raigne ouer them but God shoulde still bee their kinge But after that they had made a kinge neyther did the iudiciall lawes retayne their full force neyther did GOD himselfe appoynte Captaines ouer the Armies but all was done according to the will and commaundement of the kinges who although they did keepe the iudiciall lawe in parte and for the greate extremities in warre asked counsell of God yet they were free in both these respectes as we are afterwarde to declare more at large So that by the comming in of these kinges God himselfe if we may so basely speake of his glorious maiestie was put out of his office as hee himselfe doth confesse 1. Sam. 8.7 where hee speaketh to Samuell not to be grieued for that the people had cast off his and his sonnes gouernment for indeede saith God they haue not despised or cast awaie thee but mee and haue refused that I shoulde raigne ouer them In the seconde place the iudges had parte of this supreame authoritie who although in the greatest matters they were ouer-ruled by the worde of God yet in the ordinarie administration especially of warelike affaires they were the chiefe And therefore the state of the common wealth from Moses to Saule the first king is called the gouernment of the Iudges the which did wholly cease after that Saule was created king for the Captaines of the warre were either the kinges themselues or whom it pleased them to appointe So wee â—eade that Dauid placed and displaced Ioab at his pleasure Thirdlie the bodie of the people ioyning together in a general assembly had a part yea the greatest part of this authoritie and likewise the elders who were a compendious bodie of the people had their part especially in ciuill administration in the time of peace Iudg. 20. The children of Israel came together as one man to the Lord in Maspha to whome the leuite maketh his complaint as vnto them who had authoritie to reuenge the villanie done vnto him desiring them to determine of that cause as they did with greate seueritie The causes why the people and the elders had parte of this supreme authoritie were these First for that they did neuer giue the whole power ouer themselues into the handes of anie of the Iudges but onely did as it were vse them to be their Captaines and leaders in the time of warre the which beeing ended vsually the iudge returned to his owne house and priuate estate till the like necessitie called him abroade againe but during the time of peace they did not meddle much with ciuill iurisdiction but onely hearde those causes which were brought vnto them as to fitte arbiters because they were men renoumed eyther for their valour or because they were prophetes as were Debora and Samuell or had the office of the high prieste as had Ely Hence it is that in this booke of iudges there is no mention made of their ciuil iudgements or that they did cal together the Senate or the people vnlesse it were to warre or of any edictes which they made or of faults which they did redresse or punish Only of Samuel it is written that he went about the land to iudge the people and of Debora that the people brought their controuersies to her The second cause of the authoritie of the elders and people was the want a Iudge for whenas the Iudge died they did not streightway put another in his place vntill they had occasion giuen by warre during which time of vacation the elders and people in euery citie did iudge their owne causes and meeting together in a common asseÌ„bly did order publike matters although seldome and negligently as the people vse to gouerne So that they wanted a Iudge as often as they had one But when once they had a king created there did no more any supreame authoritie remaine either in elders or people all being giuen vnto the hands of the king who had no man which did participat with him in his authoritie For we are not to thinke that in this state the king was the chiefe gouernour and the elders senators and inferiour officers fellow gouernours and as it were his mates For all within the land of Israel were to the king meere priuate men so that if any had authoritie in respect of the people they had it all from him as from the fountaine all the officers of the kingdome all the Iudges of ciuill causes and the captaines of the armies were appointted by him Yea they were so farre from hauing any authoritie in respect of the king that all the people with their magistrates and officers of what kinde soeuer are vsually called the kinges seruantes so 2. Chro. 10.6 The counsellers of Salomon are saide to haue stood before his face to wit waiting and attending his pleasure so Esa. 37.5 Officers of the king and elderâ— of the priestes are called the kings seruantes For the state of this kingdome was not such a gouernment as both hath beene and is at this day in vse in many places where the people to auoide confusion and for the administration of iustice and of other publike affaires doe for one ouer them yea and giue vnto him although improperly the name of a king reseruing to themselues authority eyther to displace him at their pleasure or at the least to controll his doings which they thinke to be wrong to call him to account of his administration yea if need be to rise vp in armes against him and to lay violent handes vpon him This was no such gouernment but a kingdome both in name and in trueth wherein none had any iot of supreame authority saue the king onely Sect. V. BVT if it be graunted that there was no authoritie in the land which could associate it selfe with the authoritie of the king or any way intermeddle with his lawful administration as long as he did rule with religion and iustice for the glory of God the good of the people yet it may seeme that there was some authoritie to restraine him if at any time he should be imperious or vniust in his gouernment whereby he should be eyther brought to a lawfull manner of ruling or else if he were incorrigible deposed from his kingdome For otherwise the people might be miserably oppressed religion defaced yea all thinges turned vpside downe and in the ende the commonwealth vtterly ouerthrowen and therefore that both wisedome reason and necessitie iâ— the glorie of God and the good of men doe require that there should be in Israell some other authoritie eyther in the people or in the priestes in the senate or in the inferiour magistrates the which should neuer be eyther vsed or once mentioned but against those kinges which did degenerate into violent and bloody tyrantes euen as men vse a false vnder raine to pull in strong headed horses which otherwise woulde runne into some pit so destroy both themselues the riders This reason taken
euils was in their owne wickednesse and idolatrie in that they did forsake the true worship of God and therefore God did forsake them and tooke from them their iudges in whose daies they liued in religious order and peaceable estate And so the people according to that which is written Iudg. 9.13.14.15 forsooke the vine the figtree and the oliue tree euen God the fountaine of all blessinges and saide to the brier come and raigne ouer vs and we will trust in thy shadowe For to haue a king and to trust in his power doe vsually goe together Rom. 15.12 He shal raigne ouer them and they shall trust in him Thirdly the people in the pride of their heartes did despise the gouernment of the iudges as base and contemptible for that howsoeuer it was mightie in the power of the spiritte of GOD yet it had not that outwarde shew of glorie and maiestie which the stately Monarchies of other nations did carie with them The last sinne which they committed in this action we call by the generall name of disobedience for that contrarie to the expresse commaundement of God they had a crooked and peruerse desire to be transformed into all the fashions of the prophane nations amongest whome they dwelt as in all other respectes so also in their gouernment and therefore they â—id affect a kingdome which was the most vsuall kinde of gouernment Thus we see why God was offended with this alteration of the state as for the gouernment it selfe he did neuer mislike it for although he suffered it to be brought in by this cooked meanes yet he did alwaies purpose that it shoulde be established as may plainlie appeare by these reasons First for that he promised Abraham Gen. 17.6 That of his seede should come kings and nations the which is to be vnderstood chiefly of this faithfull nation of the Iewes although beside them others came of Abraham Secondly Moses did foretell this Deut. 17. That assoone as the people were quietly possessed of the lande of Chanaan they would haue a king to raigne ouer them But this doth most euidently apppeare by the prophesie of Iacob who saith Genesis 49. That the rodde shall not departe from Iuda nor a Lawe-giuer cease to be of his ofspringe till Silo come and vnto him shall be the obedience of the people Nowe this cannot be vnderstoode of the iudges for of them all onely Othoniell was of the tribe of Iuda Yea GOD did alwaies purpose that Christe shoulde succeede the kinges of Israell in the kingdome for the wordes are plaine and the euente hath shewed it to be true that of the tribe of Iuda should come the Lion and the Lions whelpe that is the stately kingdome of Israell and the continual discent thereof yea the great lion the little lion that is the Messias the great eternaâ—l king of glory and the temporall and earthly kings of Israel For this cause the most plaine and euident promises which God made of the messias were deferred vntil the time of the kings were made to Dauid who in this respect is to be counted the first king and therefore is called Math. 16. Dauid the King that is the first king of the forefathers of Christ as hath beene alreadie touched And lastly this gouernment may seeme in some sort to be the more acceptable to God because it doth most liuelely represent the power and maiesty of God for although all magistrates doe beare the image of God yet they chiefely doe it whose authoritie being absolute and their glorie great come nearest to the infinite power and glorie of God As touching the lawfulnes of this kinde of gouernement although it be inferred of the former point for whatsoeuer is acceptable to God ought to be accounted lawful for vs yet it may briefly be considered by these reasons for that this gouernment was set vp by the appointment of God and that by Samuel a faithful prophet and so accounted of al Israel yea for that it was practised by Dauid a man according to Gods owne hearte by Salomon the glorie of the worlde by Asa Iehosophat and other religious kinges by good Ezechias and by zealous Iosias who would neuer haue born this office if the kinde of gouernment had beene in any respect vnlawfull the exception which is vsually taken against this kinde of Monarchie is as touching the greatnesse of the power maiesty of it in this manner that howsoeuer the prophane nations of the world doe suffer tyrantes to spoyle them of their liberty and whatsoeuer they haue yea and doe foolishly in the pride of their heartes desire such a loftie gouernment yet that in the Church of God it is a thing both intollerable altogether vnlawfull that one should so haue all the power in his owne hands that he may at his pleasure ouerthrowe all or that a great part of the substance of the land should be imployed to maintaine him in his iolitie vpon sumptuous buildings costly attyre dainty fare great rewardes and other thinges of the same kinde which would serue for many necessarie vses both of the Church and of the commonwealth For answere heereof we are farre from going about to perswade any people which liue vnder a moderate gouernment by this wicked example of this people to affect or desire this estate yea we leaue it to others to determine whether it be the most conuenient kinde of gouernment in respect of the Church of God and the safe constance and good estate of it yet we doe not doubt to affirme that it was a lawful kinde of gouernment among the Iewes and may lawfully be practised amongest Christians at this day For howsoeuer some kindes of gouernment and magistracy are conuenient or inconuenient safe or dangerous yet this and all other kindes are to be accounted lawfull For there is no power but from God and all the powers which are haue beene instituted by God Rom. 13.2 and especially of this gouernment now in question we may see Daniel 5.18.19 that God doth professe himselfe to be the author and giuer of it for there it is saide O King God gaue Nabuchadnezzer thy father a kingdome then followeth a description of the nature of a kingdom euen maiesty honour and glorie he slewe wâ—ome he woulde and smote whome he would he aduanced and debased whom he pleased Now that we see that this kinde of gouernment was acceptable vnto God we are in the second place to consider how farre it was subiect vnto him For the which point it shal be sufficient that we know that as al other powers authorities principalities and dominions whatsoeuer they be whether in heauen or in earth so also this kingdome was wholy absolutely subiect to God and to his power and bound to obey his will and commaundementes and to set forth his glory in all things as it is written in the 17. of Deutronomie that the king whensoeuer he were made shoulde take an excript of the
although more enioyed then considered as also for that they may in part be gathered of that which hath beene spoken Sect. III. THus we haue by the generall doctrine of magistracie an entrance made to the speciall doctrine of the kingdome of Israell wherein we haue many seueral points to consider which for order and memorie sake may be reduced to two heades whereof the first containeth the state of this kingdom in respect of nâ—en or of the people of Israel the second the state of it in respect of God The first head hath the greatest part of the difference of this kingdome from the former gouernment of Iudges consisting especially in two thinges the speciall power which it had ouer the people and the speciall maiestie of it both which were exceeding great in this state yea so great that in these respectes the gouernment of the iudges may seeme not onely a meane but almost a priuate estate Hence it is that this kingdome of Israel is by Iacob prophecying of it Gen. 49.9 compared to a Lion the which doth in strength and especially in a maiesticall statelinesse so farre exceede all other beastes that it is vsually called the king of them If we desire to knowe howe it came to passe that there was so greate power and maiestie giuen to this kingdome we must haue recourse to the originall of it The causes of the setting vppe of this estate were two The first is that which may be saide to bee the cause of all thinges in the worlde to witte the eternall counsell and decree of God by the which it was before al ages appointed that the king of Israell shoulde be a type of Christ and his temporarie gouernment a type of the spirituall and eternall kingdome of Christ as is afterwarde to be declared Nowe that this kingdome might be a fitte and liuely type it was needfull that it shoulde be endued with a greate measure of power and maiestie that so it might the more liuely represente the infinite power and authoritie which the Messias was to haue ouer all creatures in heauen and in earth and likewise his vnspeakable and incomprehensible maiesty and glorie filling the heauen of heauens The second cause of the greate power and maiesty of this kingdome was the desire or rather the will of the people who did so earnestly yea so eagerly and importunately call for this stately gouernment that they would take no denyall nor heare any thing which coulde be alledged to be contrarie For that the people did alwaies desire this state we may see Deutro 17.14 where God foretelleth this that when they were once possessed of the lande they woulde haue a King and Iudg. 8.22 where they offer to make Gedeon king and more plainely Iudges 9. where they like Abimeleches opinion saying that it was better for them to haue one then many to raigne ouer them Neyther did they desire to haue one sette ouer them with the bare name and title of a kinge or with anie meane authoritie but that hee shoulde haue power and maiestie in the highest degree For howsoeuer it might seeme that this their desire was in some respecte incommodious to themselues for that the greater power they gaue to the king the lesse libertie they lefte to themselues and the greater that his pompe and maiestie was the more heauie tributes must be imposed on them for the maintayning of it yet they did so vehementlie desire to be like to other nations in a stately monarchie that they thought no price too greate for it thinking belike as it is commonlye saide that it was greater honour for them to make a mightie and a glorious Kinge then to be kings theÌ„selues as euery one was in the time of the Iudges wherein euery man did that which was good in his own eyes because they had no king to order them Iudg. 18.1.19.1 And yet we do not deny but that in ordaining so mighty maiestical an authority they thought it would be for their owne good howsoeuer it might seeme to derogate from their liberty and profitte and that the commodities would be moe and more waightie then the inconueniences of it wherein whether they did iudge right or no let others determine Sect. IIII. NOW we are to come to the particular declaration of these things First of the power of this kingdome and secondly of the maiestie of it The doctrine of the power hath in it these foure questions The first is whether the power of the king were whole or deuided The second whether it were generall ouer all persons and causes or restrained The third whether it were absolute or tied to lawes The last whether it were a milde or a peremptory power The power whereof we doe intreate is the full supreame and vniuersall authoritie for of any inferiour power we doe not speake of gouerning the people and of ordering all their publicke affaires the which before that this kingdome was set vp was not wholy in any one hand but deuided amongst many For it was partly in the handes of God partly in the handes of the iudge which was for the time partly in the handes of the elders or senat and partly in the handes of the bodie of the people For the first where we say that God had a part of this authoritie we doe not consider him simply as God for in that respect not a part only but the whole supreame power not of that country onely but of all the nations in the world yea of heauen and earth was and is in his handes but we consider him as he was after a speciall manner the king and ruler of this people so as he neuer was or will be to any other nation The actions of God which did proceede from this his regal authoritie were these First that he gaue to this people iudiciall lawes and constitutions which is part of the office not of God for then these iudiciall lawes should belong to the whole world seeing GOD is the God not of the Iewes only but also of the gentils But other nations are not tyed to these laws but only to the morall law and to these Iudicials so farre as they are morall to wit to the grounds and equitie of them but not to the lawes themselues The second thing which God did by vertue of this authoritie was the supreme administration of their battailes in cases of greate extremitie For as greate princes sende captaines to fight in their steade yet according to their direction and appointment so God did immediately either by his word or spirit stirre vp some man to fight the battailes of the people and did directe them in such actions And this Gedeon acknowledgeth Iudges 7.20 Where hee saith the sworde of the Lorde and of Gedeon In these respectes GOD was the kinge of this nation as Gedeon doth confesse Iudges 8.23 who so answereth the people going aboute to make him kinge that neyther hee nor anie of his posteritie shoulde
absolute power thinking that as that wine is most wholsome which is taken not in the full vigor and naturall strength but tempered and delayed with some colde liquor so that manarchie is most safe and acceptable the power whereof is moderated and yoked with some other power of positiue lawes or of parliamentes of the nobilitie or of the people whereby it may be restrained from iniurie iniustice and tyranny when it is needefull Thirdlye we answere that if we may as vnskilfull and ignorante men vse to doe iudge of the causes by the effectes and of counsels by the euent it should seeme that this people did not loose much by this bargaine for that the state of their common-wealth was much better vnder the gouernment of the kinges then before when as the administration of ciuil affaires was very dissolute and remisse yea often times wholly wanting for that the publike authoritie being as hath beene declared deuided amongest many to wit the iudge the high priest the elders the princes of the tribes and the people was eyther wholly or in pâ—rt neglected of all so that as it is written Iudg. 21.25 euery man did what him listed both in committing and also in redressing iniuries because there was no king in Israel but after that there was once a kinge made they neuer wanted gouernment yea they had it more strict and seuere then perhaps they desired Likewise for the other part of the gouernment which is in warlike affaires it is without question that their state was much bettered by this chaunge Before they were a common preie to the nations neere vnto them and so often subdued and captiuated eyght yeares to Chusan King of Syria Iudg. 3.7 to the King of Moab 18. to Iabin 20 yeares Iudg. 4.3 to the Madianites 7. yeares Iudg. 6.1 to the Ammonites 18. yeares Iudg. 10.8.9 to the Philistines 40. yeares Iudg. 13.2 that it might seeme true which many ages afterward was spoken of them that they were a nation borne to slauery but by their kings they were not onely freed from beeing so often subdued but also made conquerers and rulers of other nations The Iudges deliuered them from their enemies but their kings deliuered their enemies to them making them tributaries to the people before they were not pinched with heauie tributs so as afterwards by their kinges but they were much more often spoiled and their land cleane wasted by forraine inuasion before in the time of peace the common people did more abound with welth because they were free from publike burdens but the publike estate was verie meane when as it was at the best for the most part very beggerly and miserable vnder the kinges the commonalty was somewhat impouerished and yet they had as we say some thing for their money as namely a stately and glorious Monarchie which they did vehemently desire and whereof they were not a litle proud sumptuous palaces for their kings to dwel in and many faire buildinges for their princes and nobles especially in Ierusalem with all manner of prouision correspondent thereunto secondly they had a costly and famous temple wherein to worship God renowmed throughout the whole world for beautie and magnificencie Thirdly they had horses and chariots troupes of horsemen armies of common soldiers kept at the kinges or rather at the common expenses yea they had fensed and walled Cities and all such like force whereby to resist and subdue their enemies So we read 2. Chro. 1. that Salomon had a thousand and foure hundred chariots and twelue thousand horsmen yea he made siluer as plentifull as stones in Ierusalem and great summes of money were giuen to him for tribute of the kinges of Aegypt Syria and others there about and in one word they had a publike estate farre passing in glory any countrie of kingdome neare vnto them So that if it be as wise men doe thinke better to haue a hard gouernment then an anarchie and confusion to haue publike liberty from forraine power then popular licence from obedience of lawes to be pinched in their purses then to be slaine captiuated in their bodies wiues and children to suffer iniurie at home then slauerie abroad to maintaine their own naturall kinges then to enrich forraine nations to be priuately poore then publikely base to haue their Cities fenced then their houses tâ—immed and furnished Then this people was not so notoriously foolish in choosing this gouernment as diuers wise men haue thought Neyther had they a very euill penny-woorth tho they bought it with the price of their own liberty But we doe not take vpon vs to define any thing but leaue it to those who are seene and exercised in these matters Onely we say that the chiefe commoditie which they looked for by their king was safetie from their enemies abroad and execution of iustice at home as appeareth 1. Sam. 8.20 wherein they were not frustrate of their expectation Sect. IX THus we see that the power of the kingdom of Israell was wholly in the kings owne handes no other hauing part thereof In the next place we are to see how farre this power did stretch it selfe abroade The answere to this question is this that the power of this kinge did stretch it selfe as farre as the limittes of his kingdome or lande did so that there was not anie person or cause within the compasse of his dominions exempte from it For the persons of men there was no preheminence of office no nobilitie or royaltie of bloude no holinesse of calling or function neyther any other prerogatiue whatsoeuer that coulde giue vnto any man this priuiledge that he shoulde not be subiect to the iurisdiction and power of the king So Ioab was the grand-captayne in Israell placed in the highest office in the lande yea in such an office as doth vsually laugh at and contemne the power of the greatest princes such vnrulie spirites doth militarie licence breede in many men and so great a man as that Dauid durste not in the beginning of his raigne call him to account for murthering Abner but acknowledgeth that the sonnes of Seruiah were too harde for him as we may reade 2. Sam. 3.29 yet wee knowe that Salomon a peaceable kinge made him stoupe to his authoritie and lay downe his life at his feete Likewise Adonia was a man more noble in bloude then Kinge Salomon for he was his elder brother yet this royall prerogatiue coulde not saue his life and therefore he was put to death by the sentence of Salomon for aspyring nay for looking at or almost for thinking on the kingdome for the kinge perceiued by his asking of Abisage Kinge Dauids concubine that he still kept his firste minde But although both greate and noble men and all generallie which haue any place office or calling in the common-wealth be subiect to this authoritie yet it may seeme vnmeete that they who are endued with holy functions especially they who are placed in the highest authority in
of the same ciuill power THus much of the voluntarie coniunction of particular Churches vnder the gouernment of councels now followeth the necessarie coniunction of them so called because it is not in their power to shake off that common authoritie whereunto they are subiect This necessarie coniunction hath place then whenas diuerse particular Churches are tyed together in obedience to the same ciuill authoritie by the which they are ruled as hath beene declared in the former chapter Yea it may be seene almost in all publick Churches the which vsually consist of so great a number of professours as cannot possiblie be contained within the compasse of one Câ—urch for if any one populous citie doe generally professe the gospell it must of necessitie be deuided into diuers particular Churches much more a christian country nation or kingdome cannot but containe in it many particular Churches All which although they haue their proper rulers or teachers and orders as free Churches haue yet they haue also a common gouernment and lawes proceeding from the ciuill power to the obedience whereof they are all bound For in publicke Churches the ciuill power hath the greatest sway in gouerning by the which being one the whole Church and euery particular assembly is brought to a conformitie both in doctrine as also in gouernment yea it is requisite needfull that it should be so for otherwise if euery particular Church did differ from the rest in gouernment the whole Church could not be ordered without great trouble and confusion But yet this common gouernment of the magisâ—â—ate doth not take away the grouernment of particular Churches no more then the councels whereof we haue spoken do from free Churches This is to be done by the authoritie of the ciuill ruler yet by the aduise of others In the choise of whom as it is lawfull for the prince to call or passe ouer whom he thinketh meete or vnmeete so it will be conuenient for the good of the Church the which it is not lawfull for him eyther wholly to neglect or lightly to regard to call of all sortes of men those who are endued with best giftes yet so that some be had out of euery particular Church as if they were free Churches And especially the ministers of the word are to be called for the reasons declared in the former section when they by his authoritie are gathered together he is to take vnto himselfe the ruling of the whole action vnlesse it be needful that he delegate his authoritie to some other and by praying for the blessing of God vpon their consultations declaring the cause of their meeting to begin it Then he is to propound in the first place those wants faults and corruptions of the Ch. which he himselfe hath obserued would haue supplied and taken away to shewe the manner how he thinketh it most meet to be done which being done he is to giue liberty to euery one present to speake their mindes freely of those things which he hath propounded as also of any other thing which they thinke good for the Church that which is agreed vpon doth appeare to al or to the most of them right meete to be decreed he is to establish giuing vnto it the vertue of an ecclesiastical law the which the whole Ch. ought to obey That which cannot be agreed vpon is to be deferred to another time of meeting which ought to be somuch the sooner as the matters controuersed are of greater importance for more mature deliberation with themselues and others will make that cleare and euident which before was doubtfull If there be any thing which neyther can be agreed vpon by the consent of the greater part neither yet deferred without great hurt to the Church the chiefe ruler may with the consent of some of the councell decree and enact that which they thinke needfull to be done Yet he is not to vse this authority in this manner but vpon vrgent necessitie for many inconueniences do follow the enacting of ecclesiasticall laweâ— without the full consent of the councell yea the suspitioÌ„ of tyrannizing ouer the Ch. of God is by al meanes to be auoyded In regard wherof many christian Emperors rulers did resigne their authoritie which they had in gouerning the ch to these councels insomuch that they had the ful power not only of aduising lawes but also of enacting or the giuing vnto them the force of laws But as hath bene shewed this mâ—y easely turne to the hurt of the Ch. and therefore it ought not wholly to bâ— followed yet it sheweth how great regard ciuil rulers ought to haue of the iudgement aduise of those who are godly wise and learned in the ordering of the Churches subiect vnto them And therefore that which the councell thinketh good to be done or the greater part of them ought to be greatly regarded Yet if the chiefe ruler cannot be brought to giue his assent vnto it it cannot haue the force of an ecclesiastical lawe or be imposed vpon the whole Ch. in that name As touching the number wherof any national councel doth consist there caÌ„not any be defined but it must be left to the appointmeÌ„t of the chief ruler to whom the deposing authorizing of this whole action doth belong Yet it ought to be proportionable to the quantity of the Ch. to the number of the particular Churches so that if some be had out of euery one of theÌ„ it wil make the lawes enacted to be much more willingly receaued obeyed whenas it shal be knowen that some of theÌ„ selues did in the name of the rest consent vnto them And especially this is requisite in respect of the chiefe end and vse of these councels both in free and publicke churches whereof we will briefly speake The which is to bring the whole Church to a conformitie of doctrine this is needfull and good to be done and that for these causes first for the repressing of heresies which doe continually arise in the Church For the which purpose the generall consent of the Church is very forcible for eyther the consent and iudgement of the whole Church will be of great waight to take the said heresies out of the mindes of those who doe maintaine them or else the authoritie by which the trueth oppugned is publickly established will be able to remooue the maintainers of them out of the Church Secondly this forme of doctrine agreed vpon by many will be effectuall to strengthen and confirme those who are weake in the faith and not fully grounded in some pointes of christian religion Yea it may be a meanes to helpe forward those who haue not as yet taken vpon them the profession of the gospel Not that we ought to build our faith vpon the authority of men but for that we ought to take from the Church a confirmation of our faith seeing we may be greatly helped and strengthned by this meanes And lastly this forme of
doctrine ought to be esteemed the publicke confession of the whole Church whereby they doe make knowen not only to other Churches but also to the whole world that they do professe maintaine the trueth of christian religion and of euery part therof do detest abhor al the false worship of the Iewes Turkes and all other infidels whatsoeuer and also that they are free from all false erroneous opinions all grosse blasphemous heresies of men professing the faith wherewith the Church hath bene at al times and is troubled at this day This publicke profession of the faith being with great care diligence made and approued by the generall consent of the whole councel is by the authority of the chiefe ruler to be enioined to the whole Ch. so as it be not lawfull for any man to deny or refute any point of it Yet it ought not to containe in it the determination of al controuersies but only a declaration of the chiefe points of religion in the profession wherof the life as it were the very essence or being of the Church doth consist For as touching matters of lesse moment in the which men may erre without any danger to their owne saluation or hurt to the Church it is impossible that all men should be brought to think and professe the same thing but there will be continually diuersity of opinions in these points in euerie Church Yet it doth belong to this publick councel to consider to determin euen of other doubts coÌ„trouersies which do troble the Church that by this meanes contention may be taken away and as the Apostle writeth 1. Cor. 1.10 all may say the same things and be knit together in one minde and in one iudgment Yet the determination of the councell of these lighter points ought not to be imposed vpon any man to thinke or to professe but euerie man left to thinke as it shall please God to giue him to vnderstand the worde of God in that behalfe either keeping his opinion dissenting frâ—m the Church to himselfe or else imparting it to others in that moderate wise and christian manner as that no man be iustly offended by him or the publick peace of the Churche disquieted but rather all in some measure edified Sect. 4. of the gouerning of the seuerall prouinces of a national Church THus much of a publick or nationall councell gathered ordered and established by the authority of the cheife ruler for this end to bring the whole Church to a conformity both in outward rites and orders and also in the truth of doctrine Wherein this is especially to be coÌ„sidered and therefore not vnfit to be repeated that there be regard had vnto the liberty of inferiour Synodes For as it is impossible to make all men thinke the same thing in all pointes so also it is vnmeet yea impossible that the generall councell should so define of al things which are incident into the gouerning of churches as that nothing be left to the discretion and disposition of inferiour assemblies And therefore the decrees and lawes made by the generall councell ought to be as rules to direct them in their actions although all particular cases and circumstances yea matters of lesse importance be neither determined nor yet mentioned in them Nowe we are to come to prouinciall councels for so much as there do daily many doubts and controuersies arise yea great and waightie affaires do offer themselues amongest the Churches which neither for the greatnesse can sufficiently be determined and ordered by a fewe ministers neither yet conueniently be deferred to a generall meeting which cannot be had without great trouble to the Church Therefore prouinciall sinodes haue a necessarie vse They are of the same nature with general councels saue only that they belong not to the whole Ch. but onely to some parte of it as it is distinguished They are to be called ordered and established by the authoritie of the ciuil ruler and do deale in the same matters and in the manner aforesaid for the care and ordering not only of a whole nationall Ch. generall but also of the seuerall prouinces of it doth belong to the ciuill ruler so that although it doth not belong to his office to enter into particular congregations and there to performe the dutie of an ordinary gouernour or teacher yet he ought to see and procure that they be in good order that the ministers of the word do their duties diligently and sincerly that the people liue in obedience to the gospell of Christ. But in great nations and kingdoms it is not often seene that the cheife ruler can keepe in his owne handes and discharge in his owne person this dutie of ouerseeing the seuerall prouinces of the Ch. and therefore it is as alwaies lawfull so often needfull that he delegate and commit this parte of his dutie to some other euen to whomsoeuer he thinketh meetest for this purpose Neither are we to exclude those who are ministers of the word from this calling as if they only were vnmeete whenas they are in some respects fitter then others hauing been many yeares exercised in the affaires of some particular Church And therefore if it please the ciuill ruler to call any who doth performe some ordinarie ministerie in some particular Church to this office of ouerseeing many Churches he doth nothing but that which is agreable to reason and warrantable by the word of GOD. For men hauing taken vpon them any ministerie are not so tyed vnto it but that they may leaue it when as they shal be called by the cheife ruler to performe any other more waighty and publick dutie yea although it be in some ciuill office and much more to haue the care of many churches Yet it is not meet that any man hauing this office should withall haue any function in a particular Church as doth necessarely require his presence For besides other inconueniences it will be to him an occasion of negligence in the performance of his dutie and an euill example to others Which as it is a grieuous thing in any man to do the worke of God negligently so it is much more offensiue in him whose office and calling it is to see that the Church be well ordered Thus much of the common gouernment of diuers Churches whether they be free or subiect to the same ciuill power From this common gouernment whole nations and kingdoms consisting of many Churches are often called one particular church because they al haue the same humane lawes although if we speake properly they are diuers Churches because they haue not all the same lawes but only some publick common and generall lawes pertaining to all CHAP. XI THus much of a partìcular Church both seuerally and also ioyntly considered In the next and last place we are to come to the visible Church which is nothing else but a collection of all the particular Churches in the world into one body or summe which
is called the visible Church by relation had to the catholik Church the which by reason of the dispersed members of it is inuisible as hath bene declared whenas euery particular Church yea euen priuate Churches and so consequently the visible Church consisting thereof doth make a publick profession of the fayth This visible Church doth continually existe in the world forsomuch as GOD hath appointed that his name shoulde continually as longe as the worlde endureth be called vpon and worshipped in one place or other as the story of the Ch. doth witnes We confesse that it hath often lurcked in secret places and often been so ouer-shadowed with errours superstition and idolatrie that it could hardly be discerned and so hath been euen as the sunne is in the eclipse yet neuer wholly taken away for whenas there was but one particular Ch. in the world yea this particular church was not publick but priuate within one mans family and secret lurking in a corner so that they who liued at that time or in the ages following could not define where the Church was at such a time yet that Church made the visible Church For their profession was visible and open among themselues and also to others although it were not seen at that instant for a thing which is not actually seen may be visible Secondly this is to be noted that in the first ages of the world before the time of the Gospell the visible Ch. did often consist of one only particular church there being no moe in the world but since the publishing of the gospel it hath hitherto shall alwaies consist of many Lastly as touching the place of this visible Ch. although it be not tyed to any certaine place yet it hath alwaies bene cheifly in some one parte of the world So we knowe that first it was wholly in the east partes in the countries of Mesopotania Syria Iurie and others adioyning vnto these Afterwards in the first time of the gospell it was cheifly in Asia And in these last ages we see that it hath been almost wholly in Europe and whether God will change the dwelling place of it again or no euen transporte it to the fourth parte of the world lately found out or to any other place it is knowne to himselfe onely Diuers â—ther points should be added for the full declaration of â—he nature and state of the visible Church But many of them aâ—â— common with the catholick Church and therefore are handled in the first Chapter where they may be considered The rest we cut off for breuities sake because this treatise is already growen beyond our purpose and expectation So then to conclude if to this visible Church we do adde the dispersed members of the catholick Church we haue the catholick Church And so the end of this treatise is brought to the beginning FINIS Why the people desired an alteration of the state The occasion of this alteration Magistracie Gods ordinance The church hath neuer beene without magistracie How God erecteth magistracie among infidels Why God appointed magistracie In what respect the magistrate beareth the image of God The kingdome of Israel a type of Christes kingdome How God was the king of Israel The iudicial law in part abrogated by the erecting of this kingdome God put from his kingdome What authoritie the people had before the time of the Kinges No authoritie in Israel but in the hands of the king The king to his subiects as a father to his children The prophets neuer reproue the people for not resisting the idolatrous kings Vnlawfull to vse violeeÌ„e against the kiâ—g in the maintenance of religion The people could not resume their liberty giuen into the handes of the kings It belonged not to the people but to God to nominate the king Saul remained the lawfull king of Israell after that Dauid was annointed and appointed to the kingdome The rebellion of Ieroboam of the tenne tribes vnlawfull Hazaels rebellion foretold by God but not permitted God would not take the kingdome from Dauids posterity The kingdome so annexed to the house of Dauid that it could not be taken from it God neuer approued any conspiracy made against any of the kings With what weapons this people might fight against their kinges Why absolute monarchies were more in vse in the first ages of the world The gouernment of the kings compared with the former Ecclesiasticall persons subiect to the authoritie and iurisdiction of the king God deferred the building of the Temple till that the kingdome were erected The Church with the common welth make but one bodie Resisting of wicked kings weakeneth the authority of good kings Ecclesiastical constitutions made by the authority of the kinges The kings exempted from the Iudiciall lawes Great power bringeth with it great maiesty The diuine original of this kingdome made it maiesticall The annointing of these kinges signified the holinesse of their persons and functions Long continuance of hereditarie succession made this kingdome strong and maiesticall What made the gouernment of the Iudges to be contemned The statelinesse of this kingdome in the daies of Salomon The maiesty of this kingdome increase and decrease as did the sinceritie of religion The kinge might lawfully exact of the people not only for necessarie vses but for pompe pleasure An absolute Monarchie is a chargeable and costly gouernment The people had this gouernment in great reuerence and estimation This kingdome standeth yet in Christ. The people account the kinges better then ten thousand of themselues This gouernment doth more resemble the authority of God then any other kind doth Why God was offended with the people asking a king God did alwaies like this gouernment and purpose to establish it God the author of kingdomes and the setter vp of kinges The kinge held his kingdome as from God and was subiect to his will and worde This example of Samuel teaching the people the state of the kingdome is to be followed by the ministers of Gods word Nothing better beseeming Christians then due subiection to magistates A compendious abstract of the state of the kingdome of Israel Care to be had of posterity Alteration of gouernment in any common wealth troublesome and dangerous The worde Catholicke not vsed in the scripture The catholicke Church was twise contained in one familie The profession of the true religion maketh one a member of the catholicke Church Infantes are members of the catholike Church Hypocritical professours are members of the catholicke Church Excommunication doth not separate from the catholicke but only froÌ„ the visible Church Heretikes as Arians and papistes are to be counted members of the catholicke Church The papist holdeth the foundation of Christian religion Whole Churches haue held grieuous errours The state of the Church before the comming of Christ. Faith and fundamentall errours together The same errour more pernitious at one time theÌ„ at another Greater hope of the saluation of an ignorant then of a learned
man as they who contemne and labour to ouerthrow all authoritie speaking euil of those things which they know not haue imagined but an ordinance of God Rom. 13.12 There is no power but of GOD he therefore that resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God But it may be thought that it is not gods ordinance seeing it cannot be shewed that euer it was established by God throughout the worlde but rather inuented and continued by men excelling others in strength and in ambition whereby they were both moued to desire superioritie and also enabled to accomplish their desire and so haue by violence bloudshed outrage tyrannie and al manner of impietie against God and iniustice in regarde of men both gotten and vsurped the places of rulers So that seeing this hath beene the originall of the authoritie almost of all rulers we cannot make it the institution of God especially seeing that it doth not appeare that God did euer commaund that there should be magistrates sette vppe ouer the people throughout the whole worlde only amongst the Iewes magistracie was sette vp by his commaundement but not in any place beside Whereunto wee answere that the abuses of magistracie although many and grieuous cannot take away the lawfull vse of it And further that the cause why there is no expresse commaundement in the word of God enioyning that magistracie should be set vp in all places is for that the worde of God doth not belong to the whole world but only to the Church which is in all times and especially was in the first ages of the worlde the least part yea sometimes as nothing in comparison of the huge number of infidels But in the Church God hath from time to time both commaunded and established the vse of magistracie and seuerely punished the contempt of it as might be shewed by examples in all ages For although there coulde be no publicke magistracie in the Church till the dayes of Moses because vntill that time the Church was contained within the compasse of one or a fewe families yet there was priuate gouernement which had no lesse force and authoritie then when the number of the Church encreasing to a whole nation publike magistracie was erected For the first borne of the familie was the ruler and as it were a Lorde to the rest as Iacob doth call Esau Genesis 33.13.14 But although magistracie hath beene by the expresse commaundement of GOD established onely in the Churche yet it belongeth as much to infidels For it is instituted by God not â—s he is the Sauiour of his Church but as hee is the creatour and preseruer of all men Therefore howsoeuer God doth not vouchsafe his loue and eternall life comming thereof to anie of those who are not of his Church yet as the Apostle witnesseth Romanes 3.29 Hee is the GOD not onely of the Iewes who onely were then his Church but also of the Gentiles In this respect as also in regarde of his faithfull people with whome they liue and for other causes he doth bestowe vppon them manie temporall blessinges letting the raine to fall downe and the sunne to shine vppon them and also in making them partakers of this ordinaunce of magistracie by the which they may liue in order and peace safely and quietly enioying all the temporall commodities of this presente life The meanes by the which God doth sette vppe this his ordinaunce amongest infidels who are destitute of his worde is the light of nature remayning in the mindes of men by the which they doe easelie both see the manifolde commodities which come by magistracie and also desire to be made partakers thereof For although by reason of the corruption of our nature fewe can liue in due subiection vnto authoritie with a contented minde yet almost all men when they are without magistrates doe of themselues desire to haue some to gouerne and no maruaile seeing that the deformitie and inconueniences which the wante of magistrates bringeth are euidente to all men for that a people in such a state is like a to bodie without a head to mooue it The experience heereof wee haue euen in this people of the Iewes who did voluntarilie without anie compulsion desire a king and that in a most earnest manner Thus we see that magistracie is the ordinance of God whereof this doth necessarily insue that it is not as an vnholie prophane and impure state or to be vilely esteemed of as many doe affirme and account it to be who doe falsely thinke that the beautie of the Church cannot appeare neither her authoritie be sufficiently extolled and established but by deforming and treading vnder foote this diuine ordinance of ciuill magistracie the which as it is most acceptable to God so it ought to be had in greate honour by all men Lastly the endes why magistracie was â—ppointed by God are two The first is the representing of his glory here on earth The second is the procuring of the good of man For the first The magistrate is Gods deputie and vice gerent here on earth to gouerne men and to keepe the world in order without confusion euen as we see that greate monarches haue many legates and deputies by whome they rule their seuerall prouinces and therfore God doth communicate to them as his office so also his name and calleth them Gods in the which respect the magistrate is a liuely yea a liuing Image of God first of his excellencie in that he is taken from the common sort and condition of men and set aloft therefore he is to be honoured Secondly of the wisdome of God in that he is able to foresee imminent dangers to make fit lawes and orders to iudge of right and wrong and to keepe his people in peace and mutuall concorde and therefore he is to be reuerenced and to be obeyed in his lawes and edictes Thirdly of the iustice of God in that he doth seuerely punish the greate misdemeanour of malefactors and therefore he is to be feared Fourthly of the mercie of God in that he doth gratiously with fauour passe by and winke at small offences and therefore he is to be praised And lastly he carieth the image of the goodnes of God in that by his meanes foreseeing preuenting and repelling all dangers and troubles we do inioy all manner of blessings both temporal and eternall euen life and liberty plentie of all thinges and prosperity houses and landes wiues and children friendes and acquaintance and that which is much more to be esteemed the true seruice and worship of God his holy worde and in one worde all thinges needfull in regard eyther of bodie or soule and therefore the magistrate is vnfainedly to be loued and praised The second end why magistracie was appointed is the good of man that by this meanes they might liue in peace safety and order But of the seuerall commodities which magistracie bringeth we doe not purpose to entreat because they are commonly knowen
the people should haue power to depose their king as well as they had to set him vppe Whereunto we answere that although it were at the first free vnto the people whether they would haue permitted themselues wholly to the power of the king or no yet when as they had once refigned vp their liberty and authority it was not in their power to call that their voluntarie graunt backe againe Secondly we answere that the people neuer had this power in their handes to make whome they would king they did indeede voluntarilie choose this kinde of gouernment but God gaue them a king whome they coulde neyther refuse at the first nor afterwardes depose to wit Saule with his posteritie and they being by God reiected Dauid with his seede for God kept in his hand the power of nominating the king as the expresse wordes of the scripture doe witnesse Deutro 17.15 Onely thou shalt make him king ouer them whom the Lord thy God shall giue vnto thee Againe it may be obiected forsomuch as not onely kings but also all other magistrates are set vp for the glorie of God and the good of the people that if they doe not not onely not further but also hinder these respectes they do break the condition of the bargain betwixt them the people and so do forfait their kingdomes into their hands as Saul did forfait his and Salomon by his idolatrie the gouernment of the ten tribes we answer confessing this to be true that the kings of Israel had the kingdome vpon the foresaid condition but yet neyther the kingdome was giuen nor the condition imposed to them by man but by God therefore they could not forfait their kingdom to man but only to God neither coulâ— any man exact this forfaiture at their handes without an extraordinarie and speciall commission from God So that vntil such time as God did either immediatly by his own hand or by the means of some man made the executioner of his will by extraordinarie reuelation depriue them of their kingdome euen the wicked and idolatrous kinges did remaine to the people in the full estate and right of the kingdome So after that both Saule had by his disobedience forfeited his kingdome of God and also Dauid was now both appointed by God and annointed by Samuel king in his steade yet Saul remained to the people the onely lawfull king of Israell yea no lesse lawfull then he was before or any other afterwardes vntill such time as God did take from him both his life and kingdome together This doth Dauid ingenuously confesse 1. Sam. 26.10.11 saying that it was not lawfull for himselfe or any other to touch Saule beeing Gods annointed for that he could be dispossessed by none but by God onely wherein he rested not doubting but that God would take him away eyther by naturall death or by the force of the enemie or immediately by his owne hand 1. Sam. 26.10 Likewise Salomon did forfaite his kingdome to God but yet thâ— ten tribes with al their kings made of themselues did vnlawfully and impiouslie rebell against Rehoboam for so speaketh Abiam 2. Chro. 13·6 7 You ought to haue acknowledged that God gaue the kingdome of Israel to Dauid and his sonnes for euer but Ieroboam the sonne of Nebat rose vp and rebelled against his Lord and naughtie men gathered themselues to him and strengthened themselues against Rehoboam So that although the defection came from the Lord as appeareth 2. Chro. 11.4 and was good in that respect beeing a iust punishment of idolatrie yet the action of the people rebelling against their lawfull and naturall king was altogether vnlawfull If it be obiected that Ieroboam was called to be king of the ten tribes by the word of God sent by the ministery of the prophet Achijah King 11.31 where God saith to Ieroboam by the prophet that he had â—iuen to him ten tribes of Israell to this we make two answeres First that although this defection as it came from God was good yet as it was practised by Ieroboam and the people it was vnlawful rebellion For there is in God a secret wil the which when it is contrarie to his reueâ—led will and worde cannot be executed by man without sinne vnlesse it be by an extraordinarie dispensation and therefore although God did make this his secret will knowen to Ieroboam to make his vnthankfulnesse in erecting idolatrie the more inexcusable yet he did not bid him rebell against Salomon neyther did he annointe him king as he did Iehu 2. King 9.6.7 who had the expresse commaundement of God to roote out kinge Achabs house Thus God foretolde Hazael that hee shoulde be kinge of Syria 2. King 8.13 yet he did not approue his detestable murthering of the kinge his master So did Zimri 1. King 16.12 although he also did execute the sentence which God had pronounced against the house of Bahasa king of the ten tribes yet because he was not appointed by God so to do his action was vnlawfull Secondly we answere that if that foretelling of Ieroboam were an extraordinarie dispensation yet his example doth not iustifie the rebellion of the people or of any other who haue not this warrant for their actions But Dauid did lawfully rebell against the posteritie of Saul and so did Iehu against Ioram 2. King 9. because they had the expresse word of God so to doe But heere this is to be noted that although this kingdome were at the first so instituted that all the kinges should by their disobedience forfait their kingdome to God â—nd so be deposed when he thought good yet Dauid and his posteritie were in a manner freede from this condition and from forfaiting their kingdome to God For Dauid a man according to the heart of God found such fauour in his sight that he made this solemne lawe oath and promise that although his children did forsake him yet he would not take the kingdom from them as he did from Saul but onely chastice them for their sinnes And therefore the seede of Dauid kept the crowne yea tho many of them were open idolatours til the whole nation of the Iewes was destroyed and caried away captiue into Babel for their idolatrie and other sinnes Therefore God is saide 2. Chro. 13.5 to haue giuen this kingdome to Dauid by a couenant of salt that is by a perpetuall and inuiolable couenant for so it was needfull that the promises of the Messias shoulde be annexed to some stocke or linage that out of it hee might cotinually be expected But to returne to the matter in hand if it be heere asked how God did punish the notorius sins misâ—emenors of these kings we answer that he did it either immediatly by his own hand as he did smite Ozias with leprosie for his intollerable presumption 2. Chr. 26 19. or else by some forraine nation or king as by the Philistines Aegyptians Chaldaeaens Assyriaens or some other
nation and prince whoÌ„ he vsed as scourges for the misdemeanor of these kings wherof more hereafter Now we are to answer to the examples which may seeme to be contrary to this rule the which if they be indeed contrary to it yet they do not take away this truth for a few wrong actions caÌ„not preiuâ—ice a law yea a long practise and custome of right But let vs see what they are First the people do seem to haue resisted Saul in that they saued Ionathan from death wherunto he was euen deuoted by the kings solemne oth promise we answere that they did perswade the king by reason not resist him by force as doth appeare by their words 1. SaÌ„ 14.45 but the example of Libna is more plaine the which rebelled against IehoraÌ„ because he did forsake the Lord. 2. Chr. 21.10 but this one example is not sufficient for it is not approued but only barely mentioned by the writer of the story yea many actions in the scripture are coÌ„mended as proceding from a godly mind which in straight examinatioÌ„ would be found vnlawful Thirdly the deposing of Athalia 2. Chro. 23. maketh not against vs. For we do heere speak of a lawful king but she was a meer vsurper because she was not of Dauids seed Lastly as touching the coÌ„spiracies made against Ioas for killing Zacharias the son of Iehoida 2. Chr. 24.25 against Amasia for forsaking the lord 2. Chr. 25.27 the writer of the story doth not meane that the conspirators were moued by those reasons or had any purpose of reuenging those offences moued by other sinister respects not mentioned but that God brought those feareful iudgments vpon these kings for the foresaid sins Sect. VII IT may heere be asked what shoulde then be the issue of the violence and tyranny which any of these kinges might perhaps vse what ordâ—â— was taken and what was the behauiour of loyal subiectes in such cases we answere that the weapons which God gaue vnto his people wherewith to defend themselues against the tyrannie of their lawfâ—ll kinges were these The first is wisedome carefully to auoyde all occasions of the kinges anger and iniurie and because that they who are disposed to be iniurious to their subiectes neuer want occasions which they take where none is offered therefore the next remedie is to auoyde and decline from the violence or iniury it self Thus did Dauid by flying into dens caues and mountaines keepe himselfe from the rage of Saule The thirde remedie where the second is wanting is patience to suffer with a quiet minde the violence or iniustice of the king which could not be by wisedom eyther preuented or auoyded The last remedie is to appeale from the vniust sentence of the king not to any man or to any court heere on earth but to the king of kinges euen to God himselfe whose eares are alwaies open to heare those who are oppressed this remedie is the last and therfore not to be vsed but in cases of greatest extremitie when as the violence is too too grieuous shamefull and to mans infirmity altogether intollerable This meanes did Samuell commend vnto the people whereby they shoulde ease themselues of those intollerable burdens of tributes which their king would lay vpon them 1. Sam. 8.18 saying then you beeing thus oppressed by your king shall not rebell against him but shall cry vnto the Lord. Where it is added that God wil not heare them when they câ—y this is mâ—nt that they could not afterwards put down their kings neyther be freed from their tyranny which by their own wilfulnes they had brought vpon themselues otherwise God doth heare those who being intollerably iniured by their kinges do appeale vnto him So we read 2. Chro. 4.22 that when as Zacharias was stoned by the commaundement of king Ioas hee appealed to God and commended his cause to him Where the spirit of God hath carefully noted that God receiued his appeale so that within one yeare he sent the Armies of the Syrians who destroyed his princes and spoyled Ierusalem Yea the seruants of the king by the iust iudgement of God although vnlawfully coÌ„spired against him killed him for the death of Zacharias Yea this was the vsuall meanes wherby God did punish the sinne and represse the rage of idolatrous kings euen the power of forraine princes into whose handes he did often giue these kings of Iuda with their people and kingdome but did neuer by his word arme any of their subiects against them therin as in al other his actions obseruing decorum which is the rule of seemlines or ciuil order honesty vnto the which it is agreeable that kings should be chastened controlled not by their subiectes and inferiours but by other kings which are their equals Sect. VIII LAstly it may be obiected that it is a verie vnlike matter that this people with their wise elders and senatours were or could be so farre ouerseenâ—s that liuing vnder a moderate gouerment in the which either they neuer had any iniury offered vnto them by their rulers or if they had might easely haue it redressed by some other lawful authority would permit themselues their wiues and children landes and libertie to any such authority vnder the which they were subiect to iniury yea in such sort as that they had no refuge to fly vnto in any extremitie no superiour authority to appeale vnto no stronger power to oppose and finally which both might easely be come tyrannicall and beeing so could not by any meanes which they could vse be eyther ended or amended Whereunto we answere first as before that heere we doe onely make a bare narration what was done leauing it to those who professe skill in these matters to iudge whether it were wisely done or no. Secondly that we may giue some reason hereof that this was done according to the simplicitie of the first ages of the world wherein men were much more innocent then they are in these daies and did not so easely inferre iniury to others and therfore not feare to receiue hurt from others Whereby it came to passe that men did both safely and securely permiâ—â—hemselues into thâ— handes of others eyâ—her kinges Lordes or masters or any other rulers without making couenantes with them and taking caution of them for their security But the state of the worlde is much altered for nowe men are growen to that hight and ripenes of craft deceit dissimulation violence and all other kindes of wickednesse that almost euerie man feareth and suspecteth each other neyther will haue any dealinges with any other without greate pledges of securitie Heereof it hath come to passe that these greate monarchies endued with absolute power were farre more vsâ—d in the first ages of the worlde then in the times following wherein wee see that although a monarchicall state be thought more excellent and commodious then any other kinde of gouernment yet men dare not giue vnto it this ample and
the Church should be at the call and commaundement of the secular power whereby they might be eyther wholly dispossessed of their places or continually troubled interrupted in ordering the affaires of the Church and the matters of God and finally iniuriously and contumeliously handled which thing the holines of their places and persons wil in no wise suffer For the answere of this doubt it is plaine in the word of God that all ecclesiasticall persons whatsoeuer yea the chiefe priestes in them the high priest himself the prince and head of the priestes who was the type of Christ the Oracle of God and on whom the whole glory and maiesty of the priesthood was bestowed was no lesse subiect to the iurisdiction of the kinge then he which had the basest place and calling in the common-wealth The trueth heereof appeareth by the lamentable tragedie of Abimelech 1. Sam. 2. who being summoned by Saule to appeare came with all the priestes that were with him and being come acknowledged Saulâ— to be his Lord Verse 12. and did not appeale froÌ„ his vniust sentence of death to any other power The same end befel his son Abiather who for that he tooke part with Adonia was by Salomon put out of his office and condemned to die 1. King 2.26 And likewise Zachariah the son of Iehâ—ida 2. Chro. 24.21 Now although two of these kinges did impiously and tyrannically abuse their authority yet it doth appeare that they had authority ouer them yea not onely these examples but the course of the whole scripture and equitie it selfe doth shew that it ought to be so We knowe that euen Christ himselfe more holy in person and office then all the priestes men or angels in the world did throughout the whole course of his life submit himselfe to the ciuill power and at the end of it did suffer himselfe to be violently apprehended contuâ—eliously entreated yea vniustly coÌ„demned by the deputy of a heathen Emperour Likewise the Apostle Paule did appeale and subiect himselfe to the authority of Caesar. Neyther is there any cause or reason why it should be otherwise For howsoeuer the Romish prelates haue not only drawen out their neckes from the subiection of princes but also haue inuaded their thrones and subdued them vnder their feete and the whole cleargie say to the ciuill power come not near nor yet once touch me because I am holier then thou and think themselues too good to be iudged by any but by their owne ordinarie yet the trueth is that all persons as well ciuill as ecclesiasticall are and ought to be by the word of God equally subiect to the ciuill power For shall Christ himselfe and in him God himselfe stand before the iudgement seat of princes and shall sinfull men nay shall wretched wormes thinke them too prophane to be competent iudges in their causes no no the seruant is not aboue the master nor the creature aboue the creator and therefore we say with the Apostle that al soules that is euery man that hath a soule that none shoulde thinke himselfe exempted ought to be subiect to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 The ground of the contrary errour is an arrogant opinion which presumptuous men bearing function in the Church haue of their own holinâ—sse in respect of others whereas in the Church of God men who haue ciuil callings are no lesse holy then they who haue ecclesiasticaâ— yea somtimes much more holy they who haue ecclesiastical holy callings being otherwise wicked prophane for it is truly said althougâ— impiously applied by the rebellious company of Corah Numb 16.3 That not only Moses Aaron but euen the whole multitude of the common people much more the Lords annoynted is holy In the next place we are to search whether that as al persons so likewise al causes belonged to the authority of the King of Israell First of ciuill then of ecclesiasticall causes in the first kinde it is not needful that we should insist forsomuch as all men euen they who are most sparing and wary in giuing power to these kinges doe acknowledge that all ciuill causes did properly belong to their iurisdiction And so it was indeede For the king had authoritie to appointe all the publike officers of his kingdome who should be his counsellers at home or his Captaines abroad who shoulde be the iudges of the people and who of the chiefe senate in Ierusalem and good reason it was that he shoulde haue this power in these causes For seeing that his office was especially to iudge the causes of the people and to fight their battailes for the which purpose the people desired a king it could not be denied vnto him to appointe those to be his deputies whom he thought most able to discharge these dueties Yea further it belonged to him to call all publike assemblies and to order them to make peace with whom he would and to goe to battaile against whome â—e when 〈◊〉 thought good The trueth of this pointe doth 〈◊〉 plainely appeare throughout the whole storie that we need not insist in it Sect. X. NOwe we are to enquire what was the authoritie of the kinge in the matters of the Church to wit in ordering the state of religion and of the seruice of God Whereof there is greate question made whilest some doe wholly exclude him out of the Church not permitting him to intermeddle with any affaires belonging vnto it others suffer him to deale in these causes yet not to beare any great sway or to ouerrule in them and the third sort giueth vnto him the greatest part of that ecclesiasticall authoritie which belongeth to man The which distinction is necessarely to be considered for God hath not giuen to any man such ful and absolute authoritie in the Church as in the common-wealth for he hath made Christ the soueraign Lord and King of the Church to rule it by his owne lawes and worde Yet one parte of ecclesiasticall iurisdiction belongeth to men who are to establish the diuine lawes of the worship of God and to make ecclesiastical constitutions for that purpose But who hath authoritie to doe this there is all the controuersie In the first opinion or rather grosse and palpable errour are the Bishops of Rome with their adherentes who that they might through the Church enter into the common-wealth inuade the riches preferments and pleasures of kinges and vsurpe their states and crownes haue thrust out of the Church this king of Israell least that by his example other magistrates shoulde challenge to themselues â—uthoritie in causes ecclesiasticall In the second opinion are men otherwise syncere in iudgement who in a good meaning affection to the Church thinke it not safe or conuenient to permitte her wholly to the ciuill power and in a reuerent opinion of her iudge it vnmeete that ciuill rulers should order diuine matters and so make the Church say vnto the magistrate touch me not for I am more holy then thou
generall state of religion be permitted vnto him wee cannot exclude him from the making of lawes whereby the lawes of God are to be executed The humane lawes of this Church were very fewe because almost all the circumstances of the seruice of God were prescribed by the ceremoniall lawe yet there was alwaies necessary occasion of making some in the which worke the king had the chiefe stroke Thus did Dauid and Salomon make many ecclesiastical lawes which continued long after in the Church and are mentioned by Iosias saying 2. Chro. 35.4 Prepare your selues ye Leuites by your companies according to the writing of Dauid and the writing of Salomon yet these lawes were made by the aduise of others to wit eyther of the prophets as we may see 2. Chro. 33.15 or of the Church and people Thus did Ezechias hold a councel 2. Chro 30.2 wherin by the aduise of the whole Church the passeouer was held in the second month likewise verse 13 the whole assembly tooke counsell to keepe the feast other seauen daies so that although these ecclesiasticall constitutions were established by the sole authority of the king yet they were aduised by others that nothing should be done in the Church peremptorely by the absolute authority of the king or any other but rather by the counsel of others so with the good liking of al men Yea an errour cōmitted in the ordering of the church is more grieuous dangerous therfore was to be auoyded as by al other meanes so especially by taking the aduise of others in making lawes for this purpose Yet it did not belong to the king to take vppon him the office of the high priest as we may see in the example of Ozias 2. Chro. 26. or to meddle with the proper dueties of any other ecclesiasticall person or yet to change the ceremonial law but onely to order the publike state of religion to make by the aduise of others and to establishe by his own authority those lawes which serued for that purpose Sect. XI THere remaine two other properties of this regall power to wit that it was absolute and peremptorie the which we will propounde verie briefly For the first we doe not meane that this power was so loosed from lawes that the king might doe what him listed for he was tied to some lawes as namely first to the keeping of the morall law yea vpon paine of forfaiting and loosing his kingdome if he did wickedly transgresse the same and if at anie time he did commaund contrarie to this lawe he was not to be obeyed 1. King 18.13 1. Sam. 22.17 and secondly the fundamentall lawes of the kingdome the state whereof it was not in his power to alter Yea also he was tied to the ceremoniall lawe containing the outward manner of the worshippe of God But he was loosed first from the Iudiciall lawe of God and secondly from all possitiue lawes made by men By the Iudiciall lawes are vsually ment all those lawes of Moses which belong vnto the practise of the second table and of such dueties as we owe to our neighbour And it is as it were an addition to the seconde Table as the ceremoniall lawe is to the first But heere wee meane more specially onely so many of them as did belong to the publike administration of the common-wealth which may properly be called politicall iudiciall or forensicall concerning the manner of administring iustice and iudgement as namely in what order iudgement ought to beginne and proceede what punishmente ought to be inflicted for euerie seuerall offence and also howe they shoulde behaue themselues in battaile in all which the Iudges Elders and people had a prescript forme which they did follow and were bound by the commaundement of God so to doe But the kinges were freed from these lawes so that if they did execute iustice and iudgement it was free for them to doe it in what forme manner they thought best as for example the iudiciall lawe required that when any had committed any hainous trespasse there shoulde be two or three witnesses solemnely produced and that they shoulde beginne the execution and first throwe stones at the offendour But the kinges namely Saule Dauid and Salomon did put diuerse to death without obseruation of any of these circumstances Neyther heerein did they sinne against God and his lawe because they were freed from it Yea it belonged to the king to make these positiue lawes of the circumstances of executing iudgement and therefore to be a iudge a lawgiuer a kinge and a defender from forraine enemies are all ioyned together Isa. 23.22 the Lord is our iudge our law-giuer our kinge and he shall saue vs. Yea the power of this kingdome was such in this behalfe that the kinge might of himselfe without calling any to consultation make publishe establishe and execute lawes and edictes whereof there are manie examples yet it was more vsuall yea and conuenient in regard both of king and people that the aduise of the priests prophets rulers and elders of the people shoulde be taken Lastly this power of this kingdome herein differeth from the power of the Iudges Elders and of the people in that it was not so gentle and milde but after a sort a fierce and peremptorie power as may easelie be gathered by that which hath beene spoken of it for where there is a greate generall and absolute power wholly in any one hand it must needs be of this nature Hence it was that the people stood in farre greater awe of this authority then of any other insomuch that the lawes edictes and commaundementes of the kinges were like vnto the roaring of a Lyon whereat all the beastes in the forrest doe tremble and quake for feare Yea their whole behauiour was much more reuerent to the kinges then to their other rulers So we read Iudg. 8.1 and 12. that whenas Gedeon and Iephta had gotten notable victories of the enemie the Ephramites came vpon them very presumptuously to quarrell with them because for sooth they had not taken them with thē to the battaile but they did not vse to aske their kings any such questions or to require any reason of their doings but did readelie come when they called goe when they sent and do whatsoeuer thing was inioined by them Yea we may wel thinke that the cause why Rehoboam gaue the people such a strange answere was not for that he ment to increase their tributes for there was no cause why he shoulde so doe the temple and the kinges pallaces being builte and the king being furnished with all thinges requisite eyther for maiesty at home or strength abroade for the which purpose those gret tributes were imposed but rather because he and his young counsell were highly offended and inflamed with anger against the people for that they did offer to make him a conditionall king who should not raigne but vpon those conditions which they propounded To take one example of
those places or by the fauour and consent of the people obtained that great authotitie for themselues and their posteritie Yea often a temperate and meane power being graunted doth increâ—se to this immoderate and absolute authoritie whereof we speake The which although it were at the first conquered by violence and vniust dealing yet if afterwardes it be by the generall and continuall consent of the people admitted acknowledged and obeyed it is to be accounted a lawfull authority Now in many of those kingdomes the rulers are not tied to any couenants or conditions by the which they shoulde rule but onely so farre forth as they doe voluntarilie submit themselues for the more quiet obtaining enioying of their kingdoms Yea they haue the full and absolute authority of the land in their owne handes and inhereÌ„t in their own persons insomuch that al others within their dominions ioyntly and seuerally considered are in respect of them priuate men Of this kinde was the kingdome of Israell as hath beene shewed in the former treatise and many other in the which that we may apply this to our purpose it was not lawfull for any of the people to resist the ciuill authority by open force no not in the cause of setting vp or maintaining the Church as appeareth by the historie and examples of the saide kinges Yea this is agreeable to the word of God which teacheth that we ought not to doe that which is good but by good lawful and ordinarie meanes but to resist the ciuill power is euill and greatly displeasing in the eyes of God Yet we ought to vse all lawfull meanes for the setting forward of this worke when it is hindered by these magistrates as first to solicite the cause of the Church at their hands yea euen with our owne danger as did Hester Est. 4.14.16 Nehemias Neh. â— 4 and to labour to bring them to the knowledge of the truth Yea further if it be so needfull to redeeme the freedome of religion with our goods by paying to our rulers great tributes that the Church may be established Also by shewing our faithfull obedience loyal submission and duetifull seruice euen to the vnbeleeuing rulers as did Daniel Nehemias and many other godly men By the which meanes and such like the Lord working together in whose handes the heartes of kinges are to turne at his pleasure it may happely come to passe that they will become louers and furtherers yea members of the Church or at the least not haters and hinderers of it but if they doe continue obstinate and as it vsually commeth to passe become persecutours of the Church Then in the first kinde of gouernment the people may vse eyther that secret authoritie which as yet remaineth in their owne handes or else the libertie and benefit of conditionall obedience and so notwithstanding the ciuil ruler build the Church as they ought to doe But in the other kind of gouermeÌ„t we may not build with the one hand hold our weapons with the other against that gâ—eat absolute and maiesticall authoritie for here God giueth no other weapons where withall to fight saue onely patience to suffer their vngodly dealing and if they become malitious and bloudy persecutours of the Church winges to flie For that in time of persecution moued eyther by our owne magistrates or by any other power we may fly for our safetie we are taught euen by the light of nature which moueth euery one to preserue his life by all good meanes But nature is an euill counseller in cases of religion and therefore we haue a more sure ground whereon to rest in this behalfe euen the worde of God whereunto we are to hearken giuing vs this libertie yea this counsell that when we are persecuted in one place we should fly to another as the primitiue Church was dispersed except the Apostles Act. 8.1 yea this is good not onely for our selues but also for the Church for by this meanes we preserue the Church which otherwise would be destroyed in vs. Besides those who are weake and doubt of their constancy ought not to tempt God by vndergoing extreame daunger Yea the Lord vseth thiâ— meanes for the inlarging of his Church Act. 8.4 yet sometimes God doth not graunt vnto vs this libertie of flying but giueth the persecutour power ouer vs that by this meanes he may try our soundnesse and constancy in the profession of his trueth Yea sometimes it is also expedient for the Church that we doe not vse this liberty though we may as if our suffering be like to bring many to the profession of the trueth or to confirme the weake or to auoyd the slaunder of the enemy obiecting to vs fearefulnesse hypocrisie want of faith and of the hope of eternall life Sect. 7. Of the building of the Church hindered by the ciuill ruler being a christian THus much of professed hinderers being open enemies to the Church Nowe we come to those who although they professe themselues members of the Church and such as do by all meanes labour to build it yet in trueth they doe hinder the same yea often more then the opeÌ„ enemy doth And to let others passe the greatest hurt is done by those who are publicke in the Church vnto whome the building and furthering of this worke doth belong as namely the ciuill ruler being a member of the Church and the ecclesiasticall gouernour or the minister of the worde For as when the light of the body is darkenesse how greate is that darkenesse so when the builders of the Church are the hinderers of it how great is that hurt For the first the ciuill ruler for so we speake as of one because that kinde of gouerment is most vsuall may greatly hinder the building of the Church although he doe in part further the same as namely if together with the profession of the true worship of God he doe retaine some part of some false worship or the reliques and memorials of it whereby many are offended and hindered Secondly if he hinder the establishing of any part of the gouernment of the Church commaunded in the worde or else the function of any office and finally if he doe by any meanes hinder the course of the gospell and the building of Gods Church in that place Heere we haue other meanes to vse the ciuill ruler being a member of the Church For first we may be more bolde in mouing him to regard the building of the Church the which doth as much concerne his owne good and saluation as the good of any other We may also haue greate hope that he will be moued by the aduise of them who are godlie wise and learned in his realme Yea those that are the ministers of the worde of GOD by whose meanes the Church is built may deale more plainely with him and exhort yea charge him in the name of God who will one day take an accounte of him howe he hath discharged his duetie to
build after this inward manner This second kinde of building is in order and nature the first yea that which moueth the externall action of the spirituall building and prepareth the way for the ministerie of the word by the meanes whereof a Church cannot be set vp in any place whâ—ther countrie ciâ—ie or family till that the power wheâ—eâ—y the said place is ruled do either procure or at the least suffer it For the kingdome of Christ is not of this worlde neither doth it take a way the generall ordinance of magistracie and order whereby God ruleth the world but is in respect of outward action subiect vnto it and to be established and miantained by it for as God himselfe was the head and first mouer in the building of the Church when as at the first he sent his Apostles immediately by his owne authoritie to do it so also it is his will that they who do supply his place and are after a sort Gods on earth should afterwardes be the first agents in this worke For we are not to thinke that rulers by the which name we call all that haue authoritie whetheâ— in countries townes or priuate houses haue the charge onlie of the bodies of their subiects commited vnto them but rather that their chiefe care ought to be to prouide for their soules the true worshippe of GOD wherein the last ende and chiefe happinesse of man consisteth and wherevnto all temporall benefits are to be referred as the Apostle writeth .1 Timo. 2.2 the end of a quiet and peaceable life procured by magistrates is the right worshippe of GOD. For this cause ciuill rulers are called by GOD in the scripture the pastors or feeders of the people not as if they were to feed their bodies only as sheep heardes doe flockes of sheepe but chiefely in regard of their soules as we may see euidently 1. Chro 17.6 which way soeuer I walked with Israel haue I spoken of building a Church or temple to any of the iudges of Israel whome I commaunded to feede my people In the which place we may see at whose hands GOD looketh for the building of his Church But it may be here asked what if this ciuill power doe not moue in this worke whether that there should be no Church or ministerie of the word in that place or rather if that the king prince magistrate or the maister of the family he negligent in his dutie if not then the subiect sonne or seruant in a priuate house may lawfully take this worke in hand or yet the ministers of the worde may begin and goe on in their worke yea although they be neither set on worke nor yet tollerated but euen flatly forbidden and peremptorelie hindered by the saide poweâ— for otherwise it might come to passe by the obstinacy of rulers being enimies to the Gospell that there should be no Church either publick or priuate in any parte of the world whereas it is the will of God that his church and true worshippe should be established in all places And therefore it may seeme that in this case the councell and practtise of the apostles is to be followed who being forbidden by the rulers to preach the Gospell answered that it is better to obey God then man The answere is as before Chapter 7. Sect. 6. that as touching ordinarie callings a church cannot lawfully be built in any place by resisting the authoritie of the said place For no man may against the will of any man rushe into his house to instruct his family or into a city to abolishe idolatrie and to set vp publickly the true worshippe of God because howsoeuer euery one ought to endeuour to build the Church yet we ought to keepe our selues within the compasse of our owne calling and not to take vpon vs by violence the performance of other mens duties For none are crowned either with due praise or with happie successe of their labours but they who striue lawfully howsoeuer it pleaseth God some times to accept and prosper the endeauors of those who labour in aduancing his worshippe and glory more in feruent zeale then imperfect knowledge so go further in this behalfe then the secret rule of the word of God doth requier or permit As the apostles they haue an extraordinary calling and dispensation immediately from God himselfe needfull for the first publishing of the gospell the which they were to obey yea though it were contrary to his reuealed will But ordinarie ministers haue no callinges but from men and must square their actions according to the written worde And yet we are not to thinke that it is in the power of man or of any creature to forbid the seruice of God for although all the rulers in the worlde shoulde make that edict of Dariuâ— that none shoulde pray vnto God yet we ought nor to obey it as we see in the example of Daniel Daâ— 6.10 but we speake of building a Church in any place the which worke is neuer so generally hindered but that God inclineth the heartes of some to set it forward And whenas no publicke magistrate doth builde the Church yet priuate men giue it entertainement in their houses As touching other particulars wherein this ciuill power medleth with the Church we are to consider them hereafter onely we â—re here to note howe this power may be called the head of the Church to wit for that it is the first mouer in the building of it In the which respect not onely kinges and princes but euen priuate men who set vp and maintaine the Church within their houses may in regarde of their owne families be so called and yet we doe not by this meanes giue that to man which is proper to Christ for first Christ is the head of the catholicke Church but man of some particular Church onely Secondly Christ is the head not onely to the whole Church but also to the seuerall members of it to whom he giueth motion by bestowing on them the graces of his spirit eyther permanent or temporarie but man is the head onely in respect of the builders namely of the teachers and rulers of the Church and in respect of the whole bodie of the people as they giue themselues to be made a Church And lastly Christ is the head of the internall and spirituall working but man of the externall building Christ giueth giftes fit for the ministerie which make an inward calling but man giueth the outward calling Christ hath appointed the offices of the ministerie generally in the whole visible Church but man procureth the execution of the said offices in this or that particular place by this or that person So that whatsoeuer ciuill power it be whether of princes in kingdomes or of the people or senate in commonwealthes or of priuate men in their families that buildeth the Church it may very fitly be called the head in that worke As we may see Num. 1.15 7.2 that in regard of
Yea this course did Esra take in a like case by the counsell and commaundement of king Artaxarxes as we reade in the seauenth of that booke Vers. 25. And thou Ezra according to the wisedome of thy God which is in thee appoint Iudges euen all that knowe the lawes of thy God And if it were obiected but there aâ—e not a sufficient number of men which kâ—ow how to iudge instruct and order the people therefore he addeth and those that knowe not make them to know how they ought to doe these thinges So that by the good direction and counsell of those who are the chiefe worke-men in this planting of a Church men otherwise ignorant and vnexpert may become able to teach gouerne others Neyther ought this to seeme straunge vnto vs considering the weake and simple state of the people at the first is such as that although in some respect they had neede of most expert master-builders yet they may be helped and taught by those who doe themselues neede to be instructed And according to the meane estate both of the teachers and also of the people we must be content as no doubt the Lord in mercy doth accept it with a smale measure both of knowledg and also of obedience in the waies of God and if it here be obiected that which the Apostle forbiddeth Timothy to wit that none newly conuerted from paganisme should be a Bishop or elder we answere that if that be his meaning yet this commandement must giue place to the necessity of the Church yea many such may be knowen to be very sound in the faith so that we need not feare any apostasie in them And forasmuch as it may be well thought that these men cannot so soone be endued with such a measure of knowledge in the gouernment of the Church and in the teaching and ordering of the people but that they will be wanting in many things and oftentimes erre in administration it being of it selfe so hard and difficult as that euen they who haue all their life time laboured in this worke and beene teachers and gouernours in the Church shall find themselues in many respectes insufficient yea ignorant and vnexpert in many cases which do often fall out among the people therefore they by whose meanes and ministerie the Church was first founded euen as by most wise maister-builders must still haue an eye to the seuerall congregations and set those things in order which are amisse resolue the doubtes which are risen among them strengthen confirme and encourage both the people in their profession and obedience which they performe both to God and to his ministers which are set ouer them and especially they are to strâ—ngthen the teachers themselues least they faint vnder the waight of this most painfull and troublesome calling wherein they finde so many offences in the people so many infirmities and wantes in themselues yea so many lâ—ts and hinderances of their minisâ—ery laid by the malice of sathan and the meanes of wicked men Thus did the Apostle Paule exhort confirme and encourage the elders of the Church at Ephesus Act. 20. whose example is to be followed of all in this case who are endued with more excellent gifts of knowledge and wisdome in gouerning the Church of God then these are to whom in the want of men fully sufficient the congregations of the people are committed Sect. 9. To whom the enacting of ecclesiasticall lawes in a publick Church doth belong IT remaineth that we consider to whom it belongeth to make ecclesiasticall lawes in a publick Church In priuate Churches this ought to be done as hath bene said by the whole body of the Church consisting of the rulers and the people for these churches are as it wâ—re free cities exempted in regard of diuine matters from the iurisdiction of all superiour power saue only of Christ howsoeuer they be subiect to magistrates as touching ciuill obedience But it is farre otherwise in publick Churcâ—es the which comming into the common-wealth come within the dominion and iurisdiction of the ciuill magistrate not to spoile him of his power either in whole as when the ciuill state is ruled by any in the name of the Church or in part as when the Church taketh to her selfe full and supreame authority in the ordering of her own matters and so exempting hir selfe from the ciuill power doth restraine it from medling with all matters within that dominion But the Church becomming publick doth subiect her selfe to the said power as to a superiour or heâ—d and suffereth her selfe to be ordered by it in great part For euen as a man as long as he liueth in a desert place or keepeth himselfe within his owne house may liue according to his owne will but as soone as he ioyneth himselfe to a common-wealth and commeth into a publick place he must square his actions according to the commaundement of the magistrate so standeth the case with the Church The which is free as long as she is priuate but being publick is ouerruled by the ciuill power yea euen in making ecclesiasticall lawes this ciuill power hath place where by ecclesiasticall lawes we doe not meane those which prescribe the manner of the worshippe of God and the substance of Church-gouernment for these are appointed by God in the word and cannot be changed by any creature but we meane lawes made onely of the circumstances of Gods worshippe being things indifferent neither commanded forbidden nor expressed in the scripture There is an other kinde of lawes which also may be called ecclesiasticall for that they concerne the Church made to allowe commaund and authorise the publick building of it such were the edictes of Cyrus Darius and Artaxerxes for the reedifying of the temple at Ierusalem likewise the lawes of the good kings of Iuda for the ouerthrowing of idolatrie and the publick establishing of the true worshippe of God These lawes are to be made by the sole authoritie of the ciuill ruler or at the least by that authority whereby ciuill lawes are made neither can there any question be made hereof For it is plaine that no man can make the building of a publick Church either peaceable or lawfull but they who haue the ruling of that place wherein it is to be built But as touching the giuer or maker of the other lawes there is great question for it seemeth to many very vnmeete that the ciuil power should enter so farre into the Church as to haue to doe with the making of the lawes whereby it is to be ordered Yea that it is without the compasse of the magistrates calling to meddle with these matters But it seemeth that we ought to be so farre from excluding the ciuill ruler from the making of these lawes which were in some sorte to take the scepter out of his hand forasmuch as where there is a Church publickly sette vp in any realme there the state of the Church and the common-wealth doe verie much depend of
each other and their generall affaires are so lincked together as that neither can be well ordered without respect had to the other as that we rather take it agreeable to the worde of GOD that the cheife stroke in this action be giuen vnto him For the further declaration hereof the making of lawes hath two partes the first is the counselling or aduising of them the second is the establishing or enacting of them both which as it seemeth belong to the ciuill ruler the first in parte the second wholly The enacting of the lawes is the making of them and therefore in the first place we will endeauour to shewe that those thinges which are aduised for the ordering of a publick Church haue both the name and the force of lawes from the ciuill power for first this must of necessititie be graunted to it in the first founding of the Câ—urch wherein we are to suppose that there are neither ministers nor any beleeuing people only the magistrate hauing the knowledge of the true God goeth aboute to bring the people thereunto The which thing he cannot do without making and establishing lawes for that purpose So that as we see it to be in other matters in that the ciuill ruler is the first and sole founder of these publick Churches he hath the power of enacting those lawes whereby the whole worke is both begun continued and preserued thus the Apostles being the first founders of the Churches did make lawes and constitutions for the ordering of them as we may see 1. Cor. 4.17 Where Paule witnesseth of himselfe that he did make the same coÌ„stitutions in al Churches In like manner the cheife rulers although they haue not Apostolicall callings offices and giftes yet for that in planting publick Churches they do supplie thier places we are to grant vnto them authority in this behalfe And as this poâ—er cannot be denyed to the magistrate in the first founding of a Church so whenas the Church is built his authoritie is not diminished or abated or giuen to any other but remaineth still in his owne handes The trueth whereof may be declared in this manner to make a lawgiuer there must these things concur First a publick calling whereby he hath care and câ—arge of the people to procure their good as by all other meanes so especially by giuing them good and righteous lawes by the which they may be ordered Secondly authoritie to command and also power to compell those who are rebellious to yeeld obedience vnto the said lawes The which thinges for so much as they are wanting in all others saue in the cheife ruler hereof it commeth to passe that the giuing of lawes cannot belong to any saue to him onely For the greater euidence of this point we are to consider to whom this making of ecclesiasticall lawes is giuen being denied to the ciuill ruler namely to the whole ministerie of the Church established who as they haue the ordering and ruling of the Church and the greatest measuâ—e of knowledge in these affaires so it may seeme most meete that the making of lawes be permitted vnto them For the answering whereof this is to be marked that we do not here enquire who aâ—e most meet to aduise ecclesiasticall lawes and to be admitted into consultation of them for we cannot doubt but that the ministers of the word are vsually most fit for this purpose but who hath this calling office and authority to make these lawes All which seeme to be wanting in the ministerâ— whose calling and office is to be in particular Churches the ministers of the word of prayer of the sacraments of discipline but not to be lawgiuers in the Church For so they should rule ouer it as Lordes which is forbidden 1. Pet. 5.3 yea they haue no power to make and authorize lawes no not in a priuate Church which is free from the ciuill power For although they beare the chiefest sway in this and in all other actions yet the lawes take their authoritie not from the ministers but from the whole bodie of the Church consisting of ministers and people But in a publicke Church this authoritie goeth from the people to the ciuill ruler by whose authoritie it is planted built and preferred the worde lawfully preached in great assemblies of the people the which otherwise were tumultes yea the positiue lawes of the Church authorized put in force So that in a priuate Church the state iâ— popular but in a publicke Church it is according to the ciuill state as namely monarchicall in the rule of one If any doe here obiect that definition of the office and duetie of a ruler which the people of Israel make 1. Sam. 8.20 saying We wil haue a king who shall iudge vs and fight our battailes for vs and thereof gather that he being otherwise busied cannot vse the meanes of attayning a sufficient measure of knowledge in ordering of the Church we answere that this people had no care but of worldly matters And further that there is no ruler in his owne person so continually imployed in ciuil or warlike affaires but that he may and ought to giue himselfe to the studie of the worde of GOD and to the vse of all men whereby he may be made able for the discharging of this duety to the Church The trueth of this pointe appeareth in the example of Iosua who had a more waightie and troublesome charge laide vpon him namely to bring the people of Israel into the land of Chanaan and to giue them quiet possession of it then any ruler hath in the ordinarie gouernment of his realme and yet the Lorde gaue him this commaundement in the first place Ios. 1.8 That the booke of the lawe should neuer depart from him but that he should meditate on it day and night If it be further asked why the Apostles neuer make mention of any such authority that princes should haâ—e in the church the answere is plaine to wit that there were no publicke Churches in their daies And therefore the ciuill ruler had no further to deale with them then to tolerate them within their dominions and to see that they liued in ciuill peace and order As touching the aduising of lawes although the ciuill ruler haue the authoritie of enacting them yet he ought to be very sparing and moderate in vsing it The which thing as it is necessarelie to be obserued in the ciuill gouernment of all rulers who desire to haue a quiet and peaceable estate so it is much more requisite in ordering the Churrch which ought to be ruled after a most gentle and milde manner euen as the prophet Esay doth teach vs saying that in the time of the gospell Kings Queenes shal be nourse-fathers and nourse-mothers to the Church that is they shall rule and order it not tyrannically by force and violence but in a louing and tender sort euen as we see nourses deale with young children The which affection a christian ruler