Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
authority_n council_n pope_n power_n 4,584 5 5.4437 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A91186 An exact chronological history and full display of popes intollerable usurpations upon the antient just rights, liberties, of the kings, kingdoms, clergy, nobility, commons of England and Ireland Prynne, William, 1600-1669. 1666 (1666) Wing P3962A; ESTC R232177 595,052 408

There are 18 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

That the Power of summoning Councils even in Rome it self appertained to this King of Italy not to the Pope 3ly That the King upon the complaints exhibited to him against the Pope suspended him both from his temporalties benefices and Papal office by his Regal authority before the Council summoned till he had purged himself from the Crimes objected 4ly That though most of the Synod held it just this Pope should not answer the Articles against him till he was first restored to his Patrimony benefice and office yet they would determine nothing therein till this Kings approbation pleasure first known 5ly That the King would not take off this Popes Suspension till he answered his Articles and purged himself notwithstanding the Synods request and opinion to the contrary 6ly That thereupon they received and read the Articles against him 7ly That the Pope appeared by this Kings summons before this Council to answer the crimes against him where at his appearance he denies to answer in point of Law till his Suspension first released and his restitution which the Emperor overruled against him After which he appeared the second time upon Summons to answer the Articles and purge himself but was interrupted by the tumultuous force and assaults of his accusers made upon him and his followers who were wounded and had been slain by them had not the Kings Great Officers rescued them from their fury and guarded them back to their lodgings That after this upon new Summons the Pope was willing to answer and purge himself before the Synod but that he was informed he could not do it without danger of being slain by his tumultuous opposites 8ly That the Synod thereupon repaired to the King as the Supream Judge to direct them how to proceed in this cause by reason of these Tumults 9ly That thereupon the King referred the whole businesse to them to proceed therein as they should think best for the Peace of the Church and of all Christians in the City of Rome 10ly That they hereupon by vertue of this Kings regal authority and command not their own inherent Episcopal or Synodal Jurisdiction referred the merits of the cause being secret and difficult to Gods judgement and restored the Pope to his Ecclesiastical Rights and exercise of his Ministry within the City of Rome and perswaded an amicable Christian peace and agreement between him his adversaries the Senate and Citizens of Rome Where then is that transcendent Jurisdiction of Popes over Kings Councils all other Bishops and his absolute exemption from their Judicatures for any scandalous sins or heresies which succeeding Popes and their Parasites boast of in the premised Chapters To evade this undeniable president Ennodius and other flatterers of Popes pretend That Pope Symmachus out of meer humility and of his own accord submitted himself to this Kings and Councils Judgement But the premises evidence the contrary that most of these proceedings especially his Suspension overruling of his demurrer c. were much against his will and that he had no real desire to purge himself what ever he pretended And John Gerson Chancellor of Paris one of the learnedest profoundest Pontificians in his notable Book De Auferibilitate Papae resolves That Symmachus and other Popes did undergo the judgements of Councils nequaquam ex humili condescentione sicut nonnulli fingunt sed ex debito et obligatione Yea this Pope himself in his Apology to Anastatius the Emperor stiles him Principem rerum humanarum adding Thou O Emperor governest human and secular affairs Bishops dispence the divine Mysteries without any addition that Bishops govern all Ecclesiastical affairs which this King and the Emperor then did in Italy not Popes nor Bishops This Theodoricus King of Italy made and published divers Ecclesiastical Lawes intermixed with his Temporal concerning Clergy-men Churches Sanctuaries Pagan Sacrifices Sepulchers and burials in Rome it self Marriages Espousals Jews the observation of the Lords day c. commanding them to be generally observed by his Edictum Theodorice Regis Lex 26. 70. 71. 92. 93. 108. 110. 111. 125 126. and that as well by the Romans as Barbarians and Goths under pain of banishment if violated Quia quod pro omnium provincialium securitate provisum est universitatis debet servare devotio Cassiodorus a Noble learned Roman Senator tutor to this King Theodoricus in his Exposition in Psal 50. Tibi soli peccavi hath this passage De populo si quis erraverit Deo peccat Regi Nam quando Rex delinquit soli Deo reus est quia hominem non habet qui eius facta di●udicet Merito ergo Rer Deo dicit se solum peccasse quia solus erat qui eius potuisset admissa discutere Therefore not the Pope or any other Conclave of Prelates In his other works he registers the Epistle of Theodohardus to Justinian the Emperor wherein he recites In toto orbe simile nihil habet as supream for power and dignity Pope Hormisda the 1. having condemned the Eutychians in a Council at Rome by the exhortation and command of King Theodoricus by his Letters and Messengers exhorted John then Patriarch of Constantinople and Anastatius the Emperor to renounce this Heresy and believe the two natures in Christ But they taking this message in high indignation and scorn put the messengers into an old leaking Ship and Anastatius commanded them to return directly into Italy and not to touch upon the shoare of Grece enjoyning them to return this answer to the Pope Scire se Augustorum or Imperatoris proprium esse non Pontificis imperare nec Imperata Pontificis accpiere et si quid foret in quo hunc cui divina curae sunt jubere oporteat se eum esse a quo alii multo melius sua jussa expectent quam sua proponant exequenda Nos jubere volumus non Nobis juberi This Pope Hormisda after Anastatius his death in his Epistle to the Emperor Justinus adversus Nestorii Eutychetis blasphemias informs him Inter eq quae ad unitatem Ecclesiae pertinent propter quam Deus Clementiae vestrae elegit Imperiam hoc quoque venerabilis Imperator Cura fidei cui multipliciter vos studere declarastis adiecit Making the care of the Christian faith and Peace of the Church by establishing the Orthodox faith and suppressing heresies by his Imperial authority the principal cause of Gods advancing him to the Empire In pursuance whereof this Emperor Justinus by his Letters Decrees endeavoured to reconcile the differences between the Bishops Churches of Rome and Constantinople ut unitatem individuae Trinitatis ipsi quoque colant in unitate mentium Quid enim gratius reperiri potest quid justius quid illustrius quam quos idem Regnum continet idemque fidei cultus irradiat eos non diversa contendere sed collectis in eisdem sensibus instituta venerari non humana mente
Pope though restored by his means or to read the Popes Letter to him not to send any Greek Priest among the Bulgarians though conjured by him not to do it 10ly That the Popes Legates returning to Rome were taken prisoners by the Sclavi bonis omnibus atque autentico in quo omnes subscriptiones erant privati qui Imperialibus Apostolicis literis vix liberati sine autentico actorum libro revertuntur so that Surius and other Romanists having no authentick Copies of this Synod have foisted into the fragments of it many passages making for the Popes and Church of Romes Supremacy the Clergies power but against the Emperors Jurisdiction Laymens presence votes in Councils in matters of faith and Ecclesiastical affairs out of Pope Nicholas and Adrians Letters which was never assented to nor recorded in the Authentick Acts of this Synod wherein Bahanis a Layman bare chief sway 11ly That Laurentius Surius himself hath prefixed before his imperfect fragments and Epitome of its Actions De octavo Synodo admonitio ad Lectorem viz. Triplicem Octavam Constantinopoli habitam Synodum historiae loquuntur Primam in qua praeter fas ejecto Ignatio repente ex aulico neophyto creatus est Constantinopolitana Urbis Antistes Photius Alteram quae pulso Photio restituit suae sedi Ignatium Tertiam sub Johanne Octavo Romano Pontifice qui mortuo Ignatio pacis conciliandae causa Photium Constantinopolitanis Episcopum reddidit Ex his mediam docti viri Octavam recte ac merito oecumenicam censent dici oportere tametsi Graeci quidem aliter sentire videantur quorum judicia non sunt magni penaenda Semper enim illi quadam mulatione feruntur erga Latinam Ecclesiam difficile est morosis ingeniis per omnia satisfacere c. Sed iis omissis hoc te lector admonitum volumus nos dare quidem in praesentiarum legendam tibi Octavam Synodum sed ita tamen ut multa ex ejus Actionibus desiderentur Neque enim habuimus exemplar integrum sed ab illis mutua● sumus qui in compendium epitomen ipsas Actiones redigere voluerint Sub finem tamen quaedam adjuximus ex aliis bona fide collectis ad eandem Synodum pertinentia 2ly It is observable that the true cause of Photius his deposition and Ignatius his restitution by the Emperor Basilius and this Synod was because Basilius prohibitus fuit a Communione per Photium Patriarcham propter caedem Michaelis Imperatoris not because he was made Patriarch in his stead being a meer Courtier and Layman before against the Canons St. Ambrose with sundry others being made Patriarchs Archbishops Bishops yea Popes in the Eastern and Western Churches and England though mere Laymen and Courtiers when elected yea after Ignatius his death Photius was restored to his Patriarchship notwithstanding this exception 13ly It is worthy consideration what advantage Pope Nicholas the 1. and Adrian the 2d made of these schisms and differences between Ignatius and Michael Photius and Basilius Patriarchs and Emperors of Constantinople to advance their own usurped Supremacy over the Greek Emperors and Church all other Princes Prelates and Councils themselves if their Epistles Rescripts registred by Gratian and others be genuine not forged as many justly repute them For Pope Nicholas in his Letters to the Emperor Michael upon the complaint of Ignatius that he was unjustly deposed by the Emperor took upon him not only most insolently to revile check and trample upon the Emperor Michael but likewise to inlarge his own Papal power beyond all bounds and to deny abridge abolish the Emperors antient Ecclesiastical Right and Jurisdiction averring 1. That Popes have an Universal Jurisdiction over all Patriarchs Archbishops and Bishops to receive appeals from and restore them to their Sees whereof they were deprived either by Emperors Kings or Councils by their Papal authority 2. That Popes have power to summon General National or Provincial Synods for this purpose without Emperors or Kings assents and to enjoyn Emperors to suppresse all Councils Synods enacting any thing to the prejudice of the Pope or Church of Rome as meer wicked Conventicles 3ly That Emperors Kings or Laymen ought not to be present much lesse to preside in any Synods or Councils where Ecclesiastical matters are debated nor have any authority to intermeddle with or to make Lawes Constitutions for the Church or Clergy but only Popes and Bishops 4ly That Emperors and Kings have no right power to judge or dethrone Popes Bishops or other Clergy-men for any crimes nor yet to elect promote constitute Bishops or confer Bishopricks but only Popes and their Delegates 5ly That Popes may judge excommunicate depose Emperors Kings and other Laymen 7ly That the Jurisdiction power office of Emperors and Kings is confined by God and Christ only to worldly or secular not extended to Ecclesiastical religious or divine affairs which belong wholly and solely to Popes Bishops and Church-men 7ly That Popes and Prelates by their Canons and Constitutions may repeal null controll the Lawes Edicts of Kings or Emperors but they can neither null nor repeal their Canons Constitutions nor act ought against them These with other Antichristian Paradoxes Pope Adrian broached decreed upon the score of Ignatius and his successors have since incorporated them into the body of their Canon Lawes After the death of Caro●us Calvus Pope John the 9th intended to make and Crown Ludovicus Balbus Emperor but the Senate and Citizens of Rome standing for Carolus Crassus against the bribed Pope who persisted obstinate they thereupon cast him into prison from whence he escaping fled into France for succour and there Crowned Ludovicus Balbus Emperor Charles in the mean time seising upon Rome called the Pope out of France to Rome by menaces who returning thither upon his summons crowned Charles Emperor in Rome to purchase his peace with him that so he might safely reside there An Argument of his Supremacy over this Pope Pope Martin the 2d Seditione malis artibus Pontificalem dignitatem acquisivit whereupon Primo huius tempore non expectabatur Caesaris authoritas in creando Pontifice nec quaerebatur eius admissio which till then was customarily required Ita paulatim sese Pontifices Imperatorum potestate exuerunt ut facilius eos tum demum contererent pedibus Sed eo foelicius provenit Ecclesiae Urbi quod in tam male acquisito Papatu diutius non duraverit writes Balaeus he dying within 13. months after Pope Hadrian the 3d. statim post initum Pontificatum nactus opportunitatem per Caroli Crassi absentiam qui tunc exercitum ab Italia in Normannos diripientes Galliam eduxerat encouraged by his predecessors Usurpations upon the Emperors antient right in the election and confirmation of Popes proceeded one step further utterly to abolish it for the future Tantae audaciae supercilii fuit ut mox adepto Papatu
tueri Coronam et Ecclesiam defensare Alterum Regi alterum convenit Ecclesiae advocato Victoria sicut in Domino con●idimus prae manibus est Superbia arrogantia Romanorum plus quam fortitudo eorum Quid enim Nunquid quispiam magnus vel potens verbi gratia Imperator aut Rex faedam Rem istam in Imperium pariter Sacerdotiumque praesumit Sed Populus hic maledictus tumultuosus qui suas nescit metiri vires cogitare sinem considerare proventum insipientia sua furore suo ausus est hoc grande sacrilegium attentare Absit ut vel ad momentum stare possit ante faciem Regis popularis manus vulgi temeritas Factus sum insipiens qui cum sim vilis ignobilisque persona tanquam aliquis magnus consiliis tantae magnitudinis tantaeque Sapientiae me ingessi de re magna At quo ignobilior atque objectior tanto liberior sum ad loquendum quod Charitas suggerit Unde adhuc addo in eadem ins●pientia mea Si quis aliud quam locutus sum vobis quod non credimus suadere conabitur is profecto aut non diligit Regem aut parum intelligit quid Regiam deceat Majestatem aut certe quae sua sunt quaerit et non valde quae vel Dei vei Regis sunt curare convincitur This Pope at last by St. Bernards solicitation and the assistance of Conrade and Ludovicus King of France was restored to the possession of his See at Rome In the mean time whiles Engenius remained in France the Emperor Conrade apprehended that St. Bernard had done something in derogation of the Empire and his Prerogative whereupon he writ this short Epistle to him to acquit himselfe from this accusation Querimoniae Regis nostrae sunt maximè illa quàm dignanter exprimitis de invasione Imperii Regis dedecus Regni diminutionem nunquam volui Volentes odit anima mea Legi quippe Omnis anima potestatibus sublimioribus subdita sit Et qui potestati resistit Dei ordinationi resistit Quam tamen sententiam cupio vos omnimodis moneo custodire in exhibenda reverentia Summae Apostolicae Sedi beati Petri Vicario sicut ipsam vobis vultis ab universo servari Imperio Pope Eugenius intending to hold a General Council at Rhemes in France the French King conceiving it might derogate something from his Prerogative and right of his Crown intended to prohibit it hereupon St. Bernard writ this Epistle to perswade him to permit this Council to sit promising that the Pope should correct and reform any thing wherein he had exceeded his Jurisdiction to his prejudice wherein he would assist him Ludovico Dei Gratiâ Excellentissimo Regi Francorum B. Clarevallis vocatus Abbas fidelis suus salutem à Rege Regum Domino Dominantium ipsi dilectae ejus filiis ejus Regna terrae et jura Regnorum tunc satè sana suis Dominis atque illaesa persistunt si divinis ordinationibus ac dispositionibus non resistunt Cur Domine trascitur furor t●us contra Dei electum quem tua quoque sublimitas suscepit et praeelegit tibi quidem in Patrem filio autem tuo in Samuelem Armatur Regia indignatio non plane in extraneos sed in semetipsam et suos Non mirum si juxta Scripturam Ira viri justitiam Dei non 〈…〉 quae propriae quoque utilitatis sed indignitatis sed salutis facit sapè ut nec 〈…〉 omnibus advertas periculum sentias damnum Colligitur Consilium Quid in hoc detrahitur Regiae Gloriae Regni utilitatibus Ibi Vniversae Ecclesiae commendabitur ac rememorabitur Excellentiae vestrae prompta et specialis devotio quod Regum primus aut certe inter primos rabie persequentium eandem matrem vestram strenuissime et Christianissime defendendo obviastis Ibi gloriosè ab ingenti illa multitudine debitae gratiae referentur vobis ibi a Milibus Sanctorum orabitur pro vobis et vestris Alias autem quàm sit hoc eempore necessarius Conventus Episcoporum nullus ignorat nisi qui durus corde matris Ecclesiae angustias non attendit At calor inquiunt nimius est quasi nos glacilia corpora habeamus An corda nobis magis congelata sunt nemo est qui juxta Prophetam Compatiatur super contritione Joseph Sed haec alias Nunc autem ego minimus in regno vestro sed dignitate non fidelitate dico vobis non expe●it velle impedire tantum tam necessarium bonum Nec desunt evidentes causae quibus id manifestum facere possem quas nunc proferre in medium ad manum mihi est nisi quod sat arbitror dictum Sapienti Tamen si quid ex Apostolicae auctoritatis rigore processit unde se merito esse turbatam Celsitudinis vestrae Serenitas arbitratur qualiter hoc ipsum revocetur aut temperetur prout oportet ad honorem vestrum fideles vestri qui adherent totis viribus enitentur Inter nos quoque si quid possumus non dissimulabimus The design of this whole Epistle imports 1. That the Pope himself could not then summon any Council in France without the Kings special royal license authority and conviction of the grounds and necessity thereof 2ly That he had power to prohibit any Council to assemble in his Realm if held by the Pope himself without his license and approbation 3ly That if the Pope did or had done any thing by his Decrees or Papal authority to the Kings offence or prejudice of his honor all his loyal Subjects and Clergy were obliged to endeavour to revoke and moderate it Eugenius by S. Bernards instructions and assistance beyond expectation of all men became more couragious Papal apt to govern the See of Rome then was imagined whence Sigonius observes Eugenius ubi primum est designatus contra opinionem omnium ingentem animi indolem prae se tulit Nam cum à Romanis ad remittenda urbis vectigalia urgeretur eos ita aspernatus est ut ne dignos quidem queis cum habitaret putarit Itaque urbe statim egressus ad Monasterium Farfense se contulit eoque Cardinalibus evocatis novo instituto ibi consecrationem accepit atque inde aspectum pervicacis populi devitans arce S. Angeli Petri Leonibus tradita Viterbium se recepit Sub eosdem dies Arnoldus Haereticus ex Germania in Italiam reversus captato Romanae seditionis Pontificiae absentiae tempore in Urbem se conjecit ac seditioni per se satis ardenti majores quoque faces admovit populum ad vetera majorum instituta factaque imitanda gravi inprimis ac praesentibus temporibus oportuna oratione adhor●ans qui senum consilio et juvenum manu totum sibi terrarum orbem subjecissent reaedificandum Capitolium ac Senatores Equitesque Romanos renovandos inclamans
An Exact CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY AND FULL DISPLAY OF POPES Intollerable Usurpations Upon the antient just Rights Liberties of the Kings Kingdoms Clergy Nobility Commons of ENGLAND and IRELAND THE design of this Chronological History and Display being principally to remonstrate to the world by irrefragable Testimonies and Records the manifold unsufferable Vsurpations of the Bishops and See of Rome from time to time upon the antient indubitable just Rights and Liberties of the Kings Churches Nobles Commons of England and Ireland whiles they continued under their Foreign Jurisdiction More especially by Excom●unications Interdicts absolving Subjects from their Oathes of Allegia●ce raising Rebellions dethroning our Kings enforcing them to resign their Crowns to become their sworn Vassals Tributaries exempting Bishops Clerks from their Homage Judicatures collating Bishopricks Monasteries Ecclesiastical Dignities Benefices by Provisions to Aliens or others translating swearing Bishops Abbots to them and their Papal See vacating due Elections at their pleasures Appeals to Rome Dispensations Tenths Procurations First-Fruits Bribes Symony Crossadoes varieties of Extortions Oppressions by their Legates and other Instruments To discover their originals progresse growth revivals suppressions with the manifold memorable Complains Letters Oppositions Writs Prohibitions Declarations against them both in and out of Parliament and the frequent Treacheries Usurpations of our Popish Prelates Spiritual Courts Officers upon our Kings just Rights Prerogatives Regalities Courts Subjects Liberties to the extraordinary d●●ger mischief of the Crown Realm Church Christian Religion and peoples grievance And what Soveraign Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction our Kings as Gods Vicars have exercised from King Lucius his Conversion Anno 183. till the total extirpation of the Popes usurped Authority by King Henry the 8. and Edward the 6. by Histories and memorable Records in the Tower and Rolls for the most part unknown to our greatest Clerks Antiquaries worthy publick view yea adding much light to our Ecclesiastical and Political Histories very defective in these Transactions of grand Importance I apprehended it absolutely necessary by way of Introduction like a Wise Builder to lay a deep sure Foundation whereon to bottom this Weighty Structure that so if any Floods shall hereafter come or Windes blow and beat upon it from Rome or other Quarters they may not be able to shake or overturn it because it is founded upon a Rock To this end I shall by Gods assistance in one intire Book Chronologically and Historically remonstrate and where necessity requires Polemically examine discusse the Original of Soveraign Jurisdiction in what Persons God himself hath setled the Primitive Right and Exercise thereof as well over the Churches Militant as Civil State from Adams Creation till Christs Ascension and from thence till this present age And irrefragably demonstrate by Scripture Heathen Philosophers Fathers Councils Ecclesiastical Histories Imperial Laws Edicts Popes own Epistles Decretals Bulls Archbishops Bishops Popish Divines School-men Canonists Protestant Writers Testimonies and Presidents in all ages That the Supreme Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in governing protecting reforming the Church and people of God maintaining propagating the Orthodox Christian Faith the true publike worship of God suppressing all Heresies Errors Blasphemies Idolatries Schisms sinnes against both Tables in all Persons as well Ecclesiastical as Temporal taking care of the souls and salvation of men is originally vested by God himself in Kings Emperors or Soveraign Princes as Gods Vicegerents and Christs Vicars upon Earth as the principal part of their Royal Authority Office Trust not in High-Priests Priests Apostles Popes Patriarchs Archbishops Bishops or any other Ecclesiastical persons whatsoever who are all Subjects to and subordinate Ministers under them in the Churches Militant within their respective Empires Kingdoms Dominions as all inferiour Civil Magistrates Officers of Justice are in their Civil States Kingdoms Courts And that the received Distinction of two supreme Jurisdictions Powers specifically different from and independent on each other in their very essence nature by Divine Institution and at least ever since our Saviours Ascension immediately vested in two distinct callings professions of men to wit the Soveraign Civil Jurisdiction in and over all secular persons affairs in Emperors Kings and Temporal Powers alone the Supreme Ecclesiastical or Spiritual Jurisdiction in and over all Churches Militant Bishops Priests Church-Members Divine and Ecclesiastical affaires only in Popes or Patriarchs not Emperors Kings Secular Princes States is but a meer Popish Imposture Forgery Fancy Stratagem to cheat rob deprive all Christian Emperors Kings Princes of the richest Pearl Jewel chiefest Branch and Flower of their Diadems to exempt the Clergy from their Jurisdictions under this pretext and to subject both their Persons Crowns Kingdoms Subjects to the Antichristian Usurpations Tyrannies Exorbitances Oppressions of Ambitious Popes Prelates Priests as Ecclesiastical Histories evidence ever since this Heresie of two distinct Soveraign Authorities delegated by Divine Institution to two several Functions was first broached in the Christian Church being the same in substance with that of Duo Principia condemned by Popes themselves and the greatest Champions of their Universal Soveraign Monarchy as a most dangerous Heresie invented first by Marcion Manes Hermogenes and other Hereticks against whom Tertullian thus long since argued Quid erit unicum singulare nisi cui nihil adaequabitur Quid principale nisi quod super omnia nisi quod ante omnia in quo omnia Haec Deus solus habendo est solus habendo Deus est Si alius habuerit tot jam erunt Dii quot habuerint quae Dei sunt Quod summum sit Deus est summum autem non erit nisi quod unicum fuerit Unicum autem esse non poterit cui aliquid adaequabitur Veritas autem sic unum Deum exigit defendendo ut solius sit quicquid ipsius est Ita enim ipsius erit si fuerit solius Et ex hoc alius Deus non possit admitti dum nemini licet habere de Deo aliquid Ergo inquis nec nos habemus Dei aliquid Imo habemus habebimus sed ab ipso non à nobis Nam Dii erimus si meruerimus illi esse de quibus praedicavit Ego dixi vos Dii estis stetit Deus in Ecclesia Deorum sed ex gratia ipsius non ex nostra proprietate quia ipse est solus qui Deos faciat I may most aptly apply it to Emperors Kings who are Earthly Gods made such by God in their own Kingdoms as his Vice-roys The Soveraign Power Jurisdiction over all persons Churches causes as well Civil as Ecclesiastical within their respective Realms must be but one in●ire indivisible Soveraign Authority incommunicable unto any other subject or person whatsoever but by subordinate derivation and delegation by from or under them else they should presently cease to be Earthly Gods had Popes or Bishops a distinct Supreme Ecclesiastical Power within their Realms coequal with underived from or independent on them Whence St.
havock of the Church and apprehended those that professed Christ whether men or women and haled them to prison persecuting them even to strange Cities and left them in bonds Yet when he was converted and preached Christ himself was apprehended and brought before the Council and Ananias the High Priest who commanded him to be smitten on the face when he began to speak and he was 5. times beaten with rods receiving 40. stripes save one as a penal punishment Yet neither the high Priest nor the Council were the Supream Judges in Causes Ecclesiastical but the Roman Governours Rulers and Caesar Hence the high Priest with the Elders and Council by Tertullus their Orator accused Paul first before Felix the Governor for being a stirrer up of sedition among all the Jewes in the world and ringleader of the sect of the Nazarens before whom Paul made his defence Afterwards he was accused by them before Portius Festus the succeeding Governour who demanded of him Wilt thou go up to Jerusalem and THERE BE JUDGED BEFORE ME not the High Priest or Council of those things whereof he was accused Whereupon Paul doubting his justice made this Appeal to Caesar himself as Supreamest Judge in all Ecclesiastical causes I STAND AT CAESARS JUDGEMENT SEAT WHERE I OUGHT TO BE JUDGED c. No man may deliver me to the Jews I APPEAL UNTO CAESAR Then Festus when he had consulted with the Council answered Hast thou appealed unto Caesar UNTO CAESAR SHALT THOU GO Festus soon after informing King Agrippa that Paul had referred himself to the hearing and Judgement of Augustus heard him again the second time before King Agrippa who resolved This man might have been set at liberty had he not appealed unto Caesar to whose Tribunal he was thereupon sent a prisoner to Rome to Caesar himself as the Soveraign Judge as well in Religious as Civil causes persons though a Pagan Moreover Saint Paul having cast a spirit of divination out of a Damsel at Philippi the chief City of that part of Macedonia it is specially recorded When her Masters saw that the hope of their Gains was gon they caught Paul and Silas and drew them into the market-place unto the Rulers and brought them to the Magistrates saying These men being Jews do exceedingly trouble our City and teach customes which are not lawfull for us to receive neither to observe being Romans And the multitude rose up together against them and the Magistrates rent off their cloathes and commanded to beat them And when they had laid many stripes upon them they cast them into prison charging the Jaylor to keep them safely who having received such a charge thrust them into the inner prison and made their feet fast in the flocks But the next morning upon Pauls message the Magistrates released and brought them out of prison themselves In fine our Saviour foretold his Apostles They shall lay their hands on you and persecute you delivering you up to the Synagogues and into Prisons being brought before KINGS RULERS for my name sake for a testimony against them compared with Christs prohibition to his Disciples The Kings of the Gentiles exercise Lordship over them and they that exercise Authority upon them are called Benefactors But ye shall not be so and with the forecited Texts are a most clear convincing Evidence that although the Jewish high Priests and Priests usurped rather a Temporal then Ecclesiastical power to fetch the Apostles before and scourge them in their Synagogues to apprehend them by their Officers Souldiers drag and cast men and women into prison for preaching and professing Christ and that not severally by themselves but in a mixt Councel of Elders Scribes and Pharises who were no Priests sitting advising and voting with them Yet the Supream power in matters of Doctrine and Religion even amongst the Jews during our Saviours abode with them and after his Ascension continued in the Roman Deputies Kings Emperors and chief Civil Magistrates alone as they did by divine institution in Moses Joshua David Solomon and other their own forementioned Kings and Supream Temporal Governours As for the Jewish Supream Court generally stiled their Sanhedrim consisting of 71. persons of the Elders Heads and Princes of Israel as the Jewish Rabbins and those who write of the Jewish Courts collect from Numb 11. 16. where they hold it was first erected and conceive it was like our Parliaments having conusance of all highest affairs I confesse I could never yet be satisfied by any Text of Scripture or solid Antiquity 1. That this Court of 71. or Sanhedrim was a setled standing Court sitting usually at Jerusalem and that during the Judges Kings and inter-regnums too till Herod put it down 2ly That the high Priests or any Levites were antiently Members of it which Godwin and others utterly deny 3ly That they intermedled with any Ecclesiastical causes as Supream Judges of them as some alleadge they did in the case of the Prophet Jeremiah where when the malicious Priests Prophets and all the people pronounced him I conceive only by way of accusation as in the case of Christ before Pilate when they cryed out Let him be crucified not vote or Judgement to be worthy of death the Princes of Judah who heard tydings thereof came up from the Kings house and sate down in the Porch of the house of the Lord and when they had heard Jeremiah his Apology and their clamours adjudged voted the contrary that he was not worthy to die and saved his life which proves the Princes only not the Priests or Prophets to be Judges paramount even in Ecclesiastical causes persons not the Priests in their imaginary Consistory Church Council 4ly It is granted by Sigonius Dr. Field most Jewish Rabbies Antiquaries that the Princes of Judah and Israel before the Babilonish captivity sat Chief Presidents in this high Court as they do in our Parliaments and that nothing was there passed but by their assents thereto till the high Priest after that restitution by usurpation not right sat Chief therein Therefore if we admit any such Soveraign standing Court erected and continuing so long as some pretend to erect such a Presbytery in themselves having conusance of Ecclesiastical persons or causes as well as Temporal or a kind of Ecclesiastical Consistory stiled a Council which some would difference from it though I hold them both one and the same erected devised by their Elders Princes Priests after their return from the Babilonish captivity it will no wayes enervate but ratifie my second Proposition That the Soveraign Ecclesiastical Authority in the Israelitish Church of God under the Law remained alwayes setled by Divine and Natural Right in their Kings and chief Civil Magistrates Princes Councils not in their High Priest Priests or Levites separated or conjoyned and that the Civil and Ecclesiastical power are but one and the same in nature distinguished only by the Civil or Ecclesiastical
credit In the mean time since Kings Emperors were long before Popes Bishops who derive all their Lordly power Splendor Temporalties Jurisdictions Bishopricks precedency above other Ministers only from their donations not they their Crowns Kingdoms or Regal Authority from Popes or Bishops as all Histories attest against their Papal pretences to the contrary Since the Moon doth frequently ecclipse the Sunne by the interposition of her body between it and the earth as the Papal and Pontifical power hath frequently ecclipsed more or lesse the power splendor of our own and other Kings and the Roman Emperours but these Suns ver ecclipseth the Moons but only the interposition of the earths Ball betwixt them in their Divine jurisdiction being very little granted to them out of meer bounty not duty as I shall prove in due place Since the Jurisdictions Constitutions Decrees Ceremonies Franchises of Popes Prelates are still various and subject to change like the Moon the Light both of their Doctrine and Life since Pope Gregory the seventh Innocent the third Adrian the fourth Boniface 8. hath been rather Moon-light yea darkness it self then Sun-shine and the Popes Bishops Priests Monks of the Church of Rome it self more carnal earthly ambitious vitious and dark then the Kings Princes Civil Magistrates and Lay-people as St. Bernard and many of their own Authors as well as Protestants assert that the Papacy opposing and exalting it self ever since these Popes above all Christian Kings and Emperours is that Man of sin which Christ himself shall destroy with THE BRIGHTNESSE OF HIS COMMING LIGHT of the Gospel I shall rather conclude that the Pope with his Prelates Priests are the Moon and their Church the Night the Emperour and Christian Kings the Sunne and their kingdoms the Day signified in Genesis 1. then Popes and Prelates of the Church of Rome if rightly parallel'd The 2d Text alleged for the Popes Supremacy over Kings and Emperours as well in Temporals as Spirituals is The High Priest and Priests anointed crowned Saul David Solomon Jehu Joash Kings of Judah and Israel as Popes and Bishops do Kings now Ergo they were paramount their Kings as well in Temporals as Spirituals because they were anointed by and received their Crowns and Kingdoms from their hands alone who might dispose of them at their pleasures Thus Pope Adrian the 4th argued from Popes coronations of the Roman Emperour deduced from the Jewish high Priest Whence hath he King Frederick the Empire but FROM US By election of the Princes he hath the Name of King by OUR CONSECRATION he hath the name of Emperour Imperator quod habet totum habet a nobis Whatever the Emperor hath he hath the whole from Vs It is in our Power to give the Empire to whomsoever we will Hence Laurentius Ostiensis Alvarus Pelagius Marta with sundry other Pontificans thus second Pope Adrian Since Kings are made Kings by their Unction which can be had from none BUT A PRIEST as Saul and David by Samuel It is apparent they are above above Kings and That all Kings receive both the Confirmation and Administration of their Kingdoms from the Spiritual Iudge The Emperor receives his Temporal power from the Pope and Church of Rome who Confirms Annoints Crowns him therefore approves rejects and deposeth him at his Pleasure To which I reply 1. That Samuel anointed Saul and David to be Kings not at but before their Coronations and that by Gods special command as his Minister only not their Superiour whence Samuel told Saul The Lord anointed thee King over Israel and David alwayes stiled him THE LORDS ANOINTED not Samuels refusing to offer the least violence to his person upon this account So David is stiled Gods anointed who tells him I anointed thee KING over Israel and called him Mine anointed adding With my Holy oyle have I not Samuel anointed him 2. Neither Samuel nor any other of the High Priests who anointed Saul David or any King of Judah or Israel did ever from thence either claime or exercise the least Jurisdiction or Superiority over their Persons Crowns Kingdoms in Spiritualties or Temporalties as Popes and Prelates claime exercise over Christian Kings and Emperours Crowned by them Nor yet Jehojeda the High Priest who not only Anointed and Crowned Joash King but was the principal Instrument in preserving and restoring him to his Crown when Usurped by Athaliah But they all dutifully submitted to and obeyed their Royal commands ordinances in all Ecclesiastick and Divine as well as civil things as the premises evidence 3ly Not only the High Priests but Elders and People anointed David and Jehoahaz Kings without any Priest or High Priest that we read of Yet none of them claimed exercised any Supremacy over these Kings upon this account 4ly Zadoc the Priest and Nathan anointed Solomon King by King Davids special command not their own Authority who put Abiathar the chief Priest from being Priest unto the Lord because he sided with Adonijah and crowned him King and made Zadock Priest in his place Here the very King deposeth the chief Priest and tells him he deserved also to dye for anointing Adonijah not the high Priest the King for being crowned and anointed by Zadock 4ly One of the sons of the Prophets a young man by the Prophet Elisha his command from God not the high Priest anointed Jehu King saying Thus saith the Lord I HAVE ANOINTED THEE KING OVER ISRAEL which having executed he opened the door and fled If this young Prophets meer anointing Jehu King gave him an absolute Jurisdiction over him in spiritual and temporal things as these Pontificians argue then this Minor Prophet likewise gained the supream Jurisdiction over the high Priests themselves and Zadock and Nathan over Abiathar the chief Priest by anointing Solomon King as well as over Jehu and Solomon which they dare not averre 5ly Popes themselves who pretend to this absolute Soveraign power over Emperors Kings by reason they crown and anoint them are both elected crowned and anointed Popes by Bishops and Cardinals only not Popes as all their Historians Pontificale Ceremoniale Romanum attest Will Popes then inferr Ergo they are higher greater in Power Jurisdiction then Popes and may dispose of the Papacy Popes and depose them at their wills Besides in the Church of Rome all other Episcopal Churches and our English Church meer Presbyters at first and of latter ages inferiour Bishops and Clergymen both elected anointed consecrated and installed all their Patriarchs Metropolitans and Archbishops Will it therefore follow that they are superiour to Patriarchs Metropolitans Archbishops in Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and may remove them at their wills If not then this grand Argument of Popes Popelins for the Popes Prelates supremacy over Emperors Kings Churches kingdoms in Temporals and Spirituals because they anointed crown them is a meer ridiculous
Galliarum regno susciter●s 〈◊〉 enim Paternitas vestra quod cum Regnum Sacerdotium inter 〈◊〉 conveniunt bene regitur mundus floret fructificat Ecclesia Cum vero inter se discordant non tantum parvae res non crescunt sed etiam maximae res miserabiliter dilabuntur whereupon this Pope made no further progresse in these Usurpations This Yvo Carnotensis asserts the Supremacy of Kings as well in Ecclesiasticals as Temporals That they ought not to be excommunicated That if they receive any Excommunicate persons into their royal favor and protection the Bishops Priests and people ought to absolve and receive them into their Communion Dispositiones rerum temporalium Regibus attributa sunt Basilei id est fundamentum populi et caput existunt Si aliquando potestate sibi concessa abutuntur non sunt a Nobis graviter exasperandi sed ubi Sacerdotum admonitionibus non acquieverint divino judicio sunt reservandi not to the Popes tribunal ubi tanto districtius sunt puniendi quanto minus fuerint divinis admonitionibus obnoxii unde habetur in libro Capitulorum Regalium auctoritate Episcoporum constitutorum Si quos culpatorum Regia potestas aut in gratiam benignitatis receperit aut mensae suae participes effecerit his etiam Sacerdotum et populorum conventus suscipere in Ecclesiastica communione debebit ut quod principalis pietas recipit nec a Sacerdotibus Dei alienum habeatur Upon which account Yvo thus justifyed his reception of Gervasius an Excommunicated person ad communionem in Paschali Curia Pro regia honorificentia hoc feci fretus auctoritate Legis praedictae which he there recites thus ratified and prefaced in his Decretals and in the 12. Council of Toledo Vidimus quosdam flevimus ex numero culpatorum receptos in gratiam Principum extorres extitisse a Collegio Sacerdotum quod notabile malum illa res agit quia Licentia principalis in qua se solvi licentius curat ibi alios alligat quos in suam communionem videtur suscipere à communione pace Ecclesiae eligit separare qui cum illa convescant sola Sacerdotum communione priventur Et ideo quia remissio talium qui contra Regem gentem vel patriam agunt per definitiones Canonum antiquorum in potestate solum regia ponitur cui et peccasse noscuntur adeo nulla se deinceps a talibus abstinebit Sacerdotum communio Sed quos regia potestas aut in gratiam benignitatis receperit aut participes mensae suae effecerit hos etiam sacerdotum ac populorum conventus suscipere in Ecclesiasticam communionem debebit ut quod Principalis pietas habet acceptum neque à Sacerdotibus Dei habeatur extraneum This was the received practice both of the Churches Realms of France Spain and of England too as the learned French Advocate Pierre Pithou proves at large by several Histories Presidents Authorities before and under Pope Gregory Vrban and Paschal the 2. whose excommunications of the Emperors Henry 3. 4. and their adherents by all these resolutions were meerly uncanonical and voyd by this approved antient Law which gave Emperors and Kings power to absolve their Excommunicated Subjects and exempted themselves much more from Excommunications which Priviledge the French Kings Clergy strenuously maintained against this usurping Pope Paschal who though he miscarried in his Design of stripping the Emperor and King of France of their right of Investitures yet he so terrified the King of Hungary with his Thunderbolts that after a great Schism and contention between them Literis graviter scriptis renunciavit Pontifici Investituras Episcoporum aliorum Praelatorum as the Century Writers inform us out of Martinus Capel But these Letters being not extant we cannot resolve upon what terms or how farre he quitted this his ancient indubitable Prerogative royal to this Pope Before I proceed to the next Popes Contests with the Emperor I cannot but inform you what censure Sigebertus Gemblacensis Monachus living and dying under Pope Paschal in the year of Christ 1112. hath given in his Chronicle of this Controversie between the Emperors and Popes about the right of Investitures Anno 1111. Henricus Rex Romam vadit propter sedandam discordiam quae erat inter Regnum Sacerdotium quae caepit a Papa Gregorio septimo qui Hildebrandus nominatus est et exagitata a successoribus ejus Victorie Urbano et prae omnibus a Paschali magno scandalo erat toto mundo Rex autem uti volens authoritate et consuetudine et authoralibus privilegiis Imperatorum qui à Carolo Magno qui post de Regibus Francorum imperavit Romanis jamque per trecentos et eo amplius annos imperaverant sub 63 Apostolicis dabat licite Episcopatus et Abbatias et per Annulum et per Virgam Contra hanc majorum authoritatem censebant Papae Synodali judicio non posse nec debere dari per Virgam vel per Annuium Episcopatum aut aliquam Ecclesiasticam Investituram a Laicali manu et quicunque ita Episcopatum aut aliam Ecclesiastici juris Investituram accipiebant excommunicabantur Propter hanc praecipue causam Rex Romam tendebat After which he reciteth the forementioned Charter and Oath of Pope Paschal and his Cardinals confirming this antient right of Investitures to the Emperor and their perfidious violations thereof upon which many prodigies and calamities ensued I shall hereunto subjoyn these passages out of Joannes Aventinus relating the original and progresse of the Contests between this Emperor Pope Paschal and his predecessors touching Investitures Per triginta tres annos a Gregorio Urbano continenter sanguine ovium belligratum est c. donec Augustum Paschalis per filium Henricum è fastigio rerum in privatum statum deturbavit pollicitus se in Germaniam ad Conventum solennem Augustam Rhaetiae venturum Dumque eo contendit certior fit de morte Augusti Henr. 4. ad Padum ergo substitit atque coacto suae partis Coetu acta Gregorii Urbanique comprobat Clementis tertii caeterorum Episcoporum atque Augusti rescindit pollui Religionem si quispiam sacrificus suffragio prophano cooptatus fuerit fidemve principi dederit Necesse est cuivis Christiano in Romani Pontificis leges jurare decernit c. Proinde debere homines consideratius jam loqui cum illo atque pro legibus habere quae dicat Quicquid adversus Romanum Senatum Pontificalemve se extulerit contundendum esse decernit Conventu peracto ad Caesarem Legatos cum mandatis mittit se in Germaniam venturum ubi de summis utriusque rebus colloquatur promittit Inde Romam ipse at Caesar Reginoburgum ad hyemandum petit adventum Paschalis praestolatur Verum is se in Gallias Cluniacum confert Postea Augustobonae in Trecassiorum Galliae Lugdunensis Vrbe
Augustine thus resolves Sicut terreni Imperatoris auctoritas currit per omnes ut in omnibus ejus sit reverentia Ita Deus instituit ut ab ipso Rege Dei auctoritas incipint et currat per cunctos Quamvis frequenter mundus hoc non intelligit alii se subjiciat in potestate positus quam debet tamen institutio est ut unus sit qui timeatur Ubi ergo haec institutio non est ibi Cathedra pestilentiae reperitur as it is at Rome Nusquam enim unius Dei auctoritas abjicitur nisi apud eos qui multorum Deorum praedicant metum From hence our Thomas Waldensis thus concludes Ecce ab ipso Rege incipit auctoritas currit per cunctos executores justitiae hoc instituit Deus non ergo instituit Deus ut inciperet à Summo Sacerdote sola executio potestatis manaret in Principem Ecce inde est Imperator unde homo antequam Imperator unde homo antequam Imperator nisi à Deo Quamvis a Deo per Sacerdote Christianus homo tamen nec homo nec Christianus homo nisi a Deo Ita nec Imperator nec Christianus Imperator nisi a Deo quamvis per Pontificem fidelis sit Imperator a Christo et inde potestas illi unde et spiritus et nunquid spiritus illi a Pontifice Tertullianus intendi Quod non sed a Deo profecto ergo non potestas illi a Sacerdotio provenit a cujus dono animam non accepit Potestatis Regiae primum initium in ipso Rege a Deo et ab ipsius auctoritate manat in subditas potestates as well Ecclesiastical as Civil as I shall here demonstrate against all Papal or Pontifical pretences to the contrary For methods sake I shall digest the sum of my First Book into these 5. Propositions 1. That from Adams creation till the Law given by God to Moses and by him unto the Israelites his peculiar people the Supreme Paternal Regal Magistratical with that now stiled Spiritual Pontifical Ecclesiastical Authority or Jurisdiction both in and over the Family State Church Militant was by Divine and Natural Right vested united in one person not many to wit First in Adam himself but after his decease in the First-born unlesse disinherited by God for sin or in the Patriarch or Master of the Family Tribe who was both King and Priest having the Priesthood annexed to his Paternal or Regal Office not these to his Priestship 2ly That God after the Israelites deliverance from the Aegyptian bondage when he first new-modelled them into a Commonwealth and afterwards into a Kingdom setled both their State and Church-government dividing the Priesthood from the Supreme Civil Magistracy Kingship vesting the one in Moses Josuah David Solomon and their Royal Successors the other in Aaron his Sons and Tribe of Levi left the Soveraign Ecclesiastical Power Jurisdiction over all persons causes still annexed to the Kingly or Supreme Magistratical Office and residing in the King or chief Civil Officer as before transferring to Priests only the Ministerial Priestly Offices not the Soveraign Spiritual Jurisdiction the same in kind with a real part of and various dispensation only from the Civil Supremacy 3ly That the Supreme Government of the Church Militant after Christs Incarnation under the Gospel was vested in Jesus Christ himself God and Man only as he is the King not Priest or Prophet of the Church his Priestly and Prophetical Offices being united to his Kingly as the first highest in dignity and order not his Regal to his Pontifical or Prophetical Offices 4ly That Jesus Christ as Supreme King Lord Head of his Kingdom the Church whilst on Earth never claimed nor exercised any Temporal Regal Jurisdiction or Magistratical Authority over any of his Subjects much less over Emperors Kings Kingdoms Nations or Soveraign Civil Powers nor ever deprived any of them of their Crowns nor absolved their Subjects from their Allegiance nor cast down pulled or rooted up their Kingdoms nor gave them to whomsoever he pleased Neither did he either before at or after his Passion Resurrection or Ascension derive any such Superlative Power to St. Peter as his sole universal Vicar or Viceroy nor to any other Apostle Bishop Priest or Pope whatsoever Nor yet delegate to them his supreme Spiritual Jurisdiction over his Kingdom in this world the Church Militant and all the Members of it but only the Ministerial part of his Prophetical Office his High Priesthood being personal untransferrable incommunicable to any other to wit preaching the Gospel publickly to all Nations administring the Sacraments of Baptism and the Lords Supper according to his Institution and Command feeding his sheep with the sincere milk of his Word teaching them as his Apostles Ministers Servants to obey whatsoever he hath commanded them beseeching intreating them as his Ambassadors in his stead to be reconciled unto God to declare pronounce them absolved from their sins by God himself upon their sincere Repentance and to denounce damnation against them in case they do not repent and believe in Christ 5ly That Gods principal end and intention in ordaining Kings and supreme Civil Magistrates in the world was not the bare external administration of Justice between man and man the protection of their Subjects from violence oppression the preservation of them in worldly peace plenty prosperity the punishment of Malefactors the rewarding of Well-doers encouragement of Arts Vertue Trade Industry or fighting their Battels in times of War against Invading Enemies though considerable parts of their Regal Office and Soveraign Authority But the advancement of Gods honour worship service glory and spiritual Kingdom whose Viceroys they are the suppression of all Idolatry Blasphemy Heresie schisme sin wickednesse the promotion of the eternal salvation felicity of their people and to be Kings for the Lord their God by advancing his interest all they can Upon which ground in order to effect these ends God himself as well under the Gospel as Law hath delegated the supreme Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction only to Kings and other Soveraign Temporal Potentates not to Popes Bishops Priests who are subordinate to them as their Subjects Ministers not Copartners with them in their Soveraign Ecclesiastical Authority in point of Interest nor yet in its actual execution no further then they are pleased by their Laws or Commissions to delegate it to them as their Substitutes When I have Chronologically evidenced and fully demonstrated the truth of these five Conclusions in so many distinct Chapters in this First Book I shall then wholly addresse my self to my intended Chronological History in relation to the Kings and Crown of England from Lucius our first Christian King Anno Dom. 183. till the Popes extirpation concluding my First Tome thereof with the reign of King Henry the third Anno 1273. THE FIRST BOOK CHAP. I. Proposition 1. That from Adams Creation till the Law given by God to Moses and by
to cut off that ambitious usurping Antichristian Power of Roman Pontifs which opposeth exalteth it self above all that is called God and trampleth under feet both the Crowns Scepters of all Christian Kings I shall first clear and confirm it by Gods own distribution of various Gifts and powers to the Members of his mystical body the Church and members faculties of the bodies souls of men by one the self-same spirit thus emphatically expressed 1 Cor. 12 4 to 12. Now there are diversities of Gifts but the same Spirit and there are differences of administrations but the same Lord and there are diversities of operations but it is the same God which worketh all in all For to one is given by the Spirit the word of Wisdom to another the word of Knowledge by the same Spirit to another Faith by the same Spirit to another the Gifts of Healing by the same Spirit to another the working of Miracles to another Prophecy to another Discerning of spirits to another divers kinds of tongues to another the interpretation of tongues But all these worketh that one the self-same spirit dividing to every man severally as he will Compared with v. 18. 25. God hath set the members every one of them in the body natural AS IT PLEASETH HIM that there should be no Schism in the body appointing them all their distinct Offices places under one head the seat of the soul which rules and directs all the other Members in the discharge of all natural civil moral and divine actions diversified denominated only by from their various objects so stiled not the person power head or facultie by which they are all performed being but one and the same As God the great King over all the earth whose is the Kingdom and the power from whom all Kings and Potentates of the Earth derive their Jurisdiction as their Ordainer and Orderer alwayes Soveraignly ruleth in the Kingdoms of men and giveth them to whomsoever he will he removeth Kings and setteth up Kings at his pleasure by his indivisible Supream authority And as by one and the self-same power spirit he also distributes varieties of Gifts Graces Offices to the Members of his Spiritual body the Church distinct faculties to one and the same reasonable Soul in man in which they are united as vegetation sense reason memory will judgment affections c. with distinct offices places to every member in the body natural without erecting any plurality of Supream Powers parts principles heads souls in himself or them from which these diversities of Gifts and their operations issue So Kings and Soveraign Powers Gods Vicars and Ministers upon earth by that one and the same Supream Authority vested in them by God for Government of all sorts of Subjects and all sacred or civil Corporations under them whether Pagans or Christians may and do exercise all sorts of civil and Ecclesiastical Jurisdictions under them in person or by their Delegates and Substitutes without any real division in their Soveraign power continuing still one the same or erect●ng two distinct specifical Powers the one Civil the other Ecclesiastical in themselves or others ●or as their Soveraign Royal Power when exercised about Martial affairs is stiled a Military power and the Courts wherein it is judicia●●y executed are stiled Martial Courts because the matters persons in and about which it is exercised are such And when employed in matters Courts of Law and Justice is called a Civil or Legal Power and their Courts Courts of Common or Civil Law because the businesses are such And when versed in Maritine affairs or causes is called A Maritime or Admiralty Power and Admiralty Court and when in Civil matters of Equity only it is then phrased a Chancery or Equitable Power and the Court wherein it is acted a Court of Chancery So by the self-same reason when it is employed in or about divine sacred Ecclesiastical things or persons it is then stiled An Ecclesiastical power the Laws concerning them and Courts wherein these Laws powers are exercised the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws Courts without making any fraction division or distinction in the Supream power which remains still but one and the same residing intirely in the King himself alone though the execution of it be distributed to sundry subordinate Courts persons who are but the Kings meer Ministers and act or ought to act all in his Name Right without claiming any share at all in the Soveraign Regal power as vested in themselves by this distribution being thus distinguished denominated only by and from the diversity of the respective objects which make no more multiplications of nor divisions in the power it self then diversities of colours spec●es in the eyes or varieties of sounds tasts in the ears or pallate make so many distinct faculties in the Eyes Ears Pallate or as many different eyes ears pallats as there are species sounds tasts discerned by them All which doth evidently appear in this Or●ginal President of Supream Jurisdiction in Moses the first Soveraign Governour over Gods people when originally made both a Kingdom Church by Gods own institution wherein the High Priest Aaron and his Sonnes had no share at all in the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction though the Priesthood was setled on them but Moses enjoyed exercised it intirely without any Partition made by God between him and Aaron to divide these powers equally between them as Co-heirs Hostiensis and out of him Alvarus Pelagius Thomas Bozius and Marta resolve That as it is Heretical to hold duo principia Two Principles or Authors of the World So it is Heretical to hold that there are Two Vicars of God or Christ upon Earth the one in Spirituals the other in ●emorals Therefore it is of necessity that Supream Temporal and Spiritual Jurisdiction should be intirely vested in the Pope not in the Emperor or Kings who derive all their power from him and it is of necessity to believe that every creature should be subject to the Pope as well in Temporal as Spiritual things to avoid the Heresie of duo principia Dante 's the Florentine who held the contrary being coudemned by the Pope for an Heretick after his death Indeed their position That there is but one Supream Head and Fountain of all Spiritual and Regal power on Earth in every distinct Kingdom and Church is an undubitable truth as these Pontificians and Popes themselves assert But that it was ever vested in the High Priest under the Law or Popes under the Gospel but in Moses Kings and other Supream Magistrates and that they derive all their Temporal Authority from Priests Popes not they from Kings and Supream Civil Governors is a notorious untruth as this Original president of Moses and Aaron with others following will irrefragably evince This I the rather mention and have more largely insisted on because some Usurping Popes not only ground their Pontifical Crowns Priestly garments with
all their tithes offerings first-fruits for the maintenance of Gods worship Priests and Levites whom he set in their courses and respective offices as is recorded at large in Neh. cap. 5. to the end of the Book penned by himself as is conceived though a Layman and no Priest 5ly Mordecai the Jew who was next to King Ahashuerus and Esther the Queen by this Kings consent instituted and by their own Decrees confirmed the dayes and feast of Purim wherein God gave them rest and deliverance from their Enemies to be dayes of feasting and gladnesse and of sending portions to one another and gifts to the poor and that these dayes should be remembred and kept through every generation every family every province and every City and that these dayes of Purim should not fail from among the Jews nor the memorial of them from their seed And many conceive Mordecai was the penman of this Canonical History though no Priest 6ly King Nebuchadnezzer as he exercised the Supream Ecclesiastical Authority within his Empire in Erecting a golden image and commanding all his Subjects of what condition or Nation soever to fall down and worship it under pain of being cast into the fiery furnace which Decree all but Shadrac Mesac and Abednago obeyed he commanding them to be cast into this furnace for disobeying his Decree So after their miraculous preservation in and deliverance out of this furnace without any touch or smell of fire he made this memorable pious Decree That every people Nation and Language that spake any thing amisse against the God of Shadrac Mesac and Abednago shall be cut in pieces and their houses shall be made a Dunghill because there is no other God that can deliver after this sort 7ly The King of Nineveh when he heard tydings of Jonah his Message from God which he cryed in the streets thereof by Gods command Yet forty dayes and Nineveh shall be overthrown to prevent this denounced Judgement caused it to be proclaimed and published throughout Nineveh BY THE DECREE OF THE KING AND HIS NOBLES not Priests saying Let neither man nor beast herd nor flock taste anything let them not feed nor drink waeer but let man and beast be covered with sackcloth and cry mightily unto God yea let them turn every one from his evil way and from the violence that is in their hand who can tell if God will turn and repent from his fierce anger that we perish not whereupon they fasted and put on sackcloth from the greatest unto the least and the King himself was covered with sackcloth and ashes and they turned from their evil way and God pented of the evil he said he would do unto them and did it not By all these presidents recorded by the Spirit of God in Canonical Scripture it is infallibly evident That from Moses till the last King of Judah and Israel and during their Captivity yea from the very first chapter in Genesis till the last of Malachi the Supream Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in and over all persons things causes in and over the Church and people of God resided totally in and was executed by the Supream Temporal Magistrates Kings Governours and so in Pagan kingdomes too and was never so much as once seated in claimed usurped or managed by any one High Priest Priest Levite or other Ecclesiastical person whatsoever no not in divine and sacred affairs much lesse is there the least shadow of any such transcendent Jurisdiction in them over Kings and Civil Magistrates or their Subjects as all Popes and most Popish Prelates Priests too of inferiour rank now claim usurp exercise by a pretended Divine Right not to be found out or really grounded in the least on any place or president in the Old Testament from Adam till our Saviours incarnation 7ly After the Jewes return from the Babylonish Captivity though the High Priests during their unsetled estate frequent warrs with and captivity to the Romans and others usurped exercised some kind of Ecclesiastical and Civil Jurisdiction too which God never transferred to them by divine Authority nor any of their predecessors exercised under their Judges or Kings yet the Supream Civil and Ecclesiastical Authority which they frequently annexed to the Civil remained alwayes in their Chief Temporal Princes Kings whom they made their High Priests too or they made themselves both Princes Kings and High Priests by usurpation fraud and bloodshed After the extinction of the whole linage of Aaron the Kings of Syria translated the high Priestood to Simon and his family of the Asmoneans in which there were 20. high Priests as Paul Eber and others observe whereof 5. were likewise Princes and Chief Temporal Governours to wit Matthias Judas Maccabeus his Son Jonathan his Brother Simon and Hyrcanus six usurped the Crown styling themselves both Kings and High Priests as Aristobulus the 1. and 2. Alexander 1. 2. Hyrcanus and Antigonus After their Conquest by the Romans the Roman Emperours and their Deputies had the Soveraign power even in Ecclesiastical things and causes though the high Priests Princes Elders and Rulers of the people assembled in a Council in imitation of their Sanhedrim usurped to themselves both a Civil and Ecclesiastical power in religious matters having a Captain of the Temple Officers and Souldiers under them whom they sent forcibly to apprehend our Saviour Jesus Christ and bring him before them Prisoner in their Council where they examined and accused him first of blasphemy and then delivered him to Pontius Pilate the Roman Governour where he was accused by them in the Judgement hall before Pilate and at last condemned to be crucified as the Evangelists record at large By which it is evident that Pilate had the Soveraign power they having no power to put any man to death but only to put men out of the Synagogue scourge beat imprison them at their discretion After Christs death this Conventicle of Chief Priests Elders Priests Pharises and Scribes twice apprehended examined the Apostles for preaching in the Temple commanding them to preach no more in the name of the Lord Jesus which they refused to do whereupon they only threatned and let them go at first but when brought before them the second time for preaching openly in the Temple and filling Jerusalem with their doctrine notwithstanding their threats and inhibitions they then beat and let them go charging them not to speak any more in the name of Jesus Yet they were so farr from obeying their commands as Legal or them as the Supream Ecclesiastical power to which they were bound in conscence to submit that on the contrary they daily in the Temple and in every house ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ Soon after Stephen was brought before this Council and there accused of blasphemy and in the midst of his Apology stoned to death by the rude multitude Yea Paul by Letters and Authority from the High Priest made
objects about which they are exercised not in their original subject or power it self Before I proceed to the next Proposition it will be necessary to answer 4. principal Arguments Presidents out of the Old Testament before and under the Law produced by Popes and their Parasites to evidence their pretended Universal Spiritual and Temporal Jurisdiction too over the Persons Crowns Kingdoms of all Kings Princes and the Emperor himself to dispose of them at their absolute Wills as derived only from and held under them which my Chronological Method confines me here to propound and answer in their order The first is that alleged by Pope Innocent the 3d. the first Pope who interdicted the Realm of England Excommunicated King John and by force and frauds induced him to resign his Kingdoms of England and Ireland to and resume them from him under an Annual rent and to do Homage to him for them as his Vassal This Pope in an Epistle to the Emperour of Constantinople useth this Argument before Adams creation to maintain his Temporal Monarchy Moreover you ought to know that God hath made two great Lights in the firmament of heaven the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night both of them great but the other greater Ad firmamentum igitur Coeli hoc est Universalis Ecclesiae fecit Deus duo magna luminaria c. Therefore God hath made two great lights to rule the firmament of heaven to wit of the Universal Church that is he hath instituted TWO DIGNITIES quae sunt Pontificalis authoritas Regalis potestas which are The Pontifical Authority and the Regal Power But that which ruleth in the day that is in Spiritual things major est is the Greater but that which in carnal things minor is the Lesser ut quanta est inter Solem Lunam tanta inter Pontifices Reges differentia cognoscatur mark it that it might be known there is as great a difference between Popes and Kings as there is betweeen the Sunne and Moon How great this difference is this Pope defines not But some illiterate Canonists and Glossers on this Text not well versed in Astronomy resolve the Sunne to be 47. times greater then the Moon whereas Johannes Clavius and other Astronomers determine it to be no lesse then 6529. degrees greater then it and by consequence the Pope to be so many degrees greater then the Emperor by this Popes Resolution in his over-erring chaire He subjoyns If his Imperial Highnesse would prudently consider these things he would not make or permit the Patriarch of Constantinople a great and honourable Member of the Church to sit on the left side near his Footstool when as other Kings and Princes sicut debent AS THEY OUGHT reverently rise up to and assign them a venerable Chair next them on their right hand Nos autem etsi non increpando scripserimus potuissemus tamen rationabiliter increpare Mauritius de Alzedo a Spanish Doctor of the Canon Law in his highly approved and applauded Book De Praecellentia Episcopalis dignitatis concludes from this Popes Text That there is as vast a difference between the Episcopal and Regal dignity not Papal only as there is between the Sun and Moon quoting many Canonists Divines Politians and Cardinal Bellarmin himself in his Apologia pro Responsione ad JACOBUM REGEM ANGLIAE averring it Yet Pope Sixtus the 5. was so angry with Bellarmin for not asserting the direct but oblique dominion of Popes over Kings in all Temporal things in this Apology that he purposed to have burnt and totally abolished this his Book AS HERETICAL And that upon reading of Alex Carerius his Book purposely written against Bellarmins Adversus Impios Politicos Haereticos hujus Temporis branding all for impious Hereticks who denyed the Popes direct Universal Dominion in Temporal things though they acknowledged it obliquely in-order to and absolutely in all Spiritual things In this applauded Book Carerius asserts There is that proportion between the Pope and the Emperor as is between the Sun and Moon not only in Magnitude but Splendor too For as the Sun is far more excellent and eminent then the Moon seeing she borrows her splendor and light of the Sun SO IS THE POPE THEN THE EMPEROUR seeing his Authority depends on the Pope and is derived from him Our own Thomas Waldensis alluding thereunto professedly asserts against Wickliffs defence of our Kings Supream Jurisdiction over Priests and Prel●tes That Priests as well as Bishops ARE TO BE PREFERRED BEFORE ALL OTHER EARTHLY PRINCES WHATSOEVER and the Priesthood before the Kingship as far as the Flesh before the Spirit Gold before Lead the Soul before the body and Heaven BEFORE EARTH in proof whereof he spends two whole Chapters and Alvarus Pelagius above forty Articles To all which I answer 1. That God created the Sunne to Govern the day and the Moon the night by a direct divine inviolable and irrevocable Institution observed from the Creation till now when Pope Innocent and his flatterers can produce any such divine Law and constitution made either by God at the creation or by Moses for the Jews High Priests Supremacy or by Kings Princes or Christ himself under the Gospel to convince any rational Christian that Popes and Prelates are the sole Universal Governours in the Church but Kings and Emperours only in the World That Popes or Bishops were ever typified by the Sunne and Moon the Church and Earthly kingdoms by Day and Night That there is as vast a difference between the Amplitude of Jurisdiction and Splendor of Popes Bishops Kings and Emperours as is between the Grandeur and Brightnesse of the Sunne and Moon That Kings and Emperours derive all their Regal Authority Crowns Kingdoms Splendor Excellency in the world from Popes Miters or Bishops Crosiers not God himself as the Old and New Testament Paul and Peter the first pretended Bishop of Rome it self dogmatically resolve as the Moon borrows her light and splendor from the Sunne as some assert but others rationally deny being both made at once by God on the fourth day two days before Adam the first man was created and some thousands of years before Popes Prelates the Grecian or Roman Emperours were extant in the world and so could not typifie either of them as these Pontificians dream Or when they can evidence that God hath constituted Popes to rule govern and give light to the whole World by day only and to the Emperour alone not Pope by night as the Sunne and Moon govern alternis vicibus without encroaching on one the others turns when as Popes Prelates usurp the Temporal Rights of all Emperors Kings as well as Ecclesiastical all the year long I shall then subscribe these Popes and Doctors conclusions as Catholick verities whereas yet I cannot but conclude them strong Antichristian delusions lyes which few sober men will
you abundantly into THE EVERLASTING KINGDOM OF OUR LORD and Saviour Jesus Christ and our Saviours own asseverations Not every one that saith LORD LORD shall enter into the KINGDOM OF HEAVEN but he that doth the will of my father which is in heaven necessarily evince 7ly After our Saviours resurrection and ascention when God his Father highly exalted him and gave him all power both in heaven and earth his Soveraign Regality and Dominion in and over his Church and Kingdom are frequently set forth in these transcendent expressions decyphering only his Regal not Prie●tly or Prophetick Offices and Administrations Our Lord Jesus Christ who is the only Potentate the King of Kings and Lord of Lords the Prince of the Kings of the earth whom God the father of glory hath set at his own right hand in heavenly places far above all principalities and powers and might and dominion and every name that is named not only in this world but in the world to come and hath put all things under his feet and gave him to be head over all things to his Church which is his body The fullnesse of him that filleth all in all Goa hath by the extraordinary greatnesse of his mighty and glorious power delivered us from the power of darknesse and translated us into the kingdom of his dear Sonne who is the first-born of every creature For by him were all things created that are in heaven and that are in earth visible and invisible whether they be thrones or dominions or principalities or powers all things were created by him and for him And he is the head of the body the Church who is the beginning the first-born from the dead that in or among●● all things he might have the preeminence For it pleased the Father that in him all fullnesse should dwell Compared with his other Gospel titles Thou King of Saints and the united praises prostrations acclamations of the Angels with the four beasts and the 24. Elders and all the Saints and Redeemed ones before Christ who sitteth on the throne before whom they all fall worship and cast down their Crowns saying Worship and honour and thanks and glory and power be unto him that sitteth upon the throne for ever and ever worthy art thou O LORD to receive glory and honour for thou hast created all things and for thy pleasure they were and are created All these recited Texts resolve that Christ is Supream head of his Kingdom the Church not in his Priestly Propheticall capacity or office but only in his Regal and reigns in it as a King Lord not as Priest or Prophet 8ly As in the Old so in the New Testament the Church Militant as well as the Triumphant is usually stiled the Kingdom of God the Kingdom of heaven Christs Kingdom my Kingdom his Kingdom the ever lasting Kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ a Kingdom which cannot be removed c. The very Gospel it self the Gospel word and mysteries of the Kingdom yea shall the Kingdom of God and heaven it self The mighty power of God to salvation scepter of his Kingdom His Saints shall eat drink sit reign with him in his Kingdom He sits and reigns for ever in his Church as a King on a Royal throne clothed with royal Majesty and glory His rewards are all Regal A crown of righteousness of glory thrones Inheritances in his kingdom reigning with him as Kings royal Robes Honour Glory His punishments Regal Exclusion from his kingdome everlasting death infernal chaines destruction from the presence of the LORD and from the Glory of his POWER His judging of quick and dead at his appearance and comming Yea all his administrations Regal in prescribing Lawes to his Church rescuing them from the power of Satan Hell and all other Enemies protecting them from all evils treading Satan under their feet Guarding them by his Mighty power unto salvation in his heavenly kingdom compared with this fulfilling of the procies of Christs kingdom in the Old Testament thus recorded as accomplished in in the New Rev 11. 15. There were great voyces in heaven saying The Kingdomes of this world are become the Kingdom not Church of our Lord and of his Christ and he shall reign for ever and ever Rev 12. 10. And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven Now is come the Kingdom of our God and the Power of his Christ 1 Cor 15. 24 25. Then cometh the end when Christ shall have delivered up the Kingdom to God the Father when he shall have put down all rule and all authority and power for he must reign till he shall put down all enemies under his feet All and every of these Texts and considerations joyntly and severall demonstrate more clearly then the Morning Sunne That Christs Government of his Kingdom the Church under the Gospel is only Kingly and Monarchical as even Bellarmin himself and most Pontificians professe argue grounding the Popes Universal Monarchy upon it not Pontifical or Prophetical and that the Supreme Government thereof is for ever intirely annexed to his Regal not Priestly or Prophetical Office and these Offices of his united to his Regal Office as Supream not his Regal to his Sacerdotal or Propheticall as subordinate to them This being an unfallible Gospel-truth not hitherto so fully cleared and insisted on by the Oppugners or Asserters of Popes Universal Monarchy as was necessary which induced me to expatiate in its probation The second and sole Question will be Whether Christ himself did ever delegate by any Commission recorded in Sacred History all his Regal Power and Jurisdiction or any branch thereof to Saint Peter or any other Apostles Bishops Presbyters Evangelists or Ministers of the Gospel Or whether they or any of them ever justly claimed enjoyed exercised this his Royal Dominion Office Government in or over his Church on earth If yea as most Popes and their Parasites confidently affirm without the least shadow of Scripture or Verity let them produce the Commission or Texts to evidence it to every mans conscience in the sight of God and to all Kings Kingdoms Nations in the world If not as shall be evidenced in the ensuing Chapters past all contradiction I and they may then safely cry out mightily with a strong voyce as the Angel prophetically doth Babylon the great Rome is fallen is fallen and is become the habitation of Devils and the hold of every foul spirit and a cage of every unclean and hatefull Bird Come out of her my people that ye be not partakers of her sins and that ye receive not of her Plagues with violence shall she and her triple-crown'd Pontif be thrown down from the pinacle of her usurped super-transcendent power and shall be found no more at all Before I take leave of this Proposition to avoid mistakes and clear up the Truth it will be necessary to distinguish
1. The several sorts of Christs kingdomes 2ly What kind of Kingdom his Church is 3ly How and in what manner he reigns and governs in it as King and Soveraign Lord over it For the 1. It is generally agreed by Fathers Pontificians and Protestants that Jesus Christ hath a three-fold kingdom set forth in the premised Scriptures if strictly pryed into The first is a Kingdom of power and absolute Dominion which extends it self not only to all Men and Angels but likewise to all other unreasonable and inanimate Creatures whatsoever in heaven earth and under the earth yea to the very Devils themselves This Kingdom belongs unto Christ principally as he is God and the Creator of all things which comes not within the Verge of our present Discourse however Popes seem to usurp it The 2. is a Kingdom of meer purchase or Grace confined properly not to Angels or Mankind in general but to such as are truly elected called justifyed sanctified redeemed saved by Christs precious blood yet in the largest sense extended to the good Angels and all visible Members of the Church Militant professing the name and gospel of Christ as his Subjects though not actually regenerated justified sanctified saved Of this Kingdom there are two distinct parts the one Triumphant in Heaven over which no Pope or Mortals on earth can pretend the least Kingship or Dominion the other Militant upon Earth the latter in its largest extension comprehending all who bear the name of Christians whether good or bad regenerate or unregenerate This is the Kingdom of Christ of which the Pope as Christs Vicar General and Peters fictitious Successor pretends himself the Supream and sole Governor The 3d. is the Kingdom of Glory not really different from the former long since begun and encreasing every day more and more by new additions of departed Saints thereto which kingdom shall be fully compleated when all the Elect shall be gathered the Church militant united to the Church triumphant actually glorified with Christ in the kingdom of heaven For the 2d It is asserted by Fathers and most Romanists themselves as well as Protestants that this Kingdom of Christ is meerly Spiritual Not any temporal kingdom upon earth as the Jewes some grosse Milenaries Popes and their Parasites fancy over which Christ never actually reigned or shall reign as a Temporal King and Lord even in all temporal things for which we find no warrant in Scripture or Fathers Hence Thomas Waldensis himself though a grand Advocate for the Popes Supremacy layes down and proves at large these 4 Conclusions 1. Regnum temporale Judaeorum sub Jeconio excidium accepit neque amplius Judaecorum aliquis vel de jure vel de facto illud obtinuit 2. Regnum illud Judaeorum terrenum cum figura fuit Regni aeterni spiritualis Christi debuit omnino in adventu eius cessare quemadmodum et sacrificia 3. Regnum temporale quod in Prophetarum scriptis MESSIAE promissum est non est Regnum Carnale et Terrenum sed Spirituale quo per Fidem in Cordibus suorum Regnat 4. Quod ex verbis quae Christus dixit coram Pilato Tu dicis quod Rex sum ego non potest colligi quod ipse fuerit Rex Terrenus de Facto vel de Jure And Gen. 49. 10. proves That the temporal Scepter should depart from Iudah when Christ the true Shiloh came into the world Alvarus Pelagius the grand assertor of the Popes Universal Kingship in and over Christs kingdom the Church and all earthly Kings Kingdoms too informs us That the kingdom of Christ hath various acceptations in Scripture 1. It is taken for Christ himself 2ly For the sacred Scripture or Gospel of Christ 3ly For the Church of Christ divided into two Parts Militant on earth triumphant in heaven yet there are not two kingdoms in the Church but one kingdom because both end in one and there is but one King of both and one Spirit reigns in both Churches but diversly for in the Church of Travellers it reigns by faith in the Church of the blessed by open vision This Church therefore is but One for the unity of its end and beginning but it is distinguished by reason of the diversity of the state Yet this kingdom comprehends not only the Elect but also all the holy Angels for there is but one City and Kingdom of God constituted out of holy Angels and men as he proves out of Augustine and Gratian Distinct 10. 59. That Christ ever challenged or enjoyed any temporal kingdom upon earth he offers not the least proof out of Scripture or Fathers in which Cardinal Bellarmin himself confesseth he could never find that Christ had any such kingdom after most diligent search but only a kingdom in and over his Church which is not temporal but spiritual For the 3d. All antient and most modern Divines of all sorts assert that Christs immediate Government in and over his Spiritual Kingdom the Church is Spiritual not Temporal and that principally in and over the souls spirits consciences wills hearts affections of his elect Saints in which he dwells lives rules reigns by his Spirit and Grace And this his Spiritual Government is neither communicated nor transferred by Jesus Christ to any King High Priest Priest Bishop Pope or other Mortal whatsoever but resides in Christ alone the King of Saints as an incommunicable unseparable part and prerogative of his Regal not Sacerdotal or prophetical office But more of this in the two next Propositions BOOK I. CHAP. IV. That Jesus Christ as Supream King Lord Head of his Kingdom the Church whiles on Earth never claimed exercised enjoyed any Temporal Royal Jurisdiction or Magistratical Authority over any of his Subjects much lesse over Emperors Kings Kingdoms Nations or Soveraign civil Powers nor ever deprived any of them of their Crowns nor absolved their Subjects from their Allegiance nor pulled up cast down or rooted up their Kingdomes nor gave them to whomsoever he pleased Neither did he either before at or after his passion resurrection or ascention derive any such superlative Power to Saint Peter as his sole universal Vicar or Viceroy nor to any other Apostle Bishop Priest or Pope whatsoever Nor delegate his Supream Spiritual Jurisdiction over his Kingdom the Church militant in this world and all the Members of it but only committed to them the Ministerial part of his Prophetical Office his High Priestood being personal untransferrable and incommunicable unto any other of teaching and preaching the Gospel publikely to all Nations administring the Sacraments of Baptism the Lords Supper to them according to his institution and command feeding them as his Sheep with the sincere milk of his word teaching them as his Apostles Ministers Servants to obey whatever he hath commanded them beseeching intreating them as his Embassadors in his stead to be reconciled unto God and to declare pronounce them absolved
Antichristian Pride actions and Kings villain service It is St. Bernards instruction to Pope Eugenius Bonus fundus humilitas in qu●●mne aedificium spirituale constructum crescit in Templum sanctum in Domino Nulla splendidior gemma in omni praecipue conatu Summi Pontificis Quo enim celsior caeteris eo humilitate apparet illustrior in seipso And it is the determination of Thomas Waldensis a great Patron of the Popes Supremacy Petrus sicut in Apostolatu primus erat sic etiam in humilitate I wish Popes who pretend themselves to be St. Peters successors disclaiming all their premised Luciferian Ceremonies Services Exorbitances with all other Bishops and Clergy-men may from henceforth demonstrate themselves to be Christs real Disciples Apostles successors exceeding all others in humility by preaching diligence in the Ministry not in the usurpation of such Ecclesiastical Authority for which they have neither precept nor president in the Gospel as the premises demonstrate I shall cloze up this Chapter with St. Bernards words to Eugenius which I cordially desire all ambitious Popes and Prelates seriously to consider En quis es sed noli oblivisci etiam quid Quid desinas intueri quod non desiisti esse Hoc ergo consulo consideres maxime quod maximus es hominem videlicet quod natus es Tolle ergo nunc haereditaria haec perizomata ab initio maledicta Dirumpe velamen foliorum celantium ignominiam nec plagam curantium Dele fucum fugacis honoris hujus malae coloratae nitorem gloriae et unde es nude nudum consideres quia nudus egressus es de utero matris tuae Nunquid infulatus nunquid micans gemmis aut floridus sericis aut coronatus pennis aut suffarcinatus metallis Si cuncta haec veluti nubes quasdam matutinales velociter transeuntes cito pertransituras dissipes exsuffles a facie considerationis tuae occuret tibi homo nudus pauper miserabilis Homo dolens quod homo sit erubescens quod nudus sit plorans quod natus sit murmurans quod sit Homo natus ad laborem non ad honorem Homo natus de muliere ab hoc cum reatu brevi vivens tempore ideoque cum metu repletus multis miseriis ideoque cum fletu vere multis qu●● corporis animae simul Proinde si consideras quantus es cogita etiam qualis maxime Haec te sane consideratio tenet in te nec te avolare sinit nec ambulare in magnis neque in mirabilibus super te In te consistito non infra dejici non attolli supra non evadere in longius non extendi in latius Tene medium si non vis perdere modum Locus medius tutus est Medium sedes modi modus virtus Omnem extra modum habitationem sapiens exilium putat BOOK I. CHAP. V. That Gods principal end and intention in ordaining Kings and Supream Civil Magistrates in the world was not the bare external administration of Justice between man and man the protection of their Subjects from violence oppression the preservation of them in wordly peace plenty prosperity the punishment of Malefactors rewarding of well-doers encouragement of Arts Virtue Trade industry or fighting their battels in times of War against Invading Enemies though considerable parts of their Regal Office and Soveraign Authority But the advancement of Gods Honor Worship Service Glory and spiritual Kingdom whose Vice-royes they are the suppression of all Idolatry blasphemy sinne wickedness the promotion of the eternal salvation felicity of their people and to be Kings for the Lord their God by advancing his interest all they can Vpon which ground in order to effect these ends God himself as well under the Gospel as Law hath delegated the Supreme Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction only to Kings and other Soveraign Temporal Potentates not to Popes Bishops Priests who are subordinate to them as their Subjects not Copartners with them in their soveraign Ecclesiastical Authority in point of Interest nor yet in its actual execution no further then they are pleased by their Laws and Commissions to delegate it to them as their Substitutes With a specification of the chief particulars wherein this Supream Ecclesiastical Power of Christian Kings and Emperors consists THE Grand Engin by which Popes and Popish Prelats have robbed Christian Emperors Kings Princes Magistrates of their Supream Ecclesiastical Authority and monopolized it to themselves alone is this grosse Paradox and Imposture That God and Jesus Christ under the Gospel have committed to their trust care only the Administration Government of the Commonwealth and Secular not of the Church and Religious affairs of the bodies temporal estates of their Subjects not of their Souls for which they are not to give any account at all to God That the Government care reformation of the Church Religion divine Worship and their Subjects souls are by Christs institution wholly and solely delegated to Popes Bishops Priests and other Ecclesiastical persons not to Emperors Kings or Supream Civil Magistrates Upon which notorious Forgery and Mistake they have First usurped engrossed to themselves alone the Title of The Church when as the definition of a Church whether Militant Triumphant National or Provincial accords not with them but their flocks people rather and is no where given to them in Scripture and the stile of Churchmen Ecclesiastical sacred persons Clergy-men which Titles they deny to all others not in sacred Orders stiling them The world secular persons the Laity popularity prophane vulgar unconsecrated persons as if they were no members of the Church when as the Scripture stiles them the Church Members of Christs body the Church and so Church-men Ecclesiastical persons as well as Bishops Priests Saints sanctifyed holy consecrated persons yea an holy Priesthood being made such by their very calling the Sacrament of Baptism and the Lords Supper their internal sanctification by Gods holy Spirit and washing away of their sins by the bloud of Christ far nobler consecrations then their bare Clerical Orders which no Protestants esteem a Sacrament and St. Peter himself defines them to be Gods Clergy Heritage as well as much as any Popes Prelates Priests how great soever 2ly They have forged two distinct incompatible Swords Jurisdictions The one Ecclesiastical peculiar to Popes Bishops Priests and those they stile Ecclesiastical persons not belonging to Emperors Kings or secular Princes The other Temporal exercised about secular things and affairs belonging only or principally to Emperors Kings and Secular powers yet subordinate to the command of Ecclesiastical persons when they shall require or desire its protection or assistance to enforce their Ecclesiastical censures 3dly That every Pope Bishop Priest as he is an ecclesiastical person is as far above all Emperors Kings Secular persons of what quality or dignity soever as the soul is above the body heaven
Gods primitive instituting the First-born of every Family and Kings themselves before the Law to be not only Kings but Priests too as Melchisedech and others were And the very Romans Grecians with other Pagan Nations creating their Kings Emperors by the very light of Nature to be their high Priests likewise as I have formerly proved by sundry Testimonies and Alvarus Pelagius Lyra in Gen. 14. Numb 3. 12. 8. 16. Bellarmin De Romano Pontifice with other Romanists Bishop Carlton and sundry Protestants attest with one consent Because the care of Religion and Gods worship the instruction edification salvation and eternal felicity of all their Subjects souls did principally belong to them as a part of or appendant to their Regal dignity 8ly This truth is at large demonstrated by all the particulars I have formerly insisted on in the Second Chapter relating to Moses Joshua David Solomon Asa Jehoshaphat and Josiah as likewise of the Kings of Assyria Cyrus Darius Artaxerxes Nebuchadnezzar and the King of Niniveth which I shall not repeat All Kings and supream Magistrates under the Gospel having the self-same authority charge trust to promote preserve the purity syncerity of Gods worship suppress Idolatry Blasphemy Heresy all sorts of sins against the first and second Tables and indeavour the instruction salvation and eternal welfare of their Subjects as they had under the Law the ends uses grounds of Kingly and Magistratical institution Government under the Gospel continuing still the same as they were before and under the Law and being all moral perpetual not ceremonial 9ly This is most perspicuous by this precept given to all Kings by the King of Kings Psal 2. 10 11 12. Be wise now therefore O ye Kings be instructed ye Judges of the earth Serve the Lord with fear and rejoyce unto him with trembling Kisse the Son lest he be angry and ye perish from the right way Which they cannot do as Kings unlesse they command their Subjects to do it likewise Compared with these prophecies concerning Christian Kings under the Gospel Psalm 72. 2 10. The Kings of Tarshish and of the Isles shall bring presents the Kings of Sheba and Seba shall offer gifts Yea all Kings shall fall down before him and by their example and Regal authority all Nations shall serve him Psal 138. 4 5. All the Kings of the earth shall praise thee O Lord when they shall hear the words of thy mouth yea they shall sing in the praises of the Lord for great is the glory of the Lord. Isay 49. 22 23. Behold I will lift up my hand to the Gentiles and set up my standard to the people c. And Kings shall be thy Nursing-Fathers and Queens thy Nursing mothers they shall bow to thee with their faces toward the earth and lick up the dust of thy feet Kings shall see and arise Princes also shall worship Compared with Isay 41. 1 2. c. 52. 15 c. 60. 1 10 11 16. c. 62. 5. The Gentiles shall come to thy Light and Kings to the brightnesse of thy rising The Kings of the sons of Strangers shall come unto thee unto thee the rulers of the Gentiles and their Kings shall be brought c. And Psal 148. 11 12. Praise the Lord from the earth ye Kings of the earth in the first place and then by their examples and edicts Princes and all Judges of the earth both young men and maidens old men and children let them praise the name of the Lord this being the prime end of their creation and Gods instituting Kings Princes and Judges in the earth both before and under the Gospel 10ly This is most persp●cuous by the example of Jesus Christ himself the King of Kings of whom as Davis Solomon and other forecited Kings of Judah were types under the Law so himself is the president pattern for all Christian Kings under the Gospel Now the principal end scope of the Kingly Authority power 〈◊〉 of Jesus Christ is the propagation of Gods Kingdom Gospel worship glory the destruction of the Kingdoms of Satan sinne and all kind of wickednesse error heresie 〈◊〉 and the conversion sanctification salvation eternal beatitude of his Subjects souls that they may reign for ever with him in his heavenly kingdom in endlesse felicity Therefore it is and ought to be the principal end aym office duty of all Christian Kings who are his Viceroyes and ought to imitate his example 11ly This I shall more specially and peculiarly evidence by some few texts and examples 1. By Gen. 18. 18 19. Abraham shall surely become a great and mighty Nation and all the Nations of the earth shall be blessed in him For I know him that he will command his children are houshold after him that they shall keep the way of the Lord to do Iustice and Iudgement that the Lord may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken Abrahams 〈◊〉 care being then a mighty Prince over his great and numerous family and to become a great and mighty Nation was to instruct and command his children and houshold after him to keep the way of the Lord that so they and all the Nations of the earth might be blessed in him 2ly By the whole Book of Deuteronomy especially ch 4. 5. 6. 26. 28. to 34. where Moses the supream Governour of Gods own people Israel with all earnestnesse exhorts and presseth them to keep do and observe all Gods commandements judgements and statutes that they might fear the Lord their God and love and serve him with all their heart and with all their soul and with all their might they and their sons and their sons 〈◊〉 all the dayes of their life that it might be well with them and their children after them for ever c. This day the Lord thy God hath commanded thee to do these statutes and judgements thou shalt therefore keep and do them with all thy heart and with all thy soul thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God and to walk in his wayes and to keep his statutes and his commandements and his judgements and to hearken unto his voyce And the Lord hath avouched thee to be his people and that thou shouldest keep all his commandements and to make thee high above all Nations which he hath made in praise and in name and in honor and that thou mayest be an holy people unto the Lord thy God as he hath spoken This is the chief end of Gods instituting Kings and Magistrates in the earth to make their subjects an holy people to the Lord their God 3ly By Joshua his last Speech and Exhortation to the children of Israel and their chief Heads and Officers before God Josh 23. 24. where he severally charges them To fear the Lord and to serve him in sincerity and truth to put away the gods which their fathers served on the other side of Jordan and in Egypt and to serve the
ut mei providentiam fieri et causam meam examinari praecipiatis Ego enim a puero eram in Monasterio dispensator omnium rerum nihil de Episcopatu cogitans neque rogans quemquam hujus gratia dignitatis Dum ergo essem in Monachorum providentia constitutus adstitit mihi repentè illius temporis Metropolitanus Episcopus cum provincialibus Episcopis me Paros ordinavit Episcopum de qua in scriptis dejectus est Athanasius ex gravissim is capitibus accusatus nec volens pro illatis sibi criminibus reddere rationem qui aliquando quidem Episcopatum repudiabat Frequenter vero citationes vocantium cum ad Synodorum judicium declinabat Is enim in Ephesina Synodo ex praecepto Alexandrini praesulis in meam Ecclesiam superingressus est ego praeter voluntatem meam ordinatus expulsus sum Et haec quidem ecta sunt habitatoribus illius civitatis dolentibus lugentibus meam expulsionem Supplico igitur et vestrae potentiae ut jubeatis meam causam sub praesentia vestrae pietatis examinari et placitum terminum dari ut et ego cum cunctis aliis consuetas orationes pro perpetua vestra potentia semper exolvam Piissimi atque victores Principes Salvianus Episcopus dictata et subscripsi et offero vestrae pietati Baeronicianus vir devotissimus Secretarius divini Consistorii legit This Cause and all the proceedings in it in two former Councils of Ephesus and Antioch were fully heard read and considered and at last referred by the Judges themselves to Maximus Bishop of Antioch to settle Salvianus in the mean time being to enjoy the Title of the Bishop of Paros and receive maintenance out of it I find in Evagrius but not in the Acts of this Council a like Petition from Eusebius Bishop of Dorileum beginning thus It behoveth your Majesties most noble and puissant Emperors to provide carefully for the quieting of all your loving Subjects and to defend from injuries all other men but especially the sacred Senate of Priesthood And herein the divine Godhead which hath granted unto you the rule and domination of the whole world is truly honored wherefore seeing the Christian faith and we our selves also have been oppressed and unjustly molested by extreme wrong by Dioscorus the most Reverend Bishop of the most Noble City of Alexandria we are now come unto your wonted Clemency to crave Iustice at your hands Then complaining of his and Flavianus Bishops of Constantinoples unjust depositions from their Bishopricks in the Council of Ephesus by the power and unjust practises of Dioscorus and accusing him of Blasphemy and Heresie he Petitions the Emperors on his bended knees that his Petition might by his Letters be referred to the Council that both their doings might therein by justly examined and indifferently heard before them and then certified to their Imperial Majesties to do them right By all which Petitions even of these Bishops themselves the Soveraign Authority of Christian Emperors and Kings in and over all Ecclesiastical causes persons and in matters of faith religion and final Right of Appeals to them from unjust Judgements given not only by Bishops but General Councils in the very case of deprivation of Bishops for Heresie and Ecclesiastical offences is so clearly set forth by words and actions that nothing can be more full and satisfactory The Emperor Leo by his Letters to all Metropolitans in the very beginning of his reign confirmed the Orthodox faith professed heretofore by his Predecessors yet notwithstanding the Heretical faction at Alexandria in the absence of Dionysius Captain of the Garrison elected Timotheus Aelius an heretick and oppugner of the Council of Chalcedon for their Bishop and barbarously slew Proterius their orthodox Bishop thrusting Timotheus into his place whereupon all the Bishops of Aegypt and Clergy of Alexandria by a supplicatory Epistle complained to this Emperor Leo the 1. of this outrage desiring Justice and redresse wherein they relate A superna gratia modo divinitus condonatus justè non cessas pro communi utilitate cogitare post Deum cunctorum venerabilis Imperator Quapropter omnis fortitudo verborum tuis vincitur actibus Nuper enim electus a Deo et purpura exornatus optimum judicasti propositum tuum magnum ostendere quem ipse omnium Creator elegit benignius initiis largitatem remunerando bonorum quando repentè in ipso principio voce vestra ex scripto procedente piissimo ad Sanctissimos Metropolitanos Episcopos inerumpibilem Ecclesiae Catholicae crepidinem roborasti et priorum omnium piiss imorumque Principum constituta pro Orthodora religione firmasti Insuper ea quae nuper a sanctae memoriae Martiano Principe nostro sancita sunt consona decernente nihil 〈◊〉 estis mercati quam pacem omnium stabilitatem reipublicae fraenantes linguas eorum qui adversus Ecclesias consurgunt et blasphemant Deum aut in cum quecunque modo delinquunt Injuria namque Dei manifesta est haereticorum alscindentium semetipsos à recta ●ide licentia Quapropter hoc optime sciens ven●rabilis Imperator maligni prolem existere insidiantes quieti sanctarum Christi semper Ecclesiarum earumque immutilatam pacem consistere non scientes recte provi●●●●rum tuam studuisti mox adhiberi ei per omnia resistentem QUOD EST OPUS PIISSIMORUM PRINCIPUM let Popes and Prelates observe it pro orthodo●a wfide pugnantium et resistentium 〈◊〉 malis extrinsecus venientibus ET ANIMABUS FIDELIUMADVERSANTIBUS Hunc igitur animum te possidente religiosum et tutorem humani generis tantumque circa Christum studium demonstrantem adimus ex nos importabilia mala passi licet peccatores Christi Pontifices Then relating their grievances the election of Timotheus the murder of Proterius the growth of heresie opposing the orthodox faith and violent thrusting them out of their Churches at large to the Emperor thus pray redresse from him as their only Supream Ecclesiastical Judge and Protector Sanciri praecipite ut expulsi sine calumnia ad suas Ecclesias in pace celebrantes pro vestra pietate solennes orationes cum quiete servari urbemque pariter et in ea sanctas Ecclesias constitutas ad Christi gloriam et salutem et perpetuitatem vestrae Christianissimae pietatis Literas dirigentes pro his quae poscimus ad magnificentissimum Dionysium Ducem necnon ad singularum provinciarum Iudices not to the Pope or any Clergy-men quatenus ea quae a vestra mansuetudine sunt sancita et servantur et effectui contradantur Hereupon this pious Emperor presently sent abroad his Letters to all the Cities Bishops and Churches under his Empire wherein he declares Votum quidem mei pietatis fuit universas orthodoxorum sanctas Ecclesias necnon et Civitates sub Romano Imperio constitutas maxima frui quiete nihilque contingere quod possit earum statum tranquillitatemque turbare c. Then
humili prece deposcimus ne nos nostros satis invitos ad id cogatis convertere quod in quinta Universali Synodo a sede Apostolica ut in Apostolicis literis praecipue autem in Synodica B. Gregorii ad quatuor Patriarchas in aliis ejus Epistolis una cum quatuor praecedentibus legimus collandatum atque susceptum invenitur nobis tenendum Quod adhuc nostris literis ad exemplum inserere no luimus donec sciamus si duritiam mandatorum vestrorum erga nos aliter ad benignitatem inflectere poterimus Quia quod ex Apostolicae sedis nomine secundum sanctarum Scripturarum tramitem praedicationemque majorum orthodoxorum decreta scribuntur sequendum tenendum non ignoravimus et quod secus a quoquam fuerit compilatum sive confictum non solum respuendum sed et redarguendum esse cognoscimus Si denique aliter quam nos vos decuerat reverendistimae paternitati vestrae rescribendo factus sum insipiens vos me coegistis Petimus autem omnipotentem Dominum ut inspiret cordi vestro sic nos benigne tractare quatenus ulterius nobis non sit necesse vobis ita rescribere Sed ut cupimus in veneratione Apostolorum Apostolico Pontificio vestro humiliter ac devote colla corda submittere Deus omnipotens ad honorem salutationem atque exaltationem sanctae suae Ecclesiae vos per multa annorum curricula conservare dignetur Domine sanctissime reverendissime pater in Domino Hincmarus Archbishop of Rhemes with his Suffragans and four other Archbishops of France with their Suffragans by command of this King Charles in their respective Synods compiled several Canons and Ecclesiastical decrees which they presented to the King and his Nobles to confirm and ratify Upon perusal they finding some of them entrenching upon the Kings prerogative the Priviledges of the Nobles and peoples Liberties and giving overmuch power to the Bishops by enlarging their Ecclesiastical Jurisdictions the Nobles would by no means assent unto them but only selected 21. out of 88. of their Canons rejecting all the rest which 21. were confirmed by King Charles and published in his Name with this Title a Karoli Hludovici Imp. F. Capitula printed in b Fredericus Lindebregus with this preface to them Haec quae sequuntur Capitula excerpta sunt a Domino Rege Carolo Domini Hludovici Imp. Filio Principibus ejus ex Capitulis quae anno DCCCXLVI ediderant Episcopi in Synodis Wenilo scilicet cum Suffraganeis suis Guntboldus cum Suffraganeis suis Ursmarus cum Suffraganeis suis Hincmarus cum Suffraganeis suis Amalo cum Suffraganeis suis et oblata sunt some time after eidem Principi sicut ipse jusserat collecta ad relegendum in Sparnaco Villa Remensis Ecclesiae Et quia factione qudrundam motus est animus ipsius Regis contra Episcopos dissidentibus regni sui Primoribus ab eorundem Episcoporum admonitione et remotis ab eodem Concilio Episcopis ex omnibus illis Capitulis Haec tantum observanda et complacenda sibi collegerunt et Episcopis scripto tradiderunt dicentes Non amplius de eorum Capitulis acceptasse quam ista et ista se velle cum Principe observare A memorable clear Evidence 1. That no Ecclesiastical Canons and Constitutions made by Archbishops and Bishops in their Synods were obligatory or valid unlesse first examined approved by Kings and their Nobles to whom they were usually presented for their examination ratified if approved by them 2ly That the Nobles as well as Kings and Emperors had a negative voice in Councils and Synods to reject Canons or Constitutions when made and drawn up in them by the Bishops 3ly That they rejected such of them as they deemed prejudicial to the Crown their own or the peoples Priviledges or enlarged the Bishops Ecclesiastical Authority beyond its due antient limits which the Bishops were over prone to amplify in most of their Synods as well as Popes that so they might tyrannize over Kings Nobles and Laymen at their pleasures Anno 876. there was a General Synod as the Romanists stile it assembled at Constantinopl consisting of 373. Bishops wherein these particulars are observable 1. That it was summoned by the Emperor Basilius his industry about the restitution of Ignatius to the See of Constantinople of which he was deprived by Michael the Emperor and to remove Photius intruded into it in his room 2ly That Pope Adrian the 2d writ to this Emperor importuning him to summon this Council 3dly That this Pope sent his Legates to it 4ly That this Emperor Basilius though he advanced the Popes Supremacy over the Greek Church in a great measure in this Council yet in exordio Synodi ita locutus est Cum divina et benignissima providentia NOBIS GUBERNACULA UNIVERSALIS NAVIS Ecclesiae COMMISISSET not to the Pope or Patriarch of Constantinople the two competitors for this trust omne studium arripu●●us et ante publicas curas Ecclesiasticas Ecclesiasticas dissolvere et procellas quae per multos annos ex invidia odientis bonum Satanae expansae sunt in stabilem tranquilitatem per meliorem quandam provisionem transferre c. Igitur iis quae prava vobis omnibus esse videbantur et aspera in vias planas imperatoria diligentiaet studio nostro translatis commonemus et hortamur omnes vos fratres ut cum multo pondere et reverentia conveniatis ad sanctam hanc et universalem Synodum tanquam ad communem et universis aptam atque sine labore medelam nullam vitiosam motionem vel affectum ferentes nec ad contentiosam voluntatem respicientes sed potius vinci bene quam vincere periculose ac injuste sitientes Sic enim unusquisque qui vitiatum interiorem patitur hominem sanitatem recipiet et aeternam salutem percipiet c. 5ly That Photius the Patriarchand his followers summoned to and entring into this Synod Actio 4. 5. would give no answer at all to the Questions demanded of them by the Popes Legats nor acknowledge their authority wherupon the Legates spake thus to the Princes Principibus qui jussu Basi●i Imperatoris interfuerunt Interrogate illos magni fortissimi gloriosissimi Principes an illi qui introterunt faciunt libellum hoc That Actio 7. Bahanis Patricius et Praepositus dixit ad Synodum Photio praesente cum Episcopis suis Sanctus Imperator noster vult facere also cutionem ad istos per me indignum servum suum Whereupon Sanctissimi Vicarii senioris Romae ●●ixerunt Sicut jubet Imperium ejus Bahanis dixit Hortatorie alloquitur vos Imperator Homines 〈…〉 estis c. Episcopi Photii dixerunt Deus custodiat Imperatorem nostrum Verbum petivimus impunitatis ut diceremus negocia nostra cum fiducia non accepimus according to the Emperors promise quantum ergo habemus loqui c.
ut resipiscant ab infidelitate et transeant ad fidem Hoc enim est bonum coram salvatori nostro Deo qui vult omnes homines salvos fieri ad agnitionem veritatis venire Especially Kings and Princes the principal instruments to draw others to salvation and the knowledge of the truth by their Examples and Edicts Pope Symnachus being accused of Adultery and other horrid facts to Theodoricus King of Italy Sancta Synodus apud urbent Romanam ex praecepto Gloriosissimi Regis Theodorici diversis ●●regionibus congregata in Christi nomine est this King not the Pope summoning this Council even in Rome it self Cum ex diversis Provinciis ad urbem Romam convenire Sacerdotes Regia praecepisset authoritas ut de his quae de venerabili Papa Symmacho Apostolici sedis praesul ab adversariis ejus dicebantur impingi sanctum Concilium judicaret ●egitime Liguriae Aemiliae vel Venetiarum Episcopis consulendi Regem incubuit necessitas concerning this accusation Who coming into the Kings presence respondit praefatus Rer piissimus bonae conversationis affectu plura ad se de Papae Symmachi actibus horrenda fuisse perlata et in Synodo oportere si vera esset inimicorum ejus objectio judicatione constare Whereupon the Examination of his crimes being referred to this 4th some reckon it the 3d. Synod held at Rome and that by the Popes desire to purge himself as well as by the Kings precept the Pope entred into the Synod et de evocatione Synodali ●lementissimo Regi gratias retulit et rem desiderii sui evenisse testatus est Upon his accusation to the King he was suspended ab officio beneficio by this King untill he had purged himself At his first appearance before the Council he complained of this his suspension as illegal being not made by the Council but out of it and prayed to be readmitted and restored by the Council et ut omnia quae per suggestiones inimicorum suorum a parte Cleri vel aliquibus laicis amiserat potestati ejus legaliter ab honorabili Concilio redintegrarentur seu redderenter et tanti loci Praesul regulariter prius statui pristino redderetur et tunc non ante veniret ad causam et si ita recte videretur accusantium propositionibus responderet Digna res visa est maximo sacerdotum numero quae mereretur effectum decernere tamen aliquid Synodus sine Regia notitia non praesumpsit Whereupon the Synod sent to the King to know his pleasure herein Sed suggestionibus per legatorum negligentiam non meruit secundum vota responsum But contrary to the Synods desire and opinion Iussus est Regis praeceptionibus Papa Symmachus ante Patrimonii vel Ecclesiarum quas amiserat receptionem cum impugnatoribus suis in disceptatione confligere qui potestatis suae privilegia et quae pro conscientiae quantum juste aestimamus emendatione submiserat nec hac voluit vice resumere Whereupon it was thought meet that the Libel prepared against the Pope by his accusers qui quotidie seditionibus appellabant should be received by the Synod Which being received accordingly and read there appeared two things in it which seemed either false or repugnant to their Ecclesiastical power The one that his Crimes whereof he stood accused apud Regiam constitit notitiam were pending before the Kings own conusans which was false he having referred him to the Council The second that they could prove him guilty of the Crimes objected by his servants addentes ut ipse mancipia traderet quibus quantum illi disserebant posset in judicatione superari Quae res Canonibus ipsis publicis erat legibus inimica c. Et dam inter ista quae essent facienda tractabatur praefatus Papa ut causam diceret occurrebat Qui veniens abirruentibus turbis aemulorum suorum ita tractatus est ut multis Presbyteris qui cum ipso erant per cadem ipsam mortis fuisset occasio quod probat recentium adhuc vestigia vulnerum nisi illustris vir Comes Alegerius sublimes viri Gutela Vedecelsus Majores domus Regiae perspexissent quos secum unde egressus fuerat ad beati Petri Apostoli septa convexerat Upon these tumults and confusions the Synod reported the whole series of their proceedings to the King as Supream Judge iterum Nos ad Iustitiam contulimus principalem scientes vivinitare propitia regere Dominum quem ad gubernacula Ita●iae ipse providerat They informed the King Saepe nominatum Papam post caedem cui subjacuerat cum suis si voluntatem rursus haberet ereundi ad judicium fuisse commonitum but that he could not canonically purge himself without great dangers and that by reason of the tumults of his accusers who resisted justice he could not be compelled to answer against his will Ad haec serenissimus Rex taliter Deo adspirante respondit in Synodali esse arbitrio in tanto negotia sequenda praescribere nec aliquid ad se praeter reverentiam de Ecclesiasticis negotiis pertinere committens etiam potestati Pontificum ut sive propositum vellent audire negotium sive nollent quod magis putarent utile deliberarent dummodo venerandi provisione Concilii par in Civitate Romana Christianis omnibus redderetur Whereupon the Synod by vertue of this reference from the King thought best to proceed no further in the examination of the fact but to referre the cause to Gods judgement acquainting the Roman Senate with their resolutions and desiring them to consider quanta inconvenienter et praejudicialiter in hujus negotii principio contigissent That all men are sinners and have need of Gods mercy and that the examining of this cause would do more prejudice and dishonor then good to the Church Wherefore juxta mandatum Principis non discuterent but referr the whole cause to God the Judge of secret things and so acquitted him from the Articles exhibited against him as to men Vnde secundum Principalia praecepta quae nostrae hoc tribuunt potestati quicquid Ecclesiastici inter sacram Vrbem Romae vel foris Iuris est reformamus totamque causam Dei judicio reservantes universos hortamur ut sacram communionem sicut res postulat ab eo percipiant Dei animarum suarum meminerint quia ipse amator pacis est ipse Pax est qui monet Pacem meam do vobis c. From these memorable proceedings against this Pope it is most evident 1. That the Pope in this age was subject and submitted himself to the Judicature not only of the Emperor but of Thedoricus the Gothish King of Italy who removed Symmachus and Laurentius from the Papacie contending for it and placed Peter Altinat therin to appease the Schism till the cause between them was heard and to a Council of Bishops even for scandalous crimes objected against him 2ly