that the Author ought to haue proved them not to haue ben repugnant to the customes of the Realme but to haue bin in vse and practise before the making of that acte of submission For hee must proue sayth the Answerer that they are not repugnant to the customes of this Realme and shew vs how they haue bin vsed and executed heere before the making of the statute yea he can say that they are by lawe established among vs. Which points saith he because we learn by law quod facta noÌ„ presumantur matters in fact are not intended to be done vntill they bee proued so we must still put him to his proofes in the meane time say that hee hath gaped wide to say nothing to the purpose and that in his whole booke he hath talked but not reasoned All which asseveration of this Answerer if the same be true and if this plea be a good avermeÌ„t to barre the Author from having proved a learned ministerie to be commanded by the lawe dispensations for many benefices to bee vnlawfull excommunication by one alone to bee forbidden and civill gouverment to be vnlawfull in ecclesiastical persons then much more forcibly may this argument be retorted vpon all such as clayme alleage put in vre any portion of the forraigne canon law For sithence it hath never yet bene proved that the forraigne canon lawe vsed and executed at this day was accustomed vsed 25. H. 8. then because wee learne by law as he saith quod facta non presumantur wee must still put him his clients to their proofe and in the meane while tell them that their Advocat hath twisted for them but a bad threed when by his reason he hath vntwined all their lawes and broken a sunder the bands of their gouverment Moreover because it is not yet proved that the forraigne and papall canon law is not contrariant nor repugnant to the lawes statutes or customes of the Realme nor derogatorie to the prerogatiues of the regall Crown nay because the contradictorie hereof is affirmed and this denied and because we learne by law as he saith that matters in fact are not intented to be done â—ill they be proved so wee must still put the vpholders and executioners of this law to their proofe and in the meane while tell them that the forraign papall law is but a pretended necessary disused law that it is not inspired with the life of law and that it is fathered by them to be such a law as is an hedlesse a fetherlesse and a nocklesse arrow which is not fit to be drawn or shot against any subiect of the King And from this voydance abolition nullitie of forraigne and papall canon law because sublato principali tolluntur accessoria it followeth that all offices and functions of papall Archbishops papall Bishops papall Suffraganes papall Archdeacons papall Deanes and Chapters papall Priestes papall Deacons papall Subdeacons papall Chancelors papall Vicars generall papall Commissaries and papall Officials meerely depending vpon the authoritie and drawen from the rules and grounds of that lawe are likewise adnihilated and of no value Howbeit forso By the opinion of the CiviliaÌ„s the papal canon law seemeth to bee in force much as by the opinioÌ„ of some learned Civilians there seemeth vnto them a necessarie coÌ„tinuance of the same forraign and papall law by reason that Archbb. and Bishops doe now lawfully Apologie of certain proceedings in courts Ecclesiasticall as they say vse ordinarie Archiepiscopall and Episcopall iurisdiction which they could not as they thinke doe if the same common lawe were vrterly abolished and for so much also as some learned in the canon lawes do mainteyne that since the statut of 1. Eliz. c. 1. the Archbb. and Bb. cannot lawfullie clayme anie ordinarie spirituall iurisdiction at all but that the spirituall iurisdiction to be exercised by them ought to be delegated vnto them froÌ„ the King by a commission vnder the great Seale Forasmuch I say as there are these differences of opinions it seemeth expedient to be considered by what law by what authoritie Archbb. and Bb. exercise Archiepiscopal Episcopall power in the church And to the end this question may fully be knowen and no scruple nor ambiguitie be left what power spirituall may be intended to be exercised by them We distinguish spirituall power into a power properly called spirituall and into a power improperlie Power properly and improperly called spirituall or abusivelie called spirituall The power properly called spirituall is that spirituall power which consisteth and is conversant in preaching the Woord administring the Sacraments ordeyning and deposing Ministers excommunicating or absolving and if there be anie other spirituall power of the like propertie and nature Now that this power properly called spirituall could haue bin drawen from the person of our late Soveraigne Ladie the Queene vnto Power properly called spirituall was neuer in the Queens person Archbb. and Bishops we denie For the Queenes Royall person being never capable of any parte of this spirituall power how could the same be derived from her person vnto them Nemo potest plus iuris in alium transforre quam ipse habet Archiepiscopall and Episcopall power therefore exercised in and about these mysteries of our holie Religion ordinarily necessarilie must belong vnto the Archbb. and Bb. by the canon of the holy Scriptures otherwise they haue no power properly called spirituall touching these things at all The power which improperlie is called spirituall Power improperly called spiritual is indeed but a temporall power is such a power as respecteth noâ— the exercise of any pastorall or ministeriall church to the internall begetting of faith or reforming of maners in the soule of man but is such a power as whereby publike peace equitie and iustice is preserved and mainteigned in externall things peculiarly appropried and apperteyning vnto the persons or affaires of the church which power indeede is properlie a temporall or civill power and is to be exercised onelie by the authoritie of temporall and civill Magistrates Now then to returne to the state of the point in question touching this later power improperly called spirituall by what law or by what authoritie the Archbishops and Bishops doe exercise this kind of power in the church I answer that they cannot haue the same from any forraign canon lawe because the same law with all the powers dependaÌ„ces thereof is adnulled And therefore that this their power must ought to be derived vnto theÌ„ from Bb. where From whence then is their power derived Herevnto we answere that before the making of that act spirituall iurisdiction did apperteyne vnto Bishops and that Bishops were ordinaries aswell by custome of the Realme canons constitutions and ordinances provinciall synodall as by forraign canon law And Bishops remaine ordinaries by custome provincial caÌ„oÌ„s and statute law though papal canon law be abolished that therefore these canons constitutions
ordinances provinciall or synodall according to the true intent of that act could not still haue bene vsed and executed as they were before if the Bishops had not still remained ordinaries Moreover it is cleare by two statutes that the Archbishops Bishops ought 25. H. 8. c. 20. 25. H. 8. c 16. to be obeyed in all maner of things according to the name title degree and dignitie that they shall bee chosen or presented vnto and that they may doe and execute minister vse and exercise all and euerie thing and thinges touching or perteyning to the office or order of an Archbishop or Bishop with all ensignes tokens and ceremonies therevnto lawfullie belonging as any Archbishop or Bishop might at any time heretofore doe without offending of the prorogatiue Royall of the Crown and the lawes and customes of this Realme Let it be then that by custome canons provintiall and statute law Bishops bee and doe remaine ordinaries yet aswell vppon those words of the statute 25. H. 8. without offending of the prerogatiue Royal as vpon the statute of 1. Eliz. c. 1. there remaineth a scruple and ambiguitie whether it be not hurtfull or derogatorie vnto the Kinges prerogatiue Royall that Ordinaries should vse and exercise their ordinarie power improperly called spirituall without a commission vnder the great Seale or that such their power should be as immoderate and excessiue now as in times past it was by the papall canon law Concerning the first by the statut of 1. Eliz. c. 1. and by the statute of 8. Eliz. c. 1. the Queene was recognized to be in effect the Ordinarie The Queen was supreme ordinarie of ordinaries of Ordinaries that is the chief supream and Souveraigne ordinarie over all persons in all causes aswell ecclesiasticall as temporall Where it seemeth to followe that all the branches streames aswell of that power which improperlie is called spirituall as of that power which properly is called temporal should haue bene derived originally vnto the Bishop from her Highnes person as from the onlie head fountaine of all the same spiritual power within her Kingdomes in such maner and from and by such commission vnder the great Seale as her H. temporal Officers Iusticers Iudges had their authorities committed vnto them And to this opinion Maister D. Bilson seemeth to accord For all power Pag. 348 saith he is not onely committed to the sword which God hath authorised but is wholie closed in the sword Against the head that it shall not be head to rule and guide the feete can be no prescription by reason Gods ordinance for the head to governe the bodie is a perpetual and eternall law and the vsurpation of the members against it is no prescription but a confusion and the subuersion of that order which the God of heaven hath immutably decreed and setled Besides there resteth saith the Remonstrance Pag. 114. 130. vnto the Bishops of this Realm none other but subordinate delegate authoritie and that the matter heads wherein their iurisdiction is occupied are by and from the Christian Magistrats authoritie In whom as supream Governour all iurisdiction within her dominions aswell ecclesiastical as civill by Gods and mans law is invested and their authoritie ecclesiastical is but subordinat vnder God the Prince derived for the most part from the Prince From which two statutes iudgements of the 1. Eliza. c. 1 8. Eliz. c. 1 Governours of the Church conteined in these two bookes for these two bookes were seene allowed by the Governors of the church I leaue it to be coÌ„sidered if the Bishop did exercise the same improper and abusive spirituall power and iurisdiction ecclesiasticall onelie and alonelie in their owne names stiles and dignities and vnder their owne seales of office that also by authoritie of forraigne and papall lawes if I say the Bishop did these things after this this manner I leaue it then to be considered whether their exercise of such power were derogatorie and preiudiciall in a very high degree to the prerogatiues of the Royall Crown or not For my part because I find by the forraigne canon lawe that papall Bishops be the Popes sonnes and are privileged to carry the the print image of the Pope their father namely that they haue plenitudinen potestatis within their diocesses as the Ex de Maior oâ—â— Pope pretendeth to have power over the whole worlde For quilibet ordinarius saith the same law in sua diocaesi est maior quolibet principe and because also not withstanding what socuer the Bb. haue written that they were the Queenes Bb. and had their authoritie derived vnto M. Bilson pag. 330. them from the Queene they did in her life time put the same papall law in execution by the same law did take vpon them plenitudinem potestatis within their Diocesses I for my part I say can not as yet otherwise conceyue but that exceedinglie they did intrude them selues into the Royall preheminences priviledges prerogatiues of the Queene For by what other authoritie then by a certain plenarie power did they in their owne names for the gouernment of the The Bb. by a plenarie power devised promulged new canons with out the Queens assent seuerall Churches within their seuerall Diocesses from time to time make promulge and by vertue of mens corporall oathes put in execution what new Canons Iniunctions and articles soever seemed good vnto them without any licence or coÌ„firmation from the Queene first had and obteyned therevnto By which pretensed plenarie power it seemeth that the statute made to bring the Cleargie in submission to the King was covertlie deluded and our late Soveraigne Ladie the Queene cunningly bereaved of that regall authoritie over euerie partieular Diocesan or Ordinarie which notwithstanding by the Parleament was giuen vnto her Highnes over the whole body and state of the Clergie For if once there be no necessitie of the Kings licence assent or confirmation to such articles canons or iniunctions as euerie ordinarie shall make within his iurisdiction then must it bee intended that the statute of submission hath covertlie permitred severall members severally to doe to execute those things which apparantly in expresse termes the whole convocation was commaunded and with the same in verbo sacerdotij had promised not to doe then the which what can seeme more vnreasonable and absurd For then might all the Ordinaries ioyne hand in hand and agree all togither in one never in anie of their convocations assembled by the Kinges writt to devise make or promulge any canons Ecclesiasticall at all And what assent licence or confirmation from the King could then bee needfull Or how then was the Cleargie brought in submission to the King For then should it not be with them as it is in the proverbe A threefold coard is not easilie brokeÌ„ but then should it be with them contrarie to the proverbe for
they being all fast knit and bound togither vnto the Kings authoritie by a coard of 24 threads might easilie be broken but being severed and pluct a sunder into 24. Bishops can make no lawe without leaue And yet everie Bb doeth make many lawes 24 partes one from the other the King with all his regall power might not beâ— able so much as to breake one of the least threedes wherewithall one of their cordes was twisted If the Lorde Maior the Sheriffes Aldermen and whole communaltie of the Citie of London should promise vnto the King vpoÌ„ their fidelities not to set anie price vpoÌ„ Wines or other victualles by their common Councell within the said Citie vnlesse the King vnder his privie signett should first authorize theÌ„ so to doe were it not a meere collusion of the Kings meaning if everie particular AldermaÌ„ should sett prices of such things in every particular Ward But against the collection made from the Statutes 1. 8. Eliza the iudgement of the diuinies aforesaid the A collection made against the former reason by an Apologie for sundry proced by iurisdi Eccl. pag. 5. author of an Apologie to his vnderstanding reckoneth the same collection to be a very simple collection against the same hee answereth and reasoneth in effect thus If as is collected all power spirituall by a commission vnder the great Seale must be derived from the Queene to warrant the execution of it vnto him that is to exercise it then must the like warrant bee procured for euery temporall office to execute his temporall office But euery temporall officer must not procure like warrant to execute his temporall office Therefore a commission vnder the great Seale must not be procured to warrant the execution of the said spirituall power The consequence of his maior proposition being false he laboureth notwithstanding to make the same good and in effect for the same argueth thus All temporall authoritie as absolutly and as really is revested in the person of the Queene as is the said spirituall authoritie Therfore as all spirituall officers for the execution of the said spirituall power must haue their authoritie derived vnto theÌ„ from the person of the Queen vnder the great Seale so likewise must all temporall officers for the execution of their temporal offices haue the like commission The consequence of which enthimeme followeth not though the antecedent be true For although as well all teÌ„porall as all the said spiritual authoritie improperlie so called was reallie absolutelie in the person of the Queene yet herevpon it followeth not that by one and the selfe same meanes alone and namelie by a coÌ„mission vnder the great Seale all temporall and the said spirituall power in euerie part and braunch thereof should be drawen alike froÌ„ the Queenes person For there be divers and sundrie meanes to derive temporall authoritie whereas there seemeth to be but one onely meanes to derive the said spirituall authoritie and then marke the substance of the Authors argument Some temporall Officers as Stewards of Leetes Constables sundry other Officers must not drawe their temporall authoritie from the Queene by a commission vnder the great Seale Therefore no spirituall officers as Archbishops Bb Archdeacons and sâ—de vacante Deanes and Chapiters must drawe any of their spirituall authoritie from the Queene by a commission c. Which argument drawen from a particular affirmatiue vnto a general negatiue what weaknes it hath euery yong Logician can discerne And as for Stewardes af Leetes though they haue no Though all temporal officers drawe not their power from the Kinge by the great Seale yet by one meanes or other wtdrawe it froÌ„ the King commission vnder the great Seale yet for the executioÌ„ fo their Stewarships they haue a coÌ„mission vnder the Seale of the Exchequer Constables Decennary or Tythingmen and Thirdboroughes haue their authorities derived vnto the from the Kings person by the verie originall institution of their offices Sherifs of Countries Coroners Escheators and Verderors haue their offices and their â—uthorities warranted vnto them by the Kings writts out of the Chancerie But 〈◊〉 was not the mind of the Law-makers saith the Author that the Ordinaries by a commission vnder the great Seale should draw their saide spirituall power from the Queene What the mindes of the Law-makers were touching this poinct it mattereth litle or nothing at all Neither is it to purpose whether a commission vnder the great Seale bee necessarily required or not required by vertue of that statut 1. Eliz. c. 1. to warrant the said spirituall power vnto Ordinaries Only it sufficeth that the Queen having all power improperly called spirituall invested in her Royall person being really actually seysed of all the said supreme spirituall authoritie could not haue any parte of the same spirituall power drawn from her but by some one lawfull and ordinarie meanes or other For if this rule be true in euerie coÌ„mon person quod meum est sine mea voluntate à me auferri non potest how much more doth the same rule holde in the Royall prerogatiues rightes privileges dignities and supremities of a King Wherefore to saie that all supreme and ordinarie power improperly called spirituall was really and actually inherers in the Royall person of the Queene and to say also that some of the same inferior and ordinarie power not derived froÌ„ the Queen was neuerthelesse in the persons of inferior ordinaries is as much to say that some braunches of a tree may receyue nourishment from ells-where then from the roote that some meÌ„bers of the bodie are not guided by the head and that some streames flow nor from their fountaines And now to coÌ„clude this part against the canon law their Offices and functions thereof I dispute thus The forreigne and papall canon lawe with all the accessories dependances Offices and functions thereof is vtterlie abolited out of the Realme Therefore the same lawe is no part of the lawes of the Realme and therefore also it is evident that there will not followe any alteration of the lawes of the Realme by the taking of it away Which canon law also with other lawes functions how easely the same without any inconveniences may bee supplied shall God willing be presentlie made apparant if first we shall aunswere to that challenge which the state of Prelacie may seeme to make for the continuance of their Lordly primacie Chalenge for Lordly primacy out of the great Charter anâ—vered out of the wordes of the great Charter Concerning which challenge namelie that by the great Charter Lordly Archiepiscopal and Episcopall primacie or iurisdiction belonging to the state of Prelacie is belonging vnto them I demand vnto what Church this great Charter was graunted And whether it were not graunted vnto the Church of God in England The words of the Charter are these Concessimus Deo hac presenti Charta nostra confirmavimus pro nobis Mag. Charta c. 1.
did neuer yet stande by the authoritie of the three Estates I will take his meaning to be that the statute lawes of England to this day haue stood by authority of the three Estates which to alter nowe by leaving out the one c. and then therevnto I aunswere that not any one of the three The bringing in of the discipline by pastours and elders is not the leauing out of Parleament any one of of the three Estates Estates should be left out or barred frō having authoritie in making and promulging statute lawes though the goverment of the Church by Pastors and Elders were brought in For we which so much cry as he saith for this maner of gouerment to be planted are so farr from exempting or excluding any one of the three Estates from their auncient power priviledge and preheminence in the making of statute lawes as that we pronounce him to bee guilty of high treason to the King and to the Realme that avoweth the contrary And we affirme directly and confesse plainly that it belongeth onely wholy and altogether to the three Estates as well to roote out and to pull vp whatsoever goverment is not iustifiable by the holy law of God as also to plant to setle whatsoever discipline is warrantable by the same law And to speake as the thing is how were it possible to haue the discipline by Pastors Elders planted by authoritie of the three Estates if one of the three Estates should be left out Or can it be imagined that any one of the three Estates would euer consent to the bringing in of such a governement of the Church as whereby the same goverment being once brought in the same estate should ever afterwards cease to be any more an estate Besides we acknowledge that all powers are of God therfore euery one of the three Estates being a power wee graunt that the same hath his stateship by the authoritie of God And if all the three Estates be lawfull by the holie law of God how can it be verified against vs that we which vrge the same holy law for the bringing in of the discipline by Pastors and Elders should notwithstanding contrary to the same law intend the leaving out or altering of any one of the three Estates But which of the three Estates was it that he ment should be left out I trow there The state of the Prelacie is not one of the three estates in Parleament is none of the state of Prelacie so ill advised as to take vpon him the proofe of this position viz. That the Lords spirituall by them selves alone doe make one of the three Estates or that the statutes of England to this day haue stood by their authorities as by the authoritie of those who alone by themselves are to be accompted one of the three Estates For if that were so how much more thē might the great Peres Nobles and temporall Lords chalenge to make by them selves an other estate And without contradiction to this day the Commons summoned by the Kings writ haue ever bene reckoned a third Estate Now then if statutes haue hitherto stood by authoritie of the Lords spiritual as of the first Estate by authoritie of the Lordes temporall as of the second Estate by authoritie of the Commons as of the third Estate I would gladly be resolved what accoumpt the Admonitor made of the Kings Estate It had not bene liegnes nor loyaltie I am sure howsoever hee spake much of the Lords spirituals duty and fidelitie in the execution of our late Queenes lawes to haue set her Royall person authoritie and State behind the lobby at the Parliament doore Either the Kinges Royall person then as not comprised within the compasse and circumscription of the three Estates by his meaninge which had bene but a very bad meaning must be thought to haue bene hitherto secluded from authorizing the statute lawes made in Parliament Or it is a most cleare case that the Lords spiritual them selves alone do not make any one of the three Estates And what matter then of more weight may it happelie seeme to be to alter the authoritie of the Lords spirituall and to leaue them out of the Parliament when as notwithstanding they being left out the statutes of England may remaine continue by authoritie of the three Estates And it were not amisse for the Lords spirituall to consider that the bodie and state of the weale publike both now is and euer hath bene a perfect entire and complete body and State without the body and state of Prelacie And that the King the Nobles Commons of the Realme without Prelates Bishops or Clerckes do make vp all the members and parts of this body and of this state and may therefore ordaine promulge and execute all maner of lawes without any consent approbation or authoritie yeelded vnto the same Anno 36 H 8. fo 58. b. Anno 〈◊〉 j. fo 93. 2 by the Bishops spirituall or any of the Clergie And thus much our Divines Histories Lawes do iustifie Sir Iames Dier Lord chiefe Iustice of the cōmon pleas in his reportes telleth vs that the state and body of a Parliament in England consisteth first of the Kinge as of the head and chief part of the body secondlie of the Lordes as principall members and lastlie of the Commons as inferiour members of that bodie By a Statute of provisoes it appeareth 25. Ed. 3. holy church founded in the state of Prelacie by the King That the holy Church of England was founded into the state of Prelacie within the realme of England by the grandfather of King Edward the third and his progenitours and the Earles Barons and other Nobles of the Realme and their Auncestors for them to enforme the people of the law of God These vses are changed to the keeping of great horses great troupes of idlers with long hayre and great chaines of golde to make Hospitalities and almes and other workes of Charitie in the places where the churches were foūded From whence it followeth First that the Archbishoppes Bishoppes onelie alone doe not make of themselues any state of Prelacie but that the whole holy church of England was founded into a state of Prelacie Secondlie it is playne that the 6. Eliz. c. ◠Kings of England before they and the Earles Barons and other Nobles and great men had founded the holy church of Englande into a State of Prelacie ought and were bounden by the accord The Kinge boūd to doe lawes made without assent of Prelates to bee kept as laws of the realm of their people in their Parleaments to reforme and correct whatsoeuer was offensive to the lawes and rightes of the Crowne and to make remedy and lawe in avoyding the mischieves damages oppression and greevances of their people yea and that the Kings were bound by their oathes to doe the same lawes so made to be kept as lawes of the
together with their functions are arbitrable ceremonious rituall traditionall or circumstanciall yea and removeable at the pleasure of the King and State Neither doth this disagree from that A Bishopp Pastor and Elder and our Lorde B. diffu which was erst sayd of a Bb. or Pastor that they be all one in respect of their function For it is not sayd that an humane Bishop and Pastor but that a Bb. and Pastor are all one For a Bb. simplie so called is not a Bishopp and Pastor in respect of his fellowe brethren but only in regard of his flocke which he ouerseeth feedeth and ruleth But a humane what a lord Bishopp is Bishopp is hee that is promoted vnto this dignitie by man and who by mans authoritie taketh vpon him superoritie preheminence ouer them which are equall vnto him touching their function that intangleth himselfe with civill gouernment and wordlie affaires and whose Bishopplie office consisteth not so much in the dispensation of Gods worde and Sacraments as in Lordlie Bishoplie apparell Crossing with the signe of the crosse confirmation of children sole imposition of hands sole excommunication sole enioyning of articles vpō the people and Clergie of his Diocesse consecration of oratories delegation of his episcopall authoritie to his Suffragane Vicar generall and principall officiall and other such humane and Bishopplie functions All which are after the customes preceptes and traditions of men And albeit D. O. by vertue of the Queenes congedelier were chosen by the Deane and Chapter of Lichfield in episcopum Pastorem ecclesiae Lichfieldensis yet is hee never intituled The Lorde Bishoppe of Lichfield is neuer honored with the title of being Lorde Pastor with the dignitie of being the Lord Pastor but onely with the honor of being the Lord Bishop of Lichfield so that one and the self same person being a Bishop and a Pastor may be a Lord Bishop over Pastours but not a Pastor over Pastors Wherevpon it followeth that the Pastorall Pastoral authoritie of a Lord Bb of other Pastours is equall authoritie which hee hath in common with his brethren the other Pastors of his Diocesse is of no superioritie or proheminence aboue theirs and that touching the function both of his and their Pastorall cure charge there is a paritie betwene him and them by reason whereof he can haue no power over them because par in parem non habet imperium But why is it that he can not be called Pastor Pastorum ecclesiae Lichfieldensis Lord Pastor of the Pastors of the Church of Lichfield and yet may be called Dominus Episcopus Pastorum ecclesiae Lichfieldensis Lord Bishoppe of the Pastors of the Church of Lichfield Why but only for that there is custome tradition and the lawe of man for his episcopall iurisdiction and for that his pastorall function if hee haue any belongeth vnto him in common with his brethren the other Pastors iure divino The Bishoppe then having these two severall Whether a lord Bishop minister the doctrine sacrament and discipline of Christ by vertue of his lordlie episcopal or pastorall office and distinct offices imposed vpon his person the one by divine the other by humane lawe the one humane and episcopall the other without pompe pastorall there ariseth from thence this question by which of those two functions hee may lawfullie I meane according to Gods lawe minister the Doctrine Sacramēts censures of Christ If it be aunswered that it is lawfull for him by vertue of his Pastorall office to minister the doctrine and Sacramentes and by force of his humane Episcopall office to minister the censures of Christ then is not the answere fitted to the question the same being made â bene coniunctis ad male divisa For the censures of Christ as well as the doctrine of Christ being simplie of divine ordināce it must followe if his episcopall power be only of humane right pastoral power only of divine institution that the censures may be ministred by authoritie derived only from mā but the doctrine and sacraments by power derived onlie from God Which commixion of divine and humane right in the execution of the ordinances of God can no maner of wayes be sound pure and sincere and therefore also can not be pleasing vnto God For no more can the censures of Christ to the pleasure of God bee lawfullie administred by the authoritie of any one whose function is of man and not of God then could the sacrifice of God be offered by one who was a priest of man and not of God Now that humane episcopalitie or Bishoppisme in the Church of England is authorized and deduced from the power and law of Lordlie episcopalitie authorized onlie by the lawe of the Realme man viz. of the King Realme alone is evident as well by the donation endowment of the auncient Bishoprickes founded by the Kingly prerogatives of the Kings of this Realme as by the erection and establishment of the new Bishoprickes of Chester Gloucester Bristoll Peterborough and Oxford with their cathedrall Churches Seas Cities meeres and boundes of those humane Bishoppes for the exercise of their episcopall administration according to an act of Parleamēt authorizing the Kings Highnes to make Bishoppes by his letters patentes Nay further that humane episcopall iurisdiction within the meres Note that King Henry the eight by letters patents made Bb. therefore c. and boundes of every Diocesse within England is merelie of humane and not of divine iustitution appeareth by that power and authoritie which the Kinge hath in translating dissolving of Bishoprickes in conserving episcopall iurisdiction 31. H. 〈◊〉 c. 9 sometimes to such persons as be no Bishopps as did William the Cōquerour when he gaue Episcopall power to the Abbot of Battayle and lastlie by the verie maner and forme of the nomination licēce of election authoritie of investiture confirmation and consecration of Archbishoppes and Bishops established by the more positive lawe of the Realme But if it be aunswered that 25. H. 8. c. 20. the Bishoppe by his humane episcopall power doth minister the doctrine Sacraments and discipline of Christ then is the case worse with him then it was before because then not onlie the Discipline of Christ but also the doctrine Sacramentes of Christ should be ministred by that authoritie whiche is of humane institution Besides the answer should be vntrue because the Bishoppe at the time of his cōsecration doth not receyue anie authoritie to preache the worde and minister the Sacraments for that authoritie was then commited vnto him when first he was ordeyned to be a presbyter But the authorite which he receyueth at the time of his consecration is to correct and punish such as bee vnquiet disobedient and criminous within his Diocesse Whereby once againe is that confirmed which was erst said viz. That episcopall power in Englande is not of divine but of humane institution Especiallie for that
Archbishop of Canterburie cā haue over nine thirtie or fortie thē me thinketh it a matter very reasonablie of them to bee confessed that all true Pastors whether they bee great Pastors or litle Pastors may lawfullie exercise all maner of such true power spirituall as vnto true spirituall Pastors by the holie scriptures doeth apperteyne For if Bishops being great Pastours may therefore preach minister the Sacraments because they be as they say true Pastors thē also may litle Pastors therfore excommunicate because they bee as the scripture saith true Bishoppes Wherefore if the L. Bishopp of London by vertue of his Pastorall office as hee thinketh which with his brethren the other Pastors of his Diocesse he hath in commō deriveth vnto him immediatlie from the word of God may lawfullie excōmunicate then the pastorall office which Maister Doctor Androes hath ouer the people of his Parish of St. Gyles without Creeplegate and the pastorall function which Maister Doctor Whyte hath ouer the people of St. Dunstones within Temple-barre beeing as absolutelie as immediatlie deduced vnto them out of the same word what profe can be made out of the worde that the Bishoppe being not Lord Pastour of the Pastours of his Diocesse may lawfullie by the worde excommunicate all maner of offendors both Pastors and people within his Diocesse and yet neuertheles that neither Maister Doctor Androes nor Maister Doctor Whyte by the same worde may excommunicate any one of their Parishioners at all Nay further what reason can there be afforded from the law of God that Maister D. Abbot Deane of Winchester that Ma. Browne Maister Barlowe and diuers other prebendaries in the church of Winchester hauing certeyne parochiall and pastorall churches annexed to his and their Deanrie and Prebendes and Maister D. Grey in his parish by their pastorall functions should haue absolute authoritie vnlesse it bee during the time of the L. Bishoppes trienniall visitation to exercise the discipline of Christ within their seuerall and peculier churches and yet notwithstanding that neyther Maister Richman nor Mai. Burden being both of them graue godlie learned Pastors should haue at any time anie pastorall authoritie to exercise any censure at all And as it is in the church of Winchester so is it in the church of Paules in the church of Salisburie in well nigh all if not in all the Cathedrall Collegiall Churches thoroughout the Realme The Deane Prebendaries and Canons hauing certayne parochiall Churches exempted from the Bishopp within their exempt and peculier iurisdictions by mere Pastorall authoritie for episcopal authoritie by the lawes of the Church haue they none may exercise all maner of spirituall censures and that aswell by their substitutes as by them selues Nay which is more in Cheshire Lancashire Rurall Deanes in Cheshire c. vse some part of episcopall power Yorkeshire Richmondshire and other Northeren parts there be manie whole Deanries exempted from the Bishopps iurisdiction wherein the Deanes and their substitutes haue not onlie the probate of Wills and graunting of administrations but also the cognisance of ecclesiasticall crimes with power to vse the ecclesiasticall censures Yea and this authoritie of the executiō of ecclesiasticall censures haue those Deanes either long since by some papall priviledges Episcopall power to excōmunicate graunted by papall priuiledges or prescribed vse obteyned or els by long vse prescribed against the Bishopps Whereby againe it is clerelie convinced that Episcopall excommunication vsed in the Church of England is not of divine institution but onlie by humane tradition For were it of diuine right then could the same Power to excommunicate if it be of diuine right may not be prescribed no more bee prescribed or by papall immunitie be possessed thē could these Deanes prescribe power or bee enfranchised to preach the word or to administer the Sacramentes These things haue we thus at large more fullie intreated of to the end that the Kings Highnes and his Parleament and all sortes of people might well vnderstand howe it is not altogether an vnvsual and vnaccustomed thing in the Church of England that private inferiour ministers as they call them in their owne right and in their owne parochiall parishes without any authoritie from the Bishoppe should exercise even the highest censure of the Church And that in sundry places of the Realm there is no preeminence in the matter of the execution of the censures attributed to a Bb. aboue a Minister Nay whiche is more then is attributed to a Bb. aboue a No more preheminēce given to a Bb then to a Minister or to a lay man in some places for the vse of excōmunication lay man yea then to such a lay man who is authorized onlie by a lay man to his office Which is evident by the ecclesiasticall iurisdiction and censures exercised a long time by lay men in the peculiar iurisdictions of Newton Gronbie Anstic Soke of Rothelie Evington and other parishes hamlettes in the Countie of Leycester The officers of al which places for their spirituall authoritie having not had any other warrant then such only as hath bin signed sometimes vnder the hande and seale of the right Honorable the Earle of Huntingdon deceased sometimes of the Honorable Sir Henrie Grey knight sometimes of Henrie Skipwith Esquire and sometimes of others For the avoyding therefore of sundrie intollerable inconveniences whiche hitherto hath ensued for want of that authoritie which the Law setled doth enable every Minister with It is most expedient that all humane authoritie in the execution of spirituall censures bee vtterlie taken away and that the divine and Evangelicall censures of Christ bee ministred in every Congregation where learned and godly pastors with discrete Elders may bee had as from the minde of the Lord they were executed in the Apostolicall and primitiue church I had almost forgotten to speake of one common and vsuall kinde of iurisdiction spirituall in the vse of the censures of the church by the Archb. which in cases of their prerogatiue they haue prescribed against the Bb. over the presbyters and people of euery Bishoppes Diocesse and Archdeacons iurisdiction within their provinces of one other cōmon and vsuall kinde of pretensed spirituall iurisdiction and vse of the censures which the Archb. and sometimes the Deane and Chapiter sede Archiepiscopali or sede Episcopali vacante exercise and lastly of that spirituall kinde of iurisdiction censures so called of the Church whiche Suffraganes and Archdeacons haue and do vse As touching which supposed spirituall power both of the Archbishopps Archdeacons because the same their power doth only belong vnto thē iure consuetudinario non scripto by vnwritten and not by written lawe I must conclude against the iurisdiction of the Archbishopps prerogatiue and against the Archdeacons iurisdictiō in all cases as out of St. Cyprian King Henry the eight concluded against the Pope viz That their authorities can not be from Christ Because Christ saide
thervnto wonne by intreatie of persons of lewde demeanoure be pronounced voide and of no efficacie yea on the other side a number of honest lawfull and godlie contractes should bee confirmed and remaine in their full strenght and force which nowe vpon certeyne frivolous and trifeling quiddities and nicities of Much a doe in the ecclesiasticall Courts about accipio accipiam wordes and sillabes are pronounced in the ecclesiasticall Courts to be no contracts And in good earnest is there now a dayes any soundnes of reason at all to be heard amongst the Doctors and proctors of those courts where they inform out of the canon law in these cases For doth not their whole dispute and information rest principallie whether the contract bee made by wordes of the present or of the future tence whether it be made with an oath or without an oath yea and doe they not exceedingly besweate and besmyre them selves by turning and returning by folding and vnfolding their great and hydeous volumes for profe and reprofe of accipio accipiam yea and sometimes of letters and accentes If the yong-man and mayde having both of them their parents consent shall answere onelie in the future tence I will haue thee or I will take thee or I am content to take thee or I will haue none other but thee or if ever I marie I will marie thee and do not answere directlie I do take thee to mine husbande or I doe take thee to my wife oh it is a world to see and a wonderment to beholde what canvasing heaving and shoving what a stirre quoyle and garboyle the Canonistes make about the lifting and removing of these fethers And whatsoever the holie Scriptures haue determined of the necessitie of parents consent or of what necessitie likewise so ever the a Institu de â—up §. 1. civill law hold the consent of parentes to bee yet in the ecclesiasticall Courts the papall canon lawe must needes take place because by the same law consent of parentes is not de necessitate but de honestate tantum and because also matrimonia debent esse libera non pendere ex alieno arbitrio Wherein the reverend Bishops vnder their favourable pacience The canon law preferred by the revereÌ„d Bb. before the law of God and the civil law can not clearly excuse them selves of much oversight in so slender managing of a matter of so great and high a consequence The holie law of God by publike authoritie hath bene commanded within this Realme to be sincerelie and purelie taught received and embraced The civil law hath not had her free course in this case hindered by any law of the Realme And how then commeth it to passe that the canon lawe beeing in this point repugnaÌ„t to both these lawes should notwithstanding bee preferred beare sway take place in this Realm before aboue both these lawes especiallie the same in this point as beeing against the law of God being vtterly taken away The abuses past mariages past vnder coloure and pretext of this law may and ought to be bewayled and repented of yea and that no such mariages in time to come may bee made I leave it to bee considered whether it Certaine speciall pointes to be provided about mariages might not tend to the advancement of the lawe of God bee honorable for the King commodious for the common weale providentlie to provide these things following viz. First that no matrimonie secretlie contracted against the will or vnknowing of or to the Father or him or her that hath the keeping educatioÌ„ or goverment of the partie to be maried before he or thee come to a certaine age should in any sorts be good or avaylable to make the posâ—â—tie of those who shall bee so maried legitimate or inheritable Secondlie that euery contract of mariage concluded with consent of Parents Tutor Governour or Gardian should be forcible and effectuall to bind both parties irrevocablie whether the same contract with an intent to conclude a mariage be made by wordes of the present or future tence it skilleth not Thirdlie that euery man stealing away contracting and marying a mayde vnder the age of certeyne yeeres without consent of Father Tutor Governour or Gardian should be a felon and for such his felonious act suffer the paynes of death And lastlie that all liceÌ„ces to marie without banes asking according to the intendement of the booke of common prayer be forbiddeÌ„ and vnlawfull for euer Which things if they might be observed it is verie likelie that mens inheritances as now many times they do should not hang in suspence vpon question of legitimation or illegitimation of their children to be alowed or disallowed by the canon law There should not any such long and tedious sâ—â—tes variances hereafter fall out betwene the posterities and children of one man for the right interest of their Auncestors Complaint heeretofore made vpon stealing away marying mens daughters howe they may cease Lands Neither should Sir Thomas Lucie nor Sir Edmund Ludlow nor the Ladie Norton nor Maister Cooke the Kings Atturney generall nor many moe Knights Esquiers Gentlemen complayne and bewayle the stealing away and mariages of anie their daughters Neeces nere KinswomeÌ„ or Wardes Neither could it bee possible that one Woman might procure foure or fiue severall licences for the mariage of foure or five severall husbands all of them being alive together not one of them dead Neither should there anie LiceÌ„ce of mariage be graunted out of an Ecclesiasticall Court to anie man or woman with a blanck whereby the partie liceÌ„sed was enabled to haue maried an other mans wyfe or his owne or his wyves sister Neither should any couples maried and livinge together foure sixe or more yeeres as man and wyfe vpon a new and suddayne dislike or discontentement vpon a surmised precontract to be pretensedlie proued by two suborned witnesses be adiudged by vertue of the canon law to be no husband and to bee no wife Neither should any man being solemlie maried to a wyfe afterward by reason of a precontract solemlie divorced from the same his wyfe and by censures of the Church compelled to marie her for whom sentence of precoÌ„tract was adiudged be reauthorized by the same Consistorie about tenne or twelve yeres after the divorce to resommon recall rechalenge his first wife especiallie she having a testimoniall out of the same Consistorie of her lawfull divorce and being againe solemlie maried to an other husband Wherefore to conclude these matters of Tythes Testaments and Mariages if the King should not be pleased to haue the studie of the civill law advanced by some such lawe as whereof the former proiect maketh mencion I dispute for the enlargement of the common law thus If it stand with reason with the grounds and rules of the common law with the Kinges Royall prerogative that in cases of Tythes Testaments Mariages the King
subversion vpō any nation that purely and soundly in place therof hath embraced the holy Sacrament of the Lords Supper It seemeth also to be equal for many ages past that the Bishop of Rome might haue supreame and absolute power over all persons states and causes not only in Rome Italy Spaigne Germany other forraigne Kingdoms but also in England and Scotland But as yet to the view of al the world it hath not proved perilous for the King Queen of England and Scotland to establish new lawes for the alteration of that ancient abuse And why hath it not bene dangerous so to do Why forsooth because there was evident vtilitie in doing of it But how could an evident vtilitie appeare before it was done How Forsooth because the holy law of God had warranted an alteration For faith having eyes to see the wisedom the power and the trueth of God in his word discerned a far of that the institution of the Lords Supper was long before the sacrifice of the masse And therefore our Kings by abandoning popery out of the Realme did not institute any new religion but onely they restored the old Now then if the same holy lawe of God doe condemne the choyce and thrusting of a Pastour vpon the people by one man alone and againe if the same lawe doe impugne the primacie of one Pastour over all Pastours as wel in a Diocesse or Province as in the whole West part of Christendome what daunger can it be not to disfrāchise the one sithence without any maner of danger we haue abolished the other or what perill can it be not to countenance the sonnes sithence without peril we haue discountenanced the father Especially seeing in this place of the admonition we haue a playne cōfession that the common maner of election of Pastors Elders and Deacons in the old Churches was made by the people For if the examples of schisme discord Common manner of elections in the olde churches was by the people contention did commonly appeare in the olde churches while that maner of election did continue then by his owne mouth that maner of election was common and did continue in the olde churches Besides this inconvenience saith he caused Princes Bishops so much to entermedle in this matter From whence it necessarily againe followeth that by the holy Scriptures and law of God Princes and Bishops did not entermedle with that matter at all For had it bin simply lawful for thē to haue Bb. medle not with election of Pastours by the holie Scriptures dealt in those causes by the worde of God thē as well before schisme discord and dissention as afterward yea rather much more before then afterward For then by their own right might Princes and Bishops haue prevented all occasion of schisme and contention and haue so preserved the Church that no tumult or disorder should once haue bin raysed or begun therein Againe if by the lawe of God Princes Bishops had medled in these matters and had not entermedled by humane devise then lawfully by their authoritie alone might they haue chosen Pastours Elders and Deacons in the olde Churches which thing in this place by necessarie inference he denieth For schisme saith he caused thē to entermedle So as by his confession they were but entermedlers and entercommoners by reason of schisme not cōmoners and medlers by vertue of Gods word And yet now a dayes our reverend Bishops in this case are no more entercommoners with Princes and with the people they are no more entermedlers as in olde times they were but they haue now so farre encroched vpon the prerogatiues of the Prince and privileges of the people that neither Prince Bishops encroch vpon the right of prince and people nor people haue any commons in the election of Pastours Elders Deacons with them at all Besides if schisme and contention among the people were the reason why Bishops first entermedled in the choise of Pastours we now having no schisme nor contention about the choise of Pastours by the people and so the cause ceasing why should not the effect likewise cease But this effect is therefore still to be continued because otherwise the cause would a new sprout out and spring vp againe Nay rather inasmuch as for these many yeares we haue had schisme discord dissention because the Bishops wholy and altogether haue medled in the choise of Pastours and haue thrust vpon the people whatsoever Pastours please not the people but pleased themselves haue not suffered the people to medle no not so much as once to entermedle in these matters in as much I say as these things be so it seemeth most expediēt requisite necessarie for the appeasing pacifying of this discord the taking away of this schisme to haue that maner of election which was in the old Churches restored to the people and this wherein the Bishops haue entermedled without authoritie from the worde to be abolished that so againe the cause of schisme and strife which is now among vs ceasing the effect might likewise cease After I had ended this tract in this maner touching this poynt there came into mine handes a booke intituled The perpetuall gouernment of Christes church written by Thomas Bilson Warden of Winchester Colledge in the fifteenth chapter of which booke is handled this question viz to whom the election of Bishoppes and Presbiters doth rightlie belong and whether by Gods lawe the people must elect their Pastours or no. In whiche Chapter also the matter of schisme strife and contention is handled The finall scope and conclusion whereof is as the proposition importeth two fold First cōcerning Bishops then concerning Pastours The quarell taken against Bishoppes doth not so much touch sayth he the office and functions of Bishoppes as it doth the Princes prerogatiue When you rather thinke the Prince may not name her Bishoppes without the consent and election of the people you impugne nor vs but directlie call the Princes fact and her lawes in question As touching this poynt of the proposition because the people by any lawe or custome never chalenged anie right or interest in the choyse of the Kings Bishoppes we haue nothing to medle or to make about the choyse of any of his Kinglie Bishoppes The Kinge only hath power without the people to nominate his Kingly Bb. Nay we confesse as his Highnes progenitours Kings of England haue bin the Soveraigne Donours Founders Lords and Avowes of all the Bishoprickes in England without ayd of the people that so likewise it is a right and interest invested into his Imperiall Crowne that he onely his heyres successours without cōsent of the people ought to haue the free nomination appointment collation investiture and confirmation of all Bishoppes frō time to time to be placed in anie of those Bishoprickes yea we say further that the King alone hath not power onely to nominate collate confirme but also to
so to of the Church by Prelacie to be Monarchicall because the Queene was a Monarch and that the reverend Bishop governed vnder a Monarch then what did hee els but put a weapon into the handes of Pastors and Elders to prove their governement also to be Princelie and Monarchicall Because Pastors Elders desire not to haue that maner of governement to bee brought into the Church otherwise then by the Royall assent Souveraigne authoritie and expresse commandement of our most gratious King and Monarch Besids if any governement may be therefore saide to be a Monarchie because the same is derived from an earthly Monarch howe much more then may the governement of the Churches by Pastors and Elders be adiudged Monarchical by reason the same is deduced from our heavenly and everlasting Monarch For the reverend Bb. by their publike preachings apologeticall Ma. Horne Bishoppe of Winch. Ma. Iewell Bishop of Sali Mai. Bilson Bishoppe of Winch. writings testifie that power authoritie to ordeine and depose Ministers to excommunicate and to absolue to devise and to establishe rites and ceremonies in the church to define what is trueth to pronounce what is falsehood to determine what is schisme and to cōdemne what is heresie our reverend Bb. I say confesse this power to bee originallie decided vnto the true Bishoppes and Pastours of the Church from the Kinglie and Soveraine power of our Saviour Christ By what name therefore soever the gouvernment of Pastours and Elders in the Churches be called there is no manner of cause to dislike of the planting of that government in a Monarchie because the same is instituted by the Monarch of Monarches who is able and readie to vphold the state of al Monarchies in common weales togither with the state of Aristocracie in his No cause for a Monarch to feare that his Christian subiectes should haue the sence of Aristocracie in Church goverment Church Neither is there any cause for anie Monarch in the world to feare the making of christian commō people by familiar experience to haue the sence feeling of the principles and reasons of Aristocracie For if a people haue once submitted their necks to the yoke of Christ they can liue a peaceable godly life vnder all kinds of powers because they knowe all kind of powers to be the ordenance of God But especially there is not neyther euer was neyther euer can there be any cause for any King or Monarch of England greatly as the Admonitor insinuateth to feare that the common people will very easely transferre the principles and reasons of Aristocracie to the gouerment of the common weale and therevpon bee induced to thinke that they haue iniurie if they haue not as much to doe in civill matters as they haue in matters of the Church seeing they also touch their commoditie and benefit temporallie as the other doeth spirituallie And certes it seemeth that the Admonitor was drawen very drie of reason whē he was fayne to plucke this stake from the hedge to make a fire and to kindle the wrath of the Magistrate against the forme of discipline by Pastors and Elders For whether hee intendeth that the Pastors and Elders will thinke them selues to haue iniurie if they deale not in all causes of the commō weale as well as in all causes of their churches or whether he ment that the common people will easely transferre the government of the common weale from a Kingly Monarchie to a noble Aristocracie there is neither soothnes nor soundnes in his meaning For sithence Pastors disclaime to deale in civil matters the learned Ministers against the reuerend Bishopps by the holy rules of our faith mainteyne that it is not lawful for a Minister of the Gospell to exercise civill magistracy and that it is not lawfull for the man of God to bee intangled with the affaires of this life how is it probable that those Ministers will easely oppugne their owne knowledge by their owne cōtrary practise Or how is it probable that they would over-loade them selues with that burthen to ease the Church wherof they haue contentedly exposed thē selues into a number of reproches contempts bytings persecutions As for that other intendement of the Admonitors that it is greatlie to be feared that the commō people will easely transferre Monarchie vnto Democracie or Aristocracie if the principles and reason thereof by experience were made familiar in their minds this reason I say might seeme to carrie some shewe of affrighting a Monarch if the same were insinuated vnto a king whose people were neuer acquainted with the principles reasons of Democracie or Aristocracie but this feare being insinuated vnto our late Souveraigne Ladie the Queene whose people euer since the time they first begā to be a people haue had their witts long exercised with the The people of England haue their wits exercised with the sence of Democracie Aristocrarie sence and feeling of the reasons principles aswell of Democracie as also of Aristocracie what sence had the Admonitor to vrge this feare That in the Kingdome of Englande the common people haue alreadie the sence and feeling of the reasons principles of Democracie cannot be denied For in euerie cause almost aswell of criminall as ciuill iustice some few only excepted to be executed in the common weale by the common lawes of the Realm haue they not some hand and dealing in the same by one meanes or other Nay which is more haue they not the sence and feeling of the making and vnmaking their owne lawes in Parleament And is not their consultation in Parleament a mere Democraticall consultation As much also there is to bee avowed for the sence and feeling of the reasons and principles of Aristocracie to be alreadie in the minds of the Peres the Nobles the Iudges and other great men of the Realme For are not the Wisest the Noblest the Chiefest taken out of these by the King to bee of his Counsell and to be Iudges and Iusticers in his Courts Yea and is not their assembly also in Parleament a mere Aristocraticall assembly And what translation then is there greatly to be feared out of the Church to bee made into the common weale when the minds of all sorts of our common wealthes-men be already seasoned with the things which hee feareth And when the common weale is alreadie seysed of the principles and reasons which he would not haue familiarly known vnto it Wherefore that the King the Nobles and cōmons may no more be scarred with the strangenes of these vncouth and vnknowne greeke names of Democracie and Aristocracie writtē in his booke with great and capitall letters I haue thought it my duty by these presents to informe them that the govermēt of the church by Pastors and Elders nowe wanting amongst vs and desired to bee brought into the Church by the Souveraine authority of our King Nobles and commons in Parleament for the outward form
manner thereof is none other manner of gouerment nor forme of The maner of policie by Pastors and Elders in the Church is agreeable to the government in the cōmō weale pollicie thē such as they and their progenitors and Ancestors for many hundred yeares togither without interruption haue vsed and enioyed in the common weale And that therefore it will be a very easy matter to transferre the same to the gouerment of the Church For by the reasons and principles of their own gouerment in the common weale and by the sence feeling thereof they may wel be induced to thinke that they haue iniurie if they haue not as much to doe in matters of the Church as they haue to doe in matters of the common weale seeing they touch their commoditie and benefitt spiritually as the other doeth temporally And withall on the other side I shall doe my best indeavour to aduertise them that the gouernement of the Church by Prelacie is such a maner of gouernment as was neuer yet The government of the Church by Prelacie disagreeable to the government vsed in the common weale in the administration of iustice by any subiect no not touching the outward forme thereof once admitted into any part of common weale and that therefore the same if it may please the King will very easely bee sent and transmarined vnto Rome frō whence it first came where it had it originall and birth-right And to the end that we may clearelie discerne whether the nature of the gouerment of the Church by Prelacie or the nature of the gouerment desired to be planted by Pastors and Elders be more agreable to the nature of the pollicie receaued and vsed both by the Nobles and common people in the common weale it is necessarie that the manners and formes both of Prelaticall Pastorall gouernment be made familiar vnto the minde of the Reader And because wee haue alreadie declared the manner of the election and confirmation both of a Bishopp into his Episcopall Sea of a Minister into his Pastorall charge what the one is by the lawe alreadie established and what the other by a law desired to be established ought to be wee will not any more speake of their entrāce into eyther of their places vnles only a litle to recreate the Reader we merely note what answere some Bb. haue made when as long chasing after Bishopricks they haue chafed in their minds for feare of loosing their pray as was the answere of that Italian Bishopp The answer of an Italian Bishop loth to loose his Bishopricke who beeing thrise demaunded of the Archb. as the manner is vis Episcopari vis Episcopari vis Episcopari and being willed by one standing by thrise againe to aunswere as the maner is nolo nolo nolo He making no bones at the matter aunswered aloude with an oath Proh Deum dedine ego tot milia Florenorum pro volo Episcopari iam debeo dicere nolo or as was the answere of that English Bishop who having promised a Courtier one annuitie of xx pound during The answer of an English Bishop having obteyned his congedelier his life out of his Bishopricke if he could procure the speedie sealing of his congedelier within a while after whē it was sealed he rapt out an oath sware by Iesus God that the same Gentleman had done more for him then an other great Courtier who before hande for that purpose had receyued frō him one thousand markes But whether all Bishoppes buye their congedeliers dearer or better cheape is not a matter incident to this treatise onlie if they buie deare they may happelie think with them selues that they may sell deere vendere iure potest emerat ille prius setteth not anie price vpon any wares in the Royall exchange But to returne to our purpose whence by occasion of those Bishoplie oathes and answeres wee haue a little digressed let vs see what is the maner The maner of the administration of spiritual iustice in the Church by Prelacie and forme of the administration of spirituall iustice in the gouernment of the Church by Prelacie as the same is ordinarilie administred in all places throughout the Church of Englande Wherein that we be not mistaken it is to be vnderstood that the maner of administratiō of iustice wherof we speak is that administration of iustice onlie whiche respecteth the punishment of crimes eccllesiasticall to be inflicted by spirituall censures In all which cases penances suspension and excommunications in the Bishops consistorie proceed from the iudgement and authoritie of the Bishoppe alone if he bee present or from the sentence and power of his Vicar generall or Cōmissarie alone if he be absent Nay doth not everi such censure likewise in the Archdeacons consistorie proceede from the sole authoritie of the Archdeacon or if he bee absent from the sole authoritie of his officiall But if the like course of the execution of Iustice as this is can not be found to be an ordinarie course of Iustice in the common weale where Iustice is administred in criminall causes by the ministerie of a subiect I would faine learne what preiudice may be feared to redound vnto the cōmon weale if the administration of spirituall Iustice after a sort were established to be after the same manner in the Church after which civill Iustice is alreadie practised in the common weale I said after a sort to this end least I should bee mistaken For the meaning is not that spirituall Iustice should bee ministred exactly in No one subiect in the cōmon weale can alone exercise civill iustice in causes criminall every respect after the maner of civill Iustice but the comparison standeth onlie in this that as not any one temporall subiect alone hath authoritie to heare to examine and to iudge any one criminall cause in any Court of civill iustice in the common weale so likewise that not any one spirituall person alone should haue authoritie to be examiner and iudge of any one criminall cause in any Court of spirituall Iustice in the Church For if certain principall The administration of spiritual Iustice by Pastors Elders agreeable to the execution of civill iustice in the common weale godly persons associated vnto a learned and zealous Pastor in the presence and with the consent and authoritie of the people of every Parish did enioyne penance suspend or excommunicate a spirituall offendor were not this forme of administration of spirituall iustice more consonant agreeable and conformable to the daily executiō of civill Iustice in the Courts of the cōmon weale then is the administration of spirituall Iustice by the Bishopp alone or by his Vicar general alone in his Consistorie and to make this matter more familiar in the mind of the Reader for an instāce or two let vs suppose that Mai. Doctor Bancroft were still Parson of S. Andros Maister D. Bancroft with his assistāts letter able to
authorized disposed or established in particularitie the order of these thinges or if the Scripture haue not delivered everie ceremonie forme or circumstance about these three things shall not the Minister therefore minister these or any of these three things at all And suppose I pray you that neither this nor anie other law had in particularitie appointed the ceremonie of the Crosse the ceremonie of Godfathers or any other ceremonie in Baptisme or that the Law had not appoynted the ceremonie of kneeling or any other ceremonie at the celebration of the Lords Supper should not the Minister therefore minister neither Baptisme nor the Lords Supper in the charge committed vnto him yes he should And why forsooth because he hath promised so to doe and because the Lorde hath commaunded him so to doe Besides sithence everie Minister by vertue of his promise and force of this law is bound to teach the doctrine of Christ to the people of his charge notwithstanding he be not tyed by the law of the Realm nor by the holy Scripture to any rite ceremonie or circumstance or to any exact forme or particuler maner in teaching what reason can any maÌ„ pretend that the not particularizing of al rites ceremonies or circumstances in the Scripture or the not establishing of any order by the law of the Realm touching discipline should altogether hinder everie Minister from the administration of al discipline in the church For as touching the aunswere that the Ministers may and doe exercise not the Answere to the abstract Pag. 59. least partes of Discipline of declaring by doctrine according to the worde of God mens sinnes to be bound and loosed and the censure of rebuking and reproving Pag. 55. openlie and that the discipline Discipline of declaring by doctrine is called discipline erroneouslie which the Minister is to execute reacheth no further then to reach his Parish with all diligence to keepe and observe so much of the Doctrine Sacramentes and Discipline of Christ as apperteineth vnto them as touching this aunswere I say it is as erroneous as the former were frivoulous and impeâ—tinent For as consolation and comfort by way of exhortation so reprofe and sharpe rebuking by way of dehortatioÌ„ belong properlie to that part of the Ministers function which concerneth the binding and loosing of sinners by doctrine and not by discipline and is but an application of the doctrine to a wounded or seared coÌ„science Hee therefore that leaveth no other Discipline to be executed by the Pastor of the church then of declaring by doctrine mens sinnes to bee bound or loosed and by teaching his Parish to obserue doctrine sacraments and discipline Discipline doctrine confounded by the Answerer confoundeth the matters both of discipline and doctrine Againe if not any other discipline was ment to be attributed to everie Minister then such as is declared by doctrine theÌ„ these words viz. and the discipline of Christ were superfluouslie and idellie added by the Parleament For then had it bene sufficient for the Parleament to haue enioyned the Bishopp to demaund of the Minister onely this and no more viz. Whether will you giue all faithfull diligence to Minister the Doctrine and Sacraments of Christ There is therefore some other kind of discipline of Christ intendeth by the Parleament to be attributed The Parleament intendeth some other discipline then of declaring by doctrine vnto euerie Minister and wherewith also the law of the Realm doth enable euerie Minister then is this maner of discipline of declaring by doctrine teaching the people And this discipline also must needs be vnderstood to be of the spirituall censures of the Church because Christ neuer instituted any other discipline And therefore because our opposites agree with vs in a generalitie that the doctrine Sacraments and Answere to the abstract 55. 60. discipline of Christ are to be Ministred as the Lord hath commaunded onlie none otherwise and yet neuertheles doe dissent from vs touching the persons by whom this discipline is to be ministred because say they everie particuler ceremonie rite or circumstance of externall policie are not set downe in scripture because of this their answere I say it is to be coÌ„sidered First vnto what persons the function of the ministration of the discipline of Christ by the holy Scriptures is coÌ„mitted Secondlie whether the same persons with their functions be arbitrable ceremonious rituall or circuÌ„stantiall to be altered chaÌ„ged by authoritie of the Church as thinges To what persons the discipline of Christ by the scriptures is committed whether the persons bee arbitrable or no. indifferent yea or no. To the first seeing to one and the selfe same person the holie Scriptures attribute these two names Bishop and Pastor thereby signifying what are the two duties which belong to the same one person and seeing also no one person by Gods word is called a Bishop or Pastour in regard of Phil 1. 1. his fellow brethren the other Bishopps Tit. 9. 1. 5. 7. or Pastours but in regard of his owne flocke which he overseeth and seeing 1 Tim. 3. 1â— also in well ordered Churches by the ordinance of God certeyne men of approved godlines called according to the common name of the Hebrewes by the common name of Elders whom partly calleth governors were ioyned as ecclesiasticall Magistrats to the Bishop 1 Cor. 12. 28. Pastor or teaching Elder by whose coÌ„mon direction authoritie ecclesiasticall discipline was practised seeing I say these things are so we affirme that the persons to whom the ministratioÌ„ of the discipline of Christ rightlie belongeth are the persons onlie aboue specified and none other And further we say if any spirituall Discipline or power which directlie belongeth vnto the conscience The Discipline of Christ prophaned if the same be ministred by other persons then the holie scriptures doe appoint be ministred in the church by any other persons theÌ„ by those persons only that the same discipline is not to be called the discipline but a mere prophanation of the Discipline of Christ For as it is vnlawfull for any person to vsurpe any part of the Bishopps or Pastors office which consisteth in spiritual teaching the word and administring the sacraments so is it also vnlawfull for any person to vsurpe any parte of a Bishopps Pastors or Elders office which consisteth in spirituall rule and gouernment Whervpon it secondlie followeth that the same persons with their functions are not arbitrable ceremoniall rituall and circumstanciall as things indifferent to be altered by the authoritie of the church but perpetuall substanciall essentiall and as it were the verie mayne and fundamentall pillers to vphold stay the house of God from all spirituall sliding and falling downe And therefore from the execution of the discipline of Christ we seclude the persons of all humane Archbishopps humane Bishoppes Suffraganes Archdeacons Chauncelors Commissaries Officials and all Rowland Allens because their persons
by the scriptures it can not bee prooved that there be two seuerall distinct formes of ordinations the one called consecration proper to a Lord Bishoppe for the exercise of Discipline the other called ordination peculiar to a Pastor or teaching Elder for the ministration of the word and Sacraments Wherevnto lastlie If the Lord Bishop haue power to minister discipline by diuine right thē no more can he commit that his power to another thē he can commit the power which hee hath of preaching to another may be added another maine reason that Episcopall power in Englande to minister the discipline can not therfore be of divine institution because if it were of divine institution the Bishoppe could no more surrogate the same his episcopall power to his Suffragane to his Vicar generall or Rouland Allen to minister the censures of Christ in his owne name then he can depute them or any of them to minister the doctrine Sacramentes in his own name But how doth it appeare that the Vicar generall Rowland Allen or any other Presbyter did ever excommunicate by the power or in the name of the Bishoppe For the profe hereof we shall not need to search any other authenticall record then the precept and the practise before intreated of For it is not saide in the precept That the Presbyter being armed with authoritie from Christ but it is sayde that the Presbyter being armed with authoritie from the Bishoppe or Archdeacon shall denounce the sentence of excommunication the practise also of Doctor Hone every way confirmeth as much For therein Doctor Hone doeth not chalēge to be an officer vnto Christ but he sayeth that he is the officiall of the venerable Archdeacō of Surrey and that Maister Rowland Allen Presbyter by vertu of his office doth excommunicate the parties who obeyed not his mandates who made not their appearances before him c. If it be answered that Rowland Allen though he be not an immediate officer from Christ that yet nevertheles he is a mediate officer deputed to his office by an immediate officer vnto Christ vix the Lord Bishoppe or Archdeacon then we replie and say First that the Lord Bishoppe Archdeacon bee neither immediate or mediate officers appointed by Christ to be Ministers of his discipline Secondlie if they were immediate officers from Christ that yet they haue no authoritie by the law of Christ to transferre their right or any part thereof to an other person or to depute an other person in their name or by their authoritie to excommunicate As for these words viz In Dei nomine amen nos Iohānes Hone or nos Roulandus Allen c. sometimes vsed in their scedule of excommunication it is but a prophaning of the holie name of God whereby they make them selues guiltie of the taking of the glorious name of God in vaine And thus much touching both the question and answer whether the discipline of Christ may be ministred by the Bishoppes humane episcopall power yea or no. But now on the other side because no divine censure can lawfullie be executed in the church by that authoritie which is of humane institution if it be aunswered that the Bishop by reason of his pastorall Whether the L. Bishopp by pastorall authoritie may excommunicate a Pastor power which hee is saide to haue over all the Pastours and people of his Diocesse may lawfullie not onlie minister the worde and Sacraments but also the Discipline of Christ vnto them all then it followeth that by a Pastourall power one Pastour may be a Pastour of Pastors which is against the Scriptures and contrarie to the brotherly fellow-like authoritie which is common to all Pastours vnder the sunne and betwene whom touching their Pastourall functions there is to this day by the Scriptures as litle superioritie and as great a paritie as ever there was betwene Apostles and Apostles betwene Prophets and Prophets or betwene Evangelistes and Evāgelistes and as at this day there is betwene Bishops Bishops betwene Archbishops and Archbishops or betwene Patriarckes and Patriarckes yea and as is betweene Earles and Earles Dukes and Dukes Kinges and Kinges Emperours Emperours For no greater superioritie or preheminence hath any one Pastor over the person or function of an other Pastour touching the administratiō of any thing properly belōging Pastoures ouer small flockes are as truely pastors as Pastors ouer great flocks to either of their pastoral functions thē hath one Emperor over the person or function of an other Emperor or one King over the person or functiō of an other King or one Lord Bishop over the person or function of an other Lord Bishop or one Archbishop over the person or functiō of an other Archbishop or then had one Apostle over the person As great paritie betwene Pastors Pastors as between Apostles Apostles or function of an other Apostle Nay then hath one eye over an other eye one hand over an other hand one arme over another arme or one foot over another foote And therefore if touching the functions which Pastors either among them selues haue in common one with the other or which they haue over their flockes there be no disparitie but that the Pastors to whom small flockes are committed doe as reallie and as truelie participate of the nature of true Pastors as those great Pastours doe vpon whose great shoulders great burdens are imposed it behoveth great Pastors to prove vnto vs by the holie Scriptures that by the institution of their great pastorall functions they haue their power so enlarged as that thereby they may preach the Word minister the Sacraments and excommunicate and that on the other side the litle Pastours haue their power by the institution of their petie pastorall offices so streightned as whereby they may onlie preach the Word and administer the Sacramentes but not excommunicate it behooveth I say great Pastors to be able sufficiently to shew vnto vs these thinges out of the holy Scriptures or els it seemeth to stande with reason and equitie deduced from the same Scriptures that a Pastor over a few should haue like power to teach and to governe a few as a great Pastor over manie hath to instruct and to rule many Marie if they think that only great Pastors be true Pastors that great powers spirituall be only true powers spirituall then let them also conclude that onely great Knights be true Knights that only great Dukes bee true Dukes that onely great Kings be true Kings and that only great principalities temporall bee true principalities temporall Which conclusion Not onelie Kinges of great kingdomes but also Kinges of small kingdomes bee true kings if they shall iudge to be conclusionles because King Rehoboam had as large a patent to feede and to command two Tribes as King Solomon his Father had to command and to feede twelue or as the Archbishop of Yorke may suppose him self to haue over nine or tenne Counties as the
ego sum via veritas vita He neuer said ego sum consuetudo Touching the iurisdiction of the Deane and Chapter the papall lawe being abrogated how the same may lawefullie now bee vsed otherwise then by sufferance and consent of the King and Realme I know not But of all spirituall authoritie exercised at this day in the Church of England the same semeth to draw most neare to the semblance of the gouernment practised by the Apostles and primitiue Church And might bee approued in many points if so bee the Deane and Chapter being as it were a Senate of preaching Elders did no more commit the execution of their ecclesiasticall iurisdiction to the wisedome of one Vicar general or principall official then they doe put over the leassing of their Landes or dividētes of their rentes to the onlie discretion of one of their Baylifes or Stewardes As for Bishoppes Suffraganes in Englande and in Wales how many there may be and what Cities and Townes are to be taken and accepted for their Seas it is at large expressed in a statute made for the nomination of Suffraganes By which statute also wee are given to vnderstand that it remayneth onely in the disposition and libertie of everie Archbishop Bishop within this Realm c. to name and elect two honest and discrete spirituall persons being learned of good conversation and them to present vnto the Kinge by their writing vnder their Seales making humble request to giue to one such of the saide two persons as shal please his Maiestie such title name stile dignitie of Bishop of such Seas specified in the said act as the Kings Highnes shall think most cōvenient for the same so it bee within the same Province whereof the Bb. that doth name him is Besides after such title stile and name given by the Kinge it is saide that the King shall present every such person by his letters patentes vnder his great Seale to the Archbishop of the same Province wherein the Towne whereof hee hath his title name stile and dignitie of Bishop and that the Archbishop shall giue him all such consecrations benedictions and ceremonies as to the degree and office of a Bishopps Suffragane shall be requisite It is further enacted provided that every person nominated elected presented and consecrated according to that acte shall be taken accepted and reputed in all degrees places according to the stile title name dignitie that he shall be presented vnto haue such capacitie power and authoritie honor preeminence reputation in as large ample maner in cōcerning the executiō of such cōmission as by any of the saide Archb. or Bb. within their Diocesse shall be given to the saide Suffragane as to Suffraganes of this Realm hertofore hath bin vsed accustomed And that no Suffr made cōsecrated by vertue of this act shall take or receiue any maner of profits of the places Seas wherof they shall be named nor vse haue or execute any iurisdiction or Episcopall power or authoritie within their said Seas c. but only such profites iurisdiction authoritie as shall be licensed and limited vnto them to take do and execute by any Archbishopp or Bb. within their Diocesse to whom they shall be Suffraganes vnder their seales And that no such Suffragane shall vse any iurisdiction ordinarie or Episcopall power otherwise nor longer time then shall be limited by such commission to him giuen vpon peyne c. From which Act touching the vse exercise of Episcopall power and censures by the Suffragane we may againe safely conclude that the Episcopall power graunted by the Bishops to be vsed by the Suffragane is not of diuine right and institution but only from humane devise and ordinance For the Suffragan could not exercise any power called spirituall or Episcopall vnles by the Bb. he were nominated by the King elected and presented by the Archb. consecrated and by commission vnder the Bb. seale authorized in what maner and for what time he should exercise the same Custome then being not from heauen but from the earth and againe the Bb. commissiō limiting the Suffraganes delegated power being of man and not of God it followeth necessarilie that that Episcopall power which the Bishoppes vse and exercise in England can not be diuine but humane Because Episcopall authoritie which is diuine being conveyed from the Royall and Souerayne authoritie of our Sauiour Christ the giuer of all power vnto euerie officer within his Church can not be transferred to any other person by the same Bb. by the King by the bodie of the state or by custome For the Kings person and bodie of the state not being made capable by the holie scriptures to vse and exercise that Episcopall power which is of diuine institutiō can neuer transferre the same to others whereof they be thē selues vncapable And to defende that custome or any municipall lawe should transferre diuine Episcopal power from a divine Bishopp to any humane officer is more erroneous And from hence if the now L. Bb. of London iudge his Episcopall power to belong vnto him by divine and that by the same right he haue power aswell to ordeyne depose suspend and excommunicate presbyters as to confirme boyes girles yong men maydens there seemeth to bee good reason that the same Bb. should make it apparantly knowne vnto the King Realm by what power or commission descended from heaven hee may delegate vnder his Seale the same his divine authoritie of ordination deposition suspension excommunication and confirmation vnto Doctour Sterne his now Suffragane of Colchester For if from the holy Scriptures hee can produce no warrant for the making of a delegation of any part of that Episcopal power which he holdeth to be cōmitted vnto him frō our Savior Christ then well may we conclude against the ordination deposition suspention excommunication confirmation made by the same his Suffragane that the same his Suffraganes ordination deposition c. is not divine For how can an ordination a deposition c. made by a Suffragane be divine when as the commission graunted by the Bishop is meerlie humane Wherefore seeing the Bishop himself hath plucked certeyne of his principall feathers from his own spirituall winges if so be his owne winges may be spirituall and imped them with an vntwysted thread of humane policie to the humane trayne of his Suffragane and seeing also his Archbishoppes grace of Canterburie in cases of his metropoliticall prerogatiue the Archdeacons London Midlesex Essex Hertforde the Deane of Paules and certeyne prebendaries in Paules the Deane of Westminster the Maister of the Savoy and divers other Persons haue by Papall privileges or by auncient custome prescribed almost all other partes of his Episcopall power there seemeth good reason that the Bishoppe should againe declare whether the Churches within the saide Diocesse after the decease or translation of his Lordshippe shall stande in neede of any Lordlie Successour to sitt
the Kings prerogative Royall be duely advanced Which things if it might please them rightly to consider then let them humblie and seriouslie beseech our Sovereine Lord the King and States in Parleament to giue their consentes to such a law as the proiect ensuing may warrant thē the same not to be dangerous to the overthrowe of their civill studies The Proiect of an Act for the explanation and amplifying of one branch of a statute made in the first yeere of the raigne of Queene Elizabeth entituled An Act restoringe to the Crowne the ancient iurisdiction over the state Ecclesiasticall and also for the declaring and reviving of a statute made in the first yere of King Edward the sixt entituled An Act what seales and stiles Bishops and other spiritual persons exercising iurisdiction ecclesiasticall shall vse FOr asmuch as by one braunch of an Act made in the first yeere of our late Soveraigne Ladie of blessed memorie Queene Elizabeth entituled an Act restoring to the Crowne the auncient iurisdiction over the state Ecclesiastical Spirituall and abolishing all forraigne power repugnant to the same it was established and enacted That such iurisdictions priviledges superiorities and preheminences spiritual and ecclesiasticall as by anie spirituall or ecclesiasticall power or authoritie hath heeretofore bin or may lawfully be exercised or vsed for the visitation of the Ecclesiasticall state and persons and for reformation order correction of the same and of all maner errors heresies schismes abuses offences contempts and enormities should for euer by authoritie of that present Parleament be vnited and annexed to the Imperiall Crowne of this Realme by meanes whereof it may now be made a questiō whether any Archbishops or other Ecclesiasticall persons having since that time vsed or exercised any such spirituall or ecclesiasticall iurisdiction in their owne right or names might lawfully haue done or hereafter may lawfully doe the same without speciall warrant and authoritie derived immediatly frō your Highnes by and vnder your H. letters patents And whereas also by a statute made in the first yeare of Kinge Edward the sixt entituled an act what seales and stile Bishops or other spirituall persons shall vse it was ordained that all and singular Archbishops and Bishops others exercising ecclesiastical iurisdictiō should in their processe vse the Kings name and stile and not their owne and also that their Seales should bee graved with the Kings armes And forasmuch also as it must bee highly derogatorie to the Imperiall Crowne of this your Highnesse Realme that any cause whatsoever ecclesiasticall or temporall within these your H. Dominions should be heard or adiudged without warrant or commission from your Highnes your heyres successors or not in the name stile and dignitie of your Highnes your heyres and successors or that anie seales should be annexed to anie promesse but onelie your Kinglie seale and armes May it therefore please the King at the humble supplication of his Commons to haue it enacted That the aforesaid branch of the aforesaid Act made in the first yeere of Queene Elizabeth her raigne everie part thereof may still remayne for ever be in force And to the end the true intent and meaning of the said statute made in the first yeere of King Edward the sixt may be declared and revived that likewise by the authoritie aforesaid it may be ordayned and enacted that all and singular Ecclesiastical Courts and Consistories belonging to any Archb. Bb. Suffraganes Colege Deane and Chapiter Prebendarie or to any Ecclesiasticall person or persons whatsoever and which haue heretofore bin commonly called reputed taken or knowne to bee Courts or Consistories for causes of instance or wherein any suite complaint or action betwene partie and partie for any matter or cause wherin iudgment of law civil or canon hath bin or is required shall and may for ever hereafter be reputed taken and adiudged to be Courts and iudgmentseats meerely civill secular and temporall and not hence foorth Ecclesiasticall or spirituall and as of right belonging and apperteyning to the Royall Crowne and dignitie of our Soveraigne Lorde Kinge Iames that nowe is his heyres and successors for ever And that all causes of instance and controversies betwene partie partie at this day determinable in any of the said Courts heretofore taken and reputed ecclesiasticall shall for ever hereafter bee taken reputed and adiudged to be causes meerely civill secular and temporall as in trueth they ought to be and of right are belonging and appertayning to the iurisdiction of the Imperiall Crowne of this Realme And further that your H. liege people may be the better kept in awe by some authorised to be your H. Officers Ministers to execute iustice in your Highnes name and vnder your H. stile and title of King of England Scotlād Frāce and Ireland defendor of the faith c. in the said Courtes and Constories and in the said causes and controversies Bee it therefore enacted by the authoritie aforesaid That all the right title and interest of in and to the said Courts and Consistories and in and to the causes controversies aforesaide by any power iurisdiction or authoritie heretofore reputed Ecclesiasticall but by this Act adiudged civill secular and temporall shall for ever hereafter actually and reallie be invested and appropried in and to the Royall person of our Soveraigne Lord the King that now is his heyres successors Kinges and Queenes of this Realme And that it shall and may bee lawfull to and for our saide Soveraigne Lord and King his heyres and successors in all and everie Shire and Shires Diocesse and Diocesses within his H. Dominions and Countries by his and their letters patents vnder the great Seale of England from tyme to tyme and at all tymes to nominat and appoint one or moe able and sufficient Doctor or Doctors learned in the civill law to be his and their civil secular and temporal Officer and Officers Minister and Ministers of Iustice in the same civill secular and temporall Courts Consistories which in and ouer his and their royall name stile and dignitie shall as Iudge and Iudges doe perform execute all and every such act and acts thing and things whatsoeuer in and about the execution of iustice and equitie in those Courts according to the course and order of the civill lawe or the Ecclesiasticall canons and constitutions of the Realme as heretofore hath bin vsed and accustomed to bee done by for or in the name of any Archbb. Bb College Cathedral Church Deane Archdeacon Prebendary or any other Ecclesiasticall person or persons whatsoeuer And that all and every such civill secular and temporall Officer and Officers Minister and Ministers Iudge Iudges in his and their processe shall vse one manner of Seale only and none other hauing graued decently therein your Kingly armes with certaine characters for the knowledge of the Diocesse or Shire And further bee it enacted c That it shall and may be lawfull by
the authoritie aforesaide for our said Soveraigne L. the King his heyres and succerssors from tyme to tyme and at all tymes to nominat and appoint by his and their Highnes letters patents vndee the great Seale of England for euerie Shire and Shires Diocesse and Diocesses within his or their H. Dominions one or moe able sufficient persons learned in the civill lawe to be his and their Notarie and Notaries Register and Registers by him them selues or by his or their lawfull Deputie or Deputies to doe performe and execute all and euery such act acts thing and things as heretofore in the Courts and Consistories Ecclesiasticall aforesaid hath bin and now are incident and apperteyning to the office of any Register or Notarie And further at the humble suite of the Commons c. it may please the King to haue it enacted That all singular matters of Wills Testaments with all and everie their appendices that all and singular matters of Spousalls Mariages with their accessories that all and singular matters of diffamation heereto fore determinable in the ecclesiasticall Courtes and if there be anie other causes of the like meere civill nature shall be heard examined and determined by the said civill and secular Officers and Iudges in the said civil and secular Courtes according to the due course of the civil law or statutes of the Realme in that behalfe provided And that all matters of Tythes Dilapidations repayre of churches and if there be anie other of like nature with their accessories and appendices shal be heard examined and determined by the saido civill and secular Officers and Iudges in the said civil and secular Courtes according to the Kings ecclesiasticall lawes statutes and customes of the Realme in that behalfe heeretofore vsed or heereafter by the King and Parleament to be established And at the humble suite of the Commons may it please the King to haue it further enacted That all maner of fees heeretofore lawfull or heereafter by the King and Parleament to bee made lawfull for or concerning the probat of Willes administration of the goods of the intestat letters of tuition receyving or making of accompts inductions to Archbishoprickes Bishoprickes Dearries Parochiall-churches or other spirituall promotions and all other feees what soeuer heretofore lawfull or hereafter to be made lawful for anie travaile or paine to be taken in or about the expedition and execution of any of these causes shall for ever hereafter be fees allowances appropriated to the Iudges and principall Registers of the sayde Courtes equally to be devided betwene them as heeretofore hath bin accustomed and that the said Iudges and Ministers within their severall charges shal be Collectors of the Kings tenthes and subsidies graunted and due by the Clergie taking for their travayle and payne in and about the same collection such fees as heretofore haue bin accustomed Provided alwayes that none of the saide civill and temporall Officers and Ministers nor any of them for any offence contempt or abuse to be committed by any person or persons in any wise incident to any of the said Courts and Consistories suspend excommunicate or interdict any person or persons but shall and lawfully may by authoritie of this present Act proceed against everie offendor and offendors by such ordinarie processe out of the said Register or Notaries office as is vsed vpon a sub-pae-na out of the high Court of Chancerie and there vpon default or contempt to proceed to attachment proclamatiō of rebellion and in prisonment of the partie offending as in the said high Court of Chācerie is vsed Provided also that all appeales hereafter to be made from all and every Court and Courts in the Shyres and Diocesses of the Countrey shal be made to the higher Courtes as heretofore hath bin accustomed onely with an alteration and addition of the names stiles and dignities of Archb. Bb. and other Ordinaries vnto the name stile and dignitie of our Soveraign Lord the King his heyres and successors And that vpon the appeales so to be made it shall and may be lawfull for the Iudges Ministers of Iustice of and in the said higher Courts to make out all maner of processe and processes and to doe execute all and every act and acts thing things for the furtherance of Iustice in the causes afore said as to them shall by the law seeme equall right meete convenient any law statute privilege dispensation prescriptiō vse or customs heretofore to the contrarie in any wise notwithstanding Provided also that all and every such Iudge and Minister that shall execute any thing by vertue of this act shal from time to time obey the Kings write writs of prohibition of attachment vpon prohibition and indicavit and not to proceede contrarie to the tenour of such write or writes in such and the same maner and forme and condition as they have or ought to haue done before the making of this act any thing in this act to the contrary notwithstanding Provided also that this acte or any thing therein conteigned shal not extend or be interpreted to give any authoritie to the said Iudges Ossicers or any of them to put in execution any civill or Ecclesiasticall lawe repugnant or contrariant to the lawes statutes or customes of the Realm or hurtfull to the Kings prerogatiue Royall And thus it may seeme to bee but a small labour a litle cost and an easie matter for the Kinge his Nobles and Wise men of the Realm to devise formes of iudgement and maner of processe proceedings without any offices or functions of the canon law wherby the vse and studie of the civill lawe and the rewarde and maintenance for Civilians might be furthered and increased and not vtterly overthrowne taken away as the Admonitor vncivily beareth vs in hand As for the alteration of the censure of excommunication for contumacie mētioned in this proiect we haue the consent of the reverende Bishops in Pag. 138. this admonition that the same may bee altered For the Admonitor their Prolocutor speaketh on this wise Viz. As for Excommunication for contumacie by the Admonitors iudgement may be takē away without offence and with the good liking of the Bishops the excommunication practised in our ecclesiasticall Courts for contumacie in not appearing or not satisfying the iudgement of the Courte if it had pleased the Prince c. to have altered the same at the beginning and set some other order of processe in place thereof I am perswaded saith he that the Bishops Clergie of the Realme would haue bin very well contented therewith And speakinge of a certaine maner of civill discomoning vsed in the Church of Tigure he further addeth viz. Which or the like good order devised by some godlie persons if it might be by authoritie placed in this Church c I think it would be gladlie receaved to shun the offence that is taken at the other Admonition And matters
the Lordes temporall whether the Lordes spirituall would or no. And that contrary to the expresse decrees canons of the church of Rome And thus much the most reverend and godly Father Maister Iewell Bishop of Salisbury wherefore to conclude this point against the Admonitors position I dispute thus All those persons who by any necessity are none of the three estates and by whose authorities the statutes of England to this day haue not stood to leaue out the same persons may happely seeme a matter of lesse weyght then all men doe iudge it But the Archb and Bb. are such persons as by necessitie are none of the three estates and by whose consents the statutes of Englande to this day haue not stood Therefore to leaue out the Archb and Bb. may happely seeme a matter of lesse weight then all men doe iudge it If our Evangelicall Bishops be of that opinion of which the Popish Bishops were viz that the house of Parleament is an vnfit an vnmeete place to haue the holie cause of the religion of God debated and concluded vpon and that the Layitie without the Clergie ought not to conclude any thinge in religion that in respect hereof their presences their voyces and their assents are necessarie in the Parleament If our Evangelicall Prelates I say make this obiection then besides that hereby they vnseemely vnmannerly vnchristianly accuse the whole land of ignorance and blindnes in religion supposing neither King nor Nobles nor Commons to be able to discerne betwene night and day besides this I say so shamefull an abuse of a whole Christian nation I would pray them to remember what the most reuerend Fathers Maister Pilkington Maister Iewell haue aunswered to such cavillous slaunders For what els intended they by many examples proofes brought for the Parleamentes of England consisting of the King the Nobles and the Commons to be lawfull Parleaments and to haue right to establish religion but to iustifie against Popish scoffers that religion might be receyued established in Parleament notwithstandinge the absence or exclusion of the Clergie Besides since our lawes do vphold the state authoritie of the Convocation Matters of religion not concluded in Parleament before the same bee consulted of in conuocation house for the examination of all causes of Religion surely it can not be truely averred that it is necessarie for Evangelicall Bishops to be members of the Parleament house least controversie of religion should be handled and discussed without them For how should any matter of religion bee concluded without them in Parleament when first of all the same is to be argued among them selves in convocation or let them hardely if they can shew any one instance of any change or alteratiō either from religion to superstition or from superstitiō to religion to haue bin made in Parleament vnlesse the same freely at large haue bene first agreed vppon in their Synodes and Convocations And what booteth it then to haue a double or treble consultation and consent of Archbishops Bishops in Parleament Is the holy cause of God any whit bettered by their Bishops riding from Paules to Westminster Or can it receiue any more strength by their walking from Westminster Church to Westminster Pallace Nay it hath bene oftentimes so farr from being promoted by their Bishops as not onelie in their convocations but also in the Queenes Parleaments the same hath ben shamefully intreated and taken the foile as may witnesse the bill for the better observation of the Sabboth 27. Eliz. which beeing passed by both houses of Parleament was notwithstanding gainesaid withstood by none so much as by certayne Evangelicall Bishops which as there all men generallie conceaved was onlie stayed from being made a law by the Queene vpon their counsell and perswasion Admonition It hath bene alwayes dangerous to pick quarels against lawes setled Pag. 78. Assertion And is it not morbus hereditarius in Steuen Gardeners argument and the Admonitors argumēt in effect one Prelates to picke quarrels against reformation of errours For even this did Steven Gardener reason against the Lord Protector That in no case sayth Steuen Gardener is to bee attempted of the Lord Protector which may bring both danger to him and trouble to the whole Realme But innovation of Religion from that state wherein King Henry left it may bee and is like to bee dangerous to the Lord protector to breed troubles to the whole Realme Therefore innouation of Religion from the state that King Henry left it is in no wise to be attempted And even of this stāpe of this streyne is the argument of picking quarrelles against lawes settled for thus in effect he argueth That Discipline in no case is to bee brought into the Church by the Kinge Parleament which may be dangerous to lawes setled But to bring into the Church the Apostolicall discipline may bee dangerous to lawes setled Therefore the Apostolicall Discipline in no case is to bee brought into the Church by the King Parleament But forasmuch as that noble and religious Lord Protector notwithstanding Steven Gardiners sophistrie continued constant and couragious in the abolishment of Poperie and superstition which King Henrie left did without dangerous alterations of lawes then settled innovate religion How much more now may the Kings Maiestie the Lesse dāger to reforme the Church by newe lawes then to continue corruptiō by old lawes Lords and Commons in Parleament attempt with effect an innovation of that state of Ecclesiasticall goverment wherin the Queene left the Church And if it can not be denied but it had bene farre more daungerous for the Realme and for the Lord protector not to haue setled the holy doctrine of the everlasting Gospel by new lawes then to haue mainteyned and continued antichristianitie by old lawes how should it bee lesse danger for the King in these dayes to continue corruptions in the Church by tolleration of old lawes then to haue the same corruptions reformed by establishment of new lawes But vnto whō or vnto what hath it bene daungerous to picke quarrelles against lawes setled What Hath it bene dangerous to lawes setled No. For how should lawes setled be indangered by quarelers sithence quarellers are euermore in daunger of lawes settled Or hath it bene alwayes dangerous for a King for a State for a people or for a Countrey to picke quarelles against lawes setled No. For what man is he or what face carieth he that dare vpbrayde a Countrey a people a State or a King minding to vnsetle evil lawes euill customes to be quarelers against lawes setled Let it then onlie be daungerous for private persons vpon private malecontentment to picke quarelles against good lawes wel rightly setled and let it not be hurtfull or dangerous for supreame Kings powers and Principalities by publicke edicts to alter evill lawes evilly setled For to what other end should evill lawes evilly setled
godly vses how the same may bee best imployed And let the Discipline loe these sage Counsellours were all Disciplinarians be reserved vntill that time For they whose frowardnes hath bene publicke and tending to the common offence of the Church let such be recalled to the acknowledgement of their faultes and let them publicklie for the same be censured that the Church by their wholesome coertion may be brought in good frame Afterward let the Minister going apart with some of the Elders take counsell how the others whose manners are said to be lewd and whose life is saide to be full of mischiefe may first according to the commaundement of Christ in the Gospell come together be communed with by sober and discreete men and with a certeine kinde of brotherly loue By whose admonition if they shall reforme themselues thanks are diligently to be giuen vnto God But if they shall proceed foorth in their wickednes they are to be bound with that sharpe payne which by the Gospell wee know to bee prepared for contumacie And when the force and vehemencie of excommunication shal be shaken first let the Bishoppe be sought vnto who if he shall consent and oppose his authoritie let the forme of excommunicatiō be dispatched before the whole church that we may bring in as much as may be the auncient Discipline Thus much haue these most Christian Disciplinarians and renewers of the auncient Discipline by Pastours Elders and Deacons both written and spoken And yet haue they sounded neuer a word to the finding of Elders and Deacons by the Parish nor by hauing men of occupatiōs to leaue their busines to attend vpon matters of the Church For men thus meeting together once onely in the weeke and that vpon the Lords day and that onely within their owne parishes and without payment of any fees may very well notwithstanding these attendances giue themselues wholie all the weeke following to their ordinary vocations And therefore against his not able to find one tollerable Minister much lesse to find a company c. I conclude thus No Parish in England shall be burdened to find so much as one Seniour or Deacon Therefore much lesse shall euery Parish bee burdened to find a company of Seniours c. Where the Admonitor complayneth Tollerable and intollerable Ministers that many parishes are not able to finde one tollerable Minister we would gladlie learne by what brand tollerable Ministers are knowne from intollerable Ministers according as the Lords spirituall iudge or iudge not of tollerable vntollerable Ministers For if all reading Ministers as nedes with them they must be or ells why doe they tollerate them bee tollerable Ministers what a vayne and idle distinction hath he coyned touching the scarcitie of maintenance for tollerable Ministers Considering all Ministers by intendement of lawe be able to reade and considering also a verie small maintenance is esteemed to be a tollerable maintenance for reading ministers For ells why doe the great Bishoppes in their great Churches of Cōmendames and the rich Doctors in their rich Churches of non residencies make so small allowances to their reading and stipendarie Curates And where then is that parishe in Englande that is not able to mainteyne a tollerable Minister The next argument that the people might not choose their Pastours Elders Pag. 78. and Deacons as is required is drawen partlie from a feare that the same wil be a matter of schisme discord and dissention in many places partlie from affection and want of right iudgement of the people partlie from the vnrulines of the parishes and partlie from the broyle and trouble which may follow Assertion Vnto this obiection if I should aunswere nothing at all but onely should The obiectiō of feare c. answered deny that any feare or any other inconvenience at all pretended in this place is to be feared to ensue my simple negation were more to be tollerated then his simple affirmation for by the canon lawe non inficienti sed ponenti incumbit onus probandi And yet because the Lord hath spoken vnto Iosua in him vnto Doct. in c. 6 cui depreb Lib. 2. vs all that wee should not feare nor bee discouraged to obserue and to doe all that is written in the law for then sayth the Lord shalt thou make thy way prosperous and then shalt thou haue good successe therefore in the word of the Lord I say that none of all this feare broyle trouble or turmoyle is to bee feared at al. Nay that it is most assuredly and without all doubt to bee hoped looked for that he would so blesse the attempt of putting his order in execution as that the peoples approbation and allowance of their Ministers should bee a matter of all peace quietnes vnitie concorde good successe and prosperitie to the whole Church of God in England For what an heathnish incredulitie were it for vs to replie vpon the erroneous conceyte of a timorous and suspicious fancie that feare and I wot not what vnrulines vnquietnes shall follow when we receyving the lawes of peace from the Prince of peace haue his most stable trueth that his peace shall rest vpon vs and that all feare and evill successe shall cease and vanish away No busie headded body therefore shall bee able to leade any man away to disquiet either Church or common Wealth otherwise then as the Church in all ages by the malice of Satan and his instrumentes hath euermore bene disquieted if once the holy law of the Gospell touching this point were obserued put in vre And if it be feared that the choyce to be made by the people of God and which is allowed vnto them by the holy lawes of God would proue to be a matter of schisme discord and dissention howe much more reason haue wee to feare that the fire of schisme discorde and dissention being blowen alreadie should not break out and flame among vs if still one man alone be suffered to thrust vpon the people of God not tollerable Ministers accordinge to Gods heart but intollerable ministers according to mans tradition The Admonitor hath insinuated vnto vs often in this admonition that it is dāgerous to innovate And so I say too vnlesse there be evident M. de cōstitu prim L. 2 vtilitie of innovation For saith the Emperour in rebus novis constituendis evidens esse vtilitas debet vt ab eo iure recedatur quod diu aequum visum est But is it not as perilous yea sometimes much Dangerous to innouate vnlesse there bee euident vtility of innovation more perilous not to innovate for proofe whereof it shall suffice to take witnes of our owne times of our own experiences It seemed equal a long time and for many yeres that the sacrifice of the Masse with all the pelfe and trumperie thereof should not once be spoken against But we all know that the abandoning thereof hath not yet brought any perilous
carefullie vse this his freedome And therefore he may not wholy and altogether put from him selfe and expose at haphazard the provision education instruction dieting appareling and lodging of his wife his sonnes his daughters and his servaunts vnto strangers neither may Husbandes Fathers nor Maisters giue their consent to the making of anie lawe or the bringing in of anie custome whereby their freedomes should be restreyned adnihiled or made voyde in this behalfe For by thus violating the rules and grounds by thus treading as it were vnder foote the equitie of Christ and the freedome they haue by the lawe of God should they not most prophanelie and impiouslie despight God and as it were over turne the whole order he hath set in nature And if the people may not cast off these rules and these groundes this equitie and this freedome in thinges apperteyning to this frayle bodily transitorie and earthlie life howe much lesse may they cast them off or sett litle by them in things apperteyning to the salvation of their soules and to a durable spirituall everlasting and heavenlie life But the peoples right to choose their Obiection that the peoples right did neuer depend vpō the expresse commandemēt of God Bishoppes did never depende vpon the expresse commaundement of God neither can the people chalendge by Gods law the right to chose their Bishoppes I meane saieth he no such thinge is expressed and conteyned in the Scriptures What then if it doe depend or bee conteyned vnder the generall groundes and rules of reason nature christian equitie christian societie principles of humane fellowshippes the law of God the practise of the Apostles and that which was from the beginning Is it not sufficient Though it bee not expressed in these termes viz That the people must chose or that the people haue right to choose their Bishoppes It is not expressed and conteyned in the scriptures that everie man must choose his owne wife or that everie woman must choose her own husband And yet by the doctrine expressed or conteyned in the scriptures is it true that no man hath right either to choose an other mans wife or to choose an other womans husband And that everie man hath right to chose his owne wife and every woman right to choose her owne husbande Againe it is not expressed and conteyned in the scriptures that infantes must bee baptized Neither is it expressed and conteyned in the scriptures that the Bishopp of Lichfield must haue but one wife Yet because it is conteyned in the scriptures that God in the beginning brought but one woman vnto one man and gaue to one woman but one husband I assure my selfe it wil not be denied but that the Bishops must and doth content him selfe with one wife and that every Christian ought to bring their children to be Baptized Besides if Maister Bilson distinguish Bishops in England from Pastors in England and Arch-Bishops in England and Pastours in England two severall orders and degrees of Ministers in the Church of England then I graunt that it is neither expressed nor cōteyned in the Scriptures that the people must choose their Bishops in England And why but because the Scriptures having put no difference betwene Bishops and Pastours knowe no such Bishops as wee haue in Bishopps in England are only Bishops by the Kings grace not by diuine institution England And therfore Bishops in England being Bishops only by the Kinges grace and not by divine institution and ordination as Pastours in Englande be hence is it that the Kings of England by their prerogatiue Royall and not the people by the rule of Scriptures haue chosen their Bishops in England And for this cause also was it that Kinge Henry the eight with advise of the Parleament did reassume the nomination appointment investiture cōfirmation of his Kingly Bishops from the Pope As for the nomination of Pastoures having cure of soules in parishes otherwise Pastors in parochiall Churches were neuer placed by the King as Bb. are in their Bishoprickes then all patrones by right of patronage doe giue presentmentes their choyse institution translation or deprivation the Kings of Enland by their regall power never yet hetherto tooke the same vpon them And if the Kinges of England by any fact or by any law did never take away the right interest and freedome from the people in choosing their Pastours what right other then by vsurpation can the Bishops haue to impose or thrust vpon the people Pastours without their liking But by custome and consent the people haue restreyned them selves Herevnto if it were not already sufficiently answered that the people could not lawfully restreine them selves yet Maister Bilson him selfe answereth That the late Bb. of The people lost their cōsent by cursing fighting of the Popes Rome neuer left cursing fighting till they had excluded both Prince and people and reduced the electiō wholy to the Clergie By cursing and fighting then haue the people bene overruled and excluded and not by custome or consent haue they restreyned them selues Yea by vertue of this cursed fight onely doe the Bishoppes of Englande at this day exclude both Prince and people from medling in the choyse of Pastoures For by authoritie of the canon law made by those late cursing and fighting Bishopps of Rome the Bishoppes of Englād haue the sole ordination and placinge of Pastours over the people And from hence also is it playne that the peoples right was not by their default or abuse relinquished and forfeyted For then then late Bishoppes of Rome needed not to haue cursed and fought for it And now whether it bee not meete that the Lord Bb. professing them selues to bee Christian Bishoppes should still reteyne in their handes and not restore vnto Christian people the possession of their Christian equitie and freedome extorted from them by the cursings and fightinges of antichristian Bb. I leaue it to the consideration of the reverende Bishoppes them selues Touching the mischieves and inconveniences of schisme troubles strifes contentions so often inculcated and so much vrged and excepted against the election of the people there is no man able as I thinke to produce any one pregnant proofe out of any auncient or late Historie that any Kinge or Soveraigne power hath interposed any supreame authoritie to appease any discord or dissentiō ensuing or raised vpō the bare choise made of any meere Parochiall Pastour by any faithfull and Christian people The schismes strifes and factions that were raysed in the old Schismes contentions spring from schismaticall and proud clergy maisters Churches sprang out and flowed onely from the heads and fountaynes of those schismes strifes factions and namely from proud ambitious and hereticall Bishops and great Clergie maisters For they being infected and poysoned with the contagion of schisme and heresie having sowred the mindes of their Disciples with the leaven of their hereticall doctrines no merveile if the people
insinuate your selves into their companies you have tabled and boorded with the same parties and that you or one of you have bene heeretofore coÌ„vented for the causes aforesaid before the now lord Archb. his grace for enterteyning into your house a person whiche stood then and yet standed suspended deprived for disliking the booke of common prayer and other godly orders established by her Maiesties authoritie in this Realme Item we obiect vnto you the said G. B. and L. yourwife that you have not frequented divine service celebrated within your parish Church of Bothese vi 5. 4. 3. 2. or one yeares last nor doe not at this present at least every Sunday nor have receyved the holy Communion within your said parish Church during the saide yeares Quere whether the Bishop did not more offend the lawe of God by preferring these articles then the Gentleman did by procuring his children to bee Baptised by a preaching Minister having none at home Item that you the saide G. B. and L. your wife within the time aforesaid haue not Christened nor baptized your children within your parish Church but contrarie to the forme and order of hir Maiesties lawes in that case provided have eyther christened them at home privatelie in your owne house or have caried or caused them to be caried to other Churches And let them declare what Church and what Minister did baptise them and where and whether the same Minister did at the same baptisme signe the childe with the signe of the crosse and lett them declare the cause why they did baptize their children out of their parish Item that the Ministers pew or seate in the church of B. aforesaid by the directioÌ„ Note that the Bishop of L. was not Bishop of the Diocesse of the L. reverend Father in God the Bb. of L. that now is being at the same Church as also by the consent of the Minister and Church-Wardens there was placed in a verie convenient place of the Church to the end the parishioners there might the better heare and vnderstand the Minister at the time of reading the divine service Item we obiect vnto you that you the said F. B. within these vi or 3. monethes last past have without anie sufficient warrant or commaundement from the father in God the Lord Bishoppe of L. or his Chancelour or other having authoritie therein very disorderly and contemptuouslie remooved the same seat to the great offence of the parishioners and bad example of others Item we obiect vnto you that you know beleeue or have heard say that Za. G. is a Preacher of the word of God and a man of good life and conversation lawfull Parson of B. aforesaid Item we obiect vnto you that the premises notwithstanding you the said F. B. vpon a Sunday within a quarter of a yeare last past when the Parishioners of B. were assembled together at the saide Church to heare divine seruice caused divers serving men and others to sit in the pew or place which properly belonged to the Parson of the said Church so that when the saide M. G. came to take his place they thrust him and very disorderlie in the time of prayer kept him out of the said place Item wee obiect vnto you F. B. that about six yeares past you the saide F. brought into the Towne of B. a bastard child as it is credibly thought of your owne and there placed it at nurse and haue lately receyved it into your owne house to the great offence of the inhabitantes there and the bad example of others Et obijcimê° cu m duê° de quolibet Subscribed c. Wherevnto in the foote of these articles was added Maister B. I pray you let this matter be followed ex officio and the parties presently to be sent for by warrant Subscribed c. Now these Gentlemen according to the Bishoppes direction being presently sent for by a Pursevant to aunswere the articles obiected they foorthwith make their repayre to the Archbishop with a copie of the articles with whom they finde such grace as in their behalfe immediatly hee writeth to the Bishoppe as followeth SAlutem in Christo My very good Lorde I haue by meanes received these articles enclosed signed by your Lordsh hand and can not but greatly merveyle that contrary to the orders of the commission Court subscribed by your selfe the rest of the CoÌ„missioners you would cause a Gentleman of such a qualitie as Maister B. is to be sent for by a Pursevant before the ordinarie processe of a letter missiue Note that the signe of the crosse in Baptisme by an Archb. opinion is but of smal moment that suspicion of bastardie may easilie be dismissed were served vpon him especially for matters of so small moment Neither will it bee thought to proceede of any iust cause but rather of some other misconceyte when it shal be vnderstood that there is a controversie in lawe elsewhere depending betwene him and a kinsman of yours And therefore for the avoyding of his further complaint and other offence that may grow thereby I heartely pray your Lordship to suppresse the same and proceed no further therein Desiring you withall to haue due consideration of the cause least I be enforced to deale likewise in the defence of my kinsman as you doe for yours And so praying your Lo. Note that the 17. of Octo. was the Saboth day at what time the Archb. D. C. and D. B. sitting as Commissioners thâ— Archb. took pen inke and crossed the articles all overthwart and so sent them backe with this letter to returne vnto me aunswere herevnto what you meane to doe with my very heartie commendacions I commit you to the tuition of Almightie God FroÌ„ c. the 17. of Octo. c. Subscri c Vnto which letter also was added as followeth Maister B. I pray you according to the tenor of this letter to see that this cause of M. G. and F. B. bee dismissed from thence and if any be bouÌ„d to prosecute the cause against them let them vnderstand that I meane to heare it at c. otherwise let it wholie be dismissed and the bandes delivered The Bishoppes aunswere to the Archbishops former letters MAy it please your grace to vnderstand that I was the more willingly drawen to sende for Ma. B. in that sort because he was oft and of long time accused not only to be a disordered man him selfe but also a great and open mainteyner and carier from place to place of that wrangling puritane W. And as it is to bee prooued a refrainer from his church and from the CoÌ„munion as I am enformed And therefore if we haue omitted any circumstance or ceremonie it is in zeale of the redresse of such a disordered person Which if it should be fouÌ„d in your own brother I thinke your grace would not spare him Neuerthelesse if you yourselfe take it in hand to his redresse I for my part
honorable CouÌ„cell keeper of the Kings privie Seale or two of them calling vnto them one Bishop one temporal Lord of the Kings most honorable Councell the two chiefe Iustices of the Kinges bench and common Pleas for the time being or other two of the Kings Iustices in their absence haue full power and authoritie to punish after their demerits all misdoers being founde colpable before them If wee search our statutes besids the Courts and matters determinable in these spoken of before we shall find that the complaints of errour whether it touch the King or any other person 31. E 3. c. 21 made in the Exchecquer should be done to come before the Chancelor Treasurer who taking to them two Iustices other sage persons are duely to examine the busines and if any errour be found to correct amend the Roles c. By reason of delayes of iudgments vsed in the Chauncerie in the 14. E. 3. c 5 Kinges bench common bench and in the Exchecquer it was assented established and accorded that a Prelate two Earles and two Barons chosen by the ParleameÌ„t by good advise of the Chancelour c. shall proceed to take a good accord and to make a good iudgement When it was complayned vnto the King that the profites c. of his Realme by â—0 K. 2. c. 1 some great Officers c. were much withdrawen and cloyned c. it pleased the King c. to coÌ„mit the surveighing aswell of the estate c. of his house c. vnto the honourable Fathers in God William Archbishop of Canterburie and Alexander Archbishop of Yorke c. by a statute of commission for a 6. H. 6. Sewers by a statute for punishmeÌ„t of b 11. H. 5. c. 25. periurie by a statut against making or executing of actes or ordinances by any c 19 H. 7. c. 7. Maisters c. being not examined c. by the Lord Chancelour Treasurer or chiefe Iustices c. By a statute for the erection of the Court of d 27. H. 8. c 27. AugmeÌ„tation by a statute for erection of the Court of firste e 32. H. c. 45. fruits tenthes and lastly by an f 27. Eli. c. 8 acte for redresse of erroneous iudgements in the Court commonly called the Kinges Bench By all these statutes I say it is very apparant that the Administration of publike affaires in the coÌ„mon weale hath never bene vsually committed to the advisemnet discretion or definitiue sentence of any one man alone Which point is yet more fully and more perfectly Lord president and counsell in Wales Lord president couÌ„sell in the North parts Lord Deputie counsell in Irelande The Kinge and his honorable privie Counsel to be vnderstood by the establishment continuance of the Kings Lord President and Councell in Wales of the Kings Lord President and Counsel established for the North of the Kinges Lord Deputie and Councell within the Realme of Irelande of the Kings Highnesse most honorable privie Councell chosen by him for the assistance of his Royall person in matters apperteyning to his Kingly estate and lastly of the supreame and grand Councell of the three estates in Parleament for matters concerning The Kinge his grand Counsell in Parleament the Church the King and the common Weale For whether respect bee had vnto the secrete affaires of the Kings estate consulted vpoÌ„ in his Highnesse Councell Chamber by his privie Counsaylors or whether we regard the publike tractation of matters in Parleament there can bee no man so simple as not to knowe both these privie and open negotiatioÌ„s to be carried by most voyces of those persons who by the King are called to those honorable assemblies And what a vaine iangling then doth the Admonitor keepe how idlely and wranglingly doth he dispute when against the government of the church by Pastours and Elders he obiecteth that the same will interrupt the lawes of the Realme that it wil be great occasion of partiall affectionate dealing that some will incline to one parte and that the residue wil bee wrought to favour the other and that thereby it wil be a matter of strife discord schisme and heresies Howbeit if never any of these extremities and dangers haue fallen out in the common weale by any partiall or affectionate dealing of the Kings Deputies Presidents Iudges Iusticers and other Officers Ministers associated vnto theÌ„ for the administratioÌ„ of Iustice or equitie in any of the Kings civill Courtes howe much lesse cause haue we to feare any partialitie affectioÌ„ working inclination favour strife debate schismaticall or hereticall opinions if once Pastours and Elders in every Congregation and not thoroughout a Diocesse one Bishop alone had the spirituall administration of the Church-causes Can many temporall Officers Iusticers and Iudges rightly and indifferently administer the law and execute iustice and iudgment without that that some doe incline to one part without that the residue bee wrought to favour the other part And cannot spirituall Officers dispatch spiritual affaires without that that they be partially affectionally disposed What is it so easie a matter that the Ancients of God and the Ministers of Christ can the one part incline to righteousnes and the residue be wrought to favor wickednes can some incline to God and vnto Christ and can other some be wrought to follow Satan and Antichrist For what other controversie is required to be decided by Pastours and Elders then the controversie of sinne betwene the soule of man and his God And is there any Christian Pastour or Elder that wil be wrought rather to favour the sinne of a mortall man then the glorie of his immortall God But to leaue the state of the Kingdome and common weale and the good vsages and customes of the same let vs come to the state of the Church it selfe and to the lawfull government thereof established even amongst vs at this day The gouerment of the Church ought not to be by one alone For whatsoever our reverend Bishoppes practise to the contrarie yet touching ordination and deposition of Ministers touching excommunication and absolution touching the order and rule of Colleges Cathedrall churches and the Vniversities the ecclesiasticall law doth not commit the administration of these things and regiment of these places to any one person alone The Vniversities admit not the goverment of the Chancelour being present nor of his Vicechancelour The gouerment in the Vniuersities not by one alone him selfe being absent as of one alone the Doctors Procurators Regents non-Regents haue all voyces and by most of their voyces the Vniversitie causes take successe The businesses The goverment in Colleges not by one alone of Colleges by the statutes of their founders are commended to the industrie and fidelitie of the President Vice-president and fellowes vnto the Provost Viceprovost and fellowes vnto the Warden Sub-warden and fellowes vnto the Maister
and followes and vnto such like Officers fellowes The Cathedral The goverment in Cathedral churches not by one alone churches their livings and their landes their revenues their dividents their chapiters and their conferencies depend vpon the will and disposition of the Deane and Chapiter and not of the Bishop alone Neither can the Bishoppe Ex. de exces Prela c. 〈◊〉 Exc. de 〈◊〉 quaes cons cap c. novit alone by any ancient canon lawe pretended to be in force place or displace excommunicate or absolue any ecclesiasticall person without the iudgment of the Chapiter And aswell by a statute 21. H. 8. c. 13. as also by the booke of consecrating Archbishops c. the presence of divers Ministers and the people is required at the ordination of every Minister As for the deposition or degradation of Ministers vnder the correctiō whether the degradation of a Minist be warantable of the reverend Bb. be it spoken I thinke they haue not so much as any colour of any law for it The forme of the degradation of a Popish and sacrificing Priest by the canon law can bee no pretexte to degrade a Minister of the Monsieur de Plesis 164. in the seconde book of the Masse Gospel because a Minister of the Gospel is not set into his charge per calicem patinam with a cup full of wine dish full of hostes Neither receaveth he any charecter at al of a shaveling Priest And because a Minister of the Gospell is ordeyned onely after that manner which the statute lawe hath appointed howe should the ordination made by so high an authoritie bee vndone by any other power vnto the former maners of the administration of the causes of the Vniversities Colledges and Cathedrall churches may bee added the execution of ecclesiasticall iurisdiction committed heretofore by the Queene vnto the ecclesiasticall Commissioners For althoug by the words of the statute her Highnes had full power and authoritie The ecclesiastical commissiō exercised by manie commissioners and not by one by her letter patents to assigne name and authorize any one person a naturall borne subiect to execute spirituall iurisdiction yet neverthelesse according to the laudable vsages and customes of her kingdome and Courts temporal shee evermore authorised not one alone but diuers sundrie aswell temporall as ecclesiasticall persons for the execution thereof Which manner of commissiō because the reverend Bb. commend the same and avowe that it would doe more good if it were more common it cannot but seeme to bee a most gratefull thing vnto all good men especiallie vnto those reuerend Fathers if humbly wee beseech the Kinge that his Highnes would be pleased to make it more common And therefore in the The ecclesiastical commission commanded by the Bb. if it please the king may be enlarged vnto all Parishes wherein are godlie preaching Ministers behalfe aswell of the reverend Bb. as of all the learned and graue Doctors and Pastors of every church we most instātly intreat our most gracious Souverayne Lord the King that where in any Parish there shal be found a learned preaching Minister resident vpō his benefice that there he would be pleased by his authoritie Royal vnder the broad Seale to enable him and some other godly and faithfull Knights Esquires Gentlemen Citizens Borough-Maisters or other chief men of the same Parish to execute spirituall Iustice against drūkards adulterers swearers raylers and such like ecclesiasticall offendours inhabitants only within the same Parish For in this case we say as the reuerend Bb. say bonum quò communius eò melius If any No exceptiō to be taken against lay Elders to be authorized by the king in every Parish sithence the king authorizeth laie Elders in everie ecclesiasticall cōmission exception should be taken or challenge made scoffinglie and with scornefull termes against these lay parochians as heretofore hath bin vsed against laie elders or lay Aldermen as they call thē let him that taketh such exception advise him selfe wel and remember before he speake that in speaking he controle not the policie the practise the wisdom the authoritie both of our late Queen deceased and of our Souverayne Lord the King now raigning who authorized and doth authorize lay-men to bee ecclesiasticall commissioners Which kind of lay men or lay Elders as they call them that they haue ioyned in the exercise of the chiefest censure of the Church viz. excommunication with ecclesiasticall persons hath bin already proved by the sentence of excommunicatiō pronounced against E. by Maister W. and his associates whereof diuers were laie-men Againe if one laie Elder dwelling at Winchester may call and ssociate vnto him self one ecclesiasticall Elder dwellinge at S. Georges in Southwarke to excōmunicate any Parochian or Minister subiect vnto the iurisdiction of the Archdeacō of Surrey in what Parish soeuer of the same iurisdiction the partie shall dwell if it be lawfull I say Discipline of excommunication exercised by one laie Elder and one ecclesiastiall Elder for euerie ordinarie to ioyne one laie Elder one ecclesiasticall Elder together in cōmission the one to pronounce sentence of contumacie the other to denounce sentence of excōmunication for everie spirituall contumacie committed within his iurisdiction what reason can any man pretend why it should not be much more lawfull for the King by his Royall authoritie to apoint a learned preaching Pastor with the assistance of some cōpanie of faithfull inhabitants of the same Parish to exercise all maner of spiritual iustice within their own parish If the King shall stand in doubt whether any Discipline by excommunicatiō be exercised after this and this maner in the church of Englande then to put his Highnes out of all doubt hereof may it please the King to consider the precept of the reverend Bishoppes made in their convocation togither with the practise of the venerable Archdeacon of Surr. following The precept is this Vnusquisque Articlo pro clero c. de quibusdam circa excom excessib coercend 1584. Vicarius generalis officialis seu Commissarius qui ordines ecclesiastico non susceperit eruditum aliquem presbyterum sibi accerset associabit qui sufficienti authoritate vel ab ipso Episcopo in iurisdictione sua vel ab Archidiacono presbytero existente in iurisdictione sua munitus idque ex praescripto iudicis tunc praesentis excommunicationis sententiam pro contumacia denunciabit Everie Vicar generall Officiall or Commissarie which hath not taken vpon him ecclesiasticall orders shall call and associate vnto him some learned Presbyter who being armed with sufficient authoritie from the Bishopp in his iurisdiction or from the Archdeacon beeing a Presbyter in his iurisdiction shall denounce that by the prescript of the Iudge present the sentence of excommunication for contumacie Now the maner of the D. Hones practise of the Bishopps article practise of this precept ensueth in these wordes Iohannes Hone legum Doctor Officialis
childes Baptisme should be of stone of pewter of brasse or of silver whether the Minister should descend to the lower ende or the childe ascend to the vpper end of the church Whether the child should haue a great handfull or a litle sponefull of water powred vpon his head In the celebration of the Lordes Supper it is directlie commaunded that the people shal stand sit or passe whether it should be celebrated every first or second Sabboth of the moneth whether in the morning at noone or at night In the ordination of Ministers there is no iust proofe to bee made that any certeyne number of Ministers are to lay on their hands that the day of ordination should be alwayes one that the Minister should bee of such an age or that the prayers should bee of this or of that lenght and forme of wordes And therefore touching these and such like thinges of indifferencie we agree with the Admonitor and reverend Bb. that one forme of externall orders rites ceremonies is not of necessitie to be in every Church because there is no such order witnessed by the holy Scriptures to bee of necessitie But touching the ioynt severall functions of Bishops Pastours and Elders that they or any of them should in any age or state of the church of Christ bee wanting or that such offices as by warrant of the Scripture are coupled together should be severed or that any other persons should be appointed to execute any functions in the Church then such persons only as for their functiōs haue warrant from the holy Scriptures wee can not in any sorte therevnto agree And why forsooth because all both offices and officers in the Church must only and alonely be derived from our Saviour Christ as from the only fountaine and bestower of all officers offices in the house of God And therefore albeit we should graunt as the Admonitor hath saide that the outward order vsed in the primitiue Church touching rites ceremonies by Bishops Pastors and Elders is neither necessarie nor so convenient as it may be otherwise in the time of peace vnder a Christian Magistrate yet we may not herevpō imply as his negatiue implieth viz. that Bishops Pastors Elders or any of them are neither necessary nor so convenient officers or governours as other officers of mans invention might be For which our opinion by the helpe of God wee shall assay as before hath bene mencioned in an other place to lay down out of the worde of God some iust proofes according to the Admonitors request that there ought to be in all ages and states of the Church this outwarde order forme of goverment viz. that Bishoppes Pastours and Elders ought evermore to bee spirituall governours and that evermore they and none other ought to vse that essentiall kind of spirituall goverment and none other which was practised by the Bishoppes Pastours and Elders in the Apostolicall and primitiue Church Allwayes leaving the outward rites and ceremonies of their spirituall kind of goverment to be indifferent as erst hath bene said FINIS Speaches vsed in the Parleament by Sir Francis Knolles and after written to my L. Treasurer Sir William Cecill TO the end I may enform your Lord shippe of my dealing in this Parleament-time against the vndue claimed superioritie of the Bishoppes ouer their inferior brethren Thus it was Because I was in the Parleament time in the 25. yere of King HENRY the eight In which time First all the Clergie aswell Bishops as others made an hūblie submission to King HENRIE the 8. acknowledging his Supremacie and detesting the vsurpation of the Bb. of Romes authoritie Vpō which submission of the Clergie the King gaue vnto the said Bb. the same ample rule that before they had vnder the Pope ouer their inferior brethrē saving that the same rule was abridged by statute by this parenthesis following that is to say without offending the prerogatiue Royal of the Crown of England the lawes customes of the Realm In the latter end of the Statute it was added that whosoeuer offendeth in any one parte of that statute their Aydors Counsellers and Abbetters they did all fall into the penaltie of the premunire And after I had recited this statute in the Parleamēt-house I declared that in King HENRIES the eight days after this There was no Bishoppe that did practise superioritie ouer their inferiour brethren And in King EDWARDES dayes the said Bb. obteyned a statute wherby they were authorised to keepe their Courts in the Kings name the which statute was repealed in Queene Maries dayes and was not revived in her Majesties time that now is wherevppon it was doubtfull to mee by what authoritie the Bishoppes doe keepe their Courts nowe in their own names because it is against the prerogatiue Royall of the Crowne of England that any should keepe a Court without sufficient warrant from the Crowne Wherevpon I was answered that the Bishopps do keepe their Courts now by prescriptions it is true that the Bb. may prescribe that King HENRY the 8. gaue them authoritie by the statute of 25. of his raigne to haue authoritie and rule ouer their inferiour brethren as ample as they had in the Popes time But this was no speciall warrant for them to keep their Courts by and that in their owne names And yet they haue none other warrāt to keep their Courts as they do now in their owne names to my knowledge And this was the cause that made them obtaine a statute in King EDWARDS dayes to keepe their Courts by in the Kings name Now it is a strange allegation that the Bishopps should claime authoritie at this present to keepe their Courtes in their owne names as they do by prescription because the statute of 25. doth restraine thē generallie from offending of the prerogatiue Royall of the Crowne of Englande and the lawes and customes of the Realm And no man may iustly keepe a Court without a speciall warrant from the Crowne of England as is aforesaid And the generall libertie given by King H. the 8. to the Bishops to rule and governe as they did in the Popes time is no sufficient warrant to the Bishops to keepe their owne Courtes in their owne names by prescriptiō as I take it And therefore the Bishops had done wisely if they had sought a warrant by statute to keepe their Courts in the Queenes name as the Bb. did in Kinge EDWARDS dayes In which time Archbishop Crammer did cause Peter Martir and Bucer to come over into this Realme to bee placed in the two Vniversities for the better instructiō of the Vniversities in the worde of God And Bb. Crammer did humblie prefer these learned men without any challenge to him selfe of any superiour rule in this behalfe over his inferiour brethren And the time hath bin that no man could carry away any graūt frō the Crown of England by general words but that he must haue speciall wordes to carrie the same by Therfore how the Bb. are warrāted to carry away the keeping of their Courts in their own names by prescriptiō it passeth my vnderstāding Moreover where as your Lordship said vnto me that the Bishopps haue forsaken their claime of superioritie over their inferiour brethrē latelie to bee by Gods ordinance and that now they doe only claime superioritie from her Majesties supreme goverment If this be true then is it requisite necessarie that my L. of Canterburie that now is do recant and retract his saying in his booke of the great volume against Cartwright where he saith in plaine wordes by the name of Doctour Whitgift that the superioritie of Bb. is Gods owne institution Which saying doth impugne her Majesties supreme govermēt directlie therfore it is to be retracted plainly and truly For Christ plainly truly cōfesseth Ioh. 18. 36. That his Kingdom was not of this world And therfore he gaue no worldly rule or proheminence to his Apostles but the heavenly rule which was to preach the Gospel saying Ite predicate in omnem mundū quicūque crediderit baptizatus fuerit salvus erit qui non crediderit condemnabitur Goe preach in all the world who soever shall beleeue be Baptized shal be saved but he that will not beleeue shal be condemned Mark 16. 15. But the Bishops do cry out saying that Cartwright his fellows would haue no goverment c. So belike the Bb. care for no govermēt but for wordly forcible goverment over their brethren the which Christ never gaue to his Disciples nor Apostles but made them subiect to the rule of Princes who ought not to be resisted saving that they might aunswer vnto Princes that they must rather obey God then men Acts. 5. 29. and yet in no wise to resist the Prince but to take vp the crosse and follow Christ FINIS