Selected quad for the lemma: authority_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
authority_n	bishop_n	power_n	see_v	2,885	5	3.9038	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A91309	Truth triumphing over falshood, antiquity over novelty. Or, The first part of a just and seasonable vindication of the undoubted ecclesiasticall iurisdiction, right, legislative, coercive power of Christian emperors, kings, magistrates, parliaments, in all matters of religion, church-government, discipline, ceremonies, manners: summoning of, presiding, moderating in councells, synods; and ratifying their canons, determinations, decrees: as likewise of lay-mens right both to sit and vote in councells; ... In refutation of Mr. Iohn Goodwins Innocencies Triumph: my deare brother Burtons Vindication of churches, commonly called Independent: and of all anti-monarchicall, anti-Parliamentall, anti-synodicall, and anarchicall paradoxes of papists, prelates, Anabaptists, Arminians, Socinians, Brownists, or Independents: whose old and new objections to the contrary, are here fully answered. / By William Prynne, of Lincolnes Inne, Esquire.	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.	1645 (1645)	Wing P4115; Thomason E259_1; ESTC R212479	202,789	171

Common State before all controversies of Religion and causes Ecclesiasticall had beene concluded King Canute in his Parliament holden at Winchester upon Christmas day after sundry Lawes and Orders made touching the faith the keeping of holy Dayes publike prayers learning of the Lords Prayer receiving of the Communion thrice in the yeare the manner and forme of Baptisme fasting and other like matters of Religion in the end thereof saith thus Iam sequitur institutum Legum secularium Now followeth an Order for temporall Lawes Thirdly we see that the Godly Catholique Princes in old times thought is their duty before all other offices of the Common weale first to determine matters of Religion and that even BY THE PARLIAMENTS OF THIS REALME In a Parliament holden by King William the Conquerer it is written thus The King for as much as he is the Vicar of the highest King is therefore appointed for this purpose that he should Rule and defend the Kingdome and People of the Lord and above all things the holy Church c. Hereby it appeareth that Kings and Princes are specially and of purpose appointed by God not only to defend but also to Governe and Rule the holy Churh How be it if any imperfection shall appeare in the former Parliaments we give God thankes for the same that is and trust that for his owne names sake he will confirme what he hath begun The hearts of Princes and determinations of Parliaments are in his hands If any thing want the arme of the Lord is not Shorted he is able to supply the same So our incomperable Iewell enough to satisfie and silence all our Opposites Thomas Bilson Warden and afterwards Bish of Winchester bringing in the Prelates and Iesui●s objecting against our reformed Protestant Religion that it was brought in and ratified not by a Councell and Synod of the Clergy but by the Prince Queene Elizabeth and the Parliament who say they had no power to determine or deliberate of those matters returnes this answer May not the Prince command for truth within hee Realme except your consents be first required and had● May not her Highnes serve Christ in making laws for Christ without your likeing Claime you this interest and prerogative that without you nothing shall be done in matters of Religion by the Laws of God or by the liberties of this Realme By the Lawes of the land you have no such priviledges Parliaments have beene kept by the King and his Barons the. Clergy wholy excluded and their Acts and statutes good And when the Bishops were present their votes from the Conquest to this day were never negative By Gods Law you have nothing to do with making Lawes of Kingdoms or Common wealthes You may teach you may not command persuasion is your part compulsion is the Princes If Princes imbrace the truth you must obey them If they pursue truth you must abide them By what authority then claim you this Dominion over Princes that their laws for Religion shall be voyde unles you consent seeing they are the maintainers establishers and upholders of the faith with publique power and positive Lawes which they and their Parliaments may make without a precedent councel of Clergy men to guid them as he there proves at large by sundry presidents If any Concurre not with me in this undoubted Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction of Christian Princes and Parliaments after all these pregnant testimonies I must tell them in plaine english they directly violate their late vow and Covenant and symbol●e herein with Jesuites and Popish Prelates whose doctrines they have abjured by their Nationall Covenant and therefore cannot may not ever hereafter emb●ace without the highest Perjury and plaine Apostacy unto Popery I shall finish this Section of the Authority and power of Parliaments in matters of Religion Church-government Discipline and enacting Lawes in all and every of these particulars with some forraigne presidents in the Parliaments Diers Assemblyes of Estats in other Realme republikes Should I now relate unto you the many ecclesiasticall Laws of all sorts made in them I might swell this Treatise into many folio volumes I shal therefore only give you a brief touch catalogue of some few which the Studious may peruse make use of at their leisure For FRANCE you may survey the Decrees of King Childebert debated and agreed by him and his people in a Parliament de quibuscunque conditionibus una cum Optimatibus nostris c. 2. 4. c. 15. For sanctifying the Lords Day prohibiting the dressing of any but necessary food on it all Bodily labour under pecuniary mulcts The ecclesiasticall laws of Charles the great Ludovicus pius Charles the Bald collected into one volum by Abbot Ansegisus Benedictus Levita Lindebrogus others printed with some pettinent additions Parisijs 1640. stiled Capitula Regum Episcoporum Maximeque OMNIVM NOBILIVM FRANCORVM were made GENERALI CONSENSV PIDPLIVM SKORVM ET GENERALI CONSVLTV ET COMMVNI CONCILIO by generall consent of the King Bishops and especially of the Nobles and states of France in Common Councells Parliaments and Assemblies of the estates Who had so great a power in making rejecting Canons ecclesiasticall Lawes that when in the yeare 846. the Bishops of France and their suffragans had in their Synods compiled certaine Canons by the command of Charles the Bald and tendered them to him as he had commanded in Sparna● a Village of the Church of Rhaemes to peruse and approve the King Dissidentibus regni sui PRIMORIBVS ab eorundem episcoporum admonition● by reason that the Nobles and other men of his Realme differed from the Bishops in opinion in most of those Canons the King and Nobles out of all their Canons or Chapters haec tantum observanda complacenda sibi colligerunt Episcopis scripto tradiderunt dicentes NON AMPLIVS DE FORVM CAPJTVLIS ACCEPTASSE QVAM ISTA ET ISTASE VELLECVM PRINCIPE OBSERVARE which were Stiled Captule Regis CAROLI not the Bishops Canons By which it is evident that no ecclesiasticall lawes or Canons could be made in France to bind either Clergy or Laity but such at the King Nobles Parliament and three estates approved and confirmed I shall add to this that Anno 1307. King Philip the 4. of France assembled a Parliament at Paris wherein the Laity of France exhibited 65. Articles against the Clergy to regulate their jurisdiction and abuses which were there largely handled and debated as you may read at leisure in Masters Fox who records the passages very fully in the French Histories What the Parliament Estates in France have done enacted in matters of Religion Church-Government and discipline of ancient and latter times you may read at large in Liurentius Bochellus his Decreta Ecclesiae Gallicaiae in Carolus Molinaeus Contra parvas Datas c. in William Ranchin his Survay of the Councel of Trent but above all in Antonie Fontanon

TRVTH TRIVMPHING OVER FALSHOOD ANTIQVITY Over NOVELTY OR The First Part of A just and seasonable Vindication of the undoubted Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction Right Legislative Coercive Power of Christian Emperors Kings Magistrates Parliaments in all matters of Religion Church-Government Discipline Ceremonies Manners Summoning of Presiding Moderating in Councells Synods and ratifying their Canons Determinations Decrees As likewise of Lay-mens right both to sit and vote in Councells here proved to be anciently and in truth none other but Parliaments especially in England both by Scripture Texts Presidents of all sorts and the constant uninterrupted Practices Examples of the most eminent Emperors Princes Councells Parliaments Churches and Christian States especially of our owne in all ages since their embracing the Gospell In Refutation of M r. Iohn Goodwins Innocencies Triumph My deare brother Burtons Vindication of Churches commonly called Independent And of all Anti-Monarchicall Anti-Parliamentall Anti-Synodicall and Anarchicall Paradoxes of Papists Prelates Anabaptists Arminians Socinians Brownists or Independents Whose old and new Objections to the contrary are here fully answered By William Prynne of Lincolnes Inne Esquire Jer. 6. 16. Thus saith the Lord Stand yee in the wayes and see and aske for the OLD PATHES where is the GOOD WAY and walk therein and yee shall find rest for your soules But they said Wee will not walke therein Luk. 5. 39. No man also having drunk OLD WINE straightway desireth NEW for he saith THE OLD IS BETTER Tertul. de Praescrip adver Haeres Ex ipso ordine manifestatur id esse Dominicum Verum quod sit priùs traditum id autem Extraneum Falsum quod sit posterius immissum Decem. 3. 1644. It is Ordered by the Committee of the House of Commons concerning Printing that this Book entituled Truth Triumphing over Falshood Antiquity over Novelty be printed by Mich. Sparke Senior John White London Printed by John Dawson and are to be sold by Michael Sparke Senior 1645. TO THE HIGH COVRT OF PARLIAMENT Right Honourable HAving had the Honour through Gods assistance to be a meane though cordiall Instrument of Vindicating The Soveraigne Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes in all Civill or Military affaires which concerne the State in Foure severall Volumes against all Opposites whatsoeever which they have for the most part satisfied or put to silence I expected a Quietus est from all other Controversies concerning the Iurisdiction of Parliaments especially in Ecclesiasticall matters which most imagined had been put to eternall silence when our Lordly Prelates lost their Votes and Session in Parliament by a publike Law But alas I know not by what evill Genius and Pythagorean Metempsychosis the Anti-Parliamentary Soules formerly dwelling in our defunct Prelates earthly Tabernacles are transmigrated into and revived in a New-Generation of men started up of late among us commonly known by the Name of INDEPENDENTS who though for the most part really cordiall in their Affections Actions to the Parliament and Church of England for which and for their piety they are to bee highly honoured yet some of them are of late become extremely derogatory and destructive unto both in their Anarchicall and Anti-Parliamentary Positions For which and for their late gathering of Independent Churches contrary to Your Parliamentary Injunctions they are to be justly blamed as great disturbers of our publike Peace and Vnity It is the observation of learned Voetius and Vedelius That the Arminians in the Netherlands for the advancing of their owne Faction and more facill accomplishment of their private ill Designes did before the Synod of Dort and in the beginning thereof exceedingly cry up the Power of the Civill Magistrate and States of Holland in Ecclesiasticall matters both by Writing and Preaching ascribing to them the highest Jurisdiction and Power of giving ultimate Judgement in all Controversies of Faith and Ecclesiasticall matters arising in the Church as a Prerogative belonging immediately under Christ to them alone And thereupon they appealed to the States from the Ecclesiasticall Classes as the proper Iudges of the Controversies they had raised in the Belgick Churches But at last after the Synod of Dort had determined against their Arminian Errors and the States established their Determinations prohibiting the Preaching or Printing of any Arminian Tenets with the private Independent Congregations and Conventicles of the Arminian Party they presently altered both their opinions and practice crying downe the Authority of the States and Civill Magistrate as fast as they had cryed it up both in their Apologies and Sermons contracting yea denying them that very power which before they had so liberally measured ●ut unto them affirming that the States had no power at all over their private Congregations that it was not any right or part of their Office to obliege men by their authorities to the Decrees of Synods however agreeable to the word of God and that they ought not to use any coactive Power or Authority in such cases to obliege them to conformity This Practice of the Arminians was by M r Thomas Edwards by way of prediction applied to the Independents in these very tearmes And it may be feared however these Apologists NOW to ingratiate themselves and being let alone in their Church-way say they give more to the Magistrates than the Presbyteriall and that they professe to submit and to be most willing to have recourse to the Magistrates Iudgement and Cognizance and Examination of Ecclesiasticall Causes yet when they shall come once to be crossed and the Parliament by the advice of the Assembly to settle the Government of the Church and by their Authority to bind them to things agreeable to the word wee shall see then what they will say of the Magistrates Power There are too many speeches already since the Assembly out of their feare how they may goe which have fallen from many Independents THAT PROGNOSTICATE THEY WILL DOE BY THE PARLIAMENT AS THE REMONSTRANTS DID AFTER THE SYNOD OF DORT BY THE STATES Which Prognostication hath fallen out accordingly For since that time our Independents having felt the Pulses of the Assembly and Parliament bearing but very gently by way of debate against their Anarchicall and Anomolous New-Way derived from their good friends the German Anabaptists and Separatists and supported only with their Arguments as I am fully able to demonstrate they have not only in Presse and Pulpit cryed up their Way as the Onely Way Kingdome and Scepter of Christ and denyed all opposition in word deed or thought against it as a direct FIGHTING AGAINST GOD and promoted it publikely and privately with all their Industry Policy Power setting up New Independent Congregations in every corner but even with open mouth pen hand contrary to their former Solemne Vowes Covenants Protestations which I feare they have over-much forgotten cryed downe and fought against the very Ecclesiasticall Power and Legislative Authority of the High Court of Parliament it self and Supreme Temporall Magistrates proclaiming

direct Scriptures and fundamentall Truths never formerly questioned They nullifie and slight Examples of the Old Testament in all things that make against them and yet cry them up againe when they make for them especially in the point of their Church Covenant which they confesse hath no ground at all in the New Testament but onely in the Jewish Church under the Old Which yet they will not admit a sufficient Proofe of a Nationall Church Seventhly They intricate gain-say things which are cleare take things for granted that are either false or doubtfull confound things in generalities which they should distinguish deny things that are apparently true yea which is worst of any not only affirming but beleeving most things with a reserve according to their present light to the posture of their present Judgement as they are yet informed with a liberty of altering or varying to morrow from what they affirme or beleeve to day upon new light discovered Which is in truth to bring a meere Skepticisme into Religion to play fast and loose with God and our owne Consciences to doubt all things firmely beleeve nothing to set up Opinion in the Throne and Place of Faith and in conclusion to introduce flat Atheisme Eightly They refuse Church-Communion with those who are not of their Way and Churches excluding them from the Lords Table and their very Children from Baptisme in their Churches if they submit not to their Covenant and Way judging them all professed Enemies to the Kingdome and Government of Christ and so visibly without the Covenant of Grace though never so Pious or Religious Ninthly Their very Principles teach disobedience to Parliaments Synods Princes Magistrates and all other Superiors in all their just Lawes and Commands which concerne the Church or Religion dissolve all Relations all Subordinations and humane Society it selfe as I have here fully manifested Tenthly They exceedingly magnifie their owne Way Ministers Writers Opinions Conceits despising and under-valuing all others in a kind of Pharisaicall manner not deeming them worthy their Church-Communion Eleventhly They have high conceits of their owne transcendent holinesse and under pretext of being more pious pure living more holily and serving God more exactly than others they doe without sufficient Grounds quite sever from all other Churches just like Popish Monkes Hermites Anchorites Nunnes Jesuites and other Religious Orders who separate themselves from others under this very pretence of being more holy and living more devout than others Twelfthly They pretend themselves the greatest Enemies of all others to Papists Arminians Anabaptists Socinians Sectaries and yet concurre with them in their Opinions Practices Policies fighting against us with their very weapons Of all which I thought good to advertise thee kind Reader lest thy good opinion of the Piety and dignity of their Persons worthy all due honour and respect should make thee swallow downe their dangerous Principles and Opinions without strict examination Whereas good mens Errors are most infectious pernicious and so more carefully to be observed avoyded How farre they have swerved from Verity and Antiquity in sundry Particulars how fallacious and weake their principle Proofes and Arguments are I have here in part discovered and shall in due time if God say Amen put a Period to the other Part which is yet behinde In the mean time beseeching God to prosper these my impotent Endeavours to thine and the publike good which I have principally published for the satisfaction of the Learned and such who most seduce the Ignorant I shall dismisse thee with this wholesome Councell of God himselfe Ephes 4. 14 15 16. Henceforth be no more Children tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of Doctrine by the sleight of men and cunning craftinesse whereby they lye in wait to deceive But speaking the truth in love grow up into him in all things which is the Head even Christ From whom the whole Body fitly joyned together and compacted by that which every joynt supplieth according to the effectuall working in the measure of every part maketh increase of the Body unto the edifying of it selfe in love Farewell Errata Faults escaped in some Copies pag. 5. lin 14. read Regis p. 22. l. 24. Constitutions r. Consistories p. 25. l. 21. premissis p. 61. l. 12. actaque p. 65. l. 32. necesse l. 34. receptat r. refrixerat l. 46. dele to p. 69. l. 5. Turlstan p. 75. l. 31. inhibit l. 34. resist desist p. 85. l. 22. the. p. 26. l. 31. ch 1. p. 101. l. 1. servus l. 12. universa p. 108. l. 9. issue p. 169. informe p. 116. l. 36. Ministers masters p. 120. l. 9. 35. l. 24. with his his owne p. 135. l. 45. clear p. 131. l. 22. Fourthly Fifthly l. 31. Foure Five Margin p. 66. l. 21. 22. r. Incarnationis Anno. p. 119. l. 1. Rom. 13. 1. p. 124. l. 3. 11. r. 18. Truth triumphing over Falshood Antiquity over Novelty c. AS it is an unspeakable griefe and corrosive to my very soule to enter into publike contestations with any of my Christian brethren who professe the selfe-same faith together with me so it would be a far greater heart-breaking and much sorer affliction to my spirit to behold upstart groundlesse Errours triumphantly insulting over ancient orthodox Verities and dragging them captives after their domineering chariots This makes me once more take up the Sword and Buckler not of Polemicall School-divinity but Historicall Antiquity to encounter those Adverse forces which have taken up offensive armes and waged open warre in many new-printed Pamphlets against the lawfull Jurisdiction and soveraign authority of Christian Princes Magistrates Parliaments assisted with the advice of Reverend Synods and Councels in matters of Religion church-government Ecclesiasticall Lawes Canons Discipline all which through Gods assistance I hope totally to rout and dissipate in such sort that they shall never be able to make head againe by this short suddain onset which I have yet neither vacancy nor time sufficient through the multitude of other publike avocations to prosecute to the full I shall marshall my subitane collections of this nature under distinct Positive propositions which I shall propound and prosecute in order Sect. 1. Of the power of summoning Councels and Synods 1 FIrst I affirm that the right and authority of calling or summoning Ecclesiasticall Assemblies Councells Synods whether Generall Nationall or Provinciall to settle matters of Religion Worship Church-government or constitute Ecclesiasticall Lawes belongs not to Bishops Ministers or private Independent Congregations but to Princes or supreme temporall Magistrates and Powers This Proposition militating both against Papists Brownists Anabaptists and some Independents I shall ratifie by Scripture and historicall presidents in all ages as well forraigne as domestick with brevitie and perspicuitie 1. For Scripture-presidents and Authorities we have Precepts to and Presidents of Moses the prime civill-Magistrate among the Israelites Num. 10. ● 3 4. c. 8. 9. c. 20. 8 10. Exod. 35. 1 4.

second at Rheemes the third at Towers the fourth at Cavailon the fift at Arelat The third Councell at Aquesgran was summoned providentissimo et jussu salutifero of King Pipin as were the two former by the wholsom command and most provident direction of his Father Lewis The Councels of Meaux and Medardum by the consent and command of Charles the son of Lewis The Councell of Valentia by the Emperor Lotharius his command ex jussione praefati Principis reverendissimi trium provinciarum Episcopi in unum collecti residissent The Synod of Ticinum and the Councell of Wormes An. 868. were congregated by the Emperor Lewis the second The Synod of Colen Anno 887. by Charles the third his consent The Councell of Ments Anno 888. and of Triburby Arnulphus the Emperor The Councel of Ferrara by John Paleologus The Provinciall Synod of Augusta Anno 1548. by the Emperor Charles the fift Cui hanc Synodorum congregandarum facultatem veluti olim Constantino Imperatori totius ●●re orbis acceptam ferunt saith Otho the Popes own Legate To these I might accumulate the Synod at Tholetum Anno 525. congregated by the command of Richard King of the Wisi-Gothes The Synod at Rome Anno 773. cited thither by Charles the great to whom Pope Adrian and that whole Synod consisting of 154. religious Bishops and Abbots gave the right of chusing the Pope and ordaining the Apostolicall See with sundry others yea most of the Councels that I have met with in Surius Binius Crab Merlin Photius Carranza Syrmond Bochellus Spelman Cresconius Fulgentius Ferrandus and other collectors of Councels and Synods have bin alwaies usually called by Emperors and Christian Princes That being most true which the Code of the Liberties of the French Church affirmes That most christian Kings in allages have been accustomed according to the state of things hapning in their Realmes to call Synods and provinciall or Nationall Councels for the ordering of Ecclesiasticall affaires as the forecited presidents with infinite other testifie the forequoted Councels Fathers Popes Historians together with St. Hierom and Pope Gregory the great resolve Most false impudently arrogant then are the assertions of Pope Marcellus Iulius Pelagius Gregory and Symmacus if Gratian misreports not their positions as likewise of Gratian the Canonists Iesuits and Popish Parasites who all sticke not to publish without shame or feare That the power of calling generall nationall and provinciall Councels belongs properly to the Apostolicall See of Rome That regularly no Synod ought to be called without the Popes authority That it is no Councell but a Conventicle which is summoned without his authority And that all Councels without his authority presence in person or by his Legates and ratification are meerly voyd and invalid Parodoxes which all the premises and the constant practise of all ages places sufficiently confute yea and some learned Papists to Nicolaus Cufanus determines the quite contrary in these very termes The authority of a Councell doth not so depend of him by whom it was summoned that unles it be summoned by the Pope it can be no Councell for so we should avoyd all the first eight generall Councels For wee read they were summoned by Emperors not by Popes And the Pope of Rome like other Patriarcks received the Emperors Majesties sacred commandements to come or send to Councels If the Pope be negligent or if hee say nay the Emperour may by his own authority summon Councels by way of command to stay the wavering State of the Church Hence we have one conclusion that in generall Councels and making Lawes the Bishop of Rome hath no such power as certain flatterers give him Thus this learned Cardinall Aeneas Sylvius afterwards Pope Pius the second is as point-blanck as he From these authorities writes he they thinke themselves wonderfully armed who deny that Councels can be kept without the Popes consent whose judgement if it should stand as they woul have it would draw the ruine of the Church with it For what remedy shall there be if a criminous Pope should disturbe the Church if he should destroy soules if he should pervert the people with his ill example if finally he should teach things contrary to faith and should fill his subjects with haereticall Doctrines Should we suffer all things to go to ruine with him But I whiles I read over ancient Histories while I consider the Acts of the Apostles do not verily finde this custome that Popes onely should call Councels Neither afterwards in the time of Constantine the great and of other Emperors when Councels should be called there was no great account made of the Popes consent Durandus De Concilio celebrando Parisiis 1545. Tit. 1 2. Franciscus Zabarella Cardinall of Florence de Schismate Concilio p. 542 543 544 Theodoricus a Niem de Schismate c. 3. 5. 7. p. 154. confesse and teach that it belongs to the Emperors to call Councels The Code of the Liberties of the French Church saith directly Although generall Councels ought not to be called or kept without the Pope nor any thing to be decreed and concluded in them but by his authority by the Ecclesiastical rule made by Popes themselves yet notwithstanding in the French Church it hath been ever resolved that the Pope is not thought to bee above a generall Councell but is bound to keep its Decrees Statutes Precepts no lesse than the people of the Church which is the Spouse of our Lord Iesus Christ and which is especially presented by the Councel Yea William Ranchin a famous French Lawyer though a Papist in his Review of the Councell of Trent l. 1. c. 8. l. 3. c. 1. to 14. and l. 4. c. 1 2 c. not only avers but copiously and irrefragably manifests by pregnant evidences that Generall Nationall Provinciall Councels Synods in all Christian Nations Kingdoms Republikes have alwayes been constantly summoned by Emperors Kings and christian Princes and that neither the Pope nor any Prelates or Ecclesiasticall persons whatsoever have any lawfull power or authority to call them unlesse it be by the speciall licence and authority of Kings and Emperours first obtained The like is maintained and proved at large by Marsilius patavinus Defensoris Pacis pars 2. c. 21. to 27. Rabanus Maurus de Universo l 5. c. 7. Ioannis Marius de Schismate et Conciliis pars 2. c. 1. to 19. p. 507 508. by Carolus Molinaeus in his learned praeface to his Commentary on the Edict of King Henry the second of France Contra parvas Datas et Abusus Curiae Romanae p. 14. to 27. by the resolutions of divers French Councels Synods and Edicts of Parliament cited by Laurentius Bochellus Decreta Eccles Gal. l. 5. Tit. 20. cap. 17. 19 20 21. 29. 33 34 35. 38 39. 41. 43 44 45 46. by the Code of the Liberty of the French Church

of Canterbury in their and every of their distinct Courts and in the order and manner of their and every of their proceedings and by all other persons within this Realme as far as lawfully being members of the Church it may concerne them And further to conferre debate treat consider consult and agree of and upon such other points matters causes and things as we from time to time shall deliver or cause to be delivered unto the sayd Lord Archbishop of Canterbury President of the sayd Convocation in writing under Our Signe Manuell or privie Signet to be debated concluded consulted and concluded upon the sayd Statute or any other Statute Act of Parliament Proclamation Provision or restraint heretofore had made provided or set forth or any other cause matter or thing whatsoever to the contrary notwithstanding And we do also by these Presents give and grant unto the sayd Lord Archbishop of Canterbury President of the sayd Convocation and to the rest of the Bishops of the said Province of Canterbury and to all Deanes of Cathedrall Churches Archdeacons Chapter and Colledges and the whole Clergy of every severall Diocesse within the said Province full free and lawfull liberty licence power and authority That they the sayd Lord Archbishop of Canterbury President of the sayd Convocation and the rest of the sayd Bishops and other the Clergie of the same Province or the greater number of them whereof the sayd President of the sayd Convocation to be one all and every the sayd Canons Orders Ordinances Constitutions matters Causes and things so by them from time to time conferred treated debated considered concluded and agreed upon shall and may set down in writing in such forme as heretofore hath been accustomed and the same so set down in writing to exhibite and deliver or cause to be exhibited and delivered unto Us to the end that we upon mature consideration by us to be taken thereupon may allow approve confirme and ratifie or otherwise disallow annihilate and make voyd such and so many of the sayd Canons Orders Ordinances Constitutions matters causes and things so to be by force of these Presents considered consulted and agreed upon as wee shall thinke fit requisite and convenient Provided alwayes that the sayd Canons Orders Ordinances Constitutions matters and things or any of them so to be considered consulted or agreed upon as aforesaid be not contrary or repugnant to the Liturgy established or the Rubrick in it or the nine and thirty Articles or the Doctrine Orders and Ceremonies of the Church of England already established Provided also and our expresse will and commandement is That the sayd Canons Orders Ordinances Constitutions matters and things or any of them so to be by force of these presents considered consulted or agreed upon shall not be of any force effect or validity in the Law but only such and so many of them and after such time as we by our Letters Patents under our great Seale of England shall allow approve and confirme the same any thing before in these presents contained to the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding c. In witnesse whereof We have caused these our Letters to be made Patents Witnesse Our selfe at Westminster the twelfth day of May in the sixteenth yeare of our Reigne Per Regem Ipsum Willys To which I shall adde the Kings further Warrant for making a particular Canon and Oath in the late Convocation Charles R. MOst reverend Father in God right trusty and right entirely beloved Councellour Right reverend Fathers in God right trust and well-beloved and trusty and well-beloved We great you well Whereas We out of our meere grace and favour and for the good and peace of the Church have granted to you our Arch-Bishop of Canterbury free leave and licence under our great Seale of England bearing date the twelfth of this instant May to propose treat and conclude upon all such necessary Articles and Canons which you shall finde fit to be ordered for the peace and government of this Church Provided that you shall thereby have no power to meddle with nor alter any thing ratified and confirmed by Act of Parliament And whereas we have further in that Licence which we have granted unto you reserved power to our selfe to command you to propose treat and determine of any such thing or things as we shall recommend unto you under our Signe Manuall or Signet These are therefore to will and require you to propose treat and conclude upon such a Canon as may secure us and all our loving subjects against all growth and encrease of Popery in this our Kingdom as also of any hereticall or schismaticall opinions to the prejudice of the doctrine or discipline of this Church of England established by Law And that in this case you agree upon some Oath to be taken by your selves and all the Clergie respectively and by all which shall hereafter take upon them holy Orders that they shall adhere constantly to the doctrine and discipline here established and never give way for so much as can any way concerne them to any innovation or alteration thereof And when you have made this Canon and inserted this Oath we require you to present it to us that we may advise upon it and if upon mature consultation we approve it we shall confirme it and then give you power under our great Seale both to take the said Oath your selves and to administer it to all such as the Canon appoints Given under our Signet at our Court at White-hall the seventeenth day of May in the sixteenth yeere of our Reigne To the most Reverend Father in God our right trusty and right entirely beloved Councellour the Lord Arch-bishop of Canterbury Primate and Metropolitane of all England To the right Reverend Fathers in God our right trusty and well-beloved the Lords Bishops and to our trusty and well-beloved the rest of the Clergie now assembled in Convocation 3 ly by the Kings letters Patents for Confirmation of those Canons after they were made presented to be confirmed by him In the first canon whereof they thus truly resolve That a supream Power is given to this most excellent Order of Kings by God himself in the Scriptures which is That Kings should rule and command in their severall dominions all persons of what rank or estate soever whether Ecclesiasticall or Civill and that they should restrain and punish with the temporall sword all stubborn and wicked doers The care of Gods Church is so committed to Kings in the Scripture that they are commended when the Church keeps the right way and taxed when it runs amisse and therefore her government belongs in chief unto Kings For otherwise one man would be commended for anothers care and taxed but for anothers negligence which is not Gods way The power to call and dissolve Councels both nationall and provincial is the true right of all Christian Kings within their own Realms or Territories

to abate this windy tumour consider with themselves that all their greatnesses piled together in a generall or Nationall Synod though steepled with the Popes owne Chaire and three-forked Miter cannot so much as treat of debate dispute determine any Church-affaires much lesse constitute or promulge any new Ecclesiasticall Lawes Canons Articles Ceremonies Rites c. without the previous licence and permission of those temporall Princes and Powers that summon them nor yet exercise any manner of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction whatsoever more then the poorest Vicar and Curate breathing that is a Minister lawfully ordained without the Kings Letters Patents or Commission authorizing them which erected their Bishopricks Diocesse and Episcopall jurisdiction at the first and must still support them else they will fall to utter ruine and then all their pretended claimes and crackt title of jus divinum with all Independents Anabaptists Brownists Anti-monarchicall Anti-parliamentall fancies concerning the jurisdiction and authority of their Independent Congregations opposite to the premises will vanish into ayre If any deeme the premised power of Christian Princes and Civill Magistrates in limiting Synods and Councels thus to be derogatorie to the lawfull authority of Bishops Ministers Synods or Independent Churches Ianswer that it is not so forthese ensuing reasons First because the chiefe care of preserving the purity of Gods Worship Ordinances Religion the Churches peace prosperity and of suppressing all heresies errours schismes corruptions superstitions contrary thereunto is committed to Christian Princes and supreme temporall Magistrates both by the Lawes of God the constant acknowledgment use practice constitutions lawes canons of all Christian Empires Kingdomes Councels Synods in all ages and the Coronation-Oaths of all Emperours Kings Princes in the Christian World which oblige them to discharge this trust as the subsequent Sections will abundantly manifest Therefore the power of directing Synods Councels in debating matters of controversie making Lawes Canons c. concerning all or any of the premises and the confirming of them ought principally to belong to them Secondly because Christian Emperours Kings Princes are the supreme heads and Governours under Christ in and over all Ecclesiasticall persons Assemblies Synods Councels Churches within their owne Dominions as well as temporall and our Kings of England are declared to be such by severall Acts of Parliament by the Oaths of supremacy and Allegeance which all ought to take within their respective Dominions Therefore they ought of right to direct and order all manner of proceedings in such Ecclesiasticall Assemblies Synods it being the duty and just right of every Naturall and Politicke head to direct the members as of the head of the family to regulate and direct the family wife c. by way of authority or jurisdiction not they the head Thirdly because the Bishops and Clergy of our owne and other Realmes have no Legislative power or other Ecclesiasticall authority vested in them by the Word of God but onely to preach the Word administer the Sacraments and to binde or loose mens sinnes declaratively by preaching or applying the Gospel to them according as they finde them penitent or obstinate in their sinfull courses and no more of other Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction then what is derived to them by our Kings and the Lawes of this our Realme as is resolved in these expresse termes by the Statute of 37. H. 8. c. 17. The Arch-bishops Bishops Arch-deacons and other Ecclesiasticall persons of this Realme have no manner of Iurisdiction Ecclesiasticall but by under and from the Kings royall Majestie the onely and undoubtea supreme head of the Church of England and Ireland to whom by holy Scripture all authority and power is wholly given to heare and determine all manner of causes Ecclesiasticall and to correct all vice and sinne whatsoever and to such persons as his Majestie shall appoint thereunto And by the Statute of 1. Ed. 6. c. 2. in these words That all jurisdiction spirituall is derived and deducted from the Kings Majestie to all Bishops and Ecclesiasticall persons within England and Ireland as supreme head of these Churches and Realmes of England and Ireland and so instly acknowledged by the Clergie of the said Realmes and that all Courts Ecclesiasticall within the said two Realmes be kept by no other power or authority either forraigne or within the Realme but by the authority of his most Excellent Majesty whereupon it enacts That all their Processe shall issue out under the Kings Seale and in his Name and Stile as in Writs originall and judiciall at the common Law with which sundry other Acts of Parliament concurre Now the Kings and Lawes of this our Realme have given the Clergie assembled in Councels Synods and Convocations no other but such a limited power and authority as is expressed in the fore-cited Statutes of 25. H. 3. c. 19. 27. H. 8. c. 15. and mentioned in the premises Therefore they neither can challenge nor pretend to claime any other but such a limited and confined authority the rather because they are assembled to such meetings as our Assembly is now onely as advisers and assistants not as Judges or Law-givers Therefore the keeping of them to the fore-mentioned limits can neither be an infringement or eclipsing of their just priviledges or Christian liberty Fourthly because every particular Christian is to try the spirits doctrines and determinations of Ministers by the Scriptures whether they are of God or not and to beware yea judge of false Teachers doctrines and no wayes to receive them as the Marginall Texts abundantly evidence and all Orthodox Divines assert Much more then are Christian Princes the chief Defenders of the Christian faith to judge and determine of them therefore to give particular directions to and in all Synods Councels how to proceed and what to treat of for suppressing false Teachers Heresies Schisms Errours advancing Religion Truth unity and sincerity of Gods Worship within their territories and Churches Fifthly because every soule as well Bishops Ministers and all other Ecclesiasticall persons as temporall subjects is and ought to be subject to Christian Princes and the highest temporall powers who are to provide for their spirituall as well as their temporall welfare Therefore they ought to be regulated and directed by them when assembled by their Writs in Councels or Synods for their spirituall good SECT 3. Of Confirming Ratifying the Canons Decrees and Resolutions of Councells Synods by Christian Princes Peers Parliaments before they become valid or obligatory Of the Presence and Power of Christian Princes Nobles and other Lay-men in Councells That many or most Councells Synods in ancient and latter times especially in England were in truth meere Parliaments wherein Christian Princes Nobles Senators and Lay-men met and voted as well as Bishops and other Ecclesiasticall persons And that no Canons Lawes Articles concerning Gods Worship Religion Church-Government Ceremonies were ever lawfully prescribed or imposed on any Subjects of our Realme but

Henry the first summoned another Councell about Easter ad Curiam suam apud Londoniam cunctis Majoribus Regni having assembled to his Court at London not only his Archbishops and Bishops but all the great men of his Kingdome to suppresse the Marriages of Priests contrary to the Canons of the Councell of London Anno 1102. For the extirpation of which evill the King Regali authoritate atque potentia fultos roboravit by his royall Authority and power ratified those Canons and thereupon Anselmo Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas elect Archbishop of Yorke and all the Bishops of England Decreed in the presence of the said Glorious King Henry Assensu omnium Baronum suorum with the assent of all his Barons that Priests and Deacons should live chastly and keepe no Women in their Houses but those who were of their neare kindred as the Councell of Nice had defined this Canon being ratified both by the King and Peeres in Parliament to make it obligatory In these three Councells under Archbishop Anselme a great stickler for the Popes and Clergies Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction we see the King and great men of the Realme were present and ratified the Decrees and Canons therein concluded to make them valid and binding Anno 1114 King Henry the first commanded all the Bishops and Nobles of the Kingdome to meete together at his Court whereupon a rumour was spred over all the Land that the Archbishop of Canterbury was about to celebrate a generall Councell in presence of the Popes Legate and that he would promulge some new things worthy so great a Councell for the reformation of Christian Religion in every order On the sixteenth of October they all met together in the Kings Pallace at Westminster where the multitude which assembled together at last perceived that the tumour of celebrating a Councell and of the reformation of Christianity was nothing so There Anselme in the behalfe of the Pope brought a letter directed from him to the King and Bishops wherein hee taxeth the King for conferring Bishopricks claiming that right as belonging to Peters See for determining Ecclesiasticall matters and the affaires of Bishops without his or his Legats privity which belong only to the Apostolike Sea for stopping appeales to Rome as also for calling and keeping Synodall Councells without his privity when as it was unanimously ratified in the great councell of Nice consisting of 318 Bishops that no Councells ought to be summoned or kept without the privity of the Bishop of Rome and for translating Bishops without his consent Which letters much offending the Kings mind he sent his Nuntioes by common consent to Rome to give the Pope an answer and justifie his proceedings herein as warranted by his Royall Prerogative The same yeare upon the thirteenth of Aprill there was an Assembly held at Salisbury of the Bishops Abbots and great men of all England the Kings Writ compelling them to appeare there where the King appointed William his sonne lawfully begotten to be heire to the Crowne to which all the Nobles condescended and presently tooke an oath of Allegeance to him to be his men But the Bishops and Abbotts swore only and gave their faith that if he survived his Father they would forthwith conferre both the Kingdome and Crowne of the Kingdome on him without any controversie or exception In August following one Anselm the Archbish of Canterburyes kinsman came from Rome to King Henry being then in Normandie bringing the Popes Letters which authorized him to exercise the Office of the Popes Legate here in England which in a short time being knowne in the Kingdome of England the Bishops Abbots and Nobles admiring at it assembled together at London about it and certaine other things the Queen being present to discusse the matter Communi Concilio in a common Councell whereupon they all accorded to send the Archbishop of Canterbury whom it most concerned to the King to acquaint him with the ancient custome of the Kingdome and the liberty thereof and if he thought fit that he should goe likewise to Rome to annihilate This Novelty Who comming accordingly to the King found Anselme there expecting his passage into England to exercise his Legatine office there But King Henry the first not suffering any prejudice to happen to the ancient Customes of England kept him from entring into England that not without presidents For in the first yeare of this Kings Raigne Guido Archbishop of Vienna came into England having as he said the power Legatine of all England by the precept and authoritie of the Apostolicall See which being heard of throughout England was admired by all men all knowing that it was a thing unheard of in Britaine that any man except the Archbishop of Canterbury should take upon him to supply the Popes Apostolicall turnes Wherefore as he came so he returned being received as a Legate by no man nor exercising the Office of a Legate in any thing After this one Peter having obtained from the Pope a power Legatine over England Ireland France and the Iland of the Orcades at the same hereof all England was astonished the King sent the Bishop of Saint Davids and another Clergie man beyond Sea to conduct him to him enjoyning them that after his entrance into England they should not suffer him to enter into any Churches or Monasteries to lodge or eate Being brought to the King and honourably received by him having declared the cause of his comming the King answered him that hee had now no leasure to minde so great a businesse and that his Legatine power could not be established and ratified but by the connivance and assent of the Bishops Abbots Nobles and the Assembly of the whole Kingdome in Parliament moreover hee affirmed that he could not by any meanes willingly loose any of the Customes of his Country granted him by the Apostolicall See so long 〈…〉 lived whereof this was one of the chiefest and greatest that hee made the kingdome of England free from all Legatine power Whereunto Peter affented and promised to doe his endeavour to have this priviledge preserved and augmented And so being gratified with rich presents Ille qui Legati officio fungi in toto Britania venerat nimirum ab omni officio tali cum ingenti Pompa v●a qua venerat extra Angliam a Rege missus est writes Eadmerus of him by way of derision So little jurisdiction had the Popes Legates here in England in those dayes who became an intollerable vexation oppression to it in succeeding Ages in the Reignes of King John Henry the third and others In the Councell of Westminster under Iohn de Crema the Popes lecherous Legate Ann. 1125. there were 17. Canons made ab omnibus confirmata and confirmed by all there present to wit by 20. Bishops 40. Abbots Cuminumera Cleri Populi multitudine with an innumerable multitude of the Clergie and people who were present at it as the Continuer

Edward the 6. his Reigne are most punctuall and pegnant evidences hereof as namely 1. Edw. 6. ch 11. For administring the Sacrament in both kindes therein proved necessary by sundry Texts of Scripture and punishing such persons as shall unreverently speake against the Sacrament with Temporall and Ecclesiasticall censures ch 2. concerning the election and creation of Bishops by the Kings Letters Patents and what Processe and Seales they shall use declaring that they have no Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction but meerely from the King ch 9. For uniting certaine Churches within the City of Yorke ch 12. which abolisheth Sanctuaries and Clergy in some cases 2. and 3. E. 6. ch 1. For the Vniformity of service and the administration of the Sacraments throughout the Realme ch 13. For the true payment of Tythes ch 19. For abstinence from flesh ch 20. Concerning Recusants ch 23. For positive Lawes made against the Mariage of Priests ch 23. The repeale of a Statute touching Precontracts of Mariage 3. and 4. E. 6. ch 10. For the abolishing and putting away of diverse superstitious Popish Books and Images chap. 11. That the Kings Majesty may nominate and appoint 32. persons halfe Clergy-men and halfe Laymen to peruse and make Ecclesiasticall Lawes ch 12. For the manner of Ordaining Ecclesiasticall Ministers and Consecrating Bishops ch 15. Against fond and phantasticall Prophecies 5. and 6. E. 6. ch 1. For the uniformity of Common Prayer and administration of the Sacraments ch 3. For the keeping of Holy-dayes and Fasting dayes ch 4. Against fighting and quarelling in Churches and Church-Yards ch 12. For the lawfulnesse of Priests Mariage and legitimation of their children chap. 13. Touching Religious persons and c. 23. Against Vsurie All these are clearely Ecclesiasticall Acts yet made by Parliament The Statutes in Queene Maries Reigne though of a different Religion from her brother and a zealous Pontifician sufficiently evidence the jurisdiction of our Princes and Parliaments in matters of the Church and Religion witnesse 1. Mar. Parl. 1. Ses 2. Chap. 2. Repealing diverse acts-made touching Religion in King Edward the 6. his Raigne and setting up Masse and the old Lyturgies againe chap. 2. Against Offendors of Preachers and other Ministers in the Church or Church-Yard or interrupting them in their Sermons or saying Masse under paine of imprisonment fines and Ecclesiasticall censures chap. 15. For re-edifying the parish Church of Saint Ellins in Stangate 1. Mariae Par. 2. c. 1. Declaring That the Regall power of this Realme is in the Queenes Majesty as fully and absolutely as ever it was in any of her most Noble Progenitors Kings of this Realme chap. 3. Being an Act of Repeale of two severall acts in the 7. yeare of King Edward the 6. touching the dissolution of the Bishoprick of Durham Chap. 9. Touching Ordinances Rules c. in Cathedrall Churches and Schooles c. 10. Repealing a statute for the uniting of the parish Churches of Onger and Greensted in the County of Essex 1. and 2. Phil. and Mary chap. 6. For the reviving of three Statutes made for the punishment Of Heresies and that with forseiture of Lands imprisonment and death in some cases chap. 8. Intituled an Act repealing all Statutes Articles and provisions made against the See Apostolike of Rome since the 20. yeare of King H. 8. and restoring the Bishops with their Courts offices the Pope himselfe to their former usurped jurisdictions in England ratifying this Popes very Bulles and dispensations to make them valid and setling the whole affaires of the Church of England chap. 9. 20. For the punishing of traiterous Sermons and Prayers against the Queene chap. 17. Concerning leases of some spirituall persons and 2. and 3. Phil. and Mary chap. 4. For the extinguishment of first fruits c. All Ecclesiasticall Statutes In Queen Elizabeths happy Raigne there are sundry Statutes abundantly manifesting her own and the Parliaments supreame Iurisdictions and Legislative power in matters of Religion Church-government Discipline c. as namely 1 Eliz. c. 1. An Act restoring to the Crowne the ancient Jurisdiction OVER THE STATE ECCLESIASTICALL SPIRITVALL and abolishing all fortaigne power repugnant to the same which gives the Queen her heires and successors all manner of Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction in and over all Ecclesiasticall persons and causes and power to correct redresse and reform all manner of HERESIE SCHISME ERRORS ABVSES OFFENCES ECCLESIASTICALL prescribes the oath of Supremacy which all are to take and most Independents have formerly taken wherein they do utterly testifie and declare in their consciences that the Queen and her Successours are the onely supreame Governours of this Realme and other their Dommions as well IN ALL SPIRITVALL OR ECCLESIASTICALL THINGS OR CAVSES as temporall c. which jurisdiction of theirs they sweare to their power to assist and defend Which oath if any refuse to take hee shall forseit all his Ecclesiasticall promotions and temporall offices This Act likewise abolisheth the Popes jurisdiction under pain of a praemunire and other mulcts against the maintainers of it It determines what shall be adjudged HERESIE and what not namely Only such matter and cause as heretofore hath been determined ordered and adjudged to be heresie by the authority of the Canonicall Scriptures o● by the first foure generall-Councels or any of them or by any other generall Councell wherein the same was declared heresie by the expresse and plain words of the Canonicall Scripture or such as hereafter shall be ordered IVDGED OR DETERMINED TO BE HERESIE BY THE HIGH COVRT OF PARLIAMENT OF THIS REALME with the assent of the Clergy in their Convocation to wit by way of assistance and advice cumulatively not negatively as if their assent were simply necessary So as by this Act the Parliament is made the sole proper Iudge what is or shal be reputed punished as heresie what not how it shal be punished the highest point of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction Ch. 2. For the uniformity of Common prayer and service in the Church and administration of the Sacraments enjoyning conformity under temporall and Ecclesiasticall punishments is an irrefragable proofe of the Parliaments Ecclesiasticall power in all Church matters and 1 Eliz. c. 3. 4. 6. 5 Eliz. c. 1. For the assurance of the Queens royall power over all States and Subjects within her Highnesse Dominions ch 23. For the due executing of Writs de Excommunicato capiendo ch 28. For translating of the Bible and divine Service into the Welch tongue 8 Eliz. c. 1. Declaring the manner of making and Corsecrating the Archbishops Bishops and Ministers of this Realm to be good lawfull and perfect ratifying the Booke of common Prayer and of Ordination together with the Queens Soveraigne Ecclesiasticall Authority 13 Eliz. c. 2. Against the bringing in and putting in execution of Bulls and other instruments of the See of Rome chap. 8. Against Usury ch 19. concerning Dilapidations c. 12. To reforme certain disorders touching Ministers of the Church ratifying the 39.

there quoted resolving in these positive termes Soliti sunt ab omni aeuo Reges Christianissimi pro ratione rerum quae in Regno suo accidunt habere Synodos aut Concilia Provincialia aut Nationalia in quibus inter alia ad statum Regni pertinontia agitur etiam de Rebus ordinem Disciplinam Ecclesiarum Regni sui spectantibus Unde Regulae innumerae Capitula Leges Ordinationes Pragmaticae Sanctiones eorum Nominibus inscriptae prodierunt Yea their Franciscus Victoria holds that at this day in certain cases a generall Councell may be called against the Popes minde by the Emperor and Christian Princes whether hee will or no. But although some Parasites of the Popes universall Monarchy endeavour to entitle him to this prerogative royall of Christian Princes to summon Synods and Councels contrary to the Resolutions of these and infinite other Popish Authors and the practise of most popish Realmes yet none of them entitle any other Bishops or Prelates to it but the Pope alone unlesse it be by some speciall derivation from the Pope as his Legate so that Bishops cannot claime this power by any immediate inherent right but by a dirivative power onely either from the Pope or Christian Princes and from the Pope no English Prelates Ministers can or dare derive it Thirdly to proceed to our own English Synods and Councels wee shall finde that the right of summoning them and of our Convocations hath alwayes beene an indubitable Prerogative of our Christian Kings or Parliaments which I shall manifest First by presidents Secondly by Parliamentory resolutions Thirdly by the Doctrine Articles and Writers of our Church Fourthly by the determination of King James King Charles and our late Convocations To begin first with Presidents both before and since the Conquest The great Synod held at verolam Anno 446 to suppresse the Pelagian heresie with another great Councell after that Anno 449 to like purpose and the Councell of Wales Anno 465 were summoned by the Kings and Peoples joint assents who together with the Clergie were present and voted in them The Synod of Worcester and at Augustines Oke under Augustine the first Arch-bishop of Canterbury Anno 603. was called Ethelberti Regis ope auxilio by the assistance or summons of King Ethelbert adjutorio usus Edelberti Regis write some So was the Councell held at Canterbury Anno 605 in which both the Clergy and people were present The Synod of Streneshalch An. 664. under Oswy King of Northumberland and Alchfrid his Son who weee present at it was summoned by their appointment to decide the controversie concerning the time of Easter and other differences Anno 693 King Alfrick Synodum Episcoporum convocari fecit caused a Synod of Bishops to be called together Anno 694 a great Councell was summoned to meet at Becanceld by King Withred who sate President therein praecepit convocari concilium who likewise assembled and sate President in the grand Councell of Berghamsted Anno 697. About the yeare 714 there was a great Councell of the Bishops Princes Nobles Earles and of all the wise-men Elders and people of the Realme under King Ina per praeceptum Regis Ina by the precept of this King An. 724 the Synod of Northumberland was conveened authoritate gratia Osredi by the authority and favour of King Osred The famous Councell of Clovesho about the yeare 748 was assembled Ethelbaldi regis Merciorum auxilio who sate President therein and in a former Councell there held Anno 742. The Councell of Calchuth An. 787 was congregated by Offa King of Mercians and Kenulfe King of West-Saxons who together with their Bishops and Elders of the Land senioribus terrae were present at it The Councell of Clyffe An. 800 was convented by King Cenulfe his authoritie and assent A Synod was assembled by King Edward the elder about the yeare 905 Rex praedictam Synodum congregavit write the marginall Authors An. 948. a Councell and Parliament was summoned at London per regium edictum by Aedred his royall edict the King and his Nobles as well as the Bishops being present at it The Councell of Enham An. 1009. ab Ethelredo rege edictum was called by King Ethelred The Councell of Winchester An. 1070. was summoned and celebrated by the procurement of William the Conquerour Rege procurante so was the Synod at Westminster An. 1075. Rex tandem Williesmus de negotiis agere constituens Ecclesiasticis An. 1075. apud Westmon●sterium Synodum coegit This being the undoubted right of Kings in those dayes caused Archbishop Anselme though a great stickler for the Popes and Prelates supremacie An. 1093. to move King William Rufus to command Councels to be revived after the ancient manner Jube ait si placet Concilia ex antiquo usu renovari quae perperam acta sunt in medium revocari who after held a Councell at Westminster An. 1102. by King Henry 1. his assent ipso annuente The Councell at Westminster held by the Popes ●echerous Legate John de Crema An. 1125. was assembled Regis licencia by the Kings owne licence and the Councell of London An. 1129. summoned by this King The Councell at Oxford against the Publicans was called by King Henry the second his Writ Rex Episcopale praecepit concilium congregari writes Neubrigensis So the Synod of Cassels in Ireland for setling and reforming that Church was congregated by King Henry the second his authoritie and command The Councell held by Hugo Cardinalis the Popes Legat at London under the same King An. 1176. was favore regio adjutus called by the Kings favour and assistance The Councell of London under Otho the Popes Legate An. 1237. was summoned by King Henry the third his authoritie and consent And all Synods Councels Convocations from that time till this present have ever been summoned by the Kings speciall Writs for the most part as is evident by Matthew Parkers Antiquitates Ecclesiae Britannicae and by these ensuing ancient Presidents following remaining upon Record Breve pro Convocat ' habenda apud Lincoln Anno Dom. 1321. Ed. Reg. 16. Convocatio inchoata vigore brevis regii die Lunae proxim post fastum S. Sabiani Sebastiani An. Dom. 1369. Alia inchoat ' eodem An. 21. die Januarii Convocat ' inchoat ' vigore brevis die Lunae proxim ' post festum Pent ' An. 1376. Convocat ' inchoat ' vigore brevis die Lunae 9. die Novembris An. 1377. Convocat ' inchoat ' 7. Maii An. Dom. 1382. quoad process contra Haereticos Convocat ' inchoat ' 18. Novemb. An. Dom. 1382. continuat ' ad 6. diem Janu. prox ' sequènt ' Convocat ' inchoat ' 2 Decemb. An. 1383. contin ' ad 4. diem ejusdem mensis Convocat ' inchoat ' 20. Maii An. Dom. 1384. contin ' ad festum Pent ' sequent Convocat

Controversia 3 de Conci●●s Quaest 2. p. 577. to 585. Doctor Willets Synopsis Papismi Controversi 3. Concerning generall Councels Quaestion 2. Doctor John White his way to the true Church sect 29. n. 28. p. 111. Master Rogers his Analysis on the 21. Article Proposition 1. with sundry others whom I pretermit subscribe and justifie this truth against all Romish opposites And if these be not sufficient all the Reformed Churches in their several confessions registred in the Harmony of confessions cited by Master Rogers in his Analysis of the 21 Article with the whole Classe of their learned Writers unanimously resolve That the power of calling Councels Convocations Synods belongs not to Popes or Prelates but only to Christian Emperors Kings Princes and other chief temporall Magistrates which our late famous King James in the last place in his Letters Patents prefixed before the Canons and Ecclesiasticall Constitutions made in Convocation Anno 1603. ratifies to the full affirming that the Synod and Convocation at that time held was and ought to bee summoned and called only by vertue of his royall Writ The like is affirmed by our present Soveraigne King Charles in his Declaration before the 39. Articles and in his Patents Commissions licenses for making the last new Canons 1640. and resolved in the first Canon thereof From this 1. Proposition thus plentifully ratified by uncontrolable Presidents and publike Authorities of whole Synods Parliaments States in all ages which infinitely over-ballance the inconsiderable rash opinions of any private men I shall deduce these Consectaries 1. That the chiefest care of defending propagating the true Religion suppressing errors haeresies schismes vices and enacting Laws Canons for this end for the Churches peace Government and advancement of Gods true Worship belongs to Christian Princes or supreme temporall Magistrates and is an essentiall part of their duty because the right and trust of calling Synods Councels upon all such occasions is thus originally vested in them 2. That Synods Councels are very useful necessary profitable to the Churches of Christ if rightly ordered else God himself all Christian kingdoms states Churches would not have invested Kings supream civill Magistrates with such a power of convening them nor all Christian Kings Emperors but made so frequent use of this their power not onely without opposition but even with publike approbation yea such hath been the necessity and expediency of Synods and Councels in all Christian Churches in all ages That the generall Councell of Nice An. 363 the Councell of Antioch Can. 20. the first Councell of Constantinople Can. 3. the Councel of Africke Can. 18. the Councell of Chalcedon Can. 19. the third Councell of Toledo under King Reccaredus An. 600. cap. 18. the fourth Councell of Toledo under King Sisenandus An. 6●1 the Greeke Synods collected by Martin Bishop of Bracara cap. 18. the second Councell of Arelat Can. 2. the third at the same place Can. 1. and the fourth Can. 37. the second Synod of Towers Can. 1. the fifth Councell of Orleans cap. 11. the Councell of Hereford under King Egfred An. 670. the sixth Councell of Constantinople Can. 8. the Councell of Antricum Can. 7. the Councell of Mascon Can. 20. the Synod of Soissons under King Childeric the Councell under King Pepin at the Pallace of Vernis An. 755. cap. 4. the Councell of Paris under Lewis and Lothaire An. 829. the Councell of Meaux An. 845. cap. 32. yea the great Councell of Basill An. 1331. with sundry other Councels Decree that a Synod or Councell shall be kept twice or thrice or at the least once every yeare at a certaine time and place in every Province That all Bishops and others unlesse hindered by sicknesse or other inevitable occasions should be present at it and not depart from it till all businesses were ended and the Councell determined under paine of Excommunication that none should interrupt not keep back any necessary members from them Therefore certainly they are both expedient and necessary for the Church not uselesse antichristian diabolicall and pernicious to the Church as some Papists Arminians Socinians hertofore and Independents now scandalously ignorantly if not maliciously deeme them Sect. 2. THat Bishops and Clergie-men when assembled in Councels Synods and Convocations by Christian Princes and Magistrates have alwayes been limited and directed by them not onely for the time and place of their meeting but likewise for the manner and matter of their debates and proceedings having no power liberty to debate or determine any thing but what was first prescribed them by their summoners or by their speciall Licence first obtained With a touch of Princes and Laymens presiding judging voting in Synods and Councels Secondly As Bishops and Clergy-men cannot summon Councels or Convocations not yet assembled together in them but by the Princes and supreme temporall Magistrates authority who alwayes appointed both the time and place of their meeting continuance and dissolution as all ages Authors attest so when they are lawfully met in Councels they cannot debate determine any points of faith nor yet frame any Ecclesiasticall Canons Lawes Constitutions in them but by the Princes or Magistrates licence direction that summoned them who have always both abroad and at home prescribed them either in generall or speciall termes what things they should debate treat of and conclude in their Synods confining them to such particulars for the determination and ordering whereof they were convened as well as to the time and place of their assembling This is evident by sundry Presidents The first famous generall Councell of Nice and the Bishops therein assembled were thus licensed and limited by Constantine the great who fate President in it as Eusebius with others manifest at large The Bishops assembled by him in the Synod of Tyrus were limited likewise by him how to proceed and what to treat of as appears by his letters to them wherein after he had exhorted them to peace and unity he chargeth them not to delay but to define the present controversies with al earnest endeavour within those fitting bounds he there prescribed telling them That he had sent Dionysius the Consull to admonish them of all things they were to do and who ought to be present at their Synod Maximè vero ut idem animadversor sit custos conservandae aequalitatis ordinis but especially that he should be an observer and keeper of that aequability and order which he had prescribed to be observed in that Synod The Bishops assembled by Constantius his Edict in the Councell of Ariminum most humbly requested his Majesty of his gracious favour and wonted clemency to grant them license and lawfull favour firmely to persevere in those things which their ancestors had decreed and that nothing might be diminished or added unto the old and ancient decrees In the Councell held at Seleucia summoned by Constantius precept it was commanded by this

And when in the first times of Christs Church Prelates used this power 't was therefore onely because in those dayes they had no Christian Kings And it was then so onely used as in times of persecution that is with supposition is case it were required of submitting their very lives unto the very laws and commands even of those pagan Princes that they might not so muchas seem to disturb their civil Government which Christ came to confirm but by no meanes to undermine CHARLES by the Grace of GOD c. Now for asmuch as the said Lord Arch-bishop of Canterbury President of the said Convocation for the province of Canterbury and the said Arch-bishop of Yorke President of the said Convocation for the Province of Yorke and others the said Bishops Deans Arch-deacons Chapters and Colleges with the rest of the Clergie having met together respectively at the time and places before mentioned respectively and then and there by vertue of Our said authority granted unto them treated of concluded and agreed upon certaine Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions to the end and purpose by Vs limited and prescribed unto them have thereupon offered and presented the same unto Vs most humbly desiring Vs to give our Royall assent unto the same according to form of a certain Statute or Act of Parliament made in that behalfe in the 25th yeer of the Reign of King Henry the eighth and by Our said Prerogative Royall and Supream authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall to ratifie by Our Letters Patents under Our great Seal of England and to confirm the same The Title and Tenour of them being word for word as ensueth Wee of Our Princely inclination and Royall care for the maintenance of the present Estate and government of the Church of England by the Lawes of this Our Realme now setled and established having diligently with great contentment and comfort read and considered of all these their said Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions agreed upon as is before expressed And finding the same such as Wee are perswaded will be very profitable not only to Our Clergy but to the whole Church of this Our Kingdome and to all the true Members of it if they be well observed Have therefore for Vs. Our Heires and lawfull Successours of Our especiall grace certaine knowledge and meere motion given and by th●se presents doe give Our Royall Assent according to the forme of the said Statute or Act of Parliament aforesaid to all and every of the said Canons Orders Ordinances and constitutions and to all and every thing in them contained as they are before written And furthermore We do not onely by our said Prerogative Royall and supreme Authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall ratifie confirme and establish by these Our Letters Patents the said Canons Ordinances and Constitutions and all and every thing in them contained as is aforesaid but do likewise propound publish and straightly injoyne and command by Our said Authority and by these Our Letters Patents the same to be diligently observed executed and equally kept by all Our loving Subjects of this Our Kingdome both within the Provinces of Canterbury and Yorke in all points wherein they do or may concerne every or any of them according to this Our will and pleasure hereby signified and expressed And that likewise for the better observation of them every Minister by what name or title soever he be called shall in the Parish Church or Chappell where he hath charge read all the said Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions at all such times and in such manner as is prescribed in the said Canons or any of them The Booke of the said Canons to be provided at the charge of the Parish betwixt this and the Feast of S. Michael the Arch-angell next ensuing straightly charging and commanding all Archbishops Bishops and all other that exercise any Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction within this Realme every man in his place to see and procure so much as in them lyeth all and every of the same Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions to be in all points duly observed not sparing to execute the penalties in them severally mentioned upon any that shall wittingly or wilfully break or neglect to observe the same as they tender the honour of God the peace of the Church the tranquillity of the Kingdome and their duties and service to Vs their King and Soveraigne In witnesse whereof We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patents Witnesse Our Selfe at Westminster the thirtieth day of Iune in the sixteenth yeare of Our Reigne By all these Patents with others of like nature directed to all our Convocations by our Kings in former and latter times by Our present Parliaments manner of calling limiting directing our present Assembly of Divines in all particulars of their proceedings and debates appointing some eminent Members of both Houses to sit and consult together with them and to certifie all their results and determinations to them to be considered rectified rejected or approved by both Houses as they in their wisdomes shall see cause and by the fore-cited premises it is most apparent that the Arch-bishops Bishops Clergy and Convocation of England assembled Synodically together much lesse then any particular Independent Minister or Congregation notwithstanding all their late printed vaunts of their Ecclesiasticall soveraigne Iurisdiction by divine right and power to prescribe and enjoyne Visitation-Oaths Articles new Rites and Ceremonies of their owne Inventions both unto Ministers and people which they seconded with their practice to the insufferable grievance and oppression of the people are so farre from having any lawfull right power and authority to make prescribe any Ecclesiasticall Injunctions Canons Lawes Rites Ceremonies or forme of Government to any of his Majesties Subjects that though they be lawfully assembled together in a Provinciall or Nationall Synod by the Kings owne Writ or Parliaments command yet they cannot legally or of right so much as treat debate consult of any Ecclesiasticall affaires without a speciall licence first obtained from the King or Parliament and then only of such generals or particulars as they shall prescribe them much lesse compile enact promulge impose or execute any Ecclesiasticall Canons Lawes Injunctions Ordinances Oaths without their speciall approbation and ratification of them by their speciall Letters Patents under the great Seale and by Act of Parliament too as hath been lately resolved by unanimous consent of both Houses in the case of the condemned new booke of Canons The like I have proved of the Bishops Clergie Councels in other Christian Empires and Kingdomes Where then is that immense Episcopall jurisdiction authority preheminence superiority power in point of dominion over and beyond that of ordinary Ministers which our Lordly Prelats lately so much boasted of and pleaded for as due unto them by no lesse then divine institution if we may beleeve them not by the Grace Patents Grants or connivence of Christian Princes Let these swelling ambitious Grandees

HERETIQVES limiting the maner of proceeding against them defining what shal be heresie how it shall be punished and abridging the Authority of the Bishops and Canon Law ch 16. concernes Pluralities ch 19. containes the submission of the Clergy Convocation to the King declares the Kings supremacy in causes Ecclesiasticall the impotency of the Clergy or Convocation to make or promulge any Canons or Ecclesiasticall constituti●ns or to debate any thing in Convocation without his Royall Lycence and approbation The Nullity and invalidity of the Canon Law abolisheth all appeales to Rome and Authorizeth 32. persons whereof halfe to be of the Clergy the other halfe of THE LAITY to survay the Canon Law and to compile a body of the Canon Law to be authorized by the King under his Great Seale by vertue of this Act for to be the only Canon Law to be used within this Realme Chap. 20. takes away the payment of any Annates o● first fruits to the Bishop of Rome nullifies his usurped power and Buls settles the forme of electing and consecrating Archbishops and Bishops within this Realme and plentifully manifests the Kings and Parliaments Jurisdictions in Ecclesiasticall affaires chap. 21. doth the like exonerating the Kings Subjects from all exactions and Impositions heretofore payed to the Sea of Rome and enabling the Archbishop of Canterbury and his Officers to grant all Licences and dispensations within the Realme which were formerly granted at Rome only The Statute is worthy perusall consideration fully demonstrating the power of the Parliament in Church affaires 26. H. 8. c. 1. declares the Kings Highnesse to be supreme head of the Church of England under Christ making it a part of his Royall Title and to have Ecclesiasticall authority to redresse and reforme all Errors Heresies and abuses in the Church punishable by any spirituall or ecclesiasticall Law Chap. 3. enacts The payment of the first fruits of all Dignities Benefices promotions spirituall and tenthes to the King and his Heires abolishing the Popes usurpations and authority herein ch 13. abolisheth sanctuarie in cases of High Treason ch 14. Authorizeth the nomination and consecration of suffragan Bishops in sundry places of this Realme and both creates and limits their authority chap. 15. takes away some exactions of spirituall men within the Archdeaconry of Richmond 27. H. 8. c. 8. limits that the Kings spirituall Subjects shall pay no Tithes whiles they are in their first fruits ch 15. authorizeth the King to nominate 32. persons halfe of the Clergy the other of the Laity for the perusall and making of Ecclesiasticall Lawes and manifests the Convocations invalidity to make such lawes or Canons ch 19. Limiteth and abolisheth Sanctuaries and sanctuary persons ch 20. containes an Order touching the paying of Tithes throughout the Realme ch 21. Limits the maner of payment of Tythes within the City of London ch 27. suppresseth divers Monasteries Priories and Religious Houses vesteth their revenues in the King and erects the Court of Augmentations 28. H. 8. ch 10. extinguisheth thes authority of the Bishop of Rome prescribes an Oath of abjuration of it and Popery together with the Popes usurpations and excellently sets forth the Kings supreamacy the Parliaments authority in matters ecclesiasticall as you may read in the Act worthy perusall ch 11. enacts Restitution of the first fruits in time of vacation to the next incumbent ch 13. compells spirituall persons to residence upon their livings ch 16. Releaseth such as have obtained pretended Licences and dispensations from the Sea of Rome 31. H 8. c. 6. enables such as were Religious persons to purchase lands to sue and be sued in al maner of Actions which they were disabled formerly to do by the Common Canon Law ch 9. Enables the King to make Bishops by his Letters Patents only and to erect new Bishopricks which he did ch 13. disolves all Monasteries and religious Houses and vests them in the King wherein you may behold much of the Kings and Parliaments power in Church businesses ch 14. For abolishing of diversity of opinions in matters of Religion most fully and exactly demonstrates the Kings and Parliaments jurisdictions in matters of Religion as the whole Act sufficiently manifests though the Articles therein defined were erronious and the Act too cruell and bloudy 32. H. 8. cap. 8. provides for the true payment of Tythes and offerings chap. 10. containes the punishment of incontinent Priests and of women offending with them ch 12. concernes Sanctuaries and the priviledges of Churches and Church-Yards ch 15. prescribes the manner of proceeding against Heretickes and impugners of the Act for abolishing of enormious opinions in Christian Religion chap. 23 24. concernes Accounts of Bishops and subsidies granted by the Clergie chap. 25. Dispences the Kings marriage with the Lady Iane chap. 24. Dissolves the Hospitalls of Saint Johns of Ierusalem in England and Ireland for supporting and maintaining the supremacy and jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome contrary to their duty and Allegiance chap. 26. Intitled An act concerning true opinions and Declaration of Christs Religion is most pregnant to our present purpose which you may peruse chap. 38. Concerning precontracts of marriages and degrees of consanguinity is likewise a most punctuall Act for the Kings and Parliaments Ecclesiasticall power and chap 44. 45 47. good evidences of it 33. H. 8. chap. 15. 27 28 29 30 31 32. Enabling Religious persons to sue and bee sued severing the Bishopricks of CHESTER and Isle of MAN from the jurisdiction of CANTERBURY to the See of Yorke making the Church of Whitgate a Popish Church by it selfe and severing it from the Parish of Over which I wish our Independents to observe and to learne from this and other Acts that no new Churches or Parishes can be erected legally but by act of Parliament which none of their Churches are 34. and 35. H. 8. c. 1. intituled An act for The advancement of true Religion and For the abolishing of the contrary is most pertinent to our purpose and c. 15. 17 19 35. H. 8. c. 9. for ratification of the Kings stile and Title of Defender of the Faith and supreame head of the Church of England and Ireland ch 6. Concerning the qualification of the Statute of the 6. Articles c. 16. concerning the examination of the Canon Lawes by 32. persons halfe of the Clergie and halfe of the temporalty to be named by the Kings Majesty during his life to compile a body of the Canon Law to bee used in the Realme 37. H. 8. c. 4. 12. but especially ch 17. That Doctors of civill Law may execute Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction though Laymen and married a Law worthy reading and chap. 21. For the union of Churches not exceeding the value of 5l which could not be done but by Act of Parliament are all most pregnant evidences of the Kings and Parliaments indubitable Ecclesiasticall jurisdictions in matters of Discipline Religion Church-government and all Church affaires whatsoever The Statutes made in King

from Laity and Clergy Protestants of all sorts as well Presbyterians a● Independents yea from Antinomians Anabaptists Brownists and Schismatickes of all sorts to reforme Religion especially Church-government set up the Ordinances and worship of God in their purity and settle all matters of Doctrine Discipline Government by Act of Parliament as neere as might be to the word by the assistance of a godly learned Assembly of Divines the daily calling of Ministers of all sorts upon the Parliam to pursue this work the prayers of all piously affected to Almighty God both publickly and privately to assist them extraordinarily from Heaven in this great weighty spirituall building together with the Assemblies submission of all their determinations to the Parliaments alteration approbation or rejection and the Independents own addresses Petitions late tender of the reasons of their dissent from the Assembly to them is to my weak approbation a most irrefragable Argument and publicke acknowledgement of their undoubted right and Legislative power in all Ecsiasticall affaires of what nature and quality soever and that all parties ought readily to submit to their just determinations in point of practise and obedience in all these particulars whereof they have thus unanimously and importunately from time to time petitioned them to be Iudges There is no party or Sectary whatsoever which hath formerly petitioned them in this kinde but would preach and write for universall obedience to that forme of Church-government the Parliament should settle and establish provided it suited fully with their particular way which they judge the truest and most consonant to Scripture and if they should once authorize or settle the Independents hitherto concealed way I am confident they would all preach universall obedience submission to it under pain of contumacy haeresie schisme and the severest penalties Ecclesiasticall or civill since they write as much in effect already in their Pamphlets and that this their way may reasonably yea and upon higher terms then of reason be thought in time that it cannot but overthrow all other sorts of Ecclesiasticall Government and stand up it selfe in their stead If then every side be of this minde in case the Parliament determine for their party then why should not all be willingly concluded satisfied with what they shall rightly determine be it for or against their way since they have all appealled to their judgements alike which must either be altogether fruitlesse and un-obliging to any or els indifferently binde all to voluntary or enforced conformity Add to this that all or most of our opposites in this point of Parliaments juri●diction and Legislative power in Ecclesiasticall matters have freely submitted themselves to the Protestation Vow and solemne Nationall Covenant imposed and prescribed by the Parliament which enjoyne them under paine of highest Perjury with their lives and estates to maintain and defend the ancient rights and priviledges of Parliament and this we now debate as well as any other That they have generally acknowledged and obeyed the Parliaments Iurisdiction in prescribing publick monethly Fasts and others upon speciall occasions with publicke dayes of thanksgiving together with their power and Ordinances to suppresse all prophanations of the Lords day with many other abuses Sects Errors in Church affaires which hath for ever estopped them to quarrell or deny the Parliaments Legislative Iurisdiction in any other particulars of Church-government Discipline or Religion which suite not with their humors or opinions I shall conclude this point concerning Our own Parliaments Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction with the determination of our incomparable Jewell which hath more reall worth and value in it then the contrary opinion of thousands of opposites being alwayes hitherto reputed the received Doctrine of the Church of England and with Bishop Bilson a very solid Writer This reverend learned Jewell in his Apologie hath this passage concerning the establishment of the Protestant Religion among us That the matter hath been treated in open PARLIAMENT with long consultation and before a notable SYNOD and CONVOCATION Master ●●●ding his Antagonist An●●gonist answering thereunto just as some Independen●● and others who protest they have abjured all Popery though they follow it herein to an haires breadth do now The Parliaments of these later dayes did make most of you and yet how open was it for you had ye any pla●e at all in it were ye admitted within the doores or had ye any thing to do in that assembly Did they tarry many moneths about it had they Bishops had they Divines and the most learned to reason too and fro with all Liberty c. How many of the spirituall Lords a great part of the Parliament and without all doubt the part which must be chiefly and only regarded when the questiones of Religion gave their voyce to your Gospell yea which of them did not resist it save 〈◊〉 alone c If they will needs have their matters to depend of THEIR PARLIAMENT let us not be blamed if we call it PARLIAMENT RELIGION PARLIAMENT GOSPEL PARLIAMENT FAITH This learned Bishop returnes the ensuing reply to him That the Parliament war summoned by royall Authority confirmed and concluded in Order as heretofore hath been used That a Parliament might be held and Acts passed without the consent and agreement of Lords Spirituall for which he produceth sundry examples Farther whereas ye call the Doctrine of Christ that now by Gods great mercy and to your great griefe is universally and freely preached a PARLIAMENT RELIGION and a PARLIAMENT GOSPEL for such sobriety becometh you well and may stand you instead when learning fayleth ye might have remembred that Christ himselfe at the begining was universally received and honoured through this Realme BY ASSENT OF PARLIAMENT and further that WITHOUT PARLIAMENT your POPE himselfe was never received no not in the late time of Queen Mary yea and even then his Holinesse was clogged with PARLIAMENT CONDITIONS that whatsoever had beene determined in Parliament and was not repealed were it never so contrary to 〈…〉 and Canons should remain still inviolable and stand in force 〈…〉 Holinesse had gone home again Such Master Harding is the Authority of a Parliament Verily it Parliaments of Realmes be no Parliaments then will your Pope be no Pope Therefore as you now call the truth of God we professe a Parliament Religion and a Parliament Gospel even so with 〈…〉 and gravity of speech you might have sayd our Fathers in old times had a Parliament Christ And your late Father● and Brethren had of late in the time of Queene Mary a Parliament Faith a Parliament 〈◊〉 a Parliament Pope Neither is it so strange a matter to see Ecclesiasticall causes debated in Parliament read the Lawes of King Inas King El●●ede King Edward King Ethelstan King Edmond King 〈◊〉 King Canute and ye shall finde that our Godly Forefathers the Princes and Peers of this Realme never vouchsafed to entreat of matters of Peace of Warre or otherwise touching the

confession was againe ratified Anno 1567. in the first Parliament of James the 6. After which there was an Act made against the Masse and the sayers and heares thereof and another Act for the abolishing of the Pope and his usurped Authority in Scotland After this a forme of Church Government and discipline was presented to the Nobility to peruse but not then fully agreed on and setled The like Petitions and proceedings in ecclesiasticall affaires I finde in the yeares 1561. 1562. 1563. to 1580. 1581 1582. and that the Generall Assemblies of Scotland in nature of a Councell or Synod wherein they debated matters of Religion and Church-government consisted not only of Ministers but of Nobles Gentlemen with other Laikes and that their resolutions and Acts were not thought obligatory unlesse ratified by special Acts of Parliament by which they still petitioned they might be confirmed Not to trouble the Reader over long I finde these ensuing ecclesiasticall Acts of Parliament in Scotland against provisions from Rome Iam. 3. parl 6. c. 43. Iam. 4. parl 1. c. 4. parl 5. c. 53. Iam. 5. paul 〈◊〉 c. 119. Against Working Gaming playing haunting of Taverines A●ch●uses and using any sorvile worke on the SABOTH-DAY Iam. 4. parl 6. c. 83. Iam 6. parl 6 c. 70● parl ●4 c. 148 against Apostacy Idolatry Masse the Pope Semeniary Priests Iesuites uncommunicants Popery as Iam. 8. parl 1. c. ● 3 5. parl 3. c. 1. 45 46. 55. parl 4. c. 7 8. 35 parl● 7. c. 106. parl 10. c. 24 27. parl 12. c. 1 20. parl 13. c. 60. parl 14. c. 193. parl 16. c. 17 18. parl 19. c. 1. Against Adultery Mat parl 5 c. 10. parl 9. c. 74. Iam. 6. parl 2. c. 14. parl 7. c. 105 with sundry others which you may finde mentioned and recired in the 5 and 6 Acts of the second Parliament of King Charles at the Sessions holden at Edinburgh the eleventh day of Iune 1640 Regiam Majestat●● to which for brevity 〈◊〉 referre the Reader I shall conclude with the Ecclesiasticall Acts made in the severall Sessions of the second Parliament of King Charles held at Edinburgh in the yeare 1640 and 1642 where in the presens government of the Church of Scotland together with their profession of Faith nationall Covenant and all Ecclesiasticall matters whatsoever were fully settled and ratified In the first Session of this Parliament I finde these ensuing Ecclesiasticall 〈◊〉 enacted Act. 4. 〈◊〉 the Ratification of the ACTS OF THE ASSEMBLY which are recited in and ratified approved perpetually confirmed by this law Act. 5. Anent the Ratification of the Covenant and of the Assemblies Supplication Act of Councels and Act of Assymbly concerning the Covinant and confession of Faith formerly made and subscribed sundry times here in recited and confirmed In which Act sundry lawes formerly made against Popish Idolatry superstitious Doctrine Papists Seminary priests Iesuits Papisticall Ceremonies Masse the Popes iurisdiction the reformation of the Church and maintenace of Gods true religion are recapitulated confirmed Acts 6. Rescissory repealing divers former Acts concerning Archbishops Bishops with other Prelates their unjust jurisdiction and authority Acts 7. For planting of Kirks unprovided with Ministers through the Patrons default Acts 8. Anent admission of Ministers to Kirkes which belong to Bishopricks Acts 9. discharging the going of Salt-pans and Milnes upon the Sabbath day Acts 10. discharging Salmon fishing upon the Sabbath day Acts 11. Against Papists Acts 12. discharging the Zule vacancy or Christmas Act 13. discharging Monday market in Edinburgh and elsewhere as occasioning great prophanation of the Sunday and distracting men from Gods publike worship and Service Acts 14. For taking order with the abuse committed on the Sabbath day c. Acts 15. Directing Letters of horning against excommunicated persons to which I might adde Acts 16. 29 30. 32. 37 38 having relation to the Church and defence of Religion And Session second of this Parliament 1641. Acts 8. 9 10 11 for abolishing the Monuments of Idolatry 12. Anent Non-communicants and excommunicate persons all printed besides sundry other Acts unprinted are an abundant Evidence both of the Scottish English Parliaments undoubted right jurisdiction and authority in all matter of Religion Discipline and Church-government maugre all inconsiderable late privateopinions to the contrary by whomsoever broached Section 4. Containing certain Corollaries from the premised Sections against the Inpugners of Parliaments and Princes Legislative Power and Authority in matters of Church-government Discipline Religion Together with a compleat Answer to Master Iohn Goodwins pretended Authorities my deare Brother Burtons and others Arguments to the contrary in Iustificaetion of their Independent way in some late Publications the substance whereof is here clearely refuted and this point among others cleared That just humane Civill or Ecclesiasticall Lawes binde the conscience in point of obedience And that there is no exact set forme of Church government universally prescribed in Scripture to all Churches IN the precedent Sections I have according to my solemne Covenant and Protestation abundantly cleared the ancient unquestionable Iurisdiction and Legislative Authority of our Kings and Parliaments in all matters of Religion Church-government Discipline by multitudes of expresse Presidents in all Ages and Authorities of all kindes I shall in the next place Dissipate all those empty clouds of objections which endeavour to obscure this clear-shining Verity by deducing some Corollaries from the premises and then refuting the principle late objections against the same The first Corollary is this That Bishop Laudes desperate Positions in his Anti-Parliamentary paper of Hopes and Feares about calling a Parliament An. 1627. That Church-businesse is not fit for Parliaments That the Parliament House one or both can be no competent Iudge in any point of Doctrine That the Papists insult over us by this meanes and call it Parliamentary Religion That the King suffers by this as much or more than the Church For in the Statute of submission of the Clergie the King and the Convocation are Judges of all Ecclesiasticall Causes An. 25 H. 8. c. 19. And why should the Parliament take this from either That he should have little hope of good successe in Parliament till they leave medling with the Church Are all dangerous false Positions exceeding derogatory and destructive to the indubitable ancient Rights priviledges and power of our Parliaments constantly exercised and enjoyed without dispute even in the darkest times of Popery and highest Ruffe of Pope of Prelates and ever since the Reformation admitted without any opposition but by Popish Priests and Iesuits as the forequoted passages of Bishop Jewell and Bishop Bilson withall the premises manifest Secondly That Master John Goodwins late printed passages against the Ecclesiastical jurisdiction of Parliaments seconded in substance by some other Independents viz. That the generality and promiscuous multitude of the world who have a right of nominating persons to Parliamentary trust and power are but a SECVLAR ROOT

civill Magistrates as you have plentifully done even with some colour of reason as well as insanire cum ratione which is all I shall answer to your reasons Fourthly Hee writes Let Master Prynne Or any other evict mee of any wilfull or unwilfull violation of the priviledges of Parliament and I shall bee as willing as willingnesse it selfe can make me to further such a conviction and no man shall be more ready then I to crave their pardon or undergoe their Justice nay I shall repent my selfe and abhor my errour in dust and ashes Certainely this your promised late Repentance which is yet contingent and improbable after so many publike offronts and oppositions against the power and proceedings of Parliament will bee a very poore recompence and satisfaction for all your former misdemeanors and scandalls to the Parliament yet late repentance being better then none at all I shall now challenge you to make good this your promise since your owne Conscience and judgment cannot but informe you I have written enough in the former Sections to evict and convince you and all the world besides that you have not only violated but denyed oppugned those priviledges of Parliament in Ecclesiasticall affaires which our owne Parliaments in all ages and Parliamentary Assemblies in all other Kingdomes have unquestionably exercised enjoyed without any such publique opposition as you have made against them And if you now make not good your promise few or none will ever credit you hereafter 5ly For the Authors you cite to justifie yourselfe they are miserably wrested and mistaken for the most part The first you quote is Master Edwards who maintaines point blancke against you throughout his Treatise a Legislative and coerceive power in Parliaments and civil Majestrates even in Church-affaires and matters of Religion in the very pages you quote and else where Therefore you palpably abuse the Author and Reader in quoting him to the contrary who is so point-blancke against you For the passage you quote out of his Page 256. The Parliament interposeth no Authority to determine what government shall be whence you inferre p. 7. Therefore his opinion appeares to be either that the Parliament hath No authority or at least intends not to make use of it in determining a government It was written only with reference to that present time the Parliament having at that time when he writ during the Assemblies debate and consultation interposed no Authority to determine what government shall be yet before that it had declared the old prelaticall Lordly government to be abolished and called an Assembly to advise with about a New But to inferre from thence as you doe Therefore his opinion is either that the Parliament hath no Authority or at least intends not to make use of it in determining a Government Is an inference quite contrary to the next ensuing words and pages to the whole scope of the Authors Booke Humbly submitted to the Honourable houses of Parliament contrary to his expresse words p. 138. 281. to all his reasons against Toleration of your Way and to the Parliaments intent in calling the Assembly to assist them in determining and setling a Church-government agreable to Gods word Be ashamed therefore of this grosse perversion of your first Authors passages diametrally contrary to this meaning Your Passages out of Master Hayward Bishop Iewell Master Fox Mr. Calvin Iacobus Acontius Junius Peter Martyr and Gulielmus Appolonius make nothing at all against the Legislative Authority of Parliaments in matters of Religion and Church government and have no a●●inity with your Passages words most of them Bishop Iewel especially as I have already proved vindicating propugning the very ecclesiastical power of Parliaments which you oppugne Indeed some of their words seeme to diminish the Coercive power of Majestrat●s enforcing of mens consciences in matters of Religion which I shal answer in due place and manifest how you abuse the Authors herein as well as Mr. Edwards not hitherto answered by any of your party but how they militat against the jurisdiction of Parliaments in making Lawes touching Religion discipline and Church-government I am yet to seeke For the Passages he aleageth out of the Divines of Scotland That the Prince or Majestrate may not make or publish any Ecclesiasticall Law without the free assent of the Clergy c. That he may not by HIMSELFE define or direct such matters nor make any Lawes therein That the King hath not a Nomotheticke Legislative Power in matters ecclesiasticall in a constitute Church That the ordinary power of the King is not to make Ecclesiasticall Lawes c. I Answer 1. That their only meaning if I mistake not in these passages is that the Prince or chiefe civill Majestrate of HIMSELFE without a Parliament or without the assistance and consent of his Nobles Commons Clergy cannot legally make any ecclesiasticall Lawes to obliege his people upon which reason our Brethren of Scotl. rejected the late New service booke and Canons and our selves the late Canons c Oath which Canterbury wold have obtruded on us because they were made and prescribed only by the Kings Authority and the Prelates or Convocations not the Parliaments upon which very reason the Parliaments of both Kingdomes have respectively adjudged both one and other illegall But that the King or supreame temporall Majestrates assisted by a Parliament and Orthdox Divines may not make binding ecclesiasticall Lawes or that their or our Parliaments have not a reall Legislative power in any matters ecclesiastike the only point controversed is directly contrary both to the constant Doctrine and Practise of our Brethren and their Church used ever since the Reformation to the proceedings of their last Parliaments and generall Assemblies as I have formerly manifested You may therefore blush at this your perverting of their meaning as if they held that the Parliaments of England or Scotland had no power to make Ecclesiasticall Lawes for Religion or Church gouernment when as their Bookes Actions addresses to our present Parliament their presence assistance in our Assembly proclaimes the contrary And the very publique Confession of faith professed and subscribed in their Church Anno 1560 Chap. 14 since confirmed by severall Acts of Parliament doth the like But admit all those Authors really as not one of them is in verity opposite to the Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction and Legislative power of Parliaments yet the unanimous practise and resolution of all Christian Realmes Synods Parliaments in all ages contrary to their private novell opinions is sufficient infinitly to overbalance them in the Judgements of all prudent men And thus much for Mr. Goodwins Innocencies tryumph as to the present point I shall next apply my selfe to Answer such Objections as my deare Brother Master Henry Burton hath lately made against the premises in his Vindication to my 12. Queeres touching Church-Government my Independency examined His first and principall Objection is this