is of things that concerne our saluation such as the Sacraments be Theoph. Why is it againe required that there bee a promise added Mat. The third condition Because vnlesse there be a promise the Sacraments shal be vnprofitable vnto vs. Now that promise which on the behalfe of God hath the effect is as it were the soule of the Sacraments whereupon all their force and efficacy dependeth and not vppon the holinesse or worthinesse of him of whom they bee ministred or vpon the vertue of some wordes pronounced Therefore without that promise the Sacraments shall be nothing else but vaine and fruitlesse ceremonies Theoph Thinkest thou that the Sacraments if they be ministred of some wicked man and hipocrite haue as much efficacie and force as if they were ministred by some good man Mat. I thinke it so as on our part we bring nothing to hinder it as good seed if it finde good ground will beare fruit notwithstaÌ„ding it be sowen of some naughty Vpon whoÌ„ dependeth the efficacy of the Sacraments The number of the Sacraments and wicked man For the vertue of it hangeth not vpon the lower as the Sacraments do not vpon the Minister but vppon the blessing and grace of God alone Theoph. Let vs come to the number of the Sacraments How many be there in the Christian church Mat. Two namely baptisme and the Lords supper Theoph. Seeing they declare vnto vs one thing euen as the word doth namely the loue of God toward vs in Christ what is the cause that they be two in nuÌ„ber Matth. Because by Baptisme God doeth witnesse that we be receiued of him into couenant through the communion of Christ and his giftes but by the supper hee assureth that wee are held and kept in vntill we bee receiued into the heauenly life And for this cause Baptisme is onely once ministred but the Supper oftentimes Theoph Declare this reason to me more at large Matth. Yet to me it seemeth easie For seeing Baptisme is the assured conueyance vnto vs of the couenant made with vs in Christ if it should be iterated or vsed the second time or oftner it were all one as if we said that God had abrogated or disanulled the first couenant to ordaine or appoint another which indeed is altogether contrary to the verie nature truth and constancy of God For the Apostle saith I am 1. 17. With him there is no changing or shadow of turning But concerning the Supper it is altogether required both for edifying and for comfort that it be oft repeated 〈◊〉 â—…sed of vs for asmuch as such in the weaâ—nesse of 〈◊〉 faith wee do euery moment call into doubt whether God will continue in his loue toward vs or no especially when we looke vnto our daily sinnes by the which we are indeed worthie to be excluded by 〈…〉 by this Sacrament God would assure vs of hi◠〈…〉 the which he doth both offer exhibit or giue Iesus christ vnto vs with his treasures in whom alone as hath bin said that couenant and loue hath the foundation Theoph. Whether the Sacraments be necessary to saluation I wil yet demand of thee one question generally pertaining to the Sacraments before wee begin the particular exposition of them both Whether are they so necessarie to saluation that no man can be saued without partaking of them Matth. It is a most absurd opinion of them who think that God hath tyed his grace to the SacrameÌ„ts for they be onely for this end ordained that the grace and fauour yeelded vs before in Christ should be confirmed and ratified therefore it was most excellentlie said of an ancient father Bernard epist 77. That the waÌ„t of Baptisme did not condemne but the contempt of it Theoph. But Christ saith Mar. 16. 16 Whosoeuer beleeueth and is Baptised shall bee saued Out of which words it seemeth may be gathered that Christ determineth Baptisme to be necessarie to saluation no lesse then faith and that the same may bee concluded concerning the Supper out of that which Christ himselfe said in another place Iohn 6. 53. Verily verily I say vnto you except you eat the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his bloud you haue no life in you Matth. In the first place I will answer to those things which thou saidest of Baptisme whereof I say that in that place Christ doth not set downe the necessitie of Baptisme but rather what is that true faith by the which we are saued namely that it is not dead and hidden but liuely and declared by outward confession Insomuch as the beleeuers be ioyned to the church and be partakers of the preaching of the word and administration of the Sacraments wherunto that saying of Paul ought to be referred We beleeue with the heart Rom. 10. 10 to righteousnesse and confesse with the mouth to saluation And that this is the minde of Christ it is gathered by the member following for he saith But whosoeuer beleeueth not shall be condemned For if this had bin his meaning that no maÌ„ could haue bin saued without Baptisme he would haue said thus But whosoeuer shal not beleeue or shall not be baptized shal be condemned Seeing therefore he saith that vnbeliefe is the cause of condeÌ„nation by the contrary he meaneth that faith is sufficient to saluation which hee himselfe oftentimes coÌ„firmeth when he saith Iohn 3. 36. 5. 24. 6. 4. He that beleeueth in the son hath life euerlasting but hee that beleeueth not in the sonne shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth vpon him Concerning the other place of eating the flesh of Christ and drinking his bloud he doth not there entreat particularly of the Supper but generally of the vnion that we ought to haue with his body which indeed is altogether necessarie vnto saluatioÌ„ as hath bin shewed of vs in the first booke But that vnion is wrought no lesse by the word receiued by faith then by the Sacraments as it hath beene said already CHAP. III. Of Baptisme by the which God testifieth that we are receiued into couenant of him whiles hee doth communicate Christ Iesus vnto vs together with his benefites Theophilus NOw wee are to weigh those two Sacraments each by it selfe and in both those three conditions are to bee searched out that are required to make them truely Sacraments Let vs therefore begin with Baptisme what is the institution of it Mat. The institution of Baptisme First indeed it was instituted of God by the ministery of Iohn Baptist which thereupoÌ„ had his name Afterward it was dedicated and sanctisied of Christ in his own body when he would be baptized of him and when he commanded the Apostles to baptize Theoph. Let vs see those three things which thou saidest were required in the lawfull institution of a Sacrament namely 1 The signe and sacramentall rites 2 The signification of them 3 The likenesse and agreement betweene both Matth. The signe
the Scripture vnderstandeth all the benefites of Christ but for the most part maketh mention of that only because it hath as it were the first and chiefe place Theoph. Let vs go forward What vnderstandest thou by that spirituall food which thou saydest came by the eating of Christes body and drinking his bloud Matth. Our spirituall foode in the Supper First peace of conscience namely because we are more more assured of the forgiuenesse of our sins promised by baptisme SecoÌ„dly the daily growth increase of the new man begun in vs in our Baptisme so as we haue power giuen vs to serue God better and to resist the temptations that are wont to call vs away from his obedieÌ„ce Whereupon followeth an effect of this spirituall food by name that we are coÌ„firmed daily in the hope of eternall life And by these things appeareth that which I haue said of the difference of the Sacraments that Baptisme doth testifie the beginning of our partaking with Christ and his benefites and the Supper the continuance and increase thereof Theoph. Now we are to come to the commandement and promise of the Sacrament Mat. Both be added presently after the words of institution Take eate drinke you all of this do this in remembrance of me Loe the coÌ„mandement it set down theÌ„ the promise This is my body This is my bloud For the meaning of these wordes is as much as if Christ sayd This bread and this wine doe so represent vnto you my body and bloud that they assure you receiuing the visible signes to bee indeede partakers of those things that be signified by them eueÌ„ my body bloud Theoph. But the words of Christ seeme not to haue that meaning but rather that the bread and wine are transubstantiated or turned into his body and bloud Matth. The exposition of Christes wordes The wordes themselues cannot beare it For if Christ meant to haue signified that he would haue sayd thus Let this be made my body or let it be changed into my body Theoph. What then were the meaning of Christes wordes if they were to be expounded according to the letter as they say Matth. They should rather signifie that his body and bloud were changed into bread and wine For if any saw the piller of salt whereinto Lots wife was turned out of all doubt he would say This thing that is this Piller of salt is Lots wife that hee might declare that she was turned into that Piller and such as heard those wordes would take them in that sence Theoph. I perceiue indeede that those words if they were to be expounded literally doe properly signifie as thou sayest Howbeit that sence agreeth not to the wordes of Christ Mat. Thou thinkest rightly and that former agreeth nothing more namely whereby transubstantiation is builded which indeed the very words do not beare yea rather out of it foure absurdities do follow Theoph. Rehearse them Mat. A consutation of the absurdities following vpon Popish transubstantiation 1 First if the bread wine be turned into the body and bloud of Christ there shal be no signes in the holy Supper and therefore it shall not be a Sacrament which indeed cannot be without a visible signe 2 Secondly Christes bloud shal be separated from his body which is most absurd can neuer be Moreouer the body of Christ should be infinite therefore he should not be a very man neither should he haue truely ascended into heauen by which opinion the chiefe points of our faith should be ouerthrowen Theo. Some do obiect that Christs body is now glorified at one the same time may be in diuers places Mat. This objection is vaine for when Christ instituted the Supper his body was not glorified Adde hereunto that the glorification hath not taken from it the nature of a true body but hath taken away the infirmitie and weaknesse of it which was very well obserued of one of the fathers For this cause Peter saith Actes 3. 21 The heauen must hold him vntill the time of the restoring of all things And the Angels in another place Actes 1. 11. So shall he come as you haue seene him go into heauen Theoph. Shew the fourth absurditie Mat. It is this that the wicked and hypoerites comming to the Supper should bee indeede partakers of the bodie and bloud of Christ which verilie were nothing else but to ioyne God SathaÌ„ together Moreouer contrarie vnto that which the Scripture expresly teacheth the vnbeeleuers should be saued For Christ affirmeth Iohn 6. Whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud hath euerlasting life Theo. Against those who say the reprobatâ—… 〈◊〉 the Supper be partakers of Christes body bloud But Christ vnderstaÌ„deth those which eate his flesh drinke his bloud worthily For the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 11. 29. He that eateth this bread drinketh this cup vnworthely eateth and drinketh to himselfe damnation Mat. The Apostle saith not who so eateth the body of Christ drinketh the bloud of Christ vnworthely but hee that eateth the bread and drinketh the cup. For Christ should offer his body to be prophaned if he made the vnworthy partakers of it Moreouer his gifts be inseparably ioyned with his person and therefore it is impossible that any should communicate with his body but the same also must bee partakers of all his benefites eueÌ„ of euerlasting life For this cause Iohn saith 1. Ioh. 5. 12 He that hath the sonne hath life He that hath not the sonne of God hath not life Those foure absurdities recâ—…ned vp by vs doe most manifestly ouerthrow the opinion of transubstaÌ„tiation against the which experience it selfe it for as much as the bread wine of the Supper if they be kept long do corrupt WhereupoÌ„ it is plaine that their substance it not changed Theoph. I do indeede perceiue that the wordes of Christ do not establish traÌ„substantiatioÌ„ or the turning of the signes into the things signified both because the wordes themselues cannot beare it and especially in that most grosse absurdities do follow thereupon But by what arguments canst thou proue that the expositioÌ„ brought by thee doth expresse the sence of Christs wordes and that that was his meaning Mat. Of the exposition of Christes words in the Supper Seeing there must be an exposition of them it is not to be doubted but that is true and proper which may be confirmed by the testimonie of the holy Scripture whereof no absurditie followeth But that which I haue brought is such therefore it is true and proper Theoph. If thou prouest these two points thou shalt verily ouercome Mat. First that exposition is confirmed by the testimony of the holy Scripture For Paule thus expouÌ„deth the words of Christ instituting the Supper The cup of 1. Cor. 10. 16 blessing which we blesse is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ the bread which we breake is it not the
Theoph. Of the office of Christ First therefore we must see how Christ performed the office of King Prophet and Priest And afterward how hee communicateth the same with the faithfull Mat. He did the office of a king when by his diuine power he deliuered vs from the tyranny of our enemies the deuill sinne and death whom hee ouercame that he might make vs his seruants and subiects to his kingdome which indeed he doth continually exercise in vs when he ruleth vs by the scepter of his word and by the power of his spirite He did the office of a Prophet in that hee declared all the will of God vnto vs by his word he gaue the holy Ghost by the helpe whereof it might be vnderstood of vs and we yeeld our consents vnto it This office also hee exerciseth euerie day when by the ministerie of the word and working of the Spirite he causeth vs daily to profite and to go forward in that knowledge Finallie he did the office of a Priest when vpon the Crosse he offred his body and bloud for vs to God the Father that he might bee a satisfaction for our sinnes The execution of which office is also at this day when he maketh intercession for vs. Now this priesthood of Christ is the truth and fulfilling of all the sacrifices of the old Testament Theoph. Let vs now speake of our kingdome priesthood and prophetship Mat. Apot. 1. 6. We are spiritually kings in Christ that we may ouercome the deuill and sinne 1. Pet. 2. 9. We are Priests through him to offer vp an acceptable sacrifice of praise to God Act. 2. 17. Wee are prophets that being taught the truth wee may teach others and open to them the misteries of the kingdome of Heauen Theoph. It hath bin sufficiently declared how Christ hath deliuered vs from condemnation as also by what means he hath made vs fit to attain to eternal life Now the third point remaineth namely why it is necessary that his gifts should be made ours Mat. Because otherwise they shall no way helpe vs to the satisfying of the perfect iustice of God euen as other mens riches profit not to deliuer vs out of debt except they become ours Theoph. How therefore may his gifts become ours Mat. If we be made one with him For by the benefite of that vnion we are made partakers of all his spirituall Of the vnion with Christ graces and riches which are no lesse imputed vnto vs before God thē as if they were ours by nature For this cause the Apostle saith Coloss 1. 22. that we are by Christ reconciled in that bodie of his flesh through death By which wordes of his he meaneth that the merite of Christs death pertaineth not to anie but vnto such as be grafted into his bodie and are made his members Theoph. Can therfore no man be partaker of Christs gifts except he be made one with him Mat. He cannot Euen as a woman cannot be partaker of the riches and honor of some great man except she be ioyned with him in mariage that they become one bodie and one flesh the mēbers also cannot draw life from the head if they be not ioyned with it There is therefore no true partaking of Christ except there be an vnion with him For this cause therefore Christ said to the Capernaits Vnlesse ye eate of the flesh of Ioh. 6. the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud ye shall haue no life in you In which words he plainly sheweth that we are not partakers of his gifts vnto saluation except we be as nearely coupled with his humanitie as meate and drinke are ioyned with our bodie which of all others is a most neare vnion For meat drinke when they are digested in our stomach are so turned into our substance that they cannot be distinguished much lesse separated from it Theoph. This doctrine also is aboue the capacitie of man Mat. Ephes 5. 32. It is indeed Wherefore Paule speaking of it saith that it is a great misterie Now if we can neuer so litle see the bodie of the Sunne but our eyes do dazell how can our mindes pierce to that inaccessible light of the diuine maiestie to conceiue his heauenly mysteries such as be the points which we haue hādled first 1. Concerning the Trinitie 2. Of the vnion of two natures in Christ 3. And of coupling the faithfull with the humane nature of Christ It is therfore our duty rather holily to beleeue these three fundamentall points or principles of Christian religion then curiously to examine them by the rule of our reason CHAP. IIII. Of Faith by the which we are made one with Christ and so be partakers of all his gifts Theophilus HItherto I haue hard First that God which is perfectly iust doth no way absolue the guiltie Secondly that men which are most miserable sinners are before the iustice of God guiltie of eternall death Thirdly that Iesus Christ by his death hath satisfied the exact righteousnesse of God which is imputed vnto vs to the end that being set free from condemnation we may be partakers of eternall life so as we be ioyned with him It remaineth therefore that I vnderstand how we are made one with Christ Mat. By faith euen as he him selfe testifieth in the prayer which he made to God for all the faithfull in these words Ioh. 17. 20. Father I pray thee for such as shal beleeue in me that they may be all one as thou O Father art in me and I in thee that they also may be one in vs. Whereunto also that saying of Paul is to be referred Ephes 3. 17. that Christ dwelleth in our hearts by faith And herevpon it is that these sentences be often repeated in the Scriptures 1 That euery one which beleeueth in him is absolued an◠discharged Act. 13. 39. 2 Is made the child of God Iohn 1. 12. 3 Doth not perish but hath euerlasting life Iohn 3. 16. In which places those things be attributed to faith which we receiue of Christ alone to the ende we may vnderstand that both he and his gifts are committed to vs by faith Theoph. Thou hast touched a little concerning the righteousnesse of faith which I desire to haue declared Of Iustification by thee somewhat more at large for I perceiue that Paule oftentimes speaketh of it Mat. To be iustified before God is to be accompted iust that is to say without blot vnreproueable Now Paule doth often handle this point because it is one of the speciall groundes of our faith For no man can please God but he that is iustified Theoph. How so Mat. Because as God is perfectly iust and holy so he loueth holinesse and iustice on the other side hee hateth vnrighteousnesse therefore we can haue no fellowshippe with him to be partakers of his heauenly glorie except we be perfectly righteous Therefore he saith that no vncleane thing shall
the edification and saluation of the child Theoph. Why so Mat. First of all God is glorified for that he sheweth himselfe true in his promises by the which it is that he hath mercy vpon the faithfull euē to the thousand generation Moreouer the parent himselfe is wonderfully comforted confirmed in the loue of God whē he seeth that not onely he himselfe is beloued of God but also that the loue grace of God is deriued vnto his children which God assureth him of by that visible signe Finally cōcerning the child it hath a maruellous benefit bestowed vpō it that he doth so soone obtaine the partaking of Christ and his benefits by the which he hath the inheritance of eternall life By the remembrance whereof when he commeth to age he is wonderfully cōfirmed in the loue and feare of God namely whē he calleth to mind that he is so much esteemed of God that euen from his comming into the world he obtained fellowship in his couenant Theo. How the children of beleeuers lacking faith be partakers of Christ But how can a yong child by Baptisme be partaker of Christ and his benefites seeing it is certaine that he lacketh faith without which thou affirmedst before that no man can haue that felowship Mat. That indeed is true in those that be of yeares and in such as for their age may beleeue But God worketh in the childrē of the faithfull belonging to his couenant another way vnknowen vnto vs whō also the Apostle doubteth not to call holy 1. Cor. 7. 14. in so much as they cannot perish seeing they haue in them the seede of faith which verily in the due time worketh the effects in some sooner but in other later as it seemeth good to the Lord to call them Theoph. How the children of the godly be borne in originall sin I do now see that the children of the godly are to bee Baptized Notwithstanding I will yet propound one questiō before I go from the speech which I haue begun How can it be that those children of the faithfull should be borne defiled with originall sinne whose parents be cleansed from it Mat. Austen by an excellent similitude Austen de penit merit remis li. 3. cap. 18. answereth this question in these words Euen as the chaffe which by the helpe of man is seuered with great diligence frō the wheate that is threshed notwithstanding remaineth in the fruite which groweth of the sayd cleansed wheate being sowen so sinne that by Baptisme is cleansed in the parents remaineth in those whom they haue begotten Therfore our children except they be borne againe by a spirituall birth cannot bee accounted the children of God nor heires of eternall life CHAP. IIII. Of the Supper of the Lord. By the which God witnesseth that his couenāt is most certain toward vs for asmuch as by it he maketh vs more and more partakers of Christ and his benefites Theophilus HItherto hath bin spoken of Baptisme let vs now come to the Supper of the Lord and let vs begin at the institution of it Mat. Of the word Supper and the institution of it The Euangelistes shew that it was instituted of Christ the same night hee was betrayed after hee had supped and had eaten the Easter I am be according to the Law Theoph. I thinke it was thereupon called Supper Mat. It is called Supper of the Apostle not so much for this cause as to shew that it is indeede a spirituall Supper giuen of God vnto the faithful wherein he feedeth them with the body and bloud of Iesus Christ into the hope of eternall life Theoph. The three heads of the institution are to be examined of vs namely 1 The signes and Sacramentall rites 2 Their signification 3 And finally the likenesse or agreement between both Matth. The signes of the supper The signes are bread and wine which indeed do signifie the body and bloud of Christ Because the body and bloud of Christ haue that force and efficacie of feeding in our soules which bread and wine haue in our body And for this cause Christ often calleth himselfe the bread of life Iohn 6. Theoph. What difference makest thou betweene the bread and wine of the Supper and the bread and wine which we vse for our ordinarie meate and drinke Mat. In substance indeede none but in the vse and ministring of the Supper cōcerning which this I hold that the one are set before vs for the nourishmēt of the body but the other be ordained of God to be signes of the body and bloud of Christ The same also is to be thought of the water of Baptisme Theoph. Why there is a double signe in the Supper Why be there two signes in the Supper Matth. To the end we might know that in Christ we haue whole and perfect spirituall food that is whatsoeuer is requisite to our saluation It was also done for a fuller remembrance of his death For the wine that is the signe of his bloud doth as it were represent it before our eyes Theoph. Let vs come to the Sacramentall rite and signification of it Mat. It is double or two-fold 1 For the one respecteth the Minister 2 The other him which is is partaker of the Supper The Sacramentall rite of the Supper What is the duety of ministers in ministring the Supper The first is this to take the bread and to breake it whereby is signified that Christ with sufferings was broken for our redēption which himselfe declared in these words This is my body that is broken for you After to giue it being broken and to deliuer the wine in the cup by which rites is meant that God doth offer giue Christ vnto vs together with all his benefites The duetie of them that come to the Lords Table The later rite is that he which commeth to the Supper should receiue eate and drinke the bread and wine giuen vnto him which indeede doth signifie that in the Supper we do truely receiue Christ eate his body and drinke his bloud by the which we are nourished into the hope of eternall life if we do not cast him from vs through vnbeliefe Theoph. What is it to eate the body of Christ Mat. To be so nearely ioyned with his body as is the meate which we eate with our owne body Theoph. What is it to drinke the bloud of the Lord Mat. To be as truly partakers of his death passiō as if we our selues had suffered the same And this doth our Sauiour of Christ meane whē he saith Verily verily I say vnto you except you eate the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his bloud you haue no life in you He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud hath eternall life But this is to be remembred which wee spake before in the Chapter of Faith namely that by the merit of Christes death represented in the holie Supper by wine that signifieth his bloud
Cōmuniō of the body of Christ Which words do indeed signifie no other thing but that wee should vnderstand the bread and wine to bee most certaine signes of our Communion and felowship with Christs body and bloud And that doth altogether agree with my exposition Moreouer that is the meaning of these words This is my body which is of these This is my bloud But Luke expoundeth them thus This cup is Luc. 22. 20. that new Testament by my bloud which is shed for you The same exposition also did Paul follow repeating the wordes of the institution And this maner of speach can not admit any other sense without iniurie and violence done to the wordes but that we say that the wine offered in the up is a most sure pledge of the new couenant which God hath made with vs by the precious bloud of Christ The same therefore is to be said of the bread namely that it is a most sure pledge of the vnion which we haue with the body of Christ Theoph. Concerning the first part thou hast satisfied me it followeth that we come to the other Mat. In it I said that the exposition which I brought had no absurditie For there is no let but that we may trulie eate the body of Christ and drinke his bloud to our saluation Yea the foure absurdities which I spake of euen now be auoided For the signes retaine their owne nature The bloud of Christ is not separated from his body The truth of his humanitie ascention and sitting at the right hand of the Father remaineth safe Finally the vnbeleeuers are not partakers of his body and bloud Theoph. Why Christ vsed those wordes and no other in the institutiō of the Supper If that were the meaning of Christ why did he not expresse it in plainer words and lesse doubtfull Mat. He could not expresse that promise in fewer more significant wordes for if he had said This is a pledge or signe of my body there had beene no promise It had therefore beene necessary for him to haue vsed long circumstances of words after this manner I do assure that this bread and this wine doe represent vnto you my body and bloud that as often as you receiue these visible signes you shal be truly and indeede partakers of the things whereof they be signes And this kinde of speach had not beene of such force and weight as that is which he vsed This is my bloud for it compasseth all those things vnder it but with a greater maiestie And for this cause the holy Ghost vsed a like The confirmation of the former interpretation kind of speach in the Sacraments of the old Testamēt in that it giueth the name of the thing signified to the signs themselues to teach vs that such as receiue worthelie be truly partakers of the thing signified Theoph. Declare that vnto me particularly in some Sacraments of the old Church Matth. Gen. 17. 9 10. 11. First God meaning to assure Abraham and his posteritie that Circumcisiō was vnto them a most certaine signe that they were reckened in his couenāt calleth it his couenant The same also saith Moses of Exo. 12. 11. the Sacrament of the passouer For hee calleth it the Lordes passeouer to giue vs to vnderstand that it was a most certaine token of the good will of God which the Israelites had experience of when the Angell destroied the first borne of the Egiptians and passed ouer their houses without touching them whereof the passeouer was a Sacrament The. Indeed these kinds of speaking do come somewhat neare to the words of Christ vsed in the institution of the holy Supper But I aske of thee if there bee any altogether like vnto them and that haue the same meaning with that which thou hast alledged Mat. There be For the Apostle speaking of the Sacraments which the father 's vsed in the wildernesse saith 1. Cor. 10. 4. that the rocke that is the water which Moyses had not without miracle brought out of stone was Christ To teach that it was vnto them a most effectuall Sacrament of the Communiō and fellowship which they had with Christ For the same Apostle affirmeth that the fathers did eate the same spirituall meat with vs and dranke the same spirituall drinke Loe therefore a manner of speach altogether like to that which Christ vsed in the institution of the Supper and which hath the same interpretatiō with that which I brought a little before Yea and that more is there is vse of this kinde of speach not onely in the Scripture but also in our common talke for if a king will forgiue an offender the punishment of his faultes deliuering vnto him his letters patents confirmed by his hand writing and seale he will say behold thy pardon And yet he meaneth not that the letters patents bee his pardon but onely a certaine testimonie of his pardon And this similitude very excellently agreeth with the sacramēts that be as it were seales of the word as the Apostle testifieth speaking of circumcision for hee calleth it the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Theoph. I doe now see that thy interpretation doeth expresse the true meaning of Christs words I do also graunt that by those words Christ assureth vs that we are as verily partakers of his body and bloud as we do receiue the bread and wine But how can that be vnderstandest thou that his body is shut vp or inclosed in the bread and his bloud in the wine Matt. Against the error of consubstantiation No not so for the words themselues cannot any way beare it for Christ must haue said my body is with this bread and my bloud is with this wine Secondly wee should make a carnall eating which should lead vs to the three latter absurdities reckened vp of vs when we spake of transubstantiation namely that the bloud of Christ should bee seuered from his bodie that his body should be insinite and finally that the wicked comming to the supper should communicate with the body and bloud of Christ and therefore should obtaine euerlasting life Moreouer Christ himselfe doth teach the contrarie for vnto his disciples iudging the speach which he had of eating his body to he hard he answereth thus It is the spirit that giueth life the flesh profiteth nothing The words that I speak vnto you are spirit and life By which words he declareth most euidently that hee speaketh not of any carnall but of spirituall eating Theoph. Thou hast affirmed before that Christ in that place did not speake of the eating which is in the supper but of that which is spiritually by faith Matth. Of the eating of Christs body and drinking his bloud Euer as the Scripture doth set before vs one Christ so it sheweth one way how to eate his flesh and drinke his bloud that is whereby wee may bee made one with him to be partakers of all his benefites and this is spiritually
not of the ceremonial Likewise also in the Epistle to the Galathians where he doth especially entreat of the ceremonies hee alleadgeth both the sentences of Moyses namely the curse to those that fulfil not the whole law and life to those that keep it And in the former indeed hee teacheth that so many as trust to the workes of the Law to be iustified by them be vnder the curse because they cannot wholly and fully keepe it But in the other he declareth that there is so much differēce betweene the law and faith that if any man bee iustified by faith hee cannot in any sort obtaine it by the Law But it is certain that as well the curse threatned to the transgressors of the Law as the promise to eternal life made to such as fulfill it are not to be restrained to the ceremonies alone but also are to bee referred to the morall Law and that too by more right for as much as God as Hosea saith preferreth mercy before sacrifice Hos 5. 7. Moreouer after the Apostle in the secōd chapter of the Epistle to the Ephesians hath affirmed that wee are saued by grace through faith and that not of our selues he addeth but of the gift of God not of workes least any man should boast himselfe Which wor is do most euidently shew that the Apostle speaketh not of the ceremoniall works but of morall which giue men far more large matter of boasting then the ceremoniall doe Finally when he writeth to Titus Tit. 3. ◠that wee are saued not by the works of righteousnesse which we haue done but by the mercy of God who seeth not that the Apostle doth especially entreate of morall works to whom the title of righteousnesse agreeth far better then to the ceremoniall Which things being so there is no doubt but that the Apostle whensoeuer he speaketh of the workes of the Law to proue that we are neither saued nor iustified by them doth no lesse meane the morall then the ceremoniall yea rather that he doth shut out both from the cause of saluation and righteousnesse Theoph. But why be they so often called of him the workes of the Law Matth. To teach that if the workes commanded of God and euen contained in his own law be to no purpose to iustifie vs that the works commanded and deuised by men are much lesse able and fit to do it Theoph. Why God gaue a Law that we cannot keepe Now do I agree vnto thee For I perceiue that we are neither iustified nor saued by workes neither in the whole nor in part as hath beene diligently proued by thee And verily vnlesse I be deceiued there is great iniury done to the glory of God while mē go about to darken the force power of his grace and mercie mingling the same with the filthinesse of our works But seeing the matter is so why did God giue the morall law Mat. Of the vse of the Law The Apostle witnesseth Gal. 3. 21. 12. that it was not to the end we should be iustified or saued by it For he sayth If there had bene a Lawe giuen that could haue giuen life surely righteousnesse should haue bene by the Law But the Scripture hath concluded all vnder sinne that the promise by the faith of Iesus Christ should be giuē to them that beleeue Notwithstanding it is not vnprofitable to the faithfull nay rather they do reape a double commoditie by it wherein bee comprehended the ends for the which God gaue it vnto vs. I sayd to the The vse of the Law in respect of the vnfaithfull faithfull because it hath this onely worke toward the vnbeleeuers that their condemnatiō may be the more heauie for as much as comming to the knowledge of Gods will by it they do willingly run into the contrarie Theoph. Let vs consider of that double commoditie which thou saydest the beleeuers reape by it declare the first Mat. It is noted by the Apostle in the Epistle to the Galathians For after that he hath shewed that we can Gal. 3. 19. not attaine saluation by the Law he addeth wherfore then serueth the Law It was added because of the transgressions that is that by the helpe of it we might acknowledge our sinnes as the same Apostle in another place expoundeth it in these words By the Law Rom. 3. 20. commeth the knowledge of sin For if we do examine our works by that perfection which the Law requireth of vs then it shall appeare most euidently how manie waies wee be guilty before God and therefore what fearefull condemnation we haue deserued Theoph. But what profite haue we by that Mat. Much. For as a sicke man except he throughly feele his sickenes and perceiue present danger will not go to the Phisition euen so the feeling of our sins and the danger of eternall death which we see hangeth ouer our heads driueth vs to seeke for that true Phisition of our soules Christ Iesus from whome by faith wee may receiue the remedie offered vs in the Gospell which otherwise we would haue neglected Therefore Paul saieth The Law was our schoolemaister Gal. 3. 24. to bring vs vnto Christ And in another place Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnesse vnto Rom. 10. 4. euerie one that beleeueth And this is the first commoditie which we haue by the Law Theoph. Shew briefly the other Math. After that wee be regenerated and therefore made fitte to do good workes then the Law teacheth vs whatsoeuer is to be performed of vs that we may obey God For although we can not come to the perfection whereunto it leadeth vs yet we must set it before our eies as a marke whereat we are to leuell continually that daily more and more we may striue to hit it Hereunto appertaineth that exhortation of Christ Bee ye perfect as your father which is in heauen is Mat. 5. 48. perfect The Law therefore is as it were a glasse wherin we may behold the spots of our soule and so indeed be compelled by faith to wash them away in Christes bloud Moreouer it is a lanterne vnto our feete which guideth vs that wee goe not out of the right way from the path of righteousnesse Theoph. Seeing good works be not the cause of saluation it seemeth to follow that they bee altogether vnprofitable and therefore that we neede not to bee greatly carefull of them Matth. It followeth not For God hath deliuered vs out of the hands of our spirituall enemies namely the Deuill and sinne saieth Zacharie Luk. 1. 74. that we should serue him with holinesse and righteousnesse in his sight all the daies of our life Paul also cōfirmeth the same thing in the Epistle to the Ephesians Ephes 2. 8. 9 10. For after that he hath affirmed that we are saued by grace through faith and that not of our selues it was the gift of God not of workes presently he addeth For wee are his
most true Therefore I pray God and our heauenly father that as he hath imprinted his law in our mindes so he will engraue it together with his loue and feare in our hearts by the power of his holy spirit that being alwayes clothed with righteousnesse and holynesse we may serue him with due reuerence and humilitie all our life 1 And so he may be glorified of vs. 2 Our neighbour edified 3 Our faith saluation may be confirmed through Iesus Christ our Lord. Theoph. So be it CHAP. II. Of Prayer which hath the chiefe place among Good workes to testifie and confirme our faith Theophilus OVr helpe is in the name of the Lord which hath made both heauen earth Matth. So be it Theoph. Concerning the doctrine of good workes I am sufficiently satisfied most dearely beloued brother for I haue learned that they onely be worthy the name of Good works which be commanded of God in his law also that they be not the causes of our iustification and saluation neuerthelesse that they be profitable both to the glory of God and to the edification of our neighbours very much to the assurance of our saluation and faith Which is the chiefe good work A short description of true prayer Now I demand of thee which hath the first place among Good workes Math. True prayer namely that which is powred from the heart vnto God with this confidence that we shall be heard Theoph. Why giuest thou it the chiefe place among Good workes Matth. Because by the helpe of it we obtaine this The excellencie of prayer that we bee able to performe the other Good workes Moreouer it yeeldeth vs the greatest testimonie of our saluation Theoph. Whereupon is it that it yeeldeth a fuller testimonie of our faith then the other Good workes Matth. Hereupon because prayer with certaine hope of being heard cannot bee made but wee are therewithall perswaded of the loue and good will of God toward vs. For as Paule saith Rom. 10. 13 14. How shall they call vpon him in whom they haue not beleeued For this cause the same Apostle affirmeth out of the prophesie of Ioel Whosoeuer shall call vpon the name of the Lord shall be saued Theoph. But from whence haue we that assurance seeing wee be guiltie vnto our selues of our owne vnworthinesse by the which we deserue that both we our selues our prayers should be driuen backe from the seate of his Maiestie Matth. By the intercession or mediation of Iesus Christ who as it was shewed by vs in the Chapter of faith doth alwayes offer vp to God the Father the merit of his death for full satisfactiō of all our sins Wherupon it commeth to passe that he is made mercifull vnto vs and such a one as will be entreated of vs so as we shall receiue what soeuer we aske of him And that doth the Scripture teach in these wordes 1. Iohn 2. 1. We haue an aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ Theoph. It followeth therefore that the office of the mediatour is by a most straight band ioyned with the office of the redeemer Mat. It is so and therefore Iohn after those words We haue an aduocate with the Father Iesus Christ the righteous presently addeth and he is the propitiation 1. Iohn 2. 2. for our sinnes Hereupon it is that Paule ioyneth both the offices together when he saith 1. Tim. 2. 6. There is one mediatour of God and men the man Christ Iesus which gaue himselfe a ransome for all men Theoph. Seeing therefore one is our redeemer euen Christ Iesus it seemeth to follow that he alone can also fulfill the office of the mediatour for vs with the Father Matth. The confutation of the error about prayer to Saints It followeth and that indeed necessarily and for this cause in the places which we haue heard we reade it written One aduocate one mediatour for the word one is expresly added to the end we might know that besides him alone there can be no other Theoph. Therefore they deale foolishly and without any good ground whosoeuer seeke other patrons and mediatours besides Christ Matth. Verie foolishly For they forsake the Creatour to go to the creature the Lord to go to the seruant the most dearely beloued Sonne of the Father which is in the highest authoritie and fauour with him to pacifie his wrath to go to those which lacke all the things that be required to wash away sinnes and therefore bee vnable to make our prayers acceptable and of force Moreouer they do esteeme Christ as it were not sufficient enough for the office of the mediatour and therefore denie him to be our true Sauiour For if he be fit and sufficient for so great an office why doe they take to themselues other mediatours beside him If they say they doubt not but that he is both most power-full and most fit for this thing but doe doubt somewhat of his will they do therein very much bewray themselues to be vnbeleeuers which refuse to giue credit vnto him after that he hath giuen vs so notable a pledge of his exceeding loue Namely when he vouchsafed both to take vpon him our humane nature and to suffer the death of the Crosse for our redemption Adde hereunto that most louingly he calleth vs vnto himselfe by his word when he saith Mat. 11. 28. 30. Come vnto me all that labour and be laden and I will cause you to haue ease yee shall find rest vnto your soules Finally whither soeuer they turne themselues they shall neuer escape but be foūd iniurious against Christ for as much as they take frō him the office of the mediatour purchased by his owne bloud to giue it to blessed creatures that be in heauen Theoph. They obiect that the office of Christ is not translated by them to the dead Saints seeing they end all the prayers they make to God with these wordes Through Iesus Christ our Lord whereby they say is declared that the chiefe honour is giuen to Christ himselfe Mat. The confutation of it It is a craft of Sathan by the which he would haue the wickednesse of praying to Saints to be hidden and so the manifest wrong that they offer vnto Christ which put ouer his office vnto Saints while they pray God that by their merites and intercession he will grant the things that they desire and at length ad through Iesus Christ our Lord. Wherein they imitate follow him who after he hath giuen his Prince a blow would humbly do him reuerence Theoph. Is it therefore vnlawfull for the faithfull being a liue mutually amōg themselues the one to commend the saluation of the other vnto God by prayer seeing it cannot be but some thing is taken away from the intercession of Christ Matth. The confutation of the obiection Not so for many causes may be alledged for the which the one is not onely vnprofitable but also forbidden and therefore to
by faith Seeing therefore this spirituall eating is aboundantly sufficient to our saluation and is grounded vpō the word of God it ouerthoweth that carnall eating which men by the example of the Capetnaits haue deuised to themselues frō the which also if it could be there is no other profite to be looked for but that which we do receiue by spirituall eating Therefore notwithstanding Christ in that place speaketh not of the sacramentall eating but of that which is by the word receiued by faith neuertheles it may ought to be referred vnto that because it is one and the same eating and therefore whatsoeuer is said of the one must necessarily agree to the other And indeed seeing the question is of the foode of our soules which is spirituall the meat is spirituall it followeth of necessity that the eating is spirituall euen as we can not nourish our bodies except earthly foode be visibly and sensibly eaten for the preseruation of this life Theoph. What doest thou properly vnderstand by spirituall eating Matth. How wee that be in the earth be partakers of Christ his body which is in heauen That Christ although concerning his humane nature he go not out of the heauens yet by the power of the holy Ghost doth communicate vnto vs his body and bloud and that by faith which is in stead of a spirituall hand and mouth by which wee receiue him and apply him vnto vs as hath bin more at large declared of vs in the chapter of Faith And this is the spiritual eating of christ by faith cōtrary to the carnal which som haue dreamed was with the bodily mouth insomuch as the very substance of the body and bloud of Christ was eaten with it Which is a most absurd deuise and yet it is no maruell that some are fallen vnto it For as the spirituall man when he heareth that the body of Christ is to be eaten and his bloud to be drunken vnderstandeth it spiritually for his spirituall hunger and thirst and therefore prepareth his heart by faith so contrariwise the carnall man thinketh nothing but carnally in all this matter and therefore prepareth the mouth of his body to deuour Christ But the saying of Austen is notable Why doest thou make ready thy teeth and belly beleeue and thou hast eaten Theoph But how can it be that Christ which is in heauen should truly communicate his body vnto vs that be conuersant vpon the earth Matth. That ought not to seeme maruelous vnto vs for if the sunne being a creature without life do by his beames communicate the effect and power of it vnto vs that liue vppon the earth by a much more strong reason may Christ which is the sunne of righteousnes by the immeasurable power of the holy Ghost truely make vs partakers of his body in the Supper to whom it is not harder to ioyne thinges together farre distant the one from the other then those that be most nigh Which indeed appeareth euen by that that it ioyneth together all the faithfull notwithstāding they be scattered here and there to become one body whereof Christ is the head That also is shadowed in the Supper for the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 10. 17 We which are many are one body for all of vs are partakers of one bread Theoph. An obiectiō against spirituall eating But some obiect that if in the supper of the Lord we do only spiritually and by faith communicate with the body of Christ there is no great profite of it seeing that is daily fulfilled in vs by the ministery of the word receiued by faith Matth. It followeth not For there be diuerse helps ordained of God to the same end namely to further our saluation in Christ by the holy Ghost Euen as a good Phisition helpeth the health of the patient committed to his trust by sundry meanes Wherefore notwithstanding Christ receiued in the word by faith be alreadie spiritually eaten of vs yet neuerthelesse it is more and more fulfilled in the Supper by the which the Lord so worketh according to his promise that our hearts be more aboundantly inflamed with his loue confirmed in the hope of euerlasting life Theoph. Seeing then it is certaine that we are not otherwise partakers of Christ in the supper but spiritually and by faith it followeth that all they which come to it without faith haue no fruit or benefite by it Mat. That indeede is most true for by their vnbeliefe they refuse Christ whom God oftereth to them in the Supper Wherefore they be onely partakers of the signes and that to their condemnation seeing that so much as in them is they prophane and vnhallow that most holy spirituall banket prouided of God for his children whiles they come vnto it not furnished with that most precious garment namely faith wherby we are iustified before God made the sons of God and bee accompted worthie to sit downe at his table For this cause the Apostle commandeth that euerie 1. Cor. 11. 28 one should prooue himselfe and so eate of that bread and drinke of that cup. Theoph. What is the way whereby each ought to prooue himselfe Matth. Let him try himselfe and see whether hee haue faith which shall bee easie to perceiue by repentance as it hath beene said of vs in the proper place Whosoeuer therefore is not any way touched with repentance is altogether vnworthie to bee admitted to the Supper of the Lord. Theop. But what thinkest thou of him that hath some feeling of repentance notwithstanding it be little Matth. If it be so little that it shew not it selfe by turning vnto God and amendment of life it ought to be suspected for true repētāce notwithstāding it be weak doth alwaies shew it selfe by the outward workes In the meane time it is not to bee doubted but that as our faith is alwaies verie weake so the same is true concerning our repentance And this indeed is so in the most regenerate although diuersly for in some it is more in others it is lesse Notwithstanding it is so farre off that that weaknesse should driue vs from the holy Supper that it ought rather to spurre vs forward to come vnto it that by it wee might be strengthened in faith and repentance Euen as the sick man the weaker he knoweth himselfe to be should so much the more earnestly desire meate both to receiue nourishment and to refresh his strength Therefore they onely bee vnworthie to come to the Lords Supper that be ignorant and delight in their sinnes and continue in them for that spirituall foode doeth not as yet belong to them Theoph. But if such men come to the Supper what thinkest thou is to be done Matth. Ecclesiasticall discipline If their vnworthinesse be secret and hidden they ought to be left to the iudgement of God which will one day take vengeance vppon them but if it bee knowen by the order of Ecclesiasticall or Church discipline they ought to be