Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
authority_n government_n king_n power_n 6,332 5 5.0174 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A38977 An Examination of severall votes of the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament concerning such as take up armes against the Parl. of England or assist in such war wherein is declared that all such persons are traitors by the fundementall lawes of this Kingdome and ought to suffer accordingly. 1648 (1648) Wing E3723; ESTC R29796 9,053 10

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

and belongs not to any Court or Counsell and the two Houses can claime no more then belongs to a Court or Counsell The House of Commons have Ordered the printing of these Votes and t is like they expect Obedience as if it were an Act of Parliament though without the King and Lords Never did one or both Houses of Parliament presume to print before this and we may as well believe they had this Priviledge by the fundamentall Lawes which was never known before these seven yeares last past as that the Lords and Commons are the whole Parliament or that a War made by the King can be Treason But come now to the Votes The first Vote that it appears that the King seduced by Wicked Councell intends to make War against the Parliament who in all their consultations and actions have proposed no other end unto themselves but the care of Kingdomes and the performance of all duty and loyalty to His Person It seemes these men had taken such pleasure in their power of judging that they fell to judiciall Astrologie and would tell fortunes for they adventure to tell the intentions of their King though Solomon saith the Kings heart is unsearchable doubtlesse in point of Duty Subjects ought not to pry into it and we may surely conclude that as they may be deceived in their conjectures of His intentions so they have certainly broken their Loyalty by making such a Vote and run into certaine Rebellion upon certaine suspitions but their case is worse for they had resolved before this pretence on their violence against the King and had in a great part Acted it raising Tumults against Him Threatning Him with popular furies unlesse He consented to mischievous Lawes of their contriving They had Levied an Army for the guarding of Persons against an Accusation of Treason they had caused diverse Members of both Houses of Parliament to be assaulted menaced whereby they were enforced to leave the Houses they had seized the Navy disposed the Militia fortified Townes and now to blear the eyes of the poor multitude tell them the King intends to make War upon the Parliament never King had greater cause to right himselfe nor ever people lesse cause to make war on him They would perswade the people that if their war be defensive against their King its lawfull and if that they say it s so it s then out of question If selfe defence be lawfull in Subjects against Supreame power then they are not bound to assist their King against Malefactors or Rebels unlesse they first know the cause whereby all Government is at an end and obedience must follow private perswasion not publique Authority and the King doth in vaine proclaime an enemy abroad or Rebels at home and then he cannot hope long to weare a Crowne and if Subjects adhere to an enemy the King may not make War upon them but first send for a Judge to Indite them and a Malefactor may as well use force against the sentence of the Judge upon pretence of Injustice as Subjects against their King upon pretence of want of just cause of making of War it being as essentiall to Supreame power which these men sweare to be in the King as civill decisions to any Judicatory and if it were not as most certainly it is the foundation of all Government yet by Law and practice most undeniably in the King of England we cannot hope to find modesty where we see disloyalty and Rebellion and in these mens reiterated Remonstrances they take it for a ground in Law that the King cannot doe evill and if the Law will not suppose he can doe evill can there be any Law to make Warre upon Him upon pretence of doing evill and if by the policy and constitution of any Kindgome the Supreame Governor be exempt from punishment by Law as of necessity He must it is a most absurd opinion that He should be subject to private violence and if the Members of Parliament be corrupt and entertaine negotiations with foraigne Princes their Kings enemies and adhere to them as is more then possible and the King declare a Warre against such persons may they take Armes against Him to defend themselves then all Rebellions will be selfe defences and none that have force will submit to Law and so it must follow that if any commit Treason the force that the King useth for His owne preservation or their punishment shall be called War against the Parliament or War against the Subject but when ordinary wayes of Justice are shut up by force the King hath recourse to His Regall power and if His Counsell in such a case should not advise Him to make War upon such persons it might well be judged of them that they were an unfaithfull and wicked Counsell and though the King had taken no resolution of War notwithstanding the great violence offfered Him as He made appeare by many witnesses reasons yet these men reproch Him to his face with these Trayterous Votes and adde that the King seduced by wicked Counsellors so odious an expression in the mouths and pens of Subjects as cannot consist with duty and Loyalty and their professions of their care of the Kingdomes and performance of all duty and Loyalty to His Majesties Person so contradictory to these Votes can get no beliefe but were devised to give colour only to their courses being no part of their purposes and these Houses consisting of a great number who for age education or parts being no way qualified to judge of Counsels and being seduced by wicked counsels to reproach their King and seeke His ruine are no more to be trusted for their care of the Kingdome which they have brought to shame impotency and beggery then for performance of their duty to their King whom they have abused with all immaginable contumelies deposed from Government shut up in Prison and out of horror of their guile and fear of punishment have plotted how they may take away his life by poyson or assassination and these shamelesse wretches would have it believed that making War upon Him attempts to kill and depose Him imprisoning of Him and offering of violence to His Person are no Treason but that endeavouring to defend Him free Him from Imprisonment preserve His life are Treason Prodigious impudence and they might as well Vote He were no King and that England never had a King by Law That whensoever the King maketh War upon the Parliament it is a breach of the trust reposed in Him upon His people contrary to His Oath and tending to the dissolution of this Government It s apparent that the King may justly make War upon all or any Members of Parliament for Disloyall and Traiterous Acts when ordinary justice is shut up and that it is neither breach of trust reposed in Him by His people contrary to His Oath nor tending to the dissolution of this Government and if the King charge either any or all of them with