as consecrated unto God were apt to represent Christ sanctified and set apart to be our Saviour and deliverer The bread was fit to signifie his body and the Wine his blood the bread broken his body crucified the Wine powred out his blood shed and both separated and given a part did resemble his death the virtue of both to preserve life the vertue and power of Christ dying to give us eternal life The eating of the one and drinking of the other our participation of Christ for remission of our sins and our Eternal Salvation The actions in the use of these Elements are either common to both joyntly or § XIV proper to them severally The common are 1. Blessing 2. Giving 3. Taking 1. Blessing which some call Consecration was by Word and Prayer For as other Meats are sanctified by Word and Prayer 1 Tim. 4. 5. so these were blessed and sanctifyed in a peculiar manner by Word and Prayer The Prayer was 1. A Thanksgiving 2. A Petition A Thanksgiving for the Bread and Wine as Blessings of God given us for the preservation of our bodily life and for Christ the Bread of Life that came down from Heaven The Petition was for a Blessing upon our use of these Elements in this Sacrament for our Spiritual Comfort and Happiness It 's written that our Saviour gave thanks and blessed But what form of words He used is not related by any of the Evangelists Therefore we are not bound in this act of Consecration to any set-form of words yet our words must be such as are agreeable to the Scriptures and proper to this Sacrament The Prayers used in most Liturgies are such and agree not onely with the Scriptures but are suitable to the Sacrament The next common act is Giving and that some make to be twofold 1. A giving to God as Grenaeus and some others at least seem to intimate an offering of the Bread and Cup to God though it 's certain that the whole Service taken together and being a part of Divine Worship is an Offering made to God 2. A giving of both unto the People who are called Communicants The 3d Action is the taking the Elements given The Actions proper are 1. The Breaking of the Bread and the Powring out the Wine 2. The Eating of the Bread and Drinking of the Cup. The first is fit to signifie the Death and Sacrifice of Christ. The second the participation of the benefit thereof by Faith These Actions may be orderly distinguished into 1. The Acts of the Party Administring which are 1. The Blessing 2. The Breaking 3. The Giving And 2. The Acts of the Communicants which are 1. Taking 2. Eating 3. Drinking They are reducible to Three 1. Consecration 2. Distribution 3. Participation The words are the last § XV and they concern either the Participation as Take Eat Drink or the things participated and they are concerning 1. The Bread 2. The Cup. In both we may observe 1. The great Work of Redemption 2. The Covenant both which are represented by the Elements and the use of them The Redemption is signifyed by the words My Body broken and My Blood shed For these inform us that Christ dyed and offered Himself a Sacrifice unto God offended by the sin of Man to propitiate Him by satisfying His Justice and meriting His Favour This was the Foundation of the Covenant and Man's Salvation For it made Sin Pardonable and Man Save-able That His Body was broken and being broken was given it informs us that He suffered Death and offered Himself dying That this Offering was propitiatory it 's implyed in that Bloud was shed for Remission In the words of the Covenant we have 1. The Promise 2. The Precept 1. The Promise in the words This is my Body broken and given for you and This is the New Covenant in my Blood which was shed for the Remission of Sin For though remission of sins and Salvation were merited and purchased by Christ's Death and Sacrifice and so trusted in his hands yet they are conveyed in the Covenant by a Promise or Grant Yet the Word is turned A Testament and if we follow that metaphor that which is called a Promise is a Bequest Yet though the Expressions may be different yet the thing is the same and informs us That it is the Purpose and Will of God for and in consideration of the Death of Christ suffered for our sins to give man remission and eternal life And this His Will He hath signified in His Promise whereby He hath bound Himself upon certain tearms unto sinful Man Upon which tearms Man may challenge them as due unto him And whereas we read in Luke and Paul This is the New Testament or Covenant in my Blood and in Matthew and Mark This is my Blood of the New Testament You must understand 1. That the words are taken out of Exod. 24. 8. 2. That Matthew and Mark follow the Hebrew and Septuagint more expresly then Luke and Paul 3. That the Sense of both is the same For to be a Covenant in the Blood of Christ is to be a Covenant confirmed by the Bloud of Christ and to be the Bloud of the Covenant is to be the Bloud whereby the Covenant is made firm and so both teach us that by the Death of Christ the Covenant of Grace was made for ever unalterable as you heard before out of Heb. 9. 15 16 17. And the Covenant was sounded upon Christ's Death 4. That this Covenant is called the New Covenant to distinguish it from the Covenant of Works and that Covenant that was made and confirmed with Israel Exod. 24. 8. 5. That as Christ's Bloud did merit so the New Covenant did convey the Benefits merited by the Death of Christ. This is the Promise The Precept is in these words Do this in remembrance of me That is As I dyed for thee gave my Body for thee shed my Blood for thee So eat thou this Bread drink thou this Cup in remembrance of my Death suffered willingly out of the greatest love for thee This Remembrance must be practical And as the thing remembred is Christ's Death for our Sins it requires 1. A Confession of our sins a Sense of them an Hatred a Desire to be pardoned and Purpose to forsake them 2. A Belief that Christ dyed for the expiation of those sins and that His Sacrifice was accepted of God as a sufficient Satisfaction 3. An acknowledgment of God's wonderful Love and the great benefit of Redemption and desire to be for ever Thankful Thus far the Rites § XVI wherein the Elements were chosen in Excellent Wisdom the Actions ordered in an admirable manner the words though few yet very comprehensive of much and weighty matter expressing the mystical and hidden part concerning the Incarnation of the Son of God the Glorious Work of Redemption the Blessed Covenant of Grace wherein we have the Laws and Constitutions of this Glorious Kingdom whereof we discourse The
second thing that follows is the confirmation of the continuance of this Covenant and that is in these words This is my Body c. This is the New Covenant or Testament in my Blood c. The thing confirmed is the continuance of the Covenant of Grace in the Bloud of Christ. The Confirmation and so the Solemn Engagement is two-fold 1. On God's part 2. On Man's part 1. On God's part by giving the Blessed Bread and Cup to be eaten and drunken 2. On Man's part by taking and eating the Blessed Bread and drinking the Blessed Cup. By Giving God doth testifie and assure man that He continues the same firm in the Covenant and is ready to give a further increase of Graces and a greater measure of Mercy for the merit of Christ dying and upon the same tearms the Covenant was made and confirmed at first For the Condition then was not onely to begin but continue Faith and Obedience and God by this Sacrament doth renew His Promise that man may renew his Faith Man presupposed to continue in this Covenant doth solemnly by receiving and eating this Bread in remembrance of the Body of Christ broken and offered and by receiving and drinking the Cup in remembrance of the bloud of Christ testifie and engage himself to continue in thta Covenant expecting Remission and Eternal Life upon no other tearms but Faith in Christ dying for him Yet because a Mist is cast upon these words This is my Body This is my Blood I must clear them that this Confirmation may be the more evident To this end I must shew 1. What is meant by THIS 2. How THIS Whatsoever it be may be said to be the Body of Christ And how the second THIS may be affirmed to be the Bloud of Christ. By THIS in the former place is meant Bread the blessed and consecrated Bread For 1. It was Bread that Christ took 2. It was Bread Christ blessed 3. It was Bread Christ broke 4. It was Bread Christ gave 5. It was Bread which Christ cmomanded them to take and eat 6. The Apostle calls this Bread three several times 1 Cor. 11. 26 27 28. But How is this Bread Christ's Body It 's not the Body of Christ by Transsubâ—antiation nor Consubstantiation For both these are contrary to Reason to Sense to the Nature of all Religious Rites and Sacraments to all Miracles For there never was Miracle that did delude the Senses For the Water turned miraculously into Wine appeared to be Wine and tasted as Wine and was Wine indeed as it appeared That many of the Fathers seem to affirm it to be the Body of Christ is nothing for as many call it Bread and a Sign and Figure of Christ's Body To this purpose you may read the Learned Dr. Crakenthorpe against Spalatensis in the Controversie of Transubstantiation where ye shall find a multitude of Councels and Fathers exactly quoted to this purpose The word Transubstantiation was not known till latter times The thing signified by it cannot be certainly defined For the greatest School-men and subtilest Wits differ amongst themselves both in the Definitions and the Explication of their Definitions Besides there is some reason to think many of them do not believe it For some of them amongst us have refused to take it upon their Salvation that after a due Consecration according to their Rules any such change of the Elements is made But suppose the change and that it 's certain to what end doth it serve For it 's confessed that wicked men may receive the Body of Christ in the Eucharist and yet be damned neither doth it profit any man who receives it without Faith THIS therefore that is said to be Christ's Body is Bread and at the first Institution it must needs be so for then Christ's Body was not broken neither did Christ then give it The second Question therefore is How Bread may be said to be Christ's Body if not really and by Transubstantiation or Consubstantiation or some such way The Answer is That it 's His Body 1. By Representation because it 's a Sign and Figure of his Body as many of the Ancients expresly affirm and if any of these say it 's Christ's Body in proper sense as they of the Church of Rome would make us believe they do then they must needs contradict themselves And this is proper to all Religious Rites to signifie something invisible and many times the name of the thing signifyed is given to the Sign it self As Circumcision is said to be a token of the Covenant Gen. 17. 2. and afterwards it is called the Covenant My Covenant shall be in your flesh ver 13. whereas it was the token of the Covenant that was in their flesh The reason of this expression is the similitude and agreement between the sign and the thing signifyed In this respect Christ calleth His Flesh Bread not that it was Bread but because it was like to Bread And that place of John the 6th where He calls Himself and His Flesh Bread is alleadged to proveâ—t is change yet if the Expression and Predication were proper that place might prove that Christ's Body was changed into Bread and not Bread into His Body as will easily appear to any Intelligent and impartial Reader Yet to be a bare Sign is not all but to be a Sign so by Divine Institution as to confirm the Promise of the Covenant and assure the worthy Receiver that as certainly as He gives him that Bread so certainly will God give him the benefits merited by the Death of Christ. By this time we may understand what is signifyed by these words This is my Body But what is meant by the latter words This is the Covenant in my Blood and This is my Blood of the Covenant For the sense of these there can be no doubt but by THIS is meant 1. The Cup For 1. Christ took the Cup. 2. Said This Cup is the New Testament or Covenant 3. It 's called three times by St. Paul the Cup. 2. By cup is meant the Wine in the Cup. 3. This Wine blessed and consecrated according to Christs institution This Cup is said to be the new testament that is the sign whereby it 's confirmed in this Sacrament and as it were a pledge given by God and received by man of remission of sin merited by the blood of Christ and for his sake promised to us Whereas Mathew and Mark relate that Christ said This is my blood it 's meant that the Wine in the Cup was a token and sign of his blood given and received to confirm the new Testament or Covenant Thus Circumcision was a Sign and Seal of the Righteousnesse of faith to Abraham as this Cup is a sign to signify and a Seal to confirm the righteousnesse of faith and remission of sins in the blood of Christ. As for the real presence of Christ in this Sacrament it 's certain that his glorifyed body is in Heaven Yet he
usurpation and an incâ—oachment upon the Soveraign power of God who alone hath right to determine and institute these things As he hath prohibited religious Worship to be given to any but himself so he hath said that we must not do unto him the true God as the Heathen did to their Gods What he commands that they must do and must not add nor diminish Deut. 12. 31. 32. The Heathens made Images to represent their gods instituted rites some ridiculous some vain some abominable and did Worship the Images and their Gods in them by them before them and sacrificed their innocent Children unto them Men out of devotion or some other reason may add unto the rules of worship given by God or they may neglect them and omit them and institute something of their own but both are against this Law In this Commandement therefore § XI are forbidden all the foolish vain abominable superstitious rites and ceremonyes used by the Heathen both before and after the time of Moses all of all the revolting Jewes of all Mahumetans since the time of Mahomet and of Christians after that superstition entred into the Church as it entred betimes For some of the Jewes being made Christians and disperâ—ed into severaâ—l Countryes retained some of their Pharisaical traditiâ—ns and many of the Levitical Ceremonyes as being zealous of the Law and many of the Heathens converted could not at first be weaned from their heathenish customes and rites And of this some of the ancients complained in their times Some relicks both of Levitical rites and Heathenish Ceremonyes we find in many places at this day I will not in this brief exposition â—pend time in the examination of the Ceremonyes of the Masse which are very many in such a short piece of Service It 's matter oâ— Lamentation to consider how soon Superstition and Idolatry entred into the Church and being diffused through many places and having continued for a long time they put on the face oâ— Vniversality and Antiquity though neither of these be a sufficient ground to warrant any thing not instituted from Heaven Both these entred secretly and by degrees For Commemoration conâ—inued for a time and received gave occasion unto and ended in the invocation of Saints and Angels Images and Monuments of God Saints and Angels secretly crept in and were tolerated and allowed for Instruction and at length abused to Adoration And in the end the worship of Images was defended commanded used established by civil Lawes and Ecclesiasticall Canons though it was much opposed from the beginning But that which made up and brought unto perfection both Superstition and Idolatry amongst Christians was a Doctrine which did peremptorily affirm and many did and do believe it that a Wafer or a piece of Bread by a few words of a Priest was changed into the Body of Christ and Wine into his blood contrary to Scripture reason sense And it was and is commanded that upon this supposed imaginary change this Wafer and this Wine should be worshipped as God with divine and religious worship And it 's stupendious and a matter of amazement that Christians who professe the Scriptures to be the word of God that the God who made Heaven and Earth is onely one and our Lord Jeâ—us Christ one onely Lord shoulâ— believe A morsel of bread not only to be a sign of Gods presence but to be the onely true God and so be worshipped with the highest degree of Worship Yet the Eternal Glorious and most Just God looks down from Heaven sees all this and in due time will certainly judge it I need not here insist upon particulars and enumerate the superstitious rites and ceremonyes invented and used either by Heathens Jewes Christians or Mahumetans Many of them are expresly named and particularly delivered in Scripture Many others both in Christian and prophane Historyes What is here commanded may be easily understood § XII not onely from the Prohibition but also from the end and scope of this commandement For it was added to be a Fense unto the former Commandement and to prevent the violation thereof For how can we worship God as God and the onely God except we know what manner or kind of worship is most suitable to his Majesty acceptable to him and conducing to his glory and this in all times Yet these things he alone doth know and hath power to institute and his institutions are the onely rule of Worship and tend most effectually to preserve it pure and undefiled It 's true that many rites and Ceremonyes invented by man may have a fair face of devotion and Reverence but they never proved to do any good but much hurt For they did beget false notions and apprehensions of the Deity who is to be conceived of by us according as he is represented in the holy Scriptures For if our apprehensions be false our affections and worship will be base and adulterate Therefore the general duty here presented is to worship God with that Worship which he hath instituted in his word without addition or diminution As for circumstances of time place and order to be observed in the Worship of God either publick or private they ought to be regulated by the general rules of Scripture particular examples of such as are related in the Scripture to have performed the service and worship of God according to those general rules and the prudential dictates of right reason no wayes different from but agreeable to the Word of God For these are not any parts of Worship but accidentall to the Worship of God yet not to it precisely as worship but as a serious act which requires in the performance thereof due circumstances order and decency As for significant ceremonyes annexed to the service of God no wayes conducing to the better performance thereof I think they are better spared and omitted then used and observed For though consiâ—ered in themselves without any reference to Gods worship they be indifferent and so in generall may be lawfull yet if we examine their original the first occasion of their use and institution the persons who use or rather abuse them and understand withall how needlesse and unprofitable they be and how offensive unto some weak Bâ—ethren and also besides these may be instituted many more of that kind and may be imposed upon the same ground and that in the Church of Rome they have been an occasion of superstition it must needs be concluded by impartial and juâ—icious men that they are not expedient To say and publickly declare that they have no sanctifying power that they are neither holy nor unholy will not serve the turn For the same may be said of Images at first when they began to be used and do what we can many of the people do account them to be holy make them parts of Gods worship and are more carefull in the observation of them then they are of the more weighty dutyes of Religion To understand the more
ariseth from their voluntary consent expressed and no wayes else so that they may be properly called Cor-rei In this there is a great inequality between the partyes covenanting For the one is the Lord and King and the other Subjects and they as Subjects are not onely under his power but bound by his laws before they voluntarily oblige themselves and if they never promised obedience yet they are bound to do it and must be judged by the Laws given them 2. That Gods word and promise is firm and inviolable for ever without any solemn rite added to confirm it yet because mans weaknesse is great God was willing not onely by promise to oblige himself to man but also by solemn rites yea and an Oath wherein he pledged his eternall Diety to confirm his promise and all this to strengthen his weak saith and give him full assurance For God being willing more abundantly to shew unto the heires of promise the immutability of his Counsel confirm'd it by an Oath Heb. 6. 27. 3. That the thing that is confirmed both by solemn rites and his Oath is his promise 4. That because as mans infirmity and inconstancy was great therefore God thought it good to require of him a voluntary engagement and a solemn confirmation to subject himself to his power and to obey his Laws that the more freely and deeply he had engaged himself the more carefull he might be to be faithfull and obedient to his everlasting good and the thing confirmed by man is his voluntary engagement of subjection and obedience 5. That the thing whereunto man engageth himself in Baptism is that he will be a Loyal and obedient subject unto God his redeemer in Christ The thing whereunto God obligeth himself is to be his God and admit him a Subject of his blessed Kingdom 6. That though the engagement be distinct from the performance yet if it be sincere there is a beginning of performance though that performance is not the thing confirmed but the thing for which the confirmation is made 7. There is a great difference as between the making and confirming of a covenant and the keeping of it so likewise between the solemn admission into the visible Church and the mysticall which consists of real Saints and loyal Subjects What kind of profession and promise is required in the party to be baptized may be considered afterwards By all this we may easily understand that it we will expect any benefit by our Baptism we must have a speciall care to perform our promise confirmed by this solemn rite For these Sacraments are special and distinct laws added to all the rest for this end to engage man more strongly to observe them And Baptism is a kind of naturalizing of such as are baptized The Second Sacrament § XII is the Eucharist or that which we call the Communion or Supper of the Lord. It 's called the Eucharist because a Sacrament of thanksgiving for the great benefit of Redemption by Christ The Communion because in it we being many partake of one sacred bread and the same cup It 's called the Lords Supper because it was instituted at the last Supper that Christ as morall did eat with his Disciples Yet there may be other reasons of these names given and are given by others This Sacrament hath many other names a Catalogue or enumeration of the greatest part of them you may read in Casauboâ—s exercitation 16. of his Apparatus This Eucharist is a Sacrament of the Gospel wherein by the use of Bread and Wine according to our Saviours institution in remembrance of his death and passion the continuance in the covenant is confirmed This Sacrament was instituted immediately by Christ in the night wherein he was betrayed and succeeded the Passeover which was to cease For then Christ the true Paschal Lamb was exhibited and ready to be slaine The Passeover did signifie Christ to come and after Christs resurrection this Sacrament did signifie him not onely come but slain already and it is to continue to the end of the World for the perpetual memory of his sacrifice For as often as we eat this bread and drink this cup we shew forth Christs death untill his comming again 1 Cor. 11. 26. This death of Christ represented in this Sacrament was the accomplishment of the Passeover and of all propitiatory Sacrifices and sin-offerings And this Sacrament is the abridgment of all Sacrificial feasts and especially such as were used for the confirmation of leagues and covenants It was resembled in a more lively manner by that Sacrifice mentioned Exod. 24. 3 4 5 6 7 8. Where 1. Moses informs the people of all the words of the Lord and all his judgments 2. The people promise obedience This was the league and Covenant 3. Moses builds an Altar and 12. Pillars according to the 12. Tribes to signifie that they were all engaged in it 4. There were offered by 12 young men representing the 12 Tribes burnt offerings and peace offerings of Oxen to the Lord. 5. Moses took half the blood and put it in basons and half the blood he sprinkled upon the Altar which signified God one and the principall party covenanting 6. He takes the book of the Covenant and reads the precepts and promises of God in the audience of the people and they again engage to observe the Law 7. Moses took the blood of the Covenant and sprinkled it on the people saying Behold the blood of the Covenant which the Lord hath made with you concerning these Words In all this somethings are remarkable 1. That the thing that was confirmed was the covenant it self 2. That this Covenant was not onely made but solemnly confirmed on Gods side by half the blood sprinkled upon the Altar by the other half of the blood sprinkled upon the people it was established on their part 3. That to the Rite were added words and the words are taken up by our blessed Saviour in this Sacrament 4. That though a Sanction of a law be taken for the confirmation of it by promises of reward and threatnings of punishments which are indeed essentiall parts of Gods laws yet this was a true and proper sanction not onely of the precepts but the promises and the threats of God and the promises of the partyes covenanting with God and it was by blood and a solemn rite with words In the definition we may observe § XIII 1. The rite 2. The confirmation In the rite three things 1. The Elements or things sensible 2. The actions 3. The words For I take rite in a large sense to include the words The Elements as they use to call them are Bread and Wine which were then ready on the Passeover Table These were very fit both to signifie the body and blood of Christ and the eating and drinking of them a spirituall Sacrificiall feast Yet this they did not by nature but by the divine institution though by nature they were apt to resemble such things These
Attribute which God did exercise § III and manifest in this Judgment passed upon man was his Mercy which is his free love of man who had made himself unworthy For after that he had sinned and made himself miserable though his misery were an object of compassion yet his sin did provoke to anger and deserved vengeance God looking upon man in this condition was more willing to pitty him then to punish him to remove the sin then to destroy the sinner He was unwilling all Mankind should perish as they must needs have done if he had proceeded in strict justice against them The sin in it self was no fit subject of mercy yet seeing that Woman was deceived by the subtilty of the Devil and Man by Woman his dearest Wife brought into transgression God took occasion to pitty them yet there could be no mercy for them except it issue out of the abundant goodness of God who is slow to anger and so much inclined to compassion and willing in this particular rather to manifest the glory of his mercy then of his justice Man had made himself unworthy and liable to eternal misery and God might have eternally punisht him and that justly too yet mercy kept justice back mitigated the rigour of it and confined it in a narrow compass to inlarge her self more abundantly This mercy was the Fountain from which issued the Promise of Christ the ruine of Sathan's Kingdom the Redemption of Mankind the Relicks of God's Image the means of Conversion the patience long-suffering bounty and clemency of God the gifts of the Spirit the remission of sin and eternal life And that God might be placable Sin pardonable Man saveable he accepts Christ's propitiation reverseth the Law of Works as requiring and that strictly perfect and perpetual obedience as the condition of life and makes a new Law and Covenant which determines Faith to be the condition of life and that condition to be performed by the power of the Spirit merited by and restored for Christ's sake This mercy did appear in this great Judgment many ways § IV 1. God sentenced the Devils in the first place and that without any mercy and for this very cause even because they had attempted the eternal ruine of man which upon the success of their damned Design had proved unavoidable and the recovery of man impossible if God should not have done some extraordinary work to prevent it Upon this fiery indignation of God against these Liars and Murderers of Mankind expressed in this Sentence it did appear 1. That the punishment to be suffered by these cursed Fiends was grievous unavoidable and unremovable for ever 2. That God was highly displeased at their malice shewed against and the mischief done to Mankind in that he takes so fearful vengeance upon them 3. That there was some pitty in God towards poor man trembling at the Bar of God for though their folly was inexcusable yet their condition considering the temptation was lamentable 2. This mercy was manifest in an high and extraordinary degree and measure in that in this Sentence he promiseth or at least implies a most certain promise of Jesus Christ a Saviour and Redeemer It 's true that this great promise was folded and wrapt up in a few words and the same very mysterious as we read them in Moses Gen. 3. 15. But those very words inform us 1. That the Redeemer should be the Seed of the Woman that Woman whom the Serpent had so deluded and who now stood guilty before God's Tribunal 2. That this Seed of the Woman should bruise the Serpents head and so be the ruine of his Kingdom and Dominion over Man 3. That he should not obtain this Victory without Blood for his Head must be bruised and he put to death And there is not onely an Emphasis but a Mystery in those words The Seed of the Woman The Emphasis is in this That God doth not say an Angel or Spirit or some man more excellent then Adam whom he should create instantly but the Seed a Child a Mortal Man born of that sinful Woman though now contemptible and miserable should encounter the Devil with that power and policy as to foil him The Mystery seems to be this That it 's not said the Seed of Man nor the Seed of Man and Woman but the Seed of the Woman signifying though darkly that Christ should be the Seed and Child immediate of a Woman but of no Man For as he was Man he had an immediate Mother who conceived bare him brought him forth but no immediate Father Upon these words as the condition of Man and Woman became more comfortable so the Kingdom and Government of Mankind began instantly to be altered and a second Adam was appointed their Head to redeem them as the first Adam had undone them We must needs think that our first Parents being sinful guilty and convicted before the Supream Judge of Heaven and Earth stood with sad and heavy hearts expecting their doom and condemnation to Eternal Death until they heard these words The Seed of the Woman should bruise the Serpents Head Then their Despair was turned into Hope and their sinking-dying-hearts began to revive For to them these were words far above all expectation of sweetest comfort Never better words spoken never better heard 3. This mercy was evident in that God did not send the Spirit of Despair nor of Slumber and Security upon them § V nor deliver them up to a reprobate mind as he might justly have done and so made their condition desperate and irrecoverable nor presently execute his judgment Eternal upon them either by taking away their lives in their sin or making their bodies immortal to punishment in body and soul for ever Neither did he take from them the Light of Nature and the sense and power of Conscience but gave them the saving-light of the Gospel and the means of Conversion with the promise of the Spirit All this is evident by the promise of Christ the ruine of Satan's Kingdom a final Victory after a Bloody War in this Sentence of the Devil and it doth further appear by the Education of Cain and Abel and especially in the Faith of Abel That the means of Conversion have been denied several persons whole Tribes many Nations and the greatest part of the World howsoever it might be deâ—erved by this sin of Adam yet usually it 's the punishment of Apostasie as of the generality of mankind before the â—lood of the Gentiles before Christ's incarnation and of the generality of the Jews and many of the Gentiles since the preaching of the Gospel to all Nations And the very Gentiles were not delivered up unto a Reprobate mind before they abused the Light of Nature Yet the very outward means of Conversion were a gift of Free grace for the merit of Christ who was promised of pure and abundant mercy The Sentence of Justice past upon them was allayed § VI and tempered with great mercy
Propitiation of Christ makes no man absolutely but upon certain terms pardonable and savable so it was never made either to prevent all sin or all punishments For it presupposeth man both sinful and miserable And we know that the guilt and punishment of Adams sin lyes heavy upon all his posterity to this day And not onely that but the guilt of actual and personal sins lyes wholly upon us whilst impenitent and unbelieving and so out of Christ and the regenerate themselves are not fully freed from all punishments till the finall resurrection and judgement So that his propitiation doth not altogether prevent but remove sin and punishment by degees Many sins may be said to be remissible by vertue of this sacrifice which never shall be remitted In this sense it may be understood that some deny that Lord that bought them 2 Pet. â— 1. For Christ by his death acquired a right unto and so a power over all flesh but so that he must give eternall life onely to such as his Father gave him For one immediate effect of Christs death was to make God placable and sin pardoned yet he never merited that any sin should be actually pardoned but upon such terms as his heavenly Father should prescribe It may also in a sense be said that Christ dyed onely for the elect That is that onely they shall obtayn actual pardon Yet they who thus affirm must give us out of the Scriptures the true notion of Election and of the Elect and not seek to obtrude upon us their own false Conceits For the Elect as the elect in decree are no subject capable of actual Remission as such for they are no subject at all because they have no actual existence though they may be and are an object or Logicall subject of Gods decree And after that they have actual being yet they are not immediately capable of actual pardon before they are called and actually believe And whereas some affirm that Christ dyed onely for the Elect in their sense it cannot be proved Because they presupposing an order in the decrees of God take it for granted that the decrees of Election and Reprobation are antecedent to the decâ—ee of Redemption and â—o by these very decrees formally exclude the greatest part of mankind and include the rest which cannot stand with the plain texts of Scripture which signifie that we are predessinated to be conformed to the image of Christ That we are elected in Christ and predestinated to the Adoption of Children by Jesus Câ—rist unto himself The 4th and last thing in this discourse of Christs death § IX is to consider the attribuâ—es and perfections which were principally manifested in this work of Redemption For bâ—sides his absolute power by which he acted in this work above the lâ—w of Creation many of his perfections did most gloriously appeare And first his Wiâ—dom For this was one of the highest designes of God and this work of redemption was contrived and ordered in the highest degree of Wisdome that God did ever exercise out of Himself The Apostle determined to know nothing amongst the Corinthians but Christ Jesus and him crucified And though this Doctrin of the Crosse seem'd foolishnesse to men devoyd of the Spirit yet when he preached it he spake Wisdome to them who were perfect the Wisdome of God in a mystery evâ—n the hidâ—en Wisdome which God ordayned before the world was to our glory 1 Cor. 2. 2. 6 7. And by the preaching of the Gospel was made known to Principalityes and powers in heavenly places the manifold Wisdome of God Ephes. 3. 10. And the Doctrin of the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow thereupon was such and so excellent for Wisdome that the very Angels desired to pry or look in it 1 Peter 1. 12. That Wisdome must needs be wonderfull which contrived such glorious things For the seed of â—rayl Woman deceived by the Devil and now guilty before the tribunall of God must bruise and break the head and power of the Devil and shake his Kingdome over mankind in pieces The Word and eternal Son of God must be made flesh as though mortality and eternity had been united together Weaknesse must vanquish strength Mortality must be away to immortality Death to eternal life the most cruel paines to full and everlasting pleaâ—ures the moâ— bitter sorrowes to the sweetest joyes the lowest humility to the highest honour and the greatest shame to the most excellent glory And which is strange that the Devil himself must use his utmost strength and policy to overthrow himself And his deepest Counsels must be the cause of his own ruine These are the wonderfull wayes of Gods unsearchable Wisdome discovered in the humiliation of the Son of God The Holinesse § X and Justice of God appeares in this work many wayes For though he be slow to anger inclined to forgive abundant in mercy and delighting in kindnesse and doing good unto his unworthy creatures and resolved to give his Son to remit sin and to save sinners yet he will not free any man from the guilt of sin nor yield that any sin should be pardonable without expiation be made his divine justice satisfied and the honour of his law violated be vindicated He will admit of no reconciliation except propitiation be made by blood to declare his righteouâ—nesse that he might be just and the justifier of him that beleeveth on Jesus Christ Rom. 3. 25. And this propitiation must be made by the Word made flesh Therefore he sends his son his dearly beloved his onely begotten son whom he esteemed above all men and Angells He smites him wounds him and layes on him the iniquityes of us all He must not only suffer but suffer death the death of the Crosse and he must for a time be a servant and lay aside 〈◊〉 his shining Robes of Glory be content to want the joyes and pleasures of Heaven and be deprived of God's sweetest comforts be exposed to the malice of the Devill and his malicious enemies ly under the pressure of most bitter pains sorrows and anguish and suffer and that from basest wretches the basâ—â— indignityes that ever any suffered And thus though he were a son must he learn obedience by suffering and before all these things were endured his Soul seperated from his Body and his Body layd in the Grave he must not rise again to Glory And he makes an unchangeable decree that whosoever will not be willing to deny himself take up his Crosse be obedient not onely in doing good but also in suffering evill even death the most cruell and tormenting death and that with patience for his sake shall derive no benefit from his Saviour who did not only expiate sin seal the Truth with his blood but also give us an example of most eminent humility patience meeknes charity obedience all other heavenly virtues that we might follow him if we will be saved And sinful man must know
same is gone and stays no longer As this life is the subject of this Commandement so the end of it is to preserve the same and not to break the Bands of Union till it be God's time Soul and Body must part It is Negative § III and so a prohibition of some sin and this sin is murther To kill 1. In general is to take away the life of any living Creature and this is not the sin 2. It 's to take away the life of man neither is this absolutely and simply the Crime For the life of man may be taken away and yet justly Now God doth never forbid any thing that is just yet this may be so just that it would be injustice not to do it 3. Murther here forbidden is to take away the life of man unjustly and without Warrant from God To understand this sin of Murther we must observe certain distinctions For 1. It 's Negative or Positive 2. It 's total or partial 3. It 's inchoat or consummate Negative Murther is when we deny to give or do something when it 's our Duty without which life cannot subsist or continue as shall appear hereafter Positive when we by some violence or some other way do that which is destructive or tends to the destruction of life So the life of many a man is taken away by Poyson and other secret Plots devised by cursed Wretches and put in execution by bloody Villains It 's totall when life is wholly taken away immediately or the body receives some mortall harm so that life is irrecoverable Partiall Murther is committed by wounds blows stripes or other violence which destroyes a limb or limbs for all these hazard life and take away the perfection of it and tend to destruction It 's inchoate in the mind and heart first and then in words In the mind as by violent passions of anger wrath fury and rage or by malice and hatred For all murther is begun in the heart and the more of Will consent and resolution there is is the more heynous Therefore Wilfull Murther is accounted most heynous and Man-slaughter is a grievous sin though not so grievous as the former Both issue out of the heart for out of the heart proceed evill thoughts Murthers c Luke 15. 19. Chance-medly as we call it in our law indeed takes away life but the party thus killing his Neighbour whom he formerly loved or did not hate is rather unhappy then wicked because there is nothing of Will in it God therefore assigned Cityes of Refuge for the protection of such Yet these if when they did this they were either vainly or ill imployed have much cause to be deeply humbled For no such unhappy event can fall out without the Will of our Heavenly Father who could easily have prevented that sad accident The most bloody disposition of the mind which is most directly contrary to this Commandement is that of hatred and deliberate malice Therfore it is said that he that hateth his Brother is a Murtherer 1 Joh. 3. 15. Yet Anger and Wrath if rash and unjust are transgressions of this Law in the judgement of our Blessed Saviour Math. 5. 20. If anger be continued it becomes malice and that malice is most accursed which deliberates and resolves of Murder and proves implacable though it commit not the fact onely because of want of powâ—r and opportunity or for feare of some mischief which may befall the party himself if he put the bloody design in execution Yet to hate and actually Murder is more then to hate and not to Murther absolutely considered There is another degree of this sin in bitter spitefull reviling contumelious words For whosoever shall say unto his Brother Racha shall be in danger of the Councell But whosoever shall say Thou Fool shall be in danger of Hell fire Mat. 5. 21. The former word seemes to be a terme or expression of passion the other of contempt There be also treacherous words which tend to the taking away of life and there be whisperings backbiting standering and tales all tending to shed blood Ezek. 22. 9. There be words which are softer then oyle and yet are drawn Swords Psal. 55. 21. There are persons who whet their tongues like a sword and bend their bow to shoot their arrowes even bitter words Psal. 64. 3. Doeg's words did cut like a sharp Razour and cut off the lives of the innocent Priests Psal. 52. 2. Thus this bloody sin is begun in the heart and tongue of man Yet it cannot be consummate without the Hand which is the instrument to execute and accomplish what Thoughts and Words have begun Again in this sin § IV as in others some may be principall some accessory and so guilty by consent counsell assistance connivence in concealing or not hindering or some other way And whosoever shall not use all meanes to prevent and save the innocent or not endeavour to see the Murder once committed punished are guilty of blood In this respect the Priest and Levite passing by a man wounded and half dead yet neither pitying him nor endeavouring to recover him were guilty Luke 10. 30. For if we should do our diligence to save the life of a beast much more the precious life of man Let 's heare what God saith in this particular If thou forbear to deliver them who are drawn to death and those that are ready to be slain If thou sayest Behold we know it not Doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it and he that keepeth the Soul doth not He know it and shall he not render to every man according to his Works Prov. 24. 11. 12. We read that a Galatian Shepherd refusing when it was in his power to save a man torn with dogs was three yeares after slain by Wild Beasts himself This was a just judgement from God The Rich man refusing to relieve Poor miserable and hungry Lazarus lying at his gates could not be innocent neither can any such unmercifull and inhumane wretches For not onely such as cruelly oppresse afflict and grind the faces of poor people but such as are devoyd of mercy and the bowels of compassion are guilty Si non pavisti occidisti Ambros. In this kind unskilfull or carelesse Physitians cannot be excused Some of these do not valew the life of man and are easily perswaded for favour or gain to murther such as they pretend to cure As there are private § V so there be publick Murders and these are also negative or positive Negative when they neglect to enquire after the authours of Murder or acquit them being known or grant them Pardons By this meanes sometimes a whole Land is polluted with blood and suffereth Gods vengeance For a Murderer should be taken from the Altar and put to death Exod. 21. 14. No satisfaction must be taken for his life but he must surely be put to death Numb 35. 31. And a man that doth violence to the blood of any person
is here Virtually and Really present by his Spirit in this Sacrament as in all other his Ordinances and in a speciall manner and the same powerfull and comfortable to the worthy receiver The Papists have put a difference between the Sacrifice of the Masse § XVII and the Sacrament of the Eucharist and for the former Service they have their direction from the Missal for the Later from the Rituall Yet Christ did but institute a Sacrament and not a Sacrifice and in the same the bread and wine is commanded to be used in blessing the giving and receiving of both and not the offering of the body and blood of Christ for that offering was once made never to be made again And whereas they do affirm that the Sacrifice of the Masse is properly a Sacrifice Propitiatory for the Sins of the living and the dead and the same with that Sacrifice which Christ offered upon the Crosse it cannot be true neither can it be credible to any rationall unprejudiced person For a Sacrifice properly so taken especially ilasticall or propitiatory is essentially bloody as wherein the thing Sacrificed is first slain then offered But the Sacrifice of the Crosse as they themselves confesse is INCRUENTUM unbloody and therein is no death of the thing Sacrificed Neither can it be the same with that which Christ offered upon the Crosse For to that it was essential that Christ's body should be broken and the blood shed and offered unto God without spot by the eternall Spirit and without this Death and offering it could not have bin this Sacrifice at all and this Sacrifice was but offered once and once offered was never to be offered again For once in the end of the World hath he appeared to put away sin by the Sacrifice of himself Heb. 10. 14. So that we have here but one Sacrifice and the same once offered yet of eternall vertue If this Sacrifice of the Masse were the same which they affirm with the Sacrifice upon the Crosse it must needs be granted that it is propitiatory But they confesse 1. That it is incruentum 2. That it is not Expiatorium Redemptorium 3. That it 's only Commemoratorium Applicatorium By the First they grant that it 's not essentially the same By the Second that it 's not effectively the same By the Third that it 's only a Commemoration and a meanes of the Application of the same And if they would lay aside the Sacrifice of the Masse and acknowledge the Sacrifice of the Crosse and celebrate the Sacrament as it was instituted by Christ We should easily grant that therein there is a Commemoration of Christ's death and Sacrifice once offered and that this Sacrament is a meanes whereby that Sacrifice is applied Before I conclude this Doctrine of the Sacraments § XVIII I will examine 1. Who have power and right to administer them 2. To whom they may lawfully be administred 3. Whether they are to be administred according to humane judgment which is fallible or divine judgment which is infallible For the first of these Who have power to administer That 's easily and briefly determined For they who are trusted with the word and have Commmission to preach the Gospel they have power to administer these Sacraments This in respect of Baptism appears in the mission of the Apostles into all Nations For by that Commission they who must teach must baptize And we never read of any Commission given to any others either to baptize or administer the Lords supper And the constant practice of the universall Church so far as known to us hath bin conformable to this Commission What may be done in case of necessity which God not man hath brought us unto is another thing For in such cases God dispenseth with many things required in his own Institution As for the second question § XIX To whom may they be administred The answer in generall is 1. They may be administred to such as have a right unto them who are Christ's disciples and may be judged fit to be members of the Church visible and in the number of Christians 2. We must distinguish between the subjects who have a right to the actuall participation of Baptism and such as have aright to the actual participation of the Lords supper 3. Of such as may be subjects capable of Baptism some are Adulti and these if they be disciples and manifest themselves to be such they no doubt may be baptized But all the controversy in our unhappy dayes is Whether Infants of Christians and believing Parents may be baptized or no In this controversy I shall deliver my knowledge and judgment as briefly as may be 1. Infants as Infants and Children of Turks Pagans unbelieving Jews are not capable of Baptism neither as Infants nor Infants of such Parents 2. Infants as Infants and considered Physically as distinct persons from their Parents are not capable of or have any right to Baptism 3. The Infants of Christian Parents so considered as distinct persons from their Christian Parents as Christians have no right unto it 4. The Infants of Christian and believâ—ng Parents considered as one person with them as Christians and believers have right to Baptism For if they be one person with them as Christians they must needs have some kind of right to Baptism as their Parents have 5. They have not this right from them by Nature nor humane Laws for so they only receive their humane nature from them as their Parents have humane nature and this naturally and if their Parents be free or noble by humane Laws they derive freedom or nobility 6. That they derive this right from their Parents as Christians it 's from Gods free mercy and gracious ordination which includes the Children in Covenant with the Parents 7. Children are one person with their parents both by the Law of God and the Laws of Men and that in many things and especially in Obligations in Priviledges in rewards and punishments By the Laws of men in civill matters we know that SUI HEREDES as the Civilians call them derive a right unto their Parents estate though there be no Testament or if a Testament and the same they be excluded because the Law grounded upon nature considers them as one person with their Parents or next kindred deceased If the Father be a subject of a free State and so bound to subjection unto the Laws the Son born of him as a subject of that State is bound to the Lawes and derives that obligation from his Father as one person with him neiâ—her is it materiall whether the Father was a subject naturall or naturaliz'd If the Father dye indebted and the Heir enter upon the estate by vertue of that Will He by the civill Law falls under the same obligation as one with the Father and is bound to discharge the debts Paul was born a Roman Act. 22. 28. and all the Priviledges of a Roman he had by birth
God as our onely Lord and Redeemer by him and so we take him to be our God The 2. Is totall reliance upon God as our Redeemer in Christ Jesus dying and rising again for us 3. An engagement with the whole heart unto the obedience of his commands and to be his people his loyall and obedient subjects And because this duty is a return unto our God formerly forsaken by us therefore it 's called Repentance And because it 's not onely a belief of his truth but a reliance upon his promises it s called Faith By this we turn from darknesse to light and from the power of Satan unto God The reward that follows upon this is that God will be to us a God and we shall be to Him a people Heb. 8. 10. This is our admission of us as subjects of his Kingdome wherein as we must perform dutyes so we shall enjoy priviledges This makes us one with Christ ingrafts us unto him so as we become his living members and derive from God by him all grace and peace and saving blessings But of this there are degrees 1. We have Christ as our Saviour and Redeemer 2. A right unto the mercyes merited by him and promised by God in him 3. Some degree of possession and enjoyment of them 4. In the end a full communion with God the Father and Jesus Christ his Son so that our joy is made full Before I proceed to the next benefit or reward something must be observed both concerning this duty and this reward 1. The repentance faith and submission unto God Redeemer in Christ is in consistent with the habituall dominion of any sin 2. Though it be such and therefore sincere yet it 's not perfect but admits of degrees and must encrease untill we come to perfection 3. They do not look at any particular promise of God or office of Christ or benefit merited by Christ but at God Redeemer in generall as the fountain of eternall life and all benefits conducing thereunto and at all the offices of Christ and all the merits of Christ even at whole Christ as by whom God will give us this eternall full salvation 4. Yet they virtually include and are the root of all particular acts to be terminated upon particular promises offices merits Concerning the reward 1. The estate of such as have received it is inconsistent with the estate of such as are under the dominion of sin and liable to the condemnation unto eternall death 2. As the duty so the reward is imperfect at the first 3. It 's no particular reward as of justification or reconciliation or adoption or the rest formally actually and particularly considered but virtually all For we have God to be our God whole Christ to be our Saviour and be in Christ Christ is in us by his Spirit And whereas formerly the Spirit was in us to prepare us now he as the Spirit of Christ our head is in us to abide and constantly to sanctifie and comfort and seale us to the day of Redemption And the first reward upon this faith having received Christ and God received him as a member of Christ is Justification a reward The great reward CHAP. XXII Of Justification by Faith in Christ. Justification is a reward of God Redeemer whereby he justifieth a sinner believing in Christ § I as having by his blood satisfied Gods justice merited remission and making intercession in Heaven according to promise or as being the propitiation for sin by his blood and pleading this propitiation before his Father's Tribunall in Heaven In which words we must conder 1. The Judge 2. The party judged 3. The judicial Act or the reward actively considered 1. The Judge is God but 1. Not largely as Judge of men and Angels but as Judge of men 2. Not as Creatour and Judge by the Law of Creation and of works but by the Law of Redemption and grace 3. Not as merely just though just but as mercifull 4. Not as mercifull in generall and ex nuda voluntate without any respect had to satisfaction but as propitiated by the blood of Christ and having accepted the propiation made by his blood 5. Not meerely as propitiated by his blood but as moved by his intercession which he makes as our Advocate in Heaven not onely pleading the propitiation made and accepted but the repentance and faith of the sinner and the promise of him the Judge before whom he pleads 6. The Scripturâ—s in this judiciall processe consider God as a Judge and Christ as an Advocate as may appear Rom. 8. 33 34. Heb. 7. 25. 9. 24. 1 Joh. 2. 1 2. In which places Christ is made the propitiatour and intercessoâ—r or advocate 7. Though God by Christ as King may passe this judgment yet he must before that act be passed by Christ look upon Christ as propitiatour and intercessour as a priest and â—uch he must be before he can be a Judge and so looked upon not onely by God the Judge justifying but the sinner to be justified before this Judge proceed to passe and execute the judgment by his Son as King For man must first be justificable by Christ a Priest before he can be justifyed by Christ a King The generall nature of justification is a reward It 's a reward merited by Christ as Priest and Mediatour promised by God Redeemer as a Law-giver and rendred by him as Judge upon a duty performed by the Sinner to be justified and this doth difference it from the retributions of punishment according to the Laws of Redemption violated The party judged § II and justified is 1. Man 2. Man a Sinner 3. Man a Sinner believing 4. Believing in Christ as propitiatour and intercessour Propitiatour by his blood shed and offered unto God Intercessour by his blood being shed offered and accepted as pleaded 1. The subject of this act and the materiall immediate cause of this act is Man For it 's not a judgment passed upon Angels good or bad 2. Man is here considered not as innocent as he was first Created but as a Sinner and disobedient and so guilty For it is God that justifieth the ungodly that is sinners and guilty persons Rom. 4 5. Therefore the Apostle making way for his Doctrin of Justification proves Jew and Gentile that is all men under sin Rom. 3. 9. and that all the world was guilty before God that is Gods tribunal verse 19. and again affirms that all have sinned verse 23. For death passed over all men because all have sinned in one man Rom. 5. 12. For he that hath the least sin is guilty of the first sin of the first man and lyes under the penalty thereof till he be delivered For by the offence of one many were dead and by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation verse 15 16 17. For there can be but two wayes whereby men or Angels can be justifiable before God the universall and supreme most