Selected quad for the lemma: blood_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
blood_n	agree_v	call_v	great_a	73	3	2.1334	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A39051	Plain and exquisite Scripture-proof, that St. John Baptist and the blessed Apostles, and all the primitive baptizers, did baptize by sprinkling, or pouring water upon the person or persons they baptized, and not by dipping the person into water ... also some observations upon Mr. Keach's reflections upon my late treatise, intituled, Plain and express Scripture proofs, that John Baptist did as certainly baptize infants in the church of the Jews as the adult, with the confirmation of the truth reflected against by him / by Joshua Exell ...	Exell, Joshua.	1693 (1693)	Wing E3857; ESTC R15010	107,024	64

should have intended such contrary things by one and the same word in this case and they so understand him Then they might also understand his meaning to be as directly contrary in other words and expressions to them Namely that they should stand when he spake to them of cutting down and that when he called them a generation of Vipers he did mean and intend that they were Saints For if they understood his contrary meaning in one thing and if his words had a contrary signification in one thing why might they not also in another when there was no explanation made of the words But what Soul is there that can have any Scripture ground to believe That John the Baptist who was one of the greatest of all the Prophets and was filled with the holy Ghost from his mothers Womb should have such directly contrary meanings by one and the same word in the same mood at the same time about that which one was to be an example type figure or representation of the other his Baptizing with water to signify and seal Christs Baptizing with the holy Ghost And if he had such contrary intentions by one and the same word how would this have Answered the end of his Ministry in turning them to the Lord their God In case they could not understand his meaning And if the Scribes and Pharisees those Implacable enemies should have understood John to act and intend by one and the same expression contrary things how would they have railed against him and his Ministry and have said that he did deceive the people and brought this to confirm it In that he did intend such contrary things by the same word about the same ordinance and never explain his meaning And if John Baptist should have had such contrary Intentions by this one word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and never make the least explanation of the same how did he make plain the way of the Lord and help all flesh to see the salvation of God Was this to make the way of the Lord direct and straight plain and even for to make dipping to signifie Sprinkling and dipping the person into water to signifie pouring the holy Ghost upon the person and to make one word have such contrary significations in expressing the full or both parts of one ordinance when the outward Baptism with water was to be a sign of the Inward Baptism with the holy Ghost Would this help all flesh to see the Salvation of God that was to know Christ when he did come and appear by the manner of his performance and to see the way of the participation of Spiritual benefits from him by his outward and external ordinances and way of Administration of it Was this the way of the Prophets to deliver things so darkly Were they not to make the vision plain that he that runneth might read it But now if we shall on the contrary not put in dip or dipping in the place of Baptizing but pouring upon and sprinkling with and read the words thus I indeed have sprinkled you with water or I have indeed poured out water upon you or sprinkled you with water But he shall pour out his spirit upon you or sprinkle you with the Holy Ghost and with fire Here these words will agree both with the external sign and internal grace signified by the sign in the way and manner of the communication thereof foretold by the Prophets which John had a special regard to and came to bring about the fulfilling of Truth doth use to agree though truth and error can never agree this will not only make the sign and the thing signified to agree and the manner of their performance to be one But this will agree also with all the former types and figures of their cleansing In their sprinkling and purifying them with blood and also with water of separation Numbers 19. 17 18 19. Heb. 9.13 14 19 20 21. This will agree with the great Gospel promise Ezekiel 36.25 I will sprinkle clean water upon you 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which must be understood of the supernatural graces of the spirit without the means or the work of the spirit by means Or else it must be understood of the way and manner of the communication of the means or of the thing signified by the means If Any say it is meant of the pouring out of the Spirit like that Joel 2.28 Acts 2.16 17. Then it must be meant of the manner of Christs Baptizing Acts 1.5 Acts 11.15 16. And if they will not allow it to be meant of the means how then shall this be signified to poor souls whereby they may know how to pray for this mercy in the right way of the communication thereof as David did formerly Psalm 51.6 7. And God told them at that time that he would be sought unto that he should do it for them Ezekiel 36.37 Besides this of pouring of water upon them or sprinkling them with water as Christ sprinkled them with the holy Ghost will agree with what was foretold by the Prophets of Christs Isa 52 15. way and manner of the communication of the benefits of his death The Hebrew word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This also will agree with the Title given to the blood of Christ and in which it speaketh to the whole general assembly Heb. 12.24 And this will agree with the Titles given to the Inward Baptism Heb 10.22 having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience And through the sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ 1 Peter 1.2 But it may chance that we must stand to the Original and what the signification is there in this case as in some others where the translation will not serve turn some plead the Original But if the translation will serve turn then it is no matter what the Original is or doth signifie Therefore I shall endeavour to search and to produce what the Original doth signifie in this case in the Texts before quoted Matth. 3.11 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mark 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 3.16 The same as before in Matthew 3.11 John 1.31 Therefore am I come baptizing with water 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Verse 33. But he that sent me to baptise with Water 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The same is he which Baptizeth with the holy Ghost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In every one of these texts The Preposition that our Translators have rendered with is in the Original 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which generally is translated in And this the vulgar Greek Grammar tells us Soli Dativo Jungitur sed per Eclipsm Genitivo But tho generally it signifieth in and be so translated yet it doth not alwayes signifie In especially when it will not agree with the sense of the place or context And who is able to make it agree with the later part of the verse Baptizing with the holy Ghost if it should be translated in the holy

and Gospel despisers did understand it and what they did intend by it in their use of it Whensoever it is used in the New Testament it is used to set forth either the Internal or External Baptism or else the Religious ceremonial washings of the Jews and they taken as appointed of God signified as much as our external Baptism For every one that was unclean or defiled was not to come into the Sanctuary or Tabernacle nor to touch the holy things nor was he to have any remission without purifying Numbers 19. Heb. 9.19 20 21 22. The like to which our saviour declared against the despising of Baptism when it might be had and the necessity of the acceptation and use of it Luke 7.29 30. John 3.3 5 8. Certain truths of Scripture that are to be regarded as rules In the Enquiry into the true signification and constant acceptation of the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by keeping to which the General and also special scope and agreement of the contexts and Analogy of Scripture may not be departed from In the enquiry about this word First such a signification of this word cannot or ought not to be taken or received in the New Testament as will not consist with the external ordinance to be an Outward and visible sign of the Inward and spiritual grace thereby signified represented and typified out to all that by faith receive it or by unbelief reject it If the ordinance as to the manner of its Administration is not a sign the nature of it is destroyed 1 Peter 3.21 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. No such signification can or ought to be taken of this word in the New Testament As would force John the Baptist to mean two contrary things by the same word at the same time to the same people about the two parts that constitute one and the same ordinance and when one was to be the sign and representation of the other and he Intend and design to set forth by his expressing himself by the same word the external part to be a sign of the Internal grace He being a prophet and speaking by the spirit of Prophesie Matth. 3.11 Acts. 1.5 1 Peter 3.21 3. No such signification can be taken of this w rd in the New Testament as will not agree with the accomplish●●nt of the Scripture P●ophesies concerning Gospel times Isa 52.15 Psa 44.3 Joel 2.28 Acts 2.2 3.4 5 16 17. Acts 1● 44 Acts 11.15.16 4. No such acceptation or signification can be had from the New Testament of this word that will no● agree wi●h the accomplishment of the great G●spel promise to be accomplished especially in Gospel times Ezek 36.25 Which is to sprinkle clean water upon his people and to cleanse them from all their filthiness 1 John 1.7 5. N● such signification can be taken of it according to Scripture and the mind of God in the New Testament as will not agree with the Gl●rious title given to the blood of Christ that sets forth the Manner of the application of it by the holy spirit to poor sinners Heb. 1● 24 It is called the blood of sprinkling 6. No such significa●ion can be taken of this word in the New Testament as wi●l not agree with the express words of Scripture setting forth the same work of grace upon the souls of poor sinners that is sometimes called baptizing with the holy Ghost Acts. 1.5 Matth. 3.11 Acts 11.15 16 18 At other tim●s calling it sprinkling with the blood of Jesus Christ 1 Peter 1.2 and having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience Heb. 10.22 Which he shed on u● abundantly Titus 3.5.6 Acts 2.15 16 33. 7. No such signification can be had from Scripture of this word as would render that part of the Ministerial work and office an act Impossible for any one constituted officer of a compe●ent measure of the strength of an ordinary man and of that stature and proportion to perform to all sorts sexes ages and conditions of men person by person or one after another 8. No such signification of this word can be had from the New Testament as will not agree with the speediness pertinency and suitableness of the questions and answers made and returned by this word in Scripture concerning the various things about which it is used to set forth and signifie the things they discoursed of Or no such interpretation as would render John Baptist and our Saviour and all his Disciples more Imperfect in their understandings than many pretend to be Now. 9. No such signification or acceptation can be had from the New Testament by any whatsoever as would force the holy Ghost to intend that by this word in the New Testament when it is used to express and set forth external Baptism with water That it should have that signification that the holy Ghost does always express another word in the New Testament by John 13.26 Dipping is always expressed by the spirit of God by another word in the New Testament but never by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the same thing that is sometimes rendered by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is at other times rendered by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which do properly signifie sprinkling 1 Peter 1.2 Heb. 17.22 Heb. 12.24 Acts 1.5 Acts 11.15 16 18. Dipping is expressed by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 John 13.26 Luke 16.24 Revel 19.13 10. No such significa●ion or acceptation can be had from the New Testament of this word as will not agree with the synonymous terms and words whereby the holy spirit of God does s●t forth and express the same thing tha● at other times he calls Baptizing as purifying Acts 15.9 cleansing 1 John 1.7 purging Heb. 9 13 14. Pouring upon or shedding upon Titus 3.5.6 c. 11. No such acceptation of this word can be had from the New Testament as will admit of divers ways and Manners of the publick performance of this great ordinance of Baptism that is such an express instituted Gospel duty Matth 28.19 John 1.25 to 34. and as would make the same word to have two contrary s gnifications about the way of the administration of one and the same external sign of Baptism with water 1 Cor. 10.2 compared with Matth. 3 11. Eph. 4 5 12. No such acceptation or signification of this word can be had from the New Testament as will admit of Boasting to any flesh 1 Cor. 1.29 For that is wholly excluded from all ●●esh both of Jew and Gentile by the Gospel Rom. 4. Rom. 3.27 13. Not such a signification of this word can be had from the New Testament as would render the Institutions of God by Moses then in force Insignificant and Insufficient For they are all exp●essed by a noun whereby Johns baptism and Christs baptism are expressed by Heb. 9.10 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 compared with Matth. 3.7 Matth. 20.22 14 No such acceptation as makes God to prefer sacrifice before mercy 15. Not such an