Selected quad for the lemma: blood_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
blood_n	bread_n	communion_n	wine_n	5,311	4	7.9264	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A96805	The abridgment of Christian divinitie so exactly and methodically compiled, that it leads us, as it were, by the hand to the reading of the Holy Scriptures. Ordering of common-places. Vnderstanding of controversies. Cleering of some cases of conscience. By John Wollebius. Doctor of Divinity, and ordinary professor in the University of Basil. Now at last faithfully translated into English, and in some obscure places cleared and enlarged, by Alexander Ross. To which is adjoined, after the alphabetical table, the anatomy of the whole body of divinity, delineated in IX. short tables, for the help of weak memories.; Christianae theologiae compendium. English.	Wolleb, Johannes, 1586-1629.; Vaughan, Robert, engraver.; Ross, Alexander, 1591-1654.	1650 (1650)	Wing W3254; Thomason E1264_1; ESTC R204089	204,921	375

Sacrament of the New-Testament in which Christians that are of age receive spiritually Christs body and blood sealed to them in the reception of Bread and Wine according to Christs institution The RULES I. The Lords Supper is called metonimically the Eucharist or Thanksgiving Sinaxis or a collection the Lords Table the New-Testament and Synecdochically the breaking of Bread II. It hath the same efficient causes that Baptisme hath III. The outward matter thereof or Signes are Bread and Wine IV. The Supper is lame without both Signes and to rob the people of the Cup is Sacriledge Mat. 26.27 Drink yee all of this 1 Cor. 10.16 The Cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the Communion of Christs blood And 11. v. 26. As oft as you shall eat this Bread and drink of this Cup you declare the Lords death V. The inward matter is Christ with all his satisfaction and merit VI. As it is Jewish superstition to use unleavened Bread so the Popish Penny-Wafers are superstitious reliques VII It s outward form consists in Actions and Words VIII The Actions are the breaking of Bread and powring out of Wine the distribution of both Signes and the receiving thereof with the hand and mouth IX The word is the whole Institution containing the Eucharist the command and the promise but the promise chiefly X. Therefore it is impiety to think that the Bread is turned into Christs body only the bare accidents remaining by the low mumbling of these five words For this is my body and that with one breath and the Priests intention XI The internal form consisteth in the Analogie of the signe and the thing signified in which by Bread and Wine are signified Christs body and blood as spiritual meat and drink but by the breaking of Bread and powring out of the Wine are represented the breaking of his body or crucifixion and sheding of his blood and lastly by the distributing and receiving of both the applying of Christs death XII The breaking of Bread is not a thing indifferent For Christ made use of this himselfe and commanded it to be used saying do this which he himselfe explained adding This is my body which is broken for you From this the Supper is so called by this also the Churches union is shewed 1 Cor. 10.17 We being many are made one bread and one body for we are all partakers of one bread XIII The words This is my body can neither be meant of transubstantiation nor of consubstantiation but the meaning is This to wit the Bread is the Sacrament of my body The Papists interpret the words these That which is contained under the kind of Bread is my Body The Lutherans these in with under this is my Body The reason of our interpretation is explained in the former chapter They say that it is absurd to use tropical phrases which are obscure in Christs Will and Legacie Bur 1. This supposition of theirs is false that tropical phrases are obscure for we use tropes oftentimes to illustrate 2. It is false also that tropes are not used in Wils and Testaments for Jacobs Will shews the contrary Gen. 49. And Mose's Deut. 33. David 2 Sam. 23. Tobias 4. Matathias 1 Mac. 2.3 If there be no Trope in the Lords Supper then let them shew how the Cup can be called the New Testament in his blood without a Trope That saying of Austins Advers Adimant cap. 12. is worthy here to be set down The Lord doubted not to say this is my Body when he gave the Signe of his Body XIV It is one thing to say that Christ is present in the Bread and another to maintain his presence in the Supper for Christ is present in his Deitie and Spirit he is present also in his body and blood by a Sacramental presence 1. Of the Symbol not that he is present in the Bread but that he is represented by the bread as by a Symbol 2. Of Faith whereby we apply Christ with his merits to us 3. Of Vertue and efficacie XV. The proper end of the Supper not to speake of others is to seale our spiritual nutrition or preservation to life eternal by the merit of Christs death and obedience whence depends the union of the faithful with Christ and with themselves XVI It is an intolerable abuse to take this Sacrament to prove ones innocency in the courts of justice to confirm mens covenants to prosper our purposes and actions c. XVII The Lords Supper must be often times taken As often as you shal eat this bread c. 1 Cor. 11.26 XVIII The Supper differs from Baptisme not only in external signes but in its proper end because Baptisme is the signe of spiritual Regeration but the Supper of nutrition also in the object or subject to which for Baptisme is given to Infants the Supper to those onely who are of years and have been tryed they differ also in time for Baptisme is used but once the Lords Supper often-times XIX The Popish Masse is altogether repugnant to the Lords Supper 1. The holy Supper is instituted by Christ the Masse by the Pope 2. the Supper is a Sacrament instituted in memory of Christs sacrifice which was once offered but the Masse among Papists is the sacrifice it self to be offered every day the Ancients indeed called the Lords Supper a sacrifice yet not expiatory for sins but Eucharisticall and such as is joyned with prayers and charitable works which are acceptable sacrifices to God 3. Christ did not offer himself in the Supper but on the Crosse but they will have Christ to be offered in their Masse 4. Christ instituted his Supper for the living but the Masse is celebrated for the dead also 5. In the Holy Supper Christs body was already made by the virtue of the Holy Ghost not of bread but of the Virgins blood In the Masse Christs body is made anew by the Priest uttering his five words and that of bread 6. In the holy Supper there was and remained true Bread and true Wine and it obtained this name even after consecration In the Masse if we will believe it there remains onely the outward species of the Element and the accidents 7. In the holy Supper they all drank of the cup as Christ commanded in the Masse the Lay-people are denyed the cup. 8. In the Supper Bread was broken to represent Christ's body broken on the Crosse In the private Masse the bigger Hoast is broken into three parts the first is for the triumphant Church the second for the Church in Purgatory the third for the Church here on earth CHAP. XXV Of the nature of the visible Church HItherto of the outward communion of the Covenant of grace follows the externall society of the visible Church whereby all that be called are accounted for members of the Church Now the Church is considered either in it self or in opposition to the false Church the Church is considered in her self in respect of her own nature and

my Disciples and v. 12. There prepare the Passeover v. 15. I have desired to eat this Passeover with you To the purpose serve all those places in which Expiation is attributed to sacrifices and Purificat●on to water and washings also in which the name Jehovah is given to the Ark or to Jerusalem Psal 47.6 Ezek. 48.35 Like testimonies are in the New-Testament Mat. 26.26 27 28. While they were eating Jesus took bread and when he had blessed brake it and gave it to his disciples saying Take eat this is my body likewise taking the cup and having given thanks he gave to them saying Drink yee all of this for this is the blood of the New Testament c. See the like places in Mark Luke and 1 Cor. 11. so 1 Cor. 10.4 And the rock was Christ Ephes 5.26 That he might sanctifie his Church having purged her with the washing of water Col. 2. v. 12. Being buried with him in Baptisme Hebr. 9.13 For if the blood of buls and of goats and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh Yea the very same is seen in other speeches besides sacramental as Gen. 41.37 The seven cows are seven years that is types and figures of seven years Rev. 17.9 The seven heads are seven hils and v. 12. The ten horns are ten Kings XIX This kinde of speaking is called a Sacramental Metonymie of the thing signified for the signe Now it is not material whether the trope be in the attribute or in the copula or coupling of the words for though the trope may be in the attribute yet the cause or ground of the trope is in the copula The material cause of a simple enunciation consisteth in the subject and attribute but the copula being affirmed or denyed makes up the formal part by which it becomes true or false proper or figurative for as often as things of different natures are affirmed or joyned by the copula that speech is false or tropical the seal therefore of the trope is in the predicat but the cause thereof in the copula Whereas then the copula is in this enuntiation This is my Body conjoyns things of different natures to wit bread and Christs body necessarily the speech must be false but to say so were blasphemy or else tropical Therefore the interpretation of such speeches is plain bread is the body of Christ that is a Sacrament of his body Circumcision is Gods covenant that is a signe or sacrament thereof seven Kine are seven years that is figures of seven years so we are said to be cleansed with waters sacramentally because baptisme or washing is the sacrament of cleansing so sacramentally the sacrifices of the Old Testament are said to expiate because they were types of expiation by Christ XX. The end of the Sacraments is the sealing of the Covenant of Grace XXI The effects of the Sacraments are not justification or sanctification as if it were by the work wrought but the confirmation and sealing of both benefits This is plain by the example of Abraham who before he was circumcised was justified Rom. 4.11 Therefore the Pontificians falsely affirm that the Sacraments conferre remission of sins and such like benefits by their own inward vertue out of the work wrought These places then of Scripture in which such things are spoken of the Sacraments are to be expounded by a sacramental metonymie as is said XXII Sacraments are common to all that are in the Covenant in respect of the signes but proper to to the Elect in respect of the thing signified XXIII Sacraments are necessary to salvation not simply and absolutely as if they were the prime causes thereof but hypothetically as they are ordinary means of salvation to be used as Christ hath commanded Hence saith Bernard Not the want but the contempt damneth XXIV The Word and Sacraments agree in substance for what the testament promiseth the seal confirmeth but they differ 1. In that the word is received by the eare the Sacraments perceived by the eye so that the Sacrament is a visible word 2. Because the word of the Gospel is generall but by the Sacrament the promises of the Gospel are applied to every believer 3. Because by the Word faith is ordinarily begot and confirmed by the Sacraments Sacraments are of the Old Testament or of the New Of the Old Testament there were two principal and ordinary to wit Circumcision and the Passeover Of these we have handled in the doctrine of the Ceremonial Law Of the New Testament there are two Baptisme and the Lords Supper The RULES I. The Sacraments of the Old and New Testament agree in the thing signified in respect of substance to wit Christ with his benefits which is the kernel of all the Sacraments Heb. 13.8 Jesus Christ yesterday and to day is the same and for ever Rev. 13.8 The Lamb slain from the begining of the world to wit sacramentally in the Sacrifices and Passeover II. Baptisme doth answer Circumcision analogically so doth the Lords Supper the Passeover For as Circumcision was the Sacrament of initiation or of ingraffing into the Covenant of regeneration or spiritual circumcision so is Baptisme And as the Passeover was the Sacrament of spiritual food even so is the Lords Supper Hence the holy Supper succeeded the celebration of the last Passeover III. The difference between the Sacraments of the Old and New Testamen● consisteth in this 1. In external signes 2. In the manner of signifying for there was signified that Christ was to be exhibited 3. In number For besides Circumcision and the Passeover they had also other Sacraments We have none besides Baptisme and the Lords Supper 4. In amplitude for the New-Covenant doth not extend it self to one and the same people 5. In continuance for those continued only till Christs first coming but these remain to the end of the world 6. In clearnesse IV. The difference then which the Pontificians feign is false That the Sacraments of the Old Testament were types of the Sacraments of the New Testament 2. That the Sacraments of the Old Testament did only shadow out justifying grace but that ours have really in themselves the body of spiritual good things As for the first difference it is one thing to be a type of Christ another thing to be types of the Sacraments in the New-Testament That Circumcision and the Passeover were types of Christ is said but that they were types of our Sacraments I deny for it were most absurd to think that they were instituted only to represent ours The other difference also is false for both in those Sacraments and in these Christ with his benefits are the matter and marrow But the difference between the Sacraments of the Old and New Testament is rather this that they were shadows of spiritual good things whereof Christ was the body Col. 2.17 V. Neither will it follow that therefore the Sacraments of the New-Testament are not better then

those of the Old because they do not conferre justifying grace for the work wrought for their prerogatives remain as they are expressed in the third Rule chiefly the second and sixth Here it is wont to be objected that if we acknowledge not this their fictitious difference the Sacraments of the Old Testament will be clearer then these of the New for the Passeover represents Christs death clearer then the Bread in the Lords Supper But we must know wherein the clarity of a Sacrament consisteth chiefly to wit not in external signes only but in the Sacramental word Now are not these words very clear This is my body which is given for you This is my blood which is shed for you There is nothing so plain concerning Christs death in the Passeover Besides it is false that the killing of a Lamb was a cleerer signe because many more and obscure signs were added to the killing of the Lamb as also because the breaking of bread the pouring out of wine and the receiving of both do most clearly represent the breaking of Christs body the shedding of his blood and the participation of both VI. In vain do the Pontificians reckon among the Sacraments of the New-Testament Confirmation Penance Extreme Vnction Ordination of Ministers and Matrimony Three things are required to a Sacrament 1. That it be instituted by God under the Covenant of grace 2. That it may have an external Symbol ordained by God 3. That the Promise of grace may be annexed to it Now these three belong only to Baptisme and the Lords Supper and not to any of the rest Confirmation is a Popish ceremony in which the Bishop or his Suffragan having asked certain questions of the party baptized concerning the Heads of Religion besmears him with a little ointment putting a linnen-cloth on him not to be removed by the witnesses before the third day and he cuffs him the better to remember the matter and that he may be sufficiently furnished with the Holy Ghost against Satans tentations But where in Scripture do we read of the institution of this Sacrament and of its ceremonies where is the Promise We may more truly call this the Popes excrement then a Sacrament and that mark which the Beast puts upon the forehead of his worshippers Rev. 3 16. Therefore impiously do they preferre this Sacrament to Baptism for they teach plainly that Baptism is perfected by it an that in this there is a greater measure of spiritual gifts then in Baptism and whereas any Priest or Pastor may administer Baptism yea any Lay-man or woman Confirmation must only be performed by the Bishop or his Suffragan Penance is a Sacrament with them in which the sinner having given trial of his repentance is absolved by the Priest We indeed acknowledge that repentance is enjoyned to sinners and that a power of absolving is given to Ministers though they feign a far other penance and absolution as shall appear hereafter But in the mean while there is no outward symbol instituted by God which hath a promise neither can these words I absolve thee be in stead of a symbol as Bellarmine would have it Extreme Unction is a Sacrament amongst them in which the Priest having rehearsed some Letanies anointeth the party that is dying with hallowed oile of the Olive in those parts of the body where the seats of the five Senses are and this he doth after the parties confession and absolution to the end he may recover his health if it be expedient for him and that the remainder of his sinnes after he hath received the other Sacraments may be wiped away Christ indeed promised his Disciples that the sick on whom they were to lay their hands should recover Mar. 16.18 James also commanded that the sick should be anointed after imposing of hands and prayer by the Elders which ceremonies were not Sacraments but voluntary rites joyned with miracles which together with the gifts of miracles are expired Therefore between Extreme Unction and this there is no similitude For that I may say nothing of that magical exorcisme with which the oile is hallowed it is certain that in the Apostles time not only dying people as now in Popery but any also that were sick were anointed Ordination is a Sacrament among them in which the Bishop alone or his Suffragan layeth his hands upon the Minister and delivereth to him with solemn words a Book a Platter a Pastoral staffe c. using also the ceremonies of Unction and Shaving and imprints on him an indelible character to conferre Justifying grace whereby he might rightly use the power of the Keyes Now although Ministers may be ordained by imposition of hands and prayers after the example of the Apostles yet this Imposition is a thing indifferent but for the Popish ceremonies they are partly Jewish as anointing partly Heathenish as shaving expresly forbid Lev. 19.27 Marriage is no Sacrament of the Covenant of grace both because it was instituted before the fall as also because it is common to all that are within without the Covenant yet we deny not but that Marriage is a representation of that spiritual wedlock between Christ and his Church but if for this it were a Sacrament then there should be so many Sacraments as there be Parables and Allegories Hence divers Schoolmen have denied this to be a Sacrament And in what esteem it is among the Papists appears by this that they make an irreconcileable war between Marriage and Ordination and forbid Marriage in their Clergy as if it were an unclean thing CHAP. XXIII Of Baptisme BAptisme is the first Sacrament of the New-Testament in which the Elect being received into the family of God remission of sinnes and regeneration in Christs blood and the Holy Ghost are confirmed by the outward sprinkling of water The RULES I. The word Baptisme signifieth a dipping and aspersing or washing That it signifieth aspersion appears in Mar. 7.4 And when thy come from the market they eat not except they be washed II. Here are four appellations of Baptisme to be considered 1. The Baptisme of water a 2. Of light or doctrine b 3. Of the Spirit or gifts of the Spirit c 4. Of blood or martyrdome d a Mat. 3.11 I baptise you with water b Mat. 22.25 The baptisme of John that is all his ministery both of doctrine and baptisme whence was it Act. 18.25 Apollo knew only the baptisme of John c Act. 1.5 You shall be baptised with the Holy Ghost d Mat. 20.22 Can you be baptised with the baptisme wherewith I am baptised III. Christ our Lord is the principal efficient cause but the instrumental is the Minister lawfully called IV. Therefore we hold not that baptisme lawful which is administred by any private man or a woman as in Popery For if in earthly Commonwealths that is not accounted of which a private man doth without command how much lesse can Christ be pleased with such disorder in his Church V. * A.

a shew of wisdome in will-worship and humility and neglecting of the body not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh Such are those ceremonies brought in by Popery in Baptisme c. and their five Sacraments by them devised canonical houres beads and the Latine tongue in Prayer Fasts placed rather in choice of meats then in abstinence chiefly Lent fast the Vows also of Poverty Monkish obedience and Religious continency The Vow of Poverty is impious for whereas man by Gods command should eat his bread in the sweat of his face by such voluntary poverty this command is sleighted No better is the Vow of Obedience for by it man who is redeemed by the precious blood of Christ is made a slave to money and is drawn off from his lawfull calling As for the Vow of Continency it is rash for it is a rare gift and by this Vow many under pretence of chastitie are intangled in the snares of Satan The manner of Religious worship forbid by Gods Word is Idolatry and worship of Saints Idolatry is whereby an Idol is made kept and religiously worshipped There be two kindes of idolatry one is when that which is not God is accounted and worshipped for God and this is contrary to the first Precept the second kinde is when the true God indeed is worshipped but either in idols or in Saints Angels or dead men An Idol is an Image Picture or Statue made for Religious worship The RULES I. * A. R. An Idol differs from an image or similitude as the species from the genus though the Church hath appropriated the word Idol to the Heathen superstitious images so that every idol is an image but not every image an idol yet in truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and imago are the same for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the species or form and shape of a thing and this from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to see whence comes the word idea which is the species of a thing in the minde or sense so imago is as much as imitago or eum ago an imitation representation or acting of any thing whence comes the word imaginatio which is all one with idea therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Homer is expressed by imago in Virg. as Aen. 2. not a major imago Aen. 4. Magna mei sub terras ibit imago and indeed these words imag● simulachrum umbra effigies are taken indifferently one for another in Latine Authors yet in scripture we finde a great difference for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or imago stands in opposition to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or umbra Heb. 10.1 the Law hath the shaddow of good things to come and not the ve y image of the things where image is taken for the reality and truth of the things but shadow for the appearance onely and shew Hence Christ is called the image of the Father not his shadow picture or idol Rupertus makes some difference between image and similitude or likenesse in saying that Christ is the image of the Father and the Holy Ghost his similitude because God saith Let us make man in our image after our likenesse Rupert l. 2. de Trinit c. 2. But this is a nicity For indeed the word image likewise there signifieth the same thing the one word being used to explain the other An Idol differs from an image or similitude as the species from the genus The Papists in this erre doubly 1. They will have an Idol and image or similitude to be the same their reason is this because simulachrum in Latine is say they derived à simulando but it should be rather à similando from likenesse but an Idol is not the same that an image for man is Gods image which Tertullian cals Simulachrum but he is not Gods Idol in vain doe they alledge the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which say they the Latine translates simulachrum alwayes for even in the Latine Bible we have testimonies to the contrary Exod. 34.15 Levit. 26. v. 30. Act. 17.73 Secondly they say that images are of things existent but idols of things not existent but we know that the Gentiles had idols not onely of things feigned but also of things truly existing nor will Pauls phrase help them 1 Cor. 8.4 We know that an Idol is nothing in the world for this is not spoken with reference to the object which is represented by the idol but in respect of the vertue and efficacy of idols which indeed is none II. The three degrees of Idolatry are the making the keeping and worshipping of them III. The making of an Idol is when an Image is made for religious ends IV. But every making of an Image is not idolatrous for such may be made for memory delight or other civil ends V. The Cherubims Brazen Serpent and such like were made by Gods appointment not for religious worship but to be types of Christ In vain therefore do Papists defend their idols under such pretences For 1. God commanded the making of them He forbids the making of these 2. No religious worship must be given to them therefore as soon as the brazen Serpent began to be worshipped it was broken in peeces 2 King 18.4 But these are religiously adored 3. Whereas all types by Christs coming are abolished such can have no place in the New-Testament VI. The Images of Christ of Angels of Mary and of the Saints made by Papists are doubtlesse Idols The reason is because they are made for religious worship The Papists deny these to be idols 1. Because they are not images of things not existent 2. Because they are not acknowledged for Gods 3. Because a humane face and wings are ascribed to Angels 4. Because the Saints were truly men 5. Because these are Lay-mens books Answ In the first and second Argumens there is no consequence because in both an Image is falsly defined for not only is that an Idol which is a thing not existent or which is acknowledged for God seeing the Gentiles had Idols of things which were truly existent and they put difference between the Idols and the things themselves 2 The Antecedent in both is false if simply understood For it is certain that the Papists make images of them that never were as of Saint George Christopher and such like it is also certain that many do take these Idols for Gods seeing they bestow both divine vertue and divine honour on them In the third also there is no consequence from those lively images which God did exhibit in Visions to dumbe images In the fourth this only followes that the images of the Saints may be made so they be not made for Religious worship In the fifth the consequence is false for what kind of books these are may be seen in Jer. 10.14 15. Hab. 2.18 19. Where Idols are called the teachers of lying and vanity VII To make the Image of the Trinity is