Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	book_n	new_a	testament_n	2,832	5	8.5204	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A36913	Luthers Alcoran being a treatise first written in French by the learned Cardinall Peron, of famous memory, against the Hugenots of France, and translated into English by N.N.P. : the page following sheweth the particular contents of the booke, which consisteth of symbolismes, parallells, identities.	Du Perron, Jacques Davy, 1556-1618.; N. N. P.	1642 (1642)	Wing D2638; ESTC R480	118,976	240

libri c. The Apocryphall Bookes of the New Testament are the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of Imaes the second and third of Iohn the second of Peter the Epistle of Iude and the Apocalyps Thus much to demonstrate that Luther and diuers of his schollars agree with Mahumet in denying most at least of the Epistles of the Apostles And therefore we haue lesse reason to be amazed at that prophane saying of Caluin in dishonour of the Apostles in generall His words are these Apostoli (7) Caluin●● Instit 4. c. l. 9.4 non debent garrire quicquid illis collibitum fuerit c. The Apostles ought not to babble and speake idly of things as it pleaseth them but they are to relate the Commandements of God sincerely We are indeed to belieue the Apostles but this only as they speake out of the Word of God not as they speake from themselues but from the precept and speciall commandement of their Legation Thus Caluin O wonderfull procacity and insolency of Heresy As if the Apostles did somtimes babble and talke idly did speake only of themselues and not as instructed and directed by God The 5. Symbolisme Touching the erring of the Apostles CHAP. VI. THe Turks or Mahumetans as they do not belieue the writings of the Apostles So they hould the Aposties to haue erred in diuers of their Actions since they maintaine that the Apostles had not greater warrant for their not erring in their Actions then they had for their not erring in their Writings The same point is maintayned by seuerall of your first Instructours so great is your conformity with them herein For according hereto Luther sayth of S. Iames speaking of Extreme Vnction I say (8) Luther de Captiuit Babylon cap. de extrema Vnction● thaeth in any place Iames erred in this place especiall b●●e erred c. For it is not lawfull for an Apostle 〈◊〉 ●is owne authority to institute a Sacrament As 〈◊〉 the Apostle would or dared to ordayne a Sacrament without the authority command of Christ our Sauiour In like manner Brentius the Lutheran thus boldly writeth Peter (9) In Apolog Confess cap. de Conciliss the Chiefe of the Apostles and also Barnabas after the Holy Ghost receaued togeather with the Church of Ierusalem erred The Magdeburgians thus prosecute this Point Paul doth (10) Cent. ● l. ● c. 800 ●u●ne to Iames the Apostle and a Councell of the Presbyters being celebrated he is induced by Iames and the●est that for the offended Iewes he should parisy himselfe in the Temple to which Paulyieldeth which without doubt was no small slip in so eminent a Doctour Finally to o●●● the like condemnation giuen by our Reformist Whitaker the English Sectary thus hath left written It (11) De Eccles contra Bellar. controu ● q. 4. is manifest that after the descending of the Holy Ghost the Apostles erred in the Vocation of the Gentills And that Peter in like sort erred in manners touching the abrogation of the Cerem●●●all Law Now where can we find any Mahumetan or Turke all who condemne the Apostles to speake more vnworthily and debasing of them then these alledged Ghospellers haue done The 6. Symbolisme touching the Ghospells CHAP. VII TO proceed Touching the Scriptures which the Mahumetans and our new Gospellers do admit as pure and sacred the Saracens or Turks I euer meane the Mahumetans agree with the Lutherans in the manner reason and custome of Proceeding with the said Scriptures The sole Reason why the Mahumetans do not admit the New Testament as now it is though they allow of it they say as it was first giuen by Iesus pretending that it hath been corrupted i● because (1) Cuspin de relig Turcarum Septem-Castrensis de relig Turca● the Sentences and authorities of the New Testement touching Christ are repugnant to their fayth first in●ti●u●ed by Sergius in the Alcoran so as they make their Mahumetan fayth to be a square where with to measure the Truth or falshood of the New Testament And do not out Euangelists runne in one and the same liue of proceeding According to this it is that Luther in the balancing of the foure Euangelists thus writeth Qui (2) Luth. tom 3. p. aefat in epist Petri. potismū maiort prae cateris studio docent c. Such Euangelists are the chiefest who more carefully teach then other Euangetists doe that fayth in Christ only without our works doth make vs iust and in state of Saluation Thus Luther lesning the worth of the Euangelists according as they seeme more to impugne his conceyted doctrine of Iustification by fayth only Againe the Centurists in reiecting with Luther the Epistle of Iames giue this reason saying The Epistle of Iames is countrary to the doctrine of the Apostles because (3) Cent. 2. c. 4. p. ●6● it maketh Abraham to be iustifyed not by fayth only but by Works In like manner Beza reiecteth those words as surreptitious in Luke 22. This is the Chalice the New Testament in my Bloud which shal be shed for you (4) Beza in annotat in ●a Lucae because as Beza sayth The words in the Greeke Copyes confirme the Reall Presence in the Sacrament Thus we obserue that both the Mahumetans and the Lutherans do iointly make the Religion which they professe the foundation o● ground-work why they do disauthorize such or such Bookes of Scripture not reputing them to be the Word of God A strange and retrograde proceeding for since fayth and Religion is to receaue its approbation from Scripture here with he Mahumetans and the Lutherans the Scripture is to take its force and authority from fayth it selfe that fayth I meane which euery particular Sectary whether Mahumetan or Lutheran shall in his owne priuat iudgment hould to be true The 7. Symbolisme Touching the Ancient Fathers CHAP. VIII FRom the authority of the Scripture let vs descend to the authority of the anciēt Fathers of the Church of God All whom we shall fynd to be equally reiected and contemned by the Mahumetans and the Lutherans Yea Luther his Offpring before they will lend a fauorable eare to those Sentinalls of Gods Church for the good of their owne soules will soner endanger their owne Saluation they bearing themselues therein with such desperate resolution wherewith Cato did of whom it is recorded Occidii se Cato ne diceretur Caesar me seruauit And first touching the Fathers We find Mahumet in his Alcorans thus to disualew them (1) Azoara 13. Increduli minime adoranies c. The Christians are incredulous not worshipping God when they are required to giue credit to the Commandements of God and to his Legate or Mesienger videlicet Mahumet for they say se nolle imita●●● quicquam nisi quod Patres imitati sunt They will not i●ntate others in any thing but in what the Fathers haue imitated But to this is obiected Virum Patres non nisi veram fidem semper ●e●uerunt

hostile manner the authority of Gods Vniuersall Church teaching that it hath wholy erred in doctrine for the space of sixteene hundred yeares as may be gathered by his and their charging of all the Fathers since the Apostles dayes with superstition and Errours as aboue we haue shewed Mahumet first contemned the Authority of the Church but for six hundred yeares at the most Is not then Luthers sinne far greater and are not his punishments to be proportionably more intollerable therfore Againe certaine it is that such men who haue receaued from God greater meanes of finding out the true Religion if so they neglect contemne those Meanes do stand in a far higher degree of Gods indignation and wrath then others doe to whom the like meanes of searching the Truth haue not beene afforded Well then not only in seuerall ages before Luthers bursting out but euen after his appearing God hath vouchsafed to worke many most stupendious miracles in confirmation of ou● Catholi●e Religion Witnesses hereof to omit former Ages (1) S●o this point confessed of former ages by the Centurist● Cent. ● c. 11. Cent. ●0 c. 13. Ber●ard in Visa Malachiae See Also the History of Mathew Paris printed at Tyguro 1589 touching the great Miracles of S. Francis are the Miracles exhibited at Loreto in Italy and but the last day at Sichem in the Low Countryes in the Prouince of Brabant The truth of which Miracles done in both those two places Impudency it selfe hath not the forehead to deny Which Miracles haue no doubt come to the eares of our Euangelicall men according to the difference of the tymes wherein they were wrought And yet the Consideration of these Miracles though often exhibited in proofe of our Catholike Religion is so far from winning ground vpon our Aduersaries iudgments therein as that the Luthera●● acknowledging them as truly done commonly stile them Antichristian (2) Osiander Cent. 10.11 sequentib Wonders and lying signes as also prestigious (3) Peter Martyr l. contra Gardi●●●um sleights of the Deuill Now I say the report of these Miracles as being wrought here at home were neuer made knowne to the Turks through the great distermination of Countries And if they had come to the intelligence of the Turks in all likelyhood they would haue wrought more efficaciously for lesse they cold not with them then they haue done with Luther and his Sectaries So as perhaps that saying of our Lord with reference to the Turks and our New Euangelists might here haue been iustifyed If in (4) Luc. c. 10. Tyre and Sidon had been wrought the Miracles which haue been wrought in you they had done pennance in sackcloath and ashes long agoe From hence then I conclude that Luther and his Sectaries as contemning all such true Miracles stand far more culpable for such their neglect of them and consequently are with greater seuerity to be punished then the Turks who had no perfect Notion of the said true signes and astonishing Effects they being of that force for proofe of what they were wrought as that we may say of them in the words of the Prophet Dauid Mirabilia (5) Psal 91. tua credibilia facta sunt nimis And thus farre of the Parallels betweene Mahumetisme and Lutheranisme where we euidently discerne euen by force of all true Iudgment and strength of Reason that seuerall chiefe Persons of Luthers Religion haue been far more wicked at lest as wicked in their deportment then the first broachers of Turcisme haue been And that many doctrines ventilated and introduced first by Luther and his false Coapostles are more pernicious in their owne Nature and more exiciall to the Belieuers then are the different doctrines and Positions to them maintayned by Mahumet and the Turks That Mahumetisme or the Turkish Religion is first most foolish or ridiculous Secondly that it warranteth all sensuality and vnlawfull Pleasures Lastly that it is most horrid blasphemous and damnable CHAP. XXII TRue it is that Protestancy or Hugenotisme seemes to stand in a higher degree more chargeable and iniustifiable in the Points aboue paralleled then Mahumetisme doth Neuerthelesse my proiect in discoursing of the said Comparatiues is to lay open the deformity of Lutheranisme or Hugenotisme and not in any sort to aduance a good opinion to be had of Mahumetisme For although this later be in some points lesse Euill yet followeth it not that therefore it is in any sort Good since there is a great disparity or difference betweens a Positiue and reall Good and a tesser degree of Euill Now therefore for feare that men should in any fort worthily conceaue of Mahumetisme I haue thought good to reserue this Chapter for the preuenting of such a spirirituall Mischiefe wherein the Vglines of Mahumetisme shall summarily and briesly be dismanteled and laid naked And for the more perspicuous and methodicill accomplishment of this my designe I will reduce what heere followeth to these seuerall Heads First I will insist in the fabulous ridiculou● fooleries which Mahumet and the Turks do maintaine as true Secondly I wil sh●w that Mahumetisme in doctrine principally tendeth to the patronizing of Lust sensuality which Mahumet tastes to be no sinne Lastly and chiefly I will lay open how Mahumet and the Turks greatest atrocity and blaesphemy consists in the deniall of the most Blessed Trinity and of Mans Redemption by Christ Iesus To begin with the first branch and to gather but dispersedly here and there First then we (1) Cuspin in Mahumeto pag. 514 Thenet Cosmographia l. ● c. 3 Codrenus Chronograph Zonaras read that the spirit of God did descend vpon Mahumet in the forme of a Doue dictating vnto him what to write in his Alcoran The which doctrine while it was promulgated a fierce and vntamed Bull did run to Mahumet prostrating himselfe before his knees and kissing and sicking his Hand The Mahumetans further report that the Angell Gabriell accompained with seauenty thousand Angells so prodigious is this fiction descēded from Heauen to visit Mahumet being then but foure yeares of Age mouing the minds of men to giue Credit to that which Mahumet should after teach touching his doctrine and Religion In like manner Mahumet thus writeth in his Alcoran Emina (2) Azoara ●0 mater Mahumetis testabatur filium Mahumetum nec in vter● nec in parto vllum sibi dolorem fecisse Emina the Mother of Mahumet did witnes that her sonne Mahumet caused no griefe to her remayning either in her wombe or at his byrth See here how this ambitious Impostour emulous of our Sauiours Honour thought good to ennoble himselfe the more partly by prestigious forgeries partly by force to assume to himselfe the like credit and dignity in some of these former relations which we find the holy Scriptures the authority of the Church of God do ascribe and giue to our Sauiour Iesus Christ. But to proceede Mahumet further teacheth that Christ in the New Testament

Math. 7. broad Way leading to destruction provising (19) 1. Peer 3. Libery and transferring (20) Iude. v. ● the Grace of God into wantounes Now to come to the third last branch which infinitly exceedeth in impiety and Horrour the former two Heads since this woundeth Christianity in its Mayster-veyne for it consisteth in the absolute denyall of the most sacred and vndeuided Trinity and of the Incarnation of God for the Redemption of Mankind For to recapitulate that which touching this point we haue aboue in this Treatise shewed Mahumet to haue taught in his Alcoran He there thus further teacheth Indredul● (21) Azoara 12. sunt qui Iesum Maria filium D●●● dicunt esse They are incredulous who say that Iesus the Sonne of Mary is God And (22) Azoara 49 ●3 more Constanter dic ultis Christianis 〈◊〉 nec genuit nec genitus Speake constantly to those Christians that God did neither beget nor is begotten thus speaking against Christ the Sonne of God And further against the death and Pas●ion of Christ Iudai (23) Azoara 1● Christum Dei ●uncium nequaquam interfecerunt sed alterum ei simil●m The Iewes did not put to death Christ the Messenger of God but one like vnto him To conclude Mahumet thus execrateth most blasphemously in his Alcoran Confundat (24) Azoara 10. Deus Christianos qui Maria filium loco Dei venerantur Let God confound the Christians who worship the sonne of Mary in place of God And hereupon it is that as aboue I noted Bibliander sayth Prim●s (25) Bibliander in praesat Alcoran p. 3. manimus error Turcarum est quòd Trinitatem in V●●tate negant In like for Cusa●us (26) Cusanus no cribation● Alcoran l. ● c. ● l. 2 c. 14. Richard●o in conf●legis Sar●●●●● and Richardus Ordinis Pradicat●rum do thus write Principalis intentie Mahumet j●st pers●adere Chri●tum ●aque Deum neque 〈…〉 Both which authorities are vpon other occasion aboue expressed O the Incredulity of Mahumet his Sect who will not acknowledg him whose lineaments as I may say of body I meane whose seuerall Passages of his Birth Lyfe and Passion are most liuely drawne and pourtrayted by the pensills of the Prophets in the Old Law To insist only in some few points His byrth of a Virgin was prophesied in Esay c. 7. The Place of his birth in Michaeas 5. The death of the Innocents killed by Herod in Ieremy 31. His Miracles in Esay 35. His betraying by his owne disciple in Psalm 41. His preaching in Esay 61. That he should suffer diuers Kinds of Tormentes in Esay 53. That he was to suffer for our sakes in Esay 53. His foure Euangelists in Ezechiel 1. His Crueisixion in Psalm 22. His Resurrection Psalm 15. His Ascension into Heauen Psalm 14. The sending of the Holy Ghost Ioel 2. Thus Mahumet by disclaiming from Christ as his Redeemer disclaymeth withall from the authority of the Old Testament and with like contempt sleighteth the dignity of the New Testament vnder pretext that both the Old and the New were corrupted from their originall Purity In a serious perusall of which New Testament our Soule is of power to lance forth into an Ocean of Mysteries touching Christ but our Vnderstanding through the gloriousnes of his worth is not able to aprehend them so the stars are darkened through ouer much light and our eyes are too weake to behould those radiant beames of his diuine Maiesty For we therein read that it is He who being the comfort of Angells vouchsafed (27) Math. 4. to receaue comfort from Angells Who was nourished (28) Math. 20. with meate yet first gaue to meate the Vertue of nourishing so as when he did eate or drinke then did the Earth after an vnaccustomed manner nourish the Heauens It is He in whose Incarnation the Celestiall (29) Math. 17. sunne receaued its light from the Earth Orietur * Malach. 4. Sol Iustitiae to wit from the B. Virgin and thus did the Earth powre out its influence vpon the Heauens It is He O happy Sinicon who when thou (30) Luc. 2. in●ou●des him within thy Armes did infould within his Armes the whole Vniuerse It is He who being Lapis Angularis (31) Act. 4. became Petra (32) il Petr. 2. scandali And who being Humilis (33) Math. 11. corde was filius (34) Marc. 9. Alussimi It is He. who being Puer (35) Luc. ●● was before All tyme in (36) Iohn 1. principio crat Verbum and but proficiens (37) Luc 1. Sapientia then enioyed omnes thesauros (38) Coloss ● sapientiae Dei It is He Who conuersing heer vpon Earth did suspend for the tyme his owne Greatnes thereby the more easily to accommodate himselfe to Man and who ruling the whole frame of this World subiecteth himselfe in the patration of Miracles to the Voice of Man Obediente Deo (39) Iesus c. 10. voci bominis Who also being Plenus (40) Iohn 1. gratia veritatit semetipsum (41) Philip. 2. exinaniuit It is He who being the Light made Ego sum (42) Iohn ● lux mundi was deriued from the Light vnmade It is He who through the mist or cloude of his Humanity darted forth beames of his splendour and brightness Lux in tenebris lucet (43) Iohn 1. tenebra cam non comprehenderum Whose glory was really the glory of the only begotten Sonne of the Father yet recorded to be but quasi Vnigentii (44) Iohn 1. à Patre To conclude It is He who inuested himselfe with our Humanity that through an opprobrious death he might saue mankind O how many Christians haue shed their bloud in defence that Christ for them did shee l his bloud Since then the sacred Scriptures do further most largly celebrate the incomprehensiblenes of thy Mercy Most Blessed Redeemer for therein we read that God the Father said Propter (45) Esay ●3 scelus populi mei percusii cum For the wickednes of my People I haue stroken him That Christ for our sake was made obedient (46) Philip. 2. vnto death euen the death of the Crosse That Christ loued vs and (47) Ephes 9. deliuered himselfe for vs an Oblation and Host to God in an odour of swe●tnes That Christ is the (48) 1. Ioan. ● Propitiation for our sinnes and not for Ours only but for the whole world Finally to omit infinit other texts of lyke Nature that God (49) 1. Iohn ● hath sent his Sonne a Propitiation for our sinnes Seing then I say Most Blessed Iesus so many Passages of thy Diuine Word do euen proclaime forth thy Mercy I poore wretch most humbly beseech thee not to suffer my sinnes to ouerthrow that in my Soule which thy goodnes hath builtt therin Acknowledge in me what is thine but absterge and wipe away what is not thine

(9) Lascitius the Protestant so relateth Caluin to say in his Booke de Russorum 〈◊〉 Moscouitarum religious Papa tyrannils c. Because through the tyranny of the Pope the true Course of Ordination was dissolued therfore we needed a new help and therefore this function which the Lord hath imposed vpon vs was altogether extraordinary In the same dialect speaketh your Patriarch of our neighboring Towne of Gene●●● Beza (10) Beza i● his Conference at Poys● I meane for being expostulated of his owne and other his Associats Calling for their reforming of the Roman Church and planting of their Innovations peremptorily he affirmed their Calling to be Extraordinary So fully do Mahumet and Sergius sympa●●●● with our still Gospellers in maintayning the Church of God to begin to be Erroneous about the tyme of Gregory the Great and in promiscuously vendicating to themselues with contempt of all lawfull Vocation and Mission an extraordinary peculiar calling for their first sowing of their Blesphemies and Heresyes This was the proceeding of your first chiefe Maisters whome their owne learning for that they were learned it cannot be denied thus embouldened to stampe their Errours by ambitiously pretending a Miraculous Vocation But we are the lesse to meruaile thereat since Learning oftentimes makes men proud and Pryde begets Heresy and this is the vnexpected and lamentable Gradation betwene Learning and Heresy But to proceed in this vngratefull combination and Coniunction In which who had the aduantage ouer the other I referre to the iudicious seing where the Ballance is eauen there the least graine doth cast it Mahumet after he had by the industry policy of Sergius inuented and pretended a reformation of the Roman Church did instantly thereupon (11) So relateth Cuspinianus in Mahumets shake off the yoake of Obedience and Loyalty towards Is●●clius the Emperour and did draw diuers Prouinces from him euen by force and open Rebellion subiugating them to his owne power In all which said Prouinces he after planted his misbeliefe and Infidelity Thus did Sergius become Mahumets Dedalus in making him Wings for his high soaring And did not Luther treade according to his power in the same tract with Mahumet For after he had seasoned the Germans with his Nouellisme he presently Foedere Smalcaldico taught his Proselyts and followers to rise in rebellion against Charles their Emperour And wheras the Germans were obliged by Oath to the Obedience of the Emperour Luther and the Lutheran Deuines to free them of all such feares and scruples decreed by solemne Sentence that Quia (12) Sleidan the Protestant lib. 1. Caesar Religioni c. Because Cesar did threaten an overthrow to Religion and the liberty thereof therefore he gaue iust cause why the Lutherans did vis●●g against him with safe and good Consciences And thus Luther first planting his Religion by the sword and open Rebellion no lesse then Mahumet did caused such combustions insurrections and bloudy warrs throughout all Germany as that himselfe thus vauntingly speaketh thereof Videor (13) Luther in loc com class 4. c. 30. mihi videre Germaniam in sanguine nature c. Christus ●●●us viuit regnat ego viuo regnabo But touching the Warrs waged by the Lutherans and the Nouellists of this age originally for the aduancement of their Heresies I cease here further to discourse of since in a more conuenient place hereafter I will more fully enlarge my selfe Thus far now to shew the great association and affinity which the Turks your Ghospellers haue in the foundation and enlarging of both your Religions To wit First that the Broachers of Turcisme and Hugenotisuse were Apostata Monkes Secondly that they mutually agreed in equally condemning the Vniuersall Church of Christ euen from such a peculiar Age or Century Thirdly that the sowers of both their Religions did promiscuously enallege to themselues an extraordinary Vocation Finally that they maintayned and increased both their Religions once disseminated by the sword and trayterous rebellions And thus did these former Wretches thinke good to stampe their wicked doctrines though to their owne eternall damnation chiefly among other allectiues that they might be spoken of in after tymes Madmen who couet at so high a pryce to enioy a little Ayre after they cease breathing Landantus (14) August vbi non sunt torquentur vbi sunt You will I hope O You my Countrimen disclayme at least in words from Mahumetisme and can you then imbrace your owne Ghospell as diuine since it is impossible that Truth and Faisbood should indifferently be seated vpon the same Beginning Basis Ground worke and Foundations The 4. Symbolysme touching the writings of the Apostles CHAP. V. HAuing laid downe aboue the generall foundations whereupon Sergous Luther raised the Mount of their promiscuous Errours It remaynes now to descend to the particular Heresyes by them indifferently maintayned which they wrought vpon the Anuile of their owne priuate Iudgments And first though Mahumet in his Alcoran admitted the Old Testament and the Gospells yet as making no mention of the Epistles of the Aposties or of the Apocalyps he wholy discānoneth and excl●deth them For thus Mahumet writeth in his Alcoran (1) Azoar● Deus pius misericors p●●ils Testamentum Vetus videlicet legem Moysis Psalterium deinceps Euangelium rectas vias hominsbus tradidit God being pious and mercifull first deliuered to men as the right wayes the Old Testamen to wit the Law of Moyses and the Psalter then he after deliuered the Ghospell From whence we see that he pretermitteth all the other Writings of the Apostles Now in this point our new Euangelists do ioyne with Mahumet and Sergius by their expunging and obliterating most parts of the writings of the Apostles To begin with Father Luther who speaking of the Epistle of S. Iames betrampleth it in these Words The Epistile of Iames is (2) In Praefa●an Epist. Iacobi in editione Iene●si contentions swelling strawy and vnmorthy an Apostolicall spirit In like sort Luther re●●●cteth as Apocryphall the booke of the Apocalyps euen by the ●udgment of Bullinger the Protestant thus writing Martin (3) Bulling vpon the Apocaly●s cap. 1. serm 1. Luther hath as it were wounded this booke meaning the Apocalyps with a sharp Preface set before his Edition of the New Testament in Dutch For which his course taken therem graue and literate men are displèased with him To proceed further (4) Kempnit in Enchirid. pag. 6●● Kempnitius a chiefe Lutheran peremptorals hud●●ateth condemneth the second Epistle of Peter the second and third Epittle of Iohn the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of Iames the Epistle of Iude the Apocalyps stiling all these Apocryphall further assirming That these Bookes (5) Kempuit in examen part ● p. 56. haue not testimony for their authority With Kempuitius Adamus Francisci the Protestant thus agreeth saying Apocryphi (6) In Margarete Theolog pag. ●48