inuenitur in Canone Bibliae It is not expressed in the Canon of the Bible Patet quod ille modus sit possibilis nec repugnat rationi nec authoritati Bibliae imò facilior ad intelligendum rationabilior quam c. In 4. Sentent q. 6. ar 1. Cardinall de Alliaco That manner which supposeth the substance of bread to remaine still is possible neither is it contrarie to reason nor to the authoritie of the Scriptures nay it is more easie and more reasonable to conceiue if it could accord with the determination of the Church Hactenus Mattheus qui solus Testamenti noui meminit neque vllum hîc verbuÌ„ posituÌ„ est quo probetur in nostrâ Missa veram fieri carnis sanguinis Christi praesentiaÌ„ I. Fish contrà capt Babylonicam N. 8. O. I. Fisher Bishop of Rochester Hitherto Saint Matthew who onely maketh mention of the new Testament neither are there any words here written whereby it may bee proued that in the Masse is made the very presence of the body and bloud of Christ and lastly he concludeth Non potest igitur per vllam Scripturam probari it cannot be proued by any Scripture Durand Benedixit benedictione caelesti virtute verbi qua conuertitur panis in substantiam corporis Christi c. Durand in Rational l. 4. c. 41. Christ blessed the bread by his heauenly benediction and by vertue of that word the bread was turned into the substance of Christs body and saith he Tunc confecit cum benedixit He then made it when he blessed it Odo Cameracensis Christ blessed the bread Benedixit fuii corpus fecit qui prius erat panis benedictione factus est caro non enim post benedictioneÌ„ dixisset Hoc est corpus meuÌ„ nisi in Benedictione fieret corpus suuÌ„ Odo in Canonem Dist. 4. and then made that his bodie which was first bread and so by blessing it became flesh for otherwise he would not haue said after he had blessed it This is my body vnlesse by blessing it he had made it his body Cardinall Caietan That part which the Gospell hath not expressed Quod Euangelium non explicauit expresse ab Ecclesia accepiâ—ius viz. conuersioneÌ„ panis in corpus Christi Caiet 3. 7 75. ar 1. Christoph lib. de Cap FontiuÌ„ de correctione Theolog. Scho. Lege Christophorum fol. 11. 41. 87. â—8 23. 63. 58. Fol. 7. 9. c. viz. the conuersion of the bread into the bodie and bloud of Christ we haue receiued expresly from the Church Christophorus Archbishop of Caesarea Before the words This is my body were vttered by Christ if the bread by benediction had not beene his bodie that proposition had not beene true for when Christ said Take ye eate ye if at that time the bread by benediction were not changed it will follow that Christ did command his Disciples to take and eate the substance of bread and so we must denie the Article of Transubstantiation therefore it is most certaine that Christ did not consecrate by those words neither were they any part of consecration and in this opinion both the Councell of Trent and all writers did agree till the late times of Caietan that Christ did consecrate the bread by blessing it and therefore we conclude this for an infallible truth to which both Scriptures and Councels Secundò dicit Scotus non extare locum vlluÌ„ Scripturae tam expressuÌ„ vt sine Ecclesiae determinatione euidenter cogat Transubstantiationem admittere atque id non est omninò improbabiâ—e Nam etiamsi Scriptura tamen merito dubitari totest cuÌ„ homines doctissimi acutissimi qualis inprimis Scotus suit contrartuÌ„ sentiunt Bel. de Euchar. lib. 3. c. 23. and all Antiquitie yeeld an vndeniable testimony and consent that the words This is my body are not the words of coÌ„secration nor consequently the cause of Transubstantiation Cardinall Bellarmine It is not altogether improbable that there is no expresse place of Scripture to proue Transubstantiation without the declaration of the Church as Scotus said for although the Scriptures seeme to vs so plaine that they may compell any but a refractarie man to beleeue them yet it may iustly bee doubted whether the Text bee cleare enough to inforce it seeing the most acute and learned men such as Scotus was haue thought the contrarie Thus the learned Cardinall who at first did confidently affirme that the words This is my bodie were of the essence of the Sacrament and did effect that which they did signifie Vpon the examination of witnesses of his owne side confesseth Merito dubitari potest c. It may iustly bee doubted whether the Scriptures doe prooue the bodily presence and wee all know and confesse that a doubtfull opinion cannot be made an Article of faith from which coÌ„fessions I may truly infer If the consecrated bread be neither transubstantiated by Christs benediction before those words were vttered as Aquinas the Romane Catechisme and the Masse Priests commonly affirme nor by the words This is my body vttered after the Benediction as the Archbishop of Caesarea Cardinall Caietan and others doe affirme then certainely there are no words in Scripture to proue Transubstantiation for an Article of beleefe I proceed from Scriptures to Fathers Alphonsus à Castro was a diligent reader and obseruer of the ancient Fathers De Transubstantiatione panis in corpus Christi raraenim antiquis Scriptoribus mentio Alphon. lib. 8. contra heres verbo Indulgentiae yet after great studies and long search in their writings returnes this answer Of the conuersion of the body and bloud of Christ there is seldome mention in the ancient Fathers And the reason is giuen by another learned writer of his owne side Jn Primitiua Ecclesia de substaÌ„tia fidei erat corpus Christi subspeciebus contineri tamen non erat de fide substantiam panis in corpus Christi conuerti factâ consecratione illinc recedere Ioh. Yribarne in 4. d. 11. q. 3 disp 42. Sect. 1. In the Primitiue Church it was beleeued for a point of faith that the bodie of Christ was contained vnder the formes of bread and wine but it was not beleeued as a matter of faith that after consecration the substance of the bread was conuerted into the body of Christ and howsoeuer our Aduersaries pretend antiquitie and vniuersalitie of Fathers for their doctrine yet Saint Austin is so wholly ours in this point that Maldonat the Iesuite noting his exposition vpon those words of Scripture The Fathers haue eaten Manna and are dead c. makes this confession I am perswaded that if Saint Austin being so great an enemy to heretiques Hoc dico perswasum me habere SanctuÌ„ Augustinumsi nostrâ suissot â—tate longè aliter sensurum fuisse hominem omni haereticoruÌ„ generi inimicissimum cum videret ad eundem ferè modum Caluinistas hunc illum D. Pauli
Christ and the rites receiued in the solemne administration of them all I do embrace 4. I admit and receiue all those points touching originall sinne and Iustification which are defined and declared by the Councell of Trent 5. I professe that there is a true proper and propitiatorie sacrifice offered to God in the Masse both for the quicke and the dead and that in the Eucharist the Bread and the Wine are Transubstantiated into the bodie and bloud of Christ 6. I acknowledge that vnder one kind whole and perfect Christ and the true Sacrament is receiued 7. I doe constantly hold that there is Purgatorie and that the soules there detained are helped by the Prayers of the faithfull 8. I hold that the Saints are to bee worshipped and called vpon and that they offer prayers for vs vnto God and that their relickes are to be worshipped 9. I doe resolutely affirme that the Images of Christ and of the Virgin Marie and also of other Saints are to be had and retained and that due honor and veneration is to bee yeelded to them 10. I do hold that the power of Indulgences was left by Christ in the Church and that the vse of them is most wholsome to Christian people 11. I acknowledge the holy Catholike and Apostolicke Romane Church to be the Mother and Mistrisse of all Churches and I promise and sweare true obedience to the Bishop of Rome the successor of Saint Peter the Prince of the Apostles and the Vicar of Iesus Christ 12. I vndoubtedly receiue and professe all other things deliuered defined and declared by the holy Canons and Oecumenicall Councels especially by the holy Synod of Trent c. The ten Commandements 1. I Am thy Lord God The ChristiaÌ„ doctrine coÌ„posed by the ReuereÌ„d Father Iames Ledesma Priest of the societie of Iesus and printed permessu Superiorum An. 1609. 1624. Thou shalt haue no other Gods but me 2. Thou shalt not take the name of God in vaine 3. Remember to sanctifie the holy-dayes 4. Honour thy father and mother 5. Thou shalt not kill 6. Thou shalt not commit adulterie 7. Thou shalt not steale 8. Thou shalt not beare false witnesse 9. Thou shalt not desire thy neighbours wife 10. Thou shalt not desire thy neighbours goods The Contents Sect. 1. THe causelesse bitternesse of the Church of Rome against the Reformed Churches pag. 1 Sect. 2. The occasion of the contention betwixt the Churches originally proceeded from the Romanists by their owne confession p. 10. Sect. 3. Corruptions both in faith and manners confessed by the members of the Romane Church and yet the Reformation denyed by the Pope and why c. p 18 Sect 4. Many learned Romanists conuicted by the euidence of Truth either in part or in whole haue renounced Poperie before their death p. 26. Sect. 5. Worldly policie and profit hinders the Reformation of such things which are altogether inexcusable in themselues p. 35. Sect. 6. The common pretence of our Aduersaries refusing reformation because we cannot assigne the precise time when errors came in Refuted p. 43. Sect. 7. The pedigree of the Romish faith drawne downe from the ancient heretiques and the Protestant faith deriued from Christ and his Apostles p. 59. Sect. 8. The Testimonies of our Aduersaries touching the Antiquitie and vniuersality of the Protestant faith in generall p. 68. Sect. 9. The Testimonies of our Aduersaries touching the Protestant and the Roman faith in these particular paragraphes 1. Iustification by faith onely p. 80. 2. The Sacrament of the Lords Supper and the doctrine of Transubstantiation p 86. 3. Priuate Masse p 116. 4. Seuen Sacraments p 132. 5. Communion in both kinds p. 164. 6. Prayer and Seruice in a known tongue p. 175 7. Worship of Images p. 189. 8. Indulgences p. 211. Sect 10. The Testimonies of our Aduersaries touching the infallible certaintie of the Protestant faith and the vncertaintie of the Romish p. 233. Sect. 11. The Testimonies of our Aduersaries touching the greater safety comfort and benefit of the soule in the Protestant faith then in the Romish pag. 249. Sect. 12. Our Aduersaries conuicted by the euident Testimonies of the ancient Fathers either ridiculously elude them or plainly reiect them p 263. Sect. 13. Our Aduersaries conuinced of a bad cause and an euill conscience by razing of our Records and clipping their owne Authors tongues p. 272. Sect. 14. Our Aduersaries conuicted of their defence of a desperate cause by their blasphemous exception against the Scripture it selfe 278. Sect. 15. Our chiefest Aduersarie Cardinall Bellarmine testifies the truth of our doctrine in the principall points of controuersie betwixt vs. p 287. Sect. 16. Our Aduersaries obiection drawne from the Testimonies of pretended Martyrs of their Religion Answered p 295. Sect. 17. Our Aduersaries common obiection drawne from the charitable opinion of Protestants touching the saluation of professed Romanists liuing and dying in their Church Answered p. 303. Sect. 18. Prouing according to the Title of the booke by the confession of all sides that the Protestants Religion is safer because in all positiue points of doctrine the Romanists themselues agree with vs but in their additions they stand single by themselues p 315. The safe Way Sect. 1. The causlesse bitternesse of the Church of Rome against the Reformed Churches WE reade in the Ecclesiastical History when the ancient Christians at Antioch fell at variance amongst themselues Theodoret sought by a fauourable report to allay the bitternesse of their Contention with these words Both parts make one and the same Confession of their faith Theod. lib 3. Hist. Eccles cap. 4. For both maintaine the Creed of the Nicene Councell The beautifull and sacred name of Truth speakes peace to all and that louely name of Peace giues that sweet counsell to all Christians which Abraham gaue to Lot Gen 13.8 Let there be no strife betwixt me and thee for wee be brethren If the Church of Rome had loued Truth and Peace without doubt the common bond of Christianity and the Creed which is the generall Cognizance of our faith would haue incited them to the like fauourable construction of the Controuersies of this age and the rather because their owne learned Cardinall professeth Bellar de Verbo Dei l. 4. c. 11. PrimuÌ„ Nota Secundò That the Apostles neuer propounded as Common Articles of faith other things then the Articles of the Apostles Creed the ten Commandements some few of the SacrameÌ„ts because saith he these things are simply necessarie and profitable for all men the rest are such as a man may be saued without them But such is the nature of the malignant Church and for that cause the Church of Rome is rightly deciphered by that name that instead of qualifying the vnquenchable broyles and intirely preseruing the seamelesse garment of Christ Camp 1. Rat. Jewel Harding pa. 222. 178. shee â—â—rmes vs Heretiques hellâ—ounds of Swinglius Luthers whelpes Turkish Hugenots damned
bee saued by his owne merits or by any other meanes but by the merit of his passion This manner forme of Intergatories was prescribed generally to all Priests for their visitation of the sicke and the sicke partie accordingly was taught to make answer to these and the like questions Respondeat infirmus credo All this I beleeue Vpon this confession the Priest concluded with this instruction to the sicke partie Go to therefore Hosius in Cōfessione Petriconens c. 73. as long as thy soule remaineth in thee place thy whole confidence in this death onely haue confidence in no other thing commit thy self wholly to his death with this alone couer thy selfe wholly intermingle thy selfe wholly in this death wrap thy whole selfe in this death And if the Lord God will iudge thee say Lord I oppose the death of our Lord Iesus Christ betwixt mee and thy iudgement and no otherwise do I contend with thee And if he say vnto thee that thou art a sinner say Lord I put the death of our Lord Iesus Christ betwixt thee and my sins If he say vnto thee thou hast deserued damnation say Lord I set the death of our Lord Iesus Christ betwixt thee and my bad merits and I offer his merit instead of the merits which I ought to haue but yet haue not If he say that he is angrie with thee say Lord I interpose the death of our Lord Iesus Christ betwixt mee and thine anger This point of faith was publiquely professed in the Church of England and generally practised shortly after the Conquest both by Priests and people and as the word was rightly preached in those dayes according to the now Protestant faith and contrarie to the Tenet of the now Romane Church so likewise you shall obserue the two Sacraments of Baptisme and the Lords Supper were publiquely taught and duly administred in the same faith and doctrine before the Conquest as they are now declared and receiued in the Church of England PARAG. 2. The Sacrament of the Lords Supper and the doctrine of Transubstantiation FIrst concerning the Sacrament of Baptisme I thinke there is none so blinde or stupid that will denie the Baptisme now vsed in our Church both for matter and forme to be substantially the same that the Primitiue Church euer vsed that the Romish additions of Salt and Spittle and other Ceremonies vsed by them neither cause a Transubstantiation in the element nor the want of them inforceth Rebaptization in the protestant so that concerning the truth of our Baptisme there can bee no question and as concerning the Sacrament of the Lords Supper The Sacrament of the Eucharist in the daies of Aelfrick about the yeere 996 there was a Homily appointed publiquely to be read to the people on Easter day before they did receiue the Communion wherein the same faith and doctrine which our Church now professeth was publikely taught and receiued and the doctrine of the Reall presence which at that time had got footing in the Church was plainely confuted and reiected Neither was this the particular doctrine of one Bishop but at the same time the same matter was deliuered to the Clergy by diuers Bishops at their Synods out of two other writings published by the same Aelfrick one whereof was directed to Wulfstius then Bishop of Sherbourne the other writtē to Wulfstane Arch-bishop of York wherein both Priests people by their Command and directions were instructed and taught the doctrine of the Eucharist in these words There is a great difference betwixt the body wherein Christ suffered Aelfricks Homilie B. Vsher in his answer to a challenge c. cap Real pres p 78. 79. and the body which is receiued of the faithfull The body truly that Christ suffered in was borne of the flesh of Mari◠with blood and with bone with skinne and with sinewes in humane limbs with a reasonable soule liuing and his spirituall bodie which nourisheth the faithfull spiritually is gathered of many cornes without blood and bone without limbe without soule and therefore there is nothing to bee vnderstood bodily but spiritually c. this I say and the like doctrine was approued by the Abbot of Malmsbury by the Arch-bishop of Yorke by the Bishop of Sherbourne by diuers Bishops at their Synods and by them commended to the rest of the Cleargie who were commanded to reade it publiquely to the common people vpon Easter day for their better preparation and instruction in the Sacrament If this Protestant Faith then publiquely professed had beene taught onely by a multitude of seditious and factious persons or had it beene receiued by some few excommunicate members in the same Church our aduersaries might haue some colour some plea to deny the Visibility of our Church but when it appeares it was generally published by the chiefe Bishops and Pastors of seuerall Congregations when it appeares these Doctors had their Calling and succession in the Romane Church when it appeares it was approued by a publique Synod at their meetings I cannot but account it a Iesuites vaine flourish to tell vs Camp Rat. 3. That we cannot espie out so much as one towne one village one house for 1500 yeares that sauoured of our doctrine and that you may know Aelfrick the Abbot was not the first author of this Homilie but was anciently receiued in the Church before his daies it appeares plainely Aelfricus Abbas vulstano Archiepiscopo salutem in Christo ecce paruimus vestrae almitatis iussionibus trās ferentes Anglice duas Epistolas quas Latino eloquio descriptas antē annum vobis destinauimus Transcrip ex lib. Ms in Bibl. publ Iames in his corrupt of Fathers p. 55. that Aelfrick by the command of the Arch-bishop of Yorke did but translate those Sermons into English which were anciently published in Latine so that if there were any surmise of a Faction then raised in the Church it was caused by the receiuing of an ancient doctrine not by bringing in a new and that also was performed with the consent of all the Bishops nay more if that the faith of Gregorie the Great published here in England 400 yeares before that time If I say his faith and doctrine continued the same here in our Iland without alteration till the comming of Luther which our aduersaries confidently maintaine either this Homily published by the Bishops was the faith of Gregorie and so our Church continued Visible in the same faith from his time till ours or else the Romane doctrine now taught and beleeued hath not continued the same without alteration vntill the daies of Luther Thus the Word and Sacraments taught by Christ and his Apostles were published and proclaimed by the Bishops and Arch-bishops of those times for the sauing knowledge and knowne saluation both of Priests and people so that the most substantiall points of our Religion were visibly knowne and generally published not in priuate corners but in publique Libraries not in
obscure assemblies but in open Churches and generall Congregations of our owne Countrie in the darkest ages long before Luthers daies But obserue the comming of our aduersarie That book which was published in Anselmes daies for instruction and visitation of the sicke the same booke I say both for matter and substance hath of late yeares beene printed at Paris at Collen Ordo Baptizandi cum modo visitandi infirmos Paris anno 1575. Colon. anno 1556. Ven. anno 1575. at Venice whereby not onely the doctrine of merits is ecclipsed but the now Romane faith is discouered to differ from the ancient what therefore can bee expected how these men should iustifie their owne printed Authors Behold the Romane Inquisitors haue carefully prouided by two Expurgatory Indices Quiroga p. 149. Sandoual Roxas anno 1612. that the words of comfort which the Priest was enioyned to pronounce to the sicke person should be all blotted out and although the Inquisitors haue not as yet passed their sentence vpon Aelfricks Homilie Aelfricks Sermon on Easter day printed at London 1623. pag. 7. yet in that Homilie they haue suggested Transubstantiation by two feined miracles contrary to the doctrine of the Eucharist then publiquely taught and farre different from the whole Scope of the Author and the Latine Epistle written by Aelfricke to the Arch-bishop of Yorke is to be seene mangled and razed in a Manuscript in Bennets Colledge in Cambridge as is well obserued by a learned Diuine D. Iames in his corruption of Fathers pag. 55 and I cannot conceiue but it was done by some Romanist because it doth plainely confute the doctrine of Transubstantiation Thus wee see what time and errors hath brought to passe That Protestant faith which in Aelfricks daies was generally receiued in England for Catholique doctrine is now condemned as hereticall by a preuailing faction in the Romane Church and that word of truth which was published in Anselmes daies for the saluation of Priests and people in the English Church is now condemned by an Index Expurgatorius with a Deleatur vpon those sauing words but I say of them as Saint Ambrose sometimes pronounced of the Arrians Ambros orat 1. contr Arrian Transubstātiation They may well blot out our letters but our faith they shall neuer abolish Againe looke vpon their doctrine of Transubstantiation and you shall see how miserably their Church is deuided touching the antiquity and vniuersality of that point of faith some deriue it from the words of Christ others from Christs Benediction before the words were vttered some from the exposition of the Fathers others from the councel of Lateran some from the authoritie of the Scriptures others from the determination of the Church and whereas many other points of the Romish doctrine are pretended to be Apostolicall Traditions as hauing no foundation in the written word it is obserued by learned Du Plessis that the Papists generally maintaine that their Masse is prooued from the Scripture insomuch as in the 28. of Matthew and other places where there is mention made of the Sacrament the ordinarie Glosse doth note with capital letters in the Margent Moru de Miss lib. 1. c. 1. in initio Here is the Institution of the Masse It was the great vaunt of Campian the Iesuite Camp Rat. If the Protestants name the Gospell we ioyne with them the verie words are for vs This is my body this is my bloud and Bellarmine his fellow Iesuite professeth confidently that the words Bellar. de Euch. l. 1. c. 11. This is my bodie are of the essence of the Sacrament and they are operatiue If wee shall further question at what time whether before or after the wordes spoken there is a conuersion of the elements into the bodie and bloud of Christ Aquinas tels vs Vltimum instans prolationis verborum est primum instant in quo est in Sà cramento corpus Christi in toto autemtempore praecedenti est item substantia panis Aqu. par 3. q. 75. art 7. ad 1. that the verie last instance of the deliuerie of those words is the first instance of Christs bodie in the Sacrament but in all the time before there is the substance of bread remaining If these men therfore haue spoken the truth let them beare witnesse of the truth onely let mee tell you they want that vnitie in this point of faith which they appropriate as a speciall marke to their Church and for proofe of this I will proceed to publication of witnesses wherein I will produce no other testimonies but their owne learned Authors and I presume a better proofe then their owne confessions none of them can expect whereby it shall appeare that their grand point of Transubstantiation hath neither foundation in our Scriptures nor certaintie in the Fathers nor vnitie among themselues to conclude it for an Article of beleefe Touching the words of Consecration Salmeron the Iesuite speaking in the person of the Grecians deliuers their opinion in this manner Cham. lib. 6. de Euch. c. 7. When the Benediction of the Lord is not superfluous or vaine neither gaue hee simply bread it followeth when he gaue it the transmutation was made and those wordes This is my body did demonstrate what was contained in the bread Ex Catholicis solus Caietanus in Commentario huius Articuli qui iussu Pij Quinti in Romanâ editione expunctus est docuit seclusa Ecclesiae authoritate verba illa Hoc est corpus meum ad veritatem hanc confirmandā non sufficere Suar. Tom. 3. disp 46. not what was made by them And Swarez the Iesuite ingeniously professeth that Cardinall Caietan in his Commentarie vpon this Article did affirme that those words of Christ This is my body do not of themselues sufficiently prooue Transubstantiation without the supposed authoritie of the Church and therefore by the commandement of Pius Quintus that part of his Commentarie is left out of the Romish Edition Habemus confitentem wee haue a faire confession for a Cardinall and a friendly caueat touching the spunging of his authoritie And that the world may know these men are better friends to our cause then many yet conceiue them I will produce both Cardinals and Bishops and Schoolemen who will testifie with vs that there are no words in Scripture to proue Transubstantiation that those words This is my body are not of the essence of the Sacrament that the ancient Fathers did not beleeue the substance of the Sacramentall bread to be conuerted into Christs reall flesh and lastly that Transubstantiation was not beleeued de Fide as a matter of faith aboue 1000 yeares after Christ And first I will giue you their owne confessions touching the place and proofe of Transubstantiation deriued from the Scriptures Quomodò fit corpus Christi vtrum per cōuersionem alicuius c. Biel in Con. Missae Lect. 40. Gabriel Biel How the body of Christ is in the Sacrament Non
may be thought a strange saying Si tollamus authoritatem praesentis Ecclesiae praesentis Concilij in dubium reuocari poteruÌ„t omnium aliorum Conciliorum decreta tota fides Christiana Idem ibid. that one testimonie of a late Councell might suffice for an Article of faith which by his owne Tenet requires Antiquitie Vniuersalitie and Consent yet this Cardinall proceeds further and tells vs the authoritie of this Councell is so auaileable for this point yea for all Articles of faith that if wee should take away the credit of the Roman Church and Councell of Trent the decrees of other Councels nay euen Christian faith it selfe might be called in question If by Christian faith the Cardinal vnderstand the present Romane faith without doubt this saying is most true See D. Fearly in his writ of Error against the Appealer p. 54. 55 c. for if we consider their misinterpreting the Ancient Creed and there creating of a New it cannot possibly be defended but by the Romane Church the Trent Councel but if he mean the generall sauing faith of all true beleeuers I may truly say this Tenet is a foundation of Atheisme for who can truly say that the word of Christ is not alone sufficient for the faith of all beleeuing Christians It is the voice of the blessed Apostle I haue not shunned to declare vnto you all the counsell of God Acts 20.27 And Bellarmine himselfe is forced to confesse That all those things are written by the Apostles which are necessarie for all men and which the Apostles preached generally to all Besides how can the saith of Christians depend vpon a Church which is fallen from the faith or how can a generall beleefe of Christianitie relye safely vpon a Councel that is disclaimed by the greatest part of the Christian world viz. by England by France by Germanie c. But to let passe the Heluetian the Scottish the Germane and the English Churches what will become of the ancient Church of Rome nay what will become of their owne Schoolemen in the latter ages did they all beleeue and teach that there were neither more nor lesse then seuen Sacraments did they maintaine they were all instituted by Christ did they professe they were all truly and properly Sacraments of the new Law If any learned man or if all the learned men aliue shall prooue that the seuen Trent Sacraments were instituted by Christ that all the Fathers or any one Father in the Primitiue Church or any knowne Author for aboue a thousand yeares after Christ did teach that there were neither more nor lesse then seuen truely and properly so called and to be beleeued of all for an Article of faith all which is the constant doctrine of the Church of Rome let the Anathema fall vpon my head First it is agreed on both sides that the Sacraments of the new Law were instituted by Christ for he onely hath authoritie to seale the Charter in whose authority onely it is to grant it Now as Princes seales confirme and warrant their deeds and charters so doe the Sacraments witnesse vnto our consciences that Gods promises are true and shall continue for euer Thus doth God make knowne his secret purpose to his Church first he declareth his mercies by his word then he sealeth it and assureth it by his Sacraments In the word we heare his promises in the Sacraments wee see them The difference then betwixt the Church of Rome and vs stands in this In the two proper Sacraments of Baptisme and the Lords Supper wee haue the element and the institution in the other fiue there wanteth either of these and therefore in a right meaning are not be taken for Sacraments In Baptisme the element is water in the Lords Supper bread wine Baptisme hath the words of Institution Mat. 28.19 Teach all Nations baptizing in the name of the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost The Lords Supper likewise hath the wordes of Institution Luk. 22.19 Do this in remembrance of mee and therefore we say these two are properly and truly called Sacraments because in them the element is ioyned to the word and they take their ordinance from Christ and be visible signes of an inuisible sauing grace The other fiue we call them not Sacraments because they haue not the like institution Confirmation was ordained by the Apostles but the Trent Councell confesseth the Sacraments must bee ordained by Christ Pennance and Orders haue not any outward element ioyned to the Word and Matrimonie was not ordained by Christ in the new Testament but by God himselfe in Paradise Besides the grants and seales of Christ viz. the Sacraments are the peculiar and proper possession of the Church of Christ insomuch as Turks and Infidels may haue the benefit of marriage out of the Church yet cannot haue the benefit of Christs SacrameÌ„ts which belong onely to his Church And lastly how Marriage should bee a Sacrament which containeth not grace in it selfe nor power to sanctifie and how it should bee an holy thing as euery Sacrament is termed and yet must be forbidden or rather fornication in the Priests case must bee preferred be fore it Durus sermo This is an hard saâ—ing who can heare it If therefore a generall Councell shall accuse not onely those that denie the number but si quis dixerit If any shall say there are either more or lesse then seuen then woe be to all the ancient Fathers for if they be conuented before the Councel they will all stand guiltie of this curse De latere in cruce pendentis lancea percuffo Sacramenta Ecclesiae pro fluxerunt Aug. in Ioh. Tract 15. Accursed be Ambrose and Austin and Chrysostome and Bede for they taught that out of the side of Christ came the two Sacraments of the Church Bloud and Water but that there were neither more nor lesse then seuen they taught not they beleeued not Jsid OriginuÌ„ siue Etimolog lib. 6. Accursed be Isidore for he accounteth but of three Sacraments viz. Baptisme and Chrysme and the body and bloud of Christ. Part. 4. q. 5. membr 2. art 1. qu. 5. c. Accursed be Alexander ab Hales for hee saith there are onely foure which are in any sort properly to be said Sacraments of the new Law and the other three supposed Sacraments had their being before Cypr. Ablutio pedum Accursed bee the Author bearing the name of Cyprian for he mentioneth onely fiue Sacraments and one of them is Ablutio pedum washing of the Apostles feet which is none of the seuen Sacraments Accursed be Durand MatrimoniuÌ„ noÌ„ est SacramentuÌ„ stricteÌ„ proprie dictuÌ„ sicut alia Sacramenta nouae legis sed est c. In lib. 4. Dist 26. quaest 3. for he alloweth but sixe proper Sacraments for Matrimony saith he is not a Sacrament strictly and properly so called as other Sacraments are Accursed bee Cardinall Bessarion Haec
duo sola Sacramenta in Euangelijs maenifesté tradita legimus Bessa de Sacram. Euchar for he fully concludeth with the Protestants We reade of two onely Sacraments which were deliuered vs plainely in the Gospell I need not insist much vpon the deniall of the certaine and definite number of seuen Sacraments knowne to the Fathers for Cardinall Bellarmine by way of preuention giues vs to vnderstand that The Protestants ought not to require of them to shew the number of seuen Sacraments either in Scriptures or Fathers Non debere adversarios petere vt ostēdamus in Scripturis aut Patribus nomen Septena rij numeri Sacramentorū Nam nec ipsi ostendere possunt nomen binarij vel ternarij vel quaternarij Scriptura enim Patres non c. Bellar. de effectu Sacr. lib. 2. c. 24. Satis esse debet quod Patres in varijs locis aut certè varij Patres eiusdem aetatis omnium septem Sacramētorum alicubi meminerint Idem ca. 27. for that we cannot shew the number of two nor three nor foure besides it is sufficient saith he that the Fathers in diuerse places and diuerse Fathers of the same Age in some place make mention of those Sacraments The number therefore by our Adueruersaries confession is not to be expected in the Primitiue Church and therefore it is more to bee wondred why the Romane Church should impose the peremptorie number of seuen with a curse vpon al them that beleeue them not If the Fathers had made mention of the seuen Trent Sacraments onely although they had neuer mentioned the number of seuen there might haue beene some plea for the number also but when they call many things by the names of Sacraments which had a mysticall sence because they were types and figures of holy things nay more when they did insist sometimes in the number of two and so restrained the proper Sacraments of the Church to the definite number of two onely It is no way probable that those fiue Sacraments were of other account with them then other holy things which they called Sacraments for had the Fathers beleeued that those Sacraments had beene instituted by Christ as the Church of Rome doth they would of necessity concluded them for true and proper Sacraments of the Church and then without doubt the Fathers who were elegant in the application of such mysteries would haue easily found in them the mysterie of the number seuen Saint Ambrose in his Treatise of the Sacraments diuided into sixe bookes makes no mention but of two and in his first booke and first Chapter proclaimes to the beleeuers of his age De Sacramentis quae accepistis sermonem adorior I speake of the Sacraments which you haue receiued that is to say of those two Sacraments which the Church hath taught and declared vnto you and that you may rightly vnderstand what the Roman Church professed concerning the number of Sacraments in those dayes Quaedā pauca pro multu c. August de doct Christ li. 3. c. 9. Saint Austin tels vs Our Lord and his Apostles haue deliuered vnto vs a few Sacraments instead of many and the same in doing most easie in signification most excellent in obseruation most reuerend as is the Sacrament of Baptisme and the celebration of the body and bloud of our Lord and lastly concludeth them both in the number of two August de Symbol ad Catechum Haec sunt Ecclesiae gemina Sacramenta These be the two Sacraments of the Church Tunc demum planè sanctificari esse filij Dei possunt si vtroque Sacramento nascantur Cypr. li. 2. Ep. 1. ad Steph. If we looke beyond those times Saint Cyprian that blessed Martyr liued and dyed in the faith of two Sacraments onely Then saith he may we be throughly sanctified and become the children of God si vtroque Sacramento c. if we bee borne by both the Sacraments If we looke below them Fulbertus Bishop of Chartres shewes vs the way of Christian Religion Fulbertus Epist 1. is to beleeue the Trinitie and veritie of the Deitie to know the cause of his Baptisme and in whom duo vitae Sacramenta the two Sacraments of our life are contained And in the time of Charles the Great Sunt Sacramenta Christi in Ecclesiâ Catholica Baptismus corpus sanguis Christi Paschas de caena Domini Paschasius an Abbat speakes plainely and in few words These be the Sacraments of Christ in the Catholique Church Baptisme and the bodie and bloud of Christ And lastly Bessarion their owne Bishop of Tusculum professeth to all his Romish Proselites Wee reade of onely two Sacraments which were plainely deliuered in the Gospell These learned Doctors rested in the faith of two Sacraments in their dayes and yet notwithstanding called many things by the names of Sacraments Signa cum ad res diuinas adhibentur Sacramenta vocantur Aug de doct Christ l. 3. c. 6. and the reason is giuen by Saint Austin Signes when they be applyed to godly things bee called Sacraments and in this sort many rites ordinances in the Church are called Sacraments because they signifie some holy thing Aug. de bono coniugali cap 18. August in Psal 141. Aug lib. 4. de symbol c. 1. Aug. lib. 2. de pec merit remis ca. 26. Polygamie or marriage of many wiues Saint Austin cals a Sacrament as signifying the multitude of the Gentiles that should bee subiect to God Againe he termeth the signe of the crosse Exorcisme Holy bread giuen to the Catechumenists beginners in the faith by the names of Sacraments Alex. 1. Ep. 1. ca. 5. Pope Alexander the first Ambros li. 3. de Sacram. c. 1 Cypri Serm de lotion pedum Bernard de coena Domini cals Holy water a Sacrament Saint Ambrose Cyprian and Bernard cals Ablutio pedum washing of the Apostles feet a Sacrament Tertullian calleth the whole state of Christian faith a Sacrament Religionis Christianae Sacramentū Tertul. li. 4 contr Marcionem Sacramentū orationis Sacramentum esuritionis Sacramentū Scripturarū Sacramentū fletu◠Sacramentum sitis Hila. in Mat. Canon 11. 12. Canon 23. Saint Hilarie in sundry places speaketh of the Sacrament of prayer the Sacrament of fasting the Sacrament of the Scriptures the Sacrament of weeping the Sacrament of thirst And Saint Hierome speaking of the booke of the Reuelation tells vs there are in it Tot Sacramenta quot verba as many Sacraments as words All these and many like signes and mysteries were called Sacraments by the Ancients and yet are none of the seuen Sacraments which the Church of Rome holdeth so that if euerie ordinance called a mysterie or a Sacrament in Scriptures and Fathers make a true Sacrament they may decree seuentie Sacraments as well as seuen As these men therefore cannot denie there is mention of the number of two Sacraments in the Fathers and not of seuen so likewise we
consent this is a doctrine vnsearchable and past finding out In the meane time I will tender them the performance of my promise which is the confession of their owne learned Doctors in the bosome of their owne Church who are faithfull witnesses in behalfe of our Church and doctrine that the Communion in both kindes had knowne antiquity from Christ and an eminent Visibility in the ancient church that the halfe Communion was so farre from a point of faith that it was not generally receiued in the true Church aboue a thousand yeares after Christ Salmeron We doe ingenuously and openly confesse Salmer Ingenui aperti confitemur morem generalem extitisse communicandi etiam Laicos sub vtraque specie Salmer Tract 35. that it was a great custome for the Lay people to communicate vnder both kinds as it is this day vsed amongst the Graecians and was vsed in times past amongst the Corinthians and in Africa Olim Laici communicabant sub vtráque specie quod tamen antiquatum est Arbor Theosophiae lib. 8. cap. 11. Iohannes Arboreus Antiently the Lay people did communicate vnder both kinds but now it is abolished Thomas Aquinas According to the ancient custome of the Church Secundum antiquae Ecclesiae consuetudinem omnes sicut communicabant corporè ita communicabant sanguine Aquin. in Ioh. 6. all those that were partakers of the Communion of his body were partakers also of the Communion of his blood Ruardus Tapper Deane of Louayne It were more conuenient the Communion were administred vnder both kinds then vnder one alone Habito respectis ad Sacramentum magis consonum est eius institutions c. Cassand sub vtraque specie pag. 1034 for this were more agreeable to the Institution and fulnesse thereof and to the example of Christ and the Fathers of the Primitiue Church Lyra In the 1. of the Corinthians and the eleuenth Fit hic mentio de duplici specie nam in primitiua Ecclesia sic dabatur fidelibus Lyr. in 1 Cor. 1.11 there is mention made of the communion in both kinds for in the Primitiue Church it was giuen in both kinds to the faithfull Fisher the Iesuite Certaine it is that the Primitiue Church did very often and frequently vse the Communion vnder both kinds D. White Fisher in the Chapter of both kinds yea they were bound thereunto by the obligation of custome not diuine precept Alph. Nā olim per multa saeculasic apud omnes Catholicos vsitatum esse ex multorum Sanctorum Scripturis didicimus Alph. de Castro de hâc Controuersiâ Caepit ea consuetudo in Ecclesia Latina c. Greg. de Valent de legit vsu Euchar. cap. 10. Alphonsus de Castro Anciently for many ages the Communion in both kinds was vsed amongst all Catholiques as appeares by the writings of many holy men Gregorie de Valentia The custome of communicating in one kinde began in the Latine Church to bee generally receiued but a little before the Councell of Constance where it was confirmed Satis compertum est Oriētem Christi Ecclesiam hunc vsque diem Occidentalem seu Romanam mille amplius c. Cassand Consult de vtraque specie Cassander It is sufficiently manifest that the Easterne Church of Christ vntill this day and the Romane Church for more then a thousand yeares after Christ did exhibit the Sacrament in both kinds as it is most euident by innumerable testimonies both of Greeke and Latine Fathers Licet Christus post coenam instituerat licet in Primitiua Ecclesià recipitur à fidelibus c. Concil Constam Sess 13 The Councell of Constance Though Christ instituted this Venerable Sacrament vnder both kinds and though in the Primitiue Church this Sacrament was receiued by the faithfull vnder both kinds yet this custome that it should bee receiued by Lay men vnder the kinde of bread onely is to bee held for a Law which may not be refused c. Bellarmine Christ did institute vnder both kinds Christus quidom instituit sub duplici speciè sed non iussit dari omnibus sub duplici Ecclesia autem vetus ministrabat sub duplici speciè quando Christiani c. Bellar. de Euch. lib. 4. cap. 24. but he did not command it to be giuen to all vnder both kinds The ancient Church did administer vnder both kinds when the number of Christians were but few besides all did not receiue in both kinds but the multitude increasing the inconuenience appeared more and more and by degrees the vse of both kinds ceased Thus wee haue heard with our eares and our Aduersaries haue declared vnto vs that our Communion in both kinds was taught by the Fathers in there daies and in the old time before them I hope I shall not neede any supplementall proofe for the antiquity of our doctrine and the Visibility of our Church in this point when they themselues haue giuen so faire an euidence in our behalfe and as concerning the halfe communion which is receiued in the Romane Church for an Article of faith as it wants antiquitie and consent of Fathers by their owne confession so likewise it wants a right foundation in the Scriptures which an article of faith ought to haue and therefore Saint Austins confession shall be my conclusion If wee on an Angell from heauen preach vnto you any thing concerning faith and life besides that you haue receiued in the Legal and Euangelicall Scriptures let him bee acoursed PARAG. 6. Prayer and seruice in a knowne tongue THe Councell of Trent decreed and declared concerning the diuine seruice in an vnknowne tongue that Concil Trid. Sess 22. c. 8. although the Masse doe containe in it great instruction for the common people yet it doth not seeme expedient to the fathers of the Councel that it should be euery where celebrated in the vulgar tongue This decree being past they proceeded to iudgement that whosoeuer shall say he is to be condemned that pronounceth part of the Canon of the Masse Jbid. Can. 9. de Sacrificio Missa and the words of consecration with a lowe voice or that the Masse ought to be celebrated in the vulgar tongue onely let him be accursed Now it is worth the noting the first part of the decree was adiudged by some Trent Bishops to be questionable and doubtful in the construction for say they Histor of Trent lib 6. pag. 577. it seemed a contradiction to declare that that the Masse doth containe much instruction for the faithfull and yet to command that part of seruice to bee vttered with a lowe voice and in an vnknowne tongue This exception it seemes tooke some impression in the Councell for in the same Chapter and in the same Session a dispensation was granted with a Non obstante Notwithstanding the first part of the Decree that Retaining the ancient right to euery Church least the people might hunger and thirst for foode and none be ready
to giue it them it was thenceforth commanded and decreed that the Masse Priests or some others should frequently expound and declare the mysteries of the Masse which the people could not vnderstand in the Latin tongue so that from their own confessions that the Masse doth afford great instruction to the people and for that end ought to be interpreted vnto them they consequently affirmed that the seruice and prayer in the Reformed Churches in the vulgar tongue was better for the edification of the Church and without doubt the Apostles command To shew forth the Lords death till his comming was not his meaning to shew it to the walls or in a silent and vnknowne voice as it is now vsed in the Romane Church but to pronounce it openly to bee heard and vnderstood of all the hearers Haymo in 1 Cor. 14. I am saith Haymo a Grecian thou an Hebrew if I speake to thee in Greeke I shall seeme barbarous vnto thee likewise if thou speake to mee in Hebrew thou shalt seeme barbarous vnto me nay more he puts this vnanswerable question If one knoweth that onely tongue wherein he was borne and bred If such a one stand by thee whilst thou doest solemly celebrate the Mysterie of the Masse or make a Sermon or giue a blessing how shal he say Amen at thy blessing when hee knoweth not what thou sayest for so much as hee vnderstanding none but his Mothers tongue cannot tell what thou speakest in that strange and barbarous tongue If we looke higher it will appeare that prayers and Sacraments were administred in the Church for the vnderstanding of the hearer Iust Imper. in No. Constit 123. Iustinian the Emperor commanded all Bishops Priests to celebrate the sacred oblation of the Lords Supper and prayers vsed in Baptisme not in secret but with a loud and cleere voice that the mindes of the hearers might bee stirred vp with more deuotion to expresse the praises of God Let the Religious Bishops and Priests know saith he that if they neglect so to doe they should yeeld an account in the dreadfull iudgement of the great God for it and we hauing information of them will not leaue them vnpunished This care was constantly vsed by the ancient Roman Church as appeares by the Popes owne Decretals Decret Gregor tit 3. de Offic. Iud. Ord. c. 14. wherein it was publiquely declared We command that the Bishops of such Cties and Diocesses where Nations are mingled together prouide meete men to minister the holy seruice according to the diuersity of their manners and languages But I will spare the labour for further proofe of this question by citing the particular Fathers will produce our Aduersaries seuerall confessions to witnesse the truth of our doctrine that Prayer and Seruice in the vulgar and knowne tongue was altogether vsed in the best and first ages according to the precept of the Apostles and the practise of the ancient Fathers Lyra Jn Primitiua Ecclesia benedictiones caetera communia siebant in vulgari Lyra in 1. Cor. 14. If thou blesse the spirit and the people vnderstand thee not what profit hath the simple people thereby not vnderstanding thee Therefore in the Primitiue Church the blessings and all other common deuotions were performed in the vulgar tongue Iohannes Belethus Billet In the Primitiue Church it was forbidden that any man should speak with tongues Jn Primitiua Ecclesia prohibituÌ„ erat ne quu loqueretur linguis nisi esset qui interpretaretur Quid enim prodesset c. Joh. Billet in suâ—n de diuinis officijs vnlesse there were some to interpret for what should speaking auaile without vnderstanding and hereof grew a laudable custome that after the Gospell was read it should straight way be expounded in the vulgar tongue Lingua auditoris non ignota omnia peragebantur consuetudo ita ferebat vt omnes psallerent Gretz def c 16. l. 2. de verbo Dei Gretzerus The ancient Fathers did exhort all to sing together and that attentiuely and diligently the Priests and people should ioyne their voices together Jewel in 3. Artic. Diuis 28. Master Harding Verily in the Primitiue Church Seruice in a knowne tongue was necessarie where faith was a learning and therefore the prayers were made then in a common tongue knowne to the people for cause of their instructions who being of late conuerted to the faith and of Pagans made Christians had need in all things to be taught Cassander The Canonicall Prayers Canonicam preceÌ„ imprimu Dominici corporis sanguinis consecrationeÌ„ ita veteres legebant vt à populo intelligi Amen acclamari possit Cassand Lyturg Fuit ergo ratio talis Benedicendi in Ecclesia tempore Apostoli cui respondere solebat non tantum Clerus sed omnis populus Amen Wald. in doctr art Eccle tit 4. c. 31. Sed quare noÌ„dantur benedictiones in vulgari dicenduÌ„ quod hoc sorte fuit in Ecclesia Primitiua sed postquam fideles instructi sunt sciunt que audiunt fiunt Benedictiones in Latino Aquin in 1. Cor. 14. Lect. 3. and especially the words of consecration of the body and bloud of our Lord the Ancients did so reade it that all the people might vnderstand it and say Amen Waldensis When thou shalt blesse with thy spirit how shall the vnlearned say Amen at the giuing of thankes seeing he vnderstandeth not what thou sayest therefore in the Apostles time there was reason of such a blessing that at the giuing of thankes not onely the Priest but also all the people were wont to answer Amen Aquinas How comes it to passe that thankesgiuings are not made in the known tongue that the people might vnderstand them we must say it was in the Primitiue Church but after the common people were instructed and knew and vnderstood their dutie thankesgiuings were made in Latine Quare omnia in Ecclesiâ dicuntur in Latino videtur quod sit similitér insania dicendum est quòd ideo erat insania in Primitiua Ecclesia quia erant rudes in ritu Ecclesiastico vnde nesciebant qua fiebant ibi nisi exponeretur eis modo vero omnes sunt instructi c. Idem Lect. 4. Againe when all things are done in the Latine tongue in the Church it seemeth to bee madnesse to this we must answer saith he that it was madnesse in the Primitiue Church which is not so in ours for then they were rude and ignorant in Ecclesiasticall rites and ceremonies but now all are so well instructed that although it be in Latin the people vnderstand what is done in the Church Quia Christiani eraÌ„t pauci omnes siâ—ul psallebant in Ecclesia respondebant in diuinis officijs poste a crescente populo diuisa sunt magis officia solis Clericis relictuÌ„ est vt communes prece laudes in Ecclesia pèragant Bel. de verba Dei lib. 2. cap. 16. Bellarmine
Editione expunctus est docuit seclusa Ecclesiâ—e authoritate Verba illa Hoc est corpus meum ad veritatem hanc confirmandaÌ„ non sufficere Suarez Tom. 3. disp 46. §. Tertio the words This is my body doe not sufficiently prooue Transubstantiation what saith Paul the fift to this Deleatur let that passage be no more printed amongst Caietans workes Vdalricus Bishop of Augusta writes a whole Epistle touching the lawfulnesse of Priests marriage what say the Romanists to this Deleatur let that whole Epistle bee blotted out Bertram wrote a booke of the body blood of Christ opposite to the doctrine of Transubstantiation what say the Inquisitors to this Jud. Gaspar Quirâ—ga fol. 149. Jdem IbideÌ„ Totus liber penitus auferatur away with that whole booke Anselme or the author of the booke for baptizing and visiting the sicke saith Doest thou beleeue that our Lord Iesus Christ died for our saluation and that there is no means to be saued by our own merits Quiroga p. 149. Sandoual Roxas Anno 1612. what say the Inquisitors to this Deleatur let it not be spoken at the visitation of the sicke Cassan in Hymnis Eccl. p. 179. vt Cypr. Miserecordiam adeptus sum i. e. Miserecordiam merui Annotatio illa de vocabulo Merendi tota Deleatur Ind. Expurg Belg. p. 25. The word Merit saith Cassander amongst the Ancients is almost the same as to obtaine what say the Inquisitors to this doctrine Deleatur let that obseruation of the word Merit bee cleane strucken out Polydore Virgil saith almost all the Ancient Fathers condemned Images for feare of Idolatrie what say the Romanists to this doctrine Deleatur from the beginning of that Chapter to the leafe Index librorum Prohibitorum pag. 725. Lex per praesentes c. let it be blotted out Langus saith the substance of bread and wine remaine after Consecration what say the Inquisitors to this doctrine Deleatur Ind. Expurg Belg. fol. 70. from the pag. 179. to the pag. 199. let all bee blotted out Ferus saith Ridiculum est It is ridiculous that some will haue Cephas for the head In their latter edition printed at Rome 1577. they haue left out the words Ridiculum est and say some will haue Cephas for the Head Non oportet Christianos Ecclesia Dei derelictâ abire atque Angelos nominare Concil Laodic can 35. Binius Non oportet Christianos derelictâ Ecclesia Dei abire ad Angulos Merlin fol. 68. edit 1530. Crabbe fol. 226 edit Anno 1538 Lastly the ancient Councell of Laodicea decreed Anno 368. Wee ought not to leaue the Church of God and inuocate Angels In the same Councell published by Merlin and Crabbe by transmutation of a letter we are taught to say Wee ought not to leaue the Church of God and haue recourse to Angles or corners and thus are Angeli become Anguli Angels are become Angles or blinde corners least so faire an euidence of an ancient Councell should be produced against Inuocation of Angels But what these men haue gained by purging and razing of true Euidences their late Diuinity Reader at Louaine will giue his fellow Romanists a good account After I was appointed saith he to put in execution the tyrannicall decree of the Inquisitors Sed ô incredibilis in me Dei opt max. beneficentia post quaÌ„ expurgatorij Indicis quem tyrannisante Albano Benedictus Arias Montanuâ—in pioruÌ„ vircrum lucubrationes iniurias conceperat exequutor inter primos factus sexcentas coÌ„trà falsa doctrinae Pontificiae capita c. Henricus Boxhornius li. 3. de Euch. li. 3 Riuet c. 12. pag. 89. and had noted sixe hundred seuerall passages to bee spunged and blotted out which animaduersions of mine I wished I could haue washed away with my teares and bloud my heart at length being smitten and mine eyes opened by the mercie of my God I plainely perceiued abhomination in the Papacie an Idoll in the Temple Tyrannie in the commonwealth poyson and infection in Religion And thus this learned professor sometimes a votarie to the Church of Rome from the obseruation of those purging Indices makes protestation against their practises withal became a true conuert to the Protestant faith Sect. 14. Our Aduersaries conuicted of their defence of a desperate cause by their blasphemous exception against the Scripture it selfe VVHen therfore we see with the Louanian Doctor poyson in their Religion and tirannie in their common-wealth when we apparantly discerne the Abhomination of desolation stand in the holy place Mat. 24. let vs flie saith Chrysostome to the mountaines of the Scriptures But can any man be persuaded that these men after their purging and condemning all sorts of writers will at last come to the triall of the Scriptures Are we not all eye witnesses that Christ and his Apostles are called in question at the Popes Assises and there arraigned and condemned of obscuritie insufficiency in their Gospel Is not the sacred Bible ranked inter libros prohibitos Causabons answer to the Ep. of C. Peron pa. 38. hath it not the first place in the Catalogue of books prohibited doth not their owne Agrippa proclaime it to the shame of his own religion that the Inquisitors deale most cruelly with the Protestants concerning their triall by the Scriptures Agrippa de Vanit Scien c. â—6 For saith hee If the partie examined shall offer to proue his opinion by Scriptures then with swelling and angrie countenance they tell him that he is not now to deale with schollers in their Schooles but with Iudges before their Tribunall and therefore hee must answer directly whether hee will stand to the decrees of the Romane Church or not If hee refuse then they conclude saying they are not to dispute with him by arguments and Scriptures but with fire and faggot Now can any man imagine why these men should bee so angrie with Christ and his Apostles can they say the word of God is mutable and vncertaine or can they say it is subiect vnto alteration and neede an Index Expurgatorius No surely these are but peccadilioes small faults which are incident to Fathers Schoolemen and the Polemicall Authors of these times but you shall heare them speake in their owne sense a Caracteres mortui wherin they abound for I tremble to speake it a Lindan l. 3 Stroncatum c. 2. c. 6. b Littera mortua occidens The Scriptures say they are dead Characters a dead and killing letter b Idem Panopl l. 1. c. 22. without life c Muta inanis quae nec sentit nec intelligit which neither knowes nor vnderstands a meere shell without a kernell a nose of waxe a delphich sword c IdeÌ„ l. 5. c. 4. d Merum putamen sine nucleo a leaden rule a shoe fit for any foot Sybillas prophecies d Idem lib. 1. c. 6. Sphinx his riddles e Nasus cerous and matter
of Gods seruice in the time of the ministration did little dreame that the Ministers intention should make good or make voide all the seuen Sacraments and yet we see this is the Tenet of the Romish doctrine The intention no doubt of many opinions in the first founders was good Ferus Annot in Iud. Câ— 8. Colon. 1571 Duplex c. Exemplo sint sesta ceremoniae Imagines Missa Monasteria c. Nihil hominis eâ intentione institutum fuit quâ nunc habeÌ„tur c. but the application is now amisse for the housholder made good Lawes but the enemy added a Glosse There was a double sinne in Gedeon saith Ferus both in that hee made an Ephod contrary to the word of God and in that seeing the abuse thereof hee tooke it not away now who seeth not that the like happeneth to the Church How many things did the Saints ordaine with a good intent which we see at this day changed partly by abuse and partly by superstition The Feasts Ceremonies Images Masses Monasteries and the like none of them were instituted in that sort at first as now they are vsed and yet we Gedeons hold our peace they take not away the abuse they take not away the superstitions This complainant was a Friar and a member of the Romane Church he tels vs that Masses and Monasteries and Images are all different from the meaning of the first founders yet neuer tels vs of the times nor Authors that first changed them Now if the Reformed Churches should haue declined a reformation because they could not assigne the time and Authors of those errours who seeth not but they had fallen into the sinne of Gedeon who in seeing the abuse tooke it not away Nay more those Romanists which made great search and inquirie to know the time and Authors of their errors although they professe they cannot precisely set downe their first beginnings yet ingeniously confesse an alteration of diuers Tenets in their own Church Marius de Schism Concil part 3. ca. vlt. The restraine of Priests marriage to say precisely when it came in saith Marius I cannot tell although I haue most diligently enquired after it Concerning Prayer in an vnknowne tongue Mirumin hac re quam Ecclesiae mutata sit consuetudo Eras in 1. Cor. 14. It is to bee wondred how the Church is altered in this point saith Erasmus but the precise time he cannot tell The Communion in one kinde when it got first footing in the Church Greg. de Val. de legit vsu Euchar. c. 10. Minime constat it doth not appeare saith Gregorie de Valen. Now if these men could haue prooued their doctrine originally from the Scriptuâ—es they should not haue needed to inquire of vs for the first Authors of their doctrine for I am confident beyond all beliefe if forbidding of Marriage had beene the doctrine of Christ which S. Paul termeth the doctrine of diuels 1. Tim. 4.1 If Prayer in an vnknowne tongue had beene taught and commended by the Apostle Saint Paul as on the contrary it was forbidden and condemned in his first Epistle to the Corinthians If the Communion in one kind had beene instituted by Christ as the contrary was to wit in both kinds If these points I say had beene deriued from the word of God or had they alwayes beene receiued as Apostolique Traditions in the Church the beginning and the Author of their Tenets had beene easily knowne and then they might haue beene published out of certaine knowledge both for time and person and as touching this and the rest of straw and stubble which the Church hath added to her building it is manifest by the Testimonies of our aduersaries that there was a knowne time when those Tenets were not certainely knowne and generally receiued in the Romane Church The Marriage of Priests was not altogether forbidden till the time of Gregorie the seuenth saith Polidore and this was aboue a thousand yeares after Christ The number of seuen Sacraments was not expresly defined till the dayes of Peter Lombard saith Cassander and this was 1140. yeares after Christ Bellar. de Euch. lib. 3. cap. 23. The doctrine of Transubstantiation was not receiued for a point of faith till the Councell of Lateran saith Scotus and this was aboue 1200. yeares after Christ The power of Indulgences extended to soules in Purgatorie was first decreed by Boniface the eighth saith Agrippa and this was 1300. yeares after Christ The Communion in one kind began to be generally receiued but a little before the Councell of Constance saith Gregorio de Valentia and this was almost 1400. yeares after Christ Sect. 7. The Pedegree of the Romish faith drawne downe from the ancient Heretiques and the Protestant faith deriued from Christ and his Apostles BVt since these men are so inquisitiue to know of vs the first Authors of their Religion I wil tel them of their Predecessors and giue them a short Pedegree both of their Romane faith and our Protestant doctrine that it may appeare from whom they and we are lineally descended and first touching the succession in person and doctrine I will examine it Ordine retrogrado and ascend vpward Latin Seruice Latin seruice and prayer in a strange tongue came into the Church by Pope Vitalian saith Wolphius and this was about the yeare 666. Wolphius Lect. Memorab Centenarius septim p. 189. if we ascend higher the Heretiques Osseni taught in the first ages There was no need to make a prayer in a knowne tongue Epiph. heres 19. saith Epiphanius If you will ascend to the Apostles time and claime Antiquitie in the highest degree there were certaine Iewes saith Ambrose amongst the Grecians â—s namely Ambr. Epist. 1. ad Cor. c. 14. the Corinthians who did celebrate the diuine Seruice and the Sacrament sometimes in the Syriacke and most commonly in the Hebrew tongue which the common people vnderstood not For which cause Saint Paul wrote that whole Chapter of the foureteenth to the first of the Corinthians which is wholly and flatly deliuered against the Prayer and Seruice in an vnknowne tongue Here you haue the Romish succession in doctrine person deriued froÌ„ Iewes Heretiques here is our Protestant doctrine deriued from S. Paul the Apostle Pray with the spirit Pray with the vnderstanding also The doctrine of Transubstantiation was first decreed at the Councell of Lateran TransubstaÌ„tiation about foure hundred yeares agoe if we ascend higher it was set afoot by Damascen and Epiphanius for bringing in the worship of Images at the Councell of Nice If we looke further it was practised by the Helcesaitae Helcesaitae duplicem Christum faciunt alium suprà alium infrà Theodoret which feined a twofold Christ one in heauen another in earth like the Masse Priests who admit one body with all his dimensians and properties in heauen another body in the Sacrament which hath no properties of a true body If we
looke higher it was deliuered by Marcus the Heretique who by his inuocation ouer the Sacramentall Cup Ireneus li. 1. c. 9. caused the wine to appeare like bloud if you will looke into the Apostles time the first Authors were those disciples that beleeued the grosse and carnal eating of Christs flesh which murmured against him and forsooke him Here is their succession in doctrine and person deriued from Idolators from heretiques from Capernaites Here is our faith deliuered at the same time by Christ himself Ioh. 6. The words I speake are spirit and life The Popes Supremacie was confirmed at the Councell of Trent The Supremacie and the Councell of Lateran if we ascend higher it was first granted by Phocas the bloudy Emperour to the Bishop of Constantinople 600. years after Christ Vrspergensis in Phocas fol. 149. if they claime Antiquitie from the time of the Apostles the Gentiles were their first founders and benefactors For saith Christ the Kings of the Gentiles exercise Lordship ouer them Luk. 22.25 and they that exercise authoritie vpon them are called benefactors Here is their succession in doctrine and person deriued from bloud-suckers and Gentiles in vsurping right ouer Kings and kingdomes in things spirituall in things temporall here is our receiued doctrine from Christ himselfe Mat. 20 26.27 Whosoeuer will be great among you let him bee your Master and whosoeuer wil be chiefe among you let him be your seruant Worship of Images The worship of Images was decreed at the second Councell of Nice almost 800. yeares after Christ but if you claime Antiquitie because it is a point of faith Jraeneus lib. 1. cap. 23.24 Iraeneus tels vs the Basilidians and Carporatians in the Primitiue times did worship Images and professed they had the Image of Christ made by Pilate Here is their succession in doctrine and person deriued from the heretiques Basilides and Carporates here is ours deriued from the doctrine of Saint Paul Rom. 12.3 from the lesson giuen by Saint Iohn 1. Ioh. 5.21 and from the mouth of God himselfe Deu. 4.15.16 Thou shalt not make to thy selfe any grauen Image c. The Communion in one kinde was decreed at the Councell of Constance aboue 1400. yeares after Christ The CoÌ„munion in one kind yet if you stand vpon Antiquitie because it is an Article of faith Leo Serm. 4. de Quadrages Pope Leo tels you the Manichees a sort of heretiques in his time vsed the Sacrament in one kinde viz. in bread onely if you ascend to the time of the Apostles the Nazarites saith Bellarmine had made a vow not to drinke wine Non est credibile Nazareos contrà votum suum bibisse decalice nec tameÌ„ credibile est eos omninó à communione abstinuisse Bellar. Apolog contr praefat Regis monitorium B Andr. c. 8. fol. 188. and therefore in all likelyhood they tooke Sacrament in bread onely here then is their succession in person and doctrine deriued from Nazarites and heretiques here is our doctrine taught by Christ himselfe and so commended to our Church Mat. 26.27 Drinke ye all of this Againe looke vpon their Inuocation of Saints and Angels August ad quod vult Deum c. 39. and you shall finde their founders were the heretiques Angelici Looke vpon their doctrine of merits and works of Supererrogation Isid Etym. li. 8. cap. de hâ—eres Christ and you shall see their first Authors were the Cathari the Puritans Looke vpon their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their worship giuen to the blessed Virgin and you shall discerne the Collyridian heretiques which Epiphanius termes Idolators were their first leaders Epiph. heres 79. Looke vpon their restraint of Priests Marriage and you shall obserue that the heretique Tatianus and the Maniches were their Predecessors Epiph. heres 46. and forbad Marriage in Sacerdotibus in their Priests These and the like errors taught in the Church of Rome either lineally descended from the aforesaid heretiques or at leastwise haue neere affiâ—itie with their adulterate issue And if I haue failed in calculating the right natiuitie of their ancient doctrine yet sure I am they are vtterly destitute of a right succession in person and doctrine from the Apostles and the ancient Fathers of the Primitiue Church as shall appeare by many testimonies of the best learned amongst themselues Sect. 8. The Testimonies of our Aduersaries touching the Antiquitie and vniuersalitie of the Protestant faith in generall IN the meane time I will call the Church of Rome for a witnesse to our cause and if she do not plainly confesse the Antiquitie of our Tenets and the Noueltie of her owne If she herselfe do not proclaime the vniuersalitie of our faith if she do not confesse that we are both in the more certaine and safer way in the Protestant Church I will neither refuse the name nor the punishment due to heresie He therfore that shall question vs where our Church was before Luther let him looke backe into the Primitiue Church nay let him but looke into the bosome of the present Romane Church and there he shall find and confesse that if euer Antiquitie and Vniuersality were marks of the true Church of right and necessitie they must belong to ours The Creede of the Apostles Nicene Councell Athanasius Piuâ— the fourth Looke into the foure Creedes which the Church of Rome professeth and you shall finde three of those Creeds are taught and beleeued in our Church and these by our aduersaries confession were instituted by the Apostles and the Fathers of the Primitiue Church not created by Luther Looke into the seauen Sacraments which the Church of Rome holdeth and you shall acknowledge that two of those Sacraments are professed by vs and these by our aduersaries confession were instituted by Christ not broached by Luther Looke into the Canon of our Bible and you shall obserue that 22. books of Canonicall Scripture which our Church alloweth were vniuersally receiued in all ages and are approued at this day by the Church of Rome for Canonical Scripture not deuised by Luther Looke into the first seuen generall Councels and you â—hall confesse that the first 4. generall Councels are ratiâ—ed by our Church and Acts of Parliament Eliz. 1. not called by Luther Looke into the Traditions of the Church and you shal see and confesse that all the Apostolicall Traditions which were vniuersally receiued and which the Church of Rome confesseth at this day to bee Apostolicall are descended from the Apostles to vs not deriued from Luther Looke into our booke of Common Prayer and compare it with the ancient Lyturgies and it will appeare the same formes of Prayer for substance were read and published in a known tongue in the ancient Churches not broached by Luther Looke into the ordination calling of Pastors and it will appeare that the same essentiall forme of ordination which at this day is practised in our Church