Bread grows in and rises out of the Earth so did the body of Christ he brought it not with him from Heaven for it had its Original in the womb of the blessed virgin 2. Bread undergoeâ— much labour sown dyes quickens reaped threshed winnowed grinded kneaded baked Christ body under-went the like things It was sown in the womb of the Virgin by Devils and wicked men was he continually threshed and winowed he was grinded in the high priests hall knead in his Cross and Passion baked in the Oven of his Sepulchre and then presented upon this table as bread for his people 3. Bread is broken before it can be food for man men cannot eat whole loaves nor whole joynts it must therefore be broken into parts even so must he be broken upon the Cross in satisfying his Fathers justice before he can be compleat or perfectly made the Captain of our salvation 1 Cor. 11.24 not that properly he was broken on the Cross for that the Scripture should be fulfilled a bone of him shall not be broken Iohn 18.36 Ex. 12.46 Breaking is renting one part of a thing from another so was Christ soul rent from his body his blood rent from his flesh he was poured out like water all his bones were out of joynt his heart was like wax melted in the midst of his bowels without question then broken his bones might have been told they looked and stared upon him Psal. 22.14.17 4 â—read is common to all that are about a table none hath a propriety in it every one cuts sufficient for himself unto whom is the merits of the Lord limited have not all Saints since the Creation been feeding upon them and all that now are and all that shall be every one saying My Lord and my God and yet no scarcity nor absolute propriety but a holy Communion this was darkly represented â—y our Saviours birth what house in a City more common then an Inn and what place of an Inn more common then a stable shewing that the fowlest sinner he is ready to embrace cleanse and entertain 5. Bread naturally strengthens mans heart Psal. 104.15 hence it is called the staff of bread Isa 3.2 the main upholder of natural strength without which man would fall unto his first nothing Nothing more strengthens a drooping soul a doubting Christian then the application of the merits of Christ unto its heart by the holy Ghost with a morsel of this bread men may walk many dayes unto the mount of God 6. Bread is necessary for life so necessary that all things conducing to mans life are subordinate to it as the Reader may know by the Lords prayer if he have not forgot it or slights â—t because common Christ in us Our hope of glory is most necessary and as we know without food or bread we cannot live a natural life we ought to know without receiving of this Ordinance we have no ground to imagine that we shall live a spiritual We dayly hear men chiefly ministers complaining of their peoples Apostacy and yet since this Sacrament in its season was not presented to their faith which might be a strong means of confirming it is not to be wondered to see their people faint stagger and all for want of bread Further between the wine the outward sign and the blood of Christ the thing signified stands this proportion 1. Wine is the juice of â—he grape pressed out by the wine press so was Christ blood pressed out by the weights of his Fathers infinite justice Isa. 63.3 2. Wine comforteth the heart of man Psal. 104.15 the blood of Christ drank in faith in large spiritual draughts out of the vessel or chalice of this Ordinance with the mouth of the affections and received into the stomach of meditation will produce holy purposes and give good spirits to the languishing Christian. 3. Wine encourageth and emboldens It raiseth the spirits that are otherwise cast down and makes the Gyant himself to shout at the flight of his enemy it makes a man to forget trouble and sorrow Prov. 31.6 Ecles 19. Christs blood applied to the soul makes it exceeding bold to fight against principalities and powers it makes them that are of a fearful heart be strong saying feaâ— not Isa. 35.4 and emboldens it to come to the throne of grace Heb. 4.16 It makes the people to clap their hands and shout unto God with the voice of triumph Psal 47.1 4. Wine is of a healing nature Luke 10.34 the Samaritan poured in Wine with Oyle into the wounds of the bleeding traveller the bleeding wounds of an afflicted conscience know that the blood of Christ is of a Soveraign nature to preserve it from dying and yielding up the Ghost Rev. 22.2 From this Doctrine we may draw these inferences 1. When we see bread and wine and feel the comforts of the one and know the necessity of the other to think of Christ and the comforts to be had in his death and the necessity that lyeth upon believers to receive this Ordinance 2. To strive for a spiritual hunger in our approaching to the table of the Lord for otherwise there is no refreshment will be found at the receiving of this spiritual banquet 3. That the Church of Rome by her doctrine of transubstantiation takes away the beauty of this holy Ordinance robbing the people of the cup of the New Testament and by making or teaching that the Accidents of the Elements that is the whitness or roundness of the bread and the colour of the wine to be the sign of the body and blood of the Lord for which cause she is justly condemned by the reformed Churches SECT V THis Ordinance of the Supper is instituted to assure the penitent receiver of the remission of his sins yet all that receive it are not pardoned in regard that some receive it unworthily and their sins are not forgiven justly in as much as the condition upon which the Lord promiseth absolution for his part is not performed upon their part and because of that they are so far from having their soul eased that it is more burthened They being guilty of the body and blood of the Lord 1 Cor. 11.27 by reciving unworthily Now there are three wayes by which men receive unworthily First by not giving due reverence to the mystery in that Sacrament contained Secondly to the ends for which it was appointâ—d Thirdly to the Author by whom it was instituted 1. The Ministery in that Sacrament contained As 1. To the crucified body of Christ this presents unto us Christ and him crucifed and the same reverence or respect that we would give to Chrâ—â—â— were he visibly present with us we must give unto him represented before us by bread and wine Not that we should give it to the bread and wine but to the Person who is represented to us by them 2. All that God ever did do or that ever he promised to do for the best and dearest of his Saints is
Churches constituted for they have no Sacraments this follows upon the former and rises morally from it where there is no Minister or authoritative Officer there can be no Sacraments they being the Seals of the Covenant of grace which is made unto believers either when they are incorporated or confirmed in the body of Christ which is the Church Ephes. 1.23 Thy are also called broad seals of heaven that of the spirit being the private by which the receiver is assured of the pardon of his sins Now to the private Christian did Christ never give the keeping of or the power of delivering those seals The People were never Lord-chancellours of these things whether singly or collectively taken therefore they cannot give nor dispence them to another Iohn the Baptist was called from God immediately to baptize so were the Apostles by Christ who Ordained none nor Baptized none but them while the Church of Christ was constituting God was pleased so to do but after the Baptists death and the Apostles call no such extraordinary acts but all must receive now that power from the hands of the Apostles by Ordination The Church may say to those men when they come to dispence the Seals Peter I know Paul I know Stephen I know Nicanor I know Timothy I know Titus I know but who are you if you say you were or are Ordained by Christ he Ordained none but his Disciples if you were Ordained by his Disciples show it by your Commission wee shal know whether Baptisme be from Heaven that we may believe or from men that we may not be mistaken in it Possibly the peoples Election and deputation is produced for this authority which is to be equally regarded as he who should come with a Commission from a mans own son for the Father to execute the power or Office of Justice of the peace which is to be scorned his Son having no power to grant such Orders or give such Offices The power of Ordination search the Scriptures was never granted to the people neither in the Old nor New testament We find indeed Micha Iudg. 17. having a House of Gods and an Ephath and a Teraphim consecrating one of his sons for a Priest though of the tribe of Ephraim of which tribe Mosâ—s spoke nothing touching the Priesthood He afterwards Consecrated a Levite to be his Priest verse 12. which was an Office peculiar to the Sons of Aaron not to the Levites in common but who gave Micha the power of consecration how can he consecrate any Priest at all this moved him vers 6. In those days there was no King in Israel but every man did what was right in his own eyes there being no Magistrate or Governour to keep the people in awe An Ephraimite may consecrate and offer Sacrifice and the Worship of God being contemned through the disorder of the times a Levite is forced to wander for a place and assume the Priesthood The want of Government was the cause of this and other evils that followed upon it The self-same cause is the reason of the irregularity that hath lately been in England touching Micha's even Peoples ordination of Priests which power was never given to him nor them In one thing Micha is to have his due applause he would have none to offer Sacrifice in his House a priestly Office before he were consecrated i.e. before he were ordained Priest he had read in the Law what Sacrifices Duties were appointed in the designation of men into that Office his Son nor the Levites not being of that line unto whom by a natural succession the Office belonged he saw a necessity of making them Priests for he must worship God and if they be Priests they must be consecrated he knows nor how or where to procure another â—â— therefore takes the Authority to himself of Consecration And truly such Priests as he made and himself that made them and the Worship they gave by him and the gods they worshipped too were suitable to each other Even such are they though in this particular worse who will offer to design or depute any to be their Priest or Minister who are not of that line to whom by a moral Succession that Office onely belongeth by their being deputed and set apart for that Office by the Sacrifice of Prayer and Supplication and with the ceremony of Imposition of Hands by those who have received that power by Apostolical Tradition Possibly he may produce his own Gifts of Holiness Utterance Aptness to teach Courage Zeal with all other Gifts that are possible to qualifie men inwardly for that Office and indeed may shew a Call from God which he supposes ought to be sufficient to testifie that his Baptism is not of men or to demonstrate that he is a man sent from God authoritatively to teach and administer the Sacraments to his Church But the Church values not those in this nature for so Paul was qualified also and Barnabas qualified and called of God for that Office yet God will have them to be constituted authoritative teachers in the sight of the Church by the Laws that were by him appointed for the Church viz. by Ordination or Imposition of hands Act. 13.3 So Stephen Nicanor Philip c. Acts 6. were men of honest report full of the Holy ghost and wisedome yet the lowest Office in the Church cannot they neither do they offer to perform in that Ordination from the Apostles Upon this ground the Church hath reason to deny their Authority and we deny that they have power to administer Sacraments the bread that they brake is not the body of Christ the cup they offer is not the Communion of the blood of Christ shed for the remission of sins they have not received this power of the Lord because not from his Apostles of causing Bread to be by faith beheld as the body of Christ nor Wine to represent the blood of Christ. In a word let us see how or when they received power from the Apostles otherwise they must passe for counterfeits and cheats and the offence so much the more hainous as it 's a counterfeiting the Great Seal of Heaven to bring Christs Spouse and her children in an errour in matters of so gâ—â—at concernment as the Seal of the Remission of their sins but she knows his hand and though they should come with never so much show of humility nay confirm their calling by miracles she is not she will not believe it Christ her Husband hath forewarned her that such should come and charged her not to heed them not follow them but shun them and avoid them 3. Should we Church those segregated Congregations as now constituted we must and are to un-Church all the Churches that now are or that ever have been in the Christian World They taught and teached the contrary they maintained and dyed for the contrary they walk Autipodos to one another there is a great diversity in their walking thus constituted as
if weak Brothers be offended at it it is forborn for the peace of the Church if it were absolutely necessary here it would never be indifferent there 3. Something is morall necessary and binding viz. to abstain from Fornication looked upon among the Gentiles as a thing of no great concernment the Corinthians though called were very guilty of it and one in a high measure 1 Cor. 5. 6. Now says the Canon It seemed good unto the Holy Ghost and to us The Holy ghost of old and new commands to abstain from fornication and it seems good to us gathered together by the Holy ghost filled and guided by the Holy ghost viz. Us Apostles Elders c. that you should abstain from meats sacrificed to Idols and from blood c. for no otherwise are we to read the words when we consider that Peter Paul Barnabas did oppose every part of the Cenial Law yet in regard that Moses is read c. it seems good to us that these things be done They are called necessary things For 1. Fornication is necessary to be abstained 1 Cor. 6.9 And 2. That of Idols if it be taken for pollution with Idols as Iames sentence is Act. 15.20 then it is absolutely necessary if it be taken for eating meats offered to Idols as the Canon of the Councill is then it is necessary secundum quid only as abstaining from blood and strangled that is they are necessary now in respect of procuring peace to the Church for the taking away of the cause of offence for again remember that three Apostles opposed every part of that Law that was given by Moses Iames found out the Medium and abstaining from things strangled and from blood is no more necessary by this Canon then not eating of meat sacrificed to Idols that that is not necessary but may be lawfully done where no offence is taken 〈◊〉 as if it were written with a Sun-beam from 1 Cor. 8. 〈◊〉 any of these three last been necessary for salvation 〈◊〉 been much disputings against them by Paul would 〈◊〉 been against it would Iames have confirmed 〈…〉 nay would not Paul here have opposed him to his 〈…〉 Paul ever have made it a thing indifferent if the Holy Ghost had made it absolutely necessary for the preseâ—◠〈◊〉 it was judged by the Apostles so to be in regard of Moses being 〈◊〉 no further obliging There is a remarkable instance for this after the breaking up of the Council Paul preaching the gospel found and took one Timotheus Acts 16.1 2 3. and circumcised him which act he strongly opposed at Antioch yet did it in 〈◊〉 not that Paul changed his judgmenâ— â—e circumcised him says the 〈◊〉 because of the Jews which were in those quarters verse 4. that all occasion of offence might be taken from them when had that determination of the Council been literally looked after Paul sinned grosly in laying a greater burthen upon the believers then any was mentioned in the Apostles cannons this declares that in regard of the Iews at that time there was a necessity in some things to eye the Law but never holding nor teaching it as necessary yet holding it in some places and at some times convenient in some part necessary for the peace of the Church particularly that no offence might be given to the Iews so desirous were they of their salvation but when the Iews remained constantly in their keeping the Law and out of stubernness still would have it observed the Apostles then and Christians at this day stood and do stand to their Christian liberty Paul will circumcise no man be offended who will Gal. 5.1 2. and Gal. 3.1 the whole body of the Ceremonial Law is preached down written down which shews that those Ceremonial decrees in the Canon of the Apostolick Council was never ordained for a standing or an eternal rule in the Church the Temple is now gone Christianity is established Peter Paul Barnabas and Iames know that God is satisfied with our believing and though for a time it seemed good to them gathered together by the Holy Ghost to keep a few of those Laws for the peace of the Church and for the ingathering of the Iews yet since they still remain offended let them so remain and for all their offence taking let us now stand fast in the liberty where with Christ hath made us free The Law is not now read the Apostles lived to see the Jews once a glorious people a royal priesthood and a holy nation rejected of God unchurched of him and they see her ceremonies all buried hear what is written by the Holy Ghost since the Iews weakness is turned to stubbernness if Peter now take part with the Iews for offending he must and is reproved before the whole Assembly and that in Antioch too Gal. 2.12 See Gal. 5.2 Behold I Paul say unto you that if ye be circumcised Christ shall profit you nothing Now he speaks out seeing the Iews are not the better for that indulgence given For I testifie again to every man that is circumcised that he is debtor to do the whole Law by Christ we are debtors to no part of the Law nay not to abstain from eating of blood Was it not Pauls Caution to the Collossians Col. 2.16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat and in drink or in respect of an holy day or of the new Moon what ever you eat or what ever you drink let no man judge you that is condemn you though it it be not according to the Law for they were a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ blood was to be poured on the altar to make an attonement for sin but the blood of Christ is now poured forth and there ought to be no other offering for sin to be brief that blood may be eaten now under the gospel or that that decree of the Council is not binding to us in these dayes appears 1 From the rule of proportion between it and things sacrificed to idols according to the Canons of the Council they are alike unlawfull they are alike necessary they alike binding they were enjoyned by one and the self same authority but now S. Paul 1 Cor. 8. speaking of things sacrificed of idols which was one of the questions the Corinthians desired to be satisfied in from that Apostle in regard that some did eat of that meat upon their knowledge that an idol was nothing in the the world and some did not eat fearing it might be something the Apostle yeilds that though an idol be nothing in regard there is but one God and though men might eat of that meat sacrificed to them for anything was in it for neither if we eat are we the better neither if we eat not are we the worse a plain demonstration that that Law is not obliging yet he would have them to abstain not as from the Law but for the conscience of him that was offended so that
onely in respect of giving cause of offence to others is things sacrificed to idols not to be eaten and by consequence eating of blood is no more necessary the cause therefore of that forbearance being removed viz. the reading of Moses Law and the tenderness or ignorance of new converted Iews through the establishment of the gospel being also taken away that the consciences of few or none that are Christians are wounded for useing our liberty in that particular we may without sinning against our own souls eat blood as safely as ever the Corinthians might eat things sacrificed to idols or in an idols Temple since both these by the Canon of the Council were esteemed necessary not in themselves but in respect of weak consciences peace of the Church which now in these two particulars is in no danger for had things sacrificed to idols been in it self necessary to prevent sinning against a mans own soul then meat had commended us unto God which it doth not 1 Cor. 8.8 Nay our Apostle would have urged it and pressed the not doing of it upon that account but contrary he yields and would have them to abstain for the consciences of their weak brethren onely withoâ—t once mentioning any other cause 2. From the holy Apostles attestation speaking of things indifferent and of meats Rom. 14.2 3. Commands that be that eateth meats forbidden in the Law despise not him that eateth not viz. for conscience of the Law Every man living not to himself only ought to have a care of his Brother or not judge him Or put no stumbling block in his Brothers way v. 13. But why must not one judge another in eating or not eating meats forbidden in the Law the Reason he gives v. 14. I know and am perswaded by the Lord Iesus that there is nothing unclean of it self but to him that estesmeth any thing to be unclean to him it is unclean the Apostle is speaking of meats of which not by Moses but by the Lord Iesus he knows none unclean in it self therefore not blood but if a man be conceited through ignorance or conscience to that man any thing were it bread it is unclean He perswades therefore that though men by Christ may eat any thing yet if any Brother be grieved for his eating any meat forbidden by the Law he would not have him cause his Brother to sin For the kingdom of God is not in meat and drink but righteousness peace and joy in the Holy Ghost For he that in these things serveth Christ is acceptable to God and approved by him Now if it were so that that Law touching eating of blood were necessary then a part of the kingdom of God should consist in meat and though we followed after peace righteousness yet could we not neither should we be acceptable to God without abstaining from meats or something that were in it self edible for what is such is meat What ever therefore is forbidden as eating of blood is not to be forborn upon any account but onely upon the weak consciences of our brethren and in eating or forbearing none ought to judge the other for God hath received both him that eats and him that eateth not vers 3. Which God would not do if abstaining from or eating things edible had in it self been either a grace or duty 3 From the Apostles unlimited proposition 1 Tim. 4. where warning Timothy of some that in the latter days should fall from the faith and teach the doctrine of Devils Forbidding to mary and commanding to abstain from meats which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which beleeve and know thâ— truth v. 3. Blood is a creature that God hath created for the use and service of man is in it self edible and therefore meat God was pleased for a time to forbid the eating of blood having appointed it for his own Altar to make an atonement for the sin of the soul but now Christ being come and his blood shed which was Typified by that No man is now to judge us in respect of meat Col. 2.16 The time is expired and he that under the Gospel preacheth up the use of forbearing meat as a point of Doctrine binding the consciences of men under what seeming purity soever is but a messenger of Sathan and his doctrine the doctrine of Devils c. To prevent an Objection which might have been raisd against that which the Apostle is asserting suppose blood eating he affirmes that every creature of God is good and nothing to be refused if it be received with thanksgiving v. 14. But are there not some creatures that are in themselves good yet for us to eat them it is a sin and a part of unholiness No says the Apostle Every creaturo is good none is to be refused for it is sanctified by the Word of God and Prayer v. 5. Suppose S. Paul to have blood before him he is not afraid to eat he hath craved a blessing by which it is Sanctified and he wil eat for no creature is to be refused and these things if Timothy teach he shall be a good Minister of Iesus Christ v. 6. He is not a Minister of the Law and therefore he is not to look to that but of Christ and what the Word of God and Prayer hath sanctified and they sanctifie every creature let no man call it impure unlawfull and if they do as what will not some men do we are to avoid them they are seducing Spirits and teachers of lyes not apprehending the Law of the Counsel and the reason of that Law nor comparing it also with other Scriptures makes the ignorant and unlearned wrest this as wel as other Scriptures to their own hurt and the Churches disturbance making this not eating blood to be a standing law in the Gospel upon the account of sin when by the Apostles themselves it is made no more necessary then that of not eating what was Sacrificed to Idols a thing by that faithfull Labourer in the Gospel Saint Paul in it self lawful enough to be done but to be forhorn for the sake of the consciences of others and yet that very forbearance but for a time till ignorance did turn to perverseness and the Iiws weakness became stubornness then other doctrine was taught but still having a regard to the peace of the Church the ground of Iames his determination which otherwise in point of Doctrine did agree to Paul and Peter in opposing every part of the Ceremonial Law yet it seemed good in regard the Iewes in a great measure were not yet unchurched nor wholy cast off for their sakes to forbear meats in themselves lawful enough as blood was since Christs was shed But to teach now as a matter of faith the forbearance of any thing edible particularly blood the Iews being wholly unchurched and the Gospel confirmed is not of God but of Satan For every creature and therefore this is Sanctified by the Word of
Saviour of the world Acts 2.38 c. 5. To represent our Union with him and our Communion each with other bread and wine becomes flesh in us and of us and blood of our blood Christ received by faith becomes flesh of our flesh and bone of our bone we are made spiritually and mystically one body with him Eph. 5.30 And as the Catholick Church believes the remission of sins so she holds out the Communion of Saints of which the Sacraments are lively types tokens symbols and signs 1 Cor. 10.17 In a word the Sacraments to our understandings are as it were glasses darkly to behold Christ Gal. 3.1 To our memories they are as Monuments to make us remember Christ Luke 22.19 To our assurance they are as seals confirming us of our interest in Christ Rom. 4 11. SECT III. THe parts of a Sacrament are these two viz. the sign and the thing signified 1. The sign that is the outward visible and natural Element sanctified and set apart by God the onely Lawgiver to the Church to be used in that ordinance for such an end and purpose Thus water and bread and wine are appointed and instituted to be memorials representations tokens signs and Elements in the Sacraments of the Gospel as circumcision and the Paschal Lamb were of the Law Iohn 1.33 1 Cor. 11.23 2. The thing signified that is the inward invisible and spiritual thing which is mystically reprsented to the faithful receiver by the natural Element thereunto sanctified and set apart which is Christ who in presenting of the Elements is proffered and in the receiving of them is applied by the believer for his own good and comfort How grosly doth the Church of Rome oppose the very being of a Sacrament in their transubstantiation for if the very body and blood of Christ which is the thing signified by the bread and wine in the Sacrament of the supper be received by the Communicant then where is the sign the outward and visible which must necassarily be in this Ordinance if they say as they do that the figure and colour of the Cake is the sign my faith must be pardoned in that particular until it be shewn that the whiteness or roundness of the wafer or bread was appointed to be the sign by him that hath the sole power to give the thing signified Between the sign and the thing signified in the Sacraments there is a certain harmony and sweet similitude proportion how aptly did the circumcision of the flesh represent to the Iews the circumcision of the soul heart or mind Deut. 10.6 and the Paschal Lamb that Lamb of God whose blood being upon their hearts saves them from the destroying Angel What a Holy harmony is there between a Christians being washed with water in the name of the sacred Trinity and the blood of Jesus which washeth us from all our sins 1 Iohn 1.7 and being washed with baptismal water for our natural and outward impurity we ought to cleanse our selves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit 2 Cor. 7.1 The like of the other Sacrament which shall be discovered in due time Now when the Church of Rome shall finde out so exact a proportion between that which they call the sign in the supper and the thing signified they may bring possibly a true Catholick one step nearer her then for the present probably he may be we â—â—y but a step for admit the proportion be never so exact yet if the sign be not instituted it can never be a memorial of the thing signified SECT IV. VVE have them that would make the Sacraments fewer in number then God hath commanded and there are some that have made moreâ— then he hath approved Two there are no more no less viz baptisme and the Lords supper which must be observed For the observation of these we have promises and precepts Mark 16.16 Matth. 3.11 Acts 2.38 Luke 22.18 The Jewish Church had ordinary but two viz Circumcision by which they were visibly entered into the Church and Sacramentally born againâ— to this our baptisme Answers and the Paschal by which they were nourished in that Church into which by circumcision they were admitted to this our Lords supper Answers And as a man is but once born though often fed so he is but once a receiver of that Sacrament of baptisme yet ought to be a frequent partaker of that of the supper We say Ordinary the Iews had but two for that Manna from Heaven and water out of the rock were extraordinary and but for a time during Israels abode in the wilderness We need but to be born in Christ and then continue in him which is accomplished by these two without any other By baptisme we put on Christ as a garment Gal. 3.27 and by the supper we feed upon him as meat Luke 22.19 having therefore food and raiment by these Sacraments we ought to be content To all this consent the reformed Churches of Helv. Art 19.20 of Basil Art 5. of Bohem Art 11. of France Art 34. of Belg Art 33. of Sax. Art 12. of Wâ—râ— Art 9. of the four Cities Art 16. of Irel. Art 85 86. of Scotland Art 21. of England Art 25. The Article it self is this Art 25. of the Church of England Sacraments ordained of Christ be not onely badges or tokens of Christian mens profession but rather they be certain sure witnesses and effectual signs of grace and Gods good will toward us by which he doth work invisibly in us and not onely quicken but also strengthen our Faith in him c. SECT V. Questions resolved Quest. 1. VVHether those five Sacraments added by the Church of Rome be Sacraments Quest. 2. Whether the effect of the Sacraments depend upon the worthinesse of the Minister Quest. 3. Whether the Sacraments differ from the Scriptures Quest. 4. Whether the Sacraments of the old differ from those of the New Testament Quest. 5. Whether two Sacraments be sufficient under the Gospel Quest. 1. Whether those five Sacraments added by the Church of Rome be Sacraments God unto his People under the Law gave two Sacraments as signs and tokens of his good will and favour to them the contemners or neglecters whereof were in danger of the Judgement viz. Circumcision and the Paschal he hath also given to his Saints under the Gospel Baptism and the Supper as Sacraments or means to hold forth Christ and him crucified Unto these two Româ— hath added five more which are these 1. Confirmation or Laying on of hands 2. Pennance or satisfaction for sin committed 3. Orders or ordination before the work of the Ministery be assumed 4. Matrimony 5. Extreame Unction or the anointing of the sick with oyle before he depart But none of these are Sacraments for 1. None of them was instituted by Christ for such an end Let all the Gospel be searched and we shall find non of these instituted and sanctified to be as means for the applying of the merits of Christs
here fully presented and â—â—â—fo â—h grace favour mercy glory with all points that tend to â—â—â—ual life are here signified by bread and wine and comprized â— that one blessing Remission of sin the mercy here sealed 3. The incorporation or Union of a soul with Christ. The bread eaten is incorporated into the body of the receiver Christ accepted and received makes the believer one body with him flesh of his flesh that they are no more two distinct beings of themselves but parts of each other as the root or body of the vine and the branches 1 Iohn 15.5 4. The fellowship that believers shall receive with Christian glory drinking of wine on earth as this Ordinane shews That we shall drink with him in his Fathers Kingdom and that many shall come from the East and from the West and sit down with Abraham Isaac and Jacob in the Kingdom of Heaven of which this Ordinance is a special representation Math. 26.29 5. The necessity that lies upon men to embrace and apply the Lord Jesus he by this appears as necessâ—ry for our spiritual well-being as bread for our natural and sole being and as nature would decay without the one so grace will languish without the other 6. The perfection of the Lord Jesus he is for all necessary things held out by bread for all comfortable things represented by wine there is nothing necessary for our being nor comfortable for our well-being but Christ is that fully held out unto us in the Elements of this Ordinance 7. The Union and affection that ought to be in all the Members of Christ towards each other there are many grains of wheare goe to the making of one loaf and many grapes to the filling of one cup yet these being together without strife shew communicants should be of one heart without contention All or any of these mysteries not to be regarded reverenced or valued denotes the unworthy receiver 2. To the ends for which it was appointed of them we have spoken Sect. 2. Unto which the reader may look back 3. To the Author of whom it was instituted This hath the Lord Jesus for its Original and his precept for its receiving and if he be not regarded and reverenced by the Communicant the Communicant by him shall be reproved and condemned Now there are four sorts of Persons that put not that esteem upon Christ as they ought in reference to this Ordinance 1. The Formalist he comes either out of custome or curiosity at most it is that men say not he was away 2. The Hypocrite he brings an Alabaster boxe but no pretious Oyntment it is true he bows the knee yet puts a vail upon Christs face strikes him saying Prophesie who sâ—â—ites thee he denies Christs Omnipotence and omniscience as if he could not find out the wickedness of his heart or were not able to punish him for itâ— Luke 22.64 3. The impenitent it is not they who are invited to the Lambs Supper It is the mourning sorrowful weeping repenting soul for whom this table is covered and for whom Christ hath pardons ready sealed to comfort refresh cherish and acquit them the Communion cloth dryes onely the weeping eye and the wine onely warms and refreshes the fainting soul. The impenitent ought not to come there and if they do it is upon their own peril for Christ never called them 4. The malecontent he sins against the Author and mystery of this Ordinance with a witness Christ was a man of peace though acquainted with trouble and this Ordinance is a bond of peace and ought not to be sealed in wrath How shall he expect to have his talents frankly forgiven him in this who will not forgive his Brother his pence at his own table Christ is harmless separate from sinners and this man therefore is to keep from him this table is like that heâ—p of wheat Cant. 7.2 and therefore to be set about him with Lilies his man being a Nettle he is nigh to be plucked up and cast out Math. 22.13 SECT VI. BY that known rule of contraries it may be known who is the worthy receiver by him that understands by what hath been spoken what it is or who it is that receives it unworthily yet for further manifestation he is a worthy receiver 1. That is a discerner of the Lords body in the Sacramental Administrations Secondly of his own iniquity in its highest aggravations Thirdly of his own graces as Sacramental qualifications 1. To discern the Lords body in the Sacramental Administrations 1 Cor. 11.29 that is to discern in the Sacrament the Lords body by those outward Acts necessary to be performed by Minister and People while the Sacrament is administring Now they are of two sorts some done by the Minister and some done by the people 1. Of the Minister who hath five Acts in which by faith the Lords body and blood or the Lords himself is be discerned 1. The bread is set apart from all other bread to be a seal to the Believer of the remission of his sin other bread is appointed for the nourishing of the body this for the soul here must be discerned God the Father serâ—ing apart from all other men the Son of his eternal generation to be the Saviour of the world that is to as many as believe on his name How different is this night from all other nights says the Iew every time he eares the Passeover How different is this bread from all other bread may the Christian say when he eares this Supper How different was Christ from all other men there being none like him 1. In nature being God and man in one Person 2. In birth being born of a Virgin 3. Office being King Priest and Prophet 2. The bread is blessed that is prayer is made that that bread might be to the faithful soul the body of Christ broken for its sin and after the institution is read it becomes so here discern God the Father endowing his Son with those gifts and graces suitable to that office wherein he hath put him As 1. Wisdom 2. Understanding 3. Counsel 4. Judgement 5. Might 6. Knowledge Isa. 11.2 see also Isa. 91.1 3. The bread is broken It is not fit for food until it be in morsels In this act we most discern God the Father causing his Son to undergo the weight of his justice and dying for the sins of men that he might be a perfect Saviour 1 Cor. 11.24 4. The Minister then eateth himself he being subject to the same sins others are stands therefore in need of the same Saviour we may discern God the Father holding forth and presenting his Son to be the Saviour of all that call upon him 5. The bread is then distributed to the people and of it every one hath their portion signifying how God the Father holds forth his Son with all his grace merits benefits to every particular believer where vf this man unto whom this is presented is one 2.
3.10 2 External that is in body where he was like God 1 In Immortality Death was to have no dominion over him dissolution he was not to know God is Immortall and man in Immortality was like him 2 In Dominion over the creatures God gave man half his Empire to rule over Gen. 1.28 The furious Lyon the Kingly Eagle and the great Leviathan man stood in no awe of they all submitted to his Scepter The whole Creation of Beasts and Fowl was brought before him and though he was naked he feared them not and they disobeyed not him Gen. 2.20 This ushers in the second part of the question why man was created Naked For answer to which we make this brief reply 1 That but for sin this would be no more a question then it is now why men cover not their faces that was a piece or part of that perfection wherein God created him cloathing is but a cumber a toyl a labour a trouble and God made him perfectly happy 2 To admonish him of his sociable and peaceable life with his kinde God created other creatures with weapons strength to defend themselues against each other to some he gives swiftness to others craftiness to others strong and hard hides to others hard hoofes to some prickels to some sharp claws to others stings and poyson but only man is naked exposed open and free so that we see when men go to make war one upon another they deform themselves and look liker monsters then men God therefore would teach him by his being naked to live peaceably and sociably in the world 3 To Admonish him of his diligence and industry He hath given man little without him besides his skin yet Inriched the World for his use and that he might Imploy himself in some refreshing labour without trouble and do those things in the World most pleasing to himself what ever they were with the greater facility God created him naked 4 To discover the excellency of Adams perfection God did not make so beautifull a Creature to hide it in the cloud of a Woolen Silken or Linen garment he was the most beautifull of all creatures and God would have his beauty discovered As Eva was the Mother of all living I am prone to suppose she was the fairest of all her Daughters that lived and God would have her favour seen What needed cloathes to either since both were perfectly holy It was their holiness that made them not ashamod of their being naked Gen. 2.25 Quest. 7. Whether the reading of the Ceremonial Law be profitable to a Beleever Or whether any part of that Law be established under the Gospel The Law Ceremonial which consists of Types and Shadowes as Washings Shavings and Offerings of Sacrifices Shedding of blood Sprinkling c. some may think to be needlesse under the Gospel but they erre a Beleever may reap much profit by them 1 They may serve to confirm his faith in the truth of the Word by his seeing the Types fulfilled by Christ he is the Lamb of the Male kinde that must be Offered for the sins of the World He is the scape-goat that taketh the sins of men into the Wildernesse of Oblivion 2. By them we may take notice of Gods offence at sin he wil have the blood of man or of beasts to satisfie his Justice in respect of sin willing to spare men untill the Son of man come the blood of Buls and goats shall serve to the purifying of the flesh 3. By them believers may be excited to love Christ the more for freeing them from the burthen of that Law It was a yoke that the Jews were not able to bear Acts 15.10 By Christ the Believer is freed from it he is not now tyed to Ierusalem he needs not go there to worship neither need he kill his beast for Sacrifice but offering pure hands without wrath and doubring makes him accepted in the beloved 4. By that Law we see that there is but one Saviour for Jew and Gentile which may be the ground of many a fervent prayer for the Jews Conversion that they might effectually have the blood upon their hearts for the pardon of their sins whose blood typically they shed for the remmitting of their offences Poor souls whose Fathers saw his blood in the killing of their beasts yet their seed to be killed through their not believing in his blood now that it is poured forth Return O Lord to thee many thousands of Israel 5. Believers by that may see how carefull God is of his Worship in his making such strict Laws Statues and Judgements and the least of them to be fulfilled under the pain of being cut off 6. They may fear to sin the more against the gospel if it was dangerous under so dark a Ministration what now if it was death to break the Law delivered by Moses what then to sin against the Law given by Christ if these escaped not that broke the Law because they were delivered from Egypts thraldome How shall we escape if we neglect so great salvation Heb. 10.2 3. Let us not sin the more because the yoak is took from us but rejoyce always in God that made us free in Christ which calls upon us to see if by Christ we are free'd from any part of that Law or from all of it which is the second part of the Question The ground of it is the determination of that first and famous Counsell of the Church Acts 15. In which it was appointed v. 29 that the converted Gentiles should abstain from meats offered to Idols and from blood c. By reason of which precept some conclude this part of the Law to be confirmed under the gospell and by Christians to be observed But these men erre not knowing the Scriptures For the detecting of which errour we shall promise a few things touching the institution of the Law and the reason of the Law 1. Of the Institution When God had preserved himself a very small remnant in the Earth by Noahs Ark he gave to Noah and to his Sons every moving thing that liveth for meat Gen. 9.3 But flesh with the blood thereof which is the life thereof these they must not eat that is flesh with the blood in it or raw or not thorowly boyld or not throughly blooded or not throughly dressed as for haste the Israelites did 1 Sam. 14.32 33. Afterwards in the time of Moses this Law was enlarged Levit. 17.1 Prohibiting not only the eating of flesh with the blood but the blood of any manner of flesh v. 10. v. 14. so that untill Moses the not eating of blood divided from the flesh is not expressly forbidden though it might not by holy men be eaten for a reason hereafter to be shown 2. Of the reason of this Law and that is three fold Either 1. Physicall 2. Morall Or 3. Mystical 1. Physical The blood of beasts divided from the flesh eaten alone or the blood of beasts eaten
with the flesh might and doth breed bad and unwholesome humours in the body of which Noah might have been ignorant or at least would caution him against it and the Israelites we know are most of all forbidden those beasts and fouls and fishes that in their own natures do breed no good nor wholesome nourishment to the body whatever the matter was above other Countries Israel had most Lepers God suited their fare according to the nature possibly of their foyl forbidding in it selfe what might harm their healthy constitution and among other things forbid them blood or to eat flesh with the blood or flesh not well blooded as being grosse food and tending to the hurt or detriment of man 2. Morall blood might be forbidden to the Jews 1. To separate them and keep them from the practice of the Gentiles who eat and drank the blood of those Creatures they offered in Sacrifice to their false gods That Israel was a people prone to Idolatry it is known no Nation was more they might quickly learn this piece of Gentilisme which to prevent this Law might be enjoyned them 2. To dehort or keep them from cruelty to teach them by prohibiting the eating of the blood of any not greedily to thirst after the life of any Creature or of their own kind that the Jews naturally are a cruell mercilesse and hard hearted people is known by a proverb to teach them therefore to be tender of the blood wherein is the life of all Creatures how strictly doth God give a Law concerning little Birds Deut. 2.26 that they shall not take the young ones with the Dam but to let her go So they are not to seeth a Kid in his Mothers milk Deut. 23.19 which literally to understand is not absurd which shows how farre God would have his people from the very appearance of cruelty 3. Mysticall and to the Author this is Instar omnium God would have the blood not to be eaten because he would have it sprinckled and poured out upon his Altar signifying that man for his Rebeliion had forfeited his lifeto the hands of Justice for it is said Levit. 17.11 And I have given it to you an Attonement for your souls For it is the blood that maketh an Atonemen for the soul. This is the mystery that is included in the prohibiting of blood it it makes attonemeâ—t and God would have it not put to any use for food of the â—o'y for he intended to be for the use even the Atonement of the soul which might by inspiration be known even to Noah and to the Fathers before Moses since the eating purely was not exprâ—ssely forbidden till now Since Christ by his blood hath made an Attonement for the souls of men there is no use to be made of blood now in Sacrifice neither is it a Creature can be used any other way then for food it must therefore be eaten or thrown away that is upon the account oâ— conscience to throw it away haâ—h an appearance of sin nay is a sin since there is a Rule in the gospell to make all things edible good for man to be eaten some say is a sin since it is forbidden in the gosspell at a Council of the Apostles and Elders Act. 15. In that Epistle written to the Churches of Antioch but this Scripture is also wrested which to demonstrate we shall briefly view the occasion of that Epistles writing The parties written the thing written of 1. The occasion of that Epistles writing A Church being planted in Antioch by the conversion of many Gentiles to the Christian faith some Jewish Preachers yet believers taught unto them the necessity of keeping the Law of Moses Act. 15.1 if they would be saved and v. 5. this discouraged the Gentiles much from or in believing in Christ the Law being to the Iews themselves an unsupportable burâ—hen as is implyed v. 31. Paul and Barnabas dissented from such teaching maintaining that Believers were not at all tyed to Moses Law Now the Houses Churches and Pulpits of Antioch were full of disputings and arguings the Iewish Doctors teaching one thing and Paul another No small dissention was among them v. 2. At length they think of an agreement Paul and Barnabas and others some of both opinions are sent to the Church of Ierusalem to know their minds vers 2. At their arrival there is a Councel called great controversy and much disputing there was the law of Moses must be kept if they would be saved ver 5.6.7 Peter rises so great is the difference Appeals to the Councel if among them whom God appointed to Preach he had not made choice of him to Preach to the Gentiles the gospel of Christ that they might be saved from whom as if he had said I received no such commission as to preach the Law of Moses as circumcision or the like Takes God to witness that all times God had testified of his content sufficiently and was satisfyed in the Gentiles beleiving without their keeping of the Law of Moses by giving them faith and the holy Ghost vers 7.8.9 Maintains further that they tempt God that reach the contrary doctrine and hinder or may hinder the progress of the Gospell by putting on that yoake viz of the Ceremonial Law of Moses on the necks of the Disciples which neither we nor our Fathers were able to bear by which he holds forth that the law of Moses obligeth not the Church under the Gospel And therefore is to be taught by none and is any do they tempt God At this Argument the mouths of all opponents are stopped Peter had been an eye witness of our Lords death and resurrection He got a special tripled comission to feed the sheep of Christ And at Gods Appointment did preach to the Gentiles the gospel and not the Law that God had blessed his preaching by giving the Gentiles Faith and the holy Ghost Though the Law was never taught nor observed their conscience now tells them this their doctrine is not of God they remained silent no disputing no arguing more vers 10 11.12 Paul and Barnabas takeing occasion by this argument of Peters declares unto the Councel what works God had done by their preaching among the Gentiles without the observance of the Law makeing the same conclusion Implicitely that Peter made from the same Premisses viz God owning their Preaching by faith and miracles and therefore as they taught at Antioch so they teach now being both here and there guided by the infalliable Spirit of God that the Law of Moses was not to be Preached was not to be kept in the mouth of these three Witnesses guided by the Holy ghost let this truth be justified that no part of the Ceremonial Law is to be taught obliging now and by consequence eating of blood is no gospell precept v. 12. Again there is silence the whole Councel being convinced of the truth of the Arguments urged by Peter confirmed by Paul and Barnabas However being
met something must and ought to be done for the peace of the Church yet nothing contrary to the meaning of the Holy ghost It is a sin and a high one to think that either Peter or Paul or Barnabas in this taught false Doctrine which must be granted if any part of the ceremonial Law be obliging Iames therefore who was Bishop of Ierusalem demands attention maintains that to be true which Peter Paul and Barnabas had said confirms it from the Words of the Prophet Amos Am. 9.11 12. So that by Iames also This is a fourth witnesse guided by the Spirit of God the Ceremonial Law it not now obliging Iames by Peters Argument seems to apply that the teaching of it might hinder the gospell v. 19. and gives it as his sentence so that still even by these eating of blood is not forbidden under the gospel being a part of that Law which they all consent not to be binding Iames also declares that the Church ought to be satisfied in matters of salvation when God is satisfied and since he requires not that Law none is to introduce it However Authoritatively appoints that the Gentiles be written to that they may abstain from pollutions of Idols from Fornication from things strangled and from Blood his reason is and let his reason be noted for the not observing of that is the ground of the errour for Moses of old time hath in every City them that Preach him being read in the Synagogues every Sabbath day vers 19.20 21. Which determination pleased all parties the controversie ceaseth the councell writes these Letters to the Churches of Syria Cilicia and of Antioch Before the breaking up of this councell that Creed called the Apostles Creed is supposed to be made as a Standart of Doctrine now we come to 2. The parties written to the direction of the Decrees or Cannons of this Councell runs thus The Apostles Elders and Brethren send greeting unto the Brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch Syria and Cilicia c. Now we must note that in all these Countries the Jews were mingled among the Gentiles and had their Synagogues in many places at this day and the Law read therein and in them such as preached Moses God yet permitting in some sort the Jewish ceremonies to live in the World the Temple of Ierusalem yet standing this gave great occasion of quarrelling and caused conteâ—â—â— the Jews were angry that the Gentiles were not circumcised that they eat blood that they eat in Idol Temples or any part of that that had been sacrificed to Idols a thing in it self indifferent 1 Cor. 8. they wonder that the Gentils wil not abstain from fornication an act much practised among the Gentils held by many indifferent and consistent with Religion 1 Cor. 5.8 and Chap. 9. The Gentiles again wonder and proved that they were not obliged to circumcision nor tyed to worship at Jerusâ—lem nor to observe the distinction of clean and uncle in Beasts Foul or fish wondred they would abstain from blood since Christs was shed and proves and disputes that it is no sin to abstain from things strangled There is no discourse in Antioch but his every Meeting every Sabbath may every House is divided in the truth of these Doctrines some for one some for another Paul and Barnabas are for the Gentiles some of the Sects of the Pharises are for the Iews there is meeting after meeting â—bout it no smal division Moses being read and taught in the Synagogue every Sabboth day confirms the Jews in his opinions Paul and Barnabas's teaching confirms the Gentile in his judgement Paul indeed brings good arguments from Christs death but the other brings stronger from Moses writings shall Moses that was but a servant in the house have his Laws kept now the Son is come cals one and shall the Laws and customes that God himself commanded be sâ—â—ghâ—d says another In th is garhoil the Gospel is hindered the new plants of the Christian Religion are discouraged Paul thereto â—â—akes great care for them Barnabas and he maintain that the Law is not to be urged so sayes Peter so says Iames in the Counsel yet that this rock of offence might be removed the Holy Ghost puts it in the minde of Iames to decree that the Gentiles should abstain from Fornication and from Blood at which the Iews were offended And that the Iews should not teach circumcision washings c. at which the Gentiles were offended and discouraged the reason of both is Moses is read every Sabbath day and by this decree some part of the Law is kept by which the Jews might be pleased and yet not all the Law by which the Gentiles might be encouraged and that which is commanded is one of the easiest parts of the Law that the Jews might not boast and yet what is commanded is in the Law that the Gentiles might not brag for Moses is read c. and happily this determination did agree them Yet still remember that Paul Peter and Iames maintained that the Ceremonial Law was not to be taught as obliging and that yoake ought not to be put upon the disciples for the peace of the Church therefore rather then for any necessity of Salvation is that part of the Law Ceremoniall here enjoyned But this leads us to the 3. Thing written of or determination of the Councel it self with the grounds of it the Canon or decree it self is this with its preface For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you no greater burthen then these necessary things that ye abstain from meats offered to Idols and from blood and from things strangled and from Fornication It is observable that in this Epistle the Council gives the Gentiles information that they had heard that some preached to them Circumcision and the keeping of the Law unto whom says the Councel we gave no such Commandement v. 24 Where know if it had been sin for the Gentiles to have eaten blood then without question they had been commanded to have preacht it down This decree of the Councill hath 3 parts 1. Something Ceremoniall as to abstain from things strangled and from blood Here call to mind the Reasons given above for the prohibiting of blood things strangled may have some relation to them the blood not being out of them and therefore that sort of meat might be unhealthy and if this were a sin viz. to eat blood it behoved every man to assure himself of a good Cook Nay we question whether ever he would eat meat We are sure the Mysticall use of blood is gone viz. to make an Atonement for the soul what vse it is prohibited now for hath not yet been discovered 2. Something there is indifferent viz. to abstain from meats sacrificed to Idolls now we know that is not in it self unlawful for an Idol is nothing 1 Cor. 8. The Apostle there speaking of it condemns it not as a sin but only
God touching those blessings that he will give his children and a full of Will God wherein are all the duties he requires of his people recorded and inserted 2. In respect it was confirmed by the death and sufferings of Christ he was the Lamb slain before the beginning of the World Revel 8.31 Matth. 26.28 For this is my blood of the new Testament c. For where a Testament is there must also be a Testator Heb. 9.17 Having therefore the blood of Christ sealing this his last will it is called a Testament 3. In respect there is no addition to nor no diminution oâ—ght to be made of it When the Testator is dead there is nothing oâ—ght to be took from his Will nor nothing put to his Will Now Christ having fulfilled both Law and Prophets with his blood hâ—th sealed them by his death and hath threatned them that adde to or take from it Rev. 22.18.19 it is called and that fitly a Testament Quest. 10. Why are there some things in Scripture hard â—o be understood and whether the Scripture can dwell richly in those that cannot read That there are in Scripture some things hard to be understood is both arrested by S. Peter 2 Pet. 2.3.16 and known by the experience of the Saints who dayly pray that their eyes may be opened to behold the wonderous things therein written Psal. 119.18 which yet sufficeth not to maintain as the Church of Rome the imperfection of the Scripturâ—s For 1. It is but some things it is not all hard to be understood we easily understand the whole meaning of the Law and Prophets In loving the Lord our God with all our heart and with all our soul and our neighbour as our selves Matth. 22.37 2. Every thing that is necessary for salvâ—tion is most easie it is plain before us This commandement which I command thee this day it is not to hide from thee says God Deut. 30.11 And who dare say it is otherwise but observe when any thing is said to be hard in Scripture or obscure as the doctrine of the Trinity of the incarnation or the resurrection it is to be understood either in the mâ—stâ—ry it self or in the manner of its delivery now the mystery is in it self inscrutable cannot be understood nor fathomed by the wit of man we are not able throughly to apprehend the grâ—at mystery of the three persons the glory of heaven the proceeding of the Holy Ghost the nature of Angel the eternal decrees but the manner of their handling that is that these things are so is clear and manifest and held out to us for to believe which last is necessary to salvation not the other we may be happy though we cannot comprehend the nature of the Trinity yet we must beliâ—ve it The resurrection is an Article of our Creed that is we believe it and the ground of our belief is clear in Scripture though the thing it self be above our â—â—prehension 3. We ought to expect some hard things in Scripture it is no wonder to hear God speaking like himself he is delivering his own mind and sometimes he will speak according to his own conception yet that makes the Scripture no more imperfect then a man who knows not how the souls acts his bones grow nor how the watery humour of his eyes keeps a fixed place moves and how his soul by that humour discerns colours how the soul by the self same eaâ— jâ—dges of diversity of sounds is to be judged not a perfect man There are in nature many hidden mysteries and shall men wonder to find some in the book of God to come to the Question he purposely in his Scriptures conceals something from us and speaks soâ—e thing therein which is hard to be understood 1. To keep us humble knowledge is often times a cause of puffing up God foresees that men would be apt to be conceited and raised up should they comprehend his meaning therefore in divine things he wisely orders that all shall not be understood to keep down pride and bridle arrogance 2. To stir us up to diligence by this doing God intends to set us a working that by searching and praying for the spirit we might the better be brought to know what God would have us to do 3. To hold up the dignity of his word were it plain men would quickly contemn it Ministers would be slighted whose office is to open it to save his word therfore from being vilified he is pleased to wrap up some of it in the clouds of prophesies dark sentences visions that we may set the greater value upon it and men in their reading may have the more reverend thoughts of it which brings us to the second part of the Question whether it may dwell richly c. Which we shall answer briefly There are four wayes by which Christians may come to the knowledge of Scripture that is by reading by hearing by remembring by discourseing he that cannot read may have the Scriptures dwelling richly in him to salvation by the oâ—her three means Yet 1 Whose fault is it thou canst not read thy unwillingness or crosseness or thy parents neglect or carelesseness if thy self be in the fault the greater is thy sin be the more earnest unto God in acts of contrition and repentance 2. Hast thou not spent as much time in toys and in sin as thou mightest have learned to read in supposing thou wert brought up in ignorance if so redeem the time by a double diligence 3. Be more humble before God the less help thou hast of thy self call to God for more those that read must have Gods blessing before they profit and grace before they be righteous Thou shalt have grace if thou beest humble Iames 4.6 4 Be more diligent in other Ordinances if thou hast not skill to read yet hast thou ears to hear Faith comes by hearing Rom. 10 17. and by hearing of the word it may dwell richly in the salvation 1 Cor. 15.2 But this brings us to the second direction above proposed for the Words in dwelling viz. Of hearing the Scriptures that is to suffer our selves to receive the knowledge of the Scripture by its being opened taught or expounded this is done two wayes 1. Authoritatively and pâ—blickly proper to the Gospel Ministry which is commonly called preaching 2. Charitably and privately common to all believers called in the Text teaching we shall first speak of the publick proper to the ordained Ministers of the Gospel and in Order to it handle three Ordinances contemned in this age which are as adjuncts or circumstances to this Authoritative way of teaching these are 1. The time of preaching 2. The place of preaching 3. The party that preacheth The party that doth or should teach is the Minister of the Gospel appointed and separated thereunto by Apostolical Ordination the place of teaching is that which commonly and authoritatively is called the Church we shall speak of these in Order beginning with the
God himself calls a Sabbath wherever therefore one day in seven is kept Holy it may from the morality of the Law be named a Sabbath providing it to be the Sabbath of the Lord God that is a day set aparâ— by him for his own service by which we conclude that the seventh day kept by the Iew or the seventh day kept by the Turk though they work not are not morally Sabbaths the Lord never chusing the one and rejecting the other constituting the first day of the week to be since Christs Resurrection a perpetual Sabbath to himself Bâ—t what is all this to Sunday this being a prophane name drawn from the Heathens It is to be wondred at to see what canting language is in the mouthes of men and how mystically they will speak to avoid ordinary expressions in time our dip pers may new dip doublets gloves and give them new names and by consequence set us all to schoole again that we may learn to forget our selves to be men and with authority pronounce all our Ancestors fools being they could not tell how to speak The Heathens it is true named the days of the week according to some feigned Gods real planets one among the rest was called Dies Solis the day of the Sun the self same day that is our Christian Sabbath naming or dedicating that day to that planet if the day had been dipped in the fountain of the Sun all had been well enough tamen non â—bstante we may call the first day of the week Sunday any thing in this argument to the contrary notwithstanding 1. From the practice of an Holy Evangelist he that was in labours more abundantly for the Gospel then any now can pretend to be that is not past shame was not so scrupulous as these men would seem to be for it is but a seeming be in his History of the Acts Acts 28. giving us an account of Pauls dangerous voyage to Rome shews us vers 11. That they viz. Paul and his company whereof Luke who wrot this History was one after three moneths departed in a Ship of Alexandria which had wintered in the Isle whose sign was CASTOR and POLLUX the Spirit of God made no scruple at these heathenish names but writ them and they stand in the Scripture and no reproof is given to the users of them and yet in their own natures they are to be more stumbled at then Dâ—s Solis or Sunday either We shall interpret and open this story that these mens folly may appear you must know that the great Heathen God who ruled all was called Iupiter he was born at Crete and when he came to be of age he threw his Father Saturn out of his kingdom having three Brothers he gave the government of Hell to Pluto the government of the Sea to Neptune and kept the government of Heaven and Earth to himself This Iupiter according to Heathen Poets and Fables would come oftentimes out of Heaven and play pretty pranks upon Earth one of which was this One Tyndarus had a handsome wife called Lâ—da she being with childe to her own husband Iupiter in a merry pin turned her into a milk white Swan and in that shape he being a God a pretty one got her with childe likewise she grew mighty big her hour of travel comes she is delivered of two Sons well shaped boyes they were One of them is named CASTOR the other POLLVX the lads grew and when they came to be of age their coasts being pestred with Pirats they got Ships and destroyed the Pirats in a short time they rid the Sea of them for this they are worshipped as Gods of the Sea and where they are together it is a sign of a fortunate voyage this is the reason that that Ship wherein Luke and Paul was had the sign of Castor and Pollux upon Their stern as some English Ships have Saint George this Ship therefore being at her outrigging named by Castor and Pollux foolish and heathenish Gods which had such a filthyoriginals this name being used by the Spirit of God and that without a check we may use the name Sunday though used by the Heathens by a more raâ—ional cause then the other and not to be reproved by any whimsical sawcy or Hypocritical rebel whatsoever whose conscences in matter of sin we have no cause to suppose tender 2. From the innocency and harmlesness that is in the using of it there are some customes originally heathenish used too often that are attended with sin and whose being ought to be removed because of transgression as may-games particularly which always is accompanied with sinful and by relation shameful Acts and once in seven year a great occasion of the polluting of that day of which we are now speaking But this word Sunday hath nothing in it that savours of evil or that can be said to border upon that which is not right 3. From the happy event that God hath been pleased to give this name The Heathens gave one day to Mercury another to Venus one thought a thief and the other a whore the first day of the week to Apollo or the Sun Apollo they thought a God well skilled in Physick Excellent in Musick good to open Prophesies always young to such a one was this day dedicated and after him named he carrying about the Sun it was called Sunday now this hath fallen out so well as it deserves to be remembred Christ is Sol Iustisiae the Sun of Righteousness Mal. 4.2 this day did the Sun of our souls break through the clouds of his winding sheet and triumphed over darkness this day did he come out of the Chamber of his sepulchre and rejoyced as a bridegroom to run his race he came with healing under his wings to cure our souls he brought the sweet Musick of the Gospel of reconciliation I ascend said he Iohn 20.27 Vnto my Father and your Father to my God and your God he is the true explainer of the Prophets by this Sunâ— rising we see what was meant by Ienas lying in the Whales belly he comes out of his grave like a Râ—e or a young heart Cant. 8.14 In a word he is the light that inlightens every one that comes into the world our Sun the Son of God is risen by him we see Heaven by him we receive the fruits of the Earth this is his day dedicated to him by the Spirit set apart by himself never be bafled therefore but if thou so please call it Sunday it hath fallen out well that this day was by them that knew not God dedicated to the Sun and not to any other since in many points it can quadrate with our Sun of righteousness which with others it could not so well have done Quest. 10. Why is the Sabbath called Holy We shall have occasion to speak to this more at large hereafter for the present the Sabbath may be called Holy 1. In regard of the author of it
now to the several Sacraments in particular which are baptism and the Lords supper Two Ordinances that above all others meet with most opposition we shall therefore through the light and guidance of the good word of God discover unto you their several natures beginning first with baptisme that being the first Ordinance the Church gives to her Members and the first that by her Officers they are invited unto Matth. 3.6 Iohn 3.5 Acts 2.38 Acts 9.18 Acts 10.47 Acts 17.15.33 In it we shall unfold 1. The Nature of it 2. The Elements of it 3. The End of it 4. The manner of doing it 5. The parties who ought to do it 6. Resolve some Questions SECT I. BEfore we come to describe what baptisme is it is requisite to know that there is a twofold baptisme 1. Inward which is the invisible application of the blood of Christ to the soul of the sinner for its justification which is called a Baptizing with the Holy Ghost and with fire Matth. 3.11 2. Outward which is the visible application of the Element of water in the name of the Holy Trinity to the bodies of them that are fitted for or desirous of baptisme which is called a baptizing with water Luke 3.16 Of this last we are at this time to speak of and it may be thus defined It is a Holy Ordinance instituted by God whereby a man by being dipped or sprinkled with water in the name of the Trinity is declared to be admitted into Communion with him and entered into the body of his Church 1. We call it a Holy Ordinance It appears to be so in many respects 1. In regard of him in whose name we are baptized which is in the name of the Holy and undefiled Trinity Matth. 28.19 Holy is the Father Holy is the Son Holy is the Spirit Holy Holy Holy is the Lord God of hosts Isa. 6 3. 2. It is a Holy profession which the party is baptized into he is baptized into the Holy Gospel into the most Holy faith he is brought at this time before the Father of spirits that he may stand before him in Holiness and Righteousness all the days of his life Luke 1.75 3. There are promises at this to oppose what ever is unholy we engage either by our selves or by our sureties to oppose all the enemies of the Cross of Christ and when we are of age we are bound to perform what was promised for us in infancy by our sureties if ever we expect to receive any benefit by the death or blood of Christ Sacramentally applied unto us in baptisme but of this afterward 4. In regard of that holy body into which by this we are entered we are by this Ordinance entered in an open and professed manner into the body of Christ which is the Holy and Catholick Church not to speak of the invisible which is secret and hid Baptisme takes them as Barnabas took Saul Acts 9 â— and declares that they have seen the Lords Christ and the Church beholds him as one of them and he goeth in and cometh out with them of Ierusalem i.e. the Lords people 2. It is instituted by God Baptisme is no humane Invention but hath for its being a divine sanction For 1. God first appointed the Person that did baptize Iohn 1.33 2. The Element wherewith that Person should baptize Iohn 1.33 3. Gives directions how it must be done Matth. 28.19 3. Whereby a man by being dipped in or sprinkled with water in the name of the Trinity Women from baptisme are not to be withheld since Christ is necessary for them Acts 8.12 Man is here only expressed as being of the more noble sex and first created of God The word baptize signifies not alwaies dipping 1 Cor. 10. but any kinde of washing sprinkling with dipping as shall be demonstrated in due time 4. Is declared to be admitted into Communion with him c. baptisme makes not a Christian nor makes one to have Communion with God but declares him so to be for as Circumcision was a sign only of that faith which the believer had before he was Circumcised and as every Son of Abraham was of the Church before his foreskin was cut even so all are Members of the Church by faith either actual or habitual before they be washed by the word with water that onely testifying or divulging that right which either by their own or their Parents faith they have to and in the Church SECT II. THe Element or visible sign with which this Sacrament is to be Administred according to the institution is water signifying the blood of Christ washing or sprinkling the soul for it is the blood of sprinkling 1 Pet. 1 2. and this spiritually poured forth upon the off-spring of the faithful Isa. 44.3 and promised to the seed of the true believer Now between the sign and the thing signified is a sweet and holy harmony in these following circumstances 1. Water is a necessary Element to preserve the life of man next unto aire water must be accounted of absolute necessity yeâ— unto all creatures is not the New birth the spiritual washing of the soul the blood of Christ applied necessary for such as would enter the Kingdom of God Iohn 3.5 2. Water is a cheap Element in most places water is almost free as the air and if it be bought the carriage is rather paid for then the water It is self generally easie to come by Christs Blood Kingdom Merits Glory is had for asking Is. 55.1 3. Water is a comfortable Element it refreshes and cherishes the spirits of every living thing It makes the birds to sing the fields to laugh revives the heart of the strongest Iudges 15.18 Nothing makes the soul look more lovely or beautiful then to be reconciled unto and adopted by God throâ—gh the application of the blood of the Covenant unto it by the spirit of God Tit. 3.5.6 4. Water is a cleansing Ilement things that are soul water makes them clean Among other miseries that that New born infant typically the natural or unregenerate man Eze. 16.4 groaned under this was one that it was not washed yet God washed it with water vers 9. and made it clean the blood of Christ applied to the most polluted soul makes it become white like snow Psal. 51.7 5. Water is a Copious Element the Ocean is an inexhaustible Fountain there is enough in that to furnish all the world with water of water there is great plenty so Christ blood is an inexhaustible Fountain the Saints since the beginning of the world have been drinking of it yet it is not diminished they have been bathing in it yet not straitened Zacha. 13.1 6. It is a Common Element the Sea the Rivers are as Common to the poor as to the rich and as sweetly glide by the fields of the whistling plowman as by the furrows of the great Prince and being drunk refresh the one as well as the other So is Christ and his merits he
onely dipping but sprinkling or any other kind of washing as hath been before discovered To limit therefore the Ordinance of Dipping is to diminish the very sence and meaning of that Word 〈◊〉 by God to express that Ordinance which is a wrong both to him and the sence of the word 2. The word Baptize is used in Scripture where the word Dipping cannot nor ought not to be understood 1 Cor. 10.2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the Cloud and in the Sea Now let the History of the Iewes passing though the red Sea be observed and it will be found that not a man of Israel was dipped in either Some drops out of the Clouds might and questionless did fall upon the Tribes in going through the red Sea but that they were dipped in the cloud is non-sence to affirm in reason or that they were dipped in the Sea is false to affirm in History 3. The word baptize is used in Scripture where it were inconvenient to understand the word Dipped Acts 16.33 Acts 8.38 At this time this Sacrament was performed in haste and with all possible speed and the Eunuch as soon as baptized goes on his way rejoycing Now Dipping requires deliberation and provision both before and after to put off clothes to put on fresh cloths both for the baptizer and the baptized requires that which for this time cannot with conveniency be granted either for the one or the other 4. The word Baptize joyned with the word River doth not necessary imply dipping in Scripture and we find the word Baptize spoken of and no River mentioned in the Gospel Matth. 3.6 Iohn 3. â—3 Act. 16.33 Acts. 10.48 Act. 8.36 That place Matth. 3.6 And Iesus when he was baptized went up straight way out of the water holds not forth Dipping necessarily but rather that our Saviour was not baptized in Harvest For in Harvest Jordan overfloweth all his banks Ios 3.15 at that time being much dried up Iohn and Christ both might be truly said to go down to the water and to come from or out of the water without lying dipped over head and ears in it and without carrying either for dry cloaths or dry shirt we find him immediately driven to the wilderness Mark 1.12 and I am prone to suppose that it had not been very healthy for Iohn to have stood up to the middle in water so long a time and so much together as the multitude of the baptized would require if dipping must be necessarily understood in his Baptisme And what though Iohn also was baptizing in Enon because there was much water Iohn 3.23 In the Original it is many waters being a convenient place in respect water was not every where to be had where he and his Disciples might in several places baptize those multitudes that came to be baptized which possibly in other places particularly at Iordan could not so easily be done Besides there is a great difference between many waters or much water and deep water or a river of water none of which in Scripture is spoken of concerning AEnon so that dipping is not necessary to be seen or heard felt or understood about Salim and therefore cannot stand without something else to hold it up which is that grand errour that baptisme signifies onely dipping 5. If dipping had been essential to to the Sacrament that is that none ought to have been held as baptized without being plunged in a river without Question the Holy Ghost would in some place or other have told us of it and not to have left us a word of a large signification the spirit of God that leads us into all truth would have informed us in so necessary a point of doctrine in no place is there so much as a breathing for dipping yet we have sweet breathings of the spirit for that of sprinckling both in the Old and New Testament For 1. It is the usual sign of signification under the Law when things are hallowed or persons to be set apart for Gods service it was done with blood sprinkling Levit. 16.14 Levit. 4.6 Heb. 9.13 14. 2. It is a Gospel promise I will sprinckle clean water upon you and ye shall be clean which is the outward sign and I will put my spirit within you which is the thing signified Ezek. 36.25.26 and again I will pour water upon him that is thirsty the outward visible seal I will pour my spirit upon thy seed the thing inward invisible grace sealed Isa. 44.3 both those Texts in Leviticus and these in the Prophets have a shadow of good things to come Heb. 10.1 c. 3. The Apostle makes inward graces to be strengthened and given by outward signs Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience the inward grace and our bodies washed with pure water the outward sign he outward sprinkling or washing with water is an evidence of our hearts being sprinkled with blood with what blood with the blood of Christ which for that reason is called the blood of sprinkling 1 Peter 1.2 Heb. 12.24 could but one such Text be produced for dipping how might our adversaries boast and since we have such sure footing for our sprinckling besides the signification of the word baptize let us never be ashamed As it is not necessary for men to swill themselves with reverence it is spoken or drink large draughts of wine at the Sacrament of the supper a morsel being a sufficient sign of inward grace to remission of sin so it is not essential for men to plunge or dip themselves in large rivers at the Sacrament of baptisme sprinkling or any other decent application of water being a sufficient sign of our justification if adult of our regeneration being infant Further admit that dipping were essential to baptisme which it is not yet we may Question whether they be baptized that are dipped among them the water of baptisme being not applied to the flesh signifying the application of the blood of Christ to the soul. It is to be doubted whether it be applied to theirs whose bodys are not washed with water for they usually do it in rivers wells or horse-ponds as it is known for certain they have done in their shirts shifts and drawers and that ever the outward sign of baptisme was to be applied to such gear I suppose they will not affirm the baptismal water ought immediately to be applied to the body and the flesh washed with it as it is Sacrimental To say that Christ was so baptized is hard to affirm and the improbability of it hath already been handled And to say that he and all that came to Iohn were stripped naked is easie to be denied baptized he was we are sure and many others but that they were all dipped we have no certainty To conclude this Question dipping is not thought unlawful in the Catholick Church not that ridiculous kinde of dipping used