Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n
Text snippets containing the quad
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
A34331
|
The Connexion being choice collections of some principal matters in King James his reign, which may serve to supply the vacancy betwixt Mr. Townsend's and Mr. Rushworth's historical collections.
|
England and Wales. Sovereign (1603-1625 : James I)
|
1681
(1681)
|
Wing C5882; ESTC R2805
|
57,942
|
188
|
alienate the same from his own Crown and Dignity to any Spiritual Potentates or Rulers whatsoever within or without his Dominions 4. We hold that though the Kings of this Realm were no members of the Church but very Infidels yea and persâcutors of the truth that yet those Churches that shall be gathered together within these Dominions ought to acknowledge and yield the said Supremacy unto them and that the same is not tyed to their Faith and Christianity but to their very Crown from which no subject or subjects have power to separate or dis-joyn it 5. We hold that neither King nor Civil State are bound in matter of Religion to be subject and obedient to any Ecclesiastical person or persons whatsoever no further then they shall be able to convince their Consciences of the truth thereof out of the word of God yea we think they should sin against God if they should ground their Religion or any part or parcel thereof upon the bare Testimony or Judgment of any man or of all the men in the world 6. We hold that no Churches or Church-officers have power for any crime whatsoever to deprive the King of the least of his Royal prerogatives whatsoever much less to deprive him of his Supremacy wherein the height of his Royal Dignity consists 7. We hold that in all things concerning this life whatsoever the Civil Jurisdiction of Kings and Civil States excelleth and ought to have the preheminence over the Ecclesiastical and that the Ecclesiastical neither hath nor ought to have any power in the least degree over the bodies lives goods or Liberty of any person whatsoever muchless of the Kings and Rulers of the earth 8. We hold that Kings by vertue of their supremacy have power yea also that they stand bound by the Law of God to make Laws Ecclesiastical such as shall tend to the good ordering of the Churches in their Dominions and that the Churches ought not to be disobedient to any of their Laws so far as in obedience unto them they do not that which is contrary to the word of God 9. We hold that though the King should command any thing contrary to the Word unto the Churches that yet they ought not to resist him therein but only peaceably to forbear obedience and sue unto him for grace and mercy and where that cannot be obtained meekly to submit themselves to the punishment 10. We hold that the King hath power by vertue of his Supremacie to remove out of the Churches whatâoever he shall discerne to be practiced âherein not agreeable to the word of God and if he shall see any defect either in the worship of God or Ecclesiastical discipline he ought by his Royal Authority and power to procure and force the redress thereof yea though it be without the consent and against the will of the Ecclesiastical Governours themselves 11. We hold that the King hath as much Authority over the body goods and affairs of Ecclesiastical persons as of any other of his Subjects whatsoever and that by his Authority he may force them not only to all Civil Duties belonging unto them but also unto all Ecclesiastical afflicting as great punishment upon them for the neglect thereof as upon any other of his subjects 12. We hold that he hath power to remove out of the Churches all scandalous Schismatical and Hereticaâ Teachers and by all due severity oâ Laws to repress them 13. We hold that all Ecclesiastical Laws made by the King not repugnant to the word of God do in some sort bind the Consciences of his subjects and that no subject ought to refuse obedience to any such Law 14. We hold that the King onely hath power within his dominions to convene Synods and General Assemlies of Ministers and by his Authority Royal to ratifie and give life and strength to their Canons and Constitutions without whose Ratification no man can force any Subject to yield any obedience unto the same 15. We hold that though the King may force the Churches to be subject and obedient unto him and to be members of the common-wealth yet that the Churches severally or joyntly have no power to force him or any subject against their will to any service unto them or to any Religious duty whatsoever no nor so much as to âe a member of any Church 16. We hold that the King ought âot to be subject to the Ecclesiastiâal censures of any Churches Churchâfficers or Synods whatsoever but onây to that Church and those officers of âis own Court and household unto âhom in reverence of their Religiân and of the Spiritual graces of God âe sees shining in them he shall of âis own free will subject and commit âhe Regiment of his Soul in whom âhere can be no suspicion or fear of any âartialitie or unjust or rigorous dealââg against him 17. We hold that if any Ecclesiâstical Governours call them by what âame you will shall abuse their Ecâlesiastical authority in the execution âf their censures upon any man whatââever That the King and Civil States ânder him have power to punish âhem severely for it much more if âhey shall abuse it upon the Supreme Majesty himself 18. If the King subjecting himself to ãâã Spiritual Guids and Governours shall afterwards refuse to be governed and guided by them according to the word of God and living in no torious sin without repentance shall willfully contemn and despise all their holy and Religious censures that theâ these Governours are to refuse to administer the holy things of God unto him and to leave him to himself and to the secret Judgment of God and wholly to resigne and give over that Spiritual Charge and tuition over him which by calling from God and the King they did undertake and morâ then this they may not do And after all this we hold that he still retaineth and ought to retaine entirely and solidly all that aforesaid Supreme power and authority over the Churches oâ his Dominion in as ample a manner as if he were the most Christian Prince in the world 19. We acknowledge King James to be our onely lawful Soveraign and unto him to be due all the aforesaid Supremacy and we renounce and abjure all Opinions Doctrines Practices whatsoever repugnant or Contrary to âhe same as Anabaptistical and Anti-âhristian And wish they may be seâerely punished 20. We hold that the King ought âot to give his Authority away or to âommit it to any Ecclesiastical person âr persons whatsoever but ought himââlf to be as it were Arch-bishop and General overseer of all the Churches âithin his Dominions and ought to ââploy under him his Honourable Councel his Judges Lievtenants Juâices Constables and such like to oâersee the Churches in the several diâisions of their Civil Regiments visitââg them and punishing by their Civil âower whatsoever they shall see aâiss in any of them especially in the âulers and Governours 21. We hold it utterly unlawful âr any Christian Churches
Nicene Creed and Athanasius Creed contain not a profession of the true Christian Faith or that he will not profess his Faith according to the same Creeds that Christ is not God of God begotten not made but begotten and made that there are no Persons in the God-head That Christ was not God from Everlasting but began to be God when he took flesh of the Virgin Mary that the World was not made by Christ that the Apostles teach Christ to be man only that there is no Generation in God but of Creatures that this Assertion God to be made Man is contrary to the Rule of Faith and monstrous Blasphemy That Christ was not before the fullness of time Except by Promise that Christ was not God otherwise than an anoynted God that Christ was not in the form of God Equal with God that is in substance of God but in Righteousness and giveing Salvation that Christ by his Godhead wrought no Miracle that Christ is not to be prayed unto wherein he the said Bartholomew Legatt hath before the said Reverend Father maintained his said most dangerous and Blasphemous Opinions as appeareth by many his Confessions publickly made and acknowledged for which his Damnable and Heretical Opinions he is by Difinitive sentence by the said Reverend Father John Bishop of London with the Advice and Consent of other Reverend Bishops Learned Divines and others Learned in the Laws assisting in Judgment Justly adjudged pronounced and declared to be an obstinate and incorrigible Heretick and is left by them under the sentence of the great Excommunication and therefore as a Corrupt Member to be Cutt off from the Chruch of Chist and society of the Faithful and is to be by our secuâar Power and Authority as an Heretick punished as by the Significavit of the said Reverend Father in God the said Bishop of London bearing date at London the third day of March in the year of our Lord 1611. In the ninth year of our Reign and remaining in our Court of Chancery more at large appeareth And although the said Bartholomew Legatt hath since the said sentence pronouced against him been often very Charitably moved and exhorted as well by the said Bishop as by many grave and Learned Divines to disswade revoke and remove him from the said Blasphemous and Heretical Opinions yet he arrogantly and willfully persisteth and continueth in the same We therefore according to our Regal Function and Office minding the Execution of Justice in this behalf and to give Example to others lest they should attempt the like hereafter Have determined by the Assent of our Councel to will and require and do hereby Authorize and Require you our said Chancellor Immediatly upon the receipt hereof to award and make out under our great Seal of England our Writ of Execution according to the Tenor in these Presents ensuing and these Presents shall be your sufficient Warrant and Discharge for the same The WARRANT THE King to the Sheriffs of London greeting Whereas the Reverend Father in Christ John Bishop of London hath signified unto us that when he in a certain business of Heretical pravity against one Bartholomew Legatt our Subject of the City of London of the said Bishop of Londons Diocese and Jurisdiction rightly and lawfully proceeding by Acts enacted drawn proposed and by the Confessions of the said Bartholomew Legatt before the said Bishop Judicially made and acknowledged hath found in the said Bartholomew Legatt very many wicked Errours false opinions Heresies and cursed Blasphemies and Impious Doctrines expresly contrary and repugnant to the Catholick Faith and Religion and the Holy word of God knowingly and maliciously and with a pertinacious and obdurate plainly Incorrigible mind to believe hold affirme and publish the same Reverend Father the Bishop of London with the advice and consent as well of the Reverend Bishops and other Divines as also of men Learned in the Law in Judgment sitting and assisting thâ same Bartholomew Legatt by hiâ Definitive Sentence hath pronounced decreed and declared to be an Obdurate Contumacious and incorrigible Heretick and upon that occasion as a stubborn Heretick and rotten contagious Member to be cut off from the Church of Christ and the Communion of the Faithful whereas the Holy Mother Church hath not further to do and prosecute in this part the same Reveren'd Father hath left the aforesaid Bartholomew Legatt as a Blasphemous Heretick to our secular power to be punished with Condign punishment as by the Letters Patents of the said Reverend Father in Christ the Bishop of London in this behalf above made hath certified unto us in our Chancery We therefore as a Zealot of Justice and a defendor of the Catholick Faith and willing to maintaine and defend the holy Church and Rights and liberties of the same and the Catholick Faith and such Heresies and Errours every where what in us lyeth to Root out and extirpate and to punish with Condign punishment such Hereticks so Convicted and deeming that such an Heretick in form aforesaid Convicted and Condemned according to the Laws and Customs of this our Kingdom of England in this part occasioned ought to be Burned with Fire We do Command you that the said Bartholomew Legatt being in your Custody you do Commit publickly to the Fire before the people in a publick and open place in West-Smithfield for the Cause aforesaid and that you cause the said Bartholomew Legatt to be really burned in the same Fire in detestation of the said Crime for the manifest Example of other Christians lest they slide into the same fault and this that in no wise you omit under the peril that shall follow thereon witness c. Anno Dom. 1611. An. Reg. Jac. 9. The Commission and Warrant for the Condemnation and Execution of Edward Wightman at Lichfield 1611. with an Account of his Heretical Opinion âAmes by the Grace of God King of England Scotland France and âeland Defender of the Faith c. To our Right Trusty and Right âell-beloved Councellour Thomas âord Ellesmere our Chancellour of ângland Greeting Whereas the Reâerend Father in God Richard Biâop of Coventry and Lichfild Having âdiciously proceededf in the Examinaâon Hearing and Determining of a Cause of Heresie against Edward Wightâan of the Parish of Burton upon ârent in the Diocese of Coventry and âichfield Concerning the wicked Heâsies of the Ebionites Corinthians Vaântinians Arrians Macedonians of âimon Magus of Manes Manichees of Photinus and Anabaptists and ãâã other Heretical execrable and unheard of Opinions by the Instinct ãâã Satan by him excogitated and holden viz. 1. That there is not the Trinity ãâã Persons the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost in the Unity of the Deity 2. That Jesus Christ is not the true Natural Son of God perfect God and of the same Substance Eternity and Majesty with the Father in respect of his Godhead 3. That Jesus Christ is only Man and a mere Creature and not both God and Man in one Person