Selected quad for the lemma: blood_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
blood_n eat_v flesh_n meat_n 14,430 5 9.1363 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A38590 Catechistical discovrses in vvhich, first, an easy and efficacious way is proposed for instruction of the ignorant, by a breife summe of the Christian doctrine here delivered and declared : secondly, the verity of the Romane Catholike faith is demonstrated by induction from all other religions that are in the world : thirdly, the methode of the Romane catechisme, which the Councell of Trent caused to be made, is commended to practice of instructing in doctrine, confirming in faith, and inciting to good life by catechisticall sermons / by A. E. Errington, Anthony, d. 1719? 1654 (1654) Wing E3246; ESTC R8938 430,353 784

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

to the mysterys of it which thou must haue learned to vnderstande At communion time rise vp from thy place and come before the altare with profounde reuerence stirring vp in thy selfe many feruerous acts of the loue of God and detestation of sinne Say then from thy hart the words which S. Peter who with great faith and ardent affection receiued the words of Christ and professed them to be the words of life when some of his disciples went away for the hardnesse of this mystery Christ preaching to the people that he would giue them a more pretious bread then the Manna of their forefathers and that this bread was to be his owne flesh the Iewes beganne to murmure saying Io. 6. how can this man giue vs his flesh to eate he then confirmed his words againe in plane termes Saying Amen Amen I Say to you vnles you eate the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his blood you shall not haue life in you ●he that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath life euerlasting and I will raise him vp in the last day Formy flesh is meate indeede and my blood is drinke indeede They seeing him thus to confirme what he had said before that he would giue them his owne flesh to eate and not vnderstanding how it could be many euen of his disciples said that it was a hard speech and went backe and walked not with him But Christ turning to the twelue and asking them what will you also depart Then S. Peter with a constant and ready faith answered for himselfe and for them Lord to whom shall we goe Thou hast the words of eternal life And we beleeue and haue knowne that thou art Christ the sonne of God This was an answere worthy of S. Peter and Christ had soe disposed of his speech as though of purpose he had intended to draw this answere from him It was for our instruction in this point that we might say as S. Peter said especially then when we are going to receiue Lord wither shall I goe but vnto thee I beleeue thy words for that they are thine thou hast the words of eternal life and looking towards the B. Sacrament I beleeue and know that thou art Christ the sonne of God L. 6. de Saccrd And thinke with what respect the Angells attende on thy communion S. Chrysostome saith that there is not doubt but the priest is guarded by Angels whilst he is in hand with the blessed Sacrament and that a venerable and graue person had informed him that himselfe had seene the Angels enuironing it bending their heads in homage as souldiers saith he doe to their captaine and courtiers to their king See then that thou remember the Angels reuerence And when the priest presenteth the sacred host to then and saith Domine non sum dignus c. Say thou with him Lord I am not worthy that thou shouldst enter vnder my roofe but onely say the word and my soule shall be saued And repeate them thrice ouer with him The humble Centurion thought it too great an honour for him to haue Christ to come into his house to cure his seruant but he entreth into thy body to cure thy soule Thou hadst neede to be more humble and better disposed then he was although worthy to be commended of Christ When the priest de liuereth the blessed Sacrament to thee lift vp thy head that he may see what he doth and hold the towel vnder thy chinn to kepp any particle that might chance to fall open thy mouth decently and putting thy tongue to thy lips receiue that sacred host as a pledge of thy redeemers loue who as he came into this world and refused neither shame nor paine to make thee his freind soe whould he still humble himselfe in remaining with thee to keepe thee in his freindship As soone as thou hast receiued and washed thy mouth if neede be with some drinke gather together all the powers of thy soule to giue thanks vnto God doe homage to him with them and offer them to him to be imployed in his seruice all thy life time loue him with all thy hart and detest all that which is displeasing to him and neuer faile as often as thou receiuest to make a vehement detestation of that sinne which thou art most inclined vnto purposing and thinking how to amende it Vntill thou hast the benediction of the priest sitt still on thy knees burning with loue and reuerence to thy soueraigne Thenn rize vp and returning to thy place againe take thy booke and say the prayers of thanksgiuing and departing out of the Church or oratory haue a care for that day to keepe thy senses more retired and as it were at home with thy guest If some great personage or prince were come to thy house thou wouldst not stirre abrode as long as he stayed but wouldest with good reason stay at home and attende vpon his pleasure The king of kings infinitly more worthy then all the princes of the world put together commeth to thee in the Eucharist haue therefor a care to please him and let noe occasions draw thee away from him Frequent Communion Concerning the frequenting of the blessed Sacrament these are the words of S. Augustine Serm. 21. de verbis Domini To receiue the communion of the Eucharist euery day I neither commende nor discommende it but to communicate euery Sunday I would wish and exhort euery one soe to doe if his soule be without affection to sinne And he exhorteth all soe to order their liues Part. 1. ●h 20. that they may be worthy to receiue often B. Bishop Sales in his Introduction to a deuout life aduiseth euery one to receiue at least once a month That which may be gathered out of them both is in breife that some may receiue eueryday many may receiue euery weeke all may receiue euery month Those that receiue euery day had neede to be of great sanctity and aboue others in their good example and conuersation Those that receiue once a weeke must be free from affection euen to venial sinnes not that they neuer committe any but that they be not affected to any To receiue once a month requireth onely a cleare conscience that they prooue and purge themselues first by a Good confession of their mortal sinnes which if they doe they shall finde great benefit in often receiuing S. Ambrose when thy aduersary shall see thy lodging taken vp with the brightness of the heauently presence perceiuing all place for his temptations to be preuented by Christ he will depart and runne away S. Bonauenture of reuerence to the B. Sacrament abstained for some dayes from saying of masse L. 2. deprofec relig c. 27. and being present at the masse of another priest at communion time he felt a particle of the sacred host to come from the altare into his mouth By which he vnderstoode as himselfe saith relating this passage that it was
in the Church and the auncient and true doctrine was better vnderstoode that it was not of obligation for all to receiue vnder both kindes For as the Councell of Trent hath obserued when Christ said vnles you eate the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his blood you shall not haue life in you Io. 6. He added also he that eateth this bread shall liue for euer By which he declared that the benefit of the Eucharist is receiued as much in the host onely as in both the host and the chalice euerlasting life being promised to those that eate that sacred bread OF THE EFFECTS OF THE Eucharist THE effect of the Eucharist is to giue grace by which we become the adopted children of God nourished and fedd as it were at his owne table our soules hauing satiety in him and obtaining by it the fullnes of his glory That where as according to S. Tract 26. in Io. Augustine by other meate and drinke we seeke to be satiated there is noe true satiety but in this by which we gaine heauen And it is especially gained by this Sacrament both by reason of the more special vnion which we baue with Christ in it and also for that the gift of perseuerance is especially here obtained as by a strong and nourishing bread It remitteth sinne and preserueth from future sinne according to the disposition of the receiuer according to which also it blotteth out the punishment due to it It hath for its propper effect to feede and to strengthen the soule to keepe it in spiritual health and vigour And because for the most part it is receiued with more feruour and sweetnes of deuotion and outwardly in the similitude of bread therfor it is compared to the Manna of the Israëlits which is thought by some to haue had the sweetnes of all tasts S. L. 8. ep 62. Ambrose We haue the Manna euery day rayning downe vpon vs that body which came from the virgin and S. Iohn Chrysostome therefor calleth it the fountaine of paradise from whence sensible riuers flow Ho. 45 to 1. The Saints of God haue bene soe transported with spiritual consolations in the receiuing of the Eucharist that good and authentical writers haue recorded of some who haue liued for diuerse months and of others who for some yeares together haue bene susteined without any other foode S. Katherine of Siena was singularly deuoted to the blessed Sacrament She receiued it euery day except her Confessour commanded the contrary whom she obeyed in all things and noe doubt but that for a long time she was susteined onely by it In her life it is said that as children earne vnto their mothers brests soe did she to the blessed Sacrament and that it often happening that she being in an extasy all the time of masse vntill Communion and then comming to her selfe would say O my Lord although I were dead I should reuiue againe to enioy thee THE SACRAMENT OF Pennance Quest What is the Sacrament of Pennance Answ Pennance is a Sacrament by which we haue the forgiunesse of sinnes in Confession FIRST we will shew that this is a Sacrament in the forgiuenesse of sinnes and then we will declare the parts of it and benefits which are receiued by it Although Luther for the most part denyeth this to be a Sacrament and laboureth with other Protestants to robb the world of the benefit of it yet l. de capt bab he saith that it is a Sacrament There he saith truely for it is soe indeede and hath all that is included euen in the Protestants definition of a Sacrament Apol. Confess art 13. which is to be an outward signe instituted of Christ by which grace is promised And this it shall appeare to be Amongst the many apparitions which Christ made betwixt his Resurrection and Ascension to his disciples S. Iohn hath recorded that once he came and stood in the midst of them and said Peace be to you Io. 20. And when he had said this he shewed them his hands and side and said againe Peace be to you As my father hath sent mee I also doe send you And he breathed vpon them and said Receiue ye the Holy Ghost whose sinnes you shall forgiue they are forgiuen them and whose you shall retaine they are retained This is all which the Euangelist mentioneth to haue passed in that solemne apparition which must therfor include some great mystery Hence it appeareth that this is a Sacrament for where forgiunes of sinnes is promised there grace is promised And this forgiuing and retaining of sinnes being giuen to the Apostles and their successors to be practised by them who vnderstande not the inward of mens minds and consciences the poenitent must declare his sinnes to them that they may know what and how to forgiue or to retaine them And soe there is all that is included in the nature of a Sacrament to wit an outward signe both in the poenitent confessing and in the Priest absoluing and that outward signe instituted of Christ to giue grace vnto sanctification By which the Catholike doctrine is made manifest that power is giuen to the Church to forgiue sinnes For is it likely that Christ would appeare in all those circumstances and mysterious caeremonys giuing them the Holy Ghost for nothing but onely to let them know that God can and doth forgiue sinnes The Apostles esteemed soe highly of this grace that they made the forgiuenesse of sinnes an article of the Creede to wit by the power of the Catholike Church which they had professed in the article before Is it likely that they meant to make it an article of the Creede that God can and doth forgiue sinnes After that they vnderstoode that themselues had power to forgiue sinnes they being sent as Christ was sent and the Holy Ghost being giuen soe particularly then to them and therfor they feared not to practise the forgiuing of sinnes Priests of themselues haue not power to forgiue sinnes for noe man of himselfe hath that power They haue it of God as the vicars and substitutes of him who gaue it them God giu's power to priests as kings doe to iudges Iudges represent the person of the king and Priests represent the diuine maiesty Iudges must be informed and soe must priests iudges giue sentence and their sentences are ratifyed by the king God giueth authority to priests and their sentēces are ratifyed by him he that contemneth the authority of the iudge contemneth the authority of the king and he that contemneth the priests authority contemneth the diuine maiesty Christ hauing made them his iudges and set them in his owne place with power to binde and to loose promising that what they did vpon earth should be ratifyed in heauen That Christ did truely giue this power to the Church his words are as plane as words vse to be and that plane words might not be misconstrued he deliuered them in such circumstances as might binde them as
eminently blessed aboue the rest of the Sacraments and infinitly blessed in that it conteineth the authour of all blesse These are the words of S. Denis the disciple of S. Eccl hier c. 3. Paul concerning it for it is saith he according to our renewmed master the Consummation of the Sacraments Neither is it almost lawfull for any of the priestly functions to be exercized but this diuine and high Sacrament of Eucharist must be performed It is the highest indeede and most diuine of all the Sacraments because the rest conteining onely the vertue and power of Christ this truely and really conteineth Christ himselfe And therefor the Apostles called it the Eucharist that is to say a high and blessed grace or gift By it the Church of Christ is placed in a midle ranke of honour aboue the synagogue of the Iewes and vnder the cittizens of heauen we being but a litle lesse exalted then they The Synagogue of the Iewes in the law of Moyses had Christ in sigure onely we in the Eucharist haue him as really as the cittizens of heauen but they haue him in glory In the Eucharist all Christ is conteined for although by vertue of the words This is my body c. his body onely be really present in it yet because all his perfections are allwais accompanying his sacred body and wheresoeuer it is there is all Christ hence it followeth that both his body and soule and all the perfections of his diuine and humane nature and all whatsoeuer is in Christ is really in the Eucharist in company of his body If his body were without his soule then it were dead Rom 6. as it was in the sepulcher but Christ rising againe from the dead now dieth noe more Saith the Apostle Christ therfor being now not dead wheresoeuer his body is there his soule is all ouer vnited to it There is then his intire humane nature of body and soule and being that his diuine and humane nature are allwais vnited together there is also the diuine word and nature of God All Christ is intirely in the host and all Christ is intirely in the chalice although vnder different signes and species And Christ is not onely all in all the host and chalice but all Christ is in euery part of them soe that he that receiueth onely the host receiueth as much as he that receiueth both host and chalice and he that receiueth the chalice onely receiueth as much as both chalice and host and the least particle of either of them is as much as all The reason of this supposing the truth of Christs words may easily be vnderstoode for that he did not determine any particular quantity to be consecrated which if he had done then a lesser quantity had not bene consecrated but leauing the quantity indifferent and the least part of it being consecrated as well as the whole it is the perfect Eucharist and perfect Christ as well as the whole Christ being shortly to depart this world would leaue vnto vs a great testimony ef his loue and although his passion and death were sufficient to testify it yet besides them he would bestow a gift token and pledge vpon vs which might allwais remaine with vs as a memorial of him He called therfor his disciples to supper and being there all together he made his wil and last testament amongst them bequething vnto them the most pretious gift that was in his hands to giue and in his blessed hands were all thinges It was his owne pretious body which then he bequeathed and gaue to them and with it all the perfections of his diuine and humane nature and he gaue it not in promise onely and for the future but he deliuered it then to them for themselues and for all good christiās for euer And that noe haeretike might misconstrue his will and defraude the world of this pretious Isgacy he declared his minde soe planely and in such termes as could not wel be misinterpreted telling them that it was the very body which Was to be deliuered and that blood which was to be shedd G●r 1.11 For the Apostle sayth that whilst they were at supper Iesus tooke bread and blessed and brake and he gaue to his disciples and said take ye and eate THIS IS MY BODY which shall be deliuered for you and taking the chalice he gaue thanks and gaue to them saying drinke ye all of this For this is my blood of the new testament which shall be shed for many vnto remission of sinnes Commanding them to doe the same in commemoration of him If then his true body and blood was deliuered and shedd it was his true body and blood which then he gaue to them And although as there is noe absurdity soe great but haeretiks wil finde out how to mainteine it the Manichees haue conceited that an apparent body onely and not the true body of Christ was deliuered on the Cros for vs yet now that I heare of there are noe such haeretiks in the world All christians then beleeuing that his true body was deliuered on the Cros why shall not all as wel beleeue that his true body is conteined in the Eucharist seeing that we haue the same authority for it After this the Apostles vndertooke to consecrate the Eucharist and honored it as the very true body and blood of our lord Cor. 1.11 Mat. 26. S. Paul whosoeuer shall eate this bread or drinke the chalice of our Lord vnworthily he shall be guilty of the body and blood of our Lord. and that he eateth and drinketh iudgment to him selfe not discerning the body of our Lord. Thus did the Apostles receiue the Eucharist from Christ and honored it as his true body And the primitiue Church that receiued it from them gaue it the same honour as they did and as the Romane Church now doth That the Rom. Church doth now giue it that honour it is well knowne and that the primitiue Church honored it as much it shall appeare by the sentences of those fathers and first by the honorable names which they giue it Hier. Eccl. c. 3. Ignat. ad Ephes Iustin Apoll Cyp. de lapsis S. Denis termeth it hostia saluta ris the sauing host S. Ignatius calleth it medicamentum immortalitatis antidotum non moriendi the medicine of immortality the antidote against death Iustinus Caro sanguis incarnati Iesu the flesh and blood of Iesus incarnated Cyprian de laps Sanctum Domini gratia salutaris sacrificium perpes holecaustum permanens the holy one of our Lord the sauing grace the continual sac●ifice an offering allwais remaining Concilium Nicaen Agnus Dei qui tollit peccata mundi the lambe of God that taketh away the sinnes of the world S. Cyr mystag 4. Cyril hath these words of it Vnder the shew of bread the body is giuen to thee and the blood is giuen vnder the shew of wine Doe not consider it as naked bread and wine For it
is the body and blood of Christ according to the words of our Lord. and although thy sense doth suggest this faith doth confirme thee Iudge not by tast but beleeue by faith for most certaine without doubt Hil. l. 8. de Trin. that the body and blood is then giuen to thee S. Hilarius Of the verity of flesh and blood there is noe place of doubt left By the profession of our Lord himselfe and by our faith it is flesh and blood indeede Amb. l. 4. c. 4. Is nothis the truth let it be vntrue to them who deny Iesus Christ to be true God S. Ambrose This is bread before the sacramental words but the consecration being done of bread it is made the flesh of Christ S. Chrysostome Chrysos ho. 24. in cor 1. l. 3. de Sacerd ho. 2. ad pop Antioch We adore him on the altare as the sages did in the manger and againe O miracle he that sitteth with the father in heauen at the very same time is handled of men beneath Christ ascending to heauen both hath his flesh with him and left it beneath Elias left his cloke to his disciple Aug. inps 33. but the sonne of man ascending left his owne flesh S. Augustine vpon the 33. Psalme admiring how Dauid could carry himselfe in his owne hands concludeth that it is to be vnderstoode of Christ when at the last supper he tooke himselfe literally into his owne hands Thus did the fathers of the primitiue Church beleeue of the Eucharist acknowledging allwais the omnipotent power of God to be miraculous in it This beleefe continued in the world for a thousand yeares or there abouts before any haeretike opposed it and when it beganne to be opposed the Church in seueral general Councels declared the truth of it and condemned the contrary as heresy Conc. Lateran sub Innocen 5. Conc. Rom. ex Cocleo l. 1. hist Hussit Conc. Constantien sess 8. Conc. Trid. sess 13. cap. 1. can 1. Berengarius was the first that publikly denyed the real presence of our Lord in the Eucharist who reiecting the commune and receiued doctrine of the Church denyed that to be the body of Christ which Christ affirmed to be his body interpreting his words as he liked himselfe contrary to all authority in an illiteral and vnpropper sense That which he gott for his paines was to haue his doctrine condemned in seueral Councels But at last being touched inwardly with remorse of conscience he recanted And although he fell into heresys againe yet he had soe much feeling of the auctority of the Church and of a General Councel as that he recanted againe and which is very rare in such men he remained repentant vnto his death and being then affrighted at the thought of his former errors he is recorded to haue confessed the horrour of his conscience saying for my repentance I hope for glory but because I haue seduced others I feare torments Zuinglius and Caluin haue lately renewed his doctrine againe but we haue for the Catholike faith the words of Christ in the Scriptures the scriptures interpreted by the holy fathers and their interpretations approued of by the authority of the whole Church in general Councels Now that the Eucharist is a Sacrament I doe not perceiue that any haeretike doth deny it who alloweth of Sacraments Io. 6. for those that hold but two or three Sacramēts haue the Eucharist for one of them And it appeareth to be an outward signe which causeth grace in vs in that Christ promised if anyman eate of this bread he shall liue for euer OF TRANSVBSTANTIATION Quaest Is there any bread or wine in the Eucharist ANS Noe it seemeth but soe The bread and wine are conuerted by the words of consecration in to the true body and blood of our Lord. AFTER that Berengarius had recanted his first errour in which he denyed the true and real presence of Christ in the Eucharist he fell into a second in which he affirmed that the substance of bread and wine still remaine after consecration soe that there was noe transubstantiation that is to say conuersion or change of one substance into another but this was also condemned as an heresy and he in the end abiured it We beleeue then that in the consecration the substance of bread and wine are destroyed and changed by the power of God into another substance The holy fathers haue allwais acknowledged this conuersion of substance to be in the Eucharist and haue applyed diuerse figures out of the old testament and other similitudes to declare the Catholike doctrine in this The rodd of Moyses was transubstantiated that is conuerted into the substance of a Serpent The waters of Aegypt were turned into blood Water at the feast of Cana was changed by our sauiour into very good wine Soe by the omnipotency of God the substance of bread and wine is conuerted into the body of our Lord. And these very similitudes are vsed by the fathers to this purpose Iren. l 3. cont haereses c. 2. Amb. l. 4. de Sacram. c. 4. lib. de his qui initiantur myst S. Irenaeus declareth it by the water turned into wine S. Ambrose by the rod of Moyses and the waters of Aegypt Moyses his rod saith he was turned into a serpent and from a serpent into a rod againe The riuers of Aegypt were running with water and their fountaines on a suddaine brokeforth with blood and at the prayers of the Prophet the blood is turned into water againe If humane blessing haue such power what shall we say of the diuine consecration where the words of our Lord and Sauiour doe operate If at the words of Elias fire descended from heauen shall not the words of Christ haue power to change the kinds of elements Thou hast read of the creation of the world he said and it was done And could the word of Christ create of nothing that which before was not and could he not change that which was into another thinge which was also What more could we haue desired S. Ambrose to say All things are possible and easy to God and nothing more easy then another to him Yet to our vnderstandings it is easier to conuert somethinge that is all ready into some other thinge that is also then to create some thinge of iust nothing What difficulty is there then that God who with a word of his power created heauen and earth and made all things of nothing should change the substances of bread and wine into the substance of his sacred body which he would leaue with vs It is a miracle which God would worke and the fathers of the Catholike Church haue allwaies acknowledged it soe and that there is here a change of natures but if there were onely a change in the signification as the Zuinglians and Caluinists say or onely in the real presence as the Lutherans say then there were noe miraculous change of that which were
neighbour But some louers of diuision will needs diuide the first Commandement into two and breake the connexion which the doctors of the Church haue commonly acknowledged in them They will haue the first to conteine all vnto the end of those words Thou shalt not haue strange Gods before mee and the second Commandement to beginne at the words following and to conteine the forbidding of images and pictures because they thinke by this meanes to giue it more force against the auncient and Catholike doctrine which alloweth them to be worshipped as holy thinges where it hath indeede noe force at all against it as I shall presently shew Onely obserue here that it maketh noe more against images in two Commandements then in one soe that we keepe the same words and their propper translations which not withstanding those very men haue made bold to alter I remember that a Protestant freind of mine once obiected to mee that Catholiks had taken away one of the ten Commandements meaning that we had put two into one to mainteine our doctrine of the worship of images But those that had soe possessed this ignorant man had manifestly deceiued him for the Catholike Church hath declared nothing in this but leaueth it indifferent to be vnderstoode as one or as two Commandements That which the Catholike Church teacheth is that which the Holy Ghost saith Exod. 34. Deut. 4. and that is that the Commandements are ten in number but to any particular manner of diuiding them the Church obligeth not Those that will diuide the first into two must take heed that they make not eleauen Commandements and if to remedy this they shall ioyne the two last into one then they fall into another inconuenience which is to make fower Commandements in the first table and six onely in the second which is contrary to the commune and auncient manner of diuiding them into three of the first table belonging to God and seauen of the second table belonging to our neighbour which S. Augustine approoueth of Aug. quest 71 in Exod. and which hath in it selfe most cōnexion For that there is more cōnexion betwixt forbidding strange Gods and forbidding of grauen thinges to be adored and serued then there is betwixt the desire of adultery and the desire of theft as is manifest they being in two destinct kindes of sinne and therfor with more reason shall be diuided into two Commandements then the first Thus much for the diuision of the Commandements Thou shalt not haue strange Gods before mee VVorship of images Two things are here commanded The one positiue to wit to worship the true God the other negatiue prohibiting the worship of false Gods And although the second be included in the first because the worship of the true God excludeth the worship of false Gods yet because the Israelits were a people prone to idolatry and to liue in the midst of Idolatrous nations that they might not fall into that sinne as in the end they did when Ieroboam Achab and other wicked kings pretended to worship the God of Israel when they worshipped idols also therefor they were not onely commanded to worship God but also expresly forbidden to worship strange Gods And by this we may vnderstande the sense of the words following thou shalt not make to thee a grauen thinge nor any similitude c. to be that they should not make them to be adored and serued as Gods Sap. 13. which the Gentil idolatours did who haue called the works of mens hands Gods and whom holy wisdome in the same place reprooueth for that either the fire or the winde or the swift ayre or a circle of starres or exceeding much water or the Sunne and the moone they thought to be Gods rulers of the world This was perfect idolatry and this was that which God would here preuent in the Israelits and by this the worship of images with inferiour onely and not diuine worship but as holy things is not forbidden But suppose that the Israelits were commanded here not onely not to worship images and pictures with diuine worship in themselues but also not to haue them amongst them it would make nothing against vs. Many things were forbidden them which are lawfull to vs the circumstances of that imperfect law of that peoples weaknesse of those times and places requiring it They were forbidden to eate blood because they were of themselues a bloody people and in the Apostles times it was necessary to obserue it as a praecept Act. 15. but now it is not Certaine corporal clensings were commanded them and certaine creatures were forbidden to be eaten as vncleane and these were neither obserued in the Apostles times nor are now Images and pictures in those idolatrous times might be forbidden them to haue for their pronenesse to idolatry but the Apostles had them and we haue them and worship them as holy thinges in the law of Christ which was to be and hath bene as we see the dostruction of idolatry That which the Commandements oblige vnto by obligation of nature that we and all people are bounde to obserue but that which they commande as propper to the Israelits onely obligeth not vs. He therefor that would make a good argument against our worship of images must prooue that it is forbidden either by some particular praecept propper to vs or by a natural praecept commune to all but this none can euer prooue As for any particular praecept propper to vs there is none can or doth offer to produce any praecept by which images are forbidden to be worshipped particularly by christians And for any general praecept forbidding by nature the worship of images as holy thinges it is contrary to reason to the scriptures to General Councels and to the practise of the primitiue and present Church Natural reason and order requireth that euery thinge be honored according to its natural goodnesse God is to be worshipped as God with supreme and diuine worship primely in himselfe and creatures with inferiour worship according to their nature as they haue more or lesse relation to God We giue ciuill honour to one another and especially to our superiors as hauing a neerer relation to him that is supreme and we giue religious worship to holy things as they haue more or lesse relation to him Images then hauing a particular relation to God by the holy things which they represent are to be worshipped with a holy and religious worship natural reason teaching that when we worship any thinge we should worship that also which hath relation vnto it because in respect of it and for its sake it deserueth also some worship and therefor we loue all that haue relation to our freinds and worship our superiors for Gods sake whom they represent We are not then forbidden by any praecept of nature to worship images with a secondary and relatiue worship but we are taught by natural reason that as they haue relation to the holy things