Cōmuniō of the body of Christ Which words do indeed signifie no other thing but that wee should vnderstand the bread and wine to bee most certaine signes of our Communion and felowship with Christs body and bloud And that doth altogether agree with my exposition Moreouer that is the meaning of these words This is my body which is of these This is my bloud But Luke expoundeth them thus This cup is Luc. 22. 20. that new Testament by my bloud which is shed for you The same exposition also did Paul follow repeating the wordes of the institution And this maner of speach can not admit any other sense without iniurie and violence done to the wordes but that we say that the wine offered in the up is a most sure pledge of the new couenant which God hath made with vs by the precious bloud of Christ The same therefore is to be said of the bread namely that it is a most sure pledge of the vnion which we haue with the body of Christ Theoph. Concerning the first part thou hast satisfied me it followeth that we come to the other Mat. In it I said that the exposition which I brought had no absurditie For there is no let but that we may trulie eate the body of Christ and drinke his bloud to our saluation Yea the foure absurdities which I spake of euen now be auoided For the signes retaine their owne nature The bloud of Christ is not separated from his body The truth of his humanitie ascention and sitting at the right hand of the Father remaineth safe Finally the vnbeleeuers are not partakers of his body and bloud Theoph. Why Christ vsed those wordes and no other in the institutiō of the Supper If that were the meaning of Christ why did he not expresse it in plainer words and lesse doubtfull Mat. He could not expresse that promise in fewer more significant wordes for if he had said This is a pledge or signe of my body there had beene no promise It had therefore beene necessary for him to haue vsed long circumstances of words after this manner I do assure that this bread and this wine doe represent vnto you my body and bloud that as often as you receiue these visible signes you shal be truly and indeede partakers of the things whereof they be signes And this kinde of speach had not beene of such force and weight as that is which he vsed This is my bloud for it compasseth all those things vnder it but with a greater maiestie And for this cause the holy Ghost vsed a like The confirmation of the former interpretation kind of speach in the Sacraments of the old Testamēt in that it giueth the name of the thing signified to the signs themselues to teach vs that such as receiue worthelie be truly partakers of the thing signified Theoph. Declare that vnto me particularly in some Sacraments of the old Church Matth. Gen. 17. 9 10. 11. First God meaning to assure Abraham and his posteritie that Circumcisiō was vnto them a most certaine signe that they were reckened in his couenāt calleth it his couenant The same also saith Moses of Exo. 12. 11. the Sacrament of the passouer For hee calleth it the Lordes passeouer to giue vs to vnderstand that it was a most certaine token of the good will of God which the Israelites had experience of when the Angell destroied the first borne of the Egiptians and passed ouer their houses without touching them whereof the passeouer was a Sacrament The. Indeed these kinds of speaking do come somewhat neare to the words of Christ vsed in the institution of the holy Supper But I aske of thee if there bee any altogether like vnto them and that haue the same meaning with that which thou hast alledged Mat. There be For the Apostle speaking of the Sacraments which the father 's vsed in the wildernesse saith 1. Cor. 10. 4. that the rocke that is the water which Moyses had not without miracle brought out of stone was Christ To teach that it was vnto them a most effectuall Sacrament of the Communiō and fellowship which they had with Christ For the same Apostle affirmeth that the fathers did eate the same spirituall meat with vs and dranke the same spirituall drinke Loe therefore a manner of speach altogether like to that which Christ vsed in the institution of the Supper and which hath the same interpretatiō with that which I brought a little before Yea and that more is there is vse of this kinde of speach not onely in the Scripture but also in our common talke for if a king will forgiue an offender the punishment of his faultes deliuering vnto him his letters patents confirmed by his hand writing and seale he will say behold thy pardon And yet he meaneth not that the letters patents bee his pardon but onely a certaine testimonie of his pardon And this similitude very excellently agreeth with the sacramēts that be as it were seales of the word as the Apostle testifieth speaking of circumcision for hee calleth it the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Theoph. I doe now see that thy interpretation doeth expresse the true meaning of Christs words I do also graunt that by those words Christ assureth vs that we are as verily partakers of his body and bloud as we do receiue the bread and wine But how can that be vnderstandest thou that his body is shut vp or inclosed in the bread and his bloud in the wine Matt. Against the error of consubstantiation No not so for the words themselues cannot any way beare it for Christ must haue said my body is with this bread and my bloud is with this wine Secondly wee should make a carnall eating which should lead vs to the three latter absurdities reckened vp of vs when we spake of transubstantiation namely that the bloud of Christ should bee seuered from his bodie that his body should be insinite and finally that the wicked comming to the supper should communicate with the body and bloud of Christ and therefore should obtaine euerlasting life Moreouer Christ himselfe doth teach the contrarie for vnto his disciples iudging the speach which he had of eating his body to he hard he answereth thus It is the spirit that giueth life the flesh profiteth nothing The words that I speak vnto you are spirit and life By which words he declareth most euidently that hee speaketh not of any carnall but of spirituall eating Theoph. Thou hast affirmed before that Christ in that place did not speake of the eating which is in the supper but of that which is spiritually by faith Matth. Of the eating of Christs body and drinking his bloud Euer as the Scripture doth set before vs one Christ so it sheweth one way how to eate his flesh and drinke his bloud that is whereby wee may bee made one with him to be partakers of all his benefites and this is spiritually
the edification and saluation of the child Theoph. Why so Mat. First of all God is glorified for that he sheweth himselfe true in his promises by the which it is that he hath mercy vpon the faithfull euē to the thousand generation Moreouer the parent himselfe is wonderfully comforted confirmed in the loue of God whē he seeth that not onely he himselfe is beloued of God but also that the loue grace of God is deriued vnto his children which God assureth him of by that visible signe Finally cōcerning the child it hath a maruellous benefit bestowed vpō it that he doth so soone obtaine the partaking of Christ and his benefits by the which he hath the inheritance of eternall life By the remembrance whereof when he commeth to age he is wonderfully cōfirmed in the loue and feare of God namely whē he calleth to mind that he is so much esteemed of God that euen from his comming into the world he obtained fellowship in his couenant Theo. How the children of beleeuers lacking faith be partakers of Christ But how can a yong child by Baptisme be partaker of Christ and his benefites seeing it is certaine that he lacketh faith without which thou affirmedst before that no man can haue that felowship Mat. That indeed is true in those that be of yeares and in such as for their age may beleeue But God worketh in the childrē of the faithfull belonging to his couenant another way vnknowen vnto vs whō also the Apostle doubteth not to call holy 1. Cor. 7. 14. in so much as they cannot perish seeing they haue in them the seede of faith which verily in the due time worketh the effects in some sooner but in other later as it seemeth good to the Lord to call them Theoph. How the children of the godly be borne in originall sin I do now see that the children of the godly are to bee Baptized Notwithstanding I will yet propound one questiō before I go from the speech which I haue begun How can it be that those children of the faithfull should be borne defiled with originall sinne whose parents be cleansed from it Mat. Austen by an excellent similitude Austen de penit merit remis li. 3. cap. 18. answereth this question in these words Euen as the chaffe which by the helpe of man is seuered with great diligence frō the wheate that is threshed notwithstanding remaineth in the fruite which groweth of the sayd cleansed wheate being sowen so sinne that by Baptisme is cleansed in the parents remaineth in those whom they haue begotten Therfore our children except they be borne againe by a spirituall birth cannot bee accounted the children of God nor heires of eternall life CHAP. IIII. Of the Supper of the Lord. By the which God witnesseth that his couenāt is most certain toward vs for asmuch as by it he maketh vs more and more partakers of Christ and his benefites Theophilus HItherto hath bin spoken of Baptisme let vs now come to the Supper of the Lord and let vs begin at the institution of it Mat. Of the word Supper and the institution of it The Euangelistes shew that it was instituted of Christ the same night hee was betrayed after hee had supped and had eaten the Easter I am be according to the Law Theoph. I thinke it was thereupon called Supper Mat. It is called Supper of the Apostle not so much for this cause as to shew that it is indeede a spirituall Supper giuen of God vnto the faithful wherein he feedeth them with the body and bloud of Iesus Christ into the hope of eternall life Theoph. The three heads of the institution are to be examined of vs namely 1 The signes and Sacramentall rites 2 Their signification 3 And finally the likenesse or agreement between both Matth. The signes of the supper The signes are bread and wine which indeed do signifie the body and bloud of Christ Because the body and bloud of Christ haue that force and efficacie of feeding in our soules which bread and wine haue in our body And for this cause Christ often calleth himselfe the bread of life Iohn 6. Theoph. What difference makest thou betweene the bread and wine of the Supper and the bread and wine which we vse for our ordinarie meate and drinke Mat. In substance indeede none but in the vse and ministring of the Supper cōcerning which this I hold that the one are set before vs for the nourishmēt of the body but the other be ordained of God to be signes of the body and bloud of Christ The same also is to be thought of the water of Baptisme Theoph. Why there is a double signe in the Supper Why be there two signes in the Supper Matth. To the end we might know that in Christ we haue whole and perfect spirituall food that is whatsoeuer is requisite to our saluation It was also done for a fuller remembrance of his death For the wine that is the signe of his bloud doth as it were represent it before our eyes Theoph. Let vs come to the Sacramentall rite and signification of it Mat. It is double or two-fold 1 For the one respecteth the Minister 2 The other him which is is partaker of the Supper The Sacramentall rite of the Supper What is the duety of ministers in ministring the Supper The first is this to take the bread and to breake it whereby is signified that Christ with sufferings was broken for our redēption which himselfe declared in these words This is my body that is broken for you After to giue it being broken and to deliuer the wine in the cup by which rites is meant that God doth offer giue Christ vnto vs together with all his benefites The duetie of them that come to the Lords Table The later rite is that he which commeth to the Supper should receiue eate and drinke the bread and wine giuen vnto him which indeede doth signifie that in the Supper we do truely receiue Christ eate his body and drinke his bloud by the which we are nourished into the hope of eternall life if we do not cast him from vs through vnbeliefe Theoph. What is it to eate the body of Christ Mat. To be so nearely ioyned with his body as is the meate which we eate with our owne body Theoph. What is it to drinke the bloud of the Lord Mat. To be as truly partakers of his death passiō as if we our selues had suffered the same And this doth our Sauiour of Christ meane whē he saith Verily verily I say vnto you except you eate the flesh of the sonne of man and drinke his bloud you haue no life in you He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud hath eternall life But this is to be remembred which wee spake before in the Chapter of Faith namely that by the merit of Christes death represented in the holie Supper by wine that signifieth his bloud
the Scripture vnderstandeth all the benefites of Christ but for the most part maketh mention of that only because it hath as it were the first and chiefe place Theoph. Let vs go forward What vnderstandest thou by that spirituall food which thou saydest came by the eating of Christes body and drinking his bloud Matth. Our spirituall foode in the Supper First peace of conscience namely because we are more more assured of the forgiuenesse of our sins promised by baptisme SecoÌ„dly the daily growth increase of the new man begun in vs in our Baptisme so as we haue power giuen vs to serue God better and to resist the temptations that are wont to call vs away from his obedieÌ„ce Whereupon followeth an effect of this spirituall food by name that we are coÌ„firmed daily in the hope of eternall life And by these things appeareth that which I haue said of the difference of the Sacraments that Baptisme doth testifie the beginning of our partaking with Christ and his benefites and the Supper the continuance and increase thereof Theoph. Now we are to come to the commandement and promise of the Sacrament Mat. Both be added presently after the words of institution Take eate drinke you all of this do this in remembrance of me Loe the coÌ„mandement it set down theÌ„ the promise This is my body This is my bloud For the meaning of these wordes is as much as if Christ sayd This bread and this wine doe so represent vnto you my body and bloud that they assure you receiuing the visible signes to bee indeede partakers of those things that be signified by them eueÌ„ my body bloud Theoph. But the words of Christ seeme not to haue that meaning but rather that the bread and wine are transubstantiated or turned into his body and bloud Matth. The exposition of Christes wordes The wordes themselues cannot beare it For if Christ meant to haue signified that he would haue sayd thus Let this be made my body or let it be changed into my body Theoph. What then were the meaning of Christes wordes if they were to be expounded according to the letter as they say Matth. They should rather signifie that his body and bloud were changed into bread and wine For if any saw the piller of salt whereinto Lots wife was turned out of all doubt he would say This thing that is this Piller of salt is Lots wife that hee might declare that she was turned into that Piller and such as heard those wordes would take them in that sence Theoph. I perceiue indeede that those words if they were to be expounded literally doe properly signifie as thou sayest Howbeit that sence agreeth not to the wordes of Christ Mat. Thou thinkest rightly and that former agreeth nothing more namely whereby transubstantiation is builded which indeed the very words do not beare yea rather out of it foure absurdities do follow Theoph. Rehearse them Mat. A consutation of the absurdities following vpon Popish transubstantiation 1 First if the bread wine be turned into the body and bloud of Christ there shal be no signes in the holy Supper and therefore it shall not be a Sacrament which indeed cannot be without a visible signe 2 Secondly Christes bloud shal be separated from his body which is most absurd can neuer be Moreouer the body of Christ should be infinite therefore he should not be a very man neither should he haue truely ascended into heauen by which opinion the chiefe points of our faith should be ouerthrowen Theo. Some do obiect that Christs body is now glorified at one the same time may be in diuers places Mat. This objection is vaine for when Christ instituted the Supper his body was not glorified Adde hereunto that the glorification hath not taken from it the nature of a true body but hath taken away the infirmitie and weaknesse of it which was very well obserued of one of the fathers For this cause Peter saith Actes 3. 21 The heauen must hold him vntill the time of the restoring of all things And the Angels in another place Actes 1. 11. So shall he come as you haue seene him go into heauen Theoph. Shew the fourth absurditie Mat. It is this that the wicked and hypoerites comming to the Supper should bee indeede partakers of the bodie and bloud of Christ which verilie were nothing else but to ioyne God SathaÌ„ together Moreouer contrarie vnto that which the Scripture expresly teacheth the vnbeeleuers should be saued For Christ affirmeth Iohn 6. Whosoeuer eateth my flesh and drinketh my bloud hath euerlasting life Theo. Against those who say the reprobatâ—… 〈◊〉 the Supper be partakers of Christes body bloud But Christ vnderstaÌ„deth those which eate his flesh drinke his bloud worthily For the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 11. 29. He that eateth this bread drinketh this cup vnworthely eateth and drinketh to himselfe damnation Mat. The Apostle saith not who so eateth the body of Christ drinketh the bloud of Christ vnworthely but hee that eateth the bread and drinketh the cup. For Christ should offer his body to be prophaned if he made the vnworthy partakers of it Moreouer his gifts be inseparably ioyned with his person and therefore it is impossible that any should communicate with his body but the same also must bee partakers of all his benefites eueÌ„ of euerlasting life For this cause Iohn saith 1. Ioh. 5. 12 He that hath the sonne hath life He that hath not the sonne of God hath not life Those foure absurdities recâ—…ned vp by vs doe most manifestly ouerthrow the opinion of transubstaÌ„tiation against the which experience it selfe it for as much as the bread wine of the Supper if they be kept long do corrupt WhereupoÌ„ it is plaine that their substance it not changed Theoph. I do indeede perceiue that the wordes of Christ do not establish traÌ„substantiatioÌ„ or the turning of the signes into the things signified both because the wordes themselues cannot beare it and especially in that most grosse absurdities do follow thereupon But by what arguments canst thou proue that the expositioÌ„ brought by thee doth expresse the sence of Christs wordes and that that was his meaning Mat. Of the exposition of Christes words in the Supper Seeing there must be an exposition of them it is not to be doubted but that is true and proper which may be confirmed by the testimonie of the holy Scripture whereof no absurditie followeth But that which I haue brought is such therefore it is true and proper Theoph. If thou prouest these two points thou shalt verily ouercome Mat. First that exposition is confirmed by the testimony of the holy Scripture For Paule thus expouÌ„deth the words of Christ instituting the Supper The cup of 1. Cor. 10. 16 blessing which we blesse is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ the bread which we breake is it not the
by faith Seeing therefore this spirituall eating is aboundantly sufficient to our saluation and is grounded vpō the word of God it ouerthoweth that carnall eating which men by the example of the Capetnaits haue deuised to themselues frō the which also if it could be there is no other profite to be looked for but that which we do receiue by spirituall eating Therefore notwithstanding Christ in that place speaketh not of the sacramentall eating but of that which is by the word receiued by faith neuertheles it may ought to be referred vnto that because it is one and the same eating and therefore whatsoeuer is said of the one must necessarily agree to the other And indeed seeing the question is of the foode of our soules which is spirituall the meat is spirituall it followeth of necessity that the eating is spirituall euen as we can not nourish our bodies except earthly foode be visibly and sensibly eaten for the preseruation of this life Theoph. What doest thou properly vnderstand by spirituall eating Matth. How wee that be in the earth be partakers of Christ his body which is in heauen That Christ although concerning his humane nature he go not out of the heauens yet by the power of the holy Ghost doth communicate vnto vs his body and bloud and that by faith which is in stead of a spirituall hand and mouth by which wee receiue him and apply him vnto vs as hath bin more at large declared of vs in the chapter of Faith And this is the spiritual eating of christ by faith cōtrary to the carnal which som haue dreamed was with the bodily mouth insomuch as the very substance of the body and bloud of Christ was eaten with it Which is a most absurd deuise and yet it is no maruell that some are fallen vnto it For as the spirituall man when he heareth that the body of Christ is to be eaten and his bloud to be drunken vnderstandeth it spiritually for his spirituall hunger and thirst and therefore prepareth his heart by faith so contrariwise the carnall man thinketh nothing but carnally in all this matter and therefore prepareth the mouth of his body to deuour Christ But the saying of Austen is notable Why doest thou make ready thy teeth and belly beleeue and thou hast eaten Theoph But how can it be that Christ which is in heauen should truly communicate his body vnto vs that be conuersant vpon the earth Matth. That ought not to seeme maruelous vnto vs for if the sunne being a creature without life do by his beames communicate the effect and power of it vnto vs that liue vppon the earth by a much more strong reason may Christ which is the sunne of righteousnes by the immeasurable power of the holy Ghost truely make vs partakers of his body in the Supper to whom it is not harder to ioyne thinges together farre distant the one from the other then those that be most nigh Which indeed appeareth euen by that that it ioyneth together all the faithfull notwithstāding they be scattered here and there to become one body whereof Christ is the head That also is shadowed in the Supper for the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 10. 17 We which are many are one body for all of vs are partakers of one bread Theoph. An obiectiō against spirituall eating But some obiect that if in the supper of the Lord we do only spiritually and by faith communicate with the body of Christ there is no great profite of it seeing that is daily fulfilled in vs by the ministery of the word receiued by faith Matth. It followeth not For there be diuerse helps ordained of God to the same end namely to further our saluation in Christ by the holy Ghost Euen as a good Phisition helpeth the health of the patient committed to his trust by sundry meanes Wherefore notwithstanding Christ receiued in the word by faith be alreadie spiritually eaten of vs yet neuerthelesse it is more and more fulfilled in the Supper by the which the Lord so worketh according to his promise that our hearts be more aboundantly inflamed with his loue confirmed in the hope of euerlasting life Theoph. Seeing then it is certaine that we are not otherwise partakers of Christ in the supper but spiritually and by faith it followeth that all they which come to it without faith haue no fruit or benefite by it Mat. That indeede is most true for by their vnbeliefe they refuse Christ whom God oftereth to them in the Supper Wherefore they be onely partakers of the signes and that to their condemnation seeing that so much as in them is they prophane and vnhallow that most holy spirituall banket prouided of God for his children whiles they come vnto it not furnished with that most precious garment namely faith wherby we are iustified before God made the sons of God and bee accompted worthie to sit downe at his table For this cause the Apostle commandeth that euerie 1. Cor. 11. 28 one should prooue himselfe and so eate of that bread and drinke of that cup. Theoph. What is the way whereby each ought to prooue himselfe Matth. Let him try himselfe and see whether hee haue faith which shall bee easie to perceiue by repentance as it hath beene said of vs in the proper place Whosoeuer therefore is not any way touched with repentance is altogether vnworthie to bee admitted to the Supper of the Lord. Theop. But what thinkest thou of him that hath some feeling of repentance notwithstanding it be little Matth. If it be so little that it shew not it selfe by turning vnto God and amendment of life it ought to be suspected for true repētāce notwithstāding it be weak doth alwaies shew it selfe by the outward workes In the meane time it is not to bee doubted but that as our faith is alwaies verie weake so the same is true concerning our repentance And this indeed is so in the most regenerate although diuersly for in some it is more in others it is lesse Notwithstanding it is so farre off that that weaknesse should driue vs from the holy Supper that it ought rather to spurre vs forward to come vnto it that by it wee might be strengthened in faith and repentance Euen as the sick man the weaker he knoweth himselfe to be should so much the more earnestly desire meate both to receiue nourishment and to refresh his strength Therefore they onely bee vnworthie to come to the Lords Supper that be ignorant and delight in their sinnes and continue in them for that spirituall foode doeth not as yet belong to them Theoph. But if such men come to the Supper what thinkest thou is to be done Matth. Ecclesiasticall discipline If their vnworthinesse be secret and hidden they ought to be left to the iudgement of God which will one day take vengeance vppon them but if it bee knowen by the order of Ecclesiasticall or Church discipline they ought to be
is beyond the reach of man Mat. It is indeed as Paule himselfe proueth in these words Without controuersie great is the mystery of 1. Tim. 3. 16 godlinesse God manifest in the flesh Theoph. Hitherto wee haue heard sufficiently of the person of Christ nowe let vs speake of the remedie brought by him for our saluation Mat. Of the remedy by Christ Hee hath fully satisfied the iudgement of God for our sinnes and hath so redeemed vs from euerlasting death and hath together made vs capable of the heauenlie life so as we be partakers of his gifts Theop. There come three things to my mind wherof I will aske thee 1 How Christ hath satisfied the iudgement of God for our sinnes 2 How he maketh vs partakers of the heauenly life 3 And why it is necessarie that his gifts should be made ours Mat. To the end it may the more easily bee vnderstood we must remēber that whereof we spake before namely that God hath pronounced the curse against all such as transgresse his Law and that wee in two respects haue broken it that is to say transgression 1 by leauing vndone the good which he requireth transgression 2 and by doing the euill which he forbiddeth Now Christ hath prouided a remedie for both for while he was in this earth hee did fully and perfectly fulfill the Law for vs. Moreouer he suffred the death of the crosse with extreme reproch that hee might to the vtmost endure the punishment due to our sins By which meanes hauing abundantly satisfied the perfect iustice of God for vs he maketh a way to his mercy whereby we may obtain the forgiuenes of sins And in this sense it is said 1. Pet. 1. 19 That we were redeemed by the precious bloud of Christ 1. Pet. 2 24 That Christ vpon the tree did beare our sins in his bodie 1. Ioh. 17. That the bloud of Christ doth cleanse vs from all sinne Theoph. I cannot sufficiently wonder at the exceeding great loue of God toward vs that hee gaue his most dearly beloued Son to the death to redeeme vs. Mat. Adde this which were his enemies which also is diligently obserued by the Apostle in these wordes Doubtlesse one wil scarse die for a righteous man for Rom. 5. 7. for one that is profitable to him peraduenture some man will die But God commendeth his loue towards vs that when we were yet sinners Christ died for vs. From whence he draweth this most comfortable conclusion If when wee were enemies we were reconciled Rom. 5. 10. to God by the death of his Sonne much more being reconciled shall we be saued by his life Theoph. But could the iudgement of God bee no otherwise satisfied for our sinnes except his beloued Sonne had taken vpon him our nature therein to suffer death the death I say of the Crosse Mat No for man which hath offended the infinite Maiesty of God doth deserue infinit punishment that is to say eternall death which could not be suffred and ouercome of anie but of the eternall and infinit Sonne of God Moreouer the iustice of God required this that the nature which had sinned should suffer the punishment of sin But because God could not suffer and man could not ouercome death it was necessarie that the Redeemer should be verie God very man to do both Wherein also it is to be marked how neere an atonemēt God hath entred into with vs by Christ in whom the parties at variance be inseparably ioyned together whereby it is come to passe that God hath turned the fall of man to his great good for thereupon he hath taken occasion to vnite vs more nearly with him selfe Rom. 5. 20. Wherefore where sinne was increased there grace hath abounded much more by Christ Theoph. Hitherto we haue heard sufficiently of the first point namely how Christ hath satisfied the iudgment of God for our sinnes now let vs come to the other which is by what right wee may claime to our selues euerlasting life Mat. By a double right through Christ First because for vs he hath fulfilled the whole Law Leuit. 18. 5. and God hath promised life to such as fulfill it Secondly by the right of inheritāce For after that Christ is made ours we are not onely partakers of his spirituall riches as his perfect righteousnesse and obedience whereby wee are accompted iust before God but also of his dignity namely that with him we are reckened and taken for the children of God Rom. 8. 17. Therefore Paule saith If we be sonnes wee are also heires heires indeed of God but heires annexed with Christ And againe in another place he calleth eternall life the inheritance of the Saints and so hee compriseth both the rights by the which wee lay claime to Colos 1. 12. it for our selues Theoph. Therefore in Christ alone we find all things necessarie to saluation Mat. Yea verily For in him there is righteousnesse and the fulnesse of life and without him man full of sinne findeth nothing but euerlasting malediction and Act. 4. 12. curse Therefore Peter saith that neither saluation is in any other and that there is no other name vnder heauen giuen among men whereby we may be saued For this cause also the name of Iesus Christ was giuen him from heauen by the which his office is plainly set forth that is to say all that which he hath performed for our saluation and doth still performe Theoph. Go to therefore tell me what the name of Iesus Christ signifieth as also of whom it was giuen him Mat. The name Iesus signifieth Sauiour and an Angell gaue it to the Son of God because as he himselfe expounded it he should saue his people frō theyr sinnes Concerning the name of Christ it is to bee vnderstood Mat. 1. 21. that in times past in the old Testamēt Christ was figured or shadowed in the Kings Prophetes and Priests who when they were cōsecrated were annointed with oyle which signified the giftes of the holy Ghost Now the Redeemer promised in Hebrew was called Messias but in Greeke it is translated by the Dan. 9. 25. word Christ which in Latine signifieth annointed By which name we are taught that he is the chiefe 1. King Luc. 1. 33. 2. Prophet Deu. 18. 18 3. Priest Psal 110. 4 Howbeit he was annointed not with cōmon visible oyle but with the grace of the holy Ghost that most fully that from him as from the head it might be powred into each member namely into all the faithfull in so much as they also together with him are made Kings Prophets and Priests Now the name of Christ hath bin retained in all tongues because the Apostles them selues wrote in Greeke This therefore is the cause why that name was giuen vnto him as also why all the faithful are called christians euen because they be partakers of his annointing therefore of his kingdome prophesie and priesthood
Theoph. Of the office of Christ First therefore we must see how Christ performed the office of King Prophet and Priest And afterward how hee communicateth the same with the faithfull Mat. He did the office of a king when by his diuine power he deliuered vs from the tyranny of our enemies the deuill sinne and death whom hee ouercame that he might make vs his seruants and subiects to his kingdome which indeed he doth continually exercise in vs when he ruleth vs by the scepter of his word and by the power of his spirite He did the office of a Prophet in that hee declared all the will of God vnto vs by his word he gaue the holy Ghost by the helpe whereof it might be vnderstood of vs and we yeeld our consents vnto it This office also hee exerciseth euerie day when by the ministerie of the word and working of the Spirite he causeth vs daily to profite and to go forward in that knowledge Finallie he did the office of a Priest when vpon the Crosse he offred his body and bloud for vs to God the Father that he might bee a satisfaction for our sinnes The execution of which office is also at this day when he maketh intercession for vs. Now this priesthood of Christ is the truth and fulfilling of all the sacrifices of the old Testament Theoph. Let vs now speake of our kingdome priesthood and prophetship Mat. Apot. 1. 6. We are spiritually kings in Christ that we may ouercome the deuill and sinne 1. Pet. 2. 9. We are Priests through him to offer vp an acceptable sacrifice of praise to God Act. 2. 17. Wee are prophets that being taught the truth wee may teach others and open to them the misteries of the kingdome of Heauen Theoph. It hath bin sufficiently declared how Christ hath deliuered vs from condemnation as also by what means he hath made vs fit to attain to eternal life Now the third point remaineth namely why it is necessary that his gifts should be made ours Mat. Because otherwise they shall no way helpe vs to the satisfying of the perfect iustice of God euen as other mens riches profit not to deliuer vs out of debt except they become ours Theoph. How therefore may his gifts become ours Mat. If we be made one with him For by the benefite of that vnion we are made partakers of all his spirituall Of the vnion with Christ graces and riches which are no lesse imputed vnto vs before God thē as if they were ours by nature For this cause the Apostle saith Coloss 1. 22. that we are by Christ reconciled in that bodie of his flesh through death By which wordes of his he meaneth that the merite of Christs death pertaineth not to anie but vnto such as be grafted into his bodie and are made his members Theoph. Can therfore no man be partaker of Christs gifts except he be made one with him Mat. He cannot Euen as a woman cannot be partaker of the riches and honor of some great man except she be ioyned with him in mariage that they become one bodie and one flesh the mēbers also cannot draw life from the head if they be not ioyned with it There is therefore no true partaking of Christ except there be an vnion with him For this cause therefore Christ said to the Capernaits Vnlesse ye eate of the flesh of Ioh. 6. the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud ye shall haue no life in you In which words he plainly sheweth that we are not partakers of his gifts vnto saluation except we be as nearely coupled with his humanitie as meate and drinke are ioyned with our bodie which of all others is a most neare vnion For meat drinke when they are digested in our stomach are so turned into our substance that they cannot be distinguished much lesse separated from it Theoph. This doctrine also is aboue the capacitie of man Mat. Ephes 5. 32. It is indeed Wherefore Paule speaking of it saith that it is a great misterie Now if we can neuer so litle see the bodie of the Sunne but our eyes do dazell how can our mindes pierce to that inaccessible light of the diuine maiestie to conceiue his heauenly mysteries such as be the points which we haue hādled first 1. Concerning the Trinitie 2. Of the vnion of two natures in Christ 3. And of coupling the faithfull with the humane nature of Christ It is therfore our duty rather holily to beleeue these three fundamentall points or principles of Christian religion then curiously to examine them by the rule of our reason CHAP. IIII. Of Faith by the which we are made one with Christ and so be partakers of all his gifts Theophilus HItherto I haue hard First that God which is perfectly iust doth no way absolue the guiltie Secondly that men which are most miserable sinners are before the iustice of God guiltie of eternall death Thirdly that Iesus Christ by his death hath satisfied the exact righteousnesse of God which is imputed vnto vs to the end that being set free from condemnation we may be partakers of eternall life so as we be ioyned with him It remaineth therefore that I vnderstand how we are made one with Christ Mat. By faith euen as he him selfe testifieth in the prayer which he made to God for all the faithfull in these words Ioh. 17. 20. Father I pray thee for such as shal beleeue in me that they may be all one as thou O Father art in me and I in thee that they also may be one in vs. Whereunto also that saying of Paul is to be referred Ephes 3. 17. that Christ dwelleth in our hearts by faith And herevpon it is that these sentences be often repeated in the Scriptures 1 That euery one which beleeueth in him is absolued an◠discharged Act. 13. 39. 2 Is made the child of God Iohn 1. 12. 3 Doth not perish but hath euerlasting life Iohn 3. 16. In which places those things be attributed to faith which we receiue of Christ alone to the ende we may vnderstand that both he and his gifts are committed to vs by faith Theoph. Thou hast touched a little concerning the righteousnesse of faith which I desire to haue declared Of Iustification by thee somewhat more at large for I perceiue that Paule oftentimes speaketh of it Mat. To be iustified before God is to be accompted iust that is to say without blot vnreproueable Now Paule doth often handle this point because it is one of the speciall groundes of our faith For no man can please God but he that is iustified Theoph. How so Mat. Because as God is perfectly iust and holy so he loueth holinesse and iustice on the other side hee hateth vnrighteousnesse therefore we can haue no fellowshippe with him to be partakers of his heauenly glorie except we be perfectly righteous Therefore he saith that no vncleane thing shall
I bee deceiued the wicked doe not the will of God but God doth his will by the wicked Mat. Thou iudgest rightly For the purpose of the wicked in doing the will of God is far vnlike the purpose of God himselfe Which Isaiah himselfe doeth plainely note speaking of Sennacherib For after that Isai 107. he had saide that hee was the rod of Gods wrath and the staffe of his hand whom hee sent to a dissembling nation whom also he would command to pray and to take the spoile of the people of the Lordes wrath straight way he addeth But he thinketh not so neither will his heart esteeme it so for he imagineth to destroy and to cut off not a few nations Theoph. God then is the maruailous workman which can vse any instrument to do his worke by Mat. Yea indeede he vseth both good and euill to his glorie but in farre vnlike respect For hee guideth the affections of the former namely of the Angels and of the faithfull by his holy spirite so as the worke which he doth by them is altogether good But the other that is to saie the diuell and the wicked are moued by their owne malice and so they do wholly differ from God who neuerthelesse by his wonderfull wisedome doth so guide their actions that in the end they fall out vnto his glorie Theoph. This doctrine excellently agreeth with that which I haue heard of thee more then once namely that the sinnes of the wicked bee from themselues but while as sinning they do this or that thing that is of God Mat. Thou gatherest well For so doth God execute his iudgements For hee punisheth sin with another sinne and for the most part with a sin of the same kinde As murther with murther theft with theft according to the vnchangeable sentence pronounced by himselfe Gen. 9. 6. Whosoeuer sheddeth man his bloud by man his bloud shall bee shed Isai 33. 1. Woe to thee that spoilest when thou hast made an end of spoiling thou shalt bee spoiled Theoph. But often times it falleth out that the wicked prosper so as they be free from all aduersitie yea from deserued punishments the godly euery where be pressed down with afflictions Mat. Indeede God punisheth some sinnes in this world that both his prouidence and iustice may appeare for else he might seem not to care what mē did And againe he leaueth many things vnpunished that we may vnderstand there is another life after this wherein he will most seuerely reuenge all the sinnes of men yea with the greatnes of punishment recompēce his long patience toward them wherewith by his innumerable benefites he called them to repentance But concerning the afflictions of the godly when God sendeth thē he hath regard both to his own glory and to our saluation For according to the saying of the Apostle all thinges worke together for the best Rom. 8. 28. vnto them that loue God I omit that there may be many Hypocrites among the faithfull whose sinnes God doth worthely punish Theoph. Of afflictiōs But what profite may the faithfull reape by their afflictions Math. What profite not one kinde but manie which for the helpe of memorie I will bring into sixe heads Theoph. Declare the first Mat. The first vse of afflictiōs humilitie By them God bringeth vs to humilitie while by our owne experience hee prooueth that what soeuer goodly thing wee wondred at in our selues is nothing Hereuppon was that speach of Dauid With rebukes thou chastisest men for iniquitie thou makest his beautie to consume as a moth surelie euerie Psa 39. 11 man is vanity Theoph. What is the cause that God doth so humble vs Mat. 1 First that all glory and praise may bee giuen vnto him alone 2 Secondly that we may put away that same vaine confidence which naturally sticketh within vs so to fly to him alone and to put our trust in him 3 Last of all that we may bee the better prepared to receiue his gifts 1. Pet. 5. 5. which hee giueth not but to the humble Theoph. Come to the second point Mat. The second vse of afflictions repentance By afflictions God calleth vs to true repentance For when he chastiseth our sinnes hee doeth this to make vs vnderstand how much hee detesteth sinne wherein we do not a little flatter our selues that so also we might detest them Moreouer with this he tameth the rebellion of our flesh euen as husband-men are wont to tame theyr stout cattell with the plough and daily more and more teacheth vs obedience Hereuppon Dauid sayth It is good for mee that I was afflicted that I may learne Ps 119. 71. thy statutes Theoph. This bringeth that to my remembrance which before this time I haue heard of thee namely that God by afflictions doth correct our vices that he may allure vs vnto vertue Mat. Thou sayest well For euen as iron if it bee not occupied is marred with rust and the earth except it bee dressed bringeth foorth onely briers and brambles So also the godly if they bee not exercised with diuerse afflictions do as it were fall a sleepe in their pleasures and become dull and slowe to Gods seruice so as in steade of fruites beseeming repentance they bring foorth nothing but vanity and folly Therefore the Apostle sayeth to the Hebrewes Heb. 12. 11. euery affliction for the present time seemeth not ioyous but greeuous but afterwards it bringeth the quiet fruite of righteousnesse vnto them that are thereby exercised Theoph. It is now time to come to the third point Math. The 3. fruite of afflictions pitty to others By afflictions God worketh this in vs that wee learne to pitty such as be in distresse For no man hath compassion or suffereth with another who himselfe hath not suffered before By this argument the Apostle to the Hebrewes prooueth that Christ will haue compassion vppon our afflictions and that hee will bee our aduocate with his Father These bee his wordes wee haue not an high Priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities but such a one as was in all thinges tempted in like sort yet without sinne Theoph. Go forward declare vnto me the fourth point M The fourth vse of afflictions praier By afflictions the Lord shaketh of our drousines and doth stirre vs vp to earnest prayer In so much as not without good cause afflictiōs be called the schoole of the holy Ghost where we are taught to pray well The Lord also commaundeth vs to pray in the time of trouble promiseth that we shall be heard Call vpon Psal 50. 15 me in the time of thy trouble and I will deliuer thee thou shalt glorifie me Which all the faithfull do often proue true in their owne experience For as the same Prophet saith Psal 34. 19 the Lord is neare those that be broken in heart and will saue the contrite in spirit Theoph. That is a most
the sonnes of Helie Experience also confirmeth the thing of stubburne disobedient children for they be for the most part seene either in prisons or vpon the gallowes Contrariwise the well aduised and obedient for the most part haue long life with great quietnesse and peace But if at any time it fall out to be otherwise we must remember that all the promises of God concerning earthly things be with condition namely so farre forth as he shall know them to be expedient both for his owne glorie and for our saluation When therefore God doth betimes call his out of this life vnto himselfe he prouideth farre better for them then if he gaue them long life For he taketh them from the miseries of this world and putteth them into the possession of eternall life On the other side sometimes he giueth the wicked long life but so weake and full of miserie that it is more grieuous then death it selfe For this cause Moses repeating the law of God Deut. 6. 2. declareth that promise in these wordes That it may be well with thee vpon the land which c. But if it fall out otherwise it was for the cause which was at large set forth by vs when we intreated of afflictions For in that place we taught wherefore the Lord will haue the wicked somtimes to liue long happily in this world and the godly to suffer all kind of afflictions Yet notwithstanding that saying of Salomon abideth true Although Eccles 8. 12 the sinner commit euill an hundred times and God prolongeth his dayes yet I know that it shall be well with them that feare the Lord. The sixt Commandement Thou shalt not kill Theoph. Hauing finished the treatise of the fift commandement we are now to come to the sixt How many parts be there of it Mat. Two 1 First the forbidding of murther 2 The commanding of keeping peace and friendship with our neighbours Theoph. How large is the word killing Mat. The exposition of the first part It containeth all the degrees and steps by the which we come to it yea indeed all those things by the which we are procured stirred to commit murther according to the third rule Theoph. Rehearse those steps or degrees Mat. They be three The first whereof is hatred conceiued in the heart forasmuch as it is in plaine words forbidden in Moses Thou shalt not hate thy brother in Leu. 19. 17. thy heart Theoph. What if our enemie be a wicked man is it not lawfull to hate him Matth. We may indeed hate his sinnes but not his person But we must diligently beware of two extremities wherein we do sinne on either side The first is that we hate not the person of the sinner The other that we loue not the sinne for the persons sake Theoph. Let vs come to the second degree by the which we come to murther Matth. It is anger for it is a declaration of the hatred lying hid in the heart Theoph. Thinkest thou it to be altogether vnlawfull to be angry with any Mat. I do not thinke so for anger is a naturall affection wherein if moderation be kept it deserueth as much prayse as the two extremities deserue disprayse Theoph. What is that moderation Matth. When with zeale for the glory of God or with iust sorrow we be angry because iniurie is done vnto vs without our desert that keeping a meane with this caution that we neither speake nor do any thing that is against the honour of God Christian modestie and the loue of our neighbour In which sence Paule commandeth Ephes 4. 26. Be angry and sinne not Theoph. Let vs consider of the two extremities of anger and first let vs speake of that which sinneth in exceeding Mat. We doe then fall into it when we be angry rashly that is without a lawfull cause or else when being moued for a iust cause we do passe the bounds of moderation speaking or doing the things that be against the honour of God neighbourly charitie and Christian modestie But that falleth out when we be so taken vp with that affection that the iudgemēt is troubled and reason it selfe is darkened for then for a time we are like vnto mad mē that know not what they do For this cause Iames saith Iam. 1. 20. The wrath of man performeth not the righteousnesse of God Theoph. Let vs come to the other extremitie How do we sinne in the defect or want of anger Matth. When perceiuing that God is offended or our credit hurt without cause we are notwithstanding not moued as our dutie requireth which would haue vs not to suffer euils but that according to our callings we should set our selues against them Hence it was that Moses was so angry in the wildernesse with the Israelites whom he saw worshipping the golden Calfe with the Idolatrous worships Iohn Baptist with the Scribes and Pharisies and Iacob with his father in law Laban Moses indeede being moued with most iust anger drew out the sword because he was a Magistrate Iohn vsed most sharpe and vehement reprehensions because he was a minister of Gods word and had to do with hypocrites and men hardened in their sinnes Iacob dealeth with moderate and gentle admonitions because he was a priuate person and his owne matter was in question Theoph. The third step by the which men come to murther is behind Matth. It is euery hurt offered to the person of our neighbour whereupō also sometimes ensueth murther it selfe which fault is indeed most grieuous in the sight of God as appeareth by that which the Lord saith that he abhorreth the man-slayer and by the penaltie appointed by himselfe vnto men-killers For he ordained that not onely men but also the very brute beasts that had slaine man should be put to death For which cause he forbad his people the eating of bloud Leuit. 7. 26. for by that ceremonie he would shew how much he abhorred the shedding of bloud and therefore murther Theoph. Is there any speciall cause which maketh murther to be esteemed so hainous a sin before God Matth. There is and he doth declare it himselfe in the ninth Chapter of Genesis For after these wordes Who so sheddeth mans bloud by mans his bloud shall be shed presently he addeth because in the image of God made he man By which words he teacheth that his owne image which he hath engrauen in man is wronged and misused by man-slaughter Theoph. But whether was that image or likenesse of God blotted out in man by originall sinne as it hath beene sayd by thee in the second Chapter of the former booke Mat. It was indeede but not so farre that there be no steps of it at all remaining for the spirituall gifts as one of the auncients saith giuen of God to men for their saluation were by original sinne taken away such as be the true knowledge of his Maiestie and of the worship due vnto him But the