declared their perversnesse as is evident by comparing Acts 16.3 with Gal. 5.2 3. If there were no limitation in this case of giving offence there would never be an Heretick Whom we are to reject after the first and second admonition Titus 3.10 Quest. 8. Whether the Books called Apocrypha be not Scripture These Books commonly called Apocrypha are so called from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 abseondo a thing hid because the authority of them is not known to the Church and in testimony of Faith those Books must not at all be produced The Church of Rome owns them as part of the Canon but the Catholick Church did ever exclude their Authority For 1. They were never used by the Jews neither in their Temples nor in their Synagogues the Jews were always Gods Library Keepers To them were committed the Oracles of God Rom. 3.2 Now these being never used nor committed to them cannot be Gods Oracles and by consequence their authority is not binding 2. They never received any countenance from the gospel they are never mentioned as a Rule or as Books wherein the will and minde of God was made known to men which Christ would never have neglected to do had they been so yea as he chid the Pharisees for putting false glosses upon the Law surely he would have upbraided them sharply for taking away so great a part of the body of the Law Our Lord Jesus mentions no other parts of the Scriptures then Moses Psalms and the Prophets Luke 24 44 4â— of which the Apocrypha is no part 3. There are many things in those Books false both in History and in Doctrine much non-sense and against both sense reason and Canonical Scripture are there many passages 4. The Author of the second Book of Mac. Mac. 2.2.23 Ingenuously confesses that that Book was only an abridgment or compend of those five Books of the Wars of the Jews writ by one Iason a Cyrenean and great sweat pains and labour it cost hiâ— so to do This was no fit work for the Spirit of God to abridge the long books writ by Iason that men might have more pleasure in the reading of them The same Author concludes this History with a Complement and also desires to have his errours pardoned professing his best in composing that book which also shews it came not professedly from the Spirit of God The same â—each the Reformed Churches of France Art 4. of Belgiae Art 6. of Ireland Art 3. of England Art 6. Yet the Châ—rch does and hath used these books and reads them in their Congregations though not to confirm doctrine but to exhort to manners For these Reasons 1. From that Relation and aspect that it bears toward the Scripture concerning the Jews returning from the Captivity the Passeover kept by King Iosiah the Wisdom so called of Solomon though probably made by Philo the Jew who flourished An. C. 90. the sentences and sayings of the son of Sirach are so much reflecting upon Sacred Writ that they are not to be despised Iohn 10.22 We have some account of a Discourse that was held between Christ and the Jews in the Temple and withall tels us what time this discourse was viz. At the Feast of the Dedication Now of this Feast the Scripture nowhere gives us an account we read of no Laws of it no Sacrifices for it no time set apart for it yet Iesus owns it To know the original and cause of this Feast we must go to Apocrypha 1 Mac. 4. ver 52. to the end In which place we read that when the Iews had defeated the forces of Gorgias and had regained the Temple and rebuilded the Altar they offered Sacrifice thereon and dedicated it for future service and kept the days of Dedication with gladness for joy that God had given them again Liberty to worship in their Temple and ver 59. it is appointed that that feast be kept every year for eight days which in our Saviours time is kept and he graceth it with his presence too blame then are they that are offended at Ministers going down to the Apocrypha citing it for matter of fact for in this and in some other places no Minister under heaven can give his hearers any rational account of this Text without making use of the Apocrypha 2. For those excellent plain Moral Instructions that lie in many places of it so full of variety so plenteous in brevity particularly those books of Ecclisiasticus and Wisdom wherein are excellent documents suited to nay most of them taken from the word of God 3. For those godly and profitable uses beleivers may make in reading and hearing those great deliverances that God was pleased to give his own people Israel in so wonderfull a manner cloathing their enemies with shame when they were at strongest and crowning them with glory and honour when they were at weakest In a word to see how God preserved them in the midst of their enemies keeping to himself still a people when the Heathen about them had said Let them be no more a Nation as is manifest in the history of the Maccabees Yet alwayes care was taken that none of these bookes nor nothing in one of those bookes was ever made use of in matters of Faith or Doctrine but in matters of fact onely as men will make use of Poets Chronicles or moral Authors To this agree the reformed Churches and the Church of England Art 6. the Article it self is this Art 6 of the Church of England Holy Scripture containeth c. And the other books Hierom saith the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners but yet doth not apply it to establish any Doctrine c. Quest. 9. Why would God communicate his will to his Church in writing The meaning of this question is this Seeing God was pleased to let his will and his pleasure or his word be known and communicated to the world from the Creation unto Moses by tradition or by speaking why would he have it to be revealed from Moses untill the dissolution of the world by writing might it not have been delivered to succeeding ages by the present through the Fathers delivering it to the Children and so forward to the end as well as it was for two thousand years at the beginning of the world But God would not have it so he would have it given in writing 1 Because of the darkeness of mans nature the candle of the Lord shined darker and darker as man increased sin increased that lamp of light that he put in man at first grew dimmer and dimmer To prevent a gross darkness from falling upon the deluded sons of men he would not trust his word alwayes to remain upon the tongues or hands of men but would have it set in a candlestick and writ in tables of stone to remain a perpetual light 2 That it might be keept theâ—freer from corruption before man grew more stuborn and as they multiplied
is himself and his Cardinals saies it a poor bolster God knows for a man to place his rest his confidence his assurance the unchangable estate of his eternal soul upon And why must I believe it because they say it Because they cannot erre and why must I believe they cannot erre because they say so thus may they impose upon mens consciences the very doctrine of Devils as they do 1 Tim. 4.12 3 4. and the poor people are taught that they must believe that oâ— herwise they are no members of the Church out of which indeed there is no Salvation or of Christ though no Scripture be brought in the least to confirm it 2. We were not baptized in the name of the Church this argument Paul brings against the divisions of the Corinthians 1 Cor. 11.3 there were some that would stick to the Doctrine of Paul some hold to that of Cephas what sayes he was Paul Crucified for you or were you baptized in the name of Paul that you should suppose to be saved by me we were baptized in the name of the Triun God and we expect only and we believe throughly to be saved by him alone without the aid of men or Angels for if an Angel should come down and perswade us or teach to us a necessity of believing in him without or against the Scripture as frequently Rome doth he were to be accursed I say again he were to be accursed 1 Gal. 9. 3. The Catholick Church calls upon her members not to do that and good reason too the Son of God would not though he might urge his own authority plead for a beliefe but upon a Scripture account Iohn 5.39 and Paul desires to be followed no further than he follows Christ 1 Cor. 11.1 and those Bereans are made noble for searching the Scriptures whether the things that were spoken by Paul were true or no Acts 17 11. And we have a charge given us to hear the Son the same teacheth the reformed Churches as of France Art 2. Belg. Art 7. Art 20. of the Church of England Art 1. of the Church of Bohem In which Article there are two reasons given for this truth 1. because the Scriptures were inspired and taught by the holy Ghost confirmed by heavenly testimonies which spirit discovers to men how it ought to be understood for Prophecie came not in old time by the will of man but holy men spake as they were moved by the holy Ghost 2 Pet. 1. ult Besides the Lord himself saieth Search the Scriptures And again Ye are deceived not knowing the Scriptures c. 2 Because that is a true and sure testimony and a clear proof of Gods favourable good-will which he hath revealed concerning himself such things as are necessary to doctrine to discipline and government of the holy Church are all fully and absolutely so comprehended then which no Angel can bring any thing more certain and if he should he ought not to be believed For which cause saies that confession in our Churches the Scriptures are rehearsed to the hearers in the vulgar tongue and especially according to the ancient custome of the Church those portions of the Gospel in Scripture which are wont to be read on solemn daies out of the Evangelists and Apostles writings and are usually called the Epistles and Gospels The whole stream of the confessions of reformed Churches runs against Rome in this 4. Our Creed which is the rule of things to be believed as the ten Commandements are of things to be done and the Lords Prayer of things to be asked calls upon him that reads it or hears it to believe only in God the Father and in God the Son and in God the holy Ghost and not to believe in but to believe the Catholick Church i e to be perswaded that there ever was is and shall to the end of the world be a company of men Elected and called unto life by which confession we acknowledge our selves one of them Now to believe in the Church were to set her in as high dignity to rule over the consciences of men as Christ himself or any other person in the Trinity which were a giving his glory to another 5. Men should by this never be assured of their Salvation nor of their good estare it might be necessary for thy Salvation to do that this day which might not be done if I would be saved the next for as the Rulers of the Church uttered their judgments upon the light of reason I must judge my self in a happy or in a forlorn condition which is contrary to that Catholick doctrine Make your calling and Election sure 2 Pet. 1.10 which could never be done did it lye upon the fine flourishes of an Oratour or distinction of a Canonist sitting in counsell And indeed this may be one cause why the Church of Rome denies the possibility of a firm assurance of future glory contrary to the text above named 5. There are but four false religions in the world Heathnism Turcism Judaisme and Papism the Heathen possibly may reason the case for his religion against an Opponent though perhaps as soundly as Cyrus reasoned with Daniel concerning the dignity of Bel Thinkest thou not â—hat Bel is a living God said the King seest thou not how much he eateth and drinketh every day The Jew he will direct thee to the Scriptures see and try if his religion be not according to that most sure word of Prophesie The Turk is stubborn and it is death to dispute or search the truth for the confirming of the faith in the matters of the Alchoran The same it is with the Papist the bell will ring and candle will be put out and the book opened if the authority of the Bishop of Rome be once questioned though in matters of faith Let the Turk and Romanist therefore go together give me that religion that may be tryed and hold out in tryal yet let the Romanist remember that as Mahomet said he found the hand of God seven times colder than ice he may find it seventy times hotter than Purgatory for either adding or taking from the word of God and imposing any thing upon the people as necessary to be done in point of Salvation Illi ergo potius parendum monenti ut omnia exploremus quod bonum est retineamus quoe certe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 instituti non potest nisi ad manum sit Lydius ille Scripiucarum lapis cujus ope aurea ab aereis humana á Divines internoscantur Notwithstanding that the restimony of the Church is not to be taken singly in matters of faith yet the testimony of the Church is of great weight and concernmnst in matters of fact For 1 it may prepare our hearts and move them to believe the thing the surer that the Church hath affirmed This made King Charles the first of glorious memory strongly to assert that what could not be proved by the word of God to be unlawfull
sedition or division to requit it will foster Heresie Hereticks do corrumpere sidem and Schismaâ—â—cks or Separatists do disrumpere charitatem the one corrupts the Doctrine of the Church the other falls from her Communion both are fruits of the flesh and they that do such things shall not inherit the Kingdome of God Verse ult The sin of Separation is so infectious that in Scripture we are to separate from them that so do Rom. 16.17 There is a Rule in Divinity that wil make the sin of separation to be great it is this Those sins are the greatest which are most contrary to and do most oppose the greatest of Christian vertues or graces Now they are recorded 1 Cor. 13.13 Now abideth Faith Hope and Charity but the greatest of these three is Charity Now by the Rule distrust in Gods promises or in his power is a great sin it being a sin against hope Heresie or a stout persisting in an errour is a far greater sin for it is a sin against faith and seeks to cover conceal if not to destroy the truth Now Charity is greater then either of these that follows therefore that that sin that destroys the peace of the Church untyes the Ligatures by which the whole body is compact together is the greatest but this doth the sin of Separation a thing by this age of no account yet they wil find it of great moment in the day of their Account It is a sin generally accompanied with the other lusts of the flesh viz. Hatred Varience Emulations Strife Wrath which seldome lurks long in a Corner but in time appears in the field in the habit and acts of Murtherers Ravishers Traytors and all with the voyce of Iacob pretending Godlinesse and conscience as Histories do abundantly show But to answer the Question So long as a Church makes no separation from Christ no separation is to be made from it but to keep in it is the duty and safety honour and happinesse of him that would enjoy the Communion of Saints the forgivenesse of sins the Resurrection of the body unto life Everlasting A Church separates from Christ two ways 1. When she overthrows the foundation of that Doctrine that is laid by Christ the foundation of all truth is already laid and he that goes to overthrow that may be said to turn from it Do we see a society of men whether Nationally or Domestically whether openly or secretly going in that road that thwarteth the foundation or fundamental points of Religion there must be a separation Rev. 18.4 whether it be in the adding to these fundamentals as if they were not sufficient or taking from them as if they were redundant or superfluous This made the Reformed Churches beyond Sea and the Church of England to separate from the Church of Rome which hath both taken from and added to those fundamental Truths whereupon the Church was by the Lord and his Apostles erected and builded Having to the Scriptures added some Books as the Apocrypha makes the Scriptures to be an imperfect Rule and must have Traditions to compleat it That the sense and meaning of the Scripture depends upon the Churches authority That in all matters of Controversie not the Scriptures but the Church must be the Judge They have made five Sacraments more then Christ made They have clearly blotted out the whole body of the second Commandment out of the first Table of the Law in several Books That Infants that die without Baptism are eternally separate from God except they be as it were martyred by which martyrdom they are baptized Baptismo sanguinis with their own blood They teach that men are not justified by Faith alone before God They make Saints and holy men departed assistant in the work of reconciling us to God and therefore maintain they must be prayed unto That the Doctrine of Purgatory must be believed if we would be saved That the efficacy of the Sacraments depends upon the worthiness or intention of the giver That Baptism totally abolisheth Original sin That the real fleshly body of Christ is in the Bread at the Sacrament of the Lords Supper as soon as the Priest pronounceth the words Hoc est corpus meum this is my body if he should say Corpus mea it were no Sacrament They take the Wine or keep the Cup from the Laity in that Sacrament That the wine in that Ordinance must be mingled with water that that Sacrament is profitable not only for the living but for the dead The Priest is not to bless a second marriage They baptize Bells with the very words of Baptism and by that they teach Devils are drove from the Church O Romanists great is your Faith and give them proper names That God-Fathers and God-mothers at the Font by reason of the nearness of their Spiritual Kindred are not to nor must noâ— marry for the seventh generation That the Pope or Bishop of Rome is the universal Head of the Church and Christs Vicar All which â—enets as they were utterly unknown to the former Bishops of Rome nor heard of in the Church of Christ for many Ages so they are for the present opposed by all the Reformed Churches abroad who have upon that account forsaken her and England hath thrown her off and separated from her and by the Champions of the several Churches hath their separation been defended By vertue of that Catholick truth 1 Tim. 6.3 If any man teach otherwise that is then the Scriptures do and consent not to wholsom words of our Lord Iesus and to the Doctrine which is accordâ—ng to godliness c. from such separate turn away or withdraw thy self their separation is justifiable What Paul would have Timothy in this place to do he practiseth himself in another Acts 19.9 yet probably in one and the same City was it both done by Paul and to be done by Timothy Saint Paul being in Ephesus some there were that believed his word others not but hardened their heart speaking evil of him and of the Gospel After he had preached three moneths and perswading to the things concerning the Kingdom of God he separated the Disciples he would not have those Believers that had received the Truth to be in any Church-fellowship with those that spoke against it Luther who began to rise up and take his farewell of the Church of Rome Anno 1517. being an Augustian Frier was called an Apostate answered Consitetur se esse Apostatam sed beatum Sanctum qui sidem Diabolo datam non servavit that he had only fallen back from that Covenant and Engagement he had made with Satan Not that there is a separation to be made from all the Doctrine of Rome for she holds many great mysteries of Divinity purely and soundly wherein we must and do all agree with her as Christians but he that is a true member of the Church of Rome as it now stands he must believe that the least coal in Purgatory is very
at Westminister November 4.1548 and being by them perused after thanks returned to the King for his care and pains he is petitioned to let it passe unto an act and by Authority it was enacted that in all Churches and Chappels Sacraments and all other ordinances within the compasse of that bock should be performed solely and wholy by it appointing penaltys to the not users or defamers of the same It might very well be Inquired considering the premisses and our practises whether a set for me may not be as necessary in our days as it was in those considering how various men are in their form manner place or gesture in the administration of ordinances not that I would have mens gifts hindered but their spleen rancour and rage stopped unto which well composed for me would be a proper remedy which truly as it is to be suspected is the cause why a forme is by many called down knowing that it would cut be their extravagant notions their abilitye and parts being neither so high nor so great but a liturgy might be used by them but to let them passe The compilers of the Book of Common-prayer were Doct. Cranmer Arch Bishop of Cant. Doct. Goodrick Bishop of Ely Doct. Skip Bishop of Hereford Doct. Thirlby Bishop of Westminster Doct. Day Bishop of Chichester Doct. Holbeck Bishop of Lincolne Doct. Ridley Bishop of Rochester Doct. May Deane of Pauls Doct. Taylour Deane of Lincolne Doct. Heynes Dean of Exeter Doct. Redman Dean of Westminster Doct. Cox King Eâ—wards Almoner Doct. Mr. Robinson Arch-Deacon of Leinest All these being then owned for sound professors of the faith afterward great sufferers by death exile or banishment for their not yeelding to the errors of the Church of Rome Shall their work be thought to be unlawfull which after much deliberation they composed for the edification of the Church were they difstracted or mad or Hypocrites that they should thus put down and erect Popery For all the zeal of the Guisel before Latimer shall be accused as a Papist let him be indicted for an Atheist he that so says fearing neither God nor regarding man had that holy soul no religion when he gave his body to be burned I do now imagine I smell Cranmâ—ns flesh burning through the Cruelty of the Papists and let my right hand forget her cunning if I should not rather kisse the straw he lay upon and bow to thâ— chain he was fastened to the stake by then kick the ashes he was burned to or condemn him for a cheat a dissembler for a Papist which consequentially must be affirmed when that book of Common prayer is reviled and â—corned and as Popish asserred 2. This book of Common-prayer appears to be lawfull from that authoâ—ity by which it hath been established It is strange that that young Iosiah of England viz King Edward studying to root out Popery should so farre befoole himself and his counsel as to be glad at that bookes compiling if it had strengthâ—ned the Papal power was there nor a wise man in all the Parliaments of his time was there no religion in Qâ— Elizabeth was she such a notorious dissembler as under a pretence of throwing the doctrine of Rome aside would hug the Pope the closser in her armes or if she had been such was there never a holy man nor a religious Parliament in her time to rectifie that abuse â— was King Iames and his Parliaments all out of the way and King Charles of glorious memory and his Parliaments all Papists or Ignoramuses that they knew not what they did when they established this book Certainly those glorious Princes and wise Parliaments in establishing successively that book did find in it nothing that was unlawfull or that was contrary to true Godlinesse 3. From its conformity to sacred Scripture Let the Common-prayer be abserved and the matter of it be marked and bring it to the Bible Old or new Testament to Moses the Prophâ—ts or the Psalms and if there be a word sentence petition or prayer that is not agreeable to either of these all of these or a part of these the Author of these lines at this present engages himself to recant publickly what either here or elsewhere he hath written in defence of that book and become a proselyte to the profession of the Guisels In the book of Common prayer there are two things considerable 1. The matter of it 2. The Ceremonies in it 1. The matter or subject of the book of which it is composed to passe over scripture is either 1. Holy songs 2. Pious prayers 3. Godly exhortations 4. Christian confession 5. Scriptural Comminations Which may be again subdevided into 1. The Priests Versicles 2. The Peoples Responses In all which there is nothing but what is agreeable to holy writ and the will of God revealed in his Scriptures The Ceremonies in it which are those particular gestures or acts to be performed in the administration of such and such particular services and they are cheifly these 1. The crosse in Baptisme 2. Kneeling at the Supper 3. The Preists standing at the north side of the table at the communion 4. Marrying with a ring 5. Standing at the Creed In giveing obedience unto which ceremonys there is no more scripture to prove it a sin then there is to maintaine it unjust to be thrice asked in a Church before marriage as the Guisels in their directory enjoyn or to be married by a minister which there by them is also thought to be expedient 4. From the sutablenesse of it to the Common Christians capacity The service of the Church of Rome were it not repugnant in other points to the word of God yet in this it is sinfull that it is performed in a strange tongue which the common sort of Christians understand not In the Church of England there is no ordinance no service but the exhortations thanksgiveings and confessions therein are all of them so plain so easy that the bluntest understanding may reach them and the shallowest capacity may upon a certain knowledge say Amen So be it unto them all 5. From the agreements of it to the set formes of other Churches to those of Geneva Sweden France yea to the Church of Rome so farre as they are agreeable to scripture and to those formes that were of old used and at this present are in the Easterne Church doth the sevice of the Church of England agree and correspond an argument of it self were there no other of its excellency and dignity the wise composers of it having drained the errours from all other formes and thrown away what ever was a misse in other liturgys retaining what was pure and holy agreeable to found doctrine and religion which being methodicall digested and composed was presented to the King and ratified by Parliament as a standing rule to be used in the house of God which is the Church 7. Fâ—om the excellent order and uniformity that is in the
near as hot as hell he must believe the least point of Reliques with as strong a faith as the greatest mysteries of the God-head and if he deny any of the former he is no lesse an Heretick then if he had denied the latter and he that believes not the Churches tradition to be as necessary to be believed as the Epistles of Paul he cannot be saved Indeed there is not an Article of the Church of Rome that is Catholick wherein reformed Churches differ from her but in those Articles that are but of Yesterday such as those above mentioned they stand at a distance praying for her but loth to touch her she being not sick of a small Ague but hath running sores Ulcers Infections Pestilential humours within her which makes them write over her as if she were visited Lord have mercy upon her but dare not make themselves one body with her H. The Apologist of the Church of England declares That we have Renounced that Church wherein we could not have the Word of God sincerely taught being mixed with tradition nor the Sacraments rightly administred the one half of the Lords Supper being but given to the people and Baptisme being given to Bells c. Nor the Name of God duly called upon praying to the Saints and Angels and in a Latin tongue which the people understand not To conclude we have forsaken the Church viz. of Rome as it is now not as it was in old time past c. and come to that Church viz. of England wherein all things be governed purely and Reverendly This overthrowing of the foundation thou maist call Heresie in dâ—ctrine Yet by caution take not the manners of the people for doctrine let the people be what they will the man what he pleaseth it is neither the good lives of men nor the bad lives of men that makes or unmakes Churches but false and corrupted doctrine Much loosenesse was in the Church of Corinth and Prophanenesse particâ—larly about the Sacrament of the Lords Supper yet the Apostle gives no ground at all for separation only exhorts to a more orderly peaceable walking and a more holy and prepared celebration Neither must we take things indifferent for doctrine nor every blemish for fundamentall Heresie It is an errour in our age to take Circumstances and outward Ceremonies for essentiall parts of worship There was much corruption in the Church of the Jews in our Saviours time and much false glosses put upon the Law yet in regard the fundamentals were not razed he commanded his disciples to hear even the Pharisees who yet were thieves and robbers being none of those appointed to expound the Law which justified not their manner of teaching but the truth of the doctrine taught who sate in Moses chair Matth. 23.1 2 3. but gives them a Caveat to beware of the practices and leven of the Pharisees that is hearken and obey to those truths and fundamental precepts that they give out teach to be in my Fathers Law first taught by Moses as cirumcision the way and manner of the Sacrifices which in the Jewish Church were necessary points but refuse those things they lay down as from tradition as Corban washing of cups for not these but the other are commanded you to do Moreover you must be sure not to separate your selves from those who possibly are ignorant of the depths of Sathan in that particular doctrine delivered for Christ pities such and speaks comfortably to them Revel 2.4 nor from others whom you can perceive in the least to disown that corrupted doctrine though privately being troubled at the razeing out of necessary principles How many poor souls are led away from the truth by those that creep into houses in our days that are ignorant possibly of the designes of their prime Teachers following them as much as the people followed Absolon viz. in the simplicity of their heart these giving great encouragement to those that so teach makes them bolder to go on against the unity of the faith showing the Number of their Disciples loving to hear those Doctrines that either add to or take from the infallible and unalterable rule of the Word in both which the Church of Rome is erroneous and therefore the separation from her justifiable 2. We may lawfully separate our selves from a Church when she enjoyns those acts of worship as necessary not enjoyned by Christ when a Church preacheth corrupted doctrine as from God we may separate from her so may we nay so ought we to do when she injoyns false worship to be performed to God whether it be in worshipping him after a false manner or giving another besides him true worship Deut. 10.20 This is another cause of the reformed Churches separation from Rome their Beads their Ave Maries their Fastings a great part of worship with them their praying to Saints as those that have the plague must pray to St. Rochus those that have the tooth-ache to Apollonia those that are poysoned to Saint Iohn those that are in Captivity to Saint Leonard those that have the Fistulâ— to Saint Quintin Women that are in labour must pray to Saint Margaret but especially to the Virgin Mary besides those common prayers that you must make in common to all the Saints and to the Angels also must prayer be made There is a little Book published by the Authority of Pope Pius the V. in which almost at the beginning that all might prosper the better you have this Prayer Precibus meritiâ— beatae Mariae semper Virginis omnium sanctorum perducat nos Dominus ad Regna Coelorum The Summe of which Prayer is this that God would be pleased to lead bring the Petitioner unto Heaven by the intercession praers and merits of the blessed Virgin and of all the Saints I do wonder that Christ should be left out by whose merits and intercession alone we are saved but I marvail most whether all these shall be a distinct Company by themselves for of the whole company of the Virgins they cannot be the foolish Virgins had no Oyle the wise had but enough to save themselves where is there any of their merits then left for me yet this is better then Tu per Thomae sanguinom c. These with many more of the like nature as praying for the Dead offering or burning up of incense praying in an unknown Tongue that common people know not what they pray their Ordination of the Hoast their holy water their penance their Pilgrimages their oyl or Chrisme salâ— and spittle used in Baptism was the cause of that separation made from her by the reformed Churches these points and this kind of worship being not Catholick for as before they separate not from Rome in any point of worship that she holds in Common with the Châ—rch of Christ but these being brats of her own begetting they deny them entertainment or Countenance and separate themselves from her and their separation is justifiable
taught the principles of that doctrine they were baptized in The Jewish children were taught the nature of their Sacraments Exod. 12.17 so ought the Christian Infant to be trained up in the doctrine of Gospelâ— ruthâ— 2 Tim. 3.15 2 All such as are converted to the Christian faith those that forsake the vanity of the heathen the Infidelity of the Turke The Errours of the Iew ought to be taught and instructed in the foundation-principles of the Catholick faith If any should renounce the Superstition of the Romanist he were rather to unlearn some principles then be taught new there being no principle of Catholick concernment wherein the universall Church differs from that of Rome 3 All the unlearned of what age soever It is but a poor plea to drop out of the world in ignorance because men are of age if they have lived under the power of the Gospel their want of knowledge will but make them full of misery It is no disgrace to learn Christ at any time and necessary for him that would raign with Christ at the end of time However in this there is much caution and moderation to be used and even a respect is to be given to age and an honourable mentioning of their name c. SECT IV. It may appear by what hath been spoken who are principally engaged in this kind of exercise and the pâ—rsons upon whom more especialy this duty lys 1 Parents and masters we shall joyn them together for brevity's sake Deut. 6.7 20. Gen. 18.19 Lemuel a Prince was taught by his mother Prov. 31.1 and how Boaz principled his servants appears by their holy salutations and greetings each to other Ruth 2.4 Timothy was carefully trained up by his mother and Grandmother 2 Tim. 1.5 and 3.15 and the fruit of Abrahams government appears in the piety faithfullnesse and discretion of his steward Gen. 24.12 They have the greatest advantages of any other by their dayly society by their authority And God in giveing the law charges the master with his son and servant touching the keeping of his sabbath which is a circumstance of time he is therefore to instruct them in that and not forget to teach the essentiall points of faith 2 Ministers or Priests It was a charge given to all pastours in the person of Peter Ioh. 21.15 to fâ—ed the lambs of Christ there are them that are not able to retain a Sermon or understand a Sermon or apprehend the parts of a Sermon now this sincere milke of Catechising may make them grow in knowledge But what shall we say the fewnesse of ministers the Number of the people even makes this doctrine Impossible to be performed There are many I will not inquire the cause that can and have cut out worke enough for a minister to do yet it had been wisdome to have considered how much one was able to do Mens flesh is not of brasse nor their strength the strength of stones to execute all that which men will lay upon them and God himself will require no more then what man is able to do where many iorns are in the fire they cannot all heate the work that most of the clergy of England especially in the country hath before them denotes an Impossibility to have all exactly done and for this the truth is in some cases and for some persons it must in some sort be layd aside and preaching preferred that being the most ordinary means for the trâ—â—slation of sinners from darknesse unto light but of this hereafter SECT V. When this is pressed there is nothing urged but what is rational and pious no greater burthen laid upon mâ—n then what God hath bound them to bear and carry the necessity of this kind of teaching appears 1 The young as well as the old must appear before the judgment seat of Christ that child that thou seest playing in the streets shall one day be stripped naked and stand before the thâ—one of God Revel 20.12 let it know this that it may be afâ—â—aid of sinning 2 It is a hard thing otherwise to profit under the most powerfull ministry there are termes in divinity which in pulpits cannot be shunned as Justifie Elect Adopt and these can never be soundly understood without inspection into a catechisme 3 The law of equity binds men to do it if thou beest a parent thou hast conveyed some part of thy corruption whereby thy Infant is infected and is naturaly a Child of wrath now art thou not bound to give him counsell and teach him the fear of the Lord which may keep him from dying through that poyson thou hast given to him and make him a child of grace Art thou a master shalt thou teach him how to be faithfull to thee in the right managing of thy affairs or teach thy servant in the principles of thy art that he may live and neglect to instruct him in the doctrine of faith that he may be saved Art thou a Minister then thou art a Steward of the mysteries of God 1 Cor. 4.1 and so tyed to give children that meate that is proper for them and strong men what is fitting for them 4 It is a soveraign meanes to preserve religion from corruption when the heads of young Christians are filled with the particular branches or parts of catholick truth they will be the better able to stand out against the Hereticall tenets and perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds and being fixed in the truths of the Gospel when they are young they shall not be easily removed from them when they are old 5 They will be learning either good or bad and good they will learn with ease if it be taught them if the Fathers cry Hosannah unto Christ they can do so likewise Math. 21.15 and if they call an old prophet a bald prophet they can do so too 2 King 2.23 They will learn quickly to tell lyes and to swear oaths if the truth be not taught them and swearing forbidden 6 Unto this practise did our saviour yeeld himself when he was twelve years old Luk. 2.46 Noble T heophilus was thus taught Luk. 1.4 Elequent Apollos submitted to this teaching Act. 18.26 and can we follow better copys SECT VI. Questions resolved Quest. 1 Whether catechising differ from preaching Quest. 2 Whether preaching be to be preferred before it Quest. 1. Whether Catechising differ from preaching These two ordinances of the Church are in end and scope the same each of them being appointed for the perfecting of the Saints and edyfying of the body of Christ and at ordination are both layd upon him and with all authority yet as we may say of two eyes or two hands the one is not the other Preaching differs from Catechizeing 1 In respect of Amplitude or fulnesse what preaching draws out to an ample and large discourse Catechising contracts into some few words by pâ—ring off the exuberant parts of a continued speech retaining the cheif point matter or spirit of the doctrine 2
form of the institution of the Sacraments is not conditional that is the word to baptize in the name of the Father c. according to the institution is effectual to be a declarative sign of the baptizeds interest in the Father though the parties life be not exemplary Holy in regard it is not annexed to that precept which it should have been had the ordinance depended upon it So in the Sacrament of the Lords supper he that is a receiver of the bread and wine conscecrated sanctified and set a part as in the Gospel receives the body and the blood of Christ in as effectual a manner when the Minister is prophane as when he is Holy holiness in the Officer being not a condition required for the consecration And therefore as some said Now see to thine own house David we say Look to thine own faith O Christian. 5. It is against the judgement of all reformed Churches In those Articles above mentioned and of the Church of England Art 26. the Art it self is this Art 26. of the Church of England Although in the visible Church the evil be ever be mingled with the good and sometime the evil have chief authority in the Ministration of the word and Sacraments yet for as much as they do not the same in their own name but in Christs and Minister by his commission and authority we may use their Ministry both in hearing of the word of God and in receiving of the Sacraments neither is the effect of Christs Ordinance taken away by their wickedness nor the grace of Gods gifts diminished from such as by faith and rightly do receive the Sacraments Ministred unto them which be effectual because of Christs institution and promise although they be Ministred by evil men Nevertheless it appertaineth to the discipline of the Church that enquiry be made of evil Ministers c. Quest. 3. Whether the Sacraments differ from the Scriptures This is not positively determined since in some things there is a difference and in other things no difference we shall therefore in a few words discover both these beginning with their difference which consists 1. In that the word is preached delivered opened unto all the Sacraments given onely to the faithful 2. The word hath the priority of order that ever going before the Sacraments they alwayes coming after it 3. The word begets and creates faith the Sacraments nourish faith and make it to grow 4 The word is received by the ear the Sacraments by other senses 5. The word is simply and ordinarily necessary for salvation and sufficient without the Sacraments to sanctifie the soul the Sacraments are not simply necessary for life and their efficacy depends upon the word the want of the Sacraments is not damning but the contempt or neglect of them Again The word and the Sacraments differ not but agree and are one 1. In their Author God is the Author of them both he spoke the word and instituted the Sacraments 2. In their instrument by which they are both effectual that is the Holy Ghost he makes both the one and the other to be effectual unto salvation 3. In their Object both of them are for men onely and for their glory 4. In their subjects both of them hold out Christ with all his merits purchasing and proffering pardon 5. In their end both of them are designed for the glory of Christ and salvation of the elect Quest. 4. Whether the Sacraments of the Old differ from those of the New Testament As before this is not directly to be Answered they differing and not differing in some points they differ 1. In the matter and quality of their signs theirs was a cutting off the foreskin and in eating of a Lamb ours are bread and wine 2. In some external rites and ceremonies they were to circumcise precisely the eight day and eat their Lamb at such a time of the year ours are tyed to no time to no place 3. In the easiness of the duties compare our baptisme to their bloody Circumcision and we shall be brought to bless God for our freedom 4. In their duration the Sacraments of the Old were but to endure for a season but those of the New Testament are not to be altered while the world endures They agree and are one 1. In their give Christ the only Law-giver to the Church instituted both the one and the other 2. In their signification what baptisme signifieth now Circumcision signified regeneration or a being born again and was by both held forth Christ was signified by their Lamb so he is by our bread 3. In their application they received theirs by faith and our Sacraments are applied by the same grace 4. In their end or effect the invisible grace goodness and mercy of God were represented both to them and us in the external and visible signs Quest. 5. Whether two Sacraments be sufficient under the Gospel The Church of Rome maintains the necessity of seven not to stand upon the mystery and perfection of the number she teaches their necessity upon this ground viz. There are seven things she accounts necessary for preserving the natural life of man and therefore there must be seven things to preserve the spiritual life of a Christian. 1. It is necessary that there be a birth that 's baptisme 2. That there be a grouth that 's Confirmation 3. That he receive food that is the Lords supper 4. That he receive Physick that is pennance 5. That he receive Cordials that is exteame Unction 6. That he be governed by Laws that is Order 7. That he multiply in a lawful way that is Marriage Unto which they might have added a thousand more some of these being necessary for mans well being only and so are shoos and stockings hat fire houses c. but passing these over we defend that two Sacraments are sufficient under the Gospel 1. The Scripture that contains all thing necessary for salvation binds us to no more mentions of no more if more had been necessary would not Christ have told us given us the Element and the form and promise of it all which are necessary unto Sacraments but not a syllable of any of these more then unto two therefore there are no more necessary 2. Two Sacraments were sufficient for the Iews to uphold them in the faith of the promises viz Circumcision and the Paschal Lamb. Unto which now answers baptisme and the supper therefore they are sufficient for us For 1. God shewed as great a care over them as us 2. They were as dear to him as we are 3. They were as subject to frailty as we are 3. Two Sacraments are sufficient to all spiritual mercies a believer can ask for and hope for They seal testifie assure and represent Adoption Justification Regeneration Consolation and Eternal Salvation and what more would a Christian require CHAP. II. Of Baptisme HAving spoken briefly of the Sacraments in general we come
the Spirit as Faith Humility Charity c. with whcih graces whosoever prays by the spirit and the humble or faithfull soul shall by putting in practise the rules before given make known their humble and faithfull petitions with good apt orderly and found words as well as with unseigned lips Quest. 2. VVhether the wicked be bound to pray That none are exempted from this duty but that it is to be performed by all good or bad wicked and prophane by the sound Christian and by the formall Hypocrite ppeares 1. The duty of prayer is as large and as universall as that of reading hearing c. therefore to be practised by all 2. Prayer is a converting ordinance It is a meanes appointed for the obtaining of pardon of sin of the Holy Ghost of drawing nigh unto God and therefore no sinner exempted from it 3. The neglect of prayer is charged upon them as a sin Psal. 14.2 Psal. 10.4 4. The consciences of wicked men accuseth them when they have not prayed 5. God hath sometimes accepted the prayers of very wicked men even of them that have sold themselves to do wickedly 1 King 21.27 Quest. 3. Whether the set forms of Prayers used by law in the Church of England be Lawfull Before this question be directly answered we shall premise a few things 1. That the book of Common prayer had never been defended in this nature but that the crossnesse and peevishnesse of hot spirited men and passionate writers hath so defamed the the thing it self and also the users of it that it appears to be thought by them a sin unto Death Publickly or privatly to own it in the Church 2. That this defence doth not at all imply its necessity I am perswaded the Church of England might stand without it and may stand in purity by it Unifomity is necessary for the well-being of the Church as was known to the publishers of the Directory and if the Magistrate will have uniformity another way it may be had and if this way it may be used 3. That much of the Common-Prayer is in the Masse may be acknowledged to its honour It is but a furious and blind zeal that makes men inveigh against the Churches practise in this because of its affinity to Rome since we are to preserve the peace of the Church to our utmost we are not to decline too far from any opinion or practise that is lawfull the Jews preists did Sacrifice so did Baals The Papists uses this or that form of prayer if it be lawfull so may I that the breach or quarrel may appear to be one his part not on mine what ever is in the Masse that is lawfull and according to godliness is not to be despised and what ever is otherwise is to be condemned and shunned 4. That the book of Common-prayer might be altered and otherwise framed in some points bettered is not rationally to be denyed what book was ever composed by the wit or art of men but others might alter it and in some measure better it Let the Guisels view their Directory and I doubt not but they will find that somewhat might be left out and something put in part of it expunged and part of it enlarged 5. That by no meanes it ought to jostle out preaching is granted and is easily to be defended Prophecying is that ordinance that cheifly discovers the secrets of the heart that deceitfull part of man Prayer and Sacraments hath done vertuously but this excells them all and therefore for none of them is it to be disesteemed 6. That the Author hath competency of gifts for which he desires to be thankfull to do without Common-prayer as well as others Can they baptise pray bury marry c. without it absit a verbo I. Etantia so can he can they visit or pray sutably over the sick without it so can he can they promptly and readily vary their petitions at any time sutable to the duty in hand so can he In obedience to authority he useth it and so ought others though their gifts were more eminent then they are These things being considered we come now to answer the question And That the Liturgy Service book or Common-prayer of the Church of England is lawfull and with a safe conscience may be used appears by these following reasons 1. From the piety eminency and godlinesse of its composers they were men eminent and famous in their generation opposers of and to death some of them suffered for their not compliance to popish superstition when they were rooting out popery and disclaiming the Pope with all his adherents was that book compiled shall we Imagin the Guisels when they were composing the Directory were establishing Episcopacy if it were found to conjecture that why ought we to conceite the other in collecting the formes of that book of Common-prayer were confirming popery when of any other they most opposed it and suffered most by it It will not be a needlesse digression to spend a little time in shewing the occasion of compiling the book of Common-prayer and see the compilers The occasion of it was breifly this When Edward the sixth was by the Grace of God Crowned King of England c. and it being in his mind to perfect that reformation begun by his Father made many glorious acts for puryfying of the Church from Romish superstition particularly for administring the Sacrament of the supper under both kinds there were some in that time obeyed the King and some that did not so that the Sacraments were given by some one way and by others another way some were for the King some for the Pope and some were neuter to rectify which abuse and to extirpate popery with as little voyce as could be a writ is directed to the Archbishop of Canterbury who afterwards was burned by Queen Mary for his adhering to the Catholick or as the terme now is the protestant faith by the King and his counsell requiring him with others to meet and consult how to prevent for the future and remove that confusion for the present the service of the Church being then various after the use of Sarum Of York of Bangor and of Lincolne and besides them diverse other formes and bookes called Antiphoners Missales Graites Processionals Manuells Legends Pies Portuasses Couchers Iournalls Ordinals In a word every man used what form fashion or manner pleased him best This writ being sent to those persons hereafter to be mentioned they meet and after much debate consulting with the antient liturgyes of the Church expunging from them all what ever was not either in or agreeable to the word of God presented to that Godly King a book entituled The book of the Common-prayer and administration of the sacraments and other rites and Ceremonys of the Church after the use of the Church of England at the reading of which his Majesty being very thankfull both to God and man presented it to both his houses of Parliament assembled