Selected quad for the lemma: blood_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
blood_n drink_v eat_v true_a 5,199 4 5.6109 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
B00958 Homelies sette forth by the righte reuerende father in God, Edmunde Byshop of London, not onely promised before in his booke, intituled, A necessary doctrine, but also now of late adioyned, and added thereunto, to be read within his diocesse of London, of all persons, vycars, and curates, vnto theyr parishioners, vpon sondayes, & holydayes. Bonner, Edmund, 1500?-1569. 1555 (1555) STC 3285.2; ESTC S103088 74,513 149

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

dicebat That is to saye Verily there is a certayne maner of eatynge that fleshe after whiche maner he that shall haue eaten it doeth dwell in Christ Christe in hym Wherefore note in what maner soeuer a man doeth eate Christe fleshe and drinketh hys bloude he dwelleth in Christe and Christe in hym but he that eateth and drinketh after a certayne speciall maner to whiche maner Christ had respecte when he spake the foresayde woordes Idem contra Cresco gramaticum li. i. Capi. 24. The same saincte Augustine in his fyrste boke Contra Chrescouium gramaticū and the .xxiiii. Chapiter sayeth thus Quid de ipso corpore et sāguine domini vnico sacrificio pro salute nostra guamuis ipse dominus dicat Nisi manducaueritis carnē filij hominis c. non ne idē apostolus docet etiam hoc perniciosum male vtentibus fieri That is to saye What of the very body and bloude of our sauioure the onely sacrifyce for our saluation thoughe there of our Lord dothe saye vnles ye eate the fleshe of the sonne of man c. doeth not the same Apostle meanynge Paule teache that it also is pernicious to them that doo vse it not duely and ryghtfully Obiection ¶ An other obiection there is also and it is thys Christ Iohn 10.15 Iohn .x. and .xv. dothe say I am a dore I am a vyne i. Corin. 10. and sainct Paule Pri. ad Corin. x. vseth suche lyke speache whiche speache of Christe and of sainct Paule in those places doth not import that Christ in euery dede by that saying was a dore or a vyne or suche lyke but speakyng after that figuratyfe speache or maner he dyd meane that he was a fygure of a dore of a vyne and suche lyke and that he had the propertie of a doore of a vyne so forthe Semblably saye they when Christ at his laste supper takynge breade and blessynge it dyd saye This is my bodye And takyng the cup giuing thankes dyd saye this is my blood of the new testamente c. hys speache soo pronounced and vttered dyd not import that Christe thereby dothe make of the breade and wyne his body and bloude but eyther he ment that the breade and wyne was sygnes and tokens of his bodye and bloude or els that they should be fygures of hys body and bloude and not hys very body and bloude in dede and consequently therefore they saye that in the sacrament of the aulter there is neyther the bodye neyther the bloude of Christe but bare material breade wyne beyng onely sygnes tokens and fygures of Christes body and bloud there ¶ For soluciō of this obiectiō Aunsvvere this maye be sayd that it is trouthe that Christ and saincte Paule in the places before alleged doo soo saye as is deduced in the begynnynge of this argumente or obiection and trouthe it is also that the speache of Christ I am a dore I am a vyne c. dothe not importe that Christe by that speakynge was in very dede a doore or a vyne but that he was a fygure of a doore and of a vyne and had the propertye of the doore and of the vyne But when it is sayde that the semblable is of Christes woordes This is my bodye this is my bloude that is neyther true nor dothe folow eyther by the rules of reason or of scripture for concerninge reason eyther muste we reason and saye that Christe alwayes in hys speakynge dyd vse fygures metaphores and tropes which to saye is moost false as it appeareth in the .xvi. of S. Iohn Iohn 16 eyther els we must say that Christe dyd but onely sometymes speake in fygures and not soo alwayes whiche beyng true and therefore to be graunted it foloweth not in reason that thoughe Christe in the .x. and .xv. of sainct Iohn c. dyd speake fyguratiflye Iohn x. and .16 that therefore here in these woordes of Christ this is my bodye this is my bloude he dyd also speake fyguratiflye wherefore let these sely soules that haue bene seduced by thys kynde of argumentes aske theyr teachers whether they can mayntayne and defende this theyr owne argumēt with soo feble a consequent or noo And yf they can not then tel thē that they be very varlettes in dede and as for the rule of scriptures that is of the circumstaūce of the letter and of other places of scripture cōferred with the same to gather therof that very meaning of the thing an example whereof we haue Iohn 2. and .16 Iohan. ii and .xvi. And here the vnlearned are to be taughte that althoughe in the prophetes and the histories of the olde testamente tropes and fygures are receyued and allowed forasmuche as by suche tropes and fygures the thing spoken is more vehemently declared and set forth yet as the excellent prelate and notable great clerke the Lorde byshop of winchester nowe most worthy Lord chaunceler of England in his learned booke of confutaciō of heresies against the sacrament of the aulter doth prudētly aduertise vs clerly affyrme in the doctrine preceptes of the now militāt churche al thinges of our religion faith ought to be taken symply plainely And in very dede yf in the sacramēt of the aulter were not the true body of Christ but a figure a significatiō onely of it thā the sacramēts of the new testamēt shold haue nothing more but rather lesse thē the sacramēts of the olde testamēt had which is against the catholyke doctrine of the churche against al good reasō ¶ Obiection An other obiection is this Christ at his laste supper takynge the chalice or cup into his handes dyd after that he had blessed it saye This cuppe is the newe testament in my bloude And seyng these woordes must nedes as they say be taken fyguratiuely inasmuch as the very material cup it selfe was neyther the newe testamente ne yet the bloude of Christ therefore lykewyse these wordes also whych Christ takīg bread into his hādes blessīg it saying This is my body must nedes be takē figuratiuely ¶ For answer whereunto we may say Aunsvvere as we did say before to the same obiection that this argument is noughte very euyl framed for thoughe we did admit a figure to be herein the cuppe yet it foloweth not therby that we must nedes take the other speche touchīg the body to be fyguratyue also especially for that in the one speache it is to wit touchyng the body al the circūstāces of the texte course of scripture doo enforce vs to take the speache properlye wherein the other speache touchynge the cup al the circumstances of the texte and course of scripture dothe importe the contrary ¶ Obiection An other obiection is that Christe hathe but one true natural body nowe say they one true natural body can not truely be but in one place therefore say they seynge Christes body is truely in heauen it can not be truely also in
obteyne the euerlastyng lyfe whyche sende vnto you all the father the sonne and the holy Ghost to whome be al honor and glorye worlde wythout ende Amen Io. Harpesfelde sacrae theologiae professoris et Archidiaconi London ¶ An homely declarynge that in the blessed Sacrament of the aultare is the very body and bloude of oure Sauioure Christe AFter that men are once graft in Christ and be made partakers of his death passion amonge other theyr dueties one of the cheife is diligētly to prepare them selues to the worthy receauynge of the blessed Sacrament of the aultare wherevnto are two thynges on our partes requisit as sayeth saynt Basell Basill in his rules good reason confirmeth the one feare the other fayth The feare whiche men must haue when they prepare them selues to come to this sacrament ought to be grounded vpon that terrible sayinge of saynt Paule in the .xi. chapter of his fyrste Epistle to the Corinthians where he sayth 1. Cor. 11. that whosoeuer doth participate therof vnworthely doth eate and drinke his owne dampnation The fayth whiche we must haue in oure hartes when we come to Gods borde is to be buylded lykewise vpon the vndoubted aucthorities of scripture whiche declare moost playnly vnto vs what meate it is that we there eate For the parfyt vnderstandyng wherof let vs consider that our sauiour Christe beynge here on earth dyd fyrst make a solempne promyse of a meate whiche hym selfe woulde geue vnto vs and afterwarde in dede he dyd geue the same accordynge to his promyse In the promyse makynge he sayde as it is wrytten in the .vi. chapter of S. Iohns Gospel The breade Iohn 6. or foode that I wyll geue vnto you is my fleshe whiche fleshe I wyll geue for the lyfe of the world and in the same chapter he also saith My flesh is verily meat and my bloud is verely drincke And as he then promised so he afterwarde perfourmed euen the very laste nyghte that euer he companyed with his Apostles before his death at whiche tyme he toke breade into his handes and gaue thankes and brake it and gaue it to his disciples and sayde Take eate this is my body whiche shal be geuen for you Yf we cōpare the wordes spoken by Chryste when he made the promyse of a meat to be by him geuen vnto vs with those other wordes whiche he vttered in geuyng of the same we nede not doubt of the thynges which he gaue In the promysse makynge he sayde that he woulde geue vs his flesshe in the perfourmynge of the promise he geueth the same sayinge take eate this is my bodie Agayne in the promise making he affyrmeth that the fleshe whiche he would geue vs to fede on should be the selfsame flesh that sholde be geuen for the lyfe of the world and in the performaunce of his promyse he said that the thing which he gaue was his bodye whiche shoulde be geuen to death for vs. Nowe the circumstaunces beyng wel consydered which our sauiour vsed in the institution of this most blessed Sacrament shal greatly cōfyrme al godly hartes in the true belefe of the same The tyme was the night before he suffered deathe to signifie vnto vs that this meate being differred to the last day that euer our Sauiour was conuersaunt with his Apostles must nedes be his very body and bloude in dede and such a meate as no other can be in any wyse comparable vnto it Agayne in that our sauiour dyd eate of the paschal lambe with his Apostles immediatly before he did institute this sacrament it most playnely declareth vnto vs that this sacrament is a marueylous worthye mysterye and that very thing which the eatyng of the paschal lambe in the olde lawe did prefigurate for whiche cause whē this was instituted that was abrogated Nether is it with out a meruelouse consideration that Chryst at that heauenly banket would of purpose nother haue the blessed Vyrgyn Mary his mother presente with him nor anye other of his dyscyples saue onely the .xii. Apostles whome he appointed to be the heade ministers of al his misteries here on the earth and specially to be the ministers of this most blessed sacrament and the instructours of al other touching the same Now what meneth it that our Sauiour was not content to offer them this sacrament onely but with the offeryng therof he said also vnto them Take eate take and drinke Do mē vse to offer to other meate and drinke for anye other purpose but onelye that they shoulde eate and drynke thereof but bycause it was his bodye and hys bloude therefore he fyrste byddeth them take and not feare to eate and drynke the same Besydes this it is to be well noted that the three Euangelistes Mathew Marke and Luke doo all three agree in the maner of the institution of thys sacramēt they wrytyng all thre their gospeles at sōdry tymes Chrisosto and Theophilact as Mathew eyght yere after the ascencion of our sauiour Christ Marke .x. yeares Luke xv yeares And where in doubtefull speaches of our sauiour Christ some one or other of the Euangelistes euermore openeth plainely the very meaning of the speches yet touching these words this is my body no one of them maketh any declaration vpon the same but they all leue them to be takē of vs as they sound and as of most plaine wordes they make no exposition or interpretation of them at al. Whyche poynte must be well consydered And therfore note that where Chryst sayde It is impossible for a rych man to entre into the kingdō of heauē bicause the meaning of these wordes may be diuersly taken Marke 10. thereof S. Marke in his tenth chapyter declareth the very meanyng of them saying It is harde for them that trust in there substaunce to be saued Agayne Christ at another tyme sayde to the Iewes loose you this temple in three dayes shal I buyld it agayne And for that the sense of these wordes is doughtfull S. Iohn there expoundeth them and sayeth that Chryst by the tēplement his body whiche should be by the Iewes put to death and by him the thirde daye shoulde be raysed from death to lyfe In the .vii. of Ihon Iohn 7. oure sauiour sayeth He that beleueth in me as the scripture sayeth there shall ryuers of quicke water flowe out of him And bicause this saing is obscure S. Iohn to make it open sayeth that he spake those wordes of the spirit which they that beleued in him should receyue In the .xii. chapyter of S. Ihon our sauiour saieth in this maner If I belyfte vp from the earth Iohn 12. I wyl drawe al thinges vnto my selfe And S. Iohn by and by geueth vs the exposition saying that hereby he signyfyed what kynde of death he should suffer Manye other lyke places are there in the newe testamente the matter of which places is not so highe nor soo nedefull to be ryghtly vnderstanded as the meaning of
to the catholike churche they myght auoyde all daunger and meryte a great deale yet to open further the falshed and noughtines of the heretique teachers in our tyme and howe glad willinge they are to abuse the simplicitie of the vnlerned people ye shall haue here added some moo obiections and solutions geuē to them to this ende that if the sayd symple people haue bene infected with the sayd obiections or such like they maye be wel satisfied in their conscience therevpon adhere vnto the catholyke faythe maynteyned and obserued in the catholique churche out of whych there is no saluation Obiection And to procede herein this is one other common obiection that much troubleth the ignorant people it is to witte ¶ How can the body and bloude of our Sauiour Chryst be in the blessed sacrament of the aultar seing that not only euyll men do many tymes receue the same but fyre also maye consume it and other like chaunces may happen vnto it ¶ Ansvvere For aunswer to which obiectiō it is fyrst and principally to be sayd that this obiection procedeth of a vayne curiositie of them whiche rather delyte fondly to talke of this high mystery then to prepare them selues to receyue the same accordyngly Sure we are that our Sauiour Chryste is nowe man incorruptible and impassible nether by fire nor by ought els can suffer violence and therefore where it pleaseth hym of hys tender mercy and goodnes for our great comforte and soule helth by hys omnipotent worde to tourne the substaunce of bread and wyne into his most precious body and bloude in the sacrament of the aultare and yet so to make thys turne that neuerthelesse he suffereth the fourmes sensible qualities of the breade and wine to remaine in there nature as they were before the consecratyon it is to be vnderstanded that the violence or force that is or may be done to thys sacramente is done onely to the fourmes and qualities sensible whiche in dede are subiecte to passibilite corruption but in no wise to the vncorruptible body bloud of oure sauioure Christ vnder them conteyned Doo we not reade I pray you in the fourth of Mathew howe that our sauiour suffered the deuyll to take hym and carye hym vp into the pinacle of the temple afterwarde to the toppe of an hygh mountayne and yet who doth not knowe that he suffered no vilany thereby at all The sonne beames also many tymes do shyne on thynges impure vncleane yet are they no whyt thereby defyled The bodye of mā is with a greater vnion ioyned to the soule then are the fourmes of breade and wine to the body and bloude of our sauiour Christe in the Sacramente of the aultar and yet we know that mortification putrifaction and other suche lyke thinges chauncynge to our body the soule hath in it no suche passion for that it is immortall The very Godhed of oure sauioure Christ was in vnitye of person vnited to hys manhod yet none of the passiōs paines or griefes whiche he sustayned in hys manhod broughte violence alteration or chaunge to hys godhed For the godhed is in alterable vnpassible The simplicity of Christen people in the primatyue churche was suche that they beleuynge mooste certenly the body and bloude of our sauiour Chryste to be in the sacrament of the aulter vnder the fourmes of breade and wyne dyd wythout al curious talke of the fourmes accidentes bende thē selues to be present at masse wherein the myghtye woorke of consecration is wrought by god and wherin our sauiour Christ also is in fourmes of breade and wyne offered vp to the heauenly father by the priest for the soner obteinyng of mercy and fauoure towardes vs and the sayde people beynge at masse they wyth moost feruent deuotion dyd praye and dyd honour the blessed sacrament of the aulter the body and bloude of oure sauiour Christe and besydes this they dyd oftentymes wyth feare and tremblynge prepare them selues to the worthy receyte thereof and by suche theyr godly behauiour they dyd purchase to them selues greate abundaunce of grace where we by the cōtrary and moost vnchristian behauour prouoke gods wrathe dayly more and more vpon our selues and the whole realme For nothyng soner styrreth God to auengeaunce then the presumption of suche as wyl curiously enter into hys hydden secrettes and therevpō doo contempne all that whiche by theyr feble wyttes they are not able to vnderstande ¶ Obiection Another obiection is of the woordes of our sauioure in the .vi. of Iohn Iohn vi where he saieth Qui manducat meam carnem et bibit meum sanguinem habet vitam eternam That is to saye He that eateth my fleshe and drinketh my bloude hathe euerlastynge lyfe Vppon these wordes they gather that if in the sacrament of the aulter be really the body and bloude of oure sauioure Christ then who so receueth the sacramēt must nedes enioye euerlastyng life But the scripture witnesseth that Iudas receaued it and sainct Paule in the .xi. 1. Corin. xi of his fyrste Epistle to the Corinthians saieth that Who so receueth the sacrament vnworthely receaueth it to his dampnation ¶ Obiection To this obiectiō it is to be aunswered that many sentences of scripture are to be vnderstande wyth a certayne restraynte or limittation as for example the scrypture sayeth Qui credit in me habit vitam eternam That is to say He that beleueth in me hath euerlasting lyfe And in the fyrst Epistle of S. Iohn 1. Iohn 4 the fourthe chapter it is written Quisquis confessus fuerit quoniam Iesus est filius dei deus in eo manet et ipse in deo That is to saye Who soeuer shall confesse that Iesus is the sonne of God in him dwelleth God and he in God There haue bene and are thousandes whyche beleue in Christe and that Christe is the very sonne of God and yet shall not for all that be saued but either for lacke of true belefe in other articles of the christian religion or for lacke of good lyfe shal be dampned This condition than is to be added to the forsayde sentences yf in suche beleif a mā dye and therewith is faythful in the necessarye articles and out of state of all deadely sinne he shall thā with out any doute inherite the kyngedome of heauen So in thys present obiection we muste make a limitation and saye that who so eateth and drynketh worthely c. ¶ To the cōfyrmacion hereof August sermon .xi. De verbis domini Sainct Augustine saieth in hys eleuēth sermō De verbis domini Profecto est quidam modus manducandi illam carnem quomodo qui manducauerit in Christo manet et Christus in eo Non ergo quocumque modo quisquā manducauerit carnem Christi et biberit sanguinem Christi manet in Christo et in illo Christus sed certo quodam modo quem modum vtique ipse videbat quando ista
substaunce of bread is turned into the substaunce of Christes bodye and so muste all men beleue that wyll be lyuely members of the catholyke churche and in that there belefe they muste honoure the bodye and bloude of oure sauioure Christe in the sacramente of the Aultare as alwayes christen people haue vsed to doo Saincte Austin in hys exposition made vpon the .99 Psalme S. Augustine vpon the .99 Psalme sayeth that it is synne not to honoure the bodye of Christe meanynge in the Sacramente of the Aultare And as it is before in thys Homily alledged he also sayeth in the name of all men We doo honoure vnder the fourmes of breade and wyne whyche we se the bodye and bloude of Christe whyche we do not see Wherefore good christen people knowing nowe what is the ryght belefe touchynge the Sacramente of the aultare embrace and folowe the same and cleaue faste to the catholyke churche the spouse of Chryste that you maye be true members of Christe to whome wyth the father and the holye Ghoste be all honoure and glorye worlde wythoute ende Amen Io. Harpesfelde sacrae theologiae professoris et Archidiaconi London ¶ An Homily wherein is aunswere made to certayne common obiections agaynst the presence of Christes bodye and bloude in the sacramente of the Aultare MEte it were dearely beloued in our sauioure Christ that we all should so fully wholy cleaue to the faith of Christes catholike church that no appearaūce of reasō to the cōtrari therof shoulde cause vs once to doute or stagger in any part part of the same For such a kinde of faith doth God requyre of vs and for suche kynde of faythe good christen people are in scripture called Abrahās children Roma 4 which Abraham as it is wrytten in the fourth to the Romaynes cōtrary to hope beleued in hope that he should be the father of many nations accordynge to that which was spokē So shal thy sede be And he fainted not in the faith nor yet cōsidered his owne bodi which was now dead euen when he was almost an hundred yeare olde nether yet that Sara was paste chylde bearynge he staggered not at the promyse of god through vnbelefe but was strōg in the faith and gaue honor to god fully certified that what he had promysed the same he was able to make good Yf we then wil be the childrē of Abraham we muste not faynt in faith nor consyder gods woordes after the course of nature Saint Paule in the .x. 2. Corin. x. chapiter of his seconde epistle to the Corinthians geueth vs an example in hym selfe howe we shoulde alwayes brynge reason in subiection to faithe sayng The weapons of our warfare are not carnall but mighty in God to ouerthrowe stronge holdes to destroy counselles and euery hyghe thynge that exalteth it selfe agaynste the knowledge of God and to brynge in captiuitye vnto the seruyce of Christe all vnderstandinge What thinke you is the cause why the Iewes beleue not on Christe Verely fyrste because he was borne of a Vyrgyn which is contrary to the course of nature Secondly lykewyse he was in vnitie of person God man whyche how it may be no mans wyt is able by natural power to conceaue thyrdly because he beyng God and man suffered the death of the crosse which for God to be content to do semeth to naturall reason a thynge moost absurde but good christen folke geuyng place to faith do most vndoutedly beleue on Christ God mā crucified according to that S. Paule writeth in his fyrste Chapter of his fyrste Epistle to the Corinthians i. Corin. 1. saying We preache Christ crucifyed to the Iewes a stumblyng blocke to the gentels a folishnes but to so many of the iewes gētels as ar called Christ the power wysedome of God And agreably here vnto he sayeth also in the nexte Chapiter folowynge My talke my preaching was not in the persuasible woordes of mans wysedome but in shewynge of power and of the spyryte that youre faythe should not rest in the wisedome of man but in the power of God This generall aduyse and counsel of S. Paule may and ought so to staye vs in the faythe of the catholyke churche that nether carnall reasons grounded vpon the feble intelligence of mans natural wyt nether the deceatfull iudgement of oure senses shoulde make vs once to doute of any one trueth in Christes religiō were it neuer so contrarye to the course of nature neuer so farre aboue our capacities and neuer so absurde to the appearaunce of our outwarde senses But forasmuch as throughe the iniquitie of these later euyll yeares dyuers haue hadde sondrye fonde dowtes and scruples put into theyr heades especyally agaynst the presence of Christes body bloude in the Sacrament of the aultare and throughe such dowtes haue swarued from the true belefe therein therefore here shall folowe aunsweres and solutyons to such dowtes as haue ben most commen that from henceforthe no man shall nede to be seduced by them or other lyke Obiection ¶ Fyrst it hath bene obiected that our sauiour Christ immediatlye after that he had instituted and delyuered to his Apostles the sacramente dyd say vnto them Do this in remembraunce of me Vppon which wordes some haue concluded that the bodye of our sauiour Christ cannot be in the sacramente ¶ But let vs duely waye the wordes Aunsvvere and meaning of the same and we shall moost plainly perceaue theyr erroure and mysvnderstandyng Saincte Paule in hys fyrste Epistle to the Corinthians 1. Corin. xi and in the .xi. chapter of the same Epistle intreating of the institution of the Sacrament of the aultare and ther openynge the true sense of that commaundemente of Christ saythe in this maner As oft as you eate of that bread and drinke of that cuppe you shal shew forthe the Lordes death vntil he come So then the remembraunce whyche oure sauioure there requyreth of vs is the remembraunce of hys death which is past and not presente and therefore after most proper maner of speache may well be remembred Now this remembraunce can in no wyse possibly be so lyuely and so effectually worke in oure hartes as when we most certenly beleue that in the sacrament of the aultare is veryly the selfe same body in substaunce which died for vs and therfore the Prophet Dauid foreseyng in spirit this so excellēt a memorye sayeth in hys .cx. Psalme Psal 110. Oure mercyfull gratious Lord hath made a memory of all his merueylous workes and by by declaring in what maner he maketh that memory he addeth those woordes he hathe geuen a foode to suche as feare him This fode which the Prophet sayeth that Christ should leaue in remembraunce of al his maruelous workes that is of his incarnatiō his passion his ascension and glorye in heauen and other lyke workes moost chiefely is to be verifyed of the body and bloud of our sauiour Christe in the sacramente of