Selected quad for the lemma: blood_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
blood_n body_n flesh_n see_v 6,240 4 4.0122 3 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A70617 An uncovering of mysterious deceits by which many are kept from repentance and entring the doore of life in a reply to M. Garners opposition of truth stiled Unvailing of mysteries, with addition of A reply to Mr. Thomas Whitfield his treatise with a three-fold title / by Thomas Moore. Moore, Thomas, Senior. 1647 (1647) Wing M2595; ESTC R30527 138,859 193

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

whether only the materiall blood which in shedding issued out of the body of Christ as the blood he did bleed and that came forth of him when he was circumcised Luke 1.21 and when he was in his agony Luke 22.24 and as some suppose when he was Scurged and when he had a crown of Thornes platted on his head Mark 15.15 17. and when they nayled him on the Crosse and crucified him Mat. 27.35 and when after his death his fide was peirced with a speare Luke 19.34 35. whether this be his meaning by all the blood as the words with that he writ before and after it would so seem and whether this shedding be all the sprinckling he beleeveth or not it remaines doubtfull but as I understand as he tooke flesh and blood when he was made in our nature Heb. 2.14 even so all the abasements sorrowes anguishes and torments he suffered in that nature with all the forementioned being compleated or consummated in his death or dying the whole being his laying down his life for us this all this nothing lesse then this I understand by all the blood that Christ did shed 1 John 3.16 Isay 5.3.1 8. and with all his sufferings the compleating of them in dying I count the shedding of his blood though in this businesse bloodsheeding doth imply the Sacrifice offered whose blood was shed Heb. 9.12.22.26 and yet take in all his sufferings with the vertue thereof in his Sacrifice offered still shedding is not sprinckling but shedding and sprinckling are two distinct things tnd so with out shedding of blood and so offering the sacrifice whose blood was shed there is no remission of sinnes because otherwise there can be no blood to be sprinckled Heb. 9.22 23 26. yet even so also without sprinckling of blood and therein applying the vertue of the sacrifice there is no remission of sinnes purgation of conscience and nature and happy safety received and enjoyed Heb. 9.12 13 14 23. and 12.24 And this is clearly shaddowed and typed out it was not enough for the Passeover that the Lamb was of the first yeare and without blemmish and slain and so the blood shed c. unlesse the blood was offered with a branch of Hysop taken and sprnickled on the two side posts and the upper post of the dore and without which no assurance of a sacrifice Exod. 12.6 7 22 23. nor for cleansing and sanctifying Blood-shedding was not enough if it were not also sprinckled Lev. 8.11 30. and 14 7. nor for taking away any uncleannesse it was not enough that the water of purification was made for all Israel unlesse the particulars defiled were sprinckled with it Num. 19.13 18 19. yea this distinction between blood-shedding and blood-sprinckling is in the Law clearly held forth Exod. 29.16 21 Lev. 1.5 and 4.6 7. Num. 8.7 And come to the Gospell ● may be said of all to that what ever right or part Christ hath in them by vertue of his bloodshed and Sacrifice offered to God yet as Christ saith to Peter John 13.8 If he wash them not they have no part with him 3. Thirdly ●as he hath set down his proposition darkly and unprofitably so he hath set it down subtilly and craftily as a man guilty of some known errour in what he would seeme to maintain in that going about to disprove the distinction between blood-shedding and blood-sprinckling he saith all the blood which Christ did shed is the blood of sprinckling which is fit togull the un-wary leaves roome when the distinction proves sound for him notwithstanding his position to say he ment not to fault the distnction though that be his main drift that he might thirdly disprove another distinction if he could As here is a suspition ofcarnality and ignorance in his understanding of the blood of Christ as it is sprinckled may not some Reader conceive that he would have men to thinke that in the Mosayecall Sacrifices the materiall blood even so such and as it was when shed was sprinckled even so the materiall blood of Christ his body such as it was when shed even such and so materially sprinckled a brave motive for the Romish reservation of rellects and because this can no way be demonstrated and evidenced how it should be so and that it so is therefore all the blood-shedding must needs be sprinckling But to come a little neerer him If blood-shedding had been the sprinckling or if it had or could so have been sprinckled upon any what would it have profited them seeing if Christ be not risen wee are yet in our sinnes our faith vaine and preaching vain 1 Cor. 15.14 17 and the Lord Jesus Christ of whom and whose redemption wee treat hath a spirituall body and is a spirituall man the Lord from Heaven heavenly A quickning spirit 1 Cor. 15.40 49. So now as he hath dyed for our sinnes and rose for our justification and offered himselfe with the vertue of his blood and death a sacrifice to God the Father appearing now in Heaven for us Rom. 4.25 1 Cor. 15.3 4. Heb. 9.12 14.24 when we speake of his blood and death as presented before God in the heaven or applyed to or sprinckled on the hearts and consciencs of men on earth wee understand it spiritually his words even when he speakes of these things are spirit and life and so spiritually to bee understood John 6 63. and so though when we speak of his suffering blood shedding and dying we understand it materially as in a mortall body hee suffered in the flesh and shed materiall blood indeed and dyed for our sinnes and was put to death in the flesh yet as he is risen for our justification and hath overcome death and is gon up to Heaven and hath presented the vertue of his blood which is reall and spirituall before his Father in the Heavens and by the spirit by which he rose from the dead offered himselfe a spotlesse sacrifice to God and obtained eternall redemption Heb. 9.12.14 So when wee speake of the sufferings blood and death of Christ as presented in Heaven to God or applyed on earth to men wee understand it spiritually of the worth vertue and prevailing effecacy thereof with God or men and as the High-priest did once a yeare go into the holy of holiest sprinckled blood on the mercy seat c. and so sanctified the tabernacle and made an atonement for all Israel and this that they might be cleansed legally from all their sinnes Levi. 16.14.15 36.34 and yet they had their sacrifices to come to and sprincklings of blood and of the waters of purification for application which if neglected the neglectors were not personally clean but to be cut off or dye in that their legall uncleannesse Num. 19. to 8. And the fault found in those sacrifices as appertaining to conscience is that they did not make the commers thereunto perfect even so we being fallen and God yet mercifull and willing to shew us favour even at his
offered c. Is the words or sense here only that he once dyed True it is that the offering to dye is and truly may be called an offering but is rarely found that the offering of Christ to God includes but his death only however it is manifest in this chapter that here it signifies more then death yea are simply a ransome or price to purchase of God only even a sacrifice that is both a ransome or price to purchase and a reconciliation atonement or peace made with God for men and such a taking away the sinnes of the world from betweene God and men that mercy may be shewne them and meanes used towards them yea and yet farther that this sacrifice of his might be a remaining and continual thing before the Father that Christ by vertue thereof might mediate in generall for men and so send forth spirit in the meanes that they might be convinced repent and beleeve and in speciall by amediator of the new Testament for beleevers that he by vertue of this his Sacrifice may purge them and they receive the promise of the eternall inheritance and all this is manifest in this whole chapter and the drift and businesse the Apostle was about perpend it dilligently He is here treating chapter 7. and 8. and this 9. about the High priest-hood of Jesus Christ and especially mentions Christ his comming verse 11. Blood shedding verse 22 23. his assention to Heaven verse 20 24. His presentation of the vertue of of his blood and offering himselfe by the eternal spirit to God his Father there v. 12 14 26. His appearing before God with the vertue of his Sacrifice to take away sinne verse 26. having obtained eternall redemption verse 12. his blood sacrifice of force to purge the conscience of all believers on whō it 's spinckled ver 13 14. And he for this cause the mediator of the new Testament that c. verse 15 all which in this laeter part of the chapter he is explicating and confirming let it be well minded And yet a little further consider how when where and to whom Christ our great high Priest did offer himselfe a Sacrifice and wee may see Hee did not offer himselfe such a sacrifice on the wooden Crosse that was not the Altar by and on which Christ was born and offered through the foolish Idolatrous Romanists have so esteemed and so prayed Oh holy Altar of the Crosse save us our Saviour himselfe calls such conceivers fooles and teacheth us that the Altar both sanctifieth the gift and is greater then the gift Mat. 23.19 which I hope none will say of the wooden Crosse that it sanctifieth the body of Christ and is greater then the body of Christ but the divine nature was greater then the humane and did sanctifie and dignifie the gift the humane nature or body of Christ and by this divine nature even the eternall spirit which supported him in his sufferings and by which he rose from the dead By that spirit he was born up and offered himself a sacrifice to God Heb. 9.14 He went to the crosse a sinner for us he bore our sins to the tree and was made sinne and a curse for us and dyed for our sins Psal 40 12. 1 Pet. 2.24 2 Cor 5.21 Rom. 4.25 but he was raised for our justification and being risen just and holy he then offered himselfe not spotted with our sinnes on him but a spotlesse Sacrifice without fault or spot to God Hebr. 9.14 This sacrifice was not offered here on earth the other high Priests did offer on earth they could but heare and lift up and wave before the Lord the offering and approach into a worldly Sanctuary But Jesus Christ appeared in the highest Heaven and there presented the vertue of his blood and offered his sacrifice Heb. 8.1.3 〈…〉 ●nd 9.11 12 14. This Sacrince of Christ was offered in the Heaven not to men or Angels but unto God In this businesse or Sacrifice offering he had not to deale with men though for men with God To God he offered the Sacrifice and with God it is accepted and hath prevailed that so there may be an offer and tender and application to men and a prevalency in all receivers chap. 7 8. and 9.12 14 So that all this well minded Mr. Garner is too short and limitting in his affirmation But let us fullfill his request and proceed to mind it a little further Heb. 9.28 So Christ was once offered to beare the sins of c. It is not certain that in this place the word beare the sinnes doth signifie to be counted the sinner and so to accept the imputation of them and beare the punishment due unto them of which is meant Isay 53.2.3 6 7. 2 Cor. 5.19 21. For so and in that sence he his owne selfe in his owne body bear our sins to the tree or on the tree 1 Pet. 2.24 and so in that respect he is said to have been made a curse for us Gal. 3.13 And this was before his refurection for our justification and so the offering or compleating of the offering mentioned in this chap. which offering is said to be to beare the sinnes of c. In which offering he is not said to be made a curse as he was when he hung upon the tree but a blessing A great high Priest of good things to come of which high Priesthood he treateth chap. 7. and 8. and this 9. chap. and that we may the better understand what bearing is here meant let us looke into the words and chap. consider the tipes here mentioned and the truth as it is found in Jesus First For the sacrifice besides that I have forenoted Vers 12.13 Note further that in the tipes were two Goates one that was slaine for a sin offering and the blood presented in the holy place and sprinkled on the mercy seat to make an attonement The truth of what is shadowed therein is found in Christ that beare our sinnes in his body to the tree and dyed for them and being risen hath presented the vertue of his blood in the holyes of holyes and so obtained eternall redemption and made an atonment for men Levit. 9. and 16. Heb. 9.12 13. 14. But we so sin against this goodnesse that we give God just cause to hold back all the streames of mercy from us by which we ●●●ht be instructed and drawne in to partake of this attonement and redemption and so in the tipes there was another Goate prepared not a dead but a live Goat that even after the attonement and reconciliation made in the holy place was to have their sinnes confessed over him yea all their trespasses and he did beare upon him all their iniquities into a land of Separation or not inhabited where no man dwelt to be charged with them Levit. 16.10.20.21 22. And is not the truth of this found in Jesus Christ our Lord that is risen for our justification and now at the right
beleevers every one of us shall give an account of himselfe to God Rom. 14.11 12. and wee must all appoare before the judgement seate of Christ 2 Cor. 5.10 And is not this a most dangerous and perrillous way of expounding Scripture As it is more largely shown both in the Epistle and Book of the opposed Treatise which if he could not answer he might have taken warning not to have run into such snares XI He plainly and in expresse termes denyeth the Gospell and word of God to be the Gospell and word of God in that he denyeth that doctrine and Gospell and those sayings to be there which are expresly there intimating as if he had some other un written verity or Gospell which with him is the Gospell and it is not there and all in this written Gospell must be brought to that 1. Whereas the Apostle speaking of those men that must all appear before the judgement seate of Christ that every one may receive the things done in his body according to that he hath done in his body whether it be good or bad 2 Cor. 5 10. sutable to that John 5 19. and of his knowledge of the terrour of the Lord which will in that judgement be against them that would not submit to but deny the Lord that bought them and on that ground did perswade men Though his heart and spirit was manifested unto God and in beleevers verse 11. yet he preached to others also that judged evill of him and then tels them what constrained him even the love of Christ and on what ground even because we thus judge that if one dyed for all then all dyed or were dead and then affirmes it possitively with one end of his death and that he dyed for all that c. verse 14 15. and after an exposition how to take the word All when God speakes of Christ and his workes in and through Christ he saith that he by the grace of God might tast death for every man Heb. 2 9. and speaking even of unbeleevers also he saith he gave himselfe a ransome for all 2 Tim. 2.1 6. And another Apostle in an opposition between beleevers and unbeleevers saith He is the propitiation for the sins of the whole world 1 Joh. 2 2. yet this man saith that to affirme of Christ that he hath wrought a peace or reconciliation in himselfe with God for all men that it might be declared for them to beleeve and to affirme Christ dyed for all men he finds no where in the Gospell nay that is more moderate then that which followes for he goeth further page 188. It is not agreeable to the Scriptures and to preach it is not to preach the Gospell of Christ but somthing which men sure he must mean such as the Carpenter the Sonne of Mary Peter the fisher Paul the Tent-maker have added to the Gospel of Jesus Christ p. 177 he saith determinatively that this doctrin of Christ suffering for al men his phrase is persons is not the doctrin of Jesus Christ nor the subject matter of the Gospel nor is there such a thing found in the Gospell nor in any part of the word of God and then he addes rightly understood And must not that understāding be according to some unwritten Gospell to cloath this with to be adored which in its own cloathing is denied and made vile by him page 176. 2. Whereas the Gospell is glad tydings of a redemption and peace and life and so good will to be declared that in beleeving men might receive it and glad tidings and a word of truth it can be to none for whom there is nothing in truth prepared And the Gospell our Saviour so preaching John 3 16 17. and 12 47 45. commanded his disciples to preach to every creature speaking of the world of mankind as Iohn 1.3 4 5 7 9. Mat. 28.19 Mar. 16.15 and they so preached the Gospell 2 Cor. 5.19 and him the Sonne of God the Saviour of the world 1 Iohn 4 14 and many have so beleeved and confessed Iohn 4.42 He plainly denyeth all this and sayeth expresly page 133. That neither Christ nor the Apostles did so teach nor that he required them so to teach and though they declared peace to whatsoever house they came that was but ministeriall as if in ministry they told lyes page 136. nor saith he did any of the Saints so beleeve So that the written Gospell with him is no Gospell no word of God understood according to its own sayings but according to some unwritten verity of his which he calls the right understanding of it 3. Whereas the Scripture in the Gospell setteth forth God to be the Saviour of all men 1 Tim. 4.10 and that his mercies are over all his workes Psalme 145.8 9. and that it is through Christ that these mercies are extended Psalme 75.3 Iohn 1.3 4 5 9. Col. 1.18 and that these mercies are witnesses of his goodnesse Acts 14.17 and fruites of love kindnesse and mercy Mat. 5.44 48. Luke 6.32 to 36. and come to lead men to repentance Rom. 2.4 and to the Gospell that they might beleeve and when men harden their hearts and will not be brought to submit to and beleeve on him he chargeth them to hold the truth in unrighteousnesse Rom. 1.18 To be adversaries to him for his love to have rewarded him evill for good and hatred for his love Psalme 109.4.5 and that which was for their wel-fare to be turned into a trap Psalme 69.22 beside that said Psal 36.5 6 7. Yet would he have assaid to deny the enjoyment of any mercies any benefit yea as a benefit though outward by any unbeleever through Christ page 148 149. but because he is in this moderate and saith it is not cleare to him which I beleeve because he beleeveth not that for them through which it is procured and saith if he mistake in this or any other thing he is willing to be informed The Lord preserve in him and me such a heart and then wee shall not deny the sayings of Scripture XII But that he may not be said wholly and altogether to deny all the sayings of the Gospell he doth acknowledge some parts and sayings of truth and presse the same to hide and deny other parts of truth as the worke Jesus Christ worketh in men by spirituall application of his blood to deny the compleatnesse of that he hath wrought in himselfe with God for men His reconciling men to God by spirituall application of his blood to deny his reconciliation wrought with God in presenting the vertue of his blood in sacrifice offered to God his redeeming men out of the world to God to deny his purchasing men of God the eternall life given in Christ to deny the life of the world given by Christ as is seen throughout his Treatise And usuall waies of such as are witty and subtil not only in points of faith that they may the more fairely deny one for that
lesse then salvation through faith in Christ page 119. and mind his after explication saith he No taking away of sinne no Redemption Reconciliation or Atonement wrought for any but by the sprinckling or application of the blood of Christ upon them neither is it any other way of use to us neither doth it any other way speak good for us before God but as it 's sprinckled on our consciences by the power of the Spirit page 194. Neither are any persons redeemed or purchased with the blood of Christ not have they any part in his death and blood shed who have not their consciences sprinckled with the blood of Christ neither doth his blood any other way redeem purchase reconcile or make Atonement c. Surely were it not for the sake of some others I should no otherwise answer these greiveous blasphemies of the death Resurrection and presenting of the vertue of the precious blood of Iesus Christ and his invaluable Sacrifice offered to God his Father then they did Rabsh●kah with silence Isay 36.21 For he knoweth that in the opposed Treatise it is shown by and according to Scripture that there is none reconciled in heart to God none Redeemed from among men to God no purgation in Conscience but by the spirituall sprinckling and application of the precious blood of Christ and so in the application and receit of that reconciliation propitiation Atonement Redemption purgation and righteousnesse which Iesus Christ hath by and in himselfe wrought with God for men and in whom it is perfect and compleat before any receive the same and though here through many mercies by him be reached unto men to draw to him yet this Atonement c. is received no other way but in receiving him in whom it is and from whom it is never devided as is also shown in that other Treatise of the discourse about the precious blood of Christ And in this Reply also which distinction he hath striven to confound and yet now in his fashion he would seem to acknowledge it but to the greatest dishonour to Christ and in fury to men and to Saints also that ever I saw in any writer that confesseth Jesus that was borne in Bethlehem and of the Virgin Mary to be the Christ which yet I hope in part he doth but here in these affirmations it is evident without any wresting or glosse 1. He hath denyed That Christ by the vertue of his blood and Sacrifice offered to God hath purchased All men of God and received the right of Lord-ship over them thereby and so a power and right of judgeing them by his Gospell and aggravation of their sinnes by his blood shed for them and mercies extended there through to them For he hath peremtorily affirmed that there are no persons purchased with the blood of Christ who have not their cōsciences sprinkled with his blood and that his blood doth not any otherwise purchase then by sprinckling upon the Conscience And so hath plainly denyed the truth of those sayings of the Holy Ghost Ro. 149 12. Phil. 2.9 10 11. Acts 10.36 42. Psalme 2.6.10 2. He hath fully denyed all that preparation and provision of Redemption Reconciliation Atonement righteousnesse life and Spirit which God by vertue of the precious blood and Sacrifice of Christ presented to him hath made in Christ to be preached to men to invite them to come in to him and receive it yea for any but those that are come in and have it already for hee affirmed that there is no taking away of sinne no reconciliation Redemption or Atonement wrought for any but by the sprinckling or application of the blood of Christ upon them which is sure in their in-comming and within them and so hath denyed the truth of these Scriptures Joh. 14 5 9 10 11. 2 Cor. 5.10.14.19 Prov. 9.2.6 Mat. 22.1.14 3. Hee hath also denyed the will of the Father that all should honour the Sonne as they honour the Father John 5.23 for he denyeth the Lord Jesus Christ the glory of all the mercies light meanes and spirituall motions he by the vertue of his blood and Sacrifice offered to God hath procured for and extendeth to the Sonnes of men to call invite and move them to repentance and turning in to God for he saith plainly neither is his blood any other way of use to us neither doth it any other way speak good for us before God but as it 's sprinckled upon our consciences by the power of the Spirit And so he hath denyed the truth of that affirmed in John 1.4 11. Psalme 75 3. Col. 1.17 Rom. 2.4 Acts 14.17 and 17 26.31 4. Hee hath also denyed the mediation of Christ between God and men by vertue of his blood and Sacrifice offered to God 1 Tim. 2.5 Isay 53.12 yea and also his speciall Advocation and intercession by vertue of his precious blood and Sacrifice with God for Beleevers 1 John 2.1 Heb. 7 25. In that he saith his blood is no other way to us neither doth it any other way speak good for us before God but as it is sprinckled upon our consciences now in sprinckling on the conscience it speaketh peace and good to us and purgeth within And if it had not spoke good for us and Christ by it had done nothing with God for us what is that which brought it to us or is he of their mind that thinkes their was no dying of Christ for us but his dying in us I hope he is farre from that but I fort eare though here is just cause to say further only he hath denyed one part of that mediation mentioned Heb. 9 15. Thus hath he altogether denyed and raced the Gospell as it is set forth to be preached to unbeleevers as a truth that they might beleeve and in beleeving might receive and for not believing be under sinne for he hath affirmed their is no Redemption no Reconciliation no Atonemen and so no sinne taken out of the way no pardon no life obtained wrought or made with God by Christ or received into the hands of Christ for men to dispence to such as beleeve that it might be preached to them in his name that they might beleeve as Paul did to such as yet beleeved not Acts 13.36 37 38. but this mans sayings give out that of all this there is nothing done with God for any by Christ his Dying Resurrection Ascension offering Sacrifice and mediation by vertue of all with God nothing hath his blood done for any till by spirit it be sprinckled on their conscience nor doth it any thing with God for any by his presentment of it to God nor any other way but by sprinckling upon the conscience and sure that is not till they be made Beleevers so as they come to the blood of sprinckling so that till men be Beleevers and first washed by his blood there is by Mr. Garners doctrine nothing done for them by Christ of any worth to be told them to bring them
Death in dying to Dye in the very day he should eat thereof given to this man was given to all men in this man And this publique man eating of the fruit of the forbidden tree he sinned and so lost the Image of God out of his heart and fell under the guilt and power of sin and so under the power of the Law and of death c. And what he did all men did in him so as in him all men sinned and fell Rom. 5.12 And the Almighty convicting him of sin convicted all men of sin so that by this one offence or the offence of this one unto all men to condemnation that is on all men in a publique man yet not at the first on them as individuals and particulars yet so as all the individuals when ever they come forth by propogation from him as they are of him in that Nature they partake of and are under the guilt and partake of the same misery in bondage to law sin and death Rom. 5.19 Ephes 2.1 2 3. So that by reason of the sentence gone forth from the Almighty Genes 2.17 more unalterable then that of the Medes and Persians Hest 3 8 Truth and Justice required a present imposing of the execution of that Death and curse which is the first Death according to the just judgement of God without a mediator and that all men must have perished in if God had not found out a remedie for without sheading blood no Remission Heb. 9.22 But now this I beleeve that as God in his purpose of making man did see that man would fall So in his purpose and Councell he provided the remedy in his Son before the world was 1 Pet. 1.20 And presently upon the fall in the very same moment this businesse was done and acted in respect of agreement conceipt Tender and acceptation betweene God and Christ the Sonne of God to take into union of Person the nature of man to be made flesh under the Law and beare the imputation of sin and so to dye and rise and offer sacrifice for man which God accepted and so filled him in the nature of man with all fulnesse of grace and truth so that here is a propitiation life from the dead and a new creation in And a new heaven and earth for this second Man And spirit to quicken c. Psal 40. Heb. 10.5.10 So that here are two men two Adams the first the last 1 Cor. 15.45 c. So that the vertue of the Death Resurrection and Sacrifice of Christ was from the beginning so as thereby men were either saved or left to the judgement of Christ Though the fruitfulnesse thereof was neither so apparant nor abundant till it was really acted in our nature by Christ John 1 1-17 John 1.1 2. so that there is no Divinity in this Argument of Mr. W. That because many were damned before Christ actually Dyed therefore Christ dyed not for them page 4.36 37. page 11. l. 4. hee might as well have said m●ny were saved before Christ actually dyed therefore he dyed not for them But passing such Arguments as of no force to enlightened beleevers Scripture sheweth us two things wrought by God in the gift of his Son and obtained of God and effected by Christ by vertue of his Death Resurrection and offering himselfe a Sacrifice to God and receit of Spirit in the man viz. 1. A supportation of the old or first creation for a time Psal 75.3 Col. 1.17 Heb. 1.3 In which there is both time and space given that men might repent and come in to their Lord 2 Pet. 3 9. Rev. 3.21 And also meanes and some motion of Spirit to sead and move to repentance and seeking the Lord Rom 2 4. Act. 14 17. 17 26 27. Gen. 6.3 Psal 68.18 And 2. A new creation in which is pardon Peace justification life from the dead or eternall life and inheritance Revel 21.5 which all that by grace are brought into union with Christ partaking of 2 Cor 5 17. Here in this life in spirit in a first fruits Rom. 8 10.23 In the Resurrection in fulnesse both in soule and body Phil. 3.21 1 John 3.2 Now in these two men the first and the last man all men are considerable The first a naturall man The second a spirituall In the first difference of sexe and degree In the second not so The first fallen The second having undertaken hath restored that fallen nature And thereby preserveth the first with that creation for a time so as generations come forth from him the distinctions of sexe and degrees remaining preserved and ordered by him for the time and hath also a new creation for all that come forth of the first Adam and by the means he useth come in to him But as none come in to the second Adam that came not forth of the first so none come forth of the first Adam whose nature the second hath not taken for whom he hath done nothing by which they might partake of him and for refusall thereof be justly judged by him but these two Adams are not both naturall to have their severall posterities by generation The second is a spirituall man and his seed is of such as come in to him by regeneration It was therefore something unsavoury and of no force to prove any thing so to exptesse his comparison and the opposition of the two Adams with their severall posterities and then mention the supposition of a third page 68. line 17 18. unlesse Mr. W. could shew a posterity comming forth of the loynes of the Man Christ or a Generation comming in to him who never came forth of the first Adam and so were first of his posterity But to the businesse as I am helped to understand but by Scripture and also by reason subdued to beleeve God in his owne sayings If Jesus Christ in the beginning did by his consent and agreement with God his Father become the second Man the last publique Man and so under-tooke for the first man the first publique man who was all men Then he under-tooke for all men Rom. 5.12.14 1 Cor. 15.22.45 46 47. If he tooke the nature of the first Adam that was all men and not only a part of that nature or some part of the nature of Adam but the whole nature of whole Adam then he took the nature of all men Luke 3.23.38 Act. 17.26 If Jesus Christ became under the Law and stood in the stead and bare the sins of the first Adam and dyed for his sins in whom all sinned and fell under Law and whose sin was the sin of all men Then surely hee was made under the Law for and stood in the stead and bare the sins and dyed for the sins of all men Though the gift in and by Christ exceed the offence Rom. 8.3 Gal. 3.3.4 Rom. 5. And if Jesus Christ took not on him the difference of sexes and degrees or any of the excellencies or furniture