can sacro-sancta the Apostolicall sea did not receiue supremacy and preeminence from the Apostles but from our Sauiour himselfe and indeed Christ founded and built his Church vpon S. Peter Mat. 16. Thou art Peter and on this rock I vvill build my Church .... and J vvill giue vnto the the keys of the kingdome of heauen Again Christ praid especially for S. Peter and after his resurrection appointed him to feed all his sheepe and lambs Moreouer S. Peter as head and Prince of the other Apostles called the first Councill which was celebrated between the Ascention and Pentecost And in the second Council mentioned act 15. spoke first and decided the matter in debate Bishop of Rome as lawfull successour of S. Peter in suprem authority and there is not any except the Roman Church that hath published and planted the one holy apostolicall faith from the rising of the sun to the goeing down therof which denoteth its vniuersality an order to place there is not any except the Roman Church that can rockon pastours and Teachers in a continuall line of succession down from S. Peter to the present times which sheweth its vniuersality in order to time there is not any Church-Gouernour saue the Bishop of Rome to whose definitiue sentence of iudgment (x) S. Anaclete Epis 1. commanded that euery hard question should be referd to the sea Apostolick because saith he the Apostles so appointed by speciall command from Christ Wherefore Tertullian calleth the Pope king of the world and stiles Rome the Chief and Apostolicall seat whether saith he wee ought to recur in all doubtfull matters relating to faith Besids S. Austin that was a member of the African Church Epis 9. addressing himselfe to Pope Innocent in order to the Pelagians whom he impugned writeth thus ... that errour and impiety of the Pelagians the authority of the sea apostolick must anathematize Again the Council of Alexandria cals Pope Felix prophanarum haresium depositor the deposer of prophan heresies hard controuersies of faith haue been referred in all ages Furthermore it is essentiall to the true Church to begett children in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell 1. Cor. 4 that is to say to bring whole countries out of darkness of infidelity into the maruelous light of Christian faith which not any except the Roman Church hath performed Sectaries like partriges haue gathered children * Ieremiae cap. 17. perdix fouet seu congregat quae non peperit Vnde S. Aug. assimilat haereticos perdici which they haue not brought forth but the Roman Church hath begotten vnto Christ a world of children both in the primatiue times for the first 500. yeares and since For Germans Bauarians Vandals Polans Sweds Danes Noruegians Hungarians Normans English and sundry other Countryes since the yeare 600. were begotten in Iesus-Christ through the Gospell by Priests and Bishops of the Roman Church as plainly appears by the ancient and modern histories written of each people respectiuely And as touching our country of Englād that embraced the catholick faith through the preaching of S. Austin a Priest and Bishop of the Roman Church after its conuersion which happened in the reign of S. Ethelbert for near a thousand yeares continued obedient to the Bishop of Rome and constant in the profession of the catholick religion as do euidence our ancient Cronicles laws common laws ordinances Records foundations of Bishopricks Cathedrall Churches vniuersities colleges and hospitalls which remain monuments of these dayes to beare clear witnes of catholick religion wherfore it is a wonder how English Magistrats come to look with so enuious an eye vpon their catholick subiects as to persecute them for conforming their conscience to the full and constant profession of all their christian progenitours CHAR. XX. OF TRADITIONS THE CONTENTS Down from the Apostles to these times the true Church of God hath been directed and gouernd by the written and vnwritten word as by laws and customs doctrines necessary to saluation which the Apostles receiued either from the mouth of Christ or from the holy Ghost by inspiration were deliuered to the faithfull of those dayes partly in written and partly in vnritten traditions if the Churches authority and vnwritten traditions were laid a side scriptures would haue nothing of waight with them vnto euincing christian religion Answeres vnto seuerall obiections propounded against the Churches traditions TRaditions are vnwrtten doctrines deliuered by the mouth of Christ or his Apostles and committed vnto the keeping of the Church (a) 1. Cor. 11. as I haue deliuered vnto you saith S. Paul keep my precepts From this sacred Text Theophilact infers that both S. Paul and the other Apostles deliuered many things which they did not set down in writing called traditions not because they are not at all written but in regard there is no express mention thereof in the holy scriptures for t is certaine that the traditions receiued from the Apostles and deliuered as it were from hand to hand for sundry ages are now written as precepts of faith and generall manners necessary vnto saluation Though the whole scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach to conuince to correct and to instruct in iustice 2. Tim. 3. Yet it is not the same thing to be a profitable guide in the way of iustce and saluation and to be the sole expedient necessary therunto for a head is both profitable and necessary to preserue a man aliue neuertheless it alone without the society and ministery of the body is not sufficient enough to continue him aliue likewise the Sacrament of Eucharist conduceth to the purchase of eternall blessedness yet cannot effect it without the help of baptism and faith and the Chapter set down expresly asserteth that euen the old scriptures instruct to saluation and notwithstanding the Apostle requireth of Timothy perseuerance in the doctrines which he had heard of him besides what he had learned from them wherin he had been versed from (b) By the particles from his infancy euidently appeares that the Apostle spoke of these scriptures which Timothy had learned in his youth that is he meant the old testament being the new scriptures were not written when Timothy was a youth Wherefore when the Apostle writ vnto him that all scripture is profitable c. he could not vnderstand the whole body thereof as some sectaries vnaduisedly interprete him translating whole for all And indeed when the Apostle writ that Epistle to Timothy the whole body of scripture was not composed S. Iohn had not then put forth his Gosple and his Apocallps he writ after the death of S. Paul him infancy again albeit the scriptures be a great light neuertheless they doe not giue light to all a en within the house of God whose written doctrines they are vnless they be put vpon the candlestick of the Churches definitions and vnwritten traditions for setting these aside scriptures are but a light shining in a dark place 2.
his Church to determine how the Euchariste should be ordered and indeed the Church-goucrnours are the proper ministers of Christ and the dispensers of the mysteries of God 1. Cor. 4. in consequence of which the Church has authority to constitute and appoint in order to dispensing the Sacraments what she shall judge expedient according to tyme place and persons but with that prouiso that she alter nothing pertaining to the nature or essence of them muesting his Church with authority and power to dispense and order therein so the integrity and substance of the Sacrament be not prejudiced as in prudence she might thinke fit in regard of places tymes persons and circumstances (b) Communion vnder the form of bread onely was practiced in the primitiue Church according to the best antiquity prouing the lawfullness thereof out of the 2. and 20. chapter of the Acts. For example S. Austin Epis 6. ad Casulanum S. Bede in 20. Act. and indeed many of the first Christians were Nazarits who were bound by their vow not to drink any licour of grapes pum 4. wherfore since the legall ceremonies of the old law were in force as appears by the fame chapter of the Act. doubtless those new Christians receiu'd the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder one kinde onely Besides S. Cyprian that liu'd in the first 300. yeares l. de lapsis set's down two examples of communion vnder one kinde Again S. Hierom in epitap Paul ad Eustach e. 23. S. Austin l. 3. de consensu Euang. c. 23. affirme that Christ gaue the Sacrament of the Euchariste vnder the form of bread onely vnto the Disciples going to Emmaous Moreouer Tertull. l. 2. ad vxor l. de Orat. attest's that it was a practice or custome to take Christs body forthwith or to carrie it home and defer the taking to an other tyme. Lay-communion vnder one kind only was practised in the primitiue Ages as plainly doe euidence scripture and Father-Testimonies preseruing of the Eucharist vnder one sole kinde as spirituall prouision for sick persons which though they were Priests did nor communicate in sickness but vnder one kinde de onely namely bread (c) The custome of communicating Infants continued in Some Churches till the dayes of Hugo de S. Victor who liu'd about the yeare 1130. for l. 1. c. 2. de caeremon he affirmes that the Priest with his finger dipt afore in consecrated wine ministred the Sacramen of the Euchariste vnder the form of wine vnto Babes newly born they being able to suck Besides in the ancient Roman office cap. de Sabbato parents are admonished not to suffer their children to suck milk vntill they had communicated But now the Church for good and iust reasons hath wholy abolished that custome and a principall motiue there of was to resist the heresy which euen in those days the Bohemian Hussits had spread teaching that Infants could not be sau'd without receiuing the Euchariste and an other reason of taking away that practice was the eminent danger of prophaning so holy a Sacrament because of the great number of children and the distribution of the Sacrament vnto Infants in one sole kinde also Namely wine for albeit these could not eat the sacramentall bread yet they might suck the sacramentall wine from the Priest's finger which truly they did according to the custome of some Churches Again lay-communion * ConueniÅt omnes Doctores Caetbolici communionem sub vtraque specie fuisse in vsu in quibusdam Ecclesijs eiusque meminerunt S. Dionys cap. 3. de Eccles Hierarch S. Iustinus Martyr Apolog 2. S. Gregor l. 3. Dial. cap. 36 alijque Patres vnder both kindes was anciently practised at some tymes in seuerall precincts of particular christian Churches as doe plainly shew the writings of primitiue Fathers And S. Leo the first being supream Pastor in Church-gouernment vnder Christ by a speciall ordinance commanded publick lay-communion at Easter vnder both kindes the chiefe intent whereof was to discouer the manichean heriticks who to conceale their heresy these sectaries did foolishly belieue that there was a good and euill God and as foolishly held wine to be created by the euill God and therfore had an abhorrence of it were obserued to receiue the sacramentall bread at Easter which sole kinde was then in practice with Catholicks promiscuously Again lay-communion vnder both kind's was abrogated absolutely and vniuersally because of certain Bohemian sectaries named Hussit's that condemned lay-communion vnder one kinde only teaching both kind's as necessarily required to all Christians vnto saluation In detestation of this heresie as also for other good reasons the generall Councell of Constance obliged all lay-Catholick's to communicate in one kinde and indeed the Church of God ought to exercise her authority to the crushing of all heresies in the bud Yet the Greek-Church continued lay-communion in both kind's though it did not esteem both the species of the Sacrament necessary to saluation For in the generall Councill of Florence which was called with design chiefly to setle concord and vnion between that and the latine Church neither the greek or latine Fathers did except against lay-communion as to the practise thereof vnder one sole or both kinds whereby it is euidently manifest that Christ hat left it in the Churches liberty to determine and appoint the distribution of the communion vnto meer lay-people in one only or both kind's as it shall think fit according to the various condition of tymes places persons and circumstances so that though in this present age lay-communion be giuen in sacramentall bread alone through all the precincts of the easterne Church neuertheless it is in the power of the supreme Pastour to change that into another vsage of both kind's if he shall see as good reasons to moue him thereunto as he seeth cause to continue it vnder one sole kinde viêªt videlicet in opposition and detestation of moderne heresies First in regard of many Lutherans who beleiue that Christs body only is contained with the bread and his blood only with the wine and not all Christ entirely which is a manifest ignorance for wheresoeuer Christ's body is truly really and substantially from the day of his Resurrection there it is truly * Rom. non amplius moritur Christus aliue being impossible for Christ to die again and since the life of the flesh * Leuit. 17. anima omnis carnis in sanguine is in the blood Leuit. 17. it followeth euidently that wheresoeuer Christs body is there his blood is also and since Christ hath deuested himself of no reall thing that he once assumed and whatsoeuer he assumed was vnited hypostatically to his diuine person it is again plainly euident that wheresoeuer * S. Ambrosius vbi carpus Christi Christus est Christs body blood or soul is there is all Christ entire without separation of one part from another and albeit the words that consecrate Christs body according to their proper
likwise defined that vnwritten Tradition the faithfull of these dayes might haue been * S. Basil dicit Sabellianismum esse queÌ„dam Iudaismum Sabellius voro qui omnibus hareticis impietate antecelluit eirca annum 260. haresim Trinitatis propagauit quod Prâ—xeas omniuÌ„ primus humo Romanae inuexit proximè accessit ad errorem Iudaeorum Sabellians or Iewes as for any clear speaking scripture to hinder them Again we belieue that the holy Ghost is not the son of God nor that his procession is generation taken in the proper sense notwithstanding without tradition and interpretation of the holy Church it cannot be proued sufficiently that is to say by express scripture-testimony nor matters it that the Euangelists doe name the second person of the blessed Trinity the only begotten son for hence it follows not by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is no son for Salomon is styled the only begotten son Prouerb 4. Howeuer it plainly appeareth by the first booke of Paralipomenon or cronicles that he had many brothers yet he was named the only begotten son in regard he was beloued as if he had been the only begotten We must belieue that such (f) The Council of Nice hath defined that such as are baptized by hereticks must not be rebaptized And in regard the Donatists impugned this assertion which is grounded vpon tradition and the Churches definition they were counted hereticks and S. Aust I. de vtilitate credendi cap. 22. expresly affirms that the said assertion is not contained in any express scripture and indeed practice and tradition of the Church only was obiected against S. Cypri that asserted rebaptizing of such as were baptized by hereticks as appeares by his own Epistle ad Iubaian 74. ad Pompeium he conceiuing that he had scripture authority on his side left the Churches tradition and practice yet S. Austin in sundry places of his writings excuseth him from heresie because he was not obstinate in defending of his opinion neither did he break vnion with the Church Besid that controuersy rose before any generall Council defined validity of baptism conferred by Hereticks as are baptized by hereticks ought not to be baptized again wee must belieue that we are bound to keepe holy our lords day which is sunday and we must belieue that there is a necessary obligation to receiue the Apostles Creed yet for as much as none of all these doctrines be contained expresly in or can be deduced out of the holy scriptures by immodiate necessary and euident consequences they would haue nothing of weight with vs in the conuincing of our vnderstanding if the tradition and definition of the Church were laid a side Moreouer the Lutherans and Caluinists in regard they reject Church tradition adhering to the meer letter of scripture and their own interpretations thereof cannot as yet after frequent disputes euince against the Anabaptists that the SacrameÌ„t of Baptism ought to be administred vnto infants where they alledge the words of Christ set down Math. 19. suffer little children and forbid them not to come to me for of such is the kingdom of Heauen as also the practice of the Apostles that baptized whole housholds Act. 19. it is plainly euident that from neither of these testimonies they can as much as deduce by any necessary consequence what they assert as a doctrine of their faith namely that baptism ought to be applied to young children that want the vse of reason especially supposing (g) Caluin l. 4. insti c. 16. and the whole sect of Lutherans though they denyed baptism to be a requisit necessary to the saluation of children neuertheless in their conferences with Anabaptists ingeniously confessed that baptism might lawfully and indeed ought to be ministred vnto children what Lutherans and Caluinists hold as an other article of their reformed religion viz. that baptism is not absolutly necessary to saluation for as to the first testimony though by litle children Christ meant not such only as can goe and speake but also infants sucking their Mothers breasts neuertheless the words of Christ declare them only capable of blessedness without mentioning baptism at all Since then Lutherans and Caluinists doe teach that baptism is not an expedient absolutly necessary to blessedness they can infer nothing of moment and efficacy from these words of Christ to conuince the Anabaptists because the blessedness that is to say the kingdom of Heauen whereof Infants are declared capable may be obtained without baptisin according to Lutherans Caluinists and Anabaptists yet for as much as catholick faith teacheth absolute necessity of baptism out of S. Iohn Cap. 3. that except a man be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heauen Catholicks can by a clear inference from the said words of Christ proue that Baptism ought euen of necessity to be administred to children because Christs words declare theÌ„ capable of the kingdom of Heauen and consequently of baptism that being an expedient absolutly necessary vnto the obtaining of it whosoeuer is capable of any end is likwise capable of the expedient or medium which is of absolute necessity in order to the purchasing of it As touching the latter scripture testimony though it containes a most pregnant coniecture or presumption that the Apostles when they baptized whole families baptised children with all neuertheless it is not sufficient enough to the grounding of an euident and necessary consequence vnto prouing that de facto they did so because experience sheweth that many whole housholds haue no children at all Wherefore it is cleare that neither of the scripture testimonyes do proue effectually the baptism of Infants laying aside the tradition and definition of the Church And truly Lutherans and Caluinists haue only meer coniectures and remote inferences drawn from the interpretation of their own priuat spirits which is the Mother of heresies to euince the foundamentall and essentiall doctrines of their reformed religion namly that faith alone iustifieth that there are but two Sacraments that no addresses of intercession ought to be made vnto Saints or prayers offered for the benefit of soules departed c. and it is a foundamentall article of Caluinism that the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifieth only the body of Christ being a meer figure thereof contrary wise it is a foundamentall article of Lutherans that the body of Christ is really contained in the Sacrament together with the substance of bread and though both Caluinists and Lutherans teach that the scriptures speake and propounde clearly doctrines of faith howeuer they haue not as yet reconciled that controuersy which notwithstanding the many conferences and disputes held about it continueth in debate Caluinists impute to the Lutherans an heresie or errour in faith for admitting and the Lutherans ascribe heresie vnto the Caluinists for denying the reall presence of Christs body and bloud in the Eucharist whereby appeareth plainly the necessity of Church tradition and interpretation for the deciding all hard
Epis 55. affirm's That infidelity or false faith is inconsistent with the Church of Rome S. Austin Epis 66. auer's that our lord hath plac'd the doctrine of truth in the office and Chaire of the Roman Church and S. Bernard Epis 190. to Pope Innocentius against Abailardus writeth thus We must refer to your Apostle-ship all the scandalls and dangers which may happen in matters of faith for there defects in order to faith ought to be remedied where faith cannot faile for to what Other see was it euer said I haue pray'd for thee Peter that thy faith faile not Although Bishops of Rome that succeed in the Chaire of S. Peter may personally err as priuate Doctours neuertheless none euer did or shall err iudicially or definitiuely that is none of S. Peters successors haue or shall deuiat from the truth in their consistories Courts Councils consultations held concerning matters of faith Religion and generall manners because Christ's prayer I haue pray'd for thee Peter that thy faith faile not protects them Wherfore the ancient Fathers recur'd to Rome and applyed themselues to the Chaire of S. Peter in all matters of controuersy pertaining to Religion and faith namely S. Austin and the Bishops of Affricke vnto Innocentius the first and vnto Celestinus Epis 90 95. S. Chrysostome had recourse to the same Innocentius Epis 1. 2. S. Basil to the Pope in his tyme Epis 52. S. Hierom to Damasus Epis 5. 7 58. and S. Cyprian Epis ad Cornelium expresly affirm's that the cause of all schisms and heresies proceeds from want of obedience to the supream Pastour Nec aliunde saith he haereses obortae sunt aut nata sunt schismata quam inde quod vni Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur nec vnus in Ecclesia ad tempus Sacerdos ad tempus Iudex vice Christi cogitatur From disobeying of lawfull Pastours began the notorious schism of Core Dathan and Abyron who rose vp against Moyses and Aaron whome God had appoynted Chief Rulers ouer them and the rest of the Children of Israël puft vp with proud thoughts of their own abilities and conceipted worthiness they were troubled and grieu'd at the establishing of priesthood in the family of Aaron onely and therefore arrogated to themselues priestly function against the ordinance of God and to the vpholding of their schism coind a new Theology teaching that Moyses and Aaron tooke too much vpon them lifting themselues aboue the people of our lord saying all were alike holy and our lord with euery one of them alike after the same manner all schisms and heresies down from our Sauiour Christ till these dayes haue sprung vp against God's ordinance in euery age some one or other wanton schollar hath drawn Disciples and gathered Accomplices together against the supream Pastour that is the Bishop of Rome and our true Aaron as S. Bernard calleth him l. 2. de consid c. 8. pretending that he tak's too much authority vpon him lifting his own chaire aboue all others seeing that the spirit of God is with euery one of them to teach preach and administer the Sacraments without dependence of him Their intent and aime in rising thus against the supream Pastour of the Church is to persuade the vnlearned that the speciall priuiledges of Pasce oues meas confirma fratres tuos which Christ cōfer'd on S. Peter doe not descend on his successors alone in consequence of which they conceiue it needless to seek to the Bishop of Rome for Confirmation of their new opinions or to value any condemnation in order thereto that proceeds from that Apostolicall Chaire and as all wanton schollars which coyne new notions of Doctrine in order to the mysteries of Christian Religion seditiously rise against the supreame Pastour of the Church so they speake contemptuously of the schooles of orthodox Doctours in regard these be the supream Pastours chiefest consistery and the Churches sanctuary that keeps the Originall Cycli and weights of all Christian doctrine where with they weigh all coyns of new Theologies and such as are found too light are laid aside for the high Priest to condemne and anathematise lest the vnlearned learned be deluded thereby And indeed since the first erecting of scholes Cōnexae sunt saith the learned Canus scholae contemptio haeresum pestes contempt of scholes and heresies are inseperably connected together For example Luther afraid of the originall weights kept in the scholes of Orthodox Doctours sharpned his tongue against all the Vniuersities of those dayes which he called Lupanaria Antichristi the stews or Brodel houses of Antichrist and t' is common alike to all such as coyne or follow new opinions to haue an extream abhorrence from the scholes of Orthodox Doctours But woe to all such wanton schollars as goe out from the rest into seuerall sects for they perish in the contradiction of Core They are clouds without water carried about of winds Trees of Autumne without fruit raging waues of the sea foming out their owne shame and confusion wandring starres to whom is reseru'd the storm of darknes for euer Ep. Cath. Judae because they despise the scholes of Orthodox Doctours rise against the authority of their supream Pastour and cut out of their own braines vnauthorized Models of new sects and Religions As the Prince of darknes by diuine permission transforms himselfe into an Angel of light so he guideth the pencils of Ambitious schollars vnto setting forth false resemblances of true faith The extream wantonness of heady and high mynded Teachers by the crafty dealings of Satan has euen in our dayes turn'd Christianism into great disorder and confusion As the People of Rome through the delusions of Simon Magus were diuided in order to the true Selene some conceiuing her to appeare from one window some from an other and some from as many windowes as darted seeming resemblances of her so very many Christian people especially these of our own nation fince they haue let goe their hold of S. Peters Chaire that is since their falling away from the obedience due to the Church of Rome that first conuerted them to Christianism are of different iudgements as to the true faith deluded by the subtill sleights of new Teachers which according to the seuerall lustes of their high mynds haue diuided them into seuerall sects some be Lutherans some Caluinists some Protestants some Anabaptists some Independēts some fift-Monarke men some Quakers some Deists and some Atheists There are now as many faiths as wills whiles either faith is represented as new Teachers will or as they will so is interpreted and whereas according to one God one Lord and one baptism there is also but one faith men of these dayes are faln away from that which is the onely faith and begin to belieue that there is none at all confounded with the great variety of seeming faiths The ground wherof as t is afore intimated is in regard Non vnus in Ecclesia ad tempus Sacerdos ad
quickning spirit be not there also that by holy inspirations had tempered his free will became sensible of his own misery and humbly acknowledged his own imbecillity wherby he found the blessed effects of the diuine bountifullnes * Rom. 2. ignoras quoniam benignitas Dei ad poenitentiā te adducit that led him to repentance But Pharaoh through the flexibility of his free will resisted Gods mercifull will and continued in his pertinacy * Aug. l. quaes in Exod. q. 18. ascribit proprio Pharaonis vitio quod habuerit tale cor vt patientiâ Dei non moueretur ad pietatem sed potius ad impietatem and hardnes of heart whereby he experienced in punishments Gods power whose mercy in diuine Gifts he had contemned In like manner Esau for hauing contemned the diuine call to the light of truth became * Aug. l 1. ad simplicia noluit inquit Esau non cucurrit ..... spreta Dei vocatione reprobus faectus est a reprobat which God foreseeing long before to whome all future things are present and secrets of all hearts open and manifest pronounced his heauy displeasure against him saying I haue hated Esau yet God did not hate Esau for what he made him * Aug. trac 12. in Ioan. sub finē quod audis homo Deus fecit quod audis peccator ipse homo fecit dele quod fecisti vt Deus saluet quod fecit but for what Esau made him self God made him vnto saluation and he made himself vnto damnation dispising the diuine calling that might haue saued him (f) S. Austin trac 12. in Ioan. saith that if it were asked of him why the Iews could not belieue he should suddenly answere because they would not Which reply is conform to the sacred Text Act. 7. Hovv long yee stift neckt Jews vvill yee refist the holy ghost The blind and hard hearted Iews depriued themselues of the maruellous light of Christian faith for they might haue belieued in Christ if they had not resisted the holy Ghost that offered them holy inspirations to chase away their darknes to soften the hardnes of their hearts and to make pleasing what was displeasing vnto them namely the holy Prophesies cōuincingly shewing Christ to be the promised Messias (g) According to S. Austin in Euchir ad Laurent c. 95. tom 3. Deus non iniustè noluit saluos fieri habitantes sci Corozain Beth aide cum potuissent salui esse si voluissent That is the will of God in order to not sauing the inhabitants of Corozain and Bethsaida had nothing of iniustice since they might haue been sau'd if they would themselues wherefore Epis 105. ad Macedo be assertes that the neglect or resisting of diuine grace vvhich is giuen to make us good makes us euill And S. Chrysostom hom 28. in Mat. 26. and hom 46. in Ioan. 6. Teacheth that since many among those whom God calleth do perish by necessary consequence it followes that it lies within the power of their free will to perish or be saued It seemed expedient to set down the fore mentioned clear authorities out of S. Austin to shew against the new Teachers of our dayes that this chiefest Doctour of grace after S. Paul the Apostle did teach that God giues to euery man sufficient grace to saue his soul see the Annot. of the following character Again the inhabitants of Corozain and Bethsaida abused a measure of diuine grace to their perdition that would haue been sufficient to the inhabitants of Tyrus and Sidon vnto their conuersion and therefore woe was pronounced to the Citties of Corozain and Bethsaida for if the marueilous works which were done in them had been done in Tyrus and Sidon they had repented in sackcloth and ashes howeuer Gods Gifts neither outward * Per externa beneficia dumtaxat qualia sunt lex doctrina c. Dei benignitas non adducit ad poenitentiam sed insuper simul operatur in eo intrinsecus occulta inspinatione Audit inquit Aug. homo hominem vel Angelum dicentē vt autem cognoscat verum esse quod dicitur illo lumine mens intus spargitur quod aeteraum manet lucet in toncbris nor inward were wanting to these latter inhabitants for God is not desectiue in necessary expedients to the saluation of any one people whose mercifull will is to saue all CHAR. XIX OF GODS CHARITY IN LAYING HIS COMMANDEMENTS ON MAN THE CONTENTS If God had commanded man nothing man should haue had nothing whereby to know his own inferiority and his Creators superiority God imposed easy commandements giuing withall sufficient auxiliaries for the performance thereof to assert an impossibility to keepe the diuine laws and ordinances is to accuse God of impiety and iniustice GOds Charity in laying his commandements on man is the execution of his diuine will in remonstrance of his supream soueraignity vnto saluation to euery one that will keep his commandements Gods ordinances doe shew his superiority and mans inferiority and are the diuine compasses by which all such steer their course as tend vnto iustification of life Originall sin had so wounded the chief faculties of mans soul that in his vnderstanding little light was left to see euill and in the will less delight to doe good yet the mercifull wil of God compassionating this condition of human misery (a) S. Austin l. de sp lit c. 33. teacheth that God vseth two kind of perswasions to bring men vnto Christian faith one whereof is outward by Euangelicall exhortations wherby the precepts of the law worke something saith he for as much as they admonish us of our infirmities to the end we may recur to iustifying grace the other is an inward persuasion consisting in illuminations vnto clearing our vnderstanding and in pious affections vnto delighting our will which are inward actuall graces where of God is the sole cause for according to the same S. Austin it is not in the power of any man to hinder God from putting inward persuasions into his mynde though when they are put there he can cast them away being his will is free to assent or dissent there to gaue his commandements written with his own hand in two tables to * Rom. 7. peccatum nō cognoscebam nisi per legē point at sin and gaue together sufficient grace to take away what the tables of commandements only pointed at * Aug. l. 3. de lib. arb c. 28. rerum moderatori sūmo placuit iustissime vt in ortu hominis originaliter appareat iustitia punientis in prouectu misericordia liberantis though in mans natiuity appeares Gods vindicatiue iustice as vnto the said originall sin and the calamities annexed there to neuertheless in mans groth to the vsing of reason God manifesteth his deliuering mercy giuing to each man sufficient helps to ouercome the punishments or miscries which his natiuity meriteth And as * Aug. l. 3. de
vnto instruction and * Hoc facite in mean coÌ„memorationem id est in memoriam passionis mortis meae Et 1. Pet. 4. Christo passo in carne vos eadem cogitatione armemini Vnde ait S. Bernardus passio Christi est vltimum resugium contra omnes illicitas voluptates visa inquit Christi passione quis tam deliciosus qui non abstineat quis taÌ„ iracundus vt non doleat quis tam malitiosus quem non poeniteat S. Augustinus nullum est ait remedium salubrius quam iugiter cogitare de passionâ— Christi full commemoration of Christ his death and passion in compliance with his own commande as it is plainly obseruable in the garments wherwith the Priest is inuested during the tyme of sacrifice as likewise in the Altar and ornament's therof for example 10. The Amice in as much as it is a linnen cloath which the Priest pulls ouer his face and fasten's in his neck doth signify the ragg of linnen wherwith the Iews blind-folded Christ in mockery when they smote and buffited him saying Prophesie to us o Christ who is he that smote thee Mat. 20.20 The Priests Albe that is a white linnen garment doth represent the rayment in which Herod inuested Christ after that he had despised and mocked him Luc. 23.30 The maniple that the Priest weareth on his left arme and the stole that hangeth about his neck doe figure the cord's and fetters with which the officers of the Iews bound Christ Io. 18. and led him from one place to an other from Annas to Caiphas from Caiphas to Pilat from Pilat to Herod and from Herod to Pilat again 40. The Chasuble that is the vppermost vestment doth express the purple garment the souldiers put on Christ Mar. 25. and the heauy cross also that Christ carried on his shouldiers to mount Caluary 50. The Priests (b) Tonsure that is a round crown made in the heads of Clergy-men is an ancient ceremony and according to S. Bede l. 5. 〈◊〉 S. Peter wore it in remembrance of the crown of thorns wherewith Christ's head was crown'd again S. Anicetus that was Chief Church-gouernour in the first 200. years in a certaine Epistle to the Bishops of France commanded all Priests to cut their haire to the end they might not appear delicate and effeminate like secular men that weare long hair for ornament sake Tonsure that is to say the crown of his head shaued in fashion of a round circle doth shew the crown of thornes which the souldiers platted and put about the sacred head of Christ Mar. 25.60 The sundry crosses that the Priest makes ouer the host and chalice before and after consecration are mysticall representations of the many greiuous torments which Christ endured in pursuance of the generall redemption 70. The eleuation of the host and chalice doth figure the lifting vp of Christ on the crosse and in as much as that ceremony is exhibited a part or seuerally it declares the seperatioÌ„ of Christ's soul from his body and his blood from his veins 80. The diuision of the host into three distinct parts doth shew the three substances in Christ vêªt videlicet the diuine of his person the spirituall of his soul and the materiall of his body and wheras one of the said parts is put into the chalice and as it were buried therin thereby is signify'd Christ's body in the sepulcher likewise the mingling therof with the blood demonstrates that the diuine personality was neuer seperated neither from his soul in his descent into Hell nor from his body lying in the sepulcher 90. The Priest's (c) According to the Decrees of Ancient Councils a Priest ought not to depart from the Altar before he giue his benediction again the people were bound to remaine in the Church till the Priest had blest them and indeed priestly benediction was euer practised In the law of nature Melchisedech blessed Abraham in the written law Moses and Aaron blessed the people of Israel and in the law of grace Christ blessed his Disciples benediction giuen in the end of the sacrifice of Mass relates vnto the peculiar recommendation whereby Christ did recommend his Church at the rendring of his soul into the hands of his diuine Father 10. The Altar representes Mount-Caluary and signifies the cross therin erected on which Christ offering as on an Altar a sacrifice of his own body and blood consummated for euer those that are sanctified Heb. 10. And truly as the name of smoak puts vs in minde of fire because of the necessary mutuall relation to each other for smoak of necessity comes from fire that is the cause therof so the name of an Altar doth relate vnto sacrifice necessarily this being included euen in the definition of an Altar taken in the proper sense for a reall Altar to sacrifice on And such is the Altar employed in the sacrifice of Mass called by the Ancient Fathers the Altar of Christ his body and so meant by the Apostle (d) The Apostle by saying Hebrae 13. that We haue an Altar vvhereof they haue no authority to eat vvich serue in the Tabernacle meant an Altar taken in the proper sense that is an Altar on which is offered the sacrifice of Christs body and blood according to the interpretation of the Ancient Fathers S. Greg. Nazian in ora desorore Gorgonia S. Chrysostom demons an Christus sit Deus S. Austin Epis 86. de ciuit l. 8. Confess c. 27. Theophy in 23. Mat. and of the sacrifice of this Altar those cannot eat which serue in the Tabernacle that is which follow the rites and custom's of the ancient Iews nor those which belieue not in the sacrifice of Christs body and blood But this holy Altar si sometymes cal'd Mensa Dominica The Table of our lord because of the heauenly meat our lords reall body and blood which is eaten and drunk there and indeed Mensa Table according to holy scripture often signifies an Altar namely Isa 65. Malach. 1. likewise S. Austin ser 103. de diuersis discoursing of S. Cyprian's Table so called in order to his holy Reliques which were put vnder the Table or Altar erected in the same place where S. Cyprian had suffered Martyrdom In the same place saith S. Austin a Table though erected to God neuertheless was nam'd S. Cyprians Table not because S. Cyprian had feasted there but in regard he had been sacrificed there and through his Martyrdom procured that Table not that he might feed or be fed at it but that vpon it sacrifice might be offered vnto God to whom himselfe had been made an oblation Haebr 13. saying Wee haue an Altar wherof such haue no authority to eate as serue the Tabernacle and for as much as Christs body is spirituall meate and his blood spirituall drink it is named also our lords Table 1. Cor. 10 you cannot say's the Apostle be partakers of our lords Table and the table of deuills
remissions of their punishments But now in the declination of charity and fall of deuotion christians commonly haue an abhorrence from much sufferings notwithstanding that their sinnes are far greater then euer afore in respect wherof our holy Mother the Chnrch not ignorant of Satans crafty enterprizes lest in these delicate times * 2. Cor. 2. vt non circumueniamur à Satana he might circumuent and bring them either to despair or to forsake Christ and his Religion hath moderated the Church discipline condescending to the great weakness of her children and truly Christ did not put in the power of his Ministers dispensations of such discipline only but also * Cū Christus sit supremus Dominus Judex potest tum per se tum per ministros misericorditer relaxarepoenas debitas quoad suū Tribnnal vt costat ex cap. 21. Ioan. inuested them with authority to proceede with sinners more or less rigorously and to inflict longer or shorter punishments as in their wisdome they should thinke fitting in regard of places times persons and circumstances Neither does this great moderation cause any substantiall differences between the ancient and modern Indulgences as these so those importe remission of temporall paines not only in the ecclesiasticall but also in the diuine Court of Iustice before God (l) An Indulgence taken in the formall sense in a meer releasing of temporall paine due vnto sin wherfore it supposeth remission of the guilt which it cannot take away In consequence whereof the state of grace is of necessity required vnto obtaining the fruit or benefit of Indulgences which is the essentiall consistency of Indulgences that neuer doe remit eternall paine due to mortall offence because this is allwayes forgiuen together with the guilt thereof through the infusion of sanctifying grace which is a necessary supposall to remission of temporall paine Wherfore when Church-gouernours grant their letters of Indulgences they say expresly that they doe grant them to such * Clemens 6. extra vnige de peccat remis ait eos qui vsi sunt hoc Ecclesiae thesauro fuisse in amicitia Dei quae supponit remissionem culpae quam Indulgentia non remittit ideoque status gratiae praesupponitur ad fructū Indulgentiae percipiendū as are contrite and confessed which supposeth the state of grace as an essentiall requisite for the receiuing fruit therby neither doth it lie in the power of the supream Pastour to forgiue a sinner the temporall paines corresponding to his sinnes vnless the guilt of these be forgiuen afore for he is only the dispenser of Christ's treasure in consequence whereof he hath not absolute dominion ouer it and it is nt probable as to reason that Christ's will is that his Minister should confer the gracious benefit's which proceed meerly from his bounteous liberallity to such as be his enemies and perseuer in ingratitude towards him In regard that Indulgences doe release temporall paines wherunto a penitent sinner is liable euen in order to the diuine Court of Iustice that is to say before God when dayes Months and yeares of temporall paines are remitted in vertue of them the pains of Purgatory are remitted withall according to a meet proportion corresponding to that space of tyme for by the Church practice appeareth that the supreame Pastour granteth sometimes many more years of pardon then perhaps any soul shall remain in purgatory wherfore the said years of Indulgence are to be vnderstood and explicated in reference to those yeares which great sinners * Iob. 15. perditissimi peccatores bibunt iniquitatem sicut aquam that drink in this life iniquity as water ought to endure vnto full satisfaction for their sinn's in order (m) It was the custome of the primitiue Church to remit penances enioyned by the Churches Canons as appeares euidently by the ancient Council's namely Nicae can 10. 11. Ancyra can 5. Lardisae can 5. Carthag 4. can 75. 76. and indeed the concessions of Popes which giue faculty to grant many dayes and many year's Indulgences to those Priests which shall say Mass for peace amongst christian Princes exaltatiō of the Church c. as likewise to such as shall assist in the same Mass of necessity are meant in order to the penance inflicted by the Churches Canons in primitiue tymes for they cannot be vnderstood of common penances few whereof continue for many years or many dayes to the penitentiall Canons if they should continue aliue for so long a series of yeares for example in ertue of a thousand year's Indulgence such a quantity of the pains in purgatory is remitted as doth correspond to the paine prescribed in the penitentiall Canons yet no man can know precisely what portion of time in purgatory doth correspond to the space of one or more yeares of temporall pain 's inflicted by the said ancient Canons because laying aside diuine reuelations no man can haue a true knowledg of the proportion that is between the paines of purgatory and the afflictions of this life Howeuer it is an vndoubted truth that by a much shorter paine of this life may be released the longest paines of purgatory supposing parity in all circumstances For a man while be liueth vpon earth is in a capacity of obtaining greater measures of grace and mercy then in the next life where there is no meritorious working of blessedness The supposall of parity is added in respect of the extreme intensnesse of purgatory paines wherby they be sufficient enough in a short space of time to equall a long continuance of this lifes afflictions As concerning the sundry additionall particles or names frequently expressed in the concessions of Indulgences for example plenary more plenary most plenary and also Iubily this variety of words doth not cause any reall or substantiall difference in order to the prime effect of an Indulgence which is remission of temporall paine due to sin for he that forgiueth all excludeth nothing wherfore since a plenary Indulgence remitteth all the paine a sinner stands liable vnto there remaineth nothing of it pardonable by a more plenary or most plenary Indulgence yea or by a Iubily Howeuer these additions are prudently expressed for to take away scruple◠therby or to explicate more clearly what is granted and the weightiness of the motiues on which a plenary Indulgence is grounded yet they may be distinguished in respect of certaine priuiledges which are annexed to one Indulgence and not to an other But this is accidentall to an Indulgence which taken in the proper formall sense is remission only of temporall paine due to sin The Priuiledges are power to absolue from censures and reserued Cases liberty to make choyce of any ghostly Father approued and faculty to change vowes which priuiledges are not granted in vertue of each plenary Indulgence being proper to the Indulgence called a (n) The Name of Iubily comes of the Hebrew word Jobel which according to Saint Hierome and Saint Ifidore
Angell is not a Cherubin or Seraphin that being a peculiar Order of Angells distinct from the rest And albeit that S. Hierom and but he alone among all the ancient ecclesiasticall writers doth assert in his Epistle 85. to Euagrius that in the primitiue times a Bishop and a Priest were one and the same thing also that Bishops got superiority ouer meer Priests rather in respect of ecclesiasticall constitution then diuine institution yet no man must argue thence that S. Hierom did deny a Bishop taken in the ordinary ecclesiasticall sense to be distinct from a meer Priest without hauing him contradict what himselfe hath written in sundry other places which were to play the part of an vniust Iudg. Besides it is not consonant at all as to reason that so great a learned Prelate as S. Hierom should be ignorant of bishops superiority ouer meer Priests in regard of iurisdiction and order as to diuine right since Timothy whom all interpreters and Fathers call Bishop was inuested with iudicatory authority ouer meer Priests as doth plainly appeare by the Apostles own words 1. Timoth. 3. Against Priests receiue none accusation but vnder two or three witnesses Moreouer S. Hierom doth not deny in the epistle afore alleadged the superiority of Bishops ouer meer Priest's to be grounded in the truth of our lord's disposall for he doth assert only that maiority to proceede rather or more from ecclesiasticall custome then from a true ordinance of Christ for as much as ecclesiasticall constitutions haue rendred the dignity of Bishop's more eminent then it was in primary times adding thereunto preeminence of places in the Church peculiar ornaments and priuiledges to consecrate diuerse thing 's which meer Priest's cannot doe Howeuer S. Hierom doth assert expresly ordination that is power to ordain Priests proper to Episcopall function only in his said Epistle to Euagrius and likewise power to confer the Sacrament of Confirmation in a Dialogue writen against Luciferus But it is conceiued by coniecturall deductions from the writings of S. Hierom that in his Epistle 85. to Euagrius * Credibile etiam est S. Hieron prae oculis habuisse Ioannem Ierosolymae Episcopum qui iniustè afflixerat eum fratrem ipsius voluit deprimere fastum eius Legatur Epis 61. ipsius Hieron he playd the Oratour vsing the figure hyperbole being heartily angry with certain Deacons that ambitiously preferred themselues before Priests or at least suffered themselues to be preferred wherfore to suppress their inordinate ambition and extream insolence he made a parity between Bishops and meer Priest's which doubtless he meant only in respect of the great and maine function in order to the celebration of the holy Eucharist that is equall and common alike to both of them * Est propositio de fide quod sint 7. ordines communiter dicti presbyte ratus Diaconatus c. vt patet ex Concilijs Roma sub Syluestro can 7. Carthag 4. cui interfuit S. Aug. Trid. sess 32. catechismus Trid. cap. de ordine recenset omnes 7. ordines sigillatim As touching the number of ecclesiasticall Orders it is a constant Tenet of catholick faith that there be seuen orders taken in the proper sense viz of Priests Deacons sub-Deacons Acolists Lectours Exorcists and doorekeepers corresponding to as many sundry functions which are exercised in reference to the celebrating of the Eucharist The first is the consecration therof proper to Priest's alone the second administration of the Sacrament which belongeth to Deacons The third is the preparing of the sacramentall matter wherunto Sub-Deacons are ordained the fourth is the presenting of the matter at the Altar and vnto this function doth relate the order of Acolits But the other three orders regarde the disposition of such as be attendants only at the time of celebrating the Eucharist among which some are vnbelieuers and doore-Keepers are ordained to debarre and keeper of such Persons others haue a desire to belieue aright but are not sufficiently enough instructed for the perfecting of these Lectours are ordained Others though they are true belieuers and want no instructions yet in as much as they be possessed with deuills or otherwise vexed by them Exorcists are ordained for their meet help (f) According to Pope Innocent the third and other Orthodox writers before him namely Steph. Eduensis In opus de Sacra Altaris pr. 6. all the functions proper to the seuen orders were represented in the outward actions of Christ And S. Austin and other ancient Fathers affirme that Christ represented the Sacrament of penance in the raising of Lazarus for as much as he commanded the Apostles to vntye the cords that bound him Again S. Austin Comment In Ioan. c. 9. says that the washing of the mans eyes that was blind from his birth in the water of Siloe was a figure of christian baptism And all these seuen ecclesiasticall orders are figured and represented by sundry actions which Christ exercised on earth For example Christ Io. 3. made a scourge of small cordes and droue out of the Temple of Ierusalem those that sold oxen sheep Doues and changer's of money wherby are figured Door-keepers whose office is after Christ's example to shut the Church doores againsT the vnworthy and open them to the worthy Christ Luc. 4. read the Prophesie of Isaias wherin the Order of Lectours is signified their office being to read the holy Prophesies Christ Mark 8. cast out Deuills wherby Exorcists are represented Christ Io. 8. sayes I am the light of the world Wherunto doe relate Acolites the carrying of burning candles to enlighten being their function Christ Io. 13. preparing to celebrate the Eucharist tooke a Towell girded himselfe and powered water into a bason to wash his disciples feet in which action Sub-Deacons be expressed for one office of these Ecclesiasticall Ministers is to prepare water for celebrating of the Eucharist and to wash the Corporalls as is prescribed in the Roman Pontificall Christ Mat. 26. at his last supper distributed to his Apostles the Sacrament of the Euchariste and afterward Io. 13. preached vnto them in these two actions are shadowed deacons whose office is to preach and sometimes to distribute the Sacrament of the Euchariste as doth appeare plainly by the hystory of S. Steuen and S. Lawrence which as Deacons exercised the said actions Again Christ at his last supper did offer the sacrifice of the Euchariste that is of his body and blood which is proper to Priestly function * S PP Aug. Gregor alâ—â— testaÌ„tur Christum actione illa qua suscitauit LazaruÌ„ iussitque eum vinculis quibus erat ligatus ab Apostolis dissolui adumbrasse nostraÌ„ poeniteÌ„tiam potestateÌ„ traditaÌ„ Ecclesiae pro remitteÌ„dis peccatis Et Aug. comment in Euang Ioan. dicit ablutionem oculorum caeci naii ad natatoria Siloe tepraesontasse ablutionem nostri Baptismi In like manner Christs actions expressed in raysing vp of Lazarus and in commanding
dari non debeat nisi infirmo de cuius morte timetur ideo Patres Trident. vocant sacram vnctionem exeuntium Sacrameutū danger of death in respect of extream sickness or other inward infirmity is strengthned through holy vnction against the assaults of deuills and purged of veniall sin 's together with mortall offences vnwittingly forgotten afore and therfore named Extrem-vnction being administred only in extremity of sickness Albeit that the common enemy seeketh occasion at all times to deuour our souls yet then especially he employeth his greatest subtilities and craftiest dealings to bring vs into despaire of Gods sauing mercy when he seeth vs at the point of drawing our last breath of life Christ after his Resurrection instituted and S. Iames his Apostle promulgated this Sacrament to the catholick Church in the fist Chapter of his catholick epistle saying If any be sick among you let him bring in the Priests of the Church and let them pray ouer him anointing him with * Nomine olei absolusè simpliciter positi sēper intelli gitut oleum oliuarum id est liquor ex baccis oliuarum expressus alij autam humores pingues vt nucum id genus alij nō nisi eum addito dicūtur osea oile in the name of our lord and the prayer of faith shall saue the sick and our lord shall raise him vp and if he hath committed sinnes they shall be forgiuen him wherby he expresseth the necessary requisit's to a Sacrament of the new law First the outward sign or ceremony is signified by the words anointing with oile which declare the proper sensible matter of Extrem-vnction viz oile made of Oliues for that only challengeth the name of oile taken in the proper sense as wine of the vine the name of wine Secondly the sensible sacramentall form (b) According to S. Austin the making vp of a Sacrament is the putting together of the sacramentall word and the sacramentall element or matter Accedit saith he Verbum ad clementum fit Sacramentum And the sacramentall word trac 8. in Joan. he calleth the word of faith vttered together with vnction is expressed by the words Let them pray ouer him anointing him with oile which in as much as they be ioyned together with the matter do make the Sacrament Thirdly diuine institution is plainly declared by the particles in the name of our lord for the true meaning of these words let them pray ouer him anointing him with oile in the name of our lord is this let them pronounce ouer him the form of this Sacrament which is after the manner of a prayer and anoint him with oile (c) A Priest in dispensing the Sacraments supplies the room of Christ The Sacrament of Extrem-vnction is dispensable onely in order to the faithfull of Christ wherefore the Apostle vseth the particles if any be sick amongst you that is among you faithfull baptised for he direct's his Epistle to the faithfull onely in regard wherof t' is called the Catholick Epistle of S. Iames. in the room of Christ that is in vertue of the power and authority deriued vnto them from Christ which import's diuine institution and doubtlesse the Apostle meant that the whole entire action to wit vnction together with prayer of faith ought to be performed by a Priest as the rightfull Minister of Christ For in that sense he vsed the said particles In the name of our lord in the same Chapter speaking of the Prophets who haue spoken say's he in the name of our lord that is which were inuested with power and authority to speake in the room of our lord and indeed the holy Prophets were our lord's Minister's prophecying in vertue of his speciall inspiration and commission In the same sense the Apostle S. Paul 1. Cor. 5. vseth the particles in the name of our lord to signify that he excommunicated the incestuous Corinthian in the person of our lord Iesus-Christ saying I haue iudged him in the name of our lord Iesus-Christ to be deliuered vnto Satan for the destruction of the flesh c. Fourthly the effect of this Sacrament viz sanctifying grace these words do clearly express And our lord shall raise him vp and if he hath committed sins they shall be forgiuen him for sins are not remitted but by the infusion of sanctifying grace wherby also the diuine institution of this Sacrament is euident enough because Christ only in the new law by his speciall institution hath cloathed outward sensible rites or ceremonies with power to produce grace and remission of sins effectually And it matters not that the Apostle addeth to vnction the particles and the prayer of faith shall saue the sick for he doth not ascribe the effect of that ceremony to the prayer as if it alone were sufficient enough to cause it for therby it would euidently follow that he mentioneth and requireth vnction in vaine and to no purpose at all besid's he maketh vse of no particle that excludeth vnction but plainly signifie's by saying let them praey ouer him the sick anointing him with oyle that he attribute's grace and remission of sins to the whole entire action as it consisteth of vnction and orall prayer proceeding from and relying on the faith if not of the Minister himself which is not necessary to the effect of the Sacrament at least of the Church whose person the minister supplyeth in the administration therof and truly in the Sacraments of the new law the verball form doth more plainly and determinatly express the sacramentall effect then doth the sacramentall matter and therfore the Apostle by adding and the prayer of faith c. will signify only that the sacramentall form of this Sacrament lies claim to the best and noblest part of causality in the production of sanctifying grace but not to all the parts therof Fiftly by these words let him bring in the (d) S. Iames in the Chapter set down vseth the name Presbyter S. Luke Act. 15. S. Peter cap. 5. and S. Iohn Epis 1.2.3 vse the name Senior but both the names carry the same meaning they signify those which by holy ordination are inuested with priestly dignity and authority vnto dispensing the mysteries of God for as S. Hierom assert's Epis 85. and Euag. in the scripture-Text's set down those are meant which are Priests as to office dignity and function Besid's the Fathers in the Council of Trent and all catholick writers vnderstand per presbyteros Ecclesiae such onely as are Priests rightly ordain'd whether they be Bishops or meer Priests and according to the scripture custome in the name Presbyteri Bishops are comprehended Priests the ministers of the Sacrament are declared and determinated namely such only as are actually promoted in vertue of holy ordination vnto Episcopall or Priestly function and truly the new Testament when speaking of Church Ministers vseth the word Presbyter or Senior meaneth therby one inuested with Priestly dignity besides the Apostle could not mean
habetis Aaron Hurvobiscum si quid natum fuerit quaestionis referetis ad eos Aaron and Hur Iudges for the deciding all differences which might arise in the congregation during his absence Exod. 24 wherefore Christ infallibly hath ordained and appointed spirituall Gouernors of necessary and perpetuall vse in his Church for the deciding all controuersies of faith and religion and for the preseruing of it in holiness to the world's end this doctrine is plainly euidenced by sundry most cleare prophesies vttered by Christ himselfe viz. Math. 16. the gates of hell shall neuer preuaile against it Math. 18. if he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as an heathen man and a publican and Ioa. 16. the holy Ghost shall teach you all truth Whereby clearly appear's that the very office of supream Iudge in order to deciding matters concerning faith and religion is proper to the Church and truly the Church and no other thing distinct from it can rightfully challenge the full essentiall proprietys or conditions here vnto required For example * In supremo iudice cōtrouersiarū requiri veritatem infallibilem in definiendo non tantum catholici sed illorū aduersarij fatentur v. g. vvhittakerus contro 10 de scrip quas 5. can 8. in 3. suo argumento alij quādo de hac re agunt Vnd. Ang. l. 1. de moribus Ecclesiae catholicae ait illam esse magistram totius sapientiae christianorum magistram castissimam not to be liable to errour at all in defining controuersies of faith and religion is one essentiall propertie in fallible verity being of necessitie ioyned to the authority of a supream Iudg that declareth sentence of iudgment in matters relating to faith which is inconsistent with errour and falshood God by a speciall and supernaturall prouidence hath constituted this Iudg in his place and appointed him as his immediate Ambassadour to propound to all christians the verity of faith least they be carryed about with euery wind of doctrine by the craftiness of Satan which office or employment he could not execute if he were fallible in the execution thereof neither should christians acquiess in his proposalls and definitiue sentences vnless they knew or supposed him infallible that is not liable to errour matters of faith depending of diuine reuelation which is not seen An other necessary propriety required in the supream Iudg is authority to exact obedience vnto his ordinances which essentiall propriety Christ declared when speaking of the scribes and Pharisies sitting in Moyses chaire Math. 23. he said all therfore whatsoeuer they bid you obserue that obserue and doe where the particles whatsoeuer they bid you obserue importe power and authority to propound vnto the Iews what they were to belieue and the particles that obserue and doe import an obligation to admit and receiue their ordinances and indeed euery common-wealth hath a supream Iudg or magistrate that propoundeth laws and ordinances vnto subiects and commandeth their compliance thereunto A third necessary propriety or condition required in this supream Iudg is to be visible and a cleare speaker Moyses visible and liuing said of himselfe as supream Iudg of the faithfull in those times Exod. 18. When they haue a matter of controuersy they come vnto mee and I iudg between one and another and declare the ordinances of God and the laws also this necessary condition appeareth by the command giuen to the people of Israel Deut. 17. thou shalt come vnto the Priests of the Leuites and to the Iudg that shall be in those daies and aske and they shall shew thee the sentence of iudgment besides Christs own words Math. 23. whatsoeuer they bid you obserue doe sufficiently manifest that the head Priests which sate in Moyses seate were visible liuing Iudges and indeed there is no ciuill nation that hath not a visible liuing and speaking law that is to say a supream Iudg or magistrate visible liuing and speaking for an vnliud and mute Iudg namely a meer written law cannot Iudg between one and another pronounce sentence of iudgment to the punishing of peruerse offenders or to declare ordinances to the suppressing of controuersies That the proprieties of this supream Iudg thus explaned be proper to the (b) By the Church is meant the high tribunall of faithfull Priests wherof the Chief visible head is the Bishop of Rome seated in the Chair of S. Peter and as he is the Chief and supream head so he is supream Iudge in consequence of which whosoeuer is affraid to be circumuented by the hardness of a question he ought to recur to him Church of Christ taken in the proper sense for a congregation of belieuing Christians including the supream visible Pastour it is plainly demonstrable for example that this Church is not liable at all to errour which is the first propriety appeares by Christs testimony alledged before Math. 16. the gates of hell shall not preuaile against it which importeth an absolute infallibility in defining propounding and teaching matters of faith for if the power of Satan that consisteth in crafty dealings to draw men into errour could ouercome the Church by making it teach any one false doctrine it would follow euidently that the gates of hell might preuaile against it in consequence of which Christ should not be faithfull in his promises Besids Christ saying Ioan. 19. the holy Ghost shall teach you all truth meant that the Church should teach nothing of errour to the worlds end and indeed that promise was made to the Apostles and their successours in the ministery and Gouernmēt of the Church because Christ before Ioa. 14. had said expresly that the spirit of truth should abide with them for euer wherfore * Aug. l. de mor. Ecclesia catholica ait si quis metuit falli difficult ate alicuius quaestionis ad Ecclesiā esse recurrendū Jtem ait Christū habere Ecclesiā loco Synagogae Et Tom. 6. con Epis Manichaeorū Non crederem inquit Euangelio nisi Ecclesiae catholicae authoritas me cōmoueret whosoeuer is affraid least he may be deceiued through the difficulty of a hard question he ought to recur to the Church established in the room of the Synagogue for as the Pharisies and Scribes teaching in the Chaire of Moyses could not deuiate from the truth so neither can the pastours of our Christian Church sitting in the Chaire of S. Peter Secondly that the Church is inuested with power and authority to exacte from the faithfull obedience to her ordinances which is the second propriety of this supream Iudg Christ Math. 18. plainly declareth saying if he refuse to heare the Church let him be vnto thee as a heathen man and a publican that is let him be excommunicated as appeareth by Christs words immediatly following * Verba illa Christi quaecunque alligaueritis super terram intelligenda sunt de censuris ecclesiasticis id etiam fatetur Cal. l. 4. insti Whatsoeuer