be called by the predestination Vnto whome pertaine the promises of God of God according to election as it is writteÌ„ in this Epistle the 9. chap. where it is sayd Not as though the worde of God hath fallen awaye And straight way is added Are the children of the fleshe the children of God And aunswere is made They which are the children of promise are counted for the seede Wherfore they vnto whome the promises pertayne if they haue fallen shal be called backe agayne to repentance And so theyr synnes which they haue before committed shall not make voyd the promises of God Indede as touching theÌ„ they deserued to haue them made frustrate For they hauing once broken couenaunt it wer conuenient that God toward them should not stande to his promises accordinge to this common sentence Qui fraugit fidem fides fraugitur eidem That is He whiche breaketh promise let promise againe be broken vnto hym But God so dealeth not to the end his goodnes might be the better declared And those things which Vnto vs also pertayne those thinges which Paule now teacheth Paule now speaketh of the Iewes pertaine vnto vs also For most excellent are these benefites of God towardes vs namely that the Gospell is committed vnto vs that we haue baptisme the holy Eucharist and such other like which thinges vndoubtedly the Turkes and infidels haue not But a man might obiect what do these thinges profite when as in the meane tyme very many are a great deale the worse and the most part abuse them We aunswer with Paule that by this is the goodnes of God to be gathered that he will suffer many noughty men and hipocrites for a few good mens sakes whiche vse these giftes well and will rather very long beare with many wicked men then that his church should come to rume Thou wilt say peraduenture then he willeth their sinnes if he suffer them We ought not after the example of God to suffer sins when we may amend them What els after a certaine maner he willeth them Otherwise he would not suffer them vnles he willed them for God suffereth nothyng against his will But hereby canst thou not gather any excuse for meÌ„ or yâ— we also must alwayes beare with sinnes For God hath no law prescribed vnto him Therfore when he of hys goodnes doth whatsoeuer thinges he will he is not to be accused But vnto vs is a law geuen wherin we are commaunded to admonish our neighbor whom we sée to offend and that not once or alone but twise and the third tyme to take witnesses with vs so that if at the length he will not heare vs let him be brought before the congregation which if he also neglect let him be counted for a Publicane and an Ethenike These thinges are prescribed vnto vs and therfore ought to be done of vs so that the sinnes be manifest and that it may be done without a schisme Otherwyse if by plucking vp the tares shoulde also be rooted vp the wheat it must be differred vntill the end as Augustines iudgement is But in the meane time some wicked men vse to say I woulde to God we had neuer had either the woord of God or Baptisme or the Eucharist For forasmuche as these thinges profite vs not they are to our greater and more bitter iudgemente But these mâ—nne ought to consider that this euell commeth not of God but of themselues Those thinges whiche are geuen by God are good let them ascribe vnto themselues whatsoeuer euell commeth of them and let them knowe that those thinges are alwayes profitable vnto some although very oftentimes to the greater parte they serue vnto condemnation Wherefore a good pastor ought not to Pastors although theâ—se that they profite not much yet ought they not to forsake theyr ministery An example of the Prophets forsake his ministery to cease of either from preachyng or from ministryng the sacraments vnder this pretence because he séeth his labour to profite but a litle yea rather that men become a great deale worse Forasmuch as the truth of thys place abideth vnshaken namely that these thinges haue great profite Neither is there any cause why he should feare that he is not sent of God so that his calling be as touchyng other circumstances iust and lawfull For the Prophets without doubt were sent by the Lord when the captiuity of Babilon was at hand And when of theyr sermons they had none or at the leâ—t very litle fruit their words as touchyng the greater parte were both to iudgement condemnation yet ceased they not from the charge committed vnto them The Lord hath assigned one When it is lauful to depart from the ministery cause onely for which it is lawfull for the ministers of the worde to holde theyr peace namely when men wil no more geue eare and openly deride and mocke at those thynges which are spoken Then vndoubtedly must they shake of the dust of theyr féete and go theyr wayes But so long as they wyl abyde to heare al though they striue agaynst it yet are they to be borne wyth all Neyther doth the worde of God by and by bryng forth hys fruites as the féede cast into yâ— grounde doth not streight way spring vp And there are many tymes some which wheÌ„ they The
speake peculiarly of Christ we haue in Genesis that the sede of the woman Peculiar testemonies of Christ of faith that iustesieth should treade vnder foote the head of the serpent And to Abraham it was sayd In thy seed shall all nations be blessed And of the same Abraham it is written He beleued God and it was imputed vnto him for righteousnes Moreouer Paul citeth Say not in thine hart who shall ascend vp into heauen or who shall descend downe into hell The woorde is nighe at hand in thy mouth and in thy harte Paul also addeth And this is the woord of fayth which we preach If thou beleue with thy hart and confesse with thy mouth Again The Scepter shal not be taken away from the tribe of Iuda neyther a captayne out of his loynes tyll he be come whiche shal be sent and he shal be the expectation of the Gentles Ieremy writeth of Christ He shal be called God our righteousnes And in the same prophet we reade that God appoynted to geue a new Testament not according to that which he made with the Fathers but in describing his law in their harts bowells Abacuk saith The iust shall liue by fayth Esai saith I am found of them that sought me not Also God hath layed vpon hym all our iniquityes Dauid also Blessed are they whose iniquityes are forgeuen and whose sins are couered Blessed is the man vnto whome the Lord hath not imputed sinne An other kind of testimonyes also is had out of the dedes of the old fathers whiche were certayne forshewinges that Christe An ether kind oâ— testemonies are the actes of the Fathers should come to redeme mankinde For as he is sayd to lyue in vs for that we are his membres so also both was he and liued he in the old fathers Wherfore they were no les his members then are we But how the head suffereth and is recreated in his members it is most apertly declared in Paul wheÌ„ it was sayd Saul Saul why persecutest thou me And in the last iudgemeÌ„t Christ will pronouÌ„ce that whatsoeuer hath bene geueÌ„ vnto the least of his was geuen vnto him wherfore so often as we reade that the elders were ouercome brought into captiuity oppressed with calamityes we must vnderstand that Christ in them suffred these self same things And agayne wheÌ„ we heare that they got the victorye were restored and A shadowe of the death and resurrection of Christ delyuered let vs thinke that Christ also was in like sort affected in them And in the one we haue a shew of his death begon and in the other a shadow and beginning of hys resurrection And that this thing is so we are tought by that whiche Christ sayd that he should be in the hart of the earth thre dayes and thre nights lyke as was Ionas the prophet He likened himselfe also vnto the brasen serpente which Moses set vp vpon which whosoeuer looked they obteyned health be inge otherwise in daunger to dye of the venemous stinginge And in Oseas the prophet we reade Out of Egipt haue I called my sonne Which oracle the Hebrews contend to wreste vnto Pharao which was destroyed and vnto the people of Israell deliuered from his tyrannie Which thing if we should in the meane time graunt theÌ„ yet would I aske of them of whence that nation had the preeminence to be called by the name of the Children of God That vndoubtedly coulde not be proued The â—lders were not the childreÌ„ of God but by Christ to come by any other meanes then by Christ which is the Sonne of God being the first begotten amongest many brethren By whom others also as manye as are nombred to be the children of God haue aspired to suche a deuine adoption Wherefore the Apostle sayth that Christ was the first fruites and pronounceth that he hath the principalitie ouer all thinges Wherfore not without cause hath our Euangelist cited this place of the Prophet touching the Lord forsomuch as he also was by the admonishment of the Angell called backe out of Egipt Lastly the The thirde kinde of â—estemonies are sacrifices sacrifices oblations and ceremonies of the Elders bare witnes of this kinde of righteousnes For in those beastes which were slayne the death of Christ was manifested vnto the fayth of the Elders For euen as the thing sacrificed which otherwise had nothing offeÌ„ded was slaine for the sin of an other which escaped frée so was thereby shewed that Christ should be flayne for vs which were guiltie of death that by the pacefieng of the heauenly Father we might escape the punishments which we had deserued Neither let any man say that the sacraments of The sacraments of the elders how they had saluation ioyned with them and how they had not What was Paules meaning to yâ— Hebrues touching the rites of the Iewes the Elders had not saluation ioyned with them For that thing will we also graunt as touching the outward woorke which commonly is called the woorke wrought But the fayth which in those rites embraced Christ brought saluation vnto the Elders euen as at this day also the outward exercises of the sacraments or commaundementes doo nothing profite but onelye fayth bringeth saluation which seeth that vnder the infoldinges of sensible signes are set forth vnto vs heauenly giftes And if at any time the Apostle vnto the Hebrews or in anye other place seeme to affirme otherwyse wee must thyncke that hee hath to doo agaynste the Iewes which seperated Christe and hys fayth both from the lawe and also from ceremonies Which two things being seperated he firmely and strongely concludeth that they haue not saluacion by such rites and sacrifices The righteousnes of God by the fayth of Iesus Christ Now is it meete to tell what fayth is Fayth therefore is an assente and that a firme assente to the What is fayth wordes of God obteyned not by reason or by naturall demoÌ„stration but by the authority of the speaker and by the power of the holy Ghost And this definicion disagreeth not from that which Paule putteth in the .xi. to the Hebrues Hereby we may see about what thinges faith is occupied namely aboute the woordes of God And it is manifest what is the chiefest principle ground vnto whiche all thinges pertayning to God are referred and that is The Lord hath sayd But the authority of the speaker cannot be of force with vs so much as it ought vnlesse the perswasion of the holy Ghost be therunto adioyned In Greeke it is called Whence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is deriued 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word is deriued of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for we ar not accustomed to beleue but that which we are fully perswaded of Basilius as touching fayth when he expoundeth this place of the Psalme I haue beleued and therefore haue I spoken writeth Do not contend to see those thinges which are layd vp a farre of
whiche killeth a dogge and whiche offreth fiue swete cakes like vnto him whiche offreth the bloud of swyne But no man doubteth but that the workes whiche we worke are in a sorte sacrifices Wherfore if sinners offer them vnto the Lord they are displeasant vnto hym He addeth also an other reason He whiche worketh sinne is the seruant of sinne because when we be seruaunts vnto sinne it suffreth vs not to do any thing that is acceptable vnto God Lastly hee maketh thys reason that Christ said No man can serue two maisters neither is it by any meanes possible that we should serue both Mammon and God Wherupon hee concludeth that it is not possible that the wycked shoulde do good woorkes Wherefore the woorkes of preparation whyche our aduersaries fayne are What sins to be couered signifieth are vtterly excluded Augustine interpretyng the 31. Psalme sayth That sinnes to be couered is nothyng els then that God will not consider them And if sayth he hee consider them not then will he not punish them Wherefore sinnes are sayd to be couered before God because God will not punishe them They ought not so to bee vnderstand to be couered as though they were ouer couered and yet neuertheles remayne lining in vs. Their bonde and guiltines whereby punishment was due vnto vs is by forgeuenes taken away And for this thing the Prophet prayed when hee sayd Turne away thy face from my sinnes When Dauid made this Psalme hee was sicke and was troubled with a grenous disease For he maketh mencion that hys bones were withered away and that he felt the hand of God heauy vpon him and that the moystnes of hys body was in a maner all dried vp and manye other such like thinges Wherefore being by the disease admonished of his sinnes and of the wrath of God he brast forth into these woordes by which hee testified those to be blessed whose sinnes God had forgeuen And he taketh blessednes for instification For iustification as we haue sayde is a blessednes begon For Sins onely are a let that we are not blessed sins are onely a let that we are not now already blessed which whē they shall vtterly be taken away they shall no more hinder blessednes But men though they be neuer so good and holy yet so long as they lyue here are not vtterlye without sinne Therefore they alwayes aspire vnto blessednes that is vnto the forgeuenes of sinnes Wherefore in that selfe same Psalme it is afterward added For So longe as we liue here we pray for iustification He which prayeth not for the forthe forgeuenes of sins prayeth ill this shall euery one that is holy pray vnto thee Which thing our Sauiour also hath taught vs. For in the prayer which he made which euen the best and most holye oughte to saye he commaunded vs to saye Forgeue vs our trespasses And they which pray for other thinges and make not mention of this let them take hede that thyng happen not vnto them which happened vnto that Pharisey whom Luke sheweth to haue praid after this maner I geue thee thankes O God that I am not as other men are c. And for that cause saith Christ he departed not home to his house iustified bicause he rehersed before God his good workes onely But contrariwise the Publicane acknowledging his misery durst scarcely lift vp his eies vnto heauen And so being vtterly deiected in mynd he said Lord be mercifull vnto me a sinner And by this confession he acknowledged that he brought nothing vnto God but sinnes and therfore prayed that they might be forgeuen him He saith Christ returned home iustified Where as Dauid here as the Apostle citeth hym maketh no mencion of good workes yet some will obtrude it vnto vs out of these things which follow And in his spirite is no guile But vnto these mē August very well aunswereth In him saith he there is no guile which as he is a sinner so acknowledgeth himselfe to be and when he seeth himselfe vitiated with euill workes dissembleth What it is not to haue guile within one them not but manifestly confesseth them Therfore it is added in the selfe same psalme I haue said I will confesse mine owne iniquitie agaynst my selfe But yet againe suche whyche woulde so fayne weaken thys reasonynge of Paule obiecte vnto vs that there is vsed the figure Synecdoche so that wyth those thynges which Dauid setteth foorth wee shoulde also ioyne good woorkes to iustifye And to make their sentence of the more credite they gather other testimonies out of Dauid in which blessednes is also attributed vnto workes as Blessed are the immaculate which walke in the law of the Lorde Blessed is the man which feareth the Lorde Blessed is the man which hath not gone in the counsels of the vngodly and many other Whether blessednes be attributed vnto woorkes Here is entreated of the first blessednes and not of the last such like places in which they say that blessednes is as expressedly ascribed vnto workes as it is in that place which Paul now citeth vnto the remission of sinnes But forasmuch as these men doo recite againe the same argument in a manner which we haue a little before dissolued they shall also haue euen the selfe same answer Namely that here is not intreated of that blessednes or felicitie whiche follow the first iustification but here is disputed of the very first and principall iustification And why we can not here admit the figure Synecdoche we haue before alredy shewed bicause Paul expressedly affirmeth that this righteousnes cōmeth without workes And bicause it should not be said that he spake these things only of ceremoniall workes of the law he afterward addeth that the promise therefore consisteth of grace that it might be firme not wauer which excludeth not onely ceremonies but also morall works And a little before we reade forasmuch as iustification is geuen by imputation it cannot then be of workes And that he confirmed by a generall reason of working and of not working which vndoubtedly extend much farther then to ceremonies For we worke no lesse in morall workes then in ceremoniall workes He said moreouer that they which are iustified haue wherof to glory before God as though they had of him obteined righteousnes and not of their works Whiche reason remoueth from iustification eyther kynde of woorkes both ceremoniall and also morall Wherefore we moste manifestlye sée Ambrose saith we are iustifyed by faith onely that the figure Synecdoche canne by no meanes stande wyth the reasons of Paul Ambrose expounding these wordes oftentimes writeth that we are iustified by faith onely and he addeth without labour and any obseruation But that which he afterward addeth when he interpreteth this sentence of Dauid Blessed are they whose iniquityes are forgeuen he sayth Vnto whome iniquityes are forgeuen without labor or any worke and whose sinnes are couered no worke of repentance being required of them but only
things of greate wayght are added signes commonly vsed As when princes are consecrated whē matrimonies are contracted when bargainings gifts or other such like couenaunts of great waight are made For we desire to haue them to the vttermost witnessed and to be knowne not only by reason but also by the sences But there can be no other efficient cause of the sacramentes geuen but either God or our Lord Iesus Christ who also is verily God and of them ought we to haue an euident testimony out of the holy scriptures Which thing is most plainly declared by the definition which we haue now set forth For thus we defined them namelye that sacramentes are signes not indede naturall but appointed that by the will of God And this his will can not be made known vnto vs but onely out of the holy scriptures And therfore it is no hard matter to know how many they are in number in the new Testament We sée y◠How many the sacramentes of the new testament are New found out sacramentes excluded Christ instituted Baptisme and the Eucharist but the other sacramentes which the schole deuines set forth can not by the worde of GOD be proued to be sacraments We speake not this as though we deny that matrimony is to be had in reuerence or that the ordinations of ministers is to be retained still or that penance is to be doue although we reiect auriculer confession and other the abuses thereof deny it to be a sacrament otherwise euen we also do highly esteme these things but not as sacraments Neither dislike we with that confirmation whereby children when they come to age should be compelled to confesse their faith in y◠church and by outwarde profession to approue that whiche was done in Baptisme when they vnderstoode nothing but yet in such sort that of such an action we frame not a sacramēt But as touching extreme vnctiō it is manifest y◠it nothing pertayneth vnto vs especially seing it had no lōger any force then whilest the gifts of healings were extant in the Church And forasmuch as those giftes are now long since taken away it were absurde to kepe still the vayne signe thereof Neither also dyd Why besides baptisme and the Eucharist the rest are not properly sacramentes Basilius putteth vnction amongst traditions neither saith he that it is had out of the scriptures Christ commaund that this vnction should perpetually be vsed in the church But those other things which we before spake of although they may still be wyth profite retained yet are they not properly sacramentes eyther bicause they haue not outward signes or els bicause they wantmanifest words of promises which should by a visible signe be sealed or els bicause there is no commaundemēt of God extant wherby we are bound to obserue these thinges Basilius in his booke de spiritu sancto where he reckneth vp the traditions of the church maketh mencion of the signe of the crosse wherwith we ought to defend our selues and that adorations vppon the Sonday and from the resurrection vnto the feast of Penticost ought to be done standing vpright Amongst others also he reckeneth holy vnction Hereby we sée y◠this father held not that this vnction is had out of the holy scriptures which thyng our aduersaries rashly do Farther by his wordes we gather of how great waighte it is when as it is put amongst the number of those thinges which haue now long since growen out of vre Now let vs sée what be the effectes of the sacraments The Effectes of the sacramentes maister of the sentences in the 4. booke in the first dist putteth thre effectes of the sacramentes For he would that as men for pleasure sake haue made themselues subiect vnto thinges sensible and inferiour vnto themselues so now they should for piety sake do the same that of a certaine modesty or as they speake humilitie they should suffer themselues to be made subiect vnto these visible signes of the sacraments By the sacraments we are not made subiect vnto creatures In the sacramentes we are instructed touching thinges diuine But herein he far erreth For by the sacraments we are not made subiect vnto creatures neither ought we to worship them Onely the mind is there erected vnto God that man may be restored vnto his olde dignitie For he is set to be aboue all things which are sene and not to be subiect vnto them The second effect he putteth to be erudition that by the outwarde signes we should be instructed of things heauenly Which thing we also vndoubtedly affirme Lastly he sayth that therfore thei were iustituted that we should not be idle but be profitably exercised in true ceremonies rasting away supersticions But this vnles it be declared is not very plaine For we are sufficiently occupied in beleuing praying readyng of the word of God and doing good to our neighbours But outward ceremonies although they be instituted of God yet without faith they nothing profit Wherfore the exercising of them doth not of it selfe please God Howbeit if faith be presēt supersticions can take no place for that it hath alwayes a regard vnto the worde of God Wherfore after this maner they may be called exercises of faith and of pietie and be counted acceptable vnto GOD. But we will after a better sorte set forth these effectes of the sacraments First we say that they instruct vs which thing is alredye said Secondly that they kindle in vs fayth a desire of the promises of God Thirdly that they knit vs together in a streighter bond of charity for that we are By the sacramentes the holy ghost kindleth in vs fayth Other effectes What thinges are repugnante vnto the sacramentes Vnto the sacraments are sometimes attributed those thinges which long vnto the thinge signified Who be sacramentaries They are not bare signes A sacramēt is not of his owne nature a sacrifice all initiated with one and the selfe same mysteries And to these may two other effects also be added For by the sacraments we are both seperated from other sects also are admonished to lead an holy life But touching grace whither it be conferred by the sacraments or no we shall afterward sée These things being thus ordered there are two thinges which are contrary and repugnaunt vnto the nature of the sacraments The first is if we attribute to much vnto them For by y◠meanes is easely brought in idolatry when as that which belongeth vnto God onely is ascribed vnto a creature And if at any time the sacraments are sayd either to saue or to remit sinnes or any such like thing the same ought to be vnderstand of the thing signified and not of the signes For these thinges onely procéede of the promise and liberality of God whiche is sealed vnto vs by visible signes And oftentimes it happeneth that both the scriptures and the fathers seme to attribute vnto the signes those things which only belong
after the seuenth day there commeth vnto the infant newly borne so much strength that he is able easely to abyde the payne of circumcision But let vs leaue vnto them these The eyght day betokeneth the resurrection of Christ fayned toyes and let vs rather thus thinke that in the eight day was betokened the resurrection of Christ and therewith all ours which thing may easely be perceaued by Paule for he sayth that in circumcision was signified the cutting of of the sinnes of the flesh But the sinnes of the flesh can neuer be perfectly cut of from vs vntill we are come to the holy resurrection All the whole tyme of this world and the tyme of this whole life representeth a weeke of dayes But the eight day signifieth the resurrection There is moreouer an other reason The tyme of thys life is a weeke not worthy to be contemned namely that a childe being so newely borne is able to do nothing of hymselfe as touching the attaynement of righteousnes Wherfore hereby we be admonished y◠iustification cōmeth not of our workes And although it were so in the rite of Circumcisiō yet are not we in Baptisme bound to any certayn nomber of dayes For Christ hath made vs fre from this In baptisme we are not compelled to an◠certayne nomber of dayes Circumcisiō mought in the primitiue church be retayned for a time kinde of obseruation Howbeit there haue bene some which haue gone aboute in Baptisme also to compell Christians vnto the eyght day But those the Counsell held by Cypriam hath condemned In the primitiue Church Circumcision was for a tyme obserued Augustine also vpon the epistle vnto the Galathians saith that not euery circumcision after Christ was condemned but only that circumcision wherin was put hope of saluation but that circumcisiō which was receaued for this cause only to retaine peace in the Church and the more to aduaunce the preaching of the Gospel mought well be borne with all For this cause Paul suffred Timothe to be circumcised But if it be required to be done as necessary vnto saluation it is by no meanes to be permitted And therfore Paule ernestly resisted and would not suffer Titus to be circumcised as it is written in the epistle to the Galathians They say that euē now very many Churches Many churches of the christians retaine still circumcisiō in the East or in the South retayn still to this day Circumcision together with Baptisme How rightly they do it let them see vnto that Doubtles it is most likely that forasmuch as they haue retayned it so long and that so stifly they put some hope of theyr saluation in it Wherefore they should do much better if they would vtterly omitte it But it shal be good in the meane time to declare Why circumcision bound men to obserue the law how Paul to y◠Galathians sayth that he which is circumcised is debter to obserue the whole law For when Abraham receaued Circumcision the law was not yet geuen Wherefore it semeth that Circumcision had not that of his owne force and nature to binde men to obserue the law But we ought to remember that that whiche the Apostle sayth proceedeth out of an other principle namelye that Circumcision represented Christ as which should come and geue himselfe vpon the crosse and the law should so long be of force vntil Christ came Wherfore seing by Circumcision they testified that he was not as yet come it must nedes follow that they were kept still vnder the law when as the law could only by the comming of Christ be abrogated And with how greate an obseruation God would haue that sacrament to be kept hereby it is manifest for that in the booke of Genesis the 17. chapter he testefieth That the soule which is not circumcised the 8. day should be cut of from his people Ambrose in his booke of Abraham the Patriarch semeth to wonder at this so greate seuerity For God sayth he appoynted How it is sayd that the soule of the vncircumcised should be cut of cities of refuge that if any had by chance or vnwares killed a mā he mought haue a place whether to go that the frendes and kinsfolke of the party slayne should not kill hym so that he had not of set purpose and willingly but by chaunce and vnawares committed the murther Wherfore seing infants did not by their owne will refuse circumcision what reason was there they should bee cut of He answereth that therefore peraduenture God would haue the children depriued of theyr corporall life that in them the parentes might be punished for theyr impiety But he sayth that there were other which were of the opinion that this sentence pertayned not vnto the infants but vnto those in whose power they were as if it had bene sayd that they should be cut of But the very words of the scripture are agaynst this sentence wherefore he turneth himselfe to an allegoricall exposition as though that threatning should pertayn to those which circūcise not the mind which is the strongest most excellentest portion of the soule But suche allegories satisfie not this question Wherfore I thinke that two thinges are necessary to the absoluinge of this doubte The firste is that that threatning pertayned vnto him when he came to full age if he should then allow the negligence of his parents not receaue Circumcision vnto which he was by the law bound The second is that God is not to be accused of iniustice if somtimes he killed the infant being so brought vp vncircumcised For such seuerity mought be of force to admonish mē in how il part God taketh it to haue his sacramentes contemned And if paraduenture thou demaund what is to be What is to be iudged of children that perished without circumcision iudged of the soule of a child so killed hauing not as yet receaued the sacramēt I answer that we ether as touching his saluation or condemnatiō can affirm nothing on neither side For if he pertayned to the number of the elect so that he was predestinate to eternall life there is no cause but that he may be saued forasmuch as grace is not bound vnto the sacraments But if he were a vessell to that end made of God to shew forth in him his wrath and so to be condemned what can we complayne of the seuerity of God especially seing we are all borne the children of wrath and of condemnatiō Howbeit in my iudgmēt we ought to hope well of him for that forasmuch as the promise was geuen vnto the sede of Abraham and he being an infant hath not by any actuall sinne of his owne withdrawen himselfe from the promise it is most likely that he is admitted vnto the kingdome of God Neither oughte we to thincke that he was slayne of God to eternall condemnation but rather to saluation that he shoulde not by mallice change his hart and that by hys death he mought testifye
his vnderstanding that God is omnipotent But whereas Iames sayth that the deuill beleueth and trembleth to beleue is there put to know But the fayth which is here described partayneth vnto men only and to none but to those that are godly The Apostle repeteth The fayth which is here entreated of pertaineth vnto godly men onely that this fayth was imputed vnto Abraham vnto righteousnes He did indede before beleue and was iustified but the scripture sheweth now how it was expressed when his fayth shined forth more excellently and more notably For as touching this promise both the disposition of his body and the age of his wife were wonderfully agaynst it which thing is not so manifestly declared in the promises that were before geuen Now it is not written for him only that it was imputed to him for righteousnes but also for vs to whome it shal be imputed for righteousnes which beleue in him that raysed vp Iesus our Lord from the deade Who was deliuered for our sinnes and is risen agayne for our iustification Now it is not written for him only Here Paul applieth the example of Abraham vnto vs. For sayth he euen as fayth profited him vnto iustification so also shall it be imputed vnto vs vnto righteousnes This maner ought we to obserue when we come to the reading of the holy scriptures that when we haue diligently peysed any place we turne the eyes of our mynde to our selues and diligently examine how those thinges which we reade pertayne vnto vs. This thing also is to be obserued that the Apostle when he discusseth this place of controuersy touching The proues of Paule takeÌ„ out of the scriptures iustification for the iudgement of the whole disputation sendeth the beleuers no where els but vnto the scriptures for he sendeth them not to the fathers to sée what their iudgement is For that we haue the scriptures in which are all thinges playnly contayned which are necessary to saluation for Paul sayth to Timothe All scripture inspired by God is profitable to teach to reproue to enstruct and to correct that the man of God may be perfect and absolute and be enstructed to all good A place of Paule to Timothy declared workes Here are reckened fower principall pointes which comprehend the whole summe of Christian relgion For it entreateth ether of doctrines or of maners And as touching doctrines we must take hede that we confirme thinges that are good and true and confute thinges corrupt and false And of these thinges the Apostle sayth that the scriptures are profitable to teach and to reproue And as touching maners such as are good are to be perswaded by admonitioÌ„s or such as are euell are to be reprehended And hereunto pertayneth yâ— which the Apostle sayth To correct and to enstruct And these things are so contayned in the holy scriptures that by them a man may be made perfect Which could in no case be counted true if there were any thing wanting in them Wherefore our negligence is much to be accused which doth in such sort contemne to search the holy scriptures The laytie and simpler sort complayne of their pastors for seing they lye snorting a Remedy again 〈…〉 th negligence of Pastors slepe it is not to be meruayled at if others slepe There can be no better remedy agaynst this so great negligence of the pastors then that the lay men continually occupye themselues in the scriptures and when they are in doubt of any thing to bring it to their pastors and to aske of them their iudgement and to vrge them By that meanes it shall come to passe that will they or nill they they shal be compelled to be diligent in study For they should vndoubtedly at the length be ashamed when they should sée themselues not able to make answere But the lay men say they haue no leasure to study the holy scriptures when yet to the greate losse of tyme they haue leasure inough for pastimes and vnprofitable trifles Chrisostome continually in his holy sermons pricked forward all his hearers to the reading of the holy scriptures both by many other reasons and finally by this excellent A similitude similitude They which haue found out sayth he mynes of gold or siluer spare no paynes digge the grounde go vnder the earth and sustayne the pestilent exalationes of the earth that they maye come to small crommes of golde or of siluer And we hauing the scriptures a treasure most aboundant and most easy to attayne vnto neglect to excercise our selues or to take any paynes therin We must not in these daies wayte for the pastors to inuite vs to read the scriptures They had a great deale rather that they were vtterly forbidden the people that they might be kept of such men as were called Triumuiri as the bookes of the Sibils were that the people mought come and aske counsell of them and they to geue them answers as it were out of an oracle By which meanes their idlenes and ease should be very well prouided The subtelty of the Popish prieâ—â—es for But now when they sée that that cannot be they say that the sence of the scriptures is to be sought for out of the fathers forasmuch as it is an infinit worke to read them ouer all they may in the meane time at their pleasure confirme their abuses For they shall alwayes fynd some amongst them which may seme to fauor their fonde deuises and dreames Neither are these men ashamed to make the oracles of God subiect to the opinions of men But they say that they doo this onely there where the places are in controuersie neither can be expounded by the scripture it selfe Touching which matter it shall not be amisse to heare what Ierome saith He vpon the xxiij chapter of Mathew entreating of this sentence of the Lord The scripture ought not to be made subiect vnto the iudgement of meÌ„ Of Zachary slainâ— betwen◠〈…〉 e temple and the alter That Zachary the sonne of Barachias was slayn betwene the temple and the altar saith that some thought that this Zachary was the father of Iohn Baptist which was slayne in that place because he was a priest and that for no other cause but for that he had preached Christ. I sought oftentimes to know which of the fathers exposition thys was And at the length I found that it was Basilius exposition For he vseth it in his sermon of the Natiuity of our Lord and saith That it was a tradition by long succession euen vnto his tyme confirmed that Zachary beyng priest dyd register the mother of Christ after she had brought forth a chylde amongest the virgins and when he was accused of the Iewes for the fame and rendred a reason of his so doyng and preached besides also many thynges of Christ the Iewes not beyng able any longer to beare wyth him killed him Touching this history Jerom in this maner pronounceth That for as much
church can not releâ—se the afflictions of the godly these punishementes which God inflicteth vpon vs whilest we liue here are not in the power of the Church that it can at pleasure and as it listeth it selfe alter or lenifye or mitigate them as our aduersaryes haue fayned of the paynes of purgatory Which their fayned deuise they can not confirme by any reason taken out of the holy scriptures We must diligently also weigh the wordes of the Apostle For as when he fayth That we stand in grace by fayth he declareth that the property of fayth is to erect and to confirme our mindes Which property vndoubtedly it hath not but by that it cleaueth vnto the woord of God For so by it are broken the rages and tempests that rushe agaynst vs so are we established not to wauer with euery wynde of doctrine nor to change our opinion for euery chance of fortune The philosophers when they woulde amply set foorth the constancye of a iust man compared it with a fower square stone which howsoeuer it falleth falleth right But A comparison of fayth with philosophy fayth much more truely accoÌ„plisheth this theÌ„ doth philosophy Chrisostome addeth That the good thinges of this world whatsoeuer they be are nether firme nor constant For they are oftentymes assayled with many dangers and not seldome ouercome And although whilest we liue here we lose them not yet when we dye will we or nill we we must nedes forsake them But these spirituall things whereof we now intreate are both firme and shall after death be made more ample But the same Chrisostome vpon this place is of vs warely to be red For he sayth that Paul in making mencion of those thinges which we receaue of Christ rehearseth many thinges But when he commeth to those thinges which we haue of our selues he setteth forth only one thing namely fayth â–ª which sayth he we our selues bring of our owne But we must surely sticke fast to thys ground that fayth also is the gift of God and is deriued from him into vs. Out of this place also may be gathered a most firme argument that we are iustified by fayth only Which shall be made playne by the effect after this maner That by An argument wherby is proued that we are iustified by faith one lye which we are iustified ought to make vs quiet before God This thing can not workes bring to passe but fayth only Ergo we are iustified by fayth and not by workes The maior is very playne that we are not iustified vnles we haue such a quiet mynde that we abhorre not nor flye from the fight of God And that our workes are not able to performe this theyr vncleanes and vnpurenes declareth Wherefore Dauid hath not without cause written Enter not into iudgement with thy seruauntes Lord. We reioyce in the hope and glory of God Here is declared the nature of this peace and tranquilitie of the minde namely that it maketh vs most assured and sure of perpetuall felicity for we reioyce not but for that which we now possesse And that we euen now also possesse eternall lyfe Christ manifestly declareth We posses eternall life euen now also when he saith He that beleueth in me hath eternall lyfe But bicause it is not yet ful neither as yet appeareth therfore Paul addeth In the hope of the glory of God This glorye whiche we hope for is a coniunction with God that he maye wholye dwell and worke in vs which thing when we shall haue attayned we shall be adorned with the last and highest point of felicitye neither shall there be left any place vnto misery But when he sayth In the hope of the glory of God He séemeth to speake that by preuention For that as touching those which beleue the common opinion of men is excedingly deceiued For the Ethenikes commonly deride Christians for that they count themselues to be happye when yet in the meane tyme they want not wicked affections and are vexed with tribulations and aduersities They thinke yâ— we should weigh our felicity by those things which we haue Our felicity is not to be weighed by those thinges which are in vs. of our owne But we are of a farre other opinion for we so far forth counte our selues happy as we are so counted of God and that he imputeth vnto vs righteousnes not that we are not in the meane tyme renewed both in minde and in bodye although we are yet vnperfect And euen this selfe same righteousnes whiche we haue now obteyned and the renouation which is in vs we in no case thynke to be of that force that by it we can attayne vnto the rewardes of eternall lyfe Thys peace and felicitie and reioycing of which the Apostle now intreateth is yâ— which confirmed the Martirs when in Christes quarell they did shed both their lyfe and What is this peace which is had by faith bloud This is that hundreth folde which is rendered also in this lyfe is of more value then all the riches and pleasures of this world Wherefore when the Ethnikes deriding vs do boast of their riches and pleasures and power we ought not to be moued For we easely perceaue that they with al these their goods are miserable and wretched but on the other side we féele our selues happy when we haue possession of this one good thyng although we want all those thinges whiche they so highly estéeme And here is to be marked the order that the Apostle vseth in rehersing the effectes of iustification First he setteth forth peace wherby is declared The methode or order of the effectes of iustification that the battaile that sin had stirred vp against vs is now at an end For sin beyng by the death of Christ blotted out and the righteousnes of christ beingimputed vnto vs of God through faith of enemies we are made frendes whereby is made opeÌ„ vnto vs an entrance vnto his manifold grace and to the obteinement of innumerable benefites For so long as yâ— warre endured we were a great way of froÌ„ God and strangers from the promises but now that the peace is made by the mediator we are brought nearer there is geuen vs frée accesse vnto God which accesse yâ— Apostle worthely putteth in the second place as which could not haue come vnto vs vnles we had first obteyned peace Farther thirdly followeth reioycing in the hope of the glory of God For who will not now hope that he shal be adorned with the glory of God Whome will not so assured an expectation of so great a thyng of the glory I say of God make ioyfull and glad And of how great force and power this reioycing in the hope of the glory of God is that which followeth declareth And not that onely but also we reioyce in afflictions Of so greate force is this reioycing that those thinges which men especially wicked men count for a dishonor and from which they abhorre
soule from hym by traduction And so as touching thys the dignity of eche priesthode had bene alike when as eyther of them paid in Abraham tythes to Melchisedech But here mought they which fauour this opinion make aunswer yâ— there was besides an other manner of difference betwene Christ and Leui for although both of them were both as touchyng the body also as touchyng yâ— soule in yâ— loynes of Abraham yet did not both of them after one and the selfe same manner traduce their nature from him For Christ was borne of the Virgine the holy ghost commyng ouer her But Leui was begotten and borne after the common manes as other men are procreated Wherfore Augustine leaueth this reason and bringeth an other out of the booke of wisedome where it is written as he thinketh vnder the person of Christ I haue by lot obteyned a good soule For he thinketh that this phrase of speach can haue no place if the soule of Christ were by way of propagation by the law of nature traduced from his elders vnlesse we will affirme that nature worketh by chaunce And he thinketh yâ— this name of lot therfore had place in the soule of Christ to the ende we might vnderstand that those ornaments whiche we know were most riche and most plentifull in it were not geuen vnto it for any merites goyng before but of the mere mercy What lot could haue place in the soule of Christ Augustine leueth indifferent the question of the traduction of the soule Things also are sayd to be created which are done by meanes of God And this was a wonderfull great ornament of the soule of Christ to be ioyned vnto one and the selfe same substaunce and person with the word of God But this testmony forasmuch as it is not had out of the holy scriptures that are in the Canon is but of small force At the length he leueth indifferent the question of the traduction of the soules as a thing onech side probable And because they which are against it vse to cite this place out of the 33. Psalme which facioned the harts of them apart this also he saith is weake because they also which defend traduction of the soule deny not but that the soules are created of God although they contend that the same is done by a meane For so in the booke of Genesis we reade that the birdes were not created of nothyng but at the commaundement of God did issue forth out of the waters And euery one of vs is saide to be dissolued into earth from whence we were taken when as yet we haue not bodies immediatly out of the earth but of the bodies of our parents Wherfore this sentence can not be confuted and ouerthrowen by the holy scriptures Although I know that this is a receiued opinion in the churche yâ— the soules This is a receaued opinion that the soules are powred in increatioÌ„ are in creating infused and in infusion created Neither haue I for this cause â—ehersed these thinges for that I meane any innouation touching this senteÌ„ce but only that we might vnderstand what maner of propagation of originall sinne séemed most easiest vnto the ecclesiasticall writers And in dede the scholemin when they reiect this sentence leane only to Phisâ—call naturall reasons For that forasmuch The opinioÌ„ of the traduction of the soule is reasoned against onely by physicall reasons as the reasonable soule is by nature spirituall 〈◊〉 it cannot be sundred which thing yet is required in traduction And for that they hold the it is the vnderstaÌ„ding part and a thing of more worthines then that it can be drawen out of the facultie and power of â—atter they contend that it can not haue his being by generation but by creation Augustine assigneth an other way or meant in his booke 2. de nuptijs concupiscentia and in many other places where he disputeth against the Pelagians of this kinde of sinne and that is this that this vice or sinne is supposed to passe into the children through the pleasure which the parents take in their mutuall fellowship But this reason of propagation is grounded vppon a foundation suspected and in my iudgement vntrue For that pleasure which is taken of procreation is not of his owne nature euill vnles prauitie of the affect be adioyned therunto For if that action should of necessitie haue sinne ioined with it the holy ghost would not haue exhorted any man vnto it which yet he doth when he perswadeth vs to matrimony and when by Paul he admonisheth maried folks to render mutuall beneuolence one to another Howbeit amitte it were so let vs graunt that therin by reason of humaine infirmitie is some fault Therof shoulde The originall lust which is traduced pertaineth not onely to carnal pleasure follow that only this kind of lust is deriued into the children But the infection of originall sinne consisteth not onely in these thinges which pertaine to carnal pleasure but also in other lustes as of riches of honours of vengeaunce and finally in the whole corruption of our nature The third way is that God therfore createth the soule with such a sinne or defect for that it shall be the soule of a man now damned and set vnder the curse Such a soule say they God createth as is required to 3. such a man Euen as we sée that vnto a dogge is geuen such a soule as is mete for a dogge and vnto the body of an asse a soule mete for an asse But this semeth to be a It cannot be thoughte that God created a soule withfinne very harde opinion Namely that God should contaminate with sinne a soule not yet pertaining vnto AdaÌ„ especially seing they caÌ„ not say that this kind of sin is the punishment of an other sinne which went before Wherfore this fonde deuise is of euery man reiected lest we should seme to make God absolutely the author of sins The fourth maner is by the consentes of many men receiued semeth very likely 4 to be true namely that the soule is not created with some but straight way draweth vnto it sinne so soone as euer it is adioyned vnto the body deriued from The soule is said to contracte or draw originall sinne so sone as euer it is ioyned to the corrupt body By two principall thinges the soule is weakened Adam For seing the soule wanteth that grace and vertues wherewith the soule of the first man was endued and hath also gotten a body obnoxious vnto the curse and hath Organes or instruments vnapt very vnmete vnto spirituall workes therefore whereas it ought to gouerne the body it is by it oppressed kept vnder and drawen vnto lustes agréeable vnto the body For it is on â—ch fiâ—e weakened both by the vncleanes of the body and also through his owne imber 〈…〉 litye for that it waÌ„teth strengths whereby to ouercome nature of which two principall points the
some thinke that the heauenlye grace consisteth in the remission of sinnes But we haue reckened verye manye highe commendacions and for that cause we baptise children beinge infantes when as yet they are not defiled wyth sinne that to them myghte be geuen or added ryghteousnesse holynes adoption inheritaunce and brother hoode of Chryste to bee hys menbers By these wordes Iulianus thoughte that Chrisostome ment that there was no originall sinne But Augustine sayth that these his words are to be vnderstand of sinne which they haue committed by their owne proper deliberation from which sinne childreÌ„ Infantes may be called innocentes as touchinge sins whiche they haue committed of theyr own propre deliberatioÌ„ We must vse great warines in reading of the fathers To haue proper sins may be vnderstande two maner of wayes are without doubt free and after this maner they may be called innocentes According to which sentence Paul writeth of those two brethern before they had done any euill or good when as yet none at all is accepted from that which the Apostle sayd By the sinne of one man sinne came on all men to condemnation and also By the disobedieÌ„ce of one maÌ„ many are made sinners By this it appeareth how ware we ought to be in reading of the fathers For sometymes we reade in them that infantes haue not proper sinnes of their owne when as yet they do in especiall acknowledge in them the vices of nature that is originall sinne But to haue proper sinnes may be vnderstand two maner of wayes Ether it may be vnderstand of those sinnes which they haue committed of their owne proper will and frée choise and after this maner that sentence of Chrisostome concerning infantes is counted true Or els proper sinnes are called proper vices of nature wherewith we are both defiled and condemned which sinnes can not be seioyned from infantes forasmuch as they are borne in them as Dauid manifestly proueth Farther Augustine hath noted in the wordes of Chrisostome which are in the Greke tonge that there it is written sinnes in the plurall number and not sinne in the singular number as Iulianus had cited that place For thus it is written Greeke wordes of Chrisostom in Greke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is for this cause we baptise infantes when as yet they haue no sinnes Whiche woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is sinnes being in the plural number is as Augustine thinketh most aptly applied vnto those sinnes which are called actuall And he addeth Why the auncient fathers spake little of Originall sin A similitude that the auncient fathers disputed not so largely of originall sinne because the Pelagians were not yet sprong vp which impugne it These so many sentences of the fathers ought Pigghius diligently to haue weighed especially seing he counteth them for Egles which sée most sharpely and do alwayes flye vnto the body But me thinketh he reckeneth them as counters wherewith men cast accompt which being put in sondry places do sometymes signify a pounde and sometymes a peny as it pleaseth him that casteth the accompt So Pigghius wyll sometymes haue the authority of the fathers most ample and sometymes if they please him not very well he will haue it to be none at all And so sometymes he reuerenseth them as egles and sometimes he dispiseth them as Iays Pigghius dispiseth his Romish church But in this thing he semeth to contemne the iudgement of his owne Romishe Church which otherwise he euery where maketh equall euen with God him selfe For that Church doth in such maner acknowledge or originall sinne that it suffereth not infantes dying without baptisin e to be buried no not euen in the churchyard of Christians and commaundeth that the deuill be by exercismes expelled out of infantes when they are broughte to baptisme because it iudgeth them to be the bondsclaues of the deuill Which thing I do not therfore speake thereby either to allow those exorcismes or that I would haue them still retayned For that ought to be obtayned of God by prayeâ—s and we ought not to do it thereby to go about by a miracle to heale a 〈◊〉 possessed with a deuill For forasmuch as at this day there is no such gift in the Church there is Innocent liued in Augustines time They which diminish originall sinne diminish the benefite of Christ no cause why we should desire to retayne it Neither do we graunt that infaÌ„ts whiche are not yet baptised are possessed of the deuill Innocent also bishoppe of Rome which liued in Augustines tyme condemning Pelagius concerning originall sinne was of the same mynde that we are of We oughte not to extenuate this euill otherwise we shall extenuate the benefite of Christ And they which acknowledge not this spot are neither sory for it neither yet do they séeke remedy of Christ Vndoubtedly in this thinge Pigghius hath proceded farther theÌ„ eueÌ„ the Pelagians For they denied only the propagatioÌ„ of sinne through Adam Pigghius erreth more greuously in this thing then the Pelagions But Pigghius crieth out that that sentence is wicked and blasphemous and contumelious agaynst God Agayne it suffised them to say that infantes dying without Baptisme are both shut out of the kingdome of heauen and also placed in the paynes of hell but this man dreameth that they shal be happy through a certayne naturall blessednes yea and so happy that they shal blesse prayse and loue God with all their mynde with all their hart and wyth all their strengthes But now let vs see how he goeth aboute to darken and to obscure this definitioÌ„ which we haue before put First he saith that by these darknes and corruptions of nature ye vnderstand either mere priuations of the giftes of God or certayne thinges positiue If ye vnderstand them to be priuations then know I what ye meane But your debatinges are nothing els but tragicall names and vayne wordes But if ye will haue them to be thinges positiue then forasmuch as in an infant that is newly borne there is nothing but the soule and the body which are cleane and haue nature and God for their author from whence or by what haue these pestilences burst forth which ye make mencion of We answere first that the priuations which we here put What maner of priuations are vnderstand in originall sinne are not like negations which take away the whole as when we say that Centaurus or Scilla are not but we saye that they are such that they leaue the subiect mayned vnprofitable and deformed as it appeareth in an eye which wanteth sight and in the hand of one which hath the palsey which is euer shaking In such maner is originall sinne in vs. The powers indede and actions of the minde remayne but they want their vprightnes and therefore are wicked and corrupt But Pigghius still erreth because he fayneth that the nature of man A false imagination of Pigghius concerninge the nature of the first man
Paul it sufficient in such sort to set forth hys chaunge but he would also declare the maner of the chaunge For when he sayth that we obey from the hart he sufficiently teacheth that The motioÌ„ of the drawing of God is not by compulsion this motion is not by compulsion or violent but willyng and of our owne accord Here let vs marke how farre the doctrine of the Apostle is from that error wherof he was accused namely that we should sinne bicause we are exempted deliuered from the law Lastly he thus concludeth his reason But beyng made free from sinne ye are made the seruantes of righteousnes Here we ought to know that this word seruants is improperly taken For Seruitude properly obeyeth not his owne will but the will of an other man he is called a seruaunt which obeyeth not hys owne will but the will of an other man Now if there be any thing which we earnestly desire if that we obey him which sheweth himself vnto vs as a guide vnto the thyng that we desire and wil also helpe vs vnto the same then are we sayd not so much to serue him as to serue our own desire So they which are truly coÌ„uerted vnto Christ do aboue al things couet to satisfy the wil of God Wherfore if by the word of God by grace by righteousnes they be stirred vp vnto that scope or marke they are not then sayd properly to serue But he continueth in his metaphore which he began to declare the Antithesis or contrarietie betwene the state of men regenerate and the tiranny of sinne By this conclusion is this gatherod that we now being deliuered froÌ„ sinne ought so to serue righteousnes that heÌ„ceforth willingly we haue no more fellowship with sinne And that sayth Chrisostome is all one as if one shoulde say vnto a man that is escaped the handes of a tyranne Now thou hast escaped take hede therfore They most of all abhor from tiranny which haue sometimes liued vnder it An example of the people of Rome that thou come not agayne into hys power None vse more to abhorre from tyrannicall seruitude then they whiche sometymes lyued oppressed vnder it The Romanes when they had driuen out Tarquinius dyd afterwarde so excéedynglye hate hym that they banyshed Lucius Tarquinius Collatinus beynge a good man and an innocente for that he was of the same name We also beynge now made the members of Christ and grafted into the liberty of righteousnes ought not only to expell and banish all maner of sinne but also ought to tâ—mper our selues from all maner of shewe thereof thoughe it be neuer so small The A similitude same Chrisostome rehersing the goodnes of God towards mankinde sayth that he is like a riche and liberall prince which first with a greate somme money redemeth a child being an orphan and forsaken and brought not only into bondage but also compelled to do all maner of vile sclauery and drudgery and w 〈…〉 n hâ— hath so redemed hym being not content with that he adopteth him also to be his son and maketh him an heyre of exceding greate possessions All these thinges ought to prouoke vs to be seruauntes vnto righteousnes Nether let any man flatter him selfe that he is able at one time to serue both these Lords righteousnes I say and sinne For Christ affirmeth that thing to be impossible No man sayth he can serue two masters especially when they commaund thinges contrary as do righteousnes and sinne God and Mammon Yea and Augustine addeth that it is not possible to be obedient vnto one and the selfe same Lord which commaundeth contrary thinges Wherefore forasmuch as in Baptisme we haue professed obedience vnto righteousnes we ought wholy to stand vnto our promises vnles we will be those hipocrites of whome Esay sayth This people honoureth me with theyr lippes but theyr hartes farre from me If we be Christians and do professe the seruitude of righteousnes we oughte not to go on warfare in the campes of sinne I speake after the maner of man bycause of the infirmity of your flesh For as ye haue geuen your members seruauntes to vnclenes and to iniquity for iniquity so now geue your members seruaunts vnto righteousnes in holines For when ye were the seruauntes of sinne ye were free vnto righteousnes I speake after the maner of man bycause of the infirmity of your fleshe He now amplisteth the reason alredye set forth and vnto it addeth an exhortation For he desireth them that they should with no les endeuor doo seruice vnto righteousnes then before they serued sinne and he sayth that he requireth nothing of them but that which is iust so that he should be an vniust man which would not graunt vnto so iust a request And he extenuateth his peticion lest they that here it should steppe backe as it were from hard and vniust conditions Hereby An instruction for prechers let preachers learne that whatsoeuer doctrine they set forth vnto yâ— people they so set it forth that it may seme iust so that euery man may vnderstand that he ought to follow and to accomplish it and that for most iust causes This thinge only Paul requireth that we should now with the same obedience serue righteousnes wherewith before we serued sinne although in so greate a diuersity of Lordes it semeth most iust that we more promptly and diligently serue the excellenter and gentler Lord. And Paul to the end he would the more manifestly lay before theyr eyes the equity of his peticion on the one syde setteth forth the filthinâ—s and hurte which we haue by sinne and one the other side the honesty commodyty of Righteousnes for these are the places which we chiefely vse to The places of perswading and disswading perswad and disswad by But by the comparison of these contraries it semeth that he mought haue inferred that we ought more gladly willingly to serue Righteousnes then before we serued sinne But sayth Paul I speake after the maner of meÌ„ yâ— is I dele geÌ„tly I require not so much as I might iustly require Forasmuch as man is of nature gentle it seemeth a thinge strange to require It is not humanity to require hard thinges of hym thinges hard sharpe I speake after the maner of men signifieth as much as if he had sayd I speake geÌ„tly Although many expound it thus as if it should haue bene sayd I require nothing which they that haue the vse of humane reason ought not to graunt The Greke Scholies referre this vnto the thinges that go beforâ— as though Paul should there render a reason why he sayd that we Graeca Scholia are m 〈…〉 the seruauntes of righteousnes for that is not properlye seruitude W 〈…〉 he sayth that he speaketh after the manner of men for men vse to can tha◠〈…〉 h is greuousome and full of trouble by the name of seruitude and tiranny And 〈…〉 is â—ery
to moderate the paines inflicted of God althoughe the bodye be sayde to be deade bicause of sinne yet ought we not therfore to thinke that God retayneth hatred or anger against his whose sins he hath forgeuē For death and aduersities which afflict the godly ought not to be counted amongest paynes or punishments God is wont in déede to exercise the faythfull with aduersities as we rede of Dauid who although he heard that his sinne was forgeuen hym yet he both lost hys sonne and also in his family suffred wonderfull hard chaunces Wherefore the sacrifising priestes ought not hereof to conclude that it is lawfull for them at their pleasures to impose paynes and satisfactions vpon them whome they haue absolued from sinnes For only Christ when he died vpon the crosse hath aboundantly made satisfaction for vs all Neither did Christ impose any paynes ether vnto the thiefe or to the sinfull woman or vnto the man sicke of the palsey vnto whome he sayd Sonne thy sinnes are forgeuen thee Neither haue these men one word in the holy scripturs of their satisfactions Howbeit we both may and ought to exhort as many as returne vnto Christ and do repent by good workes to approue themselues to shew worthy fruites of repentance and whome they haue before by their euil workes offended him now to reconcile and edefie by their maners being changed Although these men ought not The kayes of the churche can not moderate the scourges of God vnder this pretence to clayme or chalenge vnto thēselues their kayes as though they could at their pleasure moderate the scourges of God whether they are to be suffred in this life or as they fayne in an other For it lieth in Gods hand only ether to send or to release warres disseases hunger persecutions and such other like kinde of calamities Neither hath God when he afflicteth the Saints alwayes a regard vnto this by a fatherly chastisement to correct their sinnes For oftentimes An other end of the scourges of God it commeth to passe that he will haue his Saintes geue a testemony of his doctrine and make manifest vnto the worlde how much his mighty and strong power is of efficacy in them So was Iohn Baptist behedded so were Esay Ieremy and al the Martyrs slayn This matter is clearely entreated of in the booke of Iobe Howbeit it is profitable that the godly be oftentimes admonished of repentance The spirite of Christ is the ground of our resurrection The flesh of Christ really eaten is not the cause of our resurrectiō and of good workes that God may lenefye and mitigate those scourges and calamities which he vseth to inflict vpon sinners Wherefore this place seemeth nothing to confirme either purgatory or satisfactions Howbeit by these wordes we are manifestly taught what is the ground or beginning of our resurrection namely the spirit of Christ which first dwelt in him and afterward also dwelleth in vs. Wherfore they are deceiued which thinke that vnto our resurrection is necessary either transubstantiation or the presence of Christ in the Eucharist as though out of his flesh which they will haue to be eaten of vs really we shal draw eternall life as out of a true fountaine and a certaine ground For here they make a false argument from that which is not the cause as the cause Here Paul writeth that the beginning of a new life is that we haue the selfe same spirite which was in Christ which is the whole and perfect cause of our resurrection But how the spirit of Christ can haue place in the supper of the Lord we may easely vnderstand In the holy supper we are indued with the spirite of Christ How the fleshe and bloud of Christ are a helpe vnto the reresurrectiō Wherefore the fathers sometimes attribute this thing vnto the sacraments A place of Iohn in the vi chapt for there we renue the memorye of the death of Christ of which if by faith we take hold in the communion we are more plentifully endued with the spirite of Christ wherby not only the minde is quickned but also the bodye is so renued that it is made pertaker of the blessed resurrection Hereby it is manifest how the flesh and bloud of Christ conduce to the bringing forth of the resurrectiō in vs. For by faith we take hold that they were deliuered for vs vnto the death by this faith we obteine the spirite to be made both in minde and in body pertakers of eternall lyfe And if the fathers at any time seme to attribute this vnto the sacramentes y◠hereof commeth for that they ascribe vnto the signes the thinges which are proper vnto the thinges signified This may we perceiue by the 6. chapiter of Iohn for there Christ promiseth life vnto them that eate his flesh and drinke his bloud And it is not harde for any man to sée that in that place is spoken of the spirituall eatinge whyche consisteth of fayth and the spirite For the signes were not as yet geuen of Christe And whereas hee sayth The breade whiche I will geue is my fleshe whiche I will geue for the life of the worlde is to bee vnderstande of the fleshe of Christe fastened vpon the crosse whiche beinge by faith comprehended of vs shall so strengthen and confirme vs as if it were our bread and our meate And that Christ sayd in the future tempse I vvil geue it is not to be meruayled at for he was not yet dead But hys death which afterward followed brought to passe that y◠body of Christ was offred vnto vs not only in words but also in outward signes in that last time when he was at the poynt to be deliuered Augustine in his 26. treatise vpon Iohn defendeth this doctrine For he sayth To beleue is To eate And he sayth moreouer That the old Fathers vnder the law did eate the selfe same thing that we doo For theyr sacraments and ours were all one and though their signes were diuers yet the things signified are one and the selfe same And in his epistle vnto Marcellinus he sayth That the sacramentes of the elders and ours were herein diuers for that they ▪ beleued in Christ to come and we beleue in him being now alredy come And Leo bishoppe of Rome in his epistle vnto them of Constantinoble sayth that we receauing the vertue or power of the heauēly meate do passe into the flesh of Christ which is made ours Ireneus oftentimes sayth that our flesh and our bodies are norished with the flesh and bloud of Christ which so it be rightly vnderstand we deny not For euen as by naturall meates is made bloud whereby we are naturally fed so by the flesh and bloud of Christ being taken holde of by fayth we draw vnto vs the spirite whereby the soule is norished and the body made pertakers of eternall life which we shall haue in the resurrectiō Farther we doubt not but that our flesh and body doo
of the Sentences confuted this matter For I know yâ— he in his 3. booke teacheth yâ— our hope leneth not only vnto yâ— mercy of God but also vnto our merites And therefore saith he to hope without merites is no hope but a presumption Thys sentence is not to be receaued For it addeth vnto hope a condition when as fayth without any condition apprehendeth that which is to be hoped for out of the word of God Farther when a these or any other wicked man is sodenly conuerted vnto God hath he not hope Vndoubtedly he hath for if he dispaired of saluation he would not fly vnto Christ And how can any man say that such a hope leneth to any merites when as he hath alwayes before liued wickedly But as we haue before sayd these men thinke they haue here a trimme place of refuge if they answere that thys hope of a man namely conuerted vnto Christ dependeth of merites not in dede past but to come newely that he hopeth he shal obteyne the rewardes of felicity when he hath done workes which he trusteth to doo But here they committe a double fault first bycause if he which is conuerted vnto Christ doo hope that by merites he shall haue eternal life he hath no true hope for he resisteth the true fayth For it apprehendeth the chiefe felicity offred frely Secondly vnawares they auouch that yâ— which hath not as yet his being is the cause of yâ— vertue which in acte and very dede they confesse to be in the minde of the repentaÌ„t And if they meane that he hopeth for felicitie when he hath liued well but yet in such sort that he hath no confidence that he caÌ„ by committing of sinne attaine Workes ar not the cause of hope vnto it then speake they no other thing then we do But so are not workes the cause of hope but light betwene it and the laste end as certayne meanes and first beginnings of felicity that men forasmuch as they hope that eternall blessednes shal be geuen vnto them freelye shoulde also hope that God if they liue wyll freely also geue vnto them good workes For the holy scripture teacheth â—arre otherwise then do these men For Dauid when he sayd If thou Lord shalt loke streightly vnto iniquities who shall be able to abide it And when he saw that the sinnes wherewith our workes are contaminated auocate vs from hope added The cause of our hope My soul hath hoped in his word And by the word he vnderstandeth the promise of which promise he rendreth a cause Bycause with the Lorde is mercye and with hym is plentifull redemption These are the true and proper causes of our hope The promise of God and his aboundant mercy The same Dauid in an other place sayth Why art thou sad o my soule and why dost thou trouble me Hope in God for I will still confesse vnto hym Here some obiect that we ar not iustified by fayth only for Paul sayth that we are saued by hope But these men ought to haue considered that the Apostle in this place entreateth not of Iustification For touching We are saued by hope but we are not iustified by it it he before wrote that by fayth the spirite we are deliuered from the lawe of sinne and of death and adopted into sonnes and heyres and made the fellow heyres of Christ But here he speaketh of the perfect redemption which is still to be wayted for This we also confesse to be holdeÌ„ by hope when yet notwithstanding we haue alredy by fayth obteyned iustification and remission of sinnes Farther I haue oftentimes admonished that when the scripture semeth to attribute iustification ether vnto hope or vnto charity or vnto our woorkes those places are so to be vnderstanded that iustification is there taught not by the causes but by the effectes And we ought to vnderstand that whatsoeuer is The consideration of iustification is sometymes declared by the causes and sometimes by the effectes attributed vnto works the same is wholy done by reason of fayth which is annexed vnto them Wherefore as in a wall we haue a consideration vnto the fouÌ„dation and in the fruites of trées to the roote so whatsoeuer semeth at the first sight to be ascribed vnto works is to be assigned vnto faith as vnto the mother of all good workes Which thinge Augustine hath in many places excellentlye taught Others to proue that hope depeÌ„deth of our workes cite that which Paul before sayd Tribulation worketh patience patience worketh experience and experience hope Here say they it is playne that of patience springeth hope I heare in dede the wordes of Paul but I doo not by them acknowledge that patience is the cause of hope For first it is playne inough to him that will consider it that Paul in thys connexion compareth not causes with effectes For who will say that tribulation is the cause of patience For it bringeth many to desperation and to horrible blasphemies But those thinges which Paul knitteth together in this chayne are instruments by which the holy ghost vseth to stir vp in vs these vertues But graunt that there be some consideratioÌ„ of cause betwene these things yet should it not thereof follow that patience is the cause of hope but contrariwise Patience springeth of hope that hope is the cause of patience For no man with a quiet mind patiently suffereth any thing vnles by that patience he hope to attayne vnto some thing Vndoubtedly Martirs are by hope confirmed in theyr tormentes patiently to beare them And the marchant if he had not a hope to gayn would kepe himselfe at home nether would he wander about the world And the shipmaster vnles he hoped that he could ariue at the porte would not lose out into the depe nether striue agaynst the windes and waues I confesse in dede that here is somewhat encreased by patience For when we se that vnto vs is geuen of Christ for hys Hope is somewhat encreased by patience sake with a quiet minde to suffer many thinges we more and more haue confidence that those thinges also which are remayning and which we wayte for shall one day be geuen vs. But to beleue that hope wholy dependeth of patience I can not be perswaded For as we haue before sayd by hope rather we come vnto patience And in very dede the holy ghost is the author and cause of these vertues And he goeth orderly to worke of one to produce an other Agaynst this certainty which we sayd dependeth of yâ— promise of God Pighius vseth trifling reasons that the promises are generall nether is in them mencion made either of me or of thee and therefore there is still remayning a doubt when we must discend to the application of these promises Thys man semeth to me to make the promises of God to hange in the ayre when as he will haue them to be so Euery faithfull man knoweth that the promises ar properly
Iacob and Esau For they being borne of one and the selfe same parentes yet was the one elected of God the other reiected In this place Paule bringeth in humaine reason complayning for that God dealeth not a like with all men But the Apostle aunswereth that we ought not to seeke a cause of the electiō of God which answere for as much as it satisficeth not mans reason there ariseth an other complaint why should the blame then be layd on vs that we are obstinate and come not vnto God when as the fault semeth not to be ours if God haue not chosen vs Here Paule sayth that the potters vessell ought not to complaine of his maker and that God made some vessels to honour and some to contumely Which comparison whē we call to remembrance we ought to cōsider how great a benefite we haue obtayned in that we are partakers of the election of God And though God haue chosen some of the Iewes and many more of the Ethnikes yet is not that repugnant vnto the Oracles of the scripture but rather by the testimonie of Ose the Prophet it is confirmed Neither is there any cause why the Iewes shoulde boast of their righteousnes forasmuch as it is not geuē to thē to beleue Wherfore according to the saying of Esay They haue stumbled agaynst the stone And that thing which vnto others was a strength and foundation was made vnto them a fall and offence These thinges being diligently weighed bring great vtilitie and doo verye well agree This treatise is profitable for our tymes with our tyme. It semed at that time a thing absurde that among the people of Israell so few beleued and to vs at this day it is obiected that there are verye few which truly professe the Gospell and lyue thereafter At that time men suspected that Christ was not that Messias which was promised in the law because he should saue the Iewes but this man chose very few of thē Farther they boasted of the name of the people of God So vnto vs also at this day is obiected the title of the churche And men thinke it a thing absurde that the most parte of the world should dissent from the Gospell and those in especiall which seeme to passe all others in honors and wisdome of the world Moreouer Paul sheweth What are the grounds of the churche what are the principles o◠groundes of the church namely the election of God and the worde Hereby saith he ought the matter to be measured and not by the authority or agrement of the multitude or gorgeousnes of this world Wherfore this place hath a notable consolation that we should not repent vs in that we are fewe Although we doubt not but that God for his mercy sake will daily encrease the number that the fellowship of the elect may be ful howbeit in the meane time In what thinges other congregations sometimes excell the church The Iewes boasted much of theyr kinred and workes of ceremonies we confesse that the church is not to be weighed either by the propagacion of the flesh or by the greatnes of the multitude or by dignities and honours or els by excellencies of wittes for as touching these notes other nations oftentymes excell it These two thinges which Paul in this place entreateth of namely the confidence of their stocke and bloud and the affiaunce in rites and ceremonies the wicked Iewes bosted of euen in the times of the Prophetes For they had perswaded themselues that it should neuer come to passe that either they should be ledde into captiuity or that the publike wealth of the Israelites should euer cease to be and to florish They made their vauntes that they were the stocke of Abraham and of the Patriarkes but as touching ceremonies and the outward worshippyng of God they so much swelled with pride that Ieremy the prophet in this maner derided them with an elegant irony They say saith he the temple of the Lord the temple of the Lord the temple of the Lord. They leaned also vnto the multitude whē as yet in very dede neither fewnes nor multitude are a sufficient firme and sure argument The church is not to be measured by the multitude of the church For it is a false argument taken of the Accidens For these thinges are onely accidences to the Church But the multitude and the number thou wilt say will make an argument probable I graunt that But the iudgement of wise and better men is much more probable But they are oftentymes in number most few Farther graunt that the opinion of the multitude make a probable argument yet doth it not make a true and necessary argumēt Neither can we thus gather This reason is probable or very likely therfore it is true For Thinges probable ar not alwaies true but oftentimes false there are many thinges which are goodly in shew and probable which yet afterward if they be examined are found most false And contrariwise many things at the first sight séeme absurd which yet if a man afterward diligētly pease weigh he shall finde to be true Experience teacheth vs y◠the number of them y◠truly beleue is very small if it be cōpared with the Iewes Turkes heretikes Epicures The nomber of them that truly beleue is small And Christ calleth his flocke a little flock affirmeth That many in deede are called but few are chosen Farthermore Paul in this place and the Prophetes euery where testifie that not all the Iewes shal be saued but only that a few remnantes shall be made safe Wherfore the cause is neither confirmed nor confuted by reason Fewnes nor multitude confirme not the cause of fewnes or multitude Howbeit Augustine semeth somtimes to obiect vnto y◠Donatistes that they being a few in number would yet neuertheles ascribe vnto themselues only the Church condemning the whole world besides But if a man diligently reade ouer those disputations of Augustine he shall perceyue that the Donatistes erred in thrée thinges in especiall First bicause they beleued that the Three errors of the Donatists whole Church was in Afrike only and in their multitude but other churches dispersed throughout the whole world they said were corrupt bicause many had ben pertakers with them which had betrayed the holy scripture as though in this life there can be found any church which vtterly should want all spotte and wrinckle Farther they iudged that the sacramentes were contaminated by the ill life of the ministers and for that cause they rebaptised those which fled vnto their Church But we beleue that Christ hath his churches euery where For there is nothyng more proper vnto the Church then to be catholike that is vniuersal neither so to It is proper vnto the churche to be Catholike The cause is proued by the word of God and not by fewnes nor multitude ▪ be bounde either vnto certayne places or persons that it can be no
as God had commaunded in the booke of the law This exposition in dede semeth to be somewhat more witty and more likely Howbeit by the wordes of the holy history it is confuted For when Moses feruently prayed the Lorde answered Let me alone I wyll kill all thys people at once for their contumacy towardes me and will make thee a prince of an other people both much greater and also more noble Wherefore there is no reason why Moses shoulde desire to bée putte out of authority that he shoulde not bee the head of that people when as God of hys owne accorde and wyllingly offred that thinge vnto hym Wherefore we must nedes confesse that Moses desired none other thing then that which Paul now wisheth for Chrisostome is so much against this opinion which Ierome defendeth to Algasia that he sayth That such as so thinke are so farre from the truth as a blindeman is from the light of the sunne And of this his confutacion this reason he bringeth Paul saith he had before spoken many thynges of that straighte coniunction which he had wyth God when he sayd that neyther tribulation nor anguishe nor persecution nor hunger nor nakednes nor daunger nor sworde is able to seperate hym from the loue of God After that as though he had not yet satisfied himselfe he addeth neyther death nor lyfe nor aungels nor principalities nor powers nor thynges present nor thynges to come nor height nor depth nor any other creature Now after the rehearsall of so many and so great thynges what more weighty or more noble thyng could he bryng which could excell these thynges Could this that he would gladly suffer death to bring hys brethren vnto Christ But this sayth he is a very small matter if it be coÌ„pared with those thynges before spoken For before he had twise mencioned death but he whiche refuseth to geue hys lyfe for the truth and for the health of his neyghbour seperateth hymselfe froÌ„ God by feare of death And therfore he should haue added no new thing to that which he before had spoken Wherfore we ought to thinke that Paul had a regard to farre greater thynges then these men suppose he had There is an other opinion of those which thinke that Paul referred not these thinges vnto the time wherin he wrote them but vnto that tyme wherin he liued a straunger from Christ For the better declaration wherof we ought to vnderstand that there are certaine men which after that they haue cast themselues hedlong into any thing endeuour themselues by al meanes to draw others to the same not that the place and estate wherinto they haue transferred themselues liketh them but that hauing many companions ioyned vnto them they might either be the lesse reproued or els the thing which they haue yll begon might haue a more tollerable ende And thus these men expounde the woordes of Paul The Iewes mought haue suspected that Paul for that cause desired to bring al other meÌ„ vnto Christ for yâ— he himself had already geueÌ„ himselfe vnto him not for that from the harte he counted the thing good But not so saith the Apostle yea rather so deare is your saluation vnto me that so from the hart I desire to communicate this good thing vnto you that I would wishe my selfe to be accursed from Christ and not to be yet called vnto him so that ye might come vnto him that is I would earnestly desire that ye might haue come to Christ before me And this thinke they is to be made accursed for his brethreÌ„ And to haue some shew to proue this Thou séest say they that he saith not that he desireth now to be made accursed for that could he not do after he was once conuerted but onely he wisheth himselfe to be made accursed that is when he was not yet conuerted vnto Christ But euery man may easely sée that this interpretacion is wrested and troublesome and yet if we should receiue it Paul should not auoide it which he semeth most of all to eschue For what do they not consider that he which of loue desireth to haue bene once in times past accursed from Christ the selfe man desireth this also now to be made accursed For if he should haue done that to the honour of God how should he not do this also to the honour of God Howbeit this interpretation among others haue the Gréeke Scholies I will not now stand any longer about Graeca Scholia the confutatioÌ„ therof for that I doubt not but there are not many which wil defend it There ar others which go about to proue this desire of Paul by the law of God Men say they are so framed yâ— euery man when he is in trouble aduersity desireth gladly to be redemed by some other man yea euen with the hurt of him which should redeme him They adde moreouer that the law of God is that we should loue our neighbours as our selues Wherfore forasmuch as we our selues would gladly desire that an other man should be damned for vs therefore we ought also to wyshe the same to others that we our selues should be damned for them least we would otherwyse to be done vnto oure neyghboures then we woulde to bee done vnto oure selues if we were in the like case And farther they say that euery one of vs ought so to loue his neighbor as Christ hath loued vs but Christ for oure sakes did not only geue his life vpon the â—rosse but also was made a curse and was after a sort forsaken of the father For he cryed My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Wherefore they conclude that that thing which Paul and Moses did was dew hy the Law Here if thou demaund who caÌ„ performe this Law They will answere no man but yet are not godly men for that cause condemned For say they we all dayly want muche of the iuste obseruation of the Law but our dayly falles are forgeuen vs for Christes sake and that which wanteth of our righteousnes is made good by the righteousnes of the Lord which is ascribed vnto vs through â—ayth And yet ought not anye man therefore to slake his endeuor to performe this kynde of commaundement We must labor as muche as lieth in vs if it succede not we ought to lament and so shall it come to passe that â—inne shall not be imputed vnto vs so that we doo not vtterly shake of our endeuor which thinge some men doo which so farre fall that they hate theyr enemies and persecute them but we ought not so to flatter our selues For there are certayne kinds of sinnes so greauous that they can not stand with fayth and charity Howbeit we must confesse that this vertue which we se was in Moses in Paul is a verye rare vertue Wherefore this vertue may be called heroicall or noble This in dede is a good interpretation and commended of those men vnto whome in very dede for piety and
haue despised me And in Ezechiell God saith That the children of Israell are his children namely by reason of this promise generally published amongst them and confirmed by circumcision and many other ceremonies and rites Howbeit forasmuch as many of them fell away from piety and from saluation it was very plaine that not all they were the children of God or the séede of Abraham vnto whom the promises were by election due Wherfore when Paul saith That not all they which are of Israell are Israell by Israel in the second place he vnderstandeth that séede whereunto is adioyned election and by children and by the children of God and by the children of the promise he vnderstandeth those vnto whoÌ„ the perfection of the promise was by the purpose of God coÌ„tracteth He bringeth the firste example of Isaack and Ismael out of the 21. chapiter of Genesis where Abraham is commaunded to caste forthe the handemayden and her sonne as Sara had requested â–ª For in Isaack saith he shall thy seede be called â–ª That is that promise The generall promise is by electioÌ„â—ontracted to some perticuler men which I haue made to thy séede shall by electioÌ„ be performed in Isaack neither shall pertaine to thine other sonne Ismael This place declareth that that which was before promised generally is by the hidden election of God contracted to certaine perticuler men The other oracle touching this selfe same matter is extant in the 18. chap. of Genesis In that tyme will I come and Sara shall haue a sonne This thing God promised when he was entertained of Abraham vnder yâ— oke of Mambra Ismael was nowe borne yet God promised vnto Abraham perticularly that A similitude he should haue a sonne of Sara in whom should be certainly performed the promise which before semed to hang vncertaine As if a father hauing many childreÌ„ should be promised that it should come to passe that in his stocke he should haue a kyngdome he should not streight way perceiue which of those children should be exalted Election or purpose directeth the promises Election is not repugnaunt vnto the promise to that dignitie but that appointing should consist onely in election Paul here by sheweth that the hidden purpose of God moderateth and contracteth that which was promised generally Not as though the election of God is repugnant vnto the promise yea rather it performeth accomplishethit but yet in these in whom it is decréed to be performed Neither ought we to thinke that the election of God is bound to naturall procreation And when the Apostle maketh mencion of the children of the flesh and of the children of the promise by children of the flesh he vnderstandeth those which haue in them nothing singuler or excellent besides the generation of the flesh which came vnto them from the holy Patriarkes And the children of promise he calleth those vnto whome the promise is now by election appointed From a perticuler proposition he ascendeth to a generall proposition And in this example of Esau and Ismael this is to be noted that the Apostle from a perticuler proposition ascendeth to a generall proposition that by such singuler factes he mought gather the order and maner of the election of God Here are we admonished neuer to step backe froÌ„ the faith of the word of God although these thinges which are in it intreated séeme to ouerreache humane reason and iudgement or to be made void Doubtles there should at that time most of all haue bene great doubt when as the promises made vnto the nation of the Iewes were now publikely extant but on the other side there were none in the whole world which more resisted Christ or with more cruel furiousnes repelled his Gospel then did that nation And yet notwithstanding the Apostle with an inuincible faith persisteth and as we haue now declared comforteth himselfe touching the promise of God After the same maner commeth it to passe touching the children of the faithfull We haue a promise that God is not onely our God but also the God of our We baptise infantes vnder the faith of the indefinite promise Against the Anabaptistes séede which promise being indefinite is by the hidden election of GOD applied vnto infantes not in déede alwayes to all but to some certaine as it shall séeme good vnto the purpose of God Which purpose being hidden from vs and we being bounde to follow the outward worde which is commended vnto the Church vnder that promise we baptise our infantes euen as the Elders circumcised theirs This facte the Anabaptistes reproue for that wee are not any thing assured either of the spirite or of the faith or of the election of these infants But we nothing passe vpon that only we haue a respect vnto the worde of God which is offred vnto vs in the generall and indefinite promise But the execution therof we commit vnto God when as we cannot iudge of his election But let them on the other side aunswer vs by what reason they baptise those that are of full age when as it is vncertaine whether they pertaine to election or no and whether yâ— thinges which they say they beleue and professe be truly said and whether with a sincere minde they come vnto Christ or no. Here they can answer nothing but that they follow the confession of that faith which they that are of full age make before the church when they come to be baptised But forasmuch as by yâ— confession they may easely be deceiued neither do they certainly know any thing either of their mind or of the election of God there is no cause why they should accuse vs. For it is euen so with vs in infantes which are offred vnto the church to be baptised as it is with them in those that are of full age And not only this but also Rebecka when she had conceaued by one euen by our father Isaack For the children being not yet borne and when they had done neither good nor euill Vnto the example which he before brought of Isaack and Ismaell he now addeth an other of Iacob and Esau and that not without great cause for men mought haue suspected that there had bene a diuersity in Isaack and Ismaell for that one was the sonne of an handmayden and the other of a frée woman when as no such thing could be pretended in Iacob and Esau For they had one and the selfe same father and one and the selfe same mother they were brethern which came both out of one bely and also twines conceaued in one and the same houre Wherefore as touching nature or procreation of the flesh there could be put no difference at all betwene them Wherefore seing that the one of them was reiected of God and the other elected it is of necessity that the same be attributed wholy vnto the will and election of God as to a higher ground and principle whereby are seuered those which haue one and the same
touching Ismaell and Esau whether they be faued or whether they be condemned And the like some do touching Salomon Origen and others such like But I omitte these thinges and thinke of Esau and Ismaell so much onely as the holy scripture hath set forth vnto vs. And I think that there are What is to be thought of Esau no places extant by which we may define any thing touching their saluation The scripture thus speaketh of Esau that he so vehemently hated his brother that he sought to kill him that he sold his birth right that he prouoked h 〈…〉 â—arentes to anger when he had take strange women for wiues that he was a violent man and despised the land of Chanaan promised vnto the fathers and in the epistle to the Hebrues it is written that he although he poured out many teares yet found he no place of repentance Of Ismaell also we reade that he was reiected not only What is to be thought of their stocke by the will of Sara but also by the will of God But touching both their posterities I deny not but that some of them mought be saued no les then some of the stocke of Iacob might become runnagates and obstinate For it is sufficient to the election and reiection of God that some part of ech stocke be either elected or reiected And touching this sentence I haue Ambrose on my side who affirmeth that the most holy man Iob was of the famely of Esau Which saying yet how much it is to be regarded I know not This thing only I dare affirme yâ— as many as were saued that came of Israell those were saued by the grace of God and had a promise of their saluation and on the other side as many as were saued of the stocke of Esau those also were saued by the mere grace of God but there was no peculiar promise touching their saluation But as many as were of that stocke condemed Indefinite promises at not to be vnderstanded of euery one perticulerly they were condemned for their sinnes And the sentence of the reiection of the posterity of Esau is indefinite neither is to be vnderstanded of euery one perticularly But it may séeme more then wonderfull that God in his election worketh not only contrary to our iudgement but also contrary to his own lawes For not only after the mauer of men the first borne are preferred before the rest of the brethern but also by the prescript of the lawe of God they were holy and obtayned a dooble portion of the inheritance But God therefore so doth that we should God doth thinges contrary to his lawes vnderstand that we are saued only by grace and not through any priuiledges or conditions of this life and moreouer to geue vs to vnderstand that he is vtterly free from all lawes For his will is euen iustice it selfe and the rule of all thinges that are vpright and iust But because men can not attayne to the knowledge of of this hidden election therefore we ought to frame our selues to the lawes of of God which are published abroade and set forth to all men For Isaack circumcised his sonne Esau as God had commaunded him neither was he greatly carefull whether he were elected of God or reiected for he was then vtterly ignorant of the counsaile of God But the mother for that she had hard the oracle gaue faith vnto it as it became her and had a care that the blessing mought be distributed according to the will of God And so by her industry it came to passe that Iacob preuented his brother of the blessing Touching which will when the father also was by the spirite of God made more certayne he would by no meanes make voide that which had now passed betwene him and Iacob Paul mought now seme to haue thoroughly defended the truth of the promises of God when as after the example of Ismaell and Isaack which were borne of diuers parentes and at diuers tymes he with so great diligence bringeth in also an other coople of bretheren Iacob and Esau in whome all thinges in a maner were equall For they were borne both of one and the selfe same parentes and in one and the selfe same day and as Augustine saith in his epistle to Sixtus both conceaued at one and the selfe same time least any man mought cauell that the father was better when he begat the one then he was when he begat the other And the mother which bare them both was one and the selfe same woman And although she myght in that space of time whilest she was with child alter her maners and disposition yet that could not in such sort profit the one to be a let vnto the other Although by the Greke it appeareth not that they were both conceaued at one and the selfe same tyme. Howbeit this is red That Rebecka had fellowship by one euen by our father Isaack But Augustine followed the latine translation Farther it is not vnlikely to be true yâ— they which were borne in one and the selfe same tyme were also begotten atone the selfe same tyme especially seing that the Apostle in this place endeuoreth The industry of yâ— holye ghost in Paul in this coople of twynes vtterly to take away all maner of differences In Paul also is to be considered the industry of the holy ghost who when he had affirmed out of the holy scriptures that of these two brethern the one was elected the other reiected bringeth no other reason or cause of the counsell of God but that election should abide according to purpose But because he saw that this would in no case satisfy humane reason therefore he confirmed his sentence by an oracle of Malach. who straight way at the the beginning of his first chapiter thus writeth The Lord hath loued you And ye haue sayd wherein hath the Lord loued vs And the Prophet maketh answere Iacob and Esau were they not brethern But I haue loued Iacob and haue hated Esau Wherefore with Malachy to loue is all one wyth that which Paul hath That the Election of God shoulde abide according to purpose Neither is this to be passed ouer that the Apostle in thus ioyning together these Paul most diligently red the scriptures two testimonies declareth that he had not negligently red the scriptures Wherfore we also must endeuor our selues to do the like when as we shall see places of the scriptures alleadged either of the Apostles or of other writers Paul when he red the Prophet Malachy and saw that God proueth his loue towardes the Iewes by that that he had loued Iacob and hated Esau when yet notwithstanding they were brethern and twines straight way turned himselfe to the history of Genesis and there considered many thinges which mought conduce to adorne and amplifye this matter namelye that they were borne bothe at one and the same time and of one and the selfe same parentes and that the
vs by nature but dependeth of god by those thinges which follow he taketh vertue for a minde apte and prone to good thinges But God cannot in election haue a regard vnto any such minde For there is none that hath such a mind by nature or proper vnto himselfe but it vtterly dependeth of the grace and fauor of God For as it is written in the booke of Genesis All the imagination of mans hart is â—uill But because he seeth that in the words of the Apostle is no mencion at all made of foreknowledge it is a world to see where hence in Gods name he picketh it out That which Paul saith That the election Chrisostom by purpose vnderstandeth foreknowledge What is the purpose of God There is no differeÌ„ce whether a man take works done or workes to be done Against workes and merites should abide according to purpose he thus interpretateth That in that birth of twynes God mought declare his election according to purpose that is according to the foreknowledge of workes to come which foreknowledge election followeth But he should haue proued that purpose signifieth onely foreknowledge Which doubtles he can not doe for it signifieth rather a deliberate sentence and decrée of the minde Neither doth thys any thing helpe hym which is of some obiected that Paul when he sayth Not of workes excludeth workes alredy done and not workes that shal be done As though forsooth there were any difference whether they be done or whether they be to be done For when the Apostle had sayd that we are saued by grace he added If of grace then not of workes and if of woorkes then not of grace For these haue suche an Antithesis or contrariety the one to the other as touchinge our election and saluation that the one excludeth the other Farther when Paul had sayde Not of woorkes he added But of him that calleth which word euen alone oughte to haue feared awaye men from attributing so much to merites But Chrisostom and such like as he is alwayes say that God electeth and calleth those whome he knoweth shall beleue Wherefore Chrisostome sayth Let no man obiect vnto vs the sentence of the scripture or continuall seruitude when as God beholdeth I say not the outwarde parts but also the inward worthines of the minde Wherefore he saith We must beleue the secrecy of the election of God for that it is incomprehensible But althoughe we also confesse that How the secrecie of God is said to be incomprehensible these secrecies are incomprehensible yet taketh he it one waye and we an other way for he thinketh that that secrecie is to vs incomprehensible for that we can not attaine to the knowledge of the worthines or vnworthines of those which are reiected or elected But we refer that obscurity to the order of the counsels of God which counsels as we beleue they are iust and right so also sée we not the reasoÌ„s causes of that iustice and those causes we affirme oughte not in this matter of election to be considered by thinges here but by the high and vnspeakeable wisedom of God But Chrisostome for that he leaneth to the worthines of the menne whiche A similitude of Chrisostome worthines he saith we cannot consider but God vnderstandeth right well setteth forth an example of Mathew who being a publicane and excercising a moste vile vnhonest office was yet not withstandinge a precious stone drouned in durte or myre Which God did not onely esteme but also gathered vp and polished it with grace and a great many giftes Here he séemeth plainely to saye that Mathew had that worthines of himself for he sayth that grace was afterward geuen vnto him and because he would the plainelier expounde himselfe he addeth two similitudes The first is of coÌ„ning lapidaries which choose not out those precious stones which they see allowed of men ignoraunte and of the common people but for that they Two similitudes haue a most skilfull sight they sometimes take those which others reiecte The second is of suche as tame breake horses which do not straight way choose out those coltes whiche the rusticall people iudge to be beste but they haue certaine assured markes which the common sorte of men sée not wherebye they knowe that those horses will be couragious and good when they are better growen So God elected the harlot the thiefe and the publicane reiecting the high priestes Scribes Pharisies in whome the common people thought consisted al doctrine and holines Oftentimes also in the church those which were highly esteemed and séemed to excel when persecution came fell awaye when in the meane time men abiecte and vile triumphed with the glory of martyrdome Wherfore take not vpon thee saith he of so great a woorkeman to enquire the causes why this man is beloued and that man reiected why this man is crouned and that man punished For if he loued Iacob hated Esau doubtles he did not that vniustly But he requireth a noble harte and a gratefull minde For they which are such although they sometimes fall into vices yet they streight way step vp againe And although they some longe while abide in sinnes yet God at the length deliuereth them But they which are of a vitiate and corrupt mind although they séeme sometimes to shine with good workes yet whatsoeuer they do they wholy viciate it with the prauitie of theyr mind and to declare this he bringeth also examples For Dauid was not of purpose or malice but by the violence of the flesh and vehemency of luste led to sinne and therefore was he forgeueÌ„ of God and returned againe into the right way But the pharisey Examples of Chrisostome for that he semed vnto himself to abound in good works by his boasting hipocrisy lost al. This is the sum of yâ— which Chrisostom hath when he expoundeth how God loued Iacob hated Esau But how litle these things agrée with yâ— words of the ConfutatioÌ„ of the sentence of Chrisostom Apostle although it may be vnderstaÌ„ded by those things which are red in this cha yet is it most of al manifest by yâ— which is had in the 11. chap. of this epistle where is described the answere which was made by God to Elias That God had lefte vnto himself ten M. meÌ„ which had not bowed their knées before Baal where Paul thus saith The remnantes according to the election of grace shal be made safe not of workes otherwyse grace should not be grace In which wordes is to be marked the Hebrew What is the election of grace If election hange of workes grace is not grace phrase According to the election of grace For it is all one as if it had bene sayde According to the gracious or free election For in that tong the sonne of perdition is nothing els but the lost sonne But that we should vnderstand that our election consisteth fréely Paul so excludeth workes that
sée Christ Ierome against the Pelagians Ierome praiseth Augustine which is the only scope of all the scriptures But as touching Ierome from those things which he wrote in those places which we haue now aledged I apeale vnto those which he learnedly godly wrote against the Pelagians For they thought yâ— our saluation dependeth of our workes merites He in the end of his third dialoge highly commendeth Augustine neither any where els yâ— I can remember of speaketh he more worthely of him For he calleth him a man holy and eloquent and excellently commendeth his bookes against this heresy and especially his booke of the baptisme of infantes to Marcellienus and to Hilarius And he sayth that he would not in that disputation procede any farther for that either he should speake the selfe same things that Augustine had before spoken or els if he should séeke to bring other thinges seing Augustine had before brought better he should but lose his labour But in those bookes how much Augustine is against this seÌ„tence namely that election dependeth of workes euery one that readeth them may easely iudge Farther he alleadgeth many thinges out of the scriptures whereby is most euident and playne that the strength of our frée will is so broken and weakned Testimonies which Ierome bringeth against free will that our saluation can by no meanes depend of it Ioseph saith he was led away into Egipt and when beyng now captiue he was shut vp in prison the Iailer committed all thynges to hys power and fidelity And thereof is rendred a cause namely for that the Lord was wyth hym He interpretateth vnto Pharao his dreames he is exalted vnto the dignity next vnto the king he fedeth hys father brethren Iacob goeth downe into Egipt encreaseth into a populous nation hys posterity is afterward brought forth out of Egipt and all these thinges is God sayd to haue brought to passe Where then sayth Ierome is the power of fre will And Salomon sayth with all thy hart put thy coÌ„fidence in God the Lord but be not thou puffed vp in thine owne wisdome In all thy wayes acknowledge him that he may make thy wayes right By him are directed the waies of maÌ„ And Paul saith not that we are sufficieÌ„t to thinke any thing of our selues as of our selues but our sufficiency is of God And moreouer sayth he darest thou still glory in free will and abuse the benefites of God to the contumely of him that geueth thee them and especially seing that the selfe same vessell of election agayne writeth We haue this treasour in vesselles made of clay that the aboundance of our strength should be of God and not of our selues And agayne he which glorieth let him glory in the Lord. And when then Lorde sayth in the Gospel I am the vine and ye are the braunches he which abideth in me and I in him bringeth forth much fruit for without me ye can do nothing Agayne No man can come vnto me vnles my father shall draw him by these wordes he breaketh the liberty of our will outrageous in pride He addeth also that this is to be marked that he which is drawen is signified to haue bene before slowe yea rather resisting and vnwillinge And seing yâ— the matterâ—k so how can the power of our will be so great wherby The strength of our free wil is not so great that it coulde moue God to elect vs. God could be moued to elect vs Vndoubtedly we caÌ„not so much as imagine any such power when as how great so euer it be we must always count to haue receiued it of yâ— grace of God Now let vs se what Origens mind is touching this matter He beginneth in dede well if he could haue continued still in the same minde For at the beginning he sayth That election is not of workes but of the purpose of God and of the good pleasure of him that calleth And vpon the chapiter next going before when he expoundeth this place of Paul whome he foreknew those he predestinated to be made like vnto the image of his sonne he sayth that foreknowledge can not be taken for a bare and simple knowledge For God in his foreknowledge comprehendeth also the wicked whome yet he predestinateth not to be made like vnto the image of his sonne Wherfore he saith that that knowledge signifieth an effect and loue wherby God embraseth some as Paul sayth to Timothe The Lord knoweth who are his wheÌ„ yet notwithstanding he knoweth also those that be aleantes from him So it is written that Christ knew not sinne when yet vndoubtedly he knew the nature of sinne But he is sayd not to haue knowen it bicause he allowed it not neither at any time committed any sinne The leuites also which together with Moses slew the Israelites that had played the Idolaters are sayd to haue knowen neither father nor mother nor kinsfolkes nor frendes for that they were not drawen by any priuate affection to spare them or to absteyne from killing of them Wherfore wheÌ„ Paul saith whome he foreknew those also he predestinated he thus interpretateth it that God predestinated those whome be loued These things being thus well set afterward he addeth vnto them thinges clene contrary making some kinde of protestation as Ierome did of the obscurenes of the place He also imagineth that the purpose of Paul was much like to this namely that A similitude of Origâ—nâ— he in this epistle to the Romanes doth as a maÌ„ which wil lede about a stranger thorough a goodly large Palace of a king For whilest yâ— straÌ„ger is led thorough diuers romes and paâ—lers and chambers it oftentimes commeth to passe that he knoweth not neither which way he came in nor which way to get out This similitude in dede some like very wel but in my iudgement it is not to be liked For this he semeth plainly to signifie that God hath commended vnto vs hys holy scriptures as a Labirinth or maze wherein we should waÌ„der For neither The holy scriptures are not like a Labirinth or mase is therein this place any obscurenes but such as is of these mens own deuising Wherfore he sayth that when Paul had sayd out of Malachie Iacob haue I loued but Esau haue I hatred he streight way obiected vnto him selfe What then shall we say is there iniquity with God And made answer vnto himselfe God forbid which answere he thinketh is to be repeted as often as the Apostle is asked the questioÌ„ of the importunate and froward demauÌ„der For he imagineth that one should thus continue in questioning with Paul If it was sayd vnto Moses I wil haue mercy on whome I will haue mercy and wil shew compassion on whome I wil shew compassion therefore it is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that hath compassion Here he sayth must be added God forbid Farther if it semed good to God to rayse vp Pharao to
reprobate are condemned because of their sinnes Sinnes foresene are noâ— the cause why a man is reprobate And yet we ought not hereby to inferre that sinnes foreséene are the cause why any man is reprobate For they cause not that GOD purposeth that he will not haue mercye Howbeit they are the cause of damnation whiche followeth in the last time but not of reprobation which was from eternally The laste ende of reprobation is the declaration of the mightye iustice of God as Paul hath taughte namely that these vessels are prepared vnto wrath because God woulde shew in them his power And God aunswereth of Pharao Euen vnto this end haue I raysed thee vp that I might shew in thee my power The farthest ende is damnation whiche as it is iust so also is it allowed of God But the niest ende are sinnes For God coÌ„maunded that the people should be made blinde that they should not vnderstand that they should not heare Lest peraduenture saith he they should be conuerted and I should heale them For sins although as they are sins they are by God in his lawes condemned yet as they are iuste punishmentes they are by him imposed for the wicked desertes of the vngodly But we muste not stay in these néerer endes We must go farther that we may at the length come to that ende which Paul hath set foorth namely that the iustice of God should be declared And thus muche hitherto as touching the first article Now let vs come to the second wherein is to be sought the cause of predestination Of the cause of predestination Forasmuch as predestination is the purpose or will of God and the same wil is the first cause of all thinges which is one and the selfe same with the substance of God it is not possible that there should be any cause thereof Howbeit we do not Of the will of God may sometimes be geuen a reason but neuer any cause especially an efficient cause We cannot geue any reasonâ— of the 〈◊〉 of God â–ª but those which the holâ— scriptures haue set forth vnto vs. Predestination may haue a final cause The material cause is after a sorte found in predestination The â—nd is considered two maner of wayes therfore deny but that sometimes may be shewed some reasons of the wil of God which although they may be called reasons yet ought they not to be called causes especially efficient causes But that in the scriptures are sometimes assigned reasons of the will of God may by many places be gathered The Lord sayth that he therefore did leade aboute the children of Israell throughe the deserte rather then through shorter passages through which he could haue lead them that they should not sodenlye méete with theyr enemies Adam also was placed in Paradise to husband it and to kéepe it And God testifieth that he woulde not as yet expell the Cananites out of the land of Chanaan because they had not yet as filled yâ— measure of their sinnes Howbeit althoughe as we haue sayde the scripture vse sometimes to bring reasons of the wil of God yet no maÌ„ ought to take vpon him to râ—der a certain reason of it but that which he hath gathered out of the scriptures For so as we are dull of vnderstanding we should easely vsurpe our owne dreames in stede of true reasons But that there are finall causes of the predestination of God we deny not For they are expressedly put of Paul and especially when he citeth yâ— of Pharaoâ—euen o this end haue I stirred thee vp that I mighte shewe in thee my power and of the elect he sayth that God would in them shew forth hys glorye The materiall cause also may after a sorte be assigned For men which are predestinate and those thinges which God hath decreed by predestination to geue vnto the elect as are these vocation iustification and glorification may be called the matter about which predestination is occupied This moreouer is to be noted that the end may sometimes be taken as it is of vs in minde and desire conceaued and then it hath the consideration of an efficient cause for being so conceaued in the minde it forceth men to worke Sometimes also it is taken as it is in the thinges and as we attayne vnto it after our laboures And then properly it is called the end bycause the worke is then finished and we are at quiet as now hauing obteyned the end of our purpose But we therefore put this distinction It may be both true false that we are predestinate by workes that if at any time we should be asked whether God do predestinate men for workes or no we should not rashly eyther by affirming or by beniinge geue hasty sentence For the ambiguity is in this word for how it is to be vnderstand For if good workes be taken as they are in very dede are wrought bycause God predestinateth vs to this end that we should liue vprightly as we rede in the Epistle vnto the Ephesians namely that we are elected to be holye and immaculate and that God hath prepared good workes that we shoulde walke in them as touching this sentence or meaning the proposition is to be affirmed But if that worde for he referred vnto the efficient cause as thoughe the good workes which God foresaw we should do are as certayne merites and causes which should moue God to predestinate vs this sence is by no meanes to One effect of predestination may be the cause of an other effect but they cannot be causes of the purpose of God be admitted It is possible indede that the effectes of predestination may so be compared together that one may be the cause of the other But they can not be causes of the purpose of God For vocation which is the effect of predestination is the cause that we are iustified Iustification also is the cause of good works and good workes although they be not causes yet are they meanes by which God â–ª 〈…〉 ngeth vs vnto eternall life Howbeit none of all these is the cause or the meane why we are choseÌ„ of God as contrariwise sins indede are yâ— causes why we are damned but yet not why we are reprobate of God For if they should Iâ— sinnes were the causes of reprobation no man should be elected The purpose of God not to haue mercy is as free as the purpose to haue mercy Why good workes foresene are not the causes of predestination A place out of the first epistle to Timothie be the cause of reprobation no man could be elected For the condition estate of all men is a like For we are all borne in sinne And when at any time Augustine sayth that men are iustly reprobate for theyr sins he vnderstandeth together with reprobation the last effect thereof namely damnation But we may not so speake if by reprobation we vnderstand the purpose of God not to haue mercy For that purpose is no lesse
the minde in earthly men and so themselues they bend As moues the Sire of men and Gods that dayly doth ascend And when we speake of foreknowledge we exclude not will for as we at the The foreknowledge of God is not to be seperated frō his will The foreknowledge of God ouer throweth not natures beginning admonished God can not foreknow that any thing shall come to passe but that which he willeth shall come to passe for there can nothing be but that which God willeth to be and that which God willeth he also bringeth to passe in vs. For as Paul sayth He worketh in vs both to will and to performe But this will ioyned to foreknowledge neither inuerteth nor destroyeth things naturall but so worketh in them as is agréeing with them and therefore forasmuch as the nature and propriety of the will of man is to worke fréely and by election the foreknowledge and will of God taketh not away this faculty or power from it although Predestination is the cause of all oure good workes Prayers of the church his predestination be the cause of all good actions which are done of the elect and in the elect Which thing is not only proued by testimonies of the scriptures but also the consent of the Church in their prayers affirmeth the same for thus it prayeth O God from whome all holy desires all good counsels and iust workes do proceede c. And sinnes although after a sort they are subiect vnto the will of God yet are they not in such sort produced of it as good workes are Howbeit this ought to be for certaine that they also are not done vtterly without any will of God For permission which some put differeth not from will for God permitteth Permission pertayneth vnto will that which he will not let neither ought it to be said that he permitteth vnwilling but willing as Augustine saith Wherefore in either kind of works the will and foreknowledge of God in such sort vseth it selfe that it ouerthroweth not the faculty or power of mans will In the predestinate it prouideth that nothing be of them committed which may ouerthrow their saluation And in the reprobate Note this that is spoken of the reprobate he taketh away from them no naturall power which pertaineth to their substance or nature neither compelleth he them against their wil to attempt any any thing but he bestoweth not vpon them so much mercy nor so much grace as he doth vpon the elect and as should be nedfull for their saluation But a great many hereat stomble for that they thinke with themselues If God haue foreknowen that we shall méete together tomorrow then must it néedes be that our will was vtterly determinate to this part otherwise that could not be foreknowē But we answere as we haue alredy signified that that determination in in such Whether our will be determinate to one part sort with God as is agreeing with the propriety or nature of the will But vnto it is proper so to will one part that of his nature if can also will the other part Wherefore we confesse that if we haue a respect vnto God it is appointed and decréed what we shal do For his knowledge is not in vayne called foreknowledge for he hath not an opinion of things so that his knowledge can be changed but hath a certaine and sure knowledge or science and there can be no science vnles as we haue said it be certaine and firme But this determination and certainty of his we both haue said and do say inuerteth not the nature of things neither taketh away liberty from our nature Which thing is proued by this reason God Many thinges are possible which neuer shall be foreknewe that many thinges are possible which in very déede shall neuer be and although they shall neuer be yet the foreknowledge of God taketh not away from them but that they are possible Which thing we will declare by an example of the scripture Christ when he was taken sayd I could haue asked of my father and he would haue geuen me eleuen legions of Angels which should defend me from these souldiors Wherefore Christ affirmeth that it was possible for him to aske and that vnto him mought be granted so many legions of Angels which yet was neither done nor was by any meanes to be done And yet notwithstanding God foreknew that it mought haue ben done and although it should neuer come to passe yet was it not letted by foreknowledge but that it was possible Wherfore as the foreknowledge of God letteth not possibility so also taketh it not away contingēcy and liberty This necessity of infalliblenes is not only declared and proued by the holy scriptures and by reasons as we haue now shewed but also is acknowledged of the fathers Origen against Celsus in his second booke against the argument of Celsus which he obiected against the Christians saying Your Christ at his last supper foretold as ye say that he should be betrayed of one of his disciples if he were God as ye contend he was could he not let the doing thereof Origen here wondereth and answereth that this obiection is very ridiculous for forasmuch as he foretold that that thing should come to passe if he had letted it then had he not spoken the truth and therefore he added that it was of necessity neither could it otherwise be but that that should come to passe which was foretold Howbeit because that this foretelling chaunged not the will of Iudas therefore is he worthely accused neither ought the blame to be layd vpon Christ which foretold it Origen in that place acknowledgeth either namely the necessity of certainty and that the nature of the will is not letted Ambrose also when he interpreteth those words of Paul Iacob haue I loued and Esau haue I hated referreth the sentence of the Apostle to works foreséene and yet addeth that it could not otherwise haue come to passe but as God foresaw that it should come to passe Chrisostome also expounding that which is written vnto the Corrinthians It behoueth that heresies should be cōfesseth that this necessity is a necessity of foretelling which is nothing preiudiciall vnto the power of our will and choyce Neither is this necessity taken away by certaine places in the scriptures which otherwise at the first sight séeme to put a chaunge of the sentences of God as is that of Esay when he threatened vnto Ezechias the king present death which prophesie yet God séemed to change when he prolonged his life fiftene yeares And vnto the City of Niniue it was foretold that it should be destroyed within forty dayes which thing yet came not to passe Those things in very dede make nothing against the truth before taught For God foretold vnto Ezechias death which was euen at hand according to the causes of the dissease whereof he was then sicke and therein was made no lye But The
any difference betwene the Iewes and the Gentiles The selfe same reason in a maner he before vsed in this selfe same Epistle Causes haue an affect towards their â—ffects in the 3. chapiter in that place where he sayd Is God the God of the Iewes onely yea and of the Gentiles also And the argument of Paule is firme for that it cleaueth vnto a sure ground namely that nature hath so framed yâ— things which are ioined vnto any other things as causes of them or beginning haue a desire towardes their effectes As the father hath to his children the woorkeman to his workes the Lord to his seruauntes so also hath God to his But they noorish helpe and adorne the thinges which pertayne vnto them wherefore God also will be vnto his both a helpe and also saluation and that his propriety is to preserue them the common prouer be declareth wherein it is sayd Homo homini Why God helpeth not the damned Deus that is Man is vnto man a God And if thou demaunde why hee helpeth not the damned when as they also pertayne vnto him we answer bicause he is now compared vnto them as a iudge and an auenger and not as God in whom they may any longer put coÌ„fidence or whom they can any more inuocate Moreouer let vs note that this vniuersall sentence is to bee vnderstanded predestination and election remaining safe for God is not so the God of all that he God is the God of all but yet hee predestinateth not all electeth and predestinateth all This thing onely we ought to gather that there are certayne of all sortes of people whome hee hath from eternallye elected and vnto whom in dew tyme he will geue fayth and that also hee woulde that fayth should be preached vnto all meÌ„ without difference yet hath chosen out certain whom he bringeth to the obteinment of the promisses And in this sense also as Augustine teacheth and as we haue oftentymes admonished is to be expounded that sentence of Paule vnto Timothe God will haue all men to be saued And that the proposition now alleaged is in this maner to be contracted the wordes which follow plainly declare Riche vnto all them that call vpon him They which are brought vnto saluation call vpon God and through the singuler and principall gift of God do beleue which gift is not giuen vnto all men Wherefore it is euident that preaching Preaching is common vnto al meÌ„ but â—aith is not commoÌ„ vnto al meÌ„ In what seÌ„se God is called rich ought to be common and so Christ is sayd to pertayne vnto all men But they which haue saluation which are endewed with fayth and the spirite vnto whom God is sayd to be rich are not indifferently all men but are in a certayn and definyte number conteyned in the election of God And God is called riche toward his for that he enricheth them with his grace and giftes In Greeke it is written 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for God hath no neede to be increased and enriched but encreaseth and enricheth those that are his This sentence is of great force to pacifie the myndes of the Iewes which through a certayne enuy were grieued that the Gentyles were called vnto the Gospell which thing they woulde not haue done if they had bene perswaded that God is so rich that he hath aboundantly ynough both for the Iewes and for the Gentiles so that by the calling of the Gentiles nothing was taken away from the Iewes And it is a coÌ„mon phrase in the scriptures by the name of riches to signifie the most plentifull goodnes of God So it is said in this epistle doest thou contemne the riches of his goodnes patience and long suffering And vnto the Ephesians Who is rich in mercy And Christ to the Colossians is sayd to be he in whome are all the treasures of the wysedome and knowledge of God When he addeth Rich to all them that call vpon him he adioyneth an other worke of faith For before by the testimony of Esay it was said Who soeuer beleueth in him shal not be made ashamed Now for inuocation A place of Ioel. he annexeth a testimony taken out of the second chapiter of Ioell VVhosoeuer shall call vpon the name of God shal be saued So that again we see that there is required a liuely fayth And as before confession was added vnto faith and Moses made mencion not only of the hart but also of the mouth so now together with faith is mencion made of inuocation And without doubt Ioell in that chapiter spake of the Messias for he saith that in those dayes should be geuen bloud fire pillers of a cloude and the Sunne should be turned into darknes and the Moone into bloud And there is added I will poure my spirite vpon all fleshe and your sonnes and your daughters shall prophesie your olde men shall dreame dreames and I will poure my spirite vpon your seruauntes and handmaydens That all these thinges pertayne vnto Christ and vnto the pouring forth of his spirit no man doubteth Wherfore if Paul applie them to the inuocation vpon him he nothing erreth from the natiue sence The prophet had before said that there should be a great destruction throughout the whole world and throughout the regions adioyning â–ª but he added thereunto that whosoeuer should call vpon the name of the Lord should be saued which forasmuch as he pronounâ—eth generally and vniuersally Paul therby declareth that this proposition is to be taken vniuersally It is true in deede that the Prophet saith that this saluation should be geuen in Ierusalem and in Zion but yet notwithstanding that letteth not but that it may be applied vnto the Gentiles also for he speaketh of that Ierusalem of that Zion which are preserued by God but the carnall kingdome of the Iewes is destroyed wherefore it followeth that such cityes are figuratiuely taken for the people of the faithfull which liued in them And those faithful were in their time the Church which afterward was spred abrod thoroughout the whole world neither are there any which call vpon the name of Christ but in the Church onely And it may be as some thinke that by the inuocation of the name of God is vnderstanded the whole order of piety and of sound religion But in my iudgement I thinke it better by inuocation simply to vnderstand the prayers of the faithfull And this is diligently to be noted that the Prophet writeth of that inuocation which procedeth from the spirite and What maner inuocation obtayneth saluation from a sincere faith for prayers said but of a facion and mumbled vp without vnderstanding obtaine not saluation We must also cal to memory that which Paul said vnto the Corinthians that no man can say the Lord Iesus but in the spirite Moreouer the Prophet sayth not whosoeuer shall call vpon the name of the Lord shall haue whatsoeuer he asketh but shal be saued For
the word of God then followeth it of necessity that there is nothing whereby fayth is more norished maintayned and confirmed then by continuall reding and repeting of the woorde of God Thys thing testified How â—ayth is norished Tertullian in his Apology when he sayth that to this end holy assembles are gathered together to heare the woord of God The Philosophers say that we of the selfe same thinges both are and are norished wherefore in like sorte is it yâ— if fayth be by the woorde of GOD then by the same also is it nourished We knowe moreouer that of woorkes often repeted are confirmed habites or qualities as contrariwise if a man cease of from actions they waxe weake Wherefore if a man cease to rede to heare or to repete the holy scriptures fayth will waxe feble in him And they which thinke that a liuely and pure faith may continew in Churches without ofteÌ„ preaching doo excedingly erre Chrisostome hath a very similitude of a light or lampe that burneth which easely goeth out vnles A similitude of Chrisostome there be stil oyle powred into it By the lampe or light he vnderstandeth fayth by oyle yâ— word of God this he there writeth where he entreateth of the parable of the wise and foolishe virgens But now yâ— I haue made an end of interpretating the Apostles senteÌ„ce there resteth that out of his sayings we gather things much profitable When he had put a distinction betwene the righteousnes of God and the righteousnes of men and had taught that by the righteousnes of God is to be vnderstanded faith in Christ to the end he would declare that faith pertayned not onely vnto the Hebrues He brought out of the prophet Esay Whosoeuer beleueth in him shall not be made ashamed And out of Ioell Whosoeuer calleth vpon the name of the lord shal be saued These thinges most manifestlye proue the diuinity of Christ For if fayth in him and inuocation of his name haue saluatioÌ„ The diuinitye of Christ proued ioyned with them which thing is most true it followeth of necessity that he is God when as it is not lawfull to put confidence in any creature or to call vpon it Yea these two thinges are so proper vnto God that he communicateth them not vnto others he is pronounced cursed which putteth his confideÌ„ce in man or maketh flesh his arme An other thing worthy to be noted is yâ— that so excellent commendatioÌ„ of the ministers of God is to be referred vnto those only which in very dede execute theyr office for the prophet sayth that the féete of The commendation of the ministery pertaineth not vnto theÌ„ whiche haue only the name or title therof them that preach the Gospel are beautifull and not the fete of them which haue haue only the name or title thereof It hath also bene declared that the word of God is the instrument which the holy ghost vseth to instill fayth into the beleuers wherfore we may conclude that no other thing â—â—ght eyther to be taught or preached in the Church No man also ought to be moued with the fewnes or scarsety of the beleuers for that alwayes euen from the beginning the nomber the faythful hath bene small And Augustine if sometimes he vse this kind of reasoning agaynst the Donatistes when he sayth that they are very few in comparisoÌ„ of the multitude of the catholikes he reasoneth agaynst them as it were a probabili that is by probability agaynst them I say whome he had before by other necessary reasons confured Moreouer when he alledgeth the multitude of Churches he reproueth the error of the Donatistes which had contracted the church of God only into a litle corner of Affrike as though it now had no where place but with them which vtterly ouerthroweth the propriety of the Church namely to be Catholike or vniuersall for it is spread abrode thoroughout all places although euery where be found an incredible smal nomber of them that beleue truly Ireneus also and Tertullian for no other cause appealed to the testimonies of many Churches but for that they had to deale agaynst those heretickâ—s which receaued not the holy scriptures but vsed them maymed vitiated and corrupted as semed good vnto them and therefore to reproue theyr vanity he referred them to the old Churches where the scriptures had ben kept sincere and vncorrupt Last of all is declared what preachers ought to set forth vnto the people if they wil nourish and maintaine the true faith now receaued But I say haue they not heard No doubt theyr sound went ouâ— thoroughout all the earth and theyr woordes into the endes of the worlde But I say haue they not heard When he had reproued the Iewes of incredulity and had shewed that messeÌ„gers were sent vnto them which brought vnto them glad â—idinges of peace whome they beleued not he saw that peraduenture they would excuse them selues that they had not heard How sayth he can ye so say seing that the Gospell is now euery where published abrode He had reproued theyr ignoraunce and the more to aggrauate it he declareth that they could not pretend that they had not heard No doubte theyr sound wente out throughout all the earth By these woordes is shewed that the Gospel was nowe euerye where preached But some thinke that Paul séemeth here to abuse Dauids woordes when as in that place is entreated of the knowledge of God by creatures gotten by the lighte of nature for therto séemeth the scope of the Psalme to tend as touching the first parte thereof For in the other part it entreateth of that knowledge whiche is had by the law or by the scripture for straight waye at the beginning he saith that the heauens declare the glory of God and the firmament or sky set foorth the woorkes of God So that although in heauen are not words nor speaches and albeit that those higher orbes séeme to be without voyce yet notwithstanding is euery where heard theyr speach The Chaldy Paraphrast aptly expresseth this trope or figure for he saith that they which looke vp into heauen do declare abroad the glory of God and they which looke vp vnto the sky do setfoorth his workes signifieng that these creatures indéede speake not but allure vs to speake and to confesse God In Hebrue is not written Theyr sound The Seuenty haue thus turned it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but in Hebrue is written Canam and Can signifieth a line a rule or leuell Neither any other thing can thereout be gathered but yâ— there is séene noted euery where sure rule of the making of the celestiall orbes and that their mouinges succession of their reuolutions is regurall and infallible Wherfore without all doubte the speach of the heauens setting forth their creator is most excellent wherby men are instructed touching many most excellent and most honest senteÌ„ces Cicero in his oration for Milo mencioneth many thinges of the constante order
euen so are oftentimes found many such ministers which by reason of the greate burthen of theyr vocation and bycause of the maliciousnes and incredulity of the people desire to forsake theyr ministeries hauing the selfe same infirmity where with this our Prophet semeth to haue bene after a sorte ouercome when he desired to dye But let ministers this know that they must abide in theyr vocation Ministers ought not to forsake their vocation so long as the strengths of the body will suffer them and that they be not thrust out by force For the men and people committed to theyr charge ought neuer to be forsaken so long as they can abide to heare the word of God And if they be all together contemners of the word of the lord and will not suffer it to be preached then as Christ commaunded his Apostles let them shake of agaynst them the dust of theyr feete and depart But so long as there are any amongest them which will suffer the pastor to preach and to entreate of the word of God he ought not to geue ouer his ministery Wherefore I know not whither Melitius did well or no of whome Theodoritus maketh meÌ„cion in his 2. booke and 31. chap. An history of Melitius that he foresooke the bishopricke of a certayne Church in Armenia being offended with the ouer greate dissobedience of his flocke But the same man afterward being chosen bishoppe of Antioche was for defending the catholike fayth agaynst the Arrians thrust into exile In which fact God paradueÌ„ture declared that he was not well pleased that he had departed from his first vocation By the example of this Prophete we may know how many troubles ministers haue to passe through in gouerning the Church and â—hose no small or common Ministers haue a greâ— many troubles to passe thorow troubles but such as in comparison of the which death is rather to be chosen With how greate a griefe and zeale doo we thinke Christ sayd O vnbeleuing nation how long shall I suffer you VVhich haue not bowed the knees to Baall â–ª â–ª In Hebrue is added and haue not kissed him Although the nature of idolatry be placed in the mind yet by these signes it sheweth forth it selfe outwardly The wicked bowed theyr knees to idols and kissed them And here are manifestly reproued yâ— Nicodemites of our Against the Nicodemites time For the Lord sayth that those whome he had reserued vnto him selfe dyd not these thinges how then should they thinke it to be lawfull for them in time of persecution Baall is deriued of this Hebrew word Baall signifieth to beare dominion and to be an husbande For they chose these made Gods to be theyr What Baal signifieth how that word agreeth with idols Lordes patrones as our men had their peculiar saintes to be their defenders whome they worshipped Nether is the name of an husband vnapt for idolatry for in stede of the true God which is the only husband of the Churche they broughte in other Gods as husbandes Wherefore the Prophetes called idolatry by the name of fornication whoredome and adultery which yet the vngodly as I suppose sought to adorne with the title of matrimonye God was angry with this heynous wicked crime that not without iuste cause for they went about to parte and to deuide amongest many Gods that worshippinge which was dew vnto one God only and that which they gaue vnto theyr owne imaginations was taken away from the true God And there could nothing haue bene deuised more contrary to the first and greatest commaundement wherein we are commaunded to loue God with all our hart with all our soule and with all our strengths And so much God detested this worshipping of Baall that in Osea the prophet in the 2. chapiter he sayd Thou shalt cal me Ishi that is my man and not Baalâ— that is my husband For although God were the husband of the Church yet would he not so be called of it lest he should by any maner of meanes to communicate in name with idoles Wherefore I haue oftentimes meruayled how the Christians in the old time when the Churche first began suffred the names of the dayes as Dies Solis which we call Sonday Dies Lune called Monday Dies Martis called tewsday Dies Mercurij called wedensday Dies Iouis called thursday Dies veneris called friday and Dies Saturni called saterday to take place would also by the selfe same names name the planets Verely forasmuch as these names were at that time the names of idoles it had bene better to haue abolished them and it was more dangerous at that tyme theÌ„ it is now For there are now none left which worshippe such idoles as they 〈◊〉 still did although I se that in the Church many vsed to say prima secunda â—ercia quarta feria that is as it were the first second third or fourth day of the weake as the Iewes vse to say the first second or third day of the sabaoth And in like sorte may it seme wonderfull touching the monthes as Ianuary Marche and suche like in stede of whiche the godlye named them accordinge to the order of nombers Helias maketh intercession against Israell It may seme that the disposition of Prophetes ought rather to be enclined to mercy Samuell being offended with the Israelites sayd far be it from me that I should cease to pray for you How theÌ„ doth Helias now make intercession against Israell Some say that this was only How Helias prayed against Israell a complaint made in familiar talke before God but Paul saith manifestly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is against Israell And his vision touching the wynd earthquake and fire declareth that he being moued with a great zeale desired that God woulde auenge the wickednes of the Israelites Wherefore Paul rightly interpreted his It is lawfull for the faintes to pray against the wicked prayers that they were made against Israell But this ought not to be counted a fault in the Prophetes in the godly when as they inueigh not against the men but against vices and sinnes them would they haue destroyed them woulde they haue punished and forasmuch as those sinnes can not be seperated from meÌ„ therefore their prayers describe them in such sort as they are namely with men Moreouer oftentimes it is to be sene that they frame themselues vnto the will of God which by the impulsion of the spirite they know and do to the vttermost of their power allowe and therefore as they know any to be punished they seme in their prayers to pray that way euen agaynst them And the things which they séeme oftentimes in their prayers to speake they to this end only speake them to foretell vnto them of their time things which they knew should afterward come to passe Lord saith he they haue transgressed thy couenannt and haue slayne thy Prophetes so great an enemy was Iezabell vnto
cause for that then Christe ought rather to haue holpen them by speaking plainly and not darkely vnto them But whereas the thing is spoken in the future tempse of the indicatiue mode that nothing helpeth their case for we also affirme that that then was to come which nowe we know to be done but we say that it was done by the commaundement of the Lord as Esay expresseth as Paul also declareth Moreouer sayth Pigghius it is a foretelling and therfore it is not a cause This is a weake profe for that which Esay foretold his words I say and preaching irritated the Iewes and stirred vp in them the affect of incredulity Is not the doctrine of the law sayd to encrease sinne for that by it are stirred vp lustes But this sayth he commeth not thorough the default of the law we graunt that neyther also say we that this commeth to passe thorough the default or sinne of God or of the prophets preachers when yet notwithstanding they are after a sort causes Men are not made blind thorough the default of the doctrine or preaching of the Gospell therof but let vs looke vpon originall sinne which is the foundacion of all the euils that come vnto mankind There doubtles after the first fall Adam with all his posterity was spoiled of grace and the spirite from the mind was taken away light that it should not vnderstand the things that pertayne to God from reason was taken away the power to kéepe vnder wicked appetites and on the other syde the affects were corrupted to rebell with greate violence agaynst reason and honesty These thinges thou wilt say are punishements yea they are also sinnes And who inflected them God inflicted them which thing no man can deny For it is his ordinaunce that iust that he which departeth from him should incurre suffer these thinges But of this matter I will cesse now to speake any more for that I haue before at large fully discoursed it But sayth he men are not compelled to sinne Is this most sharpe sighted Sophister yet so dull that he knoweth not how to distinguishe necessity from violence This particle vt that is that The word of God and preaching are instruments whereby they which shal be made blind are irritated sayth he in Marke signifieth a consequence and not a cause yea it also signifieth a cause for the words of God spoken and preached by Esay by Christ and by the Apostles were instruments wherby they were irritated This may be perceaued by a similitude very manifest and playne Suppose that there were a body full of choler which choler notwithstanding as yet bursteth not forth when sommer is com then by reason of heate if vnto him be geuen cold fruites and also cold drinke whereof he excessiuely taketh these things are corrupted in his stomack the choler is encreased and is poured abrode thoroughout the bodye whereof springe perillous flixes and gripinges in the inward partes Who can deny but that the heate of the sommer the fruites and drinke were the cause of this dissease at the least the cause called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 although it were not the principall cause or as they call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He supposeth that this particle That in Marke signifieth a cause efficient and not finall So that the sense is Therfore I speake in parables for that seing they sée not He chaungeth the coniunctine mode into the indicatiue mode and transformeth the whole in suche sort that he turneth the words of Marke into the words of Mathew when yet the holy ghost of purpose caused this diuersity of words to be And Pigghius séemeth to obtrude these things as though we should deny Mathew which thing is not true Onely we are displeased with Pigghius exposition but the Gospell of Mathew we both receaue and reuerence Moreouer he declareth himself not to haue bene very dâ—igent in the Popes decrées although he bable of them continually In them is coÌ„maunded that if any controuersy arise about any part of the scripture of the old Testament we should goo vnto the Hebrue verity And it is Augustines rule in his booke De doctrina Christiana Seing therfore that the Euangelists expresse In controuersies perâ—ayning to the old testament we must go to the Hebrue verity not this place of Esay with one and the self same words why goeth he not to the fountayne of the Hebrue verity Neyther is there any reason why he should be offended if this particle That do signify a finall cause as though Christ to this end spake in parables that they shoulde be made blind Doth not the Lorde say of Pharao to this end haue I raysed the vp that I might in the shew forth my power And is not the potter sayd to make some vessells to honor and some to contumely After whose maner God is sayd to haue ordeyned vessels of mercy and vessels of wrath to declare both the riches of his glory and the seuerity of his iustice When the scripture plainly setteth forth vnto vs such ends of the workes of God they ought neyther to be obscured nor to be denied Mathew turneth this place of Esay by the indicatiue mode and by the future tempse followinge the edition of the Seuenty which thing he mought lawfully do when as these interpreters disagréed not from the Hebrue verity as touching the sense but onely as touching â—oords And that this might lawfully be done Rabbi Dauid Kimhi one of the Hebrues vnderstoode only in that edition wanteth the efficient cause of their blindnes which cause both Paul and Iohn haue expressed And in the Hebrue it is plainly declared by the imperatiue mode which is in that place not in vayne put But it shal be good to heare what Ierome sayth touching this matter who in his Commentary vpon the sixt chapiter of Esay at the first doubteth why Luke as it is read in the Actes of the Apostles in the 28. chapiter citing this place followeth the 70. and not the Hebrue verity And he answereth yâ— the Ecclesiastical writers write yâ— Luke was expert in the arte of Phisike was more skilfull in the Greke â—oung then in the Hebrue therfore it is no meruaile if in citing testimonies of yâ— Luke had more skil in the Greke tonge then in the Hebrue old testameÌ„t he followed the texte which he was best acquainted with But in stead of this answere I would rather thus make answere That the holy ghost had so instructed Luke and the rest of the Euangelists that they mought redily haue cited testimonies out of the Hebrew verity if they had would but of purpose when they might conueniently they followed the 70. that the Gentiles vnto whose vses theyr writinges should chiefely serue might by that edition of the 70. which only they had vnderstand the thinges which were by them cited Ierome moreouer reproueth those which in his time sayd that we ought not to looke vpon
it is vnpunished it hath nothing in it that is good but so soone as punishment is inflicted vpon it forasmuch as that punishment is a parte of iustice sinne is thereby at the least somewhat restrained and brideled from ranging any farther abroade whiche thing also is profitable vnto wretched sinners Wherfore if we will iudge vprightlye the martyrs in so prayinge prayed rather for them then againste them Neither also were it absurde if they shoulde pray for the end of the world wherein they had suffred such great euils that impiety may once at the length haue an ende Althoughe I thinke not that all the elders are of Tertullian thought that we should pray for the prolongyng of the end of the world Why they prayed for the prolonging of the ende of the world this mind that we should pray for the end of the worlde when as rather contrariwise Tertullian in his apology saith that Christians in theyr congregations praye for the prolonging of the end of the world And in the same place he writeth that our men by the prescript of the holy scriptures prayed not only for Emperors but also for the long preseruation of the the world For after this monarchy of the Romanes as Paul writeth vnto the Thessalonians shall come Antichrist and the end Wherfore some of the saintes prayed that the time might be prolonged partly that the tribulatioÌ„ which should come through Antichrist might be differred and partely that the Children of election might be gathered together The Gréeke Scholies write that those holy martyrs prayed against the deuill that his power might at the length be brideled or brought to an ende And thus much touching Augustines opinioÌ„ who was also of the same minde against Faustus where he sayth These things which we read in the Prophets seeme to be wordes of execration of such as foretell or forespeake and not the desires of such as pray But as touching this thinge I thinke this to be true that when there is an enemy whiche both wisheth euell vnto vs and also to the vttermost We must make a distinction of the cause why our enemies haâ—e vs â–ª Distinction oâ— yâ— persoÌ„s which vse imprecatioÌ„s of his power worketh euell against vs we firste of all make a distinction of the cause wherfore he hateth vs. For either it is our proper cause humane and ciuill or els it is because he hateth God and his truth Secondly that we make a distinction of the men for some are led by an accustomed affection of theyr own and other some are moued of God who reuealeth vnto them both what he wil do in what state the wicked are stirreth theÌ„ vp to speake the things which they speak nether is this in the meane time to be passed ouer yâ— the euils which we praye for are ether teÌ„poral or eternal These distinctioÌ„s considered this we say yâ— if it be our own cause only therin we ought to be patient long suffring mild Blesse curse Distinction of the â—uils which we pray for In our own cause we ought to be patient not the scripture coÌ„maundeth vs. We ought also to pray for them that persecute vs. God hath created vs men let vs not spit out the venome of serpentes and forasmuch as we are meÌ„ let vs not suffer our selues to be changed into wild beasts They which hurt vs are madde and are moued with furies and therfore are worthy rather of compassion then vengeaunce or imprecations The mouth is geuen vnto vs to helpe and remedy things and not that we shoulde with it curse han Otherwise God will say vnto such execrations I haue commaunded thée to pray for thine enemies why doost thou now then irritate me against them Wilt thou An example of a priest of Athens haue me to be a helper to thée to transgresse my lawes and to be thine hangman A certaine woman priest of Athens coulde not be perswaded to curse Alcibiades for she said that she was placed in the priesthoode to pray for men and not to curse them And amongst the Romanes it was not lawfull for the high prieste of Iupiter to sweare for that oftentimes the ende and conclusion of an othe is execration for they say let this or that fall vpon me vnles I performe this or that And séeing it In our own cause we must vse prayers not exâ—cratioÌ„s In Gods cause it is lawfull somtymes to vse imprecations Our cause iâ— somtimes nerely ioyned with gods cause In imprecations we must beware of the incitation of the flesh We must â—e ioyne sinne from the nature of him that sinneth How it is lawfull to wishe temporal afflictions vnto sinners A maÌ„ may sometymes wish temporall euill things vnto himselfe was not lawfull for the priest to curse himselfe muche les was it lawfull for him to curse others Wherfore if the cause be our owne we ought not to vse execrations but rather prayers compassion and blessing but wheÌ„ Gods cause is in hand and that this our anger commeth by reason of sinnes and wicked actes there is no thing to let but that the godly may sometimes vse imprecations in such manner as we shall expresse And it oftentimes happeneth that our cause is ioyned wyth the glory of God and is so ioyned that it cannot be disseuered therefro but onely by diligent and attentiue consideration As if a minister of the church sée himselfe coÌ„temned and derided although oftentimes he contemne his owne dignity yet notwithstanding neither can he nor ought he quietly to suffer yâ— worde of God which he ministreth to be contemned For which cause the prophets semed many times to be very wroth for that theyr messages and prophesies were derided Wherfore I graunte that in this case both imprecations and cursinges maye iustly be vsed Howbeit this I thinke good to admonish you of that here we go warely to worke for our flesh is wonte oftentimes vnder the pretence of Gods glorye and honor to fight and to braule for our owne honor and estimation Moreouer this is not to be neglected that we very diligentlye seioyne sinnes from nature and that in anye wise we wish well vnto nature it selfe that is vnto men but let vs curse and hate sinnes And forasmuch as it oftentimes happeneth that men after that they haue bene by some afflictions and punishmentes corrected do repente therefore if vnto wicked men beinge straungers from God and transgressors of hys lawes we sometimes wishe some discommodities and aduersities of the fleshe to the ende they maye féele the wrath of God I sée nothynge but that we maye so doe Thys thing without doubte we maye sometime wishe vnto our selues and that iustly that God should rather afflict and scourge vs then to suffer vs to fall into sinnes or if we sinne that he would at the least by these meanes call vs home againe And if we may wish these and such like things vnto our selues why should we not wish
vnto other nations This is the cause why in holy seruices prayer is made for the churches which I would to God it were done with that feruentnes of minde that it ought to be done with and that vnto the prayers were adioyned an endeuor to adorne and reforme them for to praye and not to labour to do thereafter is to dally with God Otherwise thou also shalt be cut of None which beleueth ought as touching himfelf to be persuaded that he shal be cut of For faith suffreth not this persuasion None that is godly is vncertayne of his saluation to take place The Lord saith that he which beleueth passeth from death vnto life not to euery kinde of life but vnto eternall life whiche is nowe already begonne and shall be accomplished in the world to come Wherfore séeing that eternall life is promised vnto vs we ought in no wise to doubt therof euery one of the faithfull beleueth that he is adopted of God into his sonne and that he is elected vnto eternall life Wherfore it shal be vnto him as he beleueth For the Etimoligy of this woorde faith many thinke hereof to come as thoughe that shall indéede be The etimology of â—aith done which is spoken Howbeit he which so beleueth ought always to be mindfull of perseuerance and not to liue loosely and ought also to implore at Gods hands his gift and grace to abide in his bountefulnes touching the obtainment whereof we oughte not to doubte when as God hath both promised it vnto his and also a Our flesh is to be taken hede of for that it is weake and vncleane faithfull prayer cannot be powred out with doubting as the Apostle Iames testifieth howbeit it is profitable attentiuely to looke vpon our flesh which is weake and euery way vncleane neyther is any thinge in the nature thereof but that it may be damned Wherfore these words of the Apostle stirreth vs vp to bridle the pride therof and to breake the security of it and also to shake of sluggishnes Howbeit for the retaining still of certainty we must fly vnto that whiche is a little afterward written that the giftes and calling of God are without repentance And that What is to be feared touching the church It is not possible that the church should perishe Perticuler churches may fayle we may sée howe profitable this admonition of the Apostle is vnto the faithfull and not in any wayes in vayne we will vse this distribution firste to sée as touching the church what is to be feared If we speake of the whole church we muste not in any wise feare that it shall euer fayle for Christ hath promised that he will be with it vnto the end of the world It may indede be tempted cisted and shaken but vtterly ouerthrown it can not be And therfore we pray that the crosse temptacions and persecutions thereof might be asswaged and turned to good But touching perticuler churches for that it is possible that they maye be transferred we do pray both against their continuall temptacions and also that with them and especially with our church may abide the kingdome of God And as touching our We iustly feare touching our posteritie posterity also there is cause why we shoulde feare for that the promise is indefinitely set forth and vnles it be contracted by election and predestination it maye come to passe that it shall not comprehende them as all the Iewes were not comprehended in the promise And touching infants we may also iudge the like The couenant indéede and promise excludeth them not yea they are generally ment in these wordes wherin the lord saith I wil be thy God and the God of thy sede Vnder which promise we baptise them and visibly incorporate theÌ„ into the churche who yet when they come to age may reiect the couenante and contemne the Gospell whereby is made manifeste that they in very déede pertained not to election and vnto the promises Wherfore we may iustly feare least they should not stande as we sée happened in Ismaell and Esau There are moreouer in the church some 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is which beleue but for a time and in time of temptacion step backe as did Iudas and they which in time of persecutions denied Christe wherefore for these also we haue greate cause to be afeard And touching those which sincerelye beleue in Christ although they haue confidence of their saluation and are assured Many fals hange ouer the faithfuls heds We are in hope that they whom we excommunicate may be restored agayne The godly also haue whereof to be afeard thereof yet so long as we liue here there alwayes hang ouer our heads many fals and those greate as it is manifeste in Peter and in Dauid Wherefore they haue wherof to be afeard although they be not afeard that they shall eternally be damned but assuredly hope that either they shall be defended of God from fallinge or that if they do fall they shal be restored againe as we also haue confidence of them which are excoÌ„municated for they are not cast out of the church that they shoulde pearish but that at the last their spirite should be saued And therfore the elect also and they which sincerely beleue ought continually to be afearde of falles and that they be not cut of from Christ at the least way for a time And of this restitution of them that haue fallen is also mencion made in Ieremy the. 3. chapter Thou hast played the harlot with thy louers howbeit returne againe All these things declare vnto vs that this exhortacion of Paul vnto feare is not vnprofitable when as we ought so many ways to be careful both for our selues also for others Chrisostome addeth also hereunto that the abuse of the grace of God whiche raigneth amongst vs ought to be vnto vs a great feare and horror so often as we consider it If thou continue in his goodnes Otherwise thou also shalt be cut of And they also if they abide not still in vnbeliefe shal be grafted in agayn Forasmuch as it is not to be doubted but that very many of the Iewes so fell away that they sinned against the holy ghost and could no more be grafted in againe it is manifest that Paul speaketh these thinges whiche he speaketh indifinitly of yâ— people of the Iewes as touching a part Further forasmuch as it is vncertayne wheÌ„ a man doth fall into so horrible a case vnles it be declared by some certayne peculiar reuelation of God therefore Paul so speaketh that we should not put away all hope of any man so longe as he liueth here Chrisostome semeth now to alter his mind as touching that yâ— he had before spoken namely that all thinges ought to be attributed vnto the grace of God and that merites or good workes are not to be regarded For by this he sayth It is manifest how greate the dominion of our purpose and the power
thinges Whether faith be defined in that place to the Hebrewes are past neyther are they hoped for to come agayne These two reasons of Hostiensis are very weake neyther do they proue that these wordes vnto the Hebrues can not be applied vnto the definition of fayth I graunt in deede that the entente thereof the Apostle or what soeuer he was that was the author of the Epistle was not to define fayth because then he chiefely entreated of patience endeuoured to shewe that it is most of all ioyned vnto fayth because fayth is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a substance c. But by this his reason are touched all thinges that expresse the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is applied vnto hope also nature of fayth And to the first obiection we say that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or substance may in deede be applied vnto hope but yet that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which it draweth from fayth not that which it hath of it self Neyther ought it to seeme any new thing if these Diuers and sundry natures haue somethyng common in their definitions thinges which are of a diuers nature haue some thing common in their definitions for a Lyon a dogge and a maÌ„ although they differ much in nature yet herein they agree in that they be liuing creatures and therefore in their definitions is something put which is common vnto them all when as they are both bodies and also thinges hauing life and endewed with senses Wherfore it ought not to seeme meruelous if fayth and hope agree in this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 forasmuch as they are seperate by other differences For in fayth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is referred vnto the assent 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 what it hath a regard vnto in faith â–ª and what in hope but in hope to the expectation whereby we patiently abide vntill the promises such thinges as we haue receaued by fayth be rendred vnto vs. To the other reason we aunswere that Paul made mencion also of thinges past whiche are made playne vnto vs by fayth for he sayth not onely that it is a substaunce of thinges to bee hoped for but addeth that it is an argumente or conuiction of thinges that appeare not Nowe those thinges also whiche are paste appeare not Faith hath a respect to things pest and also to things present so that they be hâ—â—den for by that worde Paul or any other whatsoeuer he was comprehendeth what soeuer is beleued and is not euident whether it be paste or whither it be to come or whether it be now present But peraduenture thou wilt demaund why in the first place he maketh mencion of those thinges which are hoped for we aunswere that it is aptly done because worthely are those thinges put first which are more harde to beleue For peraduenture there are some which will easly inough graunt that God created all thinges that Christe the sonne of God came into the worlde and was borne of the virgine and such like but yet they will much doubte of the remission of their sinnes of the resurrection of the flesh to come and of the eternal glory which shal be geuen vnto the iuste Wherefore aptlye and orderly are those things placed which are read in the Epistle to the Hebrues But what the nature of faith is Esay the Prophet hath aptly expressed in the 26. chap. in which place is described the church as a citie built of God The Prophet crieth Open your gates a iust nation shall enter therein And he addeth the cause of that righteousnes Schomar emanim that is preseruing or keping fayth where thou séest that by faith the beleuers are iustified Then he addeth in what thing consisteth that faith whereby the people of God is iuste namely because Iatsar semoch titsor schalom that is with a constant affect thou shalt kepe peace This is the true faith whereby we are iustified namelye because we beleue that God will be vnto vs the author of peace and felicity and a faithfull kéeper of his promise Augustine in his 40. treatise vpon Iohn saith What is faith but to beleue that which thou seest not Whiche selfe same thing he writeth vpon the words of the Apostle in his 27. sermon but in his booke de spiritu Litera the 31. chap. he writeth that to beleue is nothing els but to consent that that is true which is spoken The Master of the sentences in the third Distinction the .xxiii. saith that faith sometimes is that which we beleue For in the Symbole of Athanasius it is saide And this is the Catholike faithe that wee The Symbole of Athanasius A distinctioÌ„ of fayth A liuely faith and â— dead fayth The fayth of miracles shoulde beleue c. But somtimes it is that whereby we beleue and in this latter signification do we vnderstande faith in this disputation He seperateth also a liuely faith from a deade faith whiche distinction is to bee liked because Iames maketh mencion of a dead faith But we must know that a dead faith is only a faith in name neither is it any more a faith then is a deade man a man For euen as a dead man is called a man although he be none so a dead faith although it be called a faith yet hath it not the nature of faith There is also an other kind of faith whiche serueth to work miracles and much differreth from the faith which iustifieth and is common both the godly also to the vngodly Of this Paul maketh mencioÌ„ in the first to the Corrinthians when he sayth Vnto one is geuen the woorde of wisedome to an other the word of knowledge to an other he saith is geuen faith and it is not méete that in that rehersall of giftes and frée graces is ment any other faith then that which is the roote of miracles especially wheÌ„ as straightway are added gifts of healinge and giftes of vertues or powers And of this kinde of faith both Chrisostome and also Theophilactus haue made mencion vpon the same firste Epistle to the Corrinth where in the xiij chapter it is saide If I haue all fayth so that I can remoue mountaines And that vnto the wicked also is this kinde of faith graunted is hereby testified in that it is most certaine that of them are set forth both Prophesies and miracles Wherefore Christ shall say vnto them I know you not although with full mouth they boast Haue not in thy name prophesied haue we not caste out deuils There is an other faith whiche endureth but for a time of whiche the Lorde Faith that dureth but for a tyme. made mencion in the parable of the séede which is sowen in the field for all falleth not vpon good earth but some vpon stony ground and when it is sprong vp it very plainly declareth those which with a glad and ioyfull minde receaue the worde of God but when the burning heate and
put out the handwriting that was against vs. In the The 47. 2. to Timothy the i. chapter Who hath called vs with an holy callinge not accordinge to our workes but according to his purpose and grace which is geuen vs through Christ Iesus Here he speaketh of a calling ful of efficacy by which men are iustified and not of the common calling as touching the preaching of the word of God which is set forth vnto all men And forasmuch as this consisteth not as Paul saith of merites or woorkes neither can iustification also come of them Vnto Titus it is written The 48. The goodnes and loue of God our Sauiour towardes vs hath appeared not by the workes of righteousnes which we haue done but according to his mercy hath he saued vs. Also vnto the Hebrues is but one onely sacrifice and one oblation namely the death The 49. of Christ by which sinnes are wiped away and satisfaction made for men Wherfore iustification is not to be loked for of workes and it ought to suffice vs that the good workes which we do after iustification are sacrifices of thankesgeuing and let vs not make them sacrifices propiciatory by which meanes we should do great iniury vnto Christe But settinge a side the Epistles of Paul let vs séeke testimonies also out of other places of the holy scriptures Christe in the vii of Mathew saith Euery good tree bringeth forth good fruites but a noughty tree bringeth foorth euell The 50. fruites And to the end the nature of those which are not regenerate mighte be the better declared he addeth A good tree cannot bring forth euill frutes nether can an euill tree bring forth good fruits Wherfore seing Christ saith y◠that canot so be how dare these men affirme that it may be for they say that by workes men may be iustified Christ vseth the selfe same reason in the 12. chapiter of Mathew Ether The 51. make the tree good and his fruite good or make the tree euil and his fruite euill for by the fruite is the tree knowen O ye generation of vipers how can ye speake good thinges whē as ye your selues are euill for of the aboundance of the hart the mouth speaketh A good man out of the good treasure of the harte bringeth forth good thinges and an euill man out of an euill treasure bringeth forth euill thinges These wordes of Christ do declare that men which are not yet regenerate are euill trees which neither do bring forth good fruite nor can do ▪ and they testify that the wicked cā not speake good thinges and much les can they worke good thinges and that out of an euill treasure of the harte are euer euill thinges to be looked for And seing the matter is so consider I pray you whither they which are alienated frō Christ ought to be called euill or no Vndoubtedly vnles they be euil none of vs y◠cleaneth vnto Christ can be called good Also in Luke the 17. chapiter But which of you hauing a The 52. seruaunt that goeth to plough or fedeth your cattell that will streight way say vnto hym when he commeth from the field Go and fitte downe and sayth not rather vnto him prepare that I may suppe gyrd vp thy selfe and serue me till I haue eaten and dronken and afterward eate thou and drinke thou doth he thanke his seruaunt bycause he hath done those thinges which he hath commaunded him I trow not So likewise ye when ye haue done all those thinges that are commaunded you say We are vnprofitable seruauntes we haue done that which we ought to haue done These words spake Christ vnto his disciples vnto his Apostles I say and which were now cōuerted to saluation who if they worke vnprofitable works what shall we thē iudge of those which haue not yet receaued the fayth of Christ But the Sophisters haue made the world such fooles that they say that workes before iustification do after a sorte merite it and those workes which follow they say are most profitable wherefore they would now haue men after a sort to make accompt with God and with beades to nomber how many prayers they haue said For what other thing ment they by thē then y◠they would by a certayne nomber recite so many Pater nosters or so many Aue Marias thinking by y◠recital to haue God most assuredly boūd The 53. vnto thē In y◠15. of Iohn Christ is compared vnto a vine tree we to the branches therof wherfore he sayth Euen as the branche can not bring forth fruit of it self vnles it abide in the vine no more also cā ye vnles ye abide in me I am the vine ye are the branches he which abideth in me and I in him the same bringeth forth much fruite And whosoeuer shal not abide in me they are cast out of the dores euē as the braunches or cuttings of frō the vine they shal gather thē and cast thē into the fire Now that we haue recited these wordes of the lord how agreeth it that men being straungers from Christ not yet regenerate can worke good works by which they may be iustified when as they are called dry braunches which shal be cast into the fire and it is sayd that they only can bring forth fruite which cleane vnto Christ as braunches cleane to the vine And that we should the better vnderstand the will The 54. of Christ there is added Without me ye can do nothing Which sentence some go aboute to darken saying that nothing can be done without Christ in respect that he is God forasmuch as he is the first cause of all thinges as though the Lord disputed then of the generall conseruation of naturall thinges and of that power whereby God bringeth forth all thinges vniuersally Christ came not into the world to teach this philosophye he vndoubtedly entreated of the fruite of saluation and of eternall life and spake of those whiche should cleane vnto hys doctrine or ells should be strangers from it Moreouer the sonne of God commaunded The 55. that the faythfull should in theyr prayers saye Forgeue vs our trespasses Signifieng thereby y◠the faythfull also haue nede of forgeuenes in those things which they do for our workes are vnperfect neyther are they able to satisfye Wherefore if our workes which we doo after our regeneration nede expiation by the merite of Christ And for as much as we pray for the same how can they be propitiatory Much more les then can we thinke of those workes which are done before regeneration that they should be acceptable and pleasāt vnto God Moreouer no man can iustly say that he is out of the nomber of such when as God hath commaunded all men to pray in that maner and his will is not that any man should make a lye in his prayer Yea and Iohn also writeth If we shall The 56. say that we haue no sinne we deceaue
the extremity of the law be set forth in any decrée and the equity and moderation of the same extreame law be no where expressed An argument taken of the Romane law the iudge ought to follow the extreame law and ought not to adde equity whiche equity yet he may thē follow if it expressed in any law As for example All lawes agrée that if a debiter pay not his mooney at his day and the creaditour by that meanes susteyne losse the debitour is bound to beare the losse And this they call to pay the interest or as other speake to pay the dammage But bycause it is had in the digestes de Regulis Iuris In all causes that thing is taken for a facte wherein it commeth to passe that by an other mans meanes there is a stay why it is not done wherefore if the debter can proue that the fault was not in him why the mooney was not payd for he had the mooney and offerd it but the creditor was in the faulte why payment was not made although the creditor sustayne neuer so much losse by forbearing of his mooney yet is not the debter bound to make recompence by equity For by equity written it is counted for a déede when the let came by reason of an other Wherefore it manifestly appeareth that it is not in the power of a iudge or of any man to moderate lawes as he lust himself And if the case be so in the Romane lawes inuented and set forth by men what shall we thinke of the law of God For it ought infinitely to be more firme then the law of man Neither is it lawfull for vs to fayne in it any equity vnles The law of God more firme then the law of man when we se it expressed in writing As for example The law is He which shall shed mās bloud his bloud shall also be shed Here we haue the extremity of the law which vndoubtedly we ought alwayes to follow vnles in some other place equity teache y◠the same extremity ought to be mitigated But in an other place it is thus writē If two go forth together into the wood to cutte downe wood and the axe by chance falleth out of the hand of the one and killeth him that standeth by him let there be some cities of refuge vnto which this manqueller may fly and in which he may liue safely till such time as the matter be tried so that if he can proue his innocency then let him be let go free at the death of the Highe priest This equity mought the iudges vse bycause it was written in the lawes of God yea they ought also to vse it so often as they saw that the matter which they had in hand so required But that it was lawful for them by theyr authority to bend the lawes of God or to mitigate them it cā not be proued by any testimony of the holy scriptures Yea rather contrarily they were commaunded There may nothing be added vnto the law of God nor any thing taken from it The law of God is impossible to be obserued by humane strengthes that they should not decline neither to the lefte hand nor to the right hand and that they should not adde any thing vnto the law of God nor diminish any thing from it And we nede no long discource to teach that the law is impossible to be obserued as touching our strengths and especially before we are regenerate For that the scripture it selfe manifestly testifieth For Paul thus writeth in the 8. chapiter vnto the Romanes That which was impossible vnto the law in as much as it was weakened by the flesh Also in the same chapiter The wisedome of the flesh is enmity agaynst God For it is not subiect vnto the law of God yea neither can it vndoubtedly And in the first to the Corrinthians The carnall man vnderstandeth not those thinges which are of the spirit of God for neither can he for vnto him they are foolishnes Christ also An euill tree saith he can not bring forth good fruits Also How can ye speake good thinges when ye your selues are euill All these thinges doo manifestly teach that it is not possible that the law of God should be obserued by humane strengths being as they are now vitiate and corrupted But as touching these cauillations and subtle euasions of the Papistes let this suffice Now let vs come to certayne singular obiections which they make whereby they labour both to trouble vs and also to establish theyr owne fond lyes They An obiectiō touching the repentaunce of Achab. say that Achab the vngodly king did rent his garmentes at the threatninges of Elias did putte on sackecloth and so lay on the grounde and fasted and wente barefoote and for that cause the lord sayd vnto the Prophet Hast thou not sene Achab humbled before me In his dayes I will not bring the euill but in the dayes of his sonne Behold say they the workes of an vngodly king and one not yet iustified doo so please God that they pacified God towardes him But we say on the contrary that Achab was by these factes iustified For if he had had that true fayth whiche How Achab is said to be humbled before God iustified men he would not haue abiden still in idolatry and other most grosse sinnes indede he was somewhat moued at the threatninges of the Prophet but that thing which he did pertayned only vnto a certayne outward and ciuill discipline rather then to true repētaunce But God sayth that he was humbled before him I answeare that that word Before me may be referred either vnto the words of God which were spoken vnto Achab by the Prophet so that the meaning is Before me that is to say at my wordes or ells Before me that is to say in the Church of the Israelites And by that facte Achab testified that he repented of the wicked facte which he had committed and that was a good and sound example before the multitude But God which beheld the inward part of his hart saw that that repentaunce was fayned and vnfruitfull And for that cause he promised that he would only differre the punishement so that that punishement which otherwise should haue happened in his dayes should happen in the dayes of his sonne Neither is God holdeth backe his scourges for the obseruing of outward discipline this strange neither ought we to be ignoraunt thereof that for the keping of outward discipline plagues are differed and most greauous punishemētes of this present life are auoyded For our doctrine is not that all sinnes are alike God also wayted till the sinnes of the Amorhites were full And then at the length is hys wrath wont to be powred out when filthy lustes and wicked actes impudently without any bridle range abrode Yea where outward discipline is kept God oftentimes geueth many good thinges not indede for the merite of the factes but by an
order appoynted by God in nature For God for the conseruation good order God will haue an order to be kept in outwarde thinges How Roboam is said not to haue prepared his harte of thinges will that this by a certayne connexion should follow of the other But I meruayle what these men meane when out of the bookes of the Chronicles they say that Roboam the sonne of Salomon did euil in that he prepared not his hart to enquire of the Lorde They mought easely haue sene that this serueth nothing to thys present purpose vnles they be if I may so terme them table doctors which haue more skill in the tables then in the bookes For as often as they finde in the table of the holy bookes thys woorde to prepare or preparation that strayght way whatsoeuer it be they snatche and thinke that it maketh for theyr purpose and pertayneth vnto theyr preparatory woorkes But the holy history when it declared that the kinge behaued hymselfe wickedlye addeth by exposition as it oftentimes doth that he had not an vpright hart redie to séeke the Lord. Neither doth this any thing helpe theyr cause which is written in the 16. chapter of the prouerbes Why it is said yâ— it pertaineth to man to prepare the harte It pertaineth to a man to prepare the hart but the aunswere of the tonge is of the Lord. For we ought by those woordes to vnderstande nothinge els then that men indéede are wonte to purpose wyth themseues manye thinges but the euent and successe is not in their power but dependeth of GOD. Men oftentimes appoynte wyth them selues what they will saye in the senate house in the iudgement place before the kinge vnto the souldiours and vnto the people But what shal come to passe lieth in the pleasure of God They indéede prepare the hart but God ordereth the aunswere of the tounge according to his prouidence Such an other waighty reason they cite out of the 10. Psalme The Lord hath heard the desire of the poore thy eare hath heard the preparation of their hart But in this place these The preparation of the hart of the poore good masters make two flat errors For first they vnderstand not that which they speake secondly they cite not the place accordinge to the truth of the Hebrue For the sence is That God despiseth not the prayers of the poore but according to hys great goodnes accomplisheth for them those thinges which they had determined in their mind to desire of him And this is the preparation of the harte For there is none that is godly desireth any thing of God but first he deliberateth in his harte that the same thing is to be desired Otherwise he should come rashly vnto God should pray foolishly But these men wheresoeuer they finde in the holy scriptures this word to prepare straight way snatch it vp euen against the nature thereof to establish workes preparatorye But nowe let vs sée what the sentence is after the Hebrue veritie Taauah anauim shamata iehouah tachin libbam tacshib osnecha That is Thou hast heard the desire of the poore Lord thou hast prepared or shalt prepare their hart thy eare shall heare Here we sée that Dauid affirmeth that God heareth God prepareth the hart of the saintes the desires of the saintes whome he calleth poore And he addeth a cause namely because God prepareth their hart to require those thinges whiche may serue to their saluation and please God But by whome God woorketh such a preparation in the hartes of the faithfull Paul teacheth in this Epistle when he thus writeth God prepareth our hartes by his holy spirits What we should aske as it behoueth vs we know not But the spirite prayeth for vs with vnspeakeable sighes But it is God which searcheth the hartes he seeth what the spirite will aske for the saintes We sée therefore both by Dauid and also by Paul that God heareth those prayers of them that pray vnto him which are by the impulsioÌ„ of his spirite stirred vp We learne also of the Ethnike Philosophers and that in mo places then one that those are worthy of reproofe which without consideration and rashly require any thing of God But they which professe Christ euen as they beleue that he is the author of their prayers so also do they close them vp in thys sentence Thy will be done But say they Ezechiell saith in his 18. chapter Walke in A concilition of places of Ieremy and Ezechiell my wayes and make ye a new hart Ieremy also saith Be ye conuerted vnto me saith the Lord. Wherefore a man say they may of himselfe prepare himselfe to the obteyning of righteousnes But these men should remember that it is no vprighte dealing to cite some places of the scriptures and to ouerhippe leaue vnspoken other some Let them goe therfore and sée what Ezechiell writeth in the. 30. chapt I saith the Lorde will bring to passe that ye shall walke in my wayes Agayne I will geue vnto you a fleshy hart and will take away from you your stony hart Ieremy also in the 31. chap. Conuert me O Lord and I shal be conuerted Wherfore Augustine very wel sayd Geue what thou commaundest and commaund what thou wilt They abuse also an other place out of the Prophet Ionas to confirme their error For in him it is writteÌ„ that Of the fact of the Niniuites God regarded the woorkes of the Niniuites Beholde say they the affliction of the Niniuites wherby they afflicted themselues with fastings and cried vnto the lord prepared theyr mindes and made them apte to obteine pardon As though it behoued not the Niniuites first to beleue the woorde of God before they coulde eyther pray healthfully or els repent Séeing therefore they beleued before they did any workes they were iustified by faith and not by works which folowed afterward And God is sayd to haue regarded their works because they pleased him Neither did we euer deny that the workes of men being now iustified are acceptable vnto A profitable rule for the right vnderstanding of sentences of the fathers touching iustificatioÌ„ God So often as we finde in the scriptures such places which séeme to attribute righteousnes vnto our workes we muste according to the doctrine of Augustine haue a consideration out of what foundation those workes procéede And when we perceaue that they springe out of faith we oughte to ascribe vnto that roote that which afterwarde is added as touching righteousnes And how fowlye these men â—rre in their reasoning hereby we may perceaue for that they take vpon them to transferre those thinges which are proper vnto one kinde of men vnto an other Which thing eueÌ„ humane lawes wil not suffer For as it is had in the Code As touching testaments or last willes If rusticall and vnlearned men which dwell out of cities A similitude and haue not store of wise and learned
men do make their last willes withous a solemnitie required thereunto and without a sufficient nomber of witnesses prescribed whiche yet otherwise were necessary such testaments ought to be allowed Now if a maÌ„ would transferre this prerogatiue vnto citesins who for that they haue their abidings in cities haue store of men of vnderstanding he should excéedingly erre For if their testamentes should be so made they are refused neither are they counted firm So we say that the workes of men iustified may please God which thing yet neyther can nor oughte to be graunted vnto them whiche are without faith and without Christ Farther let vs marke the accustomed fond kind of reasoning of the aduersaries whiche the Logicians call A non causa vt câ—usa â–ª that is from that whiche is not the cause as the cause For they alwayes appoint good workes to be the causes A similitude of righteousnes when as in very dede they are the effects of righteousnes not causes For it is as though a man should say the fire is therfore hot because it maketh How this sentence is to be vnderstand â–ª God rendreth to euery man according to his workes hot But it is cleane coÌ„trary for therfore it fore maketh hot because it is hot So also we because we ar iustified therfore do iust thinges and not because we do iuste things therfore we are iustified Somtimes also they make this obiectioÌ„ that God will reÌ„der vnto euery man according to his works Wherfore works say they are yâ— causes of our felicity But here also as theyr woÌ„ted maner is they are very much deceiued For vnles they haue found out some new grammer vnto themselues vndoubtedly this word according signifieth not yâ— cause But Christ say they in yâ— his Iuxta last iudgement séemeth to expresse these thinges as causes wherfore the kingdome of heauen is geuen vnto them For thus will he say I was hungrye and ye fed me I was thursty and ye gaue me drinke But Christ doth not in very déede rehearse these thinges as causes but rather those thinges which wente before Come ye blessed of my father possesse ye the kingdome which was prepared for you from the beginning of the world For the true cause of our felicitie is because we are elected and predestinate of God to yâ— eternal inheritance For they which are in this number are when time serueth adorned with faith whereby being iustified they haue right vnto eternall Why Christ in the iudgement will make mencion of outwarde workes There are two beginninges of thinges life But because this faith is hidden neither can be séene and Christ will haue all men to vnderstand that none but the iust are receiued into the kingdome of heauen therefore reherseth he these outwarde workes that by them it might plainly be perceaued that righteousnes is geuen vnto men by faith For there is no man that can be so ignorant but that he knoweth that there are two grounds of things the one is whereby they are the other whereby they be knowne Againe they obiect out of the first of Samuel Those that honor me I honor those that loue me I loue Here say they the promise is made vnto the worke But if they woulde make a distinction betwene the promises of the Gospel and the promises of the lawe as we haue els where aboundauntly taught they should easly vnderstand that that place is nothing repugnant vnto our sentence For if we coulde of our selues satisfie the commaundement of the law then might it be the cause why the promise should be geuen vnto vs. But forasmuch as no man is able to performe it all men flye vnto Christ and are through faith towardes him iustified Then by a certaine obedience begonne we begin to worke which although it be not exactly done according vnto the rule of the commaundement yet it pleaseth God And he of his mere liberality performeth the promise whiche was adioyned vnto that worke And so those conditions whiche are adioyned vnto the preceptes are not vnprofitable For they that are iustified attayne vnto them Neyther 〈…〉 thâ—se men ashamed to cite these wordes out of the 25. Psalme Looke vpon my labour and my vtility and forgeue me all my sinnes as though our labours or afflictions are the causes of the remission of sinnes But in this place Dauid being in most gréeuous calamities desireth of God to forgeue him his sinnes that if he should be angry for his sinnes the cause of punishmentes might be taken away For here is not entreated of labours which a man taketh vpon him of his owne voluntary will but of punishementes A similitude inflicted by God We sée also that children whilest that they are beaten of their maisters do desire forgeuenes and pardon If thou geue an almes vnto one that is leprous the leprosy can not properly be called the cause of thy compassion or mercy For otherwise all that passed by the leper should do the same But the true cause is the louing affection in thy minde But they say moreouer that in the holy scriptures much is attributed vnto repentaunce Which thing we deny not But we on the other side woulde haue them to vnderstand that repentaunce is the fruite of fayth and that no man can with profite repent hym of hys sinnes A distinction of confession vnles he first beleue They also vainely boast of many things touching confession But touching it we make a distinction For either it is seperated from hope and faith as it was in Iudas which confessed that he had sinned in deliuering the iust bloud and so farre is it of that that confession should bring any profite that it is a preparation also vnto desperation and vnto destruction or els it is ioyned wyth fayth and hope as it was in Dauid and Peter and so is it not the cause but the effect Aâ—riculeâ— confession of iustification for it followeth fayth and goeth not before it The auricular confession also of the Papistes is vtterly supersticious wherfore we vtterly contemne it For they obtrude it as a thing necessary vnto saluation and as a cause why sinnes should be forgeuen which they are neuer able to proue by any testimony of the holy scriptures They violently wrest this also out of the Lordes Forgeue vs our trespasses is expounded prayer Forgeue vs our trespasses as we also forgeue them that trespasse agaynst vs Agayne Forgeue and it shal be forgeuen you Ergo say they the forgeuenes of iniuries is the cause why our sinnes are forgeuen vs. This their reason as the common saying is with the one hand stroketh the head and with the other geueth a blowe For if the forgeuenes of iniuries should as these men would haue it deserue remission of sinnes then that remission were no remission For after thou hast once payd the price â–ª there is nothing that can be forgeuen thee but then hath remission place when the price is
exhortation and consolation to all men In these wordes Paul most manifestly teacheth to what peculiar offices the gyft of Prophesie pertayneth in the Churche Or a ministery in ministery The want of this speach may thus be supplied whether he haue a ministery let him abide and be occupied in the ministery and wholy apply himselfe thereunto vnles paraduenture any had rather with Origen to repete that former particle namely according to the proportioÌ„ or measure of fayth let him exercise himselfe in the ministery As touching the sence Paul in these wordes No man ought to be idle in his vocaâ—ion sheweth that God will not that any man should be Idle in his vocation For as Alexander sayd to Mammea There is nothing more pernicions to a common welth then to haue thinges done by deputies Euery maÌ„ ought to labour himselfe in his vocation But what a lamentable case is it to sée in these dayes infinite ministers in the Church which boast that they are not bound to preach to fede the flocke and to gouerne the shepe of Christ when yet in the meane time they receue no small gaynes at the handes of theyr shepe He which teacheth in teaching Of this commaundemeÌ„t the Apostles haue geuen vs an excellent example when they sayd It is not mete for vs to leue the word of God and to minister at tables For forasmuch as they were appoynted of the Lord to teach the whole world they would be occupied in teaching He which exhorteth in exhortacion These two to teach and to exhort are To teach to exhort are diuers of very nigh affinity the one to the other And sometimes ech is geuen to one and the same man But sometimes and for the most part they are deuided For a man shall sée some teach aptly and most playnly set forth thinges most subtle and perspicuously expound thinges that are obscure which selfe men yet in exhortatacioÌ„s are very vnapt There are others which haue a wonderfull dexteritie and efficacy in exhortacions which yet of all men are most vnapt to teach By the woordes of the Apostle to the Cor. a litle before alledged we sée how the giftes of the prophesie are distinguished â–ª First he sayth He speaketh edification which pertayneth to doctrine secondly exhortacion namely whereby men are stirred vp to doo good and to eschew euill thirdly is put consolation For oftentimes it commeth to passe Thre parts of prophecy that some are broken in aduersities which by that meanes may seme redy either to dispayre or to fall away frome the truth Wherefore it is necessary that they be holpen by consolation This part Paul here prosecuteth not I thinke therfore for that he comprehendeth it vnder exhortacion And how much publike teachinges and exhortacions were vsed in the old time in the Church we may gather out of that 14. chapiter to In the sinagoge of the Iewes these offices of prophecy were vsed the Corinthians Yea neither were these thinges euer entermitted in the sinagoges of the Iewes so often as there was had an holy assembly Which may here by be proued for that vnto Christ when he was set downe in the sinagoge was deliuered a booke to expound somewhat thereof vnto the people And when Paul and Barnabas came to Antioch as Pisidia as it is writteÌ„ in the 13. chapiter of the Actes and were come to the sinagog with the rest of the Iewes the ruler of the sinagog sayd vnto them If ye haue any word of consolation for the people say on He that distributeth let him do it with simplicity Here is touched the office of deacons as they were at that time and ought also to be in our time Theyr office was to destribute to the poore the almes and oblations of the faythfull Let theÌ„ doo theyr office sayth he with simplicity Let them conueighe nothing away by craft or by euill practises For noughty and deceatefull men when they haue the chardge of common receauinges of mooney doo nothing simply but vse wonderfull The office of Deacons guiles and subtletie The faultes Paul willeth to be remooued away from this kind of ministery Others thinke that the geuing ought to be done simply that is without any regard to get the prayse of men which some seke for in the distribution of other mens almes But the first interpretacion in my iudgement semeth more apt He that ruleth with diligence Although I doubt not that there were many kindes of gouermeÌ„t in the Church yet to confesse the truthe this as I thinke may most aptly be vnderstanded of those which were called praesbiteri that is elders not of these which had the charge of the woord and of doctrine but of those which The office of the elders were appointed as helpers to the pastors They as men of the wiser sort endewed with a greater zeale and piety were chosen out of the Laytie Their office was chiefely to se vnto discipline and to looke what euery man did and in euery house famely to se what euery man neded either as touching the soule or as touching the body For the Church had his elders or if I may so speake his senate which as time required prouided for all thinges mete and profitable Paul describeth thys kind of ministery not only in this place but also in the first to Timothe For thus he writeth The elders are worthy of double honour especially they which labour in the word in doctrine In which words he semeth to signify there are some praesbiteri which teach and set forth the woord of God and there are others which although they doo not this yet are they gouerners in the Church as elders This thing Ambrose left not vntouched when he expounded that place yea he complayneth that euen theÌ„ either thorough the pride or thorough the slouthfulnes of the priests they were in a maner worne away For whilest they which haue the gouerment of yâ— Church seeke to draw all thinges to themselues they diligently as much as they can labour that in that roome should be ioyned no fellow officers with theÌ„ Wherfore Paul willeth that they which haue this charge doo put to theyr diligence and expell slouthfulnes and sluggishnes He that sheweth mercy with cherefulnes This semeth to haue bene the office of widdowes of old men which were to that end maintayned of the Church to se vnto strangers and to sicke persons Vnto these he not without iust cause coÌ„maundeth cherefulnes For men weake and afflicted are much relieued if they sée their necessities holpen with cherefulnes For they which doo these thinges with an heauy and frowning loke doo seme to adde sorrow to them that are in sorrow For thereby they suspect that they are greauousome and burdenous to theyr Why these giftes are called free giftes brethern By meanes wherof they are oftentimes brought to that poynt that they count death much better theÌ„ that life Thus much hath Paul spokeÌ„ of the
publique ministers of yâ— Church which he not without iust cause calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yâ— is frée giftes For all these thinges although it seme they may be gotten by humane art and industry yet by our endeuor we shall neuer bring any thing to passe yâ— way vnles we be holpen by the grace of God whereby those thinges which we doo are made profitable and of efficacy For they which are occupied in these offices without the helpe of God may indede winne prayse of men and commendation of the people but they are not able to aduance the saluation of the soules and the commodities of the Church And as touching this matter oftentimes they haue God fauorable prosperous vnto theÌ„ which yet obey him not with a sincere will But this is excedingly to be lamented that this gouernance of the Church is so miserably decayed that at this day not so much as the names of these functions are any where extaÌ„t They haue put in stede of them Taper cariers Accoluthes and Subdeacons which haue light and trifling effects appoynted to them pertayning to theyr supersticious alters Let loue be without dissimulation hating that wbich is euill and cleauing to that which is good Being affectioned with a brotherly loue to loue one an other In geuing honor go one before an other Not slouthfull to do seruice feruent in spirite seruing the time Reioysing in hope patient in tribulation continuing in prayer communicating to the necessities of the Sayntes geuing your selues to hospitality Let loue be without dissimulation Men are of theyr owne nature very prone to hipocrisie Therefore Paul expressedly prohibiteth it For God as Iohn sayth will not that we should loue in woordes in toung but in dede and in truth And Paul to Timothe writeth Loue ought to come from a pure hart and a good conscience and a fayth vnfayned Origen sayth He which loueth God and those thinges which God willeth that man hath loue without dissimulation But he which loueth not either God and those thinges which God willeth he I say loueth not but only dissembleth and pretendeth loue As if a man see his neighbor fallen into some greuous crime doo not admonishe him or reproue him his loue is conterfeate For he willeth not those thinges towardes his neighbor which God willeth The fauor of his neighbor is more deare to him then the will of God Hating that which is euill and cleuing to that which is good Good and euil in this place may signifie profite and disprofite And so the sence here is he loueth Good signifieth two thinges his neighbour without hipocrisie which hateth all thinges whatsoeuer he seeth shal be discommodious and hurtefull vnto him but those thinges which may by any maner of meanes be profitable or commodious vnto him he both vehemently desireth and as much as he can helpeth forward It may be also that Good and Euill signifie honest and dishonest And so they which loue truly abhorre from wicked and filthy woorkes and as much as they can apply themselues to holy and honest woorkes Which is therefore sayd for that some are so foolish that they thinke they loue theyr neighbours when they consent to them in theyr wicked lusts and great extorcions But this is not that loue which the Apostle describeth when he sayth that we ought to abhorre from wickednes and to embrase as much as lieth in vs that which is honest iust Chrisostome noteth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is hating The affâ—ct of hatred is not in vaine planted in vs. The Stoikes vniustly reiected affectes is spoken with a vehemency For this preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Paul signifieth vehemency of speach as in the 8. to the Romanes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth not any common but a great and vehement carefulnes and anguish And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth more then to waite for For it signifieth diligently to wait for And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is redemption not euery kinde of redemption but an absolute redemption Moreouer we sée that the affect of hatred is not in vayne planted in our myndes but to the end we should exercise it vpon vices Wherefore the Stoikes vniustly reiected affects For affects are the matter of vertues And as in an harpe when to the wood pegges of bone and stringes are applied number proportion and measure is brought forth a most swéete harmonye so when to these affectes is added the spirite and grace of God of them spring forth notable and excellent vertues But we are in the fault which abuse those giftes of God and hate those thinges which both are honest and please God and contrariwise the thinges which are filthy and displease him we embrace And so peruerse oftentymes is our iudgement that we call good euill euill good Although the nature of the thinges themselues be not chaunged by our iudgement For thinges that are filthy Thinges are not chaÌ„ged by our iudgement are alwayes filthye although we iudge otherwise of them Wherefore he wisely answered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is That which is filthy is filthy whether thou so iudgest it or no. And this is to be noted that as the Apostle commaundeth vs to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word as we haue declared signifieth an hatred with vehemency so willeth he vs not simply and absolutely to cleaue vnto God but addeth the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to be ioyned together not sclenderly but as it were with a strong and indissoluble bond Being affectioned to loue one an other with a brotherly loue In Greke it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What Storge signifieth in which woords is declared what maner of affect loue is namely a brotherly affect And it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which woord signifieth an affect not comming of election such as are frendshippes which men enter into one with an other but grafted in by nature and therefore so ioyned to our minds that it can neuer in a maner vtterly be shaken of And forasmuch as of these naturall affections there are sondry sortes or kindes for either they are betwene the pareÌ„ts and the children or betwene the husband and the wife or betwene brethern the Apostle mencioneth that kind which most agréed with his exhortacion which he had begonne namely to geue vs to vnderstand yâ— our loue towardes others ought to be a brotherly loue which is therefore more vehement then are common freÌ„dshippes for yâ— these frendshipâ—â—â—e dissolued euen among honest men when they perceiue yâ— theyr frendes haue fallen away froÌ„ iustice are become wicked corrupt But as touching our parents brethern children it is vndoubtedly a griefe vnto vs if we se theÌ„ behaue them selues otherwise theÌ„ we would they should yet is not therfore yâ— affection of our mind towardes theÌ„ extinguished Moreouer in these affections of loue we seke not yâ— in our louing one should recompense an
wherewith the faithfull are illustrated Wherfore Paul requireth a force and efficacie wherby our minds should be inflamed And although as we haue before taught it lieth in no mannes hand to be endued of God with this or that power of the frée gifts for God distributeth them to euery manne as he will yet the regenerate for that they are not simply men but are the men of God and haue their strengthes after a sort renued by the grace and spirite of God they may by their endeuor prayers and industry stir vp The regeneraâ—e may after a sorte stirre vp in themselues the spirite in themselues the spirite whereby to be feruent or they may frame themselues vnto it when it stirreth them vp For so Paul sayth to Timothe Stirre vp the grace which is in thee by the imposition of the hands of the eldership And to the Thessalonians Take hede ye extinguish not the spirite For euen as vnto fire being once kindeled we may put wood and coles to make it to burne the more so the spirite being now geuen may by the exercise of doctrine exhortacion or ministery be stirred vp to make vs the more feruent and this to doo Paul now here exhorteth vs. In the Actes of the Apostles the 18. chapiter it is written of Apollo that he spake with a feruent spirite as which taught diligently those thinges which pertayned to the Lord. But it is added that he was learned and eloquent In that place I se two thinges ioyned together which are very necessarye for a preacher First that he diligently take hede what he speake that he poure out nothing rashly or agaynst the Two principal offices of a preacher truth the second is that those thinges which he speaketh be not spoken coldly and slenderly but be set forth effectually and feruently But in some though otherwise they are vehement inough yet there wanteth doctrine in other some in whom sometimes séemeth to be diligence inoughe yet they want feruentnes of spirite And that which I now speake of prâ—â—chers ought also to be applied to other offices wherof is now entreated Seruing the time Here some rede 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is time and some 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Lord. Chrysostome and Origene read Lord and rather allow that reading then to read time peraduenture therfore for that they thought it is the poynt of an inconstant and light man to be changed according to the time and for that to serue the time may seme to be rather a wary behauiour of maÌ„ then yâ— worshipping of God But coÌ„trariwise Ambrose what neded saith he to say that we must serue the Lord when as all the things which hitherto haue bene spoken thereto tend that we shold serue the Lord. But that notwithstaÌ„ding there is no cause but that we may read Lord. For they mought say that Paul in his sentence admonisheth the godly to thinke that in all those things they serue not men but God who séeth all things and to whose honor all things ought to be directed How be it Origen somewhat releÌ„teth and saith that we may serue the time whilest we consider how short it is and coÌ„tracted that although we haue wiues yet we are as if we had none and although we possesse yet as though we possessed not redéeming the dayes for that they are Occasion is to be obserâ—ed euill which interpretation I dislike not Although time in this place may more aptly signifie occasion which is earnestly and diligently to be obserued if we wil doe any good to our brethren For occasion otherwise passeth away neither can it be called backe againe when we will We know with how great subtlety and wickednes Sathan and the flesh resist the workes of God And therefore it commeth that there is no man almost which patiently taketh admonitions reprohensions And muche les in a manner if we admonish out of time and out of season Paule gaue place somewhat to the time when hée Circumcised Timothe But he could by no means be persuaded to circumcise Titus also though he were vehemently therunto vrged Christ himselfe according to the consideration of the time fled when the Iewes sought to put him to death Howbeit afterward when he saw opportunitie he returned of his owne accord Therefore his disciples sayd Euen now the Iewes sought to stone the and wilt thou now agayne go into Iewry Christ answered them Are there not 12. houres in a day In which words he signified that Occasions are counted as beckes of God we ought to serue time And for no other cause Salomon sayth that there is a time to build and a time to plant c. Such occasions are as certayne beckes of God to bring thinges well to passe which beckes we ought no les to obserue then souldiers doo the signe or watchword of theyr captayne And good seruaunts attempt nothing before that they se theyr Lord or maister to becken thereunto Erasmus thinketh that to serue the tyme is to take in good parte aduersities when they at any time happen And this sentence he thinketh is confirmed by that which followeth For Paul addeth Reioysing in hope patient in tribulation But if there be any which like better the other reding seruing the Lord we wil not be agaynst it But here is to be noted this Greke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is seruing For therby we vnderstaÌ„d which thing we before also admonished that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 belongeth not only What is to be taken hede of in obseruing of occasions vnto creatures excelling in dignity but also vnto God him selfe On the other side he which thinketh that Paul commaundeth vs to serue the time ought to beware that whilest he obserueth occasion he decline neither to the right hand nor to the left that is that he chaunge not his sentence For we ought to be constant in that which we rightly vnderstand although euery time will not suffer vs to burst forth straight way into act Reioysing in hope This can not they doo which settle them selues in worldly thinges for in them only put they all theyr hope and confidence and wayte for nothing ells Paul in this place vnderstandeth the hope of eternall felicitie whereby men are so confirmed in aduersities that Paul to the ThessoloniaÌ„s calleth it an How patience worketh hope and hope patience helmet Here is hope reckened as the ground of patience in tribulation At which thing some man paraduenture may meruayle For before in the 5. chapiter Paul wrote Tribulation worketh patience patience experience and experience hope There we se that hope is produced of patience But contrariwise in this place patience is sayd to spring of hope But herein is no contrarietie For this commonly commeth to passe in thinges which are nigh by nature that by an inuerse order they Thinges nigh by nature together â–ª doo by an inuerse order inferre thâ—â—ne the other What hope is mutually inferre
where vrge For Esay sayth in the 5. chapiter Wo be vnto them that are wise in theyr owne eyes and to those which are prudent in theyr owne sight Chrisostome affirmeth that the roote of this vice is to thinke that a man hath of himselfe all sufficientie For they which dare hope so much of themselues doo easely contemne others But the case is farre otherwise â–ª For we haue all nede of the helpe of others neither is there any man in all poyntes so perfect but that he nedeth to be holpen by others much inferior vnto him Who at any time was more prudent then Moses Yet obeyed he Iethro when he gaue him good counsell Saule followed the counsell of his lad to go to the seer And that whiche was not reuealed vnto Isaac touching the infants that straue in theyr mothers wombe was by an oracle shewed vnto Rebecca â–ª Crisostome thinketh that the Romans were much infected with this vice and therefore they were so often admonished touching this for that the pride which was amongest them much disturbed the affayres of the church when as the dignity of the city the amplenes of theyr empire and theyr excellent endewments of naturall good thinges aboudauntly ministered vnto theÌ„ matter of pride Rendring vnto no man euill for euil Vnto the cause is aptly added the effect For they which arrogantly take vpon theÌ„ many thinges and alwayes aspire vnto highe thinges doo easely contemne others and are offended euen in trifels and easely deme that they are despised of other men Thereof springeth displeasure taking and séeking of vengeaunce Some thinke that that which is now sayd differeth from that which is afterward added Dearely beloued aueng not your selues For they suppose that to render euill for euill extendeth farther then to auenge But I to speake the truth see not how he which seketh to recompence euill for euill séeketh not also to be auenged Therefore as I thinke the Apostle first setteth forth the thing generally after that he addeth what ought rather to be done last of all by way of repetition he returneth to eâ—pound that which he put forthe we ought not to render euil for euill For if we sée that that is euil which our enimy hath done vnto vs we ought by no meanes to imitate him as Chrisostome aptly He sinneth more greuously whiche reÌ„dreth euil for euil then he which first prouoketh a man to â—nger admonisheth vs. Origen addeth that they more greuously sinne which reÌ„der euil for euill then they which first committed the euill For it is possible that he which first did the hurt did it vnwares or was ignorant that that was euil which he did to an other or thought it wuld not haue bene so greuous as it was But he which hath had experience in himself and knoweth how irkesome it is and will yet notwithstanding repay the selfe same euil may much more iustly be accused then the other This sentence Paul putteth forth generally and excludeth no man Wherfore it is by no meanes lawfull to recompence euill for euill neither to Iewes nor to Gentiles nor doubtles to any man liuing And by this meanes is confounded the righteousnes of the Scribes and of the Phariseis For they taught yâ— we ought to loue our friends and to hate our enemies How be it Princes Iudges nor Magestrates doe commit nothing against this law when they punishe wicked doers for punishments procéeding of iustice ought not to be counted amongst euils Procuring good things in the sight of all men The commoÌ„ reading hath not only before God but also before all men But that particle is more then needeth Here also is to be noted that he speaketh generally For he sayth not in the sight of the Gréekes or of the Iewes or of this man or of that man but vniuersally of all men Paul in the. 10. chapiter of the first to the Corinthians sayth be ye such that ye geue no offence neither to the Iewes nor to the Grekes nor to the churche of God euen as I please all men in all things not seking mine owne profit but the profit of many that they might be saued This is in a maner all one with that which is in this place commaunded Wherefore we must not only beware that we commit not any thing against those things which are forbidden in the law but also that we behaue our selues warely in those things which should otherwise be lawfull least the weaker sort shold be offended Good things that is iust holy and honest are procured in the sight of all men when those things are done whereby is illustrated the glory of God and the edifying of our neighbor is aduaunced Howbeit this ought not to be our entent to get the praise of men For Christ admonisheth take heede that ye doe not your righteousnes before men to be sene of them But let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your father which is in heauen Wherefore Paule sayth not Seke to please men but haue a care that your examples be suche in the sight of all men that by them they may be put in minde of theyr saluation And wheÌ„ he sayth procuring he plainly declareth that this ought not to be done negligently but most diligently If it be possible as much as in you is haue peace with all men Therefore he addeth conditions for that peace can not be had but with certain And oftentimes WheÌ„ peace with men is to be refused it hapneth that through yâ— outrageousnes and malitiousnes of some peace either can not be made or els can not be kept when as they labour through theyr impietie to lead vs away from God or els we should holde our peace and consent to oppresse our neighbours But when we come once to this poynt that either God is openly to be offended or our neighbor whome we ought to ayd succor helpe is to be forsaken this peace with wicked men is vtterly to be refused For euery faithfull man ought to his power to withstande the enterprises and endeuors of the wicked Yea Chrisostome sayth that Paule was so seuere that in the. 7. chapiter to the Corinthians he thus wryteth euen of them which are ioyned in matrimony And if the vnbeleuer depart let him depart For in suche a case the brother or sister is not subiect to bondage God hath called vs in peace And we doe as muche as lieth in vs when we hate yâ— sinne and loue the persons and resist them as much as we caÌ„ that they commit nothing either against God or against our neighbor And this thing so oftentimes happeneth that Christ sayd that he came not to send peace vpon the earth but the sword Wherefore Paul not without iust cause sayth If it be possible and as much as in you is which conditions we fulfill when we haue our mindes prepared to an vpright and honest peace Dauid sayth with them that hated peace I
this is a great aduauncement vnto piety therfore Paul setteth it forth to the end to commend those weake ones to the better sort Howbeit lest in this matter he shold attribute more vnto them theÌ„ to the freer sort as though he shold think that the stronger in vsing liberty had not a consideration of the law of God he pronounceth the sentence which he setteth forth coÌ„mon to ech part They sayth he which obserue dayes obserue theÌ„ to the Lord they which obserue theÌ„ not obserue theÌ„ not vnto the Lord. And they which eat eat to the Lord they which eat not eate not to the Lord. And those datiue cases which Paul here vseth to obserue to the lord to eate to the lord to liue to the lord to dye to the lord signifie nothing ells but that we ought in all our actions in all our life and euen in death to depend of the lord And geueth thanks to God Hereby we may iudge yâ— eyther of those what soeuer they did had a regard vnto God for that either part gaue thanks vnto him Of what great force geuing of thanks is Wherefore geuing of thankes is of no small force For it is as it were a certaine healthfull sawse and maketh that which otherwise of it selfe should haue bene hurtefull commodious and healthfull vnto vs. Therefore Paul to Timothe writeth Euery creature is good and nothing is to be cast away which is receaued with thanks geuing For none of vs liueth to him selfe neither doth any die to himselfe For whether we liue we liue to the Lord or whither we die we die to the Lord. This may thus be applied to be a reason wherby the stronger sort are feared away from contemning the weaker namely for yâ— they both liue dye vnto the lord It may also be a general cause why they are sayd both to obserue not to obserue dais vnto yâ— lord either to eate or not to eate to the lord for that vniuersally they liue vnto the Lord and dye vnto the Lord. By these woordes we are aptly and manifestly The scope of our lyfe and of all â–ª our actions instructed touching the scope of our life and of all our actioÌ„s I would to God this might neuer slippe out of our mind but mought with most depe rootes be fixed in our hartes Life and death I thinke in this place are to be vnderstanded as touching the body For I se not very wel what consideration they haue which referre these thinges to the life of fayth and to the death of sinne For there is none which sinneth to the Lord. For that can not pertayne to the honor of God Vnles paraduenture they meane that this is all one with that which was before spoken He standeth to his Lord or falleth But the first exposition semeth in my iudgement more playne and agréeth with those thinges which Paul writeth to the Phillippians And Christ shal be magnified in my body whether it be by life or by death VVhither therefore we liue or die vve are the Lordes This in sum ought to be of greate force with them for that not only our life and death depende of the lord but also for that we all both as touching life and as touching death are hys proper possession And if this be so who can contemn his neighbour escape vnpunished This is in a maner all one with that which Paul before sayd Why iudgest thou an other mans seruaunt That fault was reproued in the weake ones and this is now layd to the charge of the stronger sort that they reiect and contemne not euery kind of men but these which are the Lords Paul sayth to the Corinthians Ye are not your owne men For ye are bought with a price Glorifie God now in your body and in your spirite which belong to God Agayne ye are bought with a price be not ye made the seruaunts of men For Christ therfore died rose agayne and reuiued that he might be Lord both of the quicke and of the dead Here he ascribeth a cause why we ar by good right the Lordes For he hath redemed vs by his death by his resurrection hath deserued Whether Christ if he had not dyed for vs shold haue had vs to his proper possession life for vs. Wherfore he is Lord both of our life and of our death But here paraduenture thou wilt demaund whither if Christ had not died we should haue bene his proper possession or no As touching his diuine nature eueÌ„ without his death and resurrection he is our lord For we are created of him whatsoeuer we haue we haue it thorough him But bycause he is in very dede maÌ„ he hath by his death and resurrection iustly and worthely gotten vnto him selfe this dominion which yet the father could haue geueÌ„ vnto him freely but to set forth his glory he would rather geue it to his merites Wherefore Paul to the Phil. sayth for which cause God hath geuen vnto him a name which is aboue euery name namely for that he had humbled himselfe to death euen to the death of the crose OrigeÌ„ very largely entreteth of this doubt Howbeit I thinke that this solution which I haue here brought is more playne more true But there ariseth also an other doubt For Paul semeth to speake agaynst that sentence of the Lord in 22. chapiter of Mathew He is not the God of the dead but of the liuing For if he be not the God of yâ— dead how is he here sayd to be Lord of the dead But if the matter be more narrowly examined there is not herein contrariety For there the Lord would hereby proue the resurrection of the dead for that God could not be truly the God of AbrahaÌ„ of Isaac and of Iacob vnles he would haue them to be saued and that wholy both as touching soule and body For it is the propriety of GOD to saue thâ—se whose GOD he is And the Scripture in Exodus pronounceth that GOD is the GOD of those patriarches Wherefore they liue and shall more fully liue in the blessed resurrection Hereby it is manifest that Christ spake of those which were thought to be vtterly dead both in soule and in body But God can not be their God For he can not suffer such a death to preuaile against his But here Paul sayth that Christ is Lord of of the dead which are dead in body only but liue in spirite and when tyme commeth shall rise agayne Wherefore we sée that betwene these places there is vndoubtedly no contrarity But because we are by the way lighted vpon those words of the Lord there are as I thinke in them two thinges to be obserued First that although of them is properly concluded the resurrection of the godly whose God God confesseth himselfe to be yet followeth it that of the selfe same words may be concluded the resurrection of the wicked For if God of his goodnes do so
a frowning couÌ„tenance and with bitter opprobrious woordes This is a paradoxe of Christian philosophy a doctrine intolerable vnto the fleshe that we should with a valiant minde tollerate iniuries although they be vniustly inflicted vpoÌ„ vs and Paradoxes of christian philosophy that we should not cease to doo good vnto them which haue our trauayle and diligence in suspicion and beare a deadly hatred against vs. But it is meruaile how Paul calleth them saintes who beare vnto him no great good fauour But he saw that with faith and iustification is ioyned very great infirmitie and that oftentimes With iustification is oftentimes ioyned greâ— infirmity it happeneth that holy men haue no vpright iudgement touching thynges humane either for that they are not rightly enstructed or els for yâ— they are fraudulently seduced by others That I may come with ioy vnto you by the will of God and may together vvith you be refreshed This is the ende why he wished to be deliuered namâ—ly that he might be with the Romanes and others whome he might by his diligence and labour helpe in the aduancing of the Gospell Herein Paul placed all his consolation Let the ministers now go and boast of their riches and reuenues and commodities omitting in the meane tyme the apostolicall office of doctrine of preaching of labours and of troubles For herein doth Paul put his solace rest This also is to be noted the lowlines and modesty which Paul vseth wheÌ„ he speaketh these thinges For he saith not that I may teach admonishe instruct correct you but that I may comforte and refresh my selfe with you This is it which he sayd at the beginning of this epistle To confirme you that is that I might be comforted together with you thorough that fayth which is common both yours and mine The God of peace be with you all Amen He last of all wisheth vnto them peace and that no common peace but the peace of God which ought truely to be called the chiefe good thing For as Paul in an other place sayth it passeth all vnderstanding With peace he began his epistle and with peace he endeth the same And when as he himselfe could not as yet be with them he wisheth yâ— they might haue with them the God of peace that is God pacified and mercifull for so signifieth this particle the God of peace The sixtenth Chapiter I Commend vnto you Phebe our sister which is a seruaunt of the Church of Cenchrea That ye receaue her in the Lord as it becommeth saintes and that ye asist her in whatsoeuer busines she nedeth of your ayde for she hath geuen hospitality to many and to me also I commend vnto you Phebe our sister Men thinke that this holy wooman What maner of ministery Phebe had in the church caried this epistle of Paul to Rome She had bene a minister in the Church of cenâ—hrea not indede in teaching publikely but in looking to the poore which were susteyned at the charges of the Church And what maner of widowes either as touching age or as touching maners were required to that charge it is at large set forth in the epistle to Timothe By what maner of meanes she was an helpe vnto Paul we know not But it is inough for vs out of this testimony of Paul to vnderstand that she had oftentimes bene beneficiall both to many others and also to Paul himself She is here thrée ways commended for that she was a sister for that she was a minister and for that she had geuen hospitalitie to many others and to Paul also Wherunto also may be added that she was holy For Paul streight way Phebe thre waies coÌ„mended addeth as it becommeth saints Hereby it is manifest yâ— Christians that are strangers ought not only therefore to be receaued for that they are brethern but also for that they pertayne to God as saynts and wholy dedicated vnto him Cenchrea is a towne nighe vnto Corinthe and a port or hauen longing to that towne Neither is it to be meruailed at that Paul here coÌ„mendeth a woman for he also wrotâ— letters of commendation to Phâ—lemon for Onesimus his bondman Salute Prisca and Aquila my fellow helpers in Christ Iesus which haue for my life laid downe their owne necke vnto whom not only I geue thankes but also all the churches of the Gentles Likewise greete the church that is in their house Salute my welbeloued Epenetus whiche is the first fruites of Achaia in Christ Salute Mary which bestowed much labour on vs. Salute Andronicus and Iunia my cosins and fellow prisoners which are notable Amongst the Apostles and were in Christ before me Salute Amplias my beloued in the Lorde Salute Vrbanus our fellow helper in Christ and Stachis my beloued Salute Appelles approued in Christ Salute them whiche are of Aristobulus house Salute Herodian my kinsman Salute them whiche are of the frendes of Narcissus which are in the Lord. Salute Triphena Triphosa which women labour in the Lord. Salute the beloued Persis which woman hath laboured much in the Lorde Salute Râ—fus chosen in the Lord and his mother and mine Greete Asyncritus Plegon Hermas Patrobas Mercurius and the brethren which are with them Salute Philologus and Iulias Nereas and his sister and Olimpas and al the saints which are with theÌ„ Salute one an other with an holy kisse All the Churches of Christ Salute you Salute Prisca â–ª and Aquila This woman Prisca the wife of Aquila is called of Luke in the 18. chapiter of the Actes Priscilla Her husband Aquila was borne in Pontus but as touching his stocke he was a Iew and he was of the same art or science that Paul was But why he setteth the woman before the man we know not but hereby it is manifest that the loue of ech of them was notable when as for Pauls sake they did put theyr life in danger Wherefore the Apostle coÌ„fesseth that not only he himsefe is much in theyr debt but also all the churches of the Gentils For it was euâ—â—â—t that they had doone a great benefit to them all in that they had preserued Paul theyr teacher and maister Neyther is this to be passed ouer with silence that he calleth the man and the wife his helpers and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which commonly they cal felow workers And â— not without a cause For they instructed in yâ— way of the lord Apollo a Iew one that had very great knowledge in the law as it is writen in the 18 chap. of yâ— Actes All these which are there named Paul hath adorned with most excâ—llent titles Which if a man diligently consider conteyne nothing that is earthly or worldly but conteyne most excellent gifts and vertues What thinges ought to moue christians to loue one another which God had geuen vnto them that we might vnderstand what are the things that ought to moue vs to loue men If there be any which loue them that
sacrifice 451 Almes are a blessing 452 Almes geuing what is to be sene vnto there in 453 Altares ought not to be vsed in this time 335 Allegoryes what they are 83. 327. 345 Amen what it signifieth 245 Anathema what it is 237. 238 239. 240. 241 Angels may not be prayed vnto 231 Angels some are good and some are euil 235 Angels are subiect to vanitie 213 Angels gouerne diuers regions 359 Anselme his saying vpon free will 28 Antithesis 74 Antiquitie of papisticall churches 244 Apostles and Bishops are not of like authoritie 3 Arguments of the deuinity of Christ 5 Arme of God what it is 325 Arrogancy is a pestileÌ„ce vnto brotherly loue 424 Artes of speaking are not to be condempned 232 Augustine vpon free will 26 Augustine vpon predestination 26 Augustine against Iulianus 27 Auntient fathers how they shold be read 76 Auriculer confession is wicked 382 B BAal what it signifieth 334. 337 Baptisme what it is 52. 86. 143. 145. 146. 147. 148 Beasts were worshipped 25 Beleuing what it is 38 Blasphemy what it is 46 47 Blessednes what it is 75 Blindenes of the heart is sinne 125 Blindenes of the minde 345 Boniface a proud and arrogant Pope 432 Brethren to praise them is profitable for vs. 446 C Câ—uses why Christ offred him selfe vnto death 210 Cerimonyes what they are 69. 70. 71. 152 Circumcision what it is 47. 48. 85. 86. 87. Charitie distinguisheth true faith from false 225 Chaunge of things in the ende of the world 216. 217 Children of wrath who they are 278 Christ excelleth philosophers 10 Christ to dwell in vs how it is to be vnderstand 199 Christ â–ª howe we receiue him and are ioyned vnto him 200 Christ is still the minister of oure saluation 230. 231 Christ is the ende of the law 90 Christ is the heyre of al the world 88 Christ why he is called Lord. 6 Christ had a true body 4 Christ is the head of the promises of God 18 Christe had not his soule from the virgine Mary 110 Christes church shal neuer pearish 235 Christes diuinitie 246 Christes fleshe eaten in the sacrament is not the cause of our resurrection 201. 202 Christs death why it was acceptable to his father 107 Christians what things ought to moue theÌ„ to loue one an other 454 Chrisostome is expounded 16 Chrisostome and Ambrose fail in memory 17 Churches ought to be shut when there is no congregation 31 Church what it is 236. 237. Commaundements of God expounded 46 Concupiscence is not lawful 32. 33. 150 Constantine the great 16 Contention what it is 40 Cornelius iustified 181 Creatures why they are said to mourne 214 215. 216 Creatures are signes that set forth God 21 Crosses are aduersities 209 D DEath is not naturall vnto man 112 Death hath no right wher sin is not 121 Deathe is improprely called a rewarde 157 Degrees to saluation 356 Deuell is a prince of this worlde 337 Differences betwene wryting and painting 30 Difference betwene Dulia and Latria 162 Difference betwene the law and the gospell 61 Dignity of almes 451 Dscord in the church of Rome 415 Disobedience what it is 113 Distinctions 346 Diuorcement vsed among the Iewes 160 Dumme Bishops 13 E EFfects of honour and of contempt 219 Egiptians Idolaters 25 Election what it is 229. 335 Election is the cause of saluation 246. 247. 248. 249. 250. 251. 252. Election of grace what it is 253 Election and reiection depend on the will of God 257 Election and reprobation how they differ 258. 274. 275 Enemy what he is 196 Epistle to the Romains when it was written 451 Epicures error 20 Error of the Maniches 197. 173 Error of the Pelagians 197 Eternal life is called a reward 157 Ethnickes vpbrayd the gospell 14 Ethnickes excel in sharpnes of iudgemeÌ„t 36 Execrations 345 F FAith chiefly glorifyeth God 23 Faith and the gospell may not be taken from Philosophy 19 Faith deâ—ined 20. 40 Faith may not be seperated froÌ„ the gospel 19 Faith is oures and also Gods 18 Faith what it is to liue by it 18. we are iustifyed by it 19 Faith compared with philosophy 98 Faith only iustifieth 63. 64. 75. 87 Faith hath a double signification 16 Faith what it is wherof is a large discourse from the. 62. leafe vnto the. 98. Faith hope are distinguished 220. 22â— 222. Faith is called obedyence 325. and is also called law ibidem Faith excelleth feare 355 Faith must goe before the receiuing of the Sacraments 362 Fire that shall consume the world in the last day 217 Figures are necessary in scriptures 198 Feare is defined 207. 208 Felicitie and blessednes what it is 15. 150 Freewil what it is 26. 171. 172 176. 177. 178. 254. 255. 361. Frendship is a necessary thing 343 Frustrate what the nature of that worde is 23 Fruit of almes 451 Fruit of preaching wherof it cometh 452 G GEneration what is the nature thereof 271 Gentiles conuerted to Christ are Israelites 282 Giftes of the holy ghost 223 Glory and glorifying of God what it is 23. 63. 211. 212 Glotony what it is 434 God is the searcher of our heartes and why it is so sayd 224 God of Sabaoth what it signifieth 283 Gods glory consisteth in all things 24 God suffereth long 37 God forbid what it signifyeth 53 God nedeth no aduocates 24 God tempteth not to euill 28 God willeth that is good 256. 257 God doth things contrary to his lawes 25â— God of coÌ„trary things worketh like effects 232 God is called a Lyon a Bear and a fire 274 God tempted the fathers 169 God seeth all men 55 God ought not to be expressed by images 30 God how he deceiueth 268 God hath not commaunded things vnpossible 194 God worketh in men 151 God worketh not by chaunce 278 God is faithful in his promises 106 God why he is called the God of hope 446 God is wise 456 God confirmeth his by the gospell 456 God is witnessed to be God by any thing in the world how vile so euer the same be 22 Gods reuengement for Idolatry 25 Gods gifts vnto men 13 Gods knowledge is attributed to the vngodly 22 Gods knowledge is speâ—ially knowne in two things 22 God is iudged of men 51 God in dede loueth and in dede hateth 252 God is not the author of sinne 28 God forsaketh the Ethnickes 19 Gods word is the foundation of faith 326 Good workes are not to be reiected 18. 90. 158. 159. Gospell per accidens is the instrumente of death 192 Gospell what it is 3 43. 61. 62 Gospell is no new doctrine 456 Gospel who are they that are ashamed there of 14 Gospel is preferred to al men indiffereÌ„tly 16 Gospel is not new and when it began 4 Gospel is more common then Philosophy 13 Grace what it is 115. 116. 117. 140. 141 Grace is not common vnto all men 335. 336 Grace and life cleaue together 139 Grace is not bound to the Sacraments 83 Grafting in of the GeÌ„tils â–ª truth had
iudgement they either aggrauate or extenuate the person then of necessity there must be a respect had vnto the person Because accordyng to the saying of the Gospell That seruaunt shall be more greuously punished whiche knoweth the wyll of his Lord and transgresseth it then he which sinneth ignorauntly Wherfore there remaineth that this place of the Apostle be vnderstanded of such persons as are seioyned from causes Farther there is to be put great difference Persons free from causes Besides iudgemente somethinge may be geuen vnto one man freely and an other of the same state and condition omitted betwene to accept a person in iudgemeÌ„t besides iudgement to geue vnto som one man any thing freely and not geuing to an other For this latter parte no man can iustlye accuse As if a man hauyng two debters shoulde requyre his debte of the one and forgeue the other he of whome the debte is required hath no cause iustly to complaine of his creditour So likewise God althoughe he cal one and calleth not an other because no merites went before in neyther of them cannot be called an accepter of persons Neither if in rewarding those which labored but one houre in the vineyard he would geue as great a reward vnto those and to them which had labored in it all the whole day ought he to be reproued Because he defrauded not these men of the hire for whiche he agreed with them And vnto the other he would geue freely that whiche they deserue not But then should there be iust cause to complayne if a thing should be geueÌ„ vnto one man and an other vnto whome the selfe same thing is due should be defrauded And after the selfe same manner forasmuch as God is bounde vnto God is bound to no man no man when he destributeth sondry giftes it is lawfull for him to do with his owne what pleaseth him For that in geuinge vnto some freely he defraudeth not them of any thing due whome he omitteth These thinges hath Augustine against the two Epistles of the Pelagians in his seconde booke and. 7. chap vnto Bonifacius where he thus writeth Acception of persons is there rightlye sayde to be where he which iudgeth leauinge the deserte of the cause whereof he iudgeth geeueth iudgemente with the one against the other because he findeth some thinge in the person which is woorthy either of honor or of compassion And straight way he bringeth the similitude of the two debters and the parable of the vineyard whereof we haue alredy spoken and addeth Euen as therfore here is no acception of persons because one is in such manner freely honored that an other is not defrauded of that his due so also wheÌ„ according to the purpose of God one is called and an other is not called vnto him that is called a good gift is frely geueÌ„ of which good gift the calling is the cause vnto him that is not called is rendred euill because all men are guilty for that by one man sinne entred into the world These are Augustines woordes vnto which to the ende we may ouerthrow the argumentes which we haue before recited this is to be added That Those thinges which God geueth vnto men he geueth of hys mercy whatsoeuer good thing God of his liberality geueth vnto menne the same vndoubtedly proceedeth of his mercy and clemencye And althoughe sometimes he pronounceth that he will do good vnto some eyther for theyr progenitors sake or els for theyr prayers these thinges he therfore speaketh to stirre vs vp to liue well Neither are these promises to be vnderstanded of the whole kinred of the posterity or vniuersally For God accordinge to his secret predestination hath his choyce in he seede of the saintes and in hearing of prayers which are made out of other men Which thing may be sufficiently confirmed by examples For althoughe the seede of Abraham were blessed yet that blessing had place in Isaac and not in Ismael The same promise was made vnto Isaac but it was performed in Iacob and not in Esau The common wealth of the Iewes had a promes that it shoulde be preserued but that promes was performed in the kingdome of the house of Dauid and not in the kingdome of the ten tribes Wherfore forasmuch as this choice which is according to predestination is vtterly vnknowne vnto The choyce which consisteth in predâ—stination is both vnknowne vnto vs also leaneth not vnto persons Two kinds of the benefites of God vs we oughte not to lene vnto the person And it commeth to passe perpetually that they which are so chosen of God are also adorned with good works Wherfore God hath not a respect vnto the person but as we haue sayd iudgeth according to the woorkes And how little a respect of persons he sometimes hath the place in the. 14. chap of Ezechiell declareth where it is saide That the earth shal be destroyed forasmuch as it hath bene altogether viciate and corrupte And thoughe there stoode vp in it Noah Iob Daniell vndoubtedly they shall not deliuer it but shall deliuer theyr owne soules onely Farther the benefites of God are eyther but for a time whiche pertaine vnto this life or els they are eternall whiche belong vnto the chief felicity of which Paule now intreateth Who affirmeth that without respecte of persoÌ„s it shal by the iust iudgemeÌ„t of God be either rendred or denied But as touchinge commodities whiche dure but for a time we doubt not but that God vseth sometimes either to hasten or to slacken them at the prayers of holy men which selfe thinge he attributeth also vnto the seede of the saints But in this doing he eyther prouoketh men to repentaunce or els by his lenitye they bringe vnto theÌ„selues greater punishment But as touching the eternal chief felicitie we haue now declared yâ— God hath made no promise generally for the sauing of any posteritie Therefore the Iewes deserued woorthely to be reproued for that they promised vnto themselues onely so greate a thinge as thoughe for that they were of the seede of Abraham they coulde not perishe paule in thys There is no generall promes for the sauinge of any posterity as touching eternall life selfe same Epistle the. 9. chap most manifestly declareth That not all they whyche are of Israell are Israelites neyther because they were the sede of Abraham therfore they were straight way all sons But by Isaac sayth he shall thy seede be called That is Not they whiche are the children of the fleshe are the children of God but the children of the promes are counted for the seede This sentence of the Apostle testefieth that whiche we haue sayd namely that the promises of God in this kinde were singuler and not vniuersal And it is for certaine that in those which are chosen to saluacion are vndoubtedly found good workes if they come vnto ful age Wherfore these The elect if they come to full age shall vndoubtedly
〈◊〉 that is dedicated vnto God Because that they are either seperated or els suspended by this declaration it sufficiently appeareth what it was that Paul wished vnto himselfe The proues of his principall sentence wherein he sayde that he had conceaued so great a griefe that he would gladly be made Anathema for his bretherne are of two sortes The one is taken of witnesses and the other of the cause And the cause is for that they were Israelites vnto whome pertayneth the adoption the lawe the glory the testamentes the promises and for that Christ as touching the fleshe came of their fathers And as touching the first poynt concerning witnesses he affirmeth that he sayth the truth in Christ as though he should haue to do before him and should cite him for a witnesse of his saying Farther he bringeth his owne conscience as a witnes and that rightly especially seing he entreateth of that thinge whiche no man could knowe but Paul himselfe For none knoweth our affections but we our selues onely and therefore Paul calleth his conscience for a witnes as before the iudgement seate of God And because the conscience may sometimes be deceaued forasmuch as euery man flattereth himselfe more then is meete and maketh his affections greater then they are in very deede therefore addeth he In the holy ghost For the conscience being by it directed and tempred is neuer deceaued Wherefore this othe of the Apostle consisteth of thre notable witnesses And he swereth with great waight not in a light or trifling cause but Of what greate waight the othe of the Apostle is in such a cause as bringeth a greate helpe to saluation and also vnto them vnto whome he writeth is very profitable And seing he so earnestly affirmeth with an othe that he had conceaued so greate a sorrow as he hath now expressed it most manifestly appeareth that that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is lacke or want of affectioÌ„s of the Stoikes agreeth not with Christians For certaine things are so framed of nature that strength way so sone as they are offred vnto vs we by a certaine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Stoâ—ke not agreable with Christians naturall motion abhorre from them as is death and as also are bitter chances when they happen vnto them which are ioyned vnto vs either by kinred or by countrey Christ vndoubtedly wept for the discention of Ierusalem and was heauy when his time was come that he should sone after dye And Paul in the latter to the Corrinthians sayth that when he shall come he shal hewayle them which haue not repented Samuell powred out teares for Saul bycause God had reiected him For whome also when he was slayne Dauid wept with a publike sorrow Ieremy also with many teares ditties bewayled the captiuity and ouerthrow of his people But these thinges thou wilt say happen vnto our freÌ„ds by the prouidence and commaundement of God wherefore when they so happen Whether it be lawful to be grieued for the aduersities of our neighbours holy men ought not to lament for them For we must chearefully obey the will of God otherwise why do we dayly pray Thy will be done But thou must vnderstand that we may doo both as our minde hath a respect vnto diuerse thinges For when a man beholdeth the aduersities and calamities of men and especially of those men vnto whome he is by any familiar aquaintaunce ioyned then is he both grieued and also would gladly with a greate price redeme those euilles And contrariwise when we behold the decrée prouidence and will of God we do not only take them in good part whatsoeuer thinges they be but The Prophets differ in theyr kindes of speach according to the diuersity of the respect also we receaue them gladly and with a cherefull mynde Wherefore in the Prophets there are red sundry kindes of speach according as they had a respect to diuerse thinges Sometimes they seme to desire God to turne away the calamities of sinners and seme to bewepe and lament them and sometimes they seme to wish that they which hate God may be punished and perish For our mynde like a Kameleon which way soeuer it bendeth it selfe putteth an affecte according to the nature of the thing which it beholdeth Crassus when he saw his sonne slayne and his legions go to the worse Ye souldiers sayth he fight cheare An example of Crassus fully manfully defende your Pub. welth For this mourning is my priuate mourning WheÌ„ he looked vpoÌ„ his own mischance he could not but lameÌ„t but when he set before his eyes yâ— helth of yâ— publike welth he called back his mind to cherefulnes So did Brutus so did Torquatus sley theyr own childreÌ„ yâ— the discipline Whether it wer lawfull for Paul to wish to be made Anathema from Christ of war publike liberty might be preserued But here ariseth an other question more difficâ—l â–ª how it was lawful for Paul to wish to be seperated froÌ„ Christ when as we ought to loue God aboue all thinges and when as we rede in the Gospel He which loueth his father or mother or bretherne more then me is not worthy of me This thing sayth Chrisostome is so obscure that Paul semeth to speake ridles For forasmuch as before he had said that he was perswaded that he could by no creature be plucked away from yâ— loue of Christ by what meanes can he now wish to be made Anathema for his brethern There haue bene some which thought that Anathema in this place is Kimelion that is a deare treasure and of greate price such as noble men vse to haue greate store of made of gold and siluer and fashioned with wonderfull greate conning but this is a triflinge and childishe interpretacion For if Paul had ment so he should not haue sayd from Christ but before Christ Farther what a great acte were this I pray you For there is none which desireth not to be acceptable vnto God and to pertaine vnto his flocke especiallye seinge he knoweth that he is the chiefe goodnes Farther if Paul haâ— bene in steade of a treasure before Christ what should that haue profited his brethern according to yâ— flesh But a man peradueÌ„ture wil say that he might then the better make intercession for them before God But forasmuch as the prayers of the faythfull lene not vnto the merites or dignity of theÌ„ that pray but only to a true and liuely fayth the Apostle ought not so diligently to put in these words in this place For he prayed without intermissioÌ„ for other men although according to those mens opinion he should not be Anathema In The commentaries ascribed vnto Ierome dede Chrisostome reherseth this expositioÌ„ but yet he coÌ„fesseth it to be ridiculous and folish The commeÌ„taries which are ascribed vnto Ierome say that these are to be referred vnto that time wherein Paul persecuted the Church of Christ as though he would say that he
could not only not be by any meanes remoued from the loue of Christ but also that he was chiefely for that cause excedingly vexed bycause in time past he had wished to be a straunger from Christ Which interpretation when I more diligently consider I sée that it agreth nether with the wordes nor with the intent of the Apostle For this is his scope that by reason of those thinges whereof he will afterward speake he might perswade the Iewes of his loue towardes them lest he should seme of hatred to say that they are not now the people of God but are vtterly strange froÌ„ the promise Which thing he could not haue obteyned by rehersing his sinne wherein he had persecuted the Church of God For the Iewes mought haue sayd Although hitherto thou hast loued vs when thou heldest on our side yet afterwarde when thou wentest vnto Christ thou didst change thy minde and because thou hast begone to hate vs therfore doest thou now speake these euill thinges agaynst vs. But if these thinges be vnderstand of the present state wherein he wrote this epistle vnto them and that by these wordes is signified yâ— he would euen theÌ„ also be Anathema from Christ for them then can there be no doubt put of his good will towardes them Wherefore these thinges serue nothing to the purpose of Paul if they be wrested vnto that time wherein he was as yet an vnbeleuer And that he was grieued for theyr distruction and not for his sinne this playnly declareth Paul was sory for the destruction of the Hebrued and not for his sinne which is afterwarde added Not as though the vvord of God hath fallen avvay For therefore he was grieued when he saw them perish bycause the promises of God semed to be infringed and violated And as he denieth that the promises of God are infringed so also desireth he to redeme euen with his owne distruction that it should not be thought so to come to passe and thereby the name of God should be euill spoken of Herehence come those teares and disires and not bycause he had persecuted the Church of God which yet I doubt not but it was a greate and continuall griefe vnto him But why he should make mencion of that griefe at this presenâ—e there is no reason doubtles as far as I can see Farther what neded he to contend about thys thyng wyth an othe For it was fresh in euerye mans memorye what an enemy he had bene in timâ—s past vnto Christe For hys persecution was not done in corners but publikelye and in the sight of all But thou wilt saye he therefore sweareth to make men beleue that he was excedyngelye sorye for that matter For that was secret neyther coulde it be knowen of all men but suche suspicions as are obscure are confirmed by an oth But I thinke no man doubted but that Paul was sory for the hatred which he had borne against Christ when as all men sawe with how great a feruentnes he preached his Gospell throughout the whole world Wherefore these thinges were not so doubtfull that they should nede to be confirmed by an oth Moreouer what great thinges should he thereby speake of himselfe or how should he by this meanes commend himselfe vnto his brethren by swearing But now let vs heare what the true Ierome iudged as touching this matter For that is a counterfeated Ierome which is ascribed vnto those commentaries But that is Ierome ad AlgasiaÌ„â— the true Ierome which writeth vnto Algasia in the 9. question For he asked hys counsell touching this place of Paul And he answereth that it is a question of great waight and not rashely to be passed ouer especially for as much as the Apostle wyth an oth confirmeth those thynges which he speaketh And with great admiratioÌ„ he addeth that it is a prudence vnheard of that a man should for Christes sake wishe to be seperated from Christ Straight way he compareth Paul with Moses and contendeth that either of them were endued with one and the selfe same spirite For they were both pastors of the people of God And as Christ sayth It is the part of a good shepherd to geue hys lyfe for hys shepe For to flye when the woolfe assayleth is the parts of a hired seruaunt and not of a shepherd Wherefore his iudgement is that Paul desired to dye for the saluation of his brethren For he knew that he which would saue his soule should lose it and he which would lose it shoulde finde it And to this end tendeth that which is before spoken For thy sake are we put to death all the day long and are appointed as shepe to be slayne Paul saith he desired to geue hys body and lyfe that their spirite myght be saued Farther he addeth that it may be proued by mo places thâ—n one that Haram that is Anathema in the old testament is taken for slaughter or killing We confesse that in déede the Apostle woulde and wished to geue his life for the shepe committed to his charge and for all those which might be brought vnto Christ that in him might be fulfilled those thinges which wanted of the passion of Christ But many thinges declare vnto vs that there can be no mencion made of that thing in this place For first they which so dye testifiing the fayth of Christ for the health of their neighbours are not Anathemata that is men seperated from Christ but are most nighly ioyned vnto him They are rather Anathemata that is seperated from Christ which persecute and kyll them Farthermore Haram which he saith sometimes in the olde testament signifieth killing could neuer be redemed nor be applied vnto other vses For beasts which after that maner were bound vnto God were destroyed by slaughter and thinges without life could neuer be put to publike vse or vse of common life But Martyrs which dye for the name of Christ are not made Anathemata What Moses desired of God Sepharadi The opinioÌ„ of an other Rabbins martyres which by preaching the truth dyed for the saluation of their brethren were not for that cause seperated from Christ but rather passed from this life as men which should euermore abyde with him Moreouer what will â—e answere of Moses For he desired to be slaine vnles God would spare the people but put me out saith he of the booke which thou hast written that is if we follow the common opinion blot me out of the booke of the elect For I allow not the cold fayned deuises of the Rabbines among whom Sepharadi saith If thou sparest not the people put my name out of the booke of the lawe that it be not red there What more fond exposition can there be deuised then this An other of the Rabbines thinketh that to be blotted out of the booke which God had written is nothing els then to be remoued from the office of a magistrate that he should not be the head of the people
but vseth such causes as pleaseth hym God caÌ„ vse sinnes for instrumentes of saluation â–ª sinne yet woulde I in no wise take vppon me to say that Paul dealeth onely in wordes in steade of commendations setteth forth vnto vs those which in very dede were no coÌ„mendations for we ought to defend the holy Scriptures from all manner of lying Therfore I thus thinke with my selfe that God doth not of necessity néede seconde causes but rather that naturall causes therefore bring foorth some effect for that it hath pleased God to vse them as instruments in the setting forth of new thinges Wherfore euen as he vseth the Sunne to make warme and to geue light for this thing hath he by his word commaunded that it shoulde do so can he if he will vse any other thing to these workes Wherefore as I haue before sayd according to the order of nature sinnes can not be the causes of vocation and of saluation but onely occasions howbeit if God will vse them as instrumentes whereby to woorke I se not what can let him For he calleth those things which are not as if they were he healeth by the sight of the brasen Serpent he by spittle and dust restoreth sight vnto the blynde man wherefore he can also vse sinnes as instruments and meanes whereby to bring some to saluation Yet not withstanding we ascribe the whole efficacy thereof vnto God and doubt not but that Paule spake in good earnest But there yet remayneth an other doubt What sayth Paule shal be theyr fulnes if theyr fall diminishing be the riches of the world Of which wordes it séemeth that we might gather that by the conuersion of the Iewes many other nations shall be brought vnto Christ which is not possible when as afterwarde it is sayd that the Iewes shall then bee saued and enter in when the fulnes of the Gentles hath entred in And if the calling of the Gentles shal be complete what other Gentles shall there be remayning to be by the conuersion of the Iewes brought vnto Christ But this wee maye aunswere that Paule in this place sayth not that by the conuersion of the Iewes in the last time shal be drawen other nations vnto Christ but onely sayth How mutch shall theyr fulnes be For it is possible that the Gentles already conuerted may wonderfully bee holpen by the Iewes which beleue in Christ for paraduenture by lyght of doctrine feruentnes of the spirit and holynes of lyfe they shall so illustrate the The church shal receiue profite by the conuersion of the Gentlles Church that by them the Gentles also shall be stirred and confirmed and shall thinke themselues to bee in a manner nothing in comparison of them or to haue done nothing in respecte of them Wherefore by them as it appeareth shall be brought much perfection vnto the Church For I speake to you Gentles in as mutch as I am the Apostle of the Gentles I glorify my ministery To trye if I might by any meanes prouoke them of my flesh to followe them and might saue some of them For if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world what shall the receauing be but life from the dead For if the first fruites be holy then is the lompe holy and if the roote be holy the braunches also shal be holy For I speake to you Gentles in as much as I am the Apostle of the Gentles I glorifie my ministery When he had now reasoned a minori that is of the lesse he by an example of himselfe confirmeth his sentence which he put forth namely that of the conuersion of the Gentles should follow the saluation of the Iewes through emulation For he had sayd that God called the Gentles to prouoke the Iewes to followe them he now addeth that which God doth I also séeke in my ministery for I glorifye it by this to bring many of the Gentiles to Christ to sée if I coulde by any meanes prouoke them of my fleshe to followe them and to bring some of them to saluation By this place we sée wherein consisteth The honor of the ministery wherin it consisteth the honour of the ministery namely to bring and to conuert manye vnto Christ and this is done by doctrine and preaching both publique and priuate The ministery is not adorned with riches nor with silkeÌ„ and precious garments eyther to be vsed commonly or to be vsed about any holy seruices These ornaments are Sophisticall that is per accidens or by chaunce For euery thing ought to be adorned with those thinges which pertayne to the nature substance therof Wherefore seing that the holy ministery consisteth chiefely in doctrine and preaching thereout ought it to haue his dignity But as there haue bene many which only by beard cloke and staffe haue made a shew of Philosophers and as Seneca sayth sought rather to haue the visor then the face of a Philosopher so in our dayes there are many which will vse only the name title and garments of ministers but will not performe the work therof Paul sayd that this thing is What is chiefly required at ministers handes chiefely required of stewards and ministers that they be found faythfull And in the 2. to the Corint the 6. chapiter Let vs in all things approue our selues as the ministres of God in much patience in afflictions in necessities in distresses in stripes in prisons as deceauers when yet we are true All which thinges he as a notable example to ministers excellently performed for he continually suffred greate troubles besides the dayly care which he had ouer all Churches none was tempted or burned but he together with him suffred and was burnt Where néede was he preached frealy he sought not his owne things but was made all to all to the end to winne all men he sayd Woo be vnto me if I preach not the Gospel He which to his power doth not with these vertues glorifye the ministery of the Gospel dishonoreth it Yea and Origen vpon this place sayth That Deacons or Ministers by the testimony A place of the fiâ—â—t to Timothie of the Apostle if they Minister well gette vnto themselues a good degre Wherfore it is manifest that they which execute not their office well but yll gett vnto them selues a degree of reprobation yea rather assured damnation And the same writer in this place exhorteth Priests and also Bishops to glorifye their ministery And doubtles all men as many as haue the charge of soules committed vnto them ought to thinke that this is spoken vnto them for for that at this tyme there are not Apostles they haue succeded in their place But euen as ciuills lawes are many A similitude tymes well and healthfully made but yet want such as should sée them put in vse and executed so at this day in the Church are degrées and titles and names of ministeries But there are found very fewe which truly execute their office
Wherefore God is not without iust cause angry for that the ministery is so conterfeated And it is much to be lamented that this office is of a great many of the laity had in contempt neyther can the ministers iustly complayne hereof when as the greatest part of them haue first and before all others thorough their licentiousnes idlenes slouthfulnes and neglecting of their office brought this functioÌ„ out of estimation Wherfore we must earnestly pray vnto GOD that he would vouchafe now at the length to succour his Church in sending woorkmen which The false Apostles spake ill of Paul â–ª will labour diligently The Apostle mought haue sayd I glorifye the grace which is geuen vnto you for that ye should come vnto Christe and vnto his Gospel for thereby the Iewes were stirred vp to emulation but he would make mencion of his ministery to the end to commend it and to set it forth and that not without néede for there were many false Apostles which sayd that Paul was not the true Apostle of Christ and euery where as much as in them lay extenuated his authoritye And that Paul was an instructer and teacher of the Gentiles it is manifest by the Epistle to the Galathians where he sayth that Peter Iames and Iohn had geuen vnto hym their right hands that he should preache amongst the Gentiles as they Paul was an instructer and teacher of the Gentles Paul first preached vnto the Iues before he preached to the Ethnikes did vnto the circumcision And vnto Timothe he testifyeth that he was appointed a teacher and instructer of the Gentiles Although as he went thoroughout the world before that he preached in any city vnto the Gentiles he went first to the Sinagoge of the Iewes beginning thereto publishe abraode the Gospell according to the order appointed by God that the Iewes should first be called but yâ— charge of the Church of Ierusalem he wholy left vnto others In as much as I am the Apostle of the Gentles That which in the Greke is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in as much the lattine interpreter turneth quamdiu that is so long and this also he doth in Mathew the 25. chapiter saying So long as ye haue done these thinges to one of my least when as in that place also in the Greke is reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is more aptly turned in that in as much and as For when it standeth for an aduerb of time the Apostle commonly addeth this greke worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth tyme. As in the first to the Corrinthyaus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yâ— is the wife is bound vnto the law so long as her husband liueth And vnto the Galathians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. that is So long as the heyre is a child But Origen I know not how readeth quamdiu that is so long and doubteth whether it should at the leÌ„gth come to passe that Paul should cease to be the Apostle of the Gentiles and that Paul sawe that after this life he should be the Apostle of inuisible spirits and that vnto him should be sayd that which we reade in the Gospell Come hether good seruaunt and faythfull for that thou hast bene faythfull in fewe thinges I will set thee ouer many thynges But because he sawe as I suppose that thys is somewhat to harde to be easely beleued he addeth Shall we vnderstand thys saying to bee as that is I wyll be wyth you euen vnto the ende of the worlde not as though I wyll not afterwarde also bee wyth you so nowe also he sayth so longe as I am the Apostle of the Gentiles not as though at any time he should not be the Apostle of the Gentiles Paul sayth that he glorifieth his ministery for yâ— he laboured by all maner of meanes that the ministery of his preaching might be of efficacy and that that which he The ministery is glorified so loÌ„g as it is of efficacy in the hâ—rtes of the hearers Nothing in the world better then the church spake without might by the power of the spirite be written in the hartes of the hearers wherevnto he bent all his industry and laboured by continual prayers to obteyne that at Gods hand to the end to prouoke them of his flesh to emulation Men labour to the vttermost of theyr power to followe that whiche they iudge to bee good honest and godlye But I thinke that there is nothing in the world more goodly or better then the Church being wel and holily ordered which Church God so loueth as the husband doth his wife This gaue occasioÌ„ to Salomon to write those songes of loue which are called Cantica Canticorum And Christ omitted nothing though it were hard horrible which was eyther to be done or suffred for it At this Church doo the Angels woÌ„der of it learne many thinges pertayning to the sondry and manifold wisedome of God And men if they want not theyr right wittes embrace and reuerence it Wherfore in the first to the Corrinthians it is written And if they shoulde prophesie and behaue themselues in a decent order in the Church and there should enter in any vnlearned hearing his secretes touched and made manifest namely by preachinges they would fall downe and worshippe and will they or nill they should confesse that God is amongst theÌ„ Wherefore let theÌ„ vnto whome is committed the charge to enstruct and adorne so amiable and wonderfull a society take hede what they doo for they haue committed vnto them not only the charge of those which are preseÌ„t with them but also of others which by emulation of yâ— church being wel ordred may be brought vnto Christ He calleth the Iewes his flesh after the maner of yâ— scripture wherein The Iews are called the fleshe of Paul meÌ„ vse to speke of theyr brethern and kinsfolkes He is our mouth and our flesh And in so saying he obteyneth theyr good will to heare him That I might saue some of them He sayth not all for that he knew that this was not now possible for him to doo for at that time it behoued that yâ— greatest parte should be made blinde and be shut vp vnder incredulity Towardes the end of the world is to be looked for a generall conuersion of the Iewes Thys phrase of speach is to be noted wherein he sayth That I might saue some of them For no man doubteth but yâ— it is God which saueth as many as are saued but The ministers by a certaine propertie of speach are said to saue The holy ministery ought not to be conteÌ„ned Paul so sayth for that he knew that he was a minister of the newe Testament and of the spirite And after the same maner wrote he vnto Timothe when he exhorted him to be diligent in doctrine and in reding This doing sayth he thou shalt saue both thy selfe and them which heare thee Wherefore that which is proper vnto God is by a
but was not altogether reiected And that this benefite was bestowed vpon the fathers the Scripture in many places mencioneth There were other nations which in déede receaued the Gospel but yet kéept it but for a while skarce aboue one age or two It is true that we haue succeded in the place of the Iewes and are made pertakers of the selfesame priuiledges with them yet notwithstanding the Iewes were before vs abode the long tyme before in possession Wherefore if they be nowe broken of we ought more to bee afeard if they for their pride were smitten with blindnes were for their incredulity cut of what is to be thought of vs wild oliue trées and barren vnfruitfull branches Thorough incredulity were they broken of sayth Ambrose not for thy sake but by reason of their owne defaulte whiche thing I meruayle he should write If this Preposition propter that is For do signifie the cause efficient I graunt that our saluation was not the cause of their cutting of They had Our saluatiō was the small cause of the reiection of the Iewes in themselues the sinne of incredulity which GOD minding to punishe in this sort by his iustice reiected them But that our calling was not the finall cause which God in their reiection had a regard vnto I can in no wise deny seing that Paul affirmeth it wherefore I thinke rather we may say that they were broken of from their fruitefull trée both for theyr owne default and for our sakes Be not high minded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is which is otherwise sayd 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which vice is opposite vnto the pouerty of the spirite which Christ so commended that he called them which were endewed with it blessed But they are to be laughed at which by this saying of the Apostle labour to defend ignoraunce to feare away men from knowledge Noli altum sapere say they that is Be not ouer wise Whiche exposition how strang it is from the skope of the Apostle I suppose now euery man plainly séeth But to close vp the exposition of this place I thinke that betwéene the degrées whereby we come to saluation the meanes which bring vs hedlong to destruction this order is to bee put As touching them The degrees to saluation and the degrees to destruction which shal be saued first is election or predestination Thereout burst forth grace the spirite and fayth strayght way follow good workes then haue they geuen vnto them perseueraunce and at the last is rendred the crowne of felicitie But vnto destruction the first degrée is the corruption of the lompe of mākind thorough originall sinne that God would not haue mercy thereof followe many sinnes which we by liuing wickedly afterward adde after them followeth blindnes they are infected with incredulity moreouer the harte is hardened and at the last followeth eternall damnation See therfore the bountefulnes seuerity of God Towards thē whiche haue fallen into seuerity but towards thee bountefulnes if thou continue in his bountefulnes or els thou also shalt be cut of And they also if they abide not still in vnbeliefe shal be grafted in For God is able to graft them in agayne For if thou wast cut out of the oliue tree which wast wild by nature and wast grafted contrary to nature into a right oliue tree how much more shall they that are by nature be grafted into their owne oliue tree Se therfore the goodnes and seuerity of God c. This word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greke the is See some turne Ecce y◠is Behold for in signification it is somtimes all one with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Apostle cōtinueth stil in one the self same matter For this treatise was very necessary to put away the discord which in the primitiue sprang betwene the Gentiles the Iewes He exhorteth thē to set two things before their eyes the goodnes of God his seuerity Goodnes he calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word signifieth clemency a redines of mind to do a man good to do him pleasure Seueritye he calleth in the Gréeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whiche is then when thinges are done with extremitie and that men are delt with euen according to the rigor of iustice The singuler bountefulnes of God towardes the Gētiles Against the Maniches and Marcionites The scripture euery where inuiteth vs to consider the seuerity an◠goodnes of God Towardes thee saith he goodnes For that was a singuler bountifulnes that when as the Gentils were contaminated with idolatry and mought iustly worthely haue bene left in their infidelity they were yet notwithstanding called adopted and adorned with so many ornamentes and giftes By these woordes are confuted the Manichies Marcionites which affirmed that there are two Gods one good gentle and mercifull the other seuere yea and cruell when yet the Apostle in this place attributeth the selfe same proprieties vnto one and the self same true God It is manifest also that they which are cut of are by the iust seuerity of God broken of and fall away so that they are without excuse Moreouer not onely Paul in this place but also the whole scripture in infinite places in a maner prouoke vs to the consideration of those two thinges And that not without iust cause for in the consideratiō of the goodnes of God we are prouoked vnto faith and vnto loue towards him also to geue him thanks for y◠benefits receiued at his hands But when we consider y◠seueritie iudgements of God it maketh vs to pity those which fall and to be fearefull of our owne estate Chrisostome expounding this sentence See the goodnes It is not saide saith he See thy merites and thy laboures for it commeth all whole of grace from aboue I woulde to GOD he had alwayes spoken after this manner and that he had abode still in that whiche he here teacheth The entent of the Apostle in the consideratiō of the seuerity of God is that we beholding other mens dangers and falles should be made more ware Which selfe thing he in an other place meaneth when he sayth in the first to the Corrinth He which standeth let him take heede that he fall not and vnto the Galathians Considering Two kinds of feare thy self least thou also be tempted Wherfore this is to be known that feare is of two sortes the one is which abateth nothinge of confidence but onely engendreth a greater diligence and bringeth more effectuall endeuors The other is which excéedingly diminisheth yea rather taketh away confidence pulleth away endeuor and bringeth sluggishnes The latter commeth of infidelity the other cōmeth of diligence and of fayth By this kind of feare are the churches moued more and more to apply themselues vnto God and to praye instantlye for their preseruation What prayer is vaine namely that the kingdome of God shoulde not be transferred from them