now we finde too true Queene Marie LIII AFter K. Henrie the eight succeeded in the yeare 1546. King Edward the sixt his sonne a child of nine yeares olde which childe wanting the vse of perfect reason and vnfit to gouern him self was the first Protestant Prince that euer was in England and turned the Roman religion which his Father had left though maimed in one principall point to open Protestancie Not for the miracles or rare vertues of the Preachers therof or their conuincing their aduersaries in disputation as King Ethelbert changed his Paganisme into the Roman religion as is before shewed but because the Lord Protector and his complices thought it most sutable to their humors and most fit for their aspiring pretences But how vnfortunat this exchange was not onely to the soules of this King and principall Actors therin but also to their liues and bodies yow may reade in Stow The ill end of the kringets in of Probestancie where yow shall see that the very same yeare 1548. that Proclamation was made for receauing in both Kindes the Lord Admirall a cheefe agent in the change of religion though brother to the Protector and Vnkle to the King was beheaded for a Traitor And the next yeare 1549. VVhen Proclamation was made against Masse sone after also was Proclamation made against the Protector him selfe the principall author of the change and he cast into the Tower And in the yeare 1552. when the newe seruice booke of Common prayer begun in Pauls the said Protector was beheaded And the next yeare the King died and the Duke of Northumberland an other principall actor in the change of religion though against his own conscience as he openly declared at his death was beheaded for treason and Cranmer and Ridley and other fauorers of that change were depriued of their Dignities and sone after burnt This was the rufull end of the first setters vp of Protestancie For maintenance wherof albeit a new Queene was proclaimed Nobles sworne and the strength of England gathered yet in short time almightie God ouerthrew it again without any bloodshed by one vertuous woman Q. Marie Protestancie ouerthrone by a vvoman vvithout any bloodshed Vertue of Q. Marie Author of danger positions l 2 cap. 14. Her Rom. Religion In the arraignment of F Garnat D Doue lib. of Recusancie vvil haue Bellarm. to be a Protest or at lest no perfect Papist who all the time of her life liued so chastly and religiously that all her enemies could not to this day fasten the least suspicion of vice vpon her And whome euen Protestants write to haue Bene of nature and disposition verie milde and pittifull VVhich argueth that they wel deserued the seueritie which shee shewed towards them And so earnest a Roman Catholick shee was as the Protestants write of her that there was Not these thousand yeares a more obedient daughter to the Church of Rome than she was VVherby yow may iugde of the impudencie of Doctor Reinolds who in his Confer pag. 583. denieth not onely all the former Princes but euen Queene Marie euer to haue alowed the Popes absolute spirituall supremacie or as he speaketh the Popes Monarchie but onely to haue granted him such a preheminence as the Duke of Venice hath in that state But with her in the yeare 1558. ended all the glorie of Catholick Princes of England Who except King Henrie 8. for a few yeares and King Edward 6. had continewed from the yeare 598. till the forsaid yeare 1558. the space almost of a thousand yeares And after rose a new kind of Protestancie differing from that of King Edward the childs time Not as I said before through any miracles or strange vertue of the Preachers therof or their ouercomming their aduersaries in Disputation but against the will of all the Bishops and a great parte of the Nobilitie by the counsel of meere Lay men and the authoritie of a woman who was induced to make this change not for zeale of religion which shee little regarded but to assure her state the more because shee feared if she acknowledged the authoritie of the Church of Rome her birth might be called in question But of the cause maner and meanes of erecting Protestancie we shall speake more in the second booke Epilogue HItherto gentle Reader thou hast heard 53. Princes of England successiuly beleeuing and professing the Rom. Catholick faith besides 70. and more others who reigned ouer certain partes of England whiles it was deuided into diuers Kingdoms whose names onely I will here set downe Kings of Kent 13. Ethelbert Edbald Ercombert Egbert Lotharius Edricus VVithâ—ed Edbert Edilbert Alriâ—us Edilbert-pren Cuthred and Baldred Kings of the East Saxons 9. Sebert Sigebert Sigher S. Sebba Sighard Senfred Offa Sclred Swithed Kings of Eastengland 13. to wit Redwald Carpwald S. Sigebert Egris Anna Ethelere Ethelwald Adulph Elwald Beorna Ethelred Saint Ethelbright S Edmund kings of middle England 17. Namely Peda Vulpher Ethelred Coenred Ceolred Ethelbald Bernred Offa Egfert Kenulph Saint Kenelm Ceolwulph Bernulph Ludecan VVithlof Bertulph Burdred Kings of the Northpart of England 18. Edwin Saint Oswald Oswin Oswi Egfrid Alfrid Ostred Kenred Ostrie Ceolwulph Egbert Ostwuld Mollo Alred Ethelbert Alswald Ostred Athelred and some kings also of the South Saxons Consider I pray thee now the number of these kings which is aboue 120 far aboue the smallest number of two Protestant Princes Consider their sex and age who almost all were men and of mature yeares VVheras of the Protestant Princes one was a childe the other a woman Consider their wisdome and valour in which they were inferior to no Princes in Christendome Consider their vertue which was so great as there are more Kings of Ingland Saints than of all Christendome besides Consider the end for which they first embraced the faith which was nether to enioy their lust nor to get any Church goods nor to assure their temporall state but to gaine heauen Consider the Counsellors whose aduise they followed herein were not ignorant and laye men but vertuous and learned Diuines Consider the motiues which drew them to the Catholick religion to witt rare vertue great learning admirable miracles of their first preachers Finally consider how long they continewed in their faith to wit almost a thousand yeares and how almost in euery Kings time here liued some notable men who with rare vertue and miracles haue confirmed their faith Consider I say all this and then iudge whither the Catholick religion of so many and so worthie Kings or the Protestant faith of one Child and one woman be more likely to be good and to come from God Can we thinke that so many Princes of mature yeares and iudgment should be blinde rather then one child a woman that these could see that in so few yeares which all they could not perceaue in a thousand That these two should hit vpoÌ„ Gods truth for temporall endes rather thaÌ„ they for spirituall That that should be
In this Kings time liued that witty schoolmaÌ„ William Occham King Richard 2. XLIIII IN the yeare 1377. succeeded King Richard 2. Nephew to Edward 3. by his sonne Edward the black Prince and reigned 22. yeares Qualities of K. Richard 2. He passed saith Cooper An. 1377. and Stow pag. 439. all his predecessors in bountie and liberality His Roman religion is most manifest His Rom. Religion First because he was crowned at a Masse wherof Walsingham Anno 1377. setteth downe the beginning of the Introit Graduall Epistle and Offertorie Had a Franciscan Frier for his Confessor Stow pag. 458. In the Commotion of Tiler went to Saint Edwards Shrine prayed before the high Altar offered and Confessed him selfe to an Anchor Stow pag. 459. and gaue to the said Shrine a Ruby then esteemed worth a thousand Markes pag. 593. Made foure Kings of Ireland knights at Masse pag. 501. And made the Earle of Northumberland sweare to him vpon the host after Masse p. 520. But most of all is his religion certain by his owne letters to the Pope and by his lawes and Acts against the Wicklefists Fox Acts p. 590. setteth downe his letters to Pope Boniface 9. thus To the most holy Father in Christ and Lord L. Boniface 9. by the grace of God high Pope of the most holy Roman and vniuersall Church his humble and deuout Richard by the grace of God king of England and France and Lord of Ireland greeting and kissing of his blessed feete And. pag. 511. he citeth an Act of Parlament then made to declare that Vrban was true and lawful Pope And pa. 556. saith King Richard procured letters Apostolicall from the Pope for the confirming of certain statuts of his And pag. 431. citeth a letter of Greg. 11. written in this kings time to the Vniuersitie of Oxford wherin the Pope saith that England doth not onely florish in power and aboundance of riches but is much more glorious and shining in purenes of faith accustomed alwaies to bring forth men excellently learned in the knowledg of holy scriptures grauitie of maners men notable in deuotion and defenders of the Catholick faith The like commendations he giueth in an other letter to king Richard Yea to testifie the Roman Catholick faith of this time and to stop the mouth of some Ministers who are not a shamed to say the Pope giueth leaue to sinne It pleased God this present yeare 1608. to raise in a maner a knight of that time and to make him speake For digging to make a graue in Saint Faiths Church vnder Paules they found the Coffin of Sir Gerard Bray brook the cords wherof were fresh and the herbs of good sauor and vppon his brest a Pardon granted vnto him of Pope Boniface of that time intire and whole in these words Boniface Bishop seruant of the seruants of God To his beloued sonne Gerard Braybrook the yonger Knight and to his beloued daughter in Christ Elizabeth his wife of the Diocese of Lincoln health and Apostolicall blessing It hath proceeded from the affection of your deuotion wherby yow reuerence vs and the Roman Church that we admit to our fauorable hearing your petitions those especially which concerne the halth of your soules Hence it is that we inclining to your requests do by the Tenor of these presents easely grant to your deuotion that the Confessor whom ether of yow shall thinck good to chuse shall by authoritie Apostolick giue to yow a plenarie remission of all your sinnes of which yow shal be in hart contrite and confessed once onely at the point of your death Yow persisting in the sincerity of faith in the vnity of the holy Roman Church and in obedience and deuotion to vs and our Successors the Bishopps of Rome canonically elected So notwithstanding that the said Confessor concerning those things of which satisfaction shal be imposed vpon ether He inioine it to be done by yow if yow return from perill of death or by your Heires if yow then chance to passe from this world that which yow or they are bound to performe as is aforesaid And least which God forbid in regard of such fauor yow be made more prone to committ sinne VVe will that if by any such confidence yow should fortune to transgresse that the foresaid Indulgence shall not any thing profit yow Therfore let it altogether be vnlawfull for any man to infringe this our graunt and will or with rash bouldnes contradict it If truly any shall presume to attempt it lett him know he shall incurre the indignation of Almighty God and his most blessed Apostles Saint Peter and Paul Giuen at Rome at S. Peters the 9. of Iune in the second yeare of our Popedome Behould gentle Keader this ancient pardon and consider by it First the high esteeme that our Catholick Anceistors made of the Popes pardons in so much that this worshipfull knight would send to Rome to procure a particuler one for him selfe and his wife Againe how vntruly Ministers say that Popes giue pardon and leaue to sinne seeing this pardon could not auaile for any sinnes committed vpon hope of the pardon But espetially I would haue thee consider Gods wonderfull disposition in the conseruing and reuealing of this Pardon at this time What thinckest thou that this Knights graue should be neuer opened till this day That the Pardon should be preserued from corruption so long lying in the earth That that onely Coffin in which this Pardon was should haue the cordes so long time sound the flowers so long odoriferous what thinck we this Pardon auailed to the soule of this Knight for which purpose it onely was giuen when it wrought such benefit to his dead corps But now to come to the Kings lawes and Acts against the Wicklefists Fox Acts pag. 441. saith Kings Richards lavvs against vviclefists vvhom Protest account their brethren The King adioined his assent to the setting downe of an Ordinance which was indeede the very first lawe which is to be found made against religion and the professors therof bearning the name of an Act made in the parliament Anno 5. Kichard 2. vvherin saith Fox VVicklefs doctrine is called heresie and notorious errors and slanders to ingender saith the Act discord and dissention betvveene diuers estates of the realme And order is taken for to arest and imprison such till they amend Ibid Fox citeth the letters patents of the King against Wicklef and some other there named or any other noted by any other probable suspition of heresies Again pag. 460. King Richard writeth to the Shrâ—efe of Northamton against the VVicklefists thus VVe willing therfor to withstand the Defenders and maintainers of such heresies Do will and command as wel the fornamed as namely the forsaid Iohn VVoodward to bs apprehended straitly charging the same to be imprisoned by their bodies or otherwise punished as shall seeme good to the Iustices And pag. 504. he setteth downe the Kings Commission in these words VVe by
This is a very miserable impudent shift For first it is auōched without al proof or testimony besid their owne words And therfor maybe as lightly reiected of vs as it is affirmed of them 2 ly because al Archeretiks claime this kind of sending Protestāts bring no especial proof why we shold beleue Luther in this point more thā other Archeretiks yea Erasm Ep. ad frat infer Germ. writeth that Mahomet may better chalēg the spirit thā Luther Thirdly because Luther himself disclaimeth this kind of sending him For 1. Gal. fo 11. he saith God calleth two māner of waies by means without means He calleth vs to the Ministry of his word this day not immediatly by himself but by man And addeth that ordinary vocatiō hath endured frō the Apostles to our time shall to the end of the world The same hath vogel his scholer in Thesaur Biblico c. de vocat Ministror others And who shold know how Luther was sent better than himself Besids D. Feild l. 3. of the Church c. 48. as disclaming extraordinary calling saith we saie our calling and our Ministrie is not extraordinary And D Fulke in 10. Ioan. Luther saith he had lawfull calling both of God the Church And the 23. Article of the Protestāts faith is this These we ought to iudge lawfully called and sent which be called and chosen to the work by men who haue publick authority giuen to them in the Cōgregation to cal and send Ministers Therfore according to our Protestāts faith Luther cannot be iudged to haue bene lawfully sent vnles he had bene sent by men this of publik authority in the Church yea Caluin him selfe after he had brought diuers proofes out of Scripture that to lawful calling is necessary the sending by men saith thus 4. instit cap. 3. Parag. 15. we haue therefore out of Gods word that that is lawfull calling of Ministers when they which are thought fit are made vvith consent and approbatiō of the people And Muscul loc Com. pag. 394. saith Extraordinary calling is not now in vse D. Serauin in booke of degrees of Ministers termeth extraordinary calling an vnknowne coost See D. Couell in his defence of Hooker pag. 86. 6. Fourtly ether there were Protestant Pastors befor Luther or no If there were what need Luther extraordinary calling who might be sent of these former Pastors If there were none how could ther be a Protestant Church which as Caluin saith loc cit can neuer vvant Pastors and Doctors and as Feild faith lib. 2. of Church cap. 6. The Ministery is an enssentiall note of the Church Yea as Whitaker saith cont Dur. p. 274. the soul of the Church If any say that there were Protest Pastors before Luther but they were inuisible and therfore he was not sent of them I reply that Feild l. cit c. 10. saith that the Ministrie is alwaies visible to the vvorld and the same saith Caluin 4. instit cap. 2. Parag. 2. 11. c. 1. Parag. 11. And in truth it implieth cō radictiō that ther shold haue bene Pastors preaching the word administring the sacramēts and yet inuisible especially to such faithfull men forsooth as Luther was In like sort I demād whither there were Churchs rightly setled before Luther or no. If no then Luther was the setler of the Protestant Church If yea then was not he sent extraordinarily For as Caluin teacheth 4. Instit c. 3. Parag. 3. that calling hath no place in Churches rightly setled or as Fulke saith in 10. Rom. it is not necessary but where ether ther is no Church or the Church is no member of Christ If then Luther were extraordinarly sent ether there was no protestāt Church before him or it was no member of Christ Fiftly Caluin 4. instit c. 2. parag 14 saith that no wise man vvill denie that it is altogether requisit to lawful vocatiō that Bishops be apointed of mē seing ther are so many testimonies of scripture to this end And thē sheweth that though god had extraordinarily called S. Paul yet he kept saith Cal. discipliniā Ecclesiasticae vocationis the disciplin of Ecclesiasticall vocation in apointing the Church to segregate him Barnabas laie hāds vpō thē to the end that the Churches disciplin in apointing Ministers by men might be cōserued Luther vvil haue a more extraordinarie calling than S. Paul If therfore God had called Luther or Calu. as extraordinarily as euer he called S. Paul more I hope of their modesty they wil not chalēg yet to conserue Ecclesiast disciplin he wold haue bidden thē go to some Church to be segregated by her haue hāds laid vpō thē vnles these new Apostles wil chaleng more priuiledg exemption from all Churches approbatiō of their calling thā S. Paul had 7. Sixtly extraordinary miraculous missiō frō God requireth his axtraordinary miraculous attestatiō therof But Luther had no such attestatiō Therfor he had no such missiō The first proposition I proue many waies First by the exāple of Gods procedings hertofore For whē he extraordinarily sent Moises to deliuer the Israelits he cōtested his sending by wonderous miracles whē he sēt Apostls he cōfirmed their missiō by prodiges miracles yea Christ himself though sent most extraordinarily of his Father yet saith If I had not done miraculous works in them which no other hath done they shold haue no sin And shal we sin it not beleuing Luther who maketh no one miracle or wil he desire to be beleued without miracles more than Christ did 2 ly I proue it by the authority of Tertulliā who l. de praescrit biddeth certain Heretiks who pleaded extraordinary sending to proferre virtutes to shew their miracles 3 ly I proue it by reason For euery Prince when he sendeth any extraordinary Embassador giueth him particuler letter of credēce And the particuler letters of extraordinary Embassadors from God are his miracles 4 ly I proue it by the incōueniences that otherwise wold follow For otherwise a false Prophet might make his missiō as credible to vs as a true Prophet At least one that preached true doctrine but indeed was not sent of God to preach might intrude himself in to that office with as much probability as another that was truly sent Lastly I proue that miracles are requisit to extraordinary missiō by the Confessiō of Protestāts Caluin 4. instit c. 2. parag 13. For Calu. saith Because the Ministrie of the Apostles was extraordinarie Calvin that it might be made notable with some more markable note it was to be called and apointed by our Lords own mouth Luther And if some externall note needed to the calling of the Apostles I hope it needed more to the calling of Luther Luther Luther also loc Com. clas 4. cap. 20. saith God sent not any but ether called by man or declared by miracles no not his sonne And to 5. Germ. fol. 491. he asketh a
cannot stand vnles men do creditt one an other in thinges wherin they haue no cause to distrust them for what should we know of things past before our time or of thinges done out of our sight if we would not beleeue such as were present and knew them and ether by word or writing haue reported them to vs. How should we know such to be our parents but by beleefe How should any matter be tryed in Law but by beleefe of mens wordes or writinges what familiaritie humayne societie or frendship could stand if we admitt not beleefe VVherfor abbeit it be a fault to beleeue vpon light or small testimonie which kind of beleeuers the scripture tearmeth light of hart as it is a fault to assent to any friuolous reason yet contrariwise it is a greater fault not to giue credit to euident sufficient authoritie as it is not to yeild to euident reason For in beleuinge vpon weake authoritie we do but preiudice our selues but in not beleeuinge sufficient authoritie we hinder our selues from knowledge of truth discredit our owne reportes to others do against reason which as well bindeth vs to yeild to euident authoritie as to euident reason discredit our neighbors and cut in sunder the very sinowes of humane frendship and societie lib. de vtil Cred. cap. 16. VVherfor wel said S. Austin that though it be miserable to be deceaued by authority yet most miserable it is not to be moued with authoritie And most vnreasonably do some Ministers Hovv manie things vvhich are not in scripture are yet to be beleued say that they are not bound to beleeue the great vertues or miracles of Saints in times past though neuer so authentically recorded because they be not in scripture Indeed if we vrged them to beleue these thinges with diuine and christian faith they might haue some colourable excuse of such speech because as they say all poyntes of christian faitb are in scripture But sith we vrge them onelie to giue humane beleefe to such matters either they must shew some cause why the authority of such writers is not sufficient to giue humane credite vnto the thinges by them recorded or they must reiect all humane authoritie all mens wordes or writinges and beleeue nothinge but what either God hath written or them selues haue seene for if Scripture must be the onelie square of all our beleife both humane and Dyuine we must beleue nothing but what God haeh written no not that such were our parentes that ther are Turkes Moores ar any such thinge as the Scripture mentioneth not Or if we admitt as we must needes that humane authority by either word or writinge may be sufficient for vs to beleue thinges with humayne faith as vve beleue such to be our parentes and the like vve must not thinke it reason to reiect a thinge because it is not in Scripture Inconueniences of not beleuing mens authoritie but vve must allso shevv some reason vvhy such authoritie as testifieth it is not sufficient for a vvise man to giue credit vnto or els we must confesse our selues to be vvilfull to reiect sufficient authoritie vvithout yea against reason to be in iurious to God and our selues in reiecting a meane vvhich he hath bestovved vpon vs for to knovv truth Iniurious to our neighbours in discreditinge them vvithout cause and finallie pernicious to all good frendshipp and societie vvhich vvithout beleefe of humane authoritie cannot stand And to preuent Ministers that they shall not delude the Reader by sayinge that the authoritie vvhich I alleadge for vvhat I say of Saint Austin and Luther is not sufficient Onely Protestāts alledged for vvhat is said of Luther I beseech him to consider that the Authors vvhich I alleadge for vvhat I say of Luther are onelie Protestantes uch as by other Protestantes are greatlie commended for albeit I might iustlie alleadge the testimonies of Catholiques against Luther as I shew heerafter lib. 2. cap. 1. yet partelie to avoyd all cauills but principallie because Protestantes testifie ynough against him I omitt this aduantage And the vvitnesses vvhich I produce for vvhat I vvrite of S. Austin are partelie the said Protestants partely Catholikes but such Catholiques as some of them are great Saintes some great Clarkes some lyued vvhen the thinges vvere done vvhich they vvritt some vvere domesticall some forrayne and all vvere before this controuersie betvvene Protestants and Catholikes arose and all are greatlie esteemed of Protestants as shall appeare in the Catalogue ensuinge and finallie all are contested and approued in their testimonies of diuers Protestants as shall appeare heerafter VVhich kind of testimonie I hope no indifferent man guided vvith reason vvill account vnsufficient And for other obstinat persons who as S. Hierome saith are wount shutting their eyes to denie what they will not beleue I wrot not this vvorke for as S. Austin aduiseth vs vve should rather pray for these kind of men than reason vvhith them For vvhat Readers this booke is vvritten But novv let vs come to the Catalogue of the Catholike vvriters and after of the Protestantes A CATALOGVE Of the cheife Catholike vvriters Vpon whose testimonies the Authour relieth for what he writeth of Saint Austin A ALCVIN liued in the eight age after Christ which was the second of the conuersion of our Nation to the Christian faith He was scholler to S. Bede and Maister to the famous Emperor Charles the great of whom what high esteeme Protestants make you may see Infra lib. 1. cap. 12. B BEDA liued with in the first hundred yeares after the conuersion of our Nation and therfore might well learne the truth therof How greatlie he is accounted of by Protestantes both for vertue and learninge you may read lib. 1. cap. 12. cit onelie because his testimonie is that vpon which I principallie relie in what I say of S. Austin I would heere add what Godwin in the life of Tatwin Archbishop of Canterburie saith that His historie is the most auncient that England hath worthie of credit And that Cambden in Britan. pag. 12. giueth him this testimonie that he is Inter omnes nostros scriptores veritatis amicus amongst all our writers a frend of truth And what himselfe hath in his Epistle to King Cealwulph to put as he saith all that heare or read it out of doubt of the veritie therof that vvhat he writeth of S. Austin and his fellowes he learned of Albinus a man saith he of great learninge brought vp vnder S. Theodor Archbishop and Adrian both men of great worship and learning which thinges saith he the said Albinus knew partely by writinge partlye by tradition of Elders and sent to me by Nothelmus Bale Cent. 2. cap. 8. calleth this Nothelmus a learned and graue man who after was Archbishop of Canterburie Besides this the said Historie vvas approued by the said King Cealwulph and by all writers since and is the verie fountayne of all our English Chronicles whose credit depend
of Protestants are the Protestant writers vpon whose confession or testimonie I cheefly relie in what I write of S. Austin and Luther Against whose verdict no Protestant can iustlie take exception either of ignorance because they are of the cheefest writers they haue or for partialitie for they were all most earnest Protestantes And therfor no Protestant can iustlie reiect their testimonie as insufficient THE BOOKES AND Chapters conteyned in this first parte of the prudentiall Ballance of Religion First Booke or Scale in which the qualities of S. Austin and of his doctrine are set downe 1. VVHat Religion was in this land before the comming of S. Austin Chap. 1. 2. That Saint Austin was the first preacher of the christian saith to our English Nation Chap. 2. 3. That Saint Austin preaching tooke great effect in our Nation Chap. 3. 4. That Saint Austin was a great Clarke and excellent Diuine Chap. 4. 5. That Saint Austin was A great Saint Chap. 5. 6. Certayne slanders against S. Austin disproued Chap 6. 7. That S. Austin was moued by holie motiues to come to preach to our Nation Chap. 7. 8. That S. Austin was lawfully sent to preach to our Nation proued by diuers authorities Chap 8. 9. That S. Austin was lawfully sent hither to preach proued by reason grounded in Scripture Chap. 9. 10. That S. Austin was rightlie ordered to administer the word and sacramentes Chap. 10. 11. That the faith which S. Austin preached was the vniuersall faith of Christendome in his time Chap 11. 12. That faith which S. Austin preached is confessed by the aduersaries to haue bene sufficient to saluation Chap. 12. 13. That the faith which S. Austin preached was confirmed of him by true miracles Chap. 13. 14. That the faith whi h S. Austin preached was the present Romayne Catholique faith proued by his Mayster and sender S Gregory Chap. 14. 15. The same proued by S. Austins and his fellowes deedes and Doctrine Chap. 15. 16. The same proued by the confession of learned Protestantes Chap. 16. 17. The same proued by the faith of the English Church which he founded Chap. 17. 18. That the faith of all the Archbishopes of Canterburie from S. Austin to our time was Romane Catholike proued by general Reasons Chap. 18. 19. That the faith of euery Archbishop of Canterburie from S. Austin to the time of the Conquest was romane Catholique proued in particular Chap. 19. 20. That the faith of euery Archbishop of Canterburie from the Conquest to our time was Romaine Catholike proued in particular Ch. 20. 21. That the faith of all our Christian English Kinges from S. Austins time to King Henrie the eight was Romane Catholique proued by generall reasons Chap. 21. 22. Certayne obiectiōs against the Catholique faith of our Auncient Kings aunswered Chap. 22. 23. That the faith of all our Christian Kinges to the time of the Monarchie of England was Romane Catholique proued in particular Chap. 23. 24. That the faith of all our Christian Kings from the Monarchie to the Conquest of England was Romane Catholike proued in particular Chap. 24. 25. That the faith of all our Kings from the Conquest to King Edward the third was Romane Catholique proued in particular Chap. 25. 26. That the faith of all our Kings from King Edward the third to Kinge Henrie the eight was Romane Catholique proued in particular Chap. 26. Epilogue or Conclusion The second Booke or Scale wherin the qualities of Luther and his doctrine are set downe 1. That Luther was the first Authour of the Protestants Religion Chap. 1. 2. That VVicklef and his followers were no Protestantes Chap. 2. 3. That the old auncient Britons were no Protestants Chap. 3. 4. VVhen wher wherfor and how Luther began Protestancie Chap. 4. 5. How Protestancie spred so farr Chap. 5. 6. VVhen hy whom wherfor and how Protestancie began in England Chap. 6. 7. That Luther was but meanlie learned Ch. 7. 8. That Luther was a vicious and naughtie man Chap. 8. 9. That Luther was moved to preach Protestantisme with humane noughtie motiues Ch. 9. 10. That Luther was neuer sent or called to preach Protestantisme Chap. 10. 11. That Luther was neuer ordered to preach the Protestants word or administer their Sacramentes Chap. 11. 12. That Luthers doctrine was contrarie to the vniuersall faith of Christendome at that time Chap. 12. 13. That Luthers doctrine was neuer confessed by Catholiques to be sufficient to saluation Ch. 13. 14. That Luther neuer confirmed his Doctrine by Miracles Chap. 14. 15. That Luther hath had no succession or continuance of his Doctrine heere in England Chap. 15. The third Booke in vvhich S. Austin and Luther and their Doctrines are weighed together according to the foresaid qualities of them 1. SAint Austin and Luther weighed accordinge to their learninge Chap. 1. 2. S. Austin and Luther weighed accordinge to their vertue or vice Chap. 2. 3. S. Austin and Luther weighed accordinge to their motiues of preachinge Chap. 3 4. S. Austin and Luther weighed according to their Mission or sendinge to preach Chap. 4. 5. S. Austin and Luther weighed accordinge to their orders of preachinge and administring the sacraments Chap. 5. 6. S. Austin and Luther weighed according to the vniuersalitie or singularity of their Doctrine Chap. 6. 7. S. Austin and Luther weighed accordinge to their aduersaries allowance of their Doctrines Chap. 7. 8. S. Austin and Luther weighed according to their Miracles Chap. 8. 9. S. Austin and Luther weighed acccordinge to the succession and continuance of their Doctrines Chap. 9. THE FIRST BOOKE OR SCALE IN VVHICH The qualities of S. Austin and of his Doctrine are set dovvne THE FIRST CHAPTER VVhat Religion was in this Land before the comminge of S. Austin THE ancient Inhabitans of this Iland were the Britons whome wee now call Welch-men Amongst whome the faith of Christ was first planted by the glorious Apostles S. a Metaph. in Sur. Iun. Cambd. descript Brit. pa 52. Baron an 58. p. 597. 401. Peter S. b Theod. l. 9 de Graec. Sophron. Natal Apost Fortunat Bale cent 1. c. 26 Cambd. in Britan. p. 52. Paul S. c Nicep l. 2. c. 40 Doroth in Synop Symon and the Apostolick men S. d D. Caius de antiq Cātabr Capgrau in Ios Bale cent 1. c. 22. vbi citat Fleming Scrop Polid Geo. maiorem Cambd. l. cit Ioseph of Arimathia who buried our Sauiour and S. e Doroth. in Synop. Aristobulus of whome S. Paul maketh mention in his Epistle to the Romans All these Protestants grant to haue preached Christs faith in this Iland except Saint Peter to whome some of them will not haue this Land so much behoulden Which question because it is besides my purpose I wil not stand to discusse Onely I assure the indifferent Reader that S. Peters preaching to the ancient Britons on the one side is affirmed both by Latin and Grecke by ancient and newe by foraine domesticall by
Ethelvverd After S. Beda liued Ethelwerd who lib. 2. cap. 1. writeth That by the prayers of S. Austin Bishop our Sauiour Iesus Christ sheweth innumerable miracles to his faithful at whose Tombe vnto this day no small miracles are wrought Malmesb. Huntingt vvestmon Capgraue To these witnesses we may ad Malmsb lib. 1. Pont. Hunting l. 3. westmō an 603. and Capgraue also who in the life of S. Austin writeth That there were none or few in S. Austins company who had not the gift of curing that they lightned the darknes of the heathens no lesse by miracles than by preaching And he addeth that S. Austin cured all the weak and sick that were brought vnto him or visited of him Protestāts confesse S. Austins miracles 4. Thirdly amongst protestants Fox lib. 2. pag. 116. writeth that when the King had wel considered the honest conuersation of their Austin and his fellowes life Fox and mooued by the miracles wrought through Gods hand by them and in the margent putteth this note Miracles vvrought by God for the conuersion of this land he heard than more gladly pag. 118. he mentioneth S. Gregories letter testifying Saint Austins miracles and pag. 119. he saith that Beda Cestrensis Huntington Iornalensis and Fabia testifie the forsaid miracle of the blind man Godvvin Godwin in the life of S. Dauid I doubt not but God affoarded many miracles to the first infancie of our Church Nether therfor would I be to peremptory in derogating to much from such reports as we see no reason why they may not be true And in the life of S. Austin Austin wrought a miracle by healing a blind man for confirmation of his doctrine Holinshed in Descript Brit. King Ethelbert was persuaded by the good example of S. Austin and his company and for many miracles shevved to be baptized And pag. 602. Austin to proue his opinion good vvrought a miracle by restoring to sight one of the Saxon Nation that vvas blinde And the same miracle acknowledgeth Stow Chron. pag. 66. and of forrein Protestants Hemingius in exposit psal 84. parte 1. cap. 6. Stovv Hemingius 5. Concerning the witnesses which I haue produced to testifie that S. Austin wrought these things which wee call miracles The qualities of the sayd vvitnesses for S. Austins miracles I would haue the Reader to consider first that some of them were then liuing as S. Greg. the Britons and Authors of the Epitaph Others liued after as the rest Secondly some were forrein as S. Greg. others Domestical in England Thirdly some are publick as the Epitaph others priuat Fourtly some were enemyes to S. Austin as the Britons the others freinds Fiftly some were great Clercks as S. Greg. S. Beda and some of the Britons who by their learning could iudg of the miracles others of lesse account Sixtly some were great Saints as S. Greg. and S. Beda were who would not deliuer an vntruth or vncertain fables for true and certain miracles others of meaner qualities Seuenthly some were eye witnesses as the Britons and they enemyes too who would finde what falt they could and the authors of the Epitaph others by report Lastly some are Catholicks some Protestants And what greater variety of testimonies or better qualified witnesses would we aske to beleeue a thing than these be 6. This great weight and varietie of witnesses we haue to beleeue that S. Austin did these things which are accounted miracles No author before our Daies nor reason against S. Austins miracles wether they be true or false which we shall see anon And to the contrary ther is no Author forrain or Domestical eye witnesse or other freind or foe Catholick or Protestant before our daies nor any reason at all besides that which Fulk Anotat in Io. 14. giueth against S. Austins miracles Se more of this in the preface to the Reader sup and Fox lib. 2. pag. 122. against other miracles vz. That they are not in scripture therfor they are not bound to beleeue them As if God were bound to write all the miracles which he worketh or we not bound to beleeue with human faith of which alone we speak in this matter that which is auouched by so sufficient human authoritie vve bound to belevve vvith humane faith vvhat is deleuered vvith sufficient authoritie as we can take no iust exception against it either for skil to know the truth or for will to speake it If not then farwel all human beleefe which can require no more than so fufficient human authoritie Inconueniences of not belevving humane authoritie farwel all human authoritie which can affoard no greater certaintie farwel all human conuersation which cannot stand without the beleefe of such authoritie and let vs beleeve nothing but what God hath written or our selues haue seene Let vs not beleeue any Records or Histories of times past See S. Aust lib. de vtil cred cap. 12. no that euer there was such a man as S. Austin And for times present let vs beleeue no Iurie nothing done in far Contries nothing done out of our presence no not that such were our parents because none of these are written in Gods word but are deliuered to vs by human authoritie to which as they say we are not bound to giue credit Thus yow see to what inconueniences this kind of sensles reason would lead vs if we should follow it in other lyke matters But besides it is fond in it selfe for it is taken from negatiue authoritie which kind of argument saith Iuel Art 2. Diu. 13. Vnles it be in consideration of some other circumstance is so simple as that a verie child may soone answer it And iustly Negatiue authoritie no authoritie for negatiue authoritie is no authoritie and silence no witnesse Whervpon the law saith Qui mutum exhibet nihil exhibet especially when the silence is of such which had no cause to speake of the matter as the scripture had none to fortel S. Austins miracles And therfor to argue from such negatiue authoritie is to argue from noe authoritie and to seeme to vse reason when indeed ther is none For who would suffer a Malefactor against whome many honest men haue deposed to clear him selfe because diuers standers by say no thing against him Would their silence which in any mans iudgment maketh no more for him than against him be preferred before the depositions of diuers witnesses omni exceptione maiores And so besids that the scripture was written many hunderd yeares before S. Austin was borne and therfor could not speak of his miracles but by prophecie the silence therof in his miracles maketh no more against them than for them For as it affirmeth them not so nether doth it denie them And therfor as Fulk argueth The scripture affirmeth not S. Austins miracles therfor they were not An other might with as good reason say The scripture denieth them not therfor they were But leaueth them
declared to be the true Oecumenical Patriarch S. Austin aliue vvhen the Pope as Protest say became Antichrist or head of the Church as all writers Protestants and Catholicks do agree which was done in the yeare 605. as some say or 606. as Baron And this Pope Boniface therby as generally all Protestants affirme became the first Pope and Archbishop of Rome Whitak cont Dur. pag. 501. I affiirme saith he that in the tyme of Boniface 3. Antichrist openly placed his Throne in the Church of Rome Fulk Answer to a Counter Cath. pag. 72. The Popes from Boniface 3. were all blasphemous Hereticks and Antichrists And in 1. Ioan. 2. Boniface 3. went manifestly out of the Church and became Antichrist Fox lib. 2. pag. 120. Rome euer since Boniface 3. hath houlden maintamed and defended his Supremacie The same hath Cooper Chron. An. 611. The like hath Bale Cent. 1. pag. 69. 70. Downham of Antichrist and generally all Protestants But S. Austin was both in this Popes time for he subscribed to the Charter of king Ethelbert made An. 605. and after For as Bale saith Cent. 13. cap. 1. He dyed 608. or as Malmsb. in fastis saith 613. and yet is he not found but to haue obeyed this Pope Boniface as he did obey Gregorie Which he would neuer haue done if he had thought it Antichristian for the Pope to be head of the Church S. Mellits communion vvith a Pope vvhome ProtestaÌ„ts account the second Antichrist Yea S. Mellit one of his fellowes and Successors went to Rome about the yeare 610. to commune saith Beda lib. 2. cap. 4. and counsel with the Apostolick Pope Boniface 4. the immediat successor of Boniface 3. for necessarie causes of the English Church sat in a Councel with him subscribed to what was decreed of that Councel and brought the Precepts to be obserued of the English Church And cap. 7. S. Beda writeth Also S. Iustus that this S. Mellit and S. Iustus an other of S. Austins companions and successors receaued eftsons exhorting Epistles from this Boniface And cap. 8. he saith that Iustus receaued also authoritie to ordain Bishops from the high Bishop Boniface and a Pal. And cap. 17. and 18. that S. Paulinus and S. Honorius receaued also their Pals from Pope Honorius And S. Paulin and S. Honorius Which Pal was giuen by Popes to Metropolitans as a token of agreement in faith And therfor Pope Pelagius Predecessor to S. Greg. decreed D. 100. That what Metropolitan so euer after three monthes of his Consecration shall not send to Rome to declare his faith and receaue his Pal shall leese his Dignitie This we see how S. Austin and his fellowes by their life and deedes professed their agreement and faith euen with those Popes whome Protestants account the first Antichrists But besids this we haue also the testimonie of the Popes of that tyme and of S. Austins own fellowes Popes vvhom Protest account Antichrists approued S. Austins doctrine For Pope Boniface 5. writing to S. Iustus aforsaid in Bed lib. 2. cap. 8. saith thus After vve had read the letters of our deere sonne King Edbald we vnderstood vvith vvhat great learning and instruction of holy scripture yovv haue brought him to the beleefe of the vndoubted faith Loe this Pope aproued the doctrine and faith of S. Iustus which he could neuer haue done vnles S. Iustus had allowed the Supremacie And S. Laurence Mellit and Iustus writing to the Scottish Bishops in Beda lib. 2. cap. 4. professe that it was the customable maner of the See of Rome euen in their tyme to send preachers into all places of the world Which custome they could neuer haue accounted lawful vnles they had thought that See to haue Iurisdiction and gouernment in the whole world S. Austin calleth the Pope Father of all Christendom Yea S. Austin in his speech to King Ethelbert in Capgraue calleth S. Greg. totius Christianitatis Patrem the Father of all Christendom And thus much of S. Austin and his fellowes deedes and doctrine out of Chatholick writers S. Austins acts of Papistrie out of Protestants Now let vs come to Protestants 3. Bilson and Abbots aâ— is aforsaid call S. Austin a Romish Monk a Romish Priest a Romish Legat. Which names shew of what Religion they account him Abbots Godwin in vit Aug. saith S. Greg. being made Pope sent Austin hither Godvvin vnto whome he apointed 40. other that should aide him in this holy work Ib. he testifieth that S. Greg. sent him a pal and Church ornaments That he dedicated a Monasterie to S. Peter and Paul that he claimed authoritie ouer all this Iland Entred the place of Counsel with his Banner and his Crosse and with singing Procession Fox Fox Acts. pag. 116. They went with Procession to Canterburie singing Alleluyae with the Letanie Sutclif Sutclif Subuersion cap. 5. Austin brought in an Image of Christ and a siluer Crosse and began saith he to chant Letanies Now whâ—ther these be signes of Protestancie or Papistrie I leaue to euerie one to iudge Holinshead Also Holinshed descript Brit. testifieth as before we heard out of Saint Beda that S. Austin came with a siluer Crosse and Image of our Lord and Sauiour painted in a table singing Litanies And that in Canterburie they accustomed to pray say Masse preach and baptize in S. Martins Church And that S. Greg. sent to Austin a Pal which saith he was the ornament of an Archbishop And that Masse and Letanie was at that tyme in France Again that Lawrence with his fellow Bishops wrote letters to the Britons to conform them in the Vnitie of the Roman faith Item Mellitus solemnizing Masse distributed c. Now what Masse it was that Romish Priests Romish Monkes Romish Legats as Bilson and Abbots call them sayde I leaue to euery one to iudge And if any body should doubt Fulk Fulk in Hebr. 10. may put him out of doubt For ther he writeth S. Beda sayd that English men in his time vnderstood the holsome sacrifice of Masse auailed to redemption both of body and soule Which Fulk calleth superstitious and vndoubtedly meaneth the Masse And thus much of S. Austins Papistry by his owne deedes both out of Chatholick and Protestant writers CHAP. XVI That Saint Austin was a Roman Catholick prooued by the confession of learned Protestants D. Abbots 1. DOctor Abbots in his late answer to Doct. Bishop pag. 197. calleth S. Austin a black Monk pag. 20. The Italian Monk brought new obseruations from Rome and the English receaued the same pag. 198. A Romish Priest required the British Bishops to be subiect to his Romish authoritie A Romish Archbishop brought in nouelties and superstitions and did contaminat the faith of Christ Mellitus Laurentius Iuel Iustus all of Austins company and condition Iuel Art 3. Diu. 21. It is thought of many that Austin corrupted the Religion that he found here vvith
that a while before the Conquest and somwhat after Kings tooke vpon them to inuest Bishops and Abbots as appeareth in Ingulp pag. 806. But this fact of theirs done of som ignorantly as must be thought of King Edred and others before the Conquest who were perfect Catholicks in faith as shall appeare herafter and also vertuous in life of others perhaps presumptuously and couetously against the order of the Church proueth no more that they were no Catholicks than worse facts of theirs against the law of Christ proueth them to haue bene no Christians For if Princes maye by euery fact of theirs be iudged of what religion they are they would sometimes seeme no Christians nor yet to haue a God As for S. Edward he might wel doe what he did for he was apointed by the Pope to be his Vicegerent and as it were Legat as we shall shewe in his life obiec ∣ tion 3 2. Thirdly they made saith Abbots lawes for the order and gouernment of the Church as is to be seene in the lawes of Edward of Alfred of Ethelstan and Canutus in Fox Volum 1. in fine and by many laws made since the Conquest against intrusions of the Pope as is to be seene in Syr Edward Cookes reports part 5. Ansvver Touching the lawes of the Christian Kings before the Conquest I answer that they are not Ecclesiasticall lawes such as define any thing as a point of faith or prescribe any thing concerning Religion and worship of God but are meere commandements partly for execution of former Ecclesiasticall lawes partly for procurement and conseruation of externall peace quietnes and order of the Church which kinde of lawes Princes may make as is to be seene in Stapleton Relect. Controu 2. q. 5. Ar. 1. See stapleton Besides that Christian Princes apoint thus some times things in ecclesiasticall matters not of authoritie but vpon zeale and not to dispose of faith and religion As for the lawes made since the Conquest which may seeme preiudiciall to the Popes authoritie the cheefest Authors of them were Edward 3. and Richard 2. who as shall appeare heerafter plainly professed the Popes Supremacie And therfor what lawes they made were no way to denie his authoritie but to restrain the execution therof in some cases because as the Apostle saith Omnia licent sed non omnia expediunt All things are lawfull but all things are not expedient So they thought that some execution of his authority in some matters would be preiudâ—ciall to their temporall state and therfor thought it not expedient that in those cases it should be practised As for Cookes reports they haue bene so answered as I thinck neither him self nor any for him will obiec ∣ tion 4 replie Fourthlie saith Abbots Then were the scriptures in foure seuerall languages of so many seuerall Nations besides the Latin tongue common to them all Beda lib. 1. cap. 1. This is vntrue Ansvver and Beda rather saith the contrarie His words are these This Iland at this present to the number of the 5. bookes of Moises doth studie and set forth the knowledg of one perfect truth that is with the language of the English the Britons the Scotts the Picts and the Latin which by studie of the scripture is made common to all the rest In which words he saith that the Inhabitants preached and published Christs truth in fiue seueral languages but the scripture they studied onely in Latin and therby it became common to all the Inhabitants And before in the life of Theodor we shewed by the confession of diuers Protestants that masse was in his tyme which was before S. Beda in Latin onely But admit that the scripture were then in Latin and in English too how proueth that that English men then were no Catholicks Haue not English Catholicks now the scripture in English Fiftlie saith Abbots obiec ∣ tion 5 Then were they in Monasteries commanded to be exercised in the reading of scriptures and euery one was required to learn the Lords prayer and Creede in the English tongue This is not worth the answering Ansvver For what doth the Monks reading scripture or the peoples learning the Lords prayer and Creed in English make against Catholick Religion 3. Sixtly saith Abbots Then was the CommunioÌ„ obiec ∣ tion 6 ministred in both kindes as Paris in Heraldo and Rafo reporteth of some soldiers Ansvver What Paris saith of soldiers I knowe not For at this present I haue him not at hand But that English men in our Primitiue Church communicated onely with form of bread appeareth by Beda lib. 2. cap. 5. Wher Pagans say to S. Mellit VVhy dost thou not giue vnto vs of that white bread which thou didst giue to our Father Seba and dost yet giue to the people in Church But if S. Mellit had communicated people in both kinds it is lykly they would haue demanded both Besids that Beda expoundeth that place of Luke Cognouerunt eum in fractione panis where mention is of one onely kinde of sacramental communion Therfor he and consequently our English Church then alowed communion in one kinde But whether they communicated in both or one kinde maketh little to proue that they were not Catholickâ— because til lay people were forbidden it was lawful for them to communicate Obiec ∣ tion 7 in both kindes 4. Seauenthlie theÌ„ saith Abbots was Transubstantiation vnknowne and when it began to be broached or not long after Elfricus Archbishop of Canterburie contradicted it Ansvver How vntrue this is of TraÌ„substantiation hath bene shewed before in the life of S. Greg and S. Odo As for Elfric the Protestant Bishops them selues who published that sermon confesse See befor hovv Bale confesseth Archb. Alfric to haue bene a Papist and of Transubstant in S. Odo Archb. that the Author therof was no Archbishop of Canterbury More likly it is to be true which Fox Acts. pag. 1148. saith that it was Elfric surnamed Bata an Heretick who as S. Dunstan appearing to one in a vision said as reporteth Osbern attempted to disherit his Church but I haue stopped him saith S. Dunstan he could not preuaile Albeit indeed that sermon doth more approoue Transubstantiation than disprooue it For in that is saide that Christ turned through inuisible might the bread to his owne body and wine to his blood And that holy howsel is by might of Gods word truly Christs body and his blood And that after their halowing bread and wine trulye are Christs body and blood And what other do Catholicks now say but what here is said Vz. That bread and wine are by inuisible power turned into Christs body and blood and become after consecration truly not figuratiuly his body and blood And though the Author of the sermon ad that the sacrament after consecration is not bodily but Ghostly Christs bodie yet the word ghostly is not added to deny the word Truly which is absolutly affirmed but onely to deny the word Bodily that is carnally
Egbert who began his reign An. 800. reigned 37. yeares died An. 837. He was saith Malmsb. lib. 1. Reg. cap. 2. worthely to be preferred before all Kings The vvorthines of K. Egbert 1 Monarch of EnglaÌ„d And lib. 2. cap. 1. Regis Inae abnepos King Ina his great grandchild by his brother Inegilse suldued the mindes of his subiects by clemencie and meeknes and left his sonne great occasions of commendations Houed hist pag. 407. saith he was Vir strenuissimus ac Potens most stout and puissant And as all our English Cronicles testifie in his time subdued all the rest of our English Kings Hunting l. 4. VVallos vicit sabdued the VVelchmen Florent An. 836. Danos fugat Put to flight the Danes The Roman Catholick religioÌ„ of this victorious Prince is euideÌ„t His Rom. Religion First because he suffered his sonne and heir Ethelwolph to be a Monke and subdeacon as both Catholicks and ProtestaÌ„ts affirme Godwin in the Bishops of Winchester saith it is certain Wherby saith Bale Cent. 2. cap 20. He became the Popes Creature by both professions Secondly because he committed his said sonne Ethelwolf to S. Swithin to be taught as testifieth Florent An. 827. Gotzelin and Godwin in vit Swithini Surius tom 4. And as addeth Gotzelin inter precipuos amicos numerauit reconed him in number of his especiall freinds Now this Swithin was a Roman Catholick For as Bale l. cit granteth he was a Monke and as Malmsb. lib. 2. Pont Gotzelin l. cit Westmon An. 862. and others report wrought miracles by the signe of the Crosse is canonised by the Papists for a Saint Thirdly because K. Kenulf who in his time was King of midlengland as Malmsb. saith lib. 1. Reg. Nulli ante se Regi Nothing inferior in power and religion to any King before him and whose praises shal be aduanced on high so long as there is found any indifferent iudg in England writing with all his Bish and nobilitie to Pope Leo beginneth his letter thus Domino beatissimo To my most holy Lord and wel beloued Lord Leo the Roman Bishop of the holy Apostolick See Kenulf by the grace of God King of Merchland with the Bishops Dukes all Degrees of honor within our DominioÌ„s with health of most sincere affection in Christ Infra The sublmity of the See of Rome is our helth The prosperitie of Rome the ioy of England the prosperitie therof our coÌ„tinuall ioy Because whence yow haue your Apostolicall dignitie thence had we the knowledge of the true faith VVherfor I thinck it fit that the eare of our obedience be humbly inclined vnto your holy commaÌ„dements with our whole forces to fulfill what shal be thought coÌ„uenieÌ„t by your holines to performe But now I Kenulf by the grace of God K. humbly beseech your ExcelleÌ„cie to receaue me in quiet peace into your holines lap whome no meanes of merits do support let the large abouÌ„daÌ„ce of your blessing enrich for the gouermeÌ„t of his people that almightie God by your intercessioÌ„ may together with me encorage the Nation against the inuasion of forren foes which your Apostolical authoritie hath imbued with the rudemeÌ„ts of the Christian faith Rome taught England the faith All K. Kenulphs Predecessors had the popes blessing This blessing haue all the Kings who swayed the Mercian scepter deserued to obtaine at your Predecessors hands this same do I in humble maÌ„ner request desire to obtain of yow most holy Father first by way of adoptioÌ„ to receaue me as your child as I loue yow in the persoÌ„ of a Father shall embrace yow with the whole force of obedience Againe he saith Excellentiae vestrae VVe in most humble manner beseech your Excellencie to whome the key of wisdome is giuen by God Again VVith great humility also affectioÌ„ we haue writteÌ„ these to yow most holy Pope Our K. and Peers vvrite vvith great humilitie to the Pope beseeching in most earnest wise your ClemeÌ„cie kindly iustly to answer these things vvhich vve haue bene vrged to propound VVe send yovv here as a smale token of my louing minde that is 120. Mancuzes vvith letters requesting yovv to accept therof in good part vouchsafe to bestovv your blessing vpon vs. And the Pope answering him saith â—hat this K. professed to be willing to lose his life for him acknowledged saith the Pope that Nostris Apostolicis c. That no Christian presumeth to goe against our Apostolicall Decrees Yea Fox p. 132. speaking of this K. the others before him saith They wanted the knowledg doctrin in Christ especially in the Article of free iustification in faith Which p. 840. he termeth the foundation of the Church and all Christianitie and therfor saith he they ran the vvrong vvay And so concludeth that Protestants truth was hidden to our forancestors In which I verily beleeue him King Ethelwolph XIIII 2. THe 14. Christian King was Ethelwolph sonne to the forsaid King Egbert who began his reign An. 837. and reigned 20. yeares and od monethes He was saith Malmsb. lib. 2. cap. 2. by nature gentil and more desirous of peace than of war Vertues and valour of K. Ethelvvolph And yet saith Malmsb. l. cit Danos non semel per se suos Duces contudit The Danes he ouercame more than once by him selfe and his Generalls And besides other victories at Okley in Surey slew so many Danes saith Floren and westmon An. 851. Houed pag. 413. and others as neuer was heard in one Realme and at one time nether before nor after His Roman religion is most notorious His Rom. Religion First by that which hath bene said in the life of his Father Secondly because he procured a dispensation of the Pope becausâ— he had byn a Monke and subdeacon that he might marry which Pope Malmsb. 1. Pont. saith was Leo 3. Bale Centur. 2 cap 20. saith was Gregor 4. others say Leo 4. Thirdly he first sent his sonne Alfred to Rome to be instructed saith Westmon An. 854. of the Pope in manners and religion Kings sonne sent to be instructed of the Pope And after went himselfe and staied at Rome a yeare and ther as all Catholicke and Protestant Cronicles confesse bound all England to pay the Peter pence Ethelvv lib. 3. cap. 3 Stovv pag. 89 Coper An. 852. Houeden pag. 415. Huntingt lib. 5 Ingulp pag. 862. VVestmon An â—57 VVhat maÌ„â—uâ—a is And as Bale pag. 116. speaketh Prouinciam suam c. He made his Countrey tributarie to the Roman Synagog so sayth he was all England made subiect to the Roman Beast Besides this he appointed euery yeare 300. Mancuzes which were as Caius saith lib. 2. de antiq cantab. pag. 287. thirty pence a peece to be sent to Rome wherof one hundred should buy oile for light in S. Peters Church and one hundred for the same vse in S. Pauls and one hundred should be
putteth one Iohn Goose a VVicklefist burnt vnder him And Ibid. noteth that since the time of King Richard 2. there is no reigne of any King to be assigned hitherto wherin some good man or other hath not suffered the paines of fier for the religion of Iesus Wicklef Besides Stow pag. 690. saith that King Edward vvent crowned in VVestmenster in the honor of God and S. Peter and the next day in paules in the honor of God and S. Paule And his daughter Brigit became a Nonue polidor lib. 24. King Edward 5. XLVIIII THe 49. Christian Prince was Edward 5. soune to Edward 4. a child of a 11. yeares old who liued not many dayes after his Father As for the religion which this child had it may easely appeare by what hath bene said of the Father King Richard 3. L. IN rhe yeare 1483 the 50. Christian Prince was Richard 3. brother to Edward 4 who tooke the Crown held it two yeares The qualities of this K. are notorious in all Chronicles K. Richards religion And his religioÌ„ is known both by what hath bene said of his brother And as Polidor l. 25. he began a Colledg in Yorke of an hundreth Priests King Henrie 7. LI. IN the yeare 1485. succeeded King henry 7. of the house of Lankaster and reigned 23. yeares VVorthines of K. Henrie 7. He was faith Stow a Prince of meruailous wisdomme police iustice temperance and grauity Fox Acts. pag. 729. saith the same His Rom. Religion His Roman Catholicke religion is euident For Fox setteth downe diuers Wicklefists burnt or otherwise punished vnder him as pag. 731. four wherof one the K. caused to be brought before him but when he would not be perswaded was burnt And pag. 774. he reckneth diuers others others abiured and burnt in the cheeke Wherupon Considerat 10. he saith Protestants rather died than liued vnder King Henry 7. And p. 776. saith thus of K. Henrie 7. othervvise a prudent and temperat Prince permitted the rage of the Popes Clergie so much to haue their wills ouer the poore flock of Christ as they had Ibid. The persequution began novv in the Church to be â—oat and he attributteth the death of the K. to the persequution forsooth of the Gospellers Moreouer pag. 799. He roporteth out of G. Lilly how Henry 7. Anno 1506. send three solemne Orators to Pope Iulius 2. to yeald his obedience Ex more saith Lilly to the See of Rome And Stow p. 811. writeth that Pope Iulius 2. sent a cap of maintenance and a sword to King Henrie 7. as to a Defender of the Church And Fox pag. 799. saith that Pope Alexander 6. and Pius 3. had before done the same King Henrie 7. builded also three Monasteries of Franciscans Pollidor in vit In this kings time liued Iohn Alcok Bishop of Elie Holie 7 men A man saith Godwin in his life of admirable temperance for his life and behauior vnspotted and from a child so earnestly giuen to the studie not onely of learning but of all vertue and godlinesse as in those dayes neuer any man bore a greater opinion and reputation of holines He liued all his time most soberly and chastly subduiing the temptations of the flesh by fasting studie and praier and other such good meanes King Henrie 8. LII KIng Henrie 8. sonne to king Henrie 7. began his Reign An. 1509. From the which time to An. 1530. he continewed an earnest Roman Catholick For as Fox saith pag. 789. From Anno. 1509. to 1527. diuers VVicklefists were preseÌ„ted troubled imprisoned And pag. 836. He setteth downe a letter of king Henrie Anno 13. To all Maiors Sherifes Bailifs and Constables and other officers to assist the Bishop of Lincoln for punishing Hereticks according to the lawes of holy Church And Bale Cent. 8. cap. 62. saith that two were burnt An. 1515. for the matter of the Sacrament And cap. 75. that Barnnes was made to recant Anno 1525. And likwise Bilney Garret and others An. 1527. Stow also and others write how king Henrie Anno 1511. wrote to the French king to desist from molesting Pope Iulius 2. and in the next yeare sent an army of ten thousand men into France in the Popes defence And An. 1513. K. Henrie 8. zeal in defence of the Pope VVent himself in person with a royall army conquered Torwin and Turney And not content thus manfully to haue aduentured his person to defend the Pope with his sword did in the yeare 1521. write also an excellent booke in his defence against Luther The originall wherof I haue seene in the Popes Librarie with the Kings subscription therto in these bad verses if I wel remember Hunc librum Henricus Leoni decimo mittit In signum fidei pignus amicitiae This booke to Leo tenth King Henrie the eighth doth send In testimonie of his faith and token of a freind For which booke Pope Leo gaue to him his successors for euer the glorious title of Defender of the faith And again in the yeare 1527. When Pope Clement 7. was taken prisoner he gaue monthly 60. thousand angels for the maintenance of an army for the Popes deliuerie And after this made long time suit to the same Pope that he would by his authoritie pronounce his mariage with Queene Catherin to be none and diuorce them which he not granting King Henrie as yow shall heare in the next Booke renounced the Popes authoritie and made him self head of the Church and yet remained in all other points a Roman Catholick Whervpon Bale Cent. 8. cap. 80. saith K Henrie 8. nevver a ProtestaÌ„t that King Henrie did admitt the Doctrine of Antichrist euen in the matters of greatest moment and did retain the contagious dreggs Sleidan Englil 13. fol. 174. By such phrases this wrech vseth to vnderstand Papistrie And Fox pag. 1291. granteth that Obits and Masses appeare in his will Most seuer of all Engl. Kings against Heretiks And as he saith pag. 1135. made it high treason to deny the reall presence and fellonie to defend mariage of Priests breaking of vowes or to condemne Communion in one kinde priuat Masse or auriculer CoÌ„fession without all benefit of abiuration or Clergie VVhich Lawes were seuerely executed by him And at his death would gladly haue bene reconciled to the Roman Church as Bishop Gardiner with whome he delt about that matter protested openly in a sermon at Pauls Crosse And so Catholick was the people of England in his time euen after his reuolt from the See Apostolick as when the Vicar of Croidon a most famous preacher of that time tolde them in a sermon at Pauls that as they had denyed the supremacie of the Pope so in time they would fall to deny other points of the Catholick faith Zeal of our grand fathers touching the real presence euen the reall presence of Christ in the blessed Sacrament The people at that word cryed out Neuer Neuer Neuer which yet
Thus testified Luther for him self and his German Protestants Calvvin Caluin 4. instit cap. 2 parag 4. for him self and the French Protestants saith thus VVe haue departed from their Popish Church c. 6. para 1. VVe haue left the See of Rome cap. 15. parag 17. VVe confesse we were long time blind and incredulous vnderstood not the matters of baptisme now we accuse our blindnes hardnes of hart Iuel The Apologer of England speaking for him self the English Ministers writeth thus pag. 188. VVe haue indeed gone from the Pope we haue shaken of the yoke of the Bishop of Rome Fox Finally Fox Acts pag. 3. speaking generally of Protestants saith It is true that we are remoued from the Church of Rome And D. Reinolds amongst his Conclusions maketh this one Reinolds That the reformed Churches in England Scotland France Germanie and other Kingdoms and Common wealthes haue seuered them selues lawfully saith he from the Church of Rome And if this be so notorious and confessed of all the cheefe Maisters Churches of Protestants that before Luthers reuolt they were all Roman Catholicks vndoubted it ought to be of al other Protestants of meaner sorte and consequently there was neuer a Protestant before him 8. Fourthly I proue by reason that Luther was the first beginner of Protestancy For as Iuell saith Art 1. diuis 7 Eckius Pighius A question neuer ansvvered by Protestāts Hosius and others who liued in Luthers time haue cried out a maine in their books and pulpits where was your religion before Luther began The like hath Fox Acts pag. 749. and all know to be true And yet could neither Luther then nor any since for him name one man woman or child then liuing who had bene a Protestāt before Luther And howsoeuer it may be thought that before Luthers preaching Protestāts kept secret yet can it not be thought but when they knew him to preach securely they wold haue discried themselues and runne to him if any such had bene Besides that there are men yet liuing who can remember that the first Protestants were Catholicks before Luthers new preaching Fox in his Acts pag. 749. proposing the forsaid question to him selfe nameth a few who rather shew that there were no Protestants in England before Luther For 1. all the persons whom he nameth abiured their faith as him selfe confesseth pag. 750. and died as he writeth shortly after for greef or liued with shame For his Church consisting of abured persons Hovv protested they that abiured 2. these abiurers were as he setteth down in the yeare 1521. foure yeares after Lurhers new preaching and we aske for Protestants before his preaching 3. no one of these abiured persons was accused for holding iustification by only faith which point is the soule head foundation of Protestancie as hath bene shewed before and shall hereafter so that without it they could be no Protestants And if they had held it Fox it wold haue bene discouered For as Fox saith pag. 650. The Catholick Prelats made such diligent inquisition and examination as nether was any word so closely spoken of them no articles mentioned but it was it discouered Wherefore indeed those abiurers were but pore reliques of the Lollards of whome we shall speake hereafter That Luther vvas Author of Protestancie confessed by Protestāts Covel Doue 9. Lastly I proue that Luther was the beginner of Protestancie by the plaine open confession of diuers Protestants and testimony of Luther himselfe For Doct. Couell in his booke of Articles published by authority Art 19. pag. 130. saith thus Some Protestāts make Luther Caluin Authors of the religion among vs. D. Doue of Recusancie p. 32. Luther saith he in his time began a Reformation Harborough And a booke termed the Harborough much esteemed in the beginning of Q. Elizabeth Luther begot truth maketh England to speak thus I am thy countrie England who brought forth that blessed man Iohn VVicklef who begot Hus who begot Luther who begot truth And in the margent hath this note Fox The second birth of Christ Fox also Acts pag. 770 saith Luther pluckt downe the foundatiō of Papistrie by opening one veine long hid before Luther opened the veine of all truth the touch stone of all truth and the onlie principall origen of our saluation which is our free iustification by faith onely And the Author of the booke called Prognostica finis mūdi or Antichristus writeth thus The spirit which telleth things to come vvorketh not but in time of the Gospell which Luther as it is cōfessed note the word tovvards the end of the vvorld did first bring in And p. 13. Prognost Luther first brought in his Gospel Schusselb Impudencie to say ther vvere Gospellers befor Luther Milius Morgerstern Ridiculous to say any had pure doctrin be for Luther The seduction of false prophets is not manifest but vnder the Gospell vvhich before Luther as vve said neuer vvent since the primitiue time of the Apostles And Cōrad Schusselb l. 2. Caluin Theol p. 130. doubteth not to call it impudencie to say that many learned men before Luther did hold the doctrine of the Gospell Georg. Milius in explicat art 7. Confess Aug. If there had bene saith he right beleuers before Luther there had bene no need of a Luther an reformation Benedict Morgenstein tract de Euchar. pag. 145. saith it is ridiculous to think that in time before Luther any note Manifest to the vvhole vvorld that c. had the purity af doctrine and that Luther should receaue it from them considering it is manifest note againe to the whole Christian world that before Luthers time all Churches were ouerwhelmed with more than Cymerian darknes that Luther was diuinely raised to discouer the same and to restore the light of true doctr ne Protestancie began by one man alone Sleid. prefat historia Thus Protestāts but let vs hear also Luther him selfe VVe dare glorie saith he Prefat in Corpus doctrinae lipsiae 1561. that Christ was first published of vs. And de Captiu initio speaking of his impugning indulgences saith I alone did then roole thi◠stone And 1. Galat. fol. 26. we by the grace of God haue gottē here at VVittemberg the forme of a Christian Church Luther first preached his Gospel And 3. Galat. fol. 109. many gaue thanks to God that through the Ghospell which we first note by the grace of God then preached c. fol. 142. we haue receaued the first fruits of the spirit 4 Galat. fol 205. Sectaries at the beginning of the reformatiō of the Gospell were glad to heare vs and read our bookes Luthers Gospel reuealed to the vvorld by him Ibid. The truth of the Gospell God hath now againe in thes latter daies reueiled by vs vnto this vngratefull world 10. Thus you see it euident by many waies that Luther was the first institutor of Protestant religion
Preacher whence comest thou vvho sent the vvhere are the miracles that vvitnes thy sensending from God Patere legem quam ipse tuleris And to 2. fol. 455. If he say that he vvas sent of God and his spirit as the Apostles let him proue this by signes miracles or suffer him not to preach for vvhensoeuer God vvill change the ordinarie course there he alvvaies vvorketh miracles And 1. Galat. fol. 40. It vvas necessary for S. Paul to haue the outvvard testimony of his calling And shall not we think it necessary for Luther If any saith the Declarat of discipline printed at Geneua 1580. please themselues in this gadding abrode throughout the Churches and vvill contend that they may do so let them shevv vs the signes of their Apostleship as S. Paul did to the Corinthians let theÌ„ proue that they are endued vvith those Apostolicall gifts of tonges healing doing of miracles let theÌ„ proue that they are immediatly called therunto of God Finally I proue that Luther was not extraordinarily sent of God because he was not extraordinarily assisted by him from teaching false doctrine For as our English Protest coÌ„fesse he tought false doctrin in many points But they can produce no other assuredly sent extraordinarily of God who taught false doctrin And in my iudgment English Protestants much condemne their owne doctrine in defending that Luther was sent extraordinarily from God English ProtestaÌ„ts condemne them selues in defending Luthers calling For seing he hath condemned much of their doctrine for heresie they must therby confesse that their doctrine hath bene coÌ„demned of a man especially lightned of God and extraordinarily sent of him to teach his truth Wherfore I wold they took better aduise and followed the counsell of the forsaid Declarator in these words pag. 30. Let enquirie be made into euerie ones calling Good aduise of a Protestant from Geneua let them shew how they were chosen and ordeined as the letters and seall of their calling Let them rehearse their genealogies and the race of their descent Let them bring their rodds and set them before the Arke of God And who can not shew the marks and tokens of their election and Creation they that can not fetch their pedigree from Aaron and whose rodds remaine dead before the Arke let them be by the most iust authoritie of Gods word displaced Thus he whose aduise if it be followed I doubt not but Luther wil be displaced as a false Prophet 8. The forsaid sixt agument touching miracles much trobleth Protestants and therfor they answer it diuersly Some by granting that miracles are necessarie for the attestation of extraordinarie mission and saie as Feild doth lib. 3. of the Church c. 48. and Fox p. 789. that Luther wrought miracles But these we shall disproofe of purpose herafter Wherfor others despairing to make anie probable preteÌ„ce of miracles Bâ—â—â— denie that they are necessarie to assecure vs of extraordnarie missioÌ„ Because Isaies Daniel Zacharias wrought none because S. Paul proued his missioÌ„ rather by the efficacie of his doctrine than by miracles And Caluin l. de scandal saith that howsoeuer miracles were necessarie to the extraordinarie vocation of others yet not of theÌ„ because they teach no new doctrin but the same which befor hath bene confirmed with miracles and because their doctrin is euideÌ„t needeth no miracles to proue it But these their reasons are manifestly false For Isaias miraculously cured K. Ezechias prolonging his life 15. years caused the shadow of his diall to returne back 10. lines Daniel miraculously tould both what the K had dreamed what his dreame signified Dan. 2. 4. which is one of the greatest tokens of Gods assistance that is And in like sorte Zacharias c. 1. 4. fortold diuers things which soone after were fulfilled S. Paul and Barnabas proue their doctrin by miracles Act 15. wher they tell what great signes miracles God had wrought by them among Gentils in testimonie therof And 2. Cor. 11. S. Paul proueth his Apostleship because saith he the signes of my Apostleship were wrought vpon you in miracles prodiges and powers 9. That which Calu. saith besid that euery Sectmaister saith it with as much color as he is euidently falfe Though Luthers doctrin vvere good yet he needed miracles to proue his extraordinarie calling For as for the newnes of his doctrine it partly appeareth by what hath bene said sup c. 1 shall euideÌ„tly be shewed in the 2. parte of this Treatise And how ancieÌ„t euideÌ„t soeuer his Luthers doctrine wete and therfor that it needed no miracles yet if their mission to preach their doctrin be extraordinarie it caÌ„ not be denied but their missioÌ„ is both new vneuideÌ„t they needed miracles at least to approue their mission vnto vs. For God hauing no wher auouched by word that he wold send Luther to preach ProtestaÌ„ts beleue that Luther vvas extraordinarily sent vvithout all profe testimonie or reason All right beleuers haue not authoritie to preach if he auouch not by deeds nether what certaintie haue we ether from God or maÌ„ besides Luthers owne word that Luther came from God nether let anie maÌ„ answer that Luther proueth his doctrine by the word For now the question is not about his doctrine but about his authoritie to preach which a maÌ„ maie waÌ„t yet teach true doct Wherfor absurd is that which Bilson affirmeth l. of obedience p. 300. As long as we teach the faith of the Apostles we haue their authoritie For so euerie right beleuer shold haue Apostlick authoritie to preach al shold be Apostles or doctors contrarie to S. Paul 1. Cor. 12. all shold be Pastors and none sheep all laie men yea woemen and children might administer the word and sacraments None could be prohibited or suspended from preaching Finally this licence of preaching graunted to all that haue true faith is graunted besides Gods word or warrant Wherfore Bilson vpon better aduise perhaps in his booke of gouernment of the Church cap. 9. writeth that they haue no parte of Apostolik Commission that haue no shew of Apostolik succession And that Pastors do receaue by succession power and charge of the vvord and Sacraments from and in the first Apostles And I wold he wold shew to whom Luther succeeded in his new doctrine or els confesse that he had no part in Apostolik Commission Certain therfore it is that though euerie right beleuer may confesse his faith and also teach it priuatly when necessitie requireth yet none but Pastors who are lawfully sent can preach it of authoritie take care of soules and administer the Sacraments And how I pray you shold we be assured that Luther was sent of God to do this rather than anie other right beleuer This I wold gladly know Tell me this o Ministers and euerie one shold know before he commit his soul to his guiding whome he knoweth not to haue anie charge or
But to conclude this matter with Luther words He 1. Galat. fol. 11. saith Luther Let the Preacher of the Gospel be sure that his calling is from God and he calleth phantasticall spirits who intrude them selues He that preacheth vnsent cometh to kil And fol 12. It is not saith he ynough to haue the word and pure doctrine but also he must be assured of his calling and he that entreth without this assurance entreth to no other end but to kill and destroie People need be assured of Preachers sending Ibid. the people haue great need to be assured of our calling that they maie know our word to be the word of God And in the same chapter Ther are manie saith Luther who complaine that they haue the talent of the Lord and therfore are vrged by commandment of the Gospel to teach otherwise with a most foolish conscience they beleue that they hide the Lords money and are guiltie of damnation The diuel saith he doth this that he may make them instable in their vocation O good brother let Christ quitt the of this The Gospel saith he gaue his goods to seruants called Notē Expect his calling in the meā time be secure yea if thou wert wiser than Salomon or Daniel yet if thou beest not called flie more thā hell to preach If God need the he will call the. And againe The diuel vseth to stir vp his Ministers that they run vncalled and pretend this most burning zeal that they are sorie that men are so miserably seduced that they wold teach the truth and deliuer the seduced from the snares of the diuel Thus Luther and likwise Beza epist 5. and others which I wold they had followed in their first preaching Protestancie Aptnes to preach far short of authoritie to preach 14. As for Caluins reason before cited I saie that abilitie to preach cometh far more short of that spirituall and supernaturall power to preach and administer sacraments which Gods Pastor hath than abilitie to gouerne mens bodies goods in a kingdom cometh short of temporall power to gouerne such matters And therfore if none how able soeuer he be or think him self may take vpon him to be an officer in the common wealth vnles he be apointed much les may one take vpō him to be a Pastor in the Church and gouerne soules vnles he haue authoritie therto giuen which the Declarer of the disciplin noted p. 32. When he said How fit soeuer a mā semeth to be for anie charge yet nothing is to be taken in hand without the authoritie of God who will vse in his affaires whom him pleaseth VVhy the Ieues did ill to ask Christ for his commission As for the example of the Iews brought by Bilson I graunt they did ill in asking Christ and S. Ihon for their commission because their preaching was both plainly fortold before by God and then confirmed by the daily miracles of Christ others wrought for authorizing of Saint Ihon both in his conception and Natiuitie If Luther were Christ or Caluin S. Ihon and their preaching as plainly fortold by God and confirmed by present miracles we shold do like to Iews in asking them for their Commission But seing they produce nether extraordinarie holines nor miracles VVhy vve do vvell to aske Luther for his nor prophetie not anie thing els to testifie their sēding we shold shew great lightnes of hart yea madnes to beleue them to be Gods messengers without all Commissiō The similitudes which Bilson bringeth make nothing against as may be returned against him self For vs any man or woman too when the house is on fire or the cittie in danger Gteat difference betuen-teahhing of priuat men and ptoaching as Pastors may crie fire alarme if officers do not perceaue the danger So we saie that when a man or womā also perceaueth heresie to be taught which the Pastor doth not he or she ether may giue notice or warning therof But yet as not withstanding this none can in what danger soeuer take vpon him to be Captaine and command others of authoritie but he onely who hath such authoritie giuen him So none in what danger of heresie soeuer can take vpon him to be a Pastor and guider of soules preaching tanquam authoritatem habens but onely he who is lawfully called therto But Bilsons error is in that he distinguisheth not betwene the aduertising or teaching of priuat mē and the preaching of Pastors which is an act of spirituall function and authoritie and therfore must suppose that authoritie From the same procedeth his bringing of the example of Frumentius and Aedesius who as priuat men yea as woemen maie in case of necessitie when no others is to be had being captiues amongst infideles taught them the Christian faith Socrat. lib. 1. c. 19. Raffin lib. 1. cap 9. Theodoret. lib. 1. c. 23. But nether of them tooke vpon him to be Pastor to the Infidels or as such to administer to them the word and Sacraments Theodoret. lib. 1. c. 24. before Frumentius came to S. Athanasius was by him made Bishop and lawfully sent And by as good example might Bilson haue proued that women may preach euen without sending because a woman being in like sorte captiue among infidels taught them the Christian faith and was cause of their conuersion 15. And thus thou seest Gentle Reader euidently proued both by manifest proofs and open confession of Protestants VVhat the Protestāte and their doctrin be if Luther vvere not sent to preach that Luther preached Protestancie without sending and so without all authoritie and consequently that the Protestants Church is a companie without a Pastor their doctrine a message without an Embassador and their Bishops and Ministers without prelacie or pastorall authoritie but such as S. Cipriā describeth l. de vnit Eccles vvho amongst stragling companions of them selues take authoritie vvithout Gods giuing make them selues prelats vvithout anie orderlie course and no bodie giuing them a Bishoprick chaleng the name of Bishops English Ministers condemn◠the calling of the English Clergie And not Catholiks onely thus think but euen the purer sorte of our English Clergie For the dangerous Positioner lib. 3. cap 6. telleth how it was concluded by them in a Synod at Couentrie An. 1588. That the calling of Bishops is vnlavvfull That it is not lawfull by them to be ordeined into the Ministerie That Bishops are not to be acknowledged for Doctors Elders or Deacons as hauing no ordinarie calling And cap. 14. he recounteth how some Ministers renounce the calling which they had of Bishops and account ther orders onely a ciuil thing necessarie for them to keep the ministerie And c. 16. that the English Prelats haue no authoritie to make Ministers And thus much of Luthers want of Mission Now let vs see his orders CHAP. XI That Luther was neuer ordered to preach the Protestants word or administer their sacraments 1.
Langhorn is euident in Stow Chron. Anno 1376. Finally Luther before he published his new doctrine was noted of enuie against the dominicaÌ„ Friers as is before shewed singularity In so much as Fox pag. 770. writeth that his freinds did thinck euen before he fell from the Church Luthers singularitie that he would alter and abolish that manner of teaching which then was vsed Thus all Archereticks are branded with some notorious vice or other And perhaps these Archereticks are the false Prophets whome our Sauiour gaue a marke to know by their life For which cause also both the scriptures and Fathers haue recorded the notorious vices of diuers Archereticks as a sure token that such men were not they whome God first sendeth as preachers of a new doctrine or Apostles to conuert a Nation to him Wherfor let vs compare the qualities of S. Austin Luth. that therby we may see whether was the more likly maÌ„ to be choseÌ„ of God to be he that was first sent by him to conuert our Country to his faith religion All this vvas proued befor l. 1. c. 5. l. 2. c â— 3. S. Austin forsooke the world from his youth and entred into religious life Luther not before he was 20. yeares ould then vpon feare that his companion with whome he walked was slayne with a thunderboult S. Austin was brought vp vnder S. Gregorie who as S. Beda saith lib. 1. cap. 23. was a man of greatest vertue and learning of his time Luther vnder no man of fame S. austin profited so in vertue as he was made by S. Gregory Praepositus Monasterij of Luthers like profit no such proof S. Augustin kept his religious life Luther soone shooke it of S. Austin came a thousand miles to preach to Barbarous people Luther neuer went out of his Contrie â—t such purpose and liued alwaieâ—â—er sure protection of the Prince Feâ—â—câ—â—r of Saxony S. Austin liued in continuâ—ll praier saith Beda lib. 1. cap. 26. VVatcâ—iâ—â—â—ng preaching despising the commodities 〈◊〉 wâ—â—ld and single liâ—e 〈◊〉 â—hâ—t al◠〈◊〉 â—aâ—e a Protesâ—aâ—t Wiued feaâ—◠〈◊〉 his â—ase and enioyed the pleâ—sures of the w rld S. Austin went commonly bâ—â—â—foot about England preaching and had hard knees like a Camell by frequent â—â—eling in prayer No such matter of Luther S. Austin made English men incoÌ„parable more vertuous thaâ— they were before Luther made them much worse S. Austin God approued by many miracles both aliue dead no such newes of Luther S. Austin is highly commended for his vertue by S. Greg Beda other writers to our age Contrariewise Luther greatly discommeÌ„ded eueÌ„ of his owne brethren Finally no great vice can be proued against S. Austin Many and heinous vice are proued against Luth. Iudg therfore gentle Readee God being determined to reduce our NatioÌ„ to Christs faith whether of these two meÌ„ it is most likely he would make choise of for to effect so notable and so pious a worke CHAP. III. S. Austin Luther weighed according to their motiues of preaching 1. MVch it auaileth to trie the sincerity of any mans couâ—seâ— or actioÌ„ to examine whether the Couâ—seller or Actor be like to reape any pleasure oâ— coÌ„modity therby For if he can not most likly it is that he giueth such aduice vpon sincerity iudgmeÌ„t otherwise the contrary may be suâ—pected iâ— it be not euideÌ„t Wherupon â—assius gaue that prudeÌ„t note which al wâ—se meÌ„ in that case do obserue that we shall mark Cui bonum To whome was the aduise good To whom was ther any commodity pleasure or preferment like to râ—dound And if this course he obserued in trial of S. Austin Luthers religioÌ„ we shal clearly perceaue that S. Austin is to be prefered befor Luthers For S. Austin left his CoÌ„try forsooke his freinds acquaintance left his headship of a Monasterie left his quiet aboad at home for to come to preach his religion to our NatioÌ„ Luther left none of all these to preach his S. Augustin came a thousand miles and aduentured his life her amongst a people of a different religion Luther neuer went out of his Contrie to preach his doctrine nor euer came amongst his owne Contry men of contrary religion These points proued befor l 1. c. 7 l. 2 c. 9. without a safe conduct S. August got nothing but the title of an Archbishop wherof he had little or no hope at all when he came hither Luth. got liberty wife riches preferment of the world Whetfore euident it is that S. Austin was more likly to preach his doctrine vpon sincerity iudgment and for the good of them to whome he preached because he lost much got litle hoped for lesse than Luther who by his preaching lost nothing and got much CHAP. IIII. S. Austin and Luther weighed according to their mission or sending to preach SO sure a mark it is of false Prophets to preach without sending as God almightie gaue it as a certain note of them in the ould lawe Hierem. 23. I sent them not and they did runne And our Sauiour in the new law Ioan 10. VVho entreth not by the dore into the sheepfould but climbeth vp otherwaies he is a theefe and a robber ib. All who so euer haue comeÌ„ without sendâ—ng are theeues robbers And he Apostles likwise Act. 15. Some going out of vs haue trobled yow with words whome we commaÌ„ded not And so absurd withal as nothing can be more For if none dare take vpoÌ„ him to be the messeÌ„ger or Ambassador of a Prince vnles he be sent nor to gouern his people vnles he be apointed how absurd is it for any to take vpon him to be Ambassador Messenger of the Prince of Princes be disposer of his misteries and Stuard of his houshould and guider of his flock vnles he be lawfully sent Wherfor let vs compare the missions of S. Austin Luther together that therby we may see whether was the true whether the false Prophet S. Austin was sent to preach of S. Greg. successor to S. Peter All these differences proued befor l 1. c 8 9 l. 2. c. 10. and first Patriarch of Christendome Luther when he first preached Protestancie was sent nether of Patriarch nor Bishop nor any man els S. Austin was sent by the sayd authoritie by the which the first preachers of the most part in Christendome were sent Luther by no authoritie at all S. Austin came to preach vpoÌ„ obedience Luther vpon disobedience S. Austin came of purpose to preach that faith which he did preach Luther at first meÌ„t onely to spite others for a time not to found any newe faith S. Austin neuer ment to suppresse the faith which he begaÌ„ to preach Luther ofteÌ„times offered to suppresse his if he had not bene bound to recant it S. Austins sending was coÌ„tested by S. Peters miraculous testimonie from heauen Luther had no such Finally S. Austins sending was by