Selected quad for the lemma: blood_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
blood_n	bread_n	communion_n	wine_n	5,311	4	7.9264	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A10250	Propositions and principles of diuinitie propounded and disputed in the vniuersitie of Geneua, by certaine students of diuinitie there, vnder M. Theod. Beza, and M. Anthonie Faius ... Wherein is contained a methodicall summarie, or epitome of the common places of diuinitie. Translated out of Latine into English, to the end that the causes, both of the present dangers of that Church, and also of the troubles of those that are hardlie dealt vvith els-vvhere, may appeare in the English tongue.; Theses theologicae. English	Bèze, Théodore de, 1519-1605.; La Faye, Antoine de, 1540-1615. aut; Penry, John, 1559-1593.	1591 (1591)	STC 2053; ESTC S101754	189,778	296

same both in regard of the signes also of the things signified 15 The most meete place for Baptisme to bee administred is that where the worde is preached and the most meete time is the time of the preaching euen for this cause if their were no more that publicke praiers which are of great force in this action may bee joyned with the administration of the Sacraments 16 Yet may particular Churches appoint the time and the place as circumstances shall require 17 The vse of witnesses called God-Fathers is neither absolutelie necessarie nor yet to bee cleane rejected but such witnesses onelie are to be chosen as both knowe and are also likelie to performe what they promise concerning the holie bringing vp of the infants Defended by IAMES ROVLAND a Low-countrey man PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE LORDS SVPPER LX. 1 THe other perpetuall Sacrament of the whole Christian Church is the Supper of the Lord figured by diuers types vnder the olde couenaunt 2 For it was meet the Mediatour being now come the couenaunt beeing nowe last renewed by him that the olde seales of the couenaunt should be changed into such as might agree to the time both of the ordaining of them and also of their last renuing and so might euen declare that the Mediatour was come both by water and by blood 3 Nowe the Supper is that last Sacrament of the newe Testament or that publick action of the Christian church wherein as the bread being broken is giuen to be eaten and the wine powred out giuen to be drunk after the corporall manner so the bodie of Christ beeing deliuered to death and his blood being shed to seale vp those that are in league with God is giuen vnto the faithful that can examine themselues and are spirituallie receaued of them by faith for those endes which wee will presentlie set down 4 The authour both of the thinges deliuered and of the action is Christ onelie who as far as this Testament is called the new is the onlie testator but in respect that it hath regard vnto the couenaunt that joineth others therin the authour thereof is he who is the authour of the couenaunt The Church is the partie vnto whome the promise is made and therefore the Church is not to take vppon it the authoritie to confirme this couenaunt 5 The matter of the Supper are the signes and the things signified Vnder the name of signes are comprehended not onlie the substantiall things themselues namlie the bread and the wine but also the rites and the whole action as farre as it is Sacramentall namelie the breaking of the bread the powring out of the wine the delyuering and receauing of both whereunto is joined the nourishment of the bodie arising of the receauing of it 6 Touching the bread whether it should bee leauened or vnleauened touching the wine whether it shoulde bee pure or mixed with water and if wine bee wanting whether it be lawfull to vse some other drinke we thinke them matters about which no great contentions are to be raised so that if necessitie so require that which is the speciall thing be retained namelie meat and drinke meete for nourishment and answerable vnto the proportion of the signes and the things signified 7 The administration of the signes because they are present vnto our outward senses hath Christ committed vnto the Ministers of the worde but yet so as the efficacie of the administration doth not depend vpon them but vppon Christ onelie 8 For this cause also the things which we name signes are receaued by the mouth of the bodie and therefore also by the wicked although they account them not for signes but for common things and that the receauing of them is turned vnto their greater damnation 9 The thinges sealed are the bodie and the bloode of Christ the offering and receauing of both and the spirituall nourishment arising therefrom or rather whole Christ God and man with all his benefites and the newe couenant confirmed by the death of the testator 10 For although the receauing of the bread and the wine doth onelie signifie the communion of the body and the blood yet because wee are made one with Christ by meanes of his humaine nature it doth seale vnto vs the whole benefite of saluation because neither the manhood can be seperated from the word nor the humanitie subsist without the Deitie or his benefits without the whole person and therefore the one are neither receaued nor deliuered without the other 11 It is not without cause that Christ hath seuerallie ordained the bread to be the Sacrament of his bodie and the wine of his blood and commanded them to bee seuerallie deliuered in the Church For the bodie and blood are not sacramentally represented vnto vs in this action as the whole humanitie of Christ being glorified doth now liue but in regard that they were offered vppon the crosse for vs the blood being powred out of the bodie Vaine therfore is that concomitaunce as they call it or inseparable conjunction of the body and the blood vnder both kindes seuerallie whereas the bodie is here laid before vs and giuen to bee considered by our faith as being without blood and the blood as powred out of the bodie by death 12 The things signified because they are giuen vnto our minde and that to establish and increase a spirituall life in vs are giuen by Christ himselfe and receaued through faith by the power of the holie Ghost whence it commeth that they are proper and peculiar vnto the faithfull onelie 13 Yet doth it not follow that the bread and the wine giuen vnto the vnbeleeuers are not Sacramentes For in respect of Christ he giueth vnto euerie man that whollie which he promiseth in his worde vz. the signes vnto the bodies and the thinges vnto the soules that are endued with true faith wherevpon it is no maruell if the one of them alone be receaued by the vnworthie communicants as bringing onelie their bodie and that polluted too vnto the Lords Table whereas they want the mouth of the minde that is faith 14 The forme consisteth in the apt and meet that is sacramentall and respectiue conjunction and analogie or agreement of the outwarde signe and the inwarde mysterie The Transubstantiation of the signes and the thinges signified and the essentiall consubstantiation of the things signified with the signes are to bee rejected for the former doth abolishe one part of the Sacrament to wit the signes both of them are directlie contrary both vnto the Articles of our faith concerning the truth of Christs bodie and also vnto the vse of the Sacraments whence followeth that most horrible and detestable bread-worship 15 The agreement of the signes and the things signified is manifest for as breade and wine doe nourish vs in this life euen so the bodie and blood of Christ purchase aeternall life vnto vs. Both the bread and the wine therefore are to bee deliuered in the Supper both to the end that the

once an onelie and a most perfect Sacrifice vnto God neither was there anie other that could can or shal be able to performe that work 13 For the Sacrifices that ought nowe to haue place among Christians are onelie of thankesgiuing that the faithfull may giue thankes vnto God for all his benefites and offering their prayers vnto him may perpetually consecrate themselues whollie a liuing and an acceptable sacrifice vnto his majestie An expiatorie or propitiatory sacrifice there is or can bee no other but that which Christ once made most perfectlie vppon the Alter of the crosse 14 Yet we do not denie but that the auncient writers did giue the name of Sacrifice vnto the Lords Supper but as in this point so in manie other thinges in a verie farre streatched signification and that partlie to the end that as they thought they might set foorth the dignitie of this high mysterie whereat the Angels doe admire and partlie that they might note out and retaine the custome vsed amongst the auncient Christians Who were wont in their holie feastes of loue to bestowe and offer guiftes and offerings of diuers thinges and euen of meat and drinke which beeing collected togeather into one were so disposed of by the Pastors of the Churches as first of all they were by praiers offered vnto God next some portion of them was taken wherby the holy Supper was administred lastlie that which was left was bestowed for the maintenance of the poore Out of which rites the Masse-mongers doe as yet retaine the names of OFFERTORI COLLECT and COMMVNION And hence it is thought that the name of the MASSE was deriued euen from the custome that the faithfull had to send those things vnto the publick assemblies of the Church which they would haue bestowed vpon holie vses 15 Now it is no lesse fabulous that the Popish Masse was celebrated by IAMES or anie other of the Apostles then it is most true that the same was coyned neither all at once nor yet by one and the selfe same man but was soldered together as now it is by manie Popes after manie yeares and after that it had bene eiked out with many patches which were added thereunto 16 Vnto the former errors there are adjoyned not a few others as that it is celebrated not by the congregation of the faithfull but by one Masse-monger alone that the Sacrament is after the holie action RESERVED as it were a preseruatiue against whatsoeuer inconuenience that the names of dead Saints are called vpon and their imaginary merits intermingled in the Masse that the one of the signs is in a kind of impudent and altogeather hellish boldnesse taken away from the lay people as they call them that the whole action is done in a strange tongue that the Masse-Priest alone is priuie vnto many things that are done therin that they vse the attire and gestures of stage-plaiers and many other things brought forth by this plant which the heauenly Father hath not planted and therefore shal one day be altogeather rooted out Therefore we detest this imaginary and blasphemous sacrifice of the Masse which is contrarie vnto Gods worde and ouerthroweth the force of Christes Passion and bringeth in almost innumerable errours and wee pray with al our hearts and soules that the Lord would graunt vnto all his Churches the pure and sound vse of his holie Supper Defended by THEOPHILVS HESPERIVS of Bearne PRINCIPLES TOVCHING CONSVBSTANTIATION LXII WEE HAVE ALREADIE DISPVTED concerning Transubstantiation Consubstantiation being the neerest error vnto it is now to be handled 1 COnsubstantiation consisteth in this that the bodie and blood of the Lord is said to bee corporally naturally and really present in vnder and with the bread and the wine 2 It hath this common with Transubstantiation that in both of them the wordes of the institution are in a preposterous sort stiflie maintained without any regard vnto the meaning Although that in verie deed the wordes are chaunged in both by the fained interpretations whereby they are expounded whence manie absurdities doe follow 3 First in that both of them doe take away the force nature of a Sacrament which consisteth in this that two thinges should bee in them namely earthly elementarie and signifiyng then heauenly inuisible and signified both which are seuerallie considered not as they are something absolutely and simply existing of their own nature but as there is a mutuall comparison and referrence between them whereby the signes do represent the things signified are represented 4 Next Transubstantiation maketh that the thing is not that which it is and that it is that which it is not but Consubstantiation maketh that two things indeed are become one 5 Thirdly this doctrine doth include contrarieties for it affirmeth that the same body is receiued both naturally and supernaturallie whereas the truth doth teach that the signes are naturally and the things signified supernaturallie participated 6 For the receiuing of the mouth and also the helpe of the other senses are heere required by the institution of Christ to the ende that that which is naturall and corporall may performe his owne office the operation also of the mind and faith is especiallie to be present that what is spirituall may be receiued by spirituall instruments 7 Yet wee confesse that the bodie and blood of Christ is offered bodilie that is corporallie in the holie Supper But after the same manner that PAVLE saith that all the God-head doth dwell in him corporally that is trulie and fullie the Lord performing without all doubt that which hee promised 8 And although the bodie of Christ be of it selfe a naturall substaunce and contained within the dimensions or limites thereof yet is it not materially but spiritually eaten of vs. For the fleshe would haue profited vs nothing but the Spirite and life yet we may say in some sense that the bread and the wine are the bodie and the blood and that the bodie and the blood are fed-vpon namely in a Sacramentall manner 9 This Doctrine also is directly contrary vnto that end of the institution whereby Christ commaunded vs to celebrate his memorie For if hee bee present his memorie cannot be called vnto our remembraunce except wee will speak very vnproperlie seeing things past and not present are called into memorie 10 Againe it doth abolish the nature of Christs bodie For if the same be thus receued by euery one in particuler it must needs be both present in infinit places at once and also be infinite of it selfe The which point is contrary vnto the Articles of our beliefe whereby we beleeue that hee was true man that hee was borne suffered dead risen againe ascended vp into heauen 11 Furthermore if the receiuing of Christ were corporall the ancient Church vnder the law had not bene partaker of his bodie because the same was not as yet borne which point is contrarie vnto the Apostle who saith that the Fathers did receiue the same spirituall meate and the same