of mind that the State of his Kingdom waxed worse and that he fought with unhappy success against the Goths the source of so great an evil being a little more deeply sought out he reproved the Bishops which sed not with Gospel Doctrines the people committed to them who by their profligate manners stirred up the wrath of a revenging God against him to prevent which evil for the future it was ordained in a Council That the Lords day should be kept religiously The pattern of this most Christian King while the victory in this our age inclineth to the enemies perswades us devoutly to keep the L. day solemnity for which we have â—ought unsuccessfully almost these twenty years against the enemies of our liberty that have roared in the Churches of God to our great sorrow When we count the causes of this will why should we not apply our minds with Gunther amnus to bewail the heynous violation of the Lords day and with the ancient Fathers who observed that the Lords day was not reverently kept ordained That first of all the Priests then Kings and Princes and all the Faithfull should chiefly see to it that the due observation and Religious Devotion of so great a Day now in so great a part neglected be hereafter for a sign of Christianity more devoutly exhibited and that the Christian Magistrates excellency be humbly desired of the Priests that in honour and reverence of so great a Day all may be put in fear that men presume not to keep markets do their own pleasure and works on this Holy and Venerable Day For when this solemnity is either taken away or neglected there is no more hopes of the other parts of Religion than there is of the bodies safety when the head is cut off Neither can there be used a more excellent remedy for curing the other malady than the holy observation of this Festival for the zeal of Religion waxing cold and purity of holy Doctrine being obscured what will be more fit to heal errours and stirr up the languishing strength of zeal than that an entire Worship be offered up both publickly and privately to God on this day while the holy Word of God is piously preached attentively heard the Sacred Mysteries devoutly and according to Christs institution celebrated Prayers poured into the hearts of the Faithful by the Holy Ghost are with all humility offered up to God Sacred Hymns sound in the Church with a godly joy the afflicted members of Christ and the poor provided for bountifully by the rich and those that are sound in mind do mercifully comfort them that are sorrowful These are those exercises of the Lords Day which will uphold Religion when it is falling which if they be religiously observed of the Church every one seeth how great an access will be made from thence to the Christian Religion which we all profess And these are the things Most Holy Church of Christ which in this elaborate Treatise I do not utter foolishly of my self but humbly offer all things to Thee as they are taken out of the Holy Scriptures where they afforded me any light in discussing of this dispute and the lights of purer Christianity not because as sometime Chrysostome Homil. post prioris exilii reditum Thou stand'st in need of my Doctrine which indeed I acknowledge to be but small but that I might testifie my good will to thee and that at length thy natural Sons to whom Religion is both their care and their pleasure may in some sort see what works they are to attend on that Day and from what to abstain and with what authority the institution of this solemnity is supported With Gods assistance I will briefly shew from the Holy Scriptures and Fathers of better credit asserting all these things Thou hast therefore most Beloved Mother the purpose of my mind in sending forth this little work Do thou then of thy humanity to thy friends pardon the mistakes how great soever they be in collecting these things and take in good part the slenderness of my wit which endeavoured according to its power to benefit chiefly thy natural sons that sojourn in Germany which I love upon many accounts This doth he humbly ask of thee Who loves Thee and Thine with a sincere Love in Christ Theophilus Philo-kuriaces Loncardiensis AN INDEX OF THE CHAPTERS BOOK 1. THe Preface in which first is propounded the Scope of this Treatise Secondly is shewn why we meet with more things about the duties of the Lords Day in the later than in the former Councils Thirdly how far the Church at this day may be obliged by the authorities of Provincial Councils that ordain these duties although some things of lesser value be put among their Canons Fol. 1. Chapter 1. That to the solemn Worship of God a determined time is necessary Concerning the Assemblies of the Apostles and how they were present in the Jewish Synagogues on the Sabbath day 1. Chap. 2. The ordinary time observed for celebrating the publick worship of God after Christs death was the Lords day solemnly used by the Christian Church in the very Apostles age Three Texts of the New Testament namely Acts 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 2. and Rev. 1 10. are briefly weighed 14. Chap. 3. After the Apostles death the Church met upon other dayes than the Lords The antient Christians observed the Sabbath not as an holy day the differences between the observation of the Lords day and Sabbath How Constantine the Great ordained the Parasceve to be observed Anniversary Festivals were not celebrated with that solemnity as the Lords Day Anniversary Festivals not to be preferred to the Lords days anciently they bowed not the knee on the Lords Day 30. Chap. 4. The chief of the Fathers make mention of the Lords day solemnity the authority whereof depends not upon the Emperours Constitutions When it was first ordained that Judges should cease from hearing Law-suits on the Lords day the Christians were punished for observing it VVhat it is Dominicum agere 52. Chap. 5. The reason of observing the Lords Day It 's called the first day of the week by the Evangelists and Fathers and the Lords day Sunday also and why the Sabbath and Christian Sabbath VVhy the Fathers used so seldome the name Sabbath VVhat Synaxis may signifie with the Ancients 66. Chap. 6. The whole Lords Day is to be sanctified to God and not onely some part thereof 77. Chap. 7. The ordinance of the Lords day is not properly to be reckoned amongst unwritten Traditions It was instituted of Christ by the Apostles The Apostles prerogatives above other Ministers of the Church the things ordained by the Apostles are of Divine right 90. Chap. 8. In the compass of a week one day was sanctified from the beginning of the world This is affirmed by Jews and Christians How Adam had need of the Sabbath Mention of a seventh day observed amongst the Heathen The authorities are weighed wherein the observation
not appoint any new thing but renew the old Moreover in the Council of Friuli Can. 13. all Christians were commanded to observe with all reverence the Lords Festival in which as in other Canons of that Council they acknowledge they do not institute new rules but having recited the sacred pages of their fore-fathers Canons they persist to embrace with greatest devotion and 〈…〉 with a fresher style the things that were digested by them and promulgated by a wholsome pen. There came out also a new Decree in a Council at Paris for the strict observing the Lords day of which this reason is assigned by the Fathers because a due observation and the religious devotion of that day was in a great measure neglected That was not then the first time they decreed a religious institution of the Lords day but it being grown into a disuse they labour Postliminio to renew it and call to remembrance the neglected or obscured use thereof and the dissolute manners of Christians in performing on that day the exercises of Religion have produced new Canons about observing this solemnity whenas yet the solemnity it self and the holy duties thereof were well enough known to the former Church and so the things which were neglected through the carelesness of the people were afterwards with great labour inculcated Another reason also is to be added for the ordaining new Canons about this Festival The Heathen Emperours being haters of the Christian name provided by their Laws that the Christians should not have liberty on the Lords day to keep their meetings Which the wicked Edict of Dioclesian touching this thing informs us of How therefore would they observe out of the writers of that age all the mysteries of godliness to be performed on that day whenas not without great peril of life they did celebrate the Lords dayes not on the day time but on the night yet all Authors of any note as I said do acknowledge that the day it self was to be celebrated from the beginning of the Church and if they had had liberty they had executed the same offices of Religion on that day by which it was celebrated in the succeeding Church And these are the things for whose cause the Fathers of the succeeding Church being moved have treated more at large concerning the Lords day duties than those of the foregoing There remains one other rock upon which lest any dash I judge them also to be advertised Many of the Canons upon whose authority a great sort of the duties of Religion on that day to be performed do lean were set forth by Councils which were Provincial perhaps therefore some will object that none but the Churches of those Provinces are obliged to keep those Canons But indeed since the Decrees of Provincial Councils serve for the profit of the whole and not of any particular Church onely why should they not be received of other Churches professing the same Faith with them although not by vertue of any Provincials authority but of Divine truth albeit determined in a particular Province And since the reason of a Provincial Synods determination is universal why should not Canons so determined even in that respect oblige other Churches although not to undergo the punishment For the imposing of the punishment is particular where the Law in respect of equity may be general And whenas we see the authorities of particular Fathers to be esteemed amongst all we should be too partial towards them if we should set at nought the Canons of Provincial Councils at which several Fathers and Bishops were present unless some body will think that a sentence approved by the judgments of many be of less weight and authority than when it 's pronounced by one single person apart Because Pauls Epistles were written to particular Churches they are not therefore rejected of others for that in Gods intention they pertain to the Churches of all ages and Nations nor do they less agree with their moral state and condition than with those for whom they were primarily designed Moreover if in any Province there be Churches rightly constituted and according to the rule of Gods Word doubtless they are to be honoured with the name and title of Churches and the right hands of Christian fellowship are to be given them neither is there extant at this day a Church which upon occasion does not freely use the authorities of some Provincial Councils in confirming the truth to which yet this is by none imputed as a fault and why may not its assertors sometimes have liberty to use the Provincial authorities of Canons for propagating the truth about the Lords day The Orthodox Fathers anciently when any question arose by which the peace of the Church was disturbed did advise and mutually help one another The French Bishops in the case of communion with Felix consulted the Bishops of Rome and Millain whose Letters were read in the Council of Tauritan as appeareth by the fifth Canon of that Council The Spanish Bishops in the case of the Priscillianists profess they will not communicate with the lapsed although reclaimed without the consent of the Roman Bishop and Simplicianus of Millain Liberius Bishop of Rome writes to Athanasius and begs it of him before God and Christ that if he be of his mind he would subscribe his Epistle A pud Athanas p. 397. That was indeed a sweet communication and modest prudence in the ancient Bishops that one act and one consent should be kept according to Gods Laws amongst them all And hence it was that they entirely studied to use one common counsel about the profit of Church-administration and did not reject with a supercilious disdain that which seemed best to be done to their fellow Bishops although distant from them in other Provinces but the association of Priests although large was so coupled together with the glew of mutual-concord and bond of unity that one falling into danger the rest helped him Whatever therefore was thought just by Pastors of other Churches especially those that were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Petrus Alexandrinus sayes in Sozomen of the Roman Bishop although congregated in a Provincial Council or out of Council was by good desert not rejested of other Bishops of the same Faith but they helped one another by mutual counsels and labour Whence it follows that Canons ordained although in Provincial Councils about the Lords Festival are not to be rejected But I will stay no longer to take this remora out of the way One Objection remaineth which lest any thing be wanting to the knowledge of the truth must be prevented Some having no care of the Lords Festival do contend that the Fathers in those latter Councils do stick in small things and do mingle I know not what matters of little value with their Canons about observing the Lords solemnity for whose sakes they judge whole Canons to be nothing worth as in some Councils it 's
rural works have been slain with Lightning others punished with contraction of their limbs others having their bodies and bones also consumed in an instant by visible fire and on a sudden resolved into ashes have died in great torment as many other terrible judgments have been and to this day are by which it is declared that God is offended at the dishonour of so great a day These tremendous judgments of God do shew that God the avenger of all sin is angry as the Fathers speak at the impious violators of this solemnity But if the holy festival of the Lords Day were not Gods own ordinance his severe anger would not be so hot upon those that are guilty of the violation thereof We therefore of right do esteem the Lords Day above other dayes and that by reason of its solemnity because it was by a positive determination of Christ by the Apostles set apart from other days in the week that it might supply the room of the ancient Sabbath that it might preserve Religion and the external Worship of God both publick lest the disorderly congregating of the people should diminish their faith in Christ and also private that all might be obliged to attend meditations and pious exercises on a certain stated day which otherwise would seldome or never be done by men attending on the world rather than God therefore is the Lords day ordained that they being at liberty from worldly things might give up themselves wholly to Divine matters Lastly It only remaineth that this question may sufficiently be satisfied Whether it be in the Churches power to abrogate the Lords Day and substitute another in its room Surely he that saith that so innocent a custome so long received of the Church and that through authority of God by the Apostles caught not to be troubled with a change seems to be in the right unless any think that now greater authority doth reside in the Church than the Apostles were endued with wherewith it being endued it can change those things which were ordained of the Apostles or unless some greater occasion than the Resurrection of Christ do occurr than which the world never saw a greater miracle And Chrysostom calls the Lords day or the first day of the week Hom. 2. Tom. 6. because of Christs Resurrection the birth day of the whole humane nature Lastly if the custome of the Church from which arguments are not once fetched by the Apostle as 1 Cor. 11. 26. grounded on the word of God be of any right amongst Christians I see not why the Lords Festival celebrared first by them of Hierusalem secondly by them of Troas thirdly by the Galatians and Corinthians fourthly by them of the Isles Rev. 1. fifthly by the Greeks and Latines and lastly by the whole Churh through the world professing Christs name I say why this innocent custome which is attended with no incommodity but much profit happily continued from the very Apostles age hitherto should not be by us derived to our posterity Whilst Julius blames the preposterous irruption of Georgius the Arrian into the Bishoprick of Athanasius he uses this argument It is not fitting that this new manner of canons should be brought into the Church for where is there such an Ecclesiastical Canon or such an Apostolical tradition so we say here It is by no means fitting that a new custome should be introduced against an innocent order so long received by the Church which is neither supported by the Canons of the Church or tradition received from the Apostles None in this found mind can grant that things ordained by the Apostles can be changed of the Church I confess all the ordinances of the Apostles were not of the same kind for some of them pertained to Doctrine some to rites as Wallaeus observes chap. 7. those are perpetual neither any wayes obnoxious to change he must be anathematized that preacheth any other Gospel than what we have received from the Apostles Gal. 1. 8. but these which respect the rites or circumstances of Divine worship are of a double nature for either their causes were singular and such as perpetually should not have place in the Church therefore these ordinances were to be varied because when the cause was taken away the ordinances themselves ceased but other ordinances respecting rites were not to be changed whose occasions perpetually continued in the Church such was the laying on of hands in the ordinations of Ministers and therefore when the causes of ordinances made by the Apostles are changed the ordinations themselves are to be changed but while the cause remains the ordinances also remain unmoved Which things being considered it 's easie to see that the ordinance about the Lords day is not to be varied because no greater cause than what it 's bottomed on can ever occurr for whose sake it should be changed neither hath the Church ever thus far since the Apostles age once attempted this Therefore the foresaid question is superfluous that I may say no worse and altogether unworthy a farther answer especially whenas we know that many priviledges necessary for a Church to be founded were granted by God to the Apostles which were not derived from them to the Doctors of the Church founded for they were personal and could not lawfully be challenged by others which is shewn more at large in the seventh chapter CHAP. XI In what things the sanctification of the Lords day doth consist Where about resting from gainful labours which the Fathers carefully cautioned against that they should not be used on that day A place of Chrysostom Gregory and the Council of Laodicea is explained also a Canon of the Council of Matiscon WE have seen by the judgment of the Fathers that the Lords Day is to be sanctified and that by Divine authority Now it remaineth which we undertook in the third place to be proved to find out in what the solemn observation thereof consisteth The Fathers think that to Christians the Lords day succeeded in place of the old Sabbath and therefore as Hilary speaketh is to be celebrated with the festivity of the Sabbath that is as August Serm. de Temp. 251. even as the ancients observed the Sabbath Now it appeareth by the Scriptures of the Old Testament that the observation of the Jewish Sabbath consisted first in the rest and secondly in the sanctification of this rest and in the observation of these things their records will inform us that the Lords day was solemnized by the ancients As for the rest the Church of Christ hath used it not as necessary of it self to the worship of God but only as an help thereto without which the worship commanded of God could not conveniently be performed of the people For while men are intangled in the affairs of this world they cannot religiously attend as is fitting on the things that pertain to God and his worship The Sabbath was not allowed for idleness but that men
other interpreting of the law used under the former Temple besides that which the Prophets being extraordinarily called undertook Which opinion being once admitted it will not be easie to avoid the aforesaid incommodities as to any one it will appear by a more narrow search into them Unto whose conjecture we will with their good-leave oppose the authorities both of Jews and Christians in that particular being bottomed upon the Holy Scripture Flavius Josephus whom according to Cunaeus we are to believe next to the Pen-men of Holy Writ pleading the Cause of the Jews against Appion in his Apology which in the famous Cunaeus opinion is learned to a miracle in express words affirms that Moses would have us hear the Law not once or twice or oftner but he commands all men leaving their other works to meet together to hear the Law and perfectly to learn it c. Thus he And if this Ordinance of a weekly meeting to hear and learn the Law was in force in Moses age then was it long before the Babylonish Captivity While Philo Judaeus contends that the Playes and ridiculous spectacles of Fools and Dancers ought to be put away he saith that it was the manner to study Philosophy on Sabbath dayes the Prince going before and teaching what was needful to be done or spoken the rest giving ear Whereupon he also affirms that they now should play the Philosophers upon Sabbath dayes more patrio in their country manner and he acknowledgeth that Oratories in Cities were for Schools of Virtue More credit therefore is deservedly to be given to the Jewes relating their countrey customes than to other mens conjectures of them Among the Christians divers very learned men treating of the Hebrews Common-wealth have taught the same Amongst whom Carolus Sigonius de Rep. Hebraeorum l. 5. c. 10. and Cornelius Bertramus p. 96. The famous Cunaeus to whom the Christian Church is much beholden for his labours in explaining the antiquities of the Hebrews saith that the right observation of Sabbaths consisted in the holiness of all their words and deeds and in Divine worship and Prayers All which doth plainly evidence that they used to read the Law and interpret it to the peoples capacity on the Sabbath dayes otherwise neither their words nor deeds had been noted for holiness or how else could the minds of the Jews have been furnished piously to conceive Prayers on Sabbath dayes without the explaining of the Scripture Yea the Learned Cunaeus confesses that the Levites in the Synagogues did deliver to the people in the Towns of Judaea the chief knowledge of all Laws both of Humane and Divine things and when could the Levites do this with greater profit than on the Sabbath dayes In a word although we deny that at that time the Talmudical interpretation of Scripture was grown in use which we confess the ancient Church of the Jews knew nothing of yet we cannot affirm this of the vocal interpretation of the Scriptures by the Levites But to return to our purpose We find that under the Old Testament the Scriptures were read and opened in the Jews assemblie even the Holy Ghost being witness although some doubt of the period of time at which their interpretation on Sabbath dayes began As for the Churches in the New Testament planted by the Apostles they could not so long as their Peace was disturbed with a storm of Persecutions meet together without very great difficulty for which cause as we said Chap. 1. they had their meetings sometime on the night and sometimes on the day neither again was it safe for them to hold a meeting all the day For which cause Tertullian judges that it was best for Christians if the Lords dayes solemnities could not be celebrated on the day time for persecutions whereof he speaks then ought they to keep them on the night if not with every one of them yet at least with three These things teach us that the Church was not permitted in that age with safety and as often as they list to meet together on the day time to perform the exercises of piety He therefore that requires of us some one example for expounding Scripture twice while the fire of Persecution raged with which that age abounded I desire him to tell me whether the Christians did during that Persecution twice every Lords day keep their meetings For if it were safe for them to meet why may they not as well be believed to meâ—t for interpreting of Scripture and Prayer to God since these duties are joyned by the Apostle 1 Cor. 14. and observed by Cyprian as he faithfully expounded the Scriptures Especially when it was the custom of the Church so often as Scripture was read to interpret the same This we have largely enough shewn out of Justin Origen Tertullian Ambrose Augustine and other Fathers of great authority chap. 4. Since therefore in the Jewish Apostolical and other Churches succeeding the Apostles there followed after the reading of the Scriptures an exposition of them it seems necessarily to follow that if they had liberty to meet on Lords dayes then they used to treat twice out of Scripture of which there is frequent mention in their assemblies And it 's certainly evident from the continual practiâ—â— of the Church that from the very Apostles times prayers and reading were reckoned both together which were celebrated both morning and evening No man therefore can judge it unreasonable to say that there followed an interpretation of those things which were read because reading was used to instruct the people But how could the people be instructed in the Scripture read without an interpretation The Eunucâ— answered Acts 8. 31. that he could not understand what he read except some one should guide him Yea they were wont to Treat out of the Reading or Lesson as was formerly said The calamitous condition also of those times wherein so many cruel persecutions were stirred up required the same Daily exhortations were very needful to the Christians for to bear the Cross of the Gospel patiently Neither must we think that these skilful Pastours who were set over the Church by the Apostles and Apostolical men did not endeavour as often as they could to instruct the People committed to them in the matters of Faith St. Cyprian Ep. 40. professes that he was sore troubled when he could not go to and exhort every one as the Lords and his Gospel Ministry required while he was in his banishment If it were a grief to this vigilant Bishop that because being hindred by his exile he could not provoke all who were commended to his inspection and care by his holy Exhortations to piety and patience certainly when he was with his people if he took care that by a Reader the bare reading of the Gospel was recited to them although he stirred not them up by his Exhortations to practise what they had heard read he would never in very deed have thought
called did occurr therefore since he tarried there but only for one Sabbath it cannot be said he preached to them on one of the Sabbath◠neither is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as divers observe ever read in the New Testament for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It follows therefore from thence necessarily that Sabbatum should be taken for the whole week and then on one or the first of the Sabbaths will be all one In which sense that phrase occurrs else where as in Mar. 16. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. very early in the morning the first day of the week as in the ninth verse of the same chapter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there the Evangelist expounds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. one by the first And so the Greek Fathers next the Apostles times interpreted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Martyr Dial. cum Tryph. sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. One of the Sabbaths remaining the first of all the dayes according to number the spaces of all the dayes being run again into a circle is called the eighth and remaineth the first as it is p. 201. Chrysoft Hom. 43. in Act. Apostol expounds one of the Sabbaths by the Lords Day So Hieronymus Nor otherwise Augustine Ep. 86. One of the Sabbaths sayes he was then called that day which now is called the Lords which is more plainly found in the Gospel Some also by breaking of bread understand a private banquet not the Lords Supper of which doubt this seems to be the cause In that age the Christians meeting in the Church did sup together and also received the H. Eucharist and so both tables the common and sacred were joyned together as Chrysostom teaches Hom. 26. in 1 Cor. Upon set dayes they made common tables and when the assembly was ended after communion of the Sacraments they went to eat and drink together And hence it was as Chrysostom thinks that they Acts 20. 7. met to break common bread because when the communion was celebrated the common table followed and Chrysostom affirms in the beginning of that Hom. that the day on which they met was the Lords and that all things that there were done were joyned to preaching But the breaking of bread in the foresaid place is to be expounded of the Holy Eucharist for there were sundry there and Paul took bread not at Supper time but mid-night In that Text therefore the duties of a Christian Sabbath such are an holy assembly breaking of bread or admistration of the Lords Supper preaching of the Word devout Prayers c. are read to be performed of the Church on that day which holy duties were not performed of them on another day otherwise Paul having stayed there the space of seven dayes could not have deserred them to this day especially when he was to depart the day following neither doth Luke affirm the Apostle to have proclaimed this meeting of the Church as extraordinary because he was to depart the day after but he teacheth that the Church met namely as it was wont to break bread and not to take leave of the Apostle and St. Augustine consesses that Pauls departure was the express cause of continuing his speech because he desired sufficiently to instruct them The received custome therefore of the Church and not the blessed Apostles departure from Troas gave occasion to this assembly For he stayed there seven dayes not so much for the Eucharist as waiting for the Lords Day Whence it appears that that Text shews that the Apostolical Church kept solemnly the Lords Day in the publick exercises of Religion But upon what authority the Christians met on that day we will afterwards examine here it 's enough for me only to demonstrate that they did meet on that day The second Text out of which the celebration of the Lords Day is shown is 1 Cor. 16. 1. 2. Now concerning the collection for the Saints as I have given order to the Churches of Galatia even so do ye 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. upon the first day of the week c. The former place taught us that the Apostle Paul did celebrate the Lords Day with the Church this that he commands it to be celebrated by the Church And his practise is not here only recorded but here is mention made of his Apostolical ordination about that thing Where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must be taken distributively for upon the first day of every week In which Apostolical command nothing is commanded the Church of Corinth which is not also required of the whole Church of Christ according to the golden rule of Tertullian very profitable for understanding of the Scripture Some things saith he uttered specially are to be understood generally which rule cannot but have place in this Text because what things the Apostle writ to the Church of Corinth the same belong to all that call upon the name of Christ in every place he himself being witness 1 Cor. 1. 2. Moreover who will deny that all who have given their name to Christ are bound to relieve their necessities For you must not think sayes Chrysostom that these things were written to the Corinthians alone but to every one of us and all that shall be after us Let us do therefore as Paul prescribes us and let every one of us lay by him at home on the Lords Day the Lords riches i. to be employed for such use as the Lord hath prescribed and hereupon let it become a low and immutable custome c. Therefore in Chrysostoms judgment the Apostle applies the manner of the Church in collecting almes on the Lords Dayes for the benefit of afflicted brethren which were then at Hierusalem which office of Christian Charity although no brethren liv'd in that place ought not to be omitted of Christians but in Chrysostoms opinion is to be established by an inviolable law for ever as it was done even as it appears by Justin Martyr and Tertullians Apologies in the succeeding Church I only add this Although a general law for making collections on that day to the use of the poor be set down by the Apostle yet they that at this day do it at other times must not be judged transgressors of the Apostles law That kind of collection was not so affixed to the Lords Day as it could not be done on other dayes although a peculiar reason was in it why they did rather on that than another day namely for the Church-assemblies held at that time and no time as Chrysostom witnesseth which we shall see afterwards is more fit to perform that office on than the Lords Day Others again set to another Engine by which they oppose the usual interpretation of the Apostles foresaid phrase and contend that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie every day of the week singulam Sabbatum This they assert not because it 's the probable construction of the Apostles words but that they might
some do daily partake of the Lords blood and body on the Lords day which all the ancients do witness was done in the Church-assembly and others only on the Sabbath and Lords day and in other places only on the Lords day Hierom acknowledges the Christians did observe Quartam Sabbati Parasceven and the Lords day although he shews they differed from the Jews in the observation of those dayes The testimonies of the Fathers hitherto mentioned do shew that although the use of the Lords day grew every where yet the Church had in some places oftener in others more rarely their weekly meetings whereupon it seemed equal and just to some to ordain other dayes which the succeeding Church proclaimed for publick meetings to be equallized with the Lords day and that chiefly for three causes first the publick meetings of the Church were held on other dayes besides the Lords Secondly the Christians were bound to the same duties of Religion on other dayes appointed by the Church for meetings which were required by the Church on the Lords day Lastly some Feasts the Anniversary namely were more esteemed in the Church than the Lords and these things are confidently enough affirmed that they might shew if by any means they could that the original and obligation of the Lords day and other Festivals is the same both which they set forth to the world for humane but let them look to it to whom they affirm it lest they be twit with that of Ezek. 43. 8. But that the prerogatives of the Lords Day above others may more clearly appear let us by Gods help weigh of what value the reasons are with which they contend for other feasts to be equallized with the Lords day which that it may be done with plainness we will first clearly distinguish the Church-assemblies held on the Sabbath dayes from others which were held on the Lords day relying upon the gravest testimonies of the ancients then by Gods assistance we will shew the peculiar excellency of the Lords Day for the dignity whereof it is superiour to other dayes while others contend against it in vain First we affirm that excepting the Lords there was no other weekly we speak of stated and ordinary holy day with the whole Church next the Apostles We have heard in the first Chapter that the Christians met on the first day of the week and for the allegations in this chapter out of the Fathers and Historians for the observation of the Sabbath they cannot demonstrate that the Sabbath was observed by the Christian Church as an holy day which unless it be first explicated they that peruse the records of the Ancients will haply fall into a troublous matter After the Apostles death Socrates Sozomen Epiphanius Hieronymus Augustine and if there be any more say that the Church in the publick assembly did perform the duties of piety as the Sabbaths came about yet whoever shall say that the Sabbath was neither accounted holy nor equalled to the Lords day will do no wrong to the truth Who will say the Sabbath is holy when in the holy Records a tittle cannot be read of its institution or observation in the Christian Church as is of the Lords day but that the Lords day was instituted of the Apostles indued with extraordinary power and moved by the Holy Ghosts inspiration we will afterwards by the Grace of God inform you Yea let him tell who can that the Christians in the Apostles age met by themselves on Sabbath dayes which thing yet they did on the Lords dayes is apparent enough from the Scriptures but after the Apostles death I deny not that the Christians met together on Sabbath dayes although they accounted not the Sabbath holy and those assemblies were chiefly in use with the Oriental people according to some because the Jews dispersed in the Orient and accustomed to the Sabbatical solemnity could not easily be contented to be plucked from it although they observed the Lords Day which what is it else to do but brand them with Ebionism or as Baronius thinks because certain Hereticks reproached the Sabbath that the God of the Hebrews whom they called Evil rested on that day therefore they fasted on the Sabbath Contrariwise the Catholicks not Judaizing but that they might worship him as God the Father Creator of heaven and earth with a solemn celebrity said that in honour of him the Sabbath as well as the Lords day to the glory of Christ ought to be celebrated Thus they To whom Vedelius in his notes on Ignatius's tenth Epistle numb 6. doth answer Learnedly and Orthodoxly enough Or because the Sabbath hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. a regard of creation as is defined in the Constitutions which they call the Apostles But how much these kind of conjectures are to be valued that are supported with no reasons of any authority or genuine testimonies of the Fathers let others judge It 's without controversie that the Oriental Christians and others did at that time hold assemblies on the Sabbath day although upon what reasons they were chiefly moved to this it is not well enough known by the Writers of that age Yet did they not hold the Sabbath day holy The difference of the Eastern from the Western Church in observing the Sabbath teacheth this while the Oriental people kept holy day on the Sabbath most in the West fasted I say the most of them because they of Millain though in the West and divers others of the West were not attentive to fast on Sabbath dayes but dined soberly Ambrose had a custome to dine on the Sabbath Witness Paulinus Ambrose confesseth this of himself in Augustine Augustine acknowledgeth he dined on the Sabbath without superstitious vacation Ep. 86. Yet the Roman Church and some others and at length every where even they of the East fasted on the Sabbath These things about those who fasted on the Sabbath do not declare that they acknowledged it for a Feast or holy day on which fasting was altogether to be forborn according to the custome of the Church Aug. Ep. 86. and other Authors being witnesses yet that the Lords day was accounted holy at that time is granted of all Moreover the Sabbath was not every where amongst the Christians observed with that solemnity of the Church as the Lords day For the meetings were not held in the same manner on Sabbaths as on the Lords dayes Some things touching both observed out of the Fathers will shew this 1. What things are reported of Historians and others about observing the Sabbath touching gathering assemblies were not used in every Church every where For in the Churches of Rome and Alexandria the manner of meeting on the Sabbath held not Witness Sozom. Hist l. 7. c. 19. and afterwards in other Churches it grew out of use Athanasius Hom. de semente glorieth that he never medled with the Sabbath after the Jews manner namely Tertul.
de Idol cap. 14. saith the Sabbaths are extraneous to Christians and that Holy dayes were sometime time beloved of God The Nazaraei observing the Sabbath are branded for Heresie by Epiphanius l. 1. num 30. and likewise the Ebionites If it had been the Christians duty to observe Sabbaths why had the Catholicks imputed its observation as a fault to the Hereticks which yet they have done more than once as sure as sure can be But Christians have celebrated their Lords day every where without brand of heresie or any other crime and therefore since the festivity of the Sabbath was not every where in use with the Christian Church nor doth any where occurr any Apostolical ordination for continuing it in the Church we do by good right affirm that Christians are not obliged to its celebration which to affirm of the Lords day that was observed in the Apostles age and ever after is an heirrous thing 2. When meetings were held on Sabbath dayes they met not weekly on all Sabbaths as they came about for on one Sabbath publick Conventions were to be omitted if we may believe the foresaid Constitutions so it 's ordained Constit Ap. lib. 5. cap. 19. and what that is they explain the Sabbath in the great week Constit Ap. c. 24. lib. 7. The Sabbath of the Lords burial on which it's fit we should fast but not celebrate a festival So also August to Casulanus Ep. 86. but for the omitting Church-assemblies on the Lords day as often as it came about and were safe for the Church for the Persecution of the Tyrants we read nothing was ever ordained of the ancients There is a sanction in the same Constitutions that the Lords day should be celebrated without intermission Lib. 7. cap. 31. 3. In populous Cities where without dammage to their Estates they could be present at reading of Scripture and their interpretation meetings were more frequently kept Therefore the Council of Laodicea decrees that the Gospels should be read on the Sabbath Can. 16. Ambrose treated of Prayer the same day de Sacram. lib. 4. c. 6. But all the exercises of piety were not every where performed in those assemblies that yet were not omitted on the Lords day Augustine saith in another place On the Lords day only the Communion of the Lords Body and Blood is used Socrates doth not record that they of Alexandria and Rome did celebrate those mysteries on the Sabbath While Chrysostom requireth it of the rich Lords of Villages that they build Churches in them Hom. 18. in Act. he distinguisheth those congregations that were on other days from those that were held upon the Lords day Upon those Congregations Prayers and hymns were had in these an oblation was made on every Lords day and for that cause the Lords day is in Chrysostom called dies panis i. the day of bread Athanasius purgeth himself of a calumny imputed to him for breaking the cup because it was not the time of administring the holy mysteries for it is not saith he the Lords day Whence it is evident that the Lords Supper was administred on the Lords dayes otherwise the argument wherewith Athanasius purgeth himself were of no weight Although therefore they met upon the Sabbath day yet did they not every where observe it equally to the Lords day on which they celebrated all the mysteries of Religion 4. The people were free to be present or absent from Sabbath-day meetings as they saw good that is they were not obliged by any necessity of law to meet on that day for the Sabbatarii contending for a necessary observation of the seventh day were of the whole Christian Church condemned of heresie in this behalf as I have briefly shewn before I confess Origen reproves his hearers which came seldom to hear the Word of God that scarce did come to the Church on Feast dayes Gregory Nyssen in that Oration which he made against those that would scarce endure reproofs nips the people that met not on the Sabbath With what eyes saith he lookest thou on the Lords Day that despisest the Sabbath Dost thou not know that these dayes are Sisters that if thou reproach the one thou offendest the other But he speaks of those who had oftener liberty to meet for hearing the Word which they regarded not to embrace out of a certain supine negligence or being puffed up with pride despised the Church-meetings on Sabbath-dayes Whether it was the sluggishness or arrogance of these men it was deservedly blameable whenas they might divers dayes meet at Church without dammage of their worldly affairs which yet to do they were not easily moved although the duties of their calling would bear it In the old Testament some hours in a week were consecrated to Gods Worship Numb 28. 3. but yet all the day long the whole people of Israel should not attend on the holy duties of piety this was only enjoyned to them that could commodiously do it So in the Churches planted by the Apostles they met on other dayes as often as they could besides the Lords dayes but on the Lords dayes appointed for this end they were bound to be present at the publick assemblies and their absence for a certain time from these on the Lords day was to be reprehended by the sentence of the first Concil Eliberitan Can. 21. And yet where are any Canons established for punishing their absence from Sabbathday-meetings Although the Fathers do often reprove those that come seldome on the Sabbath and other dayes to hear the Word 5. Although on the Sabbath dayes they might meet to hear the holy Oracles of God yet when that dayes meetings were ended they might not be idle but an Anathema is denounced to them that work not on that day Conc. Laodic Can. 29. Ignatius in an Epistle to the Magnesians exhorts them to spend the Sabbath in labours without rest and therefore the Sabbath had not its vacation from labours So Athan. de semente Ambros Ep. 72. which we never read was ordained of the Lords day on which it's a sin to give our selves to labour And let these things suffice for the Lords dayes prerogatives above the Sabbath by which we find that the Sabbath day was not kept holy of the Church i. e. the ancients did not separate it from common use and labour nor consecrate it wholly to God in an holy rest that on it the acts of Divine Worship and those things that pertain to a spiritual life should only be exercised neither were the conventions on that day to be compared with those held on the Lords day which things surely once to define had been much to our profit For the Institution of other dayes to hold meetings on it 's not needful to take much pains since we have nothing writ of it in the Word of God as of the Lords day and many things which were not instituted of the Apostles but first arose in
particular Churches were introduced by little and little into other which at length in process of time are made more common which Socrates ascribes to the Bishops of divers Churches and those that received such rites from the Bishops transmitted them as a law to Posterity as in other things so in the meetings of the Church it 's to be observed whose original was not used by the Church in the Apostles age Epiphanius in Panario tells us of Synaxes Ecclesiae quarta Prosabbato Dominico fartas Constantine the Great ordained by Law the Parasceve to be celebrated of which nothing is yet extant in Scripture but Sozomen seems to touch upon the cause of its institution who sayes that Constantine gave great honour to the holy Cross both for the help that was brought him in managing his wars against his enemies through its vertūe and also for the heavenly Vision that was offered him about it which things teach us that Constantine if we may say so of so godly an Emperour did very superstitiously worship the Cross whence it happened that he attributed more to the Cross than was fitting and for that cause instituted that day to be set a part for meetings in memorial of Christs Passion on that day accomplished Yet who will from that sanction compare the observation of that day ordained of Constantine and not of the Apostles with the Lords day which was long before Constantines dayes observed of the Church which we must take for certain did so often meet to hear the word of God as it fitly could Afterwards we shall see that the Fathers did treat to their people out of the Scriptures almost every day yet I trust none will equallize every day on which these assemblies were holden to the Lords day But these assemblies were free neither was the universal Church obliged by any law to keep them which yet we acknowledge of the Lords day therefore I will add no more of them And from what hath been said the attentive Reader will easily perceive that no day was observed of the whole Catholick Church with that solemnity that the Lords day was and that on the Sabbath day the Christians did not intermit their ordinary labours Now having gotten out of a very troublesome disputation I hasten to that which in the third place I thought to enquire about namely Whether Anniversary Feasts were observed of the Church with greater solemnity than the Lords day as some think especially because amongst the ancients they were sometimes equalled to the Lords day and sometimes far preferred to it From the Passover-holy-dayes until Pentecost being intentive on Prayers they did no more bend the knees than on the Lords dayes yea the answer in Justin affirms the same things that Pentecost was in equal power with the Lords day The same is ordained in the twentieth Canon Conc. Nic. 1. Mention also is made of this custome in other Fathers Basil de S. Sancto cap. 27. Tertul. de corona milit cap. 3. Hieron advers Luciferianos Aug. Epist 118. cap. 15 17 c. From their freedom from kneeling some conclude the equality of these dayes which I acknowledge was interdicted on those dayes and they were glad for their immunity at that time from their Fasts and yet I do not think that those dayes are to be compared with the Lords Verily if these prerogatives had constituted an holy day they that for this cause judge the dayes of Pentecost to be equalled to the Lords had said something but if they so think I doubt not at all but they are mistaken and what St. Austin sometime answered Urbicus disputing against those that dined on the Lords day is hither to be referred Austin concludes the Lords day must be preferred to the Sabbath for the faith of the Resurrection not for custom of refection that is they prefer not the Lords day to the Sabbath because they remit fasting on it which yet they do not on the Sabbaths but because it was declared to the Christians to be the Lords day by the Resurrection of the Lord and thereupon began to have its own festivity So we say here the dayes of Pentecost are not to be compared with the Lords Day although as well on those as on this the time was passed without bowing and fastings because the ordination whereby bowing and fasting were interdicted them was merely humane Austin thinks it is not defined by the Lords command or the Apostles on what dayes to fast and not many ages since while the Lords solemnity remained in the Church that ordination was vanisht No body therefore that 's alwaies one can by right compare the solemnity of Pentecost with the Lords whose institution afterwards we will prove Divine neither is there in the places cited made any comparison of that with this amongst the Fathers but only in regard of that immunity Ambrose saith For these fifty dayes the Church knoweth not fasting as the Lords day Afterwards he addeth they are all as the Lords day because upon them as he said as on the Lords day there was a relaxation of fasting After the same manner are Justin Martyr and Tertullian de cor mil. to be understood That I may therefore dispatch in a word if the Lords day had not been celebrated in the Apostles age and if it had been honoured with no other prerogatives than immunity from bowing and fasting then certainly they would have equallized them to this day but that this is false even as the Proverb is the blearcyed and barbers know and so they conclude arguing like Sophisters from that which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ad 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And thus far of the equality of some dayes with the Lords which some men dream of It will farther also be worthy our consideration to know whether some Feasts which they call anniversary were preferred of the Church to the Lords day To those that think thus it is enough to answer them once after this manner Whereas we cannot read that the Holy Ghost in Scripture affords a testimony to the institution or observation of these they are to be received as humane institutions which omitting others may be cleared by this one argument If those feasts had been instituted of the Apostles then they had been observed every where by the Church in the same manner and time according to the rule of Vincentius Lirinensis yet the contrary doth plainly appear by Ecclesiastical Writers and Fathers which it will not be irksome to demonstrate in some of them If the Feast of the Passover had been ordained by the law of Christ or his Apostles sayes the learned Chamier then that law had unanimously been propounded of the Apostles and accordingly celebrated of all Churches in the same manner at least at the beginning But that is not to be found which the unhappy controversie about this matter whereby the concord of divers Churches hath wonderfully been interrupted sheweth
no punishments be deterred from celebrating the same but when they were by the Heathens carried to punishment they demanded of the Christians whether they had kept the Lords day as we may see in the Acts of the Martyrs by Baronius As sometimes the bloudy Papists when other arguments failed wherewith they might stop the Protestants mouths who with singular dexterity and great acuteness of wit being happily illuminated with a notable light of the Scripture did refute their dotages at length setting upon them with this Question would fish out what their opinion was of the Sacrament of the Altar as they speak incongruously whereupon then as they desired they might have a pretence to pronounce them guilty of death according to the cruel laws enacted by them so the Heathens asked of the Christians whether they had been at their Collect and kept the Lords day and when they confessed they had been at the Collect and celebrated the Lords day with a congruous devotion of Religion as St. Dativus then had they whereupon to threaten the sentence of cruel death against them inasmuch as having done against the Emperours command Yet the Martyrs answered to this Question with an unanimous consent that they could not intermit the Lords day because they were Christians and the Law namely of God as the Martyrs themselves expound it num 51. not of the Church as is noted by Baronius in the margin num 48. had warned them to keep it So the Martyrs But it will be for the Readers profit here more throughly to weigh what it is Dominicum agere or celebrare especially for the sake of Baronius's candor in rehearsing the Acts of these Martyrs he contendeth that by Collecta Collectio and Dominicus in the Acts of the Martyrs must alwayes be understood the sacrifice of the Mass but whoever shall look more narrowly into their acts will easily perceive that Baronius's Gloss deceives the Reader Dominicum agere and Dominicum celebrare in the acts of the Martyrs are both one and this is that I may use Hieroms words the same as if they should say they celebrate the Lords day having received the Lords body or according to Tertullian it is to celebrate the Lords solemnities which by the succeeding Church were called Solemnities appointed by God So in Concil Tarraconensi Can. 4. And those were celebrated of the Church being gathered together Tertullian witnessing it in the place fore-cited and were all the exercises of Religion which Baronius foolishly following the use of his age comprehendeth under the name of the Mass altogether unknown to the Church of that age dedicated to Divine Worship and performed on the Lords day in whose number the administration of the Lords Supper is reckoned which in those first times was oftentimes celebrated every Lords day but never without other publick duties of Christian Religion of which solemnities more hereafter by the Grace of God when we treat of the Sanctification of this day Let this for the present suffice the Reader that the Martyrs being asked by the Proconsul de Dominico answer se Dominicum egisse and we meet with Dominicum in the African Writers for the Lords day Cyprian Ep. 33. saith of Aurelius an ordained Reader Dominico legit where without doubt he meaneth the Lords day It is sometimes put for the place that 's set aside for the Church to meet in comest thou in Dominicum without a sacrifice saith Cyprian de opere eleemosynis Sometimes also for the Symboles of the Lords Supper Numquid saith Cyprian Dominicum post coenam celebrare debemus In the foresaid Acts of the Martyrs the word Dominicum is taken in all its significations whenas therefore they answer se Collectam Dominicam egisse what can it be else but as they add that se ad Scripturas Dominicas legendas in Dominicum i. e. there was a publick meeting for the Church although for the Persecution they met in private houses because as they answer they were all present aderat prebyter convenisse or ex more Dominica Sacramenta celebrasse Num. 36. that is all the Mysteries of Christian Religion at that time prohibited of the Heathen Emperours were faithfully performed on the Lords Dayes in the assemblies of the Christians For when any thing is opposed to a negative command we must consider it from the nature of the thing forbidden therefore the genuine sense of this phrase Dominicum agere Dominicum celebrare in Dominicum convenire c. in the Acts of the Martyrs cannot better be demonstrated than from the very words of the Emperours edict in which charge is given for burning the Scriptures destroying the Temples and prohibiting the Christians meetings which they celebrated on the Lords day Saturninus because he gathered together the Martyrs against the Emperours Mandates was brought to punishment When therefore the Proconsul demands of them Why Dominicum egissent c it is the same as if he should ask Why they kept their meetings as the Proconsul himself expresseth it or Dominicam Collectam egissent in which the duties of piety were observed And when were such sort of meetings kept but at that time whereon the congregations of the common people were made as Austin of the same Martyrs in breviculo Collationis tert diei cap. 4. that is but upon the Lords dayes according to the command of Christ and the custome of the Church founded upon this command and in those meetings of the Martyrs they did perform all the rites and offices of their Religion entirely for which cause as I said they were aceused namely because Collectam Dominciam celebrarunt i. e. they met or synaxes egerunt in the Lords name to celebrate the Lord on the Lords day Dominicum i. e. the offices of the Christian Liturgy which were prohibited by the Imperial edict under the name of a meeting as they expound it afterâ—â—â—d cum fratribus celebrarunt namely ad Scripturas Dominicas legendas in Dominicum convenerunt Dominica Sacramenta ex more celebranda idque ex authoritate legis Dei These are the excellent offices of Piety which were performed of them with the greatest devotion 〈…〉 Religion although they were interdicted by the Emperour for whose sake as I said they were complained of by the Proconsul From which things it 's plain to any that Dominicum agere or celebrare is the same amongst the Martyrs that Dominica solemnia celebrare was to their Countrey-man Tertullian whose Phrase doth in a Parallel answer to this of the Martyrs or to perform solemnities for the honour of God on the Lords day By what hath been said it is also manifest that the authority of the Lords Day was great in the Church because the Christians would not intermit the celebrating of it according to the law prescribed them by God although they were straitly forbidden of the Emperours upon great danger of life
celebrate the Sabbath He grants then that the Sabbaths observation was according to the law of Nature that is that it was constituted by God at the Creation of Nature St. Austin sayes also that the Jews acknowledge that God sanctified a day since which he began as it were to rest from his labours So Solomon Iarchi in Gen. 26. By whom is cited R. Simson in Is 58. Aben Ezra in Exod. 20. Da. Kimchi Manasses Ben-Israel in Deut. 5. and all the Doctors of the Jews excepting Maimonides These things shew that the Jews had knowledge that the Sabbath was observed from the Creation from whom the observation of the Sabbath was very well known to the inhabitants of the whole World Of the Christians also divers both antient and modern were of this opinion a few of whose testimonies we will lightly touch Theophilus Antiochenus lib. 2. ad Antolicum saith That God finished the work that he made on the seventh day and blessed the seventh day and sanctified it because on it he rested from every work he made c. He saith not that God did consecrate the seventh day that afterwards only it might be sanctified of the Israelitish Church but so soon as the work of Creation was consummate the seventh day was of God both blessed and sanctified Afterwards he acknowledges that the seventh day was solemnized amongst all men which the Hebrews call the Sabbath and Greeks the seventh day although most know not the cause of that name And what cause was unknown to the most namely the holy resting of God on that day and its sanctification whereof Theophilus made mention a little before Tertullian saith that Christ fulfilled the Law while he made the Sabbath day which was holy from the beginning by the blessing of the Father more holy by his own doing good on it Cyprian confesseth that the Seventh day Holy day from the Creation of the world obtained authority because in six dayes Gods works were finished and the seventh consecrated to rest as holy and sanctifying honoured with a solemnity of vacation and entitled to the sanctifying Spirit Lactantius is of the same opinion God finished the world and this admirable work of the Creation in six dayes space and then ordained the seventh day whereon he rested from his works This is the Sabbath day Lactantius therefore fetcheth the sanctification of the Sabbath from the Creation and not from the History of Manna St. Athanasius saith that God rested when he had finished the former Creation and therefore the men of that generation observed the Sabbath on the seventh day Where he acknowledges that the Sabbath was observed from the Creation till Christ for he saith that all men of that generation did observe the Sabbath where he speaketh of the whole time from the beginning of the world till Christ Greg. Nyssen Lo here is for thee the Sabhath blessed from the beginning of the world mark it by that Sabbath this Sabbath the day of rest which God hath blessed above other dayes Chrysost God hath blessed and sanctified that day What is it that he hath sanctified it he hath set it apart from other dayes After when he tells us the cause why he hath sanctified it he addeth because on that he rested from all his works which God began to make Now God intimateth to us this Doctrine from the beginning teaching us that within the compass of a week one whole day is to be set apart and spent in spiritual work Therefore according to Chrysostom the Sabbath Day since the Creation was set apart from other dayes and plainly it appears that for that ordination the world is bound to dedicate one whole day of the week to the worship of God Aug. ult cap. postrem lib. de Civitate Dei while he is describing that everlasting Sabbath which the Saints shall enjoy in heaven he referrs the institution of the Sabbath to the resting of God from the work of creation He doth the like in Epist. ad Casulanum where he saith that God sanctified the seventh day when he rested on it from all his works and afterwards gave command about its observation to the Hebrew people Augustine therefore doth acknowledge that the use of the Sabbath was amongst the ancients before it grew common amongst the Hebrews namely first at the beginning before Moses and afterwards in the Church of the Jews Theodoret. He hath bestowed a blessing on the seventh day instead of creating lesâ— that day only above others should want its hoâ— nour and he hath put Hallowed it foâ— set it apart And afterwards In blessing the seventh day he hath shown that he thought it not an unprofitable and superfluous day but hath ordained it to be applied to rest Who doth not see that in Theodorets opinion from the beginning the Sabbath was set apart for the worship of God from other dayes So when he answers the question why he commanded not the Sabbath to be celebrated on another day because the God of all hath created every thing in six dayes but on the seventh day he made nothing but honoured this day with a blessing as it is added in six dayes the Lord thy God made Heaven and Earth and rested the seventh wherein he teaches us that even then this day was consecrated of God to rest and sanctification from the beginning of the world Alexander Hales affirmes that the Sabbath before the Law was observed of the Fathers and of the same opinion are divers of the Schoolmen Now if any have a mind to reckon up the grave opinions of the aforesaid Fathers he will not deny that the Sabbath day was solemnly kept from the very beginning of the world because by the judgment of them all the Sabbath was sanctified by God nor do the Fathers speak of the purpose of God as though it was not then really set apart for the worship of God but according to his purpose it was only destined for this that after two thousand years it should be set apart for this end for say they when God had finished his work of Creation the Sabbath was sanctified from the beginning or from the creation of the world when he had rested from his works from the Creation till Christ c. and therefore they acknowledge that the Sabbath day was solemnized amongst all men or all men of the former generation that is from the beginning of the world till Christ a long time before its use was established amongst the Jews All these things are affirmed in round words by the Fathers Out of which it clearly appears that one day of the week was alwayes set apart to the worshipping of God publickly And as the best of the ancients were of this opinion so the chief of our late writers that have flourished in the Reformed Churches do affirm that God did from the beginning of the world sanctifie the seventh day for his
ordained that what sometime the Priest Abimelech asked of David 1 Sam. 21. 4. that should 〈…〉 done by Christians on the Lords Day So in the Council of Friuli Can. 13. this is reputed by some for a trifle Concerning which thing it yet troubled not St. Paul to make a Canon for the married in case of Prayer and Fasting 1 Cor. 7. 5. Put for that part of Friuli's Canon wherein it 's ordained to abstain from our Wives on that day whether it was added by the Fathers or foisted into the Canon by some Sciolist on the Marginal explication of a Carnal work I dispute not I onely assert this if it be their grief that trifles repugnant to the Word of God are obtruded on the Church of Christ in this I commend and accept very well their temper who set at nought whatever point is dissonant from the Holy Soâ—iptures however approved in the judgments of many men but if under the name of trifles as they call them they shall reject those Canons that contradict not the reverend authority of writers I cannot approve their fact in this at least I would be taught this thing of them which they may find out by the whole huge Volume of Councils All the things therein ordained are not approved now adayes by all and yet those Councils are not therefore rejected by wise men Some things enacted in the first Council of Nice which have come to our hands if the authentick acts of the Council have not perished through the injury of time or cunning of the Arrians are over orude which savour not of Athanasius Ofius or Paphnatius's wit and other approved Fathers which were present at the Council and which things are now also antiquated shall we therfore judge all things in the reverend Council which hath so many witnesses to be rejected far be it from us In that Council also it 's ordained that there must be no bowing of the knees on the Lords Dayes or from the Passover to Pentecost in pouring out prayers to God Perhaps there will be some that will think this ordinance worthy derision rather than observation who will not yet for that cause reject the Council Once in a Council at Trulla Spiritual affinity as they call it was forbidden yea there we read an injunction for the fifth Canon says 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. for avoiding ridiculous jesters and other spectacles at any time but at this day they esteem it a trifling Canon who judge those tumblers to be rejected not alwayes but even on the very Holy day do permit Christian people to be present at the childish arts of tumblers when the publick exercises of Religion are ended and yet they refuse not all the Canons of that Council I can bring forth many more other examples of Canons determining small matters but I 'le spare this labour At least I add but this when in Provincial Councils of every Province Questions were handled Conc. 1. Constantinop Can. 2. T. 1. p. 510. and nothing was brought to the General Council but what could not fitly be determined in the Provincial it was needful for the Fathers to determine of the propounded questions of what kind or weight soever they were and so if any minute things which by some are reckoned trifles do occurr in the Canons they are rather to be ascribed to others who propounded them to the Fathers assembled in Council than to them determining of them These are the rocks which in the following Treatise by Gods help shall be more clearly explained in their places of which things most courteous Reader I judged it expedient to admonish thee before I dismiss thee to read it over lest in any place thou be at at a stand In which things having briefly prefaced by Gods assistance I hasten to my purpose THE Lords-Day THE FIRST BOOK In which is demonstrated the Solemnity and Antiquity of the Lords Day CHAP. 1. That to the Solemn Worship of God a determined time is necessary Concerning the Assemblies of the Apostles and how the Apostles and other Christians were present in the Jewish Synagogues on the Sabbath Day THat some certain time is to be assigned by Divine Institution on which men ceasing from common affairs are diligently to bend themselves to Divine Worship for Gods glory and the Churches good although no Religion be placed in Holy-dayes I think to be without controversie the custome received amongst Nations of all Ages that namely at a stated time and upon certain dayes all should meet to invocate and worship that Deity which they took for their supreme doth witness this and reason it self doth require the same Conventions also for performing exercises of Piety were alwayes used by the Christian Church in which said exercises it practised what pertained to godliness and the worship of God for which cause the Apostle Heb. 10. 25. allows not of that readiness in Christians to forsake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i.e. that coming to the Synagogue or meeting together and if Christ disdained not to come himself to the Temple and the Jews Synagogues 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luk. 4. 16. 1. As his custome was who will he be that shall think the places dedicated for the Churches assemblies are not to be gone unto by Christians But the necessity which Chrysostom at large decyphers de verbis Isaiae of these Assemblies of which more afterwards being admitted we must at this time briefly enquire out the fit season without which the exercise of Divine worship cannot fitly be acted in them for holding of them for the best sign of the time which was solemnized by the Church must be observed from the publick conventions which were held for performing of the Duties of Religion The time assigned for Divine worship amongst the ancient Christians was either extraordinary or ordinary solemnly to celebrate the extraordinary time they were called upon only by an extraordinary occasion when it sell out so while the Apostles were living Luke tells us Acts 12. that many were gathered together in Maries house during St. Peter's imprisonment and for his sake poured out Prayers continually 10 God the occasion of which convention was extraordinary yet did they not therefore intermit the ordinary time of meeting the ancient writers do also witness that such were the meetings of the Christians after the Apostles times when a just occasion was offered who as often as persecutions or publick calamities sell out they then joyned Prayers in their meetings congregated on that occasion and so as it were by making a band in their Prayers to God they compassed him about as they prayed which thing we read was done by the Apostles and Church Acts 4. 23. 31. When the Elders of the People forbad the Apostles they should not preach Christ the Church poured forth Prayers to God The ordinary time for the exercises of Piety was at which they attended Divine worship upon a stated and determinate day to
them out furnished with special authority to gather the Church to lay whose foundations belong to the Apostolical dignity out of the promiscuous multitude of all nations and so they were sent out by Christ to all Nations without any exception for which cause when a Church was planted in any part of the world whither they came they fixed not but removed some other way Thirdly They were endued with that abundance of Grace of the Holy Ghost for the Ministry committed to them by the Lord that they preached the truth of the Gospel infallibly I know sayes Hierom how to esteem of the Apostles in one manner of other Doctors after another that those alwayes taught the truth these in some things did erre as men Whence the Doctrine commended to the Church by the Apostles was alwayes accounted for the rule and Canon of all Christian Religion Fourthly The Apostles at the beginning of the Church by the visible sign of imposition of hands conferred the gifts of the Holy Ghost upon others that were instructed of them in the Doctrine of the Gospel and they were endued with divers other gifts of Miracles by which their call was rendred clear both to themselves and others Matth. 10. 8. And these are the signs by which the blessed Apostle teaches us that he had executed the office of a true Apostle in the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 12. 2. Deservedly for these causes were they that were elected to the honourable state of Apostolical dignity preferred to other Ministers of the Church not only in the chief eminency of Order but of Power and hence it was that all questions respecting the affairs of the whole Church were propounded to be discussed by the Apostles whom all the Churches consulted in doubtful cases as may be seen Acts 15. 2. 1 Cor. 7. 1. and whatever they determined the whole Church every where embraced which made a conscience of departing a fingers breadth from those things that were committed to them by the Apostles If therefore the solemnity of the Lords Day was celebrated while the Apostles were living which the Scriptures testifie was done as we have seen chap. 2. it must of right chiefly be imputed to their ordination otherwise without doubt the Universal Church had not followed it Baronius thinks that all who are well in their wiâ—â— will say that since it is found that it was done in the Apostles times it could not be ordained and commanded to be kept of any other but of themselves Neither is any thing worthy consideration brought to the contrary except it be because the Blessed Apostles have left no singular command with the Church for the observation of this day although he that shall attend their practise may lawfully deny this since their example and practise hath the force of a precept But who will deny that some things were instituted of the Apostles in the Church whose use while they were alive I pass not for Traditions introduced into the Church when the Apostles were dead was grown out with the primitive Christians of whose first institution or necessary continuation afterwards no precept is extant in the Scriptures yet who will be bold to extenuate the authority of these commands or will affirm that the Church at this day is not obliged to observe them because their observation being mentioned in Scripture is as it were a command by vertue whereof the Church is bound to continue them The thing will be more plain by examples The Apostles ordained Deacons Act. 6. and Elders in every Church Act. 14. 23. In the Ordinations of all Ministers imposition of hands was used but where is there extant an express commanâ— from Christ for perpetuating the ordination of those the institution of these or for the use of this ceremony yet none doubts but that the Apostles in performing of these were acted by a Divine instinct of the Spirit and that the Church at this day is bound to them by vertue of Apostolical institution But that I may briefly shew that the blessed Apostles and no others were the authors of this solemnity that which follows may suffice If it were observed while they were yet living which the Scriptures do evidently enough manifest it is deservedly to be ascribed to their ordaining it for it was either instituted by them and their authority or by some other Doctors of the Church without their consent a third way is not given the latter whereof is absurd and never to be admitted of any exercised in the Christian Faith because the Apostolical authority as formerly we have abundantly enough shewn was supreme in the Church it belonged to them to declare to the Christian flock what was best to be done in all things and not to the Church to prescribe them Statutes and Laws Why therefore did it not appertain to the Apostles the faithful founders of the Church amongst other things to commend this also to the Church and not to the Church to prescribe it the blessed Apostles Moreover the general consent of all Churches in celebrating this festival evinceth the same otherwise they had dissented from one another as in other observations not received from the Apostles but observed for a time by the succeeding Church as in the Feast of the Passover in observing Fasts c. so doubtless it would have happened in celebrating the Lords Day if by Divine authority received from the Apostles its observation had not been used amongst the Christians Thirdly if the Christian Church had ordained that day to be celebrated without the advice of the Apostles either those that turned Christians from Jews or Gentiles had done this but not those to whom the cessation of their old Sabbath was not known but by the Apostles much less would they attempt to do this by themselves or on their own authority Neither will any wise man think that those whom the Apostles invited from Heathenism to embrace the Christian faith were the authors of this Festival because it is not usual with them to Sabbatize after the manner of the Church unless so far as they were instructed to it by the Apostles Fourthly if the Holy Apostles by authority committed to them from Christ had not instituted the Lords Day but had left its observation free to the judgment of the Church then we might on good reason have called the Church the Queen of the Sabbath which yet is a very clear argument of Christs Divinity as the Learned Dr. Paraeus piously for none is Lord of the Sabbath but he that hath instituted the Sabbath c. The Sabbath is of the Lord they God Lastly if its authority did depend upon the Churches institution then it may by it be again abolished when it shall think good but this was never hitherto since Christs ascension attempted because the Lords day being taken away the publick worship of God must of necessity fall Since therefore the observation of the Lords day was used while the Apostles were
living it must altogether be ascribed to them as the first founders of the Church Moreover if it should be granted that this solemnity was instituted of the Apostles others ask Whether therefore doth this Ordination lean upon a Divine right We passing by this rather curious than sound Disputation Whether the Ordinance of the Lords day be an institution of God or his Apostles discussed by some doltish and drowsie men do acknowledge with all willingness as the ancients did that it was introduced by Divine authority And although its authority should be granted to be of Apostolical institution it would not thence follow that it is not Divine unless something be ordained in the Church by the Apostles which the Holy Ghost did not inspire them with which will not easily be admitted of any that is in his senses because the postles in all matters delivered those things to the Churches which they received from Christ as St. Paul witnesseth 1 Cor. 11. 23. and according to Christs precept taught men that embraced the Gospel to observe those things which Christ had commanded them Matth. 28. 20. So judgeth Tertullian The Apostles saith he chose nothing which they brought in at their own pleasure but faithfully appointed to the nations that discipline they received from Christ. And why should I believe that the Apostles were less acted with the Divine Spirit in their Sacred Institutions which they imposed upon the Churches than in promulgating the Doctrine of the Gospel For there is nothing Apostolical done by a right that is not Apostolical i. e. Divine and nothing done by them but the Holy Ghost endites it to them and therefore what they did they did by Divine right and that their facts which are certain and not onely their saying or writings are of Divine right cannot be denied The Apostle shews it necessary that he that is a Prophet or spiritual man must acknowledge that they are the Lords Precepts which he hath written to the Churches 2 Cor. 14. 37. Surely nothing was enjoyned the Church by the Apostles which was not first prescribed by the Lord because the Apostles were to teach what they learned of Christ which thing they performed with great faithfulness neither will any one who savours the things of the spirit deny this and yet I acknowledge that some things were instituted of them for a time inasmuch as whose occasions were singular and not to be continued wherefore those ordinations were mutable which yet cannot be affirmed of the Lords Day If there be any of the Fathers therefore who think that the institution of the Lords day was made by the Apostles they are not so to be understood as if they acknowledged it not for Divine but Humane because the same Fathers elsewhere are not affraid to ascribe it to God and Christ and they acknowledge that the blessed Apostles were not the authors of this solemnity but the Holy Ghosts amanuenses i. e. as Leo interprets it who writ their Decrees by virtue of a Divine authority in propounding it to the Church For which cause the most pious Leo hath ordained abstinence from labours on the Lords Day because this seemed good to the Holy Ghost and the Apostles instituted thereby and confesseth that that day was abundantly honoured by the Lord. The Lords Day therefore was instituted of the Apostles as the faithful Architects of the Christian Church by extraordinary power which continues not now in the Church and by inspiration of the Holy Ghost that Christians might be obliged not by Humane but by Divine authority to keep holy Convocations and to celebrate the private exercises of godliness on that day Apostolical grace saith Ambrose hath raised up the dead which although it was not the grace of the Apostles but of Christ as the Apostles themselves confess Acts 3. 12. 16. is called Apostolical because it was poured out upon them and by his help they raised up the dead So here the Lords day is called an Apostolical Institution not because it is a mere ordinance of the Apostles as they were Christians but because it was instituted of Christ by those who were endowed with extraordinary power But as I have said this is the onely thing that vexes them that call in question the authority of this institution that there is no place extant in Scripture in which by Divine authority the solemn observation of this day seems to be enjoyned These are men of subtil wits who as the Proverb goes cannot see the wood for trees Whose opinion when I consider that in the Author Oper. Imperf in Matthae comes into my mind where the Priests of old that rail'd upon the people that paid not their tythes are sharply reproved for not reproving those that sinned against God If any of the people faith he offer not his tithes the Priests did so reprove him as if he had committed some great fault because he had not offered the tenth part of any thing though never so little but if any of the people had sinned against God or injured any one or done any such thing none cared for reproving him as though he had committed no fault who had sinned against God and very careful they were of their own gain but careless of the glory of God and salvation of men Whose fault in this thing he accommodates to the Bishops Elders and Deacons of the Church as guilty of this crime Even so must we judge of these men With what heat of mind and earnestness do the very authors of this doubt contend for tythes which they cry out that the Lord hath indulged to the Church under the Gospel by a Divine right whenas yet they cannot produce one plain testimony out of the New Testament for their bestowing on the Ministers of the Gospel but about the Lords Day whose being observed more than once by the Christian Church is plain enough in the Scriptures their faith is wavering nor can they be perswaded to believe that its authority can be demonstrated out of the Word of God Let others judge whether they be worthy Tenths who deny Sevenths if I may say so to God But for their sakes admitting the Law about Tythes I would ask this Whether it 's likely that the most good great and wise God who hath put the seasons of times in his own power Act. 1. 7. would determine any thing certain of a Salary to be bestowed on the administrators of his Worship when yet he left nothing certain in the Church of the time in which his worship should be performed It 's a wise mans part first to determine the work and a fit time to do it in and then the wages where with they that under went it are to be rewarded The Parable Math. 20. relates how the housholder hired Labourers but first he signified what he would have them do and then he agreed with them for a penny a day If therefore they assert that Tythes are allowed
example of Dorcas Now I must answer to the authority of the Council of Orleans which was but a Provincial and consisted onely of twenty five Bishops for performing all labours on that day excepting rural in the same manner as sometimes Hierom to Euagrius while he was shewing what difference there was between a Bishop Elder and Deacon he would not have the custom in some sort contrary to his opinion of one City namely Rome to be brought out against him for he being judge the authority of the world was greater than the Citie 's And so I must say here If an indulgence for them had grown into use with the rest of the Church or had been supported by reason or any authority then the sentence of this though Provincial Council had been of some weight but in this their custome being rejected of the Church up and down dispersed is not to be obtruded as a law upon all Then secondly the Bishops being congregated in that Council purposed to obviate as they speak the Jewish observation of the Sabbath And they yield these things lest they should rather seem to set up a Jewish institution than Christian liberty and the very words of the Canon do intimate that the people were perswaded that these things ought not to be done I 'le add nothing of the corrupting that place which Binius judges to be depraved only let others judge what authority is to be given to it it suffices us that the Fathers with one consent do interdict all Christians earthly affairs and worldly works on Lords days although some abounding in their sense do seem to think otherwise Lastly that I may put an end to this Chapter two things now remain to be considered in the Emperours Laws made about the Lords Day which according to some do mightily prejudice its solemnity the first of these is considered in their Manumissions and the second in some certain transactions to be done on the Lords day and since both of these are a civil office some think that certain worldly things for that cause were to be done on that day which were not works of piety To add somewhat of both these offices will not be far from our purpose The indulgence for making free and manumitting granted by the Christian Emperours and to be done on the Lords day could not hinder its religious solemnity which that it may appear the reason of that institution is a little better to be enquired into Constantine of blessed memory studied by laws and all other means to promote the worship of God amongst other things he granted liberty to the Church by law that whoever were made free the Priests being witnesses they should be inrolled into the number of the Roman Citizens So Nicephorus Hist l. 7. c. 46. and Sozomen Hist l. 1. c. 8. And if any desire to see the form of these Manumissions it is extant in the fragments Conc. Toleran and in the learned Instellus his notes in Canones Africanos Can. 64. whither I refer the Reader because it is only my purpose to touch something of the time wherein these Manumissions were done which by Historians and the Emperours laws we see fall out to be on the Lords day and that especially for the honour of the Church and increase of Christian Religion while they by the Bishops were performed in the Church the Bishops were had in greater esteem among the people till as the learned Instellus very well observeth as formerly servants were manumitted in the Temple of the Goddess Feronia so afterwards by the Emperours Constitutions together with their liberty they obtained to be Roman Denizens in the Church No otherwise then as among the Egyptians the cubit wherewith the inundation of Nilus was wont to be marked was no more brought as the custome was to the Temples of the Heathen but from that time to the Churches of the Christians Sozomen 1. c. 8. After this manner the Emperour did earnestly regard the worship of God in making his laws to encrease which he also established that about Manumissions to be made on the Lords day in the Church Moreover servants those for the most part whom their Masters discharged against their will obtained their freedome not without great difficulty as Sozom. therefore the servants as saith Zonaras in Can. 88. Carthagin fled to the Church and if the Bishop determined equally they were manumitted Thereupon the Emperour ordains that all who were by the Priests testimony set at liberty in Churches should be made Denizons of the Roman Commonwealth And afterwards in process of time the Fathers of the Synod thought good to advise the Emperour that this might be done Conc. Carth. Can. 88. Now the benefit of liberty of which the Emperour was desirous as tending to the glory of God was very acceptable to God and for charity sake on that day whose holiness works of charity do not dishonour was also to be performed I could also name another cause assigned in the fragments Conc. Toletan Some thought that they did a thing very acceptable to God and profitable to their own souls if in the Church of some Saint in the presence of the Bishop or the Priests there standing or the noble Laity before the horn of the Altar of that Church send out their servants free by a charter of absolution and freedom from all bonds of servitude But these superstitious Manumissions for remedy of the soul as they speak were observed about the four hundredth year after Christ but that formerly mentioned by Zonaras Sozomen and Nicephorus was the true cause why first the pious Emperours lookt to that these Manumissions were performed on the Lords day which we do not see hindred the Lords solemnity As Manumissions do not obscure this solemnity so certain transactions are lawful on the Lords day Nor can this hinder it that Leo a most earnest defender of the Lords festival did indulge those that were at odds amongst themselves leave to meet on the Lords day vicaria poenitudine whereon they might conferr of their bargains speak of their transactions These which were offices of charity could not destroy the Lords solemnity For that holy man Leo would have adversaries freely and without fear to meet together vicaria poenitudine which the interpreter of the Law expounds by repentance which ought to return by course that is on the Lords dayes or vicaria poenitudo is that which one expecteth from the other by turn be reconciled to one another to effect which reconciliation they might be at their liberty to confer of their bargains and speak of their transactions But all these things were granted by the Emperour not for any worldly end but for renewing their lost friendship which could not obscure the honour of the festival on which the things that pertained to peace and concord were permitted for they then as it were leaving their gift before the Altar went their way that they first might be
cloyed with luxurious banquets drunken feasts and lewd drunkenness cannot devoutly consecrate the Lords day to God so they that delighting in luxury do give up themselves to pleasures are unfit for the sanctifying thereof because with their pleasures they defile the Lords holy day pleasure is the individual companion of drunkenness and intemperance in many becomes a cause of lasciviousness as we say in the Proverb When the belly is well filled then follow dances we read that these have been condemned with great fervour of mind and most holy zeal with the old friends of sincere piety which Chrysostom Hom. de Eleemosyna would not have any attend on and no wonder for all such worldly spectacles with Chrysostom are called Sathans Festivals from which he exhorts his hearers to abstain and sharply reproveth Parents that bring their children to spectacles and exhort them not to Doctrine Cyril was sorry as we have seen in the former Chapter that Christians should on feast dayes run to playes pageants and dancings because in his judgment these things cannot be done without mocking of Gods name and violation of the day for the holiness of festivals is miserably distained by petulant dancings therefore Leo and Authemius those good Emperours ordain that festivals being dedicated to the most High Majesty are by no pleasures which afterwards in detestation of them they call obscene to be defiled They say also We decree the Lords day alwayes to be so honourable and reverent that it be excused from all executions c. And after Nor yet do we relaxing the rest of this holy day suffer any one to be witholden by obscene pleasures Let the scene of the Theatre or the fights in the Cirque or the doleful sights of wild beasts challenge nothing to themselves on that day and if any solemnity fall out to be celebrated on our Birth-day let it be deferred If any one shall ever be present at â—â—ghts on this Feast-day he shall sustain the loss of his command in the Militia and the sale of his patrimony and likewise the Serjeant of every Judge that under pretence of either publick or private business doth believe that these things which are ordained in this law are to be violated The Fathers in the Council of Carthage were of the same mind who provided that no sights should be shewed on the Lords day or any other of the festivals Yea even in the thickest darkness of Popery so solemn was the splendour of this day that the Cimmerian darkness of Antichristianism could never overcome it Therefore it was provided Can. 10. part 9. of the Provincial Council of Colen that there should be an abstinence from these Wherefore say they it is our mind that on these dayes they speak of Festivals Fairs be prohibited Taverns be shut Riot Drunkenness Expences Strifes wicked Sports Dances full of madness evil Communication Bawdy Songs be avoided briefly all Luxury for by these and the blasphemies and perjuries which usually attend these the name of God is profaned and the Sabbath which admonisheth us to cease from doing perversly and learn to do well is defiled In the third Council also of Millain they decree Let the Bishop carefully prohibit and see to it that it be done that not only no leapings and dancings but no riot playes in honour of the Saints and other profane actions unmeet for the worship of those festival dayes and pious institutions be any wayes publickly acted on these dayes or brought in under pretence or occasion of them If men brought up in the Cimmerian darkness of Antichristianism declining the pure light of the Gospel like Owls yet could not through the splendour of truth but bear an illustrious testimony to the Lords festival and thereupon condemned what was opposite to its sanctification as dances which they call full of madness and wicked sports by which the Sabbath on which Christians are to cease from doing evil is violated if by no means under any pretence they permit leapings and danings to be acted to how tremendous a judgment do the ill-employed Libertines of this age expose themselves who now having the face of the Church happily discovered by the sacred Light of the Gospel are not afraid to tread under foot the holiness of this day by giving the reins to pleasures and dances running out into folly so often condemned by the Fathers As if they made haste to pass over into the heretical tents of the Heicetae who in other things following the Churches authority in their Monasteries by a company of Monks praised God using tripudiations and dances thereunto A wickedness indeed more becoming Hereticks than Christians What once the learned Morton in his Catholic Apolog lib. 2. cap. 14. related of Tollet we will apposirely apply to the Patrons of dancing on the Lords day Tollet affirms that a man is bound under a mortal sin to sanctifie a Festival but he is not bound to SANCTIFIE IT WELL. On the other side Morton cryes out and that justly What the foul ill what a sanctifying is this that wants Well without which no action can be acceptable to God So these mens sanctifying of this day while they grant the Lords day must be sanctified but labour not to sanctifie it Well is rather to be reckoned a profanation than sanctification thereof Alas Are these fruits beseeming so long a preaching of the holy Gospel while men do on the Lords day so profusely serve the pleasures of the flesh The primitive Christians whose souls are now in rest celebrated not so the Lords day who made conscience of intermitting its solemnity upon any occasion If on holy dayes we must abstain from lawful and necessary labours must we therefore attend upon unlawful vain and unhonest works God forbid The women of the Jews had better on the Sabbath day spin than dance on their New Moons as Augustin judgeth And on Psal 39. It is better to dig than dance on the Sabbath But these things are not so to be expounded as if St. Austin had commended the undertaking of gainful labour on that day but that grave Father doth praise the scope of those men rather who do apply their just and lawful labour than their unlawful vanities as otherwhere he relates of Socrates that swore by flesh a stone or any thing that was at hand to swear by not that he approved Socrates's fact but by this means he would instruct his hearers that although neither be agreeable to reason yet it is better to transferr Gods honour to Gods workmanship than to the works of mens hands So although we must not attend on the Lords day on labour undertaken for gain-sake but only on Divine worship yet the good Father judged it better on that day to employ our pains about labours lawful on other dayes than about vanities alwayes unlawful and severely condemned of God although neither will very well agree with the solemnity of that day If
which argument I will point at three things namely first I will shew what Scriptures were read in the Church-assembly secondly whose office it was to do this thirdly I will add something of the place out of which the Scriptures were read in the Church-assembly It is evident out of divers authors that those Scriptures were read by whose reading faith was nourished And that is thought by divers men of great name in imitation of the Jews by whom it was an ordinary thing to read Moses and the Prophets in the Synagogues every Sabbath day Acts 13. 15. and 15. 21. This custome of the Jews omitting ceremonials was not onely profitable to the Apostles who upon that occasion every where preached Christ in the Synagogues out of Moses and the Prophets Act. 13. 15. and 17. 2 3. but also was commended by the Apostles to Christians as often as the Church met namely that the writings of the old Prophets should be read and expounded by the modern Prophets 1 Cor. 14. 29. Origen also witnesseth although he be deceived in giving the cause for which this was enjoyned the Church of the Apostles that the Apostles ordained that the books of Jewish Histories should be read in Churches by the Disciples of Christ So he initio Hom. 15. in Josh Moreover there be some that gather out of 2 Cor. 8. 18. where the Apostle saith of Luke With Titus we have sent our brother whose praise is in the Gospel throughout all the Churches that not only the Scriptures of the Old Testament were wont to be read while the Apostles were alive but also of the Evangelists about the History and Sermons of Christ Where according to them we may not unfitly observe that even at that time the Gospel of Luke was wont to be read in Churches Paul is not afraid to adjure the Thessalonians that when that Epistle to them was finished it should be read to all the holy brethren 1 Thes 5. 27. and he requires the Colossians that they read the Epistle written from Laodicea and that they should cause that which he sent unto them to be read in the Church of the Laodiceans Col. 4. 16. And Eusebius out of Clement relates that Peter ordained that the Gospel of Mark was to be read in Churches So Euseb Hist l. 2. c. 4. and the same author our of Irenaeus asserteth that Matthew set forth his Gospel for the Hebrews in their own tongue while Paul and Peter preached the Word at Rome After the Apostles death the writings not only of the Prophets and Evangelists but of the Apostles themselves were read in the Church-assemblies as I have said from 1 Thes 5. and Col. 4. Justin Martyr saith that the writings of the Prophets and Apostles were read on Sunday in their assemblies Others afterwards confess the same thing Origen when he reckons up the works to be performed on the Christian Sabbath he mentions the sacred reading in their assemblies where also he speaks of Reading and Treatises and in Ex. Hom. 7. he saith The Lord alwayes rains down from Heaven namely when the holy Oracles were read as he afterwards explains it Manna on our Lords day whence he concludeth that the Christians Lords day is to be preferred to the Jewish Sabbath Tertullian confesses that the Church assembled for to remember those Divine things that were read And elsewhere amongst the Lords day solemnities he affirms that the sacred Scriptures were read de Anima c. 9. Cyprian mentions this reading Ep. 33. in which he writes to the Clergy and people of one Aurelius that was ordained a Reader of him to read the Gospel in the Church c. Eusebius acknowledges that both the Old and New Testament was read in Churches Ambros in Epist ad Soror Ep. 33. Aug. de Civitate Dei lib. 22. cap. 8. These things shew that the Scriptures both of the Old and New Testaments were read and in the fifty ninth Canon of the Council of Laodicea it is ordained that only the Canonical books should be read and in the sixtieth Canon they reckon up the names and order of Canonical Books of both Testaments The same provision is made in the 27th Canon of the Council of Carthage apud Zonar That beside the Canonical Scriptures nothing be read in the Church under the name of Divine Scripture Only they add the Books of Tobit Judith and Esther Yet this must not be concealed not only the writings of the Apostles and Prophets but of divers others who were famous for piety and of great authority in the Church were anciently read in the Church-assemblies Dionysius Corinthiacus apud Euseb reports that Clements Epistle ad Corinth was read on the Lords day Hierom. in Cat. Script Ecclesiast witnesseth that Effraemus Deacon of the Church at Edissa came to such renown that after the reading of the Scriptures his writings were publickly read in some Churches The sufferings of the Martyrs were also read upon their Feasts Concil Carthag Can. 50. But the Commentaries in which the Martyrs conflicts were described were only read over on those dayes whereon their memory was annually celebrated witness Zonaras in Concil Carthag Can. 50. And such humane writings as were read in the Church are to be understood chiefly of the Psalms and Songs which were devised of them to praise God by Eusebius mentions these lib. 5. cap. 28. and lib. 2. 17. Afterwards through the Devils subtilty tares sprung up in the Church and under pretence of these writings Hereticks sowed their false Doctrines which the Fathers in Trull Can. 2. observe in the Constitutions ascribed to Clement to which some things sorged and some things repugnant to Faith are annexed which evil that the Fathers might feasonably prevent they frequently ordained that no Books should be read in the publick Church-assembly but the Holy Scriptures much less that it ever should be safe through them that many dreams which they babled out with a rash attempt like old wife's dotages of vain-talking men should be read among the Holy Scriptures as afterwards by use it fell out because as we have seen they ordained that nothing but the Scriptures should be read in Churches Now for the order according to whose rule all reading of the Scriptures among the ancients was disposed we meet with a few things to be observed out of their Records Whether namely in the primitive Church there were selected parts of the Scriptures which they read or as it was familiar with the Jews on their Sabbath-dayes they read the Scripture in order as the Lords dayes returned till they had finished that work this I say is not certainly known onely what parts of Scripture they read they explained the same for the peoples use as the necessity of the present times did require Tertul. apo c. 39. Ambr. l. 5. ep 33. But afterwards it doth appear that there was an order observed in reading the Scriptures St. Austin mentions the order observed by
Hierosolymitan saith he esteems of Apostles after one sort and of other Treaters after another And Ep. ad August he calls those Treaters that did interpret the Holy Scriptures Aug. Ep. 11. In explicating this Section about Treatises upon Scriptures first we will consider whose office it was to interpret them Secondly the manner which they used in explaining of them In the third place something shall be added about the time at which the ancients did attend these In the first place we will speak of the Treaters themselves Those to whom the administration of the Word was committed by God in the Scriptures they were by a name familiar enough to the Fathers called Clerici the Clergy or in Clerum ascripti admitted into the Clergy either because Matthias was chosen by lot who was the first that we read of that was ordained by the Apostles so Augu. in Psal 67. or because they are the Lords lot 〈…〉 should possess him for their lot and inheritance with the children of Levi for ever So Austin in Prolog in Psal if that Preface be Austins Hierom gives almost the same reason who fatih they are the Lords lot and because the Lord himself is the lot that is the portion of the Clergy The Apostle comprehends all to whom any publick charge in the Church of the Philippians was committed under Bishops and Deacons Philip. 1. 1. Where under the name of Bishops he understandeth all that especially executed the office of teaching and under the name of Deacons he intimates others that ministred The name of Bishop is a general appellation signifying all those that labour in the Word of God and attend upon the cure of souls Whence the office of an Apostle is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Bishoprick Act. 1. 20. and by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are elegantly described men that administer the Word according to the Scriptures For it signifies both indulgently to attend as shepherds their flocks as Jacob Gen. 32. 38 39 40. that they may drive away wild beasts from the sheep and to watch like watch-men Ezek. 3. 17. I have made thee a watch-man to the house of Israel namely that thine adversaries come not near thee who threaten thee destruction So Heb. 13. 17. the teachers of the Gospel are said to watch for the souls of the Church The Holy Scripture calls these watchmen who watch the actions of all men and with an aim of religious curiosity spie out how every one liveth with his houshold in his house how with the Citizens in a City Where the duties of Bishops or Watchmen is excellently set out Ambrose interprets Bishops super inspectores overseers lib. de dignitate sacerdotali cap. 6. Hierom contends that they are most truly called Superintendentes because they are to look diligently over or superintend every one in their flock and Ep. ad Evagrium he renders the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by superintendentes These words therefore do not signifie any perfunctory inspection which only is undertaken for knowledge sake but a diligent and accurate watchfulness that ought to be Bishops that they might make provision of necessary means to feed their flocks and instruct them to live piously As Alipius was whom Austin Ep. 35. acknowledges to be a Pastor carefully governing the Lords pasture sheep Under the title of Bishop both Bishops and Presbyters are comprehended And though there be some that distinguish not a Presbyter from a Bishop yet I do with Austin who expounds the words Oratio Precatio Postulatio choose to understand that by these words which all or almost all the Church doth often use Ep. 59. Therefore since according to the custom of the Church or according to the words of honour which the Church useth the office of a Bishop is greater than that of a Presbyter the highest Ministry in the Church is now signified under the title of Bishop The Bishops work was especially to interpret the Holy Scriptures when the Church was gathered together and therefore I think their power was of the Ancients signified in the name Cathedra because chiefly it consisted in teaching Optatus saith the first gift of the Church was Cathedra whereby is signified that the Churches power is instructive and for this cause Aug. confesses that Christs Chair or cathedram succeeded Moses chair i. e. the Apostles of Christ succeeded the Interpreters of Moses and the Prophets The Bishops duty therefore is to instruct the people commended to their care and Hierom thinks this ability to be so necessary for them that it can profit a Bishop nothing at all to have the testimony of his virtues in his own mind except he be able to instruct the people committed to him And Hilary acknowledges that by the necessary virtue of his office he is bound to serve the Church in preaching the Gospel And therefore Athanasius excited Dracontius to take upon him a Bishoprick to which he was elected with this reason because the people by whom he was made Bishop did expect that he would bring them meat out of the Doctrine of Scripture Neither did the greatest Bishops decline that charge but rather for a Bishop to abstain from preaching seemed to Gregory the Great a foul shame and wicked act and he saith that he is dead that walks without the sound of preaching ibid. Since therefore the principal duty of Bishops is terminated in Doctrine to which by necessity of office they are obliged and without which although they otherwise live a pious life they are not to be adorned with the title of Bishops their first and principal charge was to interpret the Word of God the onely subject for all doctrine of Ministers in the Church Luk. 24. 27. when the Church was assembled for hearing the same that the most vigilant Bishops of old did this with great praise and for the great fruit of the Church their most learned Treatises which are extant among their works do testifie But to explain the Holy Scripture in the Churches publick assembly did not only lie upon Bishops but upon Presbyters also and that ex officio So 1 Pet. 5. 2. Therefore the second chair in the Church was assigned them by the Fathers So Clem. Alexand. Strom. l. 6. Origen saith that some Deacons in his age did seek after the first chairs of them who are called Presbyters If the chair was assigned to them then it was their duty to instruct the people in the doctrine of the Gospel if it had not been their duty to feed the Church with the food of the Word and Sacraments why should St. Paul charge them to take heed unto themselves and to all the flock over the which the Holy Ghost had made them overseers to feed the Church of God Augustine being yet a Presbyter while Valerius was alive edified the Church with the Word and Sacraments It was the custome at Alexandria
not finish this question which of all he judged the greatest within the space of an hour namely at the publick-assembly The same appears out of Chrysostom when he reproves those that forsook the Communion and Congregation of the Saints especially because whereas the week having an hundred sixty eight houres God hath set apart one for himself and they would spend this about secular and ridiculous matters Hom. de Euchar. And elsewhere Hom. de non contemnenda Eccles t. 7. p. 891. he makes mention of two hours in which the Church is to attend spiritual affairs idem t. 5. p. 523. But they were not so tyed to an houres space as that upon any necessary occasion emerging they might not continue their Sermon longer to the people What Austin answers to Urbicus about the continuance of Fasts may be referred hither he thought that if any necessity arose a dinner was not to be preferred to a more urgent action Which he confirms by the example of the Church Act. 20. which thought it not much to hear St. Paul continuing his Sermon till midnight To judge the same of Treatises which upon some urgent necessity may be longer continued than ordinary who will judge it to be alien from the Christian Faith Yet whether their Treatises were long or short he that went out of the Auditory before the Treater had finished his Sermon was obnoxious to the Churches censure Chrysostom for this cause doth severely pinch some that waited not for the last sentence of the mystery And elsewhere he requires it of all that none go out of the Church before they be dismissed For if any went out before the dismission he was as a fugitive required his reason Homil. de non contemnenda Eccles In the fourth Council of Carthage Canon 24. it is provided that he that goes forth while the Priest is speaking shall be noted with the terrible censure of Excommunication See the twenty eighth Canon Concil Aurelian 1. ann 507. Also Can. 27. Concil Agathensis ann 306. Lastly Because the Auditors were not to go out of the Church-assembly till the end of the Treatise the Treaters when they had ended their Treatises conferred their help in pouring out their Prayers as formerly hath been shewn in the fourth Chapter I onely add this that Chrysostome commends his hearers that received his admonitions with great chearfulness and that they were not offended with their prolixity but preserved a continual desire of hearing with an extreme setledness of vigour even to the end In princip Homil. 15. in Genesin CHAP. VII The ancients Treated every day out of Scripture and did not prohibit those that taught others diligently from that their diligence in teaching IN the second place it will not be unprofitable to find out how often we read that this was done by the ancients within a weeks compass or how often the Fathers were wont to treat out of the Scripture to the people To which question I answer briefly and say that they buckled themselves to this work every day as occasion offered but especially on Lords Dayes on which they were not wanting twice to sustain this labour when they had liberty for persecution But because this through some mens prejudice may seem a thing hard to believe we will plead with the very testimonies of the gravest authors and will teach both by the grace of God out of their records In the first place they used to preach to the people every day which will appear to him that looks into their Treatises For how often do we meet with this phrase in the beginning of their Treatises Yesterday's Sermon Ambr. de Sacramentis l. 5. c. 1. Also l 3. c. 1. also Serm. 92. which he begins in the same manner Chrysostom thinks it necessary that a Bishop should preach every day and he shews the fruit of this diligence that by continuance in teaching the auditors minds might retain the Sermon Chrys de sacerdotio lib. 6. And what burden the grave Father imposed upon other mens shoulders in this business yet he declined it not himself through a Pharisaical austerity though it were hard to be born which his Sermons shew Ye made yesterday which had been the Devils Festival to be the Spirits Feast-day because ye received what we said to you with a great desire of mind c. Hom. de Lazar. Hom. 34. in Gen. he saith Ye learned yesterday the excellent modesty of the Patriarch Hom. 22. in Gen. thus he begins The reliques of yesterdayes table I set before you to day Such prefaces as these do frequently occurr in his Homilies Hom. 5. ad Populum Although I have spoken to you of this matter yesterday and the day before yesterday yet shall I not perswade you to it to day nor to norrow nor the next day after to morrow c. Hom. 13. ad Populum With the same beginning and like prefaces with which I begun yesterday and the day before yesterday I will also begin to day These and many others that may be observed in him do plainly shew that he performed the office of Treating out of Scripture every day to the people Greg. Nyss Orat. 2. de 40 Martyribus makes mention of the things he had spoken the day before to the people and in an Oration next after that he calls to their remembrance what he had declared yesterday Austin thus begins his second Sermon in Psalm 68. The later part of the Psalm upon which we spoke yesterday to your charity remains to be explained by me to day Tract 16. in Joh. he mentions Yesterdays labour and yesterdayes lesson Tract 18. in Johan Tract 21. He begins Tractat. 22. after this manner This dayes lesson out of the Gospel follows the Sermons that I repeated to you yesterday and the day before yesterday c. Cyprian by his daily Treating out of the Gospels endeavoured to encrease the saith and knowledge of his hearers Nicephorus affirms that Alexander comforted the Church daily with his Divine instructions Hist l. 8. c. 5. And thus much for the daily labours of the Doctors of the Church which they spent in the explication of Scripture whose diligence was so great over their flocks commended to their charge to feed them saithfully with the bread of life that they would not abstain from the continual labours of Treating They became not at that time lookers after their secular affairs relicta cathedra i. leaving the chair which thing was a grief to Cyprian De Lapsis sect 4. as afterwards they were or did they grow too rank with excessive stipends but as their chief charge was bounded in Doctrine so they thought not much to bestow their most diligent labour in this office though very toylsome and the more frequently and officiously they executed the charge of preaching to the people the greater honour had they from all good men according to the Apostles Canon 1 Tim. 5. 17. which Theodosius junior did piously
suffering men to worship the immortal Gods per transitum but perswading them to undertake that with a prepared mind And therefore when the Emperour was conversant about sooth-saying and sacrifices some cryed aloud Hoc age i. e. be attentive or set thy mind on this thing only which saying did prepare as many as were present at sacrifices to attend them with a devout mind for in sacred things we must not labour in transcursu quasi lightly as it were and passing by But those whose minds are illuminated with the happy light of Scripture have more perspicuously observed the truth in this point therefore the people of Christ are perswaded to attend Prayer with the whole heart having cast aside all carnal and worldly cogitations and that the mind should think of nothing at that time but what it prayed for only and for this end the Priest having premised a Preface to the Prayer did prepare the minds of the Brethren by saying SURSUM CORDA i. up with your hearts and when the people answered HABEMUS AD DOMINUM i. have up or we have them for the Lord they were put in mind that they ought to think of nothing else but the Lord. And this was the general preparation wherewith the minds of the people were excited to all the duties of Religion and by hearing thereof they were prepared to more ardent Prayer In the third place the peoples minds being thus excited to pray this is worth our consideration that of all those who were present together there was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. one common Prayer which they uttered with one mind and sincere faith in Jesus So Ignatius in his Epistle ad Magnesianos Clemens Alexandrinus also saith the multitude of them that prayed had as it were one common voice and one mind Athanasius wished for this Apol. ad Imperatorem Constantium that all might make one and the same voice without a discord Cyprian de Oratione Dominica acknowledges that in the Church there was a common and publick prayer He adds that the Apostles Acts 1. 14. continued with one accord in Prayer when they declared the instancy and concord of their prayer For Prayer being conceived of more the more easie entrance is made unto God according to that of Matth. 18. 19. Nor need any to wonder that there was one and the same Prayer of the whole Church being assembled since there ought to be but one voice in the Church he that readeth speaketh alone and he that is the Bishop sitteth silent in the mean time and he that singeth singeth alone and when all sing together the voice is uttered as by one mouth and he that preaches to the people preacheth alone saith Chrysostom Also HomiÌ„l 18. in 2 Cor. he saith Common Prayers were made by the Priest and others and all made one Prayer Fourthly they prayed as the Holy Ghost suggested to them sive mâ—â—itore quia de pectore orabant i. they prayed without a monitor because out of their heart that is to say the Holy Ghost shewed them the way to conceive Prayers in a pious manner and by his instinct they prayed without any other monitor After the offering of bread and wine allayed with water the Praefectus put up prayers and giving of thanks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. as well as he could If he prayed as well as he could for his might then it seems he did not read prescribed forms of Prayer to the bare reading whereof there was no need of such a labour Justin Martyr ap 2. Neither could it be otherwise because upon a new occasion offered forth with new Prayers were required answering to that occasion and for this cause they could not be alwayes the same Tertullian as his manner is teacheth this elegantly There are saith he some things which may be prayed for according to the circumstance of every one first premising the lawful and ordinary Prayer he speaks of the Lords Prayer as a foundation A liberty of accidents a liberty for desires to be put out into occasional prayers Christians have liberty in Tertullians opinion to put up Prayers to God pro re nata which are formed according to the form of Prayer prescribed by Christ So St. Austin Ep. 121. ad Probam saith that we may beg for the same things in these or other words but we are not to pray for other things that is to say Men may use other words in Prayer than what Christ used in the Prayer which he prescribed the Church but the mind ought not to be intent in praying for other things than what Christ hath declared to us in that Prayer Moreover the Bishops were sometimes to commend to God in Prayer those things which the people desired them and for this cause they could not alwayes use the same Prayers because new occasions as I aid required new Prayers Especially since t was for them Chrysostom being witness to pray unto God that he might divert the evils that hung over every one And therefore since the same evils did not alwayes occurr the Bishops alwayes prayed as the state of the people commended to their cure did require In the first place therefore Prayers were used according to the quality of the time men having their minds disposed by the Holy Ghost to pray devoutly But afterwards when through the Devils subtilty divers errours in Religion crept in in process of time it sell out that prayers were by some brought in contrary to the Faith or as St. Austin speaketh some spake in their Prayers contrary to the rule of Faith the Church providing for this errour used a threefold remedy and in the first place they provided that it should be lawful for none to compose Forms of Prayer at their pleasure which they used in the publick assemblies but the same as Zonaras interprets it those that were daily used should be retained in every meeting So Conc. Laodic Can. 18. Secondly it was ordained that they should conferr with the more able Brethren about the Prayers which they used in their Assemblies It was so provided in the third Council of Carthage Can 23. ◠〈…〉 it was defined that no requests or prayers should be used in the Church but those which were approved by a Synod Conc. Milevit 2. Can. 12. lest any thing should be composed against the Faith either through ignorance or less care We meet with mention of both remedies namely the second and third in Concilio Africano Can. 70. T. 1. But it is a question whether in the aforesaid African Canons the Reverend Fathers do speak of set Forms of Prayers in publick Liturgies or of the Prayers which he that was to treat out of Scripture which was a common thing with Treaters as Can. 40. we have heard out of the Fathers did conceive at that time he came forth to speak at Some men of great account think that they meant the former
rather than the later because the cited words of the Canons do ordain what forms of prayer they should use whose office it was to perform acts of Religion when they stood at the altar So Conc. Carthag where they that were to Treat stood not the Bishops seat who did interpret the Scripture was in the midst of the Church as we have formerly shown This therefore was ordained by the Fathers lest as Hereticks increased and spread their Heterodox opinions the Christian people who did not well enough attend their practise should be imposed upon by Hereticks Canons were established because in that age especially every faction did spread abroad certain forms of Prayers and Psalms by which when they were met together they might allure unto them men that were not well enough exercised in the faith but unwarily embraced their dreams as Historians report it fell out in Chrysostoms age not long after the aforesaid Councils were held That I say these mens endeavours should be prevented lest Hereticks should spread abroad Forms of Liturgies not agreeing with the Doctrine received from the Apostles it was ordained that in publick Liturgies which were not to be prescribed by any one man none should have liberty to use any forms of Prayers but what were either formerly in use namely before the mists of Heterodoxisme had obscured the shining face of truth or had been approved by the most judicious brethren or lastly confirmed by the authority of some Synod The very words of the cited Canon do declare that the Mileritan Fathers do speak of such Prayers Let the place be seen it is extant in the first Tome of the Councils pag. 600. Moreover it appears that this was the cause of those Canons by the condition of the times in which they were ordained For at that time the Church was grievously sick of the wounds both of Arrianism and Pelagianism And reason it self perswades not to restrain the cited Canons to the Prayers which were conceived by him that Treated to the people For those were to be conceived alwayes as the necessity of the Church did require as formerly Tertullian taught us for which cause they could not alwayes be the same but were to be varied pro re nata and as the necessity of the people for whom the Treater was to offer the sacrifice of the lips to God required On the contrary if the Canons speak of the Treaters prayers then this is worthy observing that the Grave Fathers in those sanctions did not intend to prescribe lawes for all and every Treater in the Prayers he was to conceive but onely for those who were not well instructed in Religion for they speak of some who name the Father for the son or the son for the Father and who had written out Prayers to themselves from some other So Conc. Carth. where above they ordain lest the less exercised in Religion should be imposed upon through the fraud and deceit of others that they conferr with their wiser brethren about the Prayers they had written out before they uttered them to the people The same is also to be said to the Mileritan Canon wherein it is provided that nothing be composed against the Faith either through ignorance or less care And yet by those sanctions the more instructed of the brethren are not restrained to Forms of Prayer unless they be approved by others We read that certain prayers were prescribed by Constantine the Great to his Guard which they used on the Lords day yet none will thence conclude that other Christians were to put up no Prayers to God but what were commanded The cited Canons are therefore to be understood either of Liturgy Prayers or of the Prayers of the Treater unfit through ignorance to conceive Prayers and of no others Fifthly in their Prayers conceived after this manner they prayed to God for things just honest and meet to be heard Arnob. cont Gent. lib. 1. And these they asked for all mens sakes not only for familiars but enemies for Emperours and Subjects and in their prayers they seriously pleaded with God for all others so Arnobius lib. 4. For themselves and all every where as Justin Martyr Ap. sec For the Emperours health as Tertull. apol cap. 30. For their offices for their worldly state and peace Tertull. ibid. And especially for the Church because the whole people of Christ are one Cypr. de Orat. Dom. Sixthly these Prayers were conceived in a known tongue Origen instead of all will teach us this who writeth against Celsus a froward adversary of the Christian name Contr. Celsum l. 8. where he lets all know that the right Christians did not in their prayers make use of the usual names of God in Holy Writ but the Greeks prayed in the Greek and the Romans in the Roman and every one in his own Language and praised God according to their might and the Lord of all Languages heard them pray in all Languages understanding them as well when they spake in divers as if they all agreed in one Language that I may say so and as men of one voice Where he teaches us that Christians in what place soever they lived did in their Prayers use no other than their vulgar idiom Seventhly it will not be far from our purpose to add something of the posture of the body in conceiving of prayer Where in the first place it will be worth our noting what Austin excellently observed there is no prescript posture how the body should be ordered in Prayer only that the Soul being present before God that it perform its devotion And he addeth that some prayed standing some kneeling and some lying prostrate Justin Martyr relates that they prayed standing Apol. 2. When we stand saith Cyprian we ought with watchfulness and with all our hearts to apply our selves to prayer But we read that Prayer was used to be made to God upon the knees more frequently and it appears that this posture or rite in Prayer was most ancient and common in all ages Clem. Alexand. Strom. 7. saith that they fell down upon the earth when they paryed The Christian souldiers are said kneeling on the ground as it is usual with Christians when they pray to compose themselves to offer up Prayers to God in Euseb Hist. 5. c. 5. Arnobius also affirms that Christians when with joynt Prayers they worshipped God they were prostrate or as afterwards when they prayed they fell upon their bended knee The Church saith Epiphanius in fine Panarii commandeth Prayers to be made with all diligence and with kneeling on set dayes But on the Lords day in memorial of the Lords Resurrection they worshipped not on their knees and anciently they rejoyced in that immunity from the Passover till Pentecost So Tertullian Just Mart. q. 115. Which custome being in some places decayed the 20th Canon of the first Council of Nice hath ordained to be kept every where although St. Paul prayed kneeling
the Millainoys For when Justina persecuted Ambrose the people watched in the Church and then it was appointed that Psalms and hymns should be sung according to the custome of the Oriental countries lest the people should pine away with the tediousness of sorrow and from that day to this day it is retained many and now almost all congregations in the whole world imitating it Paulinus witnesseth also in the life of Ambrose that in the time of Justina hymns began to be sung in the Church of Millain and he relates that the devotion of this celebrity was not onely used in that Church but had spread over almost all provinces in the West In explaining the hymns which were anciently sung of the Church we will first search into the matter of the hymns and then into the manner of singing As for the hymns themselves the Divine Oracles being sung with a sweet voice did animate their sounds and therefore they sung sometimes David's Psalter Aug. Conf. l. 10 c. 33. So Theodoret saith that Flavianus and Diodorus did teach that David's Psalms were to be sung Hist l. 2. c. 24. Chrysostom when he reproves some that sung uncomelily mentions the very words of Davids Psalms which were uttered in the singing Austin glorieth that the divine Songs of the Prophets were sung soberly in the Church Ep. 119. c. 18. Tertullian saith that in the assemblies of Christians after the Manualis aqua every one was called forth to sing to God either out of the Holy Scriptures or of his own invention Apol. cap. 39. Sometimes also Psalms were sung in the Church-assembly which were written-by the Doctors of the Church Socrates mentions some Psalms that were written by Chrysostom lib. 6. cap. 8. Eusebius by Nepos Hist lib. 7. c. 24. Conc. Laod. Can. 59. it is prohibited that no private Psalms be uttered in the Church Therefore St. Austin in the aforesaid place doth blame the Donatists for leaving Davids Psalms and singing Hymns which were invented by themselves CHAP. XII The manner of singing in the Church was according to the vulgars capacity modest and sober the incommodities of a sweeter voice in singing The profit of a well moderated singing Hymns were sometimes sung of one sometimes of divers Antiphones Organs How none were to sing in the Church but those that were chosen to this purpose Broken Musick disallowed A censure of that Musick which is used among the Papists IN the second place this is to be observed of the manner of singing used by Christians in their assemblies although singing was every where used yet the same manner of singing was not used by all At least the ancients did chiefly regard that their singing might be understood of the people lest through the sweetness of the voice in singing without the pious affections of the heart they should be deceived The Corinthians excelling in the gift of tongues sung commonly in an unknown tongue but Paul abrogated that errour and commanded them to use a known tongue that the people might say Amen 2 Cor. 14. 15. Neither could they that sung to the Lord in their heart any otherwise stir up themselves by Psalms hymns and spiritual songs Which yet was enjoyned the Church by the Apostles Canon Col. 3. 16. Eph. 5. 19. which do teach that all the art of singing in the Church ought by the Apostles sentence to be ordered into the vulgars capacity So was is also used in the following Church St. Athanasius made the Reader of the Psalm to sound it sorth with so little a changing of the voice that he was likelier to one that pronounced it than sung it witness Austin Confess l. 10. c. 33. St. Hierom being bold upon the testimony of St. Paul 2 Cor. 14. 15. where the Apostle saith I will sing with the spirit and I will sing with understanding also teaches us that in singing a Psalm not the sweetness of the voice but the affection of the mind is to be observed For it 's better to worship God in praises and hymns that are tuned in a pure mind which God onely looketh at than those that are sung with a loud and shrill voice as sometime Philo de Plantatione Noe. The Africans did soberly sing their Divine songs of the Prophets in the Church whereas the Donatists sung their immodest roarings like songs composed by mans wit as if they were sounding a trumpet to battel Where Austin finds fault with them for two things First because they betook themselves to sing hymns which they devised by their own invention leaving the holy songs of the Prophets And secondly because they sung them not soberly as the Church did but as puffed up with pride Austin blames them for both Quaestiones ad Justinum Mariyrem acknowledge simple singing in the Church Qu. 107. Austin relates the incommodities of a sweeter concord in singing who was some time more moved with the singing than the thing which was sung for which cause he acknowledgeth that he sinned grievously and had rather that he had not heard when he sang for the contentment of his flesh beguiled him and he gave more respect to Musical delights in the Church than was seemly For avoiding these inconveniences it is ordained in Conc. in Trullo Can. 75. that those who sing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. should neither use disorderly shoutings nor strain nature to clamour Nor is the reason of this Canon assigned by Zonaras contrary to religion or right reason Singing of Psalms saith he is a kind of deprecating God wherein by suppliant prayers we beg the pardon of sins Now it 's fit that supplicants go in humble habit but clamours and rude shoutings are no argument of humility and modesty but of a mind rashly vaunting and carried away with presumption Thus Zonaras Hierom is clearly of the same opinion who thinks that our singing must be to God not with the voice but the heart Nor are we like Tragedians to anoint our throat and mouth with sweet modulation that our Theatrical tunes and songs may be heard in the Church but we are to sing with reverence indeed and in knowledge of the Scripture None doth better than Chrysostom reprove that unseemly manner of singing borrowed from the Theatres that signifie no certainty to us by their clamours It is a notable place which though it be large I will set down for the Readers sake There are some men saith he who contemning God and reckoning the Oracles of the Spirit for common and profane do utter disordered voices carrying themselves no better than those that are mad ruffling and rowling with the whole body and shewing manners far off from a spiritual stability O wretched and unhappy man thou oughtest with trembling and reverence to resound the angelical glorification and with terrour to make confession to thy Creatour and by this to beg the pardon of sins And here thou bringest in the fashions of Mimicks and Dancers while thou throwest