For either S. Peter named his Successor or he was chosen by the Clergy alone or else by the Clergy and People and then confirmed by the Emperour But now he is chosen by a pack of Cardinals a sort of Clergy altogether unheard of in primitive Ages all created by Popes themselves some in Favour to their Kindred others in Faction and to curry Kindness with some Christian Princes especially those of France and the House of Austria who alwayes have their Creatures very busie in the Conclave most of them as fit for Clergy-men as S. Peter was for a Courtier as my Lord of Hereford speaks in his Legacy a Spruce Delicate Effeminate Clergy and the World talks far worse things of them very fit persons for the Choice of S. Peters infallible Successor The truth is this boasted succession is so weak a support to the Roman Cause that their most confident Champions could never so much as pretend the very shadow of Divine Authority for it Alphonsus à Castro and others very frankly acknowledge it is not De fide a matter of Faith that this or that or the present Pope is S. Peter's Successor But of this more by and by Nor is there the least agreement in Ecclesiastical History concerning the Immediate Successor of S. Peter Some put Linus next some Clemens some Cletus And it is a most miserable Shift that Bellarmin is put to and below his great Wit to affirm the business may be thus Composed That S. Peter left his Episcopal Seat to Clement but Clement when S. Peter was dead out of his Humility would not ascend the Chair as long as Linus and Cletus were living who had been the Coadjuters of S. Peter in his Episcopal Function so Linus succeeded S. Peter Cletus to Linus and Clemens to Cletus But if S. Peter left his Chair to Clement how comes this Apostolical constitution to be abolished and why do not the Popes now design their Successors but leave a matter of so high Consequence to the factious Canvassing of the Haughty Ambitious Cardinals How durst Clement refuse the Charge intrusted to him by so great an Apostle and that only out of a Compliment A Man that duly ponders this Circumstance might very well conclude it to be a most remarkable Providence of God and intended for the humbling of that proud Church that when they come to make good their claim to that Exorbitant unlimited Authority they at this day Exercise in the Christian World they should stumble at the very Threshold as we say and fail in the very first name of their Vaunted Catalogue In a Word all things here are dark and in a Riddle and afford not sufficient matter even to ground an Implicit Faith upon But what shall we think of those long and frequent Vacations in that See for some years together and Schisms for 30 nay 70 years Which was a long Vacation indeed for it is Bellarmin's Rule An uncertain Pope is accounted for none at all Nay many and great Authors have put a Woman into the Succession many of their Bishops have been Hereticks and this makes another Interruption even Occult Heresie rendering the Pope ipso sacto none Let Cardinal Baronius a Man of undoubted Authority with them serve instead of a thousand Witnesses He treating of the year of our Lord 912 thus represents the wretched deformed Face of that Church How filthy a time was it when Whores bare all the sway at Rome At their pleasure Sees were changed Bishopricks disposed of and which is most horrible and scarce to be uttered their Gallants were thrust into the Seat of Peter We find no where any mention of Clergy choosing or giving Consent all Canons were put to silence the Pontifical Decrees were choaked Antient Traditions proscribed and all Sacred Rites extinguished Thus had Lust gotten every thing into its own hand Where did this Uninterrupted Succession sleep all this While Well near 200 years together saies the same Annalist did these monstrous abuses continue Certainly if Discontinuance of Time or Illegal Entry can marr a succession this of the Romish Church is sufficiently spoiled Benedict the 9th was a Boy of 10 years old John the 13th a Hectoring Lad not above 18. John the 11th was set up by that Infamous Strumpet Theodora and her Daughter Marozia by force of Arms deposed him John the 12th was Bastard to Sergius by Marozia and was violently intruded into the Popedome by his Mother It is not so much the wickedness of these Popes Lives as the manner of their Creation that we urge to invalidate the Succession Above 50 Popes were thus installed successively for those 200 years besides many other occasions frequently occurring in History wherein this applauded Succession hath been very notably disturbed To which if we adjoin the 30 Schisms wherein 2 and 3 Popes have been set up in opposition to one another the matter will be out of all Controversie One of these Schisms viz. that between Clement and Urban lasted for 70 years till the Duke of Savoy was Elected Pope by the Council of Basil to put a period to that fatal Tragedy And many of these Competitors had such Learned Advocates and Patrons that Bellarmin cannot assign which was the true Pope pudet haec opprobria vobis Et dici potuisse et non potuisse reselli Their Unity is no less bragg'd of than their Universality and Succession and with as little Justice for Unity without Truth and sincere Charity is but a Conspiracy or Confederation I find Revel 17. 13. that in the Kingdome of Anti-Christ they are of one mind and make War with the Lamb. And the Devils themselves in the possess'd person could unite into a Legion And if we a little better consider this pretended Roman Unity it will soon be discovered to be purely slavish and enforced an Unity of Fear more than of Affection a product of the Inquisition rather than of Charity Bellarmin seems to intimate as much They cannot think otherwise saith he because they have subjugated their sence to the sence of another meaning the Pope Nor yet is this their Unity let the Quality of it be what it will so compleat as they would make us believe How do the Jansenists and Jesuits at this day hug one another The large Order of the Dominicans look upon the Jesuits as no better then Semi-Pelagians in the Doctrine of Grace and Free Will and the Jesuits to requite them call them Calvinists The Seculars and Regulars how Unanimous they are appears by their continual Clashing And those who are throughly acquainted with their Customs may easily perceive that there are as many Sects and Factions in point of Opinion as there are Religious Orders in that Church and in point of Charity and Affection as many parties as there are Religious Houses But as for that real Unity which according to Dominie Bannes in 2. 2. q. 1. a. 10. consists in having one God and Christ for our King in being governed by the
same Holy Law in having the same Faith Hope and Charity the same Heavenly Example one worship in Spirit and in Truth one Communion or Communication of the Members which is the Unity of that Church which includes all the Faithful from the beginning of the World to the end c. In short such an Unity as the Holy Scriptures require in being derived from one beginning which is the Holy Ghost who as one Soul quickens and moves all the Parts in having one Head which is Jesus Christ and in being but one Body partaking the same Doctrine Sacraments and Worship of God This Unity by God's Grace all true Protestants breath after as may apparently be evinced by the Harmony of their Confessions although in points of smaller importance there may be some little differences and most of their Dissentions are rather Verbal then Real As to the Sanctity of that Church let but the Lives of the Roman Bishops be perused written by their own Authors a noysomer Sink and Kennel of Abomination can never be raked up in all Antiquity some Atheists some Conjurers some Adulterers Murderers Incestuous Sodomites Simâ—niacks and what not the manners and conversation of their Clergy Religious Men and Women so heinously tax'd and inveigh'd against by those Famous Writers of their own side S. Bernard Nic. Clemangis Alvar Pelagius Claud. Espencaeus c. and at least they will have little cause so boldly to challenge and appropriate it to themselves above all their Neighbours These things are sufficiently known to any that have viewed their Doctors or conversed even with their Modern practices though themselves are very much amended since the Reformation But I love not to tell stories out of the School and I promised at first to refrain from personal Reflections There are Books enough on this Subject and the World talks sufficiently loud of it If all the precedent Prerogatives signifie nothing at last we must be over-born by whole Legions of Innumerable Miracles that are obtruded upon our Credit But so spurious so ridiculous so impious many of them that the more modest and discreet among themselves dare not own them Their best Writers affirm That Miracles are not necessary for the Being of a Church but onely for the Begetting of a new Faith or an Extraordinary Mission Nay I may add not for an Extraordinary Mission neither as we may see in many of the Prophets of the Old Testament of whose Miracles not one word is mentioned Nor are they at all to be expected from or by the Protestants who neither profess a new Faith nor an Extraordinary Mission The Miracles of our Saviour his Apostles and the first Age of the Church are sufficient Seals to the Doctrine they own And as for those so importunately urged by the Romanists they are but too often convinced to be meer juggles contrivances for filthy Lucre Sleights to uphold some gainful Doctrine or to advance the reputation of some particular place or Religious Order done in a Corner of a far different Nature from those of our B. Saviour and rather of the same stamp with those the Apostle speaks of 2 Thess. 2. 9. belonging to him who comes with all Power and Signs and Lying Wonders and Revel 13. 13. who doth great Wonders so that he makes fire come down from Heaven on Earth in the Sight of Men. A man that duly ponders the most palpable Cheats and Impostures of this kind daily practised in the Church of Rome for these By-Respects would almost be of Mr. Chillingworth's mind that it cannot be sufficiently made out that ever so much as a Lame Horse was cured by way of Miracle in confirmation of any Popish Tenet Some insist much on the Outward Prosperity Pomp Splendour and Magnificence of their Church To this the Wise Man hath given an answer Eccles. 9. 1. Our Works are in the hand of God and no man knows either Love or Hatred by all that is before him Nay our Saviour puts it down as a Mark of the false Church Joh. 16. 20. Verily I say unto you that you shall weep and lament but the World shall rejoyce It remains then that the onely Certain and Evident marks of a True Apostolical Church are The Sincere Preaching of God's Word and a Due Administration of the Sacraments To which may be annexed Ecclesiastical Discipline but this is reducible to the other two These are All that the Holy Scriptures afford us Matth. 28. 19. Go and Teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost Teaching them to observe all things whatever I have commanded you Act. 2. 42. And they continued stedfastly in the Apostles Doctrin and Fellowship and in Breaking of Bread and Prayers Having thus survey'd the Roman Church in general it will hardly be thought Good Manners if we neglect his Holiness the Pope in particular or as some are pleased to flatter him The Church Virtual For what ever stirâ— and bastle they make about the Church their Mother the plain English of their meaning is nothing but the Pope their Father It is the express Doctrin of S. Thomas Aquinas and his Doctrin in that Church is little less than Canonized 2. 2. q. 1. a. 10. that the making of a true Creed belongs to the Pope as all other things do which belong to the Whole Church and that the Whole Authority of the Universal Church abides in him 2. 2. q. 12. a. 2. Thus as they take all Authority and Sufficiency from the Scripture and give it to the Church so all the Churche's Authority they attribute to the Pope Gregorius de Valentia one of the Learnedst Jesuits tells us plainly That by the Church they mean Its Head that is to say the Roman Bishop in whom resides the full Authority of the Church when he pleases to Determin matters of Faith whether he d th it with a Council or without Bellarmine teaches that the Pope himself without any Council may decree matters of Faith Bannes affirms that the Authority of the Universal Church the Authority of a Council and the Authority of the Pope are one and the same thing The Canon Law in Sext. Extrav Johan 22. c. Cum inter in Gloss. speaks thus It is Heresie to think Our Lord God the Pope may not Decree as he doth And Distinct. 19. in Canon His Rescripts and Decretal Epistles are Canonical Scripture All which passages clearly convince us what is the meaning of those perpetual Braggs of the Catholick Church His Holyness must excuse me if being no Courtier I address not my self to him in the phrase of the Roman Inscription to Paul the V. yet to be seen in that City saluting him as a Vice-God and the Stout Assertor of the Pontifical Omnipotency or as the Gloss of the Canon Law in their last and best Editions viz. the Roman 1580 and Parisian 1612. Our Lord God the Pope Waving therefore these Ceremonies I shall summarily consider his
Subjects Aphorism Confess verbo Clericus Others though I will not say this is so generally taught that Faith is not to be kept with Hereticks And if my Memory fail not the Famous Navar hath written a whole Tract in Defence of Equivocation and Mental Reservation and takes upon him the Defence of the Noble Society of Jesus as he calls them for Universally teaching it and to my knowledge practising it It were very Easy to collect these Corollaries out of the Canon Law and the Decretal of Boniface the VIII That Emperors and Kings are the Popes Subjects that they may be Deposed for Heresie and any great Sin that the Pope hath power over the whole World in Spirituals and Temporals and that he hath this Temporal power in a more worthy Superior and perfect manner than Temporal Princes that Statutes made by Lay Men do not bind the Clergy that it is necessary to Salvation to be subject to the Pope and he who affirms the contrary is no Christian without any hope or possibility of Salvation A most Pious and Charitable Rhapsody of Canonical Theology Now you must understand that this Canon Law is approved received and obeyed in that Church as The Rule of Justice in All their Courts and Consistories In this we further learn that the Holy Church by her frequent Authority absolves Subjects from their Oaths to Superiors and it exemplifies in Pope Zachary who deposed the King of France not so much for his Iniquity as for his Unprofitableness And Cardinal Turrecremata in his Comment on this Canon proves that Subjects if they have the Popes Consent may Depose their Kings The Bulls os many Popes against the Princes both of our own and other Nations are too well known and may at any time be seen in the Roman Bullary To draw to a Conclusion in this Odious Matter Our Country Man Creswell the Jesuite in his Philopater sect 2. affirms That it is the Opinion of All Catholicks that Subjects are bound to Depose an Heretical King that they are obliged by the Law of God by the most strick bonds of Conscience and utmost peril of their Souls to do this Bellarmine de Rom. Pontif. l. 5. c. 7. assures us it is the Consent of All Roman Catholicks that Heretical Princes May and Ought to be Deprived of their Dominions And the English Cardinal Allen speaking how S. Thomas defended this Position and how Cardinal Tolet expounds him adds these words of his own in his Answer to the Book of English Justice Thus doth this Notable School-man write Neither do we know any Catholick Divine of any Age to say the contrary If now the Testimonies of their Own most eminent Writers their established Laws and Canons their Authentick Papal Bulls and Decretal Constitutions the Decrees and Canons of their own General Councils the confess'd Representatives of their whole Church seconded by Actual Deposing of Emperours c. be not undeniable Evidence that this Seditious Desperate and Pernicious Doctrine is the Doctrine of the Roman Church I must humbly crave Pardon for my Ignorance in their Faith and must so far disown my self from ever having Embraced that I never understood their Doctrine and consequently never was a Roman Catholick But how Repugnant are these Positions to the Doctrine and Example of our Humble Meek Jesus and his Apostles Learn of me for I am Meek and Lowly The Son of man came not to be Ministred to but to Minister My Kingdom is not of this World Man who made me a Judge or Divider over you Luk. 12. 14. If I your Lord and Master have washed your feet c. Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's And He himself paid Tribute to Caesar and made S. Peter do so too He submitted to the Power and Jurisdiction of Pilate who was Caesar's Deputy And this not quia deerant Vires because he wanted power to resist as Bellarmine fondly affirms of the Primitive Christians for He could have called for more than 12 Legions of Angels Nay so far was He from granting the Two Swords so much boasted of to S. Peter that he severely checks him for making Use of one And the Two Princes of the Apostles as they are styled S. Peter and Paul were perfectly of their Master's temper in this point The former would not permit a Common Centurion to fall down at his feet Act. 10. 25. and his Doctrine was far different from his Successors at Rome 1 Pet. 2. 13. Submit your selves to every Ordinance of man for the Lord's sake Whether it be to the King as Supreme c. Fear God Honour the King S. Paul preaches the very same Rom. 13 1. c. Let every Soul be subject to the Higher Powers c. For he bears not the Sword in vain Wherefore you must needs be subject not only for Wrath but for Conscience sake And in matter of Jurisdiction he expresly Appeals to the Judgment Seat of Nero the Emperour And till the Mystery of Iniquity had gained Head the Roman Popes themselves spake in a different Dialect from what they now use We were in hopes says Pope Leo Ep. 44. to the Emperour Marcianus that your Clemency would have condescended so far as to have deferred the Council but since You resolve it should be kept I have sent thither Paschasme Pope Stephen speaks thus to another Emperour Hath not the Roman Church sent her Legats to the Council when you Commanded it We offer these things to your Piety says Pope Hadrian to the Emperour Basilius with all Humility veluti praesentes Genibus Adv lâ—â—i as if we were present before you on our Knees Having thus as briefly as the matter would permit dispatched what was chiefly in my Design of penning this Discourse and what had the greatest Insluence on the satisfying my own mind I shall make much shorter work with what follows General Councils when truly so are highly venerated by Protestants and the Four first so much honoured by S. Gregory the Great are better observ'd by the Church of England than by that of Rome Nor are we so severe as S. Gregory Nazian Ep. 42. ad Procâ—p Who professes he had never seen any good or Happy Issue of any of them but look'd on them as the Increase rather than Remedy of the Churche's Evils Which Censure is certainly true of those Conventions which have been for diverse Ages last past No we desire nothing more than a Free General Council to conclude differences in Religion and are most ready to submit to the Determinations of it and yield the same Authority to it which the Antient Church in the days of Constantine the Great Theodosius c. and which S. Augustine did And that we may not be slandered as being our own Judges We only desire it may be Qualified according to Cardinal Câ—sanus his Doctrine Concord Cath. l. 2. Where he declares that a Compleat General Council consists of All the Patriarchs and Principal Governours of the Universal
Authority both what he pretends to and what it really is And here starts forth a material Difficulty even at our first setting out namely Whether S. Peter whence all this Power and Soveraignty is pretended were himself Bishop of Rome or were indeed ever at Rome I will not Deny either because I know many of the Antients plead for both But the Point being onely grounded on Humane Authority for Divine Authority seems rather to contradict it i. e. Ecclesiastical History and the Differences among the Reporters being so Many and so Considerable both in Chronology and divers other Weighty Circumstances and the Probabilities that are produced against it being not altogether Contemptible I hope a Man may be excused from being a Damn'd Hererick if he do not believe it to be a Fundamental Article of Faith The Article of the Standing or Falling Church sayes a Modern Famous Controvertist and consequently hath a Meaner Esteem for all that prodigious Train of Positions which are thence deduced These following Inducements make it at least Doubtful whether S. Peter ever was Bishop of Rome or was ever there For his ever having been at Rome we do not much stand upon it But the Reasons and Testimonies brought out of Humane Histories which onely mention it are so uncertain and involv'd with such difficulties as may make any Man deservedly question it Vellenus hath published several Demonstrations that he was never there And those Authorities of the Fathers that are alleged for it are so Various that the Learned'st Romanists cannot r. concile them Marsilius Patavinus in his Defens Pacis part 2. c. 16. sayes By Scripture it cannot be made out either that S. Peter was Bishop of Rome or that he was ever there at all and when he considers the Ecclesiastical Historians that affirm it he doth it so that it is evident he doth not believe them It is true S. Peter in his 1. Ep. c. 5. 13. writes as from Babylon but that Babylon was in Assyria For though in the Apocalyptical Visions Rome is designed by Babylon yet in a plain Epistolary Salutation there was no reason at all for such a Trope Nor doth S. Paul or S. Luke who make frequent mention of Rome ever call it Babylon There is indeed an Old Chair at Rome pretended to be S. Peter's and on certain daies it is shewn to the people as likewise a Sepulchre and certain parts of his Body as Relicks But the Jugling and Imposture with Reliques and such like Trumpery is so well known that the World hath long since lessen'd her Credit to such Monuments Nor hath it been the lowest part of Rome's Policy for many Ages with Feigned Miracles Counterfeit Relicks and Forged Records and Legends to raise in the Vulgar an Opinion of her Holiness and so maintain her Grandeur But we have been too long on this Impertinency Whether He was ever Bishop of Rome deserves our stricter Examination Holy Writ seems not silent here as in the former Case but fully Opposite S. Peter and S. Paul by the Instinct of the Holy Ghost made an Accord that S. Peter should Preach to the Jews and S. Paul to the Gentiles Whereupon in the Sacred Text S. Peter's peculiar Title is The Apostle of the Circumcision and Consequent to his Charge we see that he wrote his Epistles to the scatter'd Jews neither did he direct any to or date any from Rome So that it is incredible he should be Bishop or Resident there for 25 years Whereas S. Paul was the Great Doctor and Apostle of the Gentiles and both writ to the Romans and taught and was imprisoned at Rome for several Years as is evident from Scripture Again the Authours of this Story the first whereof were probably Papias and Dionysius the one too Credulous and Erroneous the other a Counterfeit are wholly at a loss in declaring when S. Peter came to Rome how long he sat there when he dyed and who were his Successours And the most tolerable Account that is given by the best Writers How S. Peter the 5th Year after Christ's Passion went to Antioch and there fix'd his Episcopal See for 7 years thence removed to Rome and there continued 25 Years is no waies coherent with what is related of S. Peter Galat 1. 2. Act. 12. 15. From which places it is manifest that S Peter's most usual Abode was at Jerusalem at least till the 18th year after Christ's death and the 17th of S. Paul's Conversion Nor is it likely that S. Peter setled his Chair at Antioch so long since Galat. 2. we read only of his passing by there and that he was so far from behaving himself as their Bishop that he seems to have understood little of the Affairs of that Church till S. Paul had rightly informed him In the 16. to the Romans St. Paul salutes very many by name yet takes not the least notice of S. Peter nor gives them the least account where he was or how he did which seems something odd if S. Peter had then been their Soveraign Pastor And when S. Paul was himself at Rome and writ diverse Epistles in the Reign of Nero at which time Bellarmin would have S. Peter to have been at Rome though he make mention of many others of inferior rank yet not one syllable of S. Peter Nay he generally denies that there was any such present with him Colos. 4. 11. And 2 Tim. 4. 16. he grievously complains that at his first Answer when he appeared before Nero All men forsook him And when S. Paul came first to Rome the Jews there who were S. Peter's peculiar charge seemed to know nothing of the Gospel Act. 28. Thus S. Peter must be Bishop of Rome 25 years and yet never be at Rome when ever the Scripture mentions the Roman Church And S. Paul could never find him there though he is reported to be Martyred there at the same time with him We see then upon how tottering a Foundation this mighty Fabrick depends I mean how justly Questionable the Papal Monarchy is even in matter of Fact and to its very An sit But perhaps it may plead better for it self in point of Right and Equity We will briefly here inquire into two things 1. What Authority S. Peter had 2. What Authority the Pope pretends to derive from him and how justly That our Lord and Saviour never intended such an Absolute Arbitrary Soveraign Monarchical Government in his Church as the Pope at this day exercises both over Clergy and Layity is as evident in the Gospel as any Truth there contained Matth. 20. 25. You know saith Christ that the Princes of the Gentiles exercise Dominton over them c. But it shall not be so among you Whosoever will be great among you let him be your servant And the Apostle Eph. 4. 11. reckoning up the whole Sacred Oeconomy Ministry and Government of the Church le ts not fall one word concerning a Visible Monarch He gave some Apostles some Prophets
Ecclesiastical Affairs is founded upon and to consider how many Difficulties must be cleared to make it a probable Tale. 1. That S. Peter was Bishop of Rome 2. That he dyed at Rome by the special Command of Christ. 3. That he dyed Invested with such a Supremacy as is now Exercised in that Church 4. That his so dying there is sufficient without a new Revelation from God to make the Succession of the Bishop of Rome of Divine Authority We shall now take a View of that Grand Machine of the Pope's power over Temporal Princes and make it most evident that it is an Article and Doctrin of the Roman Church and being so that this alone were a sufficient Motive to forsake her Communion since She Teaches Justifies and strictly Commands even under the penalty of being accounted no Christians Treason and Rebellion The present Lord Bishop of Lincoln hath written a Learned and Satisfactory Treatise on this Subject and I find his Lordship very faithful in his Citations Wherefore I may be the more sparing However because I heartily desire that Honoured Pious and Loyal Persons may not unwarily ingage their Liberties Estates and Lives for the Maintainance of so Extravagant and Tyrannical a Power which hath in all Ages caused so many disinal Tragedies in the Christian World and is in it self Fatal and Destructive to all Civil Government I shall briefly treat of this Matter to undeceive others especially since I was herein miserably seduced my self till I had Maturely and Exactly Examined the whole Business I shall begin with General Councils whose Decrees if they will not admit I confess I as yet understand not what the Doctrin of the Roman Church is nor do I know where to find it The Third Council of Lateran c. 27. after it had Condemned and Excommunicated many Hereticks and you must know that All Protestants are both accounted so and as such are once every year solemnly accursed by His Holyness in Person on Maundy Thursday It Absolves All that had sworn Fidelity or Homage to them from those Oaths and we know who they are to whom Fidelity and Homage strictly speaking is due and they are required in Order to the Remission of their Sins to fight against them And those who dye doing Penance in that manner may undoubtedly expect Indulgence for their Sins with Eternal Rewards Then by the Authority of S. Peter and Paul the Council remits to all who shall rise and fight against them two years penance Here a General Council uses all its Industry to poyson people with Rebellious Doctrin and calls Treason Doing of Penance Not long after Pope Celestin Predecessor to Innocent the Third with more than Luciferian Arrogance sets the Crown on the Head of the Emperour Henry the 6th with his two feet and then kicks it off again And the fact is produced by no meaner a Person than Cardinal Baronius to shew that it is in the Pope's power to Give and Take away Empires But to as much purpose as He produced that Text Rise Peter Kill and Eat to incense Paul the 5th against the Venetians The second Evidence shall be the Fourth Great and as they call it Most General Council of Lateran wherein were assembled 1200 of one sort or other These C. 3. make a Decree That the Aid of Secular Princes should be required for the Rooting out of Hereticks i. e All that are not of the Roman Communion and that when the Temporal Lord required and admonished by the Church shall neglect to purge his Territory from Heretical Wickedness He shall be Excommunicated by the Metropolitan and his Suffragans And if he persist in neglecting to give satisfaction for the space of a year let him be signified to the Pope that he from thenceforth may pronounce his Subjects discharged from their Obedience and expose his Territory to be seized on by Catholicks who having exterminated the Hereticks shall possess it without Contradiction and preserve it in the Purity of the Faith So as no Injury be done to the Right of the Supreme Lord where there is such provided He do not any ways oppose himself And the Law is to take place in them who have no Superiour Lord. Which Last Clause perfectly comprehends Soveraign Princes and so anticipates that Reply which some make That the Decree was only made for Feudatory and Subordinate Princes And whereas some few deny it to be a General Council and that it made any Canons it is a most Impudent Cavil For both the Council and Canons have been and are Universally received by the Roman Church the Council as General and Approved so by Innocent the III. and the Canons as Authentick All their Writers concerning Councils put this down among the General ones â—â—â—â— commonly call it the Great General Council of Lateran and Joverius says he cannot see with what face a Man dare deny it They always put it among those Councils that are Approved by the Church for you must know that some are Reprobated some are partly Approbated and partly Reprobated Their Canon Law so esteems of it The Council of Constance puts it among those General Councils to the Observation whereof the Popes were to swear at their Installment The Council of Trent which I hope none will boggle at Sess 24. C. 5. in express terms calls it a General Council and Confirms one of its Canons To which I may add because it concerns us a Synod at Oxford where this Council was received for England And though some Princes that were deposed out of the Pope's meer Spite and Malice got some Advocates to write for them and Synods of Bishops to Protest against the Pope's Proceedings yet in the case of Pretended Heresie which neerly touches Protestant Princes not one Writer or Bishop appears in Vindication of the Temporal Power A shrewd Sign that this Deposing Heretical Magistrates is in General the Romish Doctrine The General Council of Lions is next It was summoned by Innocent the 4th against the Emperour Frederick the 2d Here the Pope having consulted with the Council Declares the Emperour deprived by God of his Dominions and thereupon they Actually Depose him and Absolve All from their Oaths of Fidelity to him strictly charging All persons to acknowledge him no more for Emperour and denouncing All that did otherwise Excommunicated Ipso facto So we have another whole General Council concurring with the Pope in asserting this Deposing Power and with Candles burning in their hands thundering out Sentence against the poor Emperour In the Council of Constance Sess. 19. we often meet with this Clause That All Breakers of their Privileges whether Emperours Kings or any other Degree were thereby Ipso facto subjected to the Banns Punishments and Censures in the Council of Lateran and Sess. 17. in the Pass they gave to the King of Arragon they decree That whatsoever Person either King Cardinal c. hinder him in his Journey he is Ipso sacto deprived of all Honour Dignity Office