Selected quad for the lemma: body_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
body_n	heir_n	male_n	remainder_n	9,097	5	12.3740	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A43221	Maxims and rules of pleading, in actions real, personal and mixt, popular and penal describing the nature of declarations, pleas, replications, rejoynders, and all other parts of pleading, shewing their validity and defects, and in what cases they are amendable by the court, or remediable by the statute-law, or otherwise : likewise, which of the parties in his plea shall first offer the issue, and where special matter may be given in evidence upon the general issue : of demurrers upon evidence, of verdicts, general and special, and of bills of exceptions to the same, of judgments, executions, writs of error and false judgment, and of appeals, indictments, and informations and the pleadings relating thereunto / published from the manuscript of Sir Robert Heath ... ; with additions of new matter to every title, from all the reports since his time.	Heath, Robert, Sir, 1575-1649.	1694 (1694)	Wing H1340; ESTC R21584	172,855	372

Replication Quod non habetur tale Recordum per quod liquet c. Et hoc paratus est verificare per Recordum illud is contrarient and naught Where it is said also That if a Plea want an Averment or have not a sufficient Averment the same is not good quod nota And it appears by 37 H. 6. 14. that in a Forcible Entry the Defendant pleaded Excommengement in the Plaintiff without any Averment because no Answer is to be made to that Plea But it appears in the Books of Entries That where a Plea is either pleaded to the Jurisdiction or to the Person by Matter en fait as Profession or Villenage there be always Averments whichs seem to be of Necessity by the last recited Book because to these Answers may be made quod nota And Note that by the Book of 37 H. 6. 23. If one have a Plea to the Whole he may plead the same to a Part Where it is said by Moyle That a Release or Iustification or any Matter in the Affirmative pleaded without an Averment of the Plea or pleaded in the Negative as Nil debet and the like without the Conclusion Et de hoc ponit se super Patriam and yet 1 3 Mar. 124. the General Issue was pleaded without that Conclusion and good or to plead a Bar in an Assize without taking the Tenancy upon him where divers are named in the Writ the same is Ill. There needs no General Averment in a Plea or Particular Averment in a Declaration of that which will come in more properly on the other side Hob. Rep. 78. 124. And by the same Reports 88. 106. there will need no Averment in a Declaration where it appears there are Reciprocal Remedies But by the same Book 251. where the Administrator durante minori aetate is Plaintiff in a Suit there the Nonage of the Executor must be Averred Secus where he is Defendant Yet by Sheppard's Abridgment Tit. Averment fo 230. the Executor of a Grantee of a Rent or Reversion expectant upon an Estate for Life may not Avow his Distress without an Averment that the Arrerages incurred after the Death of the Tenant for Life Adjudged And so by Hobart fo 141 142. he that pleads a Dispensation to hold in Commendam confirmed by the Kings Charter must aver the Performance of the Condition contained in it So by Perkins cap. 147. If the Defeasance of a Recognizance be dated before if in this Case any use be to be made of it it must be Averred to be delivered at or after the time of the Recognizance entred into By Coke's Rep. lib. 8. Case of the. City of London and lib. 9. 54. Averment needs not be of what is apparent as the Constitution made in London concerning the Sale of of Wares and Merchandizes appearing to be agreeable to and waranted by their Charter the same needs not be Averred to be so and if the Son bring an Assize of Mortdancestor he needs not to Aver that it is within the time of Limitation for that it appears to be so And by the same Author Lib. 7. 40. although any other Consideration than what is a Deed may not be Averred yet where there is an Express Consideration in it self in the Case as where a Use of Land is limited to a Wife this implies a sufficient Consideration in it self and therefore needs no Averment By Hobart 32. an Averment may be upon a Will but by Co. lib. 5. 68. an Averment will not lye of any thing that is against or besides that which is against or besides that which is expressed in a Will nor of any thing that cannot be gathered to be the Mind of him that made the Will by the Words thereof nor of any thing that doth not cohere with the Will especially if the Devise be of Lands As where one Devises to A. and the Heirs of his Body the Remainder to B. and the Heirs Males of his Body on Condition that he or they or any of them shall not alien c. In this Case no Averment may be taken by Witnesses that it was the Intent of the Devisor to include A. within the Condition by the words He or They c. So neither may an Averment be taken that the Intent was to give it to any other besides the Devisee But by Hobart 50. an Arbitrement in Writing may not be supplied by an Averment And by Bulstrode first Part fo 220. and Popham fo 201. it appears that if Tenant for three Lives make a Lease to another the Lessee in an Action brought by him needs not to aver the Lives under which he claimeth Nor by Goldesborough fo 97. needs he that sueth an Administrator upon the Assumpsit of the Deceased aver he had Assets after Debts and Legacies paid So by Hobart 297 and Coke on Littleton 373. it appears that if a Tenant disclaim upon an Avowry in Replevin he shall have Judgment tho' it be false For no Averment will lye against a violent Presumption though it be false By the Book of 34. H. 6. 42. and of 9 Ed 4. 4. an Averment may be had against any part of the Rolls or Records of County-Courts Hundred Courts Courts-Baron or other Courts belonging to Lords of Mannors But by Dyer 348. 177. no Averment will lye against such a Retorn as is definitive to the Trial of the thing Retorned as the Retorn of a Sheriff upon his Writs the Retorn of the Mayor Aldermen and Sheriffs of London upon a Writ of Habeas Corpus sent to them and the like But if it be such as is not Definitive as upon a Rescous or the like there an Averment and a Trial upon it may lye So if it be such a Retorn as may endanger a mans Life or Inheritance Also by the Statute of 1 Ed. 3. cap. 3. and Goldesbrough 129 130. and Croke 2 Part fo 13. an Averment will lye against the Bayliffs of Franchises so that the Lords thereof be not prejudiced thereby The same Law of Certificates For by Co. Lib. 7. 14. Lib. 9. 31. and Bro. Abr. 332. no Averment will lye upon such a Certificate as is a Definitive Trial in Law of the thing Certified as the Certificate of a Bishop touching Bastardy Excommunication Marriage c. But by Co. Lib. 7. 14. Lib. 8. 121. and Leon. 1 Part Case 285. an Averment may lye and shall be received against a Certificate which is only to give Information and in the Nature of a Trial and may also lye against a Certificate upon a Commission out of any Court and may likewise be received against the Certificate of Commissioners that affirm a man to be a Bankrupt But by Bro. 332. If a Bishop Certify that such a Parson doth not pay his Tenths Iuxta formam Statuti no Averment shall be received against it And in More Case 295. an Averment will not lye against a Justice of the Kings Bench or Common Pleas and the Custos

which divers Grants and Renders were made and in the third Render all the Mannors Lands and Tenements were rendred to A. and B. and the Heirs of the Body of A. and in the fourth Render part of the Premisses were rendred to B. in Tail the Remainder to the Right Heirs of A. It was Resolved that the same was not Error First That the fourth Render as to that was contained in the third Render should be in the quality of a Charter which needs not such a precise Form as a Judgment Secondly That the Conusor should not assign that for Error because he gets an Estate by it and no man shall reverse any thing for Error unless he can shew that the Error is to his advantage So More Case 202. If an Infant levy a Fine and take an Estate by Render he may not have Error for this And see Mich. 31 Eliz. in B. R. Leon. Rep 1 Part 317. Pigot and Harrington's Case where Baron and Feme were Tenants for Life the Remainder in Fee to an Infant and they three levied a Fine and the Infant only brought Error to Reverse it It was Objected that they all Three ought to joyn in the Writ according to 29 Ed. 3. 14. But per Cur ' the Writ is well brought for the Error is not Assigned in the Record but without it in the person of the Infant and that is the Cause of Action for him and for no other and the Fine was reversed as to the Infant only Vide Cro's Iacobi 330. Point's Case and Bulstrode's 1 Part 206. Batts and Ienning's Case where Inspection of an Infant in Error to Reverse a Fine upon the day of Adjornment of the Term held good by all the Judges of England And see Mo. Case 701. That a Writ of Covenant Retornable before the Date is Error CHAP. XIV Of Appeals Indictments and Informations APPEAL according to Co. on Littleton Lib. 2. cap. 11. comes from the Latin word Appello to Call quia Appellans vocat Reum in Iudicium and is used in our Law for the private Accusation of a Murderer by a Person who had Interest in the Party murdered It is as much as Accusatio with the Civilians for as in their Law Cognizance of Criminal Causes is taken either upon Inquisition Denunciation or Accusation so it is in ours upon Indictment or Appeal Indictment comprehending both Inquisition and Denunciation Accusation or Appeal being a lawful Declaration of another man's Crime of Felony at least for tho' there be an Appeal of Mayhem yet that according to Bracton is but in a manner an Action of Trespass before a Competent Iudge by one who sets his Name to the Declaration and undertakes to prove it upon the Penalty that may ensue of the contrary Appeal by others is defined to be The violent pursuing of a Subject unto Death and is the most nice kind of Suit that is commenced at the Common Law for every small matter will quash the same if it be not freshly pursued and shall in divers respects be taken strictly in favorem vitae And Note That the Process in every Appeal is to bear Date the same day of the Retorn and if not it will be a Discontinuance of the Process Note also That the Omission of any word which is material in the Writ of Appeal will abate the same And it is to be Observed That the Process in an Appeal doth vary from all other Proceedings at the Common Law for there shall be no Amendment of a Writ of Appeal nor is the Discontinuance of it helped by any Statute Then Where an Appeal of Murder will not lie for the Heir For which see Mich. 33 H. 8. Dyer 50. The Statute of 31 H. 8. made it Treason for a Woman to Poison her Husband A Woman Poisoned her Husband Afterwards the Statute of 32 H. 8. Of General Pardon pardoned the Offence the Heir brought an Appeal of Murder And it was the Opinion of all the Justices that now an Appeal of Murder did lye for the Heir for that now Murder was turned into Treason and the greater Offence shall extinguish the lesser And see Co. Lib. 6. fo 13. in the Case of Pardons acc and 7 Eliz. Dyer 235. where Petty Treason is pardoned by a General Pardon there one who killed his Master was Indicted of Murder and holden the Indictment did not lye against him but being found Guilty was Reprieved And see Mich. 33 H. 8. Dyer 51. and 33 Eliz Co. Lib. 4. 45. where an Appeal of Murder was brought against W. to Answer to A. B. alias dict' A. B. Fratri haered ' of the Person murthered but because the Plaintiff in the Appeal was named Brother and Heir in the Alias dictus which is no part of the Name the Appeal did Abate and the Defendant discharged by the Court. And see 5 Ed. 6. Dyer 69. where there were three Brothers and the Middle Brother is killed and the Eldest Brother dies within the Year without bringing any Appeal and the Question was If the Younger Brother might maintain an Appeal It was not Resolved but left a Quaere See 11 Ed. 4. 11. Stamf. 59. 20 H. 6. 43. by Fortescue that he shall not but 16 H. 7. 15. contra Then How Appeals shall be brought by Infants First See Pasch. 17 Ed. 4. Pl. 4. and More Case 646. where an Appeal was brought by an Infant and the Defendant prayed to be dismissed because the Plaintiff was an Infant Per Cur ' If the Defendant be guilty he shall stay in Ward till the Infant comes of Age. But by 27 H. 8. 1. b. the Plaintiff now shall appear by Guardian By Co. 2 Inst. 5. If an Infant bring an Appeal of the Death of his Ancestor the Parol shall not demur for want of Battail but the Infant shall be outed of it as if the Appellor were Old or Maimed But Mirror of Iustices 127. contra the Parol shall demur And see 2 Ed. 4. 19. b. and 20. a. acc and 11 H. 4. 93. a. And Pasch. 27 H. 8. 25. an Infant brought an Appeal of Murder in the time of H. 8. and prayed that the Parol might demur and Resolved it should not By 35 H. 6. 10. If an Infant be found guilty of Felony 't is in the discretion of the Court to give Judgment or not as they find the Infant hath Discretion or Malicious Intent By Owen 59 63. and Popham 115. in an Appeal of Murder after Pleading to the Writ the Defendant must Plead over to the Felony else it is a Confession of it for there his Life is in question And see 3 Cro. 223 224. where in an Appeal of the Death of an Husband the Defendant pleads Ne unques accouple c. and quoad c. Not Guilty The Plaintiff Replies fueront accouple but pleads nothing to the rest yet it seems the Plea is not Discontinued because the first Plea is not Triable at Common Law so answers

an Action of his own Possession he shall not be compelled to shew the Will or Letters of Administration And so is 21 H. 6. 23. 10 Ed. 4. 1. 16 Ed. 4. 1. and divers other Books although the Plea be but to the Writ as that he is Administrator But 42 Ed. 3. 4. 3 Ed. 3. 31. and 7 H. 6. 41. In Trespass de bonis asportat ' in vita Testatoris he must shew the Will And so is 6 E. 4. 1. and 16 Ed. 4. 8. But by 19 H. 6. he need not shew it in another Term. And this difference of Plaintiff and Defendant is confirmed in Plowden's Com. in Graysbrook and Fox's Case Next we shall shew How the Vouchee shall be forced to shew a Deed. And therefore First by 22 Ass. 88. he that Voucheth as Assignee shall not only shew the first Deed but the Deeds of Assignment also and to that intent is 3 H. 6. and other Books in this Title in Bro. 5. But he may Rebut by the first Deed. Quaere tamen For 3 H. 7. 13 14. seems that he need not shew the Deeds of Assignment upon Voucher And see 48 Ed. 3. 5. That the Tenant in Dower vouching the Heir of full Age yet ought to shew a Deed quod nota But yet see 50 Ed. 3. 25. That in the same Case or in any other as it seems he that doth Vouch one unless he do pray also that the Parol may demur for Nonage shall not need to shew any Deed to the Demandant For which see more at large in Brook and Fitzherbert's Abridgments in the Title Voucher And 10 H. 7. 21. he that Voucheth as Assignee of the Reversion to save the Tail shall shew But Keble è contra and Vouched divers Books And then How an Action may be upon Record without shewing It appears 9 Ed. 4. 5 H. 7. and 32 H. 6. in Brook hoc Titulo 158 159. Be the Action in the same Court or another the Party that brings the Action shall not be enforced to shew the same But if the Record be in the same Court unremoved by Error or otherwise the Defendant may demand Oyer of of the same and shall have it but if otherwise he is bound to take Conusance thereof and to plead Nul tiel Record and thereupon the Record it self shall be sent down by Mittimus And so is 39 H. 6. 4. But by that Book it sufficeth if the Tenor of the Record be Certified And 7 H. 6. 18. one brought Debt in the Common Pleas upon Damages recovered in Trespass at York in a Court of Piepowder containing the Tenour of the said Record in his Count and how it came into the Chancery and thither by Mittimus and yet the Defendant did plead Nul tiel Record quod nota But touching this Point further How the Record shall be Certified and where the Tenour of the Record will serve or not see Dyer 8 Eliz. 250. 6 Eliz. 227. 3 Eliz. 187 188. and otherwise there Then it appears That although one have not the Deed yet if it appear of Record in the same Court pleaded by another at that time he shall have advantage of it As 40 Ass. 34. In an Assize against two the one having a Waranty to Bar the Plaintiff pleaded the same for his part and although he would not suffer his Companion to help himself by the same yet the other took advantage thereof As by Littleton in his Chapter of Estates upon Condition 90 91. If a Deed be once pleaded the other may shew That in the same there is a Condition c. And 24 Ed. 3. 73. the Defendant pleaded a Release which the Plaintiff did deny and after was Nonsuit And in another Action brought in the same Court the Defendant did plead the same again without shewing as a Deed gainsaid remaining in the Court. And by 21 Ed. 4. 48 49. If a man plead Letters Patents remaining of Record in the said Court he shall not shew them and so said to be the use of the Exchequer And 1 Eliz. in Dyer 17. a Lease of a Bishop Inrolled in the Chancery pleaded without shewing and it seems ill by that Book CHAP. VI. Of Pleading in General THen touching Pleading in General more than before hath been discoursed of in the several Divisions And First Where one in Pleading shall shew how he was seised And therefore in some Cases One may Convey to himself an Estate without shewing how he that gave it was seised And by 34 H. 6. 48. in the Writ or Count may be said quod quidam J. S. dimisit That such an one Let without shewing that he was seised Otherwise by way of Bar or Title And so 9 H. 4. 5. 21 H. 7. 26. and 10 H. 6. in a Formedon may say Dedit And next Where one shall say he was seised In Dominico suo c. For which see first Littleton where the Thing lieth in Demean as Land or Rent c. Or where otherwise as Advowsons And 30 H. 6. 7. one of a Way did say In Dominico suo ut de feodo de jure And 21 Ed. 4. 80. of a Copyhold in Dominico suo c. secundum Consuetud ' And see 7 H. 6. Dyer 83. of Tithes one shall say in Dominico suo ut de feodo because palbable c. And see in Wortley's Ejectione firmae in Plowden That of a Reversion dependant upon an Estate for Years In Dominico suo is the proper Pleading but the Plea of De Feodo admitted Then next Where in Pleading shall be said In Iure Uxoris c. See first 27 H. 8. 21. where Lands are given to the Baron and Feme and the Heirs of the Body of the Feme the Plea shall be Quod fuerunt seisit ' simul haered ' de Corpore le Feme And 12 H. 7. 14. the Defendant in Trespass did plead That He and his Wife were seised in their Demean as of Fee and said not In jure Uxoris or Conjunctim and yet good because if he have Title to any part it is not material in what manner And so in Wortley's Case in Plowden of a Term in Right of his Wife Next VVhere more and one Interessed See 37 H. 6. 24. where Lands are given to Two and the Heirs of One of them the Pleading shall be Quod fuer ' seisit ' viz. the one In Dominico suo ut de feodo and the other In Dominico suo ut de lib'o Tenemento And then of the Plea In Iure Coronae 34 H. 6. 34. In a Quare Impedit the Plaintiff made Title for that King Henry the Fourth was seised c. and did not say In Iure Coronae and good for there is said to be no other Form And see 7 Ed. 6. Dyer 83. accordingly touching Religious Lands where the said Book of 34 H. 6. is Vouched and shewed to be the better Pleading And so is 1 2 Mar. Dyer

4 5. Mariae 162. How the Plaintiff Recovering 40 l. against one that hath Land in divers Counties may dividing his Debt or intirely have several Elegits But by Hobart 58. There may not be two several sorts of Executions out an once but one after another Yet Idem fo 2. If one Elegit be sued out and entred of Record tho' the Plaintiff get nothing by it yet he shall never have other Execution till something be found and no man will Record the Execution till he find somewhat Vide Yelvertons Reports fo 52. Where said That if a man be taken upon a wrong Writ of Execution tho' it be returned Executed yet because he in Truth never was in Execution a new Capias may issue out against him And Idem 180. Where Goods are taken in Execution in another County upon a Testatum returned That the Defendant Nulla habet Bona c. in London where the Action was Tried but in the County of B. where the Goods were taken which is false the Execution shall be avoided and the Party restored to his Goods again But by Moor Case 428. though the Court grant an Erroneous Execution yet that will not excuse the Sheriff where there is an Escape Yet by Hetley Rep. 157. Where the Sheriff upon a Fieri Facias takes a part of the Defendants Goods in Execution and delivers them to the Plaintiff and they be taken from him he shall have Execution de novo And by Popham in his Reports fo 206. one may be discharged out of Execution by word only as where one is in Execution at my Suit and I bid the Sheriff let him go this is a good discharge Vide Dyer 306. Where said That in all Cases where the Law doth once adjudge a Defendant to be in Execution at the Suit of the Plaintiff if the Sheriff suffer him to escape he shall be chargeable to the Plaintiff for the same in an Action of Debt or upon the Case Yet by Popham 41. if he be taken in a Fresh Pursuit tho' in another County by that he shall be in Execution again And by Co. lib. 3. 71. where the Sheriffs of London at the going out of their Office by Indenture did deliver B. in Execution to the New Sheriffs and he being in Execution at the Suit of C. and D. did make his Escape D. only is named C. sues the Escape and had Judgment and held that B. was not in Execution of the Old or new Sheriffs and that the Old are to give notice to the New Sheriffs of them in Execution tho' they be upon Record and the Prisoners are in Custody of the Old Sheriffs tho' out of Office till delivered to New and if the Old Sheriffs die the New must take notice of them at their Peril and the Prisoners are in Custody of the Law between the death of the Old and the coming in of the New Sheriffs But see Co. lib. 4. Blomfields Case where two were bound jointly and severally by Bond both sued and condemned and taken in Execution the one escaped the other brought an Audita Querela and held not to lie Vide Rolls Abridgment 904. Where said That if A. be taken in Execution on a Capias ad Satisfaciendum at the Suit of B. and escape from the Sheriff and no return is made of the Writ nor is the Writ filed or any Record made of the Award of the Capias B. may have a Scire Facias against A. and thereupon what Execution he will And see More Case 1177. and Hob. 55 56. Foster and Iacksons Case If the Defendant die in Execution this is a discharge of the Execution for ever as an Escape is Yet Co. lib. 5. 86. contra But by Hob. 59. If two be bound jointly and severally to me and I sue them jointly I may have a Capias against them both and the Death or Escape of the one shall not discharge the other But I may not have a Capias against one and another kind of Execution against the other when I sue them jointly But when I sue them severally I may sever them in their several kinds of Execution but yet so as if a very satisfaction be had of one or against the Sheriff upon the Escape of one the other may be relieved by Audita Querela But if a Capias ad Satisfaciendum be had against one of them in this Case so as there is such an Execution as is a Satisfaction no other can be had against him or his Heir or Executor if he dies here none may be had against either of the others For where the Law gives three or four kinds of Execution by way of Choice and the Plaintiff chooseth a Capias ad satisfaciendum and the Defendants Body is taken thereupon it cannot be for part as in a Fieri Facias Vide Anderson Part 1. Case 166. Where the Plaintiff sued a Capias ad Satisfaciendum against one of the County of C. that was brought into Court in Custody of the Sheriff where the Plaintiff was present and being asked by the Court whether he would pray that the Prisoner might be committed to the Fleet answered that he would not And this he did because the Prisoner was poor and not able to pay and had escaped out of the Sheriffs Custody against whom he said he intended to bring his Action and thereupon the Court discharged him of his Execution not committing him to the Fleet nor leaving him in the Custody of the Sheriff because the Sheriff did not pray it Then as to the Force of an Elegit See Westm. 2. cap. 18. Dyer 206 335. Co. lib. 7. 49. lib. 4. 67 68. Fitzh Nat. Brev. 48. Plowd 224. 178. 2 H. 4. 14. Bulstrode part 2. 98 99. Lane 20. That upon an Elegit the Sheriff is to make Execution of a moiety or one half of all the Houses Lands Meadows Pastures Rents Reversions and Hereditaments whereof and wherein the Defendant at the time of the Judgment had or after had any sole Estate or Interest in Fee Tail or for Life into whose hands soever the same do afterwards come So also if the Husband and Wife do hold Lands for their two Lives they are Extendable upon this Writ But a Right only to Land an Annuity Copyhold-land the Land the Husband holds in Right of his Wife in Fee or for Life is not Extendable after her Death nor liable to Execution And all the Goods and Chattels except only the Beasts of the Plow which the Defendant hath or at time of Execution had are liable to Execution on this Writ as on a Fieri Facias But no Goods and Chattels really and Bona Fide made away before Execution are liable to be taken upon this Writ Vide Hob. 57. An Elegit may be sued of Lands in Ancient Demesn And ibidem it may be sued after a Capias or Fieri Facias both and after a Capias returned non est inventus But

Querela But if a Capias ad satisfaciendum be had against one of them in this Case so as there is such an Execution as is a Satisfaction no other can be had against him or against his Heir or Executor if he die For where the Law gives several kinds of Execution by way of Choice and he Chuseth a Capias ad satisfaciendum and the Body is taken it cannot be for part as in a Fieri facias But see the Statute of 21 Iac. 1. cap. 24. how the Law is thereby changed in this Point For it is Enacted by that Act That he or they at whose Suit any Person is charged in Execution for Debt or Damages recovered their Executors or Administrators may after the Death of the Person so charged in Execution lawfully sue forth New Execution against the Lands and Tenements Goods and Chattels of the Person so Deceased in like manner as if the Person Deceased had never been in Execution And see Roll's Abridgment 903. That if one Recover in Debt against I. S. and then Outlaw him on the Judgment and afterwards I. S. is taken within the Year by Capias Utlagatum at the Suit of the King and dies in Prison before any Prayer made by the Plaintiff That he might be in Execution at his Suit This is no Satisfaction therefore the Executor or Administrator of him that is dead may be charged for the Debt notwithstanding he was in Execution by being taken upon the Capias Utlagatum But by Anderson 1 Part Case 273. if one that hath an Execution of Land Release one Acre of the Execution all is Extinct by the Release of the Execution in one Acre And by Hobart 60. If the Party in Execution Escape of his own wrong the Plaintiff can have no other Execution of him or of his Executors But if he take one in Execution where there are several Debtors by one Obligation there he may take another after the Escape of that one or he may have Satisfaction from the Sheriff upon the Escape at his Choice And by Co. 5 Part 86. and 6 Part 13. and 8 Part 152. and Dyer 152. If the Defendant pay the Mony he is discharged But if the Plaintiff makes any Release or other such like Act to the Defendant being in Execution amounting to a Discharge this will not be a Discharge Ipso facto but by this means he may have a Discharge And yet if the Plaintiff himself shall deliver the Prisoner out of Execution he is thereby Ipso facto discharged of the Execution for ever So if the Plaintiff doth acknowledge Satisfaction upon Record So by 13 H. 7. 1. Plowd Com. 36. and 33 H. 6. 47. If one taken in Execution upon a Capias ad satisfaciendum doth Escape and the Plaintiff bring his Action against the Sheriff or hath a Cepi Returned on the Writ and it be Filed by this the Defendant is discharged against the Plaintiff for ever But if no Cepi be Returned nor Action brought against the Sheriff the Law will Adjudge the Party to be out of Execution But by Co. 5 Part 86. If Two be in Execution for one Debt on a Bond made by Two and the Sheriff suffers one of them to Escape this will not discharge the other till the Plaintiff hath Recovered his Debt of the Sheriff But by Co. 8 Part 143. and 38 H. 6. 4. If one be in Execution upon a Capias ad satisfaciendum and the Court adjudge the Judgment or Execution Erroneous and so null it by this the Defendant is discharged of that Execution Yet by Fitz. Nat. Brev. 146. If Two be in Execution for one Debt and one of them dies under Execution that will not discharge the other But 38 H. 8. Dyer 6. One in Execution being a Burgess of the Parliament and discharged by a Writ of Privilege doubted whether discharged for ever But by the Statute of 1 Iac. 1. cap. 13. it appears That if a Prisoner be delivered out of Execution by Privilege of Parliament it is no discharge but after the Privilege is gone he may be taken again So Pasch. 30 H. 8. Dyer 62. Trewynyard's Case where Trewynyard being a Burgess of Parliament was taken upon an Exigent after a Capïas he brought a Writ of Privilege of Parliament and the Sheriff let him at Liberty In this Case it was Resolved First That the Privilege was Grantable notwithstanding the Execution because the King and Realm have an Interest in the Body of every Burgess of Parliament and the Common-Weal shall be preferred before the Interest of any private Person Secondly That after the Parliament ended he might be taken in Execution again For that the Plaintiff shall not be prejudiced in his Execution by the Act of the Law which doth Wrong to no man See 3 Ed. 6. Dyer 66 67. where the Sheriffs of London in Debt upon an Escape by going at large by Baston in London did plead That their Predecessors let him at large and good And Note by Dyer 4 5 Mar. 162. 10 Eliz. 275. and 12 13 Eliz. 206. If the Prisoner have the King's Protection to go at large by Baston it is an Escape and the Warden of the Fleet may be Charged upon an Escape And see the same Book of Dyer 10 Eliz. where Debt was brought against the Marshal of the Kings-Bench or his Deputy And see Plowden's Commentaries in Platt's Action of Debt against the Sheriffs of London where it seemeth That by the Custom of the City of London one in Execution in Ludgate may go by Baston within London but otherwise in Southwark But Note the same Book of Dyer in 3 Ed. 6. That the Sheriffs of London were there Charged for suffering one in Execution in Ludgate to go at large in London by Baston quod nota Then Where the Act of the Court of the Law or of the Plaintiff doth discharge the Party of the Execution As namely 24 Ed. 3. 44. If one recover the Land and Body in a Writ of Ward and Release the Body the Land is thereby discharged But otherwise of a Grant The like seemeth 40 Ass. although the Land be Extended and Granted over The lik in Pop●'s Case in Plowden's Commentaries If the Cognizor after Execution Enfeoff the Cognizee of part but it is otherwise before Execution for there the Lands be in the Hands of the Cognizor and his Body is Charged See 6 Ed. 4. 4. and 24 Ed. 3. 45 46. That if one in Execution be Outlawed or Condemned for Felony and afterwards have his Pardon yet touching his Body the same shall still remain in Execution Notwithstanding by the same Book of 6 Ed. 4. if he take himself to his Clergy he shall be out of Execution And so seemeth the Book 7 Eliz. 248. but ibid. 261. è contra See hereof Bro. Abr. 272. And see 10 Eliz. 275. That one in Execution by Agreement of the Parties and the Chief Justice went at large for a