whole particular Church or a Church Consistory Christ in Matth. 18. 17 18. establishing the power of Excommunication in his Church by divine institution doth not restraine the exercise thereof to be applyed only to a single brother in a particular Church though he give the instance in such an one for he doth institute that Order in his Kingdome whereby all scandals may be removed out of the Church and cured by spirituall authority whether committed by a particular Church or by a particular person or by whomsoever And therefore if a particular Sister Church in the Ecclesiasticall Society of many Churches doe give a scandall to those other Churches they may by this institution of Christ be brought into order by this spirituall Power And surely it is cleare even out of Parker himselfe that the divine institution of Classes may be proved from Christs institution in Matt. 18. 17 18. For lib. 3. cap. 24. de Politiâ Ecclesiasticâ he thus argues from the proportion Christ Commands that upon the despising one mans admonition we should proceed to admonition by two or three and if that be contemned to the censure of the Presbytery and if that be despised to the censure of the whole Church and why not therefore from the despising of one whole Church to more in a Classis and againe from those more in a Classis to yet more in a Synod And therefore also by this Institution of Christ not a particular Church only but a Classis and Synod also have power given of Excommunicating such as commit scandals if by this institution of Christ the nature and authority of Classes and Synods may be concluded And accordingly in those hard times of the Belgick Churches when the Church amongst us was infested by the troubles and errours of the Remonstrants whole Presbyteries of Churches were exauthorated by the Power of Classes and Synods We reject therefore the contrary Assertions 1. Of those who hold the Power of Excommunication to be so appropriated to a particular Church so that it may not be attributed to Classes and Synods But we hold that a particular Church by reason of that arct Ecclesiasticall Communion which it holdeth with other neighbour Churches in the same Classis or Synod whereby it makes up one Ecclesiasticall corporation or body and one visible sacred Society with the associate Churches hath not an absolute and compleate power to cut off and cast out a member from that particular Church because that member hath a near arct and visible union and communion with the Churches associate amongst whom he doth daily converse and celebrate the worship of God so that he doth occasion to them danger of scandall and infection and receiveth from them meanes of edification wherefore without the judgement and consent of the associate Churches he may not be cast out of that brotherly and visible Church communion by the decree of one particular Church 2. Of those also who make the highest power of Synods and Classes in the exercise of Ecclesiasticall censures toward a particular Church to consist in a denying or withdrawing brotherly communion But this Non-Communion as it is called we conceive to be such an act as a brother may exercise towards a brother a particular Church towards another particular Church who yet cannot exercise any authority or censure of Ecclesiasticall power amongst themselves one over the other nor hath it that Efficacy by Gods ordinance to bind in Heaven nor was it ordained by the Institution of Christ for this end to save the spirit of man in the day of the Lord and to teach from God such as be erroneous not to blaspheme which to the legitimate censure of Excommunication doe appertaine Matth. 18. 17 18. 1 Cor. 5. 4. 1 Tim. 1. 20. In the correction of a Sister Church the same degrees are to be observed by the Ordinance of Christ Matth. 18. 17 18. which are observed in the correction of a brother and therefore we are not to rest in the admonition of two or three Churches but by that order proceed to Excommunication thereby to cast out from the holy Communion of the Churches as a heathen and a publican and to deliver to Satan an obstinate offending Church CHAP. VII Of set Formes Question WHether it be lawfull for Churches to prescribe to themselves constituted lawes and formes and certaine Canons by Ecclesiasticall authoritie wherein Articles of Faith and things necessarily required by God for the Governement and Discipline of the Churches are out of the holy Scriptures expounded and determined and things not necessarily required are by Ecclesiasticall power prescribed according to the generall rules of Scripture from the precepts of the law of Nature and holy Prudence for the edification of the Church and the order and decency of Gods Worship and imposed on particular Churches and Church-Governors as bonds of Peace and Unity Answer VVE grant in this Controversie 1. That these Formes are not absolutely necessary to the constitution of a Church For we know that the antient Church of the Jewes wanted such Formes when as being collected in one people they had expresse rituall lawes and the Prophets frequent directions Nor did the Christian Church want its being or well being before such time as the branches of the Apostles Creed gathered out of severall places of Scripture were in a briefe Abstract joyned together in one 2. We deny that these Formes or declarations of Faith and Church-Government are to have that authority and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or authenticknesse attributed to them which belongs only to the Word of God as that they should be obtruded as a rule of Faith and that in the Examination of Doctrines and of Church Discipline judgement should be made ex formularum terminis as they speake by the letter of such formes We approve not the judgement of those nor would have their practise to be imitated of whom our Divines did heretofore justly complaine in that writing which Zacharias Vrsinus in the name of the Vniversity of Neostad opposed to the Bergenses concordistae who would obtrude the words of the Augustan confession and the writings of Luther as a rule of faith and Ecclesiasticall proceedings See Chap. 4. of that booke where much is said concerning the use and abuse of Confessions 3. We judge formes of confessions and Canons of Ecclesiasticall Government to be declarations of the true faith and discipline badges and tokens of union and communion in the Church collected in the meetings of the godly learned and ratifyed by an unanimous consent after a diligent inquiry out of Scripture wherein those things which are in divers places of Scripture pertaining to the summe of Christian faith and discipline gathered as it were into a bundle are together and at once proposed to a few eyes and by the comparing of all places wherein mention is made of one and the same article the wholsome truth in each one is expressed and explained that the controversies arising concerning the
Servants in the house of God by speciall office 2 Cor. 4. 5. who know how to behave themselves aright in the house of God 1 Tim. 3. 16. and to give to those in the house their due portion in season Math. 24. 25. rightly to divide and distribute the word of God 2 Tim. 2. 15. For the Keyes are a signe of power intrusted which are by Christ committed to the stewards and overseers in his house whereby to administer their power And by the Keyes in Scripture is signified authority faculty power administration of government which is exercised in commanding forbidding allowing restraining As Isa 22. 22. compared with Isa 9. 6. Rev. 1. 18. 3. 7. And Mat. 16. 18 19. denotes Ministers power and full administration They are committed therefore to those who are set over the Church not to all in the Church 2. That opinion is not to be admitted which doth overthrow the order constituted by Christ in the Church by which order Christ hath in the Church visible as in an Heterogeneous Organical Body constituted of divers integrall parts to which he hath given their peculiar functions and operations in that Ecclesiasticall body For he hath set in the Church eyes eares hands feet rulers and such as are over them in the Lord overseers watchmen Pastors Embassadors in Christs name preachers fathers builders sowers c. And a flock a people a house a field children and such as governed and who are bound to obey those that are set over them c. see Heb. 13. 17. 1 Thes 5. 12. 1 Tim. 5. 17. 2 Cor. 5. 20. 1 Cor. 4. 1 2 15. 1 Cor. 3. 9. c. But if all in the Church have the power of the Keys power of building ruling the Church by censures Ecclesiasticall c. all will be Embassadors Rulers Fathers Pastors Watchmen Eyes Eares for to those parts of the Church do Ecclesiasticall and authoritative oversight and rule belong as their proper function Therefore the power of the Keys and exercise thereof is not common to all members of a Church but is the proper function of the overseers and Pastors to whom the Rod and that severe power is committed for the edification of the Church 1 Cor. 4. 21. 2 Cor. 13. 10. 3. The Cannons and rules proposed in holy Scripture whereby the right government of the Church and the due use of the Keyes is directed are not given to all the beleevers in a Church but the Pastors and Elders Timothy and Titus and other Church-Governors are by the Apostle instructed how to behave themselves in the house of God as faithfull stewards in the Epistles to Timothy and Titus and also 1 Cor. chap. 3. 4. And the faults which are committed in mis-governing of Churches and abuse of the Keys are not by God imputed as the fault of all the beleevers in a Church but of some to wit the overseers 1 Tim. 3. 4 5 6. Tit. 1. 7. 1 Pet. 5. 3. Revel 2. 14 20. 3. Ioh. 16. 10. The praise and reward promised for due ordering of Churches is not by God promised to all the beleevers in a Church but to the Pastors and Elders who rule well in the Lord 1 Thes 5. 12. Heb. 13. 17. 1 Tim. 5. 17. 2 Tim. 4. 4 5. 1 Pet. 5. 4 5. Revel 22. Therefore to those only is the Government of Churches and the exercise of the Keys intrusted by Christ 4. To whom Christ gave the power and exercise of the Keys or Rule in the Church to those he gave the spirit for administration and those gifts which are necessary for the government of the Church For when God sendeth any into his Church he alwayes qualifieth them with gifts sufficient and fit for the exercise of that ministery and office committed to them as is evident by the examples of all whom God hath sent into the Church But where is the Spirit promised to all whereby all the beleevers in a Church may remit and retaine sinnes spoken of Ioh. 20 21 22 23. Where is that prudence and wisdome promised to all whereby they may be able to rule the house of God to go in and out before the people of God c. Therefore the Government of the Church and the exercise of the Keys is not by God committed to all Hence also have the Reformed Churches alwayes rejected a popular Church-Government See Sadeel's treatise in French concerning Ecclesiasticall Discipline against Morellius Of whom Reverend Beza libro de Ministrorum gradibus cap. 25. when he had described the manner of Election in the Church saith thus which order by the goodnesse of God religiously and prudently observed hitherto in this City when one democraticall fanaticall Morellius of Paris was bold by word and writing to find fault with that his writing was both in this Church and in France in many Synods worthily condemned And in our Synodicall constitutions the Churches Ecclesiasticall power Judgement Exercise of the Keys and Church-government is every where committed to the Pastors Elders to Presbyteries Consistories Classes and Synods See the Synod at Embden Anno 1571. from Article 25. to art 35. At Dort Anno 1578. art 92. to art 101. at Middleburgh Anno 1581. art 58. to art 66. at the Hagh Anno 1586. art 64. to art 74. at Middleburgh Anno 1591. art 58. to 75. at Dort Anno 1619. art 71. to art 81. II. We affirm that the power of sending or ordaining Pastors or Church-Governors is committed by God in a setled Church not to the multitude of the Church but to the Pastors and Elders or Presbyters of Churches We grant indeed as was said before that there is a liberty of nomination or election allowed by the word of God to all the members in a Church so as no Minister may without the agreement and consent of the people be obtruded upon a Church whether they will or no which Nomination or Election doth not yet confer Ministerial power on the person elected but only designeth a Person on whom it may be duly derived according to the instituted rule by those who have under Christ received that power whereby Ecclesiasticall authority is derived on this or that person We deny not also but that extraordinarily in a perplexed and depraved estate of a whole visible Church the multitude or faithfull people in a Church may choose their Pastors and Rulers and authoritatively put them into the power right and possession of the Ministery and that by reason of a cogent necessity which admitteth no law and to which all positive law giveth place But we affirm that in a setled and constituted visible Church the people by the positive law of God have not power of ordaining or sending their Pastors but that potestative Mission Ordinatiō whereby Ecclesiasticall authority or the Ministeriall power is conferred on this or that man designed to the Ministery belongeth to Presbyteries Our assertion is proved 1. From those precepts described in holy Scripture concerning Ordination or
and Synods that they may so farre as conveniently can be make use of common consent and mutuall assistance especially in those things that are of greater moment But yet how much greater and further space and remotenesse of distance there is between particular Churches so much the lesse also is the visible communion of those Churches because the danger of scandall and infection and the opportunity of mutual edification is lesse or more according as the distinct distance of places is greater or lesse Wherfore there is a more strict visible Ecclesiasticall communion between the Churches of one Province or Nation then between the particular congregations of the Church Universall and consequently the jurisdiction and Ecclesiasticall government is also lesse visible between these then between the Churches of one Nation This communion of Churches in government and Church discipline is not only for the informing of Churches what is commanded by the word of God but also for the governing of them by laws and spirituall jurisdiction for there is an authority and power of rule belonging by the word of God to Churches joyned in Classes and Synods which to particular Churches singly and severally belongeth not to wit a power of making Canons and laws Ecclesiasticall which may bind all the particular Churches of one Province or Kingdome to obey them We grant in this controversy 1. That the power of Classes and Synods doth not take away or hurt the power or liberty Ecclesiasticall of a particular Church for it serveth to direct preserve and promote the power of Synods is not privative but cumulative and granted for this end that the power given to particular Churches may be more efficacious orderly regular able and apt for edifying 2. That there is a power belonging to a particular Church immediatly granted from God not derived from Classes or Synods as likewise there is belonging to Classes and Synods a power of their own immediatly granted by God and not derived from the particular Churches For though in regard of the Originall or the rise and constitution of a Synod particular Churches intire in themselves collaterall one to another and equall in Church power do in common contribute associate and exercise their Church power and so make up a collective and combined body of a Synod yet the Synodicall authority of it selfe is not granted to any other first subject from whence it should be derived to the Synod then to the Synod it selfe to which alone by the word of God and Apostolicall institution that power belongeth for no particular Churches singly and severally considered may exercise a Synodicall power over other Churches But we affirme 1. That this union and communion of particular Churches in a government and discipline Ecclesiasticall in common which is exercised in Synods and Classes is grounded upon the word of God and in the examples of the Apostolicall Church is proposed to us to imitate 2. That these Synods and Classes have a power and authority Synodall and Classicall whereby they do by spirituall jurisdiction authoritatively decerne matters Ecclesiasticall and impose those decrees under paine of Ecclesiasticall censure on particular Churches Our opinion is proved by these following arguments 1. In Act. 15. we have in the Apostles practise an expresse example of a Synod held at Jerusalem about a question concerning the observation of the Law of Moses In which Synod that businesse which had wrought a disturbance in the particular Churches ver 2 4 5 23. is by the deputies of severall Churches ver 2 6 23. Act. 21. 17 18 25. determined with power authoritative to bind particular Churches to obedience ver 22 28. chap. 16. 4. 21 25. And the false doctrine of those who subverted the soules of their hearers is by an Ecclesiasticall judgement condemned with spirituall power ver 28 29. which thing is an act of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction as appeareth Revel 2. 2 14 20. and the determination of this Ecclesiasticall law was not by an extraordinary Apostolike authority but by an ordinary authority Ecclesiasticall for it was done not by the Apostles alone extraordinarily acted by the Spirit of God but by the Elders and brethren of the Church joyned with the Apostles acting not by their Apostololicall but by their ordinary Pastorall authority with great discussion and disputation and the assent of the Churches which argue that the decrees of this Synod were not made by an extraordinary Apostolicall authority but by an ordinary Ecclesiasticall power 2. Our assertion is proved from Christs institution Mat. 18. 17 18. where he doth institute such Ecclesiasticall Assemblies as may by Ecclesiasticall authority make provision and prepare efficacious remedies against all scandals and offences If the members of a particular Church do give scandall to one another he bids that it be shewed to a superior Ecclesiasticall Judge to wit the Church representative which by Ecclesiasticall authority doth condemne and punish and remove from Ecclesiasticall and brotherly communion the person offending and therefore doth likewise command that if particular Churches give offence to one another it should be carried to a superior Ecclesiasticall Judge which may by spirituall authority condemne punish and put from Ecclesiasticall communion the particular Church offending for where the law makes no distinction or restriction there must not we distinguish or restrain And certainly the remedy instituted in this place is ordained by Christ for the removing out of the visible Church all scandals not only caused by particular members but also by whole Churches and therfore there must be acknowledged a superior Ecclesiasticall Assembly which may by authoritative Ecclesiasticall power judge of the scandall of particular Churches as well as a superiour Ecclesiasticall judge in a particular Church is to be acknowledged from this institution for judging the scandalls of particular members For since that according to the holy Scriptures we must grant that there is an Ecclesiasticall communion between the visible Churches of one Province Nation yea and of the whole World as is proved before which communion is not only fraternall but Ecclesiasticall whereby Churches as Churches or bodies Ecclesiasticall are joyned and united in doctrine government worship discipline and Ecclesiasticall polity and seeing that in this holy communion scandals are committed which are unbeseeming those Churches and to be cast forth from that Ecclesiasticall communion therfore both by the law of nature and this divine law here instituted by Christ we must acknowledge a superiour Ecclesiasticall Senat furnished with spirituall and Ecclesiasticall authority which may remove those scandals Hence Parker himselfe de politia Ecclesiast lib. 3. cap. 24. groundeth the authority of Synods on this place And the Professors of Leyden disput 49. thes 10. discourse thus The institution of Ecclesiasticall Assemblies and so also of a Synod is not of humane but of divine right being founded on the words of Christ Tell the Church if he heare not the Church c. Whomsoever ye bind on earth c. Where
what manner ought is contracted in the same is it dissolved Hence in a Synod of the Churches was performed the Ordination of the Deacons elected Act. 6. 3. with the common consent of those Churches So 1 Tim. 4. 14. the Presbytery to whome the power of Ordaining is attributed doth not only denote a Parochiall Presbytery of which sort both in townes and in more eminent villages there were anciently one in each but it signifies a colledge of Apostles or Apostolicall men in whose number Paul was one 2 Tim. 1. 6. as the Apostles are sometimes called Elders 1 Pet. 5. 1 2. 2 Joh. ver 1 3. for this was done in the Church of Lystra as the Dutch Translators observe from Acts 16. 1 2. In which the Brethren of Derbe and Iconium were also actors as is evident from the place under whom are included also the Churches of the Region round about as may be gathered from Acts 14. 6. And if those most excellent servants of God whom God had rendred eminent by induing them with most ample gifts and setting them in a degree of an extraordinary and more sublime Ministery would not yet at their own pleasure without the counsels of others admit Timothy though named by the Spirits designation into the order of Presbyters by publike Ordination but thought fit for the observation of order first to acquaint sundry Pastors and Churches with it shall we who are no wayes to be compared with them be yet in doubt what we ought to do for not their sayings only but their doings also should be to us a rule what we ought to say and doe And so in our Belgick Churches according to the order established Ordinations of Pastors are performed with the consent and judgement of the Classis As appeares by the Synod at the Hagh Anno 1586. art 4. at Middleburgh Anno 1591. artic 3 4. at Dort Anno 1619. art 4. We reject therefore the contrary assertion of those who ascribe to particular Churches in a setled state of the Church the absolute power of ordaining their Pastours without the inspection or authoritative jurisdiction of any Classis or Synod Question 3. WHether Synod and Classes have power of Excommunication Answer In this controversy we hold 1. THat a Classis or Synod of Pastors hath power to admonish and rebuke authoritatively and with power Ecclesiasticall such as offend subvert soules by error and commit scandalls Acts 15. 10 24. This admonition reproof and condemnation in this Synod was performed by the Apostles and Elders in order to Ecclesiasticall censure And this power not a power of Order but of Jurisdiction performed not by the concionall key only but the key of Ecclesiasticall discipline For it 's done not by one but by many by the whole Synod ver 6 22. In the society of an Ecclesiasticall body which had power by common advise to decree this rebuke and what ever is determined in this cause about that question for which they came together See ver 2 6 23 24 25. chap. 16. 5. 21. 25. The cause in which it was done was not only a case of conscience but of scandall and publike offence given in Ecclesiasticall communion ver 19 28 29. with 1 Cor. 10. 24 25 26 27. Rom. 14. 14 15. Whereupon it is determined for the peace and edification of the Churches that all troubles and unprofitable burdens should be removed out of the Church ver 2 19 23 24. chap. 16. 4 5. and that in an Ecclesiasticall assembly ver 6 15 22 25. So that this rebuke performed by the Apostles in order to spirituall censure was an act of Ecclesiasticall discipline 2. There belongs also to Synods and Classes this power and exercise of Ecclesiasticall discipline to make Ecclesiasticall laws which are determinations necessary for the observation of morall precepts especially those of the first table and for the ordering the externall Government of the Church that all things be done decently and in order to the common edification of all By this power they establish outward ceremonies sutable to the due administration of the worship of God outward formes of behaviour and things indifferent such as tend to the outward order decency and edification of particular Churches and make rules for directing the discipline of the Churches The Apostles and Elders in the Synod decreed that the Gentiles who had imbraced Christ should abstain from things offered to Idolls and from bloud and things strangled Act. 15. 25 28. Lambertus Daneus discourses soundly and accurately in his Poliria Christiana lib. 6. cap. 3. Moreover saith he as for the rites and ceremonies and the outward order which is necessary in ordering the Church let an Ecclesiasticall Synod be assembled with the command and presence of the godly surpeme Magistrate and this Ecclesiasticall Synod duly gathered shall determine what that order and externall government of the Church ought to bee c. See what was said before of the Doctrinall power of Synods This power of making lawes is a power of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction and Government for it doth direct and dispose authoritatively those meanes by which the government of the Churches is put in execution For these lawes are made with the sanction of a spirituall and Ecclesiasticall penalty against delinquents and consequently proceed from that spirituall jurisdiction from whence proceedeth this threatning and inflicting of spirituall power Againe the publike judgement of direction passed with Ministeriall authority of a scandall given or taken of cases of conscience in the exercise of charity about things indifferent of the spirituall edification of the Church belongs to the externall tribunall and Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction But he that appointeth rites of order and decency in the publike worship of God and in the exercise of Ecclesiasticall discipline must of necessity give a publike judgement passed by ministeriall authority concerning scandall given or taken concerning cases of conscience in the exercise of charity about things indifferent concerning the spirituall edification of the Church for to this end are Ecclesiasticall lawes made for the avoiding of scandall for the spirituall edification of the Church for the due exercising of brotherly love in Church communion It is therfore an act of spirituall jurisdiction 3. Classes and Synods have an authoritative inspection and judgement not of discretion only but of Iurisdiction and approbation in the exercise of excommunications from particular Churches so that no particular Church which holdeth Ecclesiasticall communion with other Churches in Classes and Synods may lawfully excommunicate deliver to Sathan any member of their communion without the authoritative judgement and approbation of the Classis or Synod Which appeares by these arguments That which concernes all ought in their own way and manner to be handled by all now the excommunication of any in a consociate Church concerneth all the Churches of that society for they all receive scandall they are all liable to the danger of infection by reason of the communion which they hold
Pastors from that function CHAP. V. Of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery and the Exercise thereof p. 66 Q. 1. WHether the end and effect of the work of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery be only the Confirmation and Edification of those Church-members who are already converted and truly godly so as that Pastours are not more obliged by vertue of their Ecclesiasticall function to convert the straying soules of such as live in the world and in sinnes out of Church-communion then all beleevers indued with the gifts of the holy Ghost are by the common duty of Charity bound to doe Question 2. p. 70. Whether the Minister of a particular Church may not only by vertue of his gifts and from the common duty of Charity but also by vertue of his Ecclesiasticall Function lawfully performe ministeriall acts of his office in the Ecclesiasticall Communion of another particular Church to whose ordinary ministery he is not called Question 3. p. 75 Whether the exercise of Prophesie be a perpetuall institution in the Church of God whereby private men who beare no Church-Office may for the exercise of the gifts of the Spirit publikely before the whole body of the Church preach the Word of God with all authority in the Name of God and explaine and apply it for instruction confutation reprehension and consolation of the hearers Question 4. p. 84 Whether those Infants whose next parents doe not by a solemne Church-Covenant joyne themselves to some particular Church are not to be baptized in the Church but are to be accounted as incapable of Baptisme and to have no right to Church-priviledges CHAP. VI. Of Classes and Synods and their authority p. 89 Q. 1. VVHether Classes and Synods have an authoritative power whereby they may authoritatively judge causes Ecclesiasticall with Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction so as that particular Churches ought to submit themselves to their decrees under the penalty of Ecclesiasticall censure Question 2. p. 103 VVhether Classes and Synods have power of sending or ordaining Pastors in a particular Church Question 3. p. 118 Whether Synods and Classes have power of Excommunication CHAP. VII Of set Formes p. 130 Q. 1. VVHether it be lawfull for Churches to prescribe to themselves constituted lawes and formes and certaine Canons by Ecclesiasticall authoritie wherein Articles of Faith and things necessarily required by God for the Government and Discipline of the Churches are out of the holy Scriptures expounded and determined and things not necessarily required are by Ecclesiasticall power prescribed according to the generall rules of Scripture from the precepts of the law of Nature and holy Prudence for the edification of the Church and the order and decency of Gods Worship and imposed on particular Churches and Church-Governours as bonds of Peace and Vnity Question 2. p. 143 Whether it be lawfull to use in the Church prescript Formes of Prayer Administration of the Sacraments c. or whether those Churches who use them be guilty of superstition and will-worship and whether it be lawfull to hold Ecclesiasticall Communion with those Churches where such Formes in the publike worship are in use FINIS VVE whose names are subscribed Delegates of the Walacrian Classis doe testifie that our Reverend Colleague Mr William Apollonius was injoyned by the said Classis that in these sad troubles of England he should by writing set downe what is the Government practised in the Churches of the United Provinces which we also judge agreeable to the Word of God and what are the Controversies at this time agitated in England concerning the Government of the Church of God and state that controversie by way of Theses and Antitheses shewing the Grounds of them And that we have diligently perused and approved that writing of his We desire from our soule that there were a way of Government as much as may be Uniforme observed in all Reformed Churches for the greater edification of the Church of Christ and the destruction of the kingdome of Satan We pray that the learned and worthy our Brethren and Fellow-labourers in the Kingdome of England would be pleased fairly to interpret this our affection Iacobus D'Herde President of the Wallacrian Classis pro tempore Iodocus Larenus Assessor pro tempore Isaacus Hoornbekius Preacher at Middleburgh Cornelius Beuckelarius Preacher at Vere Melchior Burs Minister of the word at West-Souburch Maximilianus Teellinck Preacher at Middleburgh This writing is set forth by prescript of the 46. Article of Ecclesiasticall Policy established by the most Renowned and Noble the States of Zealand Melchior Burs Minister of the Word at West-Souburch
there with Pastorall Authority they preach the Word of God administer the Sacraments admit members attend to Ecclesiasticall censures choose Pastours and Church Governours c. and that to the great Edification of those Churches We reject therefore the opposite Assertion of those who affirme that a Pastor may indeed in another particular Church exercise the gifts of Praying and Preaching the Word of God but not by vertue or force of his Pastorall Office but only by reason of gifts which he is to imploy for the common edification but that he may exercise no ministeriall acts which he performeth by Ecclesiasticall power and authority as a Minister of the Church and of God in dispensing the Mysteries of God save only in that Church to which he is fastened by Election for his ordinary Ministery Question 3. WHether the exercise of Prophesie be a perpetuall institution in the Church of God whereby private men who beare no Church-Office may for the exercise of the gifts of the Spirit publikely before the whole body of the Church preach the Word of God with all authority in the Name of God and explain and apply it for instruction confutation reprehension and consolation of the hearers Answer OUr Judgement is that none may publikely in the Church Assembly of the faithfull preach the Word of God in the Name of Christ and of God but he who is sent by a divine Calling for that work as the Protestants demonstrate against the Socinians and Anabaptists from Rom. 10. 14 15. Heb. 5. 4 5. Act. 13. 1 2. 14. 22. Tit. 1. 5. 2 Tim. 2. 2 and other places and arguments and from the examples of all those who either in an extraordinary or ordinary manner were sent to preach the Word Which Mission or sending consisteth not only in conferring gifts whereby an Ability 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is given by God but in conferring a power whereby is given an Authority 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to preach the Word of God which Authority is oft-times not conferred on those on whom yet God bestowes gifts and ability For it is by the Word of God denyed to women in whose lips is the Law of God Prov. 31. 26. and a fitnesse to teach the yonger women Tit. 2. 3 4. It is certain from the Word of God that God injoynes all Beleevers to exhort comfort reprove and edifie one another Heb. 3. 13. 1 Thes 4 18. 5. 14. but it is from the common duty of Charity and the law of Nature that they are thus bound and therefore the word which they declare to their neighbours doth not by the authority of any speciall office bind to obedience those that heare it but by vertue of the subject or matter contained in that word But the Churches Ministers declare the Word of God as Christs Embassadours with authority of speciall Office and power to bind and loose 1 Cor. 4. 1 2. 2 Cor. 5. 20. Joh. 20. 21 22. There is therefore a many-fold difference between the Charitative admonitions of private Christians and the Authoritative preaching of Gods Ministers For 1. the Admonitions of ordinary Christians are to our neighbour privately and as joyned to us by the bond of Charity and the law of nature The Ministers of Churches doe publikely preach the Word of God with pastorall charge of soules and Gods Authority to the Church as a Church over which God hath made them Watchmen and Overseers 2. The Ministers Authoritative preaching the Word hath joyned with it the Ecclesiasticall power of binding and loosing sinners remitting and retaining sinnes Mat. 16. 18 19. Joh. 20. 21 22. which authority is not affixed to the Charitative admonitions of private Christians 3. There is not so absolute and strict an obligation on private Christians for that brotherly correction which is performed by them as the obligation on the Pastors of the Church of God for their office of preaching who may not involve themselves in the affaires of this world to the end that they may wholly attend upon the office of preaching 2 Tim. 2. 4. and who are in a speciall manner to give an account of the Salvation of their hearers committed to them Heb. 13. 17. Ezek. 3. 18. 33. 18. which do not concern private Christians in the exercise of charitative admonition We grant therefore in this cause 1. That it is a duty injoyned on all beleevers to speake the Word of God in private to their neighbours for their mutuall edification and that they are obliged to it from the common duty of Charity and the law of nature 2. That private Christians in an extraordinary case in a Church to be erected or that is decayed and ruined may sometimes publikely preach the Word of God for the planting a Church when there are not such as by Gods ordinary call have received from God power to preach the Word For the positive rituall law of God gives place to the morall law of God when necessitie requires it 3. We grant also that private Christians in some speciall cases and upon a particular occasion may sometimes speake the Word of God in publike by a speciall Calling from God as Martyrs are called to a publike confession of the faith But all this doth not inferre that there is an exercise of Prophesie constantly and ordinarily to be observed in the Church whereby the Word should by private Christians in the Name of Christ and with all authority be publikely preached for the edification of the Church And therefore we maintaine the negative of the question proposed and deny that there is such an exercise to be perpetually retained in the Church of Christ The Reasons on which we ground it are these 1. Because preaching the Word of God in the Name of Christ with the authority of an Embassadour of God is joyned with the administration of the Sacraments Matth. 28. 19 20. yea and there lies a more excellent utility and eminency of the Pastorall Office in preaching the Word then in administration of the Sacraments 1 Cor. 1. 17. But the administration of the Sacraments is not to be permitted to all indifferently who have those gifts as the Protestants doe solidly demonstrate against the Papists and therefore neither the Preaching of the Word 2. No man may take this honour to himself unlesse he be called of God and sent to preach his Word in the Name of God Rom. 10. 14 15. But all who have the gifts of Preaching the Word are not called and sent of God For those who are sent of God are sent either by an immediate and extraordinary call or by a mediate call by the Church but whereas now an extraordinary Mission or Sending is ceased in the Church those are therefore by the ordinary Ecclesiasticall call separated to the Office of Preaching who may lawfully undertake it 1 Tim. 4. 14. 5. 22. 2 Tim. 2. 2 3. 3. Those duties which are required of all those who publikely preach the Word of God in the Name of
Christ are not required of all those Christians that are gifted as that there lyeth on them the Pastorall charge of soules of which they are to give an account to God Heb. 13. 17. that they ought to give themselves wholly to the reading and studying of the Scriptures 2 Tim. 4. 15 16. that they may not apply themselves to the things of this world 2 Tim. 2 4. that in the Name of Christ as his Embassadours they entreat men to be reconciled to God 2 Cor. 5. 20. that they are to distribute to all and every one in the house of God their portion of food in due season Matth. 24. 46. that they are authoritatively in the Name of Christ to remit and retaine sins Joh. 20. 21. Now all these things are not injoyned on all Christians who have received the gifts of the Spirit 4. Hence also the Priviledges and Promises which are made to Pastours who preach the Word in the Name of God are not given to all beleevers who are indued with the gifts of the Spirit as that they are worthy of double honour 1 Tim. 5. 17. that God will by a peculiar and singular assistance of his Spirit be present with them Matth. 28. 20. Luk. 21. 14 15. And so a Prophets recompence and reward is distinguished from the reward of a righteous man Matth. 10. 42. Therefore that labour duty and burden to which these Promises are made is not imposed on all the righteous that are endued with gifts of the holy Ghost We reject therefore the contrary assertion of those who affirme this to be an Ordinance perpetuall and ordinary in the Church that a private Christian indued with gifts either ordinarily or upon occasion being thought fit in the judgement of those to whom it belongs may by the Word of God preach publikely in the Church-Assembly with all authority though he beare no Church Office But to us it 's certain that even under the Old Testament in the Jewish Church every one was not admitted to speake publikely in the Synagogues but that it was the ordinary function of those that are called Scribes and Lawyers the Levites being also for this cause distributed into many places whereupon they are said to sit on Moses chaire If any were indued with extraordinary gifts of Prophecy as the Prophets in Israel this was permitted and injoyned him by the Word of God publikely to preach in Gods Name When the Prophet Amos was forbidden by the chiefe Priest to prophecy at Bethel he doth not challenge this liberty to the Israelites that they might publikely preach the Word of God in Gods Name in the holy Assemblies but pleads his extraordinary Mission whereby he was sent of God to preach this word Amos 7. 14 15. And so perhaps was it permitted to the sonnes of the Prophets who were fitted educated and set apart for the Ecclesiasticall Ministery 1 Sam. 19. 20. In the Synagogues after the reading of Moses and the Prophets was ended there were exhortations added which Exhortations if at any time occasion required and it so seemed good to the rulers of the Synagogue in corrupt times especially it was indeed permitted to some out of order to teach and exhort but they were alwayes such as had testimony of their gifts and of whom there was a generall opinion of their Mission extraordinary or ordinary by reason of the doctrine they preached and the workes they did Thus at Nazareth Christ was permitted in the Synagogue to read and explaine the writings of the Prophets Luk. 4. 16. As one who by reason of his Majestie and Miracles did every where obtain audience as reverend Beza here noteth by which right he taught both in the Temple and every where wherefore also the ordinary Doctors demanded of him by what authority he did it Matt. 21. 23. So we find that Paul and Barnabas were allowed Act. 13. 15. publikely to speake and exhort in the Synagogue at Antioch as being such whose fame was already knowne to those of Antioch for they had before this time for a whole yeare preached the Word of God to many there and brought many to the faith of Christ and Agabus who was joyned with them did by an extraordinary gift of Prophesie foretell to those of Antioch the famine approaching where were also many other Prophets and Doctors who preached the Word of God both to Jews and Greekes See Act. 11. 19 20 21 25 26 27 28. and 13. 1 2. c. But in the practise of the New Testament none but Prophets by gift and Office either extraordinary or ordinary were permitted publikely in the Assembly of beleevers to preach the Word of God in Christs Name as appeareth 1 Cor. 14. 29 30 31. c. The Apostle speakes not of any in the Congregation promiscuously but of Prophets lawfully called to instruct the Church of God saith Beza on this place and therefore they are not to be hearkned to who from hence gather that any of the Assembly may speake in the Church and who reprehend the custome of having only a Sermon preached by one So also in the practise of the Reformed Belgick Church according to their Synodicall Canons none is admitted to the Ministery of the Word but by a lawfull calling and due examination of his doctrine and conversation for the time past No man saith the Synod of Middleburgh Anno 1591. art 6. shall be promoted to the publike preaching of the Word unlesse he be an established Minister of the Church belonging to some certaine Church Yet this Canon excludeth not the exercises of Proposants which are performed the doores being shut nor the offices of those who are sent forth to Churches oppressed under persecution Question 4. WHether those Infants whose next parents doe not by a solemne Church-Covenant joyne themselves to some particular Church are not to be baptized in the Church but are to be accounted as incapable of Baptisme and to have no right to Church-priviledges Answer THe opinion of the Reformed Churches is that a certain Federall holinesse whereby those who are in this manner holy have right to the meanes of Salvation and the Sacrament of Baptisme and whereby they are distinguished from Heathens Turks and such other Infidels 1 Cor. 7. 14. is communicated to a whole Nation or people to whom God so affordeth the tables of his Covenant as that they receive and professe them whom he cals and leades to the state of his visible Church Rom. 11. 16 17 18 19 20. This Federall holinesse is transferred to posterity not by the next parents inherent holinesse by whose faith or unbeliefe their immediate posterity should be deprived of it or confirmed in it but by the mercifull will of God whereby he extendeth the outward priviledges of his Covenant promised to parents even more remote and doth constantly afford it to their posterity professing the faith for many generations even to those whose next parents were ungodly and unfaithfull in the Covenant of God Thus God