likewise the statute made in Anno 32. H. 8. geueth auctoritie to dispose landes and Testamentes by last Wil and Testament in writing If a man do demise his lande by his last Wil and Testament nuncupatiue without writing this demise is insufcient in law and not warranted by the said statute We leaue of a number of like cases that we might multiplie in the prouffe of this matter wherein we haue taried the longer by cause th' Aduersaries make so great a coūtenance therevpon and bycause al vnder one it may serue for the answere also touching the Kinges royal assente to be geuen to Parlamentes by his Letters Patentes signed with his hande which is nothing else but a declaration and affirmāce of the common lawe and no newe authoritie geuen to him to do that he could not doo before or any forme prescribed to bind him vnto Bysides that in this case there is no feare in the worlde of forging and counterfeyting the Kinges hande whereas in the Testamentarie cause it is farre otherwise as the worlde knoweth and dayly experience teacheth And so withal do we conclude that by reason this surmised Wil was not signed with the Kinges hand it can not any way hurt or hinder the iuste right and claime of the Quene of Scotland to the succession of the Croune of England Now supposing that neither the L. Paget nor Sir Edward Montague and Williā Clarke had testified or published any thing to the infringing annd ouerthrowing of the Aduersaries assertiō touching the signing of the said Wil yet is not therby the Queene of Scotlandes title altogether hindred For she yet hath her iust and lawfull defence for the oppugning of the said assertion as well against the persons and saying of the witnesses if any shal come foorth as otherwise shee may iustly require the said Wil to be brought forth to light and especially the signing of the same with the Kings hand to be duely and consideratly pondered we yed and conferred She hath her iust defence and exceptions and must haue And it were against al lawes and the lawe of nature it selfe to spoile her of the same And all good reason geueth that the said original Wil standing vppon the triall of the Kinges hande be exhibited that it may be compared with his other certaine and wel knowen hand writing And that other things may be done requisite in this behalfe But yet all this notwithstanding let vs nowe imagine and suppose that the King him selfe whose harte and hande were doubtelesse farre from any suche doinges lette vs yet I say admitte that he had signed the said Will with his owne hande Yet for al that the Aduersaries perchance shal not finde no not in this case that the Queenes iuste Title right and interest doth any thing fayle or quayle Or rather lette vs without any perchance say the iustice and equitie of her cause and the inuincible force of trueth to be such that neither the Stampe nor the Kinges owne hande can beare and beate it downe Which thing we we speake not without good probable and weightie reasons Neither do we at this time minde to debate and discourse what power and autoritie and how farre the Parlament hath it in this and like cases Which perchance some other would here do We wil only intermedle with other thinges that reache not so farre nor so high and seeme in this our present question worthy and necessarie to be considered And first before we enter into other matters we aske this reasonable and necessarie questiō whether these general words wherby this large and ample autoritie is cōueied to king Henry must be as generally and as amply taken or be restrained by some māner of limitation and restrictiō agreable to such mind and purpose of the Parlament as must of very necessitie or great likelihod be construed to be the very mind and purpose of the said Parlamēt Ye wil say perchance that the power and autoritie of assignatiō must be taken generally and absolutely without exception sauing for the outward signing of the Will. Trueth it is there is nothing els expressed but yet was there some thing els principally intended and yet for al that needed not to be specified The outward maner was so specially and precisely appointed and specified to auoyde suspitious dealing to auoide corruption and forgery And yet was the Wil good and effectual without the Kinges hande Yea and the assignatiō to had ben good had not that restrainte of the Kinges hande bene added by the Parlament But for the qualification of the person to be limited and assigned and so for the necessarie restriction and limitation of the wordes were they neuer so large and ample there is though nothing were spoken thereof an ordinary helpe and remedie Otherwise if the Realme had ben set ouer to a furious or a madde man or to an idiote or to some foraine and Mahometical Prince and to such a one our stories testifie that King Iohn would haue submitted him selfe and his Realme or to any other notorious incapable or vnhable person the generalitie of the wordes seeme to beare it but the good minde and purpose of the Parlament and mans reason doe in no wise beare it If ye graunt that these wordes must nedes haue some good and honest constructiō and interpretation as reason doth force you to graunt it yet wil I aske farther whether as the King cutte of in this pretensed Wil the whole noble race of the eldest sister and the first issue of the yongest sister so if he had cutte of also al the ofspringes as wel of the said yongest sister as of the remnante of the royal blood and placed some being not of the said blood and perchance otherwise vnable this assignatiō had bene good and vailable in law as conformable to reason and to the mind and purpose of the Parlament It were surely to great an absurdity to graūt it There must be therefore in this matter some reasonable moderation and interpretatiō as wel touching the persons cōprehēded within this assignation and their qualities and for the persons also hauing right and yet excluded as for the manner of the doing of the Acte and signing the Wil. For the king as King could not dispose the Croune by his Wil and was in this behalfe but an Arbiter and Commissioner Wherefore his doinges must be directed and ruled by the lawe and according to the good minde and meaning of those that gaue the authoritie And what their minde was it wil appeare well inough euen in the statute it selfe It was for the auoiding of all ambiguities doubtes and diuisions touching the Succession They putte theyr whole truste vppon the King as one whom they thought most earnestly to minde the wealth of the Realme as one that woulde and could best and most prudently consider and weigh the matter of the Succession and prouide for the same accordingly If the doinges of the King do not plainely and
the said Wil and others for the execution and performance of the same Finally the said Testament was recorded in the Chancerie Wherfore they affirme thaâ— there ought no manner of doubt moue any man to the coÌ„trarie and that either we must graunt this Wil to be signed with his hand or that he made no Wil at al both must be graunted or both denied If any wil deny it in case he be one of the witnesses he shal impugne his owne testimonie if he be one of the executours he shal ouerthrow the foundatioÌ„ of al his doinges in procuring the said Wil to be inrolled and set forth vnder the great Seale And so by their dubblenes they shal make them selues no mete witnesses Nowe a man can not lightly imagine how any other bysides these two kind of witnesses for some of them and of the executors were such as were coÌ„tinually wayting vpon the Kinges person may impugne this Wil and proue that the king did not signe the same But if any such impugne the Wil it would be coÌ„sidered how many they are and what they are and it wil be very harde to proue negatiuam facti But it is euidente say they that there was neuer any such lawful proufe against the said Wil producted For if it had ben it would haue ben published in the Starrechamber preached at Poules Crosse declared by Acte of Parlament proclaimed in euery quarter of the Realme Yea admitting say they that it were proued that the said pretensed Wil lacked the Kinges hande yet neuerthelesse say they the very copies we haue spoken of being written and signed or at least interlined with his owne hande may be saide a sufficient signing with his owne hande For seing the scope and final purpose of the statute was to haue the succession prouided for and ascerteined whiche is sufficiently done in the said Wil and seing his owne hande was required but onely for eschewing euil and sinister dealing whereof there is no suspicion in this Will to be gathered what matter in the worlde or what difference is there when the King fulfilled and accomplisihed this gratiouse Acte that was loked for at his handes whether he signed the Will with his owne hande or no If it be obiected that the King was obliged and bound to a certaine precise order and forme which he could in no wise shift but that the Acte without it muste perish and be of no valewe then say they wee vndoe whole Parlamentes aswel in Queene Maries time as in King Henry the eightes time In Queene Maries time bycause she omitted the Style appointed by Parlamente Anno 〈◊〉 octauiâ—rice simo quinto In King Henries tyme by reason there was a statute that the Kinges royal assent may be geuen to an Acte of Parlamente by his Letters Patentes signed with his hande though he be not there personally And yet did the saied King supplie full ofte his confente by the stampe only This yet notwithstanding the said Parlamentes for the omission of these formes so exactely and precisely appointed are not destroyed and disannulled After this sorte in effecte haue the Aduersaries replied for the defence of the said pretensed Will. To this we wil make our reioynder and saye Firste that our principall matter is not to ioyne an islewe whether the saide Kinge made and ordeyned any sufficient Will or no. We leaue that to an other time But whether he made any Testament in suche order and forme as the statute requireth Wherefore if it be defectiue in the said forme as we affirme it to be were it otherwise neuer so good and perfect though it were exemplified by the great Seale and recorded in Chancerie and taken commonly for his Wâ—ll and so accomplished it is nothing to the principal question It resteth then for vs to consider the weight of the Aduersaries presumptions whereby they would inforce a probabilitie that the Testament had the foresaide requisite forme Yet first it is to be coÌ„sidered what presumptions and of what force and number do occurre to auoide and frustrate the Aduersaries presumptions and all other like We say then there occurre many likelyhoddes many presumptions many great and weightie reasons to make vs to thinke that as the king neuer had good and iuste cause to minde and enterprise suche an Acte as is pretended so likewise he did enterprise no such Acte in deede I deny not but that theâ— was such authoritie geuen him neither I deâ—y but that he might also in some honorable sort haue practised the same to the honour and wealth of the Realme and to the good coÌ„tentation of the same Realm But that he had either cause or did exercise the said authoritie in suche strange and dishonorable sort as is pretended I plainely denie For being at the time of this pretensed Wil furnished and adorned with issue the late king Edward and the Ladies Marie and Elizabeth their state and succession being also lately by Acte of Parlament established what neede or likelyhod was there for the king then to practise such newe deuises as neuer did I suppose any king in this Realme before and fewe in any other byside And where they were practised commonly had infortunate and lamentable successe What likelyhode was there for him to practise such deuises especially in his later daies when wisdome the loue of God and his Realme should haue bene moste ripe in him that were likely to sturre vppe a greater fier of greeuouse contention and woful destruction in England then euer did the deadly factioÌ„ of the red Rose and the white lately by the incorporation and vnion of the house of Yorke and Lancaster in the person of his father through the mariage of Ladie Elizabeth eldest daughter of king Edwarde the fourth most happily extinguished and buried And though it might be thought or said that there would be no such eause of feare by reason the matter passed by Parlament yet could not he be ignorant that neither Parlamentes made for Henry the fourth or continuance of twoo Descentes whiche toke no place in geuing any Title touching the Croune in King Henry the sixt nor Parlamentes made for King Râ—chard the third nor Parlaments of attainder made against his father could either preiudice his fathers right or releaue other against such as pretended iust right and title And as he could not be ignoraÌ„t therof so it is not to be thought that he would abuse the great confidence put vppon him by the Parlament and disherite without any apparent cause the next royal blood and thinke all thinges sure by the colour of Parlament The litle force whereof against the right inheritour he had to his fathers and his owne so ample benefit so lately and so largely sene and felt And yet if he minded at any time to preiudice the said Lady Marie Queend of Scotland of al times he would not haue done it then when al his care was by al possible meanes to contriue and compasse a mariage
and the whole state froÌ„ danger to liue willingly in perpetual exile and bannishment God be thanked that after these seditious and trayterous subiectes haue bene so stout and storming in the rekoning vp and accumulating of faults and offenses of their innoceÌ„t Maistresse and Quene they are yet at the leÌ„gth forced to answere for theÌ„selues and for their excessiue outragious rebellious dooings Their glorious and glittering excuses may perhaps at the first shew seme to some of the Readers to haue a ioly face of much probabilitie great trueth and feruent zeale to the weale publike But may it please them aduisedly and depely to ponder and weigh aswel what we haue said as what we farther shal say in supplement of ful answere and then to iudge and deme of the mater none otherwise then reason equitie and law do craue they shalat length fynde out and throughly perceaue and know these mennes dealinges and doinges who as yet couer their foule filthy lying detestable practises and trayterouse enormities with suche a visarde of counterfeit fained holines and suche exceding greate shew of zeale to the Queenes honour in punishing malefactors and to the preseruation of the state of the Realme as though al the worlde would fal and go to ruine if it were not vpholden and vnderpropped by the strength of their shoulders They shal see how they wil appeare in their owne natural likenes so ougly that al good harts wil vtterly detest them and thinke them moste worthie for example sake to al the worlde hereafter of extreme punishment We affirme then first that as they haue produced nothing in the worlde touching the principal points as of the Lorde Darleyes death the acquital of the Earle Bothwel and the Queenes mariage with him iustly to charge her withal so are they them selues aswel for the said acquital and mariage as for their damnable and rebellious attempts against their Souereigne and for many other enormous crimes so farre and so depely charged so foule stained and so shamefully marked and noted that neuer shal they with al their hypocritical fine fetches be able to rubbe out the dirty blottes thereof from their skirts which thing wilbâ— easely perceaued of them that wil vouchesafe aduisedly to consider the friuolous and contradictorie excuses they make in their defence At the beginning their open surmised quarel whereby they went about to drawe the peoples hartes to them selues and to streÌ„gthen their owne faction stood in three points as appeareth by their excuses and by their pretensed Proclamations The first was to deliuer the Quene from the Earle Bothwel who violently deteined her and to preuent daungers imminent to her person The second to reuenge the Kings death vpon the said Bothwel whom they knew as they pretended to haue ben the principal doer in the execution of the said murther The thirde was to preserue the yonge Prince the Queenes sonne This is their ioly and holy pretense Nowe let vs see how conformable their worthy procedinges are to these their colourable cloked holy collusions The first gentle and humble admonition that these good louing subiectes gaue her to refourme these surmised enormities was in â—attail array at Bortwike Castle which they thought vpon the sodaine to haue possessed with the Queenes person Wherevpon they being disapointed therof gat into the Town and Fortresse of Edenboroug by the treason of Balfoure the Captaine thereof and of Cragmiler the Prouost of the Citie whereby they being the more animated to follow and prosecute their wicked enterprise begaÌ„ now to be strong in the field The Queene hauing also a good stroÌ„g army and thinking her self wel able therby to encounter with th' enemie and to represse their furious outrage yet notwithstaÌ„ding for the great loue and pitie she had to them though rebellious subiects willing as muche as in her lay to kepe and preserue their blood from sheding offred them faire of her owne free motion that if they would vse her as their Queene she would peaceably come to them and take due and conuenient order for the redresse of al suche thinges as might appeare by law and reason mete to be refourmed Wherevpon the Lorde Grange was sent by the Lordes to her who in al their names moste humbly vppon his knees assured her of al dewe obedience of securitie anâ— safetie of both her life and honour And 〈◊〉 the good Ladie her conscience bearing heâ— witnes of al her iust and vpright dealingeâ— and therfore nothing mistrusting dismissing her army yelded her self to the Lordes whâ— conueyed her to Edenborough and there set her at suche a meruelous libertie and 〈◊〉 suche securitie and safetie that al good meâ— to the worlds ende wil wonder at their exceding good loyaltie First they keping her owne Palaice seâ— and placed her in a merchants house and vsed her otherwise very homely She now considering and perceauing to what ende these matters tended most pitifully cried and called vpon them to remember their late promisse or at the least that she might be brought before the Counsaile offering to stande to the order and direction of the States of the realme But God knoweth al in vaine For now had they the pray whereon they inteÌ„ded to whet their bluddy teeth ere they did dismisse or forgoe her as the euent doth declare Wherefore in the night priuily she was conueyed and with haste in disguised apparel to the strong Forte of Lochleuen and after a few daies being stripâ—ed out and spoyled of al her princely atâ—rement was clothed with a course broune â—assoke After this these good loial subiects praâ—ising and encreasing more and more daily â—he performance of their saied promised â—bedience neuer ceassed vntil they had vsurped the ful authoritie and Regiment of the whole Into the which though they had intruded themselues yet seing as blinde as they were by disordinate vnseemely and vnmeasurable ambition that the Queene remained and was stil Queene and that there was no iust cause by the ordinarie course of the lawe or for any her demerits and deserts to bring her forth to her trial that she might be conuicted and deposed went like good honest plaine men and wel meaning subiects bluntly to worke and coÌ„sulted and determined to dispatche and rid her out of her life vnlesse she would yelde to them and subscribe suche writinges as they would send to her concerning the dimission of her Croune to her sonne and the Regiment of the Realme to the Earle of Murray Wherevpon th' Earle of Athele Secretâ—rie Ledington with other principals of theiâ— factious band sent Robert Miluen to Lochâ—leuen to wil her in any ease if she sought the safegard of her life to coÌ„descend to such demaundes and set her hand to al such writinges as should be proposed and broughâ— to her Whiche as they said to doe neuâ— could be preiudicial to her being by forâ—â— and violence extorted Sir Nicolas Throgmorton also being then Ambassadour theâ—â— from England gaue her the
good reason and lawe to stande at defence and onely to auoide as easely we may their obiections which principally and chiefly are grounded vpon the common lawes and Statutes of this Realme yet for the bettering and strengthening of the same we shal lay forth sundrie great and inuincible reasons coÌ„ioyned with good and sufficient authoritie of the law so approued and confirmed that the Aduersaries shal neuer be able iustly to impugne them And so that we trust after the reading of this Treatise and the effectes of the same wel digested no maner of scruple ought to remaine in any indifferent mans hart concerning her right and Title Whose expectation and conscience allthough we truste fully in this Discourse to satisfie and doubt nothing in the worlde of the righteousnes of our cause yet must we nedes confesse the manner and forme to entreate therof to be ful of difficultie and perplexity For such causes of Princes as they be seldome and rare so is it more rare and strange to finde them discoursed discussed and determined by any lawe or statute albe it nowe and then some statutes tende that waye Neither do our lawes nor the Corps of the Romaine and Ciuil law lightly meddle with the princelie gouernement but with priuate mens causes And yet this notwithstanding for the better iustification of our cause albe it I denie not but that by the coÌ„mon law it muste be knoweÌ„ who ought to haue the Croune and that the common lawe muste discerne the right aswel of the Croune as of subiectes yet I saye that there is a greate difference betwene the Kings right and the right of others And that the Title of the Croune of this Realme is not subiect to the rules and principles of the common lawe of this Realme as to be ruled and tryed after such order and course as the inheritance of priuate persons is by the same For the prous whereof let vs consider what the common lawe of this Realme is and how the rules thereof be grounded and do take place It is very manifeste and plaine that the common lawe of this Realme of England is no law writteÌ„ but grounded only vpon a common and generall custome throughout the whole realme as appeareth by the Treatise of the auncient and famous Writer of the lawes of the realme named Ranulphus de Glanuilla who wrote in the time of the noble King Henrie the second of the law and Custome of the realme of England being then and also in the time of the raigne of King Richarde the firste the chiefe Counsailour and Iustice of the same King and also by the famouse Iustice Fortescue in his booke whiche he wrote being Chauncellour of England De laudibus Legum Angltae And by 33. H. 6.51 and by E. 4.19 Whiche Custome by vsage and continuall practise heretofore had in the Kinges Courts within this Realme is only knowen and mainteined wherein we seeme much agreable to the olde Lacedemonians who many hundred yeres past most politikely and famously gouerned their common Wealth with lawe vnwritten whereas among the Athenians the writen lawes bare al the sway This thing being so true that with any reason or good authoritie it can not be denied then we are farther to consider whether the Kinges Title to the Croune can be examined tried and ordered by this common Custome or no. Yf ye say it may then must ye proue by some recorde that it hath bene so vsed otherwise ye only say it and nothing at all proue it For nothing can be said by lawe to be subiecte to any custome vnlesse the same hath ben vsed accordingly and by force of the same custom I am wel assured that you are not able to proue the vsage and practise thereof by any record in any of the Kings courts Yea I wil farther say vnto you and also proue it that there is no one rule general or special of the common lawe of this Realme which ye â—â—ther haue shewed or can shewe that 〈◊〉 bene taken by any iuste construction to 〈◊〉 tende vnto or bind the King or his Crouâ—â—â— I wil not denie but that to declare and see forth the prerogatiue and IurisdictioÌ„ of the King ye may shewe many rules of the lawe but to binde him as I haue sayde ye can shewe none Ye say in your booke that it is a Maxime in our lawe most manifest that who so euer is borne out of England and of father and mother not being of the obedience of the King of England can not be capable to inherite any thing in England Whiche rule being general without any wordes of exception ye also say must nedes extende vnto the Croune What you meane by your law I knowe not But if you meane as I thinke you do the common lawe of England I answere there is no such Maxime in the common lawe of this Realme of Englande as hereafter I shal manifestly proue But if it were for argumentes sake admitted for this time that it be a Maxime or general rule of the coÌ„mon law of England yet to say that it is so general as that no exception can be taken against the same rule ye shewe your selfe either ignorant or els very carelesse of your creditte For it doth plainely appeare by the Statute of 25. E. 3. being a declaration of that rule of the Lawe whiche I suppose ye meane terming it a Maxime that that rule extendeth not vnto the Kinges children Whereby it moste euidently appeareth that it extendeth not generally to al. And if it extende not to binde the Kinges children in respect of any inheritance descended vnto them from any of their Auncestours it is an Argument à fortiori that it doth not extende to binde the King or his Croune And for a ful and short answere to your Authorities sette foorth in your marginall Notes as 5. Ed ward 3. tit Ayle 13. Ed war. 3. tit Bref 31. Edw. 3. tit Coson 42. Ed war. 3. fol. 2. 22. Henric. 6. fol. 42.11 Henric. 4. fol. 23. 24. Litleton ca. vilenage it may plainly appeare vnto all that will reade and pervse those Bookes that there is none of them al that doth so much as with a peece of a word or by any colour or shadow seeme to intende that the Title of the Croune is bounde by that your supposed general rule or Maxime For euerie one of the said Cases argued and noted in the said Booke are onely concerning the dishabilitie of an Alien borne and not Denizon to demaunde any landes by the lawes of the Realme by suite and action onely as a subiect vnder the King and nothing touching any dishabilitie to be laied to the King himselfe or to his subiectes Is there any controuersie about the Title of the Croune by reason of any such dishabilitie touched in any of these Bookes No verely not one worlde I dare boldely say As it may most manifestly appeare to them that wil reade and pervse
of God almighty onely But yet for arguments sake I would faine knowe where you finde your differēce and what authoritie you can shew for the prouf thereof Ye haue made no marginal note of any authoritie and therefore vnlesse ye also saye that ye are Pythagoras I will not beleue your difference Wel I am assured that I can shew you good authoritie to the contrarie and that there is no difference in your cases Pervse I praie you 22. H. 6. And there may you see the opinion of Iustice Newton that there is no difference in your cases but that in both your cases the lande shall eschete vnto the Lorde And Prisote being then of Coūsayle with the party that claimed the lands by a descent wher the eldest sonne was borne beyond the seas durst not abide in law vpon the title This authoritie is against your difference and this authoritie I am wel assured is better then any that you haue shewed to proue your difference But if we shal admitte your difference to be according to the law yet your cases wherevnto you applie your difference are nothing like as I haue said before But to procede on in the proufe of our purpose as it doth appeare that neither the King nor his Croune is bound by these general rules which before I haue shewed so do I likewise say of al the residue of the general rules and Maximes of the lawe being in a manner infinite But to retourne againe vnto your onely supposed Maxime whiche you make so general concerning the dishabilitie of persons borne beyond the seas it is very plaine that it was neuer taken to extende vnto the Croune of this Realme of Englande as it may appeare by King Stephen and by King Henry the seconde who were both straungers and Frenchemen and borne out of the Kinges allegeance and neither were they Kinges children immediate nor their parentes of the allegeance and yet they haue bene alwaies accompted lawfull Kinges of England nor their title was by any man at any time defaced or comptrolled for any such consideration or exception of foraine birth And it is a worlde to see how you would shifte your handes from the said King Henry Ye say he came not to the Croune by order of the lawe but by capitulation for asmuch as his mother by whome he conueied his Title was then liuing Well admitte that he came to the Croune by capitulation during his mothers life yet this doth not proue that he was dishabled to receaue the Croune but rather proueth his abilitie And although I did also admit that he had not the Croune by order of the law during his mothers life yet after his mothers death no man hath hitherto doubted but that he was King by lawful succession and not against the lawes and Customes of this Realme For so might you put a doubt in al the Kinges of this Realme that euer gouerned sithens and driue vs to seake heires in Scotland or els where Whiche thing we suppose you are ouer wise to goe about Bysides this I haue hard some of the aduersaries for farther helpe of their intention in this matter saye that King Henry the second was à Queenes childe and so King by the rule of the commō law Truely I know he was an Emperesse childe but no Queene of Englandes childe For although Maude the Emperesse his mother had a right and a good title to the Croune and to be Queene of England yet was she neuer in possession but kepte from the possession by King Stephen And therefore King Henry the second can not iustly be saied to be a Queene of Englandes childe nor yet any Kinges childe vnlesse ye would intend the Kinges children by the wordes of Infantes de Roy c. to be children of farther degree and descended from the right line of the King so ye might say truely that he was the child of King Henry the first being in deede the sonne and heire of Maude the Emperesse daughter and heire of Kinge Henrie the first Whereby your saide rule is here fowly foiled And therefore ye would faine for the maintenance of your pretensed Maxime catche some holde vppon Arthur the sonne of Ieffrey one of the sonnes of the saide Henry the seconde Ye say then like a good and ioly Antyquarie that he was reiected from the Croune bycause he was borne out of the Realme That he was borne out of the Realme it is very true but that he was reiected frō the Croune for that cause it is very false Neither haue you any autoritie to proue your vaine opinion in this pointe For it is to be proued by the Cronicles of this Realme that King Richarde the first vncle vnto the sayd Arthur taking his iourney towarde Hierusalem declared the said Arthur as we haue declared before to be heire apparent vnto the Croune whiche would not haue ben if he had bene taken to be vnhable to receaue the Croune by reason of foraine birth And although King Iohn did vsurpe aswel vpon the saide King Richard the firste his eldest brother as also vpon the sayd Arthur thur his nephewe yet that is no prouf that he was reiected bycause he was borne out of the Realme Yf ye could proue that then had you shewed some reason and president to proue your intent whereas hytherto you haue shewed none at al nor I am wel assured shal neuer be able to shewe Thus may ye see gentle Reader that neither this pretensed Maxime of the lawe set forth by th' Aduersaries nor a great nomber more as general as this is whiche before I haue shewed can by any reasonable meanes be stretched to bind the Croune of Englād These reasons and authorities may for this time suffice to proue that the Croune of this Realme is not subiecte to the rules and the Principles of the common lawe neither can be ruled and tried by the same Whiche thing being true al the obiectiōs of the Aduersaries made against the title of Marie the Queene of Scotland to the succession of the Croune of this Realme are fully answered and thereby clearly wiped away Yet for farther arguments sake and to the ende we might haue al matters sifted to the vttermost and therby al things made plaine let vs for this tyme somewhat yeelde vnto the Aduersaries admitting that the Title of the Croune of this Realme were to be examined and tried by the rules and principles of the cōmon law and then let vs consider and examin farther whether ther be any rule of the cōmon law or els any statute that by good and iust construction can seeme to inpugne the said title of Marie the Queene of Scotland or no. For touching her lineal descente frō King Henry the seuēth and by his eldest daughter as we haue shewed there is no man so impudent to denie What is there then to be obiected among al the rules Maximes and iudgements of the cōmon law of this Realm Only
betwene his sonne Edward and the said Lady and Quene Surely he was to wise of him selfe and was furnished with to wise CouÌ„sailours to take such an homely way to procure and purchase the said mariage by And least of all can we say he attempted that dishonorable disherision for any special inclination or fauour he bare to the French Queene his sisters children For there haue bene of his neere and priuie Counfaile that haue reported that the King neuer had any great liking of the mariage of his sister with the Duke of Suffolke who maried her first priuily in France and afterward openly in England And as it is said had his pardon for the said priuy mariage in writing Howe so euer this matter goeth certeine it is that if this pretensed Wil be true he transferreed and traÌ„sposed the reuersion of the Croune not only from the Queene of ScotlaÌ„d from my Ladie Leneux and their issue but euen from my Ladie Francis and my Ladie Elenour also daughters to the Frenche Queene whiche is a ching in a manner incredible and therefore nothing likely I must now gentle Reader put thee in remeÌ„brance of two other most pregnaÌ„t and notable coniectures and presumptions For among al other incoÌ„ueniences and absurdities that do and may accoÌ„panie this rash and vnaduised acte by this preteÌ„sed Wil inconsiderately mainteined it is principally to be noted that this Acte geueth appareÌ„t and iust occasion of perpetual disherison of the Style and Title of FraÌ„ce incorporated and vnited to the Croune of this Realme For whereby do or haue the Frenchmen hitherto excluded the Kings of this Realme claiming the Croune of France by the Title of Edward the third falling vpon him by the right of his mother other then by a politike and ciuil law of their owne that barreth the female from the right of the Croune And what doth this preteÌ„sed Act of king Henrie but iustifie and strengthen their quarel and ouerthoweth the foundatioÌ„ and bulworke wherby we mainteme our foresaid Title and claime If we may by our municipal law exclude the said Queene of Scotland being called to the Croune by the Title of general heritage then is their municipal law likewise good and effectual and coÌ„sequently we 〈◊〉 and haue made al this while an vniust and wrongful claime to the Croune of France But now to go somewhat farther in the matter or rather to come neerer home and to the quicke of the matter we say as there was some apparent and good cause why the king should the twentie and eight yeare of his reigne thinke vpon some limitation and appointement of the Croune king Edward as yet vnborne so after he was borne and that the Title and interest of the reuersion of the Croune after him was the thirtie and fifte yeare by Parlament confirmed to the late Queene Marie and her sister Elizabeth it is not to be thought that he would afterward ieoparde so great a matter by a Testament and Wil which may easely be altered and counterfeyted And least of al make such assignation of the Croune as is nowe pretended For being a Prince of such wisdome and experience he could not be ignorant that this was the next and rediest way to put the state at least of both his daughters to great peril and vtter disherison For the Kinges exaÌ„ple and boldnes in interrupting and cutting away so many branches of the neerest side and line might sone breede in aspiring and ambitious hartes a bolde and wicked attempte the way being so farre brought in and prepared to their handes by the King him selfe and their natures so readie and prone to follow euil presidents and to clime high by some colourable meanes or other to spoile and depriue the said daughters of their right of the Croune that should descend and fal vpon them and to conuey the same to the heires of the said Ladie Francis. And did not I pray you this drift and deuise fal out euen so tending to the vtter exclusioÌ„ of the late Queene Marie and her Sister Elizabeth if God had not of his mercy most gratiously and wonderfully repressed and ouerthroweÌ„ the same These reasons then and presumptions may seme wel able and sufficient to beare doune to breake doune and ouerthrow the weake and slender presumptions of th' Aduersaries grounded vpon vncertaine and mere surmises ghesses and coniectures as among other that the King was offended with the Quene of Scotland and with the Ladie Leneux Which is not true And as for the Ladie Leneux it hath no manner of probabilitie as it hath not in dede in the said Queene And if it had yet it is as probable and much more probable that the King would haue especially at that time for such cause as we haue declared suppressed the same displeasure Graunting now that there were some such displeasure was it honorable either for the King or the Realm or was it thinke ye euer thought by the Parlament that the King should disherite them for euery light displeasure And if as the Aduersaries confesse the king had no cause to be offended with the FreÌ„ch Quenes childreÌ„ why did he disherite the Ladie FraÌ„cis and the Ladie Elenor also Their other presumption whiche they ground vpoÌ„ the auoyding of the vncertenty of the succession by reason of his Wil is of smal force and rather turneth against them For it is so farre of that by this meanes the succession is made more certaine and sure that contrarywise it is subiecte to more vncerteintie and to lesse suertie then before For whereas before the right and claime to the Croune hong vppon an ordinarie and certaine course of the common lawe vpon the certaine and assured right of the royall and vnspotted blood yea vppon the very lawe of nature whereby many inconueniences manie troubles daungers and seditions are in al Countries politikely auoided so now depending vpon the statute onely it is as easie by an other statute to be intringed and ouerthrowen And depending vppon a Testament is subiect to many corruptions sinister dealinges cauillations yea and iust ouerthrowes by the dishabilitie of the Testatours witnesses or the Legatorie himselfe or for lacke of dewe order to be obserued or by the death of the Witnesses vnexamined and for many other like considerations The Monumentes of al antiquitie the memorie of al ages and of our owne age and dayly experience can tel and shewe vs many lamentable examples of many a good and lawful Testament by vndue and craftie meanes by false and suborned witnesses by the couetous bearing and main tenance of such as be in authoritie quite vndone and ouerthrowne Wherefore Valerius Maxtmus crieth out against M. Crassus and Q. Hortensiu Lumina â—uriae ornamenta Fori quod scelus vindicare debebant inhonesti lucri captura inuitati authoritatibus suis texerunt This presumption then of the Aduersaries rather maketh for vs and ministreth to vs good occasion to thinke that the King would not hasard
the weight and importaÌ„ce of such a matter to reste vpon the validitie or mualiditie of a bare Testament only By this that we haue said we may probably gather that the King had no cause to aduenture so great an interprise by a bare Wil and seâ—tament Ye shal now heare also why we think he did neuer attempt or enterprise any such thing It is wel knowen the King was not wonte lightly to ouerslippe the occasion of any great commoditie presently offered And yet this notwithstanding hauing geuen to him by Acte of Parlament the ordering and disposition of al Chantries and Colleges he did neuer or very litle practise and execute this authoritie And shall we thinke vnlesse ful and sufficient prouse necessarily enforce creditte that the King to his no present coÌ„moditie and aduantage but yet to his great dishonour and to the great obloquie of his subiectes and other Countries to the notable disherison of so many the next royal blood did vse any such authoritie as is surmised Againe if he had made any such assignation who doubteth but that as he conditioned in the said pretensed Wil with his noble daughters to marie with his CouÌ„sels aduise either els not to enioy the benefitte of the succession he would haue tyed the said Ladie Francis and Ladie Elenours heirs to the same condition Farthermore I am driuen to thinke that ther passed no such limitatioÌ„ by the said king Henries wil by reason there is not nor was these many yeares any original copy therof nor any autheÌ„tical Record in the ChaÌ„cerie or els wher to be shewed in al EnglaÌ„d as the Aduersaries theÌ„selues confesse and in the copies that be spread abrode the witnesses preteÌ„ded to be present at the signing of the said Wil be such for the meanesse of their state on the one side and for the greatnesse and weight of the cause on th' other side as seme not the most sufficient for suche a case The importance of the cause being no lesse then the disherision of so many heires of the Croune as wel from the one sister as froÌ„ the other required and craued some one or other of the priuie CouÌ„saile or some one honorable and notable person to haue ben present at the said signing or that some notificatioÌ„ should haue ben made afterward to such persons by the King him selfe or at least before some Notarie and autheÌ„tical person for the better strengthening of the said Wil. Here is now farther to be coÌ„sidered that seing the interest to the Croune is become a plaine testamentarie matter and claime and dependeth vpon a last Wil when and before what Ordinarie this Wil was exhibited al lowed and prooued Where and of whome toke the Executours their othe for the true performaÌ„ce of the Wil Who coÌ„mitted to theÌ„ th'administratioÌ„ of the Kings goods and chattles When and to whome haue they brought in the InueÌ„tory of the same Who examined the witnesses vpon their othe for the tenour and trueth of the said TestameÌ„t Namely vpon the signement of the Kinges hand wherein only consisteth the weight of no lesse then of the Croune it self where or in what spiritual or temporal Courte may one find their depositions But it were a very hard thing to finde that that as farre as men can learne neuer was And yet if the matter were so plaine so good and so sound as these men beare vs in hand if the original TestameÌ„t had ben such as might haue biddeÌ„ the touchstone the trial the light and the sight of the worlde why did not they that enioyed most commoditie therby and for the sway and authorite they bare might and ought best to haue done it take coÌ„uenient and sure order that th' original might hane ben duely and safely preserued or at the least the ordinarie Probate which is in euery poore mans Testament diligeÌ„tly obserued might haue ben procured or sene one or other auteÌ„tical InstrumeÌ„t therof reserued The Aduersaries theÌ„selues see wel inough yea and are faine to coÌ„fesse these defectes But to helpe this mischief they wold fame haue the EnrolmeÌ„t in the Chancerie to be taken for a sufficient Probate by cause as they say both the spiritual and temporal authoritie did concurre in the Kings person Yet do they know wel inough that this plaister wil not cure the sore and that this is but a poore helpe and a shift For neither the Letters Patents nor th'EnrolmeÌ„t may in any wise be counted a sufficient Probate The ChaÌ„cerie is not the Court or ordinarie place for the probate of Willes nor the Rolles for recording the same Both must be done in the Spiritual Courts where th'Executours also must be impleaded and geue their accompt where the weakenes or strength of the Wil must be tried the witnesses examined finally the probate and al other thinges thereto requisite dispatched Or if it may be done by any other person yet must his authoritie be shewed The probate and al thinges must be done accordingly And among other things the vsual clause of Saluo iure cuiuscunque must not be omitted Which things I am assured the recording in the ChaÌ„cerie caÌ„not import But this caution and prouiso of Saluo iure cuiuscunque which is most coÌ„formable to al law and reason did litle serue some mens turne And therefore there was one other caution and prouiso that though the poorest mans TestameÌ„t in al England hath this prouiso at the probate of the same yet for this Testament the weightiest I trow that euer was made in England no suche probate or clause can be found either in the one or the other court Yet we nedes must al this notwithstanding be borne in hande and borne doune that there was a TestameÌ„t and Wil formably framed according to the purpose and effect of the statute yet must the right of th' imperial Croune of EnglaÌ„d be coÌ„ueied and caried away with the color and shadow only of a Wil. I say the shadow only by reason of another coniecture and presumptioÌ„ whiche I shal tel you of Whiche is so liuely and effectual that I verily suppose it wil be very harde for any man by any good and probable reason to answere and auoide the same And is so important and vehemeÌ„t that this only might seeme vtterly to destroie al the Aduersaries coniectural prouffes coÌ„cerning the maintenance of this supposed Wil. We say therfore and affirme that in case there had ben any good and sure helpe and handfast to take and hold the Croune for the heirs of Lady Francis by the said Wil that the faction that vniustly intruded the Lady Iane eldest daughter to the said Lady FraÌ„cis to the possession of the Croune would neuer haue omitted to take receaue and imbrace the occasioÌ„ and benefit therof to them presently offered They neither would nor could haue ben driuen to so harde and bare a shifte as to colour their vsurpation against the Late Queene Marie only and her Sister Elizabeth with the