that went afore to wit with an oath by him that said vnto him Our lord hath sworne and will not repent thou art a Priest for euer according to the Order of Melchisedech 2. Outward oblation is obseruable which is expressed in the words wherby Christ consecrated his body and blood saying This is my body which is giuen for you (k) The Apostle S. Paul vseth the verbe giue in that signification when he mentioneth our redemption procured by the sacrifice of the Cross for exaÌ„ple Gal. 3. ad Tit. 2. likewise holy scripture vseth frequently the verb to shed for to Sacrifice Exod. 29. Leuit. 1.2.3 This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for you which are the terms of proper sacrifice and were outwardly vttered in the last supper For indeed all the actions performed by Christ in celebrating the Eucharist were outward actions namly blessing of the bread giuing thanks to his diuine Father before consecration and * Christus in vltima coena manducauit corpus suum bibit sanguineÌ„ suum vna cuÌ„ Apostolis vt post s. Hiero alios Patres docet S. Thomas 3. p. q. 81. eating his own hody and drinking his own blood together with his Apostles after consecration 3. Oblation of a sensible permanent thing is obseruable vêªt videlicet Christ's body and blood which are sensible things vnder the form's of bread and wine which are sensible also 4. There is obseruable destruction or reall change in the oblation to wit by substantiall conuersion of the bread into Christ's body and wine into his blood Besides by eating and drinking therof the body and blood of Christ lose that sacramentall being they had by reproduction vnder the elements of bread and wine which is a reall change also 5. It was an oblation exhibited to God alone for Christ in celebrating the Eucharist addressed all his speeches to his diuine Father lastly there is obseruable recognition of diuine omnipotency as is plainly euidenced by the oblation it self since it succeeded not only in the room of the Pascall lamb but of all the other sacrifices of the law of Moyses and consequently ought to containe in it self the perfect morall signification essentiall to those sacrifices which is recognition of diuine omnipotency and representation of the sacrifice of the cross Nor is it inconuenient for a sacrifice going afore to be a representation or commemoration of a sacrifice comming after for all the old sacrifices went before the sacrifice of the crosse which neuertheless they represented How euer the sacrifice of the cross is only distinct from the sacrifice of the Fucharist as to the manner of offering bloodily or vnbloodily for the head-offerer is the same Christ and the thing offered the same also body and blood of Christ And albeit that Christ by one sole bloody oblation that is by once offering himself in a bloody manner consummated the generall redemption neuertheless he did not think fit to make that one generall oblation an effectuall redemption or remission of sins without the application therof for so he had entailed the kingdom of Heauen vpon euery sinner and consequently deuested himself of all power to disinherit any for what fault soeuer But the applicatiue perfection as to a sacrifice he gaue to the vnbloody oblation only which by his own institution and appointment is and shall be the externall seruice of the new Testament and the continuall application of his passion vnto sanctification As corporall remedies how perfect and sufficient soeuer doe no cure vpon a sick body that is to say are not effectuall remedies vnless they be applyed so Christ his death and passion though a spirituall remedy superabundantly sufficient to take away all the sins of the world neuertheless is not an effectuall remission of any till it be applied aright neither is the preeminent perfection of Christs death and passion a iot lessened therby application being necessarily requisit to its effect by Christ his own appointmeÌ„t And praiers which the faithfull offer to God one for an other doe not prejudice or diminish any part of the intercession which Christ himself made for his people while he liued vpon earth Io. 17. nor of those which sitting at the right hand of his diuine Father he presenteth continually Rom. 8. Heb. 7. But rather do apply the fruit therof to the effecting of the said faithfull their holy desires especially when prayers are offered by the Bishopps and Priests of the catholick Church vnto whom God hath committed the (l) God saith the Apostle 2. Cor. 5. Hath giuen vnto us the vvord of reconciliation novv then are vve Ambassadours for Christ God as it vvere exhorting by us Wherby is meant that Christ as man is the principall Minister vnto reconciling of sinners to God and for and in the room of Christ in order to the office of reconcilement the Apostles and their successors were instituted as his Vicars namely the Bishops and Priests of the Catholick Church Wherfore their absolution from sinnes by offering sacrifice and their ministring the Sacraments ought to be counted as Christs own absolution remission or pardon being the absoluing from and remitting sinnes in the room of Christ in like manner their preaching and exhorting in stead of Christ is as if it were Christ's own preaching and exhorting the office of Bishops and Priests being the Vicarship of Christ So that when the same Apostle saith Hebrae 8. that Christ onely is the Priest of the new law or Testament his meaning is that Christ is the chief Priest that is the Prince of Priests to whom as to his Ambassadours he hath committed the ministery of reconciliation In the old law according to the Apostle Hebrae 7. there was a series of many chief Priests succeeding one an other in that function for none of all them was of perpetuall durance But in our new law there is but one chief Priest or Bishop that shall endure for euer and all other Priests are his Vicars onely who in his room exercise Priestly function visibly wherfore Christ is chief Priest for euer and exerciseth his Priesthood by his substitute Ministers or Vicars which execute the office of reconciliation for him and in his room ministery of reconciliation for and vnder Christ who is the high Priest and chief Minister according to his humanity of mans reconcilement to God the others exercise Christs vicarshipp only These pray and minister sacrifice and Sacraments in Christs stead both vnto remission of sins and the verifying his For euer Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech so that Christ is a Priest for euer after the right order and similitude of Melchisedech for as much as he dayly doth and shall to the end of the world offer by the Priests of the new law as his Vicars the vnbloody sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the form's of bread and wine called by vse which is the arbitratour of words and language sacrifice of the
whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and except you shall eate the flesh of the son of man and drinke his blood you haue no life in you again the bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world Thus saith S. Austin ser 2. de verbis Apos c. 1. life said of life and to him that thinketh life to be a lyer this meat shall be death and not life The bread that I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world c. Thereby signifying plainly his intent of leauing to his Church his substantiall reall body in meate and his substantiall reall blood in drinke as an effectuall expedient for the obtaining eternall life for alwaies the words of Christ or God which doe importe a thing promised tending to mans saluation ought to be vnderstood in the sense wherein they be outwardly expressed in scripture that is to say * Aug. l. de doc Chris cap. 10. 16. in sermone inquit diuino id omne pertinet ad sensum literalem id est debet accipi literaliter vt verba sonāt non figuratè quod potest referri ad morum honestatem vel fidei veritatem locutio quae iubet vel vtilitatē vel beneficentiā est propria non figuratiua secundum Iustinum codice de legibus litterally setting aside Tropes and mysticall significations Besides a law or precept that exact's obedience from subjects and such indeed is the legacy of the new Testament ought to be cleare and plain to the vnderstanding of euery man that each one may decline what is forbidden and obserue what is enjoyned For no law or precept can be vnderstood by all subjects if the words thereof be mysticall or figuratiue but Christ to shew that he spok according * Concil Nicae quod est 7. synodus generalis Act. 6. probat ex citato Textu Jo. 6. con Iconiclastas Sacramentum Eucharistiae non esse imaginem Christi sed verum reale corpus erus probat insuper ex eodem loco Trid. sess 21. can 1. laicos non adctrings iure diuine ad communionem sub vtraque specie to the plain litterall sense when he perceiued that the Capharnaits for in the synagogue at Capharnaum Christ taught these thinges began to reason among themselues concerning the possibility of giuing his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke he did not correct their conceptions as to orall manducation and orall drinking thereof yet his custome (c) In regard Nicodemus conceiu'd spirituall regeneration after the similitude of naturall generation Christ rectifyed his vnderstanding in regard the Pharisees Io. 16. Mat. 15. imagined that a meer omission of washing their hand 's before refection was a grieuous crime Christ instructed them in the knowledge of sin and in regard the Apostles made a wrong construction of his saying in order to eating his body anddrinking of his blood Christ forthwith expounded his meaning telling them that the words he had spoken were spirit and life that is according to S. Austin Epis 98. they were spiritually not carnally meant as if Christ had intended to giue vnto his Apostles particles of his body diuided from the whole so that Christ in order to the manner and that onely of eating his body and drinking of his blood corrected his Apostles was constant in conformity to his pastorall office to instruct his auditory conceiuing amiss of his sayings but repeated the same words confirmed with an oath saying to them Amen Amen except yee eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood yee haue no life in you which conuincingly shews that Christ spake not figuratiuely but litterally and indeed an oath is sworn to the end that such as doubt of the thinges promised or spoken may be assured of the true meaning of him that promiseth or speaketh any thing Hebrae 6. in consequence of which a thing confirmed with an oath ought to be interpreted in the * Innocentius 3. cap. veniens Extra de iuramento plain literall sense and according to the conceptions of those for whose sake an oath is sworn but the Capharnaits for whose sake Christ * Augus ait Christum iurasse dicēdo Amen Amen swore conceiued Christ to speake of orall manducation of his body and orall drinking of his blood wherefore it was that manner of eating and drinking that Christ confirmed with his oath but when he saw that his Disciples did misunderstand his meaning as to the eating his flesh and drinking his blood imagining him to mean that they were to eate his flesh and drink his blood with the mouth of their body after the manner of common meate and drink that is to teare Christs body and blood diuiding one part from an other in eating and drinking it he corrected (d) According to S. Cyprian ser de Coena Domini the intent and aime of Christs saying Ioan. 6. Vnlesse you eate c. was to instruct vs that our abiding in him is meate and drinke from whence Caluinists vnaduisedly infer that S. Cyprian interpreted Christs words Vnlesse you eate c. Of spiritualll manducation onely For in the place set down S. Cyprian expresly assertes that Christ cōmanded Christians in the new law to drink his blood the eating wherof in the old law Deut. 12. was prohibited which doubtless is meant of true reall drinking Wherefore S. Austin 9.57 in Leuit ingeniously confesseth that in the new law wee are as truly cōmanded to drinke the blood of Christ as were the Jews in the old law forbidden to drink the blood of sacrifices offered vnto expiating sins in consequence of which according to S. Cyprian and S. Austin reall drinking of Christs reall blood is commanded in the chapter alledged and instructed them as to the manner therof only saying The words that I spake vnto you are spirit and life that is sayes S. Aug. on the 98. Psal They ought not to be vnderstood carnally as if Christs intent had been to giue certaine particles or peices of his body diuided from the whole but they ought to be vnderstood spiritually which is to say that Christs body is in the Sacrament after the manner of a spirituall substance invisible indivisible whole and entire in the whole entire subject also whole and entire in each part thereof And here is observable that a reall substantiall and true body may be considered after two sundry fashions conformably to the Apostle that sayes 1. Cor. 15. A body is raised spirituall in incorruption that is sown naturall in corruption First as it is cloathed with terrene conditions and qualities which naturally accōpany a body in this mortall life For example visibility divisibility and mortality Secondly as it is deuested of such rayments of corporall accidents and inuested with the noble conditions and qualities of a spirit or spirituall substance namely invisibility indivisibility impassibility According to this latter consideration which is
he carryed himselfe in his own hands while giuing his body he said This is my body But truly he had not done what no other could doe if he had carried in his hands a meer figure or sign of his body onely Again S. Cyril Hieros Catech. mysti affirmes that the wine is as truly chang'd into the blood of Christ as water was conuerted into wine in Cana-Galilaea Moreouer S. Cyprian ser de Domi. coena asserts that the bread Christ gaue vnto his Disciples is chang'd saith he not as to the form or figure that is as to the accidents thereof but as to the nature that is as to substance through the Omnipotent power of the worde that was made flesh plainly and euidently otherwise the mystery established vnto saluation might leade into errour and damnation since a thing deliuered in Tropes and figures is subiect vnto vncertainty and intricacies Again the words afore mentioned set down by three Euangelists and one Apostle importe the new Testament made by Christ himselfe the night before his passion and it is vncredible that a Testatour expecting death suddenly should say in express tearmes what he meaned not In regard whereof the ancient Fathers doe vnanimously declare that the cited words of institution vêªt videlicet This is my body This is the blood of the new Testament ought to be taken in their proper sense that no man according to reason might doubt of the â—â—all and substantiall presence of Christs reall and substantiall body and blood in the Sacrament of the Eucharist Christ the diuine Testatour expressing himselfe therein plainly and clearly Wherfore it is an infallible Article of christian faith that vnder the elements of bread and wine is contained Christs true reall and substantiall body and blood through a maruelous transubstantiation that is to say substantiall (h) Transsubstantiation signifies conuersion of one substance into an other conuersion of the bread into his body and the wine into his blood in vertue of the word that was made flesh which the word made that made all thinges of nothing Gen. 1. In vertue of the word that changed Lots wife into a piller of salt Gen. 19. that turned Moyses rod into a serpent Exod. 4. that conuerted the riuers and fountaines of Egypt into blood Exod. 7. that made wine of water Io. 2. that created man of the dust of the ground and breathed in his face breath of life Gen. 1. In vertue of the word that was God Io. 10. Wherfore since the omnipotency of the word can work such marueilous effects it is euidently plain that Christ who is this omnipotent word to wit the son of God can conuert bread into his flesh and wine into his blood and the diuine omnipotency as to transmutation of one created substance into an other in like manner created the Deuil did acknowledg when he said vnto Christ If thou be the son of God command that these stones may be made bread Mat. 4. Wherfore such as deny transubstantiation in the Sacrament of Christs body and blood as an action impossible are worse then Deuills and doe not consider the infinite power of God according to the innate vertue therof Besides if the nutritiue faculty of nature can turne bread into the substance of him that eateth it and change wine into the blood of him that drinketh it if art can make Iron of earth and glass of ashes why cannot God that is aboue nature and art conuert bread into Christs body and wine into his blood Christs body and blood being created substances Furthermore it is extream weakness in a Christian that ought in the mysteries of christian doctrine to be ruled by faith which is a conuiction of thinges not seen to think that he cannot receiue in the Sacrament with his corporall mouth the true reall and substantiall body and blood of Christ because he doth not see them for indeed he might as to reason think as well that there are not three persons in God and one substance two natures in Christ and one person or that there was neuer such a man as Salomon or any such as are called his great Grand-Fathers and Grand-mothers because he hath not seen them or to thinke he is not endued with an immortall soul which quickneth each part of his body because he cannot see it and t' is as great weakness to think that if all the belieuers had eaten of Christs reall body from the first age for 1662. it would haue been wasted and spent long agoe though it had been as big as a great mountaine for Christ's (i) T is no strange thing for the substance of Christs body to exist after an indiuisibie manner since according to true Philosophy the substance or essence of euery real thing hath an indiuisible existency body by diuine dispeÌ„sation is spiritually cloathed in the Sacrament being inuisible indiuisible and incorruptible and consequently deuested of outward extension in order to place and therfore not subiect to naturall alterations which doe accompany common bodies As Heate brightness of fire sweet odour of a rose doe not suffer prejudice for as much as they be communicated to many and as the pot of meale and vessel of oile did not faile or diminish though the widow of Sareptha and her family did eat thereof continually while the Heauens were shut froÌ„ rayning through the prayers of Elias 30. Regum so the body of Christ in the Sacrament is not wasted spent or prejudiced albeit that the whole Church doth dayly feed thereof Likewise t is extream weaknesse to think that Christ cannot be in * Chrys l. de Sacerd. ait qui Christus cum patro sursum sedet in illo ipso temporis momeÌ„to omnium manibus pertractatur Heauen and in the Sacrament at once in as much as one body is not capable according to Philosophy to possess two places together for God is not confined to Aristotles principles The diuine omnipotency transcend's Philosophy her Rules and all the works of nature God made all thinges of nothing contrarie to the maxime of Aristotle Nothing is made of nothing Furthermore in Christ are two natures and one sole person Christ was conceiued of the Virgin Mary without prejudice to her virginity and in the day of his Ascension penetrated the Heauens which are solid bodies without boring into them and other effects which vnto Philosophy are impossible to God are possible Howeuer one body and many places are not inconsistent together as to naturall Philosophy especially when a body is in many places after the manner of a spirituall substance deuested of outward extension in order to the places that containe it and so Christs body is in many consecrated Hosts at once or when one body is in one place with it's quantity extended outwardly thereunto and in another depriued therof at the same time and so Christs body is in Heauen and in the Sacrament together all which according to naturall Philosophy ought not to seem thinges
reason lay claim to that passage as a proof of their forbidden doctrine in order to communion in both kind's in regard they deny that any part of the said chapter of S. Iohn is meant of sacramentall eating or drinking lest by assenting thereto they might be forced to grant Christs reall presence in the Sacrament which the chapter plainly declares if it shall beare an interpretation of sacramentall eating and drinking Howeuer the precept so interpreted doth not euince communion vnder both kinds to be enjoyned of necessity in order to each Christian in particular since according to scripture vsage the particle * Julius Paulus insignis Jurisconsultus ait comparatum esse vt coniuncta pro disiunctis accipiantur Di gestis de verborum significatione l. saepe And is frequently taken in a disiunctiue sense only For example S. Peter Act. 3. sayes Siluer and Gold haue I none where the particle And is taken disiunctiuely the true meaning thereof being Siluer or gold haue I none In like manner it is written Exod. 21. He that smiteth his Father and Mother so it is read in Hebrew shall die the death Where And is taken for or Again Math. 20. it is said by thy words thou shalt be iustified and by thy words thou shalt be condemned Where likewise the particle And is taken disiunctiuely for Or and Aristotle also taketh And in the disiunctiue sense when he defineth Nature to be Authour or cause of motion and rest all his interpreters vnderstanding the particle And in that definition to signify Or and truly by the latter particle And in the cited passage of scripture vêªt videlicet Except ye cate the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood See doubtless was meant Or as doe plainly demonstrate other word 's of Christ there set down wherby he explaines that precept saying v. 47. I am the bread of life v. 50. This is that bread that came down from Heauen If any man eate of this bread he shall liue for euer and the bread that I shall giue is my flesh which I shall giue for the life of the world Whereby is plainly euident that Christ did ascribe the effect of this Sacrament as common alike to the bread alone and to the bread and wine ioyntly Howeuer sectaries haue nothing of aduantage if the latter particle And in S. Iohn ought to be taken in the copulatiue sense for the precept euen so meant and indeed so catholick writers do vnderstand it importes an obligation only in order to the whole Church wherin there is neuer want of Priests that be obliged to communicate in both kinds as often as they offer sacrifice and not to each member therof In the old law God hauing iustituted Circumcision added this precept in generall tearmes viêªt videlicet Ye shall circumcise the foreskin of your flesh and notwithstanding only such had right to exercise that function as were deputed therunto by the Church or Synagegue which sheweth plainly that though the precept did oblige the whole Church or Synagogue yet it did not reach to each member thereof howeuer it seemes as if it had been enioyned in order to all vniuersally Again when God instituted the pascall lambe as a Sacrament and sacrifice also he imposed two precepts Exod. 12. the one Let euery man take vnto him a lambe the other all the multitude of the children of Israel shall kill it which two precepts though they be expressed in generall words to the obliging the whole Synagogue yet euery particular member therof had not right to choose and take vnto him a lamb and sacrifice it but the heads of each family only which executed Priestly function as to that sacrifice being a priuiledge giuen to them before Priesthood was appropriated to the family of Aaron as appeareth manifestly by the said chapter of Exod. As to the passages which some sectaries alledge out of S. Innocent Ep. 26. and S. Augustin lib. 7. against Iulian the Pelagian to proue a necessity of communion vnder both kinds in regard that these ancient Fathers expresly assert that Infants cannot be saued except they eate Christ's flesh and drinke his blood they make not a jot for them who require a presonall act of inward faith to the eating of Christ's body and drinking of his blood Infant 's being vncapable of exercising any such acction in consequence where of the alledged * Agunt Innocen Aug. contra Pelagium qui negabat peccatum originale in infantibus authorities afforde them nothing of aduantage But as to the true sense of these primitiue Fathers doubtless their meaning is only to shew that Infants cannot enter into the kingdome of God except they receiue sanctifying grace in baptism through the merits of Christ's body and blood that were offered for all men vnto remission of sins (d) According to Origin hom 29. in num we are said to drink of Christ's blood not only when we receiue the Sacrament but when wee heare his diuine word preach'd wherein is life according to Christ's own saying the Words vvhich I have spoken are spirit and life in as much as they be dispositions to diuine grace which is the life of the soul through the merits of Christ Again such as hear Mass deuoutly and ioyne in heart with the Priest receiue life and fruit by the Sacrament though they neither eate of Christ's body nor drink of his blood sacramentally Fourthermore in as much as Infants through baptism be made members of that Church which eateth Christ's flesh and drinketh his blood the same Church as it doth furnish them * Aug. Tom. 10. ser 10. de verbis Apostoli Mater Ecclesia inquit accommodat parvults alioruÌ„ pedes vt veniant ad Ecclesiam altorum cor vt credant alioruÌ„ linguam vt fatcantur it a Ecclesia accommodat aliorum ora vt comedant bibant with the feet of others to come vnto it with the heart of others to belieue and with the tongues of others to professe the christian faith in like manner according to a spirituall metaphoricall form of speech it may be said to furnish them with the mouths of others to eate Christ's flesh and drink his blood CHAR. X. OF PENANCE THE CONTENTS Penance hath a iust claim vnto all requisits necessary to a speciall Sacrament of the new law Christ after the similitude of an outward Court of iustice instituted an inward Tribunall where by diuine dispensation Priest's sit as Iudges of sinns committed after baptism whatsoeuer Priests judge here below God approu's aboue the power Christ gaue to the Apostles and heir successors in priestly function and authority was not onely to declare but effect indeed remission of hones in vertue of the word of reconciliation ioynt vnto a sinners sincere sorrow and humble Confession of his sinnes together with a full purpose to sin no more PEnance is a (a) There are three requisits necessary to the nature of a Sacrament of the
and offered at his last supper vnder the form's of bread and wine according to the Order of Melchisedech and that the Eucharist as it was instituted and celebrated was not only a Sacrament but also a sacrifice is plainly euidenced out of the words expressing the action that Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating therof for example (c) The three Euangelists S. Mathew S. Mark and S. Luke express the words Christ vsed in the instituting and celebrating of the Eucharist in the present Tense for example IS GIVEN IS shed likewise S. Paul as to Christs body 1. Cor. 11. is broken Besides the French and Latin Bibles of Caluinists haue IS giuen for you IS shed for you But according to the Latin vulgar translation the particles giuen shed broken are expressed in the future Tence namely shall be giuen shall be shed shall be broken Howeuer Howeuer whether they be expounded in the present or future Tense it matters not since the sense is the same for although is giuen is shed carry the signification of the present Tense neuertheless the subsequent particles namely Do this in remembrance of me vntil our lord shall come to judge the quick and the dead 1. Cor. 11. imply the future Tense The Greek Church hath alwais vsed the future Tense in their Liturgies namely S. Iames. S. Clement S. Basil S. Chrysostome to proue that Christ offered the sacrifice of his body and blood when he was present with his Apostles at his last supper and indeed Christ himselfe paue euidence enough of this Catholick assertion by saying Hic Calix Sanguinis mei This Cup of my blood And the Latin Church vseth the future Tense shall be giuen shall be shed to shew plainly that Christ spoke not of his body and blood onely then at his last supper offered but of the same sacrifice that was to be offered for the future till he should come again to judge the quick and the dead This is my body which is giuen for you Luk 22. which S. Paul expresseth in other term's viz This is my body which is broken for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood of the new Testament which is shed for many Mar 14. This is my blood the new Testament that is shed for many vnto remission of Sins Math. 26. All which sentences import sacrificing since they containe the proper words of sacrifice as it is plainly deducible out of other euident Scripture-testimonies in consequence whereof the Eucharist instituted and celebrated by Christ in his last supper is not a Sacrament only but a sacrifice also Again the afore said Verbs namely to giue to break to shed are vttered in the present tense after the Greek Translation signifying that Christ did did not only offer sacrifice in a bloody manner on the Crosse but in an vnbloody also at his last supper (d) S. Luke cap. 22. expresseth the action that Christ vsed in the institution of the Eucharist as to his body vnder the elements of bread and wine in these words This is my body vvhich is giuen for you which S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. deliuers thus This is my body vvhich is broken for you and 1. Cor. 10. he saith The bread which we break is it not the participation of the body of our lord S. Chrysostome expounding this sacred Text demandes why S. Paul added to the words of the Euangelist vvhich vve break and answer's to his own question saying This is done in the Eucharist and not on the Cross vvhere no bone of him vvas broken Io. 19. According to S. Chrysostome as likewise Theodoret and Occumenius who were versed in the Greek tongue Christ suffered himselfe to be broken in the Eucharist vnder the form of bread vnto filling of all which he did not suffer to be done saith S. Chrysostome on the Cross vnto redeeming of all and indeed Calvin in his Commentary vpon the 11. Chapter set down noteth that the particles Is Broken signify is offered or is sacrificed whereby appear's that the Apostles intent and aime was to shew that Christs body was truly broken in the vnbloody oblation offered at his last supper for as much as the species of the consecrated bread were then truly broken Besides as the words of the action which Christ vsed in instituting and celebrating the Eucharist viz This is my body which is giuen for you This is my blood shed for many vnto remission of sins doe euidently import (e) The sacrifice of the Euchariste in as much as it appeaseth God rendereth him propitious and procureth diuine grace vnto remission of sin◠is truly a propitiotary sacrifice taken in the proper sense according to the ancient Fathers S. Gyprian S. Basil S. Chrysostome S. Ambrose S. Austin and the Council of Trent assertes this Catholick doctrine and addeth withall The sacrifice of the Eucharist according to Apostolicall tradition is not onely offeréd for sinnes pains satisfactions and other necessities but likevvisa for such as are dead in the state of grace and not sufficiently purged as yet a propitiatory sacrifice for blood to be shed is to be sacrificed for propitiation or pardon of sins so the words of precept which follow This is my body giuen for you namely doe this in remembrance of me That is in memory of my death and passion doe signify a commemoratiue sacrifice and consequently plainly demonstrate the Eucharist not to be a Sacrament only but (f) The ancient Fathers S. Cypr. Ep. 63. and Caeci Orig. in cap. 16. Mat. and others also compare the sacrifice Christ offered of his body and blood at his last supper vnto the sacrifice of the paschall Lambe and other sacrifices of the old law wherby appears that the sacrifice Christ offered at his last supper was a sacrifice taken in the proper sense wherfore S. Gregor Nyssen Ora. 1. de Resur saith expresly that Christ in celebrating the Euchariste at his last supper sacrificed himselfe before he was sacrificed vpon the Cross a sacrified also For otherwise it would not be a liuely and perfect commemoration or representation of the sacrifice offered on the Cross such as Christ requireth Luk. 22. for as a Sacrament cannot be perfectly represented but by an other Sacrament 〈◊〉 a sacrifice cannot be liuely represented but by another sacrifice there is necessarily required similitude and proportion between the thing that representeth and the thing represented for a man cannot represent an horse or an horse a man nor the saying of the Apostle 1. Cor. 11. as often as you shall eat of this bread and drink of this drink you shall shew the death of our Lord doth infirm the strength of this argument * Patres antiqui in tribus oecumenicis Concilijs puta Ephesino Calcedo Constantinop vt constat ex praefatione Ephesi sic interpretati sunt verbae Apostoli quotiescunque māducabitis mortem Domini annunciabitis For the true sense and meaning therof is that the sacrifice of the Eucharist which is
A man must be made a christian through baptism before he can make a progress in christianity through confirmation A man must be made a member of Christ through baptism before he can be a soldier of Christ through confirmation A man must be endued with faith through baptism before he can be deputed to a speciall office in the exercise thereof which is to defend it against the assaults of Tyrants through confirmation A man must be invested with * Hieron diolog con Lucifer cap. 4. quemodo inquit ab Ecclesia recipiet confirmationeÌ„ qui nec dum remissionem peccatorum coÌ„secutus est Docet Arianos qui errabant contra formam baptismi non accepisse spiritum sanctuÌ„ per Sacramentum CoÌ„firmationis grace vnto remission of sins through baptism before he can receiue the holy Ghost vnto perfection through confirmation which does not confer sanctity after the manner of other Sacraments only but also doth * Omnes S. Patres qui agunt de Sacramento confirmationis doceÌ„t baptismi gratiam perfici consummari per gratiam coÌ„firmationis increase and perfect the sanctity receiued afore by baptism it being the complement or consummation thereof Whereby it is plainly euident that albeit this Sacrament is not as baptism a requisite absolutely necessary vnto obtaining eternall blessedness neuertheless it is conditionally necessary to wit as to the armour of grace and (h) According to Pope Vrban dist 5. de consecratione there is no perfect christian that hath not receiu'd the holy Ghost through the imposition of Episcopall hands and Hugo de S. Vict. l. 2. de Sacram. par 7. cap. 3. countes it dangerous to dye without being confirm'd afore which is conform to the doctrine of ancient Fathers S. Dionys Lâ—de Eccles Hierar c. 4. S. Cypr. Epis 72. ad Iubaian which assert that then a man has fulnes of sanctity and is made an adopted son of God when he receiues both the Sacraments baptism and confirmation perfection therof as also to a more ample measure of blessedness then baptisme alone doth effect so that christian catholicks especially such as liue vnder persecution ought to vse extraordinary endeauours for their admittance to this Sacrament the proper office there of being to strenghten them by grace that they may not fall from the Church of Christ * In Epis ad Fabium vti refert Eusebius l. 1. cap. 35. S. Cornelius affirmeth that Nouatus fell into Heresie for the want therof If they haue no conueniency in their own country to repaire vnto a catholick Bishop the spirituall aduantages which they may reape from the Sacrament of confirmation will compence the charges of a journey into forrain parts where catholick Bishops are to be found but this is to be vnderstood in reference to such catholicks as haue ability of body and a competency of temporall fortunes As touching the sensible rites or ceremonies employed in or about the Sacrament of confirmation the most remarkable are two only For example a Bishop in making of chrism breatheth three times in form of a cross on the mouth of the pot or flagon that containeth the said Chrism signifying thereby that euen at that time through episcopall consecration Chrism receiueth virtue from God wherby it is impowered as his instrument to confer strengthning grace to such as doe receaue the Sacrament aright and ceremonies signifying the thing that is done for the time they are employed are profitable by the confession of such * Caluinus in sua harmonia ad cap. 7. S. Marci fatetur caeremonias illas quae habent significationem eius quod tunc fit duÌ„ exercentur esse vtiles as impugne catholick ceremonies The other ceremonie is the reuerence a Bishop exhibiteth to the consecrated Chrism bowing down his head he saluteth saying Haile holy Chrism This ceremony hath nothing of Idolatry for an vnliu'd thing may challenge religious adoration in reference to an other distinct wherin excellency is contained to which religious adoration is due The ancient Iewes adored the Ark of the Testament because of the relation it had to God that is an increated excellency and all Christians doe religiously worship and adore the sacred books of the new Testament in reguard of the word of God therin comprehended And subjects of a temporall Prince do render ciuil reuerence to his chaire of state in relation to his sacred Person if a king or Emperour to which is due ciuill adoration by the law of God and nature in like manner religious worship is exhibited to holy Chrism in as much as it is the effectuall instrument of God to giue armour of grace to such as are baptised and is by speciall benediction deputed to the effecting therof CHAR. VIIJ. OF THE EVCHARISTE THE CONTENTS Christ the night before his passion made his last Testament gaue vnto his Church a legasy of his body and blood in the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form's of bread and wine for to continue the spirituall food of souls till he come to Iudgment The express words of the Testament This is my body This Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood exclude each figure that is inconsistent with the litterall sense intended by the Testatour that vseth not to say one thing literally and mean an other mystically because Christ Said this is my body this Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood no man in reason ought to doubt of it Authorities of Councils testimonies of ancient Fathers and the warrantable practice of both primitiue and modern Churches euince the reall presence of Christ in the Sacrament of the Euchariste in vertue of the same word that was made flesh and made all things of nothing bread is transubstantiated in to the body and wine in to the bloud of Christ who is in Heauen and in the Sacrament at once One body can agree with many places by diuine dispensation Requisit's necessary to a worthy receiuing of Christs body and bloud in the Sacrament THe Euchariste is the (a) The blood of Christ shed vnto remission of sinnes is the proper legacy of the new Testament according to Christs owne words set down 1. Cor. 11. This Chalice is the nevv Testament in my blood legacy of the new Testament vnto eternall life that Christ bequeathed to his Church in a Sacrament of his body and blood the night before he suffered his passion in the presence of witnesses without exception which were his Apostles The same body and blood that Christ offered in a sacrifice on the cross visibly to the redeeming of man kind vnto liberty he left in a Sacrament vnder the elements of bread and wine invisibly to the feeding of man vnto eternall life In the bestowing of this legacy Christ who is faithfull in all he promiseth fulfilled the promise he had made long afore and which is set down Io. 6. (b) Christ Ioan. 6. promising and recommending the Sacrament of his body and blood said
his Church to determine how the Euchariste should be ordered and indeed the Church-goucrnours are the proper ministers of Christ and the dispensers of the mysteries of God 1. Cor. 4. in consequence of which the Church has authority to constitute and appoint in order to dispensing the Sacraments what she shall judge expedient according to tyme place and persons but with that prouiso that she alter nothing pertaining to the nature or essence of them muesting his Church with authority and power to dispense and order therein so the integrity and substance of the Sacrament be not prejudiced as in prudence she might thinke fit in regard of places tymes persons and circumstances (b) Communion vnder the form of bread onely was practiced in the primitiue Church according to the best antiquity prouing the lawfullness thereof out of the 2. and 20. chapter of the Acts. For example S. Austin Epis 6. ad Casulanum S. Bede in 20. Act. and indeed many of the first Christians were Nazarits who were bound by their vow not to drink any licour of grapes pum 4. wherfore since the legall ceremonies of the old law were in force as appears by the fame chapter of the Act. doubtless those new Christians receiu'd the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder one kinde onely Besides S. Cyprian that liu'd in the first 300. yeares l. de lapsis set's down two examples of communion vnder one kinde Again S. Hierom in epitap Paul ad Eustach e. 23. S. Austin l. 3. de consensu Euang. c. 23. affirme that Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form of bread onely vnto the Disciples going to Emmaous Moreouer Tertull. l. 2. ad vxor l. de Orat. attest's that it was a practice or custome to take Christs body forthwith or to carrie it home and defer the taking to an other tyme. Lay-communion vnder one kind only was practised in the primitiue Ages as plainly doe euidence scripture and Father-Testimonies preseruing of the Eucharist vnder one sole kinde as spirituall prouision for sick persons which though they were Priests did nor communicate in sickness but vnder one kinde de onely namely bread (c) The custome of communicating Infants continued in Some Churches till the dayes of Hugo de S. Victor who liu'd about the yeare 1130. for l. 1. c. 2. de caeremon he affirmes that the Priest with his finger dipt afore in consecrated wine ministred the Sacramen of the Euchariste vnder the form of wine vnto Babes newly born they being able to suck Besides in the ancient Roman office cap. de Sabbato parents are admonished not to suffer their children to suck milk vntill they had communicated But now the Church for good and iust reasons hath wholy abolished that custome and a principall motiue there of was to resist the heresy which euen in those days the Bohemian Hussits had spread teaching that Infants could not be sau'd without receiuing the Euchariste and an other reason of taking away that practice was the eminent danger of prophaning so holy a Sacrament because of the great number of children and the distribution of the Sacrament vnto Infants in one sole kinde also Namely wine for albeit these could not eat the sacramentall bread yet they might suck the sacramentall wine from the Priest's finger which truly they did according to the custome of some Churches Again lay-communion * ConueniÅt omnes Doctores Caetbolici communionem sub vtraque specie fuisse in vsu in quibusdam Ecclesijs eiusque meminerunt S. Dionys cap. 3. de Eccles Hierarch S. Iustinus Martyr Apolog 2. S. Gregor l. 3. Dial. cap. 36 alijque Patres vnder both kindes was anciently practised at some tymes in seuerall precincts of particular christian Churches as doe plainly shew the writings of primitiue Fathers And S. Leo the first being supream Pastor in Church-gouernment vnder Christ by a speciall ordinance commanded publick lay-communion at Easter vnder both kindes the chiefe intent whereof was to discouer the manichean heriticks who to conceale their heresy these sectaries did foolishly belieue that there was a good and euill God and as foolishly held wine to be created by the euill God and therfore had an abhorrence of it were obserued to receiue the sacramentall bread at Easter which sole kinde was then in practice with Catholicks promiscuously Again lay-communion vnder both kind's was abrogated absolutely and vniuersally because of certain Bohemian sectaries named Hussit's that condemned lay-communion vnder one kinde only teaching both kind's as necessarily required to all Christians vnto saluation In detestation of this heresie as also for other good reasons the generall Councell of Constance obliged all lay-Catholick's to communicate in one kinde and indeed the Church of God ought to exercise her authority to the crushing of all heresies in the bud Yet the Greek-Church continued lay-communion in both kind's though it did not esteem both the species of the Sacrament necessary to saluation For in the generall Councill of Florence which was called with design chiefly to setle concord and vnion between that and the latine Church neither the greek or latine Fathers did except against lay-communion as to the practise thereof vnder one sole or both kinds whereby it is euidently manifest that Christ hat left it in the Churches liberty to determine and appoint the distribution of the communion vnto meer lay-people in one only or both kind's as it shall think fit according to the various condition of tymes places persons and circumstances so that though in this present age lay-communion be giuen in sacramentall bread alone through all the precincts of the easterne Church neuertheless it is in the power of the supreme Pastour to change that into another vsage of both kind's if he shall see as good reasons to moue him thereunto as he seeth cause to continue it vnder one sole kinde viêªt videlicet in opposition and detestation of moderne heresies First in regard of many Lutherans who beleiue that Christs body only is contained with the bread and his blood only with the wine and not all Christ entirely which is a manifest ignorance for wheresoeuer Christ's body is truly really and substantially from the day of his Resurrection there it is truly * Rom. non amplius moritur Christus aliue being impossible for Christ to die again and since the life of the flesh * Leuit. 17. anima omnis carnis in sanguine is in the blood Leuit. 17. it followeth euidently that wheresoeuer Christs body is there his blood is also and since Christ hath deuested himself of no reall thing that he once assumed and whatsoeuer he assumed was vnited hypostatically to his diuine person it is again plainly euident that wheresoeuer * S. Ambrosius vbi carpus Christi Christus est Christs body blood or soul is there is all Christ entire without separation of one part from another and albeit the words that consecrate Christs body according to their proper
signification doe constitute the body only vnder the forms of bread and the words which consecrate Christ's blood according to their proper signification doe put the blood only vnder the form's of wine neuerth eless in vertue of naturall concomitancy that is to say of the naturall connection which is between all the naturall part 's of Christ now inuested with immortality it is manifest by necessary consequence that wheresoeuer Christ's body and blood is there is all Christ vndeuided and so it is alike in the mystery of the blessed Trinity that includes three Persons really distinct though the word Father according to it's proper signification be appropriated to the first Person only notwithstanding whersoeuer the first diuine Person is who only layeth claim to the name Father taken in the proper sense there also is the second Person the son and the third Person the holy Ghost in vertue of the naturall connection that one Person has with an other Hence it is plainly euident that the Euchariste distributed vnder one kinde only ought not to be counted a lame Sacrament since one sole species contain's as much of Christ as both together to wit all Christ entirely Neither is a greater measure of grace conferred Ex opere operato that is by the Sacraments working precisely when it is taken in one sole or in both kind's the spirituall effect thereof which is supernaturall grace vnto refreshing and feeding of the soul being equally diuided to all such as receiue the Sacrament with the same worthines whether vnder one only or both kind's and all such are * 1. Cor. 10. multi vnum corpus sumus qui de vno pane participamus one bread and one body in as much as all are partakers of one bread 1. Cor. 10. which is an other effect of the Sacrament Also he that shall eate of this bread worthily which is conuerted into the body of Christ shall liue for euer 10. 6. And as * 2. Cor. 8. qui multum non abundauit qui modicum noÌ„ minorauit Et Exod. 16. filij Israel colligerunt Manna alius plus alius minus nec qui plus collegerat habuit amplius nec qui minus parauerat r. perit minus an Israëlite that gathered much Manna had nothing ouer and an Israëlite that gathered little had not the less so a Christian that receiueth the Sacrament vnder both kind's hath no more of Christ or of sacramentall grace then he that receiueth vnder one kinde only if there * Gratia sucramentalis confertur iuxta dispositiones supernaturales eorune qui recipiunt Sacramenta be parity as to the disposition of the receiuers notwithstanding all these premises it cannot be said in proper speech that he that eateth Christ's body doth drinke his blood or that he that drinketh Christ blood vnder the forme of wine doth cate his blood albeit that whosoeuer receiueth his body receiueth his blood withall and whosoeuer receiueth his blood receiueth his body withall for the reason of difference in order to the proper form of speech doth not proceed from the absence of the one and the sole presence of the other but from a different manner exercised in the conueyance of the consecrated elements * Innocentius III. ait quod quamuis dum bibitur sanguis Christi simul accipiatur eius corpus quod tamen tune non dicitur propriè â—â—aÌ„ducari vnder both of which be contained as well the body as the blood of Christ from the mouth into the stomach no man eating and thinking alike Secondly lay-communion vnder one kinde only is continued because of other modern sectaries that lay claim to a diuine precept to proue a necessary vsage of both kinds which is a manifest weakness for * Jems 6. hic est panis de coâ—le descendens sâ— quit 〈◊〉 ipso manducauevit non morictur Et v. 52. 〈…〉 si quit manducâ—â—erit c hoc pane viuet in aterâ—â—â— Rursiam qui maÌ„ducâ—t â—â—am 〈◊〉 viâ—â—t in aeternum many scripture-testion onies doe declare communion in one kinde to be enough for one obtaining eternall life and not any one doth exprosse an obsolute command to oblige the Church vnto lay-communion vnder both kinds For of all the three Euangelist's which set down the Institution of the Eucharist only S. Luk cap. as mentioneth an absolute precept given by Christ viêªt videlicet Doe this in 〈◊〉 of me but from this scripture no man ought to argue an obligation euen for consecration in both kinds and consequently much less for lay-communion vnder both kinds because the precept doth immediatly follow the consecration of the bread asone and was enjoyned afore Christ did institute the chalice and though Christ Mat. 6. after he had consecrated the chalice said drink yee all of it yet that was a precept giuen to the Apostles only which were present for S. Mark chap. 14. says And they All drank of it that is all the Apostles then sitting at the last supper Furthermore Christ by giuing the afore said precept Doe this in remember ance of mee wherby is commanded the execution of all the actions ioynt and separate that Christ then did cannot be meant vniuersally in order to all the faithfull ioynt and separate the said actions being inconsistent with meer lay-people who are not invested with power to offer proper sacrifice consecrate Christs body and ordaine Priests for the distributing the Euchariste to others which were the actions that Christ exercised and proper only to the Episcopall and Priestly function * Trident. sess 22. cap. 1. can 1. ait per verba hoc facite Christum ordinasse Apostolos Sacerdâ—tes that Christ instituted at his last supper Amongst the Apostles S. Paul 1. Cor. 11. only relateth the Institution of this Sacrament and according to his Testimonie the absolute precept Doe this in remember ance of me is giuen also before Christ consecrated the chalice and albeit that S. Paul mentioneth a conditionall precept that felloweth the institution of the said chalice to wit This doe as oft as ye drinke it in remember ance of me neuertheless as no man ought to argue according to the rules of true Logick from a condititionall proposition an vniuersall absolute so no man ought to infer from a conditionall an absolute precept vniuersally obliging the whole Church ioynt and separate and consequently there cannot be produced out of the three Euangelists and S. Paul which set down the words Christ vsed in the institution of this SacrameÌ„t any warraÌ„table ground to proue a diuine precept obliging all belieuers vniuersally to coÌ„municate vnder both kind's and although S. Iohn the EuaÌ„gelist chap. 6. doth shew an express warrant from Christ coÌ„manding as it were communion vnder both kinds in order to the whole Church joynt and separate The warrant runs thus Except ye eate the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood ye haue no life in you howeuer modern sectaries and Caluinist's especially cannot in
misericordia eius nos in omnibus praeuenit cōsentire verò vel dissentire propriè voluntatis est to consent or not consent vnto it for God forceth no man vnto his freindship As to the second kind or way of gouerment Christ the son of the Virgin Mary was * Aug. 95. haer filius hominis venit magnus medicus quia magnus iacebit aeger ipse medicus factus est medicamentum phraenetici a great mercifull phisician vndertaking the Cure of a great infirm patient which was all mankind afflicted with sundry mortall infirmityes in healing wherof he applied no other remedy then himselfe he was made both the phisician and the phisick to shew his mercifull greatnes (d) Christ In the pursuance of the generall redemption performed all the seuen works of mercy and in the Cure of each infirmity he perform'd a work of mercy Man was halfe dead with hunger himselfe gaue him Heauenly (e) Jo. 6. Christ is named bread of life bread his own body vnto euerlasting life Man was halfe dead with thirst himselfe ministred drink made of his own blood that he might be no more a thirst Man was a very Idiot as to the knowledg of his Creatours glory and his own happines himselfe taught him (f) t' was foretold Ierem. 31 that the law of grace should be giuen in the inward parts and writ in the hearts of the faithfull and writ his holy ordinances in his heart Man in a journy between Ierusalem and Ierico met with thieues that robbed him of his garments wounded and left him for halfe dead himselfe was the charitable Samaritan that took compassion of him (g) Lut. 10. he went to him and bound vp his wounds and powred oyle and wine bound vp his wounds powred in oile and wine of seuerall graces and made full prouision for him Man was detained in prison for a debt that was not in his reach to discharge himselfe visited him wiped out and cancelled (h) Coloss 2. Christ is said to haue cancelled the handwriting of the decree that was against us the handwriting of the decree that was against him and fastened it vpon his Crosse wherin he dying spoiled the principalities and powers of death and hell triumphing ouer them which had brought all the fore mentioned infirmities vpon mankind CHAR. VIIJ. OF THE CROSS OF CHRIST THE CONTENTS Of the Cross of Christ came all our happines honour and worship due to the Cross the custome of ancient and modern Christians to make the sign of the Cross in their foreheads the ground manner and meaning thereof THe Cross of Christ is the Altar of generall redemption that is the Tree that was erected in Mount Calvary wherin Christ the second Adam by a supream sacrifice of his pretious body and blood redeemed the generall loss that the first Adam made in the tree planted in the terrestiall Paradise diuine providence fore ordaining so that the deuil * Canit Ecclesia inpraefatione de Dominica passione vt qui in ligno vincebat in ligno quoque vinceretur S. Ignatius mar Epis ad philad Crucis signum inquit est trophaeū contra virtutem principis mundi quod videns expauoscit audiens timet who in wood ouercame should in wood be ouercome And as a stagg worsted in single fight by another of his fellows euer after stands in awe of the Conquerour waues his walk or if by accident or necessity he passeth by him bowes his lofty head in recognisance of his inferiority and the others superiority (a) S. Damascene calleth the Cross of Christ a sign or token of his victory ouer the deuil and erected to the intent the conquered enemy may not dare to come near the place wherin it is exposed and S. Chrisostome expresly affirmes that deuils cannot abide near such as make the sign of the Cross on their forcheads Again Origen Hom. 8. in locis diuerfis calleth the Cross of the son of God our victory at the sight wherof deuils tremble Nothing affraid saith he of golden Capitolls they stand in fear of the Cross so the deuill standes in fear of the Cross that subdued him runneth from it and though he make light of guilded pallaces and contemne the Scepters of kings neuertheless he is afraid of the weapon that wounded him and trembles as often as he sees the sword that depriued him (b) Io. 12. Christ said the Prince of this vvorld the deuil shall be cast out and vvhen I shall be exalted from the earth that is put vpon the Cross I vvill dravv all men vnto me Wherefore S. Ignatius the Martyr calleth the Cross a trophy or sign that is set vp against the power of the Prince of this world who while he see it is afraid and while he heares the naming of it trembles of his principallity and power This is one reason of the generall practice vsed by Catholick Christians in making the * S. Chryfost si vultui tuo signum sanctae Crucis affixeris nullum daemonium propè stare poterst sign of the Cross on their forheades on their meat and drink (c) S. Hieron Epis ad Eustoch exhorteth this holy virgin to make the sign of the Cross with her hand in the doing of euery worke and in all their conuersations and exercises at their going out and coming into their houses at their going to bed and rising and this pious and religious vse hath descended from Father to son euer from the beginning of Christianity Tradition left it saith Tertullian custome confirmed it and faith practized it Another reason is because the Cross is a liuely representation of the Generall redemption vnto conseruing the memory of Christs passion who did chuse saith S. Austin in exposit Euang. S. Ioan. trac 43. That kind of death to hang on the Crosse and to fasten the same Crosse in the foreheades of the faithfull that a Christian may say God forbid that I should glory saue in the Crosse of our lord IESUS Christ Besides Christians by imprinting the sign of the Cross in their foreheades and saying in the name of the Father and of the son and of the holy Ghost doe confess and profess together with the mystery of generall redemption the mystery of the holy Trinity for they mention expresly the three diuine persons and in as much as they say In the name of the Father c. and not in the names vsing the singular number only they signifie implicitly the individuall or singular vnity of the individuall or singular diuine nature equally participated by each person Also they plainly and orderly express the marueilous order that the diuine persons had from all eternity for example they name the Father in the first place the son in the second the holy ghost in the last And in regard the diuine Father is a beginning without a beginning and as it were the head of the other two diuine persons in making the sign of
Eucharist sacrifice of the Mass sacrifice of the Altar The name Eucharist comes of the Greek Eucharistia that signifies thanksgiuing for Christ in celebrating his vnbloody oblation the night before his death gaue thanks to his diuine Father both in generall for all the benefits conferred vpon all mankind as in particular also for that one singular grace wherby he was impowred as man to iustitute so diuine a mistery So that vndoubtedly by a speciall prouidence the name Eucharist is appropriated to the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood to the end that euen the name therof might excite Priests whos office and function it is to ofter that sacrifice to imitate the thanksgiuing that Christ exhibited in the enterprise of this mistery The name Mass comes of Missa which is latine doubtless for if it had been an Hebrew word the vse therof would haue remained and continued among the greek Fathers as well as of Alleluya Osanna Amen which be Hebrew words But none of the Greek Fathers vse this term Missa and consequently it is a denomination which the people of the latine Church haue imposed to express the sacrifice of Christ his body and blood and signifies the same thing that dimissio in latine that is to say dismissing or sending away for in the primitiue Church it was an ordinary ceremony practised by the Deacon to cry aloud twice in the Church during the time of celebrating diuine seruice Ite Missa est once in the begining of the mistery or sacrifice wherin the Catecumens were not suffered to be present being Belieuers vnbaptised signifying therby that all such should depart out of the Church and once again in the end of the said mistery or sacrifice intimating therby the dimissing or sending away of the faithfull baptised This signification of the name Missa in English Mass and this originall grownd therof is approued by the vniform judgment of the maior part of orthodox writers Howeuer the appropriation of the said name as to signifying the seruice of the mistery or sacrifice of Christs body and blood is deriuable euen from the primitiue successors of the Apostles who (m) S. Clement that succeeded S. Peter in the supream gouernment of the Church composed a Missale and in his writingmentioneth the word Missa Mass And S. Denys did not onely write of the Ecclesiasticall Hierarchy but of the Mass also And whereas sectaries do not ascribe that work vnto him it is without warrantable ground howeuer whosoeuer was the Author thereof t' is certain that the Church of God hath approu'd it for the first Council of Nice stileth the Author Magnum which Title he had giuen vnto him afore and S. John Damascene calleth him Magnum Theologum à great diuine but all antiquity make mention of the Mass For example Alexander that was the fourth Pope after S. Peter Epis 1. ad orthodox And Sixtus that succeeded him according to S. Damascene in the life of the same Alexander S. Telesphorus seth forth an ordinance that commanded Priests to say 3. Masses in the feast of Christs Natiuity S. Soter prohibited all Priests to eate or drinke before they said their Masses S. Steuen the Pope vnder the persecution of Valerian the Emperour was kill'd at Mass S. Felix Ep. 2. ad Episcopos Galliae mentioneth saying of Masses vpon the Tombs of Martyrs S. Hierom. in cap. 11. Prouerb affirmes that the soules of the faithfull departed receiue comfort and helpe by the celebration of Mass and S. Austin Epis 49. tom 2. ad Deo gratias c. 3. teacheth that the sacrifice which Christians now offer is euidenced both by Euangelicall and propheticall Scripture besides this Catholick assertion is taught in sundry Councils namely in the Nicen. cap. 14. Carth. 2. can 4. So that it is a manifest weakness in sectaries to deny a doctrine that all antiquity by vnanimous consent plainly assert vse the name Missa and the signification therof namely S. Dionys S. Clement S. Euarist S. Alexander S. Sixtus S. Telesphorus S. Higinus S. Soter S. Fabianus S. Stephanus S. Felix S. Syluester S. Damascenus With whom were contemporary the great lights of the Church S. Basil S. Gregory Nazianzenus S. Ambro. S. Chrysost S. Hieron S. Epiphan S. Cyrill S. August wher vnto may be added sundry generall Councills wherof the vnquestionable testimonies and records are enough to euidence the truth of this primatiue doctrine so that with great reason it may be much wondered at how the People of England came to looke with so envious an eye vpon the Mass as to count it Idolatry since the practice therof is agreeing with the full and euident Testimonies of all the primitiue Fathers And as to the Realm of England euen from the first plantation of Christianity setled therein Mass constantly continued the sole publick worship or seruice that was resorted vnto till the ciuill power of Parliament in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth put it down vpon what design of auarice liberty and ambition is needless to express But in the room of the Mass was substituted a new outward seruice named the book of Common prayer and sett forth in the vulgar tongue wheras since the first age for 1500. Years not one example can be produced of any Christian kingdom which had not for the common publick seruice of Religion the Mass and that celebrated in Hebrew Greek or Latin neither were the holy Euangels wrirten in other language then Hebrew Greek and Latine which are the three holy tongues The Hebrew was sanctified from the beginning of the world God euen then conferring with Adam in the Hebrew tongue and teaching him the names of each liuing creature Gen. 2. Besides all three were sanctified in the death and Passion of Christ the son of God the inscription ouer his Cross Iesus of Nazareth king of the Iews being written in Hebrew Greek and Latine letters and prophesied * Septuaginta super psal 56.57.58 ne disperdas Dauid in tituli inscriptionē of long afore This doctrine does not preiudice what S. Paul writeth 1. Cor. 14 saying That he that speaketh a strange language edifieth himselfe but he that prophesieth edifieth the Church of God I would that you all speake with tongues but rather that you prophesied For it is conuincingly euident that the Apostle neither by these or any other words of that chapter commandeth the vse of the vulgar tongue in the Church seruice For so there had been no need of prophesying that is of interpreting vnto edification exhortation or instruction which the Apostle expresly enjoyneth saying That if any man speak a strange tongue let it be by two or at the most by three and that by course and let one interpret Besid's it is plain that S. Paul there treateth of the miraculous guifts or strange tongues infused both into men and women in the first begining of the Church and not intelligible without the miraculous guift of interpretation also and consequently he cannot mean the
deuotion wheras the feruour and humility in the vnlearned doe compence euen the want of an exact and distinct vnderstanding howeuer it is very expedient that euery belieuer say our lords prayer in the tongue he knowes for it is not enough to vnderstand confusedly that the petitions therin contained are good and profitable but likewise to know them distinctly Wherfore sundry constitutions set forth by Synods of Bishops require vnderstanding of words and sense as to our lords prayer CHAR. III. OF MELCHISEDECH THE CONTENTS Melchisedech a type of Christ by diuine dispensation invested in holy Priesthood offered a proper sacrifice of thanksgiuing in bread and wine Melchisedech's sacrifice figured the sacrifice Christ offered of his body and blood vnder the elements of bread and wine Christs vnbloody sacrifice sulfilled the figuratiue of Melchisedech Those which deny that Christ appointed Priests as his Vicars to offer in his room daily sacrifice of his body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine of necessity destroy his euerlasting Priesthood according to the order of Melchisedech the practice of Priestly blessing MElchisedech was king of * Fuit salem vrbs terrae Chananaeae vt constat ex historia Genesis quae fuit filijs Israel à Deo promissa iam dicta Iudaea Palestina seu terra sanctae salem that it by interpretation of iustice and Peace (a) According to holy scriptures Melchisedech was a Priest priesthood taken in the proper sense for he is called the Priest of God most high Gen. 1. and Hebrae 7. and this catholick assertion the ancient Fathers haue vnanimously taught as likewise Philo Iudae l. de Abraham a Priest of God most high counted without Father and mother without kindred without beginning of daies or end of life the holy Scriptures no where making mention of his genealogic He met the great Patriarch Abraham as be returned from the slaughter of the kings brought forth bread and wine which he (b) All the ancient Fathers that florish'd in the years 100.200.300.400 namely S. Irenaeus S. Hypolitus S. Chrysostomus S. Ambrose S. Hierom S. Austin c. teach that Melchisedech offered a sacrifice of bread and wine and S. Cyprian Epis 63. ad Caecil saith expresly that Melchisedech Priest of God most high made an offering of bread and wine and in an other place he calleth the sacrifice of Melchisedech the Image of Christs sacrifice offered vnder the forms of bread and wine so that according to S. Cyprian Melchisedech said Mass figuratiuely his sacrifice being a Type or figure of the sacrifice of the Eucharist and doubtless Melchisedech brought forth bread and wine with an intent to offer a sacrifice of thanksgiuing for the great victory Abraham had won and not precisely to refresh the souldiers who needed no meat hauing refresh'd themselues afore Gen 14. Howeuer t' is probable that Melchisedech did distribute amongst the souldiers of Abraham the bread and wine which he had consecrated in representation of the sacrifice Christ offered at his last supper wherin he consecrated bread and wine and after gaue them to his Apostles and indeed Clemens Alexand. l. 4. stroma Calleth the meat Melchisedech distributed sanctifyed nourishment and S. Epipha ser 55. affirmes that Melchisedech gaue to Abraham and his souldiers consecrated bread and wine offered in sacrifice to giue thanks to him whose Priest he was for the obtained victory and afterward blessed him which shews his excellency aboue Abraham who was a Priest also and consequently aboue Leui and all the Priests of the old law that came out of the loyns of Abrahā (c) S. Paul Hebrae 7. saith that without all contradiction the less is blessed of the better signifying therby that Melchisedech was a greater Priest then Abraham whom he blessed moreouer the Scripture Text teacheth that to bless after a sacred manner is proper to Priestly function in consequence of which without all contradiction a Priest is greater in dignity then any temporall Prince that wanteth authority to giue sacred benediction As Melchisedech blessed Abraham so Priests num 6. were commanded to bless the people and Christ Mark 10. blessed young children and his Disciples Luk 24. and after the same manner the Bishops and Priests of the catholick Church bless lay-people and other creatures namely Agnus Dei bead's Crosses medal's candles Ashes Palmes Belles new shippes c. all which creatures are sanctifyed by the word of God and prayer for so the Church blesseth all such things by express invocation of God alwaise vsing this preface Adiutorium nostrum in nomine Domini Our helpe is in the name of our lord and so beseecheth God to bless consecrate and sanctifie his creatures in vertue of his passion and death suffered on the Cross that so they may be deliuered from the power of Satan and become beneficiall to men and the Church concludes all benedictions Per Christum Dominum nostrum For it is the prerogatiue of the greatest Priest to blesse the lesser besid's Abraham gaue him tithe which doth euidence the others exceeding dignity yet in these excellencies Melchisedech was a type only of Christ in whom the reall verity was contained Melchisedech as king of iustice and peace by interpretation was but a shadow of Christ who was and is actually and indeed king and Authour of both for he came into the world * Zachar. 9. Ecce Rex tuus venit iustus Saluator a just and peaceable king that * 1. Cor. 1. qui factus est nobis iustitia sanctificatio redemptio justified and reconciled man to God and his Angells Melchisedech as Priest of God that offered a sacrifice of bread and wine was a figure of Christ the son of God who being anointed Priest by the holy ghost offered (d) S. Austin in psal 33. saith that Christ instituted a sacrifice of his body and blood according to the Order of Melchisedech that is vnder the forms of bread and wine And l. 6. de ciuit c. 22. speaking of Melchisedech's sacrifice therin saith he first appeared the sacrifice which Christians offer to God and therby is fulfilled the propheticall saying Thou art a Priest according to the Order of Melchisedech a sacrifice of his own body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine at his last supper Melchisedech as Priest without beginning of daies or end of life signifieth the continuance of Christ his Priesthood for euer in as much as Priests instituted by and substituted vnder Christ as his proper Vicars shall continually offer to the end of the world the vnbloody sacrifice that Christ himselfe celebrated in his last supper neither can any man in reason deny but that Christ euen then offered an vnbloody sacrifice for that were to auerre that Christ did not fullfill the figuratiue sacrifice of Melchisedech and consequently that he was no Priest according to his order or similitude since it cannot be proued that Christ at any other time did offer a
proper to things spirituall Christ meant the orall eating of his flesh and orall drinking of his blood saying The words that I speak vnto you that is those things my flesh and blood are * Trid. sess 13. ait Christum instituisse SacrameÌ„tum Eucharistiae taÌ„quam spiritualem animaruÌ„ cibum spirit and life and that is to say are spiritually cloathed after the imitation of spirituall substances exempted from the carnall proprieties which naturally adhere to flesh and blood in this mortall life but are no essentiall requisits there vnto whereby it is plain that the eating of Christs body and drinking of his blood in the Sacrament of the Eucharist may be said spirituall in reference to the spirituall being they haue therein Besides Christs body and blood be indeed spirituall supersubstantiall meate and drink wherby the substance of humane souls is supported and nourished spiritually As corporall meate doth repaire materiall breaches which naturall heate mak's in a materiall body so this spirituall meate doth repaire the spirituall ruines that the fire of concupiscence doth cause in a spirituall soul Also the eating of Christs body and drinking of his blood may bee termed spirituall through faith for as much as a Christian that eateth and drinketh worthily is vnited to Christ by faith which is aspirituall quality Again the eating of Christs body and the drinking of his blood may be styled spirituall because of Christs death and passion figured therein and this Sacrament imports * QuotiescuÌ„quo ait Apostolus manducabitis panem hunc calicem bibetis mortem Domini annunciahitis donec veniat a commemoration thereof so that a Christian receiuing worthily doth communicate with Christs passion suffered on the cross and this manner of spirituall locution is vsed sometimes by ancient Fathers who neuertheless expresly affirm Christ to bee truly (e) The second Council of Nice Act. 6. declares euidently that the Sacrament of the Eucharist ought not to be called the Image of Christs body because he did not say take eate the Image of my body also declares that in the Sacrament is the true body of Christ because he said This is my body really and substantially in the Sacrament of the Eucharist neither is the literall sense of words inconsistent with the spirituall signification of thinges which they express taken in the literall sense For example though Isaac and Ismael doe literally signify the two sons of Abraham as the history of Genesis plainly sheweth neuertheless the Apostle Gal. 4. by Ismael that was born of Agar a seruant spiritually and figuratiuely vnderstands the old Testament that was a law of bondage and likewise by Isaac that was born of Sara a free woman spiritually and figuratiuely vnderstandeth the new Testament which is a law of liberty and grace and indeed all Sacraments whatsoeuer besides * Aug. l. 2. con aduers legis c. 9. ait Christi locutionem nisâ— manducaueritis c. codem modo esse figuratam ac duo filij Abraha fuâ—â—unt duo Test amenta Jsaac Ismael secuÌ„dum literam vere de facto fuerunt filij Abraha figurabant tamen duo Testamenta Idem Aug. l. 3. de doct Christ c. 16. ait illam Christi locutionem nisi manducaueritis c. figuratam esse quatenus praecipit communicandum passioni Christi vtiâ—â—ter recondendum in memoria quod pro nobis caro Christi crucifixa sit Non negat tamen dictam locutionem in sensu literali etïam intelligi de reali oralâ— manducatione corporit Christi bibition◠〈◊〉 sanguinis sub spocicbus consecratis panis vins their literall doe admit a spirituall or figuratiue construction being defined visible figures or signes of spirituall invisible grace The Sacrament of Circumcision according to the literall meaning thereof did signify corporall circumcision as to the foreskin of the flesh called prepuce and according to it 's spirituall and figuratiue signification did import spirituall circumcision as to the foreskin of the heart which is of spirituall vices as also did shadow grace giuen in the new law In like manner the words vttered in baptism I baptise thee taken in the literall sense which is expressed immediatly by the said words doe signify reall washing of naturall water as to the body and taken in the spirituall sense they signify spirituall washing of grace * Aug. vnde tanta vis aquae vt corpus tangat cor vero abluat as to the soul Furthermore the words whereby Christ instituted the Sacrament of the Eucharist in full performance of the promise afore mentioned Io. 6. giue cleare euidence of Christs meaning in recognition of a reall eating of his body and reall drinking of his blood The words of institution according to the consenting Testimonies of all ancient and modern writers are these This is my body which is giuen for you Luc. 22. This is my body which shall be deliuered for you This Chalice is the new Testament in my blood 1. Cor. 11. This is the blood of the new Testament which shall be shed for you Mar. 14. This is my blood of thenew Testament that shall be shed for many vnto remission of sins Mat. 26. Which words of Christ being as plainly and clearly vttered as to the litterall sense as those of God the Father in the Transfiguration of Christ to wit This is my son Mat. 30. and consequently there beeing no more reason to wrest the former then the latter words to a figuratiue signification it is a manifest blindnes in the Caluinists and other ancienter sectaries to wrest the proper cleare words and to substitute in their room improper obscure tropes and figures without any ground of reason for what can be more vnreasonable then to think that Christ saying This is my body which shall bee deliuered for you 1. Cor. 11. This is my blood which shall bee shed for many vnto remission of sins Mat. 26. meant a figure (f) Both canon and ciuil lawers treating of Testaments legasies and contracts teach that we must not recede from the words of the Testament nor from the rigour thereof and that we ought to presume of the Testatours intent and meaning according to the signification of the words taken in their proper sense of his body only and a figure of his blood only since a figure was not deliuered in a Sacrifice but Christ's true reall substantiall body nor a figure was shed vnto remission of sins but Christs true reall and substantiall blood Besides a thing that is mysterious vnheard of afore and instituted for an article of faith as is the Sacrament of the Eucharist of necessity ought to bee propounded (g) According to S. Chrysostome Hom. 83. in Mat. because Christ said This is my body we must not doubt of but belieue it to be so And S. Austin Tom. 8. in psal 33. saith expresly that when Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Eucharist he did that which no other could do for Christ saith
impossible outward extension in order to place being an accidentall propriety only of a body cloathed with quantity as naturall Philosophy teacheth and consequently the want thereof destroieth not the nature or essence of a body as naturall Philosophy teacheth also Besides though the light of the sun be a corporeall quality neuertheless it is well nigh in infinite places at once likewise the words of a preacher are corporall things which in the same moment of time possesse the eares of all such as are attentiue to his sermon and one man walking in a Chamber where be placed sundry looking-glasses his Image appeareth in each of them at the same time in consequence of which doubtless God in the virtue of his word can put supernaturally one singular Man in many places since his figure which is some thing doth naturally occupate many looking-glasses at once Out of the premises plainly followeth that the Sacrament of the Eucharist hath a singular prerogatiue beyond all the other Sacraments of the new law in as much as it is not an effectuall instrument only to confer diuine grace which is a soueraign Antidote against the poyson of sin but it containes and giues also the Author of grace wherfore it comprehends within it self both the sweetness of inherent sanctity and the giuer therof which is all sweet being the fountaine of sweetness and sweetnes it self whereunto the faire spowse in the Canticles inuiteth saying Tast yee and see how sweet our lord is Howeuer as Manna which was a figure of this Sacrament as to Christs body did seem bitter and loathsome to the ill minded and pleasant only to the good Israelites In like manner Christs body to Christians that receiue it vnworthily is the bitterness of death vnto death and to others that eat it aright the sweetness of life vnto life so fier that purgeth gold consumes wood soe the suns light that recreat's the sound offend's the vnsound eyes so the sweet sauour of an oyntâ—â—ent that refreshes doues kill 's beetles Christians by eating Christs naturall body worthily are not vnited to him only * Eph. 5. quia membra sumus de corpore eius de car ne â—â—us de ossibus cius through faith and charity mystically but really and are flesh of his flesh and bones of his bones Eph. 5. To eate worthily vnto a naturall vnion with Christ a christian ought * 1. Cor. probet autem seipsum homo sic de pane illo edat vnde dc Sacramento corporis sanguinis Christi canit Ecclesia mors est malis vita bonis to examine himselfe afore and purge out the leauen of vice Christ hath * Nulla conventio Christi ad diabolum nulla conventio charitatis ad peccatum mortale no concord with sin nor consequently vnion with a soul that sin hath dominion ouer Christs body will not be * Luc. 23. in sindone muÌ„da in sepulchro in quo nondum quisquaÌ„ positus sit wrapped but in a pure linnen cloath that is to say in a clean heart nor will be laid in a Tombe that is not hewen out of a rock wherin neuer any laid afore As there is no agreement betwixt Christ and Belial no communion betwixt sanctity and iniquity no society betwixt light and darkness so there is noe vnion betwixt Christs body and a Christian that serue's Belial delight 's in iniquity and walkes in darkness wherfore let no Christian thinke to tye a knot of vnion with Christ if he shall put his body where allready is * L. 6. super cap. 9. Lucae ait nemo accipit cibum Christi nisâ— fuerit ante sanatus Et Aug. trac 26. in Joan. sic praecipit Innocentiam ad altare portate established Belial that is to say the deuill through mortall sin and truly Christians that * 1. Cor. 11. qui manducat bibit indignè reuâ— erit sanguinis corporis Domini vnworthily receaue the body of Christ as much as lyeth in them doe betray him to the deuill putting him in a place the deuill command's in and consequently become guilty of Christ's body and blood in as high a measure (k) According to S. Chrysostom hom de non contemnenda Ecclesia hom 8 ad popul Antioch those which receiue the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ vnworthily doe an iniury to Christs proper person like the Iewes and Gentils that crucified him as Iudas that betrayed him to the Iewes As the children of Israel were forâ—idden Exod. 12. to cate the paschall lambe which was a figure of Christs Sacramentall body too * Exod. 12. non comedetis ex eo crudum quid nec coctum sed tantum assum igne raw or boiled butrosted only so Christians be prohibited to eat Christs body raw that is before the fire of charity hath prepared them for it or boiled namely in luxury and voluptuousness but rosted only viz. at the fire of a contrite heart inflamed with the memory of Christ * Ecce agnus Dei inquit Apostolus qui tollit peccata muÌ„di the lambe of God that was rosted in the hot furnace of affliction for the taking away the sins of the world CHAR. IX OF COMMVNION IN BOTH KIND'S THE CONTENTS Christ instituted the holy Euchariste vnder the elements of both bread and wine Christ by his institution did not oblige the Church to dispense the Euchariste vnder both kinds Christ left it in the Churches power to giue the Euchariste to lay-people vnder one or both kinds accordingly as she should think fit in order to tymes places and persons those which receiue the Euchariste vnder one sole kind haue nothing less nor such as receiue vnder both kinds haue nothing more of Christ nor of the Sacramentall grace if there be parity in the receiuers as to worthiness obiections answered Communion in both kinds is the receiuing of Christs reall body and blood vnder the two Sacramentall shapes or element's of bread and wine afrer Christ's own institution Mat. 26. Mar. 14. Luc. 22. Howeuer from thence it followeth not that communion vnder both kindes is necessary to the whole Church ioynt and separate vnto saluation for matrimony and the orders of Bishops and Priests doe challenge diuine institution neuertheless none of them be necessary to each member of Gods Church A Priest celebrating as he ought to consecrate the body and blood of Christ vnder distinct elements through distinct form's of words for as much as he then representes Christ's person supplyeth his room and offereth an vnbloody sacrifice on the Altar that is an express remembrance of Christ's bloody sacrifice offered on the cross wherein his blood was seperated from his body in consummation of the generall redemption so he ought likewise to communicate in the distinct consecrated elements but communion in order to lay-people which are no Priest's Christ hath left free (a) According to S. Austin Epis 108. Christ left power vnto
of other Saint's and no man hath euer thought fitting * Augus l. 10. de ciuit cap. 4. quis inquit sacrificandum ceÌ„suit nisi ei queÌ„ Deum sciuit vel putauit Et cap. 19. docet daemones ideo velle sibi offerri sacrificia vt sic pro Dijs habeantur Vnde Exod. 22. qui unmolat Dijs occidetur praeterquam Domino soli to sacrifice to any whom he ha h not known beleiued or feigned to bee a God 7. No other object interuening for God alone is the immediate object of proper sacrifice for as much as he containeth in himselfe alone the sole motiue thereof Wherby it plainly followeth that the oblation of tithe that is giuen immediately to the Ministers of God is not a proper sacrifice though it be exhibited for God's sake 8. Vnto destruction in recognition of God's supream excellency and power ouer his creatures this necessary requisite experience sheweth in all the sacrifices of the old law wherin the sensible thing offered was either killed if quick and aliue vêªt videlicet Ox lamb calf or broken or burnt if liueless (h) According to Leuiticus dry-offerings were either broken or burnt and liquid offerings were destroyed by pouring them out whereby appears that an vnbloody manner of effusion nothing derogats to the true nature or essence of a sacrifice hard and drie or consumed by effusion if liquid namely wine in testimony of God's omnipotency therby manifesting him to be Author of life and death and consequently to haue power to conserue his creatures as the thing before oblation was conserued and to destroy his creatures as the thing destroyed after oblation CHAR. II. OF THE SACRIFICE OF THE EVCHARIST OR MASS THE CONTENTS The sacrifices of the old law weak vnprofitable Element's Christ the night before his passion instituted and offered in the room of them all a sacrifice of his body and blood vnder the form's of bread and wine according to the Order of Melchisedech called sacrifice of the Eucharist sacrifice of the Altar sacrifice of Mass which is a perfect commemoration of the bloody sacrifice Christ offered on the Cross a propitiation whereby grace is obtain'd and sins remitted and the public seruice of euery true christian Church down from the Apostles till these tymes celebrated in one of the three holy tongues which be Hebrew Greek and Latin The Apostle 1. Cor. 14. forbiddeth not saying of publick or priuate prayers in an vnknown tongue THe sacrifice of the Eucharist is the speciall and proper externall sacrifice of the new law instituted and offered by Christ in his own body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine * Hebrae 7. secundum similitudinem Mâ—lchisedech sic Apostolus interpretatur secundum ordinem Melchisedech after the similitude of Melchisedech his Sacrifice of whose order Christ was annointed high Priest for euer The law of Moyses and sacrifices thereof as they had institution and confirmation of God in respect of Christ only so they were to continue only till * Luc. 10. lâ—x Propheta vsque ad JoaÌ„nem Christ came that was the * Hebrae 6. lex vetus lata fuit duraxat donec veniret semeÌ„ promissum seed to which the promise was made of a new law and a new sacrifice vnto blessedness which the law of Moyses and the sacrifices therof could not effect The law written in Tables could not make the * Aug. lex in tabulis exarata non potuit efficere eam inscriptionem quae est iustificatio inscription which is iustification of life It * Chrysos lâ—x erat tantum iubens nihil afferebat auxilij shewed but could not heale the soar of mans soule And though the old sacrifices conferred * Hebrae 9. exterior legalis mundities appellatur iustitia caâ—nis emundatio carnis legall purity on the body neuertheless they could not giue spirituall sanctity to the soul vnto saluation Besides the commandement that went afore that is to say the old law was peculiar to one people only namely the Iew 's and the sacrifices therof were but (a) According to the Apostle Hebrae 10. the old law had the shadow of good things onely and not the very Image of the things Wherby appear's that the sacrifices and Sacraments of Moyses were vnperfect resemblances and dark representations of the good things procured by the sacrifice and Sacraments of the new law namely generall redemption and sanctifying grace wherfore S. Iohn cap. 1. saith that the Lavv vvas giuen by Moyses but grace and truth came by Jesus-Christ in consequence of which the new law is called the law of Christ the law of grace Christ being the law-maker and the Grace-giuer holy figures of a better oblation and those polluted through the sins of the Priests that offered them in so much that God had no affection for either of both because * Hebrae 1. Reprobatio quidem fit praecedentis maÌ„dati propter infirmitatem eius imbecillitateÌ„ promde Christus ait Io. 13. mandatum nouum do vobis of the weakness and vnprofitablenes of the sacrifices and the vncleaness and wickednes of the Priests wherfore he sent his own son to giue a new commandement that is the new law of sanctifying grace to the sauing both Iew and Gentile and to institute a new sacrifice of a cleane oblation to the exalting his name euen among the Gentiles that being to be celebrated (b) Malach. 10. From the rising of the sun euen to the going dovvn â—â—n euery place shall be sacrificing and a clean oblation shall be offered to my name In the room of sacrificing beasts and other creatures which were not able to purge out the leauen of sin and likewise often times were polluted through the vncleanes of the Priests that offered them God by the mouth of his Prophet promised a daily cleane and vndefilable sacrifice that should continue in all places of his Church for euer vnto celebrating his name And this is the sacrifice Christ instituted of his own body and blood vnder the forms of bread and wine according to the interpretation of the ancient Fathers S. Iustin the Martyr in dial cum Triphone S. Cyprian l. 1. c. 14. aduersus Iudaeos S. Damas l. 4. c. 14. de fide orthodoxa S. Austin l. 18. c. 35. de Ciuit. S. Chrysostome in psal 95 ora 2. con Iudaeos and all modern writers that are orthodox wherfore the Prophesy is fulfilled by the sacrifice of the Altar which is daily offered in the Catholick Church from the rising of the sun to the going down in euery place of the world from the rising of the sun to the going down therof according to the Prophecy of Malachias signifying that God was determined to abolish the said weak and polluted sacrifices and substitute in lieu thereof an effectuall and most pure oblation which is that Christ the son of God and man instituted of his body and blood