Apostles themselves observed the Lords day weekely or Sabbatically and not monthly or yearely as were the Iewes Sabbaths and Holy-dayes but in relation to the fourth commandement one in seaven as knowing it to bee a perpetuall rule not a temporary and vanishing ordinance which pertained to the bondage and servitude of weake and beggerly Rudiments of which the Apostle here onely speakes And as it was farre from the Apostles thought to reckon any of the ten commandements as a weake and beggerly Rudiment so let it bee abhorred of all Christian hearts and eares But may some say Obj. is not the signification of the Sabbaths institution abrogated by Christs resurrection and the comming of the Lords day The Sabbath is altered not abrogated Answ. and the signifâ—cation subordinated not annulled being instituted upon an universall and perpetuall reason for the Sabbath was no proper Iewish type but the Churches type in that wherein it was typicall as wee may see in the fourth Hebr. 9. There remaineth therefore Sabbatismus a Sabbath-rest to the people of God which words Willet in 2. Gen. saith conclude that both the type remaineth that is a Sabbatisme and the signification of the type everlasting rest And as you may further see 12 Matth. 8. in these words The Sonne of man is Lord even of the Sabbath-day which words compared with the verses foregoing shew that the Sabbath is of a ceremonious nature for Christ there rankes it among things ceremoniall in a ceremoniall sense but with a note of inequality as it is implyed in that word Even of the Sabbath-day and is as the rest of the morall Law of equall continuance with the Church which for this cause was reviued to the Iewes because at that time they were the onely Israel and Church of God but now translated to us under the Gospell the partition wall being broken downe with an alteration of circumstance according to the season as Isay was prophecied in the foreâ— quoted place of Isa. 65. 17. And whereas Doctor Heylyâ— part 2. pag. 27. saith That it is not probable that the Apostle Paul who so opposed himselfe against the Sabbath would erect a new this had not beene saith hee to abrogate the ceremony but to change the day I answer that by the comming of Christ some things suffered alteration as well as others abrogation wherefore the Apostles were to preach onely the abrogative types and ceremonies to bee abrogated of which sort I prove the Sabbath to bee none and according to the nature of the new creation to alter the other of which sort the Sabbath was and therefore suffered subordination not abrogation And therefore hath the Scripture recorded it to us 〈◊〉 the name of the first day of the weeke or the first day of seaven before it stile it the Lords day in a sâ—gnificant opposition to the old antiquated last day of the weeke I will conclude this Answer with Master Hookers authority who was a confident maintainer of the morality of the fourth commandement as you may see in his Eccles. Pol. pag. 377. who speaking upon this place of the Galath Hooker saith That for as much as the Law of the Iewes by the comming of Christ was changed and wee thereunto no way bound Saint Paul although it were not his purpose to favour invectives against the speciall sanctification of dayes and times to the service of God and to the honour of Iesus Christ doth notwithstanding bend his forces against that opinion which imposed on the Gentiles the yoake of Iewish legall observations as if the whole World ought for ever and that upon paine of condemnation to keepe and observe them such as in this perswasion hallowed the Iewish Sabbaths the Apostle sharply reproveth saying yee observe dayes and monthes and times and yeares c. Thus you see how Master Hookers opinion was concerning this text of Paul onely to cry downe those obsolete Iewish observations and nothing lesse then to impeach the authority of the fourth commandement or the Lords day as you may plainely discerne by turning over leafe to pag. 378. where hee layeth downe three sorts of holy times thus saith hee Hooker It pleased God heretofore to exact some part of time by way of perpetuall homage never to bee dispenced withall nor remitted againe to require some other parts of time with as strict exaction but for lesse continuance and of the rest which were left arbitrary to accept what the Church should in due consideration consecrate voluntarily unto religious uses Of the first kind amongst the Iewes was the Sabbath-day Of the second those feastes which were appointed by the Law of Mosâ—s The Feast of Dedication invented by the Church standeth in the number of the last kind The morall Law requiring therefore a seaventh part throughout the age of the World to bee that way imployed although with us the day bee changed in regard of a new revolution begun by our Saviour Christ yet the same proportion of time continueth which was before because of reference to the benefit of creation and now much more of renovation thereunto added by him which was Prince of the World to come wee are bound to account the sanctification of one day in seaven a duty which Gods immutable Law doth exact for ever Thus you have Master Hookers opinion both of this text of the Gal. The morality of the fourth commandement the perpetuity of the Sabbath and the authority of the Lords-day Broad A little leaven leaveneth the whole lumpe Gal. 5. 9. Chrysost. on Gal. Why but they retained the Gospell onely they would have brought in a Iewish rite or two and yet the Apostle saith that thereby the Gospell is subverted to shew how but a little thing being untowardly mingled marreth all Luther on Gal. 2. Paul had note here his owne busines in hand but a matter of faith Now as concerning faith wee ought to bee invincible and more hard if it might bee then the Adamant stone but as touching charity wee ought to bee soft and more flexible then the reed or leafe shaken with the wind and ready to yeeld to every thing Broad A treatise of the Sabbath FOr as much as I know not whether taking my booke in hand thou mindest to read it over to the end I have therefore thought good by way of prevention in the beginning to let thee understand that howsoever there bee difference in opinion among the Godly learned yet they all for ought I know agree in this namely that the Lords-day had his beginning in the time of the Apostles and being of so great antiquity so generally received and so profitable to the Church of Christ that it ought to be observed of thee according to the practice of good Christians from time to time and the godly lawes of our most Christian governour living at this present I charge thee therefore as thou wilt answer it before Gods judgement â—ear that thou dost not take occasion hence to spend
say of the precepts of the new Moone and Holy-dayes Answ. and would it not trouble them to shew by the Scriptures how much is blotted out and what is left uncancelled The received division of Moses Law hath beenâ— into morall ceremoniall and judiciall That any commandement should bee partly ceremoniall and partly morall partly an ordinance and partly not partly nayled to the Cresse and partly remaining in the Arke partly blotted out and partly left to be read and observed I could never yet find in any part of Gods word Master Dod and Master Cleaver on the com And this no doubt some of late perceive well enough and therefore teach that the precept of the Sabbath is wholly morall or as their words are no more ceremoniall then all the rest They see plainely that hee which will have it partly blotted out and partly not had need bee greater then an Angell as teaching in part another Gospell then Saint Paul did Consider that Saint Paul here saith as much of the Sabbath and the precept thereof as hee doth say of the New-moone and the precept of the same and againe that hee saith as much here of the New-moone and its precept as is said of them in any other place Though the precept of the Sabbath bee wholly blotted out Obi. as the precepts of the New-moone and Holy dayes ioyned with it yet not the fourth commandement in the Decalogue Wee grant the fourth commandement is ceremoniall and blotted out so far forth as it Touching the supposed substance and morality of this commandement see chap. 8. sect 4. 5. enioyneth the Sabbath not onely the seaventh day and strict rest but this commandement is of a larger extent then this commeth to The fourth commandement and the commandement Answ. of the Sabbath are the same after the Scriptures so that Saint Paul here saying the commandement of the Sabbath is blotted out it is all one as if hee had said the fourth commandement in the Decalogue is blotted out you have no colour of proofe to the contrary As touching the fourth commandement being blotted out so farre forth as it enioyneth the Saboath consider that the fourth commandement must needs enioyne the Sabbath Such as â—each and this is the common Doctrine that the fourth commandement is partly ceremoniall doe say in effect that it is partly blotted out so farre forth as it is contained in these words Remember the Sabbath-day to sanctifie it c. If God had made this Law bath for Iewes and Christians is it credible but that hee would have set it downe in words fitting both sorts so that Christ at his comming should not have blotted out any part thereof Certainely Christ would not have written that againe which hee had once blotted out suppose that hee also had left Tables In a word the Sabbath is the onely thing spoken of in the fourth commandement and no Law of God or Man ever stood in force longer then it bound to doe the thing mentioned in it * Many in England so doe yea the last Parliament may well bee thought to dislike it for neither in their title of the act forkeeping the Lords-day nor yet throughout The body thereof is this name used although the heathenish name Sunday bee in both yea and although the commandement read in the Church of speaketh of sanctifying the Sabbath as many as dislike the name Sabbath for the Lords-day have cause to dislike this commandement for the Law thereof for the one is as well Iewish as the other Answer By Sabbaths in that 2. Col. 16. is to bee understood the Iewish ordinances which properly belonged to them and their time such as were their solemne fealts * Seâ— Isa. 1. 13. compared with the 14. verse which although they were Iewish Holy-dayes yet did they also carry the name of Sabbaths and holy convocations because of the Analogy they had with the weekely and morall Sabbath as wee may see Levit. 23. In the beginning of which Chapter you shall find the weekely Sabbath most gloriously intituled THE SABBATH OF THE LORD and remarkeably paled out from among those Iewish Holy-dayes Feasts and Sabbaths For God in that Chapter instituting his solemne Feastes or Iewish Holy-dayes in the first place noteth out his weekely Sabbath in the third verse to bee none of them by a glorious and sublime title and pregnant difference which sâ—emeth to bee distinctly penned by the holy Ghost to prevent confusion and unequall mixture * Which very thing is your fault and labour And having first done this then hee in the rest of the Chapter proceedeth to shew what Feasts hee meaneth which hee also calleth Sabbaths but in a farre different sense And thinke you that the Apostle would so carelesly and slightly have jumbled together in this place of the Col. what God even in the time of the Iewes was so carefull to distinguish as in this 23. Levit. appeareth as also in the exhibiting of his Lawes which were of severall natures ceremoniall and morall amongst which this was one and which with the rest was put into the Arke And as in your answer to the first objection you say that you cannot find in any place of Gods word why any * Indeed the Sabbath is both wholly ceremoniall and wholly morall as was signified by its double exhibition to the Iewes once by the hand of Moses and another time together with the Law shewing that though it was of a typicall and ceremonious signification yet notwithstanding it was of equall condition with the morall Lawes by Gods speciall appointment For when I say the Sabbath is ceremoniall I meane not in an abrogative but in a significative sense commandement should bee partly ceremoniall partly morall partly nailed to the Crosse and partly remaining in the Arke partly blotted out and partly left to bee read and observed I affirme the same of the Decalogue or ten commandements as Moses numbers them Deut. 4. 13. Not but that in the delivery and exhibition of this Decalogue this rejoyneth upon your following answer to the second objection there were things as I have said before which were more proper in regard of circumstance to the Iewes then to us and yet God made the Decalogue as a Law both for Iewes and Christians and hath set it downe though not altogether in words and letters yet in sense and substance fitting both sorts So that the Law may still bee truly said to remaine although Christs comming and the state of the Church differing may vary some circumstances as by changing the Egyptian deliverance into the antitype thereof to wit our spirituall and the Land of Canaan meant in the fift commandement into England where wee dwell and so likewise the memory of our creation into the memory of our redemption and their gates into our jurisdictions and thus though there is an alteration made yet doth the Law remaine the same in sense Broad ARG. III. IN
Israel gathered unto him So that I say the duty of the Sabbath followed as a Law together with the Law for us alwayes to observe and that the signification of it went before to signifie that our claime to this heavenly Sabbatisme is now onely by Christ. And thus you may see how you have laid your foundation upon a false ground or principle by mistaking the Sabbaths signification and in what manner it referreth to Christ. And thus by consequence your whole building falleth to the ground although it bee granted that the Sabbath is both typicall and rebus sic stantibus hath relation to Christ also Broad What God requireth on the Sabbath THe duties which God required of the people of Israel Hee required another of the Priests namely to offer two Lambs Num. 28. but this I will not stand upon on the Sabbath were two especially I. To rest from worke By servile the Scripture meaneth all worke except that is bestowed about things to eate Lev. 23. 7. 8. compared with Exod. 12. 16. that is to forbeare the doing of every thing which is commonly so called and accounted as the killing â—of beastes kindling of fires going to plow travailing c. on the first and last dayes of the feast of Passeover and some other holydayes onely servile worke is prohibited Levit. 23. 7. 8. 21. c. Num. 28. 18. 25. so that they might provide things to eate Consider that the Sabbath was ordained for a memoriall of Gods resting whereas the holy-dayes were instituted upon other occasions Exod. 12. 16. No manner of worke must bee done in them save that which every one must eate that onely may bee done of you But now on the Sabbath-day they might not doe so much For Gâ—d never that I find mentioning the word servile both in the commandement and other places saith in it Thou shalt not doe any worke They might not bake nor seeth their Mannah Exod. 16. 23. though on the other Holy-dayes they might both gather and dresse it yet they might not so much as dresse it on the Sabbath They were forbidden to kindle a fire which when a man belike would have done Exod. 35. 5. and therefore gathered stickes hee was put to death and bee it as some say though without any ground that the manner of doing did aggravate the offence yet sure I am that it did not make that an offence which had other-wayes beene none they might not then ordinarily picke up a few stickes II. A second speciall duty which God required oâ— the Sabbath was to have an holy convocation for it was not enough to worship God privately they must goe to the assemblies and praise him in the congregation To worship God privately was every dayes duty as likewise to doe works of charity for the Iew as wee was bound by the Law of nature to fulfill the nine morall commandements to the utmost of their power every day though indeed hee might performe the duties of piety and charity in greatèr measure and therefore was bound so to doe on the Sabbath as having then more opportunity idlenes being unlawfull at all times Answer By the first of these duties you seeme to mee to insinuate a Dilemma intimating by it that either the Sabbath is meerely Iewish or else that in all respects both of the duty and strictnes of rest it belongeth to us as to them Which strictnes you prove by comparing it with the other Sabbaths which had onely servile worke forbidden in them The proofe I graunt and the thing â—roved But that the Sabbath is therefore onely Iewish or that wee are bound so to observe it I deny upon these grounds 1. I deny that therefore the Sabbath is onely Iewish 1. Because that though this strict rest was typicall yet not properly Iewish because not of the same nature with Iewish types For that those which were properly types in a Iewish sence had relation to Christs and the constitution of his Church as considered properly and primarily upon Earth in its militant being in the time of grace during Christs regiment * For though Aarons bearing the names of the Tribes on his shoulders and breast signified Christ doing the same for his elect in Heaven yet it is his elect still on Earth not for his elect when they shall bee triumphant in Heaven sic de caeteris but the signification typified in this rest was of a different nature for propetly it signified the Church triumphant in Heaven it selfe which typicall difference may easily appeare onely by comparing this Sabbath with the other Sabbaths as shall bee seene anon And secondly because that this strict rest was no part of the substance of the Sabbath but onely an occasionall circumstance proper for the season of their prerâ—grination For so sooone as Mannah failed that strict rest failed so that you never after knew them condemned for providing their necessary food on the Sabbath-day although you find them often complained on for other breaches 2. And although that thus I deny this strict rest to be properly Iewish yet I deny it not to bee proper onely to the Iewes but affirme it both in respect of the duty * I meane here by duty sanction or positive holines else to rest is our duty as well as theirs of this rest as also in respect of the precisenes of it 1. For the duty of this rest I say that that was proper to the Iewes and not to us now Because that types in the time of their Discipline * Which was the time that the letter bare sway and comparatively not the Spirit carried with them a positive holines being for its continuance ordinances and not accidents But now that externall religion which consisted in types is properly no part of our worship although the thing it selfe in this particuler being a perpetuall type remaineth in the use and signification of it but as I say not in its temporary holines or occasionall precisenes for the Kingdome of Heaven now consists in righteousnes peace and joy in the holy Ghost and not in typicall sanctions For wee must understand that the Sabbath in it selfe considered without accidents was of a perpetuall typicall meaning intending the absolute rest that should bee to the Church of God in Heaven as is notoriously evident in the fourth of Hebr. by comparing the 4. verse with the 9. and 10. For which cause it may well bee conceived to bee holy even with an externall holines as other types were in the minority of those typicall times in respect of the bare rest therein commanded which yet in that sense is no part of our sanctification for our sanctification in respect of this rest properly consisteth in the signification thereof spiritualized in our hearts and in the privative sense thereof because our resting from worldly affaires is a necessary privative meanes to our sanctifying the Sabbath Like as in the Antitype our rest in Heaven
Sabbath above them therefore and its equality with nature seeing God makes use of it so especially to exhibite the commandement of nature by amongst the Lawes thereof But now in that opinion wherein you and Master Breerewood jumpe I must differ from you both to wit that now onely the generall Law of nature remaines which is that some time is to bee sanctified to Gods worship and that this fourth commandement which you call Gods speciall commandement is utterly abrogated For as for the Law of nature which consisteth onely in an indefinite sequestring of some time to the service of God it comes infinitely short of that compleatnes and solemnity of time which our necessity requireth and which God deserveth at our hands and which if hee may bee his owne spokesman hee commandeth also Indeed to set apart some time as perhaps an houre in a Day or some such like time for prayer or meditation it may bee nature or conscience would affirme it requisite but to set a part so much time and in so solemne manner as it seemes God lookes for and our state requires neither nature nor conscience will so prompt us either now or as I thinke in innocency And therefore as I may well conclude that that first institution of God concerning the Sabbath was rather a supply to nature then any Law in nature which our Antisabbatarians unnecessarily labour to disprove * Though I must say of some argumâ—nts of some former Writers of this subject of the Sabbath who not then finding opposition which hath beene an ordinary meanes in the course of Gods providence for the more diligent inquisition after the truth of God and happy discovery thereof as Hierome saith of the Fathers How that before Arrius rose up They delivered some things innocently yet lesse varily and such as cannot avoid the calumny of peâ—verse persons and superadded of God after created nature by immediate and speciall revelation So I have just cause to beleeve that this was for many speciall and perpetuall respects For left God his solemne and publicke worship to have beene arbitrarily ordered by nature and not have by himselfe determined a speciall time therefore it would have falne out very crosse to Gods intentious either being slenderly and seldomely performed or at least very confusedly and disjoyntedly seeing that so many men have so many mindes and so many severall and various occasions which by man would never have beene determined at once to have kept so solemne and compleat a portion of time as it seemes God expected especially seeing nature never suggested it if God by an over-ruling mandat had not put it past posse and velle * As he did the eating of the Passeover though a man were in a journey or were uncleane by a law made Numb 9. which hee who is not the God of confusion wisely foresaw and prevented So that though some time even by nature is taught to bee set apart for Gods worship which I deny not yet I say that this is more private and personall not so solemne and publicke as God would have it and therefore may bee arbitrary without disorder and distraction which the other cannot if left to mans free-will and therefore is purposely revealed of God and is no law innate in nature because of the reason aforesaid for nature doth not discerne of numbers or why God should chose to be worshipped on the seventh day rather then on the eight or ninth but a commandement on the by of equall force antiquity and perpetuity with nature prescribed as a rule coincident with nature for the Church of God in all ages to imitate And to this purpose speakes Marius Marius in Gen. 2. Since saith hee it is the Law of nature that some time bee peculiarly insinuated for the worship of God it was meete that that should bee determined by a positive Law But against this it will be objected Why might not time as well as place bee left to the disposition and authority of Man to appoint seeing that time and place bee alike necessary in nature to all actions I answer Answ. time and place are in nature alike necessary to all actions in genere but so is not this or that particuler time or place save where by positive Law it is made so God did appoint the seaventh day for solemne worship and left all places at liberty till it pleased him to designe one onely place for Sacrifice-worship under the Law the necessity whereof being now abrogated by the Gospell the place is left to choyce One time may agree to all the world for worship but so cannot one place Againe it will be objected Obj. that Bishop White pag. 33. layeth it downe as an essentiall Character that Lawes and Preceps meerely positively morall oblige onely the Persons or State or Nation and Republike upon which they are imposed by the Lawgiver or to whom they are published by a legall promulgation So pag. 38. If it be a precept meerely positive it can oblige those people onely upon whom it was imposed Also pag. 77. hee saith flatly that although the seaventh day Sabbath had not beene a legall Ceremony yet if it were onely a positive morall precept the obligation hereof ceased under the Gospell So that by this rule the Sabbath should not bee of universall obligation being onely positively morall To all which himselfe gives the Answer pag. Answ. 27. where hee saith Lawes positive are common and generall either for all mankind as the Law of Polygamy and Wedlocke with in some degrees mentioned or els for one nation Republicke or Community of people So that wee see through forgetfulnesse his Character doth not hold but that a positive morall Law may bee perpetuall and universall as well as nationall of which sort we have reason to reckon the Sabbath because it and the Law of Polygamy which hee instanceth in were Twins both brought forth in the state of Adams innocency Broad I praise God for the comming forth of Master Breerewoods booke The difference is in â— manner onely verball for wee both hold that the generall law of nature remaineth and againe that Gods speciall Commandementis abrogated for though there bee some difference betweene us yet meane Schollers are able to judge of it might I have spoken with him I doubt nothing but that wee should soone have accorded in lesse then an houâ—es space Answer I could wish you had perused Master Richard Byfields reply to Master Breerewoods booke before you had sent abroad this Manu-script that so you might have thanked God for that which had beene thanke worthy But that you may not bee a stranger to him I will bee bold to bring you acquainted by putting you the oftner in mind of him in this my Answer Touching the substance of your difference mentioned in the Margin I have already spoken to it and shall have more occasion as I goe along Broad I published not long since a
the Lords-day more licentiously and so to dishonour God the more when thou hast more cause to honour and praise his holy name If thou dost know assuredly that the Son hath not yet made thee free for none dare wilfully abuse our liberty purchased by Christ unlesse themselves doe still continue the very bond slaves of sinne and Sathan Answer Your admiration is worthy commendation for it is the part of every honest man to preserve the practise of piety and especially in this point of the Sabbath in the which God so often in Scripture involueth the summe of all Religion and indeed it is Gods and the Churches ancient Land-marke which being removed opens a gappe to all licentiousnes and that being once let in which is so much thirsted after by the ignorant and common people then farewell all Religion For as Doctor Denison notes upon the 13. Neh. 2. That where the Sabbath is not sanctified there is neither sound Religion nor a Christian conversation to bee expected as hee is quoted by Edward Chetwin D. D. and Deane of Bristow in his second Edition of the straight gate and narrow way to life Pag. 90. Who himselfe saith in the same page that the prophaning the holy Sabbath of God for so hee termes it is contrary to Gods morall precept still in power And therefore if you have Faith I wish you would have taken Saint Pauls advice and have had it to your selfe in this point For how you will preserve the duties of the Sabbath * Read Master Richard Bifields 13. chap. against Master Breerewoods like protestation and yet with the same breath cry downe the authority of the Sabbath and how you will maintaine solemne worship without solemne time which God ever allotted to that end I see not nor you know not And therefore what you weakely endeavour to build up with one hand you powerfully pull downe with the other for an errour in Doctrine especially tending to libertinisme is likelier to take place among men where alwayes the greater part is the worse then a bare perswasion tending to restriction It is as if a man should let slip a Grayhound at an Hare and then command him to ly downe at his foote And therefore you might have done well like a good Physitian first to have applied that receit how that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lumpe upon your selfe before you had prescribed it unto others But to prevent the spreading of this poisonous leaven I am desirous to give you a timely opposition by contending for the truth Broad CHAP. I. 1. What day God sanctified in the beginning GOd having finished the creation in sixe dayes rested on the seaventh day and was refreshed Gen. 2. Exod. 31. whereupon hee blessed the seaventh day and sanctified it The day which God sanctified in the beginning was the seaventh and no other even as the day wherein hee commanded the Israelites to kill the passeover was the fourteenth day and no other of the first month the one is as expressely set downe as the other and the reasons wherefore God sanctified the seaventh day The reason of the Sabbaths institution vanished as a shadow with the shadow and commanded the Israelites to kill the passeover on the fourteenth day of the first month are alike unchangeable For as it cannot bee that the Angell should passe over the Israelites houses on any other day of the fourteenth so neither can it bee that God should rest on any other day Answer It is no doubt but the seaventh day was the day that God onely rested on and sanctified to a different use from the rest of the dayes for having imployed these in creating things necessary for mans corporall good hee designes him this day for his spirituall benefit and his owne speciall glory whereas it is alleadged by some Bishop White pag. 42. Doctor Heylyn pag. 10. That God imposed no other Law on Adam then that of the forbidden fruit of the tree of knowledge To this I answer 1. That there was another Law imposed upon him even in innocency as appeares Gen. 2. 24. to wit the Law of having but one wife and loving her 2. That this Law of the Sabbath was a Law not of the nature of the other where on his estate depended but a Law of indulgence whereto hee both should and would readily have confented because of the blessing and benefit which should have redounded to him thereby had hee continued in in innocency and not lost himselfe and it before And questionlesse there was no other reason why hee that could have made all the World in a moment should yet contrive and spin out the worke of creation into sixe dayes space but onely to this end that hee might give an example to mankind which was then in Adam for ever to set a part the seaventh day to his more speciall and solemne worship And the reason of Gods resting from the creation why it is annexed as a reason of the commandement is because at that time there was no better thing nor greater commodity no nor any greater worke for God to rest from or thing wherein God was more seene then in the creation And therefore was the Sabbath appointed on that day having the honour to conclude the creation in memory of Gods goodnes to man and upon occasion of his refreshment therein till a greater good should befall him and a worke wherein God should bee more glorified and then that reason to bee subordinated not annulled because the creation still remaineth as a lesse good even unto us under the Gospell but as the Law is to the Gospell or the old Testament to the new or as the Prophets were to the Apostles and Ministers not in the sense as the ceremonies were to Christ to receive an absolute expiration the one by the other for it was of no such shadowish nature and yet not so unchangeable but that it is as well subject to subordination upon occasion as the Iewes deliverance out of Egypt was to their after deliverance out of Babylon For man was more happy and God as I may say more refreshed in ceasing from the worke of our redemption then of our creation And therefore is Anno Mundi worthily changed into Anno Domini And the name of the Sabbath into the Lords-day For denominatio omnis fit a majori And for this cause although in relation to our redemption wee celebrate the first day of the weeke for order yet it is the creation that makes this first day to bee the seaventh in number and good reason For seeing God in the creation divided time into the revolution of seaven how can or dare any that knowes the creation breake the order of time by God established and thinke of another division as of 6. or 8. c. seeing from the beginning it was not so especially seeing it was purposely done of God for the Sabbaths sake who els could have finished the creation in the twinckling
and cheerefulnes doe the holy works and duties of Gods worship and service which are proper to that day 2. For the precisenes of the rest which you here speake of I also affirme that that was proper onely to the Iewes as also to that time of their preregrination in the wildernes and not to us for because it was no part of the substance of the commandement or Sabbath but onely an adventitious or temporary circumstance for illustration sake begun and ended in the wildernes For the Iewes being a people in their time under a typicall discipline God chose that time and this occasion of feeding them with Mannah in the wildernes which the Scripture calleth Angels food because it came so immediatly from Heaven the more clearely to exemplifie the lively signification of the Sabbaths rest which being alwayes typicall should bee much more so in their time For they having other Sabbaths commanded them with strict rest this must bee imposed upon them with stricter rest else they should not learne its proper meaning and difference And for this cause did hee command it with so much strictnes at that time even to their not gathering nor preparing Mannah when as yet their other Sabbaths were commanded them with liberty to make ready what they should eate the better to testifie the different nature and eminent signification of that Sabbath above the other For the rest of the Iewish Sabbaths were not so absolute because they were onely appointed to signifie the rest which every beleever and the whole Church hath here by Christ on Earth to wit a rest but an interrupted rest like to their rest in the Land of Canaan not absolute but interrupted and of a mixt nature in regard of such things which are necessary to befall us in this life whereas the weekely Sabbath signified the rest which the company of beleevers should have in Heaven as it is in the fourth of Hebr. 9. There remaineth a rest therefore to the people of God which is absolute and without any mixture because that in Heaven wee shall bee at Gods immediate finding as they were thâ—n whilest they were in the wildernes but never after And therefore did so much of that rest as wherein it surpassed the other Sabbaths cease for after time both to them and us because that God ceased to raine Mannah which gave life to that circumstance of strict rest commanded them at that time So that Doctor Heylins observation pag. 145. How that after their returne from the Babylonish captivity in their redresse of their Sabbath sins they had no lesse care of the annuall Sabbaths and Sabbaths of yeares then of the weekely and the markets were no more restrained on the weekely Sabbath then on the annuall might have beene spared as making nothing for his purpose And therefore so to rest now in our dayes as not to provide our necessary food * And we have Christs example to warrant it in the 14. Luke by comparing the 8. 12. 13. verses seeing God ceaseth to raine Mannah were to create types to our selves and to cloud that light with a vaile of our owne making For the extraordinary strict rest was by God then onely commanded when by him they were extraordinarily accommodated to observe it which shall bee fulfilled onely in Heaven when againe wee shall onely bee at Gods immediate finding and shall againe eat Angel food as they did in the wildernes Saith Doctor Tailor * Christ revealed pag. 269. the not gathering Mannah on the Sabbath signified that in that eternall Sabbath wee shall enjoy Mannah without meanes So that in the meane time wee are not forbidden to bee charitable to our bodies by preparing necessary food * Iustin Martyr Neither thinke it greevous that we drinke some warme thing on the Sabbath seeing God also governeth the World on this day in like manner as he doth another dayes Although I could wish with all my heart that wee were more charitable to the soules of our servants then many of us are and not on that day so to pamper our bodies as to starve their soules that are under our charge and for whom we must give account especially if wee consider that other meaning which God had in prohibiting the gathering and preparing Mannah on the Sabbath-day so much inculcated by divines to wit that it is not earthly but heavenly Mannah that is the food and welfare of our soules which on that day our appetite ought chiefely to stand to as wee see by the example of Christs Disciples Matth 12. 1. And that this strict rest was onely proper to that season and not to us I further prove it by two contexts The first is out of the 16. Exod. 29. compared with the 27. where when the people went to gather Mannah contrary to Gods commandements Moses rebuked them saying Behold how the Lord hath given you the Sabbath therefore hee giveth you bread for two dayes tarry therefore every man in his place let no man goe out of his place to wit to gather Mannah on the seaventh day where wee see the reason of that extraordinary rest was because of Gods extraordinary provision * See Tunius his reason in his comment upon the 26 verse of this chap. so that when the one ceased the other which depended on it ceased also The second place is Numb â—5 32. where it is said that whilest the children of Israel were in the wildernes they found a man that gathered stickes upon the Sabbath-day marke the phrase whilest they were in the wildernes how it seemes to restraine that strict kind of rest to that place and that time for many worse breaches were made after they were out of the wildernes and yet noe such punishment inflicted Besides it is a rule that every morall duty may bee performed of all men but under the North-Pole they cannot bee one day without fire and they neare the equinoctiall cannot keepe their meate for heate therefore this cannot take place among them and so not generall to all nor perpetuall to bee observed for ever Whereas some interpret that Law of the Israelites not kindling fires to bee meant in relation to the building of the Tabernacle which though in it selfe it bee true that being one end happily of that inhibition yet it is not the onely meaning of that Law for they were not to bake nor seeth their food on that day as appeares Exod. 16. 23. as also by the example of the man that was stoned for gathering stickes on the Sabbath-day which it is propable was not for the Tabernacles use but to bake seeth or warme some food neither was it lawfull for them to kindâ—â— fires after the Tabernacle was finished during their abode in the wildernes But there are others that interpret those words of Exod. 16. 23. Bake 〈◊〉 yee will bake to day and seeth that yee will 〈◊〉 in this manner that is say they bake and boyle according as you use to doe
better to performe that duty Thirdly he objecteth There was no necessity of having one set day in every weeke for performing religious offices for man lived in Paradise in a fruition of God To which I answer 1. By the same rule seconded by their position The Church need appoint no Holy-dayes now under the Gospell * Which thei le hardly yeeld to for say they we are to keep every day Sabbath or Holy-day to the Lord which surely we cannot doe without spirituall fruition of God 2. That though Gods children enjoy now a constant fruition of God as a friend yet is this fruition much maintained increased and inlarged by their sanctifying the Sabbath And so doubtlesse should Adams it representing to him and us the perfection of our happinesse and his Fourthly he objecteth All Gods creatures were as living books to preach to man the majesty and bounty of the Creator To which I answer We account it not a needlesse action in God when he had made his creatures which we knew and saw well enough so solemnly notwithstanding to overlook them as is recorded Gen. 1. 31. Neither is there any cause why Adam should not have a solemne day of contemplation and service appointed him because of the time and meanes he had of serving God on other dayes seeing the Sabbath intimated most doctrinally what we ought to God to wit our whole selves and what service we should doe him in heaven to wit absolute without any interruption the better to enamourus of our change To conclude it is evident that the Sabbath was a Law in Commandment in time of Innocency else it could not have suffered losse and detriment by Adams fall which it did as is evident in that First It was one of the Lawes written in Moses his first Tables which were broken and spoyled to signifie as much Secondly Because there were renewed in the second Tables the very self same lawes which were at first whereof the Sabbath was one For the Sabbath waites as an handmaid on the morall Law in which respect chiefly it was made for man that is given to mankinde to be helpfull to his obedience So that seeing as a Law the Sabbath is concomitant with the Law in the second exhibition of it consequently it was so at first especially seeing it is reported that God writ the same things in the second Tables as he did in the first which signifyeth Gods twice giving the Law once in Adam which was defaced and so the Sabbath as well as the rest which he repaired as before And again work was commanded in Innocencie and consequently the Sabbath It is true that an Holy land and an Holy day suite well together but an Holy Church and an Holy Sabbath suite better and you shall finde this Holy Church keeping the Sabbath in the wildernesse before they came into the Holy land and more strictly too When God lastly asketh me that reason why I thought the Sabbath to be a Commandement I think it good to answer him 〈◊〉 his own example especially seeing he grounded an expresse Commandement thereupon afterwards And if God like not this answer he will then doe by it as he did by Adams breeches give me a better In the meane time I will chuse rather to erre by obeying then â—y disobeying and I am sure I shall give a better account of the one then you shall of the other Broad 2. In the state of Innocencie Answ. It hath been I suppose the generall opinion untill of late yeers that Adam fell the day before and otherwise his first childe had not been conceived in sin again the Devill doubtlesse would be â—empting as soone as might be his malice was so great that every houre seemed a twelve moneth before he could become a murderer and the sooner he set upon our first parents after they were created the likelier he was to prevaile the more easily should he have taâ—â—yed a day or two the woman might have learned by experience that the Creatures could not speake of themselves which had Eve known she would rather have been affrighted then deceived Further who and without curiositie would not be desirous to heare how Adam and Evâ— carryed themselves in that first Sabbath Had not this bin a notable pattern to all his posteritie In mans reason Adam should be ill dealt withall to have his evill deeds and not his good deeds committed to History Answer Let us herein be wise with Sobrietie and be content to receive it as God by Moses delivereth it to wit what was done before the fall as done in Innocency whereof the Sabbath was a part which silenceth your conjecturall reasons And therefore I will forbeare to refute conjectures with conjectures and satisfie my self with divine authoritie Though I could tell you that it is very unlikely that seeing in Gods dayes works in the first Chap. of Genesis who did yet but command and it was done so few things are recorded to be done on every day That Adam besides the businesse of his temptation fall and punishment together with the circumstances belonging to them which you may read in the third of Genesis took up no small time could receive his blessing Gen. 1. 28. and his regiment and libertie 29 30. and his putting into Paradise Chap. 2. 8. and his law of Commandement 16 17. and could give names to all Cattle fowles of the heaven and beasts of the field 19 and all on the day of his own Creation especially if we consider how much time God spent of it proportionably to the work that Moses allotteth to other dayes in creating the living things of the earth according to their kinde as Cattle creeping things and beasts and Adam himself and casting him into a sleep and creating Eve out of him and the view he took after of all that he had made Nor is it so considerable concerning Adam and 〈◊〉 keeping the first Sabbath seeing they kept none for God as your self observed made known his example at the evening of his seventh day and Adam fell before the the seventh day camâ— about If you aske 〈…〉 he fell Obiect if 〈…〉 〈…〉 〈…〉 Answ. but the third which was the first day of the weeke followâ—ng and 〈◊〉 which leads me thus to thinke 〈…〉 Adam in opposition to the first * And is opposed to his â—all even in his resurrection it selfe in the 1 Câ—r 15. 21. Since by man came death by man came also the resurrection of the dead I rose on that day 〈◊〉 I thinke Adam fell And that he fell not on the first of his Creation which was Gods sixth and last day appeareth not only by the Sabbaths institution in time of innocencie as aforesaid but also by the last verse of the first Chapter of 〈◊〉 Where after God had finished the works of that Day he viewed every thing that he had made and seeing all was Good presently there followeth upon that as upon the other dayes of
keep unraced the ejaculation annexed to it in our Liturgy And M r. Dow pag. 9. saith in absolute tearmes They more fully expresse the nature of this Commandement who say It is partly Morall and partly Ceremoniall Broad 6. Opinion M r. Cleaver will have this strange matter come to passe by a Trope whereby one part is put for the rest He saith That in the precepts and prohibitions more is meant then in words is expressed Moral of the Law Chap. 4. Answ. I acknowledge that in the other nine Commandements more is meant then is expressed in words but here in the fourth Commandement that which is expressed in words is not meant It is a kind of Trope to put one part for the rest but when no part is put for the rest what manner of Trope may that be For this thou shalt sanctifie the seventh day wherein I rested is no part of Gods Law in these dayes and yet this in effect is all that God spake from Sinai Answer Although the fourth Commandement be a Law still in force yet as I said it bindeth us not to keep Sabbath the last day of the weeke though the seventh For the order was foretold to be altered in the 65. Isaiah 17. where it is prophecyed that Gods creating new heavens and a new earth shall make the old to be forgotten that is there shall be a wonderfull alteration and that which now men make most account of to wit the Creation then they shall account it the least sanctifying the memory of my resting from their Redemption in stead of my resting from their Creation And thus you wilfully slander us when you say that Thou shalt sanctifie the seventh day wherein I rested is no part of Gods Law in these dayes for we grant it but with an Orthodox distinction of Rest. For the Commandement it self looketh with a double face both wayes both to the Iewish Church and ours both to the old and new Creation And beareth his Title in the very front in that word Remember And as one well observeth There is no Commandement ushered with such a Memento as that of the Sabbath wherein saith he I thinke we may discerne Gods providence forearming weake Christians against the strong assaults of their own affections strugling against the restraint of a whole dayes libeâ—tie and of mans inventions oppugning Gods institutions for it is a Commandement of Remembrance so that as once we were to remember our Creation by it as appeareth bâ— the first promulgation of it in Exodus for there the Creation is only mentioned so like wise are we now to remember our Redemption by it as appeares by the second proâ—nulgation of it in Deuâ—eronomie where the old Creation is quite forgotten not a word mentioned of it and the new set forth in its Type of their â—gyptian deliverance Which observation taken from the various reasons annexed at severall times and in such an order for the inforcing of this Commandement compared with this Text of Isaâ—ah 65. 17. and the present event sutable doth both very much illustrate the perpetuitie of the Sabbath and yet prophecie the change both in one which also if we consider the nature of those times doth well prove the thing For though Christ speaketh plainly to us now yet to them he spake and prophecyed as I may so say in parables which rightly understood are no lesse proofes then ours And thus is the substance of the fourth Commandement preserved that is the dedicating of the seventh day to duties of Pietie and Mercy and sixe dayes to our other affaires as also prophecie fulfilled and the Apostles imitated But may some say Object Our Redemption was not finished on that day for that it still remaineth in acting by Christs intercession which is Bishop Whites objection page 299. Christs intercession after his dying and rising is as Gods providence was Answ. and is after his sixe dayes Creation And as notwithstanding his continuall providence his Creation was finished on the last day of the week So Now notwithstanding Christs intercession at Gods right hand our Redemption was finished on the first day of the weeke by his Resurrection And whereas Bishop White further objecteth pag. 299. That the day of Christs resurrection cannot properly be called a Sabbath or day of Rest because our Saviour was in action on that day about the necessary works of perfecting mans Redemption by applying teaching inspiring authorizing his Disciples I answer They were all Sabbath-day works and so was the seventh day a working day to God in many such like respects sutable to the first Creation and yet it was his Sabbath for this reason because he rested and ceased from that which he did before as M r. Hildersham noteth upon the Hebrew word Sabbat in his 135. Lect. on the 51. Psalme which holds in respect of Christ. Furthermore page 300. Bishop White saith That the Primitive Church devoted the first day of the weeke to the honour and service of Christ not because of Christs cessation from redemptive actions but because it was primus dies laetitiae The first day of joy and gladnesse for the resurrection of the Lord True But the cause of this joy was the perfection of our Redemption and Deliverance which we celebrate with a congratulatory commemoration on the first day like as we were to doe the perfection of our Creation on the last day of the weeke And pag. 303. hâ— saith That Christ rested upon his resurrection day no more then he did upon every day after untill his ascension and since his ascension untill the worlds end Answ. So he may say that God rested no more from his worke of Creation on the seventh day then he hath done ever since where by the way take notice That it is the consummation of the Creation and Redemption which is meant by their Resting and which we celebrate for else if Rest should respect barely their cessation then all the after time should be of equall estimation with the last day in respect of the Creation and with the first day in respect of the Redemption And now indeed I wonder why the Egyptian deliverance being in Deut. annexed by the dictate of the spirit as a reason to inforce the duty of the fourth Commandement or Sabbath in its second promulgation should not be thought a sufficient reason to inforce the same duty law upon us as well as the obedience of the whole Law is urged upon us by the same reason contained in the Preface * Deny the one and â—eny both but reâ—son and sobrietie will deny neither seeing that in both places it signifieth alike our spirituall Redemption and deliverance Especially seeing the holy Ghost in the fifteenth verse of the fifth of Deut. after he hath there affixed to the fourth Commandement our deliverance out of spirituall Egypt in its Type as the reason of it concludeth upon it mandatorily a duty not a libertie imposed upon us therefore in these
13 Acts 32. 33. These words 32. And we declare unto you glad tidings how that the promise which was made unto the fathers 33. God hath fulfilled the same unto us their children in that he hath raised us Iesus againe as it is also written in the second Psalme Thou art my â—onne this day haâ—e I begotten thee As touching the meeting on the first day of the weeke which you say we neither finde where nor by whom it began I have even now shewed you the originall of it both for time and persons to wit on the day of Christs resurrection by the Apostles and the day fennight after Had they only met the day of his reâ—urrection we might have thought it had been only accidentall and not of speciall providence or if it had been recorded that they had met any other day besides it might somewhat have weakened the force of this argument But meeting twice and it being recorded to be on the same day together with the effects thereof it doth wonderfully prove the thing to be of purposed providence both on Gods part in assembling them then and on Christs part in appearing to them thereby to give originall to this Ordinance which accordingly hath been so observed ever since And therefore it is not likely that the Apostles tooke it up by approbation from inferiour Christians nor yet that Christ honoured it only by way of approbation but also of institution for we see what honour he gave to it a principio by his often appearings thereon and the gift of the Holy Ghost Iohn 20. 22. on this day which you so Sophister like passe over and only instance in that which seemeth to serve your turne but that it was taken up from them Though this confessed approbation of Christs granteth it to be of the same authoritie with Baptisme which was brought in by Iohn Baptist and ratified by Christ. And if the people of the Iews held the Baptisme of Iohn to be from heaven and not of men though they had no expresse command for it but only his practice and though the chiefe Priests and Elders beleeved him not only for this reason because they held Iohn as a Prophet Matth. 21. 25 26. and this their beliefe of Iohn and his Baptisme producing sutable fruits of grace and holinesse in them was approved of Christ vers 32. I wonder how any dare deny the Lords-day to be of divine institution and affirme it humane that know and acknowledge Paul to be an Apostle the least whereof was greater then Iohn Baptist and the thing of such great consequence and benefit to the Church and otherwayes so backed But let us labour to imitate these contemned Publicanes and harlots in beleeving this point of the Lords-day to be from heaven by divine institution and not of men by humane ordination suffering Pauls practice as an Apostle to overrule 〈…〉 as Iohn Baptist as a Prophet did them and framing our practice to ouâ— faith like them And so obeying him and his Ministers let us not doubt in like case the approcation of Christ in our behalfes above the over-wiâ—e unbeleevers be they 〈…〉 And you shall 〈…〉 second Treatise pag. 22. 〈…〉 that oâ— taken 〈…〉 the Lords-day is in some sort de iure divino in some sort namely not by personall but by delegate authority that is not prescribed personally and immediatly by God himselfe but onely by vertue of that authority which by God was committed to the Apostles for the ordering and governing of his Church but being taken for divine Ordinance or Commandement it is not de iure divine And further he saith To entitle a Commandement divine is required 1. That the authority be divine wherby it is ordained 2. That the Author himselfe that ordaineth be so also that is that both the power whereby and the person that doth immediatly establish it be divine Which divine authority is confessed to be in the Apostolicall constitutions but the immediate Authors are denyed to be divine Now as all other events and actions receive their denomination from their immediate not remote causes so the constitutions of the Apostles although they proceed originally from the instinct and aspiration of the Holy Ghost Gods spirit yet proceeding immediatly from the institutions of the Apostles themselves which delivered them unto the Church in forme of Commandements they are to be tearmed humane constitutions and not properly divine Thus you have M r. Breerewoods opinion of the divine authority of the Lords-day much more Orthodox then yours only in answer to this later part where he saith that Apostolicall actions are to be tearmed humane from that principle That all actions are to receive their denominations from their immediate not remote causes He might have considered how that all the new Testament is called the word of God from the remote Cause the Spirit of God which inspired it though the Apostles and Evangelists writ it which were men and that by no expresse Commandement that we finde Bishop White averreth against T. B. pag. 91. That our weekly observation of the Lords-day in the time of the Gospell is an holy and godly practise for it is warranted by the example of the Apostles and those Primitive Churches which were planted by the Apostles and which received their Ecclesiasticall precepts and constitutions by tradition from the Apostles so that the Apostles first founded it as he further affirmes pag. 97. saith he It is an ignorant speech to tearme it a popish tradition for popish traditions had not their beginnings from the Apostles So also pag. 189. We beleeve saith he that the holy Apostles ordained the Sunday to be a weekly Holy-day because the Primitive Fathers who lived some of them in the Apostles dayes and others of them immediatly after and who succeedeth them in Apostolicall Churches did universally maintaine the religious observation of this day So againe pag. 192. It is probable that in the Churches at Corinth and Galatia the Lords-day was made a weekly Holy-day by the Apostles for they principally governed those Churches at this time 1 Cor. 16. 1 2. And yet Doctor Heylyn laboureth to prove this ordination of Paul to the Galathians to be upon a Sabbath-day and not upon the Lords-day And againe pag. 192. It could not possibly have come to passe that all and every Apostolicall Church throughout the universall world should so early and in the beginning of their plantation have consented together to make the Sunday a weekly Service-day unlesse they had been thus directed by their first founders the holy Apostles themselves c. Lastly it is a true that a long time after Christs Resurrection was the name of Lords-day given to the first day of the weeke * I have shewed before the significant use of the Sabbath paffing under the name of the first day of the week in scripture before it come to be stiled the Lords-day to wit when the first day of the week began to be most currantly